Re: [osol-discuss] Solaris 11 and Samba and change ACL do not work
On 13 Dec 2011, at 11:54, Andrew Watkins wrote: Thanks Chris that solved it. I had followed that before but I missed the vfs objects = zfsacl part. Teach me to skip information. Cool. Have you managed to make your ZFS time-slider snapshots visible using the vfs shadow_copy2 (?) facility? I also used the idmap config whiched help with my mapping of AD and LDAP. ref: http://blogs.oracle.com/jurasek/entry/even_more_simple_configuration Chris ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Solaris 11 and Samba and change ACL do not work
On 9 Dec 2011, at 16:05, Andrew Watkins wrote: Hi, I will try here as my first port of call. I am using Samba to server files to our Windows users and I want them to change permissions of files so they can give access to other users. Before any says anything I am doing this in a ZONE so CIFS server is not available in Solaris zones. Well, it does not seem to work and I have followed a few blog entries but they all give the same result: - Edit file properties - Add user to Windows Security Tab and select Apply: Unable to save permission changes on MyFile.txt Access is denied Should this be a problem? The blog entries I have followed (why are they never 100% complete!) http://blog.mc-thias.org/?title=registering-a-samba-solaris-10-server-as-a-ms-ad-membermore=1c=1tb=1pb=1 http://blog.allanglesit.com/2011/03/solaris-11-join-ad-domain-for-samba/ Any pointers? Are you using vfs objects = zfsacl ? This http://nineproductions.com/technology/14-sun-solaris/65-solaris-11-samba-zfs-configuration.html looks useful... Chris ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Working with Cron under Solaris 10
On 16 Jan 2011, at 21:13, Ron Halstead wrote: Cron only reads the crontab file when it starts. Man cron and search for 'examines'. *And* when the crontab/at commands are run. --- cron only examines crontab or at command files during its own process initialization phase and when the crontab or at command is run. This reduces the overhead of checking for new or changed files at regularly scheduled intervals. --- Cheers, Chris ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] SandyBridge support
Does Solaris have any enhancements (in public commits?) to support the new Intel SandyBridge chips? AIUI some X support for SandyBridge was due in Solaris later this year (2010), so possibly is in S11 Express. But what about support for other SandyBridge features? (UEFI, vector processing extensions?) Cheers, Chris ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] SMF Howto
On 29 Dec 2010, at 20:05, Gary Gendel wrote: I keep finding some basic SMF how to guides, but none seem to be able to answer my quandary: There are command line substitutions in some of the manifests exec strings %m, %i, etc. Where can I find information about what substitutions are available and what they mean? You're in a maze of twisty little man pages, all alike... They're in the smf_method man page :-) Cheers, Chris ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Problem upgrading b134 to solaris11 express
On 11/30/10 18:12, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 11/30/10 02:07 AM, Chris Gerhard wrote:
On 11/29/10 20:00, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 11/26/10 06:48 AM, Chris Gerhard wrote:
On 11/23/10 18:42, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 11/23/10 09:58 AM, Chris Gerhard wrote:
Is there a way to list packages that are going to cause problems? The
upgrade I have just done appears to have completed but when booted
show it still on 134b/
No, because that package system doesn't know what packages are a
problem. The package system intentionally allows you to install
and/or
create packages that constrain your system in a way that prevents
all or
certain parts of it from upgrading.
That's necessary functionality so that your system can be upgraded
properly from build to build.
However, it also means that it can't automatically determine when your
system should have been upgraded and when it should not be. It
only
knows what the packages you installed tell it.
With that said, you can tell it what you expect to happen by doing
things like this:
pkg install -nv ent...@0.5.11-0.151 \
`pkg list -H | grep 'consolidation/*incorporation' |\
awk '{print $1@0.5.11-0.151}'` 21 /tmp/pkg.debug
Then check the output like this:
grep -e FAIL -e incompatible /tmp/pkg.debug
If the grep produces anything, you'll need to look at the log file and
read through to determine what went wrong.
If the grep didn't produce anything, you likely didn't configure your
system according to the release notes. Check the configuration of your
publishers, verify that everything matches the release notes, and try
again.
-Shawn
I don't think there is anything that is contrary to the release notes.
kr...@cores2-dm-dev:~$ pkg install -nv ent...@0.5.11-0.151 \
`pkg list -H | grep 'consolidation/*incorporation' |\
awk '{print $1@0.5.11-0.151}'` 21 /tmp/pkg.debug
pkg: No solution was found to satisfy constraints
kr...@cores2-dm-dev:~$ grep -e FAIL -e incompatible /tmp/pkg.debug
grep: illegal option -- e
Use 'ggrep' instead of 'grep' here. Sorry, the -e option is GNU grep
specific; forgot about that.
I did that (well used /usr/gnu/bin/grep ) and it was in my email:
Can you post /tmp/pkg.debug somewhere?
I'll email it to you off the list
--
Oracle http://www.oracle.com/
Chris Gerhard - Chief Technologist
Systems TSC
Phone: +44 (0) 11892 49022
The *MSC* and *SunSolve* Will Soon Retire
Find out what you need to know about the migration
to My Oracle Support
http://www.oracle.com/us/support/044752.html
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Problem upgrading b134 to solaris11 express
On 11/29/10 20:00, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 11/26/10 06:48 AM, Chris Gerhard wrote:
On 11/23/10 18:42, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 11/23/10 09:58 AM, Chris Gerhard wrote:
Is there a way to list packages that are going to cause problems? The
upgrade I have just done appears to have completed but when booted
show it still on 134b/
No, because that package system doesn't know what packages are a
problem. The package system intentionally allows you to install and/or
create packages that constrain your system in a way that prevents all or
certain parts of it from upgrading.
That's necessary functionality so that your system can be upgraded
properly from build to build.
However, it also means that it can't automatically determine when your
system should have been upgraded and when it should not be. It only
knows what the packages you installed tell it.
With that said, you can tell it what you expect to happen by doing
things like this:
pkg install -nv ent...@0.5.11-0.151 \
`pkg list -H | grep 'consolidation/*incorporation' |\
awk '{print $1@0.5.11-0.151}'` 21 /tmp/pkg.debug
Then check the output like this:
grep -e FAIL -e incompatible /tmp/pkg.debug
If the grep produces anything, you'll need to look at the log file and
read through to determine what went wrong.
If the grep didn't produce anything, you likely didn't configure your
system according to the release notes. Check the configuration of your
publishers, verify that everything matches the release notes, and try
again.
-Shawn
I don't think there is anything that is contrary to the release notes.
kr...@cores2-dm-dev:~$ pkg install -nv ent...@0.5.11-0.151 \
`pkg list -H | grep 'consolidation/*incorporation' |\
awk '{print $1@0.5.11-0.151}'` 21 /tmp/pkg.debug
pkg: No solution was found to satisfy constraints
kr...@cores2-dm-dev:~$ grep -e FAIL -e incompatible /tmp/pkg.debug
grep: illegal option -- e
Use 'ggrep' instead of 'grep' here. Sorry, the -e option is GNU grep
specific; forgot about that.
I did that (well used /usr/gnu/bin/grep ) and it was in my email:
I don't think there is anything that is contrary to the release notes.
kr...@cores2-dm-dev:~$ pkg install -nv ent...@0.5.11-0.151 \
`pkg list -H | grep 'consolidation/*incorporation' |\
awk '{print $1@0.5.11-0.151}'` 21 /tmp/pkg.debug
pkg: No solution was found to satisfy constraints
kr...@cores2-dm-dev:~$ grep -e FAIL -e incompatible /tmp/pkg.debug
grep: illegal option -- e
Usage: grep -hblcnsviw pattern file . . .
kr...@cores2-dm-dev:~$ /usr/gnu/bin/grep -e FAIL -e incompatible /tmp/pkg.deb
kr...@cores2-dm-dev:~$ pkg publisher
PUBLISHER TYPE STATUS URI
solaris (preferred) origin online
http://pkg.oracle.com/solaris/release/
opensolaris.org (non-sticky) origin online
http://pkg.opensolaris.org/release/
kr...@cores2-dm-dev:~$
I followed the instructions to the letter and have just tried it again. Same
thing.
--
Oracle http://www.oracle.com/
Chris Gerhard - Chief Technologist
Systems TSC
Phone: +44 (0) 11892 49022
The *MSC* and *SunSolve* Will Soon Retire
Find out what you need to know about the migration
to My Oracle Support
http://www.oracle.com/us/support/044752.html
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Problem upgrading b134 to solaris11 express
On 11/23/10 18:42, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 11/23/10 09:58 AM, Chris Gerhard wrote:
Is there a way to list packages that are going to cause problems? The
upgrade I have just done appears to have completed but when booted
show it still on 134b/
No, because that package system doesn't know what packages are a
problem. The package system intentionally allows you to install and/or
create packages that constrain your system in a way that prevents all or
certain parts of it from upgrading.
That's necessary functionality so that your system can be upgraded
properly from build to build.
However, it also means that it can't automatically determine when your
system should have been upgraded and when it should not be. It only
knows what the packages you installed tell it.
With that said, you can tell it what you expect to happen by doing
things like this:
pkg install -nv ent...@0.5.11-0.151 \
`pkg list -H | grep 'consolidation/*incorporation' |\
awk '{print $1@0.5.11-0.151}'` 21 /tmp/pkg.debug
Then check the output like this:
grep -e FAIL -e incompatible /tmp/pkg.debug
If the grep produces anything, you'll need to look at the log file and
read through to determine what went wrong.
If the grep didn't produce anything, you likely didn't configure your
system according to the release notes. Check the configuration of your
publishers, verify that everything matches the release notes, and try
again.
-Shawn
I don't think there is anything that is contrary to the release notes.
kr...@cores2-dm-dev:~$ pkg install -nv ent...@0.5.11-0.151 \
`pkg list -H | grep 'consolidation/*incorporation' |\
awk '{print $1@0.5.11-0.151}'` 21 /tmp/pkg.debug
pkg: No solution was found to satisfy constraints
kr...@cores2-dm-dev:~$ grep -e FAIL -e incompatible /tmp/pkg.debug
grep: illegal option -- e
Usage: grep -hblcnsviw pattern file . . .
kr...@cores2-dm-dev:~$ /usr/gnu/bin/grep -e FAIL -e incompatible
/tmp/pkg.deb
kr...@cores2-dm-dev:~$ pkg publisher
PUBLISHER TYPE STATUS URI
solaris (preferred) origin online
http://pkg.oracle.com/solaris/release/
opensolaris.org (non-sticky) origin online
http://pkg.opensolaris.org/release/
kr...@cores2-dm-dev:~$
I followed the instructions to the letter and have just tried it again.
Same thing.
--
Oracle http://www.oracle.com/
Chris Gerhard - Chief Technologist
Systems TSC
Phone: +44 (0) 11892 49022
The *MSC* and *SunSolve* Will Soon Retire
Find out what you need to know about the migration
to My Oracle Support
http://www.oracle.com/us/support/044752.html
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] How to compile libc or pthread ?
On 25 Nov 2010, at 18:43, Afantee Lee wrote: Hi, Ian The reason I want to compile pthread model under libc is: I am doing a project, which requires profiling the timing information of the pthread events. thus, My plan is, compile current pthread lib first, then, add profiling code, and recompile it. your suggestions will be greatly appreciated Also bear in mind some of libc is not open-source (but the Illumos project is attempting to rectify that) so you will not be able to rebuild it. Have you looked at using dtrace's pid provider instead? No need to recompile anything if that works for you... Cheers, Chris ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Problem upgrading b134 to solaris11 express
Is there a way to list packages that are going to cause problems? The upgrade I have just done appears to have completed but when booted show it still on 134b/ --chris -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Where do I post a problem/bug report on Solaris 11 express?
On 17 Nov 2010, at 14:46, Pablo León wrote: Hi Just upgraded from b134 to Sol11xp. And my Spanish keyboard mapping is a mess. It was OK on b134 and is a mess on OpenIndiana (oi_147) too. Keyboard configuration changed in July, so that change got into OI as well as S11. Does this help: http://static.opensolaris.org/on/flagdays/pages/20100720182505.html? Cheers, Chris ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Where do I post a problem/bug report on Solaris 11 express?
On 17 Nov 2010, at 15:21, Joerg Schilling wrote: Chris Ridd chrisr...@mac.com wrote: On 17 Nov 2010, at 14:46, Pablo León wrote: Hi Just upgraded from b134 to Sol11xp. And my Spanish keyboard mapping is a mess. It was OK on b134 and is a mess on OpenIndiana (oi_147) too. Keyboard configuration changed in July, so that change got into OI as well as S11. Does this help: http://static.opensolaris.org/on/flagdays/pages/20100720182505.html? The keyboard mapping is now really unusable this is a result of an incompatible interface change on July 20th, where the default fallback configuration possibility in /etc/default/kbd was replaced by incompatible new code based on SMF. It took a reboot for my workstation to recognise that I wanted UK-English as my layout - refreshing and restarting the service didn't appear to work. But the layout change worked on reboot. Cheers, Chris ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Where do I post a problem/bug report on Solaris 11 express?
On 17 Nov 2010, at 15:53, Brian Ruthven - Solaris Network Sustaining - Oracle UK wrote: Chris Ridd wrote: On 17 Nov 2010, at 15:21, Joerg Schilling wrote: hris Ridd chrisr...@mac.com wrote: On 17 Nov 2010, at 14:46, Pablo León wrote: And my Spanish keyboard mapping is a mess. It was OK on b134 and is a mess on OpenIndiana (oi_147) too. Keyboard configuration changed in July, so that change got into OI as well as S11. Does this help: http://static.opensolaris.org/on/flagdays/pages/20100720182505.html ? The keyboard mapping is now really unusable this is a result of an incompatible interface change on July 20th, where the default fallback configuration possibility in /etc/default/kbd was replaced by incompatible new code based on SMF. It took a reboot for my workstation to recognise that I wanted UK-English as my layout - refreshing and restarting the service didn't appear to work. But the layout change worked on reboot. I suspect you will find that restarting your X session (either by logging out manually or by restarting gdm to force a logout) would also work without rebooting. I think I tried that, but gdm still treated my \ key as a . I logged http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6976214 for this issue. The workaround is simple enough, and is actually the end result you want anyway. I didn't try restarting hal though. Cheers, Chris ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] [OpenIndiana-discuss] Amnesiac LDAP Configuration
On 18 Nov 2010, at 02:41, Patrick O'Sullivan wrote: I've gotten a config working where I have Kerberos auth to AD and passwd lookups via LDAP to AD. I enable it, and it works fine, but on a reboot, it stops working. Please let me know if you have any thoughts as to why this happens. (This behavior is common to both oi147 and Solaris 11 Express.) Configuring ldapclient: $ sudo ldapclient -v manual -a credentialLevel=self -a authenticationMethod=sasl/gssapi -a defaultSearchBase=dc=osulvn,dc=net -a domainName=osulvn.net -a defaultServerList=ad1.osulvn.net -a attributeMap=passwd:gecos=cn -a attributeMap=passwd:homedirectory=unixHomeDirectory -a objectClassMap=group:posixGroup=group -a objectClassMap=passwd:posixAccount=user -a objectClassMap=shadow:shadowAccount=user -a serviceSearchDescriptor=passwd:cn=users,dc=osulvn,dc=net?one -a serviceSearchDescriptor=group:cn=users,dc=osulvn,dc=net?one ... System successfully configured $ getent passwd userfoo userfoo:x:20002:3:User Foo:/home/userfoo:/bin/bash At this point I can login as userfoo with GSSAPI auth over ssh or with a password on the console. After I reboot, I can no longer login as userfoo and 'getent' returns nothing. Yes, I'm seeing the same. At the point it has lost its mojo (:-) what's in the /var/ldap/ldap_client_file and is your nsswitch.conf what it should be or has something changed them? FWIW just re-running the ldapclient command (with flags) fixes things. I have a shell script that calls it with all our local values in, which makes things a little easier. Cheers, Chris ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Update/patch policy?
On 16 Nov 2010, at 08:37, Ivan Wang wrote: So it somehow reminds me the old RecommendedSecurity patch cluster and Maintenance Update, where Recommended cluster is public available, MU is only available to customers under contract. Well it *could* be, but it seems more likely to be based on the OpenSolaris repos - the release repo is updated every 6 months (or so), the support repo is updated more regularly but only for paying customers. No recommended patches at all, unless you pay. Cheers, Chris ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Problem upgrading b134 to solaris11 express
On 16 Nov 2010, at 19:49, Shawn Walker wrote: On 11/16/10 11:37 AM, Chris Ridd wrote: NAME (PUBLISHER) VERSION STATE UFOXI ... amp-dev 0.5.11-0.111installed - This is most likely the issue (assuming you've added the 'solaris' publisher as described in the release notes). Per the release notes: http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/821-1479/fbdtw?l=ena=view ...PostgreSQL Versions 8.2, 8.3, and 8.4 have been removed. As amp-dev depends on SUNWphp52-pgsql (a PHP PostgreSQL library) which depends on PostgreSQL, the package system is unable to move your system forward. It assumes you prefer to keep postgre, etc. working instead of updating it to a point where software stops working. Yes, that makes sense. I was also slightly curious what would happen since sunstudio doesn't appear to be in the new repos; maybe that's going to be a problem too. Yes, the messaging could be better here, but it's very difficult to divine the intent of the user here. You'll need to remove amp-dev, all of the *php* and postgre packages. I believe that should allow you to upgrade (assuming there isn't some other package in the way). Nod. The image-update is now going a lot slower, so hopefully it is thinking about doing something useful this time :-) It would be helpful if pkg could write out the list of pkgs that are stopping the image-update from moving forward. Producing a very similar boot env is not helpful, as you get fooled into a useless reboot. But then, how often is pkg going to encounter this sort of incompatibility? Cheers, Chris ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Problem upgrading b134 to solaris11 express
On 16 Nov 2010, at 20:22, Chris Ridd wrote: On 16 Nov 2010, at 19:49, Shawn Walker wrote: Yes, the messaging could be better here, but it's very difficult to divine the intent of the user here. You'll need to remove amp-dev, all of the *php* and postgre packages. I believe that should allow you to upgrade (assuming there isn't some other package in the way). Nod. The image-update is now going a lot slower, so hopefully it is thinking about doing something useful this time :-) This time I got prompted to accept the license, so I think it'll work. Thanks Shawn! Cheers, Chris ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] PAM Error (/etc/pam.conf no initial module present)
On 14 Nov 2010, at 00:15, Patrick O'Sullivan wrote: Hello all, I successfully have gotten authentication to an AD Kerberos server working along with uid/gid resolution from AD LDAP. However, I am getting a strange PAM error and the only reference I can find for it is in the OpenSolaris PAM source code. r...@oitest1:~# uname -a SunOS oitest1 5.11 oi_147 i86pc i386 i86pc Solaris Now, logging in from another machine: $ ssh user...@oitest1 Password: Your Kerberos account/password will expire in 9801 days. Last login: Sat Nov 13 13:42:30 2010 from 10.128.6.55 OpenIndiana SunOS 5.11 oi_147 September 2010 -bash-4.0$ id uid=20002(userfoo) gid=3(staff) -bash-4.0$ getent passwd userfoo userfoo:x:20002:3:User Foo:/home/userfoo:/bin/bash Now, the weird part. At the time of logging in, I get the following log entry: Nov 13 13:45:25 oitest1 sshd[3925]: [ID 414352 auth.error] /etc/pam.conf no initial module present Nov 13 13:47:09 oitest1 last message repeated 3 times Nov 13 13:47:11 oitest1 sshd[3945]: [ID 414352 auth.error] /etc/pam.conf no initial module present Here's my /etc/pam.conf: r...@oitest1:~# egrep -v ^\# /etc/pam.conf login auth requisite pam_authtok_get.so.1 login auth required pam_dhkeys.so.1 login auth required pam_unix_cred.so.1 login auth sufficient pam_krb5.so.1 login auth required pam_unix_auth.so.1 login auth required pam_dial_auth.so.1 other auth requisite pam_authtok_get.so.1 other auth required pam_dhkeys.so.1 other auth required pam_unix_cred.so.1 other auth sufficient pam_krb5.so.1 other auth required pam_unix_auth.so.1 other account requisite pam_roles.so.1 other account requiredpam_unix_account.so.1 other account requiredpam_krb5.so.1 other password required pam_dhkeys.so.1 other password requisite pam_authtok_get.so.1 other password requisite pam_authtok_check.so.1 other password sufficient pam_krb5.so.1 other password required pam_authtok_store.so.1 P.S. I also get this when logging in directly from console, except the error is associated with login instead of sshd. Anyone have any thoughts? Thanks in advance. No real ideas - pam's a bit of a mystery to me - but could you get dtrace to help? Get a stack trace on the failing call to run_stack (which is what outputs that error) and maybe that gives an idea of which part of pam.conf is wrong. Cheers, Chris smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Is there live cd rescue that understands zfs
On 3 Nov 2010, at 05:26, Harry Putnam wrote: Ian Collins i...@ianshome.com writes: On 11/ 3/10 04:13 PM, Harry Putnam wrote: Is there a sort of standard approach when one needs to boot a machine running opensolaris with some sort of rescue disc that understands zfs? Use the b133 or 134 LiveCD. dimwitted question: Is that the same as the install ISO? Yes, it is the same thing. Remember not to upgrade your zpool versions past the last version supported by your most recent live CD. Cheers, Chris ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Quick question about the future
On 28 Oct 2010, at 20:15, Dmitry G. Kozhinov wrote: and the forum could be better organized like this one for example I could not find a forum at openindiana.org at all... Is it exists? They have mailing lists instead. Cheers, Chris ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] opensolaris iscsi target gives 10% performance compared to nexenta
I have been testing nexenta against opensolaris 2009.06 as an iscsi target / storage repository for Xenserver 5.6 using the same hardware and vm configuration. The target has two xeon quad-core cpus, 4gb ram and 4 seagate drives with opensolaris on the first and a 1tb volume on other three. Opensolaris seems to perform very badly compared to nexenta when performing sqlio tests on a Windows 2008 Server R2 virtual machine. The IOs/s and MB/s from opensolaris are apporximately 10% (300 and 20) of the results from nexenta. Are there tweaks to opensolaris that will increase the iscsi performance and explain the difference in performance? Thanks, Chris sqlio tests I was running sqlio -kW -t2 -s120 -dM -o1 -frandom -b64 -BH -LS testfile.dat sqlioResults-opensolaris sqlio -kW -t4 -s120 -dM -o1 -frandom -b64 -BH -LS testfile.dat sqlioResults-opensolaris sqlio -kW -t8 -s120 -dM -o1 -frandom -b64 -BH -LS testfile.dat sqlioResults-opensolaris sqlio -kW -t16 -s120 -dM -o1 -frandom -b64 -BH -LS testfile.dat sqlioResults-opensolaris sqlio -kR -t2 -s120 -dM -o1 -frandom -b64 -BH -LS testfile.dat sqlioResults-opensolaris sqlio -kR -t4 -s120 -dM -o1 -frandom -b64 -BH -LS testfile.dat sqlioResults-opensolaris -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] opensolaris iscsi target gives 10% performance compared to nexenta
Comstar. Thanks, Chris -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] Fwd: [website-discuss] XWiki Update on Monday Oct 4
This work is starting now. Chris Original Message Subject:[website-discuss] XWiki Update on Monday Oct 4 Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 00:08:04 +0900 From: Jim Grisanzio jim.grisan...@oracle.com To: website-disc...@opensolaris.org, opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org Following the updates to auth/repo last week, we are now ready to update XWiki on Monday Oct 4th starting at 5 a.m. PDT. XWiki will be down for approximately 1/2 hour. In this deployment XWiki will have a new lightweight skin, which has better organization for layout and page editing. Additionally, the watch lists feature is fixed, the subsites menu has been moved out of the left nav to be a drop down menu, and the three Collectives pages have been automated when creating and deleting groups. The other changes are integration code updates and won't be visible to users. Jim ___ website-discuss mailing list website-disc...@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] [illumos-Developer] zpool upgrade and zfs upgrade behavior on b145
Hi Cindy, I did see your first email pointing to that bughttp://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6538600. Apologies for not addressing it earlier. It is my opinion that the behavior Mike, and I http://illumos.org/issues/217 (or anyone else upgrading pools right now) is seeing is a entirely new and different bug. The bug you point to, originally submitted in 2007 says it manifests itself before a reboot. Also you say exporting and importing clear the problem. After several reboots, zdb still shows the older pool version, which means that this is a new bug or perhaps the bug you are referencing is not listing clearly and accurately what it should be and is incomplete. Suppose an export and import can update the pool label config on a large storage pool, great. How would someone go about exporting the rpool the operating system is on?? As far as I know, It's impossible to export the zpool the operating system is running on. I don't think it can be done, but I'm new so maybe I'm missing something. One option I have not explored that might work: Booting to a live CD that has the same or higher pool version present and then doing: zpool import zpool import -f rpool zpool export rpool and then rebooting into the operating system. Perhaps this might be an option that works to update the label config / zdb for rpool but I think fixing the root problem would be much more beneficial for everyone in the long run. Being that zdb is a troubleshooting/debugging tool, I would think that it's necessary for it to be aware of the proper pool version to work properly and so admins know what's really going on with their pools. The bottom line here is that if zdb is going to be part of zfs, it needs to display what is currently on disk, including the label config. If I were an admin thinking about trusting hundreds of GB's of data to zfs I would want the debugger to show me whats really on the disks. Additionally, even though zpool and zfs get version display the true and updated versions, I'm not convinced that the problem is zdb, as the label config is almost certainly set by the zpool and/or zfs commands. Somewhere, something is not happening that is supposed to when initiating a zpool upgrade, but since I know virtually nothing of the internals of zfs, I do not know where. Sincerely, -Chris ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] [illumos-Developer] zpool upgrade and zfs upgrade behavior on b145
Well strangely enough, I just logged into a OS b145 machine. It's rpool is not mirrored, just a single disk. I know that zdb reported zpool version 22 after at least the first 3 reboots after rpool upgrade, so I stopped checking. zdb now reports version 27. This machine has probably been rebooted about five or six times since the pool version upgrade. One should not have to reboot six times! More mystery to this pool upgrade behavior!! -Chris ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] [illumos-Developer] zpool upgrade and zfs upgrade behavior on b145
The strange behavior that I witnessed on the machine that had its hostname renamed was never resolved or investigated further. Luckily it was a experiment/test machine. About the zpool headers not getting updated after a zpool upgrade? I filled a bug on the Illumos bug tracker: http://illumos.org/issues/217 Somehow my formatting on the bug entry got mangled. :) Luckily this bug appears to just effect zdb. The pools and file systems are in fact upgraded after you initiate the upgrade. FYI I have witnessed the same behavior when upgrading pools created on on a clean OS b134 machine to Open Indiana b147, zpool version 28. I'm under the impression that this bug would not be difficult to fix, but being that zdb does not seem to be well documented, maybe in fact it would be hard to track down? 2010/9/27 Réfi Richárd miam...@gmail.com Hi, Did you solved your issue? RR On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 2:56 AM, Chris Mosetick cmoset...@gmail.comwrote: Not sure what the best list to send this to is right now, so I have selected a few, apologies in advance. A couple questions. First I have a physical host (call him bob) that was just installed with b134 a few days ago. I upgraded to b145 using the instructions on the Illumos wiki yesterday. The pool has been upgraded (27) and the zfs file systems have been upgraded (5). ch...@bob:~# zpool upgrade rpool This system is currently running ZFS pool version 27. Pool 'rpool' is already formatted using the current version. ch...@bob:~# zfs upgrade rpool 7 file systems upgraded The file systems have been upgraded according to zfs get version rpool Looks ok to me. However, I now get an error when I run zdb -D. I can't remember exactly when I turned dedup on, but I moved some data on rpool, and zpool list shows 1.74x ratio. ch...@bob:~# zdb -D rpool zdb: can't open 'rpool': No such file or directory Also, running zdb by itself, returns expected output, but still says my rpool is version 22. Is that expected? I never ran zdb before the upgrade, since it was a clean install from the b134 iso to go straight to b145. One thing I will mention is that the hostname of the machine was changed too (using these instructionshttp://wiki.genunix.org/wiki/index.php/Change_hostname_HOWTO). bob used to be eric. I don't know if that matters, but I can't open up the Users and Groups from Gnome anymore, *unable to su* so something is still not right there. Moving on, I have another fresh install of b134 from iso inside a virtualbox virtual machine, on a total different physical machine. This machine is named weston and was upgraded to b145 using the same Illumos wiki instructions. His name has never changed. When I run the same zdb -D command I get the expected output. ch...@weston:~# zdb -D rpool DDT-sha256-zap-unique: 11 entries, size 558 on disk, 744 in core dedup = 1.00, compress = 7.51, copies = 1.00, dedup * compress / copies = 7.51 However, after zpool and zfs upgrades *on both machines*, they still say the rpool is version 22. Is that expected/correct? I added a new virtual disk to the vm weston to see what would happen if I made a new pool on the new disk. ch...@weston:~# zpool create test c5t1d0 Well, the new test pool shows version 27, but rpool is still listed at 22 by zdb. Is this expected /correct behavior? See the output below to see the rpool and test pool version numbers according to zdb on the host weston. Can anyone provide any insight into what I'm seeing? Do I need to delete my b134 boot environments for rpool to show as version 27 in zdb? Why does zdb -D rpool give me can't open on the host bob? Thank you in advance, -Chris ch...@weston:~# zdb rpool: version: 22 name: 'rpool' state: 0 txg: 7254 pool_guid: 17616386148370290153 hostid: 8413798 hostname: 'weston' vdev_children: 1 vdev_tree: type: 'root' id: 0 guid: 17616386148370290153 create_txg: 4 children[0]: type: 'disk' id: 0 guid: 14826633751084073618 path: '/dev/dsk/c5t0d0s0' devid: 'id1,s...@sata_vbox_harddiskvbf6ff53d9-49330fdb /a' phys_path: '/p...@0,0/pci8086,2...@d/d...@0,0:a' whole_disk: 0 metaslab_array: 23 metaslab_shift: 28 ashift: 9 asize: 32172408832 is_log: 0 create_txg: 4 test: version: 27 name: 'test' state: 0 txg: 26 pool_guid: 13455895622924169480 hostid: 8413798 hostname: 'weston' vdev_children: 1 vdev_tree: type: 'root' id: 0 guid: 13455895622924169480 create_txg: 4 children[0]: type: 'disk' id: 0 guid: 7436238939623596891 path: '/dev/dsk/c5t1d0s0' devid: 'id1,s
Re: [osol-discuss] Solaris 10,Oracle Solaris Express new license
With no moving parts and no local operating system to manage, Sun Ray Clients provide a cost-effective, highly functional thin client alternative to desktop and laptop computers and reduce many of the problems associated with traditional desktop deployments. a href=http://www.kintek.com.au/;Web Design Brisbane/a -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Anonymous NFS file permissions
You need to set permissions on the file system properly. If you just want everyone to have access: zfs setsharenfs=name=chris,guestok=true tank/export/chris for CIFS zfs setsharesmb=name=chris,guestok=true tank/export/chris you should also look at idmap for cifs: read the manual first: man idmap My server is joined to active directory, using smbadm. Here are the two mappings that I'm currently using in my environment: idamp add winname:administra...@mydomain.comwinname%3aadministra...@mydomain.com unixuser:admin idamp add wingroup:Domain Admins@mydomain.com unixgroup:sysadmin those are the only two mappings I have had to set so far. All the domain users seem to work themselves out as long as I set permissions on the shares having the Domain Administrator as owner. idmap list will display all your current mappings. when you messup a whole bunch, idmap remove -a is nice. On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 7:44 PM, valrh...@gmail.com valrh...@gmail.comwrote: I am running NexentaStor 3.0.3-1 on a fileserver, and have it set up for CIFS and NFS access. I have three clients, running Win7, Ubuntu 10.04 LTS and OSol B134 (will upgrade soon to OpenIndiana!). For the NFS machines, if I create a folder or file with Ubuntu (using just the standard NFS mounting into Linux), I can't open the folder or read its files with the OSol machine. And vice versa: the Ubuntu machine can't read folders created over NFS from the OSOl machine. In both cases, the folder is identified as being owned by anonymous NFS user. I can go in and manually change the folder permission, but that's a tad tedious when you have a large number of folders. How can I fix this? This is an internal server that I just want everyone to be able to access. I already asked on the NExenta forum, but there seems to be relatively little activity, and I haven't heard back. Many thanks in advance!! -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] zpool upgrade and zfs upgrade behavior on b145
Not sure what the best list to send this to is right now, so I have selected a few, apologies in advance. A couple questions. First I have a physical host (call him bob) that was just installed with b134 a few days ago. I upgraded to b145 using the instructions on the Illumos wiki yesterday. The pool has been upgraded (27) and the zfs file systems have been upgraded (5). ch...@bob:~# zpool upgrade rpool This system is currently running ZFS pool version 27. Pool 'rpool' is already formatted using the current version. ch...@bob:~# zfs upgrade rpool 7 file systems upgraded The file systems have been upgraded according to zfs get version rpool Looks ok to me. However, I now get an error when I run zdb -D. I can't remember exactly when I turned dedup on, but I moved some data on rpool, and zpool list shows 1.74x ratio. ch...@bob:~# zdb -D rpool zdb: can't open 'rpool': No such file or directory Also, running zdb by itself, returns expected output, but still says my rpool is version 22. Is that expected? I never ran zdb before the upgrade, since it was a clean install from the b134 iso to go straight to b145. One thing I will mention is that the hostname of the machine was changed too (using these instructionshttp://wiki.genunix.org/wiki/index.php/Change_hostname_HOWTO). bob used to be eric. I don't know if that matters, but I can't open up the Users and Groups from Gnome anymore, *unable to su* so something is still not right there. Moving on, I have another fresh install of b134 from iso inside a virtualbox virtual machine, on a total different physical machine. This machine is named weston and was upgraded to b145 using the same Illumos wiki instructions. His name has never changed. When I run the same zdb -D command I get the expected output. ch...@weston:~# zdb -D rpool DDT-sha256-zap-unique: 11 entries, size 558 on disk, 744 in core dedup = 1.00, compress = 7.51, copies = 1.00, dedup * compress / copies = 7.51 However, after zpool and zfs upgrades *on both machines*, they still say the rpool is version 22. Is that expected/correct? I added a new virtual disk to the vm weston to see what would happen if I made a new pool on the new disk. ch...@weston:~# zpool create test c5t1d0 Well, the new test pool shows version 27, but rpool is still listed at 22 by zdb. Is this expected /correct behavior? See the output below to see the rpool and test pool version numbers according to zdb on the host weston. Can anyone provide any insight into what I'm seeing? Do I need to delete my b134 boot environments for rpool to show as version 27 in zdb? Why does zdb -D rpool give me can't open on the host bob? Thank you in advance, -Chris ch...@weston:~# zdb rpool: version: 22 name: 'rpool' state: 0 txg: 7254 pool_guid: 17616386148370290153 hostid: 8413798 hostname: 'weston' vdev_children: 1 vdev_tree: type: 'root' id: 0 guid: 17616386148370290153 create_txg: 4 children[0]: type: 'disk' id: 0 guid: 14826633751084073618 path: '/dev/dsk/c5t0d0s0' devid: 'id1,s...@sata_vbox_harddiskvbf6ff53d9-49330fdb/a' phys_path: '/p...@0,0/pci8086,2...@d/d...@0,0:a' whole_disk: 0 metaslab_array: 23 metaslab_shift: 28 ashift: 9 asize: 32172408832 is_log: 0 create_txg: 4 test: version: 27 name: 'test' state: 0 txg: 26 pool_guid: 13455895622924169480 hostid: 8413798 hostname: 'weston' vdev_children: 1 vdev_tree: type: 'root' id: 0 guid: 13455895622924169480 create_txg: 4 children[0]: type: 'disk' id: 0 guid: 7436238939623596891 path: '/dev/dsk/c5t1d0s0' devid: 'id1,s...@sata_vbox_harddiskvba371da65-169e72ea/a' phys_path: '/p...@0,0/pci8086,2...@d/d...@1,0:a' whole_disk: 1 metaslab_array: 30 metaslab_shift: 24 ashift: 9 asize: 3207856128 is_log: 0 create_txg: 4 ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] Ldom freed mac address table , getting duplicate mac addresses
Greetings, I am having some issues with ldoms on separate systems, giving out duplicate mac addresses to ldoms and to vnet ports even. It seems there is some particular mac in the freed mac address table, that the ldom manager keeps trying to pass out, but that mac is in use on another ldom on a separate system. The separate systems are on some of the same interfaces, but not all the same interfaces, so the mac address algorithm is not working for me. Currently everytime I create an Ldom I put its mac address, and its vnets mac's into a spreadsheet and look for duplicates. This cannot be the plan sun had when giving ldoms 512k mac addresses to pass out randomly. I have 4 systems with maybe 15 ldoms on them and I am already seeing duplicates, something is not right there. Anyhow I am desperatly looking for this freed mac address db so I can use it to track the mac's possibly. Yes using the system to convert the ip into a mac is a way to do it, but that just does not seem like a good solution either. Thanks for any assistance or thoughts. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Access to Sun Studio tools for building ON is broken
On 5 Aug 2010, at 10:12, Ian Collins wrote: On 08/ 5/10 08:56 PM, Chavdar Ivanov wrote: On 4 Aug 2010, at 21:48, Maurilio Longo wrote: Alasdair, what about this link http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/server-storage/sunst udio/downloads/studio12-update1-136165.html Ohh, yes, that works perfectly! Nice, thanks :-) Not for me, any full SunStudio (Express downloaded fine, though). http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/server-storage/sunstudio/downloads/index.html still shows Free Download; from here onwards when I select any of the options to download, I am lead to the login page; using my personal credentials I always get User not authorized on http://sunsolve.sun.com/messageHandler.do ... That's odd, it works for me with my subscription free login. The patches are still available as well. I'm getting User Not Authorized for all SunStudio downloads - for the normal release and the patched releases needed for building OpenSolaris. Maybe there's something cached for my account and not yours? It does however sound like some accidental web breakage rather than a policy change, which is reassuring. It'll be more reassuring once I can download it again, of course :-) Cheers, Chris ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Access to Sun Studio tools for building ON is broken
On 5 Aug 2010, at 15:51, Rick Ramsey wrote: Chris, The Studio pages were migrated over from SDN with some pretty coarse scripts, so we're updating them manually, along with many others. The information on those pages is not 100% reliable, yet. For instance, some of the latest updates we made to the SDN site are not showing up on the OTN site, yet. Should be up-to-date and stable again in a few days. Thanks Rick, I'll check again next week. Cheers, Chris ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] Access to Sun Studio tools for building ON is broken
http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Community+Group+tools/sun_studio_12_tools has links to the versions of Sun Studio 12 required for building ON et al. But trying just now, those downloads require a support contract and not just a valid (free) Sun account. Is this a temporary or permanent problem? Cheers, Chris ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Access to Sun Studio tools for building ON is broken
On 4 Aug 2010, at 14:43, Andras Barna wrote: you can get it from the IPS repo, right? Yes, but the version in IPS is not the correct version required to build the open sourced consolidations. Cheers, Chris ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] The nearest thing to (forthcoming) news
On 9 Jul 2010, at 03:39, John Plocher wrote: It might be worth going just to find out who the current head of Oracle Solaris development really is; it'll certainly be more than the OGB has been able to find out all year... Might it be Stephen Hahn or Tim Marsland or Bill Franklin or Vincent Murphy or Greg Lavender or someone completely new? According to his blog, Stephen's no longer at Sun/Oracle. http://blogs.sun.com/sch/entry/penultimate Cheers, Chris ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] The nearest thing to (forthcoming) news
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 4:39 AM, John Plocher john.ploc...@gmail.com wrote: It might be worth going just to find out who the current head of Oracle Solaris development really is; it'll certainly be more than the OGB has been able to find out all year... Might it be Stephen Hahn or Tim Marsland or Bill Franklin or Vincent Murphy or Greg Lavender or someone completely new? Sorry, but Tim Marsland has been fired on Oracle's behalf and now works for Apple. Most other Solaris lead designers were send away by Oracle, too. Chris -- ^---^ (@)v(@) Chris Pickett |/ IT consultant ===m==m=== pkch...@users.sourceforge.net ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Recent FUD from various camps on this mailinglist.
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Orvar Korvar knatte_fnatte_tja...@yahoo.com wrote: bsdfan, I think Svein basically is right. I mean, BSD is not that big, neither is OpenSolaris. Maybe we should cooperate instead? As of know, BSD has benefited greatly from OpenSolaris: ZFS, DTrace, and dozens of other Sun technology - do you want this to continue, or do you want OpenSolaris dead? I would like to see the modernisation parts of ksh93-integration ported to BSD, too. It would give it one of the fastest userlands , FreeBSD's userland would finally conform to the Single Unix Standard and a few of Solaris and GNU features would make it there, too. Chris -- ^---^ (@)v(@) Chris Pickett |/ IT consultant ===m==m=== pkch...@users.sourceforge.net ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] [ogb-discuss] This is how Oracle treats open communities and projects. Will OGB intervene?
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Dennis Clarke dcla...@blastwave.org wrote: On 05-10-10, John Plocher john.ploc...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 6:15 AM, Dave Johnson dave.johnson.inqu...@googlemail.com wrote: This is how Oracle treats open communities and projects. Will OGB intervene? While I have not been following this soap opera in excruciating detail John, I looked at it as some guy making a fair amount of noise and quoting himself in his arguments. So like I said in an earlier message, I made a cup of coffee and then felt that it wasn't worth looking at. Did you read http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-discuss/2010-May/056462.html? Personally I see the ksh93 shell work as some of the best open source collaboration in modern UNIX(R) history. I fully expect that it will always be around forever as some sort of package set to be installed. I agree. Both the ksh93 and the modernisation project it spawned are excellent work and would be of great benefit of Opensolaris. But all that work appears to be fruitless if the intentions of Oracle described in http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-discuss/2010-May/056462.html will be implemented. Chris -- ^---^ (@)v(@) Chris Pickett |/ IT consultant ===m==m=== pkch...@users.sourceforge.net ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] [indiana-discuss] [ogb-discuss] This is how Oracle treats open communities and projects. Will OGB intervene?
2010/5/10 Matthias Pfützner matth...@pfuetzner.de: This proof-quotes from others came later! And, the fact, that side-by-side there's /usr/gnu/bin and /usr/bin shall indicate, that there's no FURTHER development of Solaris-tools, is ridiculous... if http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-discuss/2010-May/056462.html turns out to be true then there will be development of Solaris-tools but they will be based on GNU coreutils instead of the ksh93/AST framework developed by Opensolaris in the last four years. IMHO the ksh93/AST framework is superior but it looks Oracle's management has already decided on this. Chris -- ^---^ (@)v(@) Chris Pickett |/ IT consultant ===m==m=== pkch...@users.sourceforge.net ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] [website-discuss] Free OpenSolaris CD no longer offered
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Derek Cicero derek.cic...@oracle.com wrote: FYI - Oracle is no longer offering a free OpenSolaris CD shipping program at this time. As a result, we have removed all links and icons from the opensolaris.org site. If you would like to download OpenSolaris, please visit the Downloads page at http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Main/downloads. I saw that one coming. Next on this channel: Source code access on a paid subscription level and you have to pay $$$ per incident if you want to contribute to ON ;-( Chris -- ^---^ (@)v(@) Chris Pickett |/ IT consultant ===m==m=== pkch...@users.sourceforge.net ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] automake problem...
Hi, I am trying to compile this (under svn_134) http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Dfu-util#Source_Code The autogen.sh says Can't exec aclocal: No such file or directory at /usr/share/autoconf/Autom4te/FileUtils.pm line 326. autoreconf: failed to run aclocal: No such file or directory How can I find the 'aclocal' ? (what is the package name..) thx Chris -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] automake problem...
thanx! Chris -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Gosling resigns from Oracle
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 11:18 PM, Michael Lee mle...@gmail.com wrote: Gosling resigns from Oracle. http://www.taranfx.com/father-of-java-resigns. I would have thought that Oracle would have tried to keep him on board the good yacht Oracle. That's not surprising. Gosling was for research and fair access, Oracle wants monetize its investment in JAVA and Gosling only as marketing figurehead. That conflict was brewing since a month and Gosling... lost. rumorRumor is that Gosling was escorted out of his office and set into a cab to leave the campus immediately and not come back ever again./rumor TheRegister may post the photos next Monday. Let's hope that the same won't happen for Opensolaris, although the chances are slim that this does not happen to lots of our lead developers. Chris -- ^---^ (@)v(@) Chris Pickett |/ IT consultant ===m==m=== pkch...@users.sourceforge.net ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] Latestst LiveCD download?
Where can I find B135 as LiveCD? Chris -- ^---^ (@)v(@) Chris Pickett |/ IT consultant ===m==m=== pkch...@users.sourceforge.net ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Latestst LiveCD download?
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Nikola M minik...@gmail.com wrote: Chris Pickett wrote: Where can I find B135 as LiveCD? http://www.genunix.org/ when available. 135 Not released yet. 134 is too old - it predates the 'big'ol package rename' and an attempt to update runs out of memory. My box only has 2GB. Chris -- ^---^ (@)v(@) Chris Pickett |/ IT consultant ===m==m=== pkch...@users.sourceforge.net ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] about zfs exported on nfs
Hi Harry, I get files created with UID GID set by client. See below (some names have been altered to protect the innocent, any inconsistencies are due to that editing) from mount list: 192.168.0.110:/darkstar/nebulae on /home/chris/osolnfsmount type nfs (rw,nolock,addr=192.168.0.110) ch...@plato-gent ~ $ ll osolnfsmount total 21 drwxr-sr-x 2 root dialout 2 Jan 13 13:41 archive drwxr-sr-x 3 chris_remote dialout 14 Feb 26 12:55 downloads drwxr-sr-x 2 root dialout 2 Jan 6 14:31 projects ch...@plato-gent ~ $ touch osolnfsmount/test.file ch...@plato-gent ~ $ ll osolnfsmount total 21 drwxr-sr-x 2 root dialout 2 Jan 13 13:41 archive drwxr-sr-x 3 chris_remote dialout 14 Feb 26 12:55 downloads drwxr-sr-x 2 root dialout 2 Jan 6 14:31 projects -rw-r--r-- 1 chrisdialout 0 Mar 15 2010 test.file ch...@plato-gent ~ $ sudo su chris_remote Password: chris_rem...@plato-gent /home/chris $ touch osolnfsmount/test.2.file chris_rem...@plato-gent /home/chris $ ls -l osolnfsmount total 22 drwxr-sr-x 2 root dialout 2 Jan 13 13:41 archive drwxr-sr-x 3 chris_remote dialout 14 Feb 26 12:55 downloads drwxr-sr-x 2 root dialout 2 Jan 6 14:31 projects -rw-r--r-- 1 chris_remote dialout 0 Mar 15 2010 test.2.file -rw-r--r-- 1 chrisdialout 0 Mar 15 2010 test.file chris_rem...@plato-gent /home/chris $ mkdir umask 002 chris_rem...@plato-gent /home/chris $ mkdir osolnfsmount/test chris_rem...@plato-gent /home/chris $ chmod g-s osolnfsmount/test chris_rem...@plato-gent /home/chris $ touch osolnfsmount/test/test.file chris_rem...@plato-gent /home/chris $ ls -l osolnfsmount/test total 1 -rw-rw-r-- 1 chris_remote chris_remote 0 Mar 15 2010 test.file dialout group is GID 20, which happens to be staff on OSX. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] [tools-compilers] OS b132: Sun C++ cannot compile C++ source due to linker segfault.
On 16 Feb 2010, at 20:20, Ben Taylor wrote: On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Maxim Kartashev maxim.kartas...@sun.com wrote: While waiting for that package update, I guess one could just unpack SVR4 package patch and replace binaries by hand; after all, Sun Studio patches are just archives with files and directories in them. It's a lousy workaround, but it should work. Fortunately, it's only 4 or 5 files for 141858 for each arch (i386, x64) Unfortunately patch 141858 is only downloadable from sunsolve to those with paid support contracts :-( Cheers, Chris ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] installing osol 131 from osol-dev-131-x86.iso. Password required
Always check the release announcement. It's jack and jack. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] Please help: Running OpenOffice in headless mode (on OpenSolaris)...
Hello all, I am trying to get my openoffice code to wkr under opensolaris without a monitor (a.k.a headless), so far I have tried the following connection string in my Java code (I am using the Java SDK 3.1 kit): oooCommand = /opt/openoffice.org3/program/soffice| -nologo -nodefault -norestore -nocrashreport -nolockcheck -nofirststartwizard -headless| -display :1 -accept=socket,host=127.0.0.1,port=8100;urp; which is run via the following code, Runtime.getRuntime().exec(oooCommand); using the bootstrapconnector code that ships with the SDK. This executable is launched from my java servlet... The ps -ef listing shows the following... Of course whats worth noting is that my appserver process and forked openoffice process is a userid, not ROOT: chr...@opensolaris:~$ ps -ef | grep gf21 chrisf 20003 19820 0 23:18:35 pts/1 0:00 grep gf21 gf21 19972 19971 0 23:14:19 ? 0:00 /usr/lib/ssh/sshd gf21 19992 19990 0 23:15:01 ? 0:00 /bin/sh /opt/openoffice.org3/program/soffice -nologo -nodefault -norestore -noc gf21 19180 19177 0 21:26:48 pts/1 0:00 -bash gf21 19177 19176 0 21:26:46 ? 0:00 /usr/lib/ssh/sshd gf21 19991 19975 0 23:14:50 pts/2 0:00 tail -f /opt/gf21/glassfish211/domains/domain1/logs/server.log gf21 19975 19972 0 23:14:20 pts/2 0:00 -bash gf21 19990 1 0 23:14:29 ? 0:19 /usr/jdk/instances/jdk1.6.0/bin/java -Dcom.sun.aas.instanceRoot=/opt/gf21/glass gf21 1 19992 6 23:15:02 ? 3:32 /opt/openoffice.org3/program/soffice.bin -nologo -nodefault -norestore -nocrash In Solaris prior to running my smf start command for glassfish, I launch the virtual frame buffer (Xvfb) like so; chr...@opensolaris:~$ ps -ef | grep Xv chrisf 20009 19820 0 23:19:50 pts/1 0:00 grep Xv root 18469 9 0 19:51:58 ? 0:00 /usr/X11R6/bin/Xvfb :1 -screen 0 1024x768x24 -fbdir /tmp Things seem to work for a period of time, or rather up until I use the XTextViewCursor, although it seems to continue communicating (truss'ing the process its def. doing something), although it never seems to come out of this endless loop... and my code never finishes. However, if I run the following 2 commands from a terminal session (logged in as gf21 via SSH) on the headless machine it seems to work... export DISPLAY=127.0.0.1:1.0 asadmin start-domain domain1 - However, I am trying to automate the starting and stopping of glassfish using the Solaris SMF framework which thus far, works to start/stop etc... but seems to fail under the headless mode for my OpenOffice code?? Is there something I am missing, is it because the appserver is not being kicked off from a terminal shell and some how not inheriting any of the environment settings (like the export DISPLAY above)? My SMF for starting and stopping glassfish is as below. ?xml version=1.0? !DOCTYPE service_bundle SYSTEM /usr/share/lib/xml/dtd/service_bundle.dtd.1 service_bundle type='manifest' name='glassfish:domain1' service name='application/glassfish/domain1' type='service' version='1' create_default_instance enabled='true' / single_instance / dependency name='fs-local' grouping='require_all' restart_on='none' type='service' service_fmri value='svc:/system/filesystem/local' / /dependency dependency name='network-service' grouping='require_all' restart_on='none' type='service' service_fmri value='svc:/network/service' / /dependency dependency name='xvfb-server' grouping='require_all' restart_on='none' type='service' service_fmri value='svc:/snapon/xvfb-server:default' / /dependency method_context method_credential user='gf21' group='gf21' privileges='basic,net_privaddr'/ /method_context exec_method type='method' name='start' exec='/opt/gf21/glassfish211/bin/asadmin start-domain domain1' timeout_seconds='600'/ exec_method type='method' name='stop' exec='/opt/gf21/glassfish211/bin/asadmin stop-domain domain1' timeout_seconds='600' / property_group name='startd' type='framework' propval name='duration' type='astring' value='transient' / /property_group stability value='Unstable' / template common_name loctext xml:lang='C'Glassfish V2.1 Simple non-root user SMF/loctext /common_name /template /service /service_bundle Thanks for any tips, tricks or other you may be able to provide... -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Please help: Running OpenOffice in headless mode (on OpenSolaris)...
Here below are the environment properties when I run my enable glassfish script: g...@opensolaris:/opt/gf21$ pargs -e 20482 20482: /usr/jdk/instances/jdk1.6.0/bin/java -Dcom.sun.aas.instanceRoot=/opt/gf21/glass envp[0]: XFILESEARCHPATH=/usr/dt/app-defaults/%L/Dt envp[1]: NLSPATH=/usr/dt/lib/nls/msg/%L/%N.cat envp[2]: _=*9*/usr/jdk/instances/jdk1.6.0/bin/java envp[3]: DISPLAY=192.168.1.10:1.0 envp[4]: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 envp[5]: LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/jdk/instances/jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/i386/server:/usr/jdk/instances/jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/i386:/usr/jdk/instances/jdk1.6.0/jre/../lib/i386:/opt/gf21/glassfish211/lib:/opt/gf21/glassfish211/lib:/opt/gf21/glassfish211/lib: envp[6]: PATH=/usr/sbin:/usr/bin envp[7]: PWD=/export/home/gf21 envp[8]: SHLVL=1 envp[9]: SMF_FMRI=svc:/application/glassfish/domain1:default envp[10]: SMF_METHOD=start envp[11]: SMF_RESTARTER=svc:/system/svc/restarter:default envp[12]: SMF_ZONENAME=global envp[13]: TZ=Australia/Victoria envp[14]: A__z=*SHLVL And here is the environment settings when I start it manually (via a SSH session).: (ie., export DISPLAY=192.168.1.10; asadmin start-domain domain1) --- g...@opensolaris:/opt/gf21$ pfexec pargs -e 20412 20412: /usr/jdk/instances/jdk1.6.0/bin/java -Dcom.sun.aas.instanceRoot=/opt/gf21/glass envp[0]: XFILESEARCHPATH=/usr/dt/app-defaults/%L/Dt envp[1]: NLSPATH=/usr/dt/lib/nls/msg/%L/%N.cat envp[2]: _=*20173*/usr/jdk/instances/jdk1.6.0/bin/java envp[3]: DISPLAY=192.168.1.10:1.0 envp[4]: HOME=/export/home/gf21 envp[5]: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 envp[6]: LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/jdk/instances/jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/i386/server:/usr/jdk/instances/jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/i386:/usr/jdk/instances/jdk1.6.0/jre/../lib/i386:/opt/gf21/glassfish211/lib:/opt/gf21/glassfish211/lib:/opt/gf21/glassfish211/lib: envp[7]: LOGNAME=gf21 envp[8]: MAIL=/var/mail/gf21 envp[9]: MANPATH=/usr/gnu/share/man:/usr/share/man:/usr/X11/share/man envp[10]: OLDPWD=/export/home/gf21 envp[11]: PAGER=/usr/bin/less -ins envp[12]: PATH=/usr/gnu/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/X11/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/opt/gf21/glassfish211/bin envp[13]: PWD=/opt/gf21 envp[14]: SHELL=/usr/bin/bash envp[15]: SHLVL=1 envp[16]: SSH_CLIENT=150.101.163.93 62672 22 envp[17]: SSH_CONNECTION=150.101.163.93 62672 192.168.1.10 22 envp[18]: SSH_TTY=/dev/pts/1 envp[19]: TERM=xterm-color envp[20]: TZ=Australia/Victoria envp[21]: USER=gf21 envp[22]: A__z=*SHLVL Thanks again for any help or support you may be able to provide... -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Please help: Running OpenOffice in headless mode (on OpenSolaris)...
And lastly the pargs -e for the openoffice script, when starting manually (not through SMF), I get: envp[0]: URE_BOOTSTRAP=file:///opt/openoffice.org3/program/fundamentalrc envp[1]: _=*20644*/opt/openoffice.org3/program/soffice.bin envp[2]: DISPLAY=192.168.1.10:1.0 envp[3]: HOME=/export/home/gf21 envp[4]: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 envp[5]: LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/jdk/instances/jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/i386/client:/usr/jdk/instances/jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/i386/native_threads:/usr/jdk/instances/jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/i386:/usr/jdk/instances/jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/i386/server:/usr/jdk/instances/jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/i386:/usr/jdk/instances/jdk1.6.0/jre/../lib/i386:/opt/gf21/glassfish211/lib:/opt/gf21/glassfish211/lib:/opt/gf21/glassfish211/lib: envp[6]: LOGNAME=gf21 envp[7]: MAIL=/var/mail/gf21 envp[8]: MANPATH=/usr/gnu/share/man:/usr/share/man:/usr/X11/share/man envp[9]: NLSPATH=/usr/dt/lib/nls/msg/%L/%N.cat envp[10]: PAGER=/usr/bin/less -ins envp[11]: PATH=/opt/openoffice.org3/program:/usr/gnu/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/X11/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/opt/gf21/glassfish211/bin envp[12]: PWD=/opt/gf21/glassfish211/domains/domain1/config envp[13]: SAL_ENABLE_FILE_LOCKING=1 envp[14]: SHELL=/usr/bin/bash envp[15]: SHLVL=1 envp[16]: SSH_CLIENT=192.18.17.40 45065 22 envp[17]: SSH_CONNECTION=192.18.17.40 45065 192.168.1.10 22 envp[18]: SSH_TTY=/dev/pts/2 envp[19]: TERM=xterm-color envp[20]: TZ=Australia/Victoria envp[21]: USER=gf21 envp[22]: XFILESEARCHPATH=/usr/dt/app-defaults/%L/Dt compared to the pargs -e after starting glassfish VIA SMF: chr...@opensolaris:~$ pfexec pargs -e 20595 20595: /opt/openoffice.org3/program/soffice.bin -nologo -nodefault -norestore -nocrash envp[0]: URE_BOOTSTRAP=file:///opt/openoffice.org3/program/fundamentalrc envp[1]: _=*20588*/opt/openoffice.org3/program/soffice.bin envp[2]: DISPLAY=192.168.1.10:1.0 envp[3]: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 envp[4]: LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/jdk/instances/jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/i386/client:/usr/jdk/instances/jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/i386/native_threads:/usr/jdk/instances/jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/i386:/usr/jdk/instances/jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/i386/server:/usr/jdk/instances/jdk1.6.0/jre/lib/i386:/usr/jdk/instances/jdk1.6.0/jre/../lib/i386:/opt/gf21/glassfish211/lib:/opt/gf21/glassfish211/lib:/opt/gf21/glassfish211/lib: envp[5]: NLSPATH=/usr/dt/lib/nls/msg/%L/%N.cat envp[6]: PATH=/opt/openoffice.org3/program:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin envp[7]: PWD=/opt/gf21/glassfish211/domains/domain1/config envp[8]: SAL_ENABLE_FILE_LOCKING=1 envp[9]: SHELL=/usr/bin/bash envp[10]: SHLVL=1 envp[11]: SMF_FMRI=svc:/application/glassfish/domain1:default envp[12]: SMF_METHOD=start envp[13]: SMF_RESTARTER=svc:/system/svc/restarter:default envp[14]: SMF_ZONENAME=global envp[15]: TERM=xterm-color envp[16]: TZ=Australia/Victoria envp[17]: XFILESEARCHPATH=/usr/dt/app-defaults/%L/Dt envp[18]: A__z=*SHLVL Once again any help muchly appreciated... -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] SOLVED Please help: Running OpenOffice in headless mode (on OpenSolaris)...
SOLVED folks... perseverance is key...: I added the following envars to my GlassFish SMF one by one comparing manual to the SMF way and seeing what happens...: method_environment envvar name='DISPLAY' value='192.168.1.10:1.0'/ envvar name='TERM' value='xterm-color'/ envvar name='SHELL' value='/usr/bin/bash'/ envvar name='HOME' value='/export/home/gf21'/ envvar name='LOGNAME' value='gf21'/ envvar name='USER' value='gf21'/ /method_environment /method_context -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Very slow boot time ( 35minutes)
By changing the package repository and using the update manager gui. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Very slow boot time ( 35minutes)
The boot log shown was from a boot with -v -m options. I haven't been able to complete a successful boot today, using -kv -m or normal options. For some attempts I forgot to start my timer, but they all ran passed one hour before I rebooted. However, the SVN_125 boot (to console) did succeed. It takes about 3 minutes. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Very slow boot time ( 35minutes)
Ok. I'm stuck now. My OS 2009.06 BEs won't boot, at least not within an hour. That includes a safe snapshot turned into a BE. The SVN_125 boots into console mode. It won't go into multi-user mode, because svc:/system/device/audio can't be started. Is it possible to remove the audio dependency from the mult-user service? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Very slow boot time ( 35minutes)
[url=http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6902551]Bug #6902551[/url] was responsible for the audio device issue on SVN_127 (its was always 127 not 125 as I mentioned earlier). The fix described worked a treat and the box now boots. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] Very slow boot time ( 35minutes)
Just in the last week, I've started to experience very slow boot times, upwards of 35minutes. Looking in the log, I see the following message repeated for around 30 minutes before the boot finally completes Nov 30 09:29:14 supernova nwamd[23]: [ID 821790 daemon.warning] svc:/system/device/local:default never came up Nov 30 09:30:03 supernova unix: [ID 954099 kern.info] NOTICE: IRQ16 is being shared by drivers with different interrupt levels. Nov 30 09:30:03 supernova This may result in reduced system performance. Nov 30 09:30:03 supernova npe: [ID 236367 kern.info] PCI Express-device: pci1458,a...@14,2, audiohd0 Nov 30 09:30:03 supernova genunix: [ID 936769 kern.info] audiohd0 is /p...@0,0/pci1458,a...@14,2 Nov 30 09:30:03 supernova pcplusmp: [ID 805372 kern.info] pcplusmp: pci10ec,8168 (rge) instance 0 irq 0x18 vector 0x60 ioapic 0xff intin 0xff is bound to cpu 1 Nov 30 09:30:03 supernova rge: [ID 801725 kern.info] NOTICE: rge0: Using MSI interrupt type Nov 30 09:30:03 supernova pcplusmp: [ID 805372 kern.info] pcplusmp: ide (ata) instance 0 irq 0xe vector 0x44 ioapic 0x2 intin 0xe is bound to cpu 0 Nov 30 09:30:03 supernova pcplusmp: [ID 805372 kern.info] pcplusmp: ide (ata) instance 1 irq 0xf vector 0x44 ioapic 0x2 intin 0xf is bound to cpu 1 Nov 30 09:30:03 supernova mac: [ID 469746 kern.info] NOTICE: rge0 registered Nov 30 09:30:03 supernova nwamd[23]: [ID 116842 daemon.error] sysevent_bind_handle: Permission denied Nov 30 09:30:04 supernova unix: [ID 954099 kern.info] NOTICE: IRQ16 is being shared by drivers with different interrupt levels. Nov 30 09:30:04 supernova This may result in reduced system performance. Nov 30 09:30:05 supernova mac: [ID 435574 kern.info] NOTICE: rge0 link up, 100 Mbps, full duplex Nov 30 09:30:08 supernova /sbin/dhcpagent[64]: [ID 778557 daemon.warning] configure_v4_lease: no IP broadcast specified for rge0, making best guess Nov 30 09:30:55 supernova pcplusmp: [ID 805372 kern.info] pcplusmp: ide (ata) instance 0 irq 0xe vector 0x44 ioapic 0x2 intin 0xe is bound to cpu 0 Nov 30 09:30:55 supernova pcplusmp: [ID 805372 kern.info] pcplusmp: ide (ata) instance 1 irq 0xf vector 0x44 ioapic 0x2 intin 0xf is bound to cpu 1 Nov 30 09:30:55 supernova unix: [ID 954099 kern.info] NOTICE: IRQ16 is being shared by drivers with different interrupt levels. Nov 30 09:30:55 supernova This may result in reduced system performance. Nov 30 09:31:46 supernova pcplusmp: [ID 805372 kern.info] pcplusmp: ide (ata) instance 0 irq 0xe vector 0x44 ioapic 0x2 intin 0xe is bound to cpu 0 Nov 30 09:31:46 supernova pcplusmp: [ID 805372 kern.info] pcplusmp: ide (ata) instance 1 irq 0xf vector 0x44 ioapic 0x2 intin 0xf is bound to cpu 1 Nov 30 09:31:46 supernova unix: [ID 954099 kern.info] NOTICE: IRQ16 is being shared by drivers with different interrupt levels. Nov 30 09:31:46 supernova This may result in reduced system performance. Nov 30 09:32:37 supernova pcplusmp: [ID 805372 kern.info] pcplusmp: ide (ata) instance 0 irq 0xe vector 0x44 ioapic 0x2 intin 0xe is bound to cpu 0 Nov 30 09:32:37 supernova pcplusmp: [ID 805372 kern.info] pcplusmp: ide (ata) instance 1 irq 0xf vector 0x44 ioapic 0x2 intin 0xf is bound to cpu 1 Nov 30 09:32:37 supernova unix: [ID 954099 kern.info] NOTICE: IRQ16 is being shared by drivers with different interrupt levels. Nov 30 09:32:37 supernova This may result in reduced system performance. and then repeated ... Nov 30 09:33:27 supernova pcplusmp: [ID 805372 kern.info] pcplusmp: ide (ata) instance 0 irq 0xe vector 0x44 ioapic 0x2 intin 0xe is bound to cpu 0 Nov 30 09:33:27 supernova pcplusmp: [ID 805372 kern.info] pcplusmp: ide (ata) instance 1 irq 0xf vector 0x44 ioapic 0x2 intin 0xf is bound to cpu 1 Nov 30 09:33:28 supernova unix: [ID 954099 kern.info] NOTICE: IRQ16 is being shared by drivers with different interrupt levels. Nov 30 09:33:28 supernova This may result in reduced system performance. It may or may not be relevant, but I briefly did install an ide (ata) disk in the box about a week ago. Normally, the box includes 4 sata disks and no pata disks. What is going wrong with the boot process and what can I do to return to the more usual 3-5minute boot time? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Very slow boot time ( 35minutes)
pfexec intrstat device | cpu0 %tim cpu1 %tim -+-- ahci#0 | 250 0.2 0 0.0 audiohd#1 | 1 0.0 0 0.0 ehci#0 | 0 0.0 0 0.0 ehci#1 | 1 0.0 0 0.0 hci1394#0 | 250 0.1 0 0.0 and also ch...@supernova:~# echo ::interrupts -d | mdb -k IRQ Vect IPL BusTrg Type CPU Share APIC/INT# Driver Name(s) 10x41 5 ISAEdg Fixed 1 1 0x0/0x1 i8042#0 40xb0 12 ISAEdg Fixed 0 1 0x0/0x4 asy#0 60x40 5 ISAEdg Fixed 1 1 0x0/0x6 fdc#0 70x43 5 ISAEdg Fixed 1 1 0x0/0x7 ecpp#0 90x81 9 PCILvl Fixed 1 1 0x0/0x9 acpi_wrapper_isr 12 0x42 5 ISAEdg Fixed 0 1 0x0/0xc i8042#0 16 0x84 9 PCILvl Fixed 1 2 0x0/0x10 audiohd#0, ohci#-1 17 0x82 9 PCILvl Fixed 1 1 0x0/0x11 ehci#0 18 0x85 9 PCILvl Fixed 0 3 0x0/0x12 ohci#4, ohci#3, ohci#2 19 0x83 9 PCILvl Fixed 0 2 0x0/0x13 audiohd#1, ehci#1 22 0x86 9 PCILvl Fixed 0 2 0x0/0x16 hci1394#0, ahci#0 24 0x60 6 PCIEdg MSI1 1 - rge#0 25 0x61 6 PCIEdg MSI1 1 - rge#0 160 0xa0 0 Edg IPIall 0 - poke_cpu 192 0xc0 13 Edg IPIall 1 - xc_serv 208 0xd0 14 Edg IPIall 1 - kcpc_hw_overflow_intr 209 0xd1 14 Edg IPIall 1 - cbe_fire 210 0xd3 14 Edg IPIall 1 - cbe_fire 240 0xe0 15 Edg IPIall 1 - xc_serv 241 0xe1 15 Edg IPIall 1 - apic_error_intr -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Very slow boot time ( 35minutes)
What is a lot? zfs list reports 773 snapshots. Most of those are from the auto snapshot service. I have 33 zfs file systems. The auto snapshot service has been running for a long time. I wouldn't think there would have been a significant change in the number of snapshots in the last week. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Very slow boot time ( 35minutes)
I'm running OpenSolaris 2009.06. I've twice tried updating to the development version, the latest being SVN_125. I've only been able to get it to boot to console - which it does manage in much less time than 35+ minutes. I'm haven't figured out what I need to do to get it passed the console. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] How to work out where boot process fails
Thanks. The console reported -m as an invalid option, but you got me looking in the right area. Important changes: - change console from graphics to text - delete line containing splash graphic. Now to try and resolve the actual boot issues. First, the boot archive didn't math (fix with 'bootadm update-archive') Second, it couldn't load the audio device driver so went into maintenance mode (fix with svcadmin disable audio) Now it boots, but only to the console login. It doesn't proceed on to the x login and if I login and startx, it hangs about and doesn't seem to do anything. To be fair, I really only need remote ssh access. Unfortunately, something isn't quite working with that and it rejects my key. Back to the drawing board! -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Frustrated beyond belief trying to cobble together a zfs platform
r.g. I feel your pain. I'd be careful of that board. I have OpenSolaris installed on a box using a similar AMD chipset (780G in a Gigabyte MA78GM-S2H). It works fine with 2009.06, but not with either of the two releases prior to that. And not with the recent development builds of 2010.02. I don't know the cause of the issue with 2010.02 - it won't finish booting and my knowledge of OpenSolaris isn't sufficient to find out what is going wrong. Prior to 2009.06, the issue was http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6764179 (but you could work around it, by booting in 32bit mode). In SNV116 a further change was committed, http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6773433. I speculate that this is the cause of my boot problems. I'll be posting shortly to try and find out how to find out what is causing my problems. I haven't had problems with the inbuilt NIC, at least not since 2008.05. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] Update Manager behavioural strangeness
My impression was that update manager should make a new BE, then run update on the new BE and set the new BE to be used on the next reboot. This doesn't seem to happen. I recently tried updating to the latest development build for 2010.02, feeling safe that if there were problems I could revert to my current boot environment. The update failed - my system wouldn't start (more on that elsewhere) so I reverted to my previous BE. On doing so I found that my system was trying to use a wrong version of MySQL (I suffered from the bug in 5.1.30 (http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=41710) so had rolled my own. I needed mysql running so could spend a lot of time trying to work out what had happened. This is what I could see. - the mysql version running was 5.1.30 (I believed 5.1.37 should be in SVN 127 based on http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/click.jspa?searchID=2585408messageID=418214 but was mistaken) - files dated after the update were in mysql bin directories. I solved the problem by creating a new BE using one of timeslider's automated snapshots from prior to my update attempt. But this seems to defeat the purpose of the Update Manager. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] How to work out where boot process fails
I have a working Open Solaris 2009.06 installation. I've twice now tried the development build, 118 127 and both times after upgrading the box hasn't completed the boot process. Where can I look for information about the failed boot? Is there any way to remove the boot loader screen and see console messages during the boot process? Are there useful settings to change to make more information available from the boot process? Is it possible to do an update to a specific development version without downloading that particular version? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] ZFS super slow on Intel 915 board
Is you CPU 32bit or 64bit? This is the performance you get with 32bit CPU. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Error upgrading from snv_125 to snv_127
Check this thread http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=115503tstart=0 -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] strange bash behavior
Home directory in /etc/passwd is /home/chris Underlying path is on mirrored zfs drives data/home/chris did not make any automounter modifications. My $HOME variable is /home/chris which is correct my home directory originally was /export/home/chris but then moved over the the mirrored drives once that was created and used usermod to change over my home directory to the new location. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] #top - Segmentation Fault
It happened again today. Here is pflags and pstack # pflags -r top-14186 core 'top-14186' of 14186: top data model = _LP64 flags = MSACCT|MSFORK /1:flags = 0 sigmask = 0xbefc,0x cursig = SIGSEGV %r15 = 0x00450F20 %r14 = 0x004495A0 %r13 = 0x00450DF0 %r12 = 0x004583D0 %r11 = 0x000300C6 %r10 = 0x %r9 = 0x000A186D %r8 = 0x0021 %rdi = 0x0042AA00 %rsi = 0x000A186D17B8 %rbp = 0xFD7FFFDFF430 %rbx = 0x0002 %rdx = 0xFDBF %rcx = 0x080F %rax = 0x %trapno = 0x000E %err = 0x0004 %rip = 0x0040DAC0 %cs = 0x0053 %rfl = 0x00010206 %rsp = 0xFD7FFFDFF420 %ss = 0x004B %fs = 0x %gs = 0x %es = 0x %ds = 0x %fsbase = 0xFD7FFF152A00 %gsbase = 0x # pstack top-14186 core 'top-14186' of 14186: top 0040dac0 hash_lookup_pidthr () + 40 00414eff getptable () + 35f 00411efd get_process_info () + 6d 0040f2cd main () + 33d 00408a0c () -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] strange bash behavior
now that I think about this I think it might have to do with the fact that I moved the home directory to a different drive. There must be some lingering reference to the old location that bash uses to determine if its the home directory and replace it with the tilde. my $HOME variable is set correctly when I just enter cd or cd ~ it goes back to the right directory. any ideas where any lingering reference could be to the old home location? my bash version: GNU bash, version 3.2.25(1)-release (i386-pc-solaris2.11) Copyright (C) 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc. On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 10:56 PM, Dennis Clarke dcla...@blastwave.orgwrote: I am using opensolaris 2009.06 In bash I have the prompt set to display the current directory and when I go back to my home directory I expect it to replace it with ~. The tilde is there when I first bring up a shell but if I navigate away from my home directory and then go back it doesn't replace the path with the tilde. Any ideas what the problem is here? is this a bash bug or some config problem? bash version: GNU bash, version 3.2.25(1)-release (i386-pc-solaris2.11) Copyright (C) 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc. prompt variable: PS1='[...@\h \W]\$ ' I just tried that on Solaris 8 and it works as expected : $ cd $ /opt/csw/bin/bash --version GNU bash, version 4.0.28(1)-release (i386-pc-solaris2.8) Copyright (C) 2009 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html This is free software; you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. $ /opt/csw/bin/bash bash-4.0$ PS1='[...@\h \W]\$ ' [dcla...@titan ~]$ cd /tmp [dcla...@titan tmp]$ cd [dcla...@titan ~]$ cd /export/nfs [dcla...@titan nfs]$ uname -a SunOS titan 5.8 Generic_127722-02 i86pc i386 i86pc On a recent OpenSolaris release it seems to work fine also $ uname -a SunOS opensolaris 5.11 snv_111b i86pc i386 i86pc Solaris $ bash --version GNU bash, version 3.2.25(1)-release (i386-pc-solaris2.11) Copyright (C) 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc. $ bash j...@opensolaris:~$ PS1='[...@\h \W]\$ ' [j...@opensolaris ~]$ [j...@opensolaris ~]$ cd /tmp [j...@opensolaris tmp]$ cd /mnt [j...@opensolaris mnt]$ cd [j...@opensolaris ~]$ [j...@opensolaris ~]$ exit exit Not too sure how you are getting that result. What rev of bash do you have ? Dennis ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] strange bash behavior
I did check the /etc/passwd file, that path is correct -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] python 3 package
is there an opensolaris package out there for python 3? I have search around but haven't found any. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] #top - Segmentation Fault
Thanks. The funny thing is I run top many times today but never get seg fault anymore. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] strange bash behavior
I am using opensolaris 2009.06 In bash I have the prompt set to display the current directory and when I go back to my home directory I expect it to replace it with ~. The tilde is there when I first bring up a shell but if I navigate away from my home directory and then go back it doesn't replace the path with the tilde. Any ideas what the problem is here? is this a bash bug or some config problem? bash version: GNU bash, version 3.2.25(1)-release (i386-pc-solaris2.11) Copyright (C) 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc. prompt variable: PS1='[...@\h \W]\$ ' -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] strange bash behavior
bash rev: GNU bash, version 3.2.25(1)-release (i386-pc-solaris2.11) Copyright (C) 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc. I just tried the same prompt on another account and it worked fine. I am now thinking that this does not work on my account because this account was created before I moved the home directory to a different drive. There has to be some reference of the old home directory path lingering somewhere that bash is looking at on whether to replace it with the tilde or not. Not sure where this could be though. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] #top - Segmentation Fault
Got it on snv_124 too. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] #top - Segmentation Fault
Thanks. It didn't coredump. I bearly use top, only when I saw this post and tried it. My system was originally snv_117, then luupgrade to snv_124 on every release, but as I said, never tried it before, so I don't know if it only happens to this version. What other info do you need to help diagnose this issue? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] practical zfs implementation problem
1. Get LSI SAS hba, such as 3042(8 port) or 3041(4port), these are cheap and work better than marvel based. You may want to get hotswapable SAS mobile rack that can host 5 SAS/SATA disks so with LSI 3042, you can connect 10 disks from it, plus 4 onboard SATA, that gives you 14 disks. I suggest you use ECC RAM, and the more RAM the better. I believe AMD supports ECC. 2G ram is not enough to get good performance. I'm not sure if you are able to afford SLC SSD as zil, but it will help a lot. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] Enabling Remote GUI Login via XDMCP
I have a box running OpenSolaris 09.06 which I would like to run headless and access the desktop from a Mac (currently running OSX 10.5.8) on the same LAN. This used to work under OS 08.05. 09.06 seems more secure and I'm struggling to locate all the appropriate settings to enable remote login. Specifically, I can't seem to get OpenSolaris to listen on port 177 for the xdmcp connection. After searching around, I've made the following changes: - /etc/X11/gdm/custom.conf add to [security] DisallowTCP=false add to [xdmcp] Enable=true - enabled tcp wrappers - enabled tcp-listen for x11 - set hosts.allow to ALL: 192.168. and hosts.deny to ALL: ALL gdmsetup shows all the correct xdmcp settings. but still port 177 refuses to open. enabling tcp-listen for x11, did open port 6000. Any help would be appreciated. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Nautilus Access List Tab
Ben from cuddletech.com said it was in a version of SXCE, because he wrote about it on his blog. I emailed him and he gave me the following info. Very odd, same behavior on my SX:CE 116 box. The functionality was added to GNOME-vfs some time ago (http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/820-0724/gdppz?l=dea=view). You can see ACL info for instance by using 'gnomevfs-info /some/path' Anything further you can find out would be appreciated. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] [desktop-discuss] Nautilus Access List Tab
Is there plans to implement a ACL GUI? If not I really have to wonder why. I am wanting to build an OpenSolaris NAS (because of ZFS) for a client of mine but without a GUI, I can see my support calls increasing quite a bit. some posts have said you can do it all from a windows client, however that does not seem like a solution to me, more of a workaround. -chris On Aug 25, 2009, at 10:57 AM, Ghee Teo wrote: Alan Coopersmith wrote: Chris wrote: Ben from cuddletech.com said it was in a version of SXCE, because he wrote about it on his blog. I emailed him and he gave me the following info. Very odd, same behavior on my SX:CE 116 box. The functionality was added to GNOME-vfs some time ago (http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/820-0724/gdppz?l=dea=view). You can see ACL info for instance by using 'gnomevfs-info /some/path' What Ben pointed at was SXDE which was something we shipped and stopped. I think this is what you are seeing. ACL list was implemented using gnome-vfs for nautilus and was in GNOME 2.20. But in GNOME 2.22, gvfs was written to replace gnome-vfs and since then nautilus has been using gvfs to display the various bits and also helpers for various views. The ACL file dialog was in gome-vfs was never forward ported to gvfs even for ufs. The dialog you should though was a design for zfs which was never implemented (not even in gnome-vfs). -Ghee Anything further you can find out would be appreciated. You'll find out more asking on desktop-discuss, where the GNOME engineers are found, than on the general opensolaris-discuss list. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] Nautilus Access List Tab
How do I get this in OpenSolaris 2009.06? http://www.alobbs.com/albums/albun26/ZFS_acl_dialog1.jpg thanks. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Finding my bearings with 2009.06
Note that the 'ecccheck.pl' script depends on the 'pcitweak' utility which is no longer present in OpenSolaris 2009.06 and Ubuntu 8.10 because of Xorg changes. in http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/message.jspa?messageID=398536 -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] Finding my bearings with 2009.06
I am getting used to the opensolaris GUI. The last time I used solaris was with version 1 (SunOS 4), but I am mainly a XP user these days. I am still looking for the following bits of information, hopefully with a GUI, but I can use a prompt if I have to: - regional setting (to do things like use a 24hr clock) - disk manager - where to set delay for disks to go to sleep if unused - an (hopefully easy) way to setup a simple (app-based if possible) firewall - an app using smart data to monitor disks problems for me - device mgr - is there a way to monitor how the CPU power saving is used (hlt instruction usage, SpeedStep or Cool'n'Quiet status)? Having these would mean I have all I need, I am working on the network and SMB aspects atm. Also, I was told 2009.06 can't make use of ECC memory. Is that right? Thanks for you insight. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Oracle 10g on OpenSolaris (Solaris 5.11)
On 8/16/09, Alexander a...@rsu.ru wrote: Alexander a...@rsu.ru wrote: Just my humble opinion. Why should community support two different sets of quite similar tools. Maybe some things (e.g. ZFS ACL support) should be integrated into GNU tools? Do you really believe that this will ever happen? The GNU tools do not even support Linux specific features, why do you believe that they will ever start supporting Solaris specific features? But in other case we have the following case: 1) A lot of users (and what is more significant, developers) get used to work with GNU tools. So, even to compile firefox we need GNU userland. 2) But a lot of Solaris native utils, respectively, relies on Solaris-specific behavior. And as result both kind of tools should be supported Quite strange... May be there are some ways to make GNU tools at least do what Solaris tools can do (to improve end user experience)... At least, why there can be some objections from GNU projects commiters if patches for GNU tools enhancing their functionality on Solaris are suggested to them? Of course, another way is to make own Solaris tools more GNU-like (for example as it is done in FreeBSD). It will make life of developers (and admins trying to compile soft on Solaris) easier. But it is not always possible... If you want GNU and FreeBSD features in the Solaris userland look at the ksh93-integration project. They are adding GNU and FreeBSD features to the commands in /usr/bin. Just download and install the binaries from http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/ksh93-integration/downloads/2009-07-02/ to see how the future of Solaris looks like :) Chris -- ^---^ (@)v(@) Chris Pickett |/ IT consultant ===m==m=== pkch...@users.sourceforge.net ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Has anyone had success installing Opensolaris on a Dell PE T410 or R410?
Hi Lucas I'm interested in the Dell T410 myself, did you get any further feedback or end up trying one of the systems you were investigating here? Cheers Chris -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] Newest/Best way to join Windows Domain
Considering building a OpenSolaris based NAS/SAN for a client and they are Windows 2003 AD based currently. I have found several blog posts, etc each having slightly different ways to join the windows domain to use it for authentication. Then I cam across this link: http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/819-3194/ghnmu?a=view is this the most current and best way to join windows ad for authentication and would this allow me to set ZFS ACLs with my windows user accounts/groups? thanks chris -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] cc MIA?
The /usr/bin/cc link is now owned by the new sunstudio12u1 package which is the latest FCS release of Sun Studio. You probably should just install sunstudio12u1. Many managers were involved in the decision about what should and should not be on your default search path when you had certain packages installed. ;-) It's not clear to me we got the best outcome. In the long run, I think /usr/bin/cc will always point to the latest FCS/stable version of cc. I hope we won't have to cause any surprises like this in the future. --chris -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] Diskomizer released
I am pleased to announce the release of the Diskomizer test suite as open source. Diskomizer is a program for testing storage systems and APIs under extreme load. More information about Diskomizer can be found here: http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/storage/tests/Diskomizer/ and here: http://blogs.sun.com/chrisg/entry/diskomizer_open_sourced Source code can be browsed here: http://src.opensolaris.org/source/xref/test/stcnv/usr/src/tools/diskomizer/ source code and pre built packages for OpenSolaris can be downloaded from here: http://dlc.sun.com/osol/test/downloads/current/ -- Chris Gerhard. __o __o __o Systems TSC Chief Technologist_`\,`\,`\,_ Sun Microsystems Limited (*)/---/---/ (*) Phone: +44 (0) 1252 426033 (ext 26033) http://blogs.sun.com/chrisg smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] Migrating an install from an usb thumb drive to a SATAII SDD drive
So I am wanting to do what the subject says. I'd like to transfer my current install of opensolaris 2008.11 from the slow USB drive it's currently running on, over to the newly purchased SATAII SDD drive. Is there a way to clone from the USB to the SATA II or is there some built in way to migrate from one physical disk to another? The jump drive partition and install currently consumes the entire 8GB thumb drive. The SDD is 60GB. I also have a zfs raidz pool in this machine. Are there any special things I need to do to ensure it's successful migration (or does it not have any bearing on this?) Thanks for your help! -Chris -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] X58 and i7?
Mine works on 2009.06 snv_111a I have Supermicro X8SAX, but the onboard NIC is Intel 82574L. Onboard NIC and PCI-X slots are the reasons I chose Supermicro. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] What FC HBA is supported by comstar?
I'm trying to find an FC HBA supported by Comstar. The Comstar project states 4Gb qlogic/Emulex, and 2 Gb Emulex coming. Do we have a list of known HBA that works with Comstar? Thanks Chris -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] Possible IBM aquisition of Sun
If anyone were to buy Sun, I'd prefer Fujitsu, Hitachi or Siemens . NOT IBM! Fujitsu doesn't seem to be hurting as badly as the others. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] OS laptop operates with lid closed?
Question: Does anyone know if it would be possible to run opensolaris on a laptop (sucha as an Acer Aspire One) and have it continue to run normally when the lid was closed? Chris Mahan chris.ma...@gmail.com grandcentral (818) 671-1709 ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] OS laptop operates with lid closed?
thanks all for your answers! Chris Mahan chris.ma...@gmail.com grandcentral (818) 671-1709 On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 3:45 AM, Joerg Schilling joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote: Chris Mahan chris.ma...@gmail.com wrote: Question: Does anyone know if it would be possible to run opensolaris on a laptop (sucha as an Acer Aspire One) and have it continue to run normally when the lid was closed? if a laptop does an auto-shutdown when closing the screen, there is usually a BIOS menue to swoth off this feature. Jörg -- EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.deemail%3ajo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de(home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin j...@cs.tu-berlin.de(uni) joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] SRP target project
All: iSER and SRP are not the same. iSER (along with iWARP) is a potential replacement for SRP. It just turns out that there are a lot more SRP initiators and devices out there than iSER right now. If we want to play in the IB attached storage arena right now, then SRP is the name of the game. CW Nicolas Williams wrote: On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 01:15:35PM -0600, Shawn Walker wrote: Dan Maslowski wrote: Folks, We have posted preliminary binaries and documents to the http://opensolaris.org/os/project/srp web page. We are in the process of stepping though the code and compiling for sparc etc We are currently "unhiding" the web page, but you can see it now by pointing directly to the URL. We invite active participation, comments, unit testing or other wise. I expect another drop of the source in the next couple of days and will post source by the end of this year. OpenSolaris Project: SCSI RDMA Protocol ...for those of you mystified as I was. I was mystified too. I think SRP is too confusable. I recommend a different acronym. What's wrong with "iSER" as a project name anyways? -- ---- Chris Wood Storage Data Management PE Office: 408-782-2757 (Home Office) Mobile: 408-218-7313 (Preferred) Email: chris.w...@sun.com ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] snv 99 keeps blanking screen to draw new windows
Yes, extremely annoying, happens to me as well(with a Radeon 9800XT). Good to see that it's a known problem though... -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[osol-discuss] CIFS / ZFS Permission issue
Hello Everyone, I have recently jumped onto the OpenSolaris bandwagon coming from FreeBSD, mainly because FreeBSD's ZFS stability is pretty bad. So a few weeks ago I rebuilt my BSD NAS to OpenSolaris using ZFS and CIFS. Everything has been working fine and I'm loving OpenSolaris. I haven't had any issues until tonight. I mainly use OS X clients and so I created a new folder and used Dreamweaver to create a HTML document and saved it inside the folder on the NAS that I just created. I then made some changes and did a normal save and it said access was denied. I then tried save as and it asked if I wanted to replace the file and I said yes, then again access denied, this time the file got deleted though. I then did a save as again and it saved without issue. It also did this on another mac using the program Text Wrangler. I have yet to try this on my windows clients. I did ssh into the solaris box and verify the permissions and they look fine. The ACL is that the group has full control, which im authenticating with a user of that group. Im stumped and this could end up being a pain in the ass, please help! regards, peedy -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] blastwave.org - any info?
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 12:43 PM, Al Hopper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No need to panic. The site is not changing. The only issue is that the top level domain record now points to the wrong name-servers (ns?.blastwave.org). I hear you. On the other hand, a community-held recent backup would be a good thing. It's called disaster recovery, and I think, in light of what's going on, it would be useful to think about that. -- Chris Mahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] cell 818.943.1850 ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] blastwave.org - any info?
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 7:22 PM, Ian Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://204.152.191.100/ The wiki's gone :( It's still there: http://204.152.191.100/wiki/index.php/Main_Page -- Chris Mahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] cell 818.943.1850 ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [osol-discuss] blastwave.org - any info?
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 7:27 PM, Chris Mahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 7:22 PM, Ian Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://204.152.191.100/ The wiki's gone :( It's still there: http://204.152.191.100/wiki/index.php/Main_Page Now the question is: how to suck the content out... Anybody want to write a crawler pronto? or even get a sql dump? somehow? -- Chris Mahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] cell 818.943.1850 -- Chris Mahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] cell 818.943.1850 ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
