VM Console

2010-09-03 Thread Dodds, Jim
Hello Everyone,

 

An computer operator, but of course no one owned up to it, has logged
off OPERATOR from the VM console. When they log back onto OPERATOR they
receive no messages on the console for VM.  It is as though the console
log is now going to a secondary user but there is not one specified in
the directory for OPERATOR. When I log into MAINT I get the console log
for VM.  I log off of MAINT and log on to OPERATOR no console log.  I
log back on to MAINT I have the console log.  Anyone have any idea  how
to get the console log back to OPERATOR? 

 

Jim Dodds

Systems Programmer

Kentucky State University

400 East Main Street

Frankfort, Ky 40601

502 597 6114

 



Re: VM Console

2010-09-03 Thread Dodds, Jim
Thanks Bill, Dave and Robbie that did the trick.

 

Jim Dodds

Systems Programmer

Kentucky State University

400 East Main Street

Frankfort, Ky 40601

502 597 6114

 

From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Wakser, David
Sent: Friday, September 03, 2010 11:46 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: VM Console

 

Q SYSOPER (to see who has it now) and

SET SYSOPER * (issued from OPERATOR userid)

 

From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Robert Payne
Sent: Friday, September 03, 2010 11:42 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: VM Console

 

There is a SET command for that, but don't remember the syntax.

 

-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu]on Behalf Of Dodds, Jim
Sent: Friday, September 03, 2010 10:41 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: VM Console

Hello Everyone,

 

An computer operator, but of course no one owned up to it, has
logged off OPERATOR from the VM console. When they log back onto
OPERATOR they receive no messages on the console for VM.  It is as
though the console log is now going to a secondary user but there is not
one specified in the directory for OPERATOR. When I log into MAINT I get
the console log for VM.  I log off of MAINT and log on to OPERATOR no
console log.  I log back on to MAINT I have the console log.  Anyone
have any idea  how to get the console log back to OPERATOR? 

 

Jim Dodds

Systems Programmer

Kentucky State University

400 East Main Street

Frankfort, Ky 40601

502 597 6114

 

Confidentiality Note: This e-mail, including any attachment to it, may
contain material that is confidential, proprietary, privileged and/or
Protected Health Information, within the meaning of the regulations
under the Health Insurance Portability  Accountability Act as amended.
If it is not clear that you are the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that you have received this transmittal in error, and any
review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail, including
any attachment to it, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
e-mail in error, please immediately return it to the sender and delete
it from your system. Thank you. 



Re: MP3000 VM TCP/IP

2009-11-19 Thread Dodds, Jim
Billy,

Here are some key parms for the TCPIP parm startup profile: 

DEVICE KSUVMTR  LCS F40
LINK   KSUVM  ETHERNET 1 KSUVMTR


HOME
  2xx.2yy.1zz.aaa KSUVM
; (End of HOME address information)


GATEWAY

; (IP) Network  FirstLink  Max. Packet  Subnet  Subnet
; Address   Hop  Name  Size (MTU)   MaskValue
; ---    ---   ---  --- 
;
  2xx.2yy.1zz   =KSUVM 1492 0
;
; --
; Define The DEFAULT route used for any network not explicitly routed
; via the previous entries.
; --
;
  DEFAULTNET 2xx.2yy.1zz.bbb  KSUVM  1492 0
;
; (End of GATEWAY Static Routing information)

START KSUVMTR



Jim Dodds
Systems Programmer
Kentucky State University
400 East Main Street
Frankfort, Ky 40601
502 597 6114


-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf 
Of Billy R. Bingham
Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 3:34 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: MP3000 VM TCP/IP

Hello,

Would anyone like to share their VM TCP/IP definitions for a MP3000 with 
ETHERNET cards?


Billy  


Re: MP3000 VM TCP/IP

2009-11-18 Thread Dodds, Jim
Billy,

I have an MP3000 with VM TCP/IP is this what you need? 

DEVICE KSUVMTR  LCS F40  
LINK   KSUVM  ETHERNET 1 KSUVMTR

I am not sure really what you need by the question you asked, but I am sure I 
have it.

Jim Dodds
Systems Programmer
Kentucky State University
400 East Main Street
Frankfort, Ky 40601
502 597 6114


-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf 
Of Billy R. Bingham
Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 3:34 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: MP3000 VM TCP/IP

Hello,

Would anyone like to share their VM TCP/IP definitions for a MP3000 with 
ETHERNET cards?


Billy  


Re: SVC 203

2009-10-16 Thread Dodds, Jim
I know this is probably a grand reach for a straw but I think your problem 
could be that a module that is being called is not same as on the zVM53 system 
that was on your zVM44 system. Do you still have access to the zVM440 system? 
If so you might try to port the compiled object from the zVM53 system to the 
zVM44 system. If that zVM53 compiled object works on the zVM44 system, then it 
points to a module that is probably not coded the same. Which would lead me to 
believe that a library used in the zVM44 system is missing from the zVM53 
system. 

Jim Dodds
Systems Programmer
Kentucky State University
400 East Main Street
Frankfort, Ky 40601
502 597 6114

-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf 
Of Alain Benveniste
Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 9:42 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: SVC 203

Alone in the world to still use it probably ;)

Well, I assemble the source and genmod it with amode 24 with a v stor  
at 4M and it still doesn't work
I still have a 'operation exception'...

Any ideas ?
Alain

Le 16 oct. 2009 à 00:59, Alan Altmark a écrit :

 On Thursday, 10/15/2009 at 02:56 EDT, Alain Benveniste
 a.benveni...@free.fr wrote:

 I'm looking for someone who is using a product named STAIRS, borned  
 in
 the
 70' died in the 90', no more maintained  - of course - and still  
 working
 on a zVM530. I meet a problem with the SVC 203 and I can't find any  
 info
 about this SVC.
 If someone has updated the DLNCLDR assemble to make it work... I TAKE
 IT!
 This product works on zVM440. What could have changed in 530 to  
 make it
 failed ?

 Wow!  We're still getting revenue from STAIRS!?!  Most excellent!  :-)

 What kind of error are you getting?  The suggestion to use only 16MB  
 is a
 good one, but you may also need to trim the CMS virtual machine of  
 any
 excess memory usage.

 Alan Altmark
 z/VM Development
 IBM Endicott



Re: Daylight Saving Time change

2009-10-13 Thread Dodds, Jim
You do not have to re IPL VSE unless you want to.  I have removed all
the SETs from the ASIPROC as shown by Kris.  Now what I do here at my
shop is this and it is all automated. I set time zone to vm; close and
disable all the application files in  CICSs; reset the time on each of
the CICSs on VSE; wait an hour; open and enable all the application
files in  CICSs. I have listed the job below:

 

* $$ JOB JNM=SETZONE,CLASS=0,USER=JDMAINT,DUEDATE=110208,DUETIME=0202 

* $$ LST CLASS=A,JSEP=0,DEST=(*,JDMAINT)  

* $$ PUN CLASS=A,JSEP=0,DEST=(*,JDMAINT)  

// JOB SETZONE

// EXEC PGM=DTRIATTN,PARM='TIME ZONE=VM'  

// EXEC PGM=IPLWAIT,SIZE=AUTO,PARM='10'   

// EXEC PGM=DTRIATTN,PARM='MSG F2,DATA=CEMT CEMT S FI(*) CLO DIS' 

// EXEC PGM=IPLWAIT,SIZE=AUTO,PARM='2'

// EXEC PGM=DTRIATTN,PARM='MSG F2,DATA=CEMT PERFORM RESET'

// EXEC PGM=IPLWAIT,SIZE=AUTO,PARM='2'

// EXEC PGM=DTRIATTN,PARM='MSG F4,DATA=CEMT CEMT S FI(*) CLO DIS' 

// EXEC PGM=IPLWAIT,SIZE=AUTO,PARM='2'

// EXEC PGM=DTRIATTN,PARM='MSG F4,DATA=CEMT PERFORM RESET'

// EXEC PGM=IPLWAIT,SIZE=AUTO,PARM='2'

// EXEC PGM=DTRIATTN,PARM='MSG F5,DATA=CEMT CEMT S FI(*) CLO DIS' 

// EXEC PGM=IPLWAIT,SIZE=AUTO,PARM='2'

// EXEC PGM=DTRIATTN,PARM='MSG F5,DATA=CEMT PERFORM RESET'

// EXEC PGM=IPLWAIT,SIZE=AUTO,PARM='3720' 

// EXEC PGM=DTRIATTN,PARM='MSG F2,DATA=CEMT CEMT S FI(*) OPE ENA' 

// EXEC PGM=IPLWAIT,SIZE=AUTO,PARM='2'

// EXEC PGM=DTRIATTN,PARM='MSG F4,DATA=CEMT CEMT S FI(*) OPE ENA' 

// EXEC PGM=IPLWAIT,SIZE=AUTO,PARM='2'

// EXEC PGM=DTRIATTN,PARM='MSG F5,DATA=CEMT CEMT S FI(*) OPE ENA' 

// EXEC PGM=IPLWAIT,SIZE=AUTO,PARM='2'

/* EOD

/

* $$ EOJ

 

Jim Dodds

Systems Programmer

Kentucky State University

400 East Main Street

Frankfort, Ky 40601

502 597 6114

 

From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Kris Buelens
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 10:25 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Daylight Saving Time change

 

For VSE, what I learned: from the ASIPROC
 remove SET DATE
 remove SET ZONE
 remove SET ZONEDEF
 remove SET ZONEBDY
Then VSE would take the definitions of the VM system under which it is
running.  You still need to reIPL the VSE guests when the timezone
changes.

For VMUTIL:no problems to expect.  A bit simplified: a z Series has no
timer to tell wake me up at hh:mm:ss; Wakeup allows hh:mm:ss.  The z
Series has wake me up in  seconds.  So VMUTIL converts the next
coming hh:mm:ss it finds in its WAKEUP file into wakup up in xyz
seconds.  If the timezone changes in the mean time, VMUTIL won't see
that.  But, when the xyz seconds have elapsed, it'll wake up, execute
what was wanted and scan its wakeup file again for anything that is
either late (and wakeup directly) or the first coming event and set the
xxx seconds timer again. etc

2009/10/13 David L. Craig d...@radix.net

On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 08:35:01AM -0500, Frank M. Ramaekers wrote:

 How do you accomplish this change?  (Especially with guests O/S's,
like
 VSE, and timing related service machines, like VMUTIL).

I come into the Data Center, bring down our VSE/ESA 1.7
and 2.2 virtual machines, SET TIMEZONE EST, and autolog
the VSE machines back on.  Some shops wait an hour but
that hasn't caused us any problems.

--

May the LORD God bless you exceedingly abundantly!

Dave Craig

-  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -  -
'So the universe is not quite as you thought it was.
 You'd better rearrange your beliefs, then.
 Because you certainly can't rearrange the universe.'

--from _Nightfall_  by Asimov/Silverberg




-- 
Kris Buelens,
IBM Belgium, VM customer support



Re: Why is the Daylight Saving Time change still a Big Event

2009-10-13 Thread Dodds, Jim
Don 

Your assumption is what we would all want, but the last time I had
checked VSE CICS/TS 1.1 does not use the UTC/GMT time for journal and
log entries. So the reason for the one hour wait. I guess no one has
requested the requirement or it has not been high priority at IBM CICS
labs since in effect they have quit working on VSE CICS/TS.

Jim Dodds
Systems Programmer
Kentucky State University
400 East Main Street
Frankfort, Ky 40601
502 597 6114


-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Don Williams
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 3:21 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Why is the Daylight Saving Time change still a Big Event

I understand people wanting to have date-time stamps displayed/printed
in a
particular time-zone format; it is a convenience. Every year everyone
gets
nervous over the Daylight Saving Time change, esp. the fall change. Over
the
past 40+ years, I would think that by now every program, system, etc.
would
have been updated or replaced to make the time change a non-event.

In today's world, with people and computer spread over many time zones
who
may or may not be separated from each other, it simply makes sense to
standardize internal program usage and recording of date-time stamps in
UTC/GMT Then provide programmers with simple generic date-time stamp
time
zone conversion routines to enable processing/displaying them in an
external
time zone format users want to see. I would want to push users to accept
a
time zone indicator as part of the time display. For example, 06:36PM
UTC
could be used when the users are spread all over the globe. However,
02:36PM
EDT could be used when the majority of users are the US eastern time
zone
while Daylight Saving Time was in effect and 01:36PM EST while Daylight
Saving Time was not in effect. By always having an external time zone
indicator, it allows users across multiple time zones to view them with
less
ambiguity. 

Of course, some people and computers travel across time zones. For some
events, they will want to synchronize to the time zone that they are
currently in. For other events, they will want to synchronize to their
home
time zone. For still other events, they will want to synchronize to some
other location's time zone. All this should be fairly easy to do by
simply
providing the programmers sufficiently flexible date-time stamp time
zone
conversion routines and asking them to use them.

Don Williams


Re: Using FDR Instant Backup to make FlashCopies

2009-09-02 Thread Dodds, Jim
I can only think of 2 ways that could have happened. One is that the VM
system got reIPLed and grabbed the 4506-450D volumes because they had
the correct volser and were the 1st one found.  If the system did not
get reIPLed then somehow something (FDR?) released volumes 4701-4708
from the system and attached volumes 4506-450d to the system. This is
normally done by the following commands DET 4701 SYSTEM and ATTACH 4506
SYSTEM. 

 

Jim Dodds

Systems Programmer

Kentucky State University

400 East Main Street

Frankfort, Ky 40601

502 597 6114

 

From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Karl Kingston
Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 2:13 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Using FDR Instant Backup to make FlashCopies

 

We're running a Domino mail server under z/Linux under z/VM.   Volumes
are full-pack volumes and are dedicated to the VM guest when we autolog
the guest.Dedicates are in the form of DEDICATE 1500 VOLID x. 

This has worked well for us. 

For backing this system up, we use FDR from the z/OS side to backup.
Of course, the linux system is down when we do this so we can get a
clean copy. 

Since we're using 8 3390-27's to hold our mail files, our backup window
is about 2 hours. 

In an effort to reduce the size of the window, we used FDR to Flashcopy
these volumes to other DASD.And then backup these DASD. 

My understanding is when using FDR to flashcopy, it will change the
VOLSER for the target devices (can't vary them online to z/OS). 

Our VOLSERS are LEMAI1 - LEMAI8. Reside on units 4701-4708.   
Our flashcopy targets are on 4506-450D. 

This scenario worked for several weeks until yesterday.   When we
autologged the guest machines,  somehow they grabbed 4506 and 4507.
(I'm assuming somehow the volsers got changed?) 

Has anybody had any experience with doing something like this? 
Any idea why z/VM assigned 4506-4507? 
Correct me if I'm wrong, but z/VM will take the first device it finds
matching a VOLSER? 

What can we do to remedy this?   Is this even a good idea? 

Thanks 



Re: Using FDR Instant Backup to make FlashCopies

2009-09-02 Thread Dodds, Jim
Sorry sent too quick. If you want to continue to use this method I would
change the mail system to use volumes 4506-450D and then use 4701-4708
as the flash copies and then VM will always grab 4506-450D.

 

Jim Dodds

Systems Programmer

Kentucky State University

400 East Main Street

Frankfort, Ky 40601

502 597 6114

 

From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Dodds, Jim
Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 2:33 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Using FDR Instant Backup to make FlashCopies

 

I can only think of 2 ways that could have happened. One is that the VM
system got reIPLed and grabbed the 4506-450D volumes because they had
the correct volser and were the 1st one found.  If the system did not
get reIPLed then somehow something (FDR?) released volumes 4701-4708
from the system and attached volumes 4506-450d to the system. This is
normally done by the following commands DET 4701 SYSTEM and ATTACH 4506
SYSTEM. 

 

Jim Dodds

Systems Programmer

Kentucky State University

400 East Main Street

Frankfort, Ky 40601

502 597 6114

 

From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Karl Kingston
Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 2:13 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Using FDR Instant Backup to make FlashCopies

 

We're running a Domino mail server under z/Linux under z/VM.   Volumes
are full-pack volumes and are dedicated to the VM guest when we autolog
the guest.Dedicates are in the form of DEDICATE 1500 VOLID x. 

This has worked well for us. 

For backing this system up, we use FDR from the z/OS side to backup.
Of course, the linux system is down when we do this so we can get a
clean copy. 

Since we're using 8 3390-27's to hold our mail files, our backup window
is about 2 hours. 

In an effort to reduce the size of the window, we used FDR to Flashcopy
these volumes to other DASD.And then backup these DASD. 

My understanding is when using FDR to flashcopy, it will change the
VOLSER for the target devices (can't vary them online to z/OS). 

Our VOLSERS are LEMAI1 - LEMAI8. Reside on units 4701-4708.   
Our flashcopy targets are on 4506-450D. 

This scenario worked for several weeks until yesterday.   When we
autologged the guest machines,  somehow they grabbed 4506 and 4507.
(I'm assuming somehow the volsers got changed?) 

Has anybody had any experience with doing something like this? 
Any idea why z/VM assigned 4506-4507? 
Correct me if I'm wrong, but z/VM will take the first device it finds
matching a VOLSER? 

What can we do to remedy this?   Is this even a good idea? 

Thanks 



Re: Which vm software to use?

2009-06-24 Thread Dodds, Jim
I don't know maybe the perfkt if you have it. But this can be done
several other ways with homegrown code using pipes or rexx with a disc
service machine or vmutil. You maybe able to get a few skelton pieces
code from some people off this list that do similar things. If not I
might be able to help you if I get some spare time.

Jim Dodds
Systems Programmer
Kentucky State University
400 East Main Street
Frankfort, Ky 40601
502 597 6114

-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Mary Zervos
Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2009 10:53 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Which vm software to use?


   
Hello everyone,

A professor here would like an ind user studentname taken every 4 
hours of his 80 students, with a report sent to him once a week.  My 
question is, which vm software to use and how to collect the data in a 
file to send the professor.  The professor will use his own program to 
extract the data he needs from the file.

Thanks for any help.

Mary Zervos
VM Systems Programmer
Binghamton University


Re: What we must do before we claim the zlinux server is in production stage?

2009-06-03 Thread Dodds, Jim
Don't forget we use billard tables for eating tables and que sticks for
pot passers ;)

Jim Dodds
Systems Programmer
Kentucky State University
400 East Main Street
Frankfort, Ky 40601
502 597 6114


-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Schuh, Richard
Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2009 5:19 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: What we must do before we claim the zlinux server is in
production stage?

Give him some slack. He is from Kentucky where they attempt to saddle
and ride most anything that runs.

Regards, 
Richard Schuh 

 

 -Original Message-
 From: The IBM z/VM Operating System 
 [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Martin, Terry 
 R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
 Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2009 2:05 PM
 To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
 Subject: Re: What we must do before we claim the zlinux 
 server is in production stage?
 
 If that was to happen with me on the mainframe
 
 Wow, and all of this time I thought z/VM ran on the mainframe.
 
 Thank You,
  
 Terry Martin
 Lockheed Martin - Information Technology z/OS  z/VM Systems 
 - Performance and Tuning Cell - 443 632-4191 Work - 410 
 786-0386 terry.mar...@cms.hhs.gov -Original Message-
 From: The IBM z/VM Operating System 
 [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Dodds, Jim
 Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2009 1:30 PM
 To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
 Subject: Re: What we must do before we claim the zlinux 
 server is in production stage?
 
 Bravo,
 
 It is amazing that Opies here think that if you can back it 
 up you can restore. I don't know how many times they have not 
 been able to restore files and their solution is to change 
 backup software. If that was to happen with me on the 
 mainframe side I would be unemployed. I agree with Adam you 
 should test a restore of a sample size of files from your 
 backups in my opinion at least quarterly and whenever the 
 backup parameters change. 
 
 Jim Dodds
 Systems Programmer
 Kentucky State University
 400 East Main Street
 Frankfort, Ky 40601
 502 597 6114
 
 -Original Message-
 From: The IBM z/VM Operating System 
 [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Adam Thornton
 Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2009 1:16 PM
 To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
 Subject: Re: What we must do before we claim the zlinux 
 server is in production stage?
 
 On Jun 2, 2009, at 11:51 AM, Tom Duerbusch wrote:
 
  A lot of it also depends on local practices.
 
  1.  Backupsscheduled..and monitored.
 
 And RESTORED, whether you need to or not, on some schedule.  
 A good test, I'd say, is to pick ten files at random from the 
 backup catalogue every so often and restore them to a 
 temporary location, and then verify those files.  (Assuming 
 you can spare your tape library long enough, because ten 
 random files is a lot of loading/unloading/
 seeking.)
 
 Seriously: your backup regimen is USELESS if you cannot 
 restore the files you backed up, and when you need them is 
 NOT the time to find out that the tapes haven't been being 
 written correctly.
 
 Adam
 


Re: What we must do before we claim the zlinux server is in production stage?

2009-06-02 Thread Dodds, Jim
Bravo,

It is amazing that Opies here think that if you can back it up you can
restore. I don't know how many times they have not been able to restore
files and their solution is to change backup software. If that was to
happen with me on the mainframe side I would be unemployed. I agree with
Adam you should test a restore of a sample size of files from your
backups in my opinion at least quarterly and whenever the backup
parameters change. 

Jim Dodds
Systems Programmer
Kentucky State University
400 East Main Street
Frankfort, Ky 40601
502 597 6114

-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Adam Thornton
Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2009 1:16 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: What we must do before we claim the zlinux server is in
production stage?

On Jun 2, 2009, at 11:51 AM, Tom Duerbusch wrote:

 A lot of it also depends on local practices.

 1.  Backupsscheduled..and monitored.

And RESTORED, whether you need to or not, on some schedule.  A good  
test, I'd say, is to pick ten files at random from the backup  
catalogue every so often and restore them to a temporary location, and  
then verify those files.  (Assuming you can spare your tape library  
long enough, because ten random files is a lot of loading/unloading/ 
seeking.)

Seriously: your backup regimen is USELESS if you cannot restore the  
files you backed up, and when you need them is NOT the time to find  
out that the tapes haven't been being written correctly.

Adam


Re: FTP from CMS to VSE/POWER

2009-01-13 Thread Dodds, Jim
What does your ftp jcl look like?

 

Jim Dodds

Systems Programmer

Kentucky State University

400 East Main Street

Frankfort, Ky 40601

502 597 6114

 



From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Suleiman Shahin
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 3:09 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: FTP from CMS to VSE/POWER

 


Greetings!

I am trying to FTP a CMS member to POWER LST queue. I am losing the
first byte.
What am I missing?

Thanks.

Suleiman Shahin

cross posted on VSE-L.






Windows Live(tm): Keep your life in sync. Check it out.
http://windowslive.com/explore?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_t1_allup_explore_01200
9 



Re: Filezilla FTP client and the DIR command

2009-01-12 Thread Dodds, Jim
I had this problem also and was never resolved to my satisfaction. You
may call me if you wish to discuss. 

 

Jim Dodds

Systems Programmer

Kentucky State University

400 East Main Street

Frankfort, Ky 40601

502 597 6114

 



From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Hans Rempel
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 11:59 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Filezilla FTP client and the DIR command

 

I'm having problems getting Filezilla from displaying the directory of
my files on the screen. I reviewed the list for past posts and have
changed my LISTFormat to UNIX without success. 

 

Filezilla does make a SSL connect to my system but the directory display
is failing at this point.

 

What am I missing?

 

Secondly is there a windows batch FTP with SSL support to replace the
current CMD FTP command?

 

Thanks in advance

 

Hans 



Re: IND$FILE fails through CA-TPX and TCP/IP for VM

2008-11-13 Thread Dodds, Jim
I remember I had a similar problem about 15 years ago when first started
using this a new job.  The problem was that there is a bit set in the
logmode for file transfer to be able to use or not use. Check the
logmode you are currently using and see if that could be the problem.  

 

Jim Dodds

Systems Programmer

Kentucky State University

400 East Main Street

Frankfort, Ky 40601

502 597 6114

 



From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Horlick, Michael
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 10:17 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: IND$FILE fails through CA-TPX and TCP/IP for VM

 

Greetings,

 

My client is moving away from SNA to TCP/IP. We use CA-TPX as our
session manager and the client uses a terminal emulator called
'Proclient OnWeb Web to Host'.

 

They use IND$FILE and are getting error - TRANS13 when uploading a file
from their PC to their CMS A-disk. It doesn't happen to them when native
VM and it doesn't happen doing a download from the mainframe to the PC. 

 

I use myExtra! and under TPX I have no problems. They have no problems
if using SNA. 

 

I specified the following in VM/VTAM. My SCEXIT does a DIAL to VTAM for
any IP terminals connected to port 23

 

TC070LOCAL CUADDR=070,TERM=3277,USSTAB=USSTCPIP,FEATUR2=EDATS, *

   LOGAPPL=TPX,MODETAB=ISTINCLM,DLOGMOD=D4B3290   

 

I think when they connect via SNA they get a DLOGMOD of SNX32705. 

 

Has this happened to anyone else? Any suggestions?

 

Thanks,

 

Mike

 

  



CMS file list date

2008-08-27 Thread Dodds, Jim
I have a customer that is on z/VM 4.4 and the CMS file dates shown in a
filelist have only 2 digit years. They would like to see the 4 digit
years. I am on VM 2.4 and ours displays a 4 digit year. I know both of
these products are out of service. Would anyone know how to correct
this? 

 

Jim Dodds

Systems Programmer

Kentucky State University

400 East Main Street

Frankfort, Ky 40601

502 597 6114

 



Re: CMS file list date

2008-08-27 Thread Dodds, Jim
Thanks Steve that will work as a temp solution.  I found where I need to
put this in the VM system config file  SYSTEM_DATEformat  ISOdate

But to get this to work system wide I will need to do an IPL or is can I
enter a command to make system wide?

 

 

Jim Dodds

Systems Programmer

Kentucky State University

400 East Main Street

Frankfort, Ky 40601

502 597 6114

 



From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Imler, Steven J
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 10:52 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: CMS file list date

 

Issue ... SET DATEFORMAT ISO

 

 

JR (Steven) Imler

CA

Senior Sustaining Engineer

Tel: +1 703 708 3479

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

 

 

From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dodds, Jim
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 10:46 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: CMS file list date

 

I have a customer that is on z/VM 4.4 and the CMS file dates shown in a
filelist have only 2 digit years. They would like to see the 4 digit
years. I am on VM 2.4 and ours displays a 4 digit year. I know both of
these products are out of service. Would anyone know how to correct
this? 

 

Jim Dodds

Systems Programmer

Kentucky State University

400 East Main Street

Frankfort, Ky 40601

502 597 6114

 



Re: CMS file list date

2008-08-27 Thread Dodds, Jim
Thanks Kris, I will keep that in mind, they only have a few in-house
execs and only use the VM system for multiple VSEs and storing JCL and
source code in CMS.

Jim Dodds
Systems Programmer
Kentucky State University
400 East Main Street
Frankfort, Ky 40601
502 597 6114


-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Kris Buelens
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 11:37 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: CMS file list date

Beware for a global, system wide, change: if you have execs that issue
commands that return a date, they will get a new layout.  To name
some:
- LISTFILE
- CP Q TIME
- CP Q RDR  ALL  (distribution code is no returned anymore with
FULL- or ISODATE)
- CP Q CPLEVEL
Results of affected execs become unpredictable.

Wisdom: each an every exec that is written these days should specify
the wanted date format on the commands issued, then and only then one
is sure of the response.  End-users may always decide they don't like
the selected system default date format and set their own choice.

2008/8/27 Dodds, Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 Thanks Steve that will work as a temp solution.  I found where I need
to put
 this in the VM system config file  SYSTEM_DATEformat  ISOdate

 But to get this to work system wide I will need to do an IPL or is can
I
 enter a command to make system wide?





 Jim Dodds

 Systems Programmer

 Kentucky State University

 400 East Main Street

 Frankfort, Ky 40601

 502 597 6114



 

 From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
 Behalf Of Imler, Steven J
 Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 10:52 AM
 To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
 Subject: Re: CMS file list date



 Issue ... SET DATEFORMAT ISO





 JR (Steven) Imler

 CA

 Senior Sustaining Engineer

 Tel: +1 703 708 3479

 [EMAIL PROTECTED]







 From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
 Behalf Of Dodds, Jim
 Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 10:46 AM
 To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
 Subject: CMS file list date



 I have a customer that is on z/VM 4.4 and the CMS file dates shown in
a
 filelist have only 2 digit years. They would like to see the 4 digit
years.
 I am on VM 2.4 and ours displays a 4 digit year. I know both of these
 products are out of service. Would anyone know how to correct this?



 Jim Dodds

 Systems Programmer

 Kentucky State University

 400 East Main Street

 Frankfort, Ky 40601

 502 597 6114





-- 
Kris Buelens,
IBM Belgium, VM customer support


Re: CMS file list date

2008-08-27 Thread Dodds, Jim
Thanks John. I tried the SET DATEFORMAT ISODATE SYSTEM from the userid
MAINT. It took the command but didn't change the values when I did a
QUERY DATEFORMAT. I was able to change it by doing the following on
MAINT:
SET DATEFORMAT ISODATE
SET DATEFORMAT SYSDEFAULT

They now have the correct format for the date on z/VM 4.4. Thanks to all
of you that responded for your assistance and information.

Jim Dodds
Systems Programmer
Kentucky State University
400 East Main Street
Frankfort, Ky 40601
502 597 6114


-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Franciscovich
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 11:55 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: CMS file list date

Thanks Steve that will work as a temp solution.  I found where I need
to
put this in the VM system config file  SYSTEM_DATEformat  ISOdate

But to get this to work system wide I will need to do an IPL or is can
I
enter a command to make system wide?

A user with Class B privilege can issue SET DATEFORMAT ISODATE/etc
SYSTEM
to change the default date format system-wide without an IPL.As always,
if you do this, you also want to add the system config file statement
so the same date format is in effect the next time you IPL.

SET DATEFORMAT has been in the system since VM/ESA 2.2.0

John Franciscovich
z/VM Development


Re: CMS file list date

2008-08-27 Thread Dodds, Jim
Thanks Bill. I had already found the SYSTEM CONFIG file but they wanted
it changed without an IPL. I didn't know you could add it to the user
directory. Kris Buelens also gave me a command that partially worked
from MAINT; SET DATEFORMAT ISODATE SYSTEM. I had to issue SET DATEFORMAT
ISODATE, then SET DATEFORMAT SYSDEFAULT from MAINT to get it to change.
I also changed the SYSTEM CONFIG to be ready for the next IPL. Thanks. 

 

Jim Dodds

Systems Programmer

Kentucky State University

400 East Main Street

Frankfort, Ky 40601

502 597 6114

 



From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bill Munson
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 10:58 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: CMS file list date

 


Jim, 

This can be changed system wide in the SYSTEM CONFIG file -
(SYSTEM_DATEFORMAT) 
or per user in the USER DIRECT file - (DATEFORMAT) 

enter 

q dateformat 
User Dateformat = SHORTDATE (SYSDEFAULT) 


Bill Munson
Brown Brothers Harriman
z/VM System Programmer
201-418-7588

President MVMUA
http://www2.marist.edu/~mvmua/





Dodds, Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU 

08/27/2008 10:45 AM 

Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU

To

IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU 

cc

 

Subject

CMS file list date

 

 

 




I have a customer that is on z/VM 4.4 and the CMS file dates shown in a
filelist have only 2 digit years. They would like to see the 4 digit
years. I am on VM 2.4 and ours displays a 4 digit year. I know both of
these products are out of service. Would anyone know how to correct
this? 
  
Jim Dodds 
Systems Programmer 
Kentucky State University 
400 East Main Street 
Frankfort, Ky 40601 
502 597 6114 
  



*** IMPORTANT NOTE *
The opinions expressed in this message and/or any attachments are those
of the author and not necessarily those of Brown Brothers Harriman 
Co., its subsidiaries and affiliates BBH. There is no guarantee that
this message is either private or confidential, and it may have been
altered by unauthorized sources without your or our knowledge. Nothing
in the message is capable or intended to create any legally binding
obligations on either party and it is not intended to provide legal
advice. BBH accepts no responsibility for loss or damage from its use,
including damage from virus.
***



Re: Best method

2008-07-03 Thread Dodds, Jim
Thanks Dave But does the script file need another product like DCF(?) to
format it?

Jim Dodds
Systems Programmer
Kentucky State University
400 East Main Street
Frankfort, Ky 40601
502 597 6114


-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dave Jones
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 9:16 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Best method

Jim, the documentation on how to use the vmserve package is included in
the vmarc file. 
Look for the VMSERVE SCRIPT file.



Dodds, Jim wrote:
 Is there any documentation on how to use this or must we spend time
 trying to figure out what it does and how it does it?
 
 Jim Dodds
 Systems Programmer
 Kentucky State University
 400 East Main Street
 Frankfort, Ky 40601
 502 597 6114
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
 Behalf Of Cal Fisher
 Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 5:55 PM
 To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
 Subject: Re: Best method
 
 Hi David
 Go to the VM download site http://www.vm.ibm.com/download/ and get the
 vmserve package. It uses wakeup and will do just about anything you
will
 ever want your service machine to do. I have used this for years and I
 am
 very happy with it.
 
 Cal Fisher
 My tour in the Navy
 The MVMUA website  

-- 
DJ

V/Soft
   z/VM and mainframe Linux expertise, training,
   consulting, and software development
www.vsoft-software.com


Re: Best method

2008-07-03 Thread Dodds, Jim
Listing or PDF which ever is easiest for you.

Jim Dodds
Systems Programmer
Kentucky State University
400 East Main Street
Frankfort, Ky 40601
502 597 6114


-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dave Jones
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2008 10:42 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Best method

Hi, Jim.

Yes, it doesbut you're in luck.I have DCF here, and I will
format the SCRIPT file 
and send you a copy. What output format do you prefer: LISTING or
LIST3820? Hm..I 
might be able to convert it to PDF as well.

Dodds, Jim wrote:
 Thanks Dave But does the script file need another product like DCF(?)
to
 format it?
 
 Jim Dodds
 Systems Programmer
 Kentucky State University
 400 East Main Street
 Frankfort, Ky 40601
 502 597 6114
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
 Behalf Of Dave Jones
 Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 9:16 PM
 To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
 Subject: Re: Best method
 
 Jim, the documentation on how to use the vmserve package is included
in
 the vmarc file. 
 Look for the VMSERVE SCRIPT file.
 
 
 
 Dodds, Jim wrote:
 Is there any documentation on how to use this or must we spend time
 trying to figure out what it does and how it does it?

 Jim Dodds
 Systems Programmer
 Kentucky State University
 400 East Main Street
 Frankfort, Ky 40601
 502 597 6114


 -Original Message-
 From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 On
 Behalf Of Cal Fisher
 Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 5:55 PM
 To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
 Subject: Re: Best method

 Hi David
 Go to the VM download site http://www.vm.ibm.com/download/ and get
the
 vmserve package. It uses wakeup and will do just about anything you
 will
 ever want your service machine to do. I have used this for years and
I
 am
 very happy with it.

 Cal Fisher
 My tour in the Navy
 The MVMUA website  
 

-- 
DJ

V/Soft
   z/VM and mainframe Linux expertise, training,
   consulting, and software development
www.vsoft-software.com


Re: Best method

2008-07-02 Thread Dodds, Jim
Is there any documentation on how to use this or must we spend time
trying to figure out what it does and how it does it?

Jim Dodds
Systems Programmer
Kentucky State University
400 East Main Street
Frankfort, Ky 40601
502 597 6114


-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Cal Fisher
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 5:55 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Best method

Hi David
Go to the VM download site http://www.vm.ibm.com/download/ and get the
vmserve package. It uses wakeup and will do just about anything you will
ever want your service machine to do. I have used this for years and I
am
very happy with it.

Cal Fisher
My tour in the Navy
The MVMUA website  


Re: Who Has the Longest Running VM System?

2008-06-19 Thread Dodds, Jim
We had been at July 30, 2003 until last month when management decided we needed 
to IPL the system just to see if we still remembered. We are VM 4.4

Jim Dodds
Systems Programmer
Kentucky State University
400 East Main Street
Frankfort, Ky 40601
502 597 6114


-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
Wandschneider, Scott
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 3:02 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Who Has the Longest Running VM System?

We have a VM 2.3 system that was last IPL'ed on August 17, 2003.  Anybody have 
one that was last IPL'ed before then?

q cplevel   
VM/ESA Version 2 Release 3.0, service level 0101
Generated at 03/11/02 17:44:14 EDT  
IPL at 08/17/03 04:40:50 EDT
Ready; T=0.01/0.01 14:59:18 

Thank you,
Scott R Wandschneider
Senior Systems Programmer
Infocrossing, a WIPRO Company
11707 Miracle Hills Dr.
Omaha, NE 68154
Office 402.963.8905



 


Re: Backup: Twinning Tapes to Remote Tape Unit

2008-06-06 Thread Dodds, Jim
I think in the case of having to run 2 backups jobs I would run one
backup job and then run a utility job to copy the 1st set of tapes to
the remote set of tapes. 

Jim Dodds
Systems Programmer
Kentucky State University
400 East Main Street
Frankfort, Ky 40601
502 597 6114


-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark Llewellyn
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 4:13 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: VM:Backup: Twinning Tapes to Remote Tape Unit

Greetings,

We are ramping up our Technical Recovery Plan, and intend to use
channel-
extended tape units at a remote location when performing our regular
full 
and incremental backups.  

We use CA's VM:BACKUP for file-level backups, and will be using VM:HiDRO

to capture the system image.  We're curious as to whether any other CA 
customers are using the synchronous tape twinning feature with one
local 
tape unit and one remote.  We've been cautioned by our network folks
that 
the response time from the remote tape unit would be quite a limiting 
factor affecting the speed of a synchronous, twinned backup.

Our other option is to simply run two backup jobs, one to the local
drive 
and one to the remote, but that effectively doubles the hit of the
backup 
jobs.

Any anecdotes or insight would be most welcome!  

Mark Llewellyn
VM Systems Support
Visa, Inc.


Re: Backup: Twinning Tapes to Remote Tape Unit

2008-06-06 Thread Dodds, Jim
That is a good point that I had not completely thought thru about the
tape lengths. So forget about what I said. 

Jim Dodds
Systems Programmer
Kentucky State University
400 East Main Street
Frankfort, Ky 40601
502 597 6114


-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark Wheeler
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 9:39 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Backup: Twinning Tapes to Remote Tape Unit

Can't do that, unless you can guarantee that the tapes at the remote
site
are longer than the local copy (which would be unlikely). When the
backup
runs, writing to a given pair of tapes ends when the first one hits EOT.

You would also need to a complete copy of the tapes, labels and all,
because the tapes are chained together with user labels.

If you couldn't do that, then the copy utility would have have to be
smart
enough to generate the user label records according to VM:Backup specs.
Since the VMBACKUP catalog wouldn't know about these tapes, any restores
would have to be done using VMBRITS or VMBSAR.

Mark L. Wheeler
IT Infrastructure, 3M Center B224-4N-20, St Paul MN 55144
Tel:  (651) 733-4355, Fax:  (651) 736-7689
mlwheeler at mmm.com
--
I have this theory that if one person can go out of their way to show
compassion then it will start a chain reaction of the same. People will
never know how far a little kindness can go. Rachel Joy Scott



 

 Dodds, Jim

 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 du
To 
 Sent by: The IBM  IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU

 z/VM Operating
cc 
 System

 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject 
 ARK.EDU  Re: Backup: Twinning Tapes to

   Remote Tape Unit

 

 06/06/2008 08:29

 AM

 

 

 Please respond to

   The IBM z/VM

 Operating System

 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 ARK.EDU

 

 





I think in the case of having to run 2 backups jobs I would run one
backup job and then run a utility job to copy the 1st set of tapes to
the remote set of tapes.

Jim Dodds
Systems Programmer
Kentucky State University
400 East Main Street
Frankfort, Ky 40601
502 597 6114


-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark Llewellyn
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 4:13 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: VM:Backup: Twinning Tapes to Remote Tape Unit

Greetings,

We are ramping up our Technical Recovery Plan, and intend to use
channel-
extended tape units at a remote location when performing our regular
full
and incremental backups.

We use CA's VM:BACKUP for file-level backups, and will be using VM:HiDRO

to capture the system image.  We're curious as to whether any other CA
customers are using the synchronous tape twinning feature with one
local
tape unit and one remote.  We've been cautioned by our network folks
that
the response time from the remote tape unit would be quite a limiting
factor affecting the speed of a synchronous, twinned backup.

Our other option is to simply run two backup jobs, one to the local
drive
and one to the remote, but that effectively doubles the hit of the
backup
jobs.

Any anecdotes or insight would be most welcome!

Mark Llewellyn
VM Systems Support
Visa, Inc.


Re: IS Organization question

2008-03-06 Thread Dodds, Jim
Most of the shops(all have been VM/VSE) I have worked at in my 30 year
career have had the Operations area and Systems programming area
separate reporting areas. When I first started here at the school it was
the operations staff reported to the systems programming area. Six
months later we are broken out and both report to the programming
manager. go figure that.

Jim Dodds
Systems Programmer
Kentucky State University
400 East Main Street
Frankfort, Ky 40601
502 597 6114


-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bill Pettit
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 8:18 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: IS Organization question

We have been working with a consultant that has made several
organizational change suggestions regarding Information Systems at our
company.  One of those suggestions is moving our Computer Operations
section be part of and managed by the Systems Programming manager.

I am curious about how the other mainframe organizations that are
watching this list are organized, and what their approximate overall
company size is. Along with any other details or pros and cons you want
to throw in. 

We are a VM  VSE shop with five Computer Operators and three Systems
Programmers. 

Thank you


Re: Article: In Search of Mainframe Engineers

2008-02-22 Thread Dodds, Jim
I too feel the same way that you do about this article. You may have a
point there on the H1B visas, I hadn't thought much about it.

 

Jim Dodds

Systems Programmer

Kentucky State University

400 East Main Street

Frankfort, Ky 40601

502 597 6114

 



From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mary Anne Matyaz
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2008 10:20 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Article: In Search of Mainframe Engineers

 

You know, I've been thinking about this and I just don't think I buy
this article, or this hoopla that we've heard for several years about
the aging mainframer and how to replace them and how scarce they are. I
just don't see that many job openings for MVS or VM. And I sure don't
see skyrocketing salaries, in fact IBM just cut salaries of a lot of
mainframers 15%. Now that is supposed to be offset by overtime but those
that I've talked to indicated overtime isn't allowed. 
Personally, I think this is just a way to get more h1b visas approved.
If MVS or VM sysprogs were such a hot commodity, salaries would be
rising. 

Thoughts?
MA



Re: Impromptu XEDIT Survey

2008-02-20 Thread Dodds, Jim
Depends on what I am doing. If I am entering lots of data I want it on
the right, otherwise on the left.

 

Jim Dodds

Systems Programmer

Kentucky State University

400 East Main Street

Frankfort, Ky 40601

502 597 6114

 



From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Huegel, Thomas
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 10:06 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Impromptu XEDIT Survey

 

Where does the prefix field belong? 
On the left? 
or 
On the right? 



VM FTP Question

2008-02-05 Thread Dodds, Jim
Good morning all,

 

I am trying to FTP a file from VM to Windoze. Server. But it appears
that VM/FTP will not switch to a directory on windoze that contains
spaces. Is there some command I am missing or is it just not possible
with  VM/FTP?

 

/**/

'ID (STACK LIFO'

pull  user . . . . date time zone day .

parse var date yy '-' mm '-' dd

parse var time hh ':' mi ':' ss

fta = (yy)(mm)(dd)(hh)(mi)

putcmd = 'put salmae.data.j salmae'||fta||'.txt'

say putcmd

'MAKEBUF'

'CP LINK TCPMAINT 592 FFF RR ALL'

'ACCESS FFF X'

QUEUE 'iuserid  passwd'

QUEUE 'cd FY Year End Closing\SallieMae' 

QUEUE 'dir'

QUEUE putcmd 

QUEUE 'quit'

'FTP 172.xxx.xxx.yyy (exit'

'RELEASE X (DET'

'DROPBUF'

EXIT

 

Jim Dodds

Systems Programmer

Kentucky State University

400 East Main Street

Frankfort, Ky 40601

502 597 6114

 



Re: VM FTP Question

2008-02-05 Thread Dodds, Jim
Thanks for the response John. I tried it and got an error

 

DMSREX471E Error 35 running FTPPUTSM EXEC, line 14: Invalid expression

 

From what I gather from the help on that error message it is confused
when I use both single and double quotes together.

 

Jim Dodds

Systems Programmer

Kentucky State University

400 East Main Street

Frankfort, Ky 40601

502 597 6114

 



From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of McKown, John
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2008 9:08 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: VM FTP Question

 

Can't say, but try:

 

 

QUEUE cd 'FY Year End Closing\SallieMae' 

 

That is, put the subdirectory in apostrophes.

 

 

--
John McKown
Senior Systems Programmer
HealthMarkets
Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage
Administrative Services Group
Information Technology

This message (including any attachments) contains confidential
information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and its
content is protected by law.  If you are not the intended recipient, you
should delete this message and are hereby notified that any disclosure,
copying, or distribution of this transmission, or taking any action
based on it, is strictly prohibited.
  

-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dodds, Jim
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2008 8:03 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: VM FTP Question

Good morning all,

 

I am trying to FTP a file from VM to Windoze. Server. But it
appears that VM/FTP will not switch to a directory on windoze that
contains spaces. Is there some command I am missing or is it just not
possible with  VM/FTP?

 

/**/

'ID (STACK LIFO'

pull  user . . . . date time zone day .

parse var date yy '-' mm '-' dd

parse var time hh ':' mi ':' ss

fta = (yy)(mm)(dd)(hh)(mi)

putcmd = 'put salmae.data.j salmae'||fta||'.txt'

say putcmd

'MAKEBUF'

'CP LINK TCPMAINT 592 FFF RR ALL'

'ACCESS FFF X'

QUEUE 'iuserid  passwd'

QUEUE 'cd FY Year End Closing\SallieMae' 

QUEUE 'dir'

QUEUE putcmd 

QUEUE 'quit'

'FTP 172.xxx.xxx.yyy (exit'

'RELEASE X (DET'

'DROPBUF'

EXIT

 

Jim Dodds

Systems Programmer

Kentucky State University

400 East Main Street

Frankfort, Ky 40601

502 597 6114

 



Re: VM FTP Question

2008-02-05 Thread Dodds, Jim
Thanks Alan. But I found it I had reversed the single and double quotes
at the end. I had incorrectly entered.
QUEUE cd 'FY Year End Closing\SallieMae'
instead of
QUEUE cd 'FY Year End Closing\SallieMae'



Jim Dodds
Systems Programmer
Kentucky State University
400 East Main Street
Frankfort, Ky 40601
502 597 6114


-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Alan Altmark
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2008 10:58 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: VM FTP Question

On Tuesday, 02/05/2008 at 10:48 EST, Dodds, Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
 Thanks for the response John. I tried it and got an error

 DMSREX471E Error 35 running FTPPUTSM EXEC, line 14: Invalid expression

 From what I gather from the help on that error message it is confused 
when I 
 use both single and double quotes together.

Jim, you have something else wrong.  If you re-post your current exec,
we 
can look at it more closely.

Alan Altmark
z/VM Development
IBM Endicott


Re: Hardware microcode

2007-10-10 Thread Dodds, Jim
The last Z/VM to run on that box is 4.4. We are currently running both
MP3000 and z/VM 4.4 

Jim Dodds
Systems Programmer
Kentucky State University
400 East Main Street
Frankfort, Ky 40601
502 597 6114

-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rich Greenberg
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2007 7:48 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Hardware microcode

On: Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 04:12:53PM -0500,Adam Thornton Wrote:

} On Oct 9, 2007, at 3:04 PM, Tom Duerbusch wrote:
} 
} Wonders never cease!  After two years, someone wants to buy our old  
} MP3000/H30.
} 
} And they asked a question, that got us concerned...
} 
} Does it have the microcode with it?
} 
} Assuming that it works like the P/390 (which it *should*, but I Am  
} Not A Lawyer), the LIC (Licensed Internal Code) is transferrable.   
} The S/390 OS is not.

Although IANAL either, I think Adam is correct, BUT...

Tha last z/VM that would run on that box was 2.4 or perhaps 3.1, neither
of which IBM still sells.

-- 
Rich Greenberg  N Ft Myers, FL, USA richgr atsign panix.com  + 1 239 543
1353
Eastern time.  N6LRT  I speak for myself  my dogs only.VM'er since
CP-67
Canines:Val, Red, Shasta  Casey (RIP), Red  Zero, Siberians
Owner:Chinook-L
Retired at the beach Asst
Owner:Sibernet-L


Re: SHOW still available ?

2007-07-10 Thread Dodds, Jim
Tom, 

 

Are you sure SPEDIT lets you look at an open/active spool? I am on
version 4.023 of the software. I can look at other users spool files as
long as you have CLASS D. But if someone already has the spool file open
in SPEDIT it is not available or seen in the spool queues. The SPEDIT
transfers the spool file to the requestor's reader and transfers the
spool file back when the requestor exits the view.  If the spool file is
actively being created I cannot see it. 

 

Jim Dodds

Systems Programmer

Kentucky State University

400 East Main Street

Frankfort, Ky 40601

502 597 6114

 



From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Huegel, Thomas
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2007 6:42 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: SHOW still available ?

 

Yes it does.

-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Lionel B. Dyck
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2007 5:13 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: SHOW still available ?


Does SPEDIT allow you to view an active/open spool file? 

I'm assuming VM:Spool does as I seem to recall being told that
(but can't recall for sure) 

Thanks





Lionel B. Dyck, Consultant/Specialist 
Enterprise Platform Services, Mainframe Engineering 
KP-IT Enterprise Engineering, Client and Platform Engineering
Services (CAPES) 
925-926-5332 (8-473-5332) | E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  
AIM: lbdyck | Yahoo IM: lbdyck 
Kaiser Service Credo: Our cause is health. Our passion is
service. We're here to make lives better. 

Never attribute to malice what can be caused by
miscommunication. 

NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: If you are not the intended recipient of
this e-mail, you are prohibited from sharing, copying, or otherwise
using or disclosing its contents. If you have received this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and
permanently delete this e-mail and any attachments without reading,
forwarding or saving them. Thank you. 



Huegel, Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU 

07/09/2007 01:45 PM 

Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU

To

IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU 

cc

 

Subject

Re: SHOW still available ?

 

 

 




You might want to checkout SPEDIT .. very good for the price. 
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Lionel B. Dyck
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2007 3:40 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: SHOW still available ?


Kris - your tool looks very nice - thank you for sharing it. 

Since it will not view open files I am going to have to look for
a product (VM:Spool it would appear). 

Thanks 





Lionel B. Dyck, Consultant/Specialist 
Enterprise Platform Services, Mainframe Engineering 
KP-IT Enterprise Engineering, Client and Platform Engineering
Services (CAPES) 
925-926-5332 (8-473-5332) | E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  
AIM: lbdyck | Yahoo IM: lbdyck 
Kaiser Service Credo: Our cause is health. Our passion is
service. We're here to make lives better. 

Never attribute to malice what can be caused by
miscommunication. 

NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: If you are not the intended recipient of
this e-mail, you are prohibited from sharing, copying, or otherwise
using or disclosing its contents. If you have received this e-mail in
error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and
permanently delete this e-mail and any attachments without reading,
forwarding or saving them. Thank you. 

Kris Buelens [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU 

07/09/2007 08:09 AM 

Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU

 

To

IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU 

cc

 

Subject

Re: SHOW still available ?

 

 

 





DAVE's words about TRANSFER brings some memories back:
You also might want to have a look at my URLIST package: it
shows the RDR/PUN/PRT queue of other users in an RDRLIST-like way.  It
provides a PEEK command, but that PEEK will involve a TRANSFER of the
file to your RDR-queue, PEEK, and TRANSFER back.  Drawback: this
TRANSFER process will change the spool file number (and if you'd LOGOFF
before we can transfer back, the file remains in your reader). 

2007/7/9, Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 
If your virtual machine has the needed set of CP 

Re: FTPing to z/VM

2007-06-22 Thread Dodds, Jim
Hello Alan,

What you have stated here about FileZilla is interesting. I know am
about to ask something that has to do with another operating system, but
in seeing about what happens with VM it might help me better understand
an take a similar route with VSE and get it resolved with the vendors. I
am having a problem using a VSE SSL FTP client to talk to a FileZilla
server. Everything we have done so far works except the DIR command to
get a directory listing. So I am assuming that the LISTFORMAT UNIX for
VM FTP is possibly for that problem and maybe others. Is that because
FileZilla only recognizes UNIX? Any insight would help thanks.   

Jim Dodds
Systems Programmer
Kentucky State University
400 East Main Street
Frankfort, Ky 40601
502 597 6114


-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Alan Altmark
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2007 9:11 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: FTPing to z/VM

On Wednesday, 06/20/2007 at 06:15 AST, David Boyes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
 You don't have to. It's just more useful if you do.
 
 You have to modify CHKIPADR if you want the server to present the
user's 
home 
 filespace by default on succesful authentication.

If you don't specify a default directory in CHKIPADR, the default is 
userid.191.  Since the userid is passed to CHKIPADR, creating a
default 
directory of server:userid. is easy.

As an aside, I also use CHKIPADR to set LISTFORMAT UNIX for those who
use 
non-VM-aware FTP clients like FileZilla.  At some point I should
consider 
changing my SRVRFTP CONFIG to have LISTFORMAT UNIX and SYSTEMGREETING
OFF 
so that auto-detect FTP clients won't get confused.

Alan Altmark
z/VM Development
IBM Endicott


Re: FTPing to z/VM

2007-06-22 Thread Dodds, Jim
Thanks so much for your time and assistance. What you have provided me
was very helpful. Now time for me to tackle the VSE FTP Vendor
windmill... Thanks again. 

Jim Dodds
Systems Programmer
Kentucky State University
400 East Main Street
Frankfort, Ky 40601
502 597 6114


-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Alan Altmark
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2007 11:15 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: FTPing to z/VM

On Friday, 06/22/2007 at 09:26 AST, Dodds, Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 Everything we have done so far works except the DIR command to
 get a directory listing. So I am assuming that the LISTFORMAT UNIX for
 VM FTP is possibly for that problem and maybe others. Is that because
 FileZilla only recognizes UNIX? Any insight would help thanks.

The FTP standard does not dictate the format of the output of NLST
(DIR), 
so clients are free to do as they wish.  Some FTP clients have the
ability 
to explicitly configure the type of host so that it can interpret DIR 
correctly.  Some have an auto setting (maybe configurable, maybe not) 
that uses the output of SYST to figure out how to interpret DIR.

ftp:// URLs that point to VM systems have similar problems.  FTP client 
authors that don't realize (or don't care) that NLST is not, in fact, a 
standard, interpret the output as UNIX.

IMO, there should be an FTP extension that provides a canonical
definition 
of the output of DIR.  E.g. 
NAME=profile.exec.a  SIZE=6728 ATTR=RW TYPE=FILE TIME=localtime 
TZ=-4

But I have other windmills to tilt at  :-)

Alan Altmark
z/VM Development
IBM Endicott


Re: FTPing to z/VM

2007-06-20 Thread Dodds, Jim
Yes, give me a few minutes and I will send you an example.

 

Jim Dodds

Systems Programmer

Kentucky State University

400 East Main Street

Frankfort, Ky 40601

502 597 6114

 



From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lionel B. Dyck
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 12:51 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: FTPing to z/VM

 


When I ftp to a z/vm guest is there a way to do a get on a file that is
on the 'b' minidisk? 

Thanks



Lionel B. Dyck, Consultant/Specialist 
Enterprise Platform Services, Mainframe Engineering 
KP-IT Enterprise Engineering, Client and Platform Engineering Services
(CAPES) 
925-926-5332 (8-473-5332) | E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  
AIM: lbdyck | Yahoo IM: lbdyck 
Kaiser Service Credo: Our cause is health. Our passion is service.
We're here to make lives better. 

Never attribute to malice what can be caused by miscommunication. 

NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: If you are not the intended recipient of this
e-mail, you are prohibited from sharing, copying, or otherwise using or
disclosing its contents. If you have received this e-mail in error,
please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and permanently
delete this e-mail and any attachments without reading, forwarding or
saving them. Thank you. 



Re: FTPing to z/VM

2007-06-20 Thread Dodds, Jim
Lionel,

 

Here is an example you might need the acct stmt to pass the read
password for the mdisk or the write password for the mdisk if you are
writing to it.

 

cd jdmaint.A01 

acct all   

lcd power.lst.c

get budget.listing1 budget

 

Jim Dodds

Systems Programmer

Kentucky State University

400 East Main Street

Frankfort, Ky 40601

502 597 6114

 



From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lionel B. Dyck
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 12:51 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: FTPing to z/VM

 


When I ftp to a z/vm guest is there a way to do a get on a file that is
on the 'b' minidisk? 

Thanks



Lionel B. Dyck, Consultant/Specialist 
Enterprise Platform Services, Mainframe Engineering 
KP-IT Enterprise Engineering, Client and Platform Engineering Services
(CAPES) 
925-926-5332 (8-473-5332) | E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  
AIM: lbdyck | Yahoo IM: lbdyck 
Kaiser Service Credo: Our cause is health. Our passion is service.
We're here to make lives better. 

Never attribute to malice what can be caused by miscommunication. 

NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: If you are not the intended recipient of this
e-mail, you are prohibited from sharing, copying, or otherwise using or
disclosing its contents. If you have received this e-mail in error,
please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and permanently
delete this e-mail and any attachments without reading, forwarding or
saving them. Thank you. 



Re: IBM sues PSI

2006-12-05 Thread Dodds, Jim
I cannot get it to work either. Here is the link I used:
http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=1966015

Jim Dodds
Systems Programmer
Kentucky State University
400 East Main Street
Frankfort, Ky 40601
502 597 6114


-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Edward M. Martin
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 3:04 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM sues PSI

Very Interesting article.   Sounds like the Hercules War is still
going on.

Ed Martin 
Aultman Health Foundation
330-588-4723
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
ext. 40441

 -Original Message-
 From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
 Behalf Of Dave Jones
 Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 11:34 AM
 To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
 Subject: IBM sues PSI
 
 IBM is suing PSI (Platform Solutions) for patient infringement
 

http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=1966015=
 50


Re: Another long slow decline.

2006-11-08 Thread Dodds, Jim
Dave,

I would like to see a copy of the pricing. Thanks

Jim Dodds
Systems Programmer
Kentucky State University
400 East Main Street
Frankfort, Ky 40601
502 597 6114


-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dave Jones
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 1:29 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Another long slow decline.

Hi, Paul.

P. Raulerson wrote:

 z/VM is a OTC (One Time Charge in this case) product, listing at 
 something like $40K per IFL.

Actually, z/VM 5.2 is now priced at $22,500 (OTC) for one IFL engine. As

the number of engines licensed increases,the charge per engine 
decreases. I have a document here that explains z/VM pricing in more 
detail, with examples, if anyone would like a copy.

 Linux from SuSE has a $5K per year support/subscription cost, and if
you 
 don't pay the sub,you can still use the product.
 HLASM from Dave Rivers is *amazingly* affordable.
 We could probably be coerced into licensing some software. :)
 
I thought HLASM was an IBM product.are you using the version for 
Linux on zSeries? And what debugger are you using
?
 Seriously. If you are anywhere near Austin, come visit.


I'm on the west side of Harris County (Houston, you may have heard of it

up there in Austin:-). Where are you?

Have a good one, and thanks for sharing your success..

DJ

 -Paul
 


Re: Any one in the Boston Area using a VM/VSE Combination

2006-10-06 Thread Dodds, Jim








Hello Larry,



I know you asked for the Boston area, but just in case you might need
something. We are a VM/VSE shop and I would be willing to help when I am able
to. Thanks





Jim Dodds

Systems Programmer

Kentucky State University

400 East
  Main Street

Frankfort, Ky 40601

502 597 6114













From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
l character
Sent: Friday, October 06, 2006
10:32 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Any one in the Boston
Area using a VM/VSE Combination







Anyone in the Boston
area using a vm/VSE combination





Thanks





Larry Pepero





Commonwealth Autombile Re-insurers





100 Summer St 





Boston
 MA 02110





617-880-2361





lpeperocommauto.com



  







Talk is cheap. Use Yahoo! Messenger to make PC-to-Phone calls. Great
rates starting at 1¢/min.








Z/VM 4.4 system question

2006-10-02 Thread Dodds, Jim








I hope that this list may assist or point me in the right
direction for this problem.



I have inherited an incomplete project from a coworker that
is longer with the school. Currently we have a Z/VM 4.4 system in a separate LPAR
called TECH, that was to be used to convert an set of array in our Shark dasd
subsystem from 3380 to another array set in 3390 format and to experiment with
running Linux under Z/VM. But before I could begin work on it I had a request
to get SECUREFTP installed from CSI installed by the end of this week. Upon
investigation our spare Ethernet adapter in the MP3000 is currently owned by
TECH LPAR and the next window for a system IPL to change the IOCP is at the end
of this month. Both sets of DASD arrays are shared in the TECH LPAR. So I decided
to move our vary off our dasd for the TECHVSE system on the PROD LPAR and vary
on the same dasd to the TECH LPAR. I have added the directory entries to the
TECH z/VM directory for the TECHVSE system. But when I try to IPL the TECHVSE
system on the z/VM system on the TECH LPAR I get this message:



HCPMCV1459E The virtual machine is placed in check-stop
state due to a system malfunction with CPU 00.



Explanation: The virtual machine was placed in check-stop
state due to an

uncorrectable system malfunction. This system malfunction
could not be

described specifically by a machine check interrupt
condition.



Some possible malfunctions are:



A bad page in a Named Saved System (NSS):

 This problem may
be reflected to other users sharing the NSS. An

 example would be
a damaged page on DASD that is part of the CMS NSS.

 The same could be
true of a Discontiguous Saved Segment (DCSS).



A damaged processor:

 A damaged
processor may be taken offline and the user redispatched.



System Action: Execution of instructions and interrupts
terminates, the

interval timer is not updated, and console function mode is
entered.



User Response: Enter the SYSTEM RESET or SYSTEM CLEAR
command to leave

check-stop state. If the problem persists, contact your
system programmer. The

check-stop may be indicative of a more serious error.



System Programmer Response: In the case of a failed
NSS or DCSS, resave the

segment or system that failed. If another DASD pack is
available, use it to

retry the IPL. If the problem persists, contact your IBM Support
 Center

Personnel to diagnose and correct the error.



I have read the message but I cannot understand what is
wrong. Our MP3000 has only one processor. I switched the dasd volumes back to
the PROD LPAR and was able to IPL the TECHVSE. I switched the DASD back to the
TECH LPAR and received the same message. Any help or assistance would be
greatly appreciated. 





Jim
Dodds

Systems
Programmer

Kentucky State University

400 East Main Street

Frankfort, Ky 40601

502
597 6114










Re: Z/VM 4.4 system question

2006-10-02 Thread Dodds, Jim
I was under the impression we had only a one engine CPU and no IFL. But
how can I be sure? Don't you have to configure the LPAR in some way to
use the IFL and can I not see if it is set to IFL?

Jim Dodds
Systems Programmer
Kentucky State University
400 East Main Street
Frankfort, Ky 40601
502 597 6114


-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Alan Altmark
Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 2:12 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Z/VM 4.4 system question

On Monday, 10/02/2006 at 01:59 AST, Dodds, Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
 I have inherited an incomplete project from a coworker that is longer 
with the 
 school. Currently we have a Z/VM 4.4 system in a separate LPAR called 
TECH, 
 that was to be used to convert an set of array in our Shark dasd 
subsystem from 
 3380 to another array set in 3390 format and to experiment with
running 
Linux 
 under Z/VM.
[...]
 But when I try to IPL the 
 TECHVSE system on the z/VM system on the TECH LPAR I get this message:
 
 HCPMCV1459E The virtual machine is placed in check-stop state due to a

system 
 malfunction with CPU 00.

Your statement about having only one CPU notwithstanding, I would have 
expected this if the TECH LPAR was running on an IFL instead of a
standard 
CPU. Are you sure you don't have an IFL for the z/VM LPAR and a standard

CPU for VSE?

Alan Altmark
z/VM Development
IBM Endicott


Re: Z/VM 4.4 system question

2006-10-02 Thread Dodds, Jim








After doing some further reading, it looks
like I am confused with the use of the word LPAR. 

I am used to the old days meaning of LPAR
being the equivalent of VM to use machine resources to emulate multiple
machines.

Now it looks like LPAR means one to one machine
emulation, ie one LPAR for CPU1and second LPAR for IFL1 etc. Or am I still off
base





Jim Dodds

Systems Programmer

Kentucky State University

400 East
  Main Street

Frankfort, Ky 40601

502 597 6114













From: Dodds, Jim 
Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006
1:59 PM
To: 'The
 IBM z/VM Operating System'
Subject: Z/VM 4.4 system question





I hope that this list may assist or point me in the right
direction for this problem.



I have inherited an incomplete project from a coworker that
is longer with the school. Currently we have a Z/VM 4.4 system in a separate
LPAR called TECH, that was to be used to convert an set of array in our Shark
dasd subsystem from 3380 to another array set in 3390 format and to experiment
with running Linux under Z/VM. But before I could begin work on it I had a
request to get SECUREFTP installed from CSI installed by the end of this week.
Upon investigation our spare Ethernet adapter in the MP3000 is currently owned
by TECH LPAR and the next window for a system IPL to change the IOCP is at the
end of this month. Both sets of DASD arrays are shared in the TECH LPAR. So I
decided to move our vary off our dasd for the TECHVSE system on the PROD LPAR
and vary on the same dasd to the TECH LPAR. I have added the directory entries
to the TECH z/VM directory for the TECHVSE system. But when I try to IPL the
TECHVSE system on the z/VM system on the TECH LPAR I get this message:



HCPMCV1459E The virtual machine is placed in check-stop
state due to a system malfunction with CPU 00.



Explanation: The virtual machine was placed in check-stop state
due to an

uncorrectable system malfunction. This system malfunction
could not be

described specifically by a machine check interrupt
condition.



Some possible malfunctions are:



A bad page in a Named Saved System (NSS):

 This problem may be
reflected to other users sharing the NSS. An

 example would be
a damaged page on DASD that is part of the CMS NSS.

 The same could be
true of a Discontiguous Saved Segment (DCSS).



A damaged processor:

 A damaged
processor may be taken offline and the user redispatched.



System Action: Execution of instructions and interrupts
terminates, the

interval timer is not updated, and console function mode is
entered.



User Response: Enter the SYSTEM RESET or SYSTEM CLEAR
command to leave

check-stop state. If the problem persists, contact your
system programmer. The

check-stop may be indicative of a more serious error.



System Programmer Response: In the case of a failed
NSS or DCSS, resave the

segment or system that failed. If another DASD pack is
available, use it to

retry the IPL. If the problem persists, contact your IBM Support
 Center

Personnel to diagnose and correct the error.



I have read the message but I cannot understand what is
wrong. Our MP3000 has only one processor. I switched the dasd volumes back to
the PROD LPAR and was able to IPL the TECHVSE. I switched the DASD back to the
TECH LPAR and received the same message. Any help or assistance would be
greatly appreciated. 





Jim
Dodds

Systems
Programmer

Kentucky State University

400 East Main Street

Frankfort, Ky 40601

502
597 6114










Re: Z/VM 4.4 system question

2006-10-02 Thread Dodds, Jim
Thanks Mark. I have found the answer on the MP3000 in the configuration
section of my LPARs. The TECH LPAR is marked as LINUX only. My next
question is I think that I still don't have an IFL. Can the general
processor be shared between these 2 LPARs with the TECH LPAR marked as
Linux only? What would happen if I changed the TECH LPAR from Linux only
to ESA/390? Would that mean I would have to some changes to the Z/VM 4.4
or would it IPL ok with no changes?

Jim Dodds
Systems Programmer
Kentucky State University
400 East Main Street
Frankfort, Ky 40601
502 597 6114


-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark Pace, Mainline Information System
Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 4:13 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Z/VM 4.4 system question

Just a little off.
Your old understanding is still correct.  But now if you have an IFL, it
must be in a LPAR(s) with only other IFLs.  You can not mix standard
CPUs
and IFLs in the same LPAR.



Mark D Pace
Senior Systems Engineer
Mainline Information Systems
1700 Summit Lake Drive
Tallahassee, FL. 32317
Office: 850.219.5184
Fax: 888.221.9862
http://www.mainline.com


This e-mail and files transmitted with it are confidential, and are
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom this
e-mail
is addressed.  If you are not the intended recipient, or the employee or
agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are
hereby
notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this
communication is strictly prohibited.  If you are not one of the named
recipient(s) or otherwise have reason to believe that you received this
message in error, please immediately notify sender by e-mail, and
destroy
the original message.  Thank You.


Re: We need a copy of z/VM 4.40 installation tape for 3390 system

2006-06-20 Thread Dodds, Jim








We have the z/VM 4.4 Tapes but would need
something from IBM saying it was ok for us to copy and give to you. 





Jim Dodds

Systems Programmer

Kentucky State University

400 East
  Main Street

Frankfort, Ky 40601

502 597 6114













From: The IBM z/VM
Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roland P. Chung
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 11:04
AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: We need a copy of z/VM
4.40 installation tape for 3390 system







Hello Listers, sorry to bother you guys again.











We called IBM software to order z/VM 4.40. However, the rep. said
itwas out of marketing since March 2006. He can'tship itto
us. But, he said, if we can get a copy of thedistribution tape, IBM will
licence it for us.











Please contact me off-list if you are willing to lend a copy of the
distribution tape forz/VM 4.40 for 3390 system.Greatly
appreciated.





With best regards,

...Roland Chung
Senior Technical Specialist (S/390,VM/VSE,DB2/VSEVM)
MAXC Consultants Inc.
Voice/Fax: 416-469-3280 (If busy, call: 416-469-2268)
197 Hastings Ave., Toronto,
 Ontario, Canada.
M4L 2L6

** Life is short. Stop once in a while and smell the roses. **








Re: We need a copy of z/VM 4.40 installation tape for 3390 system

2006-06-20 Thread Dodds, Jim








Roland,



I am very sorry about IBMs stand on
z/VM, but I will be glad to test those 5 3590 type J tapes that you think are
bad to see if it is the tape drive or actually the tapes that are bad.





Jim Dodds

Systems Programmer

Kentucky State University

400 East
  Main Street

Frankfort, Ky 40601

502 597 6114













From: The IBM z/VM
Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roland P. Chung
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 11:30
AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: We need a copy of
z/VM 4.40 installation tape for 3390 system







Hello Jim, great news!











However, at the conference call, IBM rep. said ...I will licence
the product ifyou can get a copy of z/VM distribution tape from somewhere
else. However, he also said (getting a copy other than from
IBM)... is not condomed nor recommended.











That is the official position of IBM. So, I am afraid you
wouldn't get an official OK from IBM. 











Thanks for your offering.











Regards,











...Roland












Dodds, Jim
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:







We have the z/VM 4.4 Tapes but would need
something from IBM saying it was ok for us to copy and give to you. 













Jim Dodds





Systems
Programmer





Kentucky State
 University





400 East Main Street





Frankfort, Ky
 40601





502 597 6114





















From: The IBM z/VM
Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roland P. Chung
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 11:04
AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: We need a copy of z/VM
4.40 installation tape for 3390 system















Hello Listers, sorry to bother you guys again.



















We called IBM software to order z/VM 4.40. However, the rep. said
itwas out of marketing since March 2006. He can'tship itto
us. But, he said, if we can get a copy of thedistribution tape, IBM will
licence it for us.



















Please contact me off-list if you are willing to lend a copy of the
distribution tape forz/VM 4.40 for 3390 system.Greatly
appreciated.









With best regards,

...Roland Chung
Senior Technical Specialist (S/390,VM/VSE,DB2/VSEVM)
MAXC Consultants Inc.
Voice/Fax: 416-469-3280 (If busy, call: 416-469-2268)
197 Hastings Ave., Toronto, Ontario,
 Canada.
M4L 2L6

** Life is short. Stop once in a while and smell the roses. **














Re: We need a copy of z/VM 4.40 installation tape for 3390 system

2006-06-20 Thread Dodds, Jim








Roland,



I am sorry, I thought for sure it was you
with the bad tapes. Well if you ever decide you need them checked just let me
know I will be happy to do it for you.





Jim Dodds

Systems Programmer

Kentucky State University

400 East
  Main Street

Frankfort, Ky 40601

502 597 6114













From: The IBM z/VM
Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roland P. Chung
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 12:22
PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: We need a copy of
z/VM 4.40 installation tape for 3390 system







Hi Jim,we arenot having problem with the tapes. Thanks for
the offering. Regards,











...Roland

Dodds, Jim
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:







Roland,











I am very sorry about IBMs stand on
z/VM, but I will be glad to test those 5 3590 type J tapes that you think are
bad to see if it is the tape drive or actually the tapes that are bad.













Jim Dodds





Systems
Programmer





Kentucky State
 University





400 East Main Street





Frankfort, Ky
 40601





502 597 6114