Re: [expert] FTP from Win NT to Linux Mandrake 7.2

2000-12-06 Thread Mike Nguyen
Thank for answer me Sarang
When ever I use the winFTPpro to try to connect from my NT to the Linux machine, It always said "Connection refuse" 
 
Here is the list of my setup:
Linux Machine with IP: 192.168.10.1
DNS Server: 192.168.10.2
I already turn inet server on
All the user in the Linux machine I add to be the member of the ftp server
 
 
NT Machine with IP: 192.168.10.3
I tried to connect to Linux machine using WinFTPpro
I config the destination to connect to is: 192.168.10.1 which is Linux machine
I can ping 192.168.10.1 from the NT machine
I also can ping 192.168.10.2 from the NT machine
I also can ping 192.168.10.3 from the linux machine
But when I tried to connect it always say "Connection refuse"
 
 
Thank you so much
 
 
 
 

>From: Sarang Lakare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>Subject: Re: [expert] FTP from Win NT to Linux Mandrake 7.2 
>Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2000 13:48:38 -0500 
> 
>what do u mean by "it does not understand?" please post the output.. 
> 
>-sarang 
> 
> 
>-- 
>-- 
>Sarang Lakare 
> 
> 
>Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
>Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list. 
Get more from the Web.  FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com


Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] linux equivalent of Partition Magic?

2000-12-06 Thread Tom Berkley

Its gnu's parted and it works.

Tom Berkley

Sarang Lakare wrote:
> 
> there is something called gnupart or soemthing like that..
> 
> btw, isn't disk drake enuff for u'r needs?
> 
> On Saturday 02 December 2000 16:10, you wrote:
> 
> > > Is there a linux equivalent to Partition Magic.
> >
> > I own a copy of PM and I know that PM is compatible with linux.  But PM
> > uses the BIOS to read the partitions.
> >
> > Linux will read a much larger hard drive than the bios can read in dos.
> > Therefore linux can read and use partitions beyond what the bios can see in
> > dos.  Presently PM cannot handle the HD part beyond what the bios sees
> > because it really runs in DOS and not really under linux.  That is why I
> > wonder if there is a similar utility that actually runs under linux to
> > address the part of the hd beyond bios under dos.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Jeff Malka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Registered Linux user  183185
> 
> 
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; name="message.footer"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> Content-Description:
> 
> 
> --
> --
> Sarang Lakare
> 
>   
> Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com:
> Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



RE: [expert] Help with video card signal

2000-12-06 Thread Jose M. Sanchez


Assuming no problems with the motherboard, power supply, video card and
monitor.

1) Make sure the video adapter is FULLY seated. If it isn't you will not get
video output.

2) If the system beeps twice during the "post" then it is not recognizing
the video adapter.

3) Remove all other cards and try, if this works, go into the bios and
"reset" the PNP/PCI data area and make sure that you PNP OS = on.

4) Re-insert the cards one at a time and make sure you are getting video.

5) You did not mention what type of card it is, some newer cards, NVIDIA &
Voodoo 3 & 5 require higher voltage levels than what the older motherboards
can provide. Normally there is a special jumper on the motherboard labeled
VOODOO or VOODOO3. If present enable this.

If not, and you have one of these boards you are SOL.

-JMS
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of N K
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2000 10:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [expert] Help with video card signal


Howdy all...

Just wondering if anyone has any idea as to why i could not get a video
signal. The card has been tested on a other machine and i could get a video
signal, but when i plug it into the original motherboard there's no video
signal.

I have tried other cards which i know that works into that motherboard and
still no signal.

As well, i have changed the power supply to see of that is the problem and
still the same thing and also i have tried other different slots on the
motherboard.


Help...

Thanks for your time.


HotBot - Search smarter.
http://www.hotbot.com





Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



[expert] Printers & Mandrake 7.2

2000-12-06 Thread Trevor Farrell

Hi,

I know that this is a common question, but I would appreciate hearing from 
anyone who has had experience with either a Canon BJC-6200 or an Epson 
ColorStylus 760 under Linux (and particularly Mdk 7.2) I have shortlisted 
these as the best 2 printers in my budget range that are presently available 
locally.

I have been to various sites that seem to suggest the Epson is better 
supported under Linux, but others describe the Canon drivers as "operational".

I am after a printer to do good quality printing - some colour photos, but 
mostly B&W - at home. It must be useable under Linux, M$ Windows (98 & NT) 
and maybe even BeOS, and also network accessable.

I currently have a Lexmark 2030 which is a Win-printer and not able to 
network even then! so I'm looking to replace it with something decent.

Any help/opinions would be much appreciated.

TIA

Trevor



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] linux equivalent of Partition Magic?

2000-12-06 Thread Sarang Lakare

there is something called gnupart or soemthing like that.. 

btw, isn't disk drake enuff for u'r needs?



On Saturday 02 December 2000 16:10, you wrote:

> > Is there a linux equivalent to Partition Magic.
>
> I own a copy of PM and I know that PM is compatible with linux.  But PM
> uses the BIOS to read the partitions.
>
> Linux will read a much larger hard drive than the bios can read in dos.
> Therefore linux can read and use partitions beyond what the bios can see in
> dos.  Presently PM cannot handle the HD part beyond what the bios sees
> because it really runs in DOS and not really under linux.  That is why I
> wonder if there is a similar utility that actually runs under linux to
> address the part of the hd beyond bios under dos.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Jeff Malka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Registered Linux user  183185


Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; name="message.footer"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Description: 


-- 
--
Sarang Lakare




Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] FTP from Win NT to Linux Mandrake 7.2

2000-12-06 Thread Sarang Lakare

what do u mean by "it does not understand?" please post the output..

-sarang


-- 
--
Sarang Lakare




Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



[expert] caching dns server

2000-12-06 Thread Steve Young

i installed the caching dns server on mandrake 7.2, it works fine one 
that box, and on other windows boxes, but when i put the ip of the dns 
server in resolv.conf on another linux box and try to run nslookup i get 
this error message,  


nslookup
*** Can't find server name for address 192.168.0.25: No response from server
*** Can't find server name for address 127.0.0.1: No response from server
*** Default servers are not available 




Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] Grub Be Gone

2000-12-06 Thread Tim Faehnle

yeah, thanks I understood.  I actually did use a boot disk and when I got
into redhat, ran lilo, but it still didn't work because I have too many
cylinders on my hard drive (or something) so I had to use the switch -L to
make lilo work.  It works now.  Thanks.

Tim


- Original Message -
From: "Daniel Velzi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2000 11:49 AM
Subject: Re: [expert] Grub Be Gone


> Tim:
> First delete Grub: in DOS mode type fdisk /mbr
> Second: install RedHat, perhaps Lilo don´t run after install (some bugs in
> RedHat install) so when install Red Hat make a boot floppy during
> instalation.
> If Lilo don´t run after instalation, must run Red Hat with boot floppy,
and
> then go to linuxconf and set lilo. Next time you boot lilo run ok.
> I you have windows NT you must run Red Hat booting from floppy. With win98
> or ME you can use Lilo.
> Sorry foy my bad english. Hope you understand.
>
> Daniel
> - Original Message -
> From: "Tim Faehnle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2000 12:22 AM
> Subject: Re: [expert] Grub Be Gone
>
>
> > I'll probably use LILO when it comes to it, but i still can't even get
it
> > installed at the moment.  When I tried to install LILO with the Redhat,
my
> > computer wouldn't even get to the LILO command line.  It would only get
to
> > the "stage1" part of Grub.  So I think I need to get rid of Grub first
and
> > I'm not sure how to do that.  Does anyone know?  Do I need to delete
grub
> > files as well?  Where do they reside?
> >
> > Tim
> > - Original Message -
> > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 7:51 PM
> > Subject: Re: [expert] Grub Be Gone
> >
> >
> > > I have multiples OS's and like LILO for the most part except -  if
> > > you load it in the upper 1024 of memory the only way to get rid of it
> > > is to hand delete its files; fdisk doesn't remove it. However when it
> > > comes to multiple OS's it's handy as it boots and waits for you to
> > > choose - if you do nothing it defaults to Linux. You can edit it for
> > > any OS you want to set as default plus you can edit it to set the
> > > length of time LILO waits before booting to default.
> > >
> > >
> > > On 5 Dec 2000, at 17:48, Tim Faehnle wrote:
> > >
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
--
> 
>
>
> > Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com:
> > Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.
> >
>
>
>






> Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com:
> Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.
>




Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



[expert] Help with video card signal

2000-12-06 Thread N K

Howdy all...

Just wondering if anyone has any idea as to why i could not get a video signal. The 
card has been tested on a other machine and i could get a video signal, but when i 
plug it into the original motherboard there's no video signal. 

I have tried other cards which i know that works into that motherboard and still no 
signal.

As well, i have changed the power supply to see of that is the problem and still the 
same thing and also i have tried other different slots on the motherboard.


Help...

Thanks for your time.


HotBot - Search smarter.
http://www.hotbot.com



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



[expert] kpanel settings

2000-12-06 Thread praedor

What is the name of the app that handles kpanel settings.  I made the mistake 
of "upgrading" from kde2.0 to kde2.0.1 and now the kpanel settings option in 
the kpanel menu (right click on kpanel) OR select from the Panel menu -> 
settings does nothing.  Nothing at all.  

Since this is broken (along with the kappfinder since it cannot find kpm 
which is clearly there and runnable from a command line) I cannot edit the 
kpanel settings.  If I knew what the name of the actual kde app was that ran 
when one selected this option on a working kde version, I could try to run it 
from an xterm.  

Can anyone provide an app name to try to run to edit the panel settings?

praedor



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] StarOffice Mailing List?

2000-12-06 Thread A V Flinsch

On Wednesday 06 December 2000 06:07, you wrote:

> > If you know of a mailing list for StarOffice, would you send me the
> URL?

There are several on egroups, take a look at 

http://www.egroups.com/group/star-linux 
http://www.egroups.com/group/starofficeusers
http://www.egroups.com/group/SO-L

Sun also has a public news server at starnews.sun.com for star office 
questions and support


-- 
Alex
(Go easy on me, I'm a COBOL programmer in real life)



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



[expert] subscribed

2000-12-06 Thread Lee jui Whuang





Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] 3Com US Robotics 56K faxmodem problems

2000-12-06 Thread Tom Brinkman

On Wednesday 06 December 2000 05:10 pm, Jeff Malka wrote:
> OK the 33 is back in and huming along.  The 56K went back to the
> store. Thanks.
>
> Is there a way to force linux (Kppp) to show the true connections
> speed for my 33 modem?

Well, every Kppp version I've ever used since Mdk 6.0, clk on the 
docked modem lights on the panel and a details/disconnect dialog box 
pops up that also shows the connection speed. Also you can check the 
'show log' box on Kppp and the debug window will show the connect speed 
briefly before it diappears.
Sort'a, that's the connection handshake speed with the ISP.  True 
connection speeds are what you can download at, from the site you're 
downloading from.  A decent sustained rate for 28,8 is 3.3K/sec, for 
31,2 - 3.6K/sec if you don't have too many stalls.  If you really 
want to monitor the connection speed, click on the panel lights (as 
above) and choose 'details'  You'll see a running avg and a graph of 
the connection.  
   Also many download butlers (my favorite is nt-1.19-1mdk.i586.rpm,
it's in /contrib/) show the download rate/avg/and time over multiple 
downloads. NT shows this and a graph, plus it's the simplest damn best 
workin downloader i've ever used. Supports retries and resumes. 'Bout 
the only configuration it needs is to tell it what dir you want the 
dl'd files put in ;) 
-- 
Tom Brinkman   [EMAIL PROTECTED] Galveston Bay



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] Clock

2000-12-06 Thread Don

No That was not the problem, I just reflash the BIOS to BP6RU125.bin BIOS, 
and the problem is still here.  I think it has something to do with the 
/etc/rc.d/rc.sysinit fle in Mandrake 7.2, because that is the file that sets 
the time at boot up.  

But thanks,

Don 

On Tuesday 05 December 2000 23:48, you wrote:

> > Not a problem with mandrake. My bp6 with 550 Celerons just smokes along
> with the clock dead on the national observatory time. Check your bios
> rev and update it if necessary. I had to update mine to RU from NJ to
> get it stable with the smp kernel in 7.2 but I've never had a clock
> problem. You may want to reset your timezone with the DrakConf after you
> fix/check the bios.
>
> tom berkley
>
> Don wrote:
>-- snip ---
 this system 14 times now trying to get 
> > things to run stable.
> >
> > Machine Info:
> > Abit BP6 with two Celeron 466's not overcclocked
> > 512 MB memory
> > ATI Rage 128 with 32MB Mem (AGP)
> > Adaptec 2940 controlling 2GB Jaz drive
> > WD 20.5 GB master Drive(Win2k) and 15.3 GB slave on IDE3 (HPT366)
> >   controller
> > Linksys NIC 10/100
> > Haupauge WINTV card
> > -
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> >  Don 
> > --
> > 73 de kk6wj
> >
> >  
> > 
> > Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com:
> > Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.


Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; name="message.footer"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Description: 


-- 
73 de kk6wj



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



[expert] [y]talk...?

2000-12-06 Thread Pierre Fortin

Hi,

I had talk working under LM7.1; but now I'm trying to support my sister & nephew
who are so far very impressed with LM7.2...  I am not sure what the proper way
is to get a talk daemon running under this newer release...  xinetd does not
seem to be the place and inetd is not running at all of course.

Is [y]talk the best tool to use to be able to communicate remotely/interactively
to help them or should I look at some other tool...?

If [y]talk is still the way to go; what's the proper way to get its daemon
working...?

Thanks,
Pierre



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [Re: [expert] A bit "afeared" of upgrading my laptop]

2000-12-06 Thread Vic

Oh poopies, I must have screwed it up somewhere,
I tried the url and it did not come up,
mebbe I will try some other config

On Wed, 06 Dec 2000, Mike MacCana wrote:
> 
> Of course DVD [ROM] works under Linux. Linux supports the UFS filesystem 
> [as well as ISO9660, used on certain DVDs]. This is a seperate issue from 
> being able to decode any VOB [video object] files that exist on the disc 
> [in the case of DVD movies] but this is being worked on by the OMS 
> project, who are building a DVD player for linux. Check them out at 
> www.intervideo.org.
> 
> Mike
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Mike MacCana  Support Consultant  
>   C Y B E R S O U R C E
>Level 9, 140 Queen St Melbourne 3000
> Ph : +61 3 9642 5997 Fax: +61 3 9642 5998
> 
> On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, Vic wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, 11 Jan 2037, Viktor Lakics wrote:
> > Your DVD works under linux??
> > 
> > >instantly, DVD-rom was OK, 
> > 
> > > 
> > > Works great!
> > > 
> > > Good luck; Viktor
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > bill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > On Tue, 5 Dec 2000, Praedor Tempus wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2000 10:11:47 -0700
> > > > > From: Praedor Tempus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > To: expert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > Subject: [expert] A bit "afeared" of upgrading my laptop
> > > > > 
> > > > > I am running 7.2 on my home system but on my laptop I still have 7.1 and
> > > > > kde 1.1.2.
> > > > > I am debating upgrading to 7.2 on my laptop but first want to know about
> > > > > general 
> > > > > experiences in, first, upgrading vs dump and clean install.  
> > > > > 
> > > > > I bought my 7.2 from cheapbytes (and am hoping that it is 'real' rather
> > > > > than a 
> > > > > partially beta version, like kde-1.95 or some other monster...haven't
> > > > > checked yet).
> > > > > 
> > > > > Is it relatively painless to do the upgrade or should I dump and
> > > > > reinstall from scratch?
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > DO NOT USE UPGRADE DO A CLEAN INSTALL
> > > > 
> > > > Of course that will still not guarantee a "no glitch" install
> > > > as each new version of LM since 6.0 has tossed a few quicks into
> > > > the kettle. I have tried not on laptops mind you but on desktop systems
> > > > serveral installs-versus-upgrades and each time the Installs have given
> > > > 95% less trouble. In one case an upgrade took 6-8 hours on on old
> > > > P-120 only to see it crap out anyway which necessitated a clean
> > > > re-install.
> > > > 
> > > > BTW Some things which worked in LM 7.1 may not perform the same or
> > > > as well in LM 7.2 while others will work better. Sometimes its a dice roll
> > > > but to us enthusiats and if IT IS NOT A MISSION CRITICAL MACHINE, it
> > > > is well worth the aggravation.
> > > > 
> > > > Of course I still would like to know why my generic three button mouse
> > > > instantly recognized and initialized by LM 6.1 has never had the same 
> > > > success since !? :)
> > > > 
> > > > Good Luck
> > > > 
> > > > William Bouterse
> > > > Talkeetna
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > > - 
> > > > Attachment: message.footer 
> > > > MIME Type: text/plain 
> > > > - 
> > > 
> > > Viktor Lakics
> > > 
> > > Through the Internet:
> > > 
> > >   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.amexmail.com/?A=1
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > Content-Type: text/plain; name="message.footer"
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> > Content-Description: 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 


Content-Type: text/plain; name="message.footer"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Description: 




Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [Re: [expert] A bit "afeared" of upgrading my laptop]

2000-12-06 Thread Vic

Oh-(duh on me) thats right I totally forgot about that!

I must have spaced that url off for a long time, 
I wondered what happened to it, thanks for
the url many many thanks I have searched
and could not find it.

Thanks again.



On Wed, 06 Dec 2000, Mike MacCana wrote:
> 
> Of course DVD [ROM] works under Linux. Linux supports the UFS filesystem 
> [as well as ISO9660, used on certain DVDs]. This is a seperate issue from 
> being able to decode any VOB [video object] files that exist on the disc 
> [in the case of DVD movies] but this is being worked on by the OMS 
> project, who are building a DVD player for linux. Check them out at 
> www.intervideo.org.
> 
> Mike
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Mike MacCana  Support Consultant  
>   C Y B E R S O U R C E
>Level 9, 140 Queen St Melbourne 3000
> Ph : +61 3 9642 5997 Fax: +61 3 9642 5998
> 
> On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, Vic wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, 11 Jan 2037, Viktor Lakics wrote:
> > Your DVD works under linux??
> > 
> > >instantly, DVD-rom was OK, 
> > 
> > > 
> > > Works great!
> > > 
> > > Good luck; Viktor
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > bill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > On Tue, 5 Dec 2000, Praedor Tempus wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2000 10:11:47 -0700
> > > > > From: Praedor Tempus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > To: expert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > Subject: [expert] A bit "afeared" of upgrading my laptop
> > > > > 
> > > > > I am running 7.2 on my home system but on my laptop I still have 7.1 and
> > > > > kde 1.1.2.
> > > > > I am debating upgrading to 7.2 on my laptop but first want to know about
> > > > > general 
> > > > > experiences in, first, upgrading vs dump and clean install.  
> > > > > 
> > > > > I bought my 7.2 from cheapbytes (and am hoping that it is 'real' rather
> > > > > than a 
> > > > > partially beta version, like kde-1.95 or some other monster...haven't
> > > > > checked yet).
> > > > > 
> > > > > Is it relatively painless to do the upgrade or should I dump and
> > > > > reinstall from scratch?
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > DO NOT USE UPGRADE DO A CLEAN INSTALL
> > > > 
> > > > Of course that will still not guarantee a "no glitch" install
> > > > as each new version of LM since 6.0 has tossed a few quicks into
> > > > the kettle. I have tried not on laptops mind you but on desktop systems
> > > > serveral installs-versus-upgrades and each time the Installs have given
> > > > 95% less trouble. In one case an upgrade took 6-8 hours on on old
> > > > P-120 only to see it crap out anyway which necessitated a clean
> > > > re-install.
> > > > 
> > > > BTW Some things which worked in LM 7.1 may not perform the same or
> > > > as well in LM 7.2 while others will work better. Sometimes its a dice roll
> > > > but to us enthusiats and if IT IS NOT A MISSION CRITICAL MACHINE, it
> > > > is well worth the aggravation.
> > > > 
> > > > Of course I still would like to know why my generic three button mouse
> > > > instantly recognized and initialized by LM 6.1 has never had the same 
> > > > success since !? :)
> > > > 
> > > > Good Luck
> > > > 
> > > > William Bouterse
> > > > Talkeetna
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > > - 
> > > > Attachment: message.footer 
> > > > MIME Type: text/plain 
> > > > - 
> > > 
> > > Viktor Lakics
> > > 
> > > Through the Internet:
> > > 
> > >   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.amexmail.com/?A=1
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > Content-Type: text/plain; name="message.footer"
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> > Content-Description: 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 


Content-Type: text/plain; name="message.footer"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Description: 




Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] 3Com US Robotics 56K faxmodem problems

2000-12-06 Thread Jeff Malka

OK the 33 is back in and huming along.  The 56K went back to the store.
Thanks.

Is there a way to force linux (Kppp) to show the true connections speed for
my 33 modem?

Thanks.

Jeff Malka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Registered Linux user  183185

- Original Message -
From: Tom Brinkman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2000 12:30 PM
Subject: Re: [expert] 3Com US Robotics 56K faxmodem problems


> On Wednesday 06 December 2000 06:03 am, Jeff Malka wrote:
> > I just purchased a 3Com US Robotics 56K Faxmodem (V.90 and x2).
>
>model # ?
>  My
> > Mandrake 7.2 installation finds the modem and connects with it but
> > connection is at 26400 baud.
> >
> > It is not the phone lines because my old 33K modem (that it is
> > supposed to replace) connects at 115000.
>
> 115k wasn't your connection speed. It's the speed that your modem
> communicates with your system, not the rate it communicates with the
> modem you connect to.  More often than not, when the phone lines will
> only support 28,8, an old 33,6 modem will consistently get better
> connection speeds (often 31,2) than most any 56k modem (often 26,4).
> Put the 33,6 modem back in ;>
> --
> Tom Brinkman   [EMAIL PROTECTED] Galveston Bay
>
>
>






> Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com:
> Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.
>




Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] StarOffice Mailing List?

2000-12-06 Thread Larry Marshall

Mike MacCana wrote:
> 
> That's true [both projects contain some unique code], but StarOffice, in
> terms of future development, is essentially dead. So feature requests
> [and perhaps also bug reports] should be directed towards openoffice.

Mike...is the OpenOffice group planning on separating the apps from
the "all in one" concept, at least such that they can be loaded
separately from an OpenOffice desktop?

Cheers --- Larry



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] 3Com US Robotics 56K faxmodem problems

2000-12-06 Thread Jeff Malka

Fascinating.  Good to know.  Thanks.

I don't need any but I saw a bunch of 33K modems at compusa.

Jeff Malka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Registered Linux user  183185

- Original Message -
From: Ken Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2000 11:00 AM
Subject: Re: [expert] 3Com US Robotics 56K faxmodem problems


> On Wednesday 06 December 2000 05:03 am, you wrote:
>
> > > I just purchased a 3Com US Robotics 56K Faxmodem (V.90 and x2).  My
> > Mandrake 7.2 installation finds the modem and connects with it but
> > connection is at 26400 baud.
> >
> > It is not the phone lines because my old 33K modem (that it is supposed
to
> > replace) connects at 115000.  Could it be that the v.90 and x2 protocols
> > need to be installed under linux and have not?  There is no linux
mentioned
> > on the CD that came with the modem.
>
> Jeff,
> For what it's worth, 56K modems will connect at a lower speed than 33.6K
> modems if there is an incompatibility (as there usually is) in the ISP's
> modem bank. It seems that ALL of the ISP's in this area have modem banks
that
> will revert to the V.34 spec's if they are unable to establish a good
connect
> with V.90. I suspect that this is your problem. I have been scrounging
33.6
> hardware modems anywhere I can find them because both my Linux and Winderz
> boxes connect faster and more reliably when using them.
>
> --
> Ken Thompson
> Electrocom Computer Services
> Payette, Idaho
> (208) 642-7101  (888) 642-7101
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Website: http://www.nwaa.com
>
>






> Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com:
> Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.
>






Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] Alsa and ES1688

2000-12-06 Thread J . A . Magallon


On Wed, 06 Dec 2000 13:58:33 Dom Savage wrote:
> Hi all, got a problem getting my sound card working as it's in a laptop
> and it's not plug and play.  It works fine with OSSFree, but I was trying
> to get the alsa modules from mdk 7.2 to work.  So far everything works
> fine, as I can play audio cd's and wavs and the like, but .mid file state:
> open /dev/sequencer: No such device.
> 

Check all the compatibility with OSS in modules.conf. I have:
alias char-major-14 soundcore
alias sound-service-0-0 snd-mixer-oss
alias sound-service-0-3 snd-pcm-oss
alias sound-service-0-12 snd-pcm-oss
alias sound-service-0-1 snd-seq-oss
alias sound-service-0-8 snd-seq-oss

Perhaps the last two are what you are missing...but i have not tested the
sequencer.

-- 
Juan Antonio Magallon Lacarta #> cd /pub
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] #> more beer

Linux 2.2.18-pre24-vm #2 SMP Wed Nov 29 02:56:21 CET 2000 i686 unknown




Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



[expert] Internationalization mdk 7.1

2000-12-06 Thread Hans-Åke Bergqvist

In another posting I wrote about mdk 7.2. As I am now back in 7.1 I would like
to ask if anyone has had trouble with:
Emacs cmds at the console - some of them do not work e b ctrl-d ctrl-e and
others. I think its something in the language files. I am using the swedish
language. 
The keyboard bindings of WordPerfect 8 does not work. The do so in every other
dist. - even 7.2 3 beta.
Some clues?
Hans

[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



[expert] trouble with mdk 7.2

2000-12-06 Thread Hans-Åke Bergqvist

I bought my mdk 7.2 on 2 CD:s from Cheapbytes. The install whent ok. But then
both Gnome and KDE was principly useless. I tried - among other things - to get
kppp and kmail running from the menu and they did not. Then I invoked them from
a terminal (only rxvt worked). I got error messages like 'kppp path was not
found' and 'cannot start Dr Konqi'. I checked that the programs were
installed in the right places. Started with a new install and made a new home
dir in case something old could be in the way. No - same errors and very few
programs could be started. Had the idea to skip Mandrake altogether but
downgraded to mdk 7.1 (in that case the internationalization does not work 100
percent) and is still running RH 7.0. Has anybody tried Cheapbytes CD-roms and
in that case - any clues as to get 7.2 working from my CD:s. I am sitting with
a 56 k modem and downloading the stuff is impossible. 

Hans

[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [Re: [expert] A bit "afeared" of upgrading my laptop]

2000-12-06 Thread Mike MacCana

Of course DVD [ROM] works under Linux. Linux supports the UFS filesystem 
[as well as ISO9660, used on certain DVDs]. This is a seperate issue from 
being able to decode any VOB [video object] files that exist on the disc 
[in the case of DVD movies] but this is being worked on by the OMS 
project, who are building a DVD player for linux. Check them out at 
www.intervideo.org.

Mike



--
Mike MacCanaSupport Consultant  
  C Y B E R S O U R C E
   Level 9, 140 Queen St Melbourne 3000
Ph : +61 3 9642 5997 Fax: +61 3 9642 5998

On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, Vic wrote:

> On Sun, 11 Jan 2037, Viktor Lakics wrote:
> Your DVD works under linux??
> 
> >instantly, DVD-rom was OK, 
> 
> > 
> > Works great!
> > 
> > Good luck; Viktor
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > bill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On Tue, 5 Dec 2000, Praedor Tempus wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2000 10:11:47 -0700
> > > > From: Praedor Tempus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > To: expert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Subject: [expert] A bit "afeared" of upgrading my laptop
> > > > 
> > > > I am running 7.2 on my home system but on my laptop I still have 7.1 and
> > > > kde 1.1.2.
> > > > I am debating upgrading to 7.2 on my laptop but first want to know about
> > > > general 
> > > > experiences in, first, upgrading vs dump and clean install.  
> > > > 
> > > > I bought my 7.2 from cheapbytes (and am hoping that it is 'real' rather
> > > > than a 
> > > > partially beta version, like kde-1.95 or some other monster...haven't
> > > > checked yet).
> > > > 
> > > > Is it relatively painless to do the upgrade or should I dump and
> > > > reinstall from scratch?
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > DO NOT USE UPGRADE DO A CLEAN INSTALL
> > > 
> > > Of course that will still not guarantee a "no glitch" install
> > > as each new version of LM since 6.0 has tossed a few quicks into
> > > the kettle. I have tried not on laptops mind you but on desktop systems
> > > serveral installs-versus-upgrades and each time the Installs have given
> > > 95% less trouble. In one case an upgrade took 6-8 hours on on old
> > > P-120 only to see it crap out anyway which necessitated a clean
> > > re-install.
> > > 
> > > BTW Some things which worked in LM 7.1 may not perform the same or
> > > as well in LM 7.2 while others will work better. Sometimes its a dice roll
> > > but to us enthusiats and if IT IS NOT A MISSION CRITICAL MACHINE, it
> > > is well worth the aggravation.
> > > 
> > > Of course I still would like to know why my generic three button mouse
> > > instantly recognized and initialized by LM 6.1 has never had the same 
> > > success since !? :)
> > > 
> > > Good Luck
> > > 
> > > William Bouterse
> > > Talkeetna
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > > - 
> > >   Attachment: message.footer 
> > >   MIME Type: text/plain 
> > > - 
> > 
> > Viktor Lakics
> > 
> > Through the Internet:
> > 
> >   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.amexmail.com/?A=1
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> Content-Type: text/plain; name="message.footer"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> Content-Description: 
> 
> 
> 



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] StarOffice Mailing List?

2000-12-06 Thread Mike MacCana

That's true [both projects contain some unique code], but StarOffice, in 
terms of future development, is essentially dead. So feature requests 
[and perhaps also bug reports] should be directed towards openoffice.

Mike

On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, Stephen Bosch wrote:

> 
> 
> Mike MacCana wrote:
> 
> > StarOffice is now OpenOffice, so feature requests and comments, as well
> > as bug reports should go to one of the lists at openoffice.org.
> 
> Don't confuse StarOffice with OpenOffice. OpenOffice contains StarOffice
> code, but they're still different things.
> 
> -Stephen-
> 
> 



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [Re: [expert] A bit "afeared" of upgrading my laptop]

2000-12-06 Thread Vic

On Sun, 11 Jan 2037, Viktor Lakics wrote:
Your DVD works under linux??

>instantly, DVD-rom was OK, 

> 
> Works great!
> 
> Good luck; Viktor
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> bill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On Tue, 5 Dec 2000, Praedor Tempus wrote:
> > 
> > > Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2000 10:11:47 -0700
> > > From: Praedor Tempus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > To: expert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Subject: [expert] A bit "afeared" of upgrading my laptop
> > > 
> > > I am running 7.2 on my home system but on my laptop I still have 7.1 and
> > > kde 1.1.2.
> > > I am debating upgrading to 7.2 on my laptop but first want to know about
> > > general 
> > > experiences in, first, upgrading vs dump and clean install.  
> > > 
> > > I bought my 7.2 from cheapbytes (and am hoping that it is 'real' rather
> > > than a 
> > > partially beta version, like kde-1.95 or some other monster...haven't
> > > checked yet).
> > > 
> > > Is it relatively painless to do the upgrade or should I dump and
> > > reinstall from scratch?
> > > 
> > 
> > DO NOT USE UPGRADE DO A CLEAN INSTALL
> > 
> > Of course that will still not guarantee a "no glitch" install
> > as each new version of LM since 6.0 has tossed a few quicks into
> > the kettle. I have tried not on laptops mind you but on desktop systems
> > serveral installs-versus-upgrades and each time the Installs have given
> > 95% less trouble. In one case an upgrade took 6-8 hours on on old
> > P-120 only to see it crap out anyway which necessitated a clean
> > re-install.
> > 
> > BTW Some things which worked in LM 7.1 may not perform the same or
> > as well in LM 7.2 while others will work better. Sometimes its a dice roll
> > but to us enthusiats and if IT IS NOT A MISSION CRITICAL MACHINE, it
> > is well worth the aggravation.
> > 
> > Of course I still would like to know why my generic three button mouse
> > instantly recognized and initialized by LM 6.1 has never had the same 
> > success since !? :)
> > 
> > Good Luck
> > 
> > William Bouterse
> > Talkeetna
> > 
> > 
> 
> > - 
> > Attachment: message.footer 
> > MIME Type: text/plain 
> > - 
> 
> Viktor Lakics
> 
> Through the Internet:
> 
>   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 
> Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.amexmail.com/?A=1
> 
> 


Content-Type: text/plain; name="message.footer"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Description: 




Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] Grub Be Gone

2000-12-06 Thread Tim Faehnle



Okay, I think I figured it out.  I looked on 
the web a little bit and found this:

"There is no concept uninstall in boot loaders, because if you 
uninstall a boot loader, an unbootable machine would simply remain. So 
all you need to do is overwrite another boot loader you like to your disk, that 
is, install the boot loader without uninstalling GRUB. 
For example, if you want to install the boot loader for Windows, just run 
FDISK /MBR on Windows. If you want to install LILO (I can't imagine 
why you want to do such a thing, though), run /sbin/lilo on 
GNU/Linux. "
http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/grub-faq.html#q11
I tried:
"fdisk /MBR"
in an MS-DOS prompt (didn't even have to leave 
windows), rebooted, and grub was gone (went directly to windows.).. 
thanks,
Tim

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Tim 
  Faehnle 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 5:48 
  PM
  Subject: [expert] Grub Be Gone
  
  I'm trying out Linuxes (Linuxi?) I've fooled with 
  Mandrake and now I'm going to try Redhat (don't hurt me), BUT when I installed 
  Redhat, it seems that half of grub was still there.  I was thinking that 
  I could just leave grub in there and use it to get to redhat, but that didn't 
  work.  In the red hat install I can say "don't install LILO" or "Do 
  install LILO". In either case, my computer boots up to "stage1" but then sits 
  there and never gets to "stage2".  And I have to reinstall Mandrake to 
  get to *any* OS.  So I figure that I have to uninstall Grub and use 
  LILO or something:
   
  Which brings me to my simple 
  question:
  How do I uninstall Grub?
   
  Not so simple question:
  I like grub better than LILO, can I keep Grub, 
  but use redhat?  I know, I know, this is the Mandrake list.
   
  Any help would be appreciated.  Thanks very 
  much
  Tim


Re: [expert] 3Com US Robotics 56K faxmodem problems

2000-12-06 Thread Ron Stodden

Jeff Malka wrote:
 
> It is not the phone lines because my old 33K modem (that it is supposed to
> replace) connects at 115000.  Could it be that the v.90 and x2 protocols
> need to be installed under linux and have not?  There is no linux mentioned
> on the CD that came with the modem.

If you saw 115200, then the link speed between the PC and the modem
is being reported.  This is the default.   If you want your modem to
report the modem to modem link speed you must fiddle with the modem
init string according to your manual.  I think it takes a W1 and an
S??? command in the init string.

-- 
Regards,

Ron. [AU]



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] A bit "afeared" of upgrading my laptop

2000-12-06 Thread Michael Powell PhD

On Tuesday 05 December 2000 12:11, you wrote:

> > I am running 7.2 on my home system but on my laptop I still have 7.1 and
> kde 1.1.2.
> I am debating upgrading to 7.2 on my laptop but first want to know about
> general
> experiences in, first, upgrading vs dump and clean install.
>
> I bought my 7.2 from cheapbytes (and am hoping that it is 'real' rather
> than a
> partially beta version, like kde-1.95 or some other monster...haven't
> checked yet).
>
> Is it relatively painless to do the upgrade or should I dump and
> reinstall from scratch?
>
> praedor

***
I also bought the cheapbytes CD set and am very pleased! But being stupid and 
thinking if I buy the Wal-Mart 4CD set, I would be adding to the mandrake 
coffer. BUT! the cheap bytes installs KDE2, where the wall-mart boxed set 
installs KDE2pre <=== honest, I have both packages. Also it is better to dump 
and install than upgrade, not only does the upgrade take like 2 light-years 
to run, but eventually dies a horrorable death


-- 
Michael Powell PhD
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Scyld Beowulf Cluster Master on
Linux-Mandrake 7.2




Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



[expert] sources for kernel-secure2.2.*.rpm

2000-12-06 Thread Amit Bapat
I have installed LM 7.2 with high security setting. It works fine.
I am using this Linux box for NAT and need the NAT to be able to work with H323 properly which is used by NetMeeting. There is a ip_masq_h323.c I found on the web. 
 
I think if I recompile the kernel with kernel-sources rpm, I'll loose all the security patches that the secure kernel is complied with. So I need the sources from which secure kernel was compiled so that I can compile ip_masq_h323.c as a module and use it with insmod to enable NetMeeting.
 
 Get more from the Web.  FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com


Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] StarOffice Mailing List?

2000-12-06 Thread Stephen Bosch



Mike MacCana wrote:

> StarOffice is now OpenOffice, so feature requests and comments, as well
> as bug reports should go to one of the lists at openoffice.org.

Don't confuse StarOffice with OpenOffice. OpenOffice contains StarOffice
code, but they're still different things.

-Stephen-



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] ANNOUNCE: KDE 2.0.1 released (fwd)

2000-12-06 Thread Daniel Woods

> I understand the need for Mandrake to continually develop new and better
> versions of their operating system, however it is coming at the expense
> of people who wish to have a stable operating system. 

That's true.  Updating key packages to a system would be very nice :)

> Surely some kind person at Mandrake could package the new 2.0.1 RPMS for
> 7.2 users and make them available as an update. Its too bad that the end
> users get ignored in Mandrake's relentless development.

Well... if someone could find a security hole in KDE 2.0, then Mandrake
will definitely provide an update... ;)

Thanks... Dan.





Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] ANNOUNCE: KDE 2.0.1 released (fwd)

2000-12-06 Thread Tom Brinkman

On Wednesday 06 December 2000 10:53 am, Ron Heron wrote:
> I appologize, but can somebody summarize this thread?  I haven't been
> following.  If I understand correctly, 2.01 is out, but not via
> Mandrake?

   Summarize  ;>  ... a bunch of ill informed complaining that LM 
doesn't have rpms for updating to KDE 2.01.  

   The fact is they've had KDE 2+ rpms for some time due to Chris 
Molnar's efforts.  They upgrade KDE past 2.01, to very nearly 2.1
IIRC, they were announced as they became available (5 updates in all) 
on the cooker and newbie lists.  I don't remember if they were 
announced on this list.

ftp://nebsllc.com/pub/KDE_UPDATE
-- 
Tom Brinkman   [EMAIL PROTECTED] Galveston Bay



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] ANNOUNCE: KDE 2.0.1 released (fwd)

2000-12-06 Thread praedor

On Tuesday 05 December 2000 05:45 pm, you wrote:
> I see Mandrake 7.2 is mentioned, is KDE 2.0.1 available via Mandrake
> Update?

No.  It is not in MandrakeUpdate.  It is also supposed to be a "bug fix" 
release...but is itself buggy, at least the precompiled binaries I installed 
from  ftp://nebsllc.com/pub/KDE_UPDATE

Some apps no longer work or, apparently, even exist.  The kpanel settings 
menu item - no worky.  The update-menus app doesn't work - it freezes up when 
it gets to the kde section in /etc/menu-methods/ directory and nothing comes 
of it...ever.  The script is itself either dicked up or menu is (I have 
menu-2.1.5-42mdk installed...do NOT say you need menu-2.1.5-44mdk because 
this defeats the whole purpose.  To use 2.1.5-44mdk, you must upgrade other 
packages that are undesireable because they will break many other 
dependencies and put you on the road to unstable beta installs).  There is no 
kde system monitoring app anymore (used to be ktop, then its name was changed 
to something else in kde2.0 and it is nonexistent in the kde2.1 from the site 
above).

I am about to dump it and go back to the functional 2.0.  This bug fix 
release needs a little work before it is ready.  

praedor



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] FTP Server Trouble

2000-12-06 Thread Buchan Milne



Adam Clater wrote:
> 
> in.ftpd, along with a variety of other applications that one might expect are not 
>installed by default in 7.2.  An attempt to install it using urpmi also fails, with  
>no package found for :
> wuftpd

should be wu-ftpd, it is on the CD, although it might be better to use
proftpd, alsoon the install CD.

> ftpd
> ftp-server
> 
> You will also note that no cli (command line interface) ftp client is installed 
>either!  To make a long > story short, check out freshmeat and download an rpm for 
>wu-ftpd, or if you have it, install from the > old mandrake 7.1 cd.

ncftp is included, and is about the best command-line client.

Maybe yuor urpmi database got lost. Update it with urpmi.update, while
the CD you want is in the drive, mounted if you don't use supermount.

Buchan

-- 
|--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone   +27824722231
email   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Centre for Automotive Engineering   http://www.cae.co.za
South Africas first satellite:http://sunsat.ee.sun.ac.za
Control Models  http://www.control.co.za
|Registered Linux User #182071-|



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] 3Com US Robotics 56K faxmodem problems

2000-12-06 Thread Tom Brinkman

On Wednesday 06 December 2000 06:03 am, Jeff Malka wrote:
> I just purchased a 3Com US Robotics 56K Faxmodem (V.90 and x2). 

   model # ?
 My
> Mandrake 7.2 installation finds the modem and connects with it but
> connection is at 26400 baud.
>
> It is not the phone lines because my old 33K modem (that it is
> supposed to replace) connects at 115000. 

115k wasn't your connection speed. It's the speed that your modem 
communicates with your system, not the rate it communicates with the 
modem you connect to.  More often than not, when the phone lines will 
only support 28,8, an old 33,6 modem will consistently get better 
connection speeds (often 31,2) than most any 56k modem (often 26,4).
Put the 33,6 modem back in ;> 
-- 
Tom Brinkman   [EMAIL PROTECTED] Galveston Bay




Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] CUPS & Samba Printing

2000-12-06 Thread Buchan Milne

Should the fixed samba client package then not appear on the updates ?
This has been giving me minor headaches, and would have given me major
headaches tomorrow!.

Buchan

Till Kamppeter wrote:
> 
> The Samba client on the distro has a bug, download the fixed Samba
> packages from
> 
>http://www.mandrakesoft.com/~tkamppeter/packages/
> 
> Drakconf has also a bug and therefore asks for another GhostScript.
> GhostScript, especially updated from the page mentioned above, is OK.
> Use KUPS when it is impossible to use DrakConf without downdating
> GhostScript.
> 
>Till
> 
> Nathan wrote:
> >
> > I want to print to a printer on a different IP range that is shared on a Win
> > 2000.
> > I've tried setting it up through DrakConf and KUPS Admin to no avail.
> > I've also tried to set up a printer that is on the same IP range, with no
> > luck.
> > I have an account on both NT networks, and I can see the printer that is on
> > the same IP range, but I don't seem to be having any luck.
> >
> > Also, it did ask me for the Ghostscript RPM when using DrakConf, even though
> > I have the latest one installed already.
> >
> > Drak/Printer Configuration Settings
> > SMB server host = userspc
> > SMB server IP = x.x.x.x
> > Share name = laserjet
> > Username = myusername
> > Password = mypassword
> > Workgroup = theirdomainname
> >
> > it looks for it at smb://pcname/printername
> > (I've tried pcname being the IP too)
> >
> 
>   
> Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com:
> Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.

-- 
|--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone   +27824722231
email   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Centre for Automotive Engineering   http://www.cae.co.za
South Africas first satellite:http://sunsat.ee.sun.ac.za
Control Models  http://www.control.co.za
|Registered Linux User #182071-|



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



[Fwd: [expert] Xserver crashes in 7.2]

2000-12-06 Thread Eunice Thompson


-- 
 Eunice Thompson
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Treasurer/Community Relations
Cerritos Linux User Group
http://www.cerritoslug.org


Dom,
Thanks for the prompt response.
I wasn't quite sure on how to check the framebuffer, but I did install
the XFree_86 3.3.6 rpms, followed your instructions and everything works
great!!
Thanks!!
Eunice


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, Eunice Thompson wrote:
> 
> > Hi.
> > I'm having problems swithcing to a console while in X.
> >
> >   > Fatal server error:
> > > Caught signal 11. Server aborting.
> > >
> > > xinit:connection to X server lost.
> > > [rose@Roset3 rose]$ xterm: fatal IO error 32 (Broken pipe) or KillClient
> > > on X server ":0.0"
> > > Terminated sighup
> 
> > I'm using a Toshiba Satellite Pro 460CDX (P166MMX)
> > 80 MB Ram
> > 6GB HD.
> > Mandrake 7.2
> > XFree 4.01
> > SVGA X server
> >
> > Please note that these problems do not exist on my desktop and were
> > never encountered with Mandrake 7.1 and XFree 3.3.6 on the same laptop.
> > Any ideas as to what I could tweak or how to get  rid of XFree 4.01 and
> > use 3.3.6?
> 
> Eunice, I have exactly the same problem with a Toshiba Sat Pro 420CDT.
> The problem seems to be in Xfree 4.01 as it works fine with 3.3.6
> You may want to check whether you are using the framebuffer on the
> console, as I seem to remember getting Xfree 4 to work when I wasn't using
> the framebuffer.  That said, to switch back to 3.3.6 you may already have
> it installed (I did).  In which case all you need to do is to make sure
> that /etc/X11/XF86Config is configured properly, and then change the
> symbolic link of /etc/X11/X to point to /usr/X11R6/bin/XF86_SVGA (instead
> of XFree86 in the same directory). The reboot X and you should be up and
> running, but using 3.3.6 instead of 4.01.  If this isn't the case (an
> d you can't find XFree86_SVGA) then give me a shout and I'll help you to
> re-install 3.3.6.
> That said, if anybody _does_ know how to get XFree 4.01  to work with a
> Chips and Tech 65550 I'd be interested!
> Regards
> Dom

-- 
 Eunice Thompson
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Treasurer/Community Relations
Cerritos Linux User Group
http://www.cerritoslug.org



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] Grub Be Gone

2000-12-06 Thread Daniel Velzi

Tim:
First delete Grub: in DOS mode type fdisk /mbr
Second: install RedHat, perhaps Lilo don´t run after install (some bugs in
RedHat install) so when install Red Hat make a boot floppy during
instalation.
If Lilo don´t run after instalation, must run Red Hat with boot floppy, and
then go to linuxconf and set lilo. Next time you boot lilo run ok.
I you have windows NT you must run Red Hat booting from floppy. With win98
or ME you can use Lilo.
Sorry foy my bad english. Hope you understand.

Daniel
- Original Message -
From: "Tim Faehnle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2000 12:22 AM
Subject: Re: [expert] Grub Be Gone


> I'll probably use LILO when it comes to it, but i still can't even get it
> installed at the moment.  When I tried to install LILO with the Redhat, my
> computer wouldn't even get to the LILO command line.  It would only get to
> the "stage1" part of Grub.  So I think I need to get rid of Grub first and
> I'm not sure how to do that.  Does anyone know?  Do I need to delete grub
> files as well?  Where do they reside?
>
> Tim
> - Original Message -
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 7:51 PM
> Subject: Re: [expert] Grub Be Gone
>
>
> > I have multiples OS's and like LILO for the most part except -  if
> > you load it in the upper 1024 of memory the only way to get rid of it
> > is to hand delete its files; fdisk doesn't remove it. However when it
> > comes to multiple OS's it's handy as it boots and waits for you to
> > choose - if you do nothing it defaults to Linux. You can edit it for
> > any OS you want to set as default plus you can edit it to set the
> > length of time LILO waits before booting to default.
> >
> >
> > On 5 Dec 2000, at 17:48, Tim Faehnle wrote:
> >
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
>
>






> Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com:
> Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.
>




Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] Xserver crashes in 7.2

2000-12-06 Thread dom

On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, Eunice Thompson wrote:

> Hi.
> I'm having problems swithcing to a console while in X.
> 
>   > Fatal server error:
> > Caught signal 11. Server aborting.
> > 
> > xinit:connection to X server lost.
> > [rose@Roset3 rose]$ xterm: fatal IO error 32 (Broken pipe) or KillClient
> > on X server ":0.0"
> > Terminated sighup

> I'm using a Toshiba Satellite Pro 460CDX (P166MMX)
> 80 MB Ram
> 6GB HD.
> Mandrake 7.2
> XFree 4.01
> SVGA X server
> 
> Please note that these problems do not exist on my desktop and were
> never encountered with Mandrake 7.1 and XFree 3.3.6 on the same laptop.
> Any ideas as to what I could tweak or how to get  rid of XFree 4.01 and
> use 3.3.6?

Eunice, I have exactly the same problem with a Toshiba Sat Pro 420CDT.
The problem seems to be in Xfree 4.01 as it works fine with 3.3.6
You may want to check whether you are using the framebuffer on the
console, as I seem to remember getting Xfree 4 to work when I wasn't using
the framebuffer.  That said, to switch back to 3.3.6 you may already have
it installed (I did).  In which case all you need to do is to make sure
that /etc/X11/XF86Config is configured properly, and then change the
symbolic link of /etc/X11/X to point to /usr/X11R6/bin/XF86_SVGA (instead 
of XFree86 in the same directory). The reboot X and you should be up and
running, but using 3.3.6 instead of 4.01.  If this isn't the case (an
d you can't find XFree86_SVGA) then give me a shout and I'll help you to
re-install 3.3.6.
That said, if anybody _does_ know how to get XFree 4.01  to work with a
Chips and Tech 65550 I'd be interested!
Regards
Dom






Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] ANNOUNCE: KDE 2.0.1 released (fwd)

2000-12-06 Thread Ron Heron

I appologize, but can somebody summarize this thread?  I haven't been
following.  If I understand correctly, 2.01 is out, but not via Mandrake?

Ron
--- Chris Spencer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On December  6, 2000 05:30 am, you wrote:
> 
> > Mandrake's Updates are _beyond_ the 2.01 release already and the folks
> > taking care of those packages saw no need for regression.   This is
> true in
> > the updates Chris Molnar has been making available for some time, (and
> they
> > tested as well or better than the 2.01), and the current CVS stuff in
> > Cooker which shows intensive development with many new features and
> many
> > broken ones.
> 
> I understand the need for Mandrake to continually develop new and better
> 
> versions of their operating system, however it is coming at the expense
> of 
> people who wish to have a stable operating system. 
> 
> Surely some kind person at Mandrake could package the new 2.0.1 RPMS for
> 7.2 
> users and make them available as an update. Its too bad that the end
> users 
> get ignored in Mandrake's relentless development.
> 
> I don't much care. The OS is free and I have installed Chris's 2.0.1-0.1
> 
> RPMs. However this is a little PR that Mandrake could get, especially
> from 
> new users coming from the Microsoft world.
> 
> -Chris
> 
> 
> 
> > Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
> Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.
> 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products.
http://shopping.yahoo.com/



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



[expert] Startup script selection at boot time - Anyone?

2000-12-06 Thread Viktor Lakics

Dear all,

I want to run two different scripts at boot time depending on the lilo
configuration. 

Eg.: If lilo entry A is selected, I want to run script A automaticaly.
This script would set up several things, and I want linux to boot   into
initlevel 3 .

On the other hand, if entry B is selected I want to run script B, and Linux to
boot into initlevel 5. 

What do I have to set to be able to do this?!

Similar problem:

Does anyone know what happens, when someone uses different profiles in LM7.2
for different laptop network confs? 

Is there a script which runs and sets the network profiles depending on the
profiles in lilo.conf (append prof=Office vs Home)?  I think this does exactly
what I want, I just do not know what happens then...Anyone has an idea?

Thanks in advance:  Viktor



Viktor Lakics

Through the Internet:

  [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.amexmail.com/?A=1



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] Second stage install hangs

2000-12-06 Thread Vic

I agree, when I ran windows, I had to make sure
that the dang ol registry and the dynamic linking
library files (.dll) were all in good shape and
that there were no stray/unused ones
laying about, otherwise---CRASH!

I have an AMD K6-400 and it runs
really nice, am I imagining things
or do AMD processors run cooler 
than intel ones?

On Tue, 05 Dec 2000, Mark Weaver wrote:
> 
I've found the secret to getting
> Windows to settle down and run stable is keeping the registry sqeaky
> clean. 



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] mail as set-uid root process problem

2000-12-06 Thread Buchan Milne

You could have just done:
chmod u-s `which sendmail`
which would have removed the setuid bit.

It might be a security risk to have sendmail owned by "nobody", as that
is usually (pre 7.2 at least) what apache runs as, and is sometimes used
for guest users (like with samba)

Buchan

Praedor Tempus wrote:
> 
> Daniel Woods wrote:
> >
> > > If I send mail as a user, I always get this message:
> > >
> > > send-mail: warning: sendmail is set-uid root, or is run from a set-uid root
> > > process
> > >
> > > First off, I do not have sendmail installed, it is postfix, but nevertheless
> > > I would like to eliminate this problem/message.  How do I do this?  Who
> > > should own/run the mail program if not root ? By this I mean if I am to
> > > remove root uid, to whom to I change it?  Daemon?
> >
> > I use postfix and I have the following setting...
> >
> > -rwxr-xr-x1 root root64284 Oct  3 12:16 /usr/sbin/sendmail
> >
> > Works fine for and no errors reported.
> 
> As soon as I changed the owner from root to "nobody" and left the group
> at
> "mail", the problems vanished.  Leaving it as you have it always
> produced the
> warning message about set-uid root.
> 
> praedor
> 
>   
> Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com:
> Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.

-- 
|--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone   +27824722231
email   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Centre for Automotive Engineering   http://www.cae.co.za
South Africas first satellite:http://sunsat.ee.sun.ac.za
Control Models  http://www.control.co.za
|Registered Linux User #182071-|



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] 3Com US Robotics 56K faxmodem problems

2000-12-06 Thread Ken Thompson

On Wednesday 06 December 2000 05:03 am, you wrote:

> > I just purchased a 3Com US Robotics 56K Faxmodem (V.90 and x2).  My
> Mandrake 7.2 installation finds the modem and connects with it but
> connection is at 26400 baud.
>
> It is not the phone lines because my old 33K modem (that it is supposed to
> replace) connects at 115000.  Could it be that the v.90 and x2 protocols
> need to be installed under linux and have not?  There is no linux mentioned
> on the CD that came with the modem.

Jeff,
For what it's worth, 56K modems will connect at a lower speed than 33.6K 
modems if there is an incompatibility (as there usually is) in the ISP's 
modem bank. It seems that ALL of the ISP's in this area have modem banks that 
will revert to the V.34 spec's if they are unable to establish a good connect 
with V.90. I suspect that this is your problem. I have been scrounging 33.6 
hardware modems anywhere I can find them because both my Linux and Winderz 
boxes connect faster and more reliably when using them.

-- 
Ken Thompson
Electrocom Computer Services
Payette, Idaho
(208) 642-7101  (888) 642-7101
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Website: http://www.nwaa.com



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



[expert] glibc2.2 question and cross-post apology

2000-12-06 Thread William Reinhart

A lot of the packeages in cooker right now require glibc2.2.  Would upgrading 
glibc break binaries I already have?  Have any of you tried upgrading yet?

Also, I'm sorry about cross-posting a message intended for the Abiword-users 
mailing list here, I must have clicked the wrong line in my addressbook.

-- 
Madness takes its toll; please have exact change

Will Reinhart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] command list

2000-12-06 Thread Anthony Russello


Linux in a Nutshell by O'Reilly and associates.

> i was recently asked by some one trying to learn linux if there was a list
> of all the commands on most mandrake installs, does anyone know of a list of
> all the commands and what they do?
>
>
>

There's plenty of semicolons to go around




Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] Clock

2000-12-06 Thread Buchan Milne

Maybe your bios battery is flat!

Don wrote:
> 
> I am trying to figure out why does not Mandrake 7.2, and/or KDE2.0 see the
> system clock?  Whenever I reboot this system the time gets reset to 00:00:00
> and starts counting from there.  I usually reset the clock in KDE, but must
> reset the clock each time I reboot.  This is a dual boot machine, with Win2k
> and Mandrake 7.2.  Win2k shows the correct time. I have reloaded MDK7.2 SMP
> on this system 14 times now trying to get  things to run stable.
> 
> Machine Info:
> Abit BP6 with two Celeron 466's not overcclocked
> 512 MB memory
> ATI Rage 128 with 32MB Mem (AGP)
> Adaptec 2940 controlling 2GB Jaz drive
> WD 20.5 GB master Drive(Win2k) and 15.3 GB slave on IDE3 (HPT366)
>   controller
> Linksys NIC 10/100
> Haupauge WINTV card
> -
> 
> Thanks,
> 
>  Don 
> --
> 73 de kk6wj
> 
>   
> Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com:
> Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.

-- 
|--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone   +27824722231
email   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Centre for Automotive Engineering   http://www.cae.co.za
South Africas first satellite:http://sunsat.ee.sun.ac.za
Control Models  http://www.control.co.za
|Registered Linux User #182071-|



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] Kernel problem with Mandrake 7.2

2000-12-06 Thread Buchan Milne

I am not sure if it might help to pass the following to the kernel at
boot. 

"ide0=dma, ide1=dma"

I can't test this as the only dma66 controllers available are production
machines running LM 7.1:

I guess if that doesn't fix it, maybe someone in the know would be kind
enough to compile a kernel with udma66 support compiled in and make a
new boot disk ?

Buchan

Paul Stear wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I hope this mail message gets on the list ok.
> 
> I have been having problems installing Mandrake 7.2.
> The boot from cdrom or floppy stops after the detection of hda.  It
> seems that kernel 2.2.17 does not recognise my Promise Ultrs66
> controller and the two disks attached to them.  This is proved by
> removing the controller card, then 7.2 installes without error.  Another
> indication is that if I install kernel 2.2.16 then the controller and
> disks are recognised and all is well.
> Why does this happen with a new release, one would think that 2.2.17
> should be better than 2.2.16. Or is that whishfull thinking?
> 
> Can anybody help me solve this problem please?
> 
> Could anybody provide me with a complete set of disks from the site
> please? I will pay all costs, I just can't afford to download them
> though my modem.
> 
> I would also like all of the upgrades listed on the site for 7.2 as this
> would take hours to download.
> 
> Thanks in anticipation, please contact me privately if you can provide
> the cd's
> 
> regard
> Paul
> 
>   
> Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com:
> Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.

-- 
|--|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone   +27824722231
email   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Centre for Automotive Engineering   http://www.cae.co.za
South Africas first satellite:http://sunsat.ee.sun.ac.za
Control Models  http://www.control.co.za
|Registered Linux User #182071-|



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [Re: [expert] A bit "afeared" of upgrading my laptop]

2000-12-06 Thread Viktor Lakics

Do a clean install! Depending on your laptop, your mileage may vary. I
recently installed MDK7.2 on my laptop (Compaq Armada M700) and I was
pleasantly surprised.

My wheel mouse was recognized instantly, DVD-rom was OK, X was setup correctly
(ATI Mobility RAge card and 1024x768 generic LCD panel). Sound worked out of
the box, I can use diffrent network profiles for home and office, even my
winmodem was recognized, and I was advised to go to www.linmodems.org for more
conf info.

Works great!

Good luck; Viktor





bill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> 
> On Tue, 5 Dec 2000, Praedor Tempus wrote:
> 
> > Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2000 10:11:47 -0700
> > From: Praedor Tempus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To: expert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: [expert] A bit "afeared" of upgrading my laptop
> > 
> > I am running 7.2 on my home system but on my laptop I still have 7.1 and
> > kde 1.1.2.
> > I am debating upgrading to 7.2 on my laptop but first want to know about
> > general 
> > experiences in, first, upgrading vs dump and clean install.  
> > 
> > I bought my 7.2 from cheapbytes (and am hoping that it is 'real' rather
> > than a 
> > partially beta version, like kde-1.95 or some other monster...haven't
> > checked yet).
> > 
> > Is it relatively painless to do the upgrade or should I dump and
> > reinstall from scratch?
> > 
> 
> DO NOT USE UPGRADE DO A CLEAN INSTALL
> 
> Of course that will still not guarantee a "no glitch" install
> as each new version of LM since 6.0 has tossed a few quicks into
> the kettle. I have tried not on laptops mind you but on desktop systems
> serveral installs-versus-upgrades and each time the Installs have given
> 95% less trouble. In one case an upgrade took 6-8 hours on on old
> P-120 only to see it crap out anyway which necessitated a clean
> re-install.
> 
> BTW Some things which worked in LM 7.1 may not perform the same or
> as well in LM 7.2 while others will work better. Sometimes its a dice roll
> but to us enthusiats and if IT IS NOT A MISSION CRITICAL MACHINE, it
> is well worth the aggravation.
> 
> Of course I still would like to know why my generic three button mouse
> instantly recognized and initialized by LM 6.1 has never had the same 
> success since !? :)
> 
> Good Luck
> 
> William Bouterse
> Talkeetna
> 
> 

> - 
>   Attachment: message.footer 
>   MIME Type: text/plain 
> - 

Viktor Lakics

Through the Internet:

  [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.amexmail.com/?A=1



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



[expert] LM 7.0 on DEC ALPHA 255 install problem

2000-12-06 Thread Joe Perry


I am trying to install Linux-Mandrake on a DEC ALPHAstation 255.
I have obtained an install CD from Mr. O's Linux Emporium
I have created a boot disk
I sucessfully boot into milo(Alpha variant of lilo)
I type the following boot command

boot scd0:/boot/instboot.gz root=/dev/fd0 load_ramdisk=1 mdkinst rw 
ramdisk_size=32000 
It requests the boot floppy(in drive) I hit 
It loads the install program
I select 'Local CDRom' for Installation Method
I select 'SCSI' for the type of CDROM that i have.
It loads second stage ramdisk
Initializing CDROM, in second stage install
I select English (US) for language
I select Expert installation class
I select Normal usage(this will eventually be a web server, ie NO ftp or 
telnet)
I select YES for try to find PCI devices
NO other devices(Found Symbios| 53c810 scsi interface. Do you have another 
one?)
Select Install on Install/Upgrade screen
Select Generic Mouse (PS/2)
Select US keyboard
I get a list of languages, this covers up the Linux screen, parts can be seen 
behind it)
Select English (US)
I get a segmentation fault
I says ' seems like memory is missing as the install crashes error :( switch to 
console f2 for a shell Press  to reboot

The machine is now locked up, neither f2 or enter will work. Please respond 
privately as I am subscribed to this list.

Joseph H. Perry
Oracle DBA
Columbus State University
4225 University Ave
Columbus, GA 31907-5645
(706) 568-2063
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



[expert] Re: fonts problem

2000-12-06 Thread William Reinhart

On Tue, 05 Dec 2000, you wrote:
>   Load "freetype"  
>  Load "type1"   
>  Load "speedo"


> > It's possible I have these entries in the wrong spot under the
> > XF86Config file, actually I just thought about something while pasting
> > this section of my XF86Config file which I will try, those three lines
> > may have o come before the Fontpath statement.  I will try that and
> > let you know if I have any success.

Those lines are listed under the "Module" section in my XF86Config file, not 
"Files". 

-- 
Madness takes its toll; please have exact change

Will Reinhart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] StarOffice Mailing List?

2000-12-06 Thread Ken Thompson

On Wednesday 06 December 2000 04:07 am, you wrote:

> > If you know of a mailing list for StarOffice, would you send me the
> URL?
>
> Note: When you reply to this message, please include
>   the mailing list and my email address.
There is a support forum (and a good one I might add) listed on the 
StarOffice web site.

-- 
Ken Thompson
Electrocom Computer Services
Payette, Idaho
(208) 642-7101  (888) 642-7101
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Website: http://www.nwaa.com



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] CUPS & Samba Printing

2000-12-06 Thread Till Kamppeter

The Samba client on the distro has a bug, download the fixed Samba
packages from

   http://www.mandrakesoft.com/~tkamppeter/packages/

Drakconf has also a bug and therefore asks for another GhostScript.
GhostScript, especially updated from the page mentioned above, is OK.
Use KUPS when it is impossible to use DrakConf without downdating
GhostScript.

   Till


Nathan wrote:
> 
> I want to print to a printer on a different IP range that is shared on a Win
> 2000.
> I've tried setting it up through DrakConf and KUPS Admin to no avail.
> I've also tried to set up a printer that is on the same IP range, with no
> luck.
> I have an account on both NT networks, and I can see the printer that is on
> the same IP range, but I don't seem to be having any luck.
> 
> Also, it did ask me for the Ghostscript RPM when using DrakConf, even though
> I have the latest one installed already.
> 
> Drak/Printer Configuration Settings
> SMB server host = userspc
> SMB server IP = x.x.x.x
> Share name = laserjet
> Username = myusername
> Password = mypassword
> Workgroup = theirdomainname
> 
> it looks for it at smb://pcname/printername
> (I've tried pcname being the IP too)
>



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] ANNOUNCE: KDE 2.0.1 released (fwd)

2000-12-06 Thread Chris Spencer

On December  6, 2000 05:30 am, you wrote:

> Mandrake's Updates are _beyond_ the 2.01 release already and the folks
> taking care of those packages saw no need for regression.   This is true in
> the updates Chris Molnar has been making available for some time, (and they
> tested as well or better than the 2.01), and the current CVS stuff in
> Cooker which shows intensive development with many new features and many
> broken ones.

I understand the need for Mandrake to continually develop new and better 
versions of their operating system, however it is coming at the expense of 
people who wish to have a stable operating system. 

Surely some kind person at Mandrake could package the new 2.0.1 RPMS for 7.2 
users and make them available as an update. Its too bad that the end users 
get ignored in Mandrake's relentless development.

I don't much care. The OS is free and I have installed Chris's 2.0.1-0.1 
RPMs. However this is a little PR that Mandrake could get, especially from 
new users coming from the Microsoft world.

-Chris





Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] A bit "afeared" of upgrading my laptop

2000-12-06 Thread bill



On Tue, 5 Dec 2000, Praedor Tempus wrote:

> Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2000 10:11:47 -0700
> From: Praedor Tempus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: expert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [expert] A bit "afeared" of upgrading my laptop
> 
> I am running 7.2 on my home system but on my laptop I still have 7.1 and
> kde 1.1.2.
> I am debating upgrading to 7.2 on my laptop but first want to know about
> general 
> experiences in, first, upgrading vs dump and clean install.  
> 
> I bought my 7.2 from cheapbytes (and am hoping that it is 'real' rather
> than a 
> partially beta version, like kde-1.95 or some other monster...haven't
> checked yet).
> 
> Is it relatively painless to do the upgrade or should I dump and
> reinstall from scratch?
> 

DO NOT USE UPGRADE DO A CLEAN INSTALL

Of course that will still not guarantee a "no glitch" install
as each new version of LM since 6.0 has tossed a few quicks into
the kettle. I have tried not on laptops mind you but on desktop systems
serveral installs-versus-upgrades and each time the Installs have given
95% less trouble. In one case an upgrade took 6-8 hours on on old
P-120 only to see it crap out anyway which necessitated a clean
re-install.

BTW Some things which worked in LM 7.1 may not perform the same or
as well in LM 7.2 while others will work better. Sometimes its a dice roll
but to us enthusiats and if IT IS NOT A MISSION CRITICAL MACHINE, it
is well worth the aggravation.

Of course I still would like to know why my generic three button mouse
instantly recognized and initialized by LM 6.1 has never had the same 
success since !? :)

Good Luck

William Bouterse
Talkeetna




Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



[expert] Xserver crashes in 7.2

2000-12-06 Thread Eunice Thompson

Hi.
I'm having problems swithcing to a console while in X.
when I use the key combos of CTRL-ALT-F*,I get the text login prompt and
then immediately am switched back to whatever display X was running on
with error messages that X has crashed i.e.:

  > Fatal server error:
> Caught signal 11. Server aborting.
> 
> When reporting a problem relating to a server crash, please send the full
> server output, not just the last messages.
> This can be found in the log file "/var/log/XFree86.0.log".
> 
> xinit:connection to X server lost.
> [rose@Roset3 rose]$ xterm: fatal IO error 32 (Broken pipe) or KillClient
> on X server ":0.0"
> Terminated sighup


I'm using a Toshiba Satellite Pro 460CDX (P166MMX)
80 MB Ram
6GB HD.
Mandrake 7.2
XFree 4.01
SVGA X server

Please note that these problems do not exist on my desktop and were
never encountered with Mandrake 7.1 and XFree 3.3.6 on the same laptop.
Any ideas as to what I could tweak or how to get  rid of XFree 4.01 and
use 3.3.6?

thanks for your help

 Eunice Thompson
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Treasurer/Community Relations
Cerritos Linux User Group
http://www.cerritoslug.org



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] ANNOUNCE: KDE 2.0.1 released (fwd)

2000-12-06 Thread civileme

On Wednesday 06 December 2000 12:30, you wrote:

> > On Wednesday 06 December 2000 01:45, you wrote:
> > > I see Mandrake 7.2 is mentioned, is KDE 2.0.1 available via Mandrake
> >
> > Update?
>
> No
>
> Mandrake's Updates are _beyond_ the 2.01 release already and the folks
> taking care of those packages saw no need for regression.   This is true in
> the updates Chris Molnar has been making available for some time, (and they
> tested as well or better than the 2.01), and the current CVS stuff in
> Cooker which shows intensive development with many new features and many
> broken ones.
>
> Civileme

As a postscript, there is an effort to make a Mandrake version of the 2.0.1 
release available through the KDE site, but it will be tested first.  It is 
non-trivial to keep KDE packages in sync with the menu structure for ML.



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



[expert] supermount & floppies

2000-12-06 Thread Florian Kleedorfer

Hi all!

I am using the mandrake kernel 2.2.17 with supermount 
activated (I have tried compiling it into the kernel and 
as a module) 

I have the following problem: 
*) if I cd to a (super)mounted directory on a floppy(e.g.
/mnt/floppy/XYZ/ where /mnt/floppy is the mount point for
   the floppy)
   and I remove the floppy from the drive, doing an ls leads to an
   i/o error. Nothing wrong with that. BUT: supermount is unable to
   mount floppies after this procedure until I reboot my machine.
*) before the said procedure, producing i/o error messages takes about
   2 seconds. After the procedure it takes about 20 seconds (Maybe this
   is significant to you...)

Does anybody have an idea as to how to solve this problem?
Does anybody happily use floppies with supermount without problems?

Although I haven't checked, I guess the said behaviour should be the
same for CDs...

Any hints are greatly appreciated.

Flo



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] The mysterious libqt-mt.so.2

2000-12-06 Thread Anthony Moulen

This file appeared in QT 2.2.2 I believe.  I know it is required by a
couple of applications that are in development now, and the only way I
could get them is by upgrading to QT 2.2.2 on my system.

I am not positive if it is in any of the 2.2.2 RPMs but I compiled a
version of 2.2.2 and got the file that way. 

On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, Mike MacCana wrote:

> This mysterious file is part of QT 2.1 or later in many distributions, 
> [Red Hat and Connectiva] but isn't included as part of Mandrakes 
> packages. I'm not sure what the purpose of the library is, [perhaps, 
> logically, it shouldn't be packaged along with QT] but it is necessary for 
> avifile, a DivX ;-) player for Linux.
> 
> Does anyone know what the file, whether it should be inside a QT package 
> or somewhere else, etc?
> 
> Mike
> 
> --
> Mike MacCana  Support Consultant  
>   C Y B E R S O U R C E
>Level 9, 140 Queen St Melbourne 3000
> Ph : +61 3 9642 5997 Fax: +61 3 9642 5998
> 
> 
> 




Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] Second stage install hangs

2000-12-06 Thread civileme

On Wednesday 06 December 2000 04:44, you wrote:

> > Mark Weaver wrote:
> > well it is very accurate as far as my experience is
> > concerned, and frankly thats the only one that really
> > matters to me since I'm the one that has to put up with it.
> > Inferior hardware sucks! Celeron sucks! Intel sucks!
> >
> > seems pretty plain and simple to me. ;)
>
> Markjust a thought, but have you considered that there
> could be something not-so-good about one or more components
> other than the cpu?  :-)

I would be suspecting the graphics hardware.  Did you try f1 on the splash 
screen and a text install?  svga/vga/vga-lo doesn't cover all the hardware, 
and nearly all distros try to be GUI on install these days.

Civileme



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] Supermount

2000-12-06 Thread Anton Graham

Submitted 06-Dec-00 by Christian A Strømmen [Number1/NumeroUno]:
>> Supermount in and of itself doesn't need to be a module, however your
>> initscripts assume it will be and disable it at boot time if they can't
>> find the module.  (I sent in a patch before the 7.2 beta cycle but it
>> wasn't included).

> So, how do I re-enable it?

First, comment out the portion of /etc/rc.d/init.d/mandrake_everytime that
disables it.  Then /usr/sbin/supermount --enable.  After that, check your
fstab to ensure that it is correct.  Finally, mount -o remount -a.

That should fix you right up.

-- 
Anton GrahamGPG ID: 0x18F78541
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> RSA key available upon request
 
An optimist believes we live in the best world possible; a pessimist fears
this is true.




Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] Grub Be Gone

2000-12-06 Thread root

On Wednesday 06 December 2000 00:48, you wrote:

> > I'm trying out Linuxes (Linuxi?) I've fooled with Mandrake and now I'm
> going to try Redhat (don't hurt me), BUT when I installed Redhat, it seems
> that half of grub was still there.  I was thinking that I could just leave
> grub in there and use it to get to redhat, but that didn't work.  In the
> red hat install I can say "don't install LILO" or "Do install LILO". In
> either case, my computer boots up to "stage1" but then sits there and never
> gets to "stage2".  And I have to reinstall Mandrake to get to *any* OS.  So
> I figure that I have to uninstall Grub and use LILO or something:
>
> Which brings me to my simple question:
> How do I uninstall Grub?

If you have a boot floppy, you can resolve the problem so:
(1) you enter into Linux
(2) you substitute grub with lilo simply launching the command: /sbin/lilo

Another possibility, if you have the linux loader in the main boot record:
(1) you boot the system with the first disk of DOS
(2) when the program asks if you want to install DOS or exit, you exit 
(pressing F3)
(3) you confirm your decision pressing again F3
(4) when you get the A> prompt, you launch the command: fdisk /mbr
(5) so, the main boot record should be fully cleared
(6) you enter into Linux by your boot floppy
(7) you launch: /sbin/lilo
(8) finally ... you've finished.
>
> Not so simple question:
> I like grub better than LILO, can I keep Grub, but use redhat?  I know, I
> know, this is the Mandrake list.
>
> Any help would be appreciated.  Thanks very much
> Tim

Bye, Giorgio Cittadini

Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"; name="Attachment: 1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Description: 




Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] Second stage install hangs

2000-12-06 Thread Larry Tobos

Just my 2 cents: never had a problem with a Celeron 433 on an oldie (and
goldie) Shuttle 637 board; trying to "upgrade" to a cheap dual board (Asus
2P97DS) and a larger HD, Mandrake would hang in 2-nd stage install, except
with a junkie 512k VGA card. The moral: for me, its Shuttle and not Asus;
all the
new crap I've seen, including BIOS-es soldered on the mobo, tells me Asus
now plays the marketing games more than the technical game we were used to.

Such a shame.

- Original Message -
From: "Mark Weaver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 9:50 PM
Subject: Re: [expert] Second stage install hangs


> Larry,
>
> Now that's what I call dancing on the razors edge. Clearly some folks are
> able to do what you're doing. I've had nothing but trouble and torment
> when trying to run Mandrake with Celeron/Intel hardware. WD is definately
> falling behind...(another story). As a matter of fact RedHat didn't run
> much better for me on my Celeron worstation.
>
> Now, my AMD at home is another story altogether. No worries at all. No
> matter what I'm running. And believe it or not I didn't stop running
> Windows because it ran crappy for me. I've found the secret to getting
> Windows to settle down and run stable is keeping the registry sqeaky
> clean. I just can't get Mandrake to run well with Celeron and Intel
> hardware.
>
> --
> Mark
>
> / * Sometimes it becomes necessary to rock the boat
>   * in order to get the rats up from below decks
>   * so they can be kicked over the side and drowned!
>   *
>   * REGISTERED LINUX USER # 182496
>   */
>
> <*REPLY SEPERATOR*>>
>
> On Sun, 3 Dec 2000 Larry Marshall had this to say!
>
> >
> > > You know...if I didn't know better I'd say you both were trying to
install
> > > Mandrake on Celeron processor machine with Western Digital hard
> > > drives. It's a hardware issue. You may want to look at the drives, or
the
> > > chipsets on the mobo's themselves. Celerons and mandrake aren't known
to
> >
> > Gee Mark...for the first few months I played with Linux I had Corel,
> > Mandrake, and Red Hat on a 300mhz Celeron and I'm currently running a
> > Western Digital drive on my K6-2 machine without any problems unless I
> > try to run 7.2 :-)  The 7.2 problems seem more associated with XFree,
> > CUPS and KDE than anything else.
> >
> > Cheers --- Larry
> >
> >
>
>
>






> Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com:
> Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.
>



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



RE: [expert] Grub Be Gone

2000-12-06 Thread Klar Brian D Contr MSG/SWS

This link explains how to install lilo after you have had grub
installed:   http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/grub-faq.html#q11
In short it states:

For example, if you want to install the boot loader for Windows, 
just run FDISK /MBR on Windows. If you want to install LILO (I 
can't imagine why you want to do such a thing, though), run 
/sbin/lilo on GNU/Linux. 

-Original Message-
From: civileme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2000 6:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [expert] Grub Be Gone


On Wednesday 06 December 2000 00:48, you wrote:

> > I'm trying out Linuxes (Linuxi?) I've fooled with Mandrake and now I'm
> going to try Redhat (don't hurt me), BUT when I installed Redhat, it seems
> that half of grub was still there.  I was thinking that I could just leave
> grub in there and use it to get to redhat, but that didn't work.  In the
> red hat install I can say "don't install LILO" or "Do install LILO". In
> either case, my computer boots up to "stage1" but then sits there and never
> gets to "stage2".  And I have to reinstall Mandrake to get to *any* OS.  So
> I figure that I have to uninstall Grub and use LILO or something:
>
> Which brings me to my simple question:
> How do I uninstall Grub?
>
> Not so simple question:
> I like grub better than LILO, can I keep Grub, but use redhat?  I know, I
> know, this is the Mandrake list.
>
> Any help would be appreciated.  Thanks very much
> Tim
Check out the article "Two mandrake versions booting?" on 
www.mandrakeforum.com.  You can keep GRUB and your Mandrake System and still 
have RedHat.

Civileme




Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] Second stage install hangs

2000-12-06 Thread Larry Marshall


> Now that's what I call dancing on the razors edge. Clearly some folks are
> able to do what you're doing. I've had nothing but trouble and torment
> when trying to run Mandrake with Celeron/Intel hardware. WD is definately

Mark, if there's one thing an observer of the Linux community should
learn quickly, the fact that one, or even a few people have trouble
with a particular piece of hardware, it's quite possible that most of
the people using it won't.  Wasn't it you that suggested that each
installation is like a snowflake?  If there are problems with Celerons
I suspect it's because most of them are sitting in boxes marked
Hewlett-Packard and Compaq, not because of the processor itself :-) 
As for WD, you don't like them.  That's fine but there are a lot of
Linux installations running on them flawlessly and the several times
you've said they don't work the responses always suggest otherwise.

> falling behind...(another story). As a matter of fact RedHat didn't run
> much better for me on my Celeron worstation.

Mark, with LM7.2 I can't do an expert install on my AMD K6-2 500 (and
not a WD drive in sight).  Does that mean I should say that Mandrake
isn't compatible with AMD processors?  Or rather, should I note that I
can do a standard workstation installation and that maybe, just maybe,
the installer is having some problems when it hangs somewhat randomly
during the applications installation portion?

> Now, my AMD at home is another story altogether. No worries at all. No

I can't imagine thatmine won't.. :-)

> matter what I'm running. And believe it or not I didn't stop running
> Windows because it ran crappy for me. I've found the secret to getting
> Windows to settle down and run stable is keeping the registry sqeaky

Me too...I eliminated it from my system and now run it under Win4Lin
in a very limited way, using it for 3 applications.

> clean. I just can't get Mandrake to run well with Celeron and Intel
> hardware.

Lots of people have.  

Cheers --- Larry



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



RE: [expert] 3Com US Robotics 56K faxmodem problems

2000-12-06 Thread Klar Brian D Contr MSG/SWS

Sounds like the new modem is acting just fine, and the problem may
be within your lines. 115000 is what your modem will show provided
you set it for max connection rate of 115000. Certain modems
require in the init string W2 (for my Supra) to show the correct
speed, and not the max set by your dialer.

-Original Message-
From: Jeff Malka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2000 7:03 AM
To: expert mandrake
Subject: [expert] 3Com US Robotics 56K faxmodem problems


I just purchased a 3Com US Robotics 56K Faxmodem (V.90 and x2).  My Mandrake
7.2 installation finds the modem and connects with it but connection is at
26400 baud.

It is not the phone lines because my old 33K modem (that it is supposed to
replace) connects at 115000.  Could it be that the v.90 and x2 protocols
need to be installed under linux and have not?  There is no linux mentioned
on the CD that came with the modem.

Jeff Malka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Registered Linux user  183185







Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



[expert] Alsa and ES1688

2000-12-06 Thread Dom Savage

Hi all, got a problem getting my sound card working as it's in a laptop
and it's not plug and play.  It works fine with OSSFree, but I was trying
to get the alsa modules from mdk 7.2 to work.  So far everything works
fine, as I can play audio cd's and wavs and the like, but .mid file state:
open /dev/sequencer: No such device.

Attached are copies of /etc/modules.conf and /proc/asound/sndstat
If anyone knows what's going wrong I'd be interested to know.
Regards
Dom





Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



[expert] 3Com US Robotics 56K faxmodem problems

2000-12-06 Thread Jeff Malka

I just purchased a 3Com US Robotics 56K Faxmodem (V.90 and x2).  My Mandrake
7.2 installation finds the modem and connects with it but connection is at
26400 baud.

It is not the phone lines because my old 33K modem (that it is supposed to
replace) connects at 115000.  Could it be that the v.90 and x2 protocols
need to be installed under linux and have not?  There is no linux mentioned
on the CD that came with the modem.

Jeff Malka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Registered Linux user  183185





Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] Second stage install hangs

2000-12-06 Thread Mark Weaver

Hi Alan,

That thought has been looming large the last few days. Especially after 
reading a post by Tom Brinkman on the Newbie list about hardware. Its a 
bit frustrating at times because what runs great on a "mut" system that 
was built from scratch doesn't run very well at all on a system that was 
bought from a vendor. Again, a lot of what Tom had to say does make a 
lot of sense.

Mark

Alan Shoemaker wrote:

> Mark Weaver wrote:
> 
>> well it is very accurate as far as my experience is
>> concerned, and frankly thats the only one that really
>> matters to me since I'm the one that has to put up with it.
>> Inferior hardware sucks! Celeron sucks! Intel sucks!
>> 
>> seems pretty plain and simple to me. ;)
> 
> 
> 
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; 
> name="message.footer"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> Content-Description: 
> 
> 
> Markjust a thought, but have you considered that there 
> could be something not-so-good about one or more components 
> other than the cpu?  :-)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
> Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.
> message.footer
> 
> Content-Type:
> 
> text/plain
> Content-Encoding:
> 
> 8bit




Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] ANNOUNCE: KDE 2.0.1 released (fwd)

2000-12-06 Thread civileme

On Wednesday 06 December 2000 01:45, you wrote:

> > I see Mandrake 7.2 is mentioned, is KDE 2.0.1 available via Mandrake
> Update?

No

Mandrake's Updates are _beyond_ the 2.01 release already and the folks taking 
care of those packages saw no need for regression.   This is true in the 
updates Chris Molnar has been making available for some time, (and they 
tested as well or better than the 2.01), and the current CVS stuff in Cooker 
which shows intensive development with many new features and many broken ones.

Civileme



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] StarOffice Mailing List?

2000-12-06 Thread Mike MacCana

StarOffice is now OpenOffice, so feature requests and comments, as well 
as bug reports should go to one of the lists at openoffice.org. I'm not 
sure if Sun [www.sun.com] still maintain StarOffice lists, or everythings 
converted into OpenOffice, butSun definitely do have a support for 
StarOffice 5.x section on their website.

Mike

--
Mike MacCanaSupport Consultant  
  C Y B E R S O U R C E
   Level 9, 140 Queen St Melbourne 3000
Ph : +61 3 9642 5997 Fax: +61 3 9642 5998

On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, SoloCDM wrote:

> If you know of a mailing list for StarOffice, would you send me the
> URL?
> 
> Note: When you reply to this message, please include
>   the mailing list and my email address.
> 
> *
> Signed,
> SoloCDM
> 
> 



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] Grub Be Gone

2000-12-06 Thread civileme

On Wednesday 06 December 2000 00:48, you wrote:

> > I'm trying out Linuxes (Linuxi?) I've fooled with Mandrake and now I'm
> going to try Redhat (don't hurt me), BUT when I installed Redhat, it seems
> that half of grub was still there.  I was thinking that I could just leave
> grub in there and use it to get to redhat, but that didn't work.  In the
> red hat install I can say "don't install LILO" or "Do install LILO". In
> either case, my computer boots up to "stage1" but then sits there and never
> gets to "stage2".  And I have to reinstall Mandrake to get to *any* OS.  So
> I figure that I have to uninstall Grub and use LILO or something:
>
> Which brings me to my simple question:
> How do I uninstall Grub?
>
> Not so simple question:
> I like grub better than LILO, can I keep Grub, but use redhat?  I know, I
> know, this is the Mandrake list.
>
> Any help would be appreciated.  Thanks very much
> Tim
Check out the article "Two mandrake versions booting?" on 
www.mandrakeforum.com.  You can keep GRUB and your Mandrake System and still 
have RedHat.

Civileme



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



[expert] StarOffice Mailing List?

2000-12-06 Thread SoloCDM

If you know of a mailing list for StarOffice, would you send me the
URL?

Note: When you reply to this message, please include
  the mailing list and my email address.

*
Signed,
SoloCDM



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] command list

2000-12-06 Thread EagleIce

In Gnome Help ->  Man Pages -> User Commands 

ei

On Wednesday 06 December 2000 05:28, Steve Young wrote:

> > i was recently asked by some one trying to learn linux if there was a list
> of all the commands on most mandrake installs, does anyone know of a list
> of all the commands and what they do?


-- 
@~~ EagleIce ~ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~@
@~~ Running GNU/Linux & KDE ~~@



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] Grub Be Gone

2000-12-06 Thread Tim Faehnle

I'll probably use LILO when it comes to it, but i still can't even get it
installed at the moment.  When I tried to install LILO with the Redhat, my
computer wouldn't even get to the LILO command line.  It would only get to
the "stage1" part of Grub.  So I think I need to get rid of Grub first and
I'm not sure how to do that.  Does anyone know?  Do I need to delete grub
files as well?  Where do they reside?

Tim
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2000 7:51 PM
Subject: Re: [expert] Grub Be Gone


> I have multiples OS's and like LILO for the most part except -  if
> you load it in the upper 1024 of memory the only way to get rid of it
> is to hand delete its files; fdisk doesn't remove it. However when it
> comes to multiple OS's it's handy as it boots and waits for you to
> choose - if you do nothing it defaults to Linux. You can edit it for
> any OS you want to set as default plus you can edit it to set the
> length of time LILO waits before booting to default.
>
>
> On 5 Dec 2000, at 17:48, Tim Faehnle wrote:
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>




Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



[expert] The mysterious libqt-mt.so.2

2000-12-06 Thread Mike MacCana

This mysterious file is part of QT 2.1 or later in many distributions, 
[Red Hat and Connectiva] but isn't included as part of Mandrakes 
packages. I'm not sure what the purpose of the library is, [perhaps, 
logically, it shouldn't be packaged along with QT] but it is necessary for 
avifile, a DivX ;-) player for Linux.

Does anyone know what the file, whether it should be inside a QT package 
or somewhere else, etc?

Mike

--
Mike MacCanaSupport Consultant  
  C Y B E R S O U R C E
   Level 9, 140 Queen St Melbourne 3000
Ph : +61 3 9642 5997 Fax: +61 3 9642 5998




Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



RE: [expert] Grub Be Gone

2000-12-06 Thread Charles A Edwards


Tim
   Use fdisk/MBR to remove Grub and then you can install and boot RH LILO.

   You can use Grub with other OSes but it will need to be installed to 1 of
your OSes.
You can find detailed info at www.gnu.org/software/grub

   Charles   (-:

Forever never goes beyond tomorrow.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of S. Anderson
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2000 4:07 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [expert] Grub Be Gone


On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 05:48:50PM -0600, Tim Faehnle wrote:
> I'm trying out Linuxes (Linuxi?) I've fooled with Mandrake and now I'm
going to try Redhat (don't hurt me), BUT when I installed Redhat, it seems
that half of grub was still there.  I was thinking that I could just leave
grub in there and use it to get to redhat, but that didn't work.  In the red
hat install I can say "don't install LILO" or "Do install LILO". In either
case, my computer boots up to "stage1" but then sits there and never gets to
"stage2".  And I have to reinstall Mandrake to get to *any* OS.  So I figure
that I have to uninstall Grub and use LILO or something:
>
> Which brings me to my simple question:
> How do I uninstall Grub?
>
> Not so simple question:
> I like grub better than LILO, can I keep Grub, but use redhat?  I know, I
know, this is the Mandrake list.
>
> Any help would be appreciated.  Thanks very much
> Tim

If you can get to dos 'fdisk /MBR' or 'fdisk \MBR' I forget which
(WINDOS~1 is evil). That should clean out the grub.

sa






Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] freeze

2000-12-06 Thread Alain

C'hwi peus skrivet:

> 
> To help find the culprit, do the following:
> 
[snip]

Thanks for the tip. Gonna check.

> but do realize that freezes may not
> be due to the app you happen to be running at the time
> (X windows, for example).
>
>
Yes, but the freezes appeared after un upgrade, so a hardware failure is 
unlikely and I noticed that network activity goes on while the computer is 
freezed.  

Alain



Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.



Re: [expert] Grub Be Gone

2000-12-06 Thread S. Anderson

On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 05:48:50PM -0600, Tim Faehnle wrote:
> I'm trying out Linuxes (Linuxi?) I've fooled with Mandrake and now I'm going to try 
>Redhat (don't hurt me), BUT when I installed Redhat, it seems that half of grub was 
>still there.  I was thinking that I could just leave grub in there and use it to get 
>to redhat, but that didn't work.  In the red hat install I can say "don't install 
>LILO" or "Do install LILO". In either case, my computer boots up to "stage1" but then 
>sits there and never gets to "stage2".  And I have to reinstall Mandrake to get to 
>*any* OS.  So I figure that I have to uninstall Grub and use LILO or something:
> 
> Which brings me to my simple question:
> How do I uninstall Grub?
> 
> Not so simple question:
> I like grub better than LILO, can I keep Grub, but use redhat?  I know, I know, this 
>is the Mandrake list.
> 
> Any help would be appreciated.  Thanks very much
> Tim

If you can get to dos 'fdisk /MBR' or 'fdisk \MBR' I forget which
(WINDOS~1 is evil). That should clean out the grub.

sa




Keep in touch with http://mandrakeforum.com: 
Subscribe the "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" mailing list.