SIZE of CSE area for dasd models bigger 3390-9
Dear all, I am not sure how big the CSE Area need to be on DASD bigger than 3390-9. The planing manual shows only 3390-9, which has in fact 9 cylinders. How big the CSA Area need to be on 3390-27 and 3390-54? Thank you very much. Best regards, Fox
AUTO: Mark Woodruff/Jefferson City/IBM is out of the office. (returning 06/23/2008)
I am out of the office until 06/23/2008. I will respond to your message when I return. Note: This is an automated response to your message IBMVM Digest - 10 Jun 2008 to 11 Jun 2008 (#2008-77) sent on 6/11/08 23:02:46. This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away.
Re: SIZE of CSE area for dasd models bigger 3390-9
The number of cylinders listed for a 3390-9 is actually enough for a 3390-54. 9 cylinders can map all 65520 cylinders of a mod 54 and of course the smaller mod 27. Maybe the table in the documentation should say 3390-9 or bigger .. On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 5:13 AM, Fox Blue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear all, I am not sure how big the CSE Area need to be on DASD bigger than 3390-9. The planing manual shows only 3390-9, which has in fact 9 cylinders. How big the CSA Area need to be on 3390-27 and 3390-54? Thank you very much. Best regards, Fox -- Bruce Hayden Linux on System z Advanced Technical Support IBM, Endicott, NY
SERVICE exec with RSU
I received electronic service for z/VM 5.3, RSU 7304. I am not clear on interpreting the installation instructions. I received 4 files: S7858796.SHIPDOC S7858796.SHIPRSU1 S7858796.SHIPRSU2 S7858796.SHIPRSU3 My question or confusion is that is the fname and ftype that the SERVICE exec needs. There are references to the ftype must be SERVLINK. If so what do I do with the dup fnames? I see another reference saying that the ftypes can be in the SHIPRSUn format that I received. I see a reference to the service envelope needs to be on the 500 disk accessed as C and another saying that it needs to be accessed as A. I've used SERVICE before but for 7304 I ordered a tape. I don't remember using SERVICE for electronic service with more than one file. What filemode does the service need to be on and what fname and ftype does SERVICE want the files to be? Jim -- Jim Bohnsack Cornell University (607) 255-1760 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SIZE of CSE area for dasd models bigger 3390-9
It's technically accurate becaues a disk with 65520 cylinder is still a 3390-9. Not that anyone calls them those... Bigger than those will be called 3390-A and can go to something like 262,000 cylinders. Marcy This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on this message or any information herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation. -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruce Hayden Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 8:10 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: [IBMVM] SIZE of CSE area for dasd models bigger 3390-9 The number of cylinders listed for a 3390-9 is actually enough for a 3390-54. 9 cylinders can map all 65520 cylinders of a mod 54 and of course the smaller mod 27. Maybe the table in the documentation should say 3390-9 or bigger .. -- Bruce Hayden Linux on System z Advanced Technical Support IBM, Endicott, NY
Re: SIZE of CSE area for dasd models bigger 3390-9
Technically, the mod-27 and mod-54 are 3390 model 9s with increased number of cylinders; so the number is 9 cylinders for the CSE area (across the board). Steve Wilkins z/VM I/O Strategy Fox Blue [EMAIL PROTECTED] AIL.COM To Sent by: The IBM IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU z/VM Operating cc System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject ARK.EDU SIZE of CSE area for dasd models bigger 3390-9 06/12/2008 05:13 AM Please respond to The IBM z/VM Operating System [EMAIL PROTECTED] ARK.EDU Dear all, I am not sure how big the CSE Area need to be on DASD bigger than 3390-9. The planing manual shows only 3390-9, which has in fact 9 cylinders. How big the CSA Area need to be on 3390-27 and 3390-54? Thank you very much. Best regards, Fox
Re: SERVICE exec with RSU
Jim Bohnsack wrote: I received electronic service for z/VM 5.3, RSU 7304. I am not clear on Did you mean 5304? interpreting the installation instructions. I received 4 files: S7858796.SHIPDOC S7858796.SHIPRSU1 S7858796.SHIPRSU2 S7858796.SHIPRSU3 I got mine through SRD and they came as RLST.BIN or RPTF.BIN files that then had to be DETERSEd to .SERVLINK files. Did you get yours through ShopZ? My question or confusion is that is the fname and ftype that the SERVICE exec needs. There are references to the ftype must be SERVLINK. If so what do I do with the dup fnames? I see another reference saying that the ftypes can be in the SHIPRSUn format that I received. I see a reference to the service envelope needs to be on the 500 disk accessed as C and another saying that it needs to be accessed as A. The Guide for Automated Installation and Service says C, but it also says If your media is electronic, follow the instructions that were sent to you electronically. FWIW, when I recently got RSU5304, the 500 disk was Z. I've used SERVICE before but for 7304 I ordered a tape. I don't remember using SERVICE for electronic service with more than one file. What filemode does the service need to be on and what fname and ftype does SERVICE want the files to be? Filemode: anywhere it can find the files; FN and FT, see above. Jim HTH Kim
Re: SERVICE exec with RSU
I just did service on 5.3. I used the Download Director to get the s?.SHIPDOC etc to my pc. Then I uploaded to the mainframe (binary). You need to use the filetype of SERVLINK when you DETERSE the binary file. Hope that helps. -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kim Goldenberg Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 12:16 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: SERVICE exec with RSU Jim Bohnsack wrote: I received electronic service for z/VM 5.3, RSU 7304. I am not clear on Did you mean 5304? interpreting the installation instructions. I received 4 files: S7858796.SHIPDOC S7858796.SHIPRSU1 S7858796.SHIPRSU2 S7858796.SHIPRSU3 I got mine through SRD and they came as RLST.BIN or RPTF.BIN files that then had to be DETERSEd to .SERVLINK files. Did you get yours through ShopZ? My question or confusion is that is the fname and ftype that the SERVICE exec needs. There are references to the ftype must be SERVLINK. If so what do I do with the dup fnames? I see another reference saying that the ftypes can be in the SHIPRSUn format that I received. I see a reference to the service envelope needs to be on the 500 disk accessed as C and another saying that it needs to be accessed as A. The Guide for Automated Installation and Service says C, but it also says If your media is electronic, follow the instructions that were sent to you electronically. FWIW, when I recently got RSU5304, the 500 disk was Z. I've used SERVICE before but for 7304 I ordered a tape. I don't remember using SERVICE for electronic service with more than one file. What filemode does the service need to be on and what fname and ftype does SERVICE want the files to be? Filemode: anywhere it can find the files; FN and FT, see above. Jim HTH Kim
Re: SERVICE exec with RSU
I got mine thru ShopZ and I remembered having to decide if I wanted to download them thru a browser or ftp. I chose browser and those 4 separate files are what were downloaded. Yes, I guess I meant RSU 5304. I just tried it again. Starting with the z/VM Electronically Delivered Service (CORective or RSU) Installation Instructions, I did step (1) Upload Service Envelope(s) I followed the directions to use MS-DOS Windows FTP. (2) De-Compaction of Service Envelope(s) That worked like a charm. (3) Installation of Service Envelope(s) on z/VM Host For service envelop files in VMSES/E format (files with extensions of SHIPTFSS, or SHIPDOCS or SHIPRSUn or SHIPDOC): Follow the appropriate instructions listed below for the release of VM you are running. (It says to go to Part 4 'Service Procedures' in the z/VM Guide for Automated Installation and Service) That tells you to enter SERVICE ALL envfn1 envfn2... but I have one name and several SHIPRSUn files. I'm going to call IBM and order a tape. It should be here by Monday. There's got to be a better way. Jim Kim Goldenberg wrote: Jim Bohnsack wrote: I received electronic service for z/VM 5.3, RSU 7304. I am not clear on Did you mean 5304? interpreting the installation instructions. I received 4 files: S7858796.SHIPDOC S7858796.SHIPRSU1 S7858796.SHIPRSU2 S7858796.SHIPRSU3 I got mine through SRD and they came as RLST.BIN or RPTF.BIN files that then had to be DETERSEd to .SERVLINK files. Did you get yours through ShopZ? My question or confusion is that is the fname and ftype that the SERVICE exec needs. There are references to the ftype must be SERVLINK. If so what do I do with the dup fnames? I see another reference saying that the ftypes can be in the SHIPRSUn format that I received. I see a reference to the service envelope needs to be on the 500 disk accessed as C and another saying that it needs to be accessed as A. The Guide for Automated Installation and Service says C, but it also says If your media is electronic, follow the instructions that were sent to you electronically. FWIW, when I recently got RSU5304, the 500 disk was Z. I've used SERVICE before but for 7304 I ordered a tape. I don't remember using SERVICE for electronic service with more than one file. What filemode does the service need to be on and what fname and ftype does SERVICE want the files to be? Filemode: anywhere it can find the files; FN and FT, see above. Jim HTH Kim -- Jim Bohnsack Cornell University (607) 255-1760 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SERVICE exec with RSU
Jim Bohnsack wrote: I got mine thru ShopZ and I remembered having to decide if I wanted to download them thru a browser or ftp. I chose browser and those 4 separate files are what were downloaded. Yes, I guess I meant RSU 5304. I just tried it again. Starting with the z/VM Electronically Delivered Service (CORective or RSU) Installation Instructions, I did step (1) Upload Service Envelope(s) I followed the directions to use MS-DOS Windows FTP. (2) De-Compaction of Service Envelope(s) That worked like a charm. (3) Installation of Service Envelope(s) on z/VM Host For service envelop files in VMSES/E format (files with extensions of SHIPTFSS, or SHIPDOCS or SHIPRSUn or SHIPDOC): Follow the appropriate instructions listed below for the release of VM you are running. (It says to go to Part 4 'Service Procedures' in the z/VM Guide for Automated Installation and Service) That tells you to enter SERVICE ALL envfn1 envfn2... but I have one name and several SHIPRSUn files. I'm going to call IBM and order a tape. It should be here by Monday. There's got to be a better way. Jim Based on what Anne Crabtree replied, you upload the files to the z/VM system BINARY FIXED 1024 and deterse then to SERVLINK file type. You probably want to rename them to SHIPRSUn SERVLINK or SHIPDOCS SERVLINK when you deterse the files. Then you can run SERVICE ALL SHIPDOCS to get the documents and then SERVICE ALL SHIPRSU1 SHIPRSU2 SHIPRSU3 to get the RSU loaded for PUT2PROD. Kim
RMSMASTR FSMKIN1100E Error from communication function 24, return code = 15
Has anyone run into the following running a DFSMSRM command from a second level z/vm? and what corrected it? FSMKIN1100E Error from communication function 24, return code = 15 Situation: First level z/VM 5.2.0 runs VM:Tape and RMSMASTR connected to a VTS. 2nd level z/VM 5.2.0 just RMSMASTR connected to same VTS. No problems with first level. 2nd level (VMTEST) in cms mode can run commands okay. RMSMASTR appears to initialize (attach then detach tape drive without errors) in 2nd level. Is there some sort of virtual ctc needed between the 1st and 2nd level?
Re: SIZE of CSE area for dasd models bigger 3390-9
That is clear now, thank's a lot. BR Fox
Re: RMSMASTR FSMKIN1100E Error from communication function 24, return code = 15
Howard, Do you have ... --- STDEVOPT LIBRARY CTL In the directory entry of *both* the VMTEST guest directory *and* RMSMASTR running as a guest under VMTEST? JR (Steven) Imler CA Senior Software Engineer Tel: +1 703 708 3479 Fax: +1 703 708 3267 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Howard Mccorkle Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 03:55 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: RMSMASTR FSMKIN1100E Error from communication function 24, return code = 15 Has anyone run into the following running a DFSMSRM command from a second= level z/vm? and what corrected it? FSMKIN1100E Error from communication function 24, return code = 15 Situation: First level z/VM 5.2.0 runs VM:Tape and RMSMASTR connected to a VTS. 2nd level z/VM 5.2.0 just RMSMASTR connected to same VTS. No problems with first level. 2nd level (VMTEST) in cms mode can run commands okay. RMSMASTR appears to initialize (attach then detach tape = drive without errors) in 2nd level. Is there some sort of virtual ctc needed between the 1st and 2nd level?
Re: RMSMASTR FSMKIN1100E Error from communication function 24, return code = 15
Try adding STDEVOPT LIBRARY CTL To the 2nd level machine's directory entry. Marcy This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on this message or any information herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation. -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Howard Mccorkle Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 12:55 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: [IBMVM] RMSMASTR FSMKIN1100E Error from communication function 24, return code = 15 Has anyone run into the following running a DFSMSRM command from a second= level z/vm? and what corrected it? FSMKIN1100E Error from communication function 24, return code = 15 Situation: First level z/VM 5.2.0 runs VM:Tape and RMSMASTR connected to a VTS. 2nd level z/VM 5.2.0 just RMSMASTR connected to same VTS. No problems with first level. 2nd level (VMTEST) in cms mode can run commands okay. RMSMASTR appears to initialize (attach then detach tape = drive without errors) in 2nd level. Is there some sort of virtual ctc needed between the 1st and 2nd level?
Re: RMSMASTR FSMKIN1100E Error from communication function 24, return code = 15
Yes to both -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Imler, Steven J Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 1:00 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: RMSMASTR FSMKIN1100E Error from communication function 24, return code = 15 Howard, Do you have ... --- STDEVOPT LIBRARY CTL In the directory entry of *both* the VMTEST guest directory *and* RMSMASTR running as a guest under VMTEST? JR (Steven) Imler CA Senior Software Engineer Tel: +1 703 708 3479 Fax: +1 703 708 3267 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Howard Mccorkle Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 03:55 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: RMSMASTR FSMKIN1100E Error from communication function 24, return code = 15 Has anyone run into the following running a DFSMSRM command from a second= level z/vm? and what corrected it? FSMKIN1100E Error from communication function 24, return code = 15 Situation: First level z/VM 5.2.0 runs VM:Tape and RMSMASTR connected to a VTS. 2nd level z/VM 5.2.0 just RMSMASTR connected to same VTS. No problems with first level. 2nd level (VMTEST) in cms mode can run commands okay. RMSMASTR appears to initialize (attach then detach tape = drive without errors) in 2nd level. Is there some sort of virtual ctc needed between the 1st and 2nd level? Email Firewall made the following annotations. -- Warning: All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the corporate e-mail system, and is subject to archival and review by someone other than the recipient. This e-mail may contain proprietary information and is intended only for the use of the intended recipient(s). If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient(s), you are notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately. ==
Re: RMSMASTR FSMKIN1100E Error from communication function 24, return code = 15
And you LOGOFF/LOGON the VMTEST guest since you added STDEVOPT LIBRARY CTL to its directory entry? JR (Steven) Imler CA Senior Software Engineer Tel: +1 703 708 3479 Fax: +1 703 708 3267 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of HOWARD MCCORKLE Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 04:01 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: RMSMASTR FSMKIN1100E Error from communication function 24, return code = 15 Yes to both -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Imler, Steven J Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 1:00 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: RMSMASTR FSMKIN1100E Error from communication function 24, return code = 15 Howard, Do you have ... --- STDEVOPT LIBRARY CTL In the directory entry of *both* the VMTEST guest directory *and* RMSMASTR running as a guest under VMTEST? JR (Steven) Imler CA Senior Software Engineer Tel: +1 703 708 3479 Fax: +1 703 708 3267 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Howard Mccorkle Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 03:55 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: RMSMASTR FSMKIN1100E Error from communication function 24, return code = 15 Has anyone run into the following running a DFSMSRM command from a second= level z/vm? and what corrected it? FSMKIN1100E Error from communication function 24, return code = 15 Situation: First level z/VM 5.2.0 runs VM:Tape and RMSMASTR connected to a VTS. 2nd level z/VM 5.2.0 just RMSMASTR connected to same VTS. No problems with first level. 2nd level (VMTEST) in cms mode can run commands okay. RMSMASTR appears to initialize (attach then detach tape = drive without errors) in 2nd level. Is there some sort of virtual ctc needed between the 1st and 2nd level? Email Firewall made the following annotations. -- Warning: All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the corporate e-mail system, and is subject to archival and review by someone other than the recipient. This e-mail may contain proprietary information and is intended only for the use of the intended recipient(s). If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient(s), you are notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately. ==
Re: RMSMASTR FSMKIN1100E Error from communication function 24, return code = 15
Hi Steve, Yes - IPL'd the 2nd level (VMTEST). Before the IPL I ran a DFSMSRM Q LIB OPS with no errors from VMTEST (CMS). The error code indicates a APPC connect error Not sure if I need to look at some connection to the first level TSAF... I'm not a VM expert. -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Imler, Steven J Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 1:06 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: RMSMASTR FSMKIN1100E Error from communication function 24, return code = 15 And you LOGOFF/LOGON the VMTEST guest since you added STDEVOPT LIBRARY CTL to its directory entry? JR (Steven) Imler CA Senior Software Engineer Tel: +1 703 708 3479 Fax: +1 703 708 3267 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of HOWARD MCCORKLE Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 04:01 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: RMSMASTR FSMKIN1100E Error from communication function 24, return code = 15 Yes to both -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Imler, Steven J Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 1:00 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: RMSMASTR FSMKIN1100E Error from communication function 24, return code = 15 Howard, Do you have ... --- STDEVOPT LIBRARY CTL In the directory entry of *both* the VMTEST guest directory *and* RMSMASTR running as a guest under VMTEST? JR (Steven) Imler CA Senior Software Engineer Tel: +1 703 708 3479 Fax: +1 703 708 3267 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Howard Mccorkle Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 03:55 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: RMSMASTR FSMKIN1100E Error from communication function 24, return code = 15 Has anyone run into the following running a DFSMSRM command from a second= level z/vm? and what corrected it? FSMKIN1100E Error from communication function 24, return code = 15 Situation: First level z/VM 5.2.0 runs VM:Tape and RMSMASTR connected to a VTS. 2nd level z/VM 5.2.0 just RMSMASTR connected to same VTS. No problems with first level. 2nd level (VMTEST) in cms mode can run commands okay. RMSMASTR appears to initialize (attach then detach tape = drive without errors) in 2nd level. Is there some sort of virtual ctc needed between the 1st and 2nd level? Email Firewall made the following annotations. -- Warning: All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the corporate e-mail system, and is subject to archival and review by someone other than the recipient. This e-mail may contain proprietary information and is intended only for the use of the intended recipient(s). If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient(s), you are notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately. == Email Firewall made the following annotations. -- Warning: All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the corporate e-mail system, and is subject to archival and review by someone other than the recipient. This e-mail may contain proprietary information and is intended only for the use of the intended recipient(s). If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient(s), you are notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately. ==
Re: SERVICE exec with RSU
It's working!! No help from the documentation. The only thing you said, Kim, that isn't necessary or wanted for an RSU is to do the SERVICE ALL SHIPDOCS. One of the many pieces of documentation says that you don't do that for an RSU, only for a COR. It went completely past me that when the doc talks about files that with extensions of SHIPRSUn that SHIPRSUn would be used as the file name and not the file type. Extensions on pc files usually get translated into file types on VM. I did call to order a tape and mentioned to the person on the call back why I was doing it, he asked if I'd like to talk to someone who might be able to shed some light on why I was having problems. I did, soon, receive a call back, altho, by that time I was following Kim's advice. I told the person who called why I was having a problem or what I was not understanding and she agreed that the way it was written could be confusing. Jim Kim Goldenberg wrote: Based on what Anne Crabtree replied, you upload the files to the z/VM system BINARY FIXED 1024 and deterse then to SERVLINK file type. You probably want to rename them to SHIPRSUn SERVLINK or SHIPDOCS SERVLINK when you deterse the files. Then you can run SERVICE ALL SHIPDOCS to get the documents and then SERVICE ALL SHIPRSU1 SHIPRSU2 SHIPRSU3 to get the RSU loaded for PUT2PROD. Kim -- Jim Bohnsack Cornell University (607) 255-1760 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HiperSockets
Hi I have set up a HiprSockets connection from z/VM 5.3 to one of my z/OS LPARS. I can PING the z/OS LPAR but when I try to PING the z/VM LPAR from the z/OS LPAR we time out. Is there anything I might be missing? We are using the OBEYFILE to bring the configuration in dynamically. Thanks.. Terry Terry Martin Lockheed Martin - CITIC z/OS Performance and Tuning (410) 786-0386 - Office (443) 632-4191 - Cell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RMSMASTR FSMKIN1100E Error from communication function 24, return
Has anyone run into the following running a DFSMSRM command from a second level z/vm? and what corrected it? FSMKIN1100E Error from communication function 24, return code = 15 Situation: First level z/VM 5.2.0 runs VM:Tape and RMSMASTR connected to a VTS. 2nd level z/VM 5.2.0 just RMSMASTR connected to same VTS. No problems with first level. 2nd level (VMTEST) in cms mode can run commands okay. RMSMASTR appears to initialize (attach then detach tape drive without errors) in 2nd level. Is there some sort of virtual ctc needed between the 1st and 2nd level? This is an IUCV error, the 15 indicates an authorization failure. Do you have IUCV ALLOW in the RMSMASTR directory on the second level system? RMSMASTR second level and first level are not aware of each other nor do they communicate with each other. In addition, the RMSMASTR directory should probably have: IUCV *IDENT RESANY BLOBAL REVOKE Best Regards, Les Geer IBM z/VM and Linux Development
Re: RMSMASTR FSMKIN1100E Error from communication function 24, return code = 15
Hmmm ... I don't think a ISFC link is require to enable (3rd level) RMSMASTER on the guest to talk to the 3494 ... I think it's all done through the real device cabling (whatever that may be). All (well most) of our guests are hooked to the host via ISFC, so I never would have noticed a failure in this case. Les ... ? JR (Steven) Imler CA Senior Software Engineer Tel: +1 703 708 3479 Fax: +1 703 708 3267 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of HOWARD MCCORKLE Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 04:14 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: RMSMASTR FSMKIN1100E Error from communication function 24, return code = 15 Hi Steve, Yes - IPL'd the 2nd level (VMTEST). Before the IPL I ran a DFSMSRM Q LIB OPS with no errors from VMTEST (CMS). The error code indicates a APPC connect error Not sure if I need to look at some connection to the first level TSAF... I'm not a VM expert. -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Imler, Steven J Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 1:06 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: RMSMASTR FSMKIN1100E Error from communication function 24, return code = 15 And you LOGOFF/LOGON the VMTEST guest since you added STDEVOPT LIBRARY CTL to its directory entry? JR (Steven) Imler CA Senior Software Engineer Tel: +1 703 708 3479 Fax: +1 703 708 3267 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of HOWARD MCCORKLE Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 04:01 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: RMSMASTR FSMKIN1100E Error from communication function 24, return code = 15 Yes to both -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Imler, Steven J Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 1:00 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: RMSMASTR FSMKIN1100E Error from communication function 24, return code = 15 Howard, Do you have ... --- STDEVOPT LIBRARY CTL In the directory entry of *both* the VMTEST guest directory *and* RMSMASTR running as a guest under VMTEST? JR (Steven) Imler CA Senior Software Engineer Tel: +1 703 708 3479 Fax: +1 703 708 3267 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Howard Mccorkle Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 03:55 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: RMSMASTR FSMKIN1100E Error from communication function 24, return code = 15 Has anyone run into the following running a DFSMSRM command from a second= level z/vm? and what corrected it? FSMKIN1100E Error from communication function 24, return code = 15 Situation: First level z/VM 5.2.0 runs VM:Tape and RMSMASTR connected to a VTS. 2nd level z/VM 5.2.0 just RMSMASTR connected to same VTS. No problems with first level. 2nd level (VMTEST) in cms mode can run commands okay. RMSMASTR appears to initialize (attach then detach tape = drive without errors) in 2nd level. Is there some sort of virtual ctc needed between the 1st and 2nd level? Email Firewall made the following annotations. -- Warning: All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the corporate e-mail system, and is subject to archival and review by someone other than the recipient. This e-mail may contain proprietary information and is intended only for the use of the intended recipient(s). If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient(s), you are notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately. == Email Firewall made the following annotations. -- Warning: All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the corporate e-mail system, and is subject to archival and review by someone other than the recipient. This e-mail may contain proprietary information and is intended only for the use of the intended recipient(s). If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient(s), you are notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately.
Re: SERVICE exec with RSU
Jim Bohnsack wrote: It's working!! No help from the documentation. The only thing you said, Kim, that isn't necessary or wanted for an RSU is to do the SERVICE ALL SHIPDOCS. One of the many pieces of documentation says that you don't do that for an RSU, only for a COR. It went completely past me that when the doc talks about files that with extensions of SHIPRSUn that SHIPRSUn would be used as the file name and not the file type. Extensions on pc files usually get translated into file types on VM. I did call to order a tape and mentioned to the person on the call back why I was doing it, he asked if I'd like to talk to someone who might be able to shed some light on why I was having problems. I did, soon, receive a call back, altho, by that time I was following Kim's advice. I told the person who called why I was having a problem or what I was not understanding and she agreed that the way it was written could be confusing. Jim Glad I could help and I hope they stop confusing us!. Kim
Re: HiperSockets
Hi Terry. I suspect that your gateway or default statement in the VM TCPIP stack is not correct. Need a network diagram and your TCPIP statements to provide further suggestions. Hans From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR) Sent: June 12, 2008 4:20 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: HiperSockets Hi I have set up a HiprSockets connection from z/VM 5.3 to one of my z/OS LPARS. I can PING the z/OS LPAR but when I try to PING the z/VM LPAR from the z/OS LPAR we time out. Is there anything I might be missing? We are using the OBEYFILE to bring the configuration in dynamically. Thanks.. Terry Terry Martin Lockheed Martin - CITIC z/OS Performance and Tuning (410) 786-0386 - Office (443) 632-4191 - Cell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: HiperSockets
On Thursday, 06/12/2008 at 04:26 EDT, Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have set up a HiprSockets connection from z/VM 5.3 to one of my z/OS LPARS. I can PING the z/OS LPAR but when I try to PINGthe z/VM LPAR from the z/OS LPAR we time out. Is there anything I might be missing? We are using the OBEYFILE to bring the configuration in dynamically. A network problem with no details and no diagram with addresses and subnet masks. If you can provide that, along with the output of NETSTAT HOME GATE from VM and MVS, then we should be able to ferret out the problem. Alan Altmark z/VM Development IBM Endicott
Re: HiperSockets
Hi I will try to get this information. I am working off of a DUMB terminal for this proof of concept so getting screen shots and such is not happening. I will probably need to talk to someone while I am displaying the information at the z/VM and z/OS consoles and rely what I am seeing as we speak. Thanks.. Terry Terry Martin Lockheed Martin - CITIC z/OS Performance and Tuning (410) 786-0386 - Office (443) 632-4191 - Cell [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan Altmark Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 5:25 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: HiperSockets On Thursday, 06/12/2008 at 04:26 EDT, Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have set up a HiprSockets connection from z/VM 5.3 to one of my z/OS LPARS. I can PING the z/OS LPAR but when I try to PINGthe z/VM LPAR from the z/OS LPAR we time out. Is there anything I might be missing? We are using the OBEYFILE to bring the configuration in dynamically. A network problem with no details and no diagram with addresses and subnet masks. If you can provide that, along with the output of NETSTAT HOME GATE from VM and MVS, then we should be able to ferret out the problem. Alan Altmark z/VM Development IBM Endicott
Oldest VM on a System Z?
Hi... Does anyone know/remember the oldest (first) realease of VM that would run on a Z processor? I know z/VM 5.1 required a Z. But what from earlier releases would run on a Z? 4.4? 4.3? 4.2? Thanks. Lee -- Lee Stewart, Senior SE Sirius Computer Solutions Phone: (303) 798-2954 Fax: (720) 228-2321 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: www.siriuscom.com
Re: Oldest VM on a System Z?
On Jun 12, 2008, at 7:55 PM, Lee Stewart wrote: Hi... Does anyone know/remember the oldest (first) realease of VM that would run on a Z processor? I know z/VM 5.1 required a Z. But what from earlier releases would run on a Z? 4.4? 4.3? 4.2? Will run and Is supported are two different things. Anything that doesn't actually require 370 mode will, I think, run natively. And of course if you're willing to be creative, there's nothing stopping you from building Hercules on z/Linux and running VM/370 or indeed CP-67 on that. I strongly suspect that it would run faster than the native iron it's emulating, even, on a z9 or z10. Adam
Re: Oldest VM on a System Z?
z/VM 3.1 was the first z release. z/VM v4 was a 64 bit version, i.e. z capable. Jim Lee Stewart wrote: Hi... Does anyone know/remember the oldest (first) realease of VM that would run on a Z processor? I know z/VM 5.1 required a Z. But what from earlier releases would run on a Z? 4.4? 4.3? 4.2? Thanks. Lee -- Jim Bohnsack Cornell University (607) 255-1760 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Oldest VM on a System Z?
Hi... Does anyone know/remember the oldest (first) realease of VM that would run on a Z processor? I know z/VM 5.1 required a Z. But what from earlier releases would run on a Z? 4.4? 4.3? 4.2? Lee: According to the z900 announcement letter, the following VM releases were supported at GA. * z/VM 3.1.0 * VM/ESA 2.4.0 * VM/ESA 2.3.0 * VM/ESA 2.2.0 According to the z800 announcement letter, the following VM releases were supported at GA. * VM/ESA 2.4.0 with APARs VM62676, VM62811, VM62942 and VM62665 * z/VM 3.1.0 * z/VM 4.1.0 * z/VM 4.2.0 with APARs VM62938 and PQ51738 for HiperSockets As you may remember, we announced z/VM 3.1 with the z900 and then quickly repackaged (and repriced) the product as z/VM 4.1/4.2. All three releases shipped in 2001. Jim
Re: Oldest VM on a System Z?
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 2:55 AM, Lee Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi... Does anyone know/remember the oldest (first) realease of VM that would run on a Z processor? I know z/VM 5.1 required a Z. But what from earlier releases would run on a Z? 4.4? 4.3? 4.2? The other responses carefully avoid the subtle part of your question: the difference between run on at least one particular z system or run on the z system of your choice You may not be able to get the hardware support for the latest ones... Rob
Re: Oldest VM on a System Z?
IIRC z/VM 3.1 could run in either 32 or 64bit mode. I think there were (by default) 2 CP Nuclei generated with a SYSGEN, one for each mode, and a bootstrap that would load the correct one. Jim Bohnsack wrote: z/VM 3.1 was the first z release. z/VM v4 was a 64 bit version, i.e. z capable. Jim Lee Stewart wrote: Hi... Does anyone know/remember the oldest (first) realease of VM that would run on a Z processor? I know z/VM 5.1 required a Z. But what from earlier releases would run on a Z? 4.4? 4.3? 4.2? Thanks. Lee
