Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal subfields

2021-08-30 Thread Erik O'Hanlon
External Email - Use Caution

Hi Eugenio,

Thanks so much for you reply. I will do that so. Just by way understanding the 
outputs I have , so the extract script only pulls the HBT automatically, and 
you need to simply add these together for the FS60 measures ? You can't modify 
the extract tool to read the FS60 data automatically?

Thanks again for your help. I will follow your instructions.

Best regards

Erik






From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
 on behalf of Iglesias Gonzalez, Juan 
E. 
Sent: Monday 30 August 2021 11:05
To: Freesurfer support list 
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal subfields

Oh, now I understand.

Yeah you can add the head, body and tail segments of each subfield to get 6.0 
type of measurements ;-)

Cheers,

/Eugenio

Juan Eugenio Iglesias
Senior research fellow
CMIC (UCL), MGH (HMS) and CSAIL (MIT)
http://secure-web.cisco.com/1knFRpDOFuoCvGaipHjXiJ2cPhPsiPMOeHi81MNBHC1pYD-xRCQzIgqWb6hExpRNqTqerIYAq3W6EUbKPQIYN6loykvYK69agvpqiJpixFB0HZxJ3tLZE5VfSe-gO2GqcRvGhQHCfYZw4IhoipbJUOi9v0tL5ajYH_Hv7r1WXRikWcSkenidoPo0bU8j8yPC21LqHlMB6c51XU6vq9XyKWHpExMjlIdUrOvuDxTOVyvXXGX6Z6Vom55EXxKNHs5XA4SgCapcbUOZufvnpzZ1tIw/http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jeiglesias.com

On Aug 28, 2021, at 08:20, Erik O'Hanlon 
mailto:ohanl...@tcd.ie>> wrote:


External Email - Use Caution


External Email - Use Caution


Hi Eugenio

So I ran the new Amygdala and hippocampus tool on my longitudinal data and from 
that I got the three output files as described on the wiki( the FS60, HBT and 
the CA) which these mgz files are in the long mri directories for each subject.

This all looks fine. The issue is that I want to look at the FS 60 version of 
the subfields and export these rather than the HBT versions. When I use the 
script to extract all the measures to a file, it works fine and I have the 
amygdala volumes but for the hippocampus, I get the HBT versions. How do you 
get the extract script to output the FS60 subfield measures?
Is it possible? If not can I simply add the HBT sections for each subfield to 
equate to the FS 60 measures?


Thanks for your prompt reply. Much appreciated

Erik






From: 
freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
 
mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>
 on behalf of Iglesias Gonzalez, Juan E. 
mailto:jiglesiasgonza...@mgh.harvard.edu>>
Sent: Friday 27 August 2021 22:02
To: Freesurfer support list 
mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal subfields

Dear Erik
I’m not sure I understand. What does your output file look like?
Cheers,
/Eugenio

Juan Eugenio Iglesias
Senior research fellow
CMIC (UCL), MGH (HMS) and CSAIL (MIT)
MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "secure-web.cisco.com" 
claiming to be 
http://secure-web.cisco.com/1knFRpDOFuoCvGaipHjXiJ2cPhPsiPMOeHi81MNBHC1pYD-xRCQzIgqWb6hExpRNqTqerIYAq3W6EUbKPQIYN6loykvYK69agvpqiJpixFB0HZxJ3tLZE5VfSe-gO2GqcRvGhQHCfYZw4IhoipbJUOi9v0tL5ajYH_Hv7r1WXRikWcSkenidoPo0bU8j8yPC21LqHlMB6c51XU6vq9XyKWHpExMjlIdUrOvuDxTOVyvXXGX6Z6Vom55EXxKNHs5XA4SgCapcbUOZufvnpzZ1tIw/http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jeiglesias.com<http://secure-web.cisco.com/1lOExJeky8AFqkFfrzJ79hMnVWS5jkY1XvPoEM7_fiDyZiO2NCivnLmj1kLuPRm2w88EDcWDJFNg74iZ5sXiGABC3n_oKlQ0uGC_9nPN9HjPWymVUYBrBeTboJSI7XzVHe1kg37ir15P16T7suVpnbFAkPhobCBTQwqWnq4d9hmBt5I1ybk3_w9_yFktbjWWuVl6uJ_6k6IUCsPgYNWjI5LqC-dobHYl3W_y6GhIsiANkJk6bKdBmRwDZDkB7o8lLevPO3On0jPYRQRhL13Rhgg/http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jeiglesias.com>

On Aug 27, 2021, at 16:14, Erik O'Hanlon 
mailto:ohanl...@tcd.ie>> wrote:

External Email - Use Caution

External Email - Use Caution

Dear FS experts,



I've run a lognitudinal hippocampal and amygdala analysis. I jave managed to 
extract the amygdala and the head body tail subfields bui I'm wondering how to 
extract the regular FS60 volume measures? I have the three versions (FS60, HBT 
and CA mgz files in my long mri directories but I just keep getting the HBT 
volumes.

I tried


quantifyHAsubregions.sh hippoSf T1.long Outputfilename

and that gives me the HBT measures

What command do I use to pull out the FS60 subfield measures from my long mri 
directories?

Thanks for any help.

Erik
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
https://secure-web.cisco.com/1KpjtWxWHIKAUquh4Uydr2e7YoRAgRF-HVDiv4BqhdUa-0X_RYf1Li44OPUb4fzHZIku_uP_nDzEHktcAlacLIl1hd9lb-vboaoyuevb--4OLvVJY8D-2mPUnYe5D5GgDInCvdRE3Et0ssZlwAYhNcjF7xV5ai2-gfZsXCKvmgILBMTAYKq_kgkrwxrLkJO2m7J2YKio6TFWV8TzwLVcr0BEUu8Y5f47aoybkO5V35ewmCWkmvIfk42BpyRVAx1O7T5J_-G7rtK7GW2osJ8Ho7Q/https%3A%2F%2Fmail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Ffreesurfer

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.

Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal subfields

2021-08-30 Thread Iglesias Gonzalez, Juan E.
Oh, now I understand.

Yeah you can add the head, body and tail segments of each subfield to get 6.0 
type of measurements ;-)

Cheers,

/Eugenio

Juan Eugenio Iglesias
Senior research fellow
CMIC (UCL), MGH (HMS) and CSAIL (MIT)
http://www.jeiglesias.com

On Aug 28, 2021, at 08:20, Erik O'Hanlon 
mailto:ohanl...@tcd.ie>> wrote:


External Email - Use Caution


External Email - Use Caution


Hi Eugenio

So I ran the new Amygdala and hippocampus tool on my longitudinal data and from 
that I got the three output files as described on the wiki( the FS60, HBT and 
the CA) which these mgz files are in the long mri directories for each subject.

This all looks fine. The issue is that I want to look at the FS 60 version of 
the subfields and export these rather than the HBT versions. When I use the 
script to extract all the measures to a file, it works fine and I have the 
amygdala volumes but for the hippocampus, I get the HBT versions. How do you 
get the extract script to output the FS60 subfield measures?
Is it possible? If not can I simply add the HBT sections for each subfield to 
equate to the FS 60 measures?


Thanks for your prompt reply. Much appreciated

Erik






From: 
freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
 
mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>
 on behalf of Iglesias Gonzalez, Juan E. 
mailto:jiglesiasgonza...@mgh.harvard.edu>>
Sent: Friday 27 August 2021 22:02
To: Freesurfer support list 
mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal subfields

Dear Erik
I’m not sure I understand. What does your output file look like?
Cheers,
/Eugenio

Juan Eugenio Iglesias
Senior research fellow
CMIC (UCL), MGH (HMS) and CSAIL (MIT)
MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "secure-web.cisco.com" 
claiming to be 
http://www.jeiglesias.com<http://secure-web.cisco.com/1lOExJeky8AFqkFfrzJ79hMnVWS5jkY1XvPoEM7_fiDyZiO2NCivnLmj1kLuPRm2w88EDcWDJFNg74iZ5sXiGABC3n_oKlQ0uGC_9nPN9HjPWymVUYBrBeTboJSI7XzVHe1kg37ir15P16T7suVpnbFAkPhobCBTQwqWnq4d9hmBt5I1ybk3_w9_yFktbjWWuVl6uJ_6k6IUCsPgYNWjI5LqC-dobHYl3W_y6GhIsiANkJk6bKdBmRwDZDkB7o8lLevPO3On0jPYRQRhL13Rhgg/http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jeiglesias.com>

On Aug 27, 2021, at 16:14, Erik O'Hanlon 
mailto:ohanl...@tcd.ie>> wrote:

External Email - Use Caution

External Email - Use Caution

Dear FS experts,



I've run a lognitudinal hippocampal and amygdala analysis. I jave managed to 
extract the amygdala and the head body tail subfields bui I'm wondering how to 
extract the regular FS60 volume measures? I have the three versions (FS60, HBT 
and CA mgz files in my long mri directories but I just keep getting the HBT 
volumes.

I tried


quantifyHAsubregions.sh hippoSf T1.long Outputfilename

and that gives me the HBT measures

What command do I use to pull out the FS60 subfield measures from my long mri 
directories?

Thanks for any help.

Erik
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
https://secure-web.cisco.com/1KpjtWxWHIKAUquh4Uydr2e7YoRAgRF-HVDiv4BqhdUa-0X_RYf1Li44OPUb4fzHZIku_uP_nDzEHktcAlacLIl1hd9lb-vboaoyuevb--4OLvVJY8D-2mPUnYe5D5GgDInCvdRE3Et0ssZlwAYhNcjF7xV5ai2-gfZsXCKvmgILBMTAYKq_kgkrwxrLkJO2m7J2YKio6TFWV8TzwLVcr0BEUu8Y5f47aoybkO5V35ewmCWkmvIfk42BpyRVAx1O7T5J_-G7rtK7GW2osJ8Ho7Q/https%3A%2F%2Fmail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Ffreesurfer

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
https://secure-web.cisco.com/1OrxGESnJasDMCX8Gy49ujB7Y2HMjR6jb8Cq5qabxvZx69eS9KXPL6IZGt7UHUTNzKvbraAtsMwHd1oVWRUXUl0vLZ1rxhtb_VQnshrp7MBK6l_W4z1uwjiWa3CWasVnlvtH0aGeEATLAPDEizcUfWYq6zwEjVVX8Ggv6y0_5FjEpZ9vdE5OfVUmCCdZO6bxVS_D6kscRQX8zM7ehGx3Bw7LljOngN7c43wj-UeubXZGouK7hN4rtfXLJ0NYFUoI7-8LvuB_Cuyi8KvwfcSangQ/https%3A%2F%2Fmail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Ffreesurfer

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is 
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail 
contains patient information, please contact the Mass General Brigham 
Compliance HelpLine at http://www.massgeneralbrigham.org/complianceline . If 
the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, 
please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Please note that this e-mail is not secure (encrypted).  If you do not wish to 
continue communication over unencrypted e-mail, please notify the sender of 
this message immediately.  Continuing to send or respond to e-mail after 
receiving this message means you understand and accept this risk and wish to 
continue to communicate over unencrypted e-mail. 


Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal subfields

2021-08-28 Thread Erik O'Hanlon
External Email - Use Caution

Hi Eugenio

So I ran the new Amygdala and hippocampus tool on my longitudinal data and from 
that I got the three output files as described on the wiki( the FS60, HBT and 
the CA) which these mgz files are in the long mri directories for each subject.

This all looks fine. The issue is that I want to look at the FS 60 version of 
the subfields and export these rather than the HBT versions. When I use the 
script to extract all the measures to a file, it works fine and I have the 
amygdala volumes but for the hippocampus, I get the HBT versions. How do you 
get the extract script to output the FS60 subfield measures?
Is it possible? If not can I simply add the HBT sections for each subfield to 
equate to the FS 60 measures?


Thanks for your prompt reply. Much appreciated

Erik






From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
 on behalf of Iglesias Gonzalez, Juan 
E. 
Sent: Friday 27 August 2021 22:02
To: Freesurfer support list 
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal subfields

Dear Erik
I’m not sure I understand. What does your output file look like?
Cheers,
/Eugenio

Juan Eugenio Iglesias
Senior research fellow
CMIC (UCL), MGH (HMS) and CSAIL (MIT)
http://secure-web.cisco.com/1lOExJeky8AFqkFfrzJ79hMnVWS5jkY1XvPoEM7_fiDyZiO2NCivnLmj1kLuPRm2w88EDcWDJFNg74iZ5sXiGABC3n_oKlQ0uGC_9nPN9HjPWymVUYBrBeTboJSI7XzVHe1kg37ir15P16T7suVpnbFAkPhobCBTQwqWnq4d9hmBt5I1ybk3_w9_yFktbjWWuVl6uJ_6k6IUCsPgYNWjI5LqC-dobHYl3W_y6GhIsiANkJk6bKdBmRwDZDkB7o8lLevPO3On0jPYRQRhL13Rhgg/http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jeiglesias.com

On Aug 27, 2021, at 16:14, Erik O'Hanlon 
mailto:ohanl...@tcd.ie>> wrote:

External Email - Use Caution

External Email - Use Caution

Dear FS experts,



I've run a lognitudinal hippocampal and amygdala analysis. I jave managed to 
extract the amygdala and the head body tail subfields bui I'm wondering how to 
extract the regular FS60 volume measures? I have the three versions (FS60, HBT 
and CA mgz files in my long mri directories but I just keep getting the HBT 
volumes.

I tried


quantifyHAsubregions.sh hippoSf T1.long Outputfilename

and that gives me the HBT measures

What command do I use to pull out the FS60 subfield measures from my long mri 
directories?

Thanks for any help.

Erik
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
https://secure-web.cisco.com/1KpjtWxWHIKAUquh4Uydr2e7YoRAgRF-HVDiv4BqhdUa-0X_RYf1Li44OPUb4fzHZIku_uP_nDzEHktcAlacLIl1hd9lb-vboaoyuevb--4OLvVJY8D-2mPUnYe5D5GgDInCvdRE3Et0ssZlwAYhNcjF7xV5ai2-gfZsXCKvmgILBMTAYKq_kgkrwxrLkJO2m7J2YKio6TFWV8TzwLVcr0BEUu8Y5f47aoybkO5V35ewmCWkmvIfk42BpyRVAx1O7T5J_-G7rtK7GW2osJ8Ho7Q/https%3A%2F%2Fmail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Ffreesurfer

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal subfields

2021-08-27 Thread Iglesias Gonzalez, Juan E.
Dear Erik
I’m not sure I understand. What does your output file look like?
Cheers,
/Eugenio

Juan Eugenio Iglesias
Senior research fellow
CMIC (UCL), MGH (HMS) and CSAIL (MIT)
http://www.jeiglesias.com

On Aug 27, 2021, at 16:14, Erik O'Hanlon 
mailto:ohanl...@tcd.ie>> wrote:

External Email - Use Caution

External Email - Use Caution

Dear FS experts,



I've run a lognitudinal hippocampal and amygdala analysis. I jave managed to 
extract the amygdala and the head body tail subfields bui I'm wondering how to 
extract the regular FS60 volume measures? I have the three versions (FS60, HBT 
and CA mgz files in my long mri directories but I just keep getting the HBT 
volumes.

I tried


quantifyHAsubregions.sh hippoSf T1.long Outputfilename

and that gives me the HBT measures

What command do I use to pull out the FS60 subfield measures from my long mri 
directories?

Thanks for any help.

Erik
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://secure-web.cisco.com/1KpjtWxWHIKAUquh4Uydr2e7YoRAgRF-HVDiv4BqhdUa-0X_RYf1Li44OPUb4fzHZIku_uP_nDzEHktcAlacLIl1hd9lb-vboaoyuevb--4OLvVJY8D-2mPUnYe5D5GgDInCvdRE3Et0ssZlwAYhNcjF7xV5ai2-gfZsXCKvmgILBMTAYKq_kgkrwxrLkJO2m7J2YKio6TFWV8TzwLVcr0BEUu8Y5f47aoybkO5V35ewmCWkmvIfk42BpyRVAx1O7T5J_-G7rtK7GW2osJ8Ho7Q/https%3A%2F%2Fmail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Ffreesurfer

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is 
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail 
contains patient information, please contact the Mass General Brigham 
Compliance HelpLine at http://www.massgeneralbrigham.org/complianceline . If 
the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, 
please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Please note that this e-mail is not secure (encrypted).  If you do not wish to 
continue communication over unencrypted e-mail, please notify the sender of 
this message immediately.  Continuing to send or respond to e-mail after 
receiving this message means you understand and accept this risk and wish to 
continue to communicate over unencrypted e-mail. 


Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal Subfields/ASEG

2021-06-21 Thread Panayiota Ventura
External Email - Use Caution

Hi Philipp,

Thank you very much! This was very helpful!

Best,

Yiota

On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 3:38 PM Saemann, Philipp 
wrote:

> External Email - Use Caution
>
> Hello Yiota,
>
>
> the whole hippocampus value is a sum of all subregions except for the
> hippocampal fissure - best try to reproduce this in an example.
>
>
> The recon-all pipeline also delivers a total hippocampal volume, but it is
> an entity/result of its own and produced independently of
>
> the subfield segmentation. It indirectly also contains areas that in the
> subfield segmentation would go to the fissure.
>
>
> There is several papers out that compared the two, generally the subfield
> based sum value is considered more reliable.
>
>
> Best,
>
> Philipp
>
>
> --
> *Von:* freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <
> freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> im Auftrag von Panayiota Ventura <
> panayiota.vent...@gmail.com>
> *Gesendet:* Montag, 21. Juni 2021 21:27
> *An:* freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> *Betreff:* [Freesurfer] Hippocampal Subfields/ASEG
>
>
> External Email - Use Caution
>
> Hello,
>
> I have a couple of questions concerning the hippocampal subfield
> extractions as well as the hippocampus extraction included in ASEG. I have
> looked around and tried to find as much information as possible about the
> two but I can't seem to find a clear answer. I'm hoping someone can help me
> out with this.
>
> 1. In the hippocampal subfields extraction, one of the labels is called
> "whole hippocampus". I would like to know what exactly is meant by that? In
> other words, what hippocampal regions are included in this "whole
> hippocampus" label?
>
> 2. The ASEG atlas also includes a hippocampus extraction. However this
> value is different from that of the hippocampal subfield extraction. What
> hippocampal regions are being included in this hippocampal extraction.
>
> 3. Which of the two would be a better estimate of hippocampal volume?
>
> Thank you for your time and help!
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Yiota Ventura
>
> ___
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://secure-web.cisco.com/1VaDYO8hN8Hm_MLbUNXDXjwL0rBdB2HHV1ucL36QnxZi5NyQD1ubqUWePGA93f4WZT2zKjQZshGeivpH4ESlRM5RRydav-5_8l7cer5dXNK4qPGtWt422G1JzT-j9oGaamlSbGJM3sUJaMI7hWVgVeqZ0XvRswXKG6wY2TE-0Hvr4QMI2wGU4p-qCxG6kw34C0QzVZvjdSGHXcZGT524sODiFdKQQR5eVEg_qjJK7CLriA21hVBny10c8vSgl9CnBxvi26Swol01DN-sp5zYOIg/https%3A%2F%2Fmail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Ffreesurfer
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal Subfields/ASEG

2021-06-21 Thread Saemann, Philipp
External Email - Use Caution

Hello Yiota,


the whole hippocampus value is a sum of all subregions except for the 
hippocampal fissure - best try to reproduce this in an example.


The recon-all pipeline also delivers a total hippocampal volume, but it is an 
entity/result of its own and produced independently of

the subfield segmentation. It indirectly also contains areas that in the 
subfield segmentation would go to the fissure.


There is several papers out that compared the two, generally the subfield based 
sum value is considered more reliable.


Best,

Philipp



Von: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
 im Auftrag von Panayiota Ventura 

Gesendet: Montag, 21. Juni 2021 21:27
An: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Betreff: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal Subfields/ASEG


External Email - Use Caution

Hello,

I have a couple of questions concerning the hippocampal subfield extractions as 
well as the hippocampus extraction included in ASEG. I have looked around and 
tried to find as much information as possible about the two but I can't seem to 
find a clear answer. I'm hoping someone can help me out with this.

1. In the hippocampal subfields extraction, one of the labels is called "whole 
hippocampus". I would like to know what exactly is meant by that? In other 
words, what hippocampal regions are included in this "whole hippocampus" label?

2. The ASEG atlas also includes a hippocampus extraction. However this value is 
different from that of the hippocampal subfield extraction. What hippocampal 
regions are being included in this hippocampal extraction.

3. Which of the two would be a better estimate of hippocampal volume?

Thank you for your time and help!

Kind regards,

Yiota Ventura

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal Subfields error "no such file or directory"/"dyld library not loaded"

2021-06-12 Thread Chester Kang
External Email - Use Caution

Hi Eugenio,

Yes, Matlab runtime had already been installed.

Copying initial description of checks/troubleshooting already done so far,
"...
> Things that have been checked/tried or troubleshooting attempted:
>  - SIP protection is disabled (csrutil status shows "disabled")
>  - Checked that there are files and correct permissions in the "lib/gcc/lib"
> and the "MCRv84" folders
>  - tried to unset DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH (in the SetUpFreeSurfer.sh)
>  - checked the DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH value and run a step directly (both with ""
> empty value and the values below)
..."

Hope to that helps!


Regards,
Chester


--

Message: 4
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2021 11:43:21 +
From: "Iglesias Gonzalez, Juan E." 
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal Subfields error "no such file or
directory"/"dyld library not loaded"
To: Freesurfer support list 
Message-ID: 
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Thanks, Chester, that looks good. Am I safely assuming that the Matlab runtime 
has been installed?
Cheers,
/Eugenio

> On 10 Jun 2021, at 21:31, Chester Kang  wrote:
>
>External Email - Use Caution
>
> Hi Eugenio,
>
> The command that was run is segmentHA_T1.sh.
>
> I've rerun and copy-n-pasted the entire session below.
>
> "...
>
> chesterk@selma:~$ source SetUpFreeSurfer_mac.sh
>  freesurfer-darwin-macOS-7.1.0-20200511-813297b 
> Setting up environment for FreeSurfer/FS-FAST (and FSL)
> FREESURFER_HOME   /Applications/freesurfer_v7.1.0
> FSFAST_HOME   /Applications/freesurfer_v7.1.0/fsfast
> FSF_OUTPUT_FORMAT nii.gz
> SUBJECTS_DIR  /Users/chesterk/subjects
> MNI_DIR   /Applications/freesurfer_v7.1.0/mni
> FSL_DIR   /usr/local/fsl_v6.0.4
> chesterk@selma:~$ cd subjects
> chesterk@selma:~/subjects$ segmentHA_T1.sh 1001126copy
> #
> #@# Hippocampal Subfields processing (T1) left Fri 11 Jun 2021 11:25:12
> AEST
> --
> Setting up environment variables
> ---
> DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH is
> .:/Applications/freesurfer_v7.1.0/MCRv84//runtime/maci64:/Applications/free
> surfer_v7.1.0/MCRv84//bin/maci64:/Applications/freesurfer_v7.1.0/MCRv84//sy
> s/os/maci64:/Applications/freesurfer_v7.1.0/lib/gcc/lib:/Applications/frees
> urfer_v7.1.0/lib/gcc/lib:/Applications/freesurfer_v7.1.0/lib/gcc/lib
> /Applications/freesurfer_v7.1.0/bin/run_segmentSubjectT1_autoEstimateAlveus
> ML.sh: line 33:
> /Applications/freesurfer_v7.1.0/bin/segmentSubjectT1_autoEstimateAlveusML.a
> pp/Contents/MacOS/segmentSubjectT1_autoEstimateAlveusML: No such file or
> directory
> Darwin selma.nnf.unimelb.edu.au 17.4.0 Darwin Kernel Version 17.4.0: Tue
> Dec 19 10:52:05 PST 2017; root:xnu-4570.47.16~1/RELEASE_X86_64 x86_64
>
>
> T1 hippocampal subfields exited with ERRORS at Fri 11 Jun 2021 11:25:12
> AEST
>
>
> For more details, see the log file
> /Users/chesterk/subjects/1001126copy/scripts/hippocampal-subfields-T1.log
>
>
> chesterk@selma:~/subjects$ more
> 1001126copy/scripts/hippocampal-subfields-T1.log
> --
> USER chesterk
> HOST selma.nnf.unimelb.edu.au
> PROCESSID 37954
> PROCESSOR x86_64
> OS Darwin
> ITK_GLOBAL_DEFAULT_NUMBER_OF_THREADS 1
> Darwin selma.nnf.unimelb.edu.au 17.4.0 Darwin Kernel Version 17.4.0: Tue
> Dec 19 10:52:05 PST 2017; root:xnu-4570.47.16~1/RELEASE_X86_64 x86_64
> --
>
> freesurfer-darwin-macOS-7.1.0-20200511-813297b
>
> setenv SUBJECTS_DIR /Users/chesterk/subjects
> cd /Users/chesterk/subjects
> /Applications/freesurfer_v7.1.0/bin/segmentHA_T1.sh 1001126copy
>
>
> #
> #@# Hippocampal Subfields processing (T1) left Fri 11 Jun 2021 11:25:12
> AEST
> --
> Setting up environment variables
> ---
> DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH is
> .:/Applications/freesurfer_v7.1.0/MCRv84//runtime/maci64:/Applications/free
> surfer_v7.1.0/MCRv84//bin/maci64:/Applications/freesurfer_v7.1.0/MCRv84//sy
> s/os/maci64:/Applications/freesurfer_v7.1.0/lib/gcc/lib:/Applications/frees
> urfer_v7.1.0/lib/gcc/lib:/Applications/freesurfer_v7.1.0/lib/gcc/lib
> /Applications/freesurfer_v7.1.0/bin/run_segmentSubjectT1_autoEstimateAlveus
> ML.sh: line 33:
> /Applications/freesurfer_v7.1.0/bin/segmentSubjectT1_autoEstimateAlveusML.a
> pp/Contents/MacOS/segmentSubjectT1_autoEstimateAlveusML: No such file or
> directory
> Darwin selma.nnf.unimelb.edu.au 17.4.0 Darwin Kernel Version 17.4.0: Tue
> Dec 19 10:52:05 PST 2017; root:xnu-4570.47.16~1/RELEASE_X86_64 x86_64

Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal Subfields error "no such file or directory"/"dyld library not loaded"

2021-06-11 Thread Iglesias Gonzalez, Juan E.
A%2F%2Fmail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Ffreesurfer
>> .mgh.harvard.edu
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>  freesurfer-requ...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>> 
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>>  freesurfer-ow...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>> 
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of Freesurfer digest..."
>> 
>> 
>> Today's Topics:
>> 
>>  1. Re: Hippocampal Subfields error "no such file or
>> directory"/"dyld library not loaded" (Iglesias Gonzalez, Juan E.)
>>  2. Ill-Conditioned/Badly Scaled Matrix Error (Lurie, Lucy)
>>  3. LGI FS 7.1 (Del Re, Elisabetta)
>>  4. mri_glmfit with pvr (std...@virgilio.it)
>>  5. Re: FW:  WM or Pial edits to correct surfaces (Fischl, Bruce)
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> 
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2021 12:24:19 +
>> From: "Iglesias Gonzalez, Juan E." 
>> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal Subfields error "no such file or
>>  directory"/"dyld library not loaded"
>> To: Freesurfer support list 
>> Message-ID: <8419d11c-c916-4249-9983-557a25229...@mgh.harvard.edu>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>> 
>> Dear Chester,
>> What command did you exactly run? There seems to be a mix of T1 and
>> T1+additionalMRI segmentation commands in there.
>> Cheers,
>> /Eugenio
>> 
>> Juan Eugenio Iglesias
>> Senior research fellow
>> CMIC (UCL), MGH (HMS) and CSAIL (MIT)
>> http://secure-web.cisco.com/1qi_706jGqyyM3M3yDYUokzl_m0IkJHWaqcVYgXiltKvmf2sZt9X-pyYSQmncbstu3rICy2Z7fHggRXk-aKCs7Fr-HTjpj0zQ6tCKLBMJ8qQlxpHWzL3Pl8OR-xTpN-F23znGzhgWE7K9yMHxIKC4JDu_uhiU4UqXswGp7DW6ImpICnIp2rAN9sjKc2johSTK9aRjCmaxJgCb5oKn4sJyy6IbRQBmyVceflyPgKIXagCBaIcBUNYGwHkmdx9RCUleJuy7MjerHcAPxmXS2QZAAA/http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jeiglesias.com
>> s.com 
>> 
>>> On Jun 9, 2021, at 00:23, Chester Kang  wrote:
>>> 
>>>   External Email - Use Caution
>>> 
>>> Hello FreeSurfer Developers,
>>> 
>>> I am trying to run subfield segmentation of the hippocampus using
>>> Freesurfer v7.1.0. Recon-all has been previously run on all subjects,
>>> however with a different version of Freesurfer (v5.3.0).
>>> 
>>> Getting the error(s): "No such file or directory" and on further
>>> investigation "dyld: Library not loaded: @rpath/libmwlaunchermain.dylib"
>>> 
>>> I've searched the archive but could not find a solution.
>>> 
>>> Could someone please help?
>>> 
>>> Below are details of the system and unsuccessful troubleshooting
>>> attempts.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Chester
>>> 
>>> 
>>> FreeSurfer version: 7.1.0
>>> Platform: Mac OS 10.13.3
>>> hippocampal-subfields-T1.log is below:
>>> 
>>> Things that have been checked/tried or troubleshooting attempted:
>>> - SIP protection is disabled (csrutil status shows "disabled")
>>> - Checked that there are files and correct permissions in the
>>> "lib/gcc/lib" and the "MCRv84" folders
>>> - tried to unset DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH (in the SetUpFreeSurfer.sh)
>>> - checked the DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH value and run a step directly (both
>>> with "" empty value and the values below)
>>> 
>>> $ echo $DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH
>>> 
>>> 
>>> .:/Applications/freesurfer_v7.1.0/MCRv84//runtime/maci64:/Applications/fr
>>> eesurfer_v7.1.0/MCRv84//sys/os/maci64:/Applications/freesurfer_v7.1.0/lib
>>> /gcc/lib
>>> 
>>> $ 
>>> /Applications/freesurfer_v7.1.0/bin/segmentSubjectT1T2_autoEstimateAlveus
>>> ML.app/Contents/MacOS/segmentSubjectT1T2_autoEstimateAlveusML
>>> 
>>> 
>>> /Applications/freesurfer_v7.1.0/bin/segmentSubjectT1T2_autoEstimateAlveus
>>> ML.app/Contents/MacOS/segmentSubjectT1T2_autoEstimateAlveusML
>>> dyld: Library not loaded: @rpath/libmwlaunchermain.dylib
>>> Referenced from:
>>> /Applications/freesurfer_v7.1.0/bin/segmentSubjectT1T2_autoEstimateAlveus
>>> ML.app/Contents/MacOS/segmentSubjectT1T2_autoEstimateAlveusML
>>> Reason: image not found
>>> Abort trap: 6
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> === hippocampal-subfields-T1.log ===
>>> 
>>> 
>>> "...
>>> ---

Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal Subfields error "no such file or directory"/"dyld library not loaded"

2021-06-10 Thread Chester Kang
Re: FW:  WM or Pial edits to correct surfaces (Fischl, Bruce)
>
>
>------------------
>
>Message: 1
>Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2021 12:24:19 +
>From: "Iglesias Gonzalez, Juan E." 
>Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal Subfields error "no such file or
>   directory"/"dyld library not loaded"
>To: Freesurfer support list 
>Message-ID: <8419d11c-c916-4249-9983-557a25229...@mgh.harvard.edu>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
>Dear Chester,
>What command did you exactly run? There seems to be a mix of T1 and
>T1+additionalMRI segmentation commands in there.
>Cheers,
>/Eugenio
>
>Juan Eugenio Iglesias
>Senior research fellow
>CMIC (UCL), MGH (HMS) and CSAIL (MIT)
>http://secure-web.cisco.com/1qi_706jGqyyM3M3yDYUokzl_m0IkJHWaqcVYgXiltKvmf2sZt9X-pyYSQmncbstu3rICy2Z7fHggRXk-aKCs7Fr-HTjpj0zQ6tCKLBMJ8qQlxpHWzL3Pl8OR-xTpN-F23znGzhgWE7K9yMHxIKC4JDu_uhiU4UqXswGp7DW6ImpICnIp2rAN9sjKc2johSTK9aRjCmaxJgCb5oKn4sJyy6IbRQBmyVceflyPgKIXagCBaIcBUNYGwHkmdx9RCUleJuy7MjerHcAPxmXS2QZAAA/http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jeiglesias.com
>s.com 
>
>> On Jun 9, 2021, at 00:23, Chester Kang  wrote:
>> 
>>External Email - Use Caution
>> 
>> Hello FreeSurfer Developers,
>> 
>> I am trying to run subfield segmentation of the hippocampus using
>>Freesurfer v7.1.0. Recon-all has been previously run on all subjects,
>>however with a different version of Freesurfer (v5.3.0).
>> 
>> Getting the error(s): "No such file or directory" and on further
>>investigation "dyld: Library not loaded: @rpath/libmwlaunchermain.dylib"
>> 
>> I've searched the archive but could not find a solution.
>> 
>> Could someone please help?
>> 
>> Below are details of the system and unsuccessful troubleshooting
>>attempts.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Chester
>> 
>> 
>> FreeSurfer version: 7.1.0
>> Platform: Mac OS 10.13.3
>> hippocampal-subfields-T1.log is below:
>> 
>> Things that have been checked/tried or troubleshooting attempted:
>> - SIP protection is disabled (csrutil status shows "disabled")
>> - Checked that there are files and correct permissions in the
>>"lib/gcc/lib" and the "MCRv84" folders
>> - tried to unset DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH (in the SetUpFreeSurfer.sh)
>> - checked the DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH value and run a step directly (both
>>with "" empty value and the values below)
>> 
>> $ echo $DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH
>> 
>> 
>>.:/Applications/freesurfer_v7.1.0/MCRv84//runtime/maci64:/Applications/fr
>>eesurfer_v7.1.0/MCRv84//sys/os/maci64:/Applications/freesurfer_v7.1.0/lib
>>/gcc/lib
>> 
>> $ 
>>/Applications/freesurfer_v7.1.0/bin/segmentSubjectT1T2_autoEstimateAlveus
>>ML.app/Contents/MacOS/segmentSubjectT1T2_autoEstimateAlveusML
>> 
>> 
>>/Applications/freesurfer_v7.1.0/bin/segmentSubjectT1T2_autoEstimateAlveus
>>ML.app/Contents/MacOS/segmentSubjectT1T2_autoEstimateAlveusML
>> dyld: Library not loaded: @rpath/libmwlaunchermain.dylib
>>  Referenced from:
>>/Applications/freesurfer_v7.1.0/bin/segmentSubjectT1T2_autoEstimateAlveus
>>ML.app/Contents/MacOS/segmentSubjectT1T2_autoEstimateAlveusML
>>  Reason: image not found
>> Abort trap: 6
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> === hippocampal-subfields-T1.log ===
>> 
>> 
>> "...
>> --
>> USER chester
>> HOST selma.nnf.unimelb.edu.au
>> PROCESSID 17656 
>> PROCESSOR x86_64
>> OS Darwin
>> ITK_GLOBAL_DEFAULT_NUMBER_OF_THREADS 1
>> Darwin selma.nnf.unimelb.edu.au 17.4.0 Darwin Kernel Version 17.4.0:
>>Tue Dec 19 10:52:05 PST 2017; root:xnu-4570.47.16~1/RELEASE_X86_64 x86_64
>> --
>> 
>> freesurfer-darwin-macOS-7.1.0-20200511-813297b
>> 
>> setenv SUBJECTS_DIR /data/netapp02/work/chester/global_pass_all
>> cd /data/netapp02/work/chester/global_pass_all
>> /Applications/freesurfer_v7.1.0/bin/segmentHA_T1.sh 1002310
>> 
>> #
>> #@# Hippocampal Subfields processing (T1) left Tue  8 Jun 2021 15:25:15
>>AEST
>> --
>> Setting up environment variables
>> ---
>> DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH is
>>.:/Applications/freesurfer_v7.1.0/MCRv84//runtime/maci64:/Applications/fr
>>eesurfer_v7.1.0/MCRv84//bin/maci64:/Applications/freesurfer_v7.1.0/MCRv84
>>//sys/os/maci64:/Applications/freesurfer_v7.1.0/lib/gcc/lib
>> 
>>/Applications/freesurfer_v7.1.0/bin/run_segmentSubjec

Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal Subfields error "no such file or directory"/"dyld library not loaded"

2021-06-09 Thread Iglesias Gonzalez, Juan E.
Dear Chester,
What command did you exactly run? There seems to be a mix of T1 and 
T1+additionalMRI segmentation commands in there.
Cheers,
/Eugenio

Juan Eugenio Iglesias
Senior research fellow
CMIC (UCL), MGH (HMS) and CSAIL (MIT)
http://www.jeiglesias.com 

> On Jun 9, 2021, at 00:23, Chester Kang  wrote:
> 
>External Email - Use Caution
> 
> Hello FreeSurfer Developers,
> 
> I am trying to run subfield segmentation of the hippocampus using Freesurfer 
> v7.1.0. Recon-all has been previously run on all subjects, however with a 
> different version of Freesurfer (v5.3.0). 
> 
> Getting the error(s): "No such file or directory" and on further 
> investigation "dyld: Library not loaded: @rpath/libmwlaunchermain.dylib"
> 
> I've searched the archive but could not find a solution.  
> 
> Could someone please help?
> 
> Below are details of the system and unsuccessful troubleshooting attempts.
> 
> Regards,
> Chester
> 
> 
> FreeSurfer version: 7.1.0
> Platform: Mac OS 10.13.3
> hippocampal-subfields-T1.log is below:
> 
> Things that have been checked/tried or troubleshooting attempted:
> - SIP protection is disabled (csrutil status shows "disabled")
> - Checked that there are files and correct permissions in the "lib/gcc/lib" 
> and the "MCRv84" folders
> - tried to unset DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH (in the SetUpFreeSurfer.sh)
> - checked the DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH value and run a step directly (both with "" 
> empty value and the values below)
> 
> $ echo $DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH
> 
> .:/Applications/freesurfer_v7.1.0/MCRv84//runtime/maci64:/Applications/freesurfer_v7.1.0/MCRv84//sys/os/maci64:/Applications/freesurfer_v7.1.0/lib/gcc/lib
> 
> $ 
> /Applications/freesurfer_v7.1.0/bin/segmentSubjectT1T2_autoEstimateAlveusML.app/Contents/MacOS/segmentSubjectT1T2_autoEstimateAlveusML
> 
> /Applications/freesurfer_v7.1.0/bin/segmentSubjectT1T2_autoEstimateAlveusML.app/Contents/MacOS/segmentSubjectT1T2_autoEstimateAlveusML
>  
> dyld: Library not loaded: @rpath/libmwlaunchermain.dylib
>  Referenced from: 
> /Applications/freesurfer_v7.1.0/bin/segmentSubjectT1T2_autoEstimateAlveusML.app/Contents/MacOS/segmentSubjectT1T2_autoEstimateAlveusML
>  Reason: image not found
> Abort trap: 6
> 
> 
> 
> === hippocampal-subfields-T1.log ===
> 
> 
> "...
> --
> USER chester
> HOST selma.nnf.unimelb.edu.au
> PROCESSID 17656 
> PROCESSOR x86_64
> OS Darwin
> ITK_GLOBAL_DEFAULT_NUMBER_OF_THREADS 1 
> Darwin selma.nnf.unimelb.edu.au 17.4.0 Darwin Kernel Version 17.4.0: Tue Dec 
> 19 10:52:05 PST 2017; root:xnu-4570.47.16~1/RELEASE_X86_64 x86_64
> --
> 
> freesurfer-darwin-macOS-7.1.0-20200511-813297b
> 
> setenv SUBJECTS_DIR /data/netapp02/work/chester/global_pass_all
> cd /data/netapp02/work/chester/global_pass_all
> /Applications/freesurfer_v7.1.0/bin/segmentHA_T1.sh 1002310
> 
> #
> #@# Hippocampal Subfields processing (T1) left Tue  8 Jun 2021 15:25:15 AEST
> --
> Setting up environment variables
> ---
> DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH is 
> .:/Applications/freesurfer_v7.1.0/MCRv84//runtime/maci64:/Applications/freesurfer_v7.1.0/MCRv84//bin/maci64:/Applications/freesurfer_v7.1.0/MCRv84//sys/os/maci64:/Applications/freesurfer_v7.1.0/lib/gcc/lib
> /Applications/freesurfer_v7.1.0/bin/run_segmentSubjectT1_autoEstimateAlveusML.sh:
>  line 33: 
> /Applications/freesurfer_v7.1.0/bin/segmentSubjectT1_autoEstimateAlveusML.app/Contents/MacOS/segmentSubjectT1_autoEstimateAlveusML:
>  No such file or directory
> Darwin selma.nnf.unimelb.edu.au 17.4.0 Darwin Kernel Version 17.4.0: Tue Dec 
> 19 10:52:05 PST 2017; root:xnu-4570.47.16~1/RELEASE_X86_64 x86_64
> 
> T1 hippocampal subfields exited with ERRORS at Tue  8 Jun 2021 15:25:16 AEST
> 
> ..."
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is 
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail 
contains patient information, please contact the Mass General Brigham 
Compliance HelpLine at http://www.massgeneralbrigham.org/complianceline . If 
the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, 
please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
Please note that this e-mail is not secure (encrypted).  If you do not wish to 
continue communication over unencrypted e-mail, please notify the sender of 
this message immediately.  Continuing to send or respond to e-mail after 
receiving this message means you understand and accept this risk and wish to 
continue to communicate over unencrypted e-mail. 



Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal Subfields

2021-04-22 Thread Jindal, Saurabh
External Email - Use Caution

Do we have an editing criteria for hippocampal inclusion/exclusion error in 
recon_all and in subfields?

Best,
Saurabh

From: Jindal, Saurabh 
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2021 2:03 PM
To: Freesurfer support list 
Subject: Re: Hippocampal Subfields

Okay, Thank you very much Philipp.


Best,
Saurabh


From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
 on behalf of Saemann, Philipp 

Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2021 2:01 PM
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal Subfields


* External Email - Caution *

External Email - Use Caution

Hi Saurabh,


you have to run (and QC) recon-all before,


Best,

Philipp



Von: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
 im Auftrag von Jindal, Saurabh 

Gesendet: Donnerstag, 22. April 2021 20:55
An: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Betreff: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal Subfields


External Email - Use Caution

Hi experts,

I am focusing on hippocampus for my work using subfield analysis on freesurfer 
7.1. Is there is way to run the container only for subfields or do we have to 
run recon_all on the subject first always? Thanks.

Saurabh
Postdoc Research Fellow





The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected Healthcare 
Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are not the 
intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying 
or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is 
strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please 
immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail.


The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected Healthcare 
Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are not the 
intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying 
or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is 
strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please 
immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail.
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal Subfields

2021-04-22 Thread Jindal, Saurabh
External Email - Use Caution

Okay, Thank you very much Philipp.


Best,
Saurabh


From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
 on behalf of Saemann, Philipp 

Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2021 2:01 PM
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal Subfields


* External Email - Caution *

External Email - Use Caution

Hi Saurabh,


you have to run (and QC) recon-all before,


Best,

Philipp



Von: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
 im Auftrag von Jindal, Saurabh 

Gesendet: Donnerstag, 22. April 2021 20:55
An: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Betreff: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal Subfields


External Email - Use Caution

Hi experts,

I am focusing on hippocampus for my work using subfield analysis on freesurfer 
7.1. Is there is way to run the container only for subfields or do we have to 
run recon_all on the subject first always? Thanks.

Saurabh
Postdoc Research Fellow





The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected Healthcare 
Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are not the 
intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying 
or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is 
strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please 
immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail.


The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected Healthcare 
Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are not the 
intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying 
or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is 
strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please 
immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail.
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal Subfields

2021-04-22 Thread Saemann, Philipp
External Email - Use Caution

Hi Saurabh,


you have to run (and QC) recon-all before,


Best,

Philipp



Von: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
 im Auftrag von Jindal, Saurabh 

Gesendet: Donnerstag, 22. April 2021 20:55
An: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Betreff: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal Subfields


External Email - Use Caution

Hi experts,

I am focusing on hippocampus for my work using subfield analysis on freesurfer 
7.1. Is there is way to run the container only for subfields or do we have to 
run recon_all on the subject first always? Thanks.

Saurabh
Postdoc Research Fellow


The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected Healthcare 
Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are not the 
intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying 
or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is 
strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please 
immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail.
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal Subfields Segmentation Violation-error

2021-03-27 Thread Hoopes, Andrew
Matt (cc’d) has recently posted a similar error on the last. Unfortunately, 
these mac MCR errors are difficult to debug. You could wait for the python 
subfield port to get released, but that might be a few months down the line. If 
you want to get things running immediately, one thing to try is to download the 
7.1 docker container from https://hub.docker.com/r/freesurfer/freesurfer and 
run FS through that. That should fix any system-specific problems.

Best
Andrew

From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
 on behalf of Ramtilak Gattu 

Date: Thursday, March 25, 2021 at 7:20 PM
To: fsbuild , freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 

Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal Subfields Segmentation Violation-error

External Email - Use Caution

External Email - Use Caution
Hi 'E' / 'R',

I even tried changing the resolution to 1.0 with no success ruling put memory 
issues.

Just wondering if its time to give up and wait for your python build to 
successfully finish the job in mac. I wonder if any other user with a similar 
MacBook pro configuration as mine
Hardware Overview:

  Model Name: MacBook Pro
  Model Identifier: MacBookPro16,1
  Processor Name: 6-Core Intel Core i7
  Processor Speed: 2.6 GHz
  Number of Processors: 1
  Total Number of Cores: 6
  L2 Cache (per Core): 256 KB
  L3 Cache: 12 MB
  Hyper-Threading Technology: Enabled
  Memory: 16 GB
  System Firmware Version: 1554.80.3.0.0 (iBridge: 18.16.14347.0.0,0)
  Serial Number (system): C02DPB3BMD6M
  Hardware UUID: D313516B-A3B9-500F-9303-EB0F4D4946A4
  Provisioning UDID: D313516B-A3B9-500F-9303-EB0F4D4946A4
  Activation Lock Status: Enabled

had successfully finished the processing or encountered the same issue and 
later fixed it to successfully run the segmentation. Is there a way to bypass 
that step and run the program till the end?

I think some Compatability issues with 'MCR' holding back the processing at 
that stage.

Again, thanks a lot for all your help in this regards.

Regards
Tilak

From: Ramtilak Gattu 
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2021 8:32 PM
To: fsbuild ; freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 

Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal Subfields Segmentation Violation-error

First let me thank you 'R' and 'E' for being so patient and working with me to 
resolve this issue.

As suggested by 'R' I monitored the activity monitored but unfortunately, the 
memory pressure graph remained green throughout the process. When the program 
was running memory usage jumped from 6.25gb to 7.85 gb.

As suggeted by 'E" I even tried to run the code by changing the parameters in 
the code for


set RESOLUTION="0.".

by:

set RESOLUTION="0.5";

still, the error persists.

It works fine on my Linux centos system(8gb ram) but fails on both the macs. 
surprisingly, it's the same exact error.

Does running the routine after installing full matlab instead of just mcr8.4 
would help? just a thought.

Thanks

Regards
Tilak


From: fsbuild 
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2021 5:09 AM
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
Cc: Ramtilak Gattu 
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal Subfields Segmentation Violation-error

I don’t see anything in your output showing say code 01 with Bus Error.  But 
code 01 could indicate a memory issue, e.g., not enough RAM.

You could bring up the Activity Monitor program and click on the memory tab to 
profile memory during the command run.  But the "memory pressure" graph does 
not go back very far in time, so you would need to be able to see it close to 
the time the command exits. See  
https://www.lifewire.com/use-activity-monitor-to-track-mac-memory-usage-2260880

- R.


On Mar 24, 2021, at 04:26, Ramtilak Gattu  wrote:

External Email - Use Caution
External Email - Use Caution
Yes it says enabled.

[tilak:~] tilak% csrutil status
System Integrity Protection status: enabled.

Thanks

Regards,
Tilak

From: fsbuild mailto:fsbu...@contbay.com>>
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2021 4:22 AM
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> 
mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>
Cc: Ramtilak Gattu mailto:rg...@med.wayne.edu>>
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal Subfields Segmentation Violation-error

Maybe you could let us know if the system integrity protection feature is 
turned on the Mac (which is the default).  The following command will report if 
it is enabled or disabled, e.g., when enabled,

$ csrutil status
System Integrity Protection status: enabled.
- R.

On Mar 24, 2021, at 01:48, Ramtilak Gattu  wrote:

External Email - Use Caution
External Email - Use Caution
Hi,

Earlier I didnt have a full matlab verion but I installed mcr by running 
"fs_install_mcr R2014b" as suggested in FSwiki.

I updated jav

Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal Subfields Segmentation Violation-error

2021-03-24 Thread Iglesias Gonzalez, Juan E.
Thank you both! On Linux, 8GB is insufficient, and 16GB is normally 
sufficient; I wonder if the requirements are a bit higher on MAC?

Could you please try the following?

  1.  Edit $FREESURFER_HOME/bin/segmentHA_T1.sh (might require sudo)
  2.  Replace the line:
set RESOLUTION="0.";
by:
set RESOLUTION="0.5";
  3.  Rerunning the code, and see if it runs to completion?
Cheers,
/E


Juan Eugenio Iglesias
Senior research fellow
CMIC (UCL), MGH (HMS) and CSAIL (MIT)
http://www.jeiglesias.com



From:  on behalf of Ramtilak Gattu 

Reply-To: Freesurfer support list 
Date: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 at 17:46
To: "freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu" 
Subject: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal Subfields Segmentation Violation-error


External Email - Use Caution

External Email - Use Caution
Hi,

I am also encountering the same issue as WON JONG CHWA on my macbook pro (16gb 
ram) and I even tried the same on imac (8gb ram). I ran recon-all successfully 
on both systems. Here are my system details


Hardware Overview:



  Model Name: MacBook Pro

  Model Identifier: MacBookPro16,1

  Processor Name: 6-Core Intel Core i7

  Processor Speed: 2.6 GHz

  Number of Processors: 1

  Total Number of Cores: 6

  L2 Cache (per Core): 256 KB

  L3 Cache: 12 MB

  Hyper-Threading Technology: Enabled

  Memory: 16 GB

  System Firmware Version: 1554.80.3.0.0 (iBridge: 18.16.14347.0.0,0)

  Serial Number (system): C02DPB3BMD6M

  Hardware UUID: D313516B-A3B9-500F-9303-EB0F4D4946A4

  Provisioning UDID: D313516B-A3B9-500F-9303-EB0F4D4946A4

  Activation Lock Status: Enabled



Here is the log for segmentation violation error
***
Fitting mesh to image data took 742.9022 seconds
Transforming points
Transforming points
Wrote image to file image.mgz
Constructing image-to-world transform from header information (asmr1.mgz)
Constructing image-to-world transform from header information 
(/Users/tilak/Desktop/Work/CNS_cases/Hipps/AD/tmp/hippoSF_T1_v21_left/imageDump.mgz)
Wrote image to file asmr2.mgz
This file does not contain MRI parameters
Caught unexpected exception of unknown type.


   Segmentation violation detected at Tue Mar 23 15:53:07 2021


Configuration:
  Crash Decoding : Disabled
  Current Visual : Quartz
  Default Encoding   : ISO-8859-1
  MATLAB Architecture: maci64
  MATLAB Root: /Applications/freesurfer/7.1.1/MCRv84
  MATLAB Version : 8.4.0.150421 (R2014b)
  Operating System   : Darwin 20.3.0 Darwin Kernel Version 20.3.0: Thu Jan 21 
00:07:06 PST 2021; root:xnu-7195.81.3~1/RELEASE_X86_64 x86_64
  Processor ID   : x86 Family 6 Model 158 Stepping 10, GenuineIntel
  Software OpenGL: 0
  Virtual Machine: Java 1.7.0_55-b13 with Oracle Corporation Java 
HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM mixed mode
  Window System  : Quartz

Fault Count: 1


Abnormal termination:
Segmentation violation

Register State (from fault):
  RAX = 0003  RBX = 000102cde080
  RCX = 7ff4ce00  RDX = 7624c180
  RSP = 7ff4ce00  RBP = 7fff2041595e
  RSI = 7000  RDI = 7fff204171f9

   R8 = 660333a0   R9 = 7624c180
  R10 = 7fff20410002  R11 = 7ff4ce05b4e0
  R12 = 7624c498  R13 = 
  R14 = 00010e5fbd9b  R15 = 0060

  RIP = 7624c498  RFL = 7624c1e0

   CS = 00010e49227b   FS = 7624c1c0   GS = 0001

Stack Trace (from fault):
[  0] 0x0001048a9e64 
/Applications/freesurfer/7.1.1/MCRv84/bin/maci64/libmwfl.dylib+00028260 
_ZN2fl4diag15stacktrace_base7captureERKNS0_14thread_contextEm+0052
[  1] 0x0001048ada2a 
/Applications/freesurfer/7.1.1/MCRv84/bin/maci64/libmwfl.dylib+00043562 
_ZN2fl4test17terminate_handledEv+0906
[  2] 0x0001048ad477 
/Applications/freesurfer/7.1.1/MCRv84/bin/maci64/libmwfl.dylib+00042103 
_ZN2fl4diag13terminate_logEPKcPK17__darwin_ucontext+0119
[  3] 0x000107e39b7a 
/Applications/freesurfer/7.1.1/MCRv84/bin/maci64/libmwmcr.dylib+00387962 
_Z32mnRunPathDependentInitializationv+3146
[  4] 0x000107e39e58 
/Applications/freesurfer/7.1.1/MCRv84/bin/maci64/libmwmcr.dylib+00388696 
_Z32mnRunPathDependentInitializationv+3880
[  5] 0x000107e37733 
/Applications/freesurfer/7.1.1/MCRv84/bin/maci64/libmwmcr.dylib+00378675 
mnFatalSignalHandler+0275
[  6] 0x7fff20630d7d   
/usr/lib/system/libsystem_platform.dylib+00015741 _sigtramp+0029
[  7] 0x   
+
[  8] 0x00010e49227b 
/Applications/freesurfer/7.1.1/MCRv84/bin/maci64/libmwm_interpreter.dylib+01782395
 _Z10inRunMfileiPP11mxArray_tagiS1_P6Mfh_mpP15inWorkSpace_tag+00010667
[  9] 0x00010e3eba17 
/Applications/freesurfer/7.1.1/MCRv84/bin/maci64/libmwm_interpret

Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal Subfields Segmentation Violation-error

2021-03-24 Thread Ramtilak Gattu
External Email - Use Caution

Yes it says enabled.


[tilak:~] tilak% csrutil status

System Integrity Protection status: enabled.

Thanks

Regards,
Tilak

From: fsbuild 
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2021 4:22 AM
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
Cc: Ramtilak Gattu 
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal Subfields Segmentation Violation-error

Maybe you could let us know if the system integrity protection feature is 
turned on the Mac (which is the default).  The following command will report if 
it is enabled or disabled, e.g., when enabled,

$ csrutil status
System Integrity Protection status: enabled.

- R.
On Mar 24, 2021, at 01:48, Ramtilak Gattu  wrote:

External Email - Use Caution
External Email - Use Caution
Hi,

Earlier I didnt have a full matlab verion but I installed mcr by running 
"fs_install_mcr R2014b" as suggested in FSwiki.

I updated java to version "1.8.0_281" (Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 
1.8.0_281-b09) Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.281-b09, mixed mode) 
and reinstalled or overwritten mcrv8.4 by running the same command again 
"fs_install_mcr R2014b" but still it ended after running for a whileand exited 
with errors again. But this time it says "Bus error detected instead of 
segmentation violation error.

Bus error detected at Wed Mar 24 00:59:58 2021


Configuration:
  Crash Decoding : Disabled
  Current Visual : Quartz
  Default Encoding   : ISO-8859-1
  MATLAB Architecture: maci64
  MATLAB Root: /Applications/freesurfer/7.1.1/MCRv84
  MATLAB Version : 8.4.0.150421 (R2014b)
  Operating System   : Darwin 20.3.0 Darwin Kernel Version 20.3.0: Thu Jan 21 
00:07:06 PST 2021; root:xnu-7195.81.3~1/RELEASE_X86_64 x86_64
  Processor ID   : x86 Family 6 Model 158 Stepping 10, GenuineIntel
  Software OpenGL: 0
  Virtual Machine: Java 1.7.0_55-b13 with Oracle Corporation Java 
HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM mixed mode
  Window System  : Quartz

Fault Count: 1


Abnormal termination:
Bus error

Register State (from fault):
  RAX = 0003  RBX = 00010145d080
  RCX = 7fdc9c70  RDX = 7959f180
  RSP = 7fdc9c70  RBP = 7fff2027d95e
  RSI = 7000  RDI = 7fff2027f1f9

   R8 = 70c054b0   R9 = 7959f180
  R10 = 7fff20270002  R11 = 7fdc9c7429e0
  R12 = 7959f498  R13 = 
  R14 = 00010f061d9b  R15 = 0060

  RIP = 7959f498  RFL = 7959f1e0

   CS = 00010eef827b   FS = 7959f1c0   GS = 0001

Stack Trace (from fault):
[  0] 0x0001036a0e64 
/Applications/freesurfer/7.1.1/MCRv84/bin/maci64/libmwfl.dylib+00028260 
_ZN2fl4diag15stacktrace_base7captureERKNS0_14thread_contextEm+0052
[  1] 0x0001036a4a2a 
/Applications/freesurfer/7.1.1/MCRv84/bin/maci64/libmwfl.dylib+00043562 
_ZN2fl4test17terminate_handledEv+0906
[  2] 0x0001036a4477 
/Applications/freesurfer/7.1.1/MCRv84/bin/maci64/libmwfl.dylib+00042103 
_ZN2fl4diag13terminate_logEPKcPK17__darwin_ucontext+0119
[  3] 0x00010ec3bb7a 
/Applications/freesurfer/7.1.1/MCRv84/bin/maci64/libmwmcr.dylib+00387962 
_Z32mnRunPathDependentInitializationv+3146
[  4] 0x00010ec3be58 
/Applications/freesurfer/7.1.1/MCRv84/bin/maci64/libmwmcr.dylib+00388696 
_Z32mnRunPathDependentInitializationv+3880
[  5] 0x00010ec39733 
/Applications/freesurfer/7.1.1/MCRv84/bin/maci64/libmwmcr.dylib+00378675 
mnFatalSignalHandler+0275
[  6] 0x7fff20498d7d   
/usr/lib/system/libsystem_platform.dylib+00015741 _sigtramp+0029
[  7] 0x   
+
[  8] 0x00010eef827b 
/Applications/freesurfer/7.1.1/MCRv84/bin/maci64/libmwm_interpreter.dylib+01782395
 _Z10inRunMfileiPP11mxArray_tagiS1_P6Mfh_mpP15inWorkSpace_tag+00010667
[  9] 0x00010ee51a17 
/Applications/freesurfer/7.1.1/MCRv84/bin/maci64/libmwm_interpreter.dylib+01100311
 _Z15inRunFinalizers7opcodesPS_Pi+0119
[ 10] 0x00010eef629d 
/Applications/freesurfer/7.1.1/MCRv84/bin/maci64/libmwm_interpreter.dylib+01774237
 _Z10inRunMfileiPP11mxArray_tagiS1_P6Mfh_mpP15inWorkSpace_tag+2509
[ 11] 0x00010fc74c55 
/Applications/freesurfer/7.1.1/MCRv84/bin/maci64/libmwm_dispatcher.dylib+00400469
 _ZN8Mfh_file11dispatch_fhEiPP11mxArray_tagiS2_+0645
[ 12] 0x00010ee9948b 
/Applications/freesurfer/7.1.1/MCRv84/bin/maci64/libmwm_interpreter.dylib+01393803
 
_Z23inEvalPcodeHeaderToWordP15_memory_contextiPP11mxArray_tagP12_pcodeheaderP6Mfh_mpj+0219
[ 13] 0x00010ee4bf4b 
/Applications/freesurfer/7.1.1/MCRv84/bin/maci6

Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal Subfields Segmentation Violation-error

2021-03-24 Thread fsbuild
h.harvard.edu>Cc: Ramtilak
 Gattu <rg...@med.wayne.edu>Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal 
Subfields Segmentation Violation-error [EXTERNAL]I”m wondering if this is 
an issue with the version of Java installed on the machine and Matlab. 
 I’ve seen the latest MCR Matlab installer try to make changes to java 
installed on a Mac.  So maybe updating or re-installing the Matlab 
software on your machine could force a java update.  You should be able to 
exit the installer before it makes any changes if you decide not to go thru 
with it.- R.On Mar 23, 2021, at 17:45, Ramtilak Gattu 
<rg...@med.wayne.edu> 
wrote:External Email - Use 
CautionExternal
 Email - Use CautionHi,I am 
also encountering the same issue as WON JONG CHWA on my macbook pro (16gb ram) 
and I even tried the same on imac (8gb ram). I ran recon-all successfully on 
both systems. Here are my system detailsHardware Overview:  Model 
Name: MacBook Pro  Model 
Identifier: MacBookPro16,1  Processor Name: 6-Core Intel 
Core i7  Processor Speed: 2.6 GHz  Number of 
Processors: 1  Total Number of Cores: 6  L2 Cache 
(per Core): 256 KB  L3 Cache: 12 
MB  Hyper-Threading 
Technology: Enabled  Memory: 16 GB  System 
Firmware Version: 1554.80.3.0.0 (iBridge: 
18.16.14347.0.0,0)  Serial Number 
(system): C02DPB3BMD6M  Hardware 
UUID: D313516B-A3B9-500F-9303-EB0F4D4946A4  Provisioning 
UDID: D313516B-A3B9-500F-9303-EB0F4D4946A4  Activation Lock 
Status: EnabledHere is the log for segmentation violation 
error***Fitting mesh to image 
data took 742.9022 secondsTransforming pointsTransforming pointsWrote image to 
file image.mgzConstructing image-to-world transform from header information 
(asmr1.mgz)Constructing image-to-world transform from header information 
(/Users/tilak/Desktop/Work/CNS_cases/Hipps/AD/tmp/hippoSF_T1_v21_left/imageDump.mgz)Wrote
 image to file asmr2.mgzThis file does not contain MRI parametersCaught 
unexpected exception of unknown 
type. 
      Segmentation violation detected at Tue Mar 23 15:53:07 
2021Configuration: 
 Crash Decoding     : Disabled  Current Visual     : 
Quartz  Default Encoding   : ISO-8859-1  MATLAB Architecture: 
maci64  MATLAB Root        : 
/Applications/freesurfer/7..1.1/MCRv84  MATLAB Version     : 
8.4.0.150421 (R2014b)  Operating System   : Darwin 20.3.0 Darwin 
Kernel Version 20.3.0: Thu Jan 21 00:07:06 PST 2021; 
root:xnu-7195.81.3~1/RELEASE_X86_64 x86_64  Processor ID     
  : x86 Family 6 Model 158 Stepping 10, GenuineIntel  Software OpenGL 
   : 0  Virtual Machine    : Java 1.7.0_55-b13 with 
Oracle Corporation Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM mixed mode  Window 
System      : QuartzFault Count: 1Abnormal 
termination:Segmentation violationRegister State (from fault):  RAX = 
0003  RBX = 000102cde080  RCX = 7ff4ce00 
 RDX = 7624c180  RSP = 7ff4ce00  RBP = 
7fff2041595e  RSI = 7000  RDI = 
7fff204171f9   R8 = 660333a0   R9 = 
7624c180  R10 = 7fff20410002  R11 = 
7ff4ce05b4e0  R12 = 7624c498  R13 = 
  R14 = 00010e5fbd9b  R15 = 
0060  RIP = 7624c498  RFL = 
7624c1e0   CS = 00010e49227b   FS = 7624c1c0 
  GS = 0001Stack Trace (from fault):[  0] 
0x0001048a9e64 
/Applications/freesurfer/7.1.1/MCRv84/bin/maci64/libmwfl.dylib+00028260 
_ZN2fl4diag15stacktrace_base7captureERKNS0_14thread_contextEm+0052[ 
 1] 0x0001048ada2a 
/Applications/freesurfer/7.1.1/MCRv84/bin/maci64/libmwfl.dylib+00043562 
_ZN2fl4test17terminate_handledEv+0906[  2] 0x0001048ad477 
/Applications/freesurfer/7.1.1/MCRv84/bin/maci64/libmwfl.dylib+00042103 
_ZN2fl4diag13terminate_logEPKcPK17__darwin_ucontext+0119[  3] 
0x000107e39b7a 
/Applications/freesurfer/7.1.1/MCRv84/bin/maci64/libmwmcr.dylib+00387962 
_Z32mnRunPathDependentInitializationv+3146[  4] 0x000107e39e58 
/Applications/freesurfer/7.1.1/MCRv84/bin/maci64/libmwmcr.dylib+00388696 
_Z32mnRunPathDependentInitializationv+3880[  5] 0x000107e37733 
/Applications/freesurfer/7.1.1/MCRv84/bin/maci64/libmwmcr.dylib+00378675 
mnFatalSignalHandler+0275[  6] 0x7fff20630d7d       
    /usr/lib/system/libsystem_platform.dylib+00015741 
_sigtramp+0029[  7] 0x         
                      
    <unknown-module>+[  8] 0x00010e49227b 
/Applications/freesurfer/7.1..1/MCRv84/bin/maci64/libmwm_interpreter.dylib+01782395
 _Z10inRunMfileiPP11mxArray_tagiS1_P6Mfh_mpP15inWorkSpace_tag+00010667[ 
 9] 0x00010e3eba17 
/Applications/freesurfer/7.1.1/MCRv84/bin/maci64/libmwm_interpreter.dylib+01100311
 _Z15inRunFinalizers7opcodesPS_Pi+0119[ 10] 0x00010e49029d 
/Applications/freesurfer/7.1.1/MCRv84/bin/maci64/libmwm_i

Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal Subfields Segmentation Violation-error

2021-03-23 Thread Ramtilak Gattu
bbP15inWorkSpace_tag+0066

[ 17] 0x00010eda72de 
/Applications/freesurfer/7.1.1/MCRv84/bin/maci64/libmwm_interpreter.dylib+00402142
 
_Z51inEvalCmdWithLocalReturnInDesiredWSAndPublishEventsRKSbItSt11char_traitsItESaItEEPibbP15inWorkSpace_tag+0062

[ 18] 0x00010f8f593e 
/Applications/freesurfer/7.1.1/MCRv84/bin/maci64/libmwiqm.dylib+00227646 
_ZNK3iqm18InternalEvalPlugin24inEvalCmdWithLocalReturnERKSbItSt11char_traitsItESaItEEP15inWorkSpace_tag+0094

[ 19] 0x00010f8f4df4 
/Applications/freesurfer/7.1.1/MCRv84/bin/maci64/libmwiqm.dylib+00224756 
_ZN3iqm18InternalEvalPlugin7executeEP15inWorkSpace_tagRN5boost10shared_ptrIN14cmddistributor17IIPCompletedEventEEE+0132

[ 20] 0x00010ec10358 
/Applications/freesurfer/7.1.1/MCRv84/bin/maci64/libmwmcr.dylib+00209752 
_ZN3mcr3mvm27McrSwappingIqmPluginAdapterIN3iqm18InternalEvalPluginEE7executeEP15inWorkSpace_tagRN5boost10shared_ptrIN14cmddistributor17IIPCompletedEventEEE+0600

[ 21] 0x00010f8e5418 
/Applications/freesurfer/7.1.1/MCRv84/bin/maci64/libmwiqm.dylib+00160792 
_ZNK3iqm17DefaultPacketInfo7executeEP15inWorkSpace_tag+0296

[ 22] 0x00010f8d07f1 
/Applications/freesurfer/7.1.1/MCRv84/bin/maci64/libmwiqm.dylib+00075761 
_ZN3iqm3Iqm15setupIqmFcnPtrsEv+4945

[ 23] 0x00010148e005 
/Applications/freesurfer/7.1.1/MCRv84/bin/maci64/libmwservices.dylib+00196613 
_ZN10eventqueue18UserEventQueueImpl5flushEv+1205

[ 24] 0x00010fa83a65 
/Applications/freesurfer/7.1.1/MCRv84/bin/maci64/libmwuix.dylib+00043621 
_Z25isHandleUserEventCallbackPFvPvE+0501

[ 25] 0x00010155da45 
/Applications/freesurfer/7.1.1/MCRv84/bin/maci64/libmwservices.dylib+01047109 
_Z21svWS_ProcessCallbacksv+00016693

[ 26] 0x000101559152 
/Applications/freesurfer/7.1.1/MCRv84/bin/maci64/libmwservices.dylib+01028434 
_Z25svWS_ProcessPendingEventsiib+0834

[ 27] 0x000101558e5e 
/Applications/freesurfer/7.1.1/MCRv84/bin/maci64/libmwservices.dylib+01027678 
_Z25svWS_ProcessPendingEventsiib+0078

[ 28] 0x00010ebfa18f 
/Applications/freesurfer/7.1.1/MCRv84/bin/maci64/libmwmcr.dylib+00119183 
_ZN3mcr7runtime17InterpreterThread4Impl14process_eventsERKN5boost10shared_ptrIS2_EE+0095

[ 29] 0x00010ebfa49f 
/Applications/freesurfer/7.1.1/MCRv84/bin/maci64/libmwmcr.dylib+00119967 
_ZN3mcr7runtime17InterpreterThread4Impl3runERKN5boost10shared_ptrIS2_EEPNS2_12init_contextE+0335

[ 30] 0x00010ebe0d1b 
/Applications/freesurfer/7.1.1/MCRv84/bin/maci64/libmwmcr.dylib+00015643 
_Z26run_init_and_handle_eventsPv+0059

[ 31] 0x7fff20454950
/usr/lib/system/libsystem_pthread.dylib+00026960 _pthread_start+0224

[ 32] 0x7fff2045047b
/usr/lib/system/libsystem_pthread.dylib+9339 thread_start+0015



If this problem is reproducible, please submit a Service Request via:

http://www.mathworks.com/support/contact_us/


A technical support engineer might contact you with further information.


Thank you for your help.** This crash report has been saved to disk as 
/Users/tilak/matlab_crash_dump.2179-1 **




MATLAB is exiting because of fatal error

/Applications/freesurfer/7.1.1/bin/run_segmentSubjectT1_autoEstimateAlveusML.sh:
 line 33:  2179 Killed: 9   
/Applications/freesurfer/7.1.1/bin/segmentSubjectT1_autoEstimateAlveusML.app/Contents/MacOS/segmentSubjectT1_autoEstimateAlveusML
 Amy_Damboise /Users/tilak/Desktop/Work/CNS_cases/Hipps 
0. 
/Applications/freesurfer/7.1.1/average/HippoSF/atlas/AtlasMesh.gz 
/Applications/freesurfer/7.1.1/average/HippoSF/atlas/AtlasDump.mgz 
/Applications/freesurfer/7.1.1/average/HippoSF/atlas/compressionLookupTable.txt 
0.05 left L-BFGS v21 '/Applications/freesurfer/7.1.1/bin/fs_run_from_mcr 
/Applications/freesurfer/7.1.1/bin/' 0

Darwin tilak.lan 20.3.0 Darwin Kernel Version 20.3.0: Thu Jan 21 00:07:06 PST 
2021; root:xnu-7195.81.3~1/RELEASE_X86_64 x86_64


T1 hippocampal subfields exited with ERRORS at Wed Mar 24 00:59:59 EDT 2021


For more details, see the log file 
/Users/tilak/Desktop/Work/CNS_cases/Hipps/Amy_Damboise/scripts/hippocampal-subfields-T1.log


tilak@tilak Hipps %




From: fsbuild 
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 11:00 PM
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
Cc: Ramtilak Gattu 
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal Subfields Segmentation Violation-error

[EXTERNAL]
I”m wondering if this is an issue with the version of Java installed on the 
machine and Matlab.  I’ve seen the latest MCR Matlab installer try to make 
changes to java installed on a Mac.  So maybe updating or re-installing the 
Matlab software on your machine could force a java update.  You should be able 
to exit the installer before it makes any changes if you decide not to go thru 
with it.

- R.

On Mar 23, 2021, at 17:45, Ramtilak Gattu  wrote:

External Email - Use Caution
External Email - Use Caution
Hi,

I am also encountering the same issue as WON JONG CHWA on my

Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal Subfields Segmentation Violation-error

2021-03-23 Thread fsbuild
External Email - Use Caution

I”m wondering if this is an issue with the version of Java installed on the 
machine and Matlab.  I’ve seen the latest MCR Matlab installer try to make 
changes to java installed on a Mac.  So maybe updating or re-installing 
the Matlab software on your machine could force a java update.  You should 
be able to exit the installer before it makes any changes if you decide not to 
go thru with it.
- R..

On Mar 23, 2021, at 17:45, Ramtilak Gattu  
wrote:External Email - Use 
CautionExternal
 Email - Use CautionHi,I am 
also encountering the same issue as WON JONG CHWA on my macbook pro (16gb ram) 
and I even tried the same on imac (8gb ram). I ran recon-all successfully on 
both systems. Here are my system detailsHardware Overview:  Model 
Name: MacBook Pro  Model 
Identifier: MacBookPro16,1  Processor Name: 6-Core Intel 
Core i7  Processor Speed: 2.6 GHz  Number of 
Processors: 1  Total Number of Cores: 6  L2 Cache 
(per Core): 256 KB  L3 Cache: 12 
MB  Hyper-Threading 
Technology: Enabled  Memory: 16 GB  System 
Firmware Version: 1554.80.3.0.0 (iBridge: 
18.16.14347.0.0,0)  Serial Number 
(system): C02DPB3BMD6M  Hardware 
UUID: D313516B-A3B9-500F-9303-EB0F4D4946A4  Provisioning 
UDID: D313516B-A3B9-500F-9303-EB0F4D4946A4  Activation Lock 
Status: EnabledHere is the log for segmentation violation 
error***Fitting mesh to image 
data took 742.9022 secondsTransforming pointsTransforming pointsWrote image to 
file image.mgzConstructing image-to-world transform from header information 
(asmr1.mgz)Constructing image-to-world transform from header information 
(/Users/tilak/Desktop/Work/CNS_cases/Hipps/AD/tmp/hippoSF_T1_v21_left/imageDump.mgz)Wrote
 image to file asmr2.mgzThis file does not contain MRI parametersCaught 
unexpected exception of unknown 
type. 
      Segmentation violation detected at Tue Mar 23 15:53:07 
2021Configuration: 
 Crash Decoding     : Disabled  Current Visual     : 
Quartz  Default Encoding   : ISO-8859-1  MATLAB Architecture: 
maci64  MATLAB Root        : 
/Applications/freesurfer/7.1.1/MCRv84  MATLAB Version     : 
8.4.0.150421 (R2014b)  Operating System   : Darwin 20..3.0 Darwin 
Kernel Version 20.3.0: Thu Jan 21 00:07:06 PST 2021; 
root:xnu-7195.81.3~1/RELEASE_X86_64 x86_64  Processor ID     
  : x86 Family 6 Model 158 Stepping 10, GenuineIntel  Software OpenGL 
   : 0  Virtual Machine    : Java 1.7.0_55-b13 with 
Oracle Corporation Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM mixed mode  Window 
System      : QuartzFault Count: 1Abnormal 
termination:Segmentation violationRegister State (from fault):  RAX = 
0003  RBX = 000102cde080  RCX = 7ff4ce00 
 RDX = 7624c180  RSP = 7ff4ce00  RBP = 
7fff2041595e  RSI = 7000  RDI = 
7fff204171f9   R8 = 660333a0   R9 = 
7624c180  R10 = 7fff20410002  R11 = 
7ff4ce05b4e0  R12 = 7624c498  R13 = 
  R14 = 00010e5fbd9b  R15 = 
0060  RIP = 7624c498  RFL = 
7624c1e0   CS = 00010e49227b   FS = 7624c1c0 
  GS = 0001Stack Trace (from fault):[  0] 
0x0001048a9e64 
/Applications/freesurfer/7.1.1/MCRv84/bin/maci64/libmwfl.dylib+00028260 
_ZN2fl4diag15stacktrace_base7captureERKNS0_14thread_contextEm+0052[ 
 1] 0x0001048ada2a 
/Applications/freesurfer/7.1.1/MCRv84/bin/maci64/libmwfl.dylib+00043562 
_ZN2fl4test17terminate_handledEv+0906[  2] 0x0001048ad477 
/Applications/freesurfer/7.1.1/MCRv84/bin/maci64/libmwfl.dylib+00042103 
_ZN2fl4diag13terminate_logEPKcPK17__darwin_ucontext+0119[  3] 
0x000107e39b7a 
/Applications/freesurfer/7.1.1/MCRv84/bin/maci64/libmwmcr.dylib+00387962 
_Z32mnRunPathDependentInitializationv+3146[  4] 0x000107e39e58 
/Applications/freesurfer/7.1.1/MCRv84/bin/maci64/libmwmcr.dylib+00388696 
_Z32mnRunPathDependentInitializationv+3880[  5] 0x000107e37733 
/Applications/freesurfer/7.1.1/MCRv84/bin/maci64/libmwmcr.dylib+00378675 
mnFatalSignalHandler+0275[  6] 0x7fff20630d7d       
    /usr/lib/system/libsystem_platform.dylib+00015741 
_sigtramp+0029[  7] 0x         
                      
    +[  8] 0x00010e49227b 
/Applications/freesurfer/7.1.1/MCRv84/bin/maci64/libmwm_interpreter.dylib+01782395
 _Z10inRunMfileiPP11mxArray_tagiS1_P6Mfh_mpP15inWorkSpace_tag+00010667[ 
 9] 0x00010e3eba17 
/Applications/freesurfer/7.1.1/MCRv84/bin/maci64/libmwm_interpreter.dylib+01100311
 _Z15inRunFinalizers7opcodesPS_Pi+0119[ 10] 0x00010e49029d 
/Applications/freesurfer/7.1.1/MCRv84/bin/maci64/libmwm_interpreter.dylib+01774237
 _Z10inRunMfileiPP11mxArray_tagiS1_P6Mfh_mpP15inWorkSpace_tag+2509[ 11] 
0x000

Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal subfields questions

2020-10-24 Thread Iglesias Gonzalez, Juan E.
Hi Steve,
Thank you very much for the interest in our tool!
Q1. Yes, mm^3.
Q2. I’ll defer to Doug Greve (CCed) 😉
Cheers,
/E

Juan Eugenio Iglesias
Senior research fellow
CMIC (UCL), MGH (HMS) and CSAIL (MIT)
http://www.jeiglesias.com



From:  on behalf of Steve Petersen 

Reply-To: Freesurfer support list 
Date: Saturday, October 24, 2020 at 05:07
To: "freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu" 
Subject: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal subfields questions


External Email - Use Caution
Dear Eugenio,

Just two simple questions about hippocampal subfields:

Q1. The volume of each hippocampal subfield is exported in mm3?

Q2. I would like to compare hippocampal subfields volume measures between three 
groups by including the eTIV as covariate. Can I perform this group analysis by 
using the command line (with mri_glmfit command as for the thickness for 
example)?. In that case should I include some specific argument to consider in 
the analysis the hippocampal subfield stats of each subject?.


Thank you in advance.


Best,

Steve
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal subfields error

2020-09-21 Thread Emily K Clarke
External Email - Use Caution

Hi Eugenio,

No, I don't think so - we're running recon-all and using the hippocampal 
pipeline from FS 6.0. I bug tested with the FS 6.0dev version and found that 
that hippocampal pipeline worked okay, but since we're combining data with an 
older dataset we need to be able to extract the older hippocampal subfields, 
starting with the recon-all hippocampal subfields processing.

Thanks,
Emily


Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2020 21:21:41 +
From: "Iglesias Gonzalez, Juan E." 
    Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal subfields error
To: Freesurfer support list 
Message-ID: <25df95c0-873a-4906-9d51-a94cf0223...@mgh.harvard.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Hi Emily.
Is it possibly that you may be mixing FS versions, by any chance?
Cheers,
/Eugenio


Juan Eugenio Iglesias
Senior research fellow
CMIC (UCL), MGH (HMS) and CSAIL (MIT)

https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.jeiglesias.com__;!!OToaGQ!54kYqoLJMazG-e4wE3yKpehQ-BMMjAGSsGWeQv_zzG6tzdVr_8s9dgvsAg3rWMo$
 



From:  on behalf of Emily K Clarke 

Reply-To: Freesurfer support list 
Date: Wednesday, September 9, 2020 at 15:53
To: "freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu" 
Subject: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal subfields error


External Email - Use Caution
Hi Eugenio,

We?re still running into the issue where running recon-all with the 
hippocampal subfields tag isn?t actually generating any of the hippocampal 
files. I?ve included our full recon-all log below. We already examined the 
scans, and they look perfectly normal ? do you know why this might be happening?

Thanks,
Emily Clarke-Rubright
Morey Neuroimaging Lab



The whole log message:

#

#@# Hippocampal Subfields processing (T1 only) left Mon Aug 10 18:54:21 EDT

2020

--

Setting up environment variables

---

LD_LIBRARY_PATH is


.:/usr/local/packages/freesurfer_v6.0.0/MCRv80/runtime/glnxa64:/usr/local/packages/freesurfer_v6.0.0/MCRv80/bin/glnxa64:/usr/local/packages/freesurfer_v6.0.0/MCRv80/sys/os/glnxa64:/usr/local/packages/freesurfer_v6.0.0/MCRv80/sys/java/jre/glnxa64/jre/lib/amd64/native_threads:/usr/local/packages/freesurfer_v6.0.0/MCRv80/sys/java/jre/glnxa64/jre/lib/amd64/server:/usr/local/packages/freesurfer_v6.0.0/MCRv80/sys/java/jre/glnxa64/jre/lib/amd64/client:/usr/local/packages/freesurfer_v6.0.0/MCRv80/sys/java/jre/glnxa64/jre/lib/amd64:/usr/lib64/qt5/plugins/platforms:/usr/local/packages/ants-2.3.4/lib:/usr/lib64/openmpi/lib:

Warning: application is running on a locale different from the original

platform locale.

Warning: No display specified.  You will not be able to display graphics on

the screen.

Registering imageDump.mgz to hippocampal mask from ASEG

This file does not contain MRI parameters

$Id: mri_robust_register.cpp,v 1.77 2016/01/20 23:36:17 greve Exp $



--mov: Using imageDump.mgz as movable/source volume.

--dst: Using /mnt/BIAC/.users/ch186/


duhsnas-pri.dhe.duke.edu/dusom_morey/Data/Lab/PGC/T1s/Duke_data/Freesurfer/addl/cch/12588326/tmp/hippoSF_T1_v10_left//hippoAmygBinaryMask_autoCropped.mgz

as target volume.

--lta: Output transform as trash.lta .

--mapmovhdr: Will save header adjusted movable as

imageDump_coregistered.mgz !

--sat: Using saturation 50 in M-estimator!



reading source 'imageDump.mgz'...

reading target '/mnt/BIAC/.users/ch186/


duhsnas-pri.dhe.duke.edu/dusom_morey/Data/Lab/PGC/T1s/Duke_data/Freesurfer/addl/cch/12588326/tmp/hippoSF_T1_v10_left//hippoAmygBinaryMask_autoCropped.mgz'.

..



Registration::setSourceAndTarget(MRI s, MRI t, keeptype = TRUE )

   Type Source : 0  Type Target : 3  ensure both FLOAT (3)

   Reordering axes in mov to better fit dst... ( -1 3 -2 )

MRIreorder() ---

xdim=-1 ydim=3 zdim=-2

src 131 241 99, 0.25 0.25 0.25

dst 131 99 241, 0.25 0.25 0.25

 Determinant after swap : 0.015625

   Mov: (0.25, 0.25, 0.25)mm  and dim (131, 99, 241)

   Dst: (1, 1, 1)mm  and dim (38, 40, 59)

   Asserting both images: 1mm isotropic

- reslicing Mov ...

   -- changing data type from 0 to 3 (noscale = 0)...

   -- Original : (0.25, 0.25, 0.25)mm and (131, 99, 241) voxels.

   -- Resampled: (1, 1, 1)mm and (38, 40, 61) voxels.

   -- Reslicing using cubic bspline

MRItoBSpline degree 3

- reslicing Dst ...

   -- Original : (1, 1, 1)mm and (38, 40, 59) voxels.

   -- Resampled: (1, 1, 1)mm and (38, 40, 61) voxels.

   -- Reslicing using cubic bspline

MRItoBSpline degree 3





 Registration::computeMultiresRegistration

   - computing centroids

   - comput

Re: [Freesurfer] hippocampal subfields error

2020-08-12 Thread Courtney Haswell
External Email - Use Caution

The whole log message:

#
#@# Hippocampal Subfields processing (T1 only) left Mon Aug 10 18:54:21 EDT
2020
--
Setting up environment variables
---
LD_LIBRARY_PATH is
.:/usr/local/packages/freesurfer_v6.0.0/MCRv80/runtime/glnxa64:/usr/local/packages/freesurfer_v6.0.0/MCRv80/bin/glnxa64:/usr/local/packages/freesurfer_v6.0.0/MCRv80/sys/os/glnxa64:/usr/local/packages/freesurfer_v6.0.0/MCRv80/sys/java/jre/glnxa64/jre/lib/amd64/native_threads:/usr/local/packages/freesurfer_v6.0.0/MCRv80/sys/java/jre/glnxa64/jre/lib/amd64/server:/usr/local/packages/freesurfer_v6.0.0/MCRv80/sys/java/jre/glnxa64/jre/lib/amd64/client:/usr/local/packages/freesurfer_v6.0.0/MCRv80/sys/java/jre/glnxa64/jre/lib/amd64:/usr/lib64/qt5/plugins/platforms:/usr/local/packages/ants-2.3.4/lib:/usr/lib64/openmpi/lib:
Warning: application is running on a locale different from the original
platform locale.
Warning: No display specified.  You will not be able to display graphics on
the screen.
Registering imageDump.mgz to hippocampal mask from ASEG
This file does not contain MRI parameters
$Id: mri_robust_register.cpp,v 1.77 2016/01/20 23:36:17 greve Exp $

--mov: Using imageDump.mgz as movable/source volume.
--dst: Using /mnt/BIAC/.users/ch186/
duhsnas-pri.dhe.duke.edu/dusom_morey/Data/Lab/PGC/T1s/Duke_data/Freesurfer/addl/cch/12588326/tmp/hippoSF_T1_v10_left//hippoAmygBinaryMask_autoCropped.mgz
as target volume.
--lta: Output transform as trash.lta .
--mapmovhdr: Will save header adjusted movable as
imageDump_coregistered.mgz !
--sat: Using saturation 50 in M-estimator!

reading source 'imageDump.mgz'...
reading target '/mnt/BIAC/.users/ch186/
duhsnas-pri.dhe.duke.edu/dusom_morey/Data/Lab/PGC/T1s/Duke_data/Freesurfer/addl/cch/12588326/tmp/hippoSF_T1_v10_left//hippoAmygBinaryMask_autoCropped.mgz'.
..

Registration::setSourceAndTarget(MRI s, MRI t, keeptype = TRUE )
   Type Source : 0  Type Target : 3  ensure both FLOAT (3)
   Reordering axes in mov to better fit dst... ( -1 3 -2 )
MRIreorder() ---
xdim=-1 ydim=3 zdim=-2
src 131 241 99, 0.25 0.25 0.25
dst 131 99 241, 0.25 0.25 0.25
 Determinant after swap : 0.015625
   Mov: (0.25, 0.25, 0.25)mm  and dim (131, 99, 241)
   Dst: (1, 1, 1)mm  and dim (38, 40, 59)
   Asserting both images: 1mm isotropic
- reslicing Mov ...
   -- changing data type from 0 to 3 (noscale = 0)...
   -- Original : (0.25, 0.25, 0.25)mm and (131, 99, 241) voxels.
   -- Resampled: (1, 1, 1)mm and (38, 40, 61) voxels.
   -- Reslicing using cubic bspline
MRItoBSpline degree 3
- reslicing Dst ...
   -- Original : (1, 1, 1)mm and (38, 40, 59) voxels.
   -- Resampled: (1, 1, 1)mm and (38, 40, 61) voxels.
   -- Reslicing using cubic bspline
MRItoBSpline degree 3


 Registration::computeMultiresRegistration
   - computing centroids
   - computing initial transform
 -- using translation info
   - Get Gaussian Pyramid Limits ( min size: 16 max size: -1 )
   - Build Gaussian Pyramid ( Limits min steps: 0 max steps: 1 )
   - Build Gaussian Pyramid ( Limits min steps: 0 max steps: 1 )
   - initial transform:
Ti = [ ...
 1.000  1.1459029727155
   0  1.00 -0.0876360601093
   00  1.0 -2.9034875996918
   000  1.0  ]

   - initial iscale:  Ii =1

Resolution: 1  S( 19 20 30 )  T( 19 20 30 )
 Iteration(f): 1
 -- diff. to prev. transform: 7.11234
 Iteration(f): 2
 -- diff. to prev. transform: 5.92976
 Iteration(f): 3
 -- diff. to prev. transform: 7.00993
 Iteration(f): 4
 -- diff. to prev. transform: 4.91305
 Iteration(f): 5
 -- diff. to prev. transform: 0.781018 max it: 5 reached!

Resolution: 0  S( 38 40 61 )  T( 38 40 61 )
 Iteration(f): 1
 -- diff. to prev. transform: 8.1296
 Iteration(f): 2
 -- diff. to prev. transform: 1.32542
 Iteration(f): 3
 -- diff. to prev. transform: 0.660013
 Iteration(f): 4
 -- diff. to prev. transform: 0.272219
 Iteration(f): 5
 -- diff. to prev. transform: 0.0943126 max it: 5 reached!

   - final transform:
Tf = [ ...
 0.9986737402682 -0.0371977207162  0.0355962086772  0.4749903609000
 0.0194355513105  0.9126027300469  0.4083852549446 -14.0571487737101
-0.0476761978762 -0.4071517980857  0.9121153400046  9.9144950322154
   000  1.0  ]

   - final iscale:  If = 1

**
*
* WARNING: Registration did not converge in 5 steps!
*  Problem might be ill posed.
*  Please inspect output manually!
*
**

Final Transform:
Adjusting final transform due to initial resampling (voxel or size changes)
...
M = [ ...
-0.2496684350671  0.00889905

Re: [Freesurfer] hippocampal subfields error

2020-08-12 Thread Iglesias Gonzalez, Juan E.
Dear Courtney,
You can safely ignore “This file does not contain MRI parameters”. If the 
output files are not created, there must be another error further down. Could 
you please send us the whole output?
Cheers,
/Eugenio


Juan Eugenio Iglesias
Senior research fellow
CMIC (UCL), MGH (HMS) and CSAIL (MIT)
http://www.jeiglesias.com



From:  on behalf of Courtney Haswell 

Reply-To: Freesurfer support list 
Date: Wednesday, August 12, 2020 at 09:34
To: "freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu" 
Subject: [Freesurfer] hippocampal subfields error


External Email - Use Caution
We are getting an error after running the hippocampal subfields pipeline that 
we have never received before. It is happening for all subjects. We run 
recon-all and then the hippocampal pipeline and the output files are not being 
created. Below is the beginning of the log and it seems like the relevant part 
is "This file does not contain MRI parameters" when referring to the imageDump 
file. I was able to open that file and it seems ok. What could be the problem? 
Thank you!


#
#@# Hippocampal Subfields processing (T1 only) left Mon Aug 10 18:54:21 EDT 2020
--
Setting up environment variables
---
LD_LIBRARY_PATH is 
.:/usr/local/packages/freesurfer_v6.0.0/MCRv80/runtime/glnxa64:/usr/local/packages/freesurfer_v6.0.0/MCRv80/bin/glnxa64:/usr/local/packages/freesurfer_v6.0.0/MCRv80/sys/os/glnxa64:/usr/local/packages/freesurfer_v6.0.0/MCRv80/sys/java/jre/glnxa64/jre/lib/amd64/native_threads:/usr/local/packages/freesurfer_v6.0.0/MCRv80/sys/java/jre/glnxa64/jre/lib/amd64/server:/usr/local/packages/freesurfer_v6.0.0/MCRv80/sys/java/jre/glnxa64/jre/lib/amd64/client:/usr/local/packages/freesurfer_v6.0.0/MCRv80/sys/java/jre/glnxa64/jre/lib/amd64:/usr/lib64/qt5/plugins/platforms:/usr/local/packages/ants-2.3.4/lib:/usr/lib64/openmpi/lib:
Warning: application is running on a locale different from the original 
platform locale.
Warning: No display specified.  You will not be able to display graphics on the 
screen.
Registering imageDump.mgz to hippocampal mask from ASEG
This file does not contain MRI parameters
$Id: mri_robust_register.cpp,v 1.77 2016/01/20 23:36:17 greve Exp $

--mov: Using imageDump.mgz as movable/source volume.
--dst: Using 
/mnt/BIAC/.users/ch186/duhsnas-pri.dhe.duke.edu/dusom_morey/Data/Lab/PGC/T1s/Duke_data/Freesurfer/addl/cch/12588326/tmp/hippoSF_T1_v10_left//hippoAmygBinaryMask_autoCropped.mgz
 as target volume.
--lta: Output transform as trash.lta .
--mapmovhdr: Will save header adjusted movable as imageDump_coregistered.mgz !
--sat: Using saturation 50 in M-estimator!

reading source 'imageDump.mgz'...
reading target 
'/mnt/BIAC/.users/ch186/duhsnas-pri.dhe.duke.edu/dusom_morey/Data/Lab/PGC/T1s/Duke_data/Freesurfer/addl/cch/12588326/tmp/hippoSF_T1_v10_left//hippoAmygBinaryMask_autoCropped.mgz'...
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal subfields --> normalization

2020-08-12 Thread Iglesias Gonzalez, Juan E.
Dear Hae Won,
Normalizing by ICV and whole hippocampal volume simply attempt to answer two 
different questions:
Is the volume of subfield X, accounting for head size, [insert analysis 
question here]?
Is the % of hippocampal volume covered by subfield X, [insert analysis question 
here]?
(where [analysis question] could be “smaller in Alzheimer’s than in controls”, 
or “related to age”)
Cheers,
/Eugenio


Juan Eugenio Iglesias
Senior research fellow
CMIC (UCL), MGH (HMS) and CSAIL (MIT)
http://www.jeiglesias.com



From:  on behalf of Haewon Roh 

Reply-To: Freesurfer support list 
Date: Wednesday, August 12, 2020 at 06:50
To: "freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu" 
Subject: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal subfields --> normalization


External Email - Use Caution

Hi. team!

Recently,  I submitted a paper dealing with volumes of hippocampus and its 
subfields in epilepsy patients who have significantly reduced  hippocampal 
volume (compared with normal controls) and, in that paper, I used the 
normalization method using ICV, which was suggested by Jack CR in 1989: 
normalized volume = volume (observed) – b (ICV – mean ICV), where b is the 
slope of regression for each ICV.

But, one of the reviewers pointed out that I should use the method based on 
each patient's hippocampus rather than total intracranial volume. Since I've 
seen that a lot of papers, which dealt about these kinds of issues about 
hippocampus and subfields, used the same method with me, I am really doubtful 
that it is more appropriate if I should use the method using individual volume 
of hippocampus (rather than ICV) in order to normalize its volumes of 
substructures in the comparison analysis with those of controls.

# And, whether this is true or not, could you please recommend to me several 
literatures that can show which method of normalizing volumes of the 
hippocampus and its subfields is more appropriate for this kind of issue?

# Really sorry for bothering you. Thank you always for your kind and delicate 
solutions ! : )

--
Hae Won ROH, M.D.

H.P: +82-10-4341-8142
E-mail: rofree...@gmail.com
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal subfields

2020-04-08 Thread Iglesias Gonzalez, Juan E.
Dear Ioana,
This is tricky because the volumes are computed from soft segmentations, which 
are not the ones you’re editing. In general, editing outputs is a bad idea; it 
may be better to simply discard the cases for which quality control fails.
Having said that: if you want to use corrected cases, you could compute volumes 
by simply summing the number of voxels with each label, and multiplying by the 
volume of a voxel (which is 1/27=0.03703703703 cubic mm). But if you do this, 
then you need to compute the volume this way for all cases, including the ones 
you didn’t edit (you don’t want to mix 2 ways of estimating volumes).
Cheers,
/Eugenio


Juan Eugenio Iglesias
Senior research fellow
CMIC (UCL), MGH (HMS) and CSAIL (MIT)
http://www.jeiglesias.com



From:  on behalf of ioana cracana 

Reply-To: Freesurfer support list 
Date: Wednesday, April 8, 2020 at 04:59
To: "freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu" 
Subject: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal subfields


External Email - Use Caution
Hello,
I'm doing a study about hippocampal atrophy and I'm using the Segmentation of 
Hippocampal subfields tool. There were some minor errors and I edited them 
using Freeview, voxel edit tool.  I would like to generate a new 
[lr]h.hippoSfVolumes-T1.v10.txt file using the edited 
[lr]h.hippoSfLabels-T1.v10.mgz in order to see the new results. What command do 
i have to use? Is there another way to edit the hippocampal subfields?And how 
do i see the results?
I'm using Freesurfer v6.0.0. on macOS Mojave.

Thanks,
Ioana
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Re: [Freesurfer] hippocampal-subfields-T1 error

2020-03-28 Thread Duvnjak, Aleksandar
External Email - Use Caution

Dear Juan,

Thank you so much. This has sorted our issue. You're a lifesaver.

Kind regards,
Aleks Duvnjak

From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
 on behalf of Iglesias Gonzalez, Juan 
E. 
Sent: 27 March 2020 19:07
To: Freesurfer support list 
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] hippocampal-subfields-T1 error


This email from jiglesiasgonza...@mgh.harvard.edu originates from outside 
Imperial. Do not click on links and attachments unless you recognise the 
sender. If you trust the sender, add them to your safe senders 
list<https://spam.ic.ac.uk/SpamConsole/Senders.aspx> to disable email stamping 
for this address.



Dear Aleks,

Please try:  chmod u+x /rds/general/project/amyloidpet/live/freesurfer/bin/*

Cheers,

/Eugenio





Juan Eugenio Iglesias

Senior research fellow

CMIC (UCL), MGH (HMS) and CSAIL (MIT)

http://www.jeiglesias.com







From:  on behalf of "Duvnjak, 
Aleksandar" 
Reply-To: Freesurfer support list 
Date: Friday, March 27, 2020 at 14:39
To: "freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu" 
Subject: [Freesurfer] hippocampal-subfields-T1 error



External Email - Use Caution

Dear FreeSurfer Experts,



FreeSurfer version: freesurfer-Linux-centos6_x86_64-stable-pub-v6.0.0

Platform: Secure Shell port of a high performance computer (HPC) accessed via 
Ubuntu 18.04 WSL



Having processed a cohort of 1mm^3 MRI images via the recon-all command, we 
have had issues processing the hippocampal subfield command as described: 
https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/HippocampalSubfields



Although we eventually want to run the command in array, we are currently 
attempting it on individual subjects to ensure a good output. Upon running the 
command we receive a "permission denied" error. The HPC is a shared cluster, 
and the FreeSurfer 6.0.0 app is downloaded in a shared dir which we cannot 
edit, and thus couldn't download the Matlab runtime to.



We initially thought this may be the issue, and so tried multiple workarounds, 
including copying the entirety of the FreeSurfer installation package from the 
shared directory to our own directory, within which we have editing 
permissions. This didn't help, even when setting our personal directory as the 
FREESURFER_HOME. As you can see from the end of the recon-all.log file, we 
tried numerous attempts with various workarounds and all have the same outcome.



I appreciate this may still be more of an issue with running FreeSurfer via a 
secure shell port to a HPC cluster rather than an issue with FreeSurfer itself, 
but I'm sure you have many research labs asking questions regarding using HPC 
systems to run FreeSurfer, so any recommendations or thoughts would be welcome.



Kind Regards,
Aleks Duvnjak
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Re: [Freesurfer] hippocampal-subfields-T1 error

2020-03-27 Thread Iglesias Gonzalez, Juan E.
Dear Aleks,
Please try:  chmod u+x /rds/general/project/amyloidpet/live/freesurfer/bin/*
Cheers,
/Eugenio


Juan Eugenio Iglesias
Senior research fellow
CMIC (UCL), MGH (HMS) and CSAIL (MIT)
http://www.jeiglesias.com



From:  on behalf of "Duvnjak, 
Aleksandar" 
Reply-To: Freesurfer support list 
Date: Friday, March 27, 2020 at 14:39
To: "freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu" 
Subject: [Freesurfer] hippocampal-subfields-T1 error


External Email - Use Caution
Dear FreeSurfer Experts,

FreeSurfer version: freesurfer-Linux-centos6_x86_64-stable-pub-v6.0.0
Platform: Secure Shell port of a high performance computer (HPC) accessed via 
Ubuntu 18.04 WSL

Having processed a cohort of 1mm^3 MRI images via the recon-all command, we 
have had issues processing the hippocampal subfield command as described: 
https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/HippocampalSubfields

Although we eventually want to run the command in array, we are currently 
attempting it on individual subjects to ensure a good output. Upon running the 
command we receive a "permission denied" error. The HPC is a shared cluster, 
and the FreeSurfer 6.0.0 app is downloaded in a shared dir which we cannot 
edit, and thus couldn't download the Matlab runtime to.

We initially thought this may be the issue, and so tried multiple workarounds, 
including copying the entirety of the FreeSurfer installation package from the 
shared directory to our own directory, within which we have editing 
permissions. This didn't help, even when setting our personal directory as the 
FREESURFER_HOME. As you can see from the end of the recon-all.log file, we 
tried numerous attempts with various workarounds and all have the same outcome.

I appreciate this may still be more of an issue with running FreeSurfer via a 
secure shell port to a HPC cluster rather than an issue with FreeSurfer itself, 
but I'm sure you have many research labs asking questions regarding using HPC 
systems to run FreeSurfer, so any recommendations or thoughts would be welcome.

Kind Regards,
Aleks Duvnjak
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Re: [Freesurfer] hippocampal-subfields-T1 error

2020-03-27 Thread Duvnjak, Aleksandar
External Email - Use Caution

To clarify, upon copying the entire FreeSurfer 6.0 package to our personal 
directory, we have then downloaded the matlab runtime MCRv80 folder to that 
directory and the issue does not appear to be the hippocampal-subfields-T1 
pipeline accessing that.

Regards,
Aleks Duvnjak

From: Duvnjak, Aleksandar
Sent: 27 March 2020 18:38
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
Subject: hippocampal-subfields-T1 error

Dear FreeSurfer Experts,

FreeSurfer version: freesurfer-Linux-centos6_x86_64-stable-pub-v6.0.0
Platform: Secure Shell port of a high performance computer (HPC) accessed via 
Ubuntu 18.04 WSL

Having processed a cohort of 1mm^3 MRI images via the recon-all command, we 
have had issues processing the hippocampal subfield command as described: 
https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/HippocampalSubfields

Although we eventually want to run the command in array, we are currently 
attempting it on individual subjects to ensure a good output. Upon running the 
command we receive a "permission denied" error. The HPC is a shared cluster, 
and the FreeSurfer 6.0.0 app is downloaded in a shared dir which we cannot 
edit, and thus couldn't download the Matlab runtime to.

We initially thought this may be the issue, and so tried multiple workarounds, 
including copying the entirety of the FreeSurfer installation package from the 
shared directory to our own directory, within which we have editing 
permissions. This didn't help, even when setting our personal directory as the 
FREESURFER_HOME. As you can see from the end of the recon-all.log file, we 
tried numerous attempts with various workarounds and all have the same outcome.

I appreciate this may still be more of an issue with running FreeSurfer via a 
secure shell port to a HPC cluster rather than an issue with FreeSurfer itself, 
but I'm sure you have many research labs asking questions regarding using HPC 
systems to run FreeSurfer, so any recommendations or thoughts would be welcome.

Kind Regards,
Aleks Duvnjak
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal subfields FS6 vs. new hippocampus tool (incl Amygdala) FreeSurfer_dev version

2020-01-24 Thread Iglesias Gonzalez, Juan E.
Good question! It’s ok if only the hippo is covered.
Cheers,
/E

Juan Eugenio Iglesias
Senior research fellow
CMIC (UCL), MGH (HMS) and CSAIL (MIT)
http://www.jeiglesias.com


From:  on behalf of Rene Seiger 

Reply-To: Freesurfer support list 
Date: Friday, 24 January 2020 at 12:15
To: "freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu" 
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal subfields FS6 vs. new hippocampus tool 
(incl Amygdala) FreeSurfer_dev version


External Email - Use Caution

Dear Juan,

Thank you very much for you answer! However, I ran into another issue using the 
new tool: It is stated:  'Using the additional scan in isolation is advised 
when it is of higher resolution than the T1 while covering the whole hippocampi 
and amygdalae'. Can I still use this processing mode, when my high-resolution 
scans only have the hippocampi covered, as I am not interested in the amygdala 
in the first place? Or is it mandatory to have both structures fully covered 
within the additional scan when I want to run it in isolation?
Thank you very much,
René



<http://www.meduniwien.ac.at/neuroimaging/>
<http://www.meduniwien.ac.at/neuroimaging/>
Am 23.01.2020 um 18:09 schrieb Iglesias Gonzalez, Juan E.:
Hi Rene,
The atlases are slightly different so the outputs will be a bit different. But 
the segmentations will indeed be comparable.
Cheers,
/Eugenio

Juan Eugenio Iglesias
Senior research fellow
CMIC (UCL), MGH (HMS) and CSAIL (MIT)
http://www.jeiglesias.com


From: 
<mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
 on behalf of Rene Seiger 
<mailto:rene.sei...@meduniwien.ac.at>
Reply-To: Freesurfer support list 
<mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Date: Thursday, 23 January 2020 at 07:48
To: "freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu"<mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> 
<mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Subject: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal subfields FS6 vs. new hippocampus tool (incl 
Amygdala) FreeSurfer_dev version


External Email - Use Caution

Dear all,

I recently saw that the page of the hippocampal module for FS6 
(https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/HippocampalSubfields) seems to be 
obsolete and it looks as if this module will be replaced by a newer version in 
the near future (now dev version, 
https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/HippocampalSubfieldsAndNucleiOfAmygdala).

However, I am not entirely sure how those two modules differ in terms of 
hippocampal subfield segmentation, when the "FS60" parcellation scheme is used 
in the new module. It is stated that 'it mimics the FreeSurfer 6.0 hippocampal 
module', but is the output 1:1 comparable?
Thank you very much and kind regards,
René
--

Dr. René Seiger
Research Associate

Medical University of Vienna
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy
Division of General Psychiatry
NEUROIMAGING LABS (NIL) - PET, MRI, EEG, TMS & Chemical Lab

Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna
Phone +43 (0) 1 40400-38250
rene.sei...@meduniwien.ac.at
<mailto:rene.sei...@meduniwien.ac.at>http://www.meduniwien.ac.at/neuroimaging/

<http://www.meduniwien.ac.at/neuroimaging/>



___

Freesurfer mailing list

Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>

https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal subfields FS6 vs. new hippocampus tool (incl Amygdala) FreeSurfer_dev version

2020-01-24 Thread Rene Seiger
   External Email - Use Caution


Dear Juan,

Thank you very much for you answer! However, I ran into another issue 
using the new tool: It is stated:  'Using the additional scan in 
isolation is advised when it is of higher resolution than the T1 while 
covering the whole hippocampi and amygdalae'. Can I still use this 
processing mode, when my high-resolution scans only have the hippocampi 
covered, as I am not interested in the amygdala in the first place? Or 
is it mandatory to have both structures fully covered within the 
additional scan when I want to run it in isolation?


Thank you very much,
René





Am 23.01.2020 um 18:09 schrieb Iglesias Gonzalez, Juan E.:


Hi Rene,

The atlases are slightly different so the outputs will be a bit 
different. But the segmentations will indeed be comparable.


Cheers,

/Eugenio

Juan Eugenio Iglesias

Senior research fellow

CMIC (UCL), MGH (HMS) and CSAIL (MIT)

http://www.jeiglesias.com

*From: * on behalf of Rene 
Seiger 

*Reply-To: *Freesurfer support list 
*Date: *Thursday, 23 January 2020 at 07:48
*To: *"freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu" 
*Subject: *[Freesurfer] Hippocampal subfields FS6 vs. new hippocampus 
tool (incl Amygdala) FreeSurfer_dev version


*External Email - Use Caution *

Dear all,

I recently saw that the page of the hippocampal module for FS6 
(https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/HippocampalSubfields) seems 
to be obsolete and it looks as if this module will be replaced by a 
newer version in the near future (now dev version, 
https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/HippocampalSubfieldsAndNucleiOfAmygdala).


However, I am not entirely sure how those two modules differ in terms 
of hippocampal subfield segmentation, when the "FS60" parcellation 
scheme is used in the new module. It is stated that 'it mimics the 
FreeSurfer 6.0 hippocampal module', but is the output 1:1 comparable?


Thank you very much and kind regards,
René

--

*Dr. René Seiger*
Research Associate

*Medical University of Vienna*
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy
Division of General Psychiatry
NEUROIMAGING LABS (NIL) - PET, MRI, EEG, TMS & Chemical Lab

Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna
Phone +43 (0) 1 40400-38250
rene.sei...@meduniwien.ac.at
http://www.meduniwien.ac.at/neuroimaging/ 






___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal subfields FS6 vs. new hippocampus tool (incl Amygdala) FreeSurfer_dev version

2020-01-23 Thread Iglesias Gonzalez, Juan E.
Hi Rene,
The atlases are slightly different so the outputs will be a bit different. But 
the segmentations will indeed be comparable.
Cheers,
/Eugenio

Juan Eugenio Iglesias
Senior research fellow
CMIC (UCL), MGH (HMS) and CSAIL (MIT)
http://www.jeiglesias.com


From:  on behalf of Rene Seiger 

Reply-To: Freesurfer support list 
Date: Thursday, 23 January 2020 at 07:48
To: "freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu" 
Subject: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal subfields FS6 vs. new hippocampus tool (incl 
Amygdala) FreeSurfer_dev version


External Email - Use Caution

Dear all,

I recently saw that the page of the hippocampal module for FS6 
(https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/HippocampalSubfields) seems to be 
obsolete and it looks as if this module will be replaced by a newer version in 
the near future (now dev version, 
https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/HippocampalSubfieldsAndNucleiOfAmygdala).

However, I am not entirely sure how those two modules differ in terms of 
hippocampal subfield segmentation, when the "FS60" parcellation scheme is used 
in the new module. It is stated that 'it mimics the FreeSurfer 6.0 hippocampal 
module', but is the output 1:1 comparable?
Thank you very much and kind regards,
René
--

Dr. René Seiger
Research Associate

Medical University of Vienna
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy
Division of General Psychiatry
NEUROIMAGING LABS (NIL) - PET, MRI, EEG, TMS & Chemical Lab

Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna
Phone +43 (0) 1 40400-38250
rene.sei...@meduniwien.ac.at
http://www.meduniwien.ac.at/neuroimaging/


___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal subfields: exporting results

2019-12-11 Thread Iglesias Gonzalez, Juan E.
Yes, you should be following the instructions here:
https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/HippocampalSubfieldsAndNucleiOfAmygdala
rather than the wiki page for 6.0 here:
https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/HippocampalSubfields
Cheers,
/Eugenio

Juan Eugenio Iglesias
Senior research fellow
CMIC (UCL), MGH (HMS) and CSAIL (MIT)
http://www.jeiglesias.com


From:  on behalf of Steve Petersen 

Reply-To: Freesurfer support list 
Date: Wednesday, 11 December 2019 at 10:28
To: "freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu" 
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal subfields: exporting results


External Email - Use Caution
Dear Eugenio,

I noticed what was the problem. I used freesurfer dev version with the 
following command:

segmentHA_T2.sh

I tried to export the hippocampal and amygdala results of several subjects with 
these commands and now everything works fine.

quantifyHAsubregions.sh hippoSf HIPO-AMY hippocampal_results.txt

quantifyHAsubregions.sh amygNuc HIPO-AMY amygdala_results.txt



Is there some difference between the segmentHA_T2.sh  that I used and the 
command of the website? In that case I would like to use the most appropriated.



recon-all -s  -hippocampal-subfields-T2  

 Thanks in advance.


Best regards,



___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal subfields: exporting results

2019-12-11 Thread Steve Petersen
External Email - Use Caution

Dear Eugenio,

I noticed what was the problem. I used freesurfer dev version with the
following command:

segmentHA_T2.sh

I tried to export the hippocampal and amygdala results of several subjects
with these commands and now everything works fine.

quantifyHAsubregions.sh hippoSf HIPO-AMY hippocampal_results.txt

quantifyHAsubregions.sh amygNuc HIPO-AMY amygdala_results.txt


Is there some difference between the *segmentHA_T2.sh*  that I used and the
command of the website? In that case I would like to use the most
appropriated.


recon-all -s  *-hippocampal-subfields-T2*  

 Thanks in advance.


Best regards,
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal subfields: exporting results

2019-12-11 Thread Iglesias Gonzalez, Juan E.
Dear Steve,
Can you please send us:
- The segmentation command you used for a sample subject
- A list of the files under the mri directory for that subject.
Cheers,
/Eugenio


Juan Eugenio Iglesias
Senior research fellow
CMIC (UCL), MGH (HMS) and CSAIL (MIT)
http://www.jeiglesias.com


From:  on behalf of Steve Petersen 

Reply-To: Freesurfer support list 
Date: Wednesday, 11 December 2019 at 03:54
To: "freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu" 
Subject: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal subfields: exporting results


External Email - Use Caution
Dear Freesurfer experts,

I used the freesurfer dev version to estimate hippocampal subfields using mode 
B (additional scan).

All have worked fine although when I tried to export the results I can not find 
the txt file created

This is the output



rmnlab1:~ neucoga$ quantifyHippocampalSubfields.sh HIPOAMYG 
HipoAmyg_results.txt /Applications/freesurfer/subjects/4001T1

Gathering results from subjects in:

   /Applications/freesurfer/subjects/4001T1

Using the suffix name:

   HIPOAMYG

And writing them to:

   HipoAmyg_results.txt







Where is saved the HipoAmyg_results.txt file?? I have searched it and I can't 
find it...



Excuse me for this basic question.





Thanks in advance.





Best regards,
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Re: [Freesurfer] hippocampal subfields as masks for mri_segstats

2019-12-04 Thread Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D.
Try using this instead
lh.hippoAmygLabels-T1.v21.FSvoxelSpace.mgz


On 12/4/19 5:09 PM, Marcel Heers wrote:
>
> External Email - Use Caution
>
> Dear all, (dear Eugenio),
>
> I would like to use hippocampal subfields as masks for mri_segstats to 
> retrieve intensity values. I am having problems loading the subfields 
> file although it works fine with aseg.mgz.
>
> Does  anyone know the cause?
>
> Thank you in advance!
>
> Best regards
> Marcel
>
> mri_segstats --seg $SUBJECTS_DIR/test/mri/aseg.mgz --ctab-default 
> --sum output.txt --in $SUBJECTS_DIR/test/mri/T1.mgz
>
> mri_segstats --seg 
> $SUBJECTS_DIR/test/mri/lh.hippoAymgLabels-T1.v21.HBT.mgz --sum 
> output.txt --in $SUBJECTS_DIR/test/mri/T1.mgz
>
> ERROR: loading $SUBJECTS_DIR/test/mri/lh.hippoAymgLabels-T1.v21.HBT.mgz
>
> ___
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Re: [Freesurfer] hippocampal subfields as masks for mri_segstats

2019-12-04 Thread Iglesias Gonzalez, Juan E.
I believe the problem is that they live in different voxel spaces (Doug, can 
you please clarify?)
Cheers,
/Eugenio

Juan Eugenio Iglesias
Senior research fellow
CMIC (UCL), MGH (HMS) and CSAIL (MIT)
http://www.jeiglesias.com


From:  on behalf of Marcel Heers 

Reply-To: Freesurfer support list 
Date: Wednesday, 4 December 2019 at 17:10
To: "Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu" 
Subject: [Freesurfer] hippocampal subfields as masks for mri_segstats


External Email - Use Caution
Dear all, (dear Eugenio),

I would like to use hippocampal subfields as masks for mri_segstats to retrieve 
intensity values. I am having problems loading the subfields file although it 
works fine with aseg.mgz.

Does  anyone know the cause?

Thank you in advance!

Best regards
Marcel

mri_segstats --seg $SUBJECTS_DIR/test/mri/aseg.mgz --ctab-default --sum 
output.txt --in $SUBJECTS_DIR/test/mri/T1.mgz

mri_segstats --seg $SUBJECTS_DIR/test/mri/lh.hippoAymgLabels-T1.v21.HBT.mgz 
--sum output.txt --in $SUBJECTS_DIR/test/mri/T1.mgz

ERROR: loading $SUBJECTS_DIR/test/mri/lh.hippoAymgLabels-T1.v21.HBT.mgz
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal Subfields Atlas

2019-09-25 Thread Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D.
Are you using fsfast?

On 9/25/19 7:00 AM, ZZY wrote:
>
> ?0?2?0?2?0?2?0?2?0?2?0?2?0?2?0?2External Email - Use Caution
>
> Dear ?0?2Doug??
>
> ?0?2 ?0?2 ?0?2I have a group of multimode MRI data, including functional MRI, 
> T1WI and diffusion MRI. We want to analyze the functional and 
> structual connectivity between the hippocampal subregions.?0?2 Now, we 
> have obtained individual-level atlas of hippocampal subfields for each 
> subject by using FREESURFER 6.0 on the T1 image. What should we do 
> next step? How do get a group-level atlas of hippocampal subfields and 
> apply it to functuional and diffusion data?
>
> Best,
>
> Zhiyong
>
>
>
> ___
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal-subfields-T1 interruption (Bruce Fischl)

2019-09-13 Thread Bruce Fischl

glad it worked out
Bruce
On Fri, 13 Sep 2019, 3 6 wrote:



External Email - Use Caution

Hi Bruce,
I checked the alias, I really aliased mv to “mv -i”, and it worked
automatically, after I unaliased.

Thanks for your help.

Best regards,
Guodong

  在
  2019年9月13日,上午12:00,freesurfer-requ...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
  写道:

Re: Hippocampal-subfields-T1 interruption (Bruce Fischl)



___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal-subfields-T1 interruption (Bruce Fischl)

2019-09-13 Thread 3 6
External Email - Use Caution

Hi Bruce,

I checked the alias, I really aliased mv to “mv -i”, and it worked 
automatically, after I unaliased.

Thanks for your help.

Best regards,
Guodong

> 在 2019年9月13日,上午12:00,freesurfer-requ...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 写道:
> 
> Re: Hippocampal-subfields-T1 interruption (Bruce Fischl)

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal-subfields-T1 interruption

2019-09-12 Thread Bruce Fischl

Hi Guodong

Hmmm, not sure what is doing that, but my guess is you have mv aliased. Can 
you type:


which mv

and see if you have it aliased to "mv -i" or some such?

cheers
Bruce


On Thu, 12 Sep 2019, 
3 6 wrote:


   External Email - Use Caution 


Hello FreeSurfer Developers,

I'm attempting to analyze hippocampal subfields for T1 scan, but when I run the command recon-all -s subjects -hippocampal-subfields-T1, I always get interrupted by the warning : 


mv: overwrite ‘imageDump.mgz’?

It keep running only when I type Y or N.

I've searched the list and no similar request have been submitted. Does anyone have any thoughts on how to make it automatically running? Also, I’ve attached the hippocampal-subfields-T1.log in case it's of any use. 


1) FreeSurfer version: freesurfer-Linux-centos6_x86_64-stable-pub-v6.0.0
2) Platform: CentOS release 7 
3) recon-all.log: see attached


Best regards,
Guodong___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal subfields

2019-08-08 Thread Iglesias Gonzalez, Juan E.
Dear Zheng,
I believe you ran out of memory. How much RAM does your machine have? You need 
about 10GB to run this.
Cheers,
/Eugenio

--
Juan Eugenio Iglesias
Senior research fellow
CMIC (UCL), MGH (HMS) and CSAIL (MIT)
http://www.jeiglesias.com


From:  on behalf of 郑凤莲 

Reply-To: Freesurfer support list 
Date: Friday, 9 August 2019 at 01:19
To: Freesurfer support list 
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal subfields


External Email - Use Caution
Dear /Eugenio,

Here is the log files and all results for one subject as the attachments. I 
have run a lots of subjects and all result directories didn't include 
l(r)h.hippoSfLabels-T1.v10.mgz file.

Sincerely,
Zheng



At 2019-08-08 09:49:30, "Iglesias Gonzalez, Juan E." 
 wrote:

Dear Zheng,
Can you please send us the log files?
Kind regards,
/Eugenio

--
Juan Eugenio Iglesias
Senior research fellow
CMIC (UCL), MGH (HMS) and CSAIL (MIT)
http://www.jeiglesias.com


From:  on behalf of 郑凤莲 

Reply-To: Freesurfer support list 
Date: Wednesday, 7 August 2019 at 21:19
To: "freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu" 
Subject: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal subfields


External Email - Use Caution
Hi exports,

I am using FS6.0 to segment hippocampus. I run "recon-all -s bert 
-hippocampal-subfields-T1" and it said "recon all bert finished without error". 
However, in mri directory, there is no l(r)h.hippoSfLabels-T1.v10.mgz file. And 
in tmp directory, there are two directories, "hippoSF_T1_v10_left" and 
"hippoSF_T1_v10_right". But in these two directories, the 
l(r)h.hippoSfLabels-T1.v10.mgz file is still not exsit. What's the matter? I 
need your help. Thanks very muxh in advance.

Sincerely,
Zheng






从网易163邮箱发来的云附件
[Image removed by 
sender.]<http://fs.163.com/fs/display/?p=X-NETEASE-HUGE-ATTACHMENT&file=G-b3qYIpqPb3JDXJ0A047b7py5g69iVSmmIFcThcCOcB6oj2z_omEpB8wqbsFq50xOBA6-GnslKTWj_4hb3Fxw&title=Re%3ARe%3A%20%5BFreesurfer%5D%20Hippocampal%20subfields>
hippocampal-subfields-T1.log<http://fs.163.com/fs/display/?p=X-NETEASE-HUGE-ATTACHMENT&file=G-b3qYIpqPb3JDXJ0A047b7py5g69iVSmmIFcThcCOcB6oj2z_omEpB8wqbsFq50xOBA6-GnslKTWj_4hb3Fxw&title=Re%3ARe%3A%20%5BFreesurfer%5D%20Hippocampal%20subfields>
 (112.5K, 2019年8月24日 13:06 到期)
下载<http://fs.163.com/fs/display/?p=X-NETEASE-HUGE-ATTACHMENT&file=G-b3qYIpqPb3JDXJ0A047b7py5g69iVSmmIFcThcCOcB6oj2z_omEpB8wqbsFq50xOBA6-GnslKTWj_4hb3Fxw&title=Re%3ARe%3A%20%5BFreesurfer%5D%20Hippocampal%20subfields>
[Image removed by 
sender.]<http://fs.163.com/fs/display/?p=X-NETEASE-HUGE-ATTACHMENT&file=G-b3qYIpqPb3JDXJ0A047b7py5g69iVSmmIFcThcCOecwuYYtWpTYGGNnWS7Zp0VT-kslDawp64gaGy57xjFlw&title=Re%3ARe%3A%20%5BFreesurfer%5D%20Hippocampal%20subfields>
CQMS004.zip<http://fs.163.com/fs/display/?p=X-NETEASE-HUGE-ATTACHMENT&file=G-b3qYIpqPb3JDXJ0A047b7py5g69iVSmmIFcThcCOecwuYYtWpTYGGNnWS7Zp0VT-kslDawp64gaGy57xjFlw&title=Re%3ARe%3A%20%5BFreesurfer%5D%20Hippocampal%20subfields>
 (359.89M, 2019年8月24日 12:57 到期)
下载<http://fs.163.com/fs/display/?p=X-NETEASE-HUGE-ATTACHMENT&file=G-b3qYIpqPb3JDXJ0A047b7py5g69iVSmmIFcThcCOecwuYYtWpTYGGNnWS7Zp0VT-kslDawp64gaGy57xjFlw&title=Re%3ARe%3A%20%5BFreesurfer%5D%20Hippocampal%20subfields>





___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal subfields

2019-08-08 Thread 郑凤莲
External Email - Use Caution

Dear /Eugenio,


Here is the log files and all results for one subject as the attachments. I 
have run a lots of subjects and all result directories didn't include 
l(r)h.hippoSfLabels-T1.v10.mgz file.


Sincerely,
Zheng





At 2019-08-08 09:49:30, "Iglesias Gonzalez, Juan E." 
 wrote:


Dear Zheng,

Can you please send us the log files?

Kind regards,

/Eugenio

 

-- 

Juan Eugenio Iglesias

Senior research fellow

CMIC (UCL), MGH (HMS) and CSAIL (MIT)

http://www.jeiglesias.com 

 

 

From:  on behalf of 郑凤莲 

Reply-To: Freesurfer support list 
Date: Wednesday, 7 August 2019 at 21:19
To: "freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu" 
Subject: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal subfields

 

External Email - Use Caution

Hi exports,

 

I am using FS6.0 to segment hippocampus. I run "recon-all -s bert 
-hippocampal-subfields-T1" and it said "recon all bert finished without error". 
However, in mri directory, there is no l(r)h.hippoSfLabels-T1.v10.mgz file. And 
in tmp directory, there are two directories, "hippoSF_T1_v10_left" and 
"hippoSF_T1_v10_right". But in these two directories, the 
l(r)h.hippoSfLabels-T1.v10.mgz file is still not exsit. What's the matter? I 
need your help. Thanks very muxh in advance.

 

Sincerely,

Zheng






 

从网易163邮箱发来的云附件
hippocampal-subfields-T1.log (112.5K, 2019年8月24日 13:06 到期)
下载
CQMS004.zip (359.89M, 2019年8月24日 12:57 到期)
下载___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal subfields

2019-08-07 Thread Iglesias Gonzalez, Juan E.
Dear Zheng,
Can you please send us the log files?
Kind regards,
/Eugenio

--
Juan Eugenio Iglesias
Senior research fellow
CMIC (UCL), MGH (HMS) and CSAIL (MIT)
http://www.jeiglesias.com


From:  on behalf of 郑凤莲 

Reply-To: Freesurfer support list 
Date: Wednesday, 7 August 2019 at 21:19
To: "freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu" 
Subject: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal subfields


External Email - Use Caution
Hi exports,

I am using FS6.0 to segment hippocampus. I run "recon-all -s bert 
-hippocampal-subfields-T1" and it said "recon all bert finished without error". 
However, in mri directory, there is no l(r)h.hippoSfLabels-T1.v10.mgz file. And 
in tmp directory, there are two directories, "hippoSF_T1_v10_left" and 
"hippoSF_T1_v10_right". But in these two directories, the 
l(r)h.hippoSfLabels-T1.v10.mgz file is still not exsit. What's the matter? I 
need your help. Thanks very muxh in advance.

Sincerely,
Zheng





___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Re: [Freesurfer] hippocampal subfields error

2019-06-17 Thread Bruce Fischl
hmmm, that is strange. Can you tar and gzip the entire subject dir then 
upload it to our ftp site?


On Mon, 17 Jun 2019, Iglesias Gonzalez, Eugenio 
wrote:




External Email - Use Caution

OK yes this is a problem with the main recon-all stream. It’d have been a 
miracle for the subfield
module to recover from that…

At this point, I’ll defer to Doug / Bruce.

Cheers,

/E

-- 

Juan Eugenio Iglesias

Senior research fellow

CMIC (UCL), MGH (HMS) and CSAIL (MIT)

http://www.jeiglesias.com 

 

 

From:  on behalf of "Mennecke, Angelika"

Reply-To: Freesurfer support list 
Date: Monday, 17 June 2019 at 10:11
To: Freesurfer support list 
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] hippocampal subfields error

 

External Email - Use Caution

Dear Eugenio,

 

attached you’ll find the picture. Looks as though the left hippocampus has 
erroneously been
attributed to gray matter.

 

Cheers, Angelika

 

Von: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
[mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] Im
Auftrag von Iglesias Gonzalez, Eugenio
Gesendet: Montag, 17. Juni 2019 15:49
An: Freesurfer support list
Betreff: Re: [Freesurfer] hippocampal subfields error

 

External Email - Use Caution

Dear Angelika,

Can you please send us a screenshot of the inaccurate T1 segmentation?

Cheers,

/Eugenio

 

-- 

Juan Eugenio Iglesias

Senior research fellow

CMIC (UCL), MGH (HMS) and CSAIL (MIT)

http://www.jeiglesias.com 

 

 

From:  on behalf of "Mennecke, Angelika"

Reply-To: Freesurfer support list 
Date: Monday, 17 June 2019 at 06:36
To: "freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu" 
Subject: [Freesurfer] hippocampal subfields error

 

External Email - Use Caution

Hi all,

 

I’m doing hippocampal subfields analysis with freesurfer 6.0 with T1 and high 
resolution T2 data
from a 7T MRT. With at least one of my datasets Matlab throws an error during 
the
hippocampal-subfields-T2 –pipeline:

 

Making Unknown map to reduced label 14

Computing hyperparameters for estimation of Gaussians of T2 data

Error using |

Inputs must have the same size.

 

Error in segmentSubjectT2_autoEstimateAlveusML (line 1064)

 

With other patients, the pipeline on the T2 images is correctly working without 
errors. I’m
wondering what is causing this error and whether there is something I can do to 
avoid it?

 

As far as I can see, the only difference between the “error” dataset and the 
others is that
hippocampal subfields-T1 is also not calculated correctly. It finishes without 
errors, but the final
result does not cover the hippocampus correctly (probably due to a 
T1-hypointense cyst in the
hippocampus of that patient).

 

Best regards,

 

Angelika


___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Re: [Freesurfer] hippocampal subfields error

2019-06-17 Thread Iglesias Gonzalez, Eugenio
External Email - Use Caution

OK yes this is a problem with the main recon-all stream. It’d have been a 
miracle for the subfield module to recover from that…
At this point, I’ll defer to Doug / Bruce.
Cheers,
/E
--
Juan Eugenio Iglesias
Senior research fellow
CMIC (UCL), MGH (HMS) and CSAIL (MIT)
http://www.jeiglesias.com


From:  on behalf of "Mennecke, 
Angelika" 
Reply-To: Freesurfer support list 
Date: Monday, 17 June 2019 at 10:11
To: Freesurfer support list 
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] hippocampal subfields error


External Email - Use Caution
Dear Eugenio,

attached you’ll find the picture. Looks as though the left hippocampus has 
erroneously been attributed to gray matter.

Cheers, Angelika

Von: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
[mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] Im Auftrag von Iglesias 
Gonzalez, Eugenio
Gesendet: Montag, 17. Juni 2019 15:49
An: Freesurfer support list
Betreff: Re: [Freesurfer] hippocampal subfields error


External Email - Use Caution
Dear Angelika,
Can you please send us a screenshot of the inaccurate T1 segmentation?
Cheers,
/Eugenio

--
Juan Eugenio Iglesias
Senior research fellow
CMIC (UCL), MGH (HMS) and CSAIL (MIT)
http://www.jeiglesias.com


From:  on behalf of "Mennecke, 
Angelika" 
Reply-To: Freesurfer support list 
Date: Monday, 17 June 2019 at 06:36
To: "freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu" 
Subject: [Freesurfer] hippocampal subfields error


External Email - Use Caution
Hi all,

I’m doing hippocampal subfields analysis with freesurfer 6.0 with T1 and high 
resolution T2 data from a 7T MRT. With at least one of my datasets Matlab 
throws an error during the hippocampal-subfields-T2 –pipeline:

Making Unknown map to reduced label 14
Computing hyperparameters for estimation of Gaussians of T2 data
Error using |
Inputs must have the same size.

Error in segmentSubjectT2_autoEstimateAlveusML (line 1064)

With other patients, the pipeline on the T2 images is correctly working without 
errors. I’m wondering what is causing this error and whether there is something 
I can do to avoid it?

As far as I can see, the only difference between the “error” dataset and the 
others is that hippocampal subfields-T1 is also not calculated correctly. It 
finishes without errors, but the final result does not cover the hippocampus 
correctly (probably due to a T1-hypointense cyst in the hippocampus of that 
patient).

Best regards,

Angelika
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Re: [Freesurfer] hippocampal subfields error

2019-06-17 Thread Iglesias Gonzalez, Eugenio
External Email - Use Caution

Dear Angelika,
Can you please send us a screenshot of the inaccurate T1 segmentation?
Cheers,
/Eugenio

--
Juan Eugenio Iglesias
Senior research fellow
CMIC (UCL), MGH (HMS) and CSAIL (MIT)
http://www.jeiglesias.com


From:  on behalf of "Mennecke, 
Angelika" 
Reply-To: Freesurfer support list 
Date: Monday, 17 June 2019 at 06:36
To: "freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu" 
Subject: [Freesurfer] hippocampal subfields error


External Email - Use Caution
Hi all,

I’m doing hippocampal subfields analysis with freesurfer 6.0 with T1 and high 
resolution T2 data from a 7T MRT. With at least one of my datasets Matlab 
throws an error during the hippocampal-subfields-T2 –pipeline:

Making Unknown map to reduced label 14
Computing hyperparameters for estimation of Gaussians of T2 data
Error using |
Inputs must have the same size.

Error in segmentSubjectT2_autoEstimateAlveusML (line 1064)

With other patients, the pipeline on the T2 images is correctly working without 
errors. I’m wondering what is causing this error and whether there is something 
I can do to avoid it?

As far as I can see, the only difference between the “error” dataset and the 
others is that hippocampal subfields-T1 is also not calculated correctly. It 
finishes without errors, but the final result does not cover the hippocampus 
correctly (probably due to a T1-hypointense cyst in the hippocampus of that 
patient).

Best regards,

Angelika
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal subfields segmentation template

2019-04-30 Thread Iglesias Gonzalez, Eugenio
External Email - Use Caution

Dear Wu,
The “templates” are probabilistic atlases with no image intensities. All you 
can look at is images like the ones in the top panel of Figure 5 in the paper.
If you want to generate these, let me know and I’ll show you instructions (it’s 
a bit tricky, because it requires  combining different versions of FreeSurfer….)
Cheers,
/Eugenio

--
Juan Eugenio Iglesias
Senior research fellow
CMIC (UCL), MGH (HMS) and CSAIL (MIT)
http://www.jeiglesias.com


From:  on behalf of Dongsheng Wu 

Reply-To: Freesurfer support list 
Date: Tuesday, 30 April 2019 at 04:38
To: "freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu" 
Subject: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal subfields segmentation template


External Email - Use Caution
Dear FS developers,

I uesd the ''recon-all command'' to get the volumes of the hippocampal 
subfields, and we would like to perform further analysis with  these subfields 
in MNI. Could you show us the templates which are used to perform hippocampal 
segmentation (CA1, CA3, HATA, etc.)?


Best wishes,
Wu





___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Re: [Freesurfer] hippocampal subfields

2018-10-08 Thread Iglesias Gonzalez, Eugenio
External Email - Use Caution

Thanks, Marcel. Can you please send us the whole output (can be found in the 
log file)
Cheers,
/E

--
Juan Eugenio Iglesias
ERC Senior Research Fellow
Centre for Medical Image Computing (CMIC)
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/


From:  on behalf of Marcel Heers 

Reply-To: Freesurfer support list 
Date: Monday, 8 October 2018 at 20:45
To: "freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu" 
Subject: [Freesurfer] hippocampal subfields


External Email - Use Caution
Dear Eugenio,

there is one error in the error.log: 'Could not set locale'.

Best regards

Marcel
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Re: [Freesurfer] hippocampal subfields error

2018-10-03 Thread Iglesias Gonzalez, Eugenio
External Email - Use Caution

That sounds pretty weird… Did you get any error messages on the Linux server?
Cheers,
/Eugenio

--
Juan Eugenio Iglesias
ERC Senior Research Fellow
Centre for Medical Image Computing (CMIC)
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/


From:  on behalf of Marcel Heers 

Reply-To: Freesurfer support list 
Date: Wednesday, 3 October 2018 at 20:11
To: "freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu" 
Subject: [Freesurfer] hippocampal subfields error


External Email - Use Caution
Dear Eugenio,

I am currently testing the newest version of your hippocampal subfield analysis 
script. If I process the data on my macbook the files 
hipposubfields.lh.T2.v21.file_ID contain the volumes of the different nuclei, 
but on the linux server these files remain empty. On the server I installed 
freesurfer as local user. Do you have any suggestions how to check what might 
go wrong?

Thanks for your help!

Marcel
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Re: [Freesurfer] hippocampal subfields segmentation error

2018-07-30 Thread 오진영
External Email - Use Caution

Dear Eugenio

Thank you for your help.
As I need to segment the nuclei of amygdala, I'll try to download the
development version.

Thanks!!

Jinyoung

2018-07-30 17:39 GMT+09:00 Iglesias Gonzalez, Eugenio 
:

> External Email - Use Caution
>
> Dear Jin,
>
> 6.0 does not segment the nuclei of the amygdala; you can ignore that line,
> assuming the code runs to completion (I am assuming it does?)
>
> If you want to segment the nuclei of the amygdala, you’ll have to download
> the development version:
>
> http://freesurfer.net/fswiki/HippocampalSubfieldsAndNucleiOfAmygdala
>
> Cheers,
>
> /Eugenio
>
>
>
> --
>
> Juan Eugenio Iglesias
>
> ERC Senior Research Fellow
>
> Centre for Medical Image Computing (CMIC)
>
> University College London
>
> http://www.jeiglesias.com
>
> http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: * on behalf of 오진영 <
> jinyoung.oh...@gmail.com>
> *Reply-To: *Freesurfer support list 
> *Date: *Monday, 30 July 2018 at 09:29
> *To: *Freesurfer support list 
> *Subject: *Re: [Freesurfer] hippocampal subfields segmentation error
>
>
>
> *External Email - Use Caution*
>
> Dear Eugenio,
>
>
>
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> I am running version "freesurfer-Darwin-OSX-stable-pub-v6.0.0-2beb96c" of
> freesurfer.
>
> As the log is so long, I attached whole log as a text file and I just
> copied few lines before the error below:
>
>
>
> WorldToImageTransform after cropping:
>
> AffineTransform (0x128c17790)
>
>   RTTI typeinfo:   itk::AffineTransform
>
>   Reference Count: 1
>
>   Modified Time: 377450804
>
>   Debug: Off
>
>   Object Name:
>
>   Observers:
>
> none
>
>   Matrix:
>
> -3.3 8.73125e-11 2.22045e-16
>
> -8.4821e-14 -2.67186e-12 -3.3
>
> 5.55112e-16 3.3 1.97674e-10
>
>   Offset: [15.4608, 101.71, 117.525]
>
>   Center: [0, 0, 0]
>
>   Translation: [15.4608, 101.71, 117.525]
>
>   Inverse:
>
> -0.3 4.85723e-17 9.7012e-12
>
> 8.32667e-17 2.19633e-11 0.3
>
> 9.42996e-15 -0.3 -2.96735e-13
>
>   Singular: 0
>
> I am WriteImage and I'm running!
>
> Wrote image to file asmr2.mgz
>
> This file does not contain MRI parameters
>
> This file does not contain MRI parameters
>
> numberOfLabels: 25
>
> Rasterizing mesh...here: 25
>
> here2: 25
>
> done
>
> mri_convert.bin discreteLabels.mgz discreteLabelsResampledT1.mgz -rt
> nearest -odt float -rl /Users/mnd_mac/Desktop/JY_
> surfer/T1_data/Jinyoung_T1/Jinyoung_test/mri/norm.mgz
>
> $Id: mri_convert.c,v 1.226 2016/02/26 16:15:24 mreuter Exp $
>
> reading from discreteLabels.mgz...
>
> TR=0.00, TE=0.00, TI=0.00, flip angle=0.00
>
> i_ras = (-1, 0, 2.84217e-14)
>
> j_ras = (0, 6.58905e-11, -1)
>
> k_ras = (2.91038e-11, 1, -8.90815e-13)
>
> reading template info from volume /Users/mnd_mac/Desktop/JY_
> surfer/T1_data/Jinyoung_T1/Jinyoung_test/mri/norm.mgz...
>
> Reslicing using nearest
>
> writing to discreteLabelsResampledT1.mgz...
>
> mv: rename volumesAmygdala.txt to /Users/mnd_mac/Desktop/JY_
> surfer/T1_data/Jinyoung_T1/Jinyoung_test/mri/lh.
> hippoSfVolumes-T1.amygdala.v10.txt: No such file or directory
>
>
>
> Thank you so much.
>
> Hope to hear you soon!
>
>
>
> Jin Young
>
>
>
> 2018-07-30 17:01 GMT+09:00 Iglesias Gonzalez, Eugenio <
> e.igles...@ucl.ac.uk>:
>
> *External Email - Use Caution*
>
> Dear Jinyoung,
>
> Can you please send us the log, or at least the last few lines before the
> error?
>
> Also, which exact version are you using? 6.0 or dev?
>
> Cheers,
>
> /Eugenio
>
>
>
> --
>
> Juan Eugenio Iglesias
>
> ERC Senior Research Fellow
>
> Centre for Medical Image Computing (CMIC)
>
> University College London
>
> http://www.jeiglesias.com
>
> http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: * on behalf of 오진영 <
> jinyoung.oh...@gmail.com>
> *Reply-To: *Freesurfer support list 
> *Date: *Monday, 30 July 2018 at 06:41
> *To: *"freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu" 
> *Cc: *JongHyun Lee 
> *Subject: *[Freesurfer] hippocampal subfields segmentation error
>
>
>
> *External Email - Use Caution*
>
> Hello, freesurfer experts
>
>
>
> I'm trying to run segmentation of hippocampal subfields and nuclei of
> amygdala by using "segmentSF_T1.sh" command.
>
> I have downloaded the newest development version(free

Re: [Freesurfer] hippocampal subfields segmentation error

2018-07-30 Thread Iglesias Gonzalez, Eugenio
External Email - Use Caution

Dear Jin,
6.0 does not segment the nuclei of the amygdala; you can ignore that line, 
assuming the code runs to completion (I am assuming it does?)
If you want to segment the nuclei of the amygdala, you’ll have to download the 
development version:
http://freesurfer.net/fswiki/HippocampalSubfieldsAndNucleiOfAmygdala
Cheers,
/Eugenio

--
Juan Eugenio Iglesias
ERC Senior Research Fellow
Centre for Medical Image Computing (CMIC)
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/


From:  on behalf of 오진영 

Reply-To: Freesurfer support list 
Date: Monday, 30 July 2018 at 09:29
To: Freesurfer support list 
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] hippocampal subfields segmentation error


External Email - Use Caution
Dear Eugenio,

Thanks for your reply.
I am running version "freesurfer-Darwin-OSX-stable-pub-v6.0.0-2beb96c" of 
freesurfer.
As the log is so long, I attached whole log as a text file and I just copied 
few lines before the error below:


WorldToImageTransform after cropping:

AffineTransform (0x128c17790)

  RTTI typeinfo:   itk::AffineTransform

  Reference Count: 1

  Modified Time: 377450804

  Debug: Off

  Object Name:

  Observers:

none

  Matrix:

-3.3 8.73125e-11 2.22045e-16

-8.4821e-14 -2.67186e-12 -3.3

5.55112e-16 3.3 1.97674e-10

  Offset: [15.4608, 101.71, 117.525]

  Center: [0, 0, 0]

  Translation: [15.4608, 101.71, 117.525]

  Inverse:

-0.3 4.85723e-17 9.7012e-12

8.32667e-17 2.19633e-11 0.3

9.42996e-15 -0.3 -2.96735e-13

  Singular: 0

I am WriteImage and I'm running!

Wrote image to file asmr2.mgz

This file does not contain MRI parameters

This file does not contain MRI parameters

numberOfLabels: 25

Rasterizing mesh...here: 25

here2: 25

done

mri_convert.bin discreteLabels.mgz discreteLabelsResampledT1.mgz -rt nearest 
-odt float -rl 
/Users/mnd_mac/Desktop/JY_surfer/T1_data/Jinyoung_T1/Jinyoung_test/mri/norm.mgz

$Id: mri_convert.c,v 1.226 2016/02/26 16:15:24 mreuter Exp $

reading from discreteLabels.mgz...

TR=0.00, TE=0.00, TI=0.00, flip angle=0.00

i_ras = (-1, 0, 2.84217e-14)

j_ras = (0, 6.58905e-11, -1)

k_ras = (2.91038e-11, 1, -8.90815e-13)

reading template info from volume 
/Users/mnd_mac/Desktop/JY_surfer/T1_data/Jinyoung_T1/Jinyoung_test/mri/norm.mgz...

Reslicing using nearest

writing to discreteLabelsResampledT1.mgz...

mv: rename volumesAmygdala.txt to 
/Users/mnd_mac/Desktop/JY_surfer/T1_data/Jinyoung_T1/Jinyoung_test/mri/lh.hippoSfVolumes-T1.amygdala.v10.txt:
 No such file or directory

Thank you so much.
Hope to hear you soon!

Jin Young

2018-07-30 17:01 GMT+09:00 Iglesias Gonzalez, Eugenio 
mailto:e.igles...@ucl.ac.uk>>:

External Email - Use Caution
Dear Jinyoung,
Can you please send us the log, or at least the last few lines before the error?
Also, which exact version are you using? 6.0 or dev?
Cheers,
/Eugenio

--
Juan Eugenio Iglesias
ERC Senior Research Fellow
Centre for Medical Image Computing (CMIC)
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/


From: 
mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>
 on behalf of 오진영 mailto:jinyoung.oh...@gmail.com>>
Reply-To: Freesurfer support list 
mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>
Date: Monday, 30 July 2018 at 06:41
To: "freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>" 
mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>
Cc: JongHyun Lee mailto:jonghyunlee1...@gmail.com>>
Subject: [Freesurfer] hippocampal subfields segmentation error


External Email - Use Caution
Hello, freesurfer experts

I'm trying to run segmentation of hippocampal subfields and nuclei of amygdala 
by using "segmentSF_T1.sh" command.
I have downloaded the newest development version(freesurfer v.6.0) and license, 
as well as the required matlab runtime.

However, I am getting the following error:
mv: rename volumesAmygdala.txt to 
/Users/mnd_mac/Desktop/JY_surfer/T1_data/Jinyoung_T1/Jinyoung_test/mri/lh.hippoSfVolumes-T1.amygdala.v10.txt:
 No such file or directory

and I have no idea how to find the text file and solve this problem out.
If you have any idea or recommends, please send me the e-mail back.

Thanks!

Jinyoung


___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] hippocampal subfields segmentation error

2018-07-30 Thread Iglesias Gonzalez, Eugenio
External Email - Use Caution

Dear Jinyoung,
Can you please send us the log, or at least the last few lines before the error?
Also, which exact version are you using? 6.0 or dev?
Cheers,
/Eugenio

--
Juan Eugenio Iglesias
ERC Senior Research Fellow
Centre for Medical Image Computing (CMIC)
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/


From:  on behalf of 오진영 

Reply-To: Freesurfer support list 
Date: Monday, 30 July 2018 at 06:41
To: "freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu" 
Cc: JongHyun Lee 
Subject: [Freesurfer] hippocampal subfields segmentation error


External Email - Use Caution
Hello, freesurfer experts

I'm trying to run segmentation of hippocampal subfields and nuclei of amygdala 
by using "segmentSF_T1.sh" command.
I have downloaded the newest development version(freesurfer v.6.0) and license, 
as well as the required matlab runtime.

However, I am getting the following error:
mv: rename volumesAmygdala.txt to 
/Users/mnd_mac/Desktop/JY_surfer/T1_data/Jinyoung_T1/Jinyoung_test/mri/lh.hippoSfVolumes-T1.amygdala.v10.txt:
 No such file or directory

and I have no idea how to find the text file and solve this problem out.
If you have any idea or recommends, please send me the e-mail back.

Thanks!

Jinyoung

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal Subfields Module, output error

2018-03-23 Thread Hurtado, Aura Maria
Thanks, Eugenio. We used the stable 6 version for reconall:
reconall -all back in 06 13 2017,
this is the build-stamp.txt: 
freesurfer-Linux-centos6_x86_64-stable-v6-20170215-dc3d7a6
reconall -long back in 02 27 2018,
this is the build-stamp.txt: 
freesurfer-Linux-centos7_x86_64-stable-v6-20161229-80ac5eb

I did use a development version for the hippocampal analyses on 02/28, 03/01 
and 03/02. I can’t find any specific references to those…

Aura M.






On Mar 23, 2018, at 5:43 AM, Iglesias Gonzalez, Eugenio 
mailto:e.igles...@ucl.ac.uk>> wrote:

Thanks, Aura.
What exact version of FreeSurfer are you using? I’m assuming it’s a development 
version, but from when? The results are indeed weird…

--
Juan Eugenio Iglesias
ERC Senior Research Fellow
Translational Imaging Group
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com<http://www.jeiglesias.com/>
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/


From: 
mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>
 on behalf of "Hurtado, Aura Maria" 
mailto:ahurt...@mgh.harvard.edu>>
Reply-To: Freesurfer support list 
mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>
Date: Friday, 23 March 2018 at 05:28
To: Freesurfer support list 
mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal Subfields Module, output error

Hi Eugenio,

Thank you for replying so quickly to my lengthy message. I correct some of my 
statements,

1. Matlab 8.4 was used (not 8.2)
2. When I ran the cross-sectional subfield command, I did not get exit errors 
as I did with the longitudinal command (kvlGetOptimizer). I got output errors 
and warnings of non convergence in the log file.

-I see your point. I mean the built-in hippocampal module (v10) worked when 
reconall was run with fs60 (hippoSf). When run independently, the hippocampal 
module (v21) exited with errors when using segmentHA_T1_long.sh, and the output 
was off when using segmentHA_T1.sh (this is better seen in pic 3). I hope this 
clarifies a bit. Please tell me if it doesn’t.

These are screenshots of the images output by jobs that exited without 
processing errors:

Pic 1 is an overlay of:
rh.hippoAmygLabels-T1 and lh.hippoAmygLabels-T1 output by segmentHA_T1_long.sh 
SUBJ1_timepoint1.long.SUBJ1_basetemplate
aseg and T1 output by fs60 reconall -long
(I am now noticing these *.long.* directories contain hippoSfVolumes text 
files, but not hippoSfLabels mgz files...)



Pic 2 is an overlay of:
rh.hippoAmygLabels-T1 and lh.hippoAmygLabels-T1 output by segmentHA_T1.sh 
SUBJ1_timepoint1.long.SUBJ1_basetemplate
aseg and T1 output by fs60 reconall




Pic 3 is an overlay of:
rh.hippoAmygLabels-T1 output by segmentHA_T1.sh SUBJ1_timepoint1
aseg, T1 and lh.hippoSfLabels-T1.v10 output by fs60 reconall



Thanks again

Aura M.






On Mar 21, 2018, at 6:33 PM, Iglesias Gonzalez, Eugenio 
mailto:e.igles...@ucl.ac.uk>> wrote:

Hi Aura,

1. What do you mean by “loading Matlab 8.2”? It should be Matlab 8.4 (2014b).
2. “Some still did”: what error did you get?

- Also, I’m confused by what you wrote, that subfields worked but hippocampal 
module didn’t (aren’t they the same thing?)
- Finally: can you please send us a screenshot of one of those abruptly cut 
hippocampi, so I better understand what might be going on?

Cheers,

/Eugenio


--
Juan Eugenio Iglesias
ERC Senior Research Fellow
Translational Imaging Group
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com<http://www.jeiglesias.com/>
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/


From: 
mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>
 on behalf of "Hurtado, Aura Maria" 
mailto:ahurt...@mgh.harvard.edu>>
Reply-To: Freesurfer support list 
mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>
Date: Wednesday, 21 March 2018 at 22:24
To: "freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>" 
mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>
Subject: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal Subfields Module, output error

Hi,

I am attempting to use the longitudinal pipeline of the "hippocampal subfields 
and nuclei of amygdala”, but keep getting a flawed output.

My dataset consists of images from a longitudinal study with some dropouts. 
First, I ran the reconall longitudinal pipeline in fs60 for all subjects. I got 
no errors. Then, I tried

1. Running the longitudinal pipeline of the hippocampal module, loading Matlab 
8.2 to run
segmentHA_T1_long.sh SUBJ1_basetemplate
segmentHA_T1_long.sh SUBJ2_basetemplate
etc

I got an error in most of these jobs (mostly for templates of subjects with 
multiple visits) that read

"ERROR: MatlabObjectArray(0x7fd7ce84cea0): Trying to access non-existing object 
(25)

Error in kvlGetOptimizer (line 11)

Error in SegmentSubfieldsT1Longitudinal (line 1155)”

2. I then tried running the cross sectional pipeline for each one of the 
timepoints in subjects already processed by the reconall longitudinal pipeline 
(i. e. segmentations in the  .long. directories)
segmentHA_T

Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal Subfields Module, output error

2018-03-23 Thread Iglesias Gonzalez, Eugenio
Thanks, Aura.
What exact version of FreeSurfer are you using? I’m assuming it’s a development 
version, but from when? The results are indeed weird…



--
Juan Eugenio Iglesias
ERC Senior Research Fellow
Translational Imaging Group
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/


From:  on behalf of "Hurtado, Aura 
Maria" 
Reply-To: Freesurfer support list 
Date: Friday, 23 March 2018 at 05:28
To: Freesurfer support list 
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal Subfields Module, output error

Hi Eugenio,

Thank you for replying so quickly to my lengthy message. I correct some of my 
statements,

1. Matlab 8.4 was used (not 8.2)
2. When I ran the cross-sectional subfield command, I did not get exit errors 
as I did with the longitudinal command (kvlGetOptimizer). I got output errors 
and warnings of non convergence in the log file.

-I see your point. I mean the built-in hippocampal module (v10) worked when 
reconall was run with fs60 (hippoSf). When run independently, the hippocampal 
module (v21) exited with errors when using segmentHA_T1_long.sh, and the output 
was off when using segmentHA_T1.sh (this is better seen in pic 3). I hope this 
clarifies a bit. Please tell me if it doesn’t.

These are screenshots of the images output by jobs that exited without 
processing errors:
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal subfields

2018-03-22 Thread Iglesias Gonzalez, Eugenio
Dear Arsenije
The atlas is encoded in a tetrahedral mesh, so there is no nifti file for it.
Having said that, it is possible to rasterize the atlas at a target resolution.
The command is the following:

kvlRasterizeAtlasMesh $FREESURFER_HOME/average/HippoSF/atlas/AtlasMesh.gz  
$FREESURFER_HOME/average/HippoSF/atlas/AtlasDump.mgz X  -1

where X is the label number (see 
$FREESURFER_HOME/average/HippoSF/atlas/compressionLookupTable.txt for a 
listing; 0 is cortex, 1 is cerebral white matter, etc). -1 indicates the 
reference position of the atlas, so do not modify that.

This command will create a file called rasterized.mgz. You can convert it to 
nifty with mri_convert, eg.
mri_convert rasterized.mgz probability_label_X.nii.gz

You can do this with all the different hippocampal labels. And if you want a 
probability for the whole hippocampus, which is probably what you need for the 
registration with your manual mask, you can sum the probabilities of the 
different subfields into a single volume (e.g., with fslmaths)

I hope this helps,

/Eugenio




--
Juan Eugenio Iglesias
ERC Senior Research Fellow
Translational Imaging Group
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/


From:  on behalf of Arsenije Subotic 

Reply-To: Freesurfer support list 
Date: Thursday, 22 March 2018 at 15:15
To: "freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu" 
Subject: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal subfields

Hi all

I would like to use subfield specific hippocampus maps that were produced Dr 
Iglesias's Lab: https://sites.google.com/site/jeiglesias/hippocampal-subfields

These maps are available via FreeSurfer, however our lab is trying to segment 
hippocampus subregions from already manually extracted hippocampuses. In other 
words, we have manually traced hippocampus masks in a NIFTI format that we 
would like to co-register with these maps.

How can I directly download subfield specific hippocampal atlases in a NIFTI 
format so that we can use non linear co registration after?

Thank you very much.

Look forward hearing from you,

Arsenije
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal Subfields Module, output error

2018-03-21 Thread Iglesias Gonzalez, Eugenio
Hi Aura,

1. What do you mean by “loading Matlab 8.2”? It should be Matlab 8.4 (2014b).
2. “Some still did”: what error did you get?

- Also, I’m confused by what you wrote, that subfields worked but hippocampal 
module didn’t (aren’t they the same thing?)
- Finally: can you please send us a screenshot of one of those abruptly cut 
hippocampi, so I better understand what might be going on?

Cheers,

/Eugenio


--
Juan Eugenio Iglesias
ERC Senior Research Fellow
Translational Imaging Group
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/


From:  on behalf of "Hurtado, Aura 
Maria" 
Reply-To: Freesurfer support list 
Date: Wednesday, 21 March 2018 at 22:24
To: "freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu" 
Subject: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal Subfields Module, output error

Hi,

I am attempting to use the longitudinal pipeline of the "hippocampal subfields 
and nuclei of amygdala”, but keep getting a flawed output.

My dataset consists of images from a longitudinal study with some dropouts. 
First, I ran the reconall longitudinal pipeline in fs60 for all subjects. I got 
no errors. Then, I tried

1. Running the longitudinal pipeline of the hippocampal module, loading Matlab 
8.2 to run
segmentHA_T1_long.sh SUBJ1_basetemplate
segmentHA_T1_long.sh SUBJ2_basetemplate
etc

I got an error in most of these jobs (mostly for templates of subjects with 
multiple visits) that read

"ERROR: MatlabObjectArray(0x7fd7ce84cea0): Trying to access non-existing object 
(25)

Error in kvlGetOptimizer (line 11)

Error in SegmentSubfieldsT1Longitudinal (line 1155)”

2. I then tried running the cross sectional pipeline for each one of the 
timepoints in subjects already processed by the reconall longitudinal pipeline 
(i. e. segmentations in the  .long. directories)
segmentHA_T1.sh SUBJ1_timepoint1.long.SUBJ1_basetemplate
segmentHA_T1.sh SUBJ1_timepoint2.long.SUBJ1_basetemplate
segmentHA_T1.sh SUBJ2_timepoint1.long.SUBJ2_basetemplate
segmentHA_T1.sh SUBJ3_timepoint1.long.SUBJ3_basetemplate
etc

Most of them ran without errors, but some still did.

3. I then tried to run the cross sectional hippocampal module for all 
subjects/timepoints without using the reconall longitudinal pipeline
segmentHA_T1.sh SUBJ1_timepoint1
segmentHA_T1.sh SUBJ1_timepoint2
segmentHA_T1.sh SUBJ2_timepoint1
segmentHA_T1.sh SUBJ3_timepoint1
etc

They were processed without errors. But when inspecting the processing log, 
there was a message that appeared 4 times in the file

"WARNING: Registration did not converge in 5 steps!
*  Problem might be ill posed.
*  Please inspect output manually!
………
……..
…...
Everything done!
It took 766.0135 seconds “

With manual inspection, subfield segmentations output by fs60 seemed fine in 
all the directories of the reconall cross sectional and longitudinal outputs 
(hippoSfLabels-T1). For the Hippocampal Module outputs (hippoAmygLabels-T1), 
the hippocampus was abbruptly cut, sometimes laterally, sometimes dorsally. 
This was the case for all three analyses.

I wonder what is the problem and what I can do to fix it so I can successfully 
run the longitudinal pipeline of the "hippocampal subfields and nuclei of 
amygdala”


Thanks for your help!

Aura M.





___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal subfields segmentation

2018-01-22 Thread Iglesias Gonzalez, Eugenio
Hi Alexis,
Yes please send me the images!
Cheers,
/E

--
Juan Eugenio Iglesias
ERC Senior Research Fellow
Translational Imaging Group
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/


From:  on behalf of Alexis Guyot 

Reply-To: Freesurfer support list 
Date: Monday, 22 January 2018 at 17:49
To: "freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu" 
Subject: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal subfields segmentation

Dear Freesurfer developers,

I have been trying to segment (with Freesurfer v6.0.0, on Ubuntu 14.04) the 
hippocampal subfields of two 7T MR images in NIFTI format: an isotropic 
(0.8*0.8*0.8 mm3) whole-brain T1-weighted source volume with an anisotropic 
(0.3*1.2*0.3 mm3) T2-weighted volume covering the brain partially and centred 
on a region comprising both hippocampi.

I have followed the instructions in 
https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/HighFieldRecon to correct the bias in 
the two 7T volumes ('T1_biasCorrected.png', 'T2_biasCorrected.png'). I have run 
'recon-all -hires [...] -expert expert.txt' ('expert.txt') on my bias-corrected 
T1 volume, which produced an accurate segmentation ('aseg.png', 
'recon-all.log'). Following this, I have run 'recon-all 
-hippocampal-subfields-T2' on the bias-corrected T2 volume 
('hippocampal-subfields-T2.log').
Looking at the resulting segmentation, I am unsure the molecular layer has been 
properly delineated in the body of the hippocampus 
('right_hippocampus_body.png', 'right_hippocampus_body_seg.png'). In addition, 
it appears the convolutions in the hippocampal head have not been correctly 
segmented ('right_hippocampus_head.png', 'right_hippocampus_head_seg.png').

I am not certain this is the expected behaviour when running the hippocampal 
subfields module on high-res data. Is it possible the recon-all output is not 
accurate enough (should I adjust the mres_inflate value prior to segmenting the 
brain)? Could the high anisotropy of the T2 volume hinder the segmentation 
process?
Any thoughts on this? Screenshots/attachments are available on request, as my 
previous message was rejected for being too big.

Thanks for your help,
Alexis
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] hippocampal subfields in younger populations

2018-01-10 Thread Iglesias Gonzalez, Eugenio
Dear Christian,

They atlas is built using subfield segmentations on scans of older adult 
brains, but:
1. it’s also built with whole hippocampus segmentations of scans of subjects of 
a wider age range.
2. the deformation model should be able to account for large parts of the 
anatomical differences between subjects of different ages.

> I would think this would be an issue for young kids that have markedly 
> different brain volumes, but not for older kids and young adults that differ 
> less dramatically from older adults.

I agree with this statement.

I hope this helps!

/Eugenio

--
Juan Eugenio Iglesias
ERC Senior Research Fellow
Translational Imaging Group
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/


From:  on behalf of Christian Krog 
Tamnes 
Reply-To: Freesurfer support list 
Date: Wednesday, 10 January 2018 at 11:33
To: Freesurfer support list 
Subject: [Freesurfer] hippocampal subfields in younger populations


Dear FreeSurfer and hippocampal subfield segmentation developers,



I have noted that the FS6.0 hippocampal subfield segmentation procedure was 
developed using scans of older adult brains. Has the application of this method 
to kids, adolescents and/or young adults in any way been validated? Or do you 
have any thoughts regarding such use of the method?



I would think this would be an issue for young kids that have markedly 
different brain volumes, but not for older kids and young adults that differ 
less dramatically from older adults. But I would greatly appreciate any input 
regarding this.



Best regards,

Christian
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] hippocampal subfields stats

2017-11-27 Thread Iglesias Gonzalez, Eugenio
Dear Donatas,
I believe that mri_segstats is just counting voxels using the hard 
segmentation, whereas the volume in lh.hippoSfVolumes-T1.long.v20.txt is 
obtained using a soft segmentation. If you’re interested in this, look up the 
WRITE_POSTERIORS option in the wiki.
Cheers,
/Eugenio

-- 
Juan Eugenio Iglesias
ERC Senior Research Fellow
Translational Imaging Group
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/
 

On 21/11/2017, 18:00, "freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu on behalf of 
Donatas Sederevicius"  wrote:

Dear Freesurfer Developers,

I’ve run the new longitudinal hippocampal subfields segmentation using 
Freesurfer’s developer version. Then I decided to extract stats for each 
hierarchy: HBT, FS60 and CA. I used the following command, for example: 

mri_segstats —seg lh.hippoAmygLabels-T1.long.v20.CA.mgz —ctab-default —sum 
output.txt

I got what I wanted but decided to compare the results of one subject for 
Hippocampal_tail for each hierarchy and with the text file 
lh.hippoSfVolumes-T1.long.v20.txt. I got the following volume values:


lh.hippoSfVolumes-T1.long.v20.txt: 583.65
HBT: 593.4
FS60: 593.4
CA: 598.3

I wonder how do you actually extract stats that are present in 
lh.hippoSfVolumes-T1.long.v20.txt file? What is the reason for different 
values? I’m very curious since I cannot get the exact same stats as in the 
lh.hippoSfVolumes-T1.long.v20.txt file.

Thanks a lot!
Donatas




___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the 
e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance 
HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in 
error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and 
properly
dispose of the e-mail.



___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Re: [Freesurfer] hippocampal subfields downsampling question

2017-10-26 Thread Joost Janssen
Great question!

El 26/10/2017 17:09, "NIELS JANSSEN ."  escribió:

> In the mri output folder, I noticed that both the 0.33 mm and 1 mm
> (voxelspace) maps have subfields that do not overlap in space, meaning that
> each subfield occupies a unique location in space that does not overlap
> with other subfields (i.e., 12 subfields and 12 unique voxel intensities).
> I am wondering how this is achieved for both resolutions simultaneously. Do
> you 'fit' the subfields first to the 0.33 mm data and then transform the
> data to the 1mm space, or do you fit to both spaces separately? I would
> like to transform the subfields to 1.5 mm data and are able to do so
> accurately, but I run into problems with subfield overlap because of the
> down sampling. I am wondering how to best deal with this issue, and from
> seeing non-overlapping subfields at both 0.33 and 1 mm I am thinking there
> must be someway to deal with this issue.
>
>
> --
> Niels Janssen
> Brain Imaging Laboratory
> Institute of Biomedical Technologies
> Center for Biomedical Research of the Canary Islands
> University of La Laguna
> Tenerife, Spain
> https://sites.google.com/view/nielsjanssen/
>
> ___
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>
> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it
> is
> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
> e-mail
> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
> HelpLine at
> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in
> error
> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and
> properly
> dispose of the e-mail.
>
>
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] hippocampal subfields downsampling question

2017-10-26 Thread Iglesias Gonzalez, Eugenio
Hi Niels,

The code works at .33 mm and ends up with a soft segmentation for each voxel, 
i.e., each voxel has a vector of probabilities corresponding to the different 
structures. So, they DO overlap. However, we don’t write those probabilities by 
default. Instead, we take the most likely label at each location (the one with 
the maximal probability), to create the discrete segmentation you’ve seen. 
Then, I do a simple nearest neighbor resampling to 1mm space, which I admit is 
a bit ugly (but fast).

My recommendation would be the following:

1. For each label of the discrete segmentation, including the background (treat 
is as any other subfield):
   1a. First extract it from the segmentation, to create a binary mask (e.g., 
CA1 vs everything else).
   1b. Resample this mask to your new space with linear interpolation. This 
will create a deformed mask that is not binary anymore, but will have values 
between 0 and 1 (or 0 and 255, depending on how you binarize in step 1a).

2. Go over all voxels in the target space. For each voxel, look at the values 
of the deformed masks. Assign the label of the mask with the highest value.

This procedure will create a smooth segmentation.

If you’re feeling really inspired, you’ve got another (prettier) option. Run 
the code with WRITE_POSTERIORS (see the wiki). Then, you can do the same thing, 
but skipping step 1a, and using the posteriors in step 1b directly instead. 
Note that the code does not write the posterior for the background, but you can 
easily calculate this as one minus the sum of all other posteriors (at each 
voxel).

I hope this helps!

Cheers,

/Eugenio



--
Juan Eugenio Iglesias
ERC Senior Research Fellow
Translational Imaging Group
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/


From:  on behalf of "NIELS JANSSEN ." 

Reply-To: Freesurfer support list 
Date: Thursday, 26 October 2017 at 16:08
To: "freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu" 
Subject: [Freesurfer] hippocampal subfields downsampling question

In the mri output folder, I noticed that both the 0.33 mm and 1 mm (voxelspace) 
maps have subfields that do not overlap in space, meaning that each subfield 
occupies a unique location in space that does not overlap with other subfields 
(i.e., 12 subfields and 12 unique voxel intensities). I am wondering how this 
is achieved for both resolutions simultaneously. Do you 'fit' the subfields 
first to the 0.33 mm data and then transform the data to the 1mm space, or do 
you fit to both spaces separately? I would like to transform the subfields to 
1.5 mm data and are able to do so accurately, but I run into problems with 
subfield overlap because of the down sampling. I am wondering how to best deal 
with this issue, and from seeing non-overlapping subfields at both 0.33 and 1 
mm I am thinking there must be someway to deal with this issue.


--
Niels Janssen
Brain Imaging Laboratory
Institute of Biomedical Technologies
Center for Biomedical Research of the Canary Islands
University of La Laguna
Tenerife, Spain
https://sites.google.com/view/nielsjanssen/
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] hippocampal subfields: which are previous step result (files) needed for the process?

2017-05-11 Thread Iglesias Gonzalez, Eugenio
Hi Guido,
I think you should wait until recon-all is done. Running 2 recon-all commands 
on the same subject simultaneously: a) would need hacking recon-all; b) it’s a 
bad idea. Moreover, the subfields make use of wmparc.mgz, which is produced 
towards the very end of recon-all -all anyway.
Cheers,
/Eugenio

Juan Eugenio Iglesias
ERC Senior Research Fellow
Translational Imaging Group
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/


On 11 May 2017, at 15:10, Guido Pascariello 
mailto:guido.pascarie...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Hi Experts,

I am running Freesurfer v6.0 on a Cluster. I've traied this command:

recon-all -i $IMAGEN -s $SUJETO -all -hippocampal-subfields-T1 
-brainstem-structures

Although all step in recon-all works fine, hippocampal-subfields process 
allocate much more RAM than previous step (10 GB of RAM more or less, and take 
about 30 mins to be completed, according to other post in the forum).

I am thinking in run these one after another, in order to not need to reserve a 
lot of memory for a long period of time (just for optimization)

I want to know which are the files (from recon-all process) that 
hippocampal-subfields process needs? Just to be sure that these will be 
transferred to the node before the process starts.

If you please help me

Cheers

--
Bioing. Guido Pascariello
Becario Doctoral CIFASIS - CONICET
Grupo de Procesamiento de Señales Multimediales
http://www.cifasis-conicet.gov.ar/
Tel/Fax: 54 341 482 6300/ 1771/ 72 Int. 386
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal Subfields Posterior Probability

2017-03-22 Thread Bharadwaj, Pradyumna - (prad)
Great! Thank you for taking that time to clarify that.


-Prad


From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
 on behalf of Iglesias Gonzalez, 
Eugenio 
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2017 11:34 AM
To: Freesurfer support list
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal Subfields Posterior Probability

Hi again, Prad,
In that case, you don’t need the discrete segmentations. Just look at the 
posteriors directly.
Cheers,
/Eugenio


Juan Eugenio Iglesias
ERC Senior Research Fellow
Translational Imaging Group
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/


On 22 Mar 2017, at 18:26, Bharadwaj, Pradyumna - (prad) 
mailto:p...@email.arizona.edu>> wrote:

Sorry about that. I should have stated what I was trying to do. I'm trying to 
see if the posterior probability changes when using a certain combination of 
the different T1 and T2 weighted scans that we have in our lab. I thought using 
the binary masks to extract the probabilities as they were the final volumes of 
the subfields would be a better way.


As an example,
when I extract some basic stats on the left CA1 posteriors for one subject, 
these are the values I get,
range: 0.15 to 1, with a mean (sd) of 0.245258 (0.335046);

and , when I use the binary mask of the CA1 from lh.hippoSfLabels-T1.v10.mgz 
and then extract the same basic stats, I get,

range: 0.247501 to 1, with a mean (sd) of 0.770796 (0.175752)

Is my approach incorrect ?

Thanks!,
-Prad



From: 
freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
 
mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>
 on behalf of Iglesias Gonzalez, Eugenio 
mailto:e.igles...@ucl.ac.uk>>
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2017 11:06 AM
To: Freesurfer support list
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal Subfields Posterior Probability

Hi Prad,
The final probabilities are in the posterior files. There’s no need to binarize 
?h.hippoSfLabels if what you’re interested in is the soft segmentations.
Or maybe I’m missing something? What are you exactly trying to do?
Cheers,
/E

Juan Eugenio Iglesias
ERC Senior Research Fellow
Translational Imaging Group
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com<http://www.jeiglesias.com/>
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/


On 22 Mar 2017, at 18:02, Bharadwaj, Pradyumna - (prad) 
mailto:p...@email.arizona.edu>> wrote:

Hi Dr. Iglesias,

Thank you for the overview of the labeling rules. I have also tried setting 
WRITE_POSTERIORS to 1 to write out the posteriors.

I had a follow up question about obtaining the probabilities for the final 
subfield labels as available in the ?h.hippoSfLabels-T1.v10.mgz

I use mri_binarize on ?h.hippoSfLabels-T1.v10.mgz to obtain binary masks for 
each subfield, and then used these masks with their respective posteriors to 
obtain the distributions.

Is this procedure correct or is there a better way ?

Thanks,
-Prad

From: 
freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
 
mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>
 on behalf of Iglesias Gonzalez, Eugenio 
mailto:e.igles...@ucl.ac.uk>>
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2017 2:22 PM
To: Freesurfer support list
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal Subfields Posterior Probability

Dear Prad,
There is a “secret” way of getting the posteriors. You need to set the 
environment variable WRITE_POSTERIORS to 1 before you call recon-all.
In (t)csh:
setenv WRITE_POSTERIORS 1
In bash:
export WRITE_POSTERIORS=1
And then call recon-all -hippocampal-subfields-T1(T2) as usual.

The discrete segmentation picks, for each voxel, the most likely label. The 
posterior of this label might or might not be above 0.5. For instance, if a 
voxel has p=0.4 of being CA1, p=0.3 of being background, and p=0.3 of being 
fimbria, it will be labeled as CA1 (even though p<0.5 for such subfield). Some 
people seem to prefer a 2-stage approach, in which a hippocampal mask is first 
created by selecting the voxels for which p(background)<0.5, and then each 
voxel within that mask is colored with the most likely subfield at that 
location.

I hope this helps!

Cheers,

/Eugenio



Juan Eugenio Iglesias
ERC Senior Research Fellow
Translational Imaging Group
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com<http://www.jeiglesias.com/>
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/


On 21 Mar 2017, at 20:09, Bharadwaj, Pradyumna - (prad) 
mailto:p...@email.arizona.edu>> wrote:

Hello Dr. Iglesias,

I'm currently examining the distributions of the posterior probabilities of the 
different hippocampal subfields, and I'm interested in obtaining the 
probability distribution images for the subfields that correspond to the 
volumes output in the subjects text file.

While I can use mri_binarize on ?h.hippoSfLabels-T1.v10.mgz to obtain the 
subfield masks and use them to obtain the posterior 

Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal Subfields Posterior Probability

2017-03-22 Thread Iglesias Gonzalez, Eugenio
Hi again, Prad,
In that case, you don’t need the discrete segmentations. Just look at the 
posteriors directly.
Cheers,
/Eugenio


Juan Eugenio Iglesias
ERC Senior Research Fellow
Translational Imaging Group
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/


On 22 Mar 2017, at 18:26, Bharadwaj, Pradyumna - (prad) 
mailto:p...@email.arizona.edu>> wrote:

Sorry about that. I should have stated what I was trying to do. I'm trying to 
see if the posterior probability changes when using a certain combination of 
the different T1 and T2 weighted scans that we have in our lab. I thought using 
the binary masks to extract the probabilities as they were the final volumes of 
the subfields would be a better way.


As an example,
when I extract some basic stats on the left CA1 posteriors for one subject, 
these are the values I get,
range: 0.15 to 1, with a mean (sd) of 0.245258 (0.335046);

and , when I use the binary mask of the CA1 from lh.hippoSfLabels-T1.v10.mgz 
and then extract the same basic stats, I get,

range: 0.247501 to 1, with a mean (sd) of 0.770796 (0.175752)

Is my approach incorrect ?

Thanks!,
-Prad



From: 
freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
 
mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>
 on behalf of Iglesias Gonzalez, Eugenio 
mailto:e.igles...@ucl.ac.uk>>
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2017 11:06 AM
To: Freesurfer support list
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal Subfields Posterior Probability

Hi Prad,
The final probabilities are in the posterior files. There’s no need to binarize 
?h.hippoSfLabels if what you’re interested in is the soft segmentations.
Or maybe I’m missing something? What are you exactly trying to do?
Cheers,
/E

Juan Eugenio Iglesias
ERC Senior Research Fellow
Translational Imaging Group
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com<http://www.jeiglesias.com/>
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/


On 22 Mar 2017, at 18:02, Bharadwaj, Pradyumna - (prad) 
mailto:p...@email.arizona.edu>> wrote:

Hi Dr. Iglesias,

Thank you for the overview of the labeling rules. I have also tried setting 
WRITE_POSTERIORS to 1 to write out the posteriors.

I had a follow up question about obtaining the probabilities for the final 
subfield labels as available in the ?h.hippoSfLabels-T1.v10.mgz

I use mri_binarize on ?h.hippoSfLabels-T1.v10.mgz to obtain binary masks for 
each subfield, and then used these masks with their respective posteriors to 
obtain the distributions.

Is this procedure correct or is there a better way ?

Thanks,
-Prad

From: 
freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
 
mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>
 on behalf of Iglesias Gonzalez, Eugenio 
mailto:e.igles...@ucl.ac.uk>>
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2017 2:22 PM
To: Freesurfer support list
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal Subfields Posterior Probability

Dear Prad,
There is a “secret” way of getting the posteriors. You need to set the 
environment variable WRITE_POSTERIORS to 1 before you call recon-all.
In (t)csh:
setenv WRITE_POSTERIORS 1
In bash:
export WRITE_POSTERIORS=1
And then call recon-all -hippocampal-subfields-T1(T2) as usual.

The discrete segmentation picks, for each voxel, the most likely label. The 
posterior of this label might or might not be above 0.5. For instance, if a 
voxel has p=0.4 of being CA1, p=0.3 of being background, and p=0.3 of being 
fimbria, it will be labeled as CA1 (even though p<0.5 for such subfield). Some 
people seem to prefer a 2-stage approach, in which a hippocampal mask is first 
created by selecting the voxels for which p(background)<0.5, and then each 
voxel within that mask is colored with the most likely subfield at that 
location.

I hope this helps!

Cheers,

/Eugenio



Juan Eugenio Iglesias
ERC Senior Research Fellow
Translational Imaging Group
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com<http://www.jeiglesias.com/>
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/


On 21 Mar 2017, at 20:09, Bharadwaj, Pradyumna - (prad) 
mailto:p...@email.arizona.edu>> wrote:

Hello Dr. Iglesias,

I'm currently examining the distributions of the posterior probabilities of the 
different hippocampal subfields, and I'm interested in obtaining the 
probability distribution images for the subfields that correspond to the 
volumes output in the subjects text file.

While I can use mri_binarize on ?h.hippoSfLabels-T1.v10.mgz to obtain the 
subfield masks and use them to obtain the posterior probabilities distribution 
after soft segmentation,
is there some other straighforward way to obtain these posterior probabilities 
for the volumes stated in the output text file ?

A follow up question - It appears that the soft segmentation approach 
approximates thresholding the posteriors by a value around 0.5 ? In you

Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal Subfields Posterior Probability

2017-03-22 Thread Bharadwaj, Pradyumna - (prad)
Sorry about that. I should have stated what I was trying to do. I'm trying to 
see if the posterior probability changes when using a certain combination of 
the different T1 and T2 weighted scans that we have in our lab. I thought using 
the binary masks to extract the probabilities as they were the final volumes of 
the subfields would be a better way.


As an example,
when I extract some basic stats on the left CA1 posteriors for one subject, 
these are the values I get,
range: 0.15 to 1, with a mean (sd) of 0.245258 (0.335046);

and , when I use the binary mask of the CA1 from lh.hippoSfLabels-T1.v10.mgz 
and then extract the same basic stats, I get,

range: 0.247501 to 1, with a mean (sd) of 0.770796 (0.175752)

Is my approach incorrect ?

Thanks!,
-Prad



From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
 on behalf of Iglesias Gonzalez, 
Eugenio 
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2017 11:06 AM
To: Freesurfer support list
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal Subfields Posterior Probability

Hi Prad,
The final probabilities are in the posterior files. There’s no need to binarize 
?h.hippoSfLabels if what you’re interested in is the soft segmentations.
Or maybe I’m missing something? What are you exactly trying to do?
Cheers,
/E

Juan Eugenio Iglesias
ERC Senior Research Fellow
Translational Imaging Group
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/


On 22 Mar 2017, at 18:02, Bharadwaj, Pradyumna - (prad) 
mailto:p...@email.arizona.edu>> wrote:

Hi Dr. Iglesias,

Thank you for the overview of the labeling rules. I have also tried setting 
WRITE_POSTERIORS to 1 to write out the posteriors.

I had a follow up question about obtaining the probabilities for the final 
subfield labels as available in the ?h.hippoSfLabels-T1.v10.mgz

I use mri_binarize on ?h.hippoSfLabels-T1.v10.mgz to obtain binary masks for 
each subfield, and then used these masks with their respective posteriors to 
obtain the distributions.

Is this procedure correct or is there a better way ?

Thanks,
-Prad

From: 
freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
 
mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>
 on behalf of Iglesias Gonzalez, Eugenio 
mailto:e.igles...@ucl.ac.uk>>
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2017 2:22 PM
To: Freesurfer support list
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal Subfields Posterior Probability

Dear Prad,
There is a “secret” way of getting the posteriors. You need to set the 
environment variable WRITE_POSTERIORS to 1 before you call recon-all.
In (t)csh:
setenv WRITE_POSTERIORS 1
In bash:
export WRITE_POSTERIORS=1
And then call recon-all -hippocampal-subfields-T1(T2) as usual.

The discrete segmentation picks, for each voxel, the most likely label. The 
posterior of this label might or might not be above 0.5. For instance, if a 
voxel has p=0.4 of being CA1, p=0.3 of being background, and p=0.3 of being 
fimbria, it will be labeled as CA1 (even though p<0.5 for such subfield). Some 
people seem to prefer a 2-stage approach, in which a hippocampal mask is first 
created by selecting the voxels for which p(background)<0.5, and then each 
voxel within that mask is colored with the most likely subfield at that 
location.

I hope this helps!

Cheers,

/Eugenio



Juan Eugenio Iglesias
ERC Senior Research Fellow
Translational Imaging Group
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com<http://www.jeiglesias.com/>
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/


On 21 Mar 2017, at 20:09, Bharadwaj, Pradyumna - (prad) 
mailto:p...@email.arizona.edu>> wrote:

Hello Dr. Iglesias,

I'm currently examining the distributions of the posterior probabilities of the 
different hippocampal subfields, and I'm interested in obtaining the 
probability distribution images for the subfields that correspond to the 
volumes output in the subjects text file.

While I can use mri_binarize on ?h.hippoSfLabels-T1.v10.mgz to obtain the 
subfield masks and use them to obtain the posterior probabilities distribution 
after soft segmentation,
is there some other straighforward way to obtain these posterior probabilities 
for the volumes stated in the output text file ?

A follow up question - It appears that the soft segmentation approach 
approximates thresholding the posteriors by a value around 0.5 ? In your 
opinion, is this value acceptable and have you found similar values in your 
testing ?

Thanks!
-Prad


___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partn

Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal Subfields Posterior Probability

2017-03-22 Thread Iglesias Gonzalez, Eugenio
Hi Prad,
The final probabilities are in the posterior files. There’s no need to binarize 
?h.hippoSfLabels if what you’re interested in is the soft segmentations.
Or maybe I’m missing something? What are you exactly trying to do?
Cheers,
/E

Juan Eugenio Iglesias
ERC Senior Research Fellow
Translational Imaging Group
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/


On 22 Mar 2017, at 18:02, Bharadwaj, Pradyumna - (prad) 
mailto:p...@email.arizona.edu>> wrote:

Hi Dr. Iglesias,

Thank you for the overview of the labeling rules. I have also tried setting 
WRITE_POSTERIORS to 1 to write out the posteriors.

I had a follow up question about obtaining the probabilities for the final 
subfield labels as available in the ?h.hippoSfLabels-T1.v10.mgz

I use mri_binarize on ?h.hippoSfLabels-T1.v10.mgz to obtain binary masks for 
each subfield, and then used these masks with their respective posteriors to 
obtain the distributions.

Is this procedure correct or is there a better way ?

Thanks,
-Prad

From: 
freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
 
mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>
 on behalf of Iglesias Gonzalez, Eugenio 
mailto:e.igles...@ucl.ac.uk>>
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2017 2:22 PM
To: Freesurfer support list
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal Subfields Posterior Probability

Dear Prad,
There is a “secret” way of getting the posteriors. You need to set the 
environment variable WRITE_POSTERIORS to 1 before you call recon-all.
In (t)csh:
setenv WRITE_POSTERIORS 1
In bash:
export WRITE_POSTERIORS=1
And then call recon-all -hippocampal-subfields-T1(T2) as usual.

The discrete segmentation picks, for each voxel, the most likely label. The 
posterior of this label might or might not be above 0.5. For instance, if a 
voxel has p=0.4 of being CA1, p=0.3 of being background, and p=0.3 of being 
fimbria, it will be labeled as CA1 (even though p<0.5 for such subfield). Some 
people seem to prefer a 2-stage approach, in which a hippocampal mask is first 
created by selecting the voxels for which p(background)<0.5, and then each 
voxel within that mask is colored with the most likely subfield at that 
location.

I hope this helps!

Cheers,

/Eugenio



Juan Eugenio Iglesias
ERC Senior Research Fellow
Translational Imaging Group
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com<http://www.jeiglesias.com/>
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/


On 21 Mar 2017, at 20:09, Bharadwaj, Pradyumna - (prad) 
mailto:p...@email.arizona.edu>> wrote:

Hello Dr. Iglesias,

I'm currently examining the distributions of the posterior probabilities of the 
different hippocampal subfields, and I'm interested in obtaining the 
probability distribution images for the subfields that correspond to the 
volumes output in the subjects text file.

While I can use mri_binarize on ?h.hippoSfLabels-T1.v10.mgz to obtain the 
subfield masks and use them to obtain the posterior probabilities distribution 
after soft segmentation,
is there some other straighforward way to obtain these posterior probabilities 
for the volumes stated in the output text file ?

A follow up question - It appears that the soft segmentation approach 
approximates thresholding the posteriors by a value around 0.5 ? In your 
opinion, is this value acceptable and have you found similar values in your 
testing ?

Thanks!
-Prad


___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it i

Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal Subfields Posterior Probability

2017-03-22 Thread Bharadwaj, Pradyumna - (prad)
Hi Dr. Iglesias,


Thank you for the overview of the labeling rules. I have also tried setting 
WRITE_POSTERIORS to 1 to write out the posteriors.


I had a follow up question about obtaining the probabilities for the final 
subfield labels as available in the ?h.hippoSfLabels-T1.v10.mgz


I use mri_binarize on ?h.hippoSfLabels-T1.v10.mgz to obtain binary masks for 
each subfield, and then used these masks with their respective posteriors to 
obtain the distributions.


Is this procedure correct or is there a better way ?


Thanks,

-Prad


From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
 on behalf of Iglesias Gonzalez, 
Eugenio 
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2017 2:22 PM
To: Freesurfer support list
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal Subfields Posterior Probability

Dear Prad,
There is a "secret" way of getting the posteriors. You need to set the 
environment variable WRITE_POSTERIORS to 1 before you call recon-all.
In (t)csh:
setenv WRITE_POSTERIORS 1
In bash:
export WRITE_POSTERIORS=1
And then call recon-all -hippocampal-subfields-T1(T2) as usual.

The discrete segmentation picks, for each voxel, the most likely label. The 
posterior of this label might or might not be above 0.5. For instance, if a 
voxel has p=0.4 of being CA1, p=0.3 of being background, and p=0.3 of being 
fimbria, it will be labeled as CA1 (even though p<0.5 for such subfield). Some 
people seem to prefer a 2-stage approach, in which a hippocampal mask is first 
created by selecting the voxels for which p(background)<0.5, and then each 
voxel within that mask is colored with the most likely subfield at that 
location.

I hope this helps!

Cheers,

/Eugenio



Juan Eugenio Iglesias
ERC Senior Research Fellow
Translational Imaging Group
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/


On 21 Mar 2017, at 20:09, Bharadwaj, Pradyumna - (prad) 
mailto:p...@email.arizona.edu>> wrote:

Hello Dr. Iglesias,

I'm currently examining the distributions of the posterior probabilities of the 
different hippocampal subfields, and I'm interested in obtaining the 
probability distribution images for the subfields that correspond to the 
volumes output in the subjects text file.

While I can use mri_binarize on ?h.hippoSfLabels-T1.v10.mgz to obtain the 
subfield masks and use them to obtain the posterior probabilities distribution 
after soft segmentation,
is there some other straighforward way to obtain these posterior probabilities 
for the volumes stated in the output text file ?

A follow up question - It appears that the soft segmentation approach 
approximates thresholding the posteriors by a value around 0.5 ? In your 
opinion, is this value acceptable and have you found similar values in your 
testing ?

Thanks!
-Prad


___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal Subfields Posterior Probability

2017-03-21 Thread Iglesias Gonzalez, Eugenio
Dear Prad,
There is a “secret” way of getting the posteriors. You need to set the 
environment variable WRITE_POSTERIORS to 1 before you call recon-all.
In (t)csh:
setenv WRITE_POSTERIORS 1
In bash:
export WRITE_POSTERIORS=1
And then call recon-all -hippocampal-subfields-T1(T2) as usual.

The discrete segmentation picks, for each voxel, the most likely label. The 
posterior of this label might or might not be above 0.5. For instance, if a 
voxel has p=0.4 of being CA1, p=0.3 of being background, and p=0.3 of being 
fimbria, it will be labeled as CA1 (even though p<0.5 for such subfield). Some 
people seem to prefer a 2-stage approach, in which a hippocampal mask is first 
created by selecting the voxels for which p(background)<0.5, and then each 
voxel within that mask is colored with the most likely subfield at that 
location.

I hope this helps!

Cheers,

/Eugenio



Juan Eugenio Iglesias
ERC Senior Research Fellow
Translational Imaging Group
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/


On 21 Mar 2017, at 20:09, Bharadwaj, Pradyumna - (prad) 
mailto:p...@email.arizona.edu>> wrote:

Hello Dr. Iglesias,

I'm currently examining the distributions of the posterior probabilities of the 
different hippocampal subfields, and I'm interested in obtaining the 
probability distribution images for the subfields that correspond to the 
volumes output in the subjects text file.

While I can use mri_binarize on ?h.hippoSfLabels-T1.v10.mgz to obtain the 
subfield masks and use them to obtain the posterior probabilities distribution 
after soft segmentation,
is there some other straighforward way to obtain these posterior probabilities 
for the volumes stated in the output text file ?

A follow up question - It appears that the soft segmentation approach 
approximates thresholding the posteriors by a value around 0.5 ? In your 
opinion, is this value acceptable and have you found similar values in your 
testing ?

Thanks!
-Prad


___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] hippocampal subfields - T1

2017-02-23 Thread Rizvi, Batool
Got it, thanks for the help!

Batool

From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
[freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] on behalf of Iglesias Gonzalez, 
Eugenio [e.igles...@ucl.ac.uk]
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2017 4:05 PM
To: Freesurfer support list
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] hippocampal subfields - T1

Hi Batool,
It’s not ideal, but if FreeSurfer does a decent job with the recon, something 
decent should come out of the subfields.
Cheers,
/Eugenio

Juan Eugenio Iglesias
ERC Senior Research Fellow
Translational Imaging Group
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/


On 23 Feb 2017, at 20:11, Rizvi, Batool 
mailto:br2...@cumc.columbia.edu>> wrote:

Hi,
I was wondering if the hippocampal subfields analysis can still run on a lower 
resolution T1 scan than 1mm? One of our datasets has T1 scans with these 
dimensions: .93 x .93 x 1.3 .

Would it still run on this dataset, if it's not the standard 1mm to begin with?

Thanks!
Batool
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] hippocampal subfields - T1

2017-02-23 Thread Iglesias Gonzalez, Eugenio
Hi Batool,
It’s not ideal, but if FreeSurfer does a decent job with the recon, something 
decent should come out of the subfields.
Cheers,
/Eugenio

Juan Eugenio Iglesias
ERC Senior Research Fellow
Translational Imaging Group
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/


On 23 Feb 2017, at 20:11, Rizvi, Batool 
mailto:br2...@cumc.columbia.edu>> wrote:

Hi,
I was wondering if the hippocampal subfields analysis can still run on a lower 
resolution T1 scan than 1mm? One of our datasets has T1 scans with these 
dimensions: .93 x .93 x 1.3 .

Would it still run on this dataset, if it's not the standard 1mm to begin with?

Thanks!
Batool
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] hippocampal subfields in average space

2017-02-20 Thread Iglesias Gonzalez, Eugenio
Hi Lauri,
it depends on what you mean by template. If you mean an intensity averaged 
image, then no. But if you mean probabilities in a reference space, then yes. 
You can visualize the atlas with (warning: the viewer is a big buggy):
cd $FREESURFER_HOME/average/HippoSF/atlas
kvlViewMeshCollectionWithGUI AtlasMesh.gz
Cheers,
/Eugenio

Juan Eugenio Iglesias
ERC Senior Research Fellow
Translational Imaging Group
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/


On 20 Feb 2017, at 17:12, Tuominen, Lauri Johannes 
mailto:ltuomi...@mgh.harvard.edu>> wrote:

Hi everyone,

Is there a template of the hippocampal subfields in some average space?

Best
Lauri Tuominen

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] hippocampal subfields analysis command

2017-02-13 Thread Rizvi, Batool
Hi Eugenio,
Here are my outputs:

ls e009723_FS (one of my subject's freesurfer folder):

bem  FS1.sh  FS2.sh  FS4.sh  label  mri  scripts  src  stats  surf  tmp  touch  
trash

- you can ignore the FS#.sh files - these are matlab script files we run.

ls mri/lh.hippoSfVolumes*.txt:

mri/lh.hippoSfVolumes-T1.v10.txt

Thanks!
Batool

From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
[freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] on behalf of Iglesias Gonzalez, 
Eugenio [e.igles...@ucl.ac.uk]
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2017 1:01 PM
To: Freesurfer support list
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] hippocampal subfields analysis command

That’s weird. What is the output of the following command?
ls /path/to/my/subjects/freesurferfolder

And of this one:
ls  /path/to/my/subjects/freesurferfolder/SUBJECT/mri/lh.hippoSfVolumes*.txt

(where SUBJECT is a subject of your choice)

Cheers,

/Eugenio


Juan Eugenio Iglesias
ERC Senior Research Fellow
Translational Imaging Group
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/


On 13 Feb 2017, at 17:04, Rizvi, Batool 
mailto:br2...@cumc.columbia.edu>> wrote:

Hi Eugenio,
That's actually the issue, it doesn't generate any file at all.. there's no 
hippo.txt in the folder where I run it, or in the subject's directory that I 
had specified.

Batool

From: 
freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
 
[freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>]
 on behalf of Iglesias Gonzalez, Eugenio 
[e.igles...@ucl.ac.uk<mailto:e.igles...@ucl.ac.uk>]
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2017 11:49 AM
To: Freesurfer support list
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] hippocampal subfields analysis command

Hi Batool
What are the contents of hippo.txt? Just empty?
Cheers,
/Eugenio

Juan Eugenio Iglesias
ERC Senior Research Fellow
Translational Imaging Group
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com<http://www.jeiglesias.com/>
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/


On 13 Feb 2017, at 16:41, Rizvi, Batool 
mailto:br2...@cumc.columbia.edu>> wrote:

Hi,
I'm having trouble getting any output from the hippocampal subfield analysis 
command. I entered in:

quantifyHippocampalSubfields.sh T1 hippo.txt 
/path/to/my/subjects/freesurferfolder

I tried both ways of having the environmental variable subjects directory 
defined to the freesurfer folder of the subjects (used *'s here for subjects 
and their freesurfer folder), but it still gives no output.

It just says:

Gathering results from subjects in:
/path/to/my/subjects/freesurferfolder
Using the suffix name:
T1
And writing them to:
hippo.txt

What am I doing wrong here?
Thanks so much!
Batool
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] hippocampal subfields analysis command

2017-02-13 Thread Iglesias Gonzalez, Eugenio
That’s weird. What is the output of the following command?
ls /path/to/my/subjects/freesurferfolder

And of this one:
ls  /path/to/my/subjects/freesurferfolder/SUBJECT/mri/lh.hippoSfVolumes*.txt

(where SUBJECT is a subject of your choice)

Cheers,

/Eugenio


Juan Eugenio Iglesias
ERC Senior Research Fellow
Translational Imaging Group
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/


On 13 Feb 2017, at 17:04, Rizvi, Batool 
mailto:br2...@cumc.columbia.edu>> wrote:

Hi Eugenio,
That's actually the issue, it doesn't generate any file at all.. there's no 
hippo.txt in the folder where I run it, or in the subject's directory that I 
had specified.

Batool

From: 
freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
 
[freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>]
 on behalf of Iglesias Gonzalez, Eugenio 
[e.igles...@ucl.ac.uk<mailto:e.igles...@ucl.ac.uk>]
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2017 11:49 AM
To: Freesurfer support list
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] hippocampal subfields analysis command

Hi Batool
What are the contents of hippo.txt? Just empty?
Cheers,
/Eugenio

Juan Eugenio Iglesias
ERC Senior Research Fellow
Translational Imaging Group
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com<http://www.jeiglesias.com/>
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/


On 13 Feb 2017, at 16:41, Rizvi, Batool 
mailto:br2...@cumc.columbia.edu>> wrote:

Hi,
I'm having trouble getting any output from the hippocampal subfield analysis 
command. I entered in:

quantifyHippocampalSubfields.sh T1 hippo.txt 
/path/to/my/subjects/freesurferfolder

I tried both ways of having the environmental variable subjects directory 
defined to the freesurfer folder of the subjects (used *'s here for subjects 
and their freesurfer folder), but it still gives no output.

It just says:

Gathering results from subjects in:
/path/to/my/subjects/freesurferfolder
Using the suffix name:
T1
And writing them to:
hippo.txt

What am I doing wrong here?
Thanks so much!
Batool
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] hippocampal subfields analysis command

2017-02-13 Thread Rizvi, Batool
Hi Eugenio,
That's actually the issue, it doesn't generate any file at all.. there's no 
hippo.txt in the folder where I run it, or in the subject's directory that I 
had specified.

Batool

From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
[freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] on behalf of Iglesias Gonzalez, 
Eugenio [e.igles...@ucl.ac.uk]
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2017 11:49 AM
To: Freesurfer support list
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] hippocampal subfields analysis command

Hi Batool
What are the contents of hippo.txt? Just empty?
Cheers,
/Eugenio

Juan Eugenio Iglesias
ERC Senior Research Fellow
Translational Imaging Group
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/


On 13 Feb 2017, at 16:41, Rizvi, Batool 
mailto:br2...@cumc.columbia.edu>> wrote:

Hi,
I'm having trouble getting any output from the hippocampal subfield analysis 
command. I entered in:

quantifyHippocampalSubfields.sh T1 hippo.txt 
/path/to/my/subjects/freesurferfolder

I tried both ways of having the environmental variable subjects directory 
defined to the freesurfer folder of the subjects (used *'s here for subjects 
and their freesurfer folder), but it still gives no output.

It just says:

Gathering results from subjects in:
/path/to/my/subjects/freesurferfolder
Using the suffix name:
T1
And writing them to:
hippo.txt

What am I doing wrong here?
Thanks so much!
Batool
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] hippocampal subfields analysis command

2017-02-13 Thread Iglesias Gonzalez, Eugenio
Hi Batool
What are the contents of hippo.txt? Just empty?
Cheers,
/Eugenio

Juan Eugenio Iglesias
ERC Senior Research Fellow
Translational Imaging Group
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/


On 13 Feb 2017, at 16:41, Rizvi, Batool 
mailto:br2...@cumc.columbia.edu>> wrote:

Hi,
I'm having trouble getting any output from the hippocampal subfield analysis 
command. I entered in:

quantifyHippocampalSubfields.sh T1 hippo.txt 
/path/to/my/subjects/freesurferfolder

I tried both ways of having the environmental variable subjects directory 
defined to the freesurfer folder of the subjects (used *'s here for subjects 
and their freesurfer folder), but it still gives no output.

It just says:

Gathering results from subjects in:
/path/to/my/subjects/freesurferfolder
Using the suffix name:
T1
And writing them to:
hippo.txt

What am I doing wrong here?
Thanks so much!
Batool
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal Subfields Segmentation Error

2017-01-27 Thread Michel Hu
Dear Juan,

Yes the recon -all -all works without errors
The problem seems to only arise when trying to use the segmentation command.
I believe it might have something to do with the matlab libraries?

Sincerely,
Michel Hu

On 26 Jan 2017, at 13:17, Iglesias Gonzalez, Eugenio 
mailto:e.igles...@ucl.ac.uk>> wrote:

I have never tried this. Does the rest of recon-all -all run without errors?
Cheers,
/Eugenio

Juan Eugenio Iglesias
ERC Senior Research Fellow
Translational Imaging Group
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/


On 25 Jan 2017, at 11:45, Michel Hu mailto:a...@live.nl>> wrote:

Dear  Juan,

I actually followed the guide on the following website in order to make it work 
on windows 10.
It seems to be a linux BASH shell with ubuntu 14.05.
http://nuclear-imaging.info/site_content/2016/09/12/installing-running-freesurfer-windows-10/
Installing and running FreeSurfer on Windows 10 - Imaging 
...<http://nuclear-imaging.info/site_content/2016/09/12/installing-running-freesurfer-windows-10/>
nuclear-imaging.info<http://nuclear-imaging.info/>
Before I get into how to install FreeSurfer, I must thank the author at K-Lab 
for the post on “How to run FSL on Windows 10“. That post describes how to 
install ...

Sincerely,
Michel hu




Van: 
freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
 
mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>
 namens Iglesias Gonzalez, Eugenio 
mailto:e.igles...@ucl.ac.uk>>
Verzonden: woensdag 25 januari 2017 12:30
Aan: Freesurfer support list
Onderwerp: Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal Subfields Segmentation Error

Dear Michel,
What exact platform are you using? Ubuntu 14.04 installed on a virtual machine 
running on Windows 10?
Cheers,
/Eugenio

Juan Eugenio Iglesias
ERC Senior Research Fellow
Translational Imaging Group
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com<http://www.jeiglesias.com/>
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/


On 24 Jan 2017, at 12:47, Michel Hu mailto:a...@live.nl>> wrote:

Dear Freesurfer Developers,

For my research I'm trying to run the hippocampal subfield segmentation 
analysis however, I keep running into the following error. I tried to solve it 
by myself however I had no luck ( I tried by removing the exec flag from the 
files ).

I'm using the following sofftware
Freesurfer : freesurfer-Linux-centos6_x86_64-dev-20170103-696bbc1
Ubuntu: 14.04.5 LTS
WIndows 10

michel@-:~$ recon-all -s bob -hippocampal-subfields-T1
Subject Stamp: freesurfer-Linux-centos6_x86_64-dev-20170103-696bbc1
Current Stamp: freesurfer-Linux-centos6_x86_64-dev-20170103-696bbc1
INFO: SUBJECTS_DIR is /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects
Actual FREESURFER_HOME /usr/local/freesurfer
-rw-rw-r-- 1 michel 1590 1249629 Jan 24 13:40 
/usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/bob/scripts/recon-all.log
Linux - 3.4.0+ #1 PREEMPT Thu Aug 1 17:06:05 CST 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 
GNU/Linux
'/usr/local/freesurfer/bin/recon-all' -> 
'/usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/bob/scripts/recon-all.local-copy'
#
#@# Hippocampal Subfields processing (T1 only) left Tue Jan 24 13:43:46 STD 2017

 /usr/local/freesurfer/bin/segmentSF_T1.sh /usr/local/freesurfer/MCRv80 
/usr/local/freesurfer bob /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects left

See log file: 
/usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/bob/scripts/hippocampal-subfields-T1.log
--
Setting up environment variables
---
LD_LIBRARY_PATH is 
.:/usr/local/freesurfer/MCRv80/runtime/glnxa64:/usr/local/freesurfer/MCRv80/bin/glnxa64:/usr/local/freesurfer/MCRv80/sys/os/glnxa64:/usr/local/freesurfer/MCRv80/sys/java/jre/glnxa64/jre/lib/amd64/native_threads:/usr/local/freesurfer/MCRv80/sys/java/jre/glnxa64/jre/lib/amd64/server:/usr/local/freesurfer/MCRv80/sys/java/jre/glnxa64/jre/lib/amd64/client:/usr/local/freesurfer/MCRv80/sys/java/jre/glnxa64/jre/lib/amd64:
/usr/local/freesurfer/bin/segmentSubjectT1_autoEstimateAlveusML: error while 
loading shared libraries: libut.so: cannot enable executable stack as shared 
object requires: Invalid argument
#
#@# Hippocampal Subfields processing (T1 only) right Tue Jan 24 13:43:46 STD 
2017

 /usr/local/freesurfer/bin/segmentSF_T1.sh /usr/local/freesurfer/MCRv80 
/usr/local/freesurfer bob /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects right

See log file: 
/usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/bob/scripts/hippocampal-subfields-T1.log
--
Setting up environment variables
---
LD_LIBRARY_PATH is 
.:/usr/local/freesurfer/MCRv80/runtime/glnxa64:/usr/local/freesurfer/MCRv80/bin/glnxa64:/usr/local/freesurfer/MCRv80/sys/os/glnxa64:/usr/local/freesurfer/MCRv80/sys/java/jre/glnxa64/jre/lib/amd64/native_threads:/usr/local/freesurfer/MCRv80/sys/java/jre/glnxa64/jre/lib/amd64/server:/usr/local/freesurfer/MCRv80/sys/java/jre/glnxa64/jre/lib/a

Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal Subfields Segmentation Error

2017-01-26 Thread Iglesias Gonzalez, Eugenio
I have never tried this. Does the rest of recon-all -all run without errors?
Cheers,
/Eugenio

Juan Eugenio Iglesias
ERC Senior Research Fellow
Translational Imaging Group
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/


On 25 Jan 2017, at 11:45, Michel Hu mailto:a...@live.nl>> wrote:

Dear  Juan,

I actually followed the guide on the following website in order to make it work 
on windows 10.
It seems to be a linux BASH shell with ubuntu 14.05.
http://nuclear-imaging.info/site_content/2016/09/12/installing-running-freesurfer-windows-10/
Installing and running FreeSurfer on Windows 10 - Imaging 
...<http://nuclear-imaging.info/site_content/2016/09/12/installing-running-freesurfer-windows-10/>
nuclear-imaging.info<http://nuclear-imaging.info/>
Before I get into how to install FreeSurfer, I must thank the author at K-Lab 
for the post on “How to run FSL on Windows 10“. That post describes how to 
install ...

Sincerely,
Michel hu




Van: 
freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
 
mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>
 namens Iglesias Gonzalez, Eugenio 
mailto:e.igles...@ucl.ac.uk>>
Verzonden: woensdag 25 januari 2017 12:30
Aan: Freesurfer support list
Onderwerp: Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal Subfields Segmentation Error

Dear Michel,
What exact platform are you using? Ubuntu 14.04 installed on a virtual machine 
running on Windows 10?
Cheers,
/Eugenio

Juan Eugenio Iglesias
ERC Senior Research Fellow
Translational Imaging Group
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com<http://www.jeiglesias.com/>
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/


On 24 Jan 2017, at 12:47, Michel Hu mailto:a...@live.nl>> wrote:

Dear Freesurfer Developers,

For my research I'm trying to run the hippocampal subfield segmentation 
analysis however, I keep running into the following error. I tried to solve it 
by myself however I had no luck ( I tried by removing the exec flag from the 
files ).

I'm using the following sofftware
Freesurfer : freesurfer-Linux-centos6_x86_64-dev-20170103-696bbc1
Ubuntu: 14.04.5 LTS
WIndows 10

michel@-:~$ recon-all -s bob -hippocampal-subfields-T1
Subject Stamp: freesurfer-Linux-centos6_x86_64-dev-20170103-696bbc1
Current Stamp: freesurfer-Linux-centos6_x86_64-dev-20170103-696bbc1
INFO: SUBJECTS_DIR is /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects
Actual FREESURFER_HOME /usr/local/freesurfer
-rw-rw-r-- 1 michel 1590 1249629 Jan 24 13:40 
/usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/bob/scripts/recon-all.log
Linux - 3.4.0+ #1 PREEMPT Thu Aug 1 17:06:05 CST 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 
GNU/Linux
'/usr/local/freesurfer/bin/recon-all' -> 
'/usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/bob/scripts/recon-all.local-copy'
#
#@# Hippocampal Subfields processing (T1 only) left Tue Jan 24 13:43:46 STD 2017

 /usr/local/freesurfer/bin/segmentSF_T1.sh /usr/local/freesurfer/MCRv80 
/usr/local/freesurfer bob /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects left

See log file: 
/usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/bob/scripts/hippocampal-subfields-T1.log
--
Setting up environment variables
---
LD_LIBRARY_PATH is 
.:/usr/local/freesurfer/MCRv80/runtime/glnxa64:/usr/local/freesurfer/MCRv80/bin/glnxa64:/usr/local/freesurfer/MCRv80/sys/os/glnxa64:/usr/local/freesurfer/MCRv80/sys/java/jre/glnxa64/jre/lib/amd64/native_threads:/usr/local/freesurfer/MCRv80/sys/java/jre/glnxa64/jre/lib/amd64/server:/usr/local/freesurfer/MCRv80/sys/java/jre/glnxa64/jre/lib/amd64/client:/usr/local/freesurfer/MCRv80/sys/java/jre/glnxa64/jre/lib/amd64:
/usr/local/freesurfer/bin/segmentSubjectT1_autoEstimateAlveusML: error while 
loading shared libraries: libut.so: cannot enable executable stack as shared 
object requires: Invalid argument
#
#@# Hippocampal Subfields processing (T1 only) right Tue Jan 24 13:43:46 STD 
2017

 /usr/local/freesurfer/bin/segmentSF_T1.sh /usr/local/freesurfer/MCRv80 
/usr/local/freesurfer bob /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects right

See log file: 
/usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/bob/scripts/hippocampal-subfields-T1.log
--
Setting up environment variables
---
LD_LIBRARY_PATH is 
.:/usr/local/freesurfer/MCRv80/runtime/glnxa64:/usr/local/freesurfer/MCRv80/bin/glnxa64:/usr/local/freesurfer/MCRv80/sys/os/glnxa64:/usr/local/freesurfer/MCRv80/sys/java/jre/glnxa64/jre/lib/amd64/native_threads:/usr/local/freesurfer/MCRv80/sys/java/jre/glnxa64/jre/lib/amd64/server:/usr/local/freesurfer/MCRv80/sys/java/jre/glnxa64/jre/lib/amd64/client:/usr/local/freesurfer/MCRv80/sys/java/jre/glnxa64/jre/lib/amd64:
/usr/local/freesurfer/bin/segmentSubjectT1_autoEstimateAlveusML: error while 
loading shared libraries: libut.so: cannot enable executable stack as shared 
object requires: Invalid argument

Started at Tue Jan 24 13:43:45 STD 2017
Ended   at T

Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal Subfields Segmentation Error

2017-01-25 Thread Michel Hu
Dear  Juan,

I actually followed the guide on the following website in order to make it work 
on windows 10.
It seems to be a linux BASH shell with ubuntu 14.05.
http://nuclear-imaging.info/site_content/2016/09/12/installing-running-freesurfer-windows-10/

Installing and running FreeSurfer on Windows 10 - Imaging 
...<http://nuclear-imaging.info/site_content/2016/09/12/installing-running-freesurfer-windows-10/>
nuclear-imaging.info
Before I get into how to install FreeSurfer, I must thank the author at K-Lab 
for the post on “How to run FSL on Windows 10“. That post describes how to 
install ...

Sincerely,
Michel hu




Van: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
 namens Iglesias Gonzalez, Eugenio 

Verzonden: woensdag 25 januari 2017 12:30
Aan: Freesurfer support list
Onderwerp: Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal Subfields Segmentation Error

Dear Michel,
What exact platform are you using? Ubuntu 14.04 installed on a virtual machine 
running on Windows 10?
Cheers,
/Eugenio

Juan Eugenio Iglesias
ERC Senior Research Fellow
Translational Imaging Group
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/


On 24 Jan 2017, at 12:47, Michel Hu mailto:a...@live.nl>> wrote:

Dear Freesurfer Developers,

For my research I'm trying to run the hippocampal subfield segmentation 
analysis however, I keep running into the following error. I tried to solve it 
by myself however I had no luck ( I tried by removing the exec flag from the 
files ).

I'm using the following sofftware
Freesurfer : freesurfer-Linux-centos6_x86_64-dev-20170103-696bbc1
Ubuntu: 14.04.5 LTS
WIndows 10

michel@-:~$ recon-all -s bob -hippocampal-subfields-T1
Subject Stamp: freesurfer-Linux-centos6_x86_64-dev-20170103-696bbc1
Current Stamp: freesurfer-Linux-centos6_x86_64-dev-20170103-696bbc1
INFO: SUBJECTS_DIR is /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects
Actual FREESURFER_HOME /usr/local/freesurfer
-rw-rw-r-- 1 michel 1590 1249629 Jan 24 13:40 
/usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/bob/scripts/recon-all.log
Linux - 3.4.0+ #1 PREEMPT Thu Aug 1 17:06:05 CST 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 
GNU/Linux
'/usr/local/freesurfer/bin/recon-all' -> 
'/usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/bob/scripts/recon-all.local-copy'
#
#@# Hippocampal Subfields processing (T1 only) left Tue Jan 24 13:43:46 STD 2017

 /usr/local/freesurfer/bin/segmentSF_T1.sh /usr/local/freesurfer/MCRv80 
/usr/local/freesurfer bob /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects left

See log file: 
/usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/bob/scripts/hippocampal-subfields-T1.log
--
Setting up environment variables
---
LD_LIBRARY_PATH is 
.:/usr/local/freesurfer/MCRv80/runtime/glnxa64:/usr/local/freesurfer/MCRv80/bin/glnxa64:/usr/local/freesurfer/MCRv80/sys/os/glnxa64:/usr/local/freesurfer/MCRv80/sys/java/jre/glnxa64/jre/lib/amd64/native_threads:/usr/local/freesurfer/MCRv80/sys/java/jre/glnxa64/jre/lib/amd64/server:/usr/local/freesurfer/MCRv80/sys/java/jre/glnxa64/jre/lib/amd64/client:/usr/local/freesurfer/MCRv80/sys/java/jre/glnxa64/jre/lib/amd64:
/usr/local/freesurfer/bin/segmentSubjectT1_autoEstimateAlveusML: error while 
loading shared libraries: libut.so: cannot enable executable stack as shared 
object requires: Invalid argument
#
#@# Hippocampal Subfields processing (T1 only) right Tue Jan 24 13:43:46 STD 
2017

 /usr/local/freesurfer/bin/segmentSF_T1.sh /usr/local/freesurfer/MCRv80 
/usr/local/freesurfer bob /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects right

See log file: 
/usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/bob/scripts/hippocampal-subfields-T1.log
--
Setting up environment variables
---
LD_LIBRARY_PATH is 
.:/usr/local/freesurfer/MCRv80/runtime/glnxa64:/usr/local/freesurfer/MCRv80/bin/glnxa64:/usr/local/freesurfer/MCRv80/sys/os/glnxa64:/usr/local/freesurfer/MCRv80/sys/java/jre/glnxa64/jre/lib/amd64/native_threads:/usr/local/freesurfer/MCRv80/sys/java/jre/glnxa64/jre/lib/amd64/server:/usr/local/freesurfer/MCRv80/sys/java/jre/glnxa64/jre/lib/amd64/client:/usr/local/freesurfer/MCRv80/sys/java/jre/glnxa64/jre/lib/amd64:
/usr/local/freesurfer/bin/segmentSubjectT1_autoEstimateAlveusML: error while 
loading shared libraries: libut.so: cannot enable executable stack as shared 
object requires: Invalid argument

Started at Tue Jan 24 13:43:45 STD 2017
Ended   at Tue Jan 24 13:43:47 STD 2017
#@#%# recon-all-run-time-hours 0.001
recon-all -s bob finished without error at Tue Jan 24 13:43:47 STD 2017
done

Sincerely,
Michel


___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient 

Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal Subfields Segmentation Error

2017-01-25 Thread Iglesias Gonzalez, Eugenio
Dear Michel,
What exact platform are you using? Ubuntu 14.04 installed on a virtual machine 
running on Windows 10?
Cheers,
/Eugenio

Juan Eugenio Iglesias
ERC Senior Research Fellow
Translational Imaging Group
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/


On 24 Jan 2017, at 12:47, Michel Hu mailto:a...@live.nl>> wrote:

Dear Freesurfer Developers,

For my research I'm trying to run the hippocampal subfield segmentation 
analysis however, I keep running into the following error. I tried to solve it 
by myself however I had no luck ( I tried by removing the exec flag from the 
files ).

I'm using the following sofftware
Freesurfer : freesurfer-Linux-centos6_x86_64-dev-20170103-696bbc1
Ubuntu: 14.04.5 LTS
WIndows 10

michel@-:~$ recon-all -s bob -hippocampal-subfields-T1
Subject Stamp: freesurfer-Linux-centos6_x86_64-dev-20170103-696bbc1
Current Stamp: freesurfer-Linux-centos6_x86_64-dev-20170103-696bbc1
INFO: SUBJECTS_DIR is /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects
Actual FREESURFER_HOME /usr/local/freesurfer
-rw-rw-r-- 1 michel 1590 1249629 Jan 24 13:40 
/usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/bob/scripts/recon-all.log
Linux - 3.4.0+ #1 PREEMPT Thu Aug 1 17:06:05 CST 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 
GNU/Linux
'/usr/local/freesurfer/bin/recon-all' -> 
'/usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/bob/scripts/recon-all.local-copy'
#
#@# Hippocampal Subfields processing (T1 only) left Tue Jan 24 13:43:46 STD 2017

 /usr/local/freesurfer/bin/segmentSF_T1.sh /usr/local/freesurfer/MCRv80 
/usr/local/freesurfer bob /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects left

See log file: 
/usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/bob/scripts/hippocampal-subfields-T1.log
--
Setting up environment variables
---
LD_LIBRARY_PATH is 
.:/usr/local/freesurfer/MCRv80/runtime/glnxa64:/usr/local/freesurfer/MCRv80/bin/glnxa64:/usr/local/freesurfer/MCRv80/sys/os/glnxa64:/usr/local/freesurfer/MCRv80/sys/java/jre/glnxa64/jre/lib/amd64/native_threads:/usr/local/freesurfer/MCRv80/sys/java/jre/glnxa64/jre/lib/amd64/server:/usr/local/freesurfer/MCRv80/sys/java/jre/glnxa64/jre/lib/amd64/client:/usr/local/freesurfer/MCRv80/sys/java/jre/glnxa64/jre/lib/amd64:
/usr/local/freesurfer/bin/segmentSubjectT1_autoEstimateAlveusML: error while 
loading shared libraries: libut.so: cannot enable executable stack as shared 
object requires: Invalid argument
#
#@# Hippocampal Subfields processing (T1 only) right Tue Jan 24 13:43:46 STD 
2017

 /usr/local/freesurfer/bin/segmentSF_T1.sh /usr/local/freesurfer/MCRv80 
/usr/local/freesurfer bob /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects right

See log file: 
/usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/bob/scripts/hippocampal-subfields-T1.log
--
Setting up environment variables
---
LD_LIBRARY_PATH is 
.:/usr/local/freesurfer/MCRv80/runtime/glnxa64:/usr/local/freesurfer/MCRv80/bin/glnxa64:/usr/local/freesurfer/MCRv80/sys/os/glnxa64:/usr/local/freesurfer/MCRv80/sys/java/jre/glnxa64/jre/lib/amd64/native_threads:/usr/local/freesurfer/MCRv80/sys/java/jre/glnxa64/jre/lib/amd64/server:/usr/local/freesurfer/MCRv80/sys/java/jre/glnxa64/jre/lib/amd64/client:/usr/local/freesurfer/MCRv80/sys/java/jre/glnxa64/jre/lib/amd64:
/usr/local/freesurfer/bin/segmentSubjectT1_autoEstimateAlveusML: error while 
loading shared libraries: libut.so: cannot enable executable stack as shared 
object requires: Invalid argument

Started at Tue Jan 24 13:43:45 STD 2017
Ended   at Tue Jan 24 13:43:47 STD 2017
#@#%# recon-all-run-time-hours 0.001
recon-all -s bob finished without error at Tue Jan 24 13:43:47 STD 2017
done

Sincerely,
Michel


___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] hippocampal subfields

2017-01-11 Thread Iglesias Gonzalez, Eugenio
Dear Ferdi,
It is really hard for us to know why you‘re getting such a weird error 
(segfault of kvlAutoCrop) in a submitted job when you don’t get it in an 
interactive session … You will have to look into the peculiarities of the 
submission system to see what is changing from one setting to the other (maybe 
some permissions?).
What version of FreeSurfer are you exactly using?
Kind regards,
/Eugenio

Juan Eugenio Iglesias
ERC Senior Research Fellow
Translational Imaging Group
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/


On 11 Jan 2017, at 07:49, Ferdi van de Kamp 
mailto:ferdivdk...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Hi all,

I'm trying to perform the longitudinal hippocampal subfields processing on a 
cluster.

When I simply access a core on the cluster directly and use it to run the 
hippocampal subfields it will run, but if I try to submit the process to the 
cluster, it will either throw errors as I have pasted below or stop after some 
registration steps.

The recon-all steps have run on the cluster (submitted) without problems.

Some notes:
As I'm testing things, the data is not in the original folder, so the path 
names in recon-all log are not correct, but if that is the problem I'd imagine 
it would be a problem for both submitting and direct processing.

Matlab runtime is installed, though in a separate folder, linking it in the way 
described on the Freesurfer website.

The problem persists no matter how much memory I allocate to the process (20GB 
RAM was the highest I tried).


Kind regards,

Ferdi van de Kamp



#
#@# Longitudinal Hippocampal Subfields processing (T1) left Wed Jan  4 03:06:40 
CET 2017
--
Setting up environment variables
---
LD_LIBRARY_PATH is 
.:/usr/local/Freesurfer/freesurfer-Linux-centos6_x86_64-stable-v6-beta/freesurfer//MCRv80/runtime/glnxa64:/usr/local/Freesurfer/freesurfer-Linux-centos6_x86_64-stable-v6-beta/freesurfer//MCRv80/bin/glnxa64:/usr/local/Freesurfer/freesurfer-Linux-centos6_x86_64-stable-v6-beta/freesurfer//MCRv80/sys/os/glnxa64:/usr/local/Freesurfer/freesurfer-Linux-centos6_x86_64-stable-v6-beta/freesurfer//MCRv80/sys/java/jre/glnxa64/jre/lib/amd64/native_threads:/usr/local/Freesurfer/freesurfer-Linux-centos6_x86_64-stable-v6-beta/freesurfer//MCRv80/sys/java/jre/glnxa64/jre/lib/amd64/server:/usr/local/Freesurfer/freesurfer-Linux-centos6_x86_64-stable-v6-beta/freesurfer//MCRv80/sys/java/jre/glnxa64/jre/lib/amd64/client:/usr/local/Freesurfer/freesurfer-Linux-centos6_x86_64-stable-v6-beta/freesurfer//MCRv80/sys/java/jre/glnxa64/jre/lib/amd64:/usr/local/OpenGridScheduler/gridengine/lib/linux-x64/:/usr/local/jemalloc/current/lib/:/usr/local/lib/:/usr/local/ScaLAPACK/scalapack-2.0.2/lib/
Warning: Unable to open display 'localhost:10.0'.  You will not be able to 
display graphics on the screen.
Registering imageDump.mgz to hippocampal mask from ASEG of Base Point
/usr/local/Freesurfer/freesurfer-Linux-centos6_x86_64-stable-v6-beta/freesurfer//bin//kvlAutoCrop:
 line 3: 65931 Segmentation fault  (core dumped) kvlAutoCrop.bin "$@"
/usr/local/Freesurfer/freesurfer-Linux-centos6_x86_64-stable-v6-beta/freesurfer//bin//kvlAutoCrop
 
/exports/fsw/MBos/DevTest/P0392Base/tmp/hippoSF_T1_long.v10_left//hippoAmygBinaryMask.mgz
 6 >/dev/null: Segmentation fault
gzip: 
/exports/fsw/MBos/DevTest/P0392Base/tmp/hippoSF_T1_long.v10_left//hippoAmygBinaryMask_autoCropped.mgz.gz:
 No such file or directory
ERROR: problem reading fname
SWITCH expression must be a scalar or string constant.

Error in myMRIread>load_mgh (line 550)



Error in myMRIread>myMRIread_aux (line 92)



Error in myMRIread (line 63)



Error in SegmentSubfieldsT1Longitudinal (line 228)



MATLAB:badSwitchExpression
@#@FSTIME  2017:01:04:03:06:40 
/usr/local/Freesurfer/freesurfer-Linux-centos6_x86_64-stable-v6-beta/freesurfer//bin/segmentSF_T1_long.sh
 N 8 e 12.17 S 0.80 U 3.63 P 36% M 680932 F 530 R 118193 W 0 c 10055 w 5994 I 
439360 O 194448 L 4.58 4.59 4.59
@#@FSLOADPOST 2017:01:04:03:06:52 
/usr/local/Freesurfer/freesurfer-Linux-centos6_x86_64-stable-v6-beta/freesurfer//bin/segmentSF_T1_long.sh
 N 8 4.72 4.62 4.60
#
#@# Longitudinal Hippocampal Subfields processing (T1) right Wed Jan  4 
03:06:52 CET 2017
--
Setting up environment variables
---
LD_LIBRARY_PATH is 
.:/usr/local/Freesurfer/freesurfer-Linux-centos6_x86_64-stable-v6-beta/freesurfer//MCRv80/runtime/glnxa64:/usr/local/Freesurfer/freesurfer-Linux-centos6_x86_64-stable-v6-beta/freesurfer//MCRv80/bin/glnxa64:/usr/local/Freesurfer/freesurfer-Linux-centos6_x86_64-stable-v6-beta/freesurfer//MCRv80/sys/os/glnxa64:/usr/local/Freesurfer/freesurfer-Linux-centos6_x86_64-stable-v6-beta/freesurfer//MCRv80/sys/java/jre/glnxa64/jre/lib/amd64/native_threads:/usr/local/Freesurfer/freesurfer-Linux-centos6_x86_64-stable-v6-beta/freesurfer//MCRv80/sys/java/jre/glnxa64/jre/

Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal subfields total volume differences

2016-07-25 Thread Mojmír Vinkler
Wow, longitudinal segmentation is absolutely awesome! It reduced our
measurement error by more than 30%. I can't wait when the hippocampal
longitudinal segmentation is ready.

By the way, I want to run (cross-sectional) hippocampal subfields on
longitudinal data using additional T2 with lower resolution and I was
wondering if I should use multispectral segmentation

recon-all -s  -hippocampal-subfields-T1T2  

or just additional scan

recon-all -s  -hippocampal-subfields-T2   

Since my T1 and T2 scans are quite well aligned, I wanted to use
-hippocampal-subfields-T2,
but I saw you recommending T1T2 in mailing list. Thanks!

(I'm also blocked by a bug with .ctf files
https://www.mail-archive.com/freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/msg48412.html,
but I'm fine with waiting for fix)

Thanks!
Mojmir

On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 12:33 PM Iglesias, Eugenio 
wrote:

> Dear Mojmir,
> using ~400 subjects, we found that the subfield module was a bit better
> than the ASEG volumes at discriminating Alzheimer’s patients from controls
> (see the Neuorimage paper). But, in any case, the difference is small.
> Regarding longitudinal segmentation: we just got a paper about this
> accepted, see
>
> http://www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/~iglesias/pdf/Neuroimage_2016_longitudinal.pdf
> I still need to find time to clean up the code and put it up on
> FreeSurfer. For the time being, you can run the subfield module on the
> longitudinally analyzed recons (method “L-INIT” in the paper).
> Cheers,
> Eugenio
>
> Juan Eugenio Iglesias
> Translational Imaging Group
> University College London
> http://www.jeiglesias.com
> http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/
>
>
> On 15 Jul 2016, at 09:00, Mojmír Vinkler  wrote:
>
> Hi Juan,
>
> Thanks! You're right, they really are tightly correlated (although their
> absolute values differ by 30%). We tried it on couple of subjects, but
> didn't find subfields to be significantly better than aseg stats though. By
> the way, is Freesurfer capable of using multiple scans from the same
> subject (longitudinal study, same modality) to make more precise
> measurements? For example by using T1 from the same subject / different
> time instead of T2 in subfields?
>
> Thanks!
> Mojmir
>
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 5:15 PM Iglesias, Eugenio 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Mojmir,
>> ASEG typically gives a larger estimate of the volume, though highly
>> correlated with that from the subfield package. We have found the
>> measurements from the subfield package to be a bit more reliable, though.
>> Cheers,
>> Eugenio
>>
>> Juan Eugenio Iglesias
>> Translational Imaging Group
>> University College London
>> http://www.jeiglesias.com
>> http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/
>>
>>
>> On 13 Jul 2016, at 16:07, Mojmír Vinkler 
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi experts,
>>
>> I'm using Freesurfer 6.0 dev version (Mac) to perform hippocampal
>> subfields segmentation. I only need to measure total hippocampus volume,
>> but measurements from basic `recon-all` were too volatile and I was hoping
>> that using subfields with T2 modality would reduce variance. However,
>> volume measured by hippocampal subfields is significantly different from
>> volume in aseg.stats.
>>
>> Here are volumes for right hippocampus from various methods:
>> aseg.stats - 3312.8
>> rh.hippoSfVolumes-T1.v10.txt (Mode A - only T1 used) - 2883.8
>> rh.hippoSfVolumes-T2.v10.txt (Mode B - using only additional scan) -
>> 2503.97
>> rh.hippoSfVolumes-T1-T1T2.v10.txt (Mode B - Multispectral segmentation)
>> - 2596.09
>>
>> I checked labeling visually and there were no obvious problems. Is such
>> a large difference common? Am I missing something? What number should be
>> most trusted?
>>
>> Thanks for any hints!
>> Mojmir
>>
>> ___
>> Freesurfer mailing list
>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>
>>
>> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it
>> is
>> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
>> e-mail
>> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
>> HelpLine at
>> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you
>> in error
>> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and
>> properly
>> dispose of the e-mail.
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Freesurfer mailing list
>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>
>>
>> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it
>> is
>> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
>> e-mail
>> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
>> HelpLine at
>> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you
>> in error
>> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and
>> properly
>> dispose of the e-mail.
>>
> 

Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal subfields --> Can't find a *ctf file?

2016-07-20 Thread pierre deman
ok thanks a lot for the quick answer.

let me know when it works.
our mri voxel size is 1 mm isotropic.
(if it changes anything, I am working on ubuntu 14.04).

Cheers,
Pierre

On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Iglesias, Eugenio 
wrote:

> Thanks a lot, Pierre.
> I’ll get this sorted out as soon as possible.  I’m in the process of
> modifying the module so it supports data with resolution >1mm, and also
> incorporating the longitudinal segmentation method described in
> https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.07.020
> Cheers,
> Eugenio
>
> Juan Eugenio Iglesias
> Translational Imaging Group
> University College London
> http://www.jeiglesias.com
> http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/
>
>
> On 20 Jul 2016, at 09:57, pierre deman  wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I downloaded the new freesurfer development version and I still have the
> same problem when running the hippocampal-subfields
>
> "Invalid MEX-file 
> '/tmp/MCR_4195017647/.mcrCache8.0/segmen0/autofs/cluster/koen/koen/GEMS-Release/bin/kvlGEMSMatlab.mexa64':
> libkvlGEMSCommon.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or
> directory
> Error in kvlClear (line 11)
>
> Error in segmentSubjectT1_autoEstimateAlveusML (line 133)
>
> MATLAB:invalidMEXFile".
>
> Does anyone have any idea about a solution ?
>
> Cheers,
> Pierre
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 12:22 PM, Iglesias, Eugenio 
> wrote:
>
>> And thanks to Zeke, of course ;-)
>>
>>
>> Juan Eugenio Iglesias
>> Translational Imaging Group
>> University College London
>> http://www.jeiglesias.com
>> http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/
>>
>>
>> On 13 Jul 2016, at 11:19, Iglesias, Eugenio  wrote:
>>
>> Dear all,
>> our expert developer Zeke Kaufman figured out what the problem was. We
>> have now fixed the Linux version; the MAC version will hopefully be ready
>> as well in a couple of days. I have also fixed other bugs (including the
>> problem that caused the code to get stuck every once in a while).
>> You can downloaded the latest development version from our website.
>> Thanks everyone for your feedback.
>> Cheers,
>> Eugenio
>>
>>
>>
>> Juan Eugenio Iglesias
>> Translational Imaging Group
>> University College London
>> http://www.jeiglesias.com
>> http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/
>>
>>
>> On 8 Jul 2016, at 12:14, Iglesias, Eugenio  wrote:
>>
>> I think I identified the problem; hopefully this will be sorted out very
>> soon.
>> Cheers,
>> Eugenio
>>
>> Juan Eugenio Iglesias
>> Translational Imaging Group
>> University College London
>> http://www.jeiglesias.com
>> http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/
>>
>>
>> On 7 Jul 2016, at 19:23, Perea Camargo, Rodrigo Dennis <
>> rpereacama...@mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:
>>
>> *Warning: This message has had one or more attachments removed
>> (recon-all.cmd). Please read the "UCL-Attachment-Warning.txt" attachment(s)
>> for more information.*
>> Hi all,
>> I am currently trying to run hippocampal subfields in a couple of my
>> participants using FreeSurfer6.0 (located at
>> *nmr*:/usr/local/freesurfer/stable6).
>>
>> It did run successfully for many of my subjects earlier in the year but
>> some of them only had a let hemisphere segmentation. So I decided to re-run
>> them using launchpad and also my local nmr computer.
>>
>> Now, none of the hippocampal sufields segmentations appear (no
>> rh/lh.hippoSfLabels-T1-T2.*.mgz appears). I looked at
>> /scripts/scripts/hippocampal-subfields-T1T2.log and the error I
>> get is:
>>
>> Error:Cannot find CTF archive
>> /autofs/cluster/freesurfer/centos6_x86_64/stable6/bin/segmentSubjectT1T2_autoEstimateAlveusML.ctf
>>
>>
>> Could a missing *.ctf  cause the error? (btw, the re-run happened after
>> the major hardware crash).
>>
>> Thanks in advance for your help,
>> Rodrigo
>>
>> PS: I am attaching the *log files as suggested in the bug reporting page.
>>
>>
>> ---
>> Rodrigo Dennis Perea
>> Research Fellow
>> Department of Radiology
>> Athinoula A. Martinos Center
>> Massachusetts General Hospital
>> rpereacama...@mgh.harvard.edu
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> This is a message from the E-Mail Virus Protection System at UCL
>> --
>>
>> The original e-mail attachment (recon-all.cmd) is on the list of
>> unacceptable attachments for UCL and has been replaced by this
>> warning message.  This constraint is in place to protect users
>> from viruses and other malware.
>>
>> If you think this attachment is a legitimate file and you wish to
>> receive it, please ask the sender to rename the file extension (eg
>> rename file.exe to file.ex_) and resend it to avoid this constraint.
>> On receiving the file you will have to save it and rename it back to
>> its original extension.
>>
>>
>> Reference: 1bLDxs-0003ZW-3F
>>
>> --
>> UCL E-mail Virus Protection System
>> serviced...@ucl.ac.uk
>> Internal phone: 25000
>>
>>
>> 
>> ___
>> Freesurfer mailing list
>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>
>>
>> The info

Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal subfields --> Can't find a *ctf file?

2016-07-20 Thread Iglesias, Eugenio
Thanks a lot, Pierre.
I’ll get this sorted out as soon as possible.  I’m in the process of modifying 
the module so it supports data with resolution >1mm, and also incorporating the 
longitudinal segmentation method described in 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.07.020
Cheers,
Eugenio

Juan Eugenio Iglesias
Translational Imaging Group
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/


On 20 Jul 2016, at 09:57, pierre deman 
mailto:deman.pie...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Hi,

I downloaded the new freesurfer development version and I still have the same 
problem when running the hippocampal-subfields

"Invalid MEX-file 
'/tmp/MCR_4195017647/.mcrCache8.0/segmen0/autofs/cluster/koen/koen/GEMS-Release/bin/kvlGEMSMatlab.mexa64':
 libkvlGEMSCommon.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
Error in kvlClear (line 11)

Error in segmentSubjectT1_autoEstimateAlveusML (line 133)

MATLAB:invalidMEXFile".

Does anyone have any idea about a solution ?

Cheers,
Pierre


On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 12:22 PM, Iglesias, Eugenio 
mailto:e.igles...@ucl.ac.uk>> wrote:
And thanks to Zeke, of course ;-)


Juan Eugenio Iglesias
Translational Imaging Group
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/


On 13 Jul 2016, at 11:19, Iglesias, Eugenio 
mailto:e.igles...@ucl.ac.uk>> wrote:

Dear all,
our expert developer Zeke Kaufman figured out what the problem was. We have now 
fixed the Linux version; the MAC version will hopefully be ready as well in a 
couple of days. I have also fixed other bugs (including the problem that caused 
the code to get stuck every once in a while).
You can downloaded the latest development version from our website.
Thanks everyone for your feedback.
Cheers,
Eugenio



Juan Eugenio Iglesias
Translational Imaging Group
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/


On 8 Jul 2016, at 12:14, Iglesias, Eugenio 
mailto:e.igles...@ucl.ac.uk>> wrote:

I think I identified the problem; hopefully this will be sorted out very soon.
Cheers,
Eugenio

Juan Eugenio Iglesias
Translational Imaging Group
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/


On 7 Jul 2016, at 19:23, Perea Camargo, Rodrigo Dennis 
mailto:rpereacama...@mgh.harvard.edu>> wrote:


Warning: This message has had one or more attachments removed (recon-all.cmd). 
Please read the "UCL-Attachment-Warning.txt" attachment(s) for more information.

Hi all,
I am currently trying to run hippocampal subfields in a couple of my 
participants using FreeSurfer6.0 (located at 
*nmr*:/usr/local/freesurfer/stable6).

It did run successfully for many of my subjects earlier in the year but some of 
them only had a let hemisphere segmentation. So I decided to re-run them using 
launchpad and also my local nmr computer.

Now, none of the hippocampal sufields segmentations appear (no 
rh/lh.hippoSfLabels-T1-T2.*.mgz appears). I looked at 
/scripts/scripts/hippocampal-subfields-T1T2.log and the error I get 
is:

Error:Cannot find CTF archive 
/autofs/cluster/freesurfer/centos6_x86_64/stable6/bin/segmentSubjectT1T2_autoEstimateAlveusML.ctf


Could a missing *.ctf  cause the error? (btw, the re-run happened after the 
major hardware crash).

Thanks in advance for your help,
Rodrigo

PS: I am attaching the *log files as suggested in the bug reporting page.


---
Rodrigo Dennis Perea
Research Fellow
Department of Radiology
Athinoula A. Martinos Center
Massachusetts General Hospital
rpereacama...@mgh.harvard.edu






This is a message from the E-Mail Virus Protection System at UCL
--

The original e-mail attachment (recon-all.cmd) is on the list of
unacceptable attachments for UCL and has been replaced by this
warning message.  This constraint is in place to protect users
from viruses and other malware.

If you think this attachment is a legitimate file and you wish to
receive it, please ask the sender to rename the file extension (eg
rename file.exe to file.ex_) and resend it to avoid this constraint.
On receiving the file you will have to save it and rename it back to
its original extension.


Reference: 1bLDxs-0003ZW-3F

--
UCL E-mail Virus Protection System
serviced...@ucl.ac.uk
Internal phone: 25000


___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you

Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal subfields --> Can't find a *ctf file?

2016-07-20 Thread pierre deman
Hi,

I downloaded the new freesurfer development version and I still have the
same problem when running the hippocampal-subfields

"Invalid MEX-file
'/tmp/MCR_4195017647/.mcrCache8.0/segmen0/autofs/cluster/koen/koen/GEMS-Release/bin/kvlGEMSMatlab.mexa64':
libkvlGEMSCommon.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or
directory
Error in kvlClear (line 11)

Error in segmentSubjectT1_autoEstimateAlveusML (line 133)

MATLAB:invalidMEXFile".

Does anyone have any idea about a solution ?

Cheers,
Pierre


On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 12:22 PM, Iglesias, Eugenio 
wrote:

> And thanks to Zeke, of course ;-)
>
>
> Juan Eugenio Iglesias
> Translational Imaging Group
> University College London
> http://www.jeiglesias.com
> http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/
>
>
> On 13 Jul 2016, at 11:19, Iglesias, Eugenio  wrote:
>
> Dear all,
> our expert developer Zeke Kaufman figured out what the problem was. We
> have now fixed the Linux version; the MAC version will hopefully be ready
> as well in a couple of days. I have also fixed other bugs (including the
> problem that caused the code to get stuck every once in a while).
> You can downloaded the latest development version from our website.
> Thanks everyone for your feedback.
> Cheers,
> Eugenio
>
>
>
> Juan Eugenio Iglesias
> Translational Imaging Group
> University College London
> http://www.jeiglesias.com
> http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/
>
>
> On 8 Jul 2016, at 12:14, Iglesias, Eugenio  wrote:
>
> I think I identified the problem; hopefully this will be sorted out very
> soon.
> Cheers,
> Eugenio
>
> Juan Eugenio Iglesias
> Translational Imaging Group
> University College London
> http://www.jeiglesias.com
> http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/
>
>
> On 7 Jul 2016, at 19:23, Perea Camargo, Rodrigo Dennis <
> rpereacama...@mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:
>
> *Warning: This message has had one or more attachments removed
> (recon-all.cmd). Please read the "UCL-Attachment-Warning.txt" attachment(s)
> for more information.*
> Hi all,
> I am currently trying to run hippocampal subfields in a couple of my
> participants using FreeSurfer6.0 (located at
> *nmr*:/usr/local/freesurfer/stable6).
>
> It did run successfully for many of my subjects earlier in the year but
> some of them only had a let hemisphere segmentation. So I decided to re-run
> them using launchpad and also my local nmr computer.
>
> Now, none of the hippocampal sufields segmentations appear (no
> rh/lh.hippoSfLabels-T1-T2.*.mgz appears). I looked at
> /scripts/scripts/hippocampal-subfields-T1T2.log and the error I
> get is:
>
> Error:Cannot find CTF archive
> /autofs/cluster/freesurfer/centos6_x86_64/stable6/bin/segmentSubjectT1T2_autoEstimateAlveusML.ctf
>
>
> Could a missing *.ctf  cause the error? (btw, the re-run happened after
> the major hardware crash).
>
> Thanks in advance for your help,
> Rodrigo
>
> PS: I am attaching the *log files as suggested in the bug reporting page.
>
>
> ---
> Rodrigo Dennis Perea
> Research Fellow
> Department of Radiology
> Athinoula A. Martinos Center
> Massachusetts General Hospital
> rpereacama...@mgh.harvard.edu
>
>
>
>
>
>
> This is a message from the E-Mail Virus Protection System at UCL
> --
>
> The original e-mail attachment (recon-all.cmd) is on the list of
> unacceptable attachments for UCL and has been replaced by this
> warning message.  This constraint is in place to protect users
> from viruses and other malware.
>
> If you think this attachment is a legitimate file and you wish to
> receive it, please ask the sender to rename the file extension (eg
> rename file.exe to file.ex_) and resend it to avoid this constraint.
> On receiving the file you will have to save it and rename it back to
> its original extension.
>
>
> Reference: 1bLDxs-0003ZW-3F
>
> --
> UCL E-mail Virus Protection System
> serviced...@ucl.ac.uk
> Internal phone: 25000
>
>
> 
> ___
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>
> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it
> is
> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
> e-mail
> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
> HelpLine at
> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in
> error
> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and
> properly
> dispose of the e-mail.
>
>
> ___
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>
> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it
> is
> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
> e-mail
> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
> HelpLine at
> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . I

Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal subfields total volume differences

2016-07-15 Thread Iglesias, Eugenio
Dear Mojmir,
using ~400 subjects, we found that the subfield module was a bit better than 
the ASEG volumes at discriminating Alzheimer’s patients from controls (see the 
Neuorimage paper). But, in any case, the difference is small.
Regarding longitudinal segmentation: we just got a paper about this accepted, 
see
http://www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/~iglesias/pdf/Neuroimage_2016_longitudinal.pdf
I still need to find time to clean up the code and put it up on FreeSurfer. For 
the time being, you can run the subfield module on the longitudinally analyzed 
recons (method “L-INIT” in the paper).
Cheers,
Eugenio

Juan Eugenio Iglesias
Translational Imaging Group
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/


On 15 Jul 2016, at 09:00, Mojmír Vinkler 
mailto:mojmir.vink...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Hi Juan,

Thanks! You're right, they really are tightly correlated (although their 
absolute values differ by 30%). We tried it on couple of subjects, but didn't 
find subfields to be significantly better than aseg stats though. By the way, 
is Freesurfer capable of using multiple scans from the same subject 
(longitudinal study, same modality) to make more precise measurements? For 
example by using T1 from the same subject / different time instead of T2 in 
subfields?

Thanks!
Mojmir

On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 5:15 PM Iglesias, Eugenio 
mailto:e.igles...@ucl.ac.uk>> wrote:
Hi Mojmir,
ASEG typically gives a larger estimate of the volume, though highly correlated 
with that from the subfield package. We have found the measurements from the 
subfield package to be a bit more reliable, though.
Cheers,
Eugenio

Juan Eugenio Iglesias
Translational Imaging Group
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/


On 13 Jul 2016, at 16:07, Mojmír Vinkler 
mailto:mojmir.vink...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Hi experts,

I'm using Freesurfer 6.0 dev version (Mac) to perform hippocampal subfields 
segmentation. I only need to measure total hippocampus volume, but measurements 
from basic `recon-all` were too volatile and I was hoping that using subfields 
with T2 modality would reduce variance. However, volume measured by hippocampal 
subfields is significantly different from volume in aseg.stats.

Here are volumes for right hippocampus from various methods:
aseg.stats - 3312.8
rh.hippoSfVolumes-T1.v10.txt (Mode A - only T1 used) - 2883.8
rh.hippoSfVolumes-T2.v10.txt (Mode B - using only additional scan) - 2503.97
rh.hippoSfVolumes-T1-T1T2.v10.txt (Mode B - Multispectral segmentation) - 
2596.09

I checked labeling visually and there were no obvious problems. Is such a large 
difference common? Am I missing something? What number should be most trusted?

Thanks for any hints!
Mojmir
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient in

Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal subfields total volume differences

2016-07-15 Thread Mojmír Vinkler
Hi Juan,

Thanks! You're right, they really are tightly correlated (although their
absolute values differ by 30%). We tried it on couple of subjects, but
didn't find subfields to be significantly better than aseg stats though. By
the way, is Freesurfer capable of using multiple scans from the same
subject (longitudinal study, same modality) to make more precise
measurements? For example by using T1 from the same subject / different
time instead of T2 in subfields?

Thanks!
Mojmir

On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 5:15 PM Iglesias, Eugenio 
wrote:

> Hi Mojmir,
> ASEG typically gives a larger estimate of the volume, though highly
> correlated with that from the subfield package. We have found the
> measurements from the subfield package to be a bit more reliable, though.
> Cheers,
> Eugenio
>
> Juan Eugenio Iglesias
> Translational Imaging Group
> University College London
> http://www.jeiglesias.com
> http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/
>
>
> On 13 Jul 2016, at 16:07, Mojmír Vinkler  wrote:
>
> Hi experts,
>
> I'm using Freesurfer 6.0 dev version (Mac) to perform hippocampal
> subfields segmentation. I only need to measure total hippocampus volume,
> but measurements from basic `recon-all` were too volatile and I was hoping
> that using subfields with T2 modality would reduce variance. However,
> volume measured by hippocampal subfields is significantly different from
> volume in aseg.stats.
>
> Here are volumes for right hippocampus from various methods:
> aseg.stats - 3312.8
> rh.hippoSfVolumes-T1.v10.txt (Mode A - only T1 used) - 2883.8
> rh.hippoSfVolumes-T2.v10.txt (Mode B - using only additional scan) -
> 2503.97
> rh.hippoSfVolumes-T1-T1T2.v10.txt (Mode B - Multispectral segmentation)
> - 2596.09
>
> I checked labeling visually and there were no obvious problems. Is such a
> large difference common? Am I missing something? What number should be most
> trusted?
>
> Thanks for any hints!
> Mojmir
>
> ___
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>
> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it
> is
> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
> e-mail
> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
> HelpLine at
> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in
> error
> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and
> properly
> dispose of the e-mail.
>
>
> ___
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>
> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it
> is
> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
> e-mail
> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
> HelpLine at
> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in
> error
> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and
> properly
> dispose of the e-mail.
>
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal subfields --> Can\'t find a *ctf file?

2016-07-14 Thread Iglesias, Eugenio
The MAC version is now fixed as well. It should be available for download in 
the next couple of days (Zeke can provide a better estimate).
Thanks again to all of you for your feedback.
/E


Juan Eugenio Iglesias
Translational Imaging Group
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/


On 14 Jul 2016, at 10:05, Fernando Pérez-García 
mailto:fepe...@gmail.com>> wrote:

I am using Ubuntu 14.04.4.
Please let me know if you need some more info.

Cheers,
Fernando

2016-07-14 10:59 GMT+02:00 Iglesias, Eugenio 
mailto:e.igles...@ucl.ac.uk>>:
Dear Fernando,
Are you using the MAC version? I haven’t finished fixing the bugs in that one 
yet.
If you’re using the Linux version: Zeke, can you please shed some light on what 
the problem might be?
Cheers,
Eugenio



Juan Eugenio Iglesias
Translational Imaging Group
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/


On 14 Jul 2016, at 08:57, Fernando Pérez-García 
mailto:fepe...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Dear Eugenio,

I'm still having this issue, even after downloading the latest development 
version from the website as you suggested. My steps (yesterday):

  1.  Download and install FS (dev version)
  2.  Run recon-all
  3.  Download and install Matlab runtime
  4.  Run recon-all with brainstem structures

I get the following error:

Error:Cannot find CTF archive /usr/local/freesurfer/bin/SegmentSubject.bin.ctf


Should I try the same steps again today?


Best,

Fernando



___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal subfields --> Can\'t find a *ctf file?

2016-07-14 Thread Iglesias, Eugenio
Dear Fernando,
Are you using the MAC version? I haven’t finished fixing the bugs in that one 
yet.
If you’re using the Linux version: Zeke, can you please shed some light on what 
the problem might be?
Cheers,
Eugenio



Juan Eugenio Iglesias
Translational Imaging Group
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/


On 14 Jul 2016, at 08:57, Fernando Pérez-García 
mailto:fepe...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Dear Eugenio,

I'm still having this issue, even after downloading the latest development 
version from the website as you suggested. My steps (yesterday):

  1.  Download and install FS (dev version)
  2.  Run recon-all
  3.  Download and install Matlab runtime
  4.  Run recon-all with brainstem structures

I get the following error:

Error:Cannot find CTF archive /usr/local/freesurfer/bin/SegmentSubject.bin.ctf


Should I try the same steps again today?


Best,

Fernando

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal subfields total volume differences

2016-07-13 Thread Iglesias, Eugenio
Hi Mojmir,
ASEG typically gives a larger estimate of the volume, though highly correlated 
with that from the subfield package. We have found the measurements from the 
subfield package to be a bit more reliable, though.
Cheers,
Eugenio

Juan Eugenio Iglesias
Translational Imaging Group
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/


On 13 Jul 2016, at 16:07, Mojmír Vinkler 
mailto:mojmir.vink...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Hi experts,

I'm using Freesurfer 6.0 dev version (Mac) to perform hippocampal subfields 
segmentation. I only need to measure total hippocampus volume, but measurements 
from basic `recon-all` were too volatile and I was hoping that using subfields 
with T2 modality would reduce variance. However, volume measured by hippocampal 
subfields is significantly different from volume in aseg.stats.

Here are volumes for right hippocampus from various methods:
aseg.stats - 3312.8
rh.hippoSfVolumes-T1.v10.txt (Mode A - only T1 used) - 2883.8
rh.hippoSfVolumes-T2.v10.txt (Mode B - using only additional scan) - 2503.97
rh.hippoSfVolumes-T1-T1T2.v10.txt (Mode B - Multispectral segmentation) - 
2596.09

I checked labeling visually and there were no obvious problems. Is such a large 
difference common? Am I missing something? What number should be most trusted?

Thanks for any hints!
Mojmir
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal subfields --> Can't find a *ctf file?

2016-07-13 Thread Iglesias, Eugenio
And thanks to Zeke, of course ;-)


Juan Eugenio Iglesias
Translational Imaging Group
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/


On 13 Jul 2016, at 11:19, Iglesias, Eugenio 
mailto:e.igles...@ucl.ac.uk>> wrote:

Dear all,
our expert developer Zeke Kaufman figured out what the problem was. We have now 
fixed the Linux version; the MAC version will hopefully be ready as well in a 
couple of days. I have also fixed other bugs (including the problem that caused 
the code to get stuck every once in a while).
You can downloaded the latest development version from our website.
Thanks everyone for your feedback.
Cheers,
Eugenio



Juan Eugenio Iglesias
Translational Imaging Group
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/


On 8 Jul 2016, at 12:14, Iglesias, Eugenio 
mailto:e.igles...@ucl.ac.uk>> wrote:

I think I identified the problem; hopefully this will be sorted out very soon.
Cheers,
Eugenio

Juan Eugenio Iglesias
Translational Imaging Group
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/


On 7 Jul 2016, at 19:23, Perea Camargo, Rodrigo Dennis 
mailto:rpereacama...@mgh.harvard.edu>> wrote:


Warning: This message has had one or more attachments removed (recon-all.cmd). 
Please read the "UCL-Attachment-Warning.txt" attachment(s) for more information.

Hi all,
I am currently trying to run hippocampal subfields in a couple of my 
participants using FreeSurfer6.0 (located at 
*nmr*:/usr/local/freesurfer/stable6).

It did run successfully for many of my subjects earlier in the year but some of 
them only had a let hemisphere segmentation. So I decided to re-run them using 
launchpad and also my local nmr computer.

Now, none of the hippocampal sufields segmentations appear (no 
rh/lh.hippoSfLabels-T1-T2.*.mgz appears). I looked at 
/scripts/scripts/hippocampal-subfields-T1T2.log and the error I get 
is:

Error:Cannot find CTF archive 
/autofs/cluster/freesurfer/centos6_x86_64/stable6/bin/segmentSubjectT1T2_autoEstimateAlveusML.ctf


Could a missing *.ctf  cause the error? (btw, the re-run happened after the 
major hardware crash).

Thanks in advance for your help,
Rodrigo

PS: I am attaching the *log files as suggested in the bug reporting page.


---
Rodrigo Dennis Perea
Research Fellow
Department of Radiology
Athinoula A. Martinos Center
Massachusetts General Hospital
rpereacama...@mgh.harvard.edu






This is a message from the E-Mail Virus Protection System at UCL
--

The original e-mail attachment (recon-all.cmd) is on the list of
unacceptable attachments for UCL and has been replaced by this
warning message.  This constraint is in place to protect users
from viruses and other malware.

If you think this attachment is a legitimate file and you wish to
receive it, please ask the sender to rename the file extension (eg
rename file.exe to file.ex_) and resend it to avoid this constraint.
On receiving the file you will have to save it and rename it back to
its original extension.


Reference: 1bLDxs-0003ZW-3F

--
UCL E-mail Virus Protection System
serviced...@ucl.ac.uk
Internal phone: 25000


___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please con

Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal subfields --> Can't find a *ctf file?

2016-07-13 Thread Iglesias, Eugenio
Dear all,
our expert developer Zeke Kaufman figured out what the problem was. We have now 
fixed the Linux version; the MAC version will hopefully be ready as well in a 
couple of days. I have also fixed other bugs (including the problem that caused 
the code to get stuck every once in a while).
You can downloaded the latest development version from our website.
Thanks everyone for your feedback.
Cheers,
Eugenio



Juan Eugenio Iglesias
Translational Imaging Group
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/


On 8 Jul 2016, at 12:14, Iglesias, Eugenio 
mailto:e.igles...@ucl.ac.uk>> wrote:

I think I identified the problem; hopefully this will be sorted out very soon.
Cheers,
Eugenio

Juan Eugenio Iglesias
Translational Imaging Group
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/


On 7 Jul 2016, at 19:23, Perea Camargo, Rodrigo Dennis 
mailto:rpereacama...@mgh.harvard.edu>> wrote:


Warning: This message has had one or more attachments removed (recon-all.cmd). 
Please read the "UCL-Attachment-Warning.txt" attachment(s) for more information.

Hi all,
I am currently trying to run hippocampal subfields in a couple of my 
participants using FreeSurfer6.0 (located at 
*nmr*:/usr/local/freesurfer/stable6).

It did run successfully for many of my subjects earlier in the year but some of 
them only had a let hemisphere segmentation. So I decided to re-run them using 
launchpad and also my local nmr computer.

Now, none of the hippocampal sufields segmentations appear (no 
rh/lh.hippoSfLabels-T1-T2.*.mgz appears). I looked at 
/scripts/scripts/hippocampal-subfields-T1T2.log and the error I get 
is:

Error:Cannot find CTF archive 
/autofs/cluster/freesurfer/centos6_x86_64/stable6/bin/segmentSubjectT1T2_autoEstimateAlveusML.ctf


Could a missing *.ctf  cause the error? (btw, the re-run happened after the 
major hardware crash).

Thanks in advance for your help,
Rodrigo

PS: I am attaching the *log files as suggested in the bug reporting page.


---
Rodrigo Dennis Perea
Research Fellow
Department of Radiology
Athinoula A. Martinos Center
Massachusetts General Hospital
rpereacama...@mgh.harvard.edu






This is a message from the E-Mail Virus Protection System at UCL
--

The original e-mail attachment (recon-all.cmd) is on the list of
unacceptable attachments for UCL and has been replaced by this
warning message.  This constraint is in place to protect users
from viruses and other malware.

If you think this attachment is a legitimate file and you wish to
receive it, please ask the sender to rename the file extension (eg
rename file.exe to file.ex_) and resend it to avoid this constraint.
On receiving the file you will have to save it and rename it back to
its original extension.


Reference: 1bLDxs-0003ZW-3F

--
UCL E-mail Virus Protection System
serviced...@ucl.ac.uk
Internal phone: 25000


___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] hippocampal subfields command

2016-07-06 Thread Alexopoulos, Dimitrios
Thanks. Only for FS 6.0 and later, correct?

Jim

From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
[mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Iglesias, Eugenio
Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2016 9:47 AM
To: Freesurfer support list 
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] hippocampal subfields command

Hi Jim,
the latter command uses a new, higher resolution atlas based on ex vivo scans.
Cheers,
Eugenio

Juan Eugenio Iglesias
Translational Imaging Group
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/

On 6 Jul 2016, at 15:39, Alexopoulos, Dimitrios 
mailto:alexopoulo...@kids.wustl.edu>> wrote:

A quick question re: hippocampal segmentation.

I have processed 1mm isotropic T1 data with 5.3 using the following command:
recon-all  -qcache -all  -hippo-subfields

How is this this different than using the following command I have found here: 
https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/HippocampalSubfields
-hippocampal-subfields-T1


Thanks.
Jim


The materials in this email are private and may contain Protected Health 
Information. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that any 
unauthorized use, disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action 
in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you 
have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender via 
telephone or return email.

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal subfields segmentation - what is the voxel size of the input?

2016-07-06 Thread Iglesias, Eugenio
Not yet, sorry. But it’s on my todo list.


Juan Eugenio Iglesias
Translational Imaging Group
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/


On 6 Jul 2016, at 14:39, Hibert, Matthew Louis 
mailto:mhib...@mgh.harvard.edu>> wrote:

Hi Eugenio,
Have you had a chance to look into the possibility of combining the -hires flag 
with the hippocampal subfield segmentation?

Thanks,
Matt

From: 
freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
 
[freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>]
 on behalf of Iglesias, Eugenio 
[e.igles...@ucl.ac.uk<mailto:e.igles...@ucl.ac.uk>]
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 3:36 AM
To: Freesurfer support list
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal subfields segmentation - what is the 
voxel size of the input?

Hi Matt,
Bruce actually mentioned this possibility yesterday. Good to hear it doesn’t 
crash when you run it! That said, I need to go through the code, and make sure 
that data are handled the way they are supposed to: the fact that it doesn’t 
crash doesn’t directly imply that it is working properly. Hopefully I’ll find 
time to do this next week…
Cheers,
Eugenio


Juan Eugenio Iglesias
Translational Imaging Group
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com<http://www.jeiglesias.com/>
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/


On 9 Jun 2016, at 21:51, Hibert, Matthew Louis 
mailto:mhib...@mgh.harvard.edu>> wrote:

Hi Eugenio,
Would it also be possible to use the -hires flag in the initial recon-all 
command to prevent the T1 from being downsampled and maintain the voxel size 
that the T1 was acquired at, and use that resulting recon for the hippocampal 
subfield segmentation?  I've tested this with MEMPRAGE scans acquired at 0.75mm 
isotropic and coronal T2 anisotropic scans acquired at 0.33mm in plane with 1mm 
thick slices, and the results look reasonable.  The "1mm" label files are 
correctly downsampled to 0.75mm instead of 1mm, and the higher resolution label 
files remain at 0.33mm resolution.

Thanks,
Matt

Stufflebeam Lab
Athinoula A. Martinos Center
Massachusetts General Hospital
149 13th Street, Room 1115S
Charlestown, MA 02129

From: 
freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
 
[freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>]
 on behalf of Iglesias, Eugenio 
[e.igles...@ucl.ac.uk<mailto:e.igles...@ucl.ac.uk>]
Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2016 2:36 PM
To: Freesurfer support list
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal subfields segmentation - what is the 
voxel size of the input?

Hi Fernando,

Unfortunately, FreeSurfer does downsample the T1s to 1mm, and the subfield code 
assumes that the T1 comes from FreeSurfer… For the paper, I hacked the code to 
take advantage of multiple images with higher resolution, but it hasn’t been 
thoroughly tested and it’s not publicly available at this point.
That said, there are different things you can do at this point:
1. Use the T1+T2 as is (disadvantage: T1 will be resampled to 1 mm).
2. Use only the T2.
3. Use only the T1. To do this, you would use the T1 as additional scan on its 
own (i.e., the main and additional scans are the same, but the additional one 
won’t be resampled).
4. There might be a way (hack) of using both scans at full resolution. If you 
change the header of the T1 scan and specify that the voxel size is 1mm, no 
resampling will happen; FreeSurfer will believe that you’re dealing with a 
subject with a very large head. If you do this, you’ll also have to enlarge the 
voxel size of the T2 by a factor 1/0.7. Also, the resulting volumes will have 
to be divided by (1/0.7)^3 in order to correct for the “wrong” voxel size.

I hope this helps!

Cheers,

Eugenio

Juan Eugenio Iglesias
Translational Imaging Group
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com<http://www.jeiglesias.com/>
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/


On 9 Jun 2016, at 19:23, Fernando Pasquini Santos 
mailto:fernandop...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Dear,

I have a doubt regarding the input T1 image used for the Hippocampal Subfield 
segmentation in Freesurfer 6.0 - 
https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/HippocampalSubfields

In this documentation it says that I can use a standard 1mm T1 image or the 
same standard 1mm T1 image with an additional scan. However, I want to use a 
0.7mm T1 image as input, with an additional T2 scan. When I run the program 
with it, the output images (nu.mgz and orig.mgz) are downsampled to 1mm voxel 
size. So, I don't know if this happens just because of the recon-all program or 
if the segmentation is being done in the downsampled T1 image or in the 
original 0.7mm.

By reading the article "A computational atlas of the hippocampal formation 
using ex vivo, ultra-high resolution MRI: Ap

Re: [Freesurfer] hippocampal subfields command

2016-07-06 Thread Iglesias, Eugenio
Hi Jim,
the latter command uses a new, higher resolution atlas based on ex vivo scans.
Cheers,
Eugenio

Juan Eugenio Iglesias
Translational Imaging Group
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/


On 6 Jul 2016, at 15:39, Alexopoulos, Dimitrios 
mailto:alexopoulo...@kids.wustl.edu>> wrote:

A quick question re: hippocampal segmentation.

I have processed 1mm isotropic T1 data with 5.3 using the following command:
recon-all  -qcache -all  -hippo-subfields

How is this this different than using the following command I have found here: 
https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/HippocampalSubfields
-hippocampal-subfields-T1


Thanks.
Jim


The materials in this email are private and may contain Protected Health 
Information. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that any 
unauthorized use, disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action 
in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you 
have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender via 
telephone or return email.
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal subfields segmentation - what is the voxel size of the input?

2016-07-06 Thread Hibert, Matthew Louis
Hi Eugenio,
Have you had a chance to look into the possibility of combining the -hires flag 
with the hippocampal subfield segmentation?

Thanks,
Matt

From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
[freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] on behalf of Iglesias, Eugenio 
[e.igles...@ucl.ac.uk]
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 3:36 AM
To: Freesurfer support list
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal subfields segmentation - what is the 
voxel size of the input?

Hi Matt,
Bruce actually mentioned this possibility yesterday. Good to hear it doesn’t 
crash when you run it! That said, I need to go through the code, and make sure 
that data are handled the way they are supposed to: the fact that it doesn’t 
crash doesn’t directly imply that it is working properly. Hopefully I’ll find 
time to do this next week…
Cheers,
Eugenio


Juan Eugenio Iglesias
Translational Imaging Group
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/


On 9 Jun 2016, at 21:51, Hibert, Matthew Louis 
mailto:mhib...@mgh.harvard.edu>> wrote:

Hi Eugenio,
Would it also be possible to use the -hires flag in the initial recon-all 
command to prevent the T1 from being downsampled and maintain the voxel size 
that the T1 was acquired at, and use that resulting recon for the hippocampal 
subfield segmentation?  I've tested this with MEMPRAGE scans acquired at 0.75mm 
isotropic and coronal T2 anisotropic scans acquired at 0.33mm in plane with 1mm 
thick slices, and the results look reasonable.  The "1mm" label files are 
correctly downsampled to 0.75mm instead of 1mm, and the higher resolution label 
files remain at 0.33mm resolution.

Thanks,
Matt

Stufflebeam Lab
Athinoula A. Martinos Center
Massachusetts General Hospital
149 13th Street, Room 1115S
Charlestown, MA 02129

From: 
freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
 
[freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>]
 on behalf of Iglesias, Eugenio 
[e.igles...@ucl.ac.uk<mailto:e.igles...@ucl.ac.uk>]
Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2016 2:36 PM
To: Freesurfer support list
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal subfields segmentation - what is the 
voxel size of the input?

Hi Fernando,

Unfortunately, FreeSurfer does downsample the T1s to 1mm, and the subfield code 
assumes that the T1 comes from FreeSurfer… For the paper, I hacked the code to 
take advantage of multiple images with higher resolution, but it hasn’t been 
thoroughly tested and it’s not publicly available at this point.
That said, there are different things you can do at this point:
1. Use the T1+T2 as is (disadvantage: T1 will be resampled to 1 mm).
2. Use only the T2.
3. Use only the T1. To do this, you would use the T1 as additional scan on its 
own (i.e., the main and additional scans are the same, but the additional one 
won’t be resampled).
4. There might be a way (hack) of using both scans at full resolution. If you 
change the header of the T1 scan and specify that the voxel size is 1mm, no 
resampling will happen; FreeSurfer will believe that you’re dealing with a 
subject with a very large head. If you do this, you’ll also have to enlarge the 
voxel size of the T2 by a factor 1/0.7. Also, the resulting volumes will have 
to be divided by (1/0.7)^3 in order to correct for the “wrong” voxel size.

I hope this helps!

Cheers,

Eugenio

Juan Eugenio Iglesias
Translational Imaging Group
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com<http://www.jeiglesias.com/>
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/


On 9 Jun 2016, at 19:23, Fernando Pasquini Santos 
mailto:fernandop...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Dear,

I have a doubt regarding the input T1 image used for the Hippocampal Subfield 
segmentation in Freesurfer 6.0 - 
https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/HippocampalSubfields

In this documentation it says that I can use a standard 1mm T1 image or the 
same standard 1mm T1 image with an additional scan. However, I want to use a 
0.7mm T1 image as input, with an additional T2 scan. When I run the program 
with it, the output images (nu.mgz and orig.mgz) are downsampled to 1mm voxel 
size. So, I don't know if this happens just because of the recon-all program or 
if the segmentation is being done in the downsampled T1 image or in the 
original 0.7mm.

By reading the article "A computational atlas of the hippocampal formation 
using ex vivo, ultra-high resolution MRI: Application to adaptive segmentation 
of in vivo MRI" I saw that, in the methods section, the algorithm is used to 
segment 0.6mm T1 images. But is this possible to do in the Freesurfer package? 
Obviously, doing the segmentation directly on 0.7mm data would be better than a 
downsampled version to 1mm...

Thanks,

Fernando Pasquini Santos
PhD student in Dynamic Systems
fernandosan...@pitt.edu<mailto:fernandosan...@pitt.edu>

Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal Subfields Segmentation

2016-07-06 Thread Iglesias, Eugenio
Dear all,

We are working on this; I'll write again when the problem is solved (hopefully 
soon!)

Cheers

Eugenio


Juan Eugenio Iglesias

Translational Imaging Group

University College London

http://www.jeiglesias.com

http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/



From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
 on behalf of pierre deman 

Sent: Tuesday, July 5, 2016 7:04:21 PM
To: Freesurfer support list
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal Subfields Segmentation


Hi,
I still have a problem as well with the subfields segmentation (ubuntu 14.04, 
with the files .ctf)

Cheers,
Pierre

Hello FreeSurfer Experts,

I'm having issues with the hippocampal subfields segmentation using OS X 
Yosemite v10.10.5, Freesurfer dev version 6.0, Freesurfer  Subject Stamp: 
freesurfer-Linux-centos6_x86_64-stable-pub-v5.2.0   Current Stamp: 
freesurfer-Linux-centos6_x86_64-dev-20160616-8264611.

I ran the recon-all -s VE002 -hippocampal-subfields-T1 command and keep getting 
an error message : Error:CTF file 
'/usr/local/freesurfer-dev/bin/segmentSubjectT1_autoEstimateAlveusML.ctf' 
failed to open for 'Read' access. Error message: 'Open a zip file for 
read/modify failed.'

The segmented hippocampal files as described on free surfer wiki cannot be 
found under the subject 'mri' folder.
I understand other users have complained of a similar issue within the last 
week.

I'd ve grateful if you could assist me with the issue above.

Many thanks
Permesh




This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee
and may contain confidential information. If you have received this
message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.

Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this
message or in any attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the
author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the
University of Nottingham.

This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an
attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your
computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email
communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as
permitted by UK legislation.


___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal Subfields Segmentation

2016-07-05 Thread pierre deman
Hi,
I still have a problem as well with the subfields segmentation (ubuntu
14.04, with the files .ctf)

Cheers,
Pierre
Hello FreeSurfer Experts,

I’m having issues with the hippocampal subfields segmentation using OS X
Yosemite v10.10.5, Freesurfer dev version 6.0, Freesurfer  Subject Stamp:
freesurfer-Linux-centos6_x86_64-stable-pub-v5.2.0   Current Stamp:
freesurfer-Linux-centos6_x86_64-dev-20160616-8264611.

I ran the recon-all -s VE002 -hippocampal-subfields-T1 command and keep
getting an error message : Error:CTF file
'/usr/local/freesurfer-dev/bin/segmentSubjectT1_autoEstimateAlveusML.ctf'
failed to open for 'Read' access. Error message: 'Open a zip file for
read/modify failed.’

The segmented hippocampal files as described on free surfer wiki cannot be
found under the subject ‘mri’ folder.
I understand other users have complained of a similar issue within the last
week.

I’d ve grateful if you could assist me with the issue above.

Many thanks
Permesh




This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee
and may contain confidential information. If you have received this
message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.

Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this
message or in any attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the
author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the
University of Nottingham.

This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an
attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your
computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email
communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as
permitted by UK legislation.


___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in
error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and
properly
dispose of the e-mail.
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal Subfields Segmentation

2016-06-29 Thread Iglesias, Eugenio
I could finally look into this. It is indeed weird. The CTF is indeed embedded 
in the executable…
Zeke/Nick, can you shed some light on this?
Cheers,
Eugenio

Juan Eugenio Iglesias
Translational Imaging Group
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/


On 27 Jun 2016, at 15:43, Iglesias, Eugenio 
mailto:e.igles...@ucl.ac.uk>> wrote:

Hi Pierre,
Due to some technical problems, it might take me a couple of days to figure out 
what’s going on.  But it definitely sounds funny that it is asking for the CTF, 
since this is supposed to be embedded in the executable… I’ll get back to you 
as soon as possible.
Cheers,
Eugenio

Juan Eugenio Iglesias
Translational Imaging Group
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/


On 27 Jun 2016, at 15:32, pierre deman 
mailto:deman.pie...@gmail.com>> wrote:

I tried that. but didn't work.

Cheers,
Pierre

On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 4:32 PM, Iglesias, Eugenio 
mailto:e.igles...@ucl.ac.uk>> wrote:
Hi everyone,
you need to install the Matlab 2012b runtime as explained in the wiki:
https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/MatlabRuntime
Cheers,
Eugenio



Juan Eugenio Iglesias
Translational Imaging Group
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/


On 27 Jun 2016, at 15:16, pierre deman 
mailto:deman.pie...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Hello,

I have similar problem. "
"Error:Cannot find CTF archive
/autofs/cluster/freesurfer/centos6_x86_64/dev/bin/segmentSubjectT1_autoEstimateAlveusML.ctf"
the file is here but when I try to execute it, it's always missing some library 
(libmwi18n.so for example, it was missing others before that I added on my 
computer, but it never ends)
I am on ubuntu 14.04.
I thought that the problem is linked to the matlab runtime. I installed the 
2012b. I tried newer version. installed again the 2012b.

Regards,
Pierre


On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 4:05 PM, Permesh Dhillon 
mailto:permesh.dhil...@nottingham.ac.uk>> 
wrote:
Hello FreeSurfer Developers,

I’m having issues with the hippocampal subfields segmentation using OS X 
Yosemite v10.10.5, Freesurfer dev version 6.0, Freesurfer  Subject Stamp: 
freesurfer-Linux-centos6_x86_64-stable-pub-v5.2.0   Current Stamp: 
freesurfer-Linux-centos6_x86_64-dev-20160616-8264611.

I ran the recon-all -s VE002 -hippocampal-subfields-T1 command and keep getting 
an error message : Error:CTF file 
'/usr/local/freesurfer-dev/bin/segmentSubjectT1_autoEstimateAlveusML.ctf' 
failed to open for 'Read' access. Error message: 'Open a zip file for 
read/modify failed.’

The segmented hippocampal files as described on free surfer wiki cannot be 
found under the subject ‘mri’ folder.
I understand other users have complained of a similar issue within the last 
week.

I’d ve grateful if you could assist me with the issue above.

Many thanks
Permesh

This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee
and may contain confidential information. If you have received this
message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.

Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this
message or in any attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the
author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the
University of Nottingham.

This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an
attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your
computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email
communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as
permitted by UK legislation.


___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.




--
DEMAN Pierre
Mobile : +33 7 82 57 80 94
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


_

Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal Subfields Segmentation

2016-06-27 Thread Iglesias, Eugenio
Hi Pierre,
Due to some technical problems, it might take me a couple of days to figure out 
what’s going on.  But it definitely sounds funny that it is asking for the CTF, 
since this is supposed to be embedded in the executable… I’ll get back to you 
as soon as possible.
Cheers,
Eugenio

Juan Eugenio Iglesias
Translational Imaging Group
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/


On 27 Jun 2016, at 15:32, pierre deman 
mailto:deman.pie...@gmail.com>> wrote:

I tried that. but didn't work.

Cheers,
Pierre

On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 4:32 PM, Iglesias, Eugenio 
mailto:e.igles...@ucl.ac.uk>> wrote:
Hi everyone,
you need to install the Matlab 2012b runtime as explained in the wiki:
https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/MatlabRuntime
Cheers,
Eugenio



Juan Eugenio Iglesias
Translational Imaging Group
University College London
http://www.jeiglesias.com
http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/


On 27 Jun 2016, at 15:16, pierre deman 
mailto:deman.pie...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Hello,

I have similar problem. "
"Error:Cannot find CTF archive
/autofs/cluster/freesurfer/centos6_x86_64/dev/bin/segmentSubjectT1_autoEstimateAlveusML.ctf"
the file is here but when I try to execute it, it's always missing some library 
(libmwi18n.so for example, it was missing others before that I added on my 
computer, but it never ends)
I am on ubuntu 14.04.
I thought that the problem is linked to the matlab runtime. I installed the 
2012b. I tried newer version. installed again the 2012b.

Regards,
Pierre


On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 4:05 PM, Permesh Dhillon 
mailto:permesh.dhil...@nottingham.ac.uk>> 
wrote:
Hello FreeSurfer Developers,

I’m having issues with the hippocampal subfields segmentation using OS X 
Yosemite v10.10.5, Freesurfer dev version 6.0, Freesurfer  Subject Stamp: 
freesurfer-Linux-centos6_x86_64-stable-pub-v5.2.0   Current Stamp: 
freesurfer-Linux-centos6_x86_64-dev-20160616-8264611.

I ran the recon-all -s VE002 -hippocampal-subfields-T1 command and keep getting 
an error message : Error:CTF file 
'/usr/local/freesurfer-dev/bin/segmentSubjectT1_autoEstimateAlveusML.ctf' 
failed to open for 'Read' access. Error message: 'Open a zip file for 
read/modify failed.’

The segmented hippocampal files as described on free surfer wiki cannot be 
found under the subject ‘mri’ folder.
I understand other users have complained of a similar issue within the last 
week.

I’d ve grateful if you could assist me with the issue above.

Many thanks
Permesh

This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee
and may contain confidential information. If you have received this
message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.

Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this
message or in any attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the
author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the
University of Nottingham.

This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an
attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your
computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email
communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as
permitted by UK legislation.


___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.




--
DEMAN Pierre
Mobile : +33 7 82 57 80 94
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.


___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Complia

Re: [Freesurfer] Hippocampal Subfields Segmentation

2016-06-27 Thread pierre deman
I tried that. but didn't work.

Cheers,
Pierre

On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 4:32 PM, Iglesias, Eugenio 
wrote:

> Hi everyone,
> you need to install the Matlab 2012b runtime as explained in the wiki:
> https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/MatlabRuntime
> Cheers,
> Eugenio
>
>
>
> Juan Eugenio Iglesias
> Translational Imaging Group
> University College London
> http://www.jeiglesias.com
> http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/
>
>
> On 27 Jun 2016, at 15:16, pierre deman  wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have similar problem. "
> "Error:Cannot find CTF archive
>
> /autofs/cluster/freesurfer/centos6_x86_64/dev/bin/segmentSubjectT1_autoEstimateAlveusML.ctf"
> the file is here but when I try to execute it, it's always missing some
> library (libmwi18n.so for example, it was missing others before that I
> added on my computer, but it never ends)
> I am on ubuntu 14.04.
> I thought that the problem is linked to the matlab runtime. I installed
> the 2012b. I tried newer version. installed again the 2012b.
>
> Regards,
> Pierre
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 4:05 PM, Permesh Dhillon <
> permesh.dhil...@nottingham.ac.uk> wrote:
>
>> Hello FreeSurfer Developers,
>>
>> I’m having issues with the hippocampal subfields segmentation using OS X
>> Yosemite v10.10.5, Freesurfer dev version 6.0, Freesurfer  Subject
>> Stamp: freesurfer-Linux-centos6_x86_64-stable-pub-v5.2.0   Current
>> Stamp: freesurfer-Linux-centos6_x86_64-dev-20160616-8264611.
>>
>> I ran the recon-all -s VE002 -hippocampal-subfields-T1 command and keep
>> getting an error message : Error:CTF file
>> '/usr/local/freesurfer-dev/bin/segmentSubjectT1_autoEstimateAlveusML.ctf'
>> failed to open for 'Read' access. Error message: 'Open a zip file for
>> read/modify failed.’
>>
>> The segmented hippocampal files as described on free surfer wiki cannot
>> be found under the subject ‘mri’ folder.
>> I understand other users have complained of a similar issue within the
>> last week.
>>
>> I’d ve grateful if you could assist me with the issue above.
>>
>> Many thanks
>> Permesh
>>
>> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee
>> and may contain confidential information. If you have received this
>> message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.
>>
>> Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this
>> message or in any attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the
>> author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the
>> University of Nottingham.
>>
>> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an
>> attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your
>> computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email
>> communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as
>> permitted by UK legislation.
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Freesurfer mailing list
>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>
>>
>> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it
>> is
>> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
>> e-mail
>> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
>> HelpLine at
>> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you
>> in error
>> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and
>> properly
>> dispose of the e-mail.
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> DEMAN Pierre
> Mobile : +33 7 82 57 80 94
> ___
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>
> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it
> is
> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
> e-mail
> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
> HelpLine at
> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in
> error
> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and
> properly
> dispose of the e-mail.
>
>
>
> ___
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>
> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it
> is
> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
> e-mail
> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
> HelpLine at
> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in
> error
> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and
> properly
> dispose of the e-mail.
>
>


-- 
DEMAN Pierre
Mobile : +33 7 82 57 80 94
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The informati

  1   2   >