Re: CA web site

2007-01-31 Thread Ted MacNEIL
Why are you afraid to call the helpdesk?  They are there for support, how-to 
questions, recommendations, and of course, defects.

Since when?
I thought they were there to intercept complaints and stop the pesky customers 
from bothering the technicians!
Some even charge for 'how to'.

-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!  

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: setting LE runtime options programatically.

2007-01-31 Thread Jim McAlpine

Have I upset everyone.  I asked half a dozen supplementary questions and
didn't get a single answer.

Jim McAlpine


On 1/30/07, Jim McAlpine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


We can't run under BPXBATCH.  Is there a way to set POSIX(ON) as an
environment variable also.

Jim McAlpine



--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html




--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: TRSMAIN question

2007-01-31 Thread Dave Cartwright
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 15:35:07 -0600, McKown, John 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

And is there anyway to ftp that to an ASCII based server and uncompress
it? Yes - this relates to my previous question about RACF IRRADU00
reformatted records.


John,
I suggest you convert the tapes to AWS, ftp to a PC and zip them there.
You may use GZIP on the mainframe to reduce the network load, which I guess 
was your original intention. If you are not bothered about the network but 
instead about storage costs, go with WinZip and copy the images onto a DVD.
Better yet, convert to HET and send to a PC running MVS3.8 under Hercules 
to be printed.

Dave

(Super post from Barry Merril, as usual).

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: AOPBATCH Continuation character

2007-01-31 Thread Hunkeler Peter (KIUK 3)
I do agree that a C program source displayed through a French 
code page does look odd... 

Only if the source isn't encoded in the French code page 
as well :-)


Peter Hunkeler
CREDIT SUISSE

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: AOPBATCH Continuation character

2007-01-31 Thread Hunkeler Peter (KIUK 3)
At what level is this translation performed.  For example,
suppose an assembler program with source in the IBM-1047
code page, and assembled and linked in the IBM-1047 locale
does a BPX1RED then a CLI '\' on the data in the buffer.
Will this match an IBM-1047 '\' or an IBM-273 '\'?

What about a C program?  Etc.? 

I've not played with code pages and assembler so far, so 
I may be missing HLASM options.

The assembler doesn't care for a locale, does it? So the
backslash on the CLI will not be changed during execution,
irrespective of any locale that may have been set in the LE 
(assuming this is LE enabled assembler code).

BPX1RED does not translate what it reads (except in the
context of autoconvert), does it? So, changing the locale
does not have any influence in what you get in your buffer.


Peter Hunkeler
CREDIT SUISSE

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: AOPBATCH Continuation character

2007-01-31 Thread Jan MOEYERSONS
//STDIN DD  *
ln -s /usr/lpp/db2/db2810/jcc/classes/db2jcc_license_cisuz.jar 
db2jcc_license_c\
isuz.jar

Maybe you should try:

ln -s /usr/lpp/db2/db2810/jcc/classes/db2jcc_license_cisuz.jar  \
db2jcc_license_cisuz.jar


And one more thing... (Thanks to Walter Heestermans for pointing this out.) 
If you need to quote some data and continue that on the next line, it 
becomes really odd:

//STDINDD *
...
+1+2+3+4+5+6+7+-
---8
db2sqljcustomize -url jdbc:db2://150.45.92.33:3200/TMMEDB2D -user 
whe4841  \
 -password  -bindoptions 'EXPLAIN YES DEGREE 1 ISOLATION CS OWNER 
TCOD
 COLLECTION TCOD QUALIFIER TCOD SQLERROR NOPACKAGE VALIDATE 
BIND'  \
 -collection TCOD -qualifier TCOD -staticpositioned NO -automaticbind 
YES  \
 -onlinecheck YES -singlepkgname TCO92052 -
storebindoptions\
 com/tmme/whe4841/dao/iterator/db2/NamedIteratorWithHold_SJProfile0.ser
...


(the above may have been wrapped. The point is that when you open a string 
with an apostrophe and want to continue that string on the next line, you 
do NOT put a backslash at the end of the string to continue.)

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: CA web site

2007-01-31 Thread Russell Witt
Come on Ted; we are talking about CA here (remember, the good guys). I do
not believe we have ever charged for how-to questions, recommendations or to
obtain solutions to defects for any of your licensed mainframe products. I
know the CA-1 techs PREFER to get how-to questions and give
recommendations then to help solve I think I did the wrong thing problems
later on.

Russell Witt
CA-1 Level-2 Support Manager

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 2:22 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: CA web site


Why are you afraid to call the helpdesk?  They are there for support,
how-to questions, recommendations, and of course, defects.

Since when?
I thought they were there to intercept complaints and stop the pesky
customers from bothering the technicians!
Some even charge for 'how to'.

-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: What is 'VTAM application name'?(Confirmation needed)

2007-01-31 Thread Johnny Luo

Enlightened by Chris and Pat, I went back to the book 'MVS Sytem
Programming'. It's old but it has a very basic and good chapter about
VTAM/SNA.  I read it one year ago but this time I definitely have a far more
better understanding about it.

So my question has been answered and actually I got even more from this
topic. It's really a nice feeling.

(Chris, I agree with you on the usage of RESTRICTAPPL.  When I read it from
the manual, I was curious about it: what on earth it is? So I tried to use
it just for the sake of curiosity. And after seeing how it works, I know I
wont use it: Most of VTAM applications, such as TSO, CICS, NVAS, have their
own ways of enabling security. So why bother?)

Regards,
Johnny

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Smartbatch for OS/390 vs Batchpipes OS/390

2007-01-31 Thread Birger Heede

I also find Batchpipes V2 R1 as the only release for Version 2.
Program number is 5655-D45. Available May 2000.

I find nothing later.

For some non-IBM information see:
http://www.jpaulmorrison.com/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?BatchPipes


Birger Heede not a spokesperson for anything
IBM Denmark

oktg wrote:

Hi,

In an earlier posting I asked if somebody could tell me the latest 
available release of Smartbatch for OS/90. I have now found an IBM  
PAL which says:


Programming Announcement letter ZP01-0183 dated March 06, 2001
Versions to be withdrawn from service April 04, 2004:
Product Name   Version  Product
 Number

IBM SmartBatch for OS/390  15655-A17

So Smartbatch is discontinuedbut now my want to know the latest 
available releasenr of BatchPipes OS/390 ???


On IBM booksshelves i found documents for:

 IBM BatchPipes OS/390 V2R1

Many thanks in advance

Frank Silven



--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: SORT question

2007-01-31 Thread Chase, John
 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Frank Yaeger
 
 [ snip ]
 
 I have a question for you (or anyone else on the list if they 
 can shed some light on it) about something I'm curious about. 
  I noticed you said DFHSORT instead of DFSORT (Data 
 Facility Sort).  You're not the first person to call it that. 
  Any particular reason why you inserted the H?

That piqued my curiosity as well.  DFH as a prefix belongs to CICS,
and AFAIK IBM has never offered a CICS sort utility, whether named
DFHSORT or something else.

-jc-

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Need ideas - IRADU00 output very large.

2007-01-31 Thread Roberto Halais

John:

1- Maybe security folks started a new audit feature?
2- Check the userid of the access/success records to see who's running
what.

Just some ideas.

Roberto








I am as you, in you, for you. One as you in all, as all, forever. My call
is your call.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: TRSMAIN question

2007-01-31 Thread McKown, John
 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Cartwright
 Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 3:36 AM
 To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
 Subject: Re: TRSMAIN question
 
 
 On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 15:35:07 -0600, McKown, John 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 And is there anyway to ftp that to an ASCII based server 
 and uncompress
 it? Yes - this relates to my previous question about RACF IRRADU00
 reformatted records.
 
 
 John,
 I suggest you convert the tapes to AWS, ftp to a PC and zip 
 them there.
 You may use GZIP on the mainframe to reduce the network load, 
 which I guess 
 was your original intention. If you are not bothered about 
 the network but 
 instead about storage costs, go with WinZip and copy the 
 images onto a DVD.
 Better yet, convert to HET and send to a PC running MVS3.8 
 under Hercules 
 to be printed.
 
 Dave
 
 (Super post from Barry Merril, as usual).

The reason to compress on the mainframe was to reduce the time needed to
ftp. Trying to ftp 21 MEDIA2 tapes (3490E) worth of data to my PC (over
100Mb ethernet) scares me. I was hoping that since IRRADU00 data is all
character that it would compress very effectively and that I would,
overall, save time. Likely a vain hope.

--
John McKown
Senior Systems Programmer
HealthMarkets
Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage
Administrative Services Group
Information Technology

The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged
and/or confidential.  It is for intended addressee(s) only.  If you are
not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure,
reproduction, distribution or other use of this communication is
strictly prohibited and could, in certain circumstances, be a criminal
offense.  If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the
sender by reply and delete this message without copying or disclosing
it. 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Need ideas - IRADU00 output very large.

2007-01-31 Thread McKown, John
 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roberto Halais
 Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 8:06 AM
 To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
 Subject: Re: Need ideas - IRADU00 output very large.
 
 
 John:
 
 1- Maybe security folks started a new audit feature?
 2- Check the userid of the access/success records to see who's running
 what.
 
 Just some ideas.
 
 Roberto

I am the security people. And no, I haven't. I do have a vague GUESS as
to what is happening. I will almost bet that somebody has some COBOL
code like:

PERFORM UNTIL X
  OPEN INPUT FILE
  READ FILE
  PERFORM PROCESS-FILE-RECORD
  CLOSE FILE
END-PERFORM

I am fairly sure that every OPEN will cut an RACF ACCESS record. Yes,
I've seen them do this in the past. Just not as bad. But this is just a
GUESS.

--
John McKown
Senior Systems Programmer
HealthMarkets
Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage
Administrative Services Group
Information Technology

The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged
and/or confidential.  It is for intended addressee(s) only.  If you are
not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure,
reproduction, distribution or other use of this communication is
strictly prohibited and could, in certain circumstances, be a criminal
offense.  If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the
sender by reply and delete this message without copying or disclosing
it. 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: CA web site

2007-01-31 Thread Ed Gould

On Jan 31, 2007, at 2:22 AM, Ted MacNEIL wrote:

Why are you afraid to call the helpdesk?  They are there for  
support, how-to questions, recommendations, and of course, defects.


Since when?
I thought they were there to intercept complaints and stop the  
pesky customers from bothering the technicians!

Some even charge for 'how to'.


Imagine having to hear BYPASS((holdsystem,id,error ...) and pay for it?

Ed

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: SORT question

2007-01-31 Thread Larry Burch
Well, I was sorta thinking maybe an HSM Sort functionality, or an SMS 
something or other.

On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 07:52:24 -0600, Chase, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Frank Yaeger

 [ snip ]

 I have a question for you (or anyone else on the list if they
 can shed some light on it) about something I'm curious about.
  I noticed you said DFHSORT instead of DFSORT (Data
 Facility Sort).  You're not the first person to call it that.
  Any particular reason why you inserted the H?

That piqued my curiosity as well.  DFH as a prefix belongs to CICS,
and AFAIK IBM has never offered a CICS sort utility, whether named
DFHSORT or something else.

-jc-


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


TCP/IP

2007-01-31 Thread Philip Miscione
FYI
 
 
Is there a way I can clear the ARP cache on the TCP/ip stack on the
Mainframe without shutting down TCP/IP ?
 
 
 
Thanks in advance

Philip A. Miscione Sr 

Project Leader

Barnes  Noble, Inc. 

email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Phone: 516-338-8227

Fax : 516-338-8487

 

 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: CA web site

2007-01-31 Thread Jon Brock
I didn't say I was afraid to call the help desk.  As a matter of fact, I said, 
It appears most likely to be some sort of problem with our network here.  I 
just wanted some confirmation, since I'm waiting on response from CA.  I was 
working this problem via email, since I was in and out of the office all day.  
(I generally prefer electronic problem resolution means anyway.)  They had 
already suggested deleting cookies and a few other things, which hadn't worked. 
 I have no problem with CA's help desk; I had already emphasized to them that 
this was a non-critical problem and that I thought the culprit was somewhere on 
our end.

Jon



snip
Why are you afraid to call the helpdesk?  They are there for support, how-to
questions,
recommendations, and of course, defects.  
/snip

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: CA web site

2007-01-31 Thread Dave Reinken
 From: Russell Witt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Wed, January 31, 2007 8:06 am
 
 Come on Ted; we are talking about CA here (remember, the good guys). 

Wow! How far things have come, I guess.
I manage to spit out after I finish choking on my drink.

Maybe I'm thinking of a different CA. *shrug*

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


DADSM allocation for non-SMS files

2007-01-31 Thread Ron Hawkins
Brent,

SRM still gets involved in volume selection for non-SMS volumes. It is a
much simpler algorithm, and my shaky memory says that the order is based on
LCU activity and number of allocated datasets on the volume. 

Volumes already allocated to other new datasets in the same step also go to
the end of the queue - this stops you from having all your SORTWKS on one
volume.

SECONDARY space is not taken into consideration when the Primary space is
allocated.

Now what I don't understand about your problem description below is why you
have a problem when you code UNIT=(esoteric,6). Is this from an IEFBR14 at
the start of the job allocating a file to be written to in a subsequent
step? If so, your problem may be that non-SMS files do not catalog the UNIT
COUNT as unspecified candidate volumes.

For non-SMS you must also specify UNIT=(esoteric,6) in the JCL of the step
that writes the file so that SECONDARY extents can be allocated on up to 6
more volumes.

//ALLOCEXEC PGM=IEFBR14
//NEWFILE  DD DSN=MY.NONSMS.DSN,DISP=(NEW,CATLG,DELETE),
//UNIT=ESOTERIC,
//SPACE=(CYL,(1000,500))
//STEP1EXEC PGM=WRITEIT 
//NEWFILE  DD DSN=MY.NONSMS.DSN,DISP=OLD,
//UNIT=(ESOTERIC,6),
// ETC,ETC, ETC

In example above the UNIT COUNT can be omitted from the IEFBR14 as it is
never used. Having it in the step that writes to the file is where you need
it.

Ron

 
 For example, for a Physical Sequential file with
 UNIT=(esoteric,6)
 SPACE=(CYL,(1000,500))
 and 3390 geometry (3339 cylinders)
 
 we have observed DADSM pass over volumes with
 plenty of space and instead allocate 3 volumes
 that had preexisting files with 3000 cylinders.
 
 In other words, the most cylinders available
 would be 3339-3000 = 339 yet with a secondary
 of 500 cylinders DADSM would still pick the packs
 with less than 339 and the file would end
 up running out of space.
 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: TRSMAIN question

2007-01-31 Thread Tim Hare
 I believe TRSMAIN uses an LZ (Lempel-Ziv?) or LZW (add Welch) algorithm 
of sorts, but of course the algorithm matters less than the archive format 
in your case.

IBM's Unix Tools  Toys page (I believe) has GZIP ported for Unix Systems 
Services.  I got this to work for me:

 cat //'dataset_name' | gzip -c  archive_name.gz

Yes that is double quotes around the double slash entity, and single 
quotes around the fully-qualified dataset name, I am sure there may be 
better syntax(?) but it worked.

So, if your tape data is cataloged, and you have mount authority you might 
be able to issue a command like that for your tapes, sit back, and wait.

Once you're in gzip you can decompress it on a PC I'm sure.

Oh - you might have to pipe it through iconv to get it into ASCII / 
Unicode before zipping it.


Tim Hare
Senior Systems Programmer
Florida Department of Transportation
(850) 414-4209

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: TRSMAIN question

2007-01-31 Thread McKown, John
 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Hare
 Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 8:50 AM
 To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
 Subject: Re: TRSMAIN question
 
 
  I believe TRSMAIN uses an LZ (Lempel-Ziv?) or LZW (add 
 Welch) algorithm 
 of sorts, but of course the algorithm matters less than the 
 archive format 
 in your case.
 
 IBM's Unix Tools  Toys page (I believe) has GZIP ported for 
 Unix Systems 
 Services.  I got this to work for me:
 
  cat //'dataset_name' | gzip -c  archive_name.gz
 
 Yes that is double quotes around the double slash entity, and single 
 quotes around the fully-qualified dataset name, I am sure 
 there may be 
 better syntax(?) but it worked.
 
 So, if your tape data is cataloged, and you have mount 
 authority you might 
 be able to issue a command like that for your tapes, sit 
 back, and wait.
 
 Once you're in gzip you can decompress it on a PC I'm sure.
 
 Oh - you might have to pipe it through iconv to get it into ASCII / 
 Unicode before zipping it.
 
 
 Tim Hare

Thanks for the idea. It may be easier than trying to reverse engineer
TRSMAIN. Assuming that I had the talent to do so and it is not forbidden
by IBM.

--
John McKown
Senior Systems Programmer
HealthMarkets
Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage
Administrative Services Group
Information Technology

The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged
and/or confidential.  It is for intended addressee(s) only.  If you are
not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure,
reproduction, distribution or other use of this communication is
strictly prohibited and could, in certain circumstances, be a criminal
offense.  If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the
sender by reply and delete this message without copying or disclosing
it. 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: SORT question

2007-01-31 Thread Howard Brazee
On 30 Jan 2007 13:50:10 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (George, William ,
DHS-ITSD) wrote:

Note: I can write a simple REXX to do this but need to do it in SORT.
Double sigh.

Most any language would do this - why do you need to do it in SORT?

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: TCP/IP

2007-01-31 Thread Chris Mason
Philip

Scanning the online manual z/OS Communications Server IP System
Administrator's Commands

http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/F1A1C250

using the search word cache, I found the following:

quote

1.6.7 VARY TCPIP,,PURGECACHE

Purpose

Use the VARY TCPIP,,PURGECACHE command to delete the ARP cache entries for a
link or neighbor cache entries for an interface.

Format

   __Vary __TCPIP__,__ __
__,__PURGECache,name___
|_procname_|

Parameters

name
The interface name or link name of the cache to be purged.

If the name matches a link name, the local ARP cache or the outboard OSA
cache entries (for QDIO token ring and QDIO Ethernet) for that link is
purged. If the name matches an interface name, the IPv6 neighbor cache for
that interface is purged.

/quote

So you certainly don't need to shut down the IP main address space but you
do have to know the names of the relevant interfaces.

Incidentally, you should look the command up yourself for all the notes and
examples following the text I quoted above,

Chris Mason

- Original Message - 
From: Philip Miscione [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Sent: Wednesday, 31 January, 2007 3:28 PM
Subject: TCP/IP


 FYI


 Is there a way I can clear the ARP cache on the TCP/ip stack on the
 Mainframe without shutting down TCP/IP ?



 Thanks in advance

 Philip A. Miscione Sr

 Project Leader

 Barnes  Noble, Inc.

 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Phone: 516-338-8227

 Fax : 516-338-8487

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: DADSM allocation for non-SMS files

2007-01-31 Thread John Kington
 For example, for a Physical Sequential file with
 UNIT=(esoteric,6)
 SPACE=(CYL,(1000,500))
 and 3390 geometry (3339 cylinders)

 we have observed DADSM pass over volumes with
 plenty of space and instead allocate 3 volumes
 that had preexisting files with 3000 cylinders.

 In other words, the most cylinders available
 would be 3339-3000 = 339 yet with a secondary
 of 500 cylinders DADSM would still pick the packs
 with less than 339 and the file would end
 up running out of space.

Brent,
Do you have any product that is attempting to prevent
x37 abends? You should always be using the secondary
amount when you extend to a new volume.
Your candidate list is built by taking the volumes in
the esoteric that are mounted storage. The list is then
passed to SRM along with a list of volumes that you
already have allocated. SRM ranks the candidate list
by putting the ones you already have to the bottom and
the others by device delay where device delay is the
sum of iosq time, pend time and disconnect time. The
only real difference here between SMS and non-SMS is
that SMS knows how much space is on a volume and will
put only volumes with enough freespace to meet your
allocation request without going over the space
utilization threshold for the storage group on the
primary candidate list.
Regards,
John

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: TCP/IP

2007-01-31 Thread Lou Losee

Hi Phillip,
The command vary tcpip,,purgecache should do the trick, see:
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/f1a1c250/1.6.7?ACTION=MATCHESREQUEST=ARPTYPE=FUZZYSHELF=F1A1BK80.bksDT=20060622162258CASE=searchTopic=TOPICsearchText=TEXTsearchIndex=INDEXrank=RANKScrollTOP=FIRSTHIT#FIRSTHIT

Lou Losee
atsec information security

On 1/31/07, Philip Miscione [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


FYI


Is there a way I can clear the ARP cache on the TCP/ip stack on the
Mainframe without shutting down TCP/IP ?



Thanks in advance

Philip A. Miscione Sr

Project Leader

Barnes  Noble, Inc.

email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Phone: 516-338-8227

Fax : 516-338-8487





--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html





--
Artificial Intelligence is no match for Natural Stupidity

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: AOPBATCH Continuation character

2007-01-31 Thread Paul Gilmartin
In a recent note, Hunkeler Peter (KIUK 3) said:

 Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 11:01:42 +0100
 
 I've not played with code pages and assembler so far, so
 I may be missing HLASM options.
 
If there is such an option for HLASM, an assembler program
would need to be recompiled for each locale; no portable
load modules.  Undesirable.

 The assembler doesn't care for a locale, does it? So the
 backslash on the CLI will not be changed during execution,
 irrespective of any locale that may have been set in the LE
 (assuming this is LE enabled assembler code).
 
 BPX1RED does not translate what it reads (except in the
 context of autoconvert), does it? So, changing the locale
 does not have any influence in what you get in your buffer.
 
So, how does the PARM='ENVAR(LC_ALL=De_DE.IBM-273)/sh'
you suggested work?  Does it cause the shell to translate
all character data to a standard code page when performing
any test?  Performance?  Well, it's only an interpreter anyway.

You wrote, AOPBATCH's shell.  Does AOPBATCH have its own
version of shell, or does it use /bin/sh?  What programs other
than sh are ENVAR()-savvy.

As for Jan M's caution about multiple Unicode representations,
UTF-8 has wide support; it's highly compatible with applications
that have metacharacters in only the USASCII subset; it's
indifferent to endianness; it can be further encoded with Q-P
for 7-bit hygiene.  I can only regret that UTF-8 (not EBCDIC
UTF-8!) was not made the base encoding for Unix System Services.

Does iconv support UTF-8?  Does PARM=ENVAR() support UTF-8?

-- gil
-- 
StorageTek
INFORMATION made POWERFUL

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: DADSM allocation for non-SMS files

2007-01-31 Thread John Kington
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on 01/31/2007
09:52:57 AM:

 If it is a non-sms file then you need to define a volume list. Simply
 adding a volume count doesn't work unless these are volumes are mounted
 as storage or public. Private volumes will require a
 vol=ser=(vol1,vol2,etc)

You only want to specify volsers if you always want to
allocate in a specific order. You can always allocate
across multiple volumes, you just have more control in
a SMS managed pool.
Regards,
John

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: DADSM allocation for non-SMS files

2007-01-31 Thread O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C]
Brent,

  Are the volumes that your job has selected for allocation mounted as
Public, Storage or Private?
The volumes with space that were passed over, how are they mounted? 

Dave

-Original Message-
From: John Kington 
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 10:18 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: DADSM allocation for non-SMS files

IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on 01/31/2007
09:52:57 AM:

You only want to specify volsers if you always want to allocate in a
specific order. You can always allocate across multiple volumes, you
just have more control in a SMS managed pool.
Regards,
John

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search
the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: TCP/IP

2007-01-31 Thread Philip Miscione
Will this work on on a z/OS 1.4 System ?

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lou Losee
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 10:02 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: TCP/IP

Hi Phillip,
The command vary tcpip,,purgecache should do the trick, see:
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/f1a1c250/1.6.
7?ACTION=MATCHESREQUEST=ARPTYPE=FUZZYSHELF=F1A1BK80.bksDT=2006062216
2258CASE=searchTopic=TOPICsearchText=TEXTsearchIndex=INDEXrank=RANK
ScrollTOP=FIRSTHIT#FIRSTHIT

Lou Losee
atsec information security

On 1/31/07, Philip Miscione [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 FYI


 Is there a way I can clear the ARP cache on the TCP/ip stack on the 
 Mainframe without shutting down TCP/IP ?



 Thanks in advance

 Philip A. Miscione Sr

 Project Leader

 Barnes  Noble, Inc.

 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Phone: 516-338-8227

 Fax : 516-338-8487





 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send 
 email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO 
 Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html




--
Artificial Intelligence is no match for Natural Stupidity

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search
the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Who intercepted SVC 26?

2007-01-31 Thread David Andrews
On Fri, 2007-01-26 at 15:07 -0500, Bob Rutledge wrote:
 In IPCS option 0, set the source to active and then enter
 ip l 10?+c8?+84?+d0? str l(512)

Bob, thanks for this (and thanks to Rob Scott, Ken Kripke, and other
folks who also pointed me to IPCS -- it's been so long I'd forgotten
about it).

The culprit appeared to be... FDR!  That was a surprise to me, so I went
digging in the installation parms and discovered that we'd configured it
to use a catalog locate exit for auto recall.  Guess when Bruce says
locate exit he means front-end SVC 26 since there isn't a locate
exit anymore.

In the ensuing discussion on ibm-main I was surprised to find what a
popular target this was.  It probably belongs on the SSI!

Mystery solved, in any case.

-- 
David Andrews
A. Duda and Sons, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: TRSMAIN question

2007-01-31 Thread Paul Gilmartin
In a recent note, Tim Hare said:

 Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 09:49:31 -0500
 
 IBM's Unix Tools  Toys page (I believe) has GZIP ported for Unix Systems
 Services.  I got this to work for me:
 
  cat //'dataset_name' | gzip -c  archive_name.gz
 
 Yes that is double quotes around the double slash entity, and single
 quotes around the fully-qualified dataset name, I am sure there may be
 better syntax(?) but it worked.
 
I have found no better syntax.

cat is not among the utilities documented as supporting Classic
data sets; use at your own risk.  It will likely not produce expected
results for both character and binary files.  A form using a supported
utility is:

cp //'dataset_name' /dev/fd/1 | gzip -c  archive_name.gz

Additional options to cp can select character or binary mode, etc.

 So, if your tape data is cataloged, and you have mount authority you might
 be able to issue a command like that for your tapes, sit back, and wait.
 
In an earlier submission to this thread I suggested using IEBGENER
instead of cat or cp.  I formed the IEBGENER habit before Classic
data set support in cp was announced; it still retains the value
of supporting uncatalogued data sets and concatenations.  You'd
need to write a wrapper (I use Rexx) to connect IEBGENER to gzip.
Then you might have the added value or connecting gzip directly to
FTP with no need for a temporary archive-name.gx.

-- gil
-- 
StorageTek
INFORMATION made POWERFUL

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


[SPAM] Re: Just another example of mainframe costs.

2007-01-31 Thread Howard Brazee
On 5 Jan 2007 18:46:42 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stephen Y Odo)
wrote:

So how does one advocate intelligently for its use?  I mean, if 
Sun+Oracle is better, cheaper, faster, etc. than 
z/OS+CICS+ADABAS/Natural why should I be pushing for z/OS?

You shouldn't be pushing for any platform.   You should be analyzing
your company's needs, and comparing the costs and benefits of various
solutions using various platforms - for your company's needs.

Just don't assume you or your bosses *know* what a particular platform
gives them.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: DADSM allocation for non-SMS files

2007-01-31 Thread Looper, Brent E
The non-SMS volumes for the esoteric in question
are all mounted STORAGE (all 35 of them).  
 
We do not have any program products installed that
are intercepting (x37).
 
The abend I am most familiar with did not involve
pre-allocation via an IEFBR14.  It was defined as
below (dsn has been changed) in a production job. 
 
//AHY1OUT  DD  DSN=HLQ.SLQ.TLQ(+1),  
// DISP=(NEW,CATLG,DELETE),  
// UNIT=(ACHDA,6),   
// SPACE=(CYL,(1000,500),RLSE),  
// DCB=(HBOPM.PF,RECFM=VB,LRECL=3924,BLKSIZE=0,BUFNO=14) 
 
The file used the primary of 1000, then grabbed 
two secondaries of 500 cylinders on two other 
volumes, then ran out of space as the remaining
3 volumes that were allocated all had less than
339 cylinders on them.  There were other volumes
available with 500 contiguous cylinders but they
were not assigned to the file. Why were these 
candidate volumes allocated if they had less than
500 cylinders while others with ample space were not ?
 
The only thing that makes sense is what John K. said
 
The only real difference here between SMS and non-SMS is
that SMS knows how much space is on a volume ...  
 
 
 
Brent,

  Are the volumes that your job has selected for allocation mounted as
Public, Storage or Private?
The volumes with space that were passed over, how are they mounted?

Dave
 
 

** Original post excerpt **

We have had a few abends lately where DADSM
is not allocating non-SMS space as anticipated.
We are z/OS 1.4 on the way to 1.7.   

I have found an excellent paper on DADSM
for SMS files, but have not been able to
find anything on allocation of non-SMS files.

For example, for a Physical Sequential file with
UNIT=(esoteric,6)
SPACE=(CYL,(1000,500))
and 3390 geometry (3339 cylinders)

we have observed DADSM pass over volumes with
plenty of space and instead allocate 3 volumes
that had preexisting files with 3000 cylinders.

In other words, the most cylinders available
would be 3339-3000 = 339 yet with a secondary
of 500 cylinders DADSM would still pick the packs
with less than 339 and the file would end
up running out of space.   


** end original post excerpt **


 

 

 

 

 





Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for 
the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and 
privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or 
distribution is prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient, please 
contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original 
message.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: TCP/IP

2007-01-31 Thread Lou Losee

On 1/31/07, Philip Miscione [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Will this work on on a z/OS 1.4 System ?

snip



Don't know for sure - the Summary of changes in the pub only goes back to
1.6.  A sure way to find out is to try it.

Lou Losee
atsec information security

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


VTAM recovery of FICON CTC links

2007-01-31 Thread Knutson, Sam
If you are using or planning to use FICON CTC links (for VTAM) you might
want to get on the interested parties list or open your own marketing
request to IBM the same as 
 
MR0413054727 VTAM RECOVERY OF FICON CTC LINKS
MR0130072900 VTAM RECOVERY OF FICON CTC LINKS 

We converted to use FICON CTC last year and have been happy in general
but VTAM with FICON CTC does not work as well as VTAM with ESCON CTC.

At IPL you may see an error and not get cross domain links active.
 
IST380I ERROR FOR ID = MPLBTOHZ - REQUEST: ACTLINK, SENSE: 081C003C 

IBM explained

===
If the other side of the FICON CTC is not up then VTAM is not able to
recover the link.  
ESCON works differently at the hardware level.  The CTC is online (after
IPL) so after VTAM activates the CTC it goes PCTD1,(and waits for the
other side to come up). For FICON the link goes NEVAC caused by a
Condition Code 3 which
indicates no path. It therefore is not waiting for the other end to come
up. The reason for the Ficon CTC devices not coming online when the 1st
partition only is IPLed is due to the concept changes. In the ESCON
environment, the customer needs to define which side will have the CTC
function. In the FICON environment the CTC control unit is not known in
advance like in ESCON and because the load of the CTC functions will be
balanced equally between each side,   
it will also be necessary for the two involved channels to negotiate on
which side the CTC function will finally be. 
This is why, in order to establish the negotiation, both sides must be
up, which explains why the CTCs devices are brought online when the
second partition is IPLed. The way round this is to use automation to
allow VTAM to use the FICON  
CTCs when they are up. Unfortunately there is no dynamics with a CTC
short of inactivation and activation of the Major Node.  I double
checked the V ACT,UPDATE=ALL command processing and function capability
beyond Switched Major nodes, Local Major Nodes and Channels defined as
APPN TRLE MPC connections.  No dynamics with CTC VBUILD GROUP.   
VTAM requires that at least 1 write subchannel and at least 1 read
subchannel be ONLINE to MVS when the MPC is activated  
in order for the activation to work. 

We've learned that FICON CTC works differently than ESCON CTC in how
they come ONLINE at power on/IPL time. A VTAM requirement has recently
(about 2 weeks ago) been opened for VTAM to wait for the FICON CTC's to
come online - and not fail the activation. For now, one of each must be
ONLINE to MVS for the activation to work.  
1 read / 1 write must be ONLINE when activating VTAM MPC.   
--- 
The 081C003C sense code indicates you do have the problem of the devices
not yet online at time of activation.   
It means the channel device (CTC device) does not come up online during
MVS IPL. Vary ACT involving the device will fail with ACTLINK 081C003C.
To recover the situation, issue MVS V ONLINE command and re-issue   
VTAM V NET,ACT. V NET,ACT will be required to get CTC active.

There is a Marketing Requirement in place : MR0413054727 VTAM RECOVERY  
OF FICON CTC LINKS. The requirement is in the process for the release

after R8 so it will be approximately a year before it is available. 
==

It continues to sound positive that this requirement will be met by IBM
in a future release after release 8. We think this is something that
must be in the next z/OS release and should be considered if at possible
to roll back to R7 and R8 as a new function APAR or APARs.  

I have heard it said that IBM won't bring out any equipment which is not
as capable or more capable than it's current offering.  FICON CTC was a
big step backwards for use by VTAM.   We have had to put in Netview
CLISTs to deal with this manually as a customer when it should be
handled automagically by VTAM.

Just be aware of this if you are considering to use FICON CTC and
perhaps take time to contact IBM and get on the interested parties list.
If there is any chance to see this function pushed back to current z/OS
releases it seems that IBM is going to have to get a lot of interested
parties.

Best Regards, 

Sam Knutson, GEICO 
Performance and Availability Management 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
(office)  301.986.3574 

Think big, act bold, start simple, grow fast...

This email/fax message is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution of this
email/fax is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please
destroy all paper and electronic copies of the 

Re: SORT question

2007-01-31 Thread Frank Yaeger
On Jan 31, 6:33 am,  Tim Burkart wrote:
 Even though DFSORT will NOT stop as soon as it gets two records for
 each value, but it will give you up to two records for each value
 could it be done via an exit? In general can DFSORT be directed to
 stop processing after creating a predefined number of output records?

Yes, but probably not in a way you'd want to do it.  An E35 (output) exit
could
pass back a return code of 16 to DFSORT at any point to tell DFSORT to
terminate with a return code of 16.  That will stop DFSORT from processing
any more records.  But it won't look like a successful run (RC=16 instead
of RC=0).

(Note that an E35 can pass back a return code of 8 to DFSORT to tell DFSORT
not
to return to the exit, but any remaining records will still be processed -
they just won't
be passed to the exit.)

Frank Yaeger - DFSORT Team (IBM) - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Specialties: PARSE, JFY, SQZ, ICETOOL, IFTHEN, OVERLAY, Symbols, Migration

 = DFSORT/MVS is on the Web at http://www.ibm.com/storage/dfsort/

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Need ideas - IRADU00 output very large.

2007-01-31 Thread Hal Merritt
Your plan is good. Here is another idea for you.

Take a random sample of the records you suspect. Pick one or two and
discover the root technical cause. Avoid speculation and choose your
words carefully (see below). Keep an open mind. 

Pick a few more and do the same thing. 

By now you should have a good idea what the problem is, and can craft
some statistical studies to see if you are on the right path. 

Once you do that, craft some report jobs that prove the issue beyond any
reasonable shadow of a doubt. I smell the foul stench of an auditor
making security decisions and setting policy. But it is too early to
tell. As another very correctly posted, it could be a malfunctioning
program. 

But your unenviable, thankless, daunting task could be to inform
management that they made a very expensive mistake. That is *never* a
good career move. Keep that in mind as you raise alarms and report your
findings to your management. Play this right, and hero status awaits.


-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of McKown, John
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 3:28 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Need ideas - IRADU00 output very large.

Last week, we produced 35,746,835 output records for the reformatted
RACF (IRRADU00 output). This blew our processing. The previous week was
only 7,555,827 records. Two weeks ago only 4,896,905 records. And three
weeks ago, only 2,470,655 records. Of course, the question is what
happened?!?

I'm trying to process this information using SAS. So far in about 3 wall
clock hours, I've read 5 of the 21 input tapes (virtual 3490E - MEDIA2).
My SAS output dataset, so far, is 250,500 tracks and 166 extents on 11
of 30 possible output DASD volumes, and still growing.

 
NOTICE: This electronic mail message and any files transmitted with it are 
intended exclusively
for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. The message, together 
with any attachment, may contain confidential and/or privileged
information. Any unauthorized review, use, printing, saving, copying, 
disclosure 
or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in 
error, please immediately
advise the sender by reply email and delete all copies.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Smartbatch for OS/390 vs Batchpipes OS/390

2007-01-31 Thread Knutson, Sam
Making PIPES an automatically entitled part of the base z/OS product
would allow users and vendors to build function that depends on it and
add a great deal of value to z/OS as a platform.  I remember how excited
I was when I stumbled on one of the Plumber's sessions at SHARE years
ago and how quickly that excitement faded when I realized the hurdles I
felt I could not overcome to get it acquired.  

Best Regards, 

Sam Knutson, GEICO 
Performance and Availability Management 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
(office)  301.986.3574 

Think big, act bold, start simple, grow fast...

-Original Message-
withdrawn and but the Batchpipes component was again offered by itself.
I
believe Batchpipes is still supported.

Have a nice day,
Dave Betten
DFSORT Development, Performance Lead
IBM Corporation
email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1-240-715-4655, tie line 268-1499
DFSORT/MVSontheweb at http://www.ibm.com/storage/dfsort/

This email/fax message is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution of this
email/fax is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please
destroy all paper and electronic copies of the original message.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: TCP/IP

2007-01-31 Thread Chris Mason
Philip

Yes

In the reply I sent you before - not the one to which you refer here - I do
hope it got through - I quoted from the z/OS V1R8 manual, this being the
latest.

Now that you have informed us of the level of z/OS you are using I can
easily page down the different releases and pull out the V1R4 version of the
z/OS Communications Server IP System Administrator's Commands manual

http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/F1A1C211 [1]

Here the equivalent text to the text I quoted before is as follows:

quote

| 1.37 VARY TCPIP,,PURGECACHE

| Purpose

| Use the VARY TCPIP,, PURGECACHE command to delete the ARP cache entries
| for a link or neighbor entries for an interface.

| Format

 | __Vary __TCPIP__,__ __
__,__PURGECache,name___
 |  |_procname_|

| Parameters

| name

| The interface name or link name of the cache to be purged.

| If the name matches a link name, the local ARP cache or the outboard
| OSA cache entries (for QDIO token ring and QDIO ethernet) for that
| link is purged. If the name matches an interface name, the IPv6
| neighbor cache for that interface is purged.

/quote

Note the revision bars so I guess the command is new in V1R4 - confirmed by
taking a peek at the Summary of Changes section of the manual.

Chris Mason

[1] Lou, you can skip the garbage after f1a1c250, in the case you used, when
providing the URL for manuals and so avoid problems with line wrapping in
the e-mail as received.

- Original Message - 
From: Philip Miscione [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Sent: Wednesday, 31 January, 2007 4:25 PM
Subject: Re: TCP/IP


 Will this work on on a z/OS 1.4 System ?

 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Lou Losee
 Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 10:02 AM
 To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
 Subject: Re: TCP/IP

 Hi Phillip,
 The command vary tcpip,,purgecache should do the trick, see:
 http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/f1a1c250/1.6.
 7?ACTION=MATCHESREQUEST=ARPTYPE=FUZZYSHELF=F1A1BK80.bksDT=2006062216
 2258CASE=searchTopic=TOPICsearchText=TEXTsearchIndex=INDEXrank=RANK
 ScrollTOP=FIRSTHIT#FIRSTHIT

 Lou Losee
 atsec information security

 On 1/31/07, Philip Miscione [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  FYI
 
 
  Is there a way I can clear the ARP cache on the TCP/ip stack on the
  Mainframe without shutting down TCP/IP ?
 
 
 
  Thanks in advance
 
  Philip A. Miscione Sr
 
  Project Leader
 
  Barnes  Noble, Inc.
 
  email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  Phone: 516-338-8227
 
  Fax : 516-338-8487

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: TRSMAIN question

2007-01-31 Thread TISLER Zaromil
- snip -
 Once you're in gzip you can decompress it on a PC I'm sure.
 
 Oh - you might have to pipe it through iconv to get it into ASCII / 
 Unicode before zipping it.

Thanks for the idea. It may be easier than trying to reverse engineer
TRSMAIN. Assuming that I had the talent to do so and it is not forbidden
by IBM.
- snip -

What about infozip URL: www.info-zip.org ?

Knowing nothing about RACF IRRADU00 reformatted records, a question:

Is it possible to transfer less data using DFSORT/ICETOOL to extract what
you need or even to found the problematic records (or the number of them)?

Zaromil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Dorting multiple VSAM and PS files

2007-01-31 Thread Carl Edwards
I have recently migrated a small VSE system to Z/os.

evrything went well with one exception.
The VSE Sort program was able to sort a variety of
files, mixed SAM and VSAM in one pass. This is not
supported in Z/OS (DFSORT).

I can write an E15 exit to handle this, but I am
somewhat amazed that this cabability does not exist in
Z/os.
Has anyone else encounterd this issue?

THX


 

It's here! Your new message!  
Get new email alerts with the free Yahoo! Toolbar.
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/mail/

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: How to display JES2 Checkpoint Level (was: -none-)

2007-01-31 Thread Schwarz, Barry A
And please remember to quote a little of the original post if you change the 
subject.



From: Hunkeler Peter (KIUK 3) [mailto:snip]
Sent: Tue 1/30/2007 11:29 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: How to display JES2 Checkpoint Level (was: -none-)



$d activate

netiquette
Would you mind supplying a subject and signing your posts?
/netiquette



--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: DADSM allocation for non-SMS files

2007-01-31 Thread John Kington
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on 01/31/2007
10:50:23 AM:

 The non-SMS volumes for the esoteric in question
 are all mounted STORAGE (all 35 of them).

 We do not have any program products installed that
 are intercepting (x37).

 The abend I am most familiar with did not involve
 pre-allocation via an IEFBR14.  It was defined as
 below (dsn has been changed) in a production job.

 //AHY1OUT  DD  DSN=HLQ.SLQ.TLQ(+1),
 // DISP=(NEW,CATLG,DELETE),
 // UNIT=(ACHDA,6),
 // SPACE=(CYL,(1000,500),RLSE),
 // DCB=(HBOPM.PF,RECFM=VB,LRECL=3924,BLKSIZE=0,BUFNO=14)

 The file used the primary of 1000, then grabbed
 two secondaries of 500 cylinders on two other
 volumes, then ran out of space as the remaining
 3 volumes that were allocated all had less than
 339 cylinders on them.  There were other volumes
 available with 500 contiguous cylinders but they
 were not assigned to the file. Why were these
 candidate volumes allocated if they had less than
 500 cylinders while others with ample space were not ?

Brent,

I am seeing a little clearer. I thought you did get an allocation
of 339 cylinders on one or more of the volumes.

When you allocate a non-SMS managed dataset using unit count greater
than one, you will get all devices allocated at step initation. If
the dataset is SMS managed, only one device will be allocated and
the remaining will be converted to an asterisk. When you need to
extend to a new volume, SMS will then pick a volume that will
accomodate your allocation request. For non-SMS datasets, your
devices are set without regard to space availability.

What can you do to prevent/reduce this problem?
1. Increase the unit count to the number of volumes in the pool up
to a maximum of 59 and hope for the best.
2. Convert this pool (or dataset) to SMS which will work.
3. Get a third party product that will dynamically add a volume when
you need it.

Regards,
John

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Why isn't ISPF APAR OA14164 PE'd?

2007-01-31 Thread Pinnacle
- Original Message - 
From: Mark Zelden [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 5:16 PM
Subject: Why isn't ISPF APAR OA14164 PE'd?



(cross posted to IBM-MAIN and ISPF-L)

This past weekend we rolled out maintenance up to RSU0606 in one of
our environments.   We usually do quarterly RSU - 1 quarter plus
hipers which would mean RSU0609, but some local issues and EOY put
us behind in this environment - hence RSU0606.

Anyway... we ran into the problem described by APAR OA16455. The
fix is on RSU0609, but right in the APAR text it says the problem was
caused by OA14164.  We go to great pains to keep very current
on holddata running / reviewing reports on Friday prior to a weekend
rollout of a new RSU level just to make sure no PEs are rolling
in (also the reason we do quarterly RSU - 1 quarter).

Since the new APAR PTFs sup OA14164, why wouldn't OA14164 get marked
PE? It it had been - we could have avoided the problem.


Mark,

You should report this as a bug to IBM.  I agree with you that there should 
have been a PE here.  I know Brian Peterson agrees with you.  This is a 
longstanding problem with IBM.  PE's are bad, so they will avoid issuing one 
if possible.  They're getting better, but some still slip through the 
cracks.  IBM should create an AI APAR PE'ing both OA14164 and OA16455.


Good luck,
Tom 


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: TCP/IP

2007-01-31 Thread Chris Mason
Lou

If you start from this page

http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/zos/bkserv/

you can go all the way back to OS/390 V2R4 and TCP/IP for MVS V3R2 (1997).

Chris Mason

- Original Message - 
From: Lou Losee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Sent: Wednesday, 31 January, 2007 4:55 PM
Subject: Re: TCP/IP


 On 1/31/07, Philip Miscione [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Will this work on on a z/OS 1.4 System ?
 
  snip
 
 
 Don't know for sure - the Summary of changes in the pub only goes back to
 1.6.  A sure way to find out is to try it.
 
 Lou Losee
 atsec information security

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: CA web site

2007-01-31 Thread Norman Hollander
OK- I was not trying to start a tirade on CA.  Yes, I am wearing a CA hat as
we speak.
Using this site for shared issues is what it is for.  I was trying to reduce
your time to
get your network problem possibly fixed.  Our support folks are usually
quite good at either solving the problem, or pointing you in the right
direction.  You may be hitting an
intermittent problem that others are not having.  Just because I'm not
having a connection issue from internal CA networks or VPN (work laptop), or
even my personal connections through ATT (home desktop), doesn't mean an
issue doesn't exist from you.
In fact, it may be an issue in your network that the support folks can help
you find.
I'm just suggesting, that in the effort to save time, CALL THE HELPDESK and
see if they know about a problem which may be impacting you.  There is NO
charge to you for this type of help.

Norman

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Need ideas - IRADU00 output very large.

2007-01-31 Thread Chase, John
 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Hal Merritt
 
 [ snip ]
 
 But your unenviable, thankless, daunting task could be to 
 inform management that they made a very expensive mistake. 
 That is *never* a good career move. Keep that in mind as you 
 raise alarms and report your findings to your management. 
 Play this right, and hero status awaits.

It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.  [I
forget]

-jc-

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Dorting multiple VSAM and PS files

2007-01-31 Thread Gilbert Saint-Flour
On Wednesday 31 January 2007 11:17, Carl Edwards wrote:

 I have recently migrated a small VSE system to Z/os.
 evrything went well with one exception.
 The VSE Sort program was able to sort a variety of files, mixed SAM 
 and VSAM in one pass.  This is not supported in Z/OS (DFSORT).
 I can write an E15 exit to handle this, but I am somewhat amazed 
 that this cabability does not exist in Z/os.
 Has anyone else encounterd this issue?

I certainly have, way too many times!  Just last year, I had a customer which 
had that particular problem in over 700 SORT steps.  Note that this isn't 
just a DFSORT problem: it also exists with SYNCSORT and CA-SORT.

Over the years, I have used three approaches to solve this problem:

1. a generic E15/E35 exit called VSAMSORT which I first wrote in 1985

2. An ICETOOL step with COPY/COPY/SORT (an obviously more recent solution)

3. a request to the DFSORT developers to add support for multiple VSAM input 
files - that never worked :-( 

-- 
 Gilbert Saint-Flour
 GSF Software
 http://gsf-soft.com/

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: TN3270 server offload options

2007-01-31 Thread Chris Mason
Bob

Watching the responses to your post, if seems a popular offload option is
to onload.

Chris Mason

- Original Message - 
From: Robert Mattingly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Sent: Tuesday, 30 January, 2007 12:24 AM
Subject: TN3270 server offload options


 We need to migrate offloaded TN3270 server sessions from ESCON connected
 Cisco CPA (Channel Port Adapter) devices.  I am not aware of an IBM option
 for this since the 3172 went away.  From the research I have done, it
 looks like Visara has a good option with their 1174 comm. server line.
 The other products I have seen involve a gateway PC with Unix/Linux or
 Windows running MS-HIS or some other software product.  I am leaning
 towards Visara at this time.  Does anyone know of other options or have
 any recommendations?

 Thanks,
 Bob

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Smartbatch for OS/390 vs Batchpipes OS/390

2007-01-31 Thread McKown, John
 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Knutson, Sam
 Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 10:07 AM
 To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
 Subject: Re: Smartbatch for OS/390 vs Batchpipes OS/390
 
 
 Making PIPES an automatically entitled part of the base z/OS product
 would allow users and vendors to build function that depends on it and
 add a great deal of value to z/OS as a platform.  I remember 
 how excited
 I was when I stumbled on one of the Plumber's sessions at 
 SHARE years
 ago and how quickly that excitement faded when I realized the 
 hurdles I
 felt I could not overcome to get it acquired.  
 
 Best Regards, 
 
 Sam Knutson, GEICO 

I don't know anything about the PIPES being discussed here. However, you
can pipe information from one job to another using standard JCL. Run
the following two jobs together, in separate initiators (of course!).
Oh, and make any JCL changes necessary!

//useridGW JOB (H0I),'TESTPIPE1',CLASS=D,MSGCLASS=X,
// TYPRUN=HOLD,
// NOTIFY=SYSUID,TIME=NOLIMIT
//STEP002  EXEC  PGM=ICEGENER
//SYSPRINT DD  SYSOUT=*
//SYSINDD  DUMMY
//SYSUT1   DD  DISP=SHR,DSN=SYS1.MACLIB(READ)
//SYSUT2 DD PATH='/tmp/MCKOWNPIPE',
// PATHDISP=(KEEP,KEEP),
// PATHMODE=(SIRUSR,SIWUSR),
// PATHOPTS=(OCREAT,OWRONLY),
// DSNTYPE=PIPE,
// LRECL=80,RECFM=F,BLKSIZE=80
//
/*EOF
//useridGR JOB (H0I),'TESTPIPE2',CLASS=D,MSGCLASS=X,
// TYPRUN=HOLD,
// NOTIFY=SYSUID,TIME=NOLIMIT
//STEP002  EXEC  PGM=ICEGENER
//SYSPRINT DD  SYSOUT=*
//SYSINDD  DUMMY
//SYSUT1 DD PATH='/tmp/MCKOWNPIPE',
// PATHDISP=(KEEP,KEEP),
// PATHMODE=(SIRUSR,SIWUSR),
// PATHOPTS=(OCREAT,ORDONLY),
// DSNTYPE=PIPE,
// LRECL=80,RECFM=F,BLKSIZE=80
//SYSUT2   DD  SYSOUT=*
//

The GW job will pipe SYS1.MACLIB(READ) to /tmp/MCKOWNPIPE, which will
be read and printed by the GR job. Whichever one starts first will wait
for the second one to start. When the GW job signals EOF, then both jobs
will terminate.

--
John McKown
Senior Systems Programmer
HealthMarkets
Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage
Administrative Services Group
Information Technology

The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged
and/or confidential.  It is for intended addressee(s) only.  If you are
not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure,
reproduction, distribution or other use of this communication is
strictly prohibited and could, in certain circumstances, be a criminal
offense.  If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the
sender by reply and delete this message without copying or disclosing
it. 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Need ideas - IRADU00 output very large.

2007-01-31 Thread (IBM Mainframe Discussion List)
 
 
In a message dated 1/31/2007 10:53:41 A.M. Central Standard Time, jchase @  
USSCO.COM writes:
It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.  [I  forget]
 
This similar quote is attributed to Voltaire:  “It  is dangerous to be right 
in matters on which the established authorities are  wrong.”
 
Bill  Fairchild



--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: M$ Vista Experiences?

2007-01-31 Thread Dave Kopischke
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 09:45:35 EST, Ed Finnell wrote:

From Dell site...
_http://www.dell.com/content/topics/global.aspx/solutions/en/winvista?
c=uscs=
19l=ens=dhs~ck=anavml_
(http://www.dell.com/content/topics/global.aspx/solutions/en/winvista?
c=uscs=19l=ens=dhs~ck=anavml)

or tiny'd

_www.tinyurl.com/37zuk2_ (http://www.tinyurl.com/37zuk2)

Seems the small lightweight genre would be having a field  day.


Who says those Dell guys don't have a sense of humor...


The chart below offers a handy guide to help make sure your system
is equipped to support the Windows VistaTM  experience you want:

.
System Memory
512MB RAM  

Great for...
Booting the Operating System, without running applications or games



I have a bunch of machines that I just boot to watch lights flash and hear 
hard drives spin.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: CA web site

2007-01-31 Thread Dave Kopischke
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 14:37:55 -0500, Jon Brock wrote:

   Has anyone else had trouble with CA's SupportConnect web site for 
the last several days?  I am unable to use the Knowledge Base feature.  I 
thought for a little while the problem was an Internet access-monitoring 
package we have, but now that doesn't seem to be the case.
   Is CA's Knowledge Base usable for the rest of you?


I've been wandering about CA's Knowledge base over the last few days and 
have only had trouble with several broken links. Mostly links that appear 
most related to my questions. I'm lucky that way.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Getting control

2007-01-31 Thread Hal Merritt
Well, the consensus of postings so far is not promising. 

What is your business/technical/security problem? 

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jon Renton
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 7:23 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Getting control

Hello,
 
I am looking for a way to prevent users calling certain load modules
directly. Instead I would like my module to get control. This module can
then perform certain tasks before passing control to the user requested
processing module.
 
Here as a simple flow:
 
- User calls module A
- My module B gets control instead (without the user noticing this)
- After internal processing B calls A
 
Is there a way to achieve this using documented interfaces (or
otherwise)?
 
Many thanks in advance
 
Regards
Jon
 
NOTICE: This electronic mail message and any files transmitted with it are 
intended exclusively
for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. The message, together 
with any attachment, may contain confidential and/or privileged
information. Any unauthorized review, use, printing, saving, copying, 
disclosure 
or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in 
error, please immediately
advise the sender by reply email and delete all copies.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Withdrawal of VM ServiceLink

2007-01-31 Thread Knutson, Sam
Anyone get any traction on the lack of a replacement for VPL?

Best Regards, 

Sam Knutson, GEICO 
Performance and Availability Management 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
(office)  301.986.3574 

Think big, act bold, start simple, grow fast...


Withdrawal of VM ServiceLink 
Access to ServiceLink via the VM mode (green screen) will be removed on
March 31, 2007. ServiceLink will only  be available through:
www.ibm.com/ibmlink  
The internet version of ServiceLink has been embraced by our customers 
as a safe and secure method of obtaining technical support and software
maintenance for their zSeries system.

-




This email/fax message is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution of this
email/fax is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please
destroy all paper and electronic copies of the original message.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Console issue (was SAE and SAR with Visara)

2007-01-31 Thread Hal Merritt
I use that feature, but am very unhappy with the result. It seems a
*lot* of messages are not displayed making it darned difficult to
diagnose a failing IPL. 

Any idea what I might be doing wrong? I have no consoles defined in the
IODF, forcing NIP messages to the HMC. That works ok, but when NIP hands
off control to MVS, many MVS and JES messages just don't appear.

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bruce Black
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 9:16 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SAE and SAR with Visara

 

If you have no non-SNA consoles, you can always use the primative 
console function built into the HMC.  There are instructions in the SAR 
section of the FDR manual (section 15).

-- 
Bruce A. Black
Senior Software Developer for FDR
Innovation Data Processing 973-890-7300
personal: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sales info: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tech support: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: www.innovationdp.fdr.com
 
NOTICE: This electronic mail message and any files transmitted with it are 
intended exclusively
for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. The message, together 
with any attachment, may contain confidential and/or privileged
information. Any unauthorized review, use, printing, saving, copying, 
disclosure 
or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in 
error, please immediately
advise the sender by reply email and delete all copies.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Doubt about Server Pac and Catalogs

2007-01-31 Thread Víctor de la Fuente

I am a newbie on Server Pac, and I read a lot of documentation related to
Server Pac; I was trying to get a good approach. One of the things I read (I
think it was on Planning for Installation book) was related to catalogs. The
recommendation was having one or more disks for Target Libraries, one or
more for Distribution Libraries, one for MCAT and some operational data
sets, one for HFS Target,...and so on. There was also a recommendation about
having a UCAT on each of these disks; I mean, one UCAT for Target LIBs, one
for DLIBs, one for HFS Target,...

But I cannot imagine how can I catalog target data sets for, say, AOP, in
one catalog and distribution data sets for AOP in other catalog. OK, I can
create an alias for DLIBS, but I'm not sure this is a good option.

Could you give me some clues to solve this quiz?


Thank you very much!

Víctor.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Dorting multiple VSAM and PS files

2007-01-31 Thread Reda, John
I think the problem that you are encountering is an operating system
restriction.  If you OPEN a file with a VSAM ACB, when the end of data
condition is encountered VSAM code is not prepared to close the VSAM
data set, clean up the VSAM control blocks, convert the ACB to a DCB
(not sure how this would be done) and reopen the file using the
converted DCB.  The reverse is also true for physical sequential to VSAM
concatenation.  About the only way this would be possible is for the
program to break down the concatenation using dynamic allocation,
rebuild multiple files without the sequential to VSAM conversions, and
then programmatically work through the newly dynamically allocated
files.  This would be an extremely messy situation.  

We understand that this situation can lead to confusion.  If a
programmer codes a concatenated file and the step ends with a RC=0, most
people would assume that all of the data had been read.  To avoid this
confusion SyncSort will post an error message and end with a RC=16.

Sincerely,
John Reda
Software Services Manager
Syncsort Inc.
201-930-8260

 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Gilbert Saint-Flour
 Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 11:53 AM
 To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
 Subject: Re: Dorting multiple VSAM and PS files
 
 On Wednesday 31 January 2007 11:17, Carl Edwards wrote:
 
  I have recently migrated a small VSE system to Z/os.
  evrything went well with one exception.
  The VSE Sort program was able to sort a variety of files, mixed SAM
  and VSAM in one pass.  This is not supported in Z/OS (DFSORT).
  I can write an E15 exit to handle this, but I am somewhat amazed
  that this cabability does not exist in Z/os.
  Has anyone else encounterd this issue?
 
 I certainly have, way too many times!  Just last year, I had a
customer
 which
 had that particular problem in over 700 SORT steps.  Note that this
isn't
 just a DFSORT problem: it also exists with SYNCSORT and CA-SORT.
 
 Over the years, I have used three approaches to solve this problem:
 
 1. a generic E15/E35 exit called VSAMSORT which I first wrote in 1985
 
 2. An ICETOOL step with COPY/COPY/SORT (an obviously more recent
solution)
 
 3. a request to the DFSORT developers to add support for multiple VSAM
 input
 files - that never worked :-(
 
 --
  Gilbert Saint-Flour
  GSF Software
  http://gsf-soft.com/

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Console issue (was SAE and SAR with Visara)

2007-01-31 Thread Dennis Trojak
Have you checked the ROUTCODE setting for SYSCONS?
Dennis 

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Hal Merritt
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 11:33 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Console issue (was SAE and SAR with Visara)

I use that feature, but am very unhappy with the result. It seems a
*lot* of messages are not displayed making it darned difficult to
diagnose a failing IPL. 

Any idea what I might be doing wrong? I have no consoles defined in the
IODF, forcing NIP messages to the HMC. That works ok, but when NIP hands
off control to MVS, many MVS and JES messages just don't appear.

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bruce Black
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 9:16 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SAE and SAR with Visara

 

If you have no non-SNA consoles, you can always use the primative 
console function built into the HMC.  There are instructions in the SAR 
section of the FDR manual (section 15).

-- 
Bruce A. Black
Senior Software Developer for FDR
Innovation Data Processing 973-890-7300
personal: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sales info: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tech support: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: www.innovationdp.fdr.com
 
NOTICE: This electronic mail message and any files transmitted with it
are intended exclusively
for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. The message,
together with any attachment, may contain confidential and/or privileged
information. Any unauthorized review, use, printing, saving, copying,
disclosure 
or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
message in error, please immediately
advise the sender by reply email and delete all copies.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Dorting multiple VSAM and PS files

2007-01-31 Thread Charles Mills
Oh gosh, it would be a very reasonable programming task to enhance a sort
program to have multiple input files that were allocated with separate DD
statements (SORTIN01, SORTIN02, ... ?) and to read them in succession as
though they were a single file.

If Gilbert's exit can do it, surely the roomful of programmers at Syncsort
or IBM could do it.

Charles

P.S. Dorting multiple files, on the other hand, I'm not so confident about
that. g

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Reda, John
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 10:46 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Dorting multiple VSAM and PS files

I think the problem that you are encountering is an operating system
restriction.  If you OPEN a file with a VSAM ACB, when the end of data
condition is encountered VSAM code is not prepared to close the VSAM
data set, clean up the VSAM control blocks, convert the ACB to a DCB
(not sure how this would be done) and reopen the file using the
converted DCB.  The reverse is also true for physical sequential to VSAM
concatenation.  About the only way this would be possible is for the
program to break down the concatenation using dynamic allocation,
rebuild multiple files without the sequential to VSAM conversions, and
then programmatically work through the newly dynamically allocated
files.  This would be an extremely messy situation.  

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Dorting multiple VSAM and PS files

2007-01-31 Thread Gilbert Saint-Flour
John,

The problem is the restriction imposed by the access-method (EOV, mostly) that 
a VSAM data set can't be part of a concatenation.  As a result, if a program 
(SORT or otherwise) wants to read more than one data set and at least one is 
VSAM, then it must use several DD statements and different DD names.

What I would like is that SORT utility programs be enhanced with an option to 
read SORTIN data sets using several DD names, such as SORTIN01-SORTIN99.  
This is already what they do when the command is MERGE, but when the command 
is SORT, the only thing they do is read the SORTIN concatenation .   
Here's an example of what I would like:

 //STEP100 EXEC PGM=SORT
 //SORTIN01 DD DSN=VSAM.DATA.SET,DISP=OLD
 //SORTIN02 DD DSN=NON-VSAM.DATA.SET,DISP=OLD
 //SORTOUT DD DSN=
  SORT FIELDS=(1,8,CH,A)
 /*

-- 
 Gilbert Saint-Flour
 GSF Software
 http://gsf-soft.com/


On Wednesday 31 January 2007 13:46, Reda, John wrote:

 I think the problem that you are encountering is an operating system
 restriction.  If you OPEN a file with a VSAM ACB, when the end of data
 condition is encountered VSAM code is not prepared to close the VSAM
 data set, clean up the VSAM control blocks, convert the ACB to a DCB
 (not sure how this would be done) and reopen the file using the
 converted DCB.  The reverse is also true for physical sequential to VSAM
 concatenation.  About the only way this would be possible is for the
 program to break down the concatenation using dynamic allocation,
 rebuild multiple files without the sequential to VSAM conversions, and
 then programmatically work through the newly dynamically allocated
 files.  This would be an extremely messy situation.
 
 We understand that this situation can lead to confusion.  If a
 programmer codes a concatenated file and the step ends with a RC=0, most
 people would assume that all of the data had been read.  To avoid this
 confusion SyncSort will post an error message and end with a RC=16.
 
 Sincerely,
 John Reda
 Software Services Manager
 Syncsort Inc.
 201-930-8260
 
 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Behalf Of Gilbert Saint-Flour
 Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 11:53 AM
 To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
 Subject: Re: Dorting multiple VSAM and PS files
 
 On Wednesday 31 January 2007 11:17, Carl Edwards wrote:
 
  I have recently migrated a small VSE system to Z/os.
  evrything went well with one exception.
  The VSE Sort program was able to sort a variety of files, mixed SAM
  and VSAM in one pass.  This is not supported in Z/OS (DFSORT).
  I can write an E15 exit to handle this, but I am somewhat amazed
  that this cabability does not exist in Z/os.
  Has anyone else encounterd this issue?
 
 I certainly have, way too many times!  Just last year, I had a customer
 which had that particular problem in over 700 SORT steps.  
 Note that this isn't just a DFSORT problem: it also exists with SYNCSORT
 and CA-SORT. 
 
 Over the years, I have used three approaches to solve this problem:
 
 1. a generic E15/E35 exit called VSAMSORT which I first wrote in 1985
 
 2. An ICETOOL step with COPY/COPY/SORT (an obviously more recent
 solution)
 
 3. a request to the DFSORT developers to add support for multiple VSAM
 input files - that never worked :-(
 
 --
  Gilbert Saint-Flour
  GSF Software
  http://gsf-soft.com/

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Doubt about Server Pac and Catalogs

2007-01-31 Thread John Eells

See below...

Víctor de la Fuente wrote:

I am a newbie on Server Pac, and I read a lot of documentation related to
Server Pac; I was trying to get a good approach. One of the things I 
read (I
think it was on Planning for Installation book) was related to catalogs. 
The

recommendation was having one or more disks for Target Libraries, one or
more for Distribution Libraries, one for MCAT and some operational data
sets, one for HFS Target,...and so on. There was also a recommendation 
about

having a UCAT on each of these disks; I mean, one UCAT for Target LIBs, one
for DLIBs, one for HFS Target,...



Well, not really.  The book recommends using a user catalog to 
own the SMP/E CSI data sets that are on one of the target library 
volumes, and one on the HFS volume if that volume is SMS-managed, 
and then one on each additional product set target volume.



But I cannot imagine how can I catalog target data sets for, say, AOP, in
one catalog and distribution data sets for AOP in other catalog. OK, I can
create an alias for DLIBS, but I'm not sure this is a good option.


Well, you probably do not want the DLIBs to be cataloged in the 
master catalog, but you can either leave them uncataloged (they 
will be located using SMP/E DDDEFs) or catalog them in the user 
catalog used for the DLIB CSI data set.  So, for example, the 
AOP.* target libraries would be cataloged in the target system's 
master catalog, and the DLIBs could be either cataloged or 
renamed (e.g., to DLIB.AOP.*) and then cataloged in the DLIB user 
catalog.




Could you give me some clues to solve this quiz?


Hope this helps.  I'm sure others will chime in, too.

snip


--
John Eells
z/OS Technical Marketing
IBM Poughkeepsie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Console issue (was SAE and SAR with Visara)

2007-01-31 Thread Richard Peurifoy

Dennis Trojak wrote:

Have you checked the ROUTCODE setting for SYSCONS?
Dennis 


-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Hal Merritt
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 11:33 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Console issue (was SAE and SAR with Visara)

I use that feature, but am very unhappy with the result. It seems a
*lot* of messages are not displayed making it darned difficult to
diagnose a failing IPL. 


Any idea what I might be doing wrong? I have no consoles defined in the
IODF, forcing NIP messages to the HMC. That works ok, but when NIP hands
off control to MVS, many MVS and JES messages just don't appear.



Another thought, do you have an AUTOACT group setup so the HMC will
be automatically activated when there are no other available consoles?

--
Richard

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Sorting multiple VSAM and PS files

2007-01-31 Thread Steve Comstock

Gilbert Saint-Flour wrote:

John,

The problem is the restriction imposed by the access-method (EOV, mostly) that 
a VSAM data set can't be part of a concatenation.  As a result, if a program 
(SORT or otherwise) wants to read more than one data set and at least one is 
VSAM, then it must use several DD statements and different DD names.


What I would like is that SORT utility programs be enhanced with an option to 
read SORTIN data sets using several DD names, such as SORTIN01-SORTIN99.  
This is already what they do when the command is MERGE, but when the command 
is SORT, the only thing they do is read the SORTIN concatenation .   
Here's an example of what I would like:


 //STEP100 EXEC PGM=SORT
 //SORTIN01 DD DSN=VSAM.DATA.SET,DISP=OLD
 //SORTIN02 DD DSN=NON-VSAM.DATA.SET,DISP=OLD
 //SORTOUT DD DSN=
  SORT FIELDS=(1,8,CH,A)
 /*



Uh, you mean DISP=SHR on those input files, right?

Kind regards,


-Steve Comstock
The Trainer's Friend, Inc.

303-393-8716
http://www.trainersfriend.com

-- to be included in our opt-in list of announcements of
-- new courses and other products and services from The
-- Trainer's Friend, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Doubt about Server Pac and Catalogs

2007-01-31 Thread Mark Zelden

Víctor de la Fuente wrote:
 I am a newbie on Server Pac, and I read a lot of documentation related to
 Server Pac; 
snip

I can understand his pain.  I have done many over the years but I am
in the process of doing my first one since OS/390 2.10 (although I've
helped others during z/OS 1.4 and z/OS 1.6).  The amount of documentation
can be overwhelming - even to a seasoned sysprog.  


Well, not really.  The book recommends using a user catalog to
own the SMP/E CSI data sets that are on one of the target library
volumes, and one on the HFS volume if that volume is SMS-managed,
and then one on each additional product set target volume.


I have use one CPAC master catalog and one SSA for everything for
all the ones I have done (many in the past while consulting). This
time... 2 HLQs - one for SYS1 and one for our systems HLQ that gets
used for SMP/E and CPAC datasets like CMDPROC, DOCLIB, etc. I then
MERGECAT the that HLQ back into the proper catalog sometime after
the SSA is removed from the physical data sets.  

At other shops I still used one SSA / catalog but there might be 
many other SSA relationships (SYS1,ISP,ISF,GIM, etc.).  However,
I like the SYS1.* approach for everything including HFS files
(SYS1.OMVS.resvol.ROOT, SYS1.OMVS.resvol.TIVOLI, etc.).  
 
John, 

One thing I still don't like is that the system upgrade option doesn't
let you define a catalog. I still want to create one as a work 
catalog.  I have to do this on my own.  Do you know why that isn't
an option?


 But I cannot imagine how can I catalog target data sets for, say, AOP, in
 one catalog and distribution data sets for AOP in other catalog. OK, I can
 create an alias for DLIBS, but I'm not sure this is a good option.

Well, you probably do not want the DLIBs to be cataloged in the
master catalog, but you can either leave them uncataloged (they
will be located using SMP/E DDDEFs) or catalog them in the user
catalog used for the DLIB CSI data set. 

snip

I have a mixture here. Some systems have some DLIBs cataloged (blast
from the past?) and some only have a few dlibs cataloged.  I still find
lots of JCL with SYS1.AMODGEN and SYS1.AMACLIB. (just last week a CICS
guy called me and asked me where SYS1.AMODGEN was on one system where
it wasn't cataloged... I told him to use SYS1.MODGEN instead).  The ones
that are cataloged are cataloged in the master catalog using a system 
symbolic for the volser. When I upgrade, I change IEASYMxx.  

BTW... kudos to IBM for electronic Serverpac delivery!  This was my 
first one doing 100% electronic (it wasn't available when we did 
our 1.6 ESP and we skipped 1.7). It sure beats mounting tapes!

The only thing I didn't like was downloading 16GB of CD images 
additional material).  There was no download all option so
I had to select each one individually. I also ran into a few
file problems (according to download director). The download director
won't let you skip one file so you have to cancel the whole thing 
and start over (and not re-select the files you already downloaded). 
A lot of data compared to the measly 5.6G for the z/OS portion of 
the order. :-)

Regards,

Mark
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead
Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group:  G-ITO
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
z/OS and OS390 expert at http://searchDataCenter.com/ateExperts/
Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: VTAM recovery of FICON CTC links

2007-01-31 Thread Patrick O'Keefe
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 10:58:42 -0500, Knutson, Sam [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

If you are using or planning to use FICON CTC links (for VTAM) you might
want to get on the interested parties list or open your own marketing
request to IBM the same as

MR0413054727 VTAM RECOVERY OF FICON CTC LINKS
MR0130072900 VTAM RECOVERY OF FICON CTC LINKS
...
At IPL you may see an error and not get cross domain links active.

IST380I ERROR FOR ID = MPLBTOHZ - REQUEST: ACTLINK, SENSE: 081C003C
...

Yow!  I think we are planning this migration soon and will definitely be
hit by this.  Thanks for the heads up.

Pat O'Keefe

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Need ideas - IRADU00 output very large.

2007-01-31 Thread McKown, John
On the off chance that anybody is interested, I have finally created a
SAS dataset containing the input from all 21 tapes. It contains
35,122,765 observations. It is 903,000 tracks in 346 extents on 27
volumes.

Now to try to run some statistics burr on those observations.

--
John McKown
Senior Systems Programmer
HealthMarkets
Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage
Administrative Services Group
Information Technology

The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged
and/or confidential.  It is for intended addressee(s) only.  If you are
not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure,
reproduction, distribution or other use of this communication is
strictly prohibited and could, in certain circumstances, be a criminal
offense.  If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the
sender by reply and delete this message without copying or disclosing
it. 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: VTAM recovery of FICON CTC links

2007-01-31 Thread Mark Zelden
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:50:06 -0600, Patrick O'Keefe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 10:58:42 -0500, Knutson, Sam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

If you are using or planning to use FICON CTC links (for VTAM) you might
want to get on the interested parties list or open your own marketing
request to IBM the same as

MR0413054727 VTAM RECOVERY OF FICON CTC LINKS
MR0130072900 VTAM RECOVERY OF FICON CTC LINKS
...
At IPL you may see an error and not get cross domain links active.

IST380I ERROR FOR ID = MPLBTOHZ - REQUEST: ACTLINK, SENSE: 081C003C
...

Yow!  I think we are planning this migration soon and will definitely be
hit by this.  Thanks for the heads up.

Pat O'Keefe


I passed Sam's post on to our VTAM folks and they said we have not
run into this issue as far as they know (don't know why). We have been
using FICON CTCs for more than 3 years now. 

BTW, thanks for the post Sam.  Always great information!

Mark
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead
Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group:  G-ITO
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
z/OS and OS390 expert at http://searchDataCenter.com/ateExperts/
Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Doubt about Server Pac and Catalogs

2007-01-31 Thread Jousma, David
 I'm just the opposite.  The finished state for my systems, is to have
no SMPE TARGET's or DLIB's cataloged at all.  It would be nice if
Serverpack didn't require the targets to be cataloged as part of the
allocds/RESTORE job(with the exception of HFS/ZFS).  The dialogs know
what volumes they are being allocted to when restoring them all.  It
just seems easier because then there really is no use for the SSA's as
far as I can tell.  Every serverpac I do, I setup the dialogs with the
names I want, but then before I run the alloc job, I modify the
jobstream and change the target datasets.  I do the same in the restore
job, and when completed, uncatalog, and rename all the datasets to what
I wanted in the first place.  If the restore job just had a vol=ser
reference in the dd statements, I wouldn't even have to do that.



Dave Jousma
Principal Systems Programmer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
616.653.8429



 
John, 

One thing I still don't like is that the system upgrade option doesn't
let you define a catalog. I still want to create one as a work
catalog.  I have to do this on my own.  Do you know why that isn't an
option?


 But I cannot imagine how can I catalog target data sets for, say,
AOP, in
 one catalog and distribution data sets for AOP in other catalog. OK,
I can
 create an alias for DLIBS, but I'm not sure this is a good option.

Well, you probably do not want the DLIBs to be cataloged in the
master catalog, but you can either leave them uncataloged (they
will be located using SMP/E DDDEFs) or catalog them in the user
catalog used for the DLIB CSI data set. 

snip


This e-mail transmission contains information that is confidential and may be 
privileged.   It is intended only for the addressee(s) named above. If you 
receive this e-mail in error, please do not read, copy or disseminate it in any 
manner. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, 
distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. Please 
reply to the message immediately by informing the sender that the message was 
misdirected. After replying, please erase it from your computer system. Your 
assistance in correcting this error is appreciated.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Need ideas - IRADU00 output very large.

2007-01-31 Thread Hal Merritt
Yes. Yes. Inquiring minds want to know!!

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of McKown, John
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 2:52 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Need ideas - IRADU00 output very large.

On the off chance that anybody is interested, I have finally created a
SAS dataset containing the input from all 21 tapes. It contains
35,122,765 observations. It is 903,000 tracks in 346 extents on 27
volumes.

Now to try to run some statistics burr on those observations.

--
John McKown
Senior Systems Programmer
HealthMarkets
Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage
Administrative Services Group
Information Technology
 
NOTICE: This electronic mail message and any files transmitted with it are 
intended exclusively
for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. The message, together 
with any attachment, may contain confidential and/or privileged
information. Any unauthorized review, use, printing, saving, copying, 
disclosure 
or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in 
error, please immediately
advise the sender by reply email and delete all copies.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: CA web site

2007-01-31 Thread Ted MacNEIL
Come on Ted; we are talking about CA here (remember, the good guys). I do
not believe we have ever charged for how-to questions, recommendations or to


I was talking in general.
And, I forgot the smiley.

But, I can name a specific helpdesk that charges: RIM (I bet you were expecting 
somebody else?).

Before they will even talk to you, they request a credit card number and expiry 
date.
By IVR, no less.

-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!  

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Doubt about Server Pac and Catalogs

2007-01-31 Thread Mark Zelden
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:58:43 -0500, Jousma, David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I'm just the opposite.  The finished state for my systems, is to have
no SMPE TARGET's or DLIB's cataloged at all.  It would be nice if
Serverpack didn't require the targets to be cataloged as part of the
allocds/RESTORE job(with the exception of HFS/ZFS).  The dialogs know
what volumes they are being allocted to when restoring them all.  It
just seems easier because then there really is no use for the SSA's as
far as I can tell.  Every serverpac I do, I setup the dialogs with the
names I want, but then before I run the alloc job, I modify the
jobstream and change the target datasets.  I do the same in the restore
job, and when completed, uncatalog, and rename all the datasets to what
I wanted in the first place.  If the restore job just had a vol=ser
reference in the dd statements, I wouldn't even have to do that.


That won't work for HFS/zFS since you can't mount by VOLSER.  Also a 
problem for SMS managed DSNs since they have to be cataloged.  

When you say no SMP/E targets are cataloged, do you mean they are 
a different name than the live cataloged versions? My SMP/E targets
aren't cataloged either in that sense.  They have the same name but
are referenced via DDDEF with VOLSER.   That is why I am able to
throw away the CPAC master catalog after DSNs have been renamed 
to remove the SSA (and DDDEFs have been updated via supplied job).

Mark
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead
Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group:  G-ITO
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
z/OS and OS390 expert at http://searchDataCenter.com/ateExperts/
Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Who intercepted SVC 26?

2007-01-31 Thread Tony Harminc
Bob Rutledge wrote:

 In IPCS option 0, set the source to active and then enter
 
 ip l 10?+c8?+84?+d0? str l(512)
 
 This will show you who's actually handling SVC 26 (it's 
 CVT-SVCT-SVCTABLE-entry for SVC 26-entry point).

It's probably a lot faster to do the same thing using TSO TEST. Essentially
the same syntax, but you'll need dots after the address (optional in IPCS
unless the address has no numerics in it, but required in TEST).

So:

l 10.?+c8?+84?+d0? xc l(512)

Tony H.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Need ideas - IRADU00 output very large.

2007-01-31 Thread Michael Babcock
We had a situation last year with excessive records.  Someone turned on 
AUDIT on an ID.  That logged everything that ID did and he was a very 
active user. 


McKown, John wrote:

On the off chance that anybody is interested, I have finally created a
SAS dataset containing the input from all 21 tapes. It contains
35,122,765 observations. It is 903,000 tracks in 346 extents on 27
volumes.

Now to try to run some statistics burr on those observations.


  


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Getting control

2007-01-31 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 01/29/2007
   at 09:04 AM, Charles Mills [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:

I guess for any of these approaches, the question becomes how tight
does this have to be/how clever (or malicious) are your users? 

Also, what will it break?
 
-- 
 Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
 ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html 
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Need ideas - IRADU00 output very large.

2007-01-31 Thread R.S.

McKown, John wrote:

On the off chance that anybody is interested, I have finally created a
SAS dataset containing the input from all 21 tapes. It contains
35,122,765 observations. It is 903,000 tracks in 346 extents on 27
volumes.

Now to try to run some statistics burr on those observations.



That's only approx 50GB g
In fact, I had to do with 10+ GB IRRADU files and the size was *typical* 
for the datacenter. I also had to do with SMF file approx. 1TB (yes, 
TERAbyte) for given month - although it was by mistake of CICS guy.
I didn't have to much trouble to process the data. Mainframe is 
*dedicated* to process huge amounts of data, isn't it ?


My $0.02
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: VTAM recovery of FICON CTC links

2007-01-31 Thread Patrick O'Keefe
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:04:00 -0600, Mark Zelden [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

...
Someone else told me they have seen the problem - but only when
a CEC was down for hardware changes and other LPARs IPLed.  But
many LPARs being IPLed at different times is SOP during scheduled
outage windows once a month.
...

That would make sense if the active/passive relationship were determined
when the hardware initialized rather than at IPL time.  Unfortunately
we try to keep one CEC (CPC now, I think) up whenever we do a POR so we
would occassionally run into this.   All we have to do to avoid it is
make sure our PORs are timed to happen simultaneously and finish within
milliseconds of each other.  

Pat O'Keefe 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: SORT question

2007-01-31 Thread Martin Kerner
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 15:34:52 -0800, Frank Yaeger wrote:

I have a question for you (or anyone else on the list if they can shed some
light on it) about something I'm curious about.  I noticed you said
DFHSORT instead of DFSORT (Data Facility Sort).  You're not the first
person to call it that.  Any particular reason why you inserted the H?

I'm sure that was a freudian whatever for DFSHORT :-)
Sorry guys, I couldn't resist; keep up your good work.
/martin

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Who intercepted SVC 26?

2007-01-31 Thread Bob Rutledge

Nah.  That would be way too easy! :-)

Bob, clearly spending way too much time in dumps.

Tony Harminc wrote:

Bob Rutledge wrote:


In IPCS ...


It's probably a lot faster to do the same thing using TSO TEST. Essentially
the same syntax, but you'll need dots after the address (optional in IPCS
unless the address has no numerics in it, but required in TEST).

So:

l 10.?+c8?+84?+d0? xc l(512)


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: SORT question

2007-01-31 Thread Charles Mills
So many MVS utilities have vernacular names that consist of a 3-letter
prefix followed by a functional name, they just seem to roll off the tongue
that way: I-E-B-copy, I-E-H-program, I-E-B-gener, I-E-B-print/punch,
I-E-H-init, I-E-H-list, I-E-B-update, D-F-H-sort.

I-D-C-access-method-services seems to fit the same pattern but everyone
calls it I-D-cams. I guess IBM should have given it an entry point of
IDCSVCES; then we could call it I-D-C-services.

Charles

-Original Message-

On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 15:34:52 -0800, Frank Yaeger wrote:

I have a question for you (or anyone else on the list if they can shed some
light on it) about something I'm curious about.  I noticed you said
DFHSORT instead of DFSORT (Data Facility Sort).  You're not the first
person to call it that.  Any particular reason why you inserted the H?
a.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Need ideas - IRADU00 output very large.

2007-01-31 Thread McKown, John
 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R.S.
 Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 4:35 PM
 To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
 Subject: Re: Need ideas - IRADU00 output very large.
 
 
 McKown, John wrote:
  On the off chance that anybody is interested, I have 
 finally created a 
  SAS dataset containing the input from all 21 tapes. It contains 
  35,122,765 observations. It is 903,000 tracks in 346 extents on 27 
  volumes.
  
  Now to try to run some statistics burr on those observations.
  
 
 That's only approx 50GB g
 In fact, I had to do with 10+ GB IRRADU files and the size 
 was *typical* 
 for the datacenter. I also had to do with SMF file approx. 1TB (yes, 
 TERAbyte) for given month - although it was by mistake of 
 CICS guy. I didn't have to much trouble to process the data. 
 Mainframe is 
 *dedicated* to process huge amounts of data, isn't it ?
 
 My $0.02
 -- 
 Radoslaw Skorupka
 Lodz, Poland

True. But we were a small shop with a small shop mentality. We only
recently started getting more of a large shop mentality (i.e. you
don't get something done by calling a friend and just asking for
something, you formally request it).

But I have a winner. One jobname came up with over 25 million RACF
records. Likewise a particular day came up with over 25 million RACF
records. And it __appears__ that the job, run on that same day, is still
on the JES2 SPOOL. Of course, I must verify this futher. But, off hand,
I don't yet see exactly what has happened. But the job is a code and
go in CA-Easytrieve Plus, which I don't really know much about. More
analysis needed. But I'll bet that it is multiple OPENs of an input file
(maybe one per record read?).

--
John McKown
Senior Systems Programmer
HealthMarkets
Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage
Administrative Services Group
Information Technology

This message (including any attachments) contains confidential
information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and its
content is protected by law.  If you are not the intended recipient, you
should delete this message and are hereby notified that any disclosure,
copying, or distribution of this transmission, or taking any action
based on it, is strictly prohibited. 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Sorting multiple VSAM and PS files

2007-01-31 Thread Clark Morris
On 31 Jan 2007 12:22:38 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:

On Wednesday 31 January 2007 14:53, Reda, John wrote:

 This is clearly much more feasible than programming around the
 restriction.  I will speak with the Development Group about this.

Thanks, John, your help is much appreciated.

There's a fourth solution around this problem I forgot to mention: 
  convert VSAM files to non-VSAM.  

In VSE, sequential files which have no need to be VSAM are often defined as 
VSAM ESDS, simply because DASD management is so deficient in VSE.  
Then you have VSAM-managed SAM files, which, among other things, can be 
processed indifferently as VSAM or non-VSAM by application or utility 
programs.   Quite confusing if you ask me.

Converting files from VSAM to non-VSAM require source-code changes, but it can 
lead to many negative side-effects which make it risky business.   
In other words, if you think that changing -AS- to -S- in the ASSIGN clause 
of an ESDS in COBOL is a simple and easy way to make it non-VSAM, 
you may be in for quite a surprise later on.   Having said that, we have 
converted thousands of VSAM files to non-VSAM in recent years, 
and acquired much experience in the process.

Of course if IBM had ever fully understood the implications of the
SHARE Guide Language Futures Task Force (or Guide SHARE depending on
perspective), we wouldn't have this happy horse manure about having to
differentiate in the program between an ESDS and a QSAM data set.  In
fact we wouldn't have to change the program if we wanted to read a
KSDS with the same record description.  I want to be able to
concatenate an ESDS and a QSAM data set if they share a record
description.  It is arcanity like this that frustrates me about the z
platform.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Need ideas - IRADU00 output very large.

2007-01-31 Thread Rick Fochtman

snip-
But I have a winner. One jobname came up with over 25 million RACF 
records. Likewise a particular day came up with over 25 million RACF 
records. And it __appears__ that the job, run on that same day, is still 
on the JES2 SPOOL. Of course, I must verify this futher. But, off hand, 
I don't yet see exactly what has happened. But the job is a code and 
go in CA-Easytrieve Plus, which I don't really know much about. More 
analysis needed. But I'll bet that it is multiple OPENs of an input file 
(maybe one per record read?).

unsnip---
I can't speak for your particular situation, but I know from prior 
experience that SleazyTrieve does a LOT of OPEN/CLOSE activity. And 
the more complex the selections, the more OPENs/CLOSEs it seems to do.


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: TN3270 server offload options

2007-01-31 Thread Timothy Sipples
Patrick O'Keefe writes:
If the shops I've seen are any example, there are many thousands
(millions?) of lines of online application code whose function depends
on knowing and understanding LU names.  This is not for security, but
for setting the application environment: this user gets this print queue,
this mailing address, access to this database, etc.  Whether that is a
reasonable design is irrelevant; it exists, and it is too deeply embedded
to change without major redesign.

Absolutely true. I generally advise at least reviewing these sorts of
issues. There are many cases (e.g. print LUs) where it may be possible to
change strategies and let a modern TN3270 gateway -- CS z/OS certainly
qualifies -- handle some or all of the LU assignment logic previously
hardcoded. It depends.

Even so, that does not argue for offloaded Tn3270 servers.  If anything,
it argues for the need to centralize maintenance of the various LU pools
so that changes or additions to LU names don't conflict with existing
names.

Yes indeed -- very good point.

And THAT argues against the value of an outboard Tn3270 server as
protection against a Denial of Service attack.  Unless the only IP
service you provide is Tn3270 you still to provide access to your host.
It protects you against a DoD attack directed to your Tn3270 port on
your Tn3270 server's IP address.  It does nothing to protect you from a
DoS attack directed at any port on your hosts.  It doesn't even mean one
less port on your host; you still may use port 23 (or whatever port you
choose) on your host for Telnet or Tn3270.

Agreed, TN3270 is rarely the only IP service.  Let's remember also you can
have all sorts of attacks without IP.  Install any offboard server, connect
it to another (such as a mainframe), trust it for application interaction
of any kind (e.g. traditional LU6.2), and you've now got a potential attack
vector.  Nothing new here.  I would argue that complex (i.e. multi-tier)
infrastructures are inherently more difficult to secure than simpler ones,
and hopefully that isn't a controversial idea.

Security-oriented people must also be very careful in understanding the
human element. If you build a total moat around your mainframe and make it
hard for even legitimate access to information, then workers are simply
going to figure out a way to get their jobs done, and it probably won't be
the way you intended. I saw one organization with an end user department
that set up clusters of Windows machines which did nothing but 3270 screen
scrape, using a single user ID, in order to replicate a database
(effectively) so they could run a data cleansing program of their own
design then upload the new contents. Of course that wasn't a technical
problem -- mainframes can run such programs just fine, written in any
particular language you like, developed using end-user friendly graphical
tools, and SAF/RACF-protected so they only do what they're supposed to do
-- but that's what happened when two groups failed to work together. And
the resulting solution was anything but secure. (Imagine if one of those
machines caught the wrong worm or virus. Game over.)

Chris Mason writes:
Watching the responses to your post, if seems a popular offload option
is
to onload.

I think that's right, although I want to be careful and say never say
never.  There are a couple interesting corner solutions where it might be
appropriate to run an offboard TN3270 gateway, but it requires some careful
consideration.

- - - - -
Timothy Sipples
IBM Consulting Enterprise Software Architect
Specializing in Software Architectures Related to System z
Based in Tokyo, Serving IBM Japan and IBM Asia-Pacific
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Console issue (was SAE and SAR with Visara)

2007-01-31 Thread Bruce Hewson
Hello Hal,

My SYSCONS entry from CONSOLxx member

// 
CONSOLE DEVNUM(SYSCONS)   /* MCONS - HMC*/ 
NAME(SYSNAME.HMC) 
AUTH(MASTER)   
ROUTCODE(ALL)  
MSCOPE(ALL)
CMDSYS(*)  
/*  */ 

I have found it impossible to LOGON to a HMC console, but the session can 
be auto-logon via USERID=ConsoleName. (LOGON processing is 3270 datastream 
only :-( )

Secondly, we use the HMC for all IPLs, with no NIP consoles defined.
But we are parallel SYSPLEX, and it is a very rare occurrence when we have 
all sysplex members down.

In that event, and the first system does not IPL we take a SA-Dump, and 
read the captured syslog on an active system.

Regards
Bruce Hewson

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Dorting multiple VSAM and PS files

2007-01-31 Thread Ed Gould

On Jan 31, 2007, at 10:53 AM, Gilbert Saint-Flour wrote:
-SNIP-


I certainly have, way too many times!  Just last year, I had a  
customer which
had that particular problem in over 700 SORT steps.  Note that this  
isn't

just a DFSORT problem: it also exists with SYNCSORT and CA-SORT.

Over the years, I have used three approaches to solve this problem:

1. a generic E15/E35 exit called VSAMSORT which I first wrote in 1985

2. An ICETOOL step with COPY/COPY/SORT (an obviously more recent  
solution)


3. a request to the DFSORT developers to add support for multiple  
VSAM input

files - that never worked :-(

--
 Gilbert Saint-Flour
 GSF Software
 http://gsf-soft.com/


I am guessing but would a MERGE do it? The records are pretty much in  
sequence right? (I am guessing its a keyed file).


I do find this strange that it would not work as it would be a  
reasonable thing to do, no?


Ed

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Re: Doubt about Server Pac and Catalogs

2007-01-31 Thread Víctor de la Fuente

From my little knowledge, I prefer not cataloging more datasets than

necessary in the master. I don't know if this is a wrong positioning. Is it?
Nevertheless, my main doubts are the catalogs I should use...

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html


Ditto to copy 3480 to 3590 tape

2007-01-31 Thread Victor Zhang
Hi all,
Is it possible to ditto to copy all files residing on 3480 tape to 3590 
tape? Of course the source tape drive is 3480/3490 tape drive and target 
drive is 3590 drive.
I have an installation media that will be used in a datacenter where there 
is no 3480/3490 tape drives.

Regards
Victor

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html