[google-appengine] CoderBuddy invite -- Web-based development and publishing apps & static sites to App Engine
Hi, We've been working on making a tool to help make it easier and faster to develop for App Engine -- it's called CoderBuddy. People can create, edit, test and publish Python applications and static web sites in their browser, without having to download or install anything. It's currently in private beta, and we'd love to invite members of the group to try developing with it. We have 100 new accounts available at: https://coderbuddy1.appspot.com/testinggae Oh, and yes, it's free, even for commercial projects. There's a basic code editor and also an HTML editor built in. We also have a new tabbed code editor available with keyboard shortcuts (New Editor Beta), which we're working on. We'd love to hear your feedback and thoughts. We hope that this initial functionality will be helpful for developing side-projects and for new developers, and look forward to improving it based on your feedback. Thank you, Adrian CEO, Founder CoderBuddy [ Founding investor, Napster; Founder, social networking pioneer Ryze ] P.S. We're also interested in hearing from people who are teaching programming (and App Engine) in workshops and meetups, as we've been testing it out in those environments and experiencing some nice successes. We have a few extra little features we can enable for folks who'd like to use it in those contexts. Additionally, we'd welcome hearing from folks who'd like us to provide Java and/or Go support about any special features they'd like to see. -- Adrian Scott, Ph.D. CEO, Founder CoderBuddy http://www.coderbuddy.com/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Re: CoderBuddy invite -- Web-based development and publishing apps & static sites to App Engine
Very cool, thanks! When we did some App Engine workshops before we had this available ourselves, we lost a good part of the first hour or so trying to get the different attendees' laptops configured with the SDK. We'd be happy to try to support you online when you have the workshop, feel free to keep in contact directly as it gets closer. Note that people can add others as developers on the apps for somewhat collaborative development. We also have a simple 'group' homepage we could possibly enable for your workshop (which has links to all of the group member profile pages, and helps them keep in contact ongoing). -A On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Albert wrote: > Hi Adrian! > > This is very interesting! > > I'm hosting a GAE workshop in 2 weeks. I'll play some more with this, > and I'll see if I can use it. Definitely cool stuff! :D > > Thanks and enjoy! > > > Albert > > On Jun 23, 6:35 am, Adrian Scott wrote: > > Hi, We've been working on making a tool to help make it easier and faster > to > > develop for App Engine -- it's called CoderBuddy. People can create, > edit, > > test and publish Python applications and static web sites in their > browser, > > without having to download or install anything. > > > > It's currently in private beta, and we'd love to invite members of the > group > > to try developing with it. We have 100 new accounts available at: > > > > https://coderbuddy1.appspot.com/testinggae > > > > Oh, and yes, it's free, even for commercial projects. There's a basic > code > > editor and also an HTML editor built in. We also have a new tabbed code > > editor available with keyboard shortcuts (New Editor Beta), which we're > > working on. > > > > We'd love to hear your feedback and thoughts. We hope that this initial > > functionality will be helpful for developing side-projects and for new > > developers, and look forward to improving it based on your feedback. > > > > Thank you, > > > > Adrian > > CEO, Founder > > CoderBuddy > > > > [ Founding investor, Napster; Founder, social networking pioneer Ryze ] > > > > P.S. We're also interested in hearing from people who are teaching > > programming (and App Engine) in workshops and meetups, as we've been > testing > > it out in those environments and experiencing some nice successes. We > have a > > few extra little features we can enable for folks who'd like to use it in > > those contexts. Additionally, we'd welcome hearing from folks who'd like > us > > to provide Java and/or Go support about any special features they'd like > to > > see. > > > > -- > > Adrian Scott, Ph.D. > > CEO, Founder > > CoderBuddyhttp://www.coderbuddy.com/ > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google App Engine" group. > To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. > > -- Adrian Scott, Ph.D. CEO, Founder CoderBuddy http://www.coderbuddy.com/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Google APPs Engine projects with team work
Hi Ahmed, One option is to use our new web-based environment for collaborative development, testing and publishing, CoderBuddy. We have a few more preview accounts available at: https://coderbuddy1.appspot.com/testinggae (CoderBuddy is free to use for commercial and non-commercial projects.) The collaboration is rather simple right now, but we do have groups using it for development, as well as ourselves. You can see what files have been updated most recently and by whom. We don't yet have clone/merge capabilities but are looking at that for the future. If each of your team is developing a different part of the project that can work pretty well with our existing set-up. I hope this option helps -- feel free to drop me a note with any questions, feature requests, etc. -Adrian -- Adrian Scott, Ph.D. CEO, Founder CoderBuddy http://www.coderbuddy.com/ On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 4:20 PM, ahmed adel wrote: > If I have a team consists of 5 developers, each one is developing part > of the project. So how can I manage and collect all the developers > work in one project is there smth like sub version control ? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google App Engine" group. > To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Google APPs Engine projects with team work
Valid point. We have little desire to reinvent it. Easiest way for us to develop MVP running on GAE was through something simple. We're looking primarily at Git for that piece (hopefully Bram Cohen will still be my friend). Further recommendations and suggestions are welcome (probably best directly to me, off-list :). -- Adrian Scott, Ph.D. CEO, Founder CoderBuddy http://www.coderbuddy.com/ On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 5:35 PM, Branko Vukelic wrote: > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 1:38 AM, Adrian Scott > wrote: > > updated most recently and by whom. We don't yet have clone/merge > > capabilities but are looking at that for the future. If each of your team > is > > developing a different part of the project that can work pretty well with > > our existing set-up. > > Trying to figure out why you guys are trying to reinvent SCM... > > -- > Branko Vukelić > bra...@herdhound.com > > Lead Developer > Herd Hound (tm) - Travel that doesn't bite > www.herdhound.com > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google App Engine" group. > To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Re: When the ssl on custom domain feature will be added?
I was hoping we'd see this on the Pricing page as a sign of imminent release ;) [ http://www.google.com/enterprise/appengine/appengine_pricing.html ] We'd be willing to part with significant cash for this feature in any form... -A -- Adrian Scott, Ph.D. CEO, Founder CoderBuddy http://www.coderbuddy.com/ On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Gregory D'alesandre wrote: > Hi Tapir, this is one of our top priorities and we are actively working to > get it done. I know that might not sound as reassuring as a specific date > when it will be done, but as soon as we have that we'll announce it. We > know how important this is to a lot of our developers. > > Thanks! > > Greg D'Alesandre > Senior Product Manager, Google App Engine > > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Tapir wrote: > >> This feature is requested from almost 3 years ago: >> http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=792 >> >> On Jun 25, 12:44 am, Tapir wrote: >> > It is in the "Features on Deck" of todo list for more than one year. >> http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/roadmap.html >> > >> > Is there any difficulties to add it? >> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Mass mailing: task queue vs BCC field
Recommend using a 3rd-party mailing solution like Sendgrid.com or Amazon's new service to get some decent deliverability (possibly Mailgun is another option). App Engine is not really trying to be a solution for this yet, imho. I've used bcc constructs for newsgroup-post-publication style notifications (for ryze.com), but generally prefer generating individual msgs. Take a look at Facebook's From address structure sometime too for amusement, if you haven't already. -a On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Branko Vukelic wrote: > I have a few scenarios where I need to send emails en masse (batches > of 10 to maybe 200 or 400 addresses). In some cases, the batch size > would be a result of the amount of users' activities, and in certain > cases the batch is for notifications sent to multiple users at once > (something like a mailing list). > > The former will probably best handled by task queues, but for the > latter scenario (notification email), I was thinking maybe using BCC > would save some Mail API calls and time. The messages themselves are > identical in those cases, so I see no reason why it couldn't be sent > using BCC instead of TO field. Of course, it might have some > consequences that I'm failing to see. Can anyone advise me on this? > > -- > Branko Vukelić > bra...@herdhound.com > > Lead Developer > Herd Hound (tm) - Travel that doesn't bite > www.herdhound.com > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google App Engine" group. > To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. > > -- Adrian Scott, Ph.D. CEO, Founder CoderBuddy http://www.coderbuddy.com/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Re: DKIM support and gmail -- now it's urgent!
+1 on the Amazon SES suggestion. I would rather the App Engine team focus on other priorities than mail, imho. Just DKIM is only part of the solution needed for getting mail deliverability humming... Then Sendgrid, Mailgun or something when you have a bit more volume or want more stats etc. -- Adrian Scott, Ph.D. CEO, Founder CoderBuddy http://www.coderbuddy.com/ On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 9:55 AM, JH wrote: > I'll agree that sometimes it's hard to understand priorities, say for > instance XMPP in general, or yes, prospective search. > All that aside, I'd encourage everyone to check out using Amazon's SES > service to send email via GAE. Their REST api works well and I > actually get fewer urlfetch timeouts using it than I got mail.send > timeouts sending with GAE. Also, their deliver ability is great! I > began using it when many GAE emails were flagged as spam via Yahoo. > Since then I have had just about 100% of my mail make it to inboxes. > Also, many threads on this list seem to indicate that GAE is not > planning on fixing their mail issues, and actually encourage users to > use a 3rd party for mail. > > > On Jun 29, 11:26 am, Adam Sah wrote: > > folks-- gmail is now flagging all non-DKIM-signed email as possible > > phishing, which is destroying the value of the App Engine Email API. > > > > what's the ETA to add DKIM support? (and why is this lower priority > than, > > say, Prospective Search?) > > > > http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=3161 > > > > adam > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google App Engine" group. > To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Re: I have to leave App Engine platform, feeling really bad and sad
I share your concern, Thomas... It is also worth comparing the performance of an early stage (#1 in your list) non-optimized app at low volumes on an AWS box versus on GAE (e.g. pageload time)... something to think about, no? -A -- Adrian Scott, Ph.D. CEO, Founder CoderBuddy http://www.coderbuddy.com/ <-- Create a Google App Engine app in a minute without installing anything On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 9:34 PM, Thomas Wiradikusuma wrote: > Typical startup flow is like this: > 1. build an app with the most rapid way (forget about best coding > practices etc) > 2. get traction > 3. get funding > 4. pay someone smarter to refine the code and make it scale > > Even in the 'right way' scenario, people often defer optimization as > "premature optimization is the root of all evil". But developing in > GAE forces us to optimize from the beginning (e.g. must use index, > must denormalize, must make program startup fast). > > That's not all bad, but I think it's making us slow. Partly because > we' accustomed to develop "normal" apps (use SQL with all its bells > and whistles, use Spring for Java, freedom of framework/stack, etc). > What do you guys think? > > > On Nov 4, 6:29 am, Sun Jing wrote: > > I think there must be a way to optimize, but I agree with you that it's > not > > worth redesigning and rewriting your site. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google App Engine" group. > To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Idle instances and pending latency management advice
I dropped ours from 3 to 2 minimum idle instances, and saw significant drop in daily cost. 7-9 user requests per minute shouldn't be too much of a hit (depending on how much time is used to serve them and the background tasks they spawn of course)... -- Adrian Scott, Ph.D. CEO, Founder CoderBuddy http://www.coderbuddy.com/ <-- Create a Google App Engine app in a minute without installing anything On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Ice13ill wrote: > Hello, my app has about 7-9 user requests per minute and my settings > for idle instances and pending latencies are set to Automatic. > These requests also trigger tasks creation (for some background > computing and datastore writes). > I need some basic advice for managing my settings on idle instances > and pending latencies (at least...) so that my costs are kept as low > as possible, according to the new pricing model (articles, other group > threads, or documentation links would be very appreciated) > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google App Engine" group. > To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Re: New Pricing is now in place!
Thanks, that'd be great. Just updated my billing settings but felt like i was flying blind ;). -- Adrian Scott, Ph.D. CEO, Founder CoderBuddy http://www.coderbuddy.com/ <-- Create a Google App Engine app in a minute without installing anything On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Gregory D'alesandre wrote: > Thanks for the feedback, we are looking into the possibility of adding > this information back. > > Greg D'Alesandre > Senior Product Manager, Google App Engine > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 8:40 AM, Sandeep Koduri > wrote: > >> This should help , if possible >> it would be great >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Vivek Puri wrote: >> >>> Can we please get the old estimated bills back in the Billing history. >>> I wanted to compute the total hours my app consumed for the past few >>> weeks but the history has suddenly vanished. Please help! >>> >>> On Nov 7, 4:26 am, "Gregory D'alesandre" wrote: >>> > Hello All, >>> > >>> > Today is Nov 7th and App Engine is out of Preview and the new pricing >>> is >>> > now active! After the changeover we have yet to see any issues except >>> > that, for paid apps, we're still updating datastore quotas, so your >>> > datastore usage might not be included in your dashboard estimate, your >>> bill >>> > will be accurate though. >>> > >>> > If you are running into any unexpected issues due to this change and >>> would >>> > like to get a direct response from the App Engine team feel free to >>> email >>> > us at appengine_updated_pric...@google.com. Of course we'll be >>> monitoring >>> > this list and stackoverflow as well. >>> > >>> > Thank you! >>> > >>> > Greg D'Alesandre >>> > Senior Product Manager, Google App Engine >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "Google App Engine" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Regards >> Sandeep Koduri >> Phone: +91- 99 666 02 456 >> Gtalk: sandeep.koduri | Skype: sandeep.koduri >> P Please consider the environment before printing this email >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Google App Engine" group. >> To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google App Engine" group. > To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Create a Facebook App on GAE in a minute, new release from CoderBuddy
Hi guys, We've just released a new starter app that helps you create a Facebook App in a minute on Google App Engine (on CoderBuddy, the free, social web IDE). We've written up quick, detailed instructions to help you with the configuration on Facebook's Dev site as well. You can check it all out here at: http://coderbuddyblog.com/lose-your-facebook-app-virginity-create-one-i I warmly welcome any feedback, thoughts, suggestions, etc. Note that if you want to get developers using your own API's or tech... or create GAE and/or Python tutorials, you can set up a starter app like this yourself -- because we now have a Copy Project feature (which we used for this). I'd been meaning to develop some Facebook Apps for a while, and this is a quick way to get started and then iterate it into your own idea... Thanks, -A -- Adrian Scott, Ph.D. CEO, Founder CoderBuddy http://www.coderbuddy.com/ <-- Create a Google App Engine app in a minute without installing anything -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] zipped packages and .pyc
No, best to take those out. -A -- Adrian Scott, Ph.D. CEO, Founder CoderBuddy http://www.coderbuddy.com/ <-- Create a Google App Engine app in a minute without installing anything On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 9:02 AM, andreas schmid wrote: > hi, > > if i have some packages as .zip files how is GAE dealing with the .pyc > files. > would it have a better performance if .pyc files are included in the .zip? > > thx > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google App Engine" group. > To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Create a Facebook App on GAE in a minute, new release from CoderBuddy
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 7:56 PM, Ikai Lan (Google) wrote: > Who pretty cool! > > thanks!!! :) > Dude, on another note, what's up with the URL slug? > "lose-your-facebook-app-virginity-create-one-i" Did you guys set a title > and change it to something more safe-for-work? =) > yah... you figured us out! ;) we had that fun title in there at first, but in combo with the photo we put in, it seemed a bit too much ;) -a -- Adrian Scott, Ph.D. CEO, Founder CoderBuddy http://www.coderbuddy.com/ <-- Create a Facebook or Google App Engine app in a minute without installing anything -- > Ikai Lan > Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine > plus.ikailan.com | twitter.com/ikai > > > > On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 1:23 AM, Adrian Scott wrote: > >> Hi guys, >> >> We've just released a new starter app that helps you create a Facebook >> App in a minute on Google App Engine (on CoderBuddy, the free, social web >> IDE). >> >> We've written up quick, detailed instructions to help you with the >> configuration on Facebook's Dev site as well. You can check it all out here >> at: >> >> >> >> http://coderbuddyblog.com/lose-your-facebook-app-virginity-create-one-i >> >> >> I warmly welcome any feedback, thoughts, suggestions, etc. Note that if >> you want to get developers using your own API's or tech... or create GAE >> and/or Python tutorials, you can set up a starter app like this yourself -- >> because we now have a Copy Project feature (which we used for this). I'd >> been meaning to develop some Facebook Apps for a while, and this is a quick >> way to get started and then iterate it into your own idea... >> >> Thanks, >> -A >> >> >> -- >> Adrian Scott, Ph.D. >> CEO, Founder >> CoderBuddy >> http://www.coderbuddy.com/ <-- Create a Google App Engine app in a >> minute without installing anything >> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Google App Engine" group. >> To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google App Engine" group. > To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Twitter Library
If you want to make the app on CoderBuddy public (Project Settings) and
post the project url, we can take a look at the code there. Or you could
add me as a developer ( username: adrian ), and I'll see if I can spot the
error/debug.
Thanks! Cool stuff -- this might be the first tweepy on CoderBuddy,
-A
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Max wrote:
> I have test it on coderbuddy.com and it's giving me this error:
>
> **: No module named http.client
> args = ('No module named http.client',)
> message = 'No module named http.client'
>
> I have downloaded the zip. Then uploaded the Tweepy directory in
> Coderbuddy. And tried this code:
>
> import tweepy
>
> no_auth_api = tweepy.API()
>
> public_timeline = no_auth_api.public_timeline()
> print 'Public timeline...'
> print public_timeline
>
>
> Am I forgetting something?
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Google App Engine" group.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/GwwWGwHfVfsJ.
>
> To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
>
--
Adrian Scott, Ph.D.
CEO, Founder
CoderBuddy
http://www.coderbuddy.com/ <-- Create a Google App Engine app in a minute
without installing anything
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Image upload
We have sample code for uploading an image in our open-source adrianremembersme-django project (though this is not using GWT). To use the latest version of it, just create a project on CoderBuddy using the Starting Content options of "Guestbook App - Adrian Remembers Me - Django" or ""Adrian Remembers Me - Django". The upload image code is used to store a person's profile photo. You can customize from there. (After you create your first project, you'll have these Starting Content options in the second project.) Hope this helps -- enjoy, -A -- Adrian Scott, Ph.D. CEO, Founder CoderBuddy http://www.coderbuddy.com/ <-- Create a Facebook or Google App Engine app in a minute without installing anything On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Deepak Singh wrote: > > Hi, > > I need to upload an image to GAE server and store it in datastore. > I looked for many options and found that FileUpload widget released with > GWT 2.4 can do it but the restriction is that this widget must be used with > FormPanel. > but i dont want to use formPanel. > > Can anyone suggest me the best possible way w.r.t GWT + GAE > > I am using GWT 2.4, GAE 1.5.5 > > Thanks > Deepak Singh > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google App Engine" group. > To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Re: What happened to the promised reliability improvement for email delivery?
> As far as email goes - personally, I'd rather Appengine shut down the > email API and put those developers to work on something else. Email > I agree, completely... well almost completely... Keep the current basic email to help newbies play and test, but minimize devoting any further significant resources and possibly relabel that api as beta/experimental or at least as not destined to receive lots of attention right away, to be up front about it. It's a non-trivial, high-nuisance service to provide/maintain. -A -- Adrian Scott, Ph.D. CEO, Founder CoderBuddy http://www.coderbuddy.com/ <-- Create a Facebook or Google App Engine app in a minute without installing anything > is something that many other providers do well, and there's no > particular benefit to having it built in (getting two bills is truly a > "first world problem"). I'd rather Google focus on the hard problems > which can't easily be implemented by third parties - spatial indexes, > pull queue grouping, transactional task deleting, etc. These enable > whole new solution domains. Think about the major new features that > the GAE team has rolled out in the last year... the HRD, XG > transactions, Backends, Exploding Index Repellant, Pull Queues, > Memcache CAS, Deferred Tasks, Cursors, Async Datastore Operations... > every time one of these features comes out I think "How did I ever > write code without this?" That's what I want more of. > > Jeff > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google App Engine" group. > To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] URGENT: google checkout for usage i dont know where it comes from.
Also, we should be able to turn off current/future billing even if Google's system is in the process of charging a new card. I submitted an updated credit card yesterday for a payment that didn't go through, but it will not let me disable billing on an old app yesterday or today..., so I'm being billed against my will. An extra $0.30 one-time fee is not a big deal to me, but it would be good to get that interface fixed. The current situation must violate some law too, imho. Hope this helps, -A -- Adrian Scott, Ph.D. CEO, Founder CoderBuddy http://www.coderbuddy.com/ <-- Create a Facebook or Google App Engine app in a minute without installing anything On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 10:07 AM, Joshua Smith wrote: > +1. I just had the same issue: trying to figure out what I was being > charged for. Please make this a priority. > > On Nov 14, 2011, at 6:34 PM, Gregory D'alesandre wrote: > > Thanks for the feedback, we are currently looking into adding the appid > into the receipt. > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google App Engine" group. > To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] URGENT: google checkout for usage i dont know where it comes from.
You can cancel a subscription from Google Checkout -- I just did for an old account. If you only have apps billing that you want to turn off, maybe that's an option for you guys... Still, the interface should allow it on a per-app level, not a binary whole-account level... -A On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:40 AM, Adrian Scott wrote: > Also, we should be able to turn off current/future billing even if > Google's system is in the process of charging a new card. I submitted an > updated credit card yesterday for a payment that didn't go through, but it > will not let me disable billing on an old app yesterday or today..., so I'm > being billed against my will. An extra $0.30 one-time fee is not a big deal > to me, but it would be good to get that interface fixed. > > The current situation must violate some law too, imho. > > Hope this helps, > -A > > -- > Adrian Scott, Ph.D. > CEO, Founder > CoderBuddy > http://www.coderbuddy.com/ <-- Create a Facebook or Google App Engine app > in a minute without installing anything > > > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 10:07 AM, Joshua Smith > wrote: > >> +1. I just had the same issue: trying to figure out what I was being >> charged for. Please make this a priority. >> >> On Nov 14, 2011, at 6:34 PM, Gregory D'alesandre wrote: >> >> Thanks for the feedback, we are currently looking into adding the appid >> into the receipt. >> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Google App Engine" group. >> To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. >> > > > > > -- Adrian Scott, Ph.D. CEO, Founder CoderBuddy http://www.coderbuddy.com/ <-- Create a Facebook or Google App Engine app in a minute without installing anything -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine's Team Dishonesty
ight now. I understand that failures occur, but >>> > specifying a "99.95%" and being so far from it is to me a major >>> > failure on the part of Google. >>> > >>> > To make matters worse, we, AppEngine's paying users, NEVER receive any >>> > explanations or descriptions of the cause of the failure, the solution >>> > and Google's efforts to prevent its returning occurance. Not by any >>> > means to compare, but EC2's team constantly admit and report ALL of >>> > the failures and their debriefing! >>> > >>> > And now for the "cherry on the top", and the reason I used the word >>> > 'dishonesty' - You remove any note of the disruption from System >>> > Status. For example, yesterday there was a disruption causing 40 secs >>> > (!!!) of latency in response. Today viewing the System Status, >>> > yesterday is marker with "No significant issues". That to me is >>> > dishonesty and a clear cut lie. >>> > >>> > Unfortunately, our service is now so deeply connect to the AppEngine >>> > framework that leaving this service is currently not an option, but I >>> > would definitively not advise or recommend anyone to use the AppEngine >>> > today, and my next product will definitely not run on the AppEngine. >>> > >>> > Regards, >>> > >>> > - Yoav. >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "Google App Engine" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. >>> >>> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Google App Engine" group. >> To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google App Engine" group. > To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. > -- Adrian Scott, Ph.D. CEO, Founder CoderBuddy http://www.coderbuddy.com/ <-- Create a Facebook or Google App Engine app in a minute without installing anything -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Re: What is the better way to deal with static images/icons? Blobstore or ?
Also, if you deploy them as static files in your application, GAE handles them differently and they will likely load faster for your users than from the Blobstore, somewhat like a CDN. So Blobstore is better for user-generated and/or other dynamic/changing content. Hope this helps, -A -- Adrian Scott, Ph.D. CEO, Founder CoderBuddy http://www.coderbuddy.com/ <-- Create a Facebook or Google App Engine app in a minute without installing anything On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 7:56 AM, Max wrote: > If they are all static files not not supposed to be changed then deploy > with your application. > > You will have to write some extra migration scripts if you want to use > Blobstore. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google App Engine" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/7Ixo4tgAbpkJ. > > To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
Re: [google-appengine] Re: Doom day
We're simply not going to 2.7 until it's no longer experimental. It's that simple. We're doing enough other stuff that's experimental etc. It would have made sense for Google to extend the 50% discount til one month after 2.7 leaving experimental, imho, and that would have created a nice little incentive to the google team, and also better relationships with developers after all that has gone on recently. We're doing a bit of optimization as we go along, but putting a hefty priority on improving functionality and ease of use over just minimizing expense. -A -- Adrian Scott, Ph.D. CEO, Founder CoderBuddy http://www.coderbuddy.com/ <-- Create a Facebook or Google App Engine app in a minute without installing anything On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Brandon Wirtz wrote: > I didn't mean to say that Alexis's bugs aren't real, just that the presence > of 2 bugs shouldn't prevent someone from starting the conversion to the new > system. > > You can't make the move without testing. There are bugs in 2.5. Your odds > of hitting a bug is higher on 2.7, but they are far from guaranteed. I > would > go so far as to say if your average request is less than 5 seconds, your > move is most likely to be painless. > > Most of the issues that are cause by the high computation bug can be > avoided > by splitting task across more than one request, or offloading to a back end > instance. Not Ideal, but not insurmountable. Even with the changes > necessary to avoid the scenarios that cause the high computation but 2.7 is > significantly faster than 2.5 and more cost effective. If you don't want > to > modify your code setting Min Idle Instance Higher will prevent most issues > as well at the expense of more instance hours. > > 2.7 does occasionally have long start up times. This can be avoided by > using a warmup in the app.yaml and avoiding splitting your files across too > many .py files (not sure why this matters but it seems to) > > 2.7 is also much happier if your initialization variables are pulled from > mem-cache not datastore. Part of that whole you have to initialize quickly > or things get really slow. As a result it is not a bad idea to read and > re-write any initialization variables to memcache at the start of each > request. Doing this using serialized data makes this VERY fast. If you > have to use DataStore (which you do) you should also serialize the > initialization variables so that you need only make one call rather than 1 > for each value. > > 2.7 does seem to have some interesting potential security holes, but these > are "by design" and are avoidable if you don't want them, and can be used > for certain performance increase if you know what you are doing. I believe > there are also a few subtle difference in some of the Typing that may > impact > you if you are building non-english apps. > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > From: google-appengine@googlegroups.com > [mailto:google-appengine@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Brian Quinlan > Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2011 4:16 AM > To: google-appengine@googlegroups.com > Subject: Re: [google-appengine] Re: Doom day > > Hi Brandon, > > On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 8:11 PM, Brandon Wirtz wrote: > > I run on 2.7. I have been rock solid and my costs are 1/10th what they > > are on 2.5 > > Wow, that's awesome! > > > I had very few code changes other than removing CGI handlers. > > Also good news. > > > I would recommend 2.7 without hesitation. > > > > Pointing out 2 bugs that aren't well documented, and (one of which I > > can't > > Repo) Is more of a "I'm too lazy to do the migration" than a real excuse. > > If you aren't testing on 2.7 you are weeks from being deployed on it > > anyway, and are just griping. Get a test version of your app on it, > > find out where it fails and if you have bugs file them. Don't be a > > wuss unless you have the same code snippet that is listed in a bug in > > your source code. Then I might say you should test on 2.7 but not > > invest time in adapting the code beyond removing 2.7 incompatible code. > > Both of the bugs that Alexis mentioned are significant and we can reproduce > them - though the probability of being affected by > http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=6401 should be > pretty low. > > Python 2.7 is still experimental and your good experiences aren't a > guarantee that others won't encounter serious problems. > > Cheers, > Brian > > > -Brandon > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: g
[google-appengine] vijayp on migration of partychat from GAE to EC2/GAE-hybrid; from $20/day expense to < $1/day
http://www.vijayp.ca/blog/?p=162 Interesting data... -A -- Adrian Scott, Ph.D. CEO, Founder CoderBuddy http://www.coderbuddy.com/ <-- Create a Facebook or Google App Engine app in a minute without installing anything -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Hiring - Jobs : Python, Google App Engine, Silicon Valley-style startup, remote work is fine
Hi!! We're Hiring Developers (we are very open to remote team members): Project: Something disruptive that will change the way software is developed. Tech: We are developing with Python, Google App Engine and Django. Team background: Founding investor, Napster; pioneer in social networking (from 2001); previously raised almost $4MM in Silicon Valley for past startup Project status: already in private beta Reqs: Python/GAE experience not necessary if you learn quickly and can show past projects. Especially interested in folks with abilities in 1 or more of the following: - Excellent math/algorithmic abilities - Excellent sense for consumer Internet usability - Solid productive programming chops - Orientation towards A/B (/multivariate) testing - Customer Development Process experience - Experience in social media development We are looking to add team members who can rapidly become seriously productive and want to create applications for use by tens and hundreds of millions of users. We currently have team members in North American and Indian timezones. We will be raising funding from our personal network of successful tech entrepreneurs. Interested? Send a curriculum to my firstname @ firstname lastname . com by email, preferably along with info and links to projects you've developed. Thank you! -Adrian -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
[google-appengine] Google Analytics support team can't access my GAE app ;)
Having a pretty hilarious experience here. Trying to get my lost google analytics account recovered for a site now running on google app engine. I put in the analytics reset code url they wanted for verification / validation, but the support rep says he can't load that url or even my home page. Whereas I can in multiple browsers, so can other people, so can my 3rd- party monitoring service from a dozen locations, etc. The rep says he's tried it w/ 3 browsers through 3 isps. Pretty hilarious. Anyone else experience anything like this? -a --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: IBM DB2 and App Engine
Hi! Sounds like you need some connection to your existing DB2 database on your own servers. I would expect you would need to make the connection from your google app engine web application through HTTP w/ SSL. So you could do it that way, but probably not over the standard DB2 networking, at least for the near future. Hope this helps! -Adrian http://www.adrianscott.com/ On Feb 12, 4:54 pm, isc_jcjl wrote: > Hi all, My company is search for new technology solutions, and now we > focuses on Google App Engine, my Question: > > Does Google Apps support DB2 connections? > > Is very important for us, because, we need extract some data parts > from our database (DB2). > > Thanks All --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] how to stop local gae web dev server?
Hi, Is there any way to stop the local GAE web dev server, aside from killing the job? I'm on Windows using cmd.exe command window... Same goes for trying manage.py runserver for app-engine-patch django... thanks!! -Adrian http://www.adrianscott.com/ --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] app-engine-patch startup errors; help with getting started
trying manage.py runserver lots of startup errors including on .po files within locale 'msgfmt' is not recognized as an internal or external command also WARNING: root:Could not read datastore data from ... \django-aep- sample.datastore -- other thing: http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/intro/tutorial01/#intro-tutorial01 speaks about a mysite directory. i don't see such a dir. just a myapp dir... should we use that one to do: python manage.py startapp polls "Most manage.py commands just work (runserver, test, flush, ...), so you should be in a familiar environment. " is where the getting started docs leave me... but i'm just starting w/ django, so it's not a familiar environment. not sure what to do where to go next... anyone else having this little challenge? :) -a http://www.adrianscott.com/ --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] unicode username in cookie value
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/browse_thread/thread/3674ba3ddffe29a5/da79c3298fa4160a?lnk=gst&q=unicode# this is giving me plenty of fun when looking at storing a username in cookie values with special characters, e.g. adrián ;) see y'all in tomorrow's chat, -adrian www.adrianscott.com --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: how to stop local gae web dev server?
Ah Thanks!! Forgot to RTM nice to have docs ;) -a On Feb 13, 10:39 am, Tony Smith wrote: > HeyAdrian, > > Killing the job is the only way documented on documentation > server:http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/python/tools/devserver.html > (To stop the web server: With Windows, press Control-Break in your > command prompt window. With Mac OS X or Unix, press Control-C.) > > Why are you looking for another way to stop it? > > Tony > > On Feb 13, 10:35 am, "AdrianScott. com" > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > Is there any way to stop the local GAE web dev server, aside from > > killing the job? > > > I'm on Windows using cmd.exe command window... > > > Same goes for trying manage.py runserver for app-engine-patch > > django... > > > thanks!! > > > -Adrianhttp://www.adrianscott.com/- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] new Open source proj -- for login, remember me, security, usability functionality -- adrian remembers
Get your app started very quickly with this free code... for membership capability http://www.adrianremembersme.com/ Version 0.1.1 currently offers basic login, remember me functionality ( + photo upload for profile ) Attempting to follow and encode best practices for cookies, security, etc. Let's stop re-inventing the wheel ;) On the roadmap -- advanced security features (e.g. handling when someone's trying to hack a pwd, save yourself! from Twitter's recent celeb hack embarassment), usability enhancements (ooh aah) Please come and Kick the Tires... and tell us what you really think! http://www.adrianremembersme.com/ http://code.google.com/p/adrianremembersme/ http://adrianremembersme.appspot.com/ recruiting developers, soon will be posting bounties for little upgrades... great code for new developers to start poking around with! --- i couldn't find anything else that really provided all this in one bundle, according to most current best practices, etc. we can put together a django version of this at some point too... --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] basic login functionality; jump-start your next app quickly; 'adrian remembers me' upgrade 0.1.4 released
having fun in a variety of areas: - email validation, the rabbit hole gets deeper; put some initial validation in place, want to revisit later/soon for a better/more complete solution(s) - i think the 'remember me' cookie design is reasonably elegant, though could be worth sprucing up a little; check out how we implemented (2 good links to other writings on the topic on the code homepage below) looking forward to getting to: - the issue of funny unicode characters in usernames --- cookie interactions. whee! inching forward here steadily, several features put into place with new 0.1.4 version: checks for valid email address, minimum password length, username not already used, email not already used, logs in new member when they create membership, ... the code is coming together nicely. use this code to jumpstart your next app (or tell me why it wouldn't be of use to you ;) check it out and let me know what your biggest needs are! http://www.adrianremembersme.com/ thanks, adrian --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: new Open source proj -- for login, remember me, security, usability functionality -- adrian remembers
Thanks for the question. It's built over an independent authentication system, so you have an independent user base from google, for enhanced portability, independence, etc. On Mar 18, 5:51 am, Luca wrote: > Is it built over the Google authentication API's or have you > reimplemented a thisapp-owned authentication system? > > On 16 Mar, 15:44, "AdrianScott . com" wrote: > > > > > Get your app started very quickly with this free code... for > > membership capability > > >http://www.adrianremembersme.com/ > > > Version 0.1.1 currently offers basic login, remembermefunctionality > > ( + photo upload for profile ) > > > Attempting to follow and encode best practices for cookies, security, > > etc. Let's stop re-inventing the wheel ;) > > > On the roadmap -- advanced security features (e.g. handling when > > someone's trying to hack a pwd, save yourself! from Twitter's recent > > celeb hack embarassment), usability enhancements (ooh aah) > > > Please come and Kick the Tires... and tell us what you really think! > > >http://www.adrianremembersme.com/ > > >http://code.google.com/p/adrianremembersme/ > > >http://adrianremembersme.appspot.com/ > > > recruiting developers, soon will be posting bounties for little > > upgrades... great code for new developers to start poking around with! > > > --- > > i couldn't find anything else that really provided all this in one > > bundle, according to most current best practices, etc. we can put > > together a django version of this at some point too...- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Sample based on non google accounts
i looked at django user authentication and was not very excited by it. so i created this: http://www.adrianremembersme.com/ i found the django user auth more oriented towards site content maintainers than building a app w/ significant membership (e.g. no remember me etc). (note that what i've done can be rolled into django etc) -a On Mar 20, 2:26 am, arnie wrote: > I have seen the below given > linkhttp://code.google.com/p/google-app-engine-samples/ > that provides a lot of samples but all are using google accounts for > authentication. I am in search of samples that uses django user > authentication for google app engine based on user table in my > datastore > > Thanks > Arnieterm --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Multilingual i18n -- django, any problems w/ it? roll your own?
Hi, i'm looking at doing i18n / multilingual for my apps. For those using Django, have you run into any problems w/ Django's approach? or any stuff that just seems weird etc? For others doing i18n / multilingual, what approaches have you been taking and what factors have influenced you or been most important to you. Been looking at Django i18n ( http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/topics/i18n/ ), but it just seems weird to me... http://code.google.com/p/adrianremembersme/source/browse/trunk/main.py Any links to any write-ups on this topic would be much-appreciated also. I've done a bit of research, but haven't found a lot of illuminating info... Thanks! --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Downside of the Google App Engine relying on Google Apps - Horror Story
Thanks for posting about this Eaden. This is extremely useful info. I am not clear on why we should have to rely on Google Apps for domain pointing. We also need some capability for redundancy of some sort. What is currently possible for redundancy, assuming something goes bad with google apps? E.g. Could we change DNS to fwd to blah.appspot.com -- was that doable in your case? Which brings up another point, for remember me logins, should we set cookies for both x.appspot.com and x.com? Sounds like it. (Another feature to add to http://www.adrianremembersme.com/ ... ) This is extremely critical, so let's figure out some best practices for people to follow. Anyone who's had a popular site that includes an invite member capability knows how many spam reports are received... so this may be a nice band-aid and step forward, but a comprehensive system for redundancy is needed... -A On Mar 5, 12:37 am, Eaden wrote: > Just an update: > > More than 48 hours later, even after an email from Brett, my app is > still down. > > I've done all I can do, emailed everyone I can think of and I don't > even have a support ticket number to show for it. > > Relying on Google App Engine for business critical things at this > stage is not a good idea in my opinion. > Google App Engine charges now, but when you're paying there should be > better support. > > Regards > Eaden > > On Mar 4, 11:52 am, Eaden wrote: > > > > > Hi there, > > > In order to host an application on Google App Engine you need to add > > your domain to a Google Apps account. If anything goes wrong with your > > Google Apps account, your Google App Engine sites can be affected and > > you have no where to turn for support. Your apps are not accessible > > from your domain ( you can still reach them from app.appspot.com > > however ). > > > For example, my Google Apps account broke. I can't even get to the > > login page and get an error saying there is no Google Apps set up for > > this domain name. However I had been using the account for a number of > > years. I cannot even upgrade to premium support as it is impossible to > > log in. > > > Because Google Apps can only be hosted by google, even if you have > > backups you can not easily move your App to another server while the > > issue is sorted out. So far I have had about 15 hours downtime on my > > app. > > > I'm not sure what I'd recommend but there needs to be better channels > > of support for Google Apps if it is to be part of Google App Engine. > > > Regards- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[google-appengine] Re: Charging for you app.
YES! On Mar 20, 9:04 am, Big Stu wrote: > I'm not absolutely sure myself (I haven't read the terms yet either), > but from some of the previous questions/answers I've seen on here it > sounds like you're good to go. > > Good luck! > > Stu > > On Mar 19, 10:38 am, Ronn Ross wrote: > > > > > If I create an app in gae. Can I charge people for use. I didn't fully read > > term of use.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
