RE: PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red
Hi Tim I have no problem at all if you want to photoshop. Maybe earning my money with computer support makes me tired of watching computer generated stuff again on the PDML, so I'm somewhat influenced ;-) I would much, much prefer to see some wildlife bird photos according to your project with or without a crappy lens ;-) greetings Markus I assume you dislike it out of ethical reasons. I should confess; I have mixed emotions towards it myself. Generally speaking I am against heavy manipulations. I do like the idea of being true to the original capture. Tim
Re: PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red
On 4/2/06, Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have done a makeover on the Aristocrat in red picture. http://www.foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=228580 This is a sandwich of three different exposures, all from the same standpoint, and from the same session. The result is a new head ;-) and a improved(?) composition. This is the first time my hands have become dirty from working in PS. So I would really appreciate some comments on the result. Whatdoyuahthink? What about the photoshoping, anything I could have done better or different? Does it look real? And is it an improvement? Or could I have saved me the trouble? (The original is at a thumb below the picture for reference.) A lot of questions, but isn't that what life is, questions? Beautiful. -frank -- Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
Re: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red)
On 4/4/06, Gonz, discombobulated, unleashed: what a waste of time Yeah, time for some movement out of here. Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com _
Re: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red)
On Apr 4, 2006, at 6:12 PM, John Forbes wrote: Thank you, Kenneth, you're a gentleman. I seem to recall a thread a year or two ago about mountains named after breasts - Grand Teton, Pap of Glencoe, Grandes Mamelles - that sort of thing. But are there any named after bottoms? If not, there should be (IMPO of course), though perhaps there is a logical problem with calling a top after a bottom. Don't know of any Mount Tush, but here in the Blue Ridge Mountains of Virginia we have Sweet Annie's Hollow. Bob
Re: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red)
Bob Shell wrote: On Apr 4, 2006, at 6:12 PM, John Forbes wrote: Thank you, Kenneth, you're a gentleman. I seem to recall a thread a year or two ago about mountains named after breasts - Grand Teton, Pap of Glencoe, Grandes Mamelles - that sort of thing. But are there any named after bottoms? If not, there should be (IMPO of course), though perhaps there is a logical problem with calling a top after a bottom. Don't know of any Mount Tush... Ain't that out west, where them cowboys come from? ...but here in the Blue Ridge Mountains of Virginia we have Sweet Annie's Hollow. Bob Yup. That's a good 'un... keith
Re: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red)
Re: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red) On 4/4/06, Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip You kinky Norwegian you. VBG Dave S -- All I ask is the chance to prove that money can't make me happy. - Spike Milligan
Re: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red)
Doug Brewer wrote: Do we have a Subject Line Hall of Fame around here? If so, I nominate this one. Come on Doug, don't try to make Tim the butt of your jokes...
Re: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red)
Tim's gaffe was damaging, but Doug's retort rectum. On Apr 4, 2006, at 7:19 AM, Mark Roberts wrote: Doug Brewer wrote: Do we have a Subject Line Hall of Fame around here? If so, I nominate this one. Come on Doug, don't try to make Tim the butt of your jokes...
Re: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red)
Mark Roberts wrote: Doug Brewer wrote: Do we have a Subject Line Hall of Fame around here? If so, I nominate this one. Come on Doug, don't try to make Tim the butt of your jokes... Dr Freud would have loved this. I just had to butt in! As Roman Polanski might have said. Argh! -- Dr E D F Williams www.kolumbus.fi/mimosa/ personal.inet.fi/cool/don.williams/ 41660 TOIVAKKA – Finland - +358400706616
Re: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red)
Op Tue, 04 Apr 2006 13:25:57 +0200 schreef Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Tim's gaffe was damaging, Ass bad ass it gets... but Doug's retort rectum. On Apr 4, 2006, at 7:19 AM, Mark Roberts wrote: Doug Brewer wrote: Do we have a Subject Line Hall of Fame around here? If so, I nominate this one. Come on Doug, don't try to make Tim the butt of your jokes... -- Regards, Lucas
RE: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 128 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red)
Not change # in headline. This is as ugly, ass can be. This list _is_ the dark side ;-) Seriously. Isn't it real English to use anals as short for analects? My spellchecker says no, but it is very limited. Tim Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian) Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds (Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy) -Original Message- From: Tim Øsleby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 4. april 2006 02:26 To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Subject: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red) I had another look at the remake I submitted yesterday. And, now I am embarrassed by my lack of judgement. It is not total crap, but it sure is very muddy looking. Ok, it is crappy. I did ruin it. Just consider it a sketch that left office by accident. When doing the sandwich my mind was in single track mode. I was obsessed by getting the puzzle bits together, so I kind of forgot to look at general picture. Besides being muddy, it also had a big dust spot. I saw that, but simply forgot to do something about it. Not an unforgivable sin, but I'm not proud of that either. The worst thing is that I can't claim to have been drinking and photoshopping. Go on, laugh and make jokes on my expense, but if you do, you also have to give me a warm we all do mistakes hug. (I really don't expect any of those hugs, I know you are evil people and will do whatever you can to rub it in ;-)) When you are done, I will have another go at the motif, waiting for the right moment, trying to get it right in camera (if the bird is still there). Tim, the Muddy Norwegian. -Original Message- From: Tim Øsleby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 3. april 2006 02:11 To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Subject: PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red I have done a makeover on the Aristocrat in red picture. http://www.foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=228580 This is a sandwich of three different exposures, all from the same standpoint, and from the same session. The result is a new head ;-) and a improved(?) composition. This is the first time my hands have become dirty from working in PS. So I would really appreciate some comments on the result. Whatdoyuahthink? What about the photoshoping, anything I could have done better or different? Does it look real? And is it an improvement? Or could I have saved me the trouble? (The original is at a thumb below the picture for reference.) A lot of questions, but isn't that what life is, questions? Tim Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian) Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds (Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
Re: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 128 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red)
Tim, I think you meant annals, anals is something else entirely. -Adam Tim Øsleby wrote: Not change # in headline. This is as ugly, ass can be. This list _is_ the dark side ;-) Seriously. Isn't it real English to use anals as short for analects? My spellchecker says no, but it is very limited. Tim Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian) Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds (Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy) -Original Message- From: Tim Øsleby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 4. april 2006 02:26 To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Subject: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red) I had another look at the remake I submitted yesterday. And, now I am embarrassed by my lack of judgement. It is not total crap, but it sure is very muddy looking. Ok, it is crappy. I did ruin it. Just consider it a sketch that left office by accident. When doing the sandwich my mind was in single track mode. I was obsessed by getting the puzzle bits together, so I kind of forgot to look at general picture. Besides being muddy, it also had a big dust spot. I saw that, but simply forgot to do something about it. Not an unforgivable sin, but I'm not proud of that either. The worst thing is that I can't claim to have been drinking and photoshopping. Go on, laugh and make jokes on my expense, but if you do, you also have to give me a warm we all do mistakes hug. (I really don't expect any of those hugs, I know you are evil people and will do whatever you can to rub it in ;-)) When you are done, I will have another go at the motif, waiting for the right moment, trying to get it right in camera (if the bird is still there). Tim, the Muddy Norwegian. -Original Message- From: Tim Øsleby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 3. april 2006 02:11 To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Subject: PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red I have done a makeover on the Aristocrat in red picture. http://www.foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=228580 This is a sandwich of three different exposures, all from the same standpoint, and from the same session. The result is a new head ;-) and a improved(?) composition. This is the first time my hands have become dirty from working in PS. So I would really appreciate some comments on the result. Whatdoyuahthink? What about the photoshoping, anything I could have done better or different? Does it look real? And is it an improvement? Or could I have saved me the trouble? (The original is at a thumb below the picture for reference.) A lot of questions, but isn't that what life is, questions? Tim Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian) Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds (Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
Re: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red)
Mark Roberts wrote: Doug Brewer wrote: Mark Roberts wrote: Doug Brewer wrote: Do we have a Subject Line Hall of Fame around here? If so, I nominate this one. Come on Doug, don't try to make Tim the butt of your jokes... yeah, sorry. I was just being an ass. Now we'll never hear the end of it. at least until we scrape bottom.
Re: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red)
I think his grammatical use of the colon was correct. On 4/4/06, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Doug Brewer wrote: Mark Roberts wrote: Doug Brewer wrote: Do we have a Subject Line Hall of Fame around here? If so, I nominate this one. Come on Doug, don't try to make Tim the butt of your jokes... yeah, sorry. I was just being an ass. Now we'll never hear the end of it. -- Perry Pellechia Primary email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Alternate email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Home Page: http://homer.chem.sc.edu/perry
Re: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red)
On Apr 4, 2006, at 6:31 AM, Doug Brewer wrote: Mark Roberts wrote: Doug Brewer wrote: Mark Roberts wrote: Doug Brewer wrote: Do we have a Subject Line Hall of Fame around here? If so, I nominate this one. Come on Doug, don't try to make Tim the butt of your jokes... yeah, sorry. I was just being an ass. Now we'll never hear the end of it. at least until we scrape bottom. well, in hindsight, it seems to have been a mistaken contraction. Godfrey
Re: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red)
Doug Brewer wrote: Mark Roberts wrote: Doug Brewer wrote: Do we have a Subject Line Hall of Fame around here? If so, I nominate this one. Come on Doug, don't try to make Tim the butt of your jokes... yeah, sorry. I was just being an ass. Now we'll never hear the end of it.
Re: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red)
Mark Roberts wrote: Doug Brewer wrote: Do we have a Subject Line Hall of Fame around here? If so, I nominate this one. Come on Doug, don't try to make Tim the butt of your jokes... yeah, sorry. I was just being an ass.
RE: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 128 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red)
In Oxford advanced learner dictionary it is analects with one l. But, when looking further down I now do find annals. Even the limited spellchecker conform it. So my spellchecker is smarter than me ;-) That makes me? Very limited, or an ass/æs/ animal of horse family with long ears and a tuft of the end of its tail. Tim Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian) Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds (Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy) -Original Message- From: Adam Maas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 4. april 2006 14:12 To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Subject: Re: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 128 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red) Tim, I think you meant annals, anals is something else entirely. -Adam Tim Øsleby wrote: Not change # in headline. This is as ugly, ass can be. This list _is_ the dark side ;-) Seriously. Isn't it real English to use anals as short for analects? My spellchecker says no, but it is very limited. Tim Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian) Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds (Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy) -Original Message- From: Tim Øsleby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 4. april 2006 02:26 To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Subject: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red) I had another look at the remake I submitted yesterday. And, now I am embarrassed by my lack of judgement. It is not total crap, but it sure is very muddy looking. Ok, it is crappy. I did ruin it. Just consider it a sketch that left office by accident. When doing the sandwich my mind was in single track mode. I was obsessed by getting the puzzle bits together, so I kind of forgot to look at general picture. Besides being muddy, it also had a big dust spot. I saw that, but simply forgot to do something about it. Not an unforgivable sin, but I'm not proud of that either. The worst thing is that I can't claim to have been drinking and photoshopping. Go on, laugh and make jokes on my expense, but if you do, you also have to give me a warm we all do mistakes hug. (I really don't expect any of those hugs, I know you are evil people and will do whatever you can to rub it in ;-)) When you are done, I will have another go at the motif, waiting for the right moment, trying to get it right in camera (if the bird is still there). Tim, the Muddy Norwegian. -Original Message- From: Tim Øsleby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 3. april 2006 02:11 To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Subject: PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red I have done a makeover on the Aristocrat in red picture. http://www.foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=228580 This is a sandwich of three different exposures, all from the same standpoint, and from the same session. The result is a new head ;-) and a improved(?) composition. This is the first time my hands have become dirty from working in PS. So I would really appreciate some comments on the result. Whatdoyuahthink? What about the photoshoping, anything I could have done better or different? Does it look real? And is it an improvement? Or could I have saved me the trouble? (The original is at a thumb below the picture for reference.) A lot of questions, but isn't that what life is, questions? Tim Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian) Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds (Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
Re: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red)
Do we have a Subject Line Hall of Fame around here? If so, I nominate this one. Come on Doug, don't try to make Tim the butt of your jokes... yeah, sorry. I was just being an ass. Now we'll never hear the end of it. at least until we scrape bottom. Guys, this is wholly inappropriate. Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com _
RE: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 128 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red)
Note to myself: Speaking of anals, I must let my blunder go ;-) Tim Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian) Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds (Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy) -Original Message- From: Tim Øsleby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 4. april 2006 14:08 To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Subject: RE: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 128 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red) Not change # in headline. This is as ugly, ass can be. This list _is_ the dark side ;-) Seriously. Isn't it real English to use anals as short for analects? My spellchecker says no, but it is very limited. Tim Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian) Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds (Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy) -Original Message- From: Tim Øsleby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 4. april 2006 02:26 To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Subject: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red) I had another look at the remake I submitted yesterday. And, now I am embarrassed by my lack of judgement. It is not total crap, but it sure is very muddy looking. Ok, it is crappy. I did ruin it. Just consider it a sketch that left office by accident. When doing the sandwich my mind was in single track mode. I was obsessed by getting the puzzle bits together, so I kind of forgot to look at general picture. Besides being muddy, it also had a big dust spot. I saw that, but simply forgot to do something about it. Not an unforgivable sin, but I'm not proud of that either. The worst thing is that I can't claim to have been drinking and photoshopping. Go on, laugh and make jokes on my expense, but if you do, you also have to give me a warm we all do mistakes hug. (I really don't expect any of those hugs, I know you are evil people and will do whatever you can to rub it in ;-)) When you are done, I will have another go at the motif, waiting for the right moment, trying to get it right in camera (if the bird is still there). Tim, the Muddy Norwegian. -Original Message- From: Tim Øsleby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 3. april 2006 02:11 To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Subject: PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red I have done a makeover on the Aristocrat in red picture. http://www.foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=228580 This is a sandwich of three different exposures, all from the same standpoint, and from the same session. The result is a new head ;-) and a improved(?) composition. This is the first time my hands have become dirty from working in PS. So I would really appreciate some comments on the result. Whatdoyuahthink? What about the photoshoping, anything I could have done better or different? Does it look real? And is it an improvement? Or could I have saved me the trouble? (The original is at a thumb below the picture for reference.) A lot of questions, but isn't that what life is, questions? Tim Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian) Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds (Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
Re: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red)
Cotty wrote: Do we have a Subject Line Hall of Fame around here? If so, I nominate this one. Come on Doug, don't try to make Tim the butt of your jokes... yeah, sorry. I was just being an ass. Now we'll never hear the end of it. at least until we scrape bottom. Guys, this is wholly inappropriate. And Cotty, as usual, is bringing up the rear.
Re: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red)
Do we have a Subject Line Hall of Fame around here? If so, I nominate this one. Come on Doug, don't try to make Tim the butt of your jokes... yeah, sorry. I was just being an ass. Now we'll never hear the end of it. at least until we scrape bottom. Guys, this is wholly inappropriate. And Cotty, as usual, is bringing up the rear. That's right Brewer, crack the whip. Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com _
Re: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red)
Cotty wrote: Do we have a Subject Line Hall of Fame around here? If so, I nominate this one. Come on Doug, don't try to make Tim the butt of your jokes... yeah, sorry. I was just being an ass. Now we'll never hear the end of it. at least until we scrape bottom. Guys, this is wholly inappropriate. And Cotty, as usual, is bringing up the rear. That's right Brewer, crack the whip. why, you cheeky sod.
Re: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red)
Do we have a Subject Line Hall of Fame around here? If so, I nominate this one. Come on Doug, don't try to make Tim the butt of your jokes... yeah, sorry. I was just being an ass. Now we'll never hear the end of it. at least until we scrape bottom. Guys, this is wholly inappropriate. And Cotty, as usual, is bringing up the rear. That's right Brewer, crack the whip. why, you cheeky sod. You exude such respect when you discharge your duties. Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com _
Re: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red)
Boy, the crap we have to put up with this list is starting to pile up. If its not the potty mouth Brits, it the stuck up Canadians. I wish we can put you all on a space ship and send you to Uranus. For once I wish we could stop all these assinine puns. or not 8-) On 4/4/06, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do we have a Subject Line Hall of Fame around here? If so, I nominate this one. Come on Doug, don't try to make Tim the butt of your jokes... yeah, sorry. I was just being an ass. Now we'll never hear the end of it. at least until we scrape bottom. Guys, this is wholly inappropriate. And Cotty, as usual, is bringing up the rear. That's right Brewer, crack the whip. why, you cheeky sod. You exude such respect when you discharge your duties. Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com _ -- Perry Pellechia Primary email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Alternate email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Home Page: http://homer.chem.sc.edu/perry
Re: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red)
On 4/4/06, Perry Pellechia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For once I wish we could stop all these assinine puns. or not 8-) Wow! That's some serious flatulence. -- Scott Loveless http://www.twosixteen.com -- You have to hold the button down -Arnold Newman
Re: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red)
Scott Loveless wrote: On 4/4/06, Perry Pellechia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For once I wish we could stop all these assinine puns. or not 8-) Wow! That's some serious flatulence. Yes, it may require an examination by some Pentax medical gear to find the source. -- Scott Loveless http://www.twosixteen.com -- You have to hold the button down -Arnold Newman -- Someone handed me a picture and said, This is a picture of me when I was younger. Every picture of you is when you were younger. ...Here's a picture of me when I'm older. Where'd you get that camera man? - Mitch Hedberg
Re: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red)
On 4/4/06, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 4/4/06, Perry Pellechia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For once I wish we could stop all these assinine puns. or not 8-) Wow! That's some serious flatulence. That's funny coming from a wind bag like you.
Re: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red)
On Tue, 04 Apr 2006 17:28:38 +0100, Perry Pellechia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Boy, the crap we have to put up with this list is starting to pile up. If its not the potty mouth Brits, it the stuck up Canadians. I wish we can put you all on a space ship and send you to Uranus. For once I wish we could stop all these assinine puns. or not 8-) Not a hope. The fundamental problem is that the PDML has a bottomless pit of terrible puns. There is no end to it. It's a pain in the ane. But so what? It's cool to be cul. I con-fesse I rather like flogging these things to death. Burrowing into the arsenal to see what's there. And how appropriate for a list dedicated to a maker of proctoscopes. Anyway, time for supper, and a nice bare, sorry, rare rump. John On 4/4/06, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do we have a Subject Line Hall of Fame around here? If so, I nominate this one. Come on Doug, don't try to make Tim the butt of your jokes... yeah, sorry. I was just being an ass. Now we'll never hear the end of it. at least until we scrape bottom. Guys, this is wholly inappropriate. And Cotty, as usual, is bringing up the rear. That's right Brewer, crack the whip. why, you cheeky sod. You exude such respect when you discharge your duties. Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com _ -- Perry Pellechia Primary email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Alternate email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Home Page: http://homer.chem.sc.edu/perry -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
Re: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red)
I'd like to reply, but I think I'll pass. On 4/4/06, Perry Pellechia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 4/4/06, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 4/4/06, Perry Pellechia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For once I wish we could stop all these assinine puns. or not 8-) Wow! That's some serious flatulence. That's funny coming from a wind bag like you. -- Scott Loveless http://www.twosixteen.com -- You have to hold the button down -Arnold Newman
Re: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red)
Come on, stop farting around. Scott Loveless wrote: I'd like to reply, but I think I'll pass. On 4/4/06, Perry Pellechia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 4/4/06, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 4/4/06, Perry Pellechia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For once I wish we could stop all these assinine puns. or not 8-) Wow! That's some serious flatulence. That's funny coming from a wind bag like you. -- Scott Loveless http://www.twosixteen.com -- You have to hold the button down -Arnold Newman -- Someone handed me a picture and said, This is a picture of me when I was younger. Every picture of you is when you were younger. ...Here's a picture of me when I'm older. Where'd you get that camera man? - Mitch Hedberg
Re: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red)
Perry Pellechia wrote: I think his grammatical use of the colon was correct. Alimentary, my dear Watson.
Re: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red)
You have a lot of gall to bring that up. On 4/4/06, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Perry Pellechia wrote: I think his grammatical use of the colon was correct. Alimentary, my dear Watson. -- Perry Pellechia Primary email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Alternate email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Home Page: http://homer.chem.sc.edu/perry
Re: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red)
On 4/4/06, Perry Pellechia, discombobulated, unleashed: Boy, the crap we have to put up with this list is starting to pile up. If its not the potty mouth Brits, it the stuck up Canadians. I wish we can put you all on a space ship and send you to Uranus. For once I wish we could stop all these assinine puns. or not 8-) I prefer bottom posting. Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com _
Re: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red)
On 4/4/06, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 4/4/06, Perry Pellechia, discombobulated, unleashed: Boy, the crap we have to put up with this list is starting to pile up. If its not the potty mouth Brits, it the stuck up Canadians. I wish we can put you all on a space ship and send you to Uranus. For once I wish we could stop all these assinine puns. or not 8-) I prefer bottom posting. That can still get you arrested in several states in the US. Perry Pellechia Primary email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Alternate email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Home Page: http://homer.chem.sc.edu/perry
Re: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red)
Tim's gaffe was damaging, but Doug's retort rectum. Rectum, hell it dam near killed him ;-. Kenneth Waller - Original Message - From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red) Tim's gaffe was damaging, but Doug's retort rectum. On Apr 4, 2006, at 7:19 AM, Mark Roberts wrote: Doug Brewer wrote: Do we have a Subject Line Hall of Fame around here? If so, I nominate this one. Come on Doug, don't try to make Tim the butt of your jokes...
Re: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red)
Finally. I was waiting for someone to recognize the setup. Ken dumped right on it! -- Original message -- From: Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tim's gaffe was damaging, but Doug's retort rectum. Rectum, hell it dam near killed him ;-. Kenneth Waller - Original Message - From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red) Tim's gaffe was damaging, but Doug's retort rectum. On Apr 4, 2006, at 7:19 AM, Mark Roberts wrote: Doug Brewer wrote: Do we have a Subject Line Hall of Fame around here? If so, I nominate this one. Come on Doug, don't try to make Tim the butt of your jokes...
Re: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red)
- Original Message - From: Doug Brewer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red) Cotty wrote: Do we have a Subject Line Hall of Fame around here? If so, I nominate this one. Come on Doug, don't try to make Tim the butt of your jokes... yeah, sorry. I was just being an ass. Now we'll never hear the end of it. at least until we scrape bottom. Guys, this is wholly inappropriate. And Cotty, as usual, is bringing up the rear. Yeah And if he doesn't watch out, he'll get it in the end. Kenneth Waller
Re: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red)
Just when you thought this was going to be wiped clean.:-) Dave Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Finally. I was waiting for someone to recognize the setup. Ken dumped right on it! -- Original message -- From: Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tim's gaffe was damaging, but Doug's retort rectum. Rectum, hell it dam near killed him ;-. Kenneth Waller - Original Message - From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red) Tim's gaffe was damaging, but Doug's retort rectum. On Apr 4, 2006, at 7:19 AM, Mark Roberts wrote: Doug Brewer wrote: Do we have a Subject Line Hall of Fame around here? If so, I nominate this one. Come on Doug, don't try to make Tim the butt of your jokes... Equine Photography in York Region
Re: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red)
- Original Message - From: John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 1:34 PM Subject: Re: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red) On Tue, 04 Apr 2006 17:28:38 +0100, Perry Pellechia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Boy, the crap we have to put up with this list is starting to pile up. If its not the potty mouth Brits, it the stuck up Canadians. I wish we can put you all on a space ship and send you to Uranus. For once I wish we could stop all these assinine puns. or not 8-) Not a hope. The fundamental problem is that the PDML has a bottomless pit of terrible puns. There is no end to it. It's a pain in the ane. But so what? It's cool to be cul. I con-fesse I rather like flogging these things to death. Burrowing into the arsenal to see what's there. And how appropriate for a list dedicated to a maker of proctoscopes. Anyway, time for supper, and a nice bare, sorry, rare rump. John John, here's hoping everything comes out okay. Kenneth Waller
Re: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red)
I'll make note of this thread in my diarya. : )
Re: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red)
That's it. This thread is officially in the toilet (or crapper for Cotty). Kenneth Waller - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red) I'll make note of this thread in my diarya. : )
RE: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 128 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red)
-Original Message- From: Tim Øsleby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 04 April 2006 13:08 To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Subject: RE: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 128 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red) Not change # in headline. This is as ugly, ass can be. This list _is_ the dark side ;-) Seriously. Isn't it real English to use anals as short for analects? My spellchecker says no, but it is very limited. It sounds as though it was looking up anal. Perhaps it should have looked up annal instead! Bob
Re: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red)
On 4/4/06, Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That's it. This thread is officially in the toilet (or crapper for Cotty). Just remember to use toilet paper; on the hole one brand's as good as the other. cheers, frank -- Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
Re: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red)
On 4/4/06, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 4/4/06, Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That's it. This thread is officially in the toilet (or crapper for Cotty). Just remember to use toilet paper; on the hole one brand's as good as the other. And on that note, we could all use a courtesy flush. -- Scott Loveless http://www.twosixteen.com -- You have to hold the button down -Arnold Newman
Re: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red)
On Tue, 04 Apr 2006 20:21:34 +0100, Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - Original Message - From: John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 1:34 PM Subject: Re: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red) On Tue, 04 Apr 2006 17:28:38 +0100, Perry Pellechia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Boy, the crap we have to put up with this list is starting to pile up. If its not the potty mouth Brits, it the stuck up Canadians. I wish we can put you all on a space ship and send you to Uranus. For once I wish we could stop all these assinine puns. or not 8-) Not a hope. The fundamental problem is that the PDML has a bottomless pit of terrible puns. There is no end to it. It's a pain in the ane. But so what? It's cool to be cul. I con-fesse I rather like flogging these things to death. Burrowing into the arsenal to see what's there. And how appropriate for a list dedicated to a maker of proctoscopes. Anyway, time for supper, and a nice bare, sorry, rare rump. John John, here's hoping everything comes out okay. Thank you, Kenneth, you're a gentleman. I seem to recall a thread a year or two ago about mountains named after breasts - Grand Teton, Pap of Glencoe, Grandes Mamelles - that sort of thing. But are there any named after bottoms? If not, there should be (IMPO of course), though perhaps there is a logical problem with calling a top after a bottom. John -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
RE: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red)
I seem to recall a thread a year or two ago about mountains named after breasts - Grand Teton, Pap of Glencoe, Grandes Mamelles - that sort of thing. But are there any named after bottoms? If not, there should be (IMPO of course), though perhaps there is a logical problem with calling a top after a bottom. I've always thought the Mariana Trench sounds promising... Bob
Re: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red)
On Tue, 04 Apr 2006 23:26:07 +0100, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I seem to recall a thread a year or two ago about mountains named after breasts - Grand Teton, Pap of Glencoe, Grandes Mamelles - that sort of thing. But are there any named after bottoms? If not, there should be (IMPO of course), though perhaps there is a logical problem with calling a top after a bottom. I've always thought the Mariana Trench sounds promising... :-) You need to go deep for that one. John -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
RE: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red)
First chance I've had time to actually read all the posts for a while. Same old crap, huh? ;-) ;-) ;-) Don
RE: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red)
You were, perhaps, expecting ~new~ crap? Shel [Original Message] From: Don Sanderson First chance I've had time to actually read all the posts for a while. Same old crap, huh? ;-) ;-) ;-)
Re: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red)
- Original Message - From: Don Sanderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 6:30 PM Subject: RE: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red) First chance I've had time to actually read all the posts for a while. Same old crap, huh? ;-) ;-) ;-) Don Yep a veritable wasteland. Kenneth Waller
RE: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red)
Have to admit, it takes a lot of intestinal fortitude to keep a thread like this alive. Don -Original Message- From: Kenneth Waller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 6:14 PM To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Subject: Re: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red) - Original Message - From: Don Sanderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 6:30 PM Subject: RE: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red) First chance I've had time to actually read all the posts for a while. Same old crap, huh? ;-) ;-) ;-) Don Yep a veritable wasteland. Kenneth Waller
Re: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red)
Yeah but shortly it will be eliminated.. Kenneth Waller - Original Message - From: Don Sanderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 7:45 PM Subject: RE: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red) Have to admit, it takes a lot of intestinal fortitude to keep a thread like this alive. Don -Original Message- From: Kenneth Waller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 6:14 PM To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Subject: Re: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red) - Original Message - From: Don Sanderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 6:30 PM Subject: RE: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red) First chance I've had time to actually read all the posts for a while. Same old crap, huh? ;-) ;-) ;-) Don Yep a veritable wasteland. Kenneth Waller
Re: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red)
what a waste of time Kenneth Waller wrote: Yeah but shortly it will be eliminated.. Kenneth Waller - Original Message - From: Don Sanderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 7:45 PM Subject: RE: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red) Have to admit, it takes a lot of intestinal fortitude to keep a thread like this alive. Don -Original Message- From: Kenneth Waller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 6:14 PM To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Subject: Re: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red) - Original Message - From: Don Sanderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 6:30 PM Subject: RE: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red) First chance I've had time to actually read all the posts for a while. Same old crap, huh? ;-) ;-) ;-) Don Yep a veritable wasteland. Kenneth Waller
RE: PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red
Hi Tim Maybe I misunderstood you but what has all this photoshopping to do with your original bird project? I strongly dislike the way you have choosen here and hope you have read my last post ;-) greetings Markus -Original Message- From: Tim Øsleby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 2:11 AM To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Subject: PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red I have done a makeover on the Aristocrat in red picture. http://www.foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=228580 This is a sandwich of three different exposures, all from the same standpoint, and from the same session. The result is a new head ;-) and a improved(?) composition. This is the first time my hands have become dirty from working in PS. So I would really appreciate some comments on the result. Whatdoyuahthink? What about the photoshoping, anything I could have done better or different? Does it look real? And is it an improvement? Or could I have saved me the trouble? (The original is at a thumb below the picture for reference.) A lot of questions, but isn't that what life is, questions? Tim Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian) Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds (Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
Re: PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red
Tim, I like the original better. This one is too dark, and for some reason it makes the color unappealing--it reminds me of Philadelphia air on a really hot, sticky July evening. Rick --- Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have done a makeover on the Aristocrat in red picture. http://www.foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=228580 This is a sandwich of three different exposures, all from the same standpoint, and from the same session. The result is a new head ;-) and a improved(?) composition. This is the first time my hands have become dirty from working in PS. So I would really appreciate some comments on the result. Whatdoyuahthink? What about the photoshoping, anything I could have done better or different? Does it look real? And is it an improvement? Or could I have saved me the trouble? (The original is at a thumb below the picture for reference.) A lot of questions, but isn't that what life is, questions? Tim Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian) Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds (Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy) http://www.photo.net/photos/RickW __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
RE: PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red
Marcus. I did read your post. Don't worry, this is not a crappy lens... this is something different. It's a spin off idea. You say you strongly dislike this photoshoping. That's strong words, I'll give you credit for that ;-) I assume you dislike it out of ethical reasons. I should confess; I have mixed emotions towards it myself. Generally speaking I am against heavy manipulations. I do like the idea of being true to the original capture. The problem is where to draw the line. I may have crossed it here, I really don't know. Partly that's why I did this. I think it is kind of silly to reject something you don't know. I needed to experiment a bit to explore the possibilities. I have to debate a bit with myself what image to use in the bird project. Right now the purist in me says this is a deceiving lie. And, the less conservative part of me says this is not really a manipulation, it is the same spot, same background, nearly the same time, and all I really did was to change the position of the head. I may also end up rejecting both versions... But, I did not do this to start a list debate on the ethics. I simply needed to see what could be done, and the effect of the final image. To see, if the changes gave it more impact. On this, I have made up my mind. I now know what composition I will make, _if_ I go back and redo the shot. While writing this, I also believe I have made up my mind about the ethics. So this rant post has had it's purpose ;-) Tim Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian) Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds (Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy) -Original Message- From: Markus Maurer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 3. april 2006 08:50 To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Subject: RE: PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red Hi Tim Maybe I misunderstood you but what has all this photoshopping to do with your original bird project? I strongly dislike the way you have choosen here and hope you have read my last post ;-) greetings Markus -Original Message- From: Tim Øsleby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 2:11 AM To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Subject: PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red I have done a makeover on the Aristocrat in red picture. http://www.foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=228580 This is a sandwich of three different exposures, all from the same standpoint, and from the same session. The result is a new head ;-) and a improved(?) composition. This is the first time my hands have become dirty from working in PS. So I would really appreciate some comments on the result. Whatdoyuahthink? What about the photoshoping, anything I could have done better or different? Does it look real? And is it an improvement? Or could I have saved me the trouble? (The original is at a thumb below the picture for reference.) A lot of questions, but isn't that what life is, questions? Tim Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian) Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds (Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red)
I had another look at the remake I submitted yesterday. And, now I am embarrassed by my lack of judgement. It is not total crap, but it sure is very muddy looking. Ok, it is crappy. I did ruin it. Just consider it a sketch that left office by accident. When doing the sandwich my mind was in single track mode. I was obsessed by getting the puzzle bits together, so I kind of forgot to look at general picture. Besides being muddy, it also had a big dust spot. I saw that, but simply forgot to do something about it. Not an unforgivable sin, but I'm not proud of that either. The worst thing is that I can't claim to have been drinking and photoshopping. Go on, laugh and make jokes on my expense, but if you do, you also have to give me a warm we all do mistakes hug. (I really don't expect any of those hugs, I know you are evil people and will do whatever you can to rub it in ;-)) When you are done, I will have another go at the motif, waiting for the right moment, trying to get it right in camera (if the bird is still there). Tim, the Muddy Norwegian. -Original Message- From: Tim Øsleby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 3. april 2006 02:11 To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Subject: PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red I have done a makeover on the Aristocrat in red picture. http://www.foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=228580 This is a sandwich of three different exposures, all from the same standpoint, and from the same session. The result is a new head ;-) and a improved(?) composition. This is the first time my hands have become dirty from working in PS. So I would really appreciate some comments on the result. Whatdoyuahthink? What about the photoshoping, anything I could have done better or different? Does it look real? And is it an improvement? Or could I have saved me the trouble? (The original is at a thumb below the picture for reference.) A lot of questions, but isn't that what life is, questions? Tim Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian) Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds (Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
Re: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red)
Do we have a Subject Line Hall of Fame around here? If so, I nominate this one. On Apr 3, 2006, at 8:26 PM, Tim Øsleby wrote: I had another look at the remake I submitted yesterday. And, now I am embarrassed by my lack of judgement. It is not total crap, but it sure is very muddy looking. Ok, it is crappy. I did ruin it. Just consider it a sketch that left office by accident. When doing the sandwich my mind was in single track mode. I was obsessed by getting the puzzle bits together, so I kind of forgot to look at general picture. Besides being muddy, it also had a big dust spot. I saw that, but simply forgot to do something about it. Not an unforgivable sin, but I'm not proud of that either. The worst thing is that I can't claim to have been drinking and photoshopping. Go on, laugh and make jokes on my expense, but if you do, you also have to give me a warm we all do mistakes hug. (I really don't expect any of those hugs, I know you are evil people and will do whatever you can to rub it in ;-)) When you are done, I will have another go at the motif, waiting for the right moment, trying to get it right in camera (if the bird is still there). Tim, the Muddy Norwegian. -Original Message- From: Tim Øsleby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 3. april 2006 02:11 To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Subject: PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red I have done a makeover on the Aristocrat in red picture. http://www.foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=228580 This is a sandwich of three different exposures, all from the same standpoint, and from the same session. The result is a new head ;-) and a improved(?) composition. This is the first time my hands have become dirty from working in PS. So I would really appreciate some comments on the result. Whatdoyuahthink? What about the photoshoping, anything I could have done better or different? Does it look real? And is it an improvement? Or could I have saved me the trouble? (The original is at a thumb below the picture for reference.) A lot of questions, but isn't that what life is, questions? Tim Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian) Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds (Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red
I have done a makeover on the Aristocrat in red picture. http://www.foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=228580 This is a sandwich of three different exposures, all from the same standpoint, and from the same session. The result is a new head ;-) and a improved(?) composition. This is the first time my hands have become dirty from working in PS. So I would really appreciate some comments on the result. Whatdoyuahthink? What about the photoshoping, anything I could have done better or different? Does it look real? And is it an improvement? Or could I have saved me the trouble? (The original is at a thumb below the picture for reference.) A lot of questions, but isn't that what life is, questions? Tim Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian) Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds (Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
Re: PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red
I think it is much better. Nice work - EXCEPT - the white line around the bottom of the wings and body has to go! Not sure how it got there. If you can't get rid of it by changing your PS technique then go to 400% and clone it out with a small brush. Powell I have done a makeover on the Aristocrat in red picture. http://www.foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=228580 This is a sandwich of three different exposures, all from the same standpoint, and from the same session. The result is a new head ;-) and a improved(?) composition. This is the first time my hands have become dirty from working in PS. So I would really appreciate some comments on the result. Whatdoyuahthink? What about the photoshoping, anything I could have done better or different? Does it look real? And is it an improvement? Or could I have saved me the trouble? (The original is at a thumb below the picture for reference.) A lot of questions, but isn't that what life is, questions? Tim Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
