SMP GIM58903W Message
This is the message relating to the new FIXCAT MCS with smpe at rel 34 or below. My question is why would I get this msg on my z1.9 system that was installed using serverpac and smp v35? When receiving the latest RSU maintenance on my z19 system I got just one of these messages. Secondly are the commands below correct, to fix this problem. Anything else to look out for? Thanks Set bdy(global). Upgrade. Set bdy(target). Upgrade. Set bdy(dlib). Upgrade. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: SMPE Help
Since I have back ups of all files (hfs&smp) I plan to restore to just before the apply, run the zoneedit job to change my path dddef's, run apply check and verify. Thanks for your help. Matt >>> "Chase, John" 4/14/2009 1:50 PM >>> > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Tom Marchant > > On Tue, 14 Apr 2009 12:03:06 -0500, Staller, Allan wrote: > > > >As to the original question/problem. An APPLY REDO should put everything > >back in sync, after, of course, correcting the issue that caused the > >failure > > It will not undo the changes that were done to his production HFS data sets. RESTORE should handle that (unless something got ++DELETEd). -jc- -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: SMPE Help
Jerry, you are correct I did not run job UPDDDUV. That explains the self
inflected wound.
Thanks
>>> Jerry Fuchs 4/14/2009 1:07 PM >>>
I found that job UPDDDUV from the server pac install did
SET BDY(MVST100) .
ZONEEDIT DDDEF .
CHANGE PATH('/Service/'*,
'/'*) .
ENDZONEEDIT .
Fortunately I bypassed this step, but would explain how your SMPE got that
way
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: SMPE Help
I have back ups of everything before I started so I can recover. There are over 1000 DDDEF's, how do I go about determining which ones need to be changed? Anybody have a sample batch job? Thanks Tom- point taken on the non-descriptive subject matter and agreed. Hast makes waste... >>> Tom Marchant 4/14/2009 10:24 AM >>> On Tue, 14 Apr 2009 09:33:12 -0400, Matt Dazzo wrote: >Need some direction on how to correct this self inflicted wound on my z1.9 sand box system. I ran an smp apply for RSU maintenance and forgot to mount my alternate HFS files under /service before starting. Below are some messages from DD BPXPRINT and the first error msg in SMPOUT. I believe the BPX error I got was a space issue but then I realized I forgot to mount the HFS files under /service. > >Has my primary HFS files been compromised? Where do I go from here? Thanks Matt > > >1BPXF151I BPXCOPY WAS INVOKED FOR HEAD ID 000254. > BPXF150I MVS DATA SET WITH DDNAME SYSUT1 SUCCESSFULLY COPIED INTO TEXT HFS FILE /usr/lpp/cpo/IBM/CPOCPREG. >1BPXF151I BPXCOPY WAS INVOKED FOR HEAD ID 000255. > BPXF150I MVS DATA SET WITH DDNAME SYSUT1 SUCCESSFULLY COPIED INTO TEXT HFS FILE /usr/lpp/cpo/IBM/CPOCPSCH. >1BPXF151I BPXCOPY WAS INVOKED FOR HEAD ID 000256. > BPXF150I MVS DATA SET WITH DDNAME SYSUT1 SUCCESSFULLY COPIED INTO TEXT HFS FILE /usr/lpp/cpo/IBM/CPOENV. >1BPXF151I BPXCOPY WAS INVOKED FOR HEAD ID 000257. > BPXF150I MVS DATA SET WITH DDNAME SYSUT1 SUCCESSFULLY COPIED INTO BINARY HFS FILE /usr/lpp/cpo/IBM/CPOHWMC. >1BPXF151I BPXCOPY WAS INVOKED FOR HEAD ID 000258. > BPXF106E RETURN CODE 0085, REASON CODE 5B4FC005. AN ERROR OCCURRED DURING THE WRITING TO HFS FILE /usr/lpp/cpo/IBM/CPOS > > > >GIM69168E ** HFSCOPY PROCESSING TO THE SCPOHFS LIBRARY FAILED FOR HFS CPOSETUP > IN SYSMOD UA39307. THE RETURN CODE (12) EXCEEDED THE ALLOWABLE > VALUE. DATE 09.103 - TIME 15:46:53 - SEQUENCE NUMBER 000258. >GIM30216IAPPLY PROCESSING FAILED FOR SYSMOD UA39307. SYSTEM UTILITY > PROCESSING FAILED FOR AN ELEMENT IN UA39307. If I am reading this correctly, none of your updates were to /service/ What to your DDDEF PATH entries look like? They should all specify path names beginning with /service. If they do not, mounting your maintenance HFS files would not have helped you. In that case, any previous maintenance that you applied was likely done incorrectly also. BTW, "SMPE Help" is not a very descriptive subject. -- Tom Marchant -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
SMPE Help
Need some direction on how to correct this self inflicted wound on my z1.9 sand box system. I ran an smp apply for RSU maintenance and forgot to mount my alternate HFS files under /service before starting. Below are some messages from DD BPXPRINT and the first error msg in SMPOUT. I believe the BPX error I got was a space issue but then I realized I forgot to mount the HFS files under /service. Has my primary HFS files been compromised? Where do I go from here? Thanks Matt 1BPXF151I BPXCOPY WAS INVOKED FOR HEAD ID 000254. BPXF150I MVS DATA SET WITH DDNAME SYSUT1 SUCCESSFULLY COPIED INTO TEXT HFS FILE /usr/lpp/cpo/IBM/CPOCPREG. 1BPXF151I BPXCOPY WAS INVOKED FOR HEAD ID 000255. BPXF150I MVS DATA SET WITH DDNAME SYSUT1 SUCCESSFULLY COPIED INTO TEXT HFS FILE /usr/lpp/cpo/IBM/CPOCPSCH. 1BPXF151I BPXCOPY WAS INVOKED FOR HEAD ID 000256. BPXF150I MVS DATA SET WITH DDNAME SYSUT1 SUCCESSFULLY COPIED INTO TEXT HFS FILE /usr/lpp/cpo/IBM/CPOENV. 1BPXF151I BPXCOPY WAS INVOKED FOR HEAD ID 000257. BPXF150I MVS DATA SET WITH DDNAME SYSUT1 SUCCESSFULLY COPIED INTO BINARY HFS FILE /usr/lpp/cpo/IBM/CPOHWMC. 1BPXF151I BPXCOPY WAS INVOKED FOR HEAD ID 000258. BPXF106E RETURN CODE 0085, REASON CODE 5B4FC005. AN ERROR OCCURRED DURING THE WRITING TO HFS FILE /usr/lpp/cpo/IBM/CPOS GIM69168E ** HFSCOPY PROCESSING TO THE SCPOHFS LIBRARY FAILED FOR HFS CPOSETUP IN SYSMOD UA39307. THE RETURN CODE (12) EXCEEDED THE ALLOWABLE VALUE. DATE 09.103 - TIME 15:46:53 - SEQUENCE NUMBER 000258. GIM30216IAPPLY PROCESSING FAILED FOR SYSMOD UA39307. SYSTEM UTILITY PROCESSING FAILED FOR AN ELEMENT IN UA39307. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: SMPE Help
Thanks all >>> "Barkow, Eileen" 4/2/2009 11:39 AM >>> I think that you can just delete the zoneindex from the global zone. UCLIN . DEL GLOBALZONE ZONEINDEX( (&ANAME) ) . ENDUCL . -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Matt Dazzo Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 11:26 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: SMPE Help I'll leave out the details to keep this pithy. I did the below ADD GZONE but now want to delete it. I tried a zoneexport with purge, the job got RC=00. The smp listing states the zone was deleted but when looking in smpe it's still there. What is the best way to delete this zone? An example would be great. Thanks SET BDY (GLOBAL) . UCLIN . ADD GZONE ZINDEX((TZOS19A,SMPE.ZOS19.GLOBAL.CSI,TARGET)) . ENDUCL. export job run to do the purge SETBDY (TZOS19A) . ZONEEXPORT (TZOS19A) OUTFILE(EXPORT1) PURGE . /EXPORT1 DD DSN=xxx.xxx -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
SMPE Help
I'll leave out the details to keep this pithy. I did the below ADD GZONE but now want to delete it. I tried a zoneexport with purge, the job got RC=00. The smp listing states the zone was deleted but when looking in smpe it's still there. What is the best way to delete this zone? An example would be great. Thanks SET BDY (GLOBAL) . UCLIN . ADD GZONE ZINDEX((TZOS19A,SMPE.ZOS19.GLOBAL.CSI,TARGET)) . ENDUCL. export job run to do the purge SETBDY (TZOS19A) . ZONEEXPORT (TZOS19A) OUTFILE(EXPORT1) PURGE . /EXPORT1 DD DSN=xxx.xxx -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: IEE252I MSG's
It appears that an old parameter SHRLIBMAXPAGES in BPXPARMxx was set causing an exception with check USS_PARMLIB. I corrected the member, did a refresh on the BPX member and the check. I will monitor the console but looks like the check was doing it. thanks all >>> "Jousma, David" 3/23/2009 10:54 AM >>> Matt, Can you paste the entire message including all the data that is to the left of the message ID from SYSLOG? Might help to determine what is generating that message. Could be Health Checker, or something else. _ Dave Jousma Assistant Vice President, Mainframe Services david.jou...@53.com 1830 East Paris, Grand Rapids, MI 49546 MD RSCB1G p 616.653.8429 f 616.653.8497 -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Matt Dazzo Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 9:56 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: IEE252I MSG's z1.9 is up and running in our sandbox, currently using all HFS and no zFS files systems. I noticed that every hour on the hour I get msg's below on the system log. I searched IBM and found APAR Identifier .. OA17269 but that relates to zFS files systems. Anyone else getting these msg's with HFS and is there a way stop them? IEE252I MEMBER BPXPRMZ9 FOUND IN SYS1.PARMLIB IEE252I MEMBER BPXPRM00 FOUND IN SYS1.PARMLIB Thanks Matt This e-mail transmission contains information that is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended only for the addressee(s) named above. If you receive this e-mail in error, please do not read, copy or disseminate it in any manner. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. Please reply to the message immediately by informing the sender that the message was misdirected. After replying, please erase it from your computer system. Your assistance in correcting this error is appreciated. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: IEE252I MSG's
Dave, here you go. At this time there is no automation up and running. Thanks N 000 SYS1 09082 10:41:45.91 0290 IEE252I MEMBER BPXPRMZ9 FOUND IN SYS1.PARMLIB N 000 SYS1 09082 10:41:46.04 0290 IEE252I MEMBER BPXPRM00 FOUND IN SYS1.PARMLIB >>> "Jousma, David" 3/23/2009 10:54 AM >>> Matt, Can you paste the entire message including all the data that is to the left of the message ID from SYSLOG? Might help to determine what is generating that message. Could be Health Checker, or something else. _ Dave Jousma Assistant Vice President, Mainframe Services david.jou...@53.com 1830 East Paris, Grand Rapids, MI 49546 MD RSCB1G p 616.653.8429 f 616.653.8497 -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Matt Dazzo Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 9:56 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: IEE252I MSG's z1.9 is up and running in our sandbox, currently using all HFS and no zFS files systems. I noticed that every hour on the hour I get msg's below on the system log. I searched IBM and found APAR Identifier .. OA17269 but that relates to zFS files systems. Anyone else getting these msg's with HFS and is there a way stop them? IEE252I MEMBER BPXPRMZ9 FOUND IN SYS1.PARMLIB IEE252I MEMBER BPXPRM00 FOUND IN SYS1.PARMLIB Thanks Matt This e-mail transmission contains information that is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended only for the addressee(s) named above. If you receive this e-mail in error, please do not read, copy or disseminate it in any manner. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. Please reply to the message immediately by informing the sender that the message was misdirected. After replying, please erase it from your computer system. Your assistance in correcting this error is appreciated. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
IEE252I MSG's
z1.9 is up and running in our sandbox, currently using all HFS and no zFS files systems. I noticed that every hour on the hour I get msg's below on the system log. I searched IBM and found APAR Identifier .. OA17269 but that relates to zFS files systems. Anyone else getting these msg's with HFS and is there a way stop them? IEE252I MEMBER BPXPRMZ9 FOUND IN SYS1.PARMLIB IEE252I MEMBER BPXPRM00 FOUND IN SYS1.PARMLIB Thanks Matt -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: z/OS 1.9 installation ROOT ETC and VAR
I'd like to jump in here as I have a question along the same line. We are 1.7 going to 1.9, 1.9 is up in our sand box (non shared environment) with all the serverpac provided HFS's (going zfs in the future) mounted with no problems. The migration guide states that there could be customer configured files in /etc and /var that should be merged into the new 1.9 HFS /etc and /var file system. That is true in our case for /etc not sure about /var. I don't know how many files or which ones were customized? Should I copy all the /etc files and sub directories over to the new hfs? Or is there an easy way to determine what's been customized? Thanks Matt >>> Jerry Fuchs 3/11/2009 1:04 PM >>> I am on z/OS 1.7 installing z/OS 1.9. I created a new ROOT file by copying my existing production ROOT file. New ETC and VAR files were created. The restore of the ROOT file failed because there were existing etc and var directories. I had to delete the etc and var directories to get the restore to run successfully. Now I have etc and var symlink (whatever that is) in the new ROOT file. What should I do now? Should I delete/rename the symlink's and create etc and var directories? The BPXPARM specifies that the ETC and VAR files are to be mounted off of the etc and var directories. Thanks, Jerry -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: File Transfer Issue
Thanks Hal, worked like a charm. >>> Hal Merritt 2/24/2009 4:16 PM >>> I've never had much luck FTP'ing certificates. I open them in Notepad and copy/paste into a TN3270 TSO session. Even then, I recall having to rename them to TXT to make Windows display them properly. By the way, the REST is the RESTART command, and that just means that checkpoint/restart is not available in this session. It looks like the transfer was successful. Perhaps Windows garbled the certificate. HTH and good luck. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Matt Dazzo Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2009 2:35 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: File Transfer Issue I am transferring a certificate that is in ascii armored format from my desktop to the mainframe using wsftp pro. For some reason only part of the cert is transferred. Below is the ftp log, in the log is an 504 error which is means 'Command not implemented for that parameter.' Can some one explain what that means and how can I get around it. Thanks Matt NOTICE: This electronic mail message and any files transmitted with it are intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. The message, together with any attachment, may contain confidential and/or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, printing, saving, copying, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately advise the sender by reply email and delete all copies. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
File Transfer Issue
I am transferring a certificate that is in ascii armored format from my desktop to the mainframe using wsftp pro. For some reason only part of the cert is transferred. Below is the ftp log, in the log is an 504 error which is means 'Command not implemented for that parameter.' Can some one explain what that means and how can I get around it. Thanks Matt PWD 257 "'XX.'" is working directory. TYPE A 200 Representation type is Ascii NonPrint PASV 227 Entering Passive Mode (27,1,39,75,12,113) connecting data channel to 27.1.39.75:3185 data channel connected to 27.1.39.75:3185 LIST 125 List started OK transferred 11970 bytes in 0.656 seconds, 142.495 Kbps ( 17.812 KBps), transfer succeeded. Starting request REST 1024 504 Restart requires Block or Compressed transfer mode. TYPE I 200 Representation type is Image PASV 227 Entering Passive Mode (27,1,39,75,12,118) connecting data channel to 27.1.39.75:3190 data channel connected to 27.1.39.75:3190 STOR bom2009.cer 125 Storing data set ST1MAT.BOM2009.CER transferred 1789 bytes in < 0.001 seconds, 13976.563 Kbps ( 1747.070 KBps), transfer succeeded. 250 Transfer completed successfully. Transfer request completed with status: Finished TYPE A 200 Representation type is Ascii NonPrint PASV 227 Entering Passive Mode (27,1,39,75,12,119) connecting data channel to 27.1.39.75:3191 data channel connected to 27.1.39.75:3191 LIST 125 List started OK transferred 11970 bytes in 0.625 seconds, 149.620 Kbps ( 18.703 KBps), transfer succeeded. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: zOS PDF Documentation
Ah, I just learned that someone in the group has the z1.9 collection on cd in book mgr format. Id like to put these into an HFS file and use a browser for reading them. Aside from using ftp to copy to an HFS file is there other set steps involved? Thanks Matt >>> Leo Smith 1/29/2009 9:50 AM >>> |I found this site that has the z1.9 collection in PDF format, but they are all separate down loads. Is there a site where they all be down loaded with a single | | |click? Thanks Matt |http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/zos/v1r9/index.jsp Hey Matt, There's no ftp site available for the z/OS PDFs. However, you have several options for downloading. the PDFs. One is the way you mentioned, downloading one-by-one off the z/OS PDF pages at: http://www.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/bkserv/r9pdf/ Another way would be to use Softcopy Librarian which is available at: http://www.ibm.com/software/applications/office/bkmgr/librarian.html: A third way would be to use a Web crawler on the PDF page you're interested in. For example, I've used HTTrack to copy entire BookManager books. For your purpose, you would just point HTTrack at the PDF page you're interested in and it should download all of the PDFs on the page. True, it will also download stuff you don't want, like links to HTML pages and graphics, but you can set an exclusion list for HTTrack that will exclude any file extension you're not interested in (like HTML pages). You can find HTTrack at: http://www.httrack.com/page/2/en/index.html Lastly, you could choose not to download at all and get the CD or DVD containing the z/OS elements and features pubs. For z/OS V1R9, the order number for the CD is SK3T-4269-20 and for the DVD, it's SK3T-4271-20. If it was me doing this, I'd try HTTrack. Hope this helps. Leo -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
zOS PDF Documentation
I found this site that has the z1.9 collection in PDF format, but they are all separate down loads. Is there a site where they all be down loaded with a single click? Thanks Matt http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/zos/v1r9/index.jsp -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: HFS Mount Points
Thanks all. >>> "Bobbie Jo" 1/20/2009 2:56 PM >>> There should be a member in your new 1.9 "cpac.parmlib(bpxprm*)" that has exactly this info in it. ----- Original Message - From: "Matt Dazzo" Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main To: Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 2:50 PM Subject: HFS Mount Points I have installed z1.9 and working on the configuration. When updating BPXPRMXX how do I determine what the mount point is of these new HFS files. Can't find this info in any manual or the archives. Thanks Matt SYS1.ZOS19.OMVS.JAVA31V5 SYS1.ZOS19.OMVS.JAVA31V6 SYS1.ZOS19.OMVS.JAVA64V5 SYS1.ZOS19.OMVS.JAVA64V6 SYS1.ZOS19.OMVS.JV390 SYS1.ZOS19.OMVS.SHPEROOT SYS1.ZOS19.OMVS.SHPHROOT -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
HFS Mount Points
I have installed z1.9 and working on the configuration. When updating BPXPRMXX how do I determine what the mount point is of these new HFS files. Can't find this info in any manual or the archives. Thanks Matt SYS1.ZOS19.OMVS.JAVA31V5 SYS1.ZOS19.OMVS.JAVA31V6 SYS1.ZOS19.OMVS.JAVA64V5 SYS1.ZOS19.OMVS.JAVA64V6 SYS1.ZOS19.OMVS.JV390 SYS1.ZOS19.OMVS.SHPEROOT SYS1.ZOS19.OMVS.SHPHROOT -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
System Install and Catalogs
Working on my first system upgrade 1.7 to 1.9. I selected a software install option. I am up to and ran the RECATDS job so all the z1.9 dsn's are in a separate z1.9 catalog that contains only the 1.9 files. When I Ipl 1.9 I would like to use my existing (z1.7) system's master catalog, but as it stands now it will not know about any new dataset names on the 1.9 system. I am looking to find how other folks handle sync'ing any new dataset names to an existing mcat or deleting names no longer required from the 1.7 system. Manually checking file names between the systems leaves alot of room for human error. I know IDCAMS provides MERGECAT but I have never used it and don't know if there are pit falls with it. Any information on how you handle this situation is appreciated. FYI- I did add in the new omvs HFS's files as they are named uniquely. Matt -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Define Master Catalog
I am installing zos1.9 and need to create a new master catalog for it. I have done an archive search for a jcl example but no hits. I created the job below but would like some feed back if what I have is ok. Other JCL examples are welcome. Thanks Matt // EXEC PGM=IDCAMS,REGION=0K //SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=* //SYSIN DD * DEFINE - MASTERCATALOG(NAME(CATALOG.Z19MCAT) - ICFCATALOG - VOL(OSMCAT) - CYLINDERS(7,1) ) /* -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Z Install 1.7 to 1.9 Options
Working on my first install and would like to get some in site on what most experienced people do for the install option. Which option do most folks use when choosing the installation type, either 'full system replacement' or 'software upgrade'? What are the pro's and con's of each. Thanks -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Custompac Question
Working on installing z1.9 and have a question pertaining to the Automatic Data Set Assignment panel in custompac. This is my first go around on this. I have two empty 3390-9's that I am using for the install, one for target libs and one for dlibs. I enter these in, as displayed in the first screen shot. I then enter the create command, upon completion custompac adds 2 more target volumes and 1 more dlib volume. Can someone explain what is happening, do I need 3 mod-9 for the target libs and 2 for dlibs? Thanks. Phys. Volume Sequence Device Used + Volume TypeNumberTypeReserved -- -- TZ19P1 TARGET T013390-9 85 % Z19DLB DLIB D013390-9 85 % Type in CR command, results are below Phys. Volume Sequence Device Used + Volume TypeNumberTypeReserved -- -- TZ19P1 TARGETT013390-9 85 % TARG04 TARGETT023390-9 85 % TARG05 TARGETT033390-9 5 % Z19DLB DLIB D013390-9 85 % DLIB03 DLIB D023390-9 23 % -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: SMPE question
Mark, the version is displayed on the initial smpe screen (top right) on my 1.7 system. >>> Mark Pace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 12/3/2008 2:58 PM >>> Yes, that part I knew. The embarrassing part is that I'm still trying to figure out how to get SMPE to tell me what versions of software I'm running. It was so much easier in VSE. MSHP RETRACE. Thanks for your help! On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 2:56 PM, Lizette Koehler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Depending on the version of SMPE > > PTF UO00700 should be installed on SMP/E 3.3 or UO00701 should be installed > on SMP/E 3.4. > > Lizette > > > > > > >No, the last RSU I applied was 0801. > > > >I found the found the APAR in IBMLink. But I can't tell which PTF I need. > >UO00700, UO00701, or UO00702 > > > >On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 2:37 PM, Lizette Koehler <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >wrote: > > > >> Mark, do you have PTFon your SMPE 3.4 system? > >> > >> FIXCAT HOLDDATA is incompatible with prior releases of SMP/E. It can > only > >> be processed by SMP/E 3.5. Coexistence APAR IO07480 is provided for > SMP/E > >> 3.3 and SMP/E 3.4 to enable those releases to silently ignore the FIXCAT > >> HOLDs when they are present in the SMPHOLD file. The PTF for APAR > IO07480 > >> (PTFs UO00700 or UO00701) must be installed on SMP/E 3.3 or SMP/E 3.4. > >> Failure to install these PTFs will cause the RECEIVE command to fail > with > >> message GIM20311E and GIM56701E when processing SMP/E HOLDDATA, after > the > >> availability of z/OS 1.10. When installed, this fix will ignore FIXCAT > >> ++HOLD statements during RECEIVE processing of HOLDDATA when using SMP/E > 3.3 > >> or SMP/E 3.4. > >> > >> The PTFs for APAR IO07480 (UO00700 and UO00701) are available in > RSU0803. > >> > >> Note: Users running a SMP/E release prior to 3.3 will not be able to > >> process ++HOLDs after the general availability of z/OS 1.10. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Lizette > >> > >> > >> -Original Message- > >> >From: Mark Pace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> >Sent: Dec 3, 2008 2:20 PM > >> >To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu > >> >Subject: Re: SMPE question > >> > > >> >My concern here is that, as I understand it, a ++HOLD is to prevent a > >> piece > >> >of maintenance from being applied. With this syntax error will the PTF > >> end > >> >up being applied if I run APPLY? > >> > > >> >Obviously I'm an SMPE newb. > >> > > >> >On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Matt Dazzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > > >> >> You may need SMPE ver 3.5 or add required PTF's to ver 3.4 to handle > new > >> >> FIXCAT FMID. > >> >> > >> >> >>> Mark Pace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 12/3/2008 2:10 PM >>> > >> >> I'm doing RECEIVE processing for the latest RSU and I got a lot of > these > >> >> errors. > >> >> What is this trying to tell me? > >> >> > >> >> sample: > >> >> > >> >> ++HOLD(HCYT71Q) FIXCAT FMID(HCYT71Q) REASON(AA27056) > RESOLVER(UA44721) > >> >> ** THERE IS A SYNTAX ERROR IN THE CONTROL STATEMENT AT COLUMN 17. > >> >> ** THERE IS AN ERROR IN A ++HOLD MCS FOR SYSMOD HCYT71Q IN SMPHOLD. > >> >> RECEIVE PROCESSING IS COMPLETE. THE HIGHEST RETURN CODE WAS 08. > >> >> > >> >> SYSMOD TYPE STATUS REASON FMID > >> >> HCYT71Q ERR N/A AA27056 HCYT71Q > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html > -- Mark Pace Mainline Information Systems 1700 Summit Lake Drive Tallahassee, FL. 32317 -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: SMPE question
You may need SMPE ver 3.5 or add required PTF's to ver 3.4 to handle new FIXCAT FMID. >>> Mark Pace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 12/3/2008 2:10 PM >>> I'm doing RECEIVE processing for the latest RSU and I got a lot of these errors. What is this trying to tell me? sample: ++HOLD(HCYT71Q) FIXCAT FMID(HCYT71Q) REASON(AA27056) RESOLVER(UA44721) ** THERE IS A SYNTAX ERROR IN THE CONTROL STATEMENT AT COLUMN 17. ** THERE IS AN ERROR IN A ++HOLD MCS FOR SYSMOD HCYT71Q IN SMPHOLD. RECEIVE PROCESSING IS COMPLETE. THE HIGHEST RETURN CODE WAS 08. SYSMOD TYPE STATUS REASON FMID HCYT71Q ERR N/A AA27056 HCYT71Q -- Mark Pace Mainline Information Systems 1700 Summit Lake Drive Tallahassee, FL. 32317 -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Custompac Question
When working in custompac is there a way to tell if a previous zos system install was a software upgrade or a complete system replacement? Thanks -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: VTSSTATS
Got it, thanks all. Happy Thanksgiving. >>> "Morris, Carey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 11/26/2008 9:09 AM >>> Try this one: ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/storage/tapetool/ -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Dazzo Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2008 7:45 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: VTSSTATS Search as I might, I can not find the IBMTOOLS.EXE link to download an updated vtsstats tools. Does anyone have the link for this? Thanks Matt -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
VTSSTATS
Search as I might, I can not find the IBMTOOLS.EXE link to download an updated vtsstats tools. Does anyone have the link for this? Thanks Matt -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
zOS 1.9 Order
We are preparing to place our 1.9 order and as most of you already know Enhanced ACIF is billable. Two questions for a Friday afternoon, what is it? And how do I tell if it is used here? Thanks Matt -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: ServerPac and zFS A<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Just looking into this myself, doesn't DSF have to be configured and running to support zFS? >>> "McKown, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 5/7/2008 3:29 PM >>> > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lizette Koehler > Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 2:18 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU > Subject: ServerPac and zFS > > I am getting ready to download my ServerPac from IBM. I have > been asked to do it using a zFS file rather than HFS. > > I have done neither in the past. So I am wondering what > needs to be done to create a zFS file to receive the download > to z/OS. > > I have found past entries in the archives for HFS, but not > much on zFS. > > Any guidance is appreciated. > > Lizette I use ISPF option 6, then invoke ISHELL. Select "Setup" on the menu (upper right corner), then option 7 "Enable Superuser mode". Then select "File_systems" from the top menu and option 4 "new zFS" on it. It is all smooth sailing from there. It will have a place for the zFS dataset name, the owner and group, size, everything you need. -- John McKown Senior Systems Programmer HealthMarkets Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage Administrative Services Group Information Technology The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged and/or confidential. It is for intended addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other use of this communication is strictly prohibited and could, in certain circumstances, be a criminal offense. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply and delete this message without copying or disclosing it. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Formdef W/OVROTATE
Hello All, I am trying to get my overly to be rotated. The way I interpret the PPFA users guide this should work, but I get the error that I pasted at the bottom of the page. Any help is appreciate. Thanks Matt SETUNITS 1 PELS 1 PELS LINESP 8 LPI ; FORMDEFL6500 REPLACE YES PRESENT LANDSCAPE DIRECTION ACROSS OFFSET 00 PELS 00 PELS ; OVERLAY PERF OVROTATE 90; SUBGROUP OVERLAY PERF ; /* // PAGE PRINTER FORMATTING AID/390(PK38127) DIAGNOSTIC MESSAGE LIST CODE LINE DESCRIPTION AKQ103E 6 INVALID SUBCOMMAND OVROTATE IS SPECIFIED. AKQ313E FORMDEF F1L6500 IS NOT GENERATED. MAX RETURN CODE = AKQ301I PAGE PRINTER FORMATTING AID ENDED, MAX RETURN CODE = -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
FCB Information
Hi All, I am looking for the book that specifies what FCB's IBM provides. I need a 4248 FCB that is for forms 11w x 8.5 length, 8lpi. Would anyone know if IBM supplies one like this and what name it is? Other than that I guess I may learn to build one. Thanks Matt -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: TCPIP IPDS Printer
Yes, and the printer config shows IPDS mode. >>> Michael Saraco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 4/2/2008 4:44 PM >>> I have my PSF printers setup similar and also use vtamprint. I have question did you buy and have the IPDS function installed on the 6500 printer? Michael Saraco Systems Consultant From: Matt Dazzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Date: 04/02/2008 02:29 PM Subject: TCPIP IPDS Printer Setting up an IBM 6500 as a JES2 PSF printer. I am unable to get it to print through jes but did get to print using Macro4's vtamprint product over tcpip. So the network and TCPIP appear to be ok. I included pieces of my jes2 config and psf proc, also the psf listing. Any ideas what might be holding things up? If this is the incorrect forum for this question please direct, thanks. PSF proc segment. //PRT6 CNTL //PRT6 PRINTDEV FONTDD=*.FONT01, /* FONT LIBRARY DD */ // OVLYDD=*.OLAY01, /* OVERLAY LIBRARY DD */ // PSEGDD=*.PSEG01, /* SEGMENT LIBRARY DD */ // PDEFDD=*.PDEF01, /* PAGEDEF LIBRARY DD */ // FDEFDD=*.FDEF01, /* FORMDEF LIBRARY DD */ // JOBHDR=*.JOBHDR, /* JOB HEADER SEPARATOR*/ // JOBTRLR=*.JOBTLR,/* JOB TRAILER SEPARATOR */ // DSHDR=*.DSHDR, /* DATA SET HEADER SEPARATOR */ // MESSAGE=*.MSGDS, /* MESSAGE DATA SET OUTPUT */ // BUFNO=15,/* NUMBER OF WRITE DATA BUFFERS*/ // PAGEDEF=L06464, /* DEVICE PAGEDEF DEFAULT */ // FORMDEF=Q50010, /* DEVICE FORMDEF DEFAULT */ // CHARS=GT10, /* DEVICE DEFAULT FONT */ // PIMSG=YES, /* YES PRINT ALL PSF MESSAGES */ // DATACK=BLOCK,/* NO REPORT DATA-CHECK ERRORS*/ // TRACE=NO,/* NO INTERNAL TRACEING */ // SETUP=FORMS, /* ISSUE SETUP MSG */ // FAILURE=WCONNECT,/* WAIT FOR CONNECT*/ // CONNINTV=600,/* ATTEMPT CONN FOR 10 MIN */ // DISCINTV=15, /* STAY CONN W/PRINTER WHEN IDLE */ // MGMTMODE=IMMED, /* START COMM W/PRINTER*/ // IPADDR='27.1.39.76' /* TCPIP ADDR */ //PRT6 ENDCNTL JES2 Parms /* FUNCTIONAL SUBSYSTEM DEFINITION PARAMETERS */ FSSDEF(FSS1) PROC=FSS1001,/* SYS4.PROCLIB MEMBER TO START ASI. */ AUTOSTOP=NO, /* DO NOT STOP ASI WHEN ALL PRT DRAIN */ HASPFSSM=HASPFSSM /* LOAD MODULE NAME. */ /* */ /* LOCAL PRINTER PARAMETERS --*/ /*--*/ PRT(6) BURST=NO,/* NO BURST FEATURE ON THIS UNIT */ CLASS=A, /* INITIAL OUTPUT QUEUE TO PROCESS*/ CKPTMODE=PAGE, /* CHECK POINTS COUNTS ARE PAGES */ CKPTPAGE=100,/* 100 PAGES BETWEEN CHECK POINTS */ COPYMARK=DATASET,/* COPYMARK TO CHANGE EVER DATA SET */ FCB=8, /* FORMS CONTROL BUFFER NAME = P18*/ FSS=FSS1,/* FUNCTIONAL SUBSYSTEM NAME */ MARK=YES,/* YES 3800 EDGE MARKS USED */ MODE=FSS,/* INITIALLY STARTED IN FSS MODE */ PRESELCT=NO, /* SELECT TWO REPORTS AT A TIME */ PRMODE=(LINE,PAGE), /* TYPE OUTPUT TO BE DIRECTED */ SEP=YES, /* YES SEPARATOR PAGES*/ SEPCHARS=DEFAULT,/* DEFAULT FONT FOR SEPARATOR PAGES */ SEPDS=NO,/* NO HEADER SEPARATOR PAGES WANTED */ START=NO,/* AUTO-START PRINTER? NO */ TRKCELL=NO, /* YES DESPOOL THE COMPLETE TRACK */ UCS=GT12,/* X0GT12 CHARATER SET NAME TO LOAD */ WS=(W,R,Q,PMD,LIM,F/C,P) /* WORK SELECTION CRITERIA */ FSS1 Messages STC04403 $HASP373 FSS1001 STARTED STC04403 IEF403I FSS1001 - STARTED - TIME=15.01.02 STC04403 APS621I FSS1001 FSS1 *** OPERATOR INTERFACE INITIALIZED FOR 400 (CONT.) PSF 3.4.0 FOR z/OS. STC04403 APS933I FSS1001 FSS1 *** PRT6 (TCPIP) PRINTER INFORMATION, 401 (CONT.) DEV=6500, IBM INFOPRINT 6500, ECLEVEL=0, (CONT.) ADDR=27.1.39.76, SYSNAME=SYS1, CPUID=00024E7E2086, ATTACH=PSF. STC04403 APS929I FSS1001 FSS1 *** PRT6 (TCPIP) COMMUNICATION WITH 404 (CONT.) TCP/IP-ATTACHED PRINTER (PRT6) IPADDR (27.1.39.76) WAS (CONT.) TERMINATED DUE TO A DISCONNECT INTERVAL TIMEOUT. STC04403 APS933I FSS1001 FSS1 *** PRT6 (TCPIP
TCPIP IPDS Printer
Setting up an IBM 6500 as a JES2 PSF printer. I am unable to get it to print through jes but did get to print using Macro4's vtamprint product over tcpip. So the network and TCPIP appear to be ok. I included pieces of my jes2 config and psf proc, also the psf listing. Any ideas what might be holding things up? If this is the incorrect forum for this question please direct, thanks. PSF proc segment. //PRT6 CNTL //PRT6 PRINTDEV FONTDD=*.FONT01, /* FONT LIBRARY DD */ // OVLYDD=*.OLAY01, /* OVERLAY LIBRARY DD */ // PSEGDD=*.PSEG01, /* SEGMENT LIBRARY DD */ // PDEFDD=*.PDEF01, /* PAGEDEF LIBRARY DD */ // FDEFDD=*.FDEF01, /* FORMDEF LIBRARY DD */ // JOBHDR=*.JOBHDR, /* JOB HEADER SEPARATOR*/ // JOBTRLR=*.JOBTLR,/* JOB TRAILER SEPARATOR */ // DSHDR=*.DSHDR, /* DATA SET HEADER SEPARATOR */ // MESSAGE=*.MSGDS, /* MESSAGE DATA SET OUTPUT */ // BUFNO=15,/* NUMBER OF WRITE DATA BUFFERS*/ // PAGEDEF=L06464, /* DEVICE PAGEDEF DEFAULT */ // FORMDEF=Q50010, /* DEVICE FORMDEF DEFAULT */ // CHARS=GT10, /* DEVICE DEFAULT FONT */ // PIMSG=YES, /* YES PRINT ALL PSF MESSAGES */ // DATACK=BLOCK,/* NO REPORT DATA-CHECK ERRORS*/ // TRACE=NO,/* NO INTERNAL TRACEING */ // SETUP=FORMS, /* ISSUE SETUP MSG */ // FAILURE=WCONNECT,/* WAIT FOR CONNECT*/ // CONNINTV=600,/* ATTEMPT CONN FOR 10 MIN */ // DISCINTV=15, /* STAY CONN W/PRINTER WHEN IDLE */ // MGMTMODE=IMMED, /* START COMM W/PRINTER*/ // IPADDR='27.1.39.76' /* TCPIP ADDR */ //PRT6 ENDCNTL JES2 Parms /* FUNCTIONAL SUBSYSTEM DEFINITION PARAMETERS */ FSSDEF(FSS1) PROC=FSS1001,/* SYS4.PROCLIB MEMBER TO START ASI. */ AUTOSTOP=NO, /* DO NOT STOP ASI WHEN ALL PRT DRAIN */ HASPFSSM=HASPFSSM /* LOAD MODULE NAME. */ /* */ /* LOCAL PRINTER PARAMETERS --*/ /*--*/ PRT(6) BURST=NO,/* NO BURST FEATURE ON THIS UNIT */ CLASS=A, /* INITIAL OUTPUT QUEUE TO PROCESS*/ CKPTMODE=PAGE, /* CHECK POINTS COUNTS ARE PAGES */ CKPTPAGE=100,/* 100 PAGES BETWEEN CHECK POINTS */ COPYMARK=DATASET,/* COPYMARK TO CHANGE EVER DATA SET */ FCB=8, /* FORMS CONTROL BUFFER NAME = P18*/ FSS=FSS1,/* FUNCTIONAL SUBSYSTEM NAME */ MARK=YES,/* YES 3800 EDGE MARKS USED */ MODE=FSS,/* INITIALLY STARTED IN FSS MODE */ PRESELCT=NO, /* SELECT TWO REPORTS AT A TIME */ PRMODE=(LINE,PAGE), /* TYPE OUTPUT TO BE DIRECTED */ SEP=YES, /* YES SEPARATOR PAGES*/ SEPCHARS=DEFAULT,/* DEFAULT FONT FOR SEPARATOR PAGES */ SEPDS=NO,/* NO HEADER SEPARATOR PAGES WANTED */ START=NO,/* AUTO-START PRINTER? NO */ TRKCELL=NO, /* YES DESPOOL THE COMPLETE TRACK */ UCS=GT12,/* X0GT12 CHARATER SET NAME TO LOAD */ WS=(W,R,Q,PMD,LIM,F/C,P) /* WORK SELECTION CRITERIA */ FSS1 Messages STC04403 $HASP373 FSS1001 STARTED STC04403 IEF403I FSS1001 - STARTED - TIME=15.01.02 STC04403 APS621I FSS1001 FSS1 *** OPERATOR INTERFACE INITIALIZED FOR 400 (CONT.) PSF 3.4.0 FOR z/OS. STC04403 APS933I FSS1001 FSS1 *** PRT6 (TCPIP) PRINTER INFORMATION, 401 (CONT.) DEV=6500, IBM INFOPRINT 6500, ECLEVEL=0, (CONT.) ADDR=27.1.39.76, SYSNAME=SYS1, CPUID=00024E7E2086, ATTACH=PSF. STC04403 APS929I FSS1001 FSS1 *** PRT6 (TCPIP) COMMUNICATION WITH 404 (CONT.) TCP/IP-ATTACHED PRINTER (PRT6) IPADDR (27.1.39.76) WAS (CONT.) TERMINATED DUE TO A DISCONNECT INTERVAL TIMEOUT. STC04403 APS933I FSS1001 FSS1 *** PRT6 (TCPIP) PRINTER INFORMATION, 405 (CONT.) DEV=6500, IBM INFOPRINT 6500, ECLEVEL=0, (CONT.) ADDR=27.1.39.76, SYSNAME=SYS1, CPUID=00024E7E2086, ATTACH=PSF. ---
z9 BC Hardware Upgrade
We maybe moving from a z890 to a z9 BC machine. We are running zos1.7 at RSU0709 maintenance level. I checked the hardware bucket for the z9-bc and ran the extract file through the host compare program and found only 3 PTF's required. My question is how do I determine if these PTF's can coexist on both machines? There seems to be no coexistence information in the PTF. Thanks Matt -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Enhanced PSP Compare Program
Thanks all, used SMPECSI instead of SMPCSI. >>> "Jousma, David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 3/26/2008 12:46 PM >>> Take the "E" out of SMPECSI ___ Dave Jousma Assistant Vice President Mainframe Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] 616.653.8429 -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Dazzo Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 9:49 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: Enhanced PSP Compare Program Here's what I'm running, no difference to me. //ESPSPT EXEC PGM=EPSPT,PARM='PZOS17A', //REGION=0M //STEPLIB DD DISP=SHR,DSN=SMPE.EPSPT.HOST.TOOL.NEW //SMPECSI DD DISP=SHR,DSN=SMPE.ZOS17.GLOBAL.CSI //SYSINDD DISP=SHR,DSN=ST1MAT.DEV2096 //OUTPUT DD SYSOUT=* //OUTPUTL DD SYSOUT=* //SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=* >>> Mark Jacobs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 3/26/2008 9:40 AM >>> Matt Dazzo wrote: > I updated the program to the latest level. I tried to using the global > csi and the target csi and I get the following messages. Job ends with > cc=0 but I get an error in the report. Any ideas? Thanks + > This is what I use in my job, works fine; //ZOS18EXEC PGM=EPSPT,PARM='MVST100',COND=(0,NE) //STEPLIB DD DSN=TECHSVC.TECHNAPF.LOADLIB,DISP=SHR //SMPCSI DD DSN=SMPE.ZOS18.GLOBAL.CSI,DISP=SHR Where MVST100 is the name of the target zone. > Report Level:1.04.11 Last Update:2007/06/28 > For target zone PZOS17A > HOLD APAR -RESOLVING SYSMOD- RELEVANT > FMID NUMBER NAME RECEIVED UPGRADE+SUBSET > - > MSG 010: SEVERE ERROR: Target Zone Query Failed, Report to IBM > NOTE: An asterisk denotes an APAR that has been previously > mentioned in this report. > * > * SUMMARY * > * > NO APARs/PTFs required. > FMIDs applicable: 0 > APARs applied:0 > APARs required: 0 > PTFs received: 0 > Report Level:1.04.11 Last Update:2007/06/28 > For target zone PZOS17A > MSG 019: rc from zone qry = 12 > MSG 010: SEVERE ERROR: Target Zone Query Failed, Report to IBM > MSG 098: RC = , CC = }D \ > MSG 099: MSGBUFF = GIM44233IGIMMPVIA - A PREALLOCATED VSAM DATA SE > MSG 099: MSGBUFF = T WAS NOT FOUND FOR THE GLOBAL ZONE. > MSG 099: MSGBUFF = GIM50504S ** OPEN PROCESSING FAILED FOR THE GLOBAL > MSG 099: MSGBUFF = ZONE. > > This e-mail transmission contains information that is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended only for the addressee(s) named above. If you receive this e-mail in error, please do not read, copy or disseminate it in any manner. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. Please reply to the message immediately by informing the sender that the message was misdirected. After replying, please erase it from your computer system. Your assistance in correcting this error is appreciated. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Enhanced PSP Compare Program
Here's what I'm running, no difference to me. //ESPSPT EXEC PGM=EPSPT,PARM='PZOS17A', //REGION=0M //STEPLIB DD DISP=SHR,DSN=SMPE.EPSPT.HOST.TOOL.NEW //SMPECSI DD DISP=SHR,DSN=SMPE.ZOS17.GLOBAL.CSI //SYSINDD DISP=SHR,DSN=ST1MAT.DEV2096 //OUTPUT DD SYSOUT=* //OUTPUTL DD SYSOUT=* //SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=* >>> Mark Jacobs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 3/26/2008 9:40 AM >>> Matt Dazzo wrote: > I updated the program to the latest level. I tried to using the global csi > and the target csi and I get the following messages. Job ends with cc=0 but I > get an error in the report. Any ideas? Thanks > + > This is what I use in my job, works fine; //ZOS18EXEC PGM=EPSPT,PARM='MVST100',COND=(0,NE) //STEPLIB DD DSN=TECHSVC.TECHNAPF.LOADLIB,DISP=SHR //SMPCSI DD DSN=SMPE.ZOS18.GLOBAL.CSI,DISP=SHR Where MVST100 is the name of the target zone. > Report Level:1.04.11 Last Update:2007/06/28 > For target zone PZOS17A > HOLD APAR -RESOLVING SYSMOD- RELEVANT > FMID NUMBER NAME RECEIVED UPGRADE+SUBSET > - > MSG 010: SEVERE ERROR: Target Zone Query Failed, Report to IBM > NOTE: An asterisk denotes an APAR that has been previously > mentioned in this report. > * > * SUMMARY * > * > NO APARs/PTFs required. > FMIDs applicable: 0 > APARs applied:0 > APARs required: 0 > PTFs received: 0 > Report Level:1.04.11 Last Update:2007/06/28 > For target zone PZOS17A > MSG 019: rc from zone qry = 12 > MSG 010: SEVERE ERROR: Target Zone Query Failed, Report to IBM > MSG 098: RC = , CC = }D \ > MSG 099: MSGBUFF = GIM44233IGIMMPVIA - A PREALLOCATED VSAM DATA SE > MSG 099: MSGBUFF = T WAS NOT FOUND FOR THE GLOBAL ZONE. > MSG 099: MSGBUFF = GIM50504S ** OPEN PROCESSING FAILED FOR THE GLOBAL > MSG 099: MSGBUFF = ZONE. > > >>>> Kurt Quackenbush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 3/26/2008 9:21 AM >>> >>>> > You didn't show your EPSPT job, so this is a guess, but ensure the > SMPCSI DD statement specifies the CSI data set for your global zone > (SMPE.ZOS17.GLOBAL.CSI), not the CSI data set name for your target zone. > The PARM then specifies the name of your target zone (PZOS17A). > > Kurt Quackenbush -- IBM, SMP/E Development > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html > > -- Mark Jacobs Time Customer Service Tampa, FL In accordance to the principles of Doublethink, it does not matter if the war is not real, or when it is, that victory is not possible. The war is not meant to be won. It is meant to be continuous. The essential act of modern warfare is the destruction of the produce of human labor. A hierarchical society is only possible on the basis of poverty and ignorance. In principle, the war effort is always planned to keep society on the brink of starvation. The war is waged by the ruling group against its own subjects. And its object is not victory over Eurasia or Eastasia, but to keep the very structure of society intact. George Orwell - 1984 -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Enhanced PSP Compare Program
I updated the program to the latest level. I tried to using the global csi and the target csi and I get the following messages. Job ends with cc=0 but I get an error in the report. Any ideas? Thanks Report Level:1.04.11 Last Update:2007/06/28 For target zone PZOS17A HOLD APAR -RESOLVING SYSMOD- RELEVANT FMID NUMBER NAME RECEIVED UPGRADE+SUBSET - MSG 010: SEVERE ERROR: Target Zone Query Failed, Report to IBM NOTE: An asterisk denotes an APAR that has been previously mentioned in this report. * * SUMMARY * * NO APARs/PTFs required. FMIDs applicable: 0 APARs applied:0 APARs required: 0 PTFs received: 0 Report Level:1.04.11 Last Update:2007/06/28 For target zone PZOS17A MSG 019: rc from zone qry = 12 MSG 010: SEVERE ERROR: Target Zone Query Failed, Report to IBM MSG 098: RC = , CC = }D \ MSG 099: MSGBUFF = GIM44233IGIMMPVIA - A PREALLOCATED VSAM DATA SE MSG 099: MSGBUFF = T WAS NOT FOUND FOR THE GLOBAL ZONE. MSG 099: MSGBUFF = GIM50504S ** OPEN PROCESSING FAILED FOR THE GLOBAL MSG 099: MSGBUFF = ZONE. >>> Kurt Quackenbush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 3/26/2008 9:21 AM >>> You didn't show your EPSPT job, so this is a guess, but ensure the SMPCSI DD statement specifies the CSI data set for your global zone (SMPE.ZOS17.GLOBAL.CSI), not the CSI data set name for your target zone. The PARM then specifies the name of your target zone (PZOS17A). Kurt Quackenbush -- IBM, SMP/E Development -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Enhanced PSP Compare Program
When attempting to use this tool I get the error; MSG 004: SYSTEM ERROR: Target Zone Not Valid Report Level:1.04.4 Last Update:2005/08/17 For target zone PZOS17A MSG 004: SYSTEM ERROR: Target Zone Not Valid An smpe list for zone PZOS17A is shown below. ZONEDDNAME DDDEFNAM SMPDDNAM TYPE--DATA SET OR PATH--- PZOS17APERMSMPE.ZOS17.PRODALT.TARGET.CSI SMPCNTLSYSIO ST1MAT.ST1MATT1.JOB04141.D101.? SMPCSI PERMSMPE.ZOS17.GLOBAL.CSI SMPLISTDUMMY SMPLOG PERMSYS1.SMPE.ZOS17.SMPTLOG SMPLOGAPERMSYS1.SMPE.ZOS17.SMPTLOGA SMPOUT SMPOUTSYSIO ST1MAT.ST1MATT1.JOB04141.D102.? SMPPARM SMPPARM NODDF SMPRPT SMPRPTSYSIO ST1MAT.ST1MATT1.JOB04141.D103.? I am using zone PZOS17A with csi SMPE.ZOS17.PRODALT.TARGET.CSI as input to the compare job. Is that not right? Thanks Matt -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Custompac
Thanks Steve, I don't understand why but it worked. >>> Steven Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 3/14/2008 12:15 PM >>> Hi, Jack. I ran into the same thing. Just blank out everything except the volser on the Physical Allocations page, and ServerPac will go take a look at the volume. You'll be fine. Cheers,,,Steve Steve Conway Lead Systems Programmer Information Systems & Services Division Computer & Network Operations Phone: (703) 450-3156 Fax:(703) 450-3197 Matt Dazzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 03/14/2008 11:38 AM Please respond to IBM Mainframe Discussion List To IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu cc Subject Re: Custompac Jack, yes this is serverpac. This is an order that is already installed and completed. I'd like to go back in and look at what jobs were run. It appears that serverpac thinks that some of the volumes are over allocated and will not allow you to select 'Installation' option. When I go into 'M' for 'Modify System Layout' then run SUMP cmd several of the volumes have error conditions 'OVR<>> Jack Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 3/12/2008 4:24 PM >>> If it's anything like Service Pac, you have to complete, at least do, the preceding item before it'll let you start the next one. If that's what you're talking about. Jack Kelly 202-502-2390 (Office) Matt Dazzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 03/12/2008 02:54 PM Please respond to IBM Mainframe Discussion List To IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu cc Subject Custompac When using custompac to view an existing installed order I find that some of the options like 'Installation' have an asterisk next to them and are not able to be selected for viewing. Any body know why this might be? Thanks Matt -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html This message w/attachments (message) may be privileged, confidential or proprietary, and if you are not an intended recipient, please notify the sender, do not use or share it and delete it. Unless specifically indicated, this message is not an offer to sell or a solicitation of any investment products or other financial product or service, an official confirmation of any transaction, or an official statement of Merrill Lynch. Subject to applicable law, Merrill Lynch may monitor, review and retain e-communications (EC) traveling through its networks/systems. The laws of the country of each sender/recipient may impact the handling of EC, and EC may be archived, supervised and produced in countries other than the country in which you are located. This message cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free. This message is subject to terms available at the following link: http://www.ml.com/e-communications_terms/ . By messaging with Merrill Lynch you consent to the foregoing. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Custompac
Jack, yes this is serverpac. This is an order that is already installed and completed. I'd like to go back in and look at what jobs were run. It appears that serverpac thinks that some of the volumes are over allocated and will not allow you to select 'Installation' option. When I go into 'M' for 'Modify System Layout' then run SUMP cmd several of the volumes have error conditions 'OVR<>> Jack Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 3/12/2008 4:24 PM >>> If it's anything like Service Pac, you have to complete, at least do, the preceding item before it'll let you start the next one. If that's what you're talking about. Jack Kelly 202-502-2390 (Office) Matt Dazzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 03/12/2008 02:54 PM Please respond to IBM Mainframe Discussion List To IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu cc Subject Custompac When using custompac to view an existing installed order I find that some of the options like 'Installation' have an asterisk next to them and are not able to be selected for viewing. Any body know why this might be? Thanks Matt -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html This message w/attachments (message) may be privileged, confidential or proprietary, and if you are not an intended recipient, please notify the sender, do not use or share it and delete it. Unless specifically indicated, this message is not an offer to sell or a solicitation of any investment products or other financial product or service, an official confirmation of any transaction, or an official statement of Merrill Lynch. Subject to applicable law, Merrill Lynch may monitor, review and retain e-communications (EC) traveling through its networks/systems. The laws of the country of each sender/recipient may impact the handling of EC, and EC may be archived, supervised and produced in countries other than the country in which you are located. This message cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free. This message is subject to terms available at the following link: http://www.ml.com/e-communications_terms/ . By messaging with Merrill Lynch you consent to the foregoing. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Custompac
When using custompac to view an existing installed order I find that some of the options like 'Installation' have an asterisk next to them and are not able to be selected for viewing. Any body know why this might be? Thanks Matt -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Java / Languages
That's a good question, it was posed to me from a new vendor on a conference call with a good # of people on it. I thought asking that question was dumb so I held it, apparently not that dumb. >>> Ted MacNEIL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2/1/2008 11:24 AM >>> >I need to find out if we have virtual java available on our mainframe? What is 'virtual' JAVA? - Too busy driving to stop for gas! -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Java / Languages
What a question for a Friday. I need to find out if we have virtual java available on our mainframe? We are running zOS 1.7. The FMID we have is HJVA14B and the description is IBM 64-Bit SDK FOR z/OS. Can anyone tell me is this is virtual java? The java -version command display is as follows; ST1MAT:/: >java -version java version "1.4.2" Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 2.2) IBM J9SE VM (build 2.2, J2RE 1.4.2 IBM J9 2.2 z/OS s390x-64 j9mz64142-20061124 ( JIT enabled) J9VM - 20061121_1035_BHdSMr JIT - r7_level20061020_1803) Also, how I determine what languages our LE can run and what compilers we have ? The LE FMID is HLE7720. Thanks in advance for your help, Matt -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Restartable PDSE Address space
Thanks to all who responded. Matt >>> Patrick Lyon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 1/4/2008 1:16 PM >>> On Fri, 4 Jan 2008 11:04:30 -0500, Matt Dazzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Is there anyway to create a latch problem on a test PDSE to test the restartable STC? > >Thanks Matt > Way back when in 2.7 days (OS/390) latch issues would happen quite often. I unfortunately got good at freeing them. It seemed to me that they happened a lot when the processor was pegged, i.e. when the owner of the PDSE that had the latch was not getting enough CPU time to finish whatever they were doing and other address spaces were requesting the PDSE. I wouldn't know how to go about causing such a situation. Perhaps 2 batch jobs, one that had a PDSE with a disp=old and one disp=shr on the PDSE and they both used some type of time delay, like the BPXBATCH sleep option or something. It just seems to me that when we got to z/OS the latch issues seemed to go away. I believe a lot of effort has gone into internal code to help latches fix themselves, and hats off to the OS developers for that. All I know is when there are latch issues, don't go off issuing a FORCE on the offending latch holder. That would leave the latch in SMS but the address space was gone. I would have to code up a call to RTM to knock out the offending TCB. "There is a grave ugliness in our country". :) At least that was in 2.7 days. Good luck. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Restartable PDSE Address space
Is there anyway to create a latch problem on a test PDSE to test the restartable STC? Thanks Matt >>> Mark Zelden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 1/3/2008 9:04 AM >>> On Wed, 2 Jan 2008 18:11:20 -0500, Craddock, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I have 3 monoplexes that have SMSPDSE1 but all of them >> also specify PDSESHARING(EXTENDED) > >Color me confused. PDSE sharing across sysplex boundaries is forbidden >and so specifying it for a monoplex would seem to be superfluous at >best. > Yes... but required for PDSE_RESTARTABLE_AS(YES) as I wrote. We added PDSESHARING(EXTENDED) and PDSE_RESTARTABLE_AS(YES) as we rolled out z/OS 1.6. Why is it required? Ask IBM. I'm sure they will give you a good reason. :-) http://bama.ua.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0801&L=ibm-main&D=1&O=D&P=5480 BTW, since I have nothing better to do (NOT) during our year end change freeze, I did try IPLing a monoplex sandbox LPAR without PDSESHARING(EXTENDED) along with specifying PDSE_RESTARTABLE_AS(YES) and SMSPDSE1 was not created as documented. Doc from the fine manual: http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/IEA2E280/54.9?SHELF=IEA2BK80&DT=20070516223132 PDSE_RESTARTABLE_AS(YES|NO) Specifies whether PDSE initialization during IPL NIP processing brings up a second restartable PDSE address space. If you specify PDSE_RESTARTABLE_AS(YES), with PDSESHARING(EXTENDED), and EXTENDED sharing is not used, processing does not allow PDSE initialization to create a second restartable PDSE address space. The PDSE_RESTARTABLE_AS specification is set in the IGDSMSxx member of SYS1.PARMLIB. This value cannot be changed through an operator Default: NO -- Mark Zelden Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] z/OS Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/ Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Restartable PDSE Address space
Dean, you can catch up here. http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/tips0531.html >>> Dean Montevago <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 1/2/2008 3:01 PM >>> I'm jumping in late. What does this pertain to ? Why would the address space abend ? -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steven Conway Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 2:57 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Restartable PDSE Address space Matt, I started running this about a month ago. No problems, negligible resource usage. I took no actions other than adding PDSE_RESTARTABLE_AS(YES) to IGDSMSxx. Cheers,,,Steve Steve Conway Lead Systems Programmer Information Systems & Services Division Computer & Network Operations Phone: (703) 450-3156 Fax:(703) 450-3197 IBM Mainframe Discussion List wrote on 01/02/2008 02:39:42 PM: > From my reading it seems the restartable PDSE Address space is a > good idea and suggested by IBM. I'd like to know if the restartable > PDSE address space is a good idea for all MVS environments? We are > running zOS1.7 in MONOPLEX MODE with one production and one test > lpar. I do not know to what extent PDSE's are used in the shop. > > Also, are there any specific things to watch out for with the implementation? > > Happy New Year! > > Matt > > -- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send > email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Restartable PDSE Address space
>From my reading it seems the restartable PDSE Address space is a good idea and >suggested by IBM. I'd like to know if the restartable PDSE address space is a >good idea for all MVS environments? We are running zOS1.7 in MONOPLEX MODE >with one production and one test lpar. I do not know to what extent PDSE's are >used in the shop. Also, are there any specific things to watch out for with the implementation? Happy New Year! Matt -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: zOS Maintenance Best Practices
Dave, thanks. >>> Dave Danner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 12/7/2007 4:14 PM >>> On Fri, 7 Dec 2007 10:48:29 -0600, Patrick Lyon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >If you are a SHARE member, the last conference had an excellent session on >maintenance best practices. > >z/OS Maintenance Best Practices - The Rationale Behind the Recommendations You can get it here: http://shareew.prod.web.sba.com/client_files/callpapers/attach/SHARE_in_San _Diego/S2829GD105741.pdf It's open to anyone. You don't need a SHARE ID. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
zOS Maintenance Best Practices
I'm looking for latest pdf for zOS Maintenance Best Practices. Anyone care to share? Thanks -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Vary Too Many Devices Online
Just a short time ago 10/22/07 there was a thread on Vary Too Many Devices Offline, well we got hit with an operator varying on hundreds of devices that belong to another system. Anyone monitoring operator commands with BMC Autooper? If so care to share the logic? Thanks -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: PSF problems going from chan-attach to TCP/IP
Has anyone had to change TCPIP parameters pertaining to MTU size or INTERVAL? We are getting ready to test IBM 6500 using PSF over IP and the PSF set up guide recommends MTU size change and INTERVAL time change. Matt Dazzo Technical Services Publishers Clearing House 516-944-4816 [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> "Pommier, Rex R." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 10/10/2007 3:31 PM >>> Not sure what an IP3000 is, but we did something similar, moved a XEROX printer from B/T to TCP/IP printing via PSF. Had no problems. Can we get a bit more info from you - such as what are you using to print to it (like PSF or what), any errors you're getting, any config info, or so on? Rather than going ESCON, can you get a hold of an ESCON converter box? When we went from our 7060 to the z9, we did just that for keeping our old impact (6262) printer. Rex -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pinnacle Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 2:09 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: PSF problems going from chan-attach to TCP/IP Went from a 9672 to a z9, so our IP3000 went from bus and tag to TCP/IP (ESCON card was about 10X the cost of the network card). Unfortunately, the TCP/IP protocol is slightly less robust than channel attach. Lots of connection errors, foul-ups, reprinting from checkpoints and duplicate output, etc. Has anyone else successfully made this conversion, and if so, HTF did you do it? I'm recommending that my client take a serious look at ponying up for the ESCON, because we never had operational printer problems with channel-attach. Regards, Tom Conley -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Convert Tool
Go to http://www.centralcoastsoftware.com/ there is a great tool you can down load. Best of all it's free! Matt Dazzo Technical Services Publishers Clearing House 516-944-4816 [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> esmie moo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 10/11/2007 8:04 AM >>> Good Day Gentle Readers, I am looking for a way to convert megabytes to cylinders. I did a "google" but came up empty. For example I would like to know how many cylinders are in 420MB? Thank you - Ask a question on any topic and get answers from real people. Go to Yahoo! Answers. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
PSF Printer
We are considering using PSF over IP to run IBM 6500 printers, we are zOS1.7. I am looking to see if anyone is using this and how it is working out. Along with that considering using the line mode migration feature to automatically load FCB and page def information, looking for feed back from anyone using that feature. Lastly, looking for sample JES2 statements and the fss proc used. Thanks for any info you can provide. Matt -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
HTTP Server Abend
In the dark of night our HTTP server starting having problems on our zOS1.7 sand box. Well it was really probably during the day and we have not noticed it. Anyway, it has been working fine for a long time. The last known changes were to separate Telnet services outside TCPIP and change the Gateway statement to the Beginroutes statement. We backed the changes out and still got the same abend. Has anyone run across this or any suggestions as to what might be causing this abend? Thanks The return and reason codes suggest this is caused by mounting the HFS as R/W on another system that is not in the same GRS ring. No changes have been made there either and it appears the proper HFS files are mounted. $HASP373 IMWEBSRV STARTED IEF403I IMWEBSRV - STARTED - TIME=15.14.55 IMW3534I PID: 33555289 SERVER STARTING IEA995I SYMPTOM DUMP OUTPUT 191 USER COMPLETION CODE=4039 REASON CODE= TIME=15.14.55 SEQ=00468 CPU= ASID=0057 PSW AT TIME OF ERROR 078D1400 84A5BA8E ILC 2 INTC 0D NO ACTIVE MODULE FOUND NAME=UNKNOWN DATA AT PSW 04A5BA88 - 00181610 0A0D58D0 D00498EC * TOP OF DATA ** This is IBM HTTP Server V5R3M0 Built on Jan 12 2007 at 13:00:21. Started at Tue Sep 11 11:14:55 2007 Running as "WEBSRV", UID:0, GID:5. Using _CEE_ENVFILE /etc/httpd.envvars. CEE3512S An HFS load of module GSKCMS31 failed. The system return code was 157; the reason code was 5B4B000D. entry offset +03D8 at address 10C029D0. >From entry point __dllstaticinit at compile unit offset +03D8 at e 1CEE3DMP V1 R7.0: Condition processing resulted in the unhandled condition. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: DASD wont go offline.
Powering off the entire data centre? Not far fetched for some, we had someone do that. He thought the power distribution unit was the AC unit and hit the power off switch. Much to his sha-grin it wasn't. Matt Dazzo Technical Services Publishers Clearing House 516-944-4816 [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Doc Farmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 9/4/2007 6:54 AM >>> On Tue, 4 Sep 2007 14:29:49 +1000, FRASER, Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Yeah, just go pull it out of it's berth and see what screams? >Pfft > > > >It would probably be the Ops Manager that screams first, quickly >followed by my manager and finally my Mrs when I tell her that I'm no >longer employed and will be at home to annoy her every day. :-) > > Naw, that last one's too dangerous - she'd probably get you hooked on "As The Stomach Turns" (see also: Death, fate worse than). Couldn't be worse than the guy who actually hits the emergency shutdown switch and powers off the entire data centre [insert evil grin here]... -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Vtamprint on z/OS 1.7
Paul, this is not much help but we do have Vtamprint 4.9.1 running on zOS1.7. I was not here at the time of the zos upgrade but my coworker said they did not have problems. On another topic, do you use Vtamprint to print IPDS data streams? My co-workers is trying to get Vtamprint to work with IPDS to an IBM 6400 and having one heck of a time. Thanks Matt Dazzo Technical Services Publishers Clearing House 516-944-4816 [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> "Beesley, Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 3/19/2007 7:14:00 AM >>> Does anybody run Macro 4's VTAMPRINT ? We had to backout a z/OS 1.7 upgrade yesterday because Vtamprint sat there ignoring all the output it should have been processing. We will be in touch with the vendor but it anybody else has experienced the same problem I'd be interested to hear how it was resolved. We are on Vtamprint 4.9. I've confirmed that the JES offset table was correctly assembled for 1.7 Thanks Paul Beesley UKOSG - Infrastructure Specialist Senior EDS Victoria House Bournemouth BH1 2NF Phone: 01202 502334 Mobile: 07790 495140 Please consider your environmental responsibility before printing this e-mail or any other document. This email contains information which is confidential and may be privileged. Unless you are the intended addressee (or authorised to receive for the addressee) you may not use, forward, copy or disclose to anyone this email or any information contained in this email. If you have received this email in error, please advise the sender by reply email immediately and delete this email. Electronic Data Systems Ltd Registered Office:, Lansdowne House, Berkeley Square, London W1J 6ER Registered in England no: 53419 VAT number: 432 99 5915 -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Zos Maintenance and pax format
First time user of Shopzeries and ordering system maintenance, I have 2 questions. 1. Is there a way to order so the files are .zip format and not in .pax format and still get internet delivery? 2. Any issues with creating an temporary HFS file on a volume other than a res volume to place the maintenance into? Current space on HFS does not appear to be enough to handle maintenance. Maintenance files will need 4300mb of space in HFS. HFS res volume has 5300 cyls available. Suggestions on the best way to handle this? We are running zOS1.7. Thanks Current HFS root stats are Current Allocation Allocated tracks . : 37,188 Allocated extents . : 2 Maximum dir. blocks : NOLIMIT Current Utilization Used pages . . . . : 392,242 % Utilized . . . . : 87 Number of members . : 11,516 Matt Dazzo Technical Services Publishers Clearing House 516-944-4816 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: IBMLink web access broken all accounts presented Entitlement page TN3270 working fine
Shopzseries and IBMlink appear to be working for me. Matt Dazzo Technical Services Publishers Clearing House 516-944-4816 [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> "Knutson, Sam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 3/16/2007 8:03 AM >>> Hi, Everyone in our company cannot get into the web version of IBMLink today. We are all being presented with the Entitlement page. TN3270 version is working fine. It seems the mappings for web id to account or something is not working properly.The help desk won't open it as a SEV1 since we can login even though no one can work. I found 4 of my co-workers who had the problem while I was on with the help desk. I really liked the part where the technician asked for my userid and password so he could see what is happening. I would have been happy to share out my desktop with him using an IBM tool like AOS but our policy is pretty strict about giving out your password over the phone. Anyone else seeing this today? If so please call the IBMLink help desk 1-800-543-3912 so they get reports from multiple accounts and will escalate it. Maybe it just is GEICO's account but I am skeptical. Best Regards, Sam Knutson, GEICO Performance and Availability Management mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (office) 301.986.3574 "Think big, act bold, start simple, grow fast..." This email/fax message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution of this email/fax is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all paper and electronic copies of the original message. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Accidental Advertisement?
Ed, interesting that an advertisement would promote a mainframe as that sounds so antiquated to many today. Most people don't have any idea what a mainframe is and that includes folks who work here, "IBM MAIN" would have to be more foreign than mainframe. We (employees) do not get those pieces of mail as we are not able to enter the contest, would be interesting to see. Matt Dazzo Technical Services Publishers Clearing House [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Ed Gould <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 3/13/2007 9:19 PM >>> I normally don't pay attention to envelopes from Publishers Clearing House but today I got an the usual envelope. Of course it had the usual advertisement stuff but it caught my eye because it mentioned their "IBM Mainframe" was going to choose the winning number. It also mentioned item about "IBM MAIN". I think it was a slip but advertisement for IBM-Main was probably accidently. Ed -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: IBM's web Face
Yeap Matt Dazzo Technical Services Publishers Clearing House 516-944-4816 [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3/8/2007 1:06:34 PM >>> Any one else having problems with IBMLink and ShopzSeries sites today? Sometimes I get logged on sometimes I don't. Our proxy server times out trying to get to ShopzSeries. I ordered PUT0702 for internet delivery and trying to download it I get "connection reset by peer" - every time I try and down load it. That's been happening for a couple of days now. Alan -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: zOS Service Levels
Anybody know if Session 2829-z/OS Maintenance Best Practices is available on the web or a pdf? I did some web searches but came up empty. Matt Dazzo [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3/5/2007 12:47 PM >>> >>What is the difference between service levels (PUTyymm or RSUyymm)? The way I understand, PUT level is when the PTF was made available. Once the PTF is available it is run through IBM's quarterly QA test, what IBM calls Consolidated Service Test. Their QA system is a 'Customer Like' system with zOS, DB2, CICS, IMS MQ and WAS, so is is a good test of how the ptf will perform in a "real" environment. Once the ptf passes CST, it is assigned the RSU value of that QTRly Test. I had the same question(s). SHARE-Tampa had a really good session on this (Session 2829-z/OS Maintenance Best Practices), put on by Greg Daynes, where there is additional detail on RSU and much more on maintaining systems. ... Most helpful. gabe -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
zOS Service Levels
What is the difference between service levels (PUTyymm or RSUyymm)? Is there any preferred method (PUTyymm or RSUyymm) or is it a personal preference? Thanks Matt Dazzo [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: less generic, more informative subject lines
John, point taken. But realize some folks are new to the service (like me) and therefore not familiar with what works best. Matt >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/14/2006 12:20 PM >>> Matt Dazzo is only the most recent offender, but I will shoot at him to make my point. His title, SMF question is less than helpful because too generic. Such a title as SMF records for catalog changes? would (1) be more immediately informative and (2) make the archives much more useful down the road. Let's all try to make our title lines for OPs more descriptive of what they contain. John Gilmore Ashland, MA 01721-1817 USA _ Use your PC to make calls at very low rates https://voiceoam.pcs.v2s.live.com/partnerredirect.aspx -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
smf question
Is there an smf record to track when a catalog was changed/updated or when a dataset was uncataloged? We have a mystery as to how several datasets were deleted in the mvs catalog then scratched by the tape management system. Thanks -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: make -v error > solved
Thanks Steve Use an upper case V: make -V Kind regards, -Steve Comstock -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html Matt Dazzo Technical Services Publishers Clearing House 516-944-4816 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
make -v error
Hello All, When entering the command (make -v) with no ( ) in USS to check for functionality I get the error below. Can anyone point me in the right direction to the solution. Thanks Matt ST1MAT:/: >make -v >>> Defined macro MAKECMD=make >>> Defined macro MFLAGS= >>> Defined macro MFLAGS= >>> Defined macro MAKEFLAGS= >>> Defined macro OS=OPENMVS >>> Defined macro @B=$(@:b) >>> Defined macro @D=$(@:d) >>> Defined macro @F=$(@:f) >>> Defined macro %B=$(%:b) >>> Defined macro %D=$(%:d) >>> Defined macro %F=$(%:f) >>> Defined macro *B=$(*:b) >>> Defined macro *D=$(*:d) >>> Defined macro *F=$(*:f) >>> Defined macro >> Defined macro >> Defined macro >> Defined macro ?B=$(?:b) >>> Defined macro ?F=$(?:f) >>> Defined macro ?D=$(?:d) >>> /etc/startup.mk: line 0: Defined macro INCDEPTH=0 >>> /etc/startup.mk: line 0: Defined macro MAKESTARTUP=/etc/startup.mk >>> /etc/startup.mk: line 0: Defined macro MAKESTARTUP=/etc/startup.mk >>> /etc/startup.mk: line 0: Reading startup file '/etc/startup.mk' >>> /etc/startup.mk: line 21: Defined macro __SILENT= >>> /etc/startup.mk: line 22: Defined macro .SILENT=yes >>> /etc/startup.mk: line 25: Defined macro E= >>> /etc/startup.mk: line 26: Defined macro O=.o >>> /etc/startup.mk: line 27: Defined macro S=.s >>> /etc/startup.mk: line 28: Defined macro A=.a >>> /etc/startup.mk: line 29: Defined macro P=.p >>> /etc/startup.mk: line 30: Defined macro F=.f >>> /etc/startup.mk: line 33: Defined macro SHELLMETAS=;*?"<>|()&*Ý$#`': >>> /etc/startup.mk: line 34: Defined macro GROUPSUFFIX= >>> /etc/startup.mk: line 37: Defined macro SYS=omvs >>> /etc/startup.mk: line 38: Defined macro CC=c89 >>> /etc/startup.mk: line 39: Defined macro CCC=cxx >>> /etc/startup.mk: line 40: Defined macro LD=c89 >>> /etc/startup.mk: line 44: Defined macro MAKE=make >>> /etc/startup.mk: line 45: Defined macro AR=ar >>> /etc/startup.mk: line 46: Defined macro RM=rm >>> /etc/startup.mk: line 47: Defined macro YACC=yacc >>> /etc/startup.mk: line 47: Defined macro YACC=yacc >>> /etc/startup.mk: line 48: Defined macro LEX=lex >>> /etc/startup.mk: line 50: Defined macro LEXYY=lex.yy >>> /etc/startup.mk: line 51: Defined macro YTAB=y.tab >>> /etc/startup.mk: line 53: Defined macro YACCR=yacc -r >>> /etc/startup.mk: line 54: Defined macro YACCE=yacc -e >>> /etc/startup.mk: line 57: Defined macro ARFLAGS=-rv >>> /etc/startup.mk: line 58: Defined macro CFLAGS=-O >>> /etc/startup.mk: line 59: Defined macro CCFLAGS= >>> /etc/startup.mk: line 60: Defined macro LDFLAGS= >>> /etc/startup.mk: line 61: Defined macro LFLAGS= >>> /etc/startup.mk: line 62: Defined macro YFLAGS= >>> /etc/startup.mk: line 63: Defined macro RMFLAGS= >>> /etc/startup.mk: line 131: Defined macro @B=$(@:b) >>> /etc/startup.mk: line 132: Defined macro @D=$(@:d) >>> /etc/startup.mk: line 133: Defined macro @F=$(@:f) >>> /etc/startup.mk: line 134: Defined macro *B=$(*:b) >>> /etc/startup.mk: line 135: Defined macro *D=$(*:d) >>> /etc/startup.mk: line 136: Defined macro *F=$(*:f) >>> /etc/startup.mk: line 137: Defined macro >> /etc/startup.mk: line 137: Defined macro >> /etc/startup.mk: line 138: Defined macro >> /etc/startup.mk: line 139: Defined macro >> /etc/startup.mk: line 140: Defined macro ?B=$(?:b) >>> /etc/startup.mk: line 141: Defined macro ?F=$(?:f) >>> /etc/startup.mk: line 142: Defined macro ?D=$(?:d) >>> /etc/startup.mk: line 145: Defined macro .SILENT= >>> /etc/startup.mk: line 148: FSUM9439 Include file startup.mk, not found >>> Defined macro INCDEPTH=0 >>> environment: Defined macro _BPX_TERMPATH=OMVS >>> en
Re: Java Error - Resolved
MEMLIMIT changed to 2G, this resolved the problem. Thanks Matt Dazzo Technical Services Publishers Clearing House 516-944-4816 [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/2/2006 4:36 PM >>> I just tried it with MEMLIMIT set to 256M and it worked !!! (I had MEMLIMIT set to 128M on my sand-box LPAR) On Fri, 3 Nov 2006 07:12:32 +1000, Shane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Thu, 2006-11-02 at 14:47 -0600, Ramiro Camposagrado wrote: >> I didn't see right away that you were trying to invoke the 64bit version >> JAVA 1.4. I found this APAR on IBMLINK: PK24855 >> >... >> I tried it on y asnd-box LPAR and I got this error: Could not create JAVA >> virtual machine. (And I have a 512M reagion size) Take a look at their >> LOCAL fix... It looks like a 2 gig region size to me !!! > >If it's anything like the 1.5_64, you can't allow MEMLIMIT to default to >0 in SMFPRMxx. Give it something - I think 256 was recommended. >What a pox Java is - in all environments, in all architectures >apparently. > >Shane ... > >-- >For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO >Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html >= -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Java Error
Current region size is ACCTNUM= ACCT# DEST= LOCAL HOLDCLASS= P PROC= $PCHPROC SIZE= 00512000 MAXSIZE= 00512000 SYSOUTCLASS= X USERDATA= COMMAND= >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/2/2006 3:09 PM >>> Make sure that you TSO logon region size is big enough. Probably somewhere between 128M to 256M (I have 256M on mine) -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Java Error
Hi All, working with java 1.4.2 on zOS 1.7. Entered command java -version in USS and got the following error. Any thoughts? Thanks ST1MAT:/: >java -version Error: unable to allocate 67108864 bytes for GC in j9vmem_reserve_memory. Error: unable to allocate 53686272 bytes for GC in j9vmem_reserve_memory. Error: unable to allocate 53686272 bytes for GC in j9vmem_reserve_memory. Error: unable to allocate 42948608 bytes for GC in j9vmem_reserve_memory. Error: unable to allocate 34358272 bytes for GC in j9vmem_reserve_memory. Error: unable to allocate 27486208 bytes for GC in j9vmem_reserve_memory. Error: unable to allocate 21988352 bytes for GC in j9vmem_reserve_memory. Error: unable to allocate 17590272 bytes for GC in j9vmem_reserve_memory. Error: unable to allocate 14071808 bytes for GC in j9vmem_reserve_memory. JIT: Method sample thread failed to start -- disabling sampling. JVMJ9VM019E Fatal error: Unable to find and initialize required class java/lang/ NoClassDefFoundError JVMJ9VM020I Searched in /usr/lpp/java/J1.4_64/lib/jclSC14/classes.zip JVMJ9VM020I Searched in /usr/lpp/java/J1.4_64/lib/core.jar JVMJ9VM020I Searched in /usr/lpp/java/J1.4_64/lib/charsets.jar JVMJ9VM020I Searched in /usr/lpp/java/J1.4_64/lib/graphics.jar JVMJ9VM020I Searched in /usr/lpp/java/J1.4_64/lib/security.jar JVMJ9VM020I Searched in /usr/lpp/java/J1.4_64/lib/ibmpkcs.jar JVMJ9VM020I Searched in /usr/lpp/java/J1.4_64/lib/ibmorb.jar JVMJ9VM020I Searched in /usr/lpp/java/J1.4_64/lib/ibmorbapi.jar JVMJ9VM020I Searched in /usr/lpp/java/J1.4_64/lib/ibmjcefw.jar JVMJ9VM020I Searched in /usr/lpp/java/J1.4_64/lib/ibmjcefw.jar JVMJ9VM020I Searched in /usr/lpp/java/J1.4_64/lib/ibmjssefips.jar JVMJ9VM020I Searched in /usr/lpp/java/J1.4_64/lib/ibmjgssprovider.jar JVMJ9VM020I Searched in /usr/lpp/java/J1.4_64/lib/ibmjsseprovider.jar JVMJ9VM020I Searched in /usr/lpp/java/J1.4_64/lib/ibmjaaslm.jar JVMJ9VM020I Searched in /usr/lpp/java/J1.4_64/lib/ibmjaasactivelm.jar JVMJ9VM020I Searched in /usr/lpp/java/J1.4_64/lib/ibmcertpathprovider.jar JVMJ9VM020I Searched in /usr/lpp/java/J1.4_64/lib/server.jar JVMJ9VM020I Searched in /usr/lpp/java/J1.4_64/lib/xml.jar JVMJ9VM023I This may indicate that JAVA_HOME is incorrect, or that class librari es are not installed -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Re: Oracle on z/OS
Yeah, I found that site and that's why I'm asking for additional possibilities. Thanks >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/1/2006 3:36:26 PM >>> > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Dazzo > Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 2:19 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU > Subject: Oracle on z/OS > > > Does anyone know of a discussion forum or listserv specifically for > Oracle on z/OS? > > Thanks Matt Don't I wish! I would love something like DB2-L! The best that I've found, and it is moribund, is a Web site: http://www.zseriesoraclesig.org/ -- John McKown Senior Systems Programmer HealthMarkets Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage Administrative Services Group Information Technology This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and its content is protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this transmission, or taking any action based on it, is strictly prohibited. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
Oracle on z/OS
Does anyone know of a discussion forum or listserv specifically for Oracle on z/OS? Thanks Matt -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
