Re: [newbie] ntfs

2005-02-26 Thread Lee Wiggers
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 12:09:54 -0700
Ron Hunter-Duvar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Finest list in computerland,
 
  I haven't seen an ntfs write question in a year.  Has the write
  issue been resolved?  Can I safely share with an ntfs partition
  now?
 
  Lee
 
 Last I heard (a month or two ago), they had experimental write
 capability. But they recommended against using it unless you don't
 mind if your partition gets trashed.

Thanks all. 


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



[newbie] ntfs

2005-02-25 Thread Lee Wiggers
Finest list in computerland,

I haven't seen an ntfs write question in a year.  Has the write
issue been resolved?  Can I safely share with an ntfs partition now?

Lee


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



Re: [newbie] ntfs

2005-02-25 Thread Paul
On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 06:03, Lee Wiggers wrote:
 Finest list in computerland,
 
 I haven't seen an ntfs write question in a year.  Has the write
 issue been resolved?  Can I safely share with an ntfs partition now?
 

As far as I know, you can still read, but not write.



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



Re: [newbie] ntfs

2005-02-25 Thread Anne Wilson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Friday 25 Feb 2005 18:54, Paul wrote:
 On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 06:03, Lee Wiggers wrote:
  Finest list in computerland,
 
  I haven't seen an ntfs write question in a year.  Has the write
  issue been resolved?  Can I safely share with an ntfs partition now?

 As far as I know, you can still read, but not write.

You may want to look at Captive.

Anne
- -- 
Registered Linux User No.293302 (http://counter.li.org/)
Have you visited http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org yet?  Mandrake at all levels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCH10tkFAvMr/nNX8RAnpfAKChvs4yRhZAev4GLAWDOiDxi/zjPQCfcohH
l8HU4U7G4Im6ze+BIQle5Ks=
=uJrw
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



Re: [newbie] ntfs

2005-02-25 Thread Ron Hunter-Duvar
On February 24, 2005 23:03, Lee Wiggers wrote:
 Finest list in computerland,

 I haven't seen an ntfs write question in a year.  Has the write
 issue been resolved?  Can I safely share with an ntfs partition now?

 Lee

Last I heard (a month or two ago), they had experimental write capability. But 
they recommended against using it unless you don't mind if your partition 
gets trashed. The problem as I understand it is that there is no published 
ntfs spec, so they had to reverse engineer it, and they're not confident that 
they've done that well enough to trust it. But you can always backup your 
partition first, and restore it if you trash it (dd is good for this).

A newer approach is CaptiveNTFS. It relies on you having a version of Windoze 
that supports ntfs (NT, 2000, XP) installed on your machine (not just access 
to an ntfs partition). Apparently, it wraps the Windoze ntfs driver to make 
it into a Linux driver. So the writing should be just as reliable as it is in 
Windoze. I haven't tried it (haven't needed to), but I've read success 
stories on the linux online news.

-- 
Ron
ronhd at users dot sourceforge dot net

Opinions expressed here are all mine.

As you know, necessity is the mother of invention.
I don't know who the father is. Remorse, I guess. - Red Green


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



Re: [newbie] NTFS Partition slaughter

2004-06-22 Thread Ariestao1
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 12:43 am, Lord Storm wrote:
 SNIP

  Storm, old china plate, Windows ALWAYS needs to be installed FIRST - no
  matter what - it's a Microsoft thing - it will rewrite your partition
  tables no matter what - and if you hose up your Windows installation
  after mucking around with GNU/linux, well, you're going to have to blast
  it all out and start again.
 
  For whatever reason, the MS family of OS's refuses to be on anything -
  or rather, boot from anything except for HDA1 (or the entire HDA for
  that matter); by common practise, Windows is install first, then
  everything else after that. Can't get around it.

 snip
 Windows 2k was installed first then mandrake then partition scrambled.
 FIXMBR FIXBOOT did not work at all. I know that Windows has to be
 installed first (been using mandrake since 9.0) but this is the first time
 I have encountered this problem with MDK in 10. Some how it could be the
 bios level F4 bios its now F6 and Mandrakesoft may be configuring stuff for
 the F6 BIOS now.

 Also I do not know enough about lilo to configure it after mandrake is
 installed.

 I think ill be doing the beta run with MDK 10.1 and all candidates I just
 hope they anounce it on Distrowatch.

This might be of interest:-


See: http://basiclinux.net/cgi-bin/twiki/view/Basiclinux/WindowsBootLoss

Be sure to see the link to the Prevention and Recovery - it's a lot
easier to read then the huge bug reports. :-)

 Loss of Windows XP boot after Linux Install

Some people are finding that they can no longer boot Windows XP after 
installing Fedora Core 2. I found a similar bugzilla report for Mandrake 10 
and reports of this on SUSE 9.1 as well. There is a combination of 
ingredients that causes this problem.

They are:

   1. The distro uses the 2.6 kernel
   2. The distro installer uses parted to repartition the drive
   3. The installation is done on a large hard drive
   4. Windows XP is installed on that same drive

What happens to cause the problem? I am not an expert on this, but my 
understanding of what I've read in the bug reports is that this is it in a 
nutshell:

   1. kernel 2.6 doesn't try to give the logical geometry, and gives the 
physical geometry instead
   2. parted (front-ends include diskdrake and disk druid) uses the physical 
geometry given by the kernel to generate the CHS information during the 
repartitioning. This CHS information gets written to the partition table
   3. the BIOS sees that the partition table uses a different CHS geometry, 
and adapts to it
   4. Windows has the previous geometry that it keeps in its boot sector. This 
no works with the changed CHS that the BIOS now provides. The Windows boot 
fails.

To read the bug reports yourself, see:

* Mandrake bug report opened: 2004.02.17 
http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=7959

* Fedora bug report opened: 2004-02-17 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115980

For information on how to prevent or recover from this problem see Dual 
Booting Issues With Fedora Core 2 and Windows: Prevention  Recovery 
http://lwn.net/Articles/86835/ This guide should also help with other distros 
which have this problem. The basic idea for prevention here is to give the 
drive geometry as a parameter when booting the kernel during installation - 
for example:

   linux hda=14593,255,63

The guide explains that you can get the geometry using fdisk (Linux version) 
from a rescue disk. The explanation uses the Fedora Rescue CD, but there are 
a number of rescue disks available - normally the installation CD itself can 
function as a rescue disk.

My thinking is that laying down the partitions before doing the install would 
solve the problem, but many new users would rightfully just use the installer 
to do the job and run right into this situation of not being able to book 
Windows XP afterwards. fdisk or cfdisk do not read the geometry in the same 
way that parted does.

Another prevention for this would be to install Linux on a separate hard 
drive. I would recommend that you do not install GRUB or LILO to the MBR of 
the disk that Windows is on, because I have seen reports of this geometry 
still being rewritten in such a case.

-- AnitaLewis - 19 Jun 2004 

-- 
Registered Linux User:- 329524
---
The words which express our faith and piety are not definite; yet they are 
significant and fragrant like frankincense to superior natures. 
.Henry David Thoreau
___
This email is guaranteed to be Wholly Linux Mandrake 9.2, KMail v1.5.3 and 
OpenOffice.org1.1.0

Experience what others using Mandrake Linux have experienced at:- 
http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : 

Re: [newbie] NTFS Partition slaughter

2004-06-22 Thread Lord Storm

  I think ill be doing the beta run with MDK 10.1 and all candidates I just
  hope they anounce it on Distrowatch.

 Have you tried using Partition Magic to repair the partition table?

 stephen kuhn - proprietor

No since I dont think they make partition Magic for linux and I only have 1 
harddrive otherwise the problem would of been fixed by now. 

All I can say is ... im glad im not alone I dont know what they did with 
the NTFS sure it was buggy but it seemed more buggy since SOT RC1 came out. 
Gee catch up time I suppose... WINFS is comming soon.

MDK10 
Gigabyte GA-8SR533 P4 Titan M/b
1.7Ghz Celeron 384MB RAM Geforce 4 64MB
Labtec USB mouse ADSL eth0 40gig Maxtor


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



Re: [newbie] NTFS Partition slaughter

2004-06-22 Thread Stephen Kuhn
On Tue, 2004-06-22 at 18:23, Lord Storm wrote:
   I think ill be doing the beta run with MDK 10.1 and all candidates I just
   hope they anounce it on Distrowatch.
 
  Have you tried using Partition Magic to repair the partition table?
 
  stephen kuhn - proprietor
 
 No since I dont think they make partition Magic for linux and I only have 1 
 harddrive otherwise the problem would of been fixed by now. 
 
 All I can say is ... im glad im not alone I dont know what they did with 
 the NTFS sure it was buggy but it seemed more buggy since SOT RC1 came out. 
 Gee catch up time I suppose... WINFS is comming soon.

Partition Magic comes on a CD and no matter what x86 OS you run, it can
access the partitons and/or repair them - you just boot from the PM
CD...

stephen kuhn - proprietor
__
illawarra computer services :: a kuhn media australia venture
http://kma.0catch.com  :: mobile 0410.728.389
Serving Sydney, The Illawarra, South Coast and Rural NSW
__
  * This message was composed on a 100% Microsoft free computer *
  We expressly refuse to utilise Microsoft DRM encoded documents
__
  Certified virus-free since we don't use Microsoft products

In a whiskey it's age, in a cigarette it's taste and in a sports car
it's impossible.



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



Re: [newbie] NTFS Partition slaughter

2004-06-21 Thread Stephen Kuhn
On Mon, 2004-06-21 at 21:39, Lord Storm wrote:
 Well I run the bellow system. I had windows 2k pro with NTFS and some how 
 mandrake purged Win2k from Partitions and windows would not reinstall. 
 Operating system error or something like that it was about 2 weeks ago. Not 
 that I realy care now, but SOT linux did it to me as well. 9.2 Didnt do it. 
 So I was wondering if it is creeping into the NTFS partition managagement 
 tree.
 
 I have downloaded the maxtor tool for low level format to try and fix the hard 
 drive latter. 

Storm, old china plate, Windows ALWAYS needs to be installed FIRST - no
matter what - it's a Microsoft thing - it will rewrite your partition
tables no matter what - and if you hose up your Windows installation
after mucking around with GNU/linux, well, you're going to have to blast
it all out and start again.

For whatever reason, the MS family of OS's refuses to be on anything -
or rather, boot from anything except for HDA1 (or the entire HDA for
that matter); by common practise, Windows is install first, then
everything else after that. Can't get around it.

stephen kuhn - proprietor
==
illawarra computer services
a kuhn media australia company
http://kma.0catch.com
mobile: 0410.728.389
--
  * This message was composed on a 100% Microsoft free computer *
  We expressly refuse to utilise Microsoft DRM encoded documents
--
  Certified virus-free since we don't use Microsoft products

Are you a parent? Do you sometimes find yourself unsure as to what to
say in those awkward situations? Worry no more... Go away. You bother
me. Why? Because life is unfair. That's a nice drawing. What is it?
Children should be seen and not heard. You'll be the death of me. You'll
understand when you're older. Because. Wipe that smile off your face. I
don't believe you. How many times have I told you to be careful? Just
beacuse.



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



Re: [newbie] NTFS Partition slaughter

2004-06-21 Thread Bryan Phinney
On Monday 21 June 2004 08:49 am, Stephen Kuhn wrote:

 For whatever reason, the MS family of OS's refuses to be on anything -
 or rather, boot from anything except for HDA1 (or the entire HDA for
 that matter); by common practise, Windows is install first, then
 everything else after that. Can't get around it.

To give MS credit where it is due, that is not totally true.  Win XP can be 
readily installed to any hard drive and while it is true that it will rewrite 
the MBR of HDA with its own boot loader, booting from the Mandrake CD and 
adding an entry to lilo.conf and then reinstalling lilo to the MBR will allow 
dual booting.  Of course, you have to know what you are doing when you 
install Windows and IIRC, you have to manually create the installation 
partitions, not allow Windows to do it on its own.

-- 
Bryan Phinney
Software Test Engineer


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



Re: [newbie] NTFS Partition slaughter

2004-06-21 Thread Stephen Kuhn
On Mon, 2004-06-21 at 22:58, Bryan Phinney wrote:
 On Monday 21 June 2004 08:49 am, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
 
  For whatever reason, the MS family of OS's refuses to be on anything -
  or rather, boot from anything except for HDA1 (or the entire HDA for
  that matter); by common practise, Windows is install first, then
  everything else after that. Can't get around it.
 
 To give MS credit where it is due, that is not totally true.  Win XP can be 
 readily installed to any hard drive and while it is true that it will rewrite 
 the MBR of HDA with its own boot loader, booting from the Mandrake CD and 
 adding an entry to lilo.conf and then reinstalling lilo to the MBR will allow 
 dual booting.  Of course, you have to know what you are doing when you 
 install Windows and IIRC, you have to manually create the installation 
 partitions, not allow Windows to do it on its own.

Ok, so ya pinned me to a dead fish on that - but still, UNLESS YOU'RE AN
EXPERT, you're going to hose up the installation...and if you're
dependent on particular partion numberings, installing Windows AFTER
linux is going to be a nightmare.

stephen kuhn - proprietor
__
illawarra computer services :: a kuhn media australia venture
http://kma.0catch.com  :: mobile 0410.728.389
Serving Sydney, The Illawarra, South Coast and Rural NSW
__
  * This message was composed on a 100% Microsoft free computer *
  We expressly refuse to utilise Microsoft DRM encoded documents
__
  Certified virus-free since we don't use Microsoft products

Real wealth can only increase. -- R. Buckminster Fuller



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



Re: [newbie] NTFS Partition slaughter

2004-06-21 Thread Lord Storm
SNIP
 Storm, old china plate, Windows ALWAYS needs to be installed FIRST - no
 matter what - it's a Microsoft thing - it will rewrite your partition
 tables no matter what - and if you hose up your Windows installation
 after mucking around with GNU/linux, well, you're going to have to blast
 it all out and start again.

 For whatever reason, the MS family of OS's refuses to be on anything -
 or rather, boot from anything except for HDA1 (or the entire HDA for
 that matter); by common practise, Windows is install first, then
 everything else after that. Can't get around it.

snip
Windows 2k was installed first then mandrake then partition scrambled. 
FIXMBR FIXBOOT did not work at all. I know that Windows has to be 
installed first (been using mandrake since 9.0) but this is the first time I 
have encountered this problem with MDK in 10. Some how it could be the bios 
level F4 bios its now F6 and Mandrakesoft may be configuring stuff for the F6 
BIOS now.

Also I do not know enough about lilo to configure it after mandrake is 
installed. 

I think ill be doing the beta run with MDK 10.1 and all candidates I just hope 
they anounce it on Distrowatch.
-- 

MDK10 Unsupported  
Gigabyte GA-8SR533 P4 Titan M/b F4 BIOS
1.7Ghz Celeron 384MB RAM Geforce 4 64MB
Labtec USB mouse ADSL eth0 40gig Maxtor


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



Re: [newbie] NTFS Partition slaughter

2004-06-21 Thread Carroll Grigsby
On Monday 21 June 2004 09:42 am, Stephen Kuhn wrote:

 snip


 Ok, so ya pinned me to a dead fish on that - but still, UNLESS YOU'RE AN
 EXPERT, you're going to hose up the installation...and if you're
 dependent on particular partion numberings, installing Windows AFTER
 linux is going to be a nightmare.

 stephen kuhn - proprietor

Installing Windows BEFORE Linux isn't exactly a day in the country, either. 
There was a thread on /. last night about the problem of updating a brand new 
installation of Windows without getting hacked. Not a simple task, 
particularly for a home user with only one PC.
-- cmg



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



Re: [newbie] NTFS Partition slaughter

2004-06-21 Thread Stephen Kuhn
On Tue, 2004-06-22 at 00:43, Lord Storm wrote:
 SNIP
  Storm, old china plate, Windows ALWAYS needs to be installed FIRST - no
  matter what - it's a Microsoft thing - it will rewrite your partition
  tables no matter what - and if you hose up your Windows installation
  after mucking around with GNU/linux, well, you're going to have to blast
  it all out and start again.
 
  For whatever reason, the MS family of OS's refuses to be on anything -
  or rather, boot from anything except for HDA1 (or the entire HDA for
  that matter); by common practise, Windows is install first, then
  everything else after that. Can't get around it.
 
 snip
 Windows 2k was installed first then mandrake then partition scrambled. 
 FIXMBR FIXBOOT did not work at all. I know that Windows has to be 
 installed first (been using mandrake since 9.0) but this is the first time I 
 have encountered this problem with MDK in 10. Some how it could be the bios 
 level F4 bios its now F6 and Mandrakesoft may be configuring stuff for the F6 
 BIOS now.
 
 Also I do not know enough about lilo to configure it after mandrake is 
 installed. 
 
 I think ill be doing the beta run with MDK 10.1 and all candidates I just hope 
 they anounce it on Distrowatch.

Have you tried using Partition Magic to repair the partition table?

stephen kuhn - proprietor
__
illawarra computer services :: a kuhn media australia venture
http://kma.0catch.com  :: mobile 0410.728.389
Serving Sydney, The Illawarra, South Coast and Rural NSW
__
  * This message was composed on a 100% Microsoft free computer *
  We expressly refuse to utilise Microsoft DRM encoded documents
__
  Certified virus-free since we don't use Microsoft products

[Washington, D.C.] is the home of... taste for the people -- the big,
the bland and the banal. -- Ada Louise Huxtable



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



Re: [newbie] NTFS Partition slaughter

2004-06-21 Thread Stephen Kuhn
On Tue, 2004-06-22 at 04:43, Carroll Grigsby wrote:
 On Monday 21 June 2004 09:42 am, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
 
  snip
 
 
  Ok, so ya pinned me to a dead fish on that - but still, UNLESS YOU'RE AN
  EXPERT, you're going to hose up the installation...and if you're
  dependent on particular partion numberings, installing Windows AFTER
  linux is going to be a nightmare.
 
  stephen kuhn - proprietor
 
 Installing Windows BEFORE Linux isn't exactly a day in the country, either. 
 There was a thread on /. last night about the problem of updating a brand new 
 installation of Windows without getting hacked. Not a simple task, 
 particularly for a home user with only one PC.
 -- cmg

Actually, I had a laugh over that one (I'm on /. at least twice a day)

I've developed a particular routine for dual-boot machines:

1.) Partition the drive, give Windows the first partition; format the
partition with VFAT, then move that first partition to the REAR of the
HD - reboot
2.) Install Win
3.) After Win is installed, boot into Partition Magic, create whatever
partitions are required (a swap and at least a / partition) format with
ext3
4.) Start the GNU/linux installation - keep the partitions unless
wanting a different file system (like ReiserFS or whatever)
5.) Install lilo to the MBR

Works like a champ every time.

stephen kuhn - proprietor
__
illawarra computer services :: a kuhn media australia venture
http://kma.0catch.com  :: mobile 0410.728.389
Serving Sydney, The Illawarra, South Coast and Rural NSW
__
  * This message was composed on a 100% Microsoft free computer *
  We expressly refuse to utilise Microsoft DRM encoded documents
__
  Certified virus-free since we don't use Microsoft products

The first 90% of a project takes 90% of the time, the last 10% takes the
other 90% of the time.



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



[newbie] ntfs write support fully supported.....kind of

2004-05-21 Thread John Drouhard
I was experimenting with Knoppix 3.4 yesterday and found something of
interest - Captive NTFS. I clicked on it to see what it was, and found
something that many people may be looking for. It is a program type
thing that downloads certain ntfs driver files directly from Microsoft,
and uses the code to give linux full read-write support for ntfs
partitions.

I know that alot of you are completely against using any closed source
stuff at all, but it works like a charm. I now have it on my computer,
and have copied a bunch of music from my home directory to My Documents
on the ntfs partition.

http://www.jankratochvil.net/project/captive/

It took me awhile to get it working correctly, so if anyone wants some
step-by-step instructions on how to get it working, just let me know.

John


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com



Re: [newbie] ntfs read/write?

2004-03-20 Thread Paul Smith
So, should one choose creating a fat32 partition to have a shared 
(between MS Windows and Linux, and with write privileges) hard disk 
partition?

Paul


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com


Re: [newbie] ntfs read/write?

2004-03-17 Thread Stephen Kuhn
On Wed, 2004-03-17 at 14:46, Jerry wrote:

 I try :
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] My Documents]# touch test.txt
 touch: cannot touch `test.txt': Read-only file system
 
 I tried also adding rw to options but still got the same result.
 
 /dev/hda1 /mnt/windows ntfs iocharset=iso8859-15,umask=0,rw 0 0
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] My Documents]# touch test.txt
 touch: cannot touch `test.txt': Read-only file system
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] My Documents]# cp /home/jerry/flowers3.JPG ./
 cp: cannot create regular file `./flowers3.JPG': Read-only file system
 
 windows drive is win2k if that helps any.

I'll play around with this today - I can access/change stuff on mine, so
somethings not right here...

stephen kuhn - owner
==
illawarra computer services
a kuhn media australia company
http://kma.0catch.com
--
  * This message was composed on a 100% Microsoft free computer *
  We expressly refuse to utilise Microsoft DRM encoded documents
--
I don't understand the HUMOUR of the THREE STOOGES!!


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com


Re: [newbie] ntfs read/write?

2004-03-17 Thread Jerry
On Thu, 18 Mar 2004 07:26:23 +1100
Stephen Kuhn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 
 I'll play around with this today - I can access/change stuff on mine, so
 somethings not right here...
 
 stephen kuhn - owner

I d/l'ed the 2.6.4 kernel tonight and got looking around and saw something I think 
answers my question.

From make xconfig...

NTFS write support (NTFS_RW)

This enables the partial, but safe, write support in the NTFS driver.

The only supported operation is overwriting existing files, without
changing the file length. No file or directory creation, deletion or
renaming is possible. Note only non-resident files can be written to
so you may find that some very small files (500 bytes or so) cannot
be written to.

While we cannot guarantee that it will not damage any data, we have
so far not received a single report where the driver would have
damaged someones data so we assume it is perfectly safe to use.

Note: While write support is safe in this version (a rewrite from
scratch of the NTFS support), it should be noted that the old NTFS
write support, included in Linux 2.5.10 and before (since 1997),
is not safe.

This is currently useful with TopologiLinux. TopologiLinux is run
on top of any DOS/Microsoft Windows system without partitioning your
hard disk. Unlike other Linux distributions TopologiLinux does not
need its own partition. For more information see
http://topologi-linux.sourceforge.net/

It is perfectly safe to say N here.

So with the re-write it looks like maybe I can't do it, right?  Or am I on the wrong 
track?

Jerry

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com


Re: [newbie] ntfs read/write?

2004-03-17 Thread Stephen Kuhn
On Thu, 2004-03-18 at 14:21, Jerry wrote:
 So with the re-write it looks like maybe I can't do it, right?  Or am I on the wrong 
 track?
 
 Jerry

Actually, it looks like you're on the right (write) track...

stephen kuhn - owner
==
illawarra computer services
a kuhn media australia company
http://kma.0catch.com
--
  * This message was composed on a 100% Microsoft free computer *
  We expressly refuse to utilise Microsoft DRM encoded documents
--
Adhere to your own act, and congratulate yourself if you have done
something strange and extravagant, and broken the monotony of a decorous
age. -- Ralph Waldo Emerson


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com


[newbie] NTFS disk in linux

2004-03-16 Thread Paranoid
I am just installing mandrake 9 on my server. My server have been running win 2k 
server before so all my harddisk is in ntfs and i still want to be able to use them in 
my workstations that stop windows. But what do i do to get ntfs support on my linux 
server.

From an Sony Ericsson T68

WG Paranoid.

--
Rudolff B Vang
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] NTFS disk in linux

2004-03-16 Thread Greg Meyer
On Tuesday 16 March 2004 03:11 am, Paranoid wrote:
 I am just installing mandrake 9 on my server. My server have been running
 win 2k server before so all my harddisk is in ntfs and i still want to be
 able to use them in my workstations that stop windows. But what do i do to
 get ntfs support on my linux server.

Linux cannot run off of an NTFS disk and an ntfs data partition should be 
mounted read only for now because of the potential to corrupt data.  

You can convert the disk to a linux native format like reiserfs or ext3 during 
install and then create your shares using samba.  The workstation doesn't 
care what format the disk is because the system presents a windows share to 
the network via samba, which all windows boxes can interface with.  As long 
as the server OS can read the filesystem, it will work.
-- 
/g

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] ntfs read/write?

2004-03-16 Thread Jerry
On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 10:16:02 +1100
Stephen Kuhn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 
 You should be able to just edit the /etc/fstab and make it read-write;
 here's how mine is (at least the entry for the Wincrap drives)
 
 (snip)
 
 /dev/hda1 /mnt/win_c ntfs iocharset=iso8859-15,umask=0 0 0
 /dev/hdb1 /mnt/win_c2 ntfs iocharset=iso8859-15,umask=0 0 0
 
 (/snip)

fstab entry for windows drive is:

/dev/hda1 /mnt/windows ntfs iocharset=iso8859-15,umask=0 0 0

I try :

[EMAIL PROTECTED] My Documents]# touch test.txt
touch: cannot touch `test.txt': Read-only file system

I tried also adding rw to options but still got the same result.

/dev/hda1 /mnt/windows ntfs iocharset=iso8859-15,umask=0,rw 0 0

[EMAIL PROTECTED] My Documents]# touch test.txt
touch: cannot touch `test.txt': Read-only file system

[EMAIL PROTECTED] My Documents]# cp /home/jerry/flowers3.JPG ./
cp: cannot create regular file `./flowers3.JPG': Read-only file system

windows drive is win2k if that helps any.

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] ntfs read/write?

2004-03-16 Thread Fajar Priyanto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 17 March 2004 06:16 am, Stephen Kuhn wrote:

 You should be able to just edit the /etc/fstab and make it read-write;
 here's how mine is (at least the entry for the Wincrap drives)

 (snip)

 /dev/hda1 /mnt/win_c ntfs iocharset=iso8859-15,umask=0 0 0
 /dev/hdb1 /mnt/win_c2 ntfs iocharset=iso8859-15,umask=0 0 0

 (/snip)

 stephen kuhn - owner
 ==
 illawarra computer services
 a kuhn media australia company
 http://kma.0catch.com
 --
   * This message was composed on a 100% Microsoft free computer *
   We expressly refuse to utilise Microsoft DRM encoded documents
 --
 A couple more shots of whiskey, women 'round here start looking good.
 [something about a 10 being a 4 after a six-pack? Ed.]

Hi Stephen, good to see you again. Lots of people are looking for you :)
By the way, Jerry,
If you installed MDK into a box that already contains ms windows, it should 
automatically recognize the ntfs partition and all. It will be labeled as 
/mnt/win_c, win_d, so on.
Fajar.
- -- 
12:29:55 up 3:12, Mandrake Linux release 9.2 (FiveStar) for i586 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAV+Lrkp5CsIXuxqURAkObAKClffxCT4ZLhy2zWUwRWh98gQHjjwCgskAk
OXn8G2uiijNKZPvMamajGiM=
=xmZi
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[newbie] ntfs read/write?

2004-03-14 Thread Jerry
according to the PR for 10.0 it says: 

Server deployments also benefit from interoperability with MS-Windows® systems thanks 
to enhanced support of Windows' Logical Disk Manager and new read/write NTFS support.

( this at http://www.linuxmandrake.com/en/10.0/100PR.php3 )

now.. is it actually possible to write to NTFS partitions now?  and how would one go 
about doing it?

Jerry.

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[newbie] NTFS and Lilo in MBR

2003-11-30 Thread R.E. Perrett




I have a hard drive with Windows XP Pro installed 
using NTFS.
I want to put Mandrake 9.2 on a second hard 
drive.
If I tell the install program to put the Lilo boot 
loader on the NTFS drive in the MBR will it work or will the NTFS cause problems 
because Linux can't write to an NTFS drive?
Roger


Re: [newbie] NTFS and Lilo in MBR

2003-11-30 Thread Melissa Reese
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Roger,

On Sunday, November 30, 2003, at 1:59:30 AM PST, you wrote:

 I have a hard drive with Windows XP Pro installed using NTFS. I want
 to put Mandrake 9.2 on a second hard drive.

I've done exactly this, having recently installed MDK 9.2 on my second
drive.

 If I tell the install program to put the Lilo boot loader on the
 NTFS drive in the MBR will it work or will the NTFS cause problems
 because Linux can't write to an NTFS drive?

This is how I have my Lilo installed, and it works perfectly.

- -- 
Melissa

PGP public keys:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Body=Please%20send%20keys

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

iD8DBQE/ycGujVbXUvsE8ukRAo5EAJwNs9klXhsHcyPjul9aRMt1vzqm4QCcDOXP
nF1XICIakx9jd+6xk9Gulso=
=ZnN4
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] NTFS and Lilo in MBR

2003-11-30 Thread Brian Parish
On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 20:59, R.E. Perrett wrote:
  
 I have a hard drive with Windows XP Pro installed using NTFS.
 I want to put Mandrake 9.2 on a second hard drive.
 If I tell the install program to put the Lilo boot loader on the NTFS
 drive in the MBR will it work or will the NTFS cause problems because
 Linux can't write to an NTFS drive?
 Roger
No - it will work just fine.

cheers
Brian


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] NTFS and Lilo in MBR

2003-11-30 Thread R.E. Perrett
thanks guys
roger
- Original Message - 
From: Brian Parish [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: newbie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2003 9:09 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] NTFS and Lilo in MBR


 On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 20:59, R.E. Perrett wrote:
 
  I have a hard drive with Windows XP Pro installed using NTFS.
  I want to put Mandrake 9.2 on a second hard drive.
  If I tell the install program to put the Lilo boot loader on the NTFS
  drive in the MBR will it work or will the NTFS cause problems because
  Linux can't write to an NTFS drive?
  Roger
 No - it will work just fine.

 cheers
 Brian









 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] NTFS and Lilo in MBR

2003-11-30 Thread Johan
If you have done it already then OK.
Suggest...
Switch drive 1 with drive 2 and then install mdk on this drivethis will
leave your XP drive with an intact mbrif you have problems with linux
booting (or whatever reason) then just unplug drive 1...then you do not need
to restore xp mbr.
I have seen a lot of traffic on list of people wanting to restore XP boot.
I have this setup and it has saved me some grief.(Please note in my case
both drives is master on their cables.)
Another suggestion...
Have a scratch partiton to move stuff between systems.
I use grub bootloader..if you require the instructions for xp on 2nd drive
... just ask and I will provide.
I have found that mdk is smart enough to do thisif the drive is
connected on istallation..(just incase)
Johan

- Original Message - 
From: Melissa Reese [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: R.E. Perrett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2003 12:08 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] NTFS and Lilo in MBR


 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

 Hi Roger,

 On Sunday, November 30, 2003, at 1:59:30 AM PST, you wrote:

  I have a hard drive with Windows XP Pro installed using NTFS. I want
  to put Mandrake 9.2 on a second hard drive.

 I've done exactly this, having recently installed MDK 9.2 on my second
 drive.

  If I tell the install program to put the Lilo boot loader on the
  NTFS drive in the MBR will it work or will the NTFS cause problems
  because Linux can't write to an NTFS drive?

 This is how I have my Lilo installed, and it works perfectly.

 - -- 
 Melissa

 PGP public keys:
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Body=Please%20send%20keys

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

 iD8DBQE/ycGujVbXUvsE8ukRAo5EAJwNs9klXhsHcyPjul9aRMt1vzqm4QCcDOXP
 nF1XICIakx9jd+6xk9Gulso=
 =ZnN4
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-









 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] NTFS and Lilo in MBR

2003-11-30 Thread John Richard Smith
R.E. Perrett wrote:

 
I have a hard drive with Windows XP Pro installed using NTFS.
I want to put Mandrake 9.2 on a second hard drive.
If I tell the install program to put the Lilo boot loader on the NTFS 
drive in the MBR will it work or will the NTFS cause problems because 
Linux can't write to an NTFS drive?
Roger
Of course it will work.

John

--
John Richard Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] NTFS and Lilo in MBR

2003-11-30 Thread Greg Meyer
On Sunday 30 November 2003 06:37 am, Johan wrote:
 If you have done it already then OK.
 Suggest...
 Switch drive 1 with drive 2 and then install mdk on this drivethis will
 leave your XP drive with an intact mbrif you have problems with linux
 booting (or whatever reason) then just unplug drive 1...then you do not
 need to restore xp mbr.
 I have seen a lot of traffic on list of people wanting to restore XP boot.
 I have this setup and it has saved me some grief.(Please note in my case
 both drives is master on their cables.)
 Another suggestion...
 Have a scratch partiton to move stuff between systems.
 I use grub bootloader..if you require the instructions for xp on 2nd drive
 ... just ask and I will provide.
 I have found that mdk is smart enough to do thisif the drive is
 connected on istallation..(just incase)
 Johan
To restore XP bootloader, isn't it far easier to boot the install cd to rescue 
mode and select restore bootloader than it is to take the computer apart to 
switch disks?
-- 
/g

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] NTFS and Lilo in MBR

2003-11-30 Thread Johan
Probably is. OK it was only suggestions.
You the user must decide what is appropriate for *your*  set of
circumstances and which system you regard as more important and what chances
you are prepared to take.
Me,  I place a *high* priority on my XP installation and is prepared to
dissect the pc if necessary to save my installation. That's why I do not let
it share HD with installed linux due to a serious mishap with a linux
install in the
past.
FYI my hd 1 = win98 - mdk92 - rh90- suse90.
my hd 2 = XP ntfs- 2 x vfat part -1 x vfat  scratchpad between systems - 1
linux
part for backup with rsync.
Johan
**
- Original Message - 
From: Greg Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2003 3:39 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] NTFS and Lilo in MBR


 On Sunday 30 November 2003 06:37 am, Johan wrote:
  If you have done it already then OK.
  Suggest...
  Switch drive 1 with drive 2 and then install mdk on this drivethis
will
  leave your XP drive with an intact mbrif you have problems with
linux
  booting (or whatever reason) then just unplug drive 1...then you do not
  need to restore xp mbr.
  I have seen a lot of traffic on list of people wanting to restore XP
boot.
  I have this setup and it has saved me some grief.(Please note in my case
  both drives is master on their cables.)
  Another suggestion...
  Have a scratch partiton to move stuff between systems.
  I use grub bootloader..if you require the instructions for xp on 2nd
drive
  ... just ask and I will provide.
  I have found that mdk is smart enough to do thisif the drive is
  connected on istallation..(just incase)
  Johan
 To restore XP bootloader, isn't it far easier to boot the install cd to
rescue
 mode and select restore bootloader than it is to take the computer apart
to
 switch disks?
 -- 
 /g








 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] NTFS ?

2003-06-17 Thread eric huff
  I had the same problems as you did,Discdrake will not let
 you shrink the NTFS drive,this not a Linux problem.It's caused by XP
 building non-existent swap files on your Hard Drive,it does not matter
 how many times you run Defrag of Scandisk,it will not play.

The first time i installed, i had no trouble shrinkin it.  Latere, after 
getting rid of stuff in windows, (and haveing to reinstally ML9.1) 
diskdrake told me the partition was too fragmented to shrink.  As you, i 
had defragged many times.

Not sure why it behaved differently...

eric

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] NTFS ?

2003-06-17 Thread FemmeFatale
At 09:57 AM 6/17/2003 +0100, you wrote:
Snip
I would have thought using M$ partitioning tools was the safest way of
shrinking a ntfs partition?  As for the rest, the free space could be
left as such for linux, or, more usefully, a fat32 partition made for
data exchange, which is what I was recommending, leaving the rest for
linux.
snip
Anne
yes you'd think so...

what i found was that in my experimenting M$'s partitioning tools do not 
follow any sort of logical standard for its allocation tables.  Figures 
huh?  It seems to wish to somehow put the tables on sectors  parts where 
most other OSes don't expect them.  I assume this is so because windows is 
programmed to presume it will be the only OS on the system.  This results 
in data corruption if your other OS lands on that sector!  GAH!

not good... PM avoids this by analyzing existing sectors  clusters then 
landing the new sectors for your partition one sector over from the one 
M$ would overwrite/use.  Smart but it makes windows think later (if you try 
their GUIed partitioner) that something is wrong.  MDK Does the same thing 
as PM  PM then in turn will find an error MDK made  try to correct it 
if you let it!  MDK in my experience is the most useful so far in that its 
partitoning tools seems more intelligent.  M$'s partitioning tools don't 
find that same error after an MDK sector swap session.  Dunno why 
exactly...haven't figured that out...but i'm guessing MDK Is made to 
imitate Windows or fool it somehow, where PM isn't made to do that for / 
with windows  other OSes involved.  PHEW!  sorry to ramble just never 
tried to get all that thought out on paper before. :D

-
FemmeFatale, aka The Skirt
Good Decisions Your boss Made:
We'll do as you suggest and go with Linux. I've always liked that
character from Peanuts.
- Source: Dilbert



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] NTFS ?

2003-06-17 Thread Charles A Edwards
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 15:30:43 -0600
FemmeFatale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Smart but it makes windows think later (if you try 
 their GUIed partitioner) that something is wrong.   


Just a comment/warning here.

I have, without problem, on various systems used PM, SysCom, or
diskdrake to partition numerous hds.

The important note to remember is that though they all do the same job
each will do so 'slightly' different manner.
You may use any tool avaiable to format an existing partition but,
unless you wish to repartition the entire drive use Only 1
partitioning program and use this program Every time on this hd.
Any other program will see errors on the drive.
Worse yet is that if you let it 'fix' these errors you are screwed.


Charles

-- 
Fortune's real live weird band names #121:

Candy Striper Death Orgy
-
Mandrake Linux 9.2 on PurpleDragon
Kernel- 2.4.21-0.1mdk
-


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [newbie] NTFS ?

2003-06-17 Thread FemmeFatale
At 05:55 PM 6/17/2003 -0400, you wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 15:30:43 -0600
FemmeFatale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Smart but it makes windows think later (if you try
 their GUIed partitioner) that something is wrong.
Just a comment/warning here.

I have, without problem, on various systems used PM, SysCom, or
diskdrake to partition numerous hds.
The important note to remember is that though they all do the same job
each will do so 'slightly' different manner.
You may use any tool avaiable to format an existing partition but,
unless you wish to repartition the entire drive use Only 1
partitioning program and use this program Every time on this hd.
Any other program will see errors on the drive.
Worse yet is that if you let it 'fix' these errors you are screwed.
Charles
Ty Charles...you're saying what I was trying to get across.  heh Much 
obliged. :)

-
FemmeFatale, aka The Skirt
Good Decisions Your boss Made:
We'll do as you suggest and go with Linux. I've always liked that
character from Peanuts.
- Source: Dilbert



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] NTFS ?

2003-06-17 Thread John Richard Smith
Charles A Edwards wrote:

On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 15:30:43 -0600
FemmeFatale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 

Smart but it makes windows think later (if you try 
their GUIed partitioner) that something is wrong.   
   



Just a comment/warning here.

I have, without problem, on various systems used PM, SysCom, or
diskdrake to partition numerous hds.
The important note to remember is that though they all do the same job
each will do so 'slightly' different manner.
You may use any tool avaiable to format an existing partition but,
unless you wish to repartition the entire drive use Only 1
partitioning program and use this program Every time on this hd.
Any other program will see errors on the drive.
Worse yet is that if you let it 'fix' these errors you are screwed.
   Charles

 

I fully concure, but here we were also discussing MS partition tools and 
how they distroy data when resizing existing partitions. An important 
point to remember, so only PM and discdrake can repartition without loss 
of data, although I don't know anything about SysCom.But I absolutely 
agree it's best to do all partitioning on a given hard drive with the 
single partition tool. You can format with any formatting tool.

John

--
John Richard Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[newbie] NTFS ?

2003-06-16 Thread Ralph Bagwell



My effort to install Mandrake 9.1 on a PC that has 
Windows XP already installed has stopped at the "partitioning" phase twice . I 
now recall a comment somewhere that Linux doesn't like NTFS systems - Can I 
install on this XP machine that is using NTFS? If not can I use Partition Magic 
and create a FAT 32 partition and go from there?

I'm on hold !!

Thanks

Ralph


Re: [newbie] NTFS ?

2003-06-16 Thread Anne Wilson
On Monday 16 Jun 2003 9:34 pm, Ralph Bagwell wrote:
 My effort to install Mandrake 9.1 on a PC that has Windows XP
 already installed has stopped at the partitioning phase twice . I
 now recall a comment somewhere that Linux doesn't like NTFS systems
 - Can I install on this XP machine that is using NTFS? If not can I
 use Partition Magic and create  a FAT 32 partition and go from
 there?

 I'm on hold  !!

 Thanks

 Ralph

I don't know xp - never used it - but w2k had a partitioning tool 
built in IIRC.  If it's still there in windows, see if you can create 
your fat32 partition there.

Anne

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] NTFS ?

2003-06-16 Thread nathan
Quoting Anne Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 On Monday 16 Jun 2003 9:34 pm, Ralph Bagwell wrote:
  My effort to install Mandrake 9.1 on a PC that has Windows XP
  already installed has stopped at the partitioning phase twice . I
  now recall a comment somewhere that Linux doesn't like NTFS systems
  - Can I install on this XP machine that is using NTFS? If not can I
  use Partition Magic and create  a FAT 32 partition and go from
  there?
 
  I'm on hold  !!
 
  Thanks
 
  Ralph
 
 I don't know xp - never used it - but w2k had a partitioning tool 
 built in IIRC.  If it's still there in windows, see if you can create 
 your fat32 partition there.
 
 Anne
 
 
You won't be able to install linux on an NTFS partition - linux can read NTFS 
but writing is unreliable.  You'll need to use some partioning tool to resize 
your NTFS partition so linux can be installed.  I used partition magic pro - it 
can create Linux Ext2 partitions.  Just make sure you back up your data first.

Nathan



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] NTFS ?

2003-06-16 Thread FemmeFatale
At 10:27 PM 6/16/2003 +0100, you wrote:
snips some grass  smokes

I don't know xp - never used it - but w2k had a partitioning tool
built in IIRC.  If it's still there in windows, see if you can create
your fat32 partition there.
Anne
NOO

DO NOT EVER USE M$ partitioning tools!

EVER!

esp. not for linux stuff ... that POS SUCKS!

use PM if you must (get pm8 if you can or 7)... yes and you can resize your 
NTFS with that... for now if you're new to partitioning, DO NOT use MDK's 
ability to do so you will likely fubar your system.

-
FemmeFatale, aka The Skirt
Good Decisions Your boss Made:
We'll do as you suggest and go with Linux. I've always liked that
character from Peanuts.
- Source: Dilbert



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] NTFS ?

2003-06-16 Thread FemmeFatale
At 10:02 PM 6/16/2003 +, you wrote:
snips some leaves
You won't be able to install linux on an NTFS partition - linux can read NTFS
but writing is unreliable.  You'll need to use some partioning tool to resize
your NTFS partition so linux can be installed.  I used partition magic pro 
- it
can create Linux Ext2 partitions.  Just make sure you back up your data first.

Nathan
PM sucks for EXT2 Partitioning...if you must, make a blank set of 
partitions for linux  let MDK write the filesystem.  PM's partitioning 
scheme isn't very good or efficient.   Fair warning:  PM will etll you 
later your partitions are corrupt if you follow my method.  IGNORE IT!  DO 
NOT let it fix this problem it perceives or  you will lose your linux info.

-
FemmeFatale, aka The Skirt
Good Decisions Your boss Made:
We'll do as you suggest and go with Linux. I've always liked that
character from Peanuts.
- Source: Dilbert



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] NTFS ?

2003-06-16 Thread Jason
AND ALWAYS bacup data prior to partitioning/repartitioning, there is 
ALWAYS a chance of data loss.

Cheers

Jason

FemmeFatale wrote:

At 10:27 PM 6/16/2003 +0100, you wrote:

snips some grass  smokes

I don't know xp - never used it - but w2k had a partitioning tool
built in IIRC.  If it's still there in windows, see if you can create
your fat32 partition there.
Anne


NOO

DO NOT EVER USE M$ partitioning tools!

EVER!

esp. not for linux stuff ... that POS SUCKS!

use PM if you must (get pm8 if you can or 7)... yes and you can resize 
your NTFS with that... for now if you're new to partitioning, DO NOT 
use MDK's ability to do so you will likely fubar your system.

-
FemmeFatale, aka The Skirt
Good Decisions Your boss Made:
We'll do as you suggest and go with Linux. I've always liked that
character from Peanuts.
- Source: Dilbert





Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
 



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] NTFS ?

2003-06-16 Thread Stephen Kuhn
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 06:34, Ralph Bagwell wrote:
 My effort to install Mandrake 9.1 on a PC that has Windows XP already
 installed has stopped at the partitioning phase twice . I now recall
 a comment somewhere that Linux doesn't like NTFS systems - Can I
 install on this XP machine that is using NTFS? If not can I use
 Partition Magic and create  a FAT 32 partition and go from there?
  
 I'm on hold  !!
  
 Thanks
  
 Ralph

You can resize NTFS with MDK 9.1; is that a resolution to the issue?

-- 
Tue Jun 17 09:20:00 EST 2003
 09:20:00 up 3 days, 16:34,  3 users,  load average: 0.18, 0.14, 0.10
-
|____  |kuhn media australia|
|   /-oo /| |'-.   |http://kma.0catch.com   |
|  .\__/ || |   |  ||
|   _ /  `._ \|_|_.-'  |stephen kuhn|
|  | /  \__.`=._) (_   | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
-
 linux user #:267497 linux machine #:194239 * MDK 9.1  RH 7.3  
 Mandrake Linux Kernel 2.4.21-11mdk Cooker for i586
-
 * This message was composed on a 100% Microsoft free computer *

The Crown is full of it!
-- Nate Harris, 1775

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] NTFS ?

2003-06-16 Thread Douglas Bainbridge
Ralph,
I'd recommend using Partition Magic to carry out all your manipulations
on XP. Follow the preparatory steps recommended by PM. Then use PM to
shrink the space allocated to XP. If your user data are on a separate
virtual drive, convert that to FAT32. Install MD in the free space and
install lilo as your bootloader.
You can then look at your NTFS partition and write to your FAT32
partition in Linux and dual-boot into Linux or XP.

Good luck!

DougB

 


On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 21:34, Ralph Bagwell wrote:
 My effort to install Mandrake 9.1 on a PC that has Windows XP already
 installed has stopped at the partitioning phase twice . I now recall
 a comment somewhere that Linux doesn't like NTFS systems - Can I
 install on this XP machine that is using NTFS? If not can I use
 Partition Magic and create  a FAT 32 partition and go from there?
  
 I'm on hold  !!
  
 Thanks
  
 Ralph


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[newbie] NTFS question

2002-01-27 Thread Mafiajoe3
hello. does anyone know of any program i can u use to resize my NTFS hard drive. it won't let me do it on the install. and i can't do it when i install windows cause it uses a recovery image.. so i'm lookin for something that will let me resize to make another partition that i could put linux on..


Re: [newbie] NTFS question

2002-01-27 Thread Pena Family



Partition Magic is one of the best known and most 
popular. I heard of a free one but do not recall it at this 
moment.


Re: [newbie] NTFS question

2002-01-27 Thread Mafiajoe3
i was thinkign of using a program like that.. but i'm trying to do this on a laptop. and the only way i have of re installing XP it i screw it up (again) is w/ the recovery disk. will those still work if i use some type of partition program.. 


Joe


Re: [newbie] NTFS question

2002-01-27 Thread Brian Parish

The recovery disks I've seen just wipe out everything and set the
machine up in an arbitrary predetermined way.  Therefore I would say
that it doesn't matter what you try - at worst you can put it back the
way it came.

Brian

On Mon, 2002-01-28 at 15:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 i was thinkign of using a program like that.. but i'm trying to do this on a 
 laptop. and the only way i have of re installing XP it i screw it up (again) 
 is w/ the recovery disk. will those still work if i use some type of 
 partition program..  
 
 
 Joe





Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



[newbie] NTFS Partition Not Mountable

2002-01-02 Thread Noah Swint

NTFS is compiled in the kernel but I'm unable to mount the drive

I get the error:

mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/hda2,
   or too many mounted file systems

If it is a bad superblock how do I check and correct the problem and
just how many mounts are too many?





Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] NTFS Partition Not Mountable

2002-01-02 Thread Sridhar Dhanapalan

On 02 Jan 2002 21:45:56 -0500, Noah Swint [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 NTFS is compiled in the kernel but I'm unable to mount the drive
 
 I get the error:
 
 mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/hda2,
or too many mounted file systems
 
 If it is a bad superblock how do I check and correct the problem and
 just how many mounts are too many?

What version of NTFS do you have? I don't think the Mandrake kernels support
anything over NTFS 4.0 (from NT4). NTFS 5.0 (from Win2K) _may_ work, but 5.1
(from XP) won't work at all.

-- 
Sridhar Dhanapalan

The number of UNIX installations has grown to 10, with more expected
-- The UNIX Programmer's Manual, 2nd Edition, June 1972



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] NTFS Partition Not Mountable

2002-01-02 Thread Michael Viron

Which version of Windows is it from?  If it is from Windows 2000 / XP, it
won't mount because it uses a newer NTFS than is supported by the current
kernel release (I think they support up to NTFS 4 read, and (very
experimental) write).

Michael

--
Michael Viron
Registered Linux User #81978
Senior Systems  Administration Consultant
Web Spinners, University of West Florida

At 09:45 PM 01/02/2002 -0500, you wrote:
NTFS is compiled in the kernel but I'm unable to mount the drive

I get the error:

mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/hda2,
   or too many mounted file systems

If it is a bad superblock how do I check and correct the problem and
just how many mounts are too many?



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com




Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] NTFS Partition Not Mountable

2002-01-02 Thread Noah Swint

XP... NTFS 5.1   I went to the http://linux-ntfs.sourceforge.net/ site
and downloaded the rpm but it still doesn't work. 


On Thu, 2002-01-03 at 00:55, Michael Viron wrote:
 Which version of Windows is it from?  If it is from Windows 2000 / XP, it
 won't mount because it uses a newer NTFS than is supported by the current
 kernel release (I think they support up to NTFS 4 read, and (very
 experimental) write).
 
 Michael
 
 --
 Michael Viron
 Registered Linux User #81978
 Senior Systems  Administration Consultant
 Web Spinners, University of West Florida
 
 At 09:45 PM 01/02/2002 -0500, you wrote:
 NTFS is compiled in the kernel but I'm unable to mount the drive
 
 I get the error:
 
 mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/hda2,
or too many mounted file systems
 
 If it is a bad superblock how do I check and correct the problem and
 just how many mounts are too many?
 
 
 
 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
 
 
 
 

 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
-- 
http://ld.net/?nswint



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] NTFS Partition Not Mountable

2002-01-02 Thread Sridhar Dhanapalan

Try http://linux-ntfs.sourceforge.net/.

On Wed, 02 Jan 2002 23:55:05 -0600, Michael Viron [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote: Which version of Windows is it from?  If it is from Windows 2000 / XP,
it won't mount because it uses a newer NTFS than is supported by the current
 kernel release (I think they support up to NTFS 4 read, and (very
 experimental) write).
 
 Michael
 
 --
 Michael Viron
 Registered Linux User #81978
 Senior Systems  Administration Consultant
 Web Spinners, University of West Florida
 
 At 09:45 PM 01/02/2002 -0500, you wrote:
 NTFS is compiled in the kernel but I'm unable to mount the drive
 
 I get the error:
 
 mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/hda2,
or too many mounted file systems
 
 If it is a bad superblock how do I check and correct the problem and
 just how many mounts are too many?

-- 
Sridhar Dhanapalan

I feel that open, competitive markets, free thought and democracy all flourish
only when we defend the medium itself as being independent. That may mean
constraints that carriers cannot also supply software, that suppliers of generic
software should be constrained from competing in markets which that software
gives access to. -- Tim Berners-Lee, founder of the World Wide Web



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] NTFS support on Linux

2001-09-08 Thread Sridhar Dhanapalan

On Sat, 8 Sep 2001 05:16:11 -0500, Sher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Dear friends:
 
 Using dual-boot LM 8.0/Win2000 (with NTFS File System).
 
 Question: Currently, Linux can only read NTFS files but not write to it. What 
 is the reason for this? Is there any hope that Linux will be able to both 
 read and write to NTFS soon?
 
 Thank you.
 
 Benjamin

As you would know, Microsoft are very secretive when it comes to their
intellectual property, like filesystems. Linux NTFS support is the result of a
great deal of experimentation and clever reverse-engineering. This is, of
course, extremely difficult to do, and it cannot be guaranteed to be 100%
reliable. To make matters more difficult, Microsoft have raised the bar a few
times, once with Win2K (upgrading NTFS4 to NTFS5) and again with WinXP (NTFS5 to
5.1). NTFS4 is very different from NTFS5, and Linux supports this older
filesystem a little better.

At present in Linux, NTFS read support is quite reliable, but write support is
still considered to be experimental. For this reason, Mandrake (and many other
distros) only compile read-only support into their kernel. If you change to
another kernel (e.g. by compiling your own) you can get write support. If you
decide to write to NTFS in GNU/Linux, you need to unmount the filesystem and run
a clean-up script before booting back into Windows to fix corruption issues.

-- 
Sridhar Dhanapalan.
There are two major products that come from Berkeley:
LSD and UNIX. We don't believe this to be a coincidence.
-- Jeremy S. Anderson



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Re: [newbie] NTFS and Mandrake

2001-07-16 Thread Paul

It was Mon, 16 Jul 2001 07:49:14 -0500 when Jack Gill wrote:

NTFS is implemented ReadOnly only. So it is not just you.
Paul

I tried installing Mandrake 8.0 on a system that had Windows 2000 already on
it, using NTFS file system.  I could not get the install to work.  However
when I re-installed Windows 2000 using FAT 32, and then installed Mandrake,
it worked.

--
Why cats ever decided to become pets will remain a mystery.

http://nlpagan.net - Registered Linux User 174403
 Linux Mandrake 8.0 - Sylpheed 0.5.0
** http://www.care2.com - when you care **




Re: [newbie] NTFS and Mandrake

2001-07-16 Thread Sridhar Dhanapalan

This is a problem with Microsoft -- they like to keep the specs for NTFS 5 
(as used in Win2K) secret, making it very difficult for GNU/Linux filesystem 
developers to include NTFS support. NTFS support in GNU/Linux is very good in 
read-only mode, but still experimental in read-write mode (Mandrake's default 
kernel doesn't even include read-write support).

The solution (well, it worked for 7.2; I'm not too sure about 8.0) is to 
install Mandrake _without_ mounting the NTFS partition (just ignore it). 
After the install, modify your /etc/fstab to mount it at boot.


On Mon, 16 Jul 2001 22:49, Jack Gill wrote:
 I tried installing Mandrake 8.0 on a system that had Windows 2000 already
 on it, using NTFS file system.  I could not get the install to work. 
 However when I re-installed Windows 2000 using FAT 32, and then installed
 Mandrake, it worked.

 Is this a general characteristic, or just specific to my system?

 Jack Gill

-- 
Sridhar Dhanapalan.
There are two major products that come from Berkeley:
LSD and UNIX. We don't believe this to be a coincidence.
-- Jeremy S. Anderson




Re: [newbie] ntfs support?

2001-05-30 Thread John W

On Saturday 29 May 1999 22:17, you wrote:
 I've heard alot about the ntfs support module being really really buggy. 
 One can read horror stories of it completely destroying some people's ntfs
 partition and needing a format.  Is ntfs support really this buggy?  I'm
 running windows2000 on my first drive and mandrake 8.0 on my second drive. 
 Thanks for your input.

 Adam

I never had any problems but i didn't very much reading from the NTFS 
partition.

John W




[newbie] ntfs support?

2001-05-29 Thread Adam Willcox



I've heard alot about the ntfs support module being 
really really buggy. One can read horror stories of it completely 
destroying some people's ntfs partition and needing a format. Is ntfs 
support really this buggy? I'm running windows2000 on my first drive and 
mandrake 8.0 on my second drive. Thanks for your input.

Adam


[newbie] NTFS Partition and GRUB

2000-06-23 Thread Alan Carpenter

I am happy to say that I really like Mandrake 7.1.  Finally it has the
support for my video card "voodoo 3000", and some of my usb devices =).  I
only have one problem.  I can't get to my windows 2000 partition anymore.
When the boot loader install came up, I sat there for about 5 minutes
thinking about, should I make life easy and boot from a disk or try a boot
loader.  Well I went with GRUB, and setup an extra option to boot from my
NTFS partition which is /hda1.  GRUB comes up fine, but when I choose the
2000 partition is bombs out with an error.  I know the error is important to
know, but I can't remember exactly what it is.  My first question is can I
bootup with the 2000 boot disks and fdisk /mbr and remove the bootloader.  I
wasn't sure because it's a NTFS partition and not fat.  Is lilo or Grub
compat with a NTFS partition?

did I mention I love this mailing list =)

Alan




[newbie] NTFS

2000-02-17 Thread Brent Timmer

Great, I can now access my ntfs partitions in linux.  I can also access ntfs
and write to dos in any user.  Now I'm wondering if linux can write to ntfs,
or just read from it?



[newbie] NTFS in Linux

2000-02-16 Thread Brent Timmer

Anybody know if there is a way to see my ntfs partitions in linux?



Re: [newbie] NTFS in Linux

2000-02-16 Thread Sam

Brent Timmer wrote:
 
 Anybody know if there is a way to see my ntfs partitions in linux?
Hello Brent,
Look at your /etc/fstab
For my setup, I added the line:
/dev/hda4 /nt40 ntfs defaults 0 0

then I added the directory "nt40"  to my "/" partition

There is proably a cmd to make all this work. However I had to do a
reboot shades of 2 many yrs with nt and it was up.

I must admit to a few dumbfounded hours spent staring at the "man
fstab"  to try to figure it out. Hopefully you're a quicker study.

God Bless,
Sam

http://www.wcc.net/~peacemkr/linuxindex.html
NOT an IE friendly site!



Re: [newbie] ntfs

1999-09-12 Thread Ralph | byte-runner |

On Sat, 11 Sep 1999, you wrote:
 Thats why the Write option comes with a big WARNING notice.
No kidding!!

** 
Where Ever Your Head Goes Your Ass Will Follow
**



[newbie] ntfs

1999-09-11 Thread byte-runer | Ralph |

Hey all,
Well it got me finally!! I was useing my ntfs as a place to drop files and
was writeing a cd and guess what ? I only lost about 2.5 gb of files no
shit!!! The partition was blank and unformated and would not even mount. Be
careful if ya use it.

Ralph



Re: [newbie] ntfs

1999-09-11 Thread tom950

Thats why the Write option comes with a big WARNING notice.

At 08:04 AM 9/11/99 -0400, you wrote:
Hey all,
Well it got me finally!! I was useing my ntfs as a place to drop files and
was writeing a cd and guess what ? I only lost about 2.5 gb of files no
shit!!! The partition was blank and unformated and would not even mount. Be
careful if ya use it.

Ralph





Re: [newbie] ntfs partition

1999-08-30 Thread Carl J. Bauman

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On 18 Aug, Toshiro Viera Stalker wrote:
  A little question: I want to mount a NTFS partition at boot time, can you tell me 
syntax of the line I need to add in fstab?
 
  Toshiro.

 Sure- it's just like the other lines in /etc/fstab, except: fs type is
 ntfs, and you'll probably want to specify your own mount options (i.e.
 noexec, nodev, ...).  For information on those, see `man mount`.  Oh,
 and those two numbers at the end of the line should both be 0.

 --
 -Matt Stegman

Hi,

I tried to mount my NTFS partition from the command line with the following result:

[root@shiloh /]# mount -t ntfs /dev/hda1 /dosc
mount: fs type ntfs not supported by kernel

I was under the impression that Mandrake had NTFS support built in.  Is this not so?  
I'm running Mandrake 6.0 with the kernel
upgraded to  2.2.9-27mdk.

Thanks,
Carl



Re: [newbie] ntfs partition

1999-08-30 Thread mas9483

On 30 Aug, Carl J. Bauman wrote:
 I tried to mount my NTFS partition from the command line with the following result:
 
 [root@shiloh /]# mount -t ntfs /dev/hda1 /dosc
 mount: fs type ntfs not supported by kernel
 
 I was under the impression that Mandrake had NTFS support built in.  Is this not so? 
 I'm running Mandrake 6.0 with the kernel
 upgraded to  2.2.9-27mdk.

For whatever reason, the Mandrake team decided not to include NTFS
support with the basic kernel.  You'll have to recompile- not an
extremely difficult task.
-- 
-Matt Stegman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



[newbie] NTFS access

1999-08-30 Thread tom950

How can I allow normal users to access NTFS partitions. I'm not concerned
about writing anything i just want to be able to read some files there. No
matter what i try i keep getting Permission Denied when try to access any
NTFS mounted partition. Normal vfat partitions are working fine.



[newbie] NTFS partition access

1999-06-22 Thread Anonymous

Does anyone know if Linux 2.2 (Redhat 6.0) has support for accessing NT
partitions.  I have tried all permutations of the mount command to try and
mount the NT partition.  I keep getting the error message "fs type nfts not
supported by kernel"

What is going on?



Re: [newbie] NTFS partition access

1999-06-22 Thread Axalon


On Tue, 22 Jun 1999, Mark A. Walters wrote:

 Does anyone know if Linux 2.2 (Redhat 6.0) has support for accessing NT
 partitions.  I have tried all permutations of the mount command to try and
 mount the NT partition.  I keep getting the error message "fs type nfts not
 supported by kernel"
 
 What is going on?
 


  Sorry ntfs is not compiled into 2.2.9(all releases bero?), I'm not
familiar with the current state of the ntfs driver, as long as it's not a
total system killer Bernard can probably include it modular the next time
he repackages.