Re: [ADMIN] Want to help?
On 10/11/12 02:49, AndyHC wrote: no can do from here - it just times out AndyD 8-)# in Goa snip No luck from Australia either, Andy. I tried many times, first when Ed posted the original message and again on the weekend; timed out each time. FireFox on Ubuntu 10.04. Today I asked wife and one daughter to attempt access from work computers, all Windows, neither successful. We also failed to get a response using the iPhone. This afternoon I searched locally and found there was one CFF web site for each Australian State. Tried to phone but it was right on 5.00pm, call went to messagebank. Daughter suggests CFF probably have a world wide agreement - to block access from callers in other countries. To save someone donating to an overseas group when they meant to cash to go locally. So, I explored further. Attempted to access CFF India. (ref: AndyHC - Goa) Found this page http://www.cfww.org/pub/english/cfwnl/7/617/Cystic_Fibrosis_in_India That seems to knock Carolyn's idea on the head. Especially since I was able to access the DONATE page attached to that one. However, at the bottom of that (Indian) page I find the following note. * Cystic Fibrosis Worldwide Inc. is a 501(c)(3) tax exempt organization based in Worcester, Massachussets. All donations are tax-deductible. Donors will receive a letter via email for their tax records. That made me wonder whether perhaps I could donate on that page and somehow add the correct references to attach the donation to Ed's effort. But am I going around in circles... USA people, please attempt to access the Indian and the Australian site (below). If you are all successful, I'll begin to believe the block is a one-way affair and will phone locally tomorrow trying to find some answers. The Australian Site: http://www.cysticfibrosis.org.au/ Thanks GT ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/50a0b587.7030...@taig.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Memo field repair
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012, at 06:33 PM, Ted Roche wrote: What's the current guidance on memo field repair? It depends on how mangled it is. I normally: select recno() as rec, * from bustedtable into dbf temp Then edit the structure of the damaged table, removing the memo-type fields. Then re-instate them, which will create a new, blank memo file. Then scan through the 'temp' table from above and replace the memo field contents. If it's *really* broken I see if FoxFix can do something. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1352711491.14187.140661152501693.3a14a...@webmail.messagingengine.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] 140 people die in Sao Paulo in last two weeks
You have an amazing ability to morph any comment, any fact and any information into redneck-speak. Enjoy FOUR MORE YEARS, because after that comes 8 years of Hillary Clinton. The republicans are unelectable. -Original Message- From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan Sent: Monday, 12 November 2012 6:00 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] 140 people die in Sao Paulo in last two weeks So it's better to kill yourself by hanging or by slitting your wrists than by gunshot. Gotcha. - Original Message - From: geoff data...@adam.com.au To: 'ProFox Email List' profox@leafe.com Cc: Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 1:02 AM Subject: RE: [OT] 140 people die in Sao Paulo in last two weeks The astonishing thing is the 'thats a good result!' response. The ENTIRE gun deaths figures include accidents and suicides. The figure you quote is ONLY homicide. and its only 8-10 times per capita the rate in places like UK and australia. yep... guns really keep you safe!!! -Original Message- From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan Sent: Monday, 12 November 2012 3:47 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] 140 people die in Sao Paulo in last two weeks Geoff is a slow learner. We've posted this for him over and over. From: Michael Oke, II oke...@gmail.com To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2012 11:46 PM Subject: Re: [OT] 140 people die in Sao Paulo in last two weeks 2010 numbers from the FBI says 8,775. Michael Oke, II 661-349-6221 Contents of this and all messages are intended for their designated recipient. On Nov 11, 2012, at 8:12 PM, geoff data...@adam.com.au wrote: We had this debate and Im not going to do it again. We went to your own USA official statistics to confirm. You however wanted to use NRA figures and where's the surprise that they are orders of magnitude different? -Original Message- From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Pete Theisen Sent: Monday, 12 November 2012 11:02 AM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] 140 people die in Sao Paulo in last two weeks On 11/11/2012 07:07 PM, geoff wrote: In that same period of time 2000 Americans died from gunshot. I know you don't accept it and you and Pete want to exclude this that and the other category of gun deaths but it remains true that 50,000 die each year from the wrong end of a gun. Hi Geoff, You NEVER cite your source, probably barroom rumors. When we google to find a similar figure to what you claim we find it including stuff as measles, car accidents, slips/falls and war deaths. That notwithstanding, what does Oz/Paradise do about druggies and their killings? -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ http://elect-pete-theisen.com/ [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/005501cdc0bb$4ac7ae30$e0570a90$@com.au ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: Do NOT use old FoxPro?
I have found dbc's useful as a transition stage starting with local tables local views remote views; later I found cursoradapters, which I think came too late in FoxPro evolution to be fully appreciated - as pointed out in a different post it is useful to be able to drag your data onto a form and cursoradapters will allow you to do this and then change your backend data source without breaking your forms (re-compile needed though?) AndyD 8-)# On 12/11/2012 02:35, Dan Covill wrote: On 11/11/12 07:02, AndyHC wrote: VFP is good dbf's - not dbc's - maybe I'd modify that list just a little: VFP is _still_ good dbf's - use a SQL database instead dbc's - never were any good! Dan [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/50a0c8b2.70...@hawthorncottage.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] 140 people die in Sao Paulo in last two weeks
You can't possibly earn a living with that convoluted mind. From: geoff data...@adam.com.au To: 'ProFox Email List' profox@leafe.com Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 4:51 AM Subject: RE: [OT] 140 people die in Sao Paulo in last two weeks You have an amazing ability to morph any comment, any fact and any information into redneck-speak. Enjoy FOUR MORE YEARS, because after that comes 8 years of Hillary Clinton. The republicans are unelectable. -Original Message- From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan Sent: Monday, 12 November 2012 6:00 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] 140 people die in Sao Paulo in last two weeks So it's better to kill yourself by hanging or by slitting your wrists than by gunshot. Gotcha. - Original Message - From: geoff data...@adam.com.au To: 'ProFox Email List' profox@leafe.com Cc: Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 1:02 AM Subject: RE: [OT] 140 people die in Sao Paulo in last two weeks The astonishing thing is the 'thats a good result!' response. The ENTIRE gun deaths figures include accidents and suicides. The figure you quote is ONLY homicide. and its only 8-10 times per capita the rate in places like UK and australia. yep... guns really keep you safe!!! -Original Message- From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan Sent: Monday, 12 November 2012 3:47 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] 140 people die in Sao Paulo in last two weeks Geoff is a slow learner. We've posted this for him over and over. From: Michael Oke, II oke...@gmail.com To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2012 11:46 PM Subject: Re: [OT] 140 people die in Sao Paulo in last two weeks 2010 numbers from the FBI says 8,775. Michael Oke, II 661-349-6221 Contents of this and all messages are intended for their designated recipient. On Nov 11, 2012, at 8:12 PM, geoff data...@adam.com.au wrote: We had this debate and Im not going to do it again. We went to your own USA official statistics to confirm. You however wanted to use NRA figures and where's the surprise that they are orders of magnitude different? -Original Message- From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Pete Theisen Sent: Monday, 12 November 2012 11:02 AM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] 140 people die in Sao Paulo in last two weeks On 11/11/2012 07:07 PM, geoff wrote: In that same period of time 2000 Americans died from gunshot. I know you don't accept it and you and Pete want to exclude this that and the other category of gun deaths but it remains true that 50,000 die each year from the wrong end of a gun. Hi Geoff, You NEVER cite your source, probably barroom rumors. When we google to find a similar figure to what you claim we find it including stuff as measles, car accidents, slips/falls and war deaths. That notwithstanding, what does Oz/Paradise do about druggies and their killings? -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ http://elect-pete-theisen.com/ [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/005501cdc0bb$4ac7ae30$e0570a90$@com.au ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1352719262.85723.yahoomail...@web122301.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] 140 people die in Sao Paulo in last two weeks
Wow!!! CONVOLUTED That's more than two syllables Mike, are you attending school again? Congratulations! Good for you. You'll make us all proud. El 12/11/12 08:21, Michael Madigan escribió: You can't possibly earn a living with that convoluted mind. From: geoff data...@adam.com.au To: 'ProFox Email List' profox@leafe.com Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 4:51 AM Subject: RE: [OT] 140 people die in Sao Paulo in last two weeks You have an amazing ability to morph any comment, any fact and any information into redneck-speak. Enjoy FOUR MORE YEARS, because after that comes 8 years of Hillary Clinton. The republicans are unelectable. -Original Message- From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan Sent: Monday, 12 November 2012 6:00 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] 140 people die in Sao Paulo in last two weeks So it's better to kill yourself by hanging or by slitting your wrists than by gunshot. Gotcha. - Original Message - From: geoff data...@adam.com.au To: 'ProFox Email List' profox@leafe.com Cc: Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 1:02 AM Subject: RE: [OT] 140 people die in Sao Paulo in last two weeks The astonishing thing is the 'thats a good result!' response. The ENTIRE gun deaths figures include accidents and suicides. The figure you quote is ONLY homicide. and its only 8-10 times per capita the rate in places like UK and australia. yep... guns really keep you safe!!! -Original Message- From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan Sent: Monday, 12 November 2012 3:47 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] 140 people die in Sao Paulo in last two weeks Geoff is a slow learner. We've posted this for him over and over. From: Michael Oke, II oke...@gmail.com To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2012 11:46 PM Subject: Re: [OT] 140 people die in Sao Paulo in last two weeks 2010 numbers from the FBI says 8,775. Michael Oke, II 661-349-6221 Contents of this and all messages are intended for their designated recipient. On Nov 11, 2012, at 8:12 PM, geoff data...@adam.com.au wrote: We had this debate and Im not going to do it again. We went to your own USA official statistics to confirm. You however wanted to use NRA figures and where's the surprise that they are orders of magnitude different? ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/50a0e0fc.40...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [ADMIN] Want to help?
GaryT g...@taig.net wrote: On 10/11/12 02:49, AndyHC wrote: no can do from here - it just times out AndyD 8-)# in Goa snip No luck from Australia either, Andy. I tried many times, first when Ed posted the original message and again I was able to reach the Australian site. The link Ed have redirects to this for me. Perhaps this link will work better for you. http://www.cff.org/LWC/dsp_donationPage.cfm?idEvent=21008idUser=599885 -- Tracy ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/2825451d-ffa1-491f-b0a7-05b7b08cd...@email.android.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
SHA256 hash WITHOUT using VFPEncryption.FLL
Hi Does anybody have any idea on how I can create a SHA256 hash from a string without using Craig Boyd's VFPEncryption.FLL? I am hesitant to use the FLL because it exposes methods whose name could be the same as other functions or procedures. Many thanks Paul Newton --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/9a8106afb0ef9b44b69045c4448935a20a8...@ukfawexmbx1.infor.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [ADMIN] Want to help?
Tracy Pearson tr...@powerchurch.com wrote: GaryT g...@taig.net wrote: On 10/11/12 02:49, AndyHC wrote: no can do from here - it just times out AndyD 8-)# in Goa snip No luck from Australia either, Andy. I tried many times, first when Ed posted the original message and again I was able to reach the Australian site. The link Ed have redirects to this for me. Perhaps this link will work better for you. http://www.cff.org/LWC/dsp_donationPage.cfm?idEvent=21008idUser=599885 -- Tracy [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/6c12077d-a305-4084-96ab-dd7a1d4d6...@email.android.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: SHA256 hash WITHOUT using VFPEncryption.FLL
Does anybody have any idea on how I can create a SHA256 hash from a string without using Craig Boyd's VFPEncryption.FLL? You might find some ideas on the news2news site about leveraging the Windows Crypto API. Don't think there's a native VFP version around unfortunately ... ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1352725212.32084.140661152574709.543b2...@webmail.messagingengine.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [ADMIN] Want to help?
Tracey, that link is simply another page on the same web site. I get blocked at the cff.org stage. Looks to me like the blocking might be all one way. Were you able to access the Indian web site? GT On 12/11/12 23:39, Tracy Pearson wrote: GaryT g...@taig.net wrote: On 10/11/12 02:49, AndyHC wrote: no can do from here - it just times out AndyD 8-)# in Goa snip No luck from Australia either, Andy. I tried many times, first when Ed posted the original message and again I was able to reach the Australian site. The link Ed have redirects to this for me. Perhaps this link will work better for you. http://www.cff.org/LWC/dsp_donationPage.cfm?idEvent=21008idUser=599885 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/50a0f36e.3050...@taig.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: SHA256 hash WITHOUT using VFPEncryption.FLL
Thanks Alan - unfortunately I am not a member and you need to be a member to access a lot of the good stuff ... Paul -Original Message- From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Alan Bourke Sent: 12 November 2012 13:00 To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Re: SHA256 hash WITHOUT using VFPEncryption.FLL Does anybody have any idea on how I can create a SHA256 hash from a string without using Craig Boyd's VFPEncryption.FLL? You might find some ideas on the news2news site about leveraging the Windows Crypto API. Don't think there's a native VFP version around unfortunately ... ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/9a8106afb0ef9b44b69045c4448935a20a8...@ukfawexmbx1.infor.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: SHA256 hash WITHOUT using VFPEncryption.FLL
Paul Newton paul.new...@pegasus.co.uk wrote: Hi Does anybody have any idea on how I can create a SHA256 hash from a string without using Craig Boyd's VFPEncryption.FLL? I am hesitant to use the FLL because it exposes methods whose name could be the same as other functions or procedures. Many thanks Paul Newton Paul, You can unload the library after you make your call into it. Set Library to vfpencryption.fll Sha256 Set library to If you already use other libraries grab the loaded list with set(library) to restore them back. -- Tracy ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/ae21793a-5dca-4f02-9bb0-0f518c127...@email.android.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: SHA256 hash WITHOUT using VFPEncryption.FLL
Thanks Tracy I will consider that as a possibility. No need to restore other libraries if you use Release Library vfpencryption.fll instead of Set Library To Paul -Original Message- From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Tracy Pearson Sent: 12 November 2012 13:16 To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Re: SHA256 hash WITHOUT using VFPEncryption.FLL Paul Newton paul.new...@pegasus.co.uk wrote: Hi Does anybody have any idea on how I can create a SHA256 hash from a string without using Craig Boyd's VFPEncryption.FLL? I am hesitant to use the FLL because it exposes methods whose name could be the same as other functions or procedures. Many thanks Paul Newton Paul, You can unload the library after you make your call into it. Set Library to vfpencryption.fll Sha256 Set library to If you already use other libraries grab the loaded list with set(library) to restore them back. -- Tracy [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/9a8106afb0ef9b44b69045c4448935a20a8...@ukfawexmbx1.infor.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: SHA256 hash WITHOUT using VFPEncryption.FLL
Many thanks Paul - I will give that a try -Original Message- From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Paul Hill Sent: 12 November 2012 13:18 To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Re: SHA256 hash WITHOUT using VFPEncryption.FLL LMGTFY :-) http://jammox.co.uk/server/snippets.php?sn=fox3 On 12 November 2012 12:42, Paul Newton paul.new...@pegasus.co.uk wrote: Hi Does anybody have any idea on how I can create a SHA256 hash from a string without using Craig Boyd's VFPEncryption.FLL? I am hesitant to use the FLL because it exposes methods whose name could be the same as other functions or procedures. Many thanks Paul Newton -- Paul --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/9a8106afb0ef9b44b69045c4448935a20a8...@ukfawexmbx1.infor.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: SHA256 hash WITHOUT using VFPEncryption.FLL
Paul Newton paul.new...@pegasus.co.uk wrote: Thanks Tracy I will consider that as a possibility. No need to restore other libraries if you use Release Library vfpencryption.fll instead of Set Library To Paul I don't remember every function all the time. -- Tracy ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/40d6459f-0347-41ea-ba33-961054f17...@email.android.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: SHA256 hash WITHOUT using VFPEncryption.FLL
Just tested that out and compared it with using HASH in VFPEncryption Scanned a table of 10,000 employee records and calculated the hash for forenames+surname Hash took just over 0.1 seconds SHA256.Encode took just over 38 seconds I suppose that was to be expected and it might even be acceptable Paul Newton -Original Message- From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Paul Hill Sent: 12 November 2012 13:18 To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Re: SHA256 hash WITHOUT using VFPEncryption.FLL LMGTFY :-) http://jammox.co.uk/server/snippets.php?sn=fox3 On 12 November 2012 12:42, Paul Newton paul.new...@pegasus.co.uk wrote: Hi Does anybody have any idea on how I can create a SHA256 hash from a string without using Craig Boyd's VFPEncryption.FLL? I am hesitant to use the FLL because it exposes methods whose name could be the same as other functions or procedures. Many thanks Paul Newton -- Paul --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/9a8106afb0ef9b44b69045c4448935a20a8...@ukfawexmbx1.infor.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: The - VFP is Old Tech Complaint...
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012, at 07:02 PM, Kurt @ VR-FX wrote: However, is there any other Ammo that I can use in my arguments to convince the guy that its STILL a Viable Tech??? COBOL has been around since, what, 1960-something, and In 1997, the Gartner Group reported that 80% of the world's business ran on COBOL with over 200 billion lines of code in existence and with an estimated 5 billion lines of new code annually. So old tech does not necessarily equate to bad idea. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1352729791.16900.140661152600373.2122b...@webmail.messagingengine.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[OT] Obama won't save the working class or the Jersey Shore
Hi Everybody, http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2012/11/201211692437285102.html yesterday he was hugging Obama and thanking him for his policies, even as so many of the things for which he expressed thanks - regulating Wall Street, keeping Americans safe, fighting the increasing disparities in wealth - are things Obama simply has not done. -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ http://elect-pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/50a10b37.8080...@verizon.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: The - VFP is Old Tech Complaint...
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Kurt @ VR-FX v...@optonline.net wrote: Hey Mike, Thanks for the input. I shall try and consider SQL as a backend for the system. Especially since I know so many people here on this mailing list has done Exactly that - using SQL. However, to be truthful - I have very little experience with doing something like that. Also, I've done the Visual type screen design - where I drop one or more DBF's into the Env. on a Form - which allows me to easily do DragDrop to layout the screen design. I suspect that with an SQL backend - you can't do that at all... I'd STRONGLY suggest you take advantage of some of your free time to get familiar with VFP and its Client-Server (C/S) solutions. There's SQL Pass-Through (SPT), Remote Views and cursoradaptors. All three technologies have strengths and weaknesses, and the best systems I've worked on have a combination of them. And with remote views, you can do visual design pretty similarly to what you are used to. When all you own is a hammer, everything looks like a nail. In my last years of pushing VFP solutions, I was a big fan of the idea that a VFP C/S app could be one of several front ends. VFP is awesome for heads-down data entry, rich desktop applications, grids, drag-and-drop and so forth. A second or third app could also access the same data: Excel for bean-counter what-ifs, a web-based app for salesmen on the road to do price lookups, etc. For the past decade, I've specialized in web apps using PHP and Ruby/Rails, mostly with MySQL backends, but with a smattering of SQLite, Postgres, Ingres and even SQL Server (under protest, of course). I have been AMAZED at the range of tools out there and the cool things you can do. If you're serious about being in this business for the long term, you owe it to yourself to always be learning new stuff. It's the cost of doing business. --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cacw6n4vd44racwgdripwpztnvjarynsa3vkzgcrfqze6f8t...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: The - VFP is Old Tech Complaint...
On Nov 12, 2012, at 8:16 AM, Alan Bourke alanpbou...@fastmail.fm wrote: COBOL has been around since, what, 1960-something, and In 1997, the Gartner Group reported that 80% of the world's business ran on COBOL with over 200 billion lines of code in existence and with an estimated 5 billion lines of new code annually. So old tech does not necessarily equate to bad idea. If the question posed was whether to get rid of an existing VFP app simply because it is old tech, I would agree with this 100%. Unlike humans, older tech tends to run faster and more reliably as time progresses. However, if the question was what technology to use to develop a new application, I think the answer for both COBOL and VFP should be the same: absolutely not. There are many alternatives that can do the job as well or better, and they will be much more supportable in the long run. There are precious few new developers entering either of those languages these days, and the only reason I can see for a consultant to recommend either is to line their own pockets, as there is no way that such a choice for new development could ever be in the best interest of the client. Sorry if that sounds harsh, but that's the way that this industry works. If you're not willing to learn new stuff, you really should find another line of work. -- Ed Leafe ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/52af40df-a40d-44d5-9451-3af409d8b...@rackspace.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win
It is Obama legal team (Holder) who have blocked voter ID which is the main problem for corruption in Florida. Nick Geti - Original Message - From: geoff data...@adam.com.au To: 'ProFox Email List' profox@leafe.com Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2012 4:00 PM Subject: RE: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win Doesnt anyone else find it astonishing that the american voting system is so corrupt and such a shambles? What is needed is FEDERAL over-riding legislation to set up a single electoral body responsible to running every election and setting up effective and non-fraudulent systems like those run in most of the rest of the world. The degree of fraud and corruption is only overshadowed by the incompetence. But no one in govt seems overly concerned that the voting results are inaccurate and fraudulent as long as they got elected. Your elections are a joke. Paul ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/5AD7CE3DC416476DB6FA32B3920E2885@dual ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win
You keep forgetting that your beloved leader and his sidekick, Holder, are the ones who are blocking voter ID tooth and nail. So, how can you expect Florida to implement this kind of system? The Democrats in Florida like it this way. Nick Geti - Original Message - From: lelandj lela...@mail.smvfp.com To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2012 4:18 PM Subject: Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win On 11/11/2012 02:32 PM, Paul Hill wrote: On 11 November 2012 19:15, lelandj lela...@mail.smvfp.com wrote: Just off the top of my head, an internal control might work something like this. The starting point in a voter casting a ballot is registering to vote. Because many people have the same name, at the time a person registers to vote, they could be issued a unique ID number. In order for the voter to receive a ballot, when they go to vote, they could be required to present their unique ID number. This number could be check, and if its valid, and has not already been used, the voter could receive a ballot. You just described the voting system as used by half the world! Here in the UK I receive a card in the post which I take down to vote. It can only be used once and only at one place (normally a local school, in my case the local judo club). The alternative is the system used in India. The voter dips his/her finger in a strong dye. If you have a blue finger you can't vote! I don't know why this type system is not more prevalent in the USA. In this type of system a lot of the work like showing photo ID, etc could be done during registration, and then all a voter need do to vote is appear with their registration, which contained their unique ID. This would eliminate the problem of more votes being cast than registrations on record. LOL It could also be used to track the voter from the point of registration to the point of where the vote is cast. It could also be used to back track to a voter, should irregularities arise. Regards, LelandJ [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/757FFD898395452193062D5DDE76058B@dual ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win
In Connecticut one has to show a drivers license with a photo ID on it. No one complains about disenfranchising here about that. We also use a paper ballot containing for each candidate a circle that one darkens with a special pen. It is very fast and can be recounted if necessary. The problem with Florida is that the Republican West lost because of this faulty voting but the Democrats wanted to win so that is why they like it. Nick Geti - Original Message - From: Michael Oke, II oke...@gmail.com To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2012 4:39 PM Subject: Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win And again I tell you that anything of this nature is being bashed as harmful. It would disenfranchise certain voters. I personally have no issue with something of this nature being instituted but that would probably require federal intervention. Michael Oke, II 661-349-6221 Contents of this and all messages are intended for their designated recipient. On Nov 11, 2012, at 1:33 PM, lelandj lela...@mail.smvfp.com wrote: On 11/11/2012 02:29 PM, Michael Oke wrote: Voter identification of that sort is being fought tooth and nail by certain sectors of the current political regimes. I'm talking about an internal control where a voter would provide proof of eligibility to vote at the point of registration, and receive a unique ID. From this point the voter could be tracked through the system, much like UPS tracks a package from it point of origin to point of delivery. This system would eliminate the problem of more votes being cast than registered voters on record, or significantly less votes being cast than registered voters on record, and provide a back tracking mechanism should anyone try to use a unique ID more than once. Regards, LelandJ Michael Oke, II 661-349-6221 Contents of this and all messages are intended for their designated recipient. On Nov 11, 2012, at 11:15 AM, lelandj lela...@mail.smvfp.com wrote: On 11/11/2012 12:25 PM, Pete Theisen wrote: On 11/11/2012 01:10 PM, lelandj wrote: http://watchdogwire.com/florida/2012/11/10/massive-voter-fraud-in-st-lucie-county-florida-141-turnout/ official St Lucie County, FL 2012 election results. Only one precinct had less than 113% turnout. The unofficial vote count is 175,554 registered voters 247,713 vote cards cast (141.10% ). The National SEAL Museum, a St. Lucie county polling place, had 158.85% voter turn out, the highest in the county. How would Texas cope with that? Florida should engage one of the big four accounting firms to perform an operational audit of the current system, and make recommendation Hi Leland, How would the auditors identify the fraudulent ballots? THAT is what has to be done! Just off the top of my head, an internal control might work something like this. The starting point in a voter casting a ballot is registering to vote. Because many people have the same name, at the time a person registers to vote, they could be issued a unique ID number. In order for the voter to receive a ballot, when they go to vote, they could be required to present their unique ID number. This number could be check, and if its valid, and has not already been used, the voter could receive a ballot. If the system is automated the voter could be required to enter his unique ID to cast a vote. The voting machine would check to see if the unique ID number had not already been used within a statewide voting system; before, accepting the voters input. This kind of system would need strong security to protect the voters privacy. Without some kind of internal control in place, such as the example I provided above, it may not be possible to identify fraudulent votes. Regards, LelandJ [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/FF71BCEF836E4089A287B49E12A27826@dual ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win
You shouldn't have any problems understanding why. Just read my previous comments. It is not difficult. Nick Geti - Original Message - From: lelandj lela...@mail.smvfp.com To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2012 4:53 PM Subject: Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win OK, I just looked at my Texas Voter Registration Certificate and it has a UVID number of 1056035183 in my case. I do not understand Florida having such a hard time with its system. LOL It could be a lack of internal control, non-compliance with the current system in place, a lack of education of those managing the voting locations, willful manipulate of the results, LOL, who know what else. What I do know is any system with a lack of internal controls cannot be audited. Regards, LelandJ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/00302A3BEB644FABB2B53FBC12051985@dual ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: The - VFP is Old Tech Complaint...
I'd say MySQL or PostgreSQL would sell better than Access as both of those are certainly not going away any time soon...better bet with those over Access for a multitude of reasons! I said Access for the front end, not the DB backend I don't like it because I'm used to and spoiled by VFP all those years, but Access should be fine for user interface work. And they've at prolly heard of it... -- Matt Jarvis Eugene, Oregon USA ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAPT54raX=1vpt5au4pdarzwxr6n1tcekospxyeorgh_refw...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win
On 11/12/2012 11:27 AM, Nicholas Geti wrote: Hi Nick, Leland, I suspect a double standard here in Florida. When I vote they want picture ID with my signature on it. If a counter/race/culture person shows up driving alone with only a learner's permit because he/she lost his/her license he/she gets to vote the same as I do. I know that because one of my old buddies worked the election last week and had one like that. Multiply that one by everyone working the election. But the 141% turn out was probably an inside job. Someone working the election got one of the ballot forms and reproduced it with the right votes on it. Then he/she ran it into the computer as many times as necessary when no one was looking. You shouldn't have any problems understanding why. Just read my previous comments. It is not difficult. Nick Geti OK, I just looked at my Texas Voter Registration Certificate and it has a UVID number of 1056035183 in my case. I do not understand Florida having such a hard time with its system. LOL It could be a lack of internal control, non-compliance with the current system in place, a lack of education of those managing the voting locations, willful manipulate of the results, LOL, who know what else. What I do know is any system with a lack of internal controls cannot be audited. -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ http://elect-pete-theisen.com/ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/50a12b82.9040...@verizon.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: The - VFP is Old Tech Complaint...
On 11/12/2012 11:56 AM, M Jarvis wrote: I'd say MySQL or PostgreSQL would sell better than Access as both of those are certainly not going away any time soon...better bet with those over Access for a multitude of reasons! I said Access for the front end, not the DB backend I don't like it because I'm used to and spoiled by VFP all those years, but Access should be fine for user interface work. And they've at prolly heard of it... Gotcha... -- Mike Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC President, Chief Software Architect http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com http://twitter.com/mbabcock16 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/50a13198.2040...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [ADMIN] Want to help?
I think mine got through this time. Thanks again, Ed! -- Mike Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC President, Chief Software Architect http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com http://fabmate.com http://twitter.com/mbabcock16 ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/50a13567.6040...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
VFP vs.NET, et. al.
Ed, I agree with you with regard to new apps. My arguments go to a percentage of existing apps where there is no good business argument to be made to change languages now. We do conversions to .NET and, in a limited number of cases, to Microsoft Access with a SQL backend. With regard to learning new skills, agree 100%. Wes Wes Wilson, President ERW Custom Programming, Inc. Crescent Lake Plaza 5459 Elizabeth Lake Rd. Waterford, MI 48327 (248) 683-4182 http://www.erw.com/ weswil...@erw.com www.visualfoxprohelpwanted.com/VFPHelpWantedShortForm.php From: profox-requ...@leafe.com profox-requ...@leafe.com To: profox@leafe.com Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 11:56 AM Subject: ProFox Digest, Vol 115, Issue 44 - Forwarded Message - Send ProFox mailing list submissions to profox@leafe.com To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to profox-requ...@leafe.com You can reach the person managing the list at profox-ow...@leafe.com When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than Re: Contents of ProFox digest... Today's Topics: 1. RE: SHA256 hash WITHOUT using VFPEncryption.FLL (Paul Newton) 2. Re: SHA256 hash WITHOUT using VFPEncryption.FLL (Tracy Pearson) 3. Re: SHA256 hash WITHOUT using VFPEncryption.FLL (Paul Hill) 4. RE: SHA256 hash WITHOUT using VFPEncryption.FLL (Paul Newton) 5. RE: SHA256 hash WITHOUT using VFPEncryption.FLL (Paul Newton) 6. RE: SHA256 hash WITHOUT using VFPEncryption.FLL (Tracy Pearson) 7. RE: SHA256 hash WITHOUT using VFPEncryption.FLL (Paul Newton) 8. Re: The - VFP is Old Tech Complaint... (Alan Bourke) 9. [OT] Obama won't save the working class or the Jersey Shore (Pete Theisen) 10. Re: The - VFP is Old Tech Complaint... (Ted Roche) 11. Re: The - VFP is Old Tech Complaint... (Ed Leafe) 12. Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win (Nicholas Geti) 13. Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win (Nicholas Geti) 14. Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win (Nicholas Geti) 15. Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win (Nicholas Geti) 16. Re: The - VFP is Old Tech Complaint... (M Jarvis) Thanks Alan - unfortunately I am not a member and you need to be a member to access a lot of the good stuff ... Paul -Original Message- From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Alan Bourke Sent: 12 November 2012 13:00 To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Re: SHA256 hash WITHOUT using VFPEncryption.FLL Does anybody have any idea on how I can create a SHA256 hash from a string without using Craig Boyd's VFPEncryption.FLL? You might find some ideas on the news2news site about leveraging the Windows Crypto API. Don't think there's a native VFP version around unfortunately ... Paul Newton paul.new...@pegasus.co.uk wrote: Hi Does anybody have any idea on how I can create a SHA256 hash from a string without using Craig Boyd's VFPEncryption.FLL? I am hesitant to use the FLL because it exposes methods whose name could be the same as other functions or procedures. Many thanks Paul Newton Paul, You can unload the library after you make your call into it. Set Library to vfpencryption.fll Sha256 Set library to If you already use other libraries grab the loaded list with set(library) to restore them back. -- Tracy LMGTFY :-) http://jammox.co.uk/server/snippets.php?sn=fox3 On 12 November 2012 12:42, Paul Newton paul.new...@pegasus.co.uk wrote: Hi Does anybody have any idea on how I can create a SHA256 hash from a string without using Craig Boyd's VFPEncryption.FLL? I am hesitant to use the FLL because it exposes methods whose name could be the same as other functions or procedures. Many thanks Paul Newton -- Paul --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- Thanks Tracy I will consider that as a possibility. No need to restore other libraries if you use Release Library vfpencryption.fll instead of Set Library To Paul -Original Message- From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Tracy Pearson Sent: 12 November 2012 13:16 To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Re: SHA256 hash WITHOUT using VFPEncryption.FLL Paul Newton paul.new...@pegasus.co.uk wrote: Hi Does anybody have any idea on how I can create a SHA256 hash from a string without using Craig Boyd's VFPEncryption.FLL? I am hesitant to use the FLL because it exposes methods whose name could be the same as other functions or procedures. Many thanks Paul Newton Paul, You can unload the library after you make your call into it. Set Library to vfpencryption.fll Sha256 Set library to If you already use other libraries grab the loaded list with set(library) to restore them back. -- Tracy [excessive
Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win
On 11/12/2012 10:25 AM, Nicholas Geti wrote: In Connecticut one has to show a drivers license with a photo ID on it. There are many individual that are qualified to vote, that don't have a driver license. A better system would be to key on a unique Voter ID, that is issued during registration; after, the individual is scrutinized to ensure eligibility. No one complains about disenfranchising here about that. We also use a paper ballot containing for each candidate a circle that one darkens with a special pen. It is very fast and can be recounted if necessary. If the individual qualifies during registration, it should not be necessary for the individual to show their registration papers at the registrar table and have the registrar look them up in paper list of registered voters. If the individual's registration certificate contained the voter ID in both regular number format, and bar code format, the individual could proceed immediately to the voting both, where his voting certificate would be scanned. The voting machines at each voting location could be networked together to check that the individual's voter id was valid and not previously used. If so, the voting machine could unlock a touch screen to allow the individual to vote. This kind of system could be used to let the system gradually transition to the internet, when the internet is ready to handle such a critical system. Then the individual could comfortable vote by connecting to the internet from anywhere and casting his vote from his computer, notebook, tablet, laptop, etc. Regards, LelandJ The problem with Florida is that the Republican West lost because of this faulty voting but the Democrats wanted to win so that is why they like it. Nick Geti - Original Message - From: Michael Oke, II oke...@gmail.com To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2012 4:39 PM Subject: Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win And again I tell you that anything of this nature is being bashed as harmful. It would disenfranchise certain voters. I personally have no issue with something of this nature being instituted but that would probably require federal intervention. Michael Oke, II 661-349-6221 Contents of this and all messages are intended for their designated recipient. On Nov 11, 2012, at 1:33 PM, lelandj lela...@mail.smvfp.com wrote: On 11/11/2012 02:29 PM, Michael Oke wrote: Voter identification of that sort is being fought tooth and nail by certain sectors of the current political regimes. I'm talking about an internal control where a voter would provide proof of eligibility to vote at the point of registration, and receive a unique ID. From this point the voter could be tracked through the system, much like UPS tracks a package from it point of origin to point of delivery. This system would eliminate the problem of more votes being cast than registered voters on record, or significantly less votes being cast than registered voters on record, and provide a back tracking mechanism should anyone try to use a unique ID more than once. Regards, LelandJ Michael Oke, II 661-349-6221 Contents of this and all messages are intended for their designated recipient. On Nov 11, 2012, at 11:15 AM, lelandj lela...@mail.smvfp.com wrote: On 11/11/2012 12:25 PM, Pete Theisen wrote: On 11/11/2012 01:10 PM, lelandj wrote: http://watchdogwire.com/florida/2012/11/10/massive-voter-fraud-in-st-lucie-county-florida-141-turnout/ official St Lucie County, FL 2012 election results. Only one precinct had less than 113% turnout. The unofficial vote count is 175,554 registered voters 247,713 vote cards cast (141.10% ). The National SEAL Museum, a St. Lucie county polling place, had 158.85% voter turn out, the highest in the county. How would Texas cope with that? Florida should engage one of the big four accounting firms to perform an operational audit of the current system, and make recommendation Hi Leland, How would the auditors identify the fraudulent ballots? THAT is what has to be done! Just off the top of my head, an internal control might work something like this. The starting point in a voter casting a ballot is registering to vote. Because many people have the same name, at the time a person registers to vote, they could be issued a unique ID number. In order for the voter to receive a ballot, when they go to vote, they could be required to present their unique ID number. This number could be check, and if its valid, and has not already been used, the voter could receive a ballot. If the system is automated the voter could be required to enter his unique ID to cast a vote. The voting machine would check to see if the unique ID number had not already been used within a statewide voting system; before, accepting the voters input. This kind of system would need strong security to protect the voters privacy. Without some kind
Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win
On 11/12/2012 11:01 AM, Pete Theisen wrote: On 11/12/2012 11:27 AM, Nicholas Geti wrote: Hi Nick, Leland, I suspect a double standard here in Florida. When I vote they want picture ID with my signature on it. If a counter/race/culture person shows up driving alone with only a learner's permit because he/she lost his/her license he/she gets to vote the same as I do. I know that because one of my old buddies worked the election last week and had one like that. Multiply that one by everyone working the election. But the 141% turn out was probably an inside job. Someone working the election got one of the ballot forms and reproduced it with the right votes on it. Then he/she ran it into the computer as many times as necessary when no one was looking. Pete, probably all the illegal ballot were votes for Congressman Allen west, but not in numbers enough to put him in the winner's circle. LOL Republican Congressman West should concede to newcomer Patrick Murph, and let the country move forward. http://www.examiner.com/article/fl-election-2012-update-allen-west-loses-won-t-concede-awaits-limited-recount Regards, LelandJ You shouldn't have any problems understanding why. Just read my previous comments. It is not difficult. Nick Geti OK, I just looked at my Texas Voter Registration Certificate and it has a UVID number of 1056035183 in my case. I do not understand Florida having such a hard time with its system. LOL It could be a lack of internal control, non-compliance with the current system in place, a lack of education of those managing the voting locations, willful manipulate of the results, LOL, who know what else. What I do know is any system with a lack of internal controls cannot be audited. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/50a1469a.4030...@mail.smvfp.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win
On 11/12/2012 12:41 PM, Stephen Russell wrote: On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 12:14 PM, lelandj lela...@mail.smvfp.com wrote: On 11/12/2012 10:25 AM, Nicholas Geti wrote: In Connecticut one has to show a drivers license with a photo ID on it. There are many individual that are qualified to vote, that don't have a driver license. A better system would be to key on a unique Voter ID, that is issued during registration; after, the individual is scrutinized to ensure eligibility. - Why not get finger prints over the next set of elections? I works on my laptop very well. Yeah, now you're getting the idea. Anyway, I had though about having the voting machine scan the voter's thumb print, rather than requiring an electronic signature. Anyway, the internet may not yet be ready to handle a voting system. For example, a company like Microsoft might require all its employees to report to a area, where they would be required to cast votes for Republican candidates, while being observed by management. Anyone not casting his/her vote for Repulican candidates, would be immediately terminated. LOL http://www.technologyreview.com/news/506741/why-you-cant-vote-online/ Regards, LelandJ Also take images from drivers licence because that use to work on my other laptop . ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/50a14cd2.4040...@mail.smvfp.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win
On 11/12/2012 01:34 PM, Stephen Russell wrote: On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 1:24 PM, lelandj lela...@mail.smvfp.com wrote: Why not get finger prints over the next set of elections? I works on my laptop very well. Yeah, now you're getting the idea. Anyway, I had though about having the voting machine scan the voter's thumb print, rather than requiring an electronic signature. -- This is just to identify yourself at the voting location. No internet vote at all. Purely a check in procedure. You've got my vote for it. Regards, LelandJ ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/50a150d7.6010...@mail.smvfp.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
[NF] John McAfee wanted for murder
He's been murdering my CPU performance for years. http://gizmodo.com/5959812/john-mcafee-wanted-for-murder --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1352749579.43110.yahoomail...@web122304.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [NF] John McAfee wanted for murder
Its hard to believe that is the same person that started McAfee SW! But, I gotta say - my favorite user comment was: So basically the main thing MDPV has in common with McAfee products is if you shove both in your ass they'll probably work better. :-) -K- On 11/12/2012 2:46 PM, Michael Madigan wrote: He's been murdering my CPU performance for years. http://gizmodo.com/5959812/john-mcafee-wanted-for-murder ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/50a1552e.30...@optonline.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [NF] John McAfee wanted for murder
Wow! What a wild story... -- rk -Original Message- From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 2:46 PM To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: [NF] John McAfee wanted for murder He's been murdering my CPU performance for years. http://gizmodo.com/5959812/john-mcafee-wanted-for-murder ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/DF1EEF11E586A64FB54A97F22A8BD0442179E13EAA@ACKBWDDQH1.artfact.local ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win
You are totally ignoring the important fact that Obama and crew do not want voter ID. No how, no way. So why are you pounding on ways to prevent voter fraud? Nick Geti. - Original Message - From: lelandj lela...@mail.smvfp.com To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 1:14 PM Subject: Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win On 11/12/2012 10:25 AM, Nicholas Geti wrote: In Connecticut one has to show a drivers license with a photo ID on it. There are many individual that are qualified to vote, that don't have a driver license. A better system would be to key on a unique Voter ID, that is issued during registration; after, the individual is scrutinized to ensure eligibility. No one complains about disenfranchising here about that. We also use a paper ballot containing for each candidate a circle that one darkens with a special pen. It is very fast and can be recounted if necessary. If the individual qualifies during registration, it should not be necessary for the individual to show their registration papers at the registrar table and have the registrar look them up in paper list of registered voters. If the individual's registration certificate contained the voter ID in both regular number format, and bar code format, the individual could proceed immediately to the voting both, where his voting certificate would be scanned. The voting machines at each voting location could be networked together to check that the individual's voter id was valid and not previously used. If so, the voting machine could unlock a touch screen to allow the individual to vote. This kind of system could be used to let the system gradually transition to the internet, when the internet is ready to handle such a critical system. Then the individual could comfortable vote by connecting to the internet from anywhere and casting his vote from his computer, notebook, tablet, laptop, etc. Regards, LelandJ . ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/F547B9BE177041E1BB2EB5CDD3CE92BC@dual ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [ADMIN] Want to help?
Phew glad it wasn't just me in Australia that had problems. I tried all weekend too, but no luck. If anyone figures this out - let me know where to go and donate ok Christina Bull www.datahouse.com.au -Original Message- From: GaryT [mailto:g...@taig.net] Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 7:39 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Want to help? On 10/11/12 02:49, AndyHC wrote: no can do from here - it just times out AndyD 8-)# in Goa snip No luck from Australia either, Andy. I tried many times, first when Ed posted the original message and again on the weekend; timed out each time. FireFox on Ubuntu 10.04. Today I asked wife and one daughter to attempt access from work computers, all Windows, neither successful. We also failed to get a response using the iPhone. This afternoon I searched locally and found there was one CFF web site for each Australian State. Tried to phone but it was right on 5.00pm, call went to messagebank. Daughter suggests CFF probably have a world wide agreement - to block access from callers in other countries. To save someone donating to an overseas group when they meant to cash to go locally. So, I explored further. Attempted to access CFF India. (ref: AndyHC - Goa) Found this page http://www.cfww.org/pub/english/cfwnl/7/617/Cystic_Fibrosis_in_India That seems to knock Carolyn's idea on the head. Especially since I was able to access the DONATE page attached to that one. However, at the bottom of that (Indian) page I find the following note. * Cystic Fibrosis Worldwide Inc. is a 501(c)(3) tax exempt organization based in Worcester, Massachussets. All donations are tax-deductible. Donors will receive a letter via email for their tax records. That made me wonder whether perhaps I could donate on that page and somehow add the correct references to attach the donation to Ed's effort. But am I going around in circles... USA people, please attempt to access the Indian and the Australian site (below). If you are all successful, I'll begin to believe the block is a one-way affair and will phone locally tomorrow trying to find some answers. The Australian Site: http://www.cysticfibrosis.org.au/ Thanks GT ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/011001cdc112$297be550$7c73aff0$@datahouse.com.au ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [ADMIN] Want to help?
That's the one! Worked for me and donated this morning (AU time) -Original Message- From: Tracy Pearson [mailto:tr...@powerchurch.com] Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 11:40 PM To: profox@leafe.com Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Want to help? I was able to reach the Australian site. The link Ed have redirects to this for me. Perhaps this link will work better for you. http://www.cff.org/LWC/dsp_donationPage.cfm?idEvent=21008idUser=599885 -- Tracy ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/011101cdc112$c3eca390$4bc5eab0$@datahouse.com.au ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win
On 11/12/2012 01:44 PM, Nicholas Geti wrote: You are totally ignoring the important fact that Obama and crew do not want voter ID. No how, no way. So why are you pounding on ways to prevent voter fraud? Because Florida needs help. http://articles.latimes.com/2012/nov/07/nation/la-na-florida-20121108 Regards, LelandJ Nick Geti. - Original Message - From: lelandj lela...@mail.smvfp.com To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 1:14 PM Subject: Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win On 11/12/2012 10:25 AM, Nicholas Geti wrote: In Connecticut one has to show a drivers license with a photo ID on it. There are many individual that are qualified to vote, that don't have a driver license. A better system would be to key on a unique Voter ID, that is issued during registration; after, the individual is scrutinized to ensure eligibility. No one complains about disenfranchising here about that. We also use a paper ballot containing for each candidate a circle that one darkens with a special pen. It is very fast and can be recounted if necessary. If the individual qualifies during registration, it should not be necessary for the individual to show their registration papers at the registrar table and have the registrar look them up in paper list of registered voters. If the individual's registration certificate contained the voter ID in both regular number format, and bar code format, the individual could proceed immediately to the voting both, where his voting certificate would be scanned. The voting machines at each voting location could be networked together to check that the individual's voter id was valid and not previously used. If so, the voting machine could unlock a touch screen to allow the individual to vote. This kind of system could be used to let the system gradually transition to the internet, when the internet is ready to handle such a critical system. Then the individual could comfortable vote by connecting to the internet from anywhere and casting his vote from his computer, notebook, tablet, laptop, etc. Regards, LelandJ . [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/50a15e89.2040...@mail.smvfp.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] 140 people die in Sao Paulo in last two weeks
How is your wife, the llama, doing? From: Ricardo Aráoz ricar...@gmail.com To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 6:43 AM Subject: Re: [OT] 140 people die in Sao Paulo in last two weeks Wow!!! CONVOLUTED That's more than two syllables Mike, are you attending school again? Congratulations! Good for you. You'll make us all proud. El 12/11/12 08:21, Michael Madigan escribió: You can't possibly earn a living with that convoluted mind. From: geoff data...@adam.com.au To: 'ProFox Email List' profox@leafe.com Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 4:51 AM Subject: RE: [OT] 140 people die in Sao Paulo in last two weeks You have an amazing ability to morph any comment, any fact and any information into redneck-speak. Enjoy FOUR MORE YEARS, because after that comes 8 years of Hillary Clinton. The republicans are unelectable. -Original Message- From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan Sent: Monday, 12 November 2012 6:00 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] 140 people die in Sao Paulo in last two weeks So it's better to kill yourself by hanging or by slitting your wrists than by gunshot. Gotcha. - Original Message - From: geoff data...@adam.com.au To: 'ProFox Email List' profox@leafe.com Cc: Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 1:02 AM Subject: RE: [OT] 140 people die in Sao Paulo in last two weeks The astonishing thing is the 'thats a good result!' response. The ENTIRE gun deaths figures include accidents and suicides. The figure you quote is ONLY homicide. and its only 8-10 times per capita the rate in places like UK and australia. yep... guns really keep you safe!!! -Original Message- From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan Sent: Monday, 12 November 2012 3:47 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] 140 people die in Sao Paulo in last two weeks Geoff is a slow learner. We've posted this for him over and over. From: Michael Oke, II oke...@gmail.com To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2012 11:46 PM Subject: Re: [OT] 140 people die in Sao Paulo in last two weeks 2010 numbers from the FBI says 8,775. Michael Oke, II 661-349-6221 Contents of this and all messages are intended for their designated recipient. On Nov 11, 2012, at 8:12 PM, geoff data...@adam.com.au wrote: We had this debate and Im not going to do it again. We went to your own USA official statistics to confirm. You however wanted to use NRA figures and where's the surprise that they are orders of magnitude different? ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/50a0e0fc.40...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1352752672.1004.yahoomail...@web122304.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] 140 people die in Sao Paulo in last two weeks
Hey! I was congratulating you on your studies man! Anyway there are no llamas here, that's in the Andes and I'm at sea level. Well, I guess you haven't studied geography yet. But hold on! Eventually you might even get an education. Good for you! El 12/11/12 17:37, Michael Madigan escribió: How is your wife, the llama, doing? From: Ricardo Aráoz ricar...@gmail.com To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 6:43 AM Subject: Re: [OT] 140 people die in Sao Paulo in last two weeks Wow!!! CONVOLUTED That's more than two syllables Mike, are you attending school again? Congratulations! Good for you. You'll make us all proud. El 12/11/12 08:21, Michael Madigan escribió: You can't possibly earn a living with that convoluted mind. From: geoff data...@adam.com.au To: 'ProFox Email List' profox@leafe.com Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 4:51 AM Subject: RE: [OT] 140 people die in Sao Paulo in last two weeks You have an amazing ability to morph any comment, any fact and any information into redneck-speak. Enjoy FOUR MORE YEARS, because after that comes 8 years of Hillary Clinton. The republicans are unelectable. -Original Message- From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan Sent: Monday, 12 November 2012 6:00 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] 140 people die in Sao Paulo in last two weeks So it's better to kill yourself by hanging or by slitting your wrists than by gunshot. Gotcha. - Original Message - From: geoff data...@adam.com.au To: 'ProFox Email List' profox@leafe.com Cc: Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 1:02 AM Subject: RE: [OT] 140 people die in Sao Paulo in last two weeks The astonishing thing is the 'thats a good result!' response. The ENTIRE gun deaths figures include accidents and suicides. The figure you quote is ONLY homicide. and its only 8-10 times per capita the rate in places like UK and australia. yep... guns really keep you safe!!! -Original Message- From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan Sent: Monday, 12 November 2012 3:47 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] 140 people die in Sao Paulo in last two weeks Geoff is a slow learner. We've posted this for him over and over. From: Michael Oke, II oke...@gmail.com To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2012 11:46 PM Subject: Re: [OT] 140 people die in Sao Paulo in last two weeks 2010 numbers from the FBI says 8,775. Michael Oke, II 661-349-6221 Contents of this and all messages are intended for their designated recipient. On Nov 11, 2012, at 8:12 PM, geoff data...@adam.com.au wrote: We had this debate and Im not going to do it again. We went to your own USA official statistics to confirm. You however wanted to use NRA figures and where's the surprise that they are orders of magnitude different? ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/50a173b8.6020...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win
We all agree Florida voting needs help. Let's not belabor that point. So how are you going to convince your Leader and crew to accept fixing Florida? Nick Geti - Original Message - From: lelandj lela...@mail.smvfp.com To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 3:39 PM Subject: Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win On 11/12/2012 01:44 PM, Nicholas Geti wrote: You are totally ignoring the important fact that Obama and crew do not want voter ID. No how, no way. So why are you pounding on ways to prevent voter fraud? Because Florida needs help. http://articles.latimes.com/2012/nov/07/nation/la-na-florida-20121108 Regards, LelandJ . ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/0CAA2D6212614267B889516D72016409@dual ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win
Federal intervention. Clearly they are unwilling to fix the problem. Clearly corruption and vote-rigging is what is behind it. -Original Message- From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Nicholas Geti Sent: Tuesday, 13 November 2012 8:56 AM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win We all agree Florida voting needs help. Let's not belabor that point. So how are you going to convince your Leader and crew to accept fixing Florida? Nick Geti - Original Message - From: lelandj lela...@mail.smvfp.com To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 3:39 PM Subject: Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win On 11/12/2012 01:44 PM, Nicholas Geti wrote: You are totally ignoring the important fact that Obama and crew do not want voter ID. No how, no way. So why are you pounding on ways to prevent voter fraud? Because Florida needs help. http://articles.latimes.com/2012/nov/07/nation/la-na-florida-20121108 Regards, LelandJ . [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/000901cdc125$3a8444b0$af8cce10$@com.au ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win
You should do a better job of keeping up with the news. It is Obama and Holder who are pressing claims in court to block all voter ID requirements in the states: Arizona, Florida, and others. Look it up in Google. Nick Geti - Original Message - From: geoff data...@adam.com.au To: 'ProFox Email List' profox@leafe.com Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 5:29 PM Subject: RE: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win Federal intervention. Clearly they are unwilling to fix the problem. Clearly corruption and vote-rigging is what is behind it. -Original Message- From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Nicholas Geti Sent: Tuesday, 13 November 2012 8:56 AM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win We all agree Florida voting needs help. Let's not belabor that point. So how are you going to convince your Leader and crew to accept fixing Florida? Nick Geti - Original Message - From: lelandj lela...@mail.smvfp.com To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 3:39 PM Subject: Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win . ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/165E7FC1DCEF40B89763AD3FD06BB8C9@dual ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: The - VFP is Old Tech Complaint...
Hi Kurt Also, I've done the Visual type screen design - where I drop one or more DBF's into the Env. on a Form - which allows me to easily do DragDrop to layout the screen design. I suspect that with an SQL backend - you can't do that at all... I developed two forms: one that converts my dbf's, indexes and constraints directly into MS SQL tables, and the other one just passes the data from the dbf tables to the new SQL tables. I do not use the VFP upsizing wizard, because I am that kind of geek who likes to have absolute control on things. What I usually do is create the tables and their indexes in VFP and then, when I need to create data entry forms, I use those tables in the DE to just drag-drop the fields. Afterwards I simply remove the tables from the DE and do the programming using MS SQL server as a back end. Using the above forms, I recreate the tables in the SQL backend, by just clicking on a button. I use sql pass through or cursor adapters in the same app, as the need arises. When I use cursor adapters I just rename the tables loaded in the DE with the name of the CA cursor or the cursor obtained using SPT, as for instance the customers table is renamed in the DE as curCustomers. Then I drag the fields and finally I remove the tables from the DE. In the form, I create the cursor adapter as curCustomers, and it is all very straight forward. In addition, I developed special classes to create cursor adapters, retrieve the newly created PK from the SQL tables to be used as a foreign key, save using SPT, etc. I even developed a routine that enables you to use the NAME clause of the INSERT command in VFP to update a SQL table. I uploaded this routine to Ed's download area. It parses the insert into mysqltable from name oSQLTable and creates a construct that can be used as a parameter to the SQLExec function. I have been programming in DBase languages since 1987 and am too old now to spend years learning .NET and achieve the speed and proficiency I have in VFP. Most of my clients need desktop apps and whenever there is need for web access, I subcontract that part of the work with specialized programmers. It works very well, because the client remains with me, no fear to loose it to my associate, and I am able to provide a comprehensive service to my client. VFP may be dead for new young programmers, but for us oldies it is still alive and kicking. Someone spoke in another post of the fact that the client needs a solution to his needs and doesn't give a s... as to what language the app is programmed in. As a matter of fact, most of them haven't got a clue on what the heck a computer language is anyways. At least the kind of people I deal with in this country (small to medium sized businesses). Of course, when you are talking big corps, that's something else. But I make my living from the small companies, so . My advice to you is to consider the client's needs and try to provide the best solution you can with the tools you know best. If the requirements involve knowledge you don't have, it is better to pay for the expertise, as long as you control the whole picture. My two pesos (cheaper than US dollars :-) ) Rafael Copquin ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/50a187be.1060...@fibertel.com.ar ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win
I dont care who does what. That's the game your two idiotic parties play all the time - the blame game. How about just FIX it and maybe the rest of the world won't mock your electoral 'system'. -Original Message- From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Nicholas Geti Sent: Tuesday, 13 November 2012 9:10 AM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win You should do a better job of keeping up with the news. It is Obama and Holder who are pressing claims in court to block all voter ID requirements in the states: Arizona, Florida, and others. Look it up in Google. Nick Geti - Original Message - From: geoff data...@adam.com.au To: 'ProFox Email List' profox@leafe.com Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 5:29 PM Subject: RE: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win Federal intervention. Clearly they are unwilling to fix the problem. Clearly corruption and vote-rigging is what is behind it. -Original Message- From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Nicholas Geti Sent: Tuesday, 13 November 2012 8:56 AM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win We all agree Florida voting needs help. Let's not belabor that point. So how are you going to convince your Leader and crew to accept fixing Florida? Nick Geti - Original Message - From: lelandj lela...@mail.smvfp.com To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 3:39 PM Subject: Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win . [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/002301cdc135$520c2ed0$f6248c70$@com.au ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win
Voter fraud is exclusively a Democratic problem. - Original Message - From: geoff data...@adam.com.au To: 'ProFox Email List' profox@leafe.com Cc: Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 7:25 PM Subject: RE: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win I dont care who does what. That's the game your two idiotic parties play all the time - the blame game. How about just FIX it and maybe the rest of the world won't mock your electoral 'system'. -Original Message- From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Nicholas Geti Sent: Tuesday, 13 November 2012 9:10 AM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win You should do a better job of keeping up with the news. It is Obama and Holder who are pressing claims in court to block all voter ID requirements in the states: Arizona, Florida, and others. Look it up in Google. Nick Geti - Original Message - From: geoff data...@adam.com.au To: 'ProFox Email List' profox@leafe.com Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 5:29 PM Subject: RE: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win Federal intervention. Clearly they are unwilling to fix the problem. Clearly corruption and vote-rigging is what is behind it. -Original Message- From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Nicholas Geti Sent: Tuesday, 13 November 2012 8:56 AM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win We all agree Florida voting needs help. Let's not belabor that point. So how are you going to convince your Leader and crew to accept fixing Florida? Nick Geti - Original Message - From: lelandj lela...@mail.smvfp.com To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 3:39 PM Subject: Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win[excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1352768386.69192.yahoomail...@web122302.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win
It's tough having an argument with Geoff since he is so misinformed on general knowledge. - Original Message - From: Nicholas Geti ng...@optonline.net To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Cc: Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 5:40 PM Subject: Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win You should do a better job of keeping up with the news. It is Obama and Holder who are pressing claims in court to block all voter ID requirements in the states: Arizona, Florida, and others. Look it up in Google. Nick Geti - Original Message - From: geoff data...@adam.com.au To: 'ProFox Email List' profox@leafe.com Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 5:29 PM Subject: RE: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win Federal intervention. Clearly they are unwilling to fix the problem. Clearly corruption and vote-rigging is what is behind it. -Original Message- From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Nicholas Geti Sent: Tuesday, 13 November 2012 8:56 AM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win We all agree Florida voting needs help. Let's not belabor that point. So how are you going to convince your Leader and crew to accept fixing Florida? Nick Geti - Original Message - From: lelandj lela...@mail.smvfp.com To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 3:39 PM Subject: Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win . ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/165E7FC1DCEF40B89763AD3FD06BB8C9@dual ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1352770276.29637.yahoomail...@web122302.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win
El 12/11/12 22:31, Michael Madigan escribió: It's tough having an argument with Geoff since he is so misinformed on general knowledge. Whereas you are only misinformed on particular knowledge. ... .. . Particular to human beings I mean. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/50a1a686.9070...@gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [ADMIN] Want to help?
Many thanks, Tracy. One family member has been able to load that page, so it looks promising. We'll get our donation in well before the deadline. From what I've been told Ed, you'll meet your target. Gary Taig On 12/11/12 23:59, Tracy Pearson wrote: I was able to reach the Australian site. The link Ed have redirects to this for me. Perhaps this link will work better for you. http://www.cff.org/LWC/dsp_donationPage.cfm?idEvent=21008idUser=599885 Tracy ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/50a1be80.5090...@taig.net ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win
Yes. It is easy to say just do it when the very parties who are blocking things are also in control of deciding whether to do it. Geoff doesn't see that as a problem. Just do it. I would like to but I would need some powerful weapons to go to Florida and tell them what I want to do. LOL. - Original Message - From: Michael Madigan mmadi10...@yahoo.com To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 8:31 PM Subject: Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win It's tough having an argument with Geoff since he is so misinformed on general knowledge. - Original Message - From: Nicholas Geti ng...@optonline.net To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Cc: Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 5:40 PM Subject: Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win You should do a better job of keeping up with the news. It is Obama and Holder who are pressing claims in court to block all voter ID requirements in the states: Arizona, Florida, and others. Look it up in Google. Nick Geti - Original Message - From: geoff data...@adam.com.au To: 'ProFox Email List' profox@leafe.com Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 5:29 PM Subject: RE: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win Federal intervention. Clearly they are unwilling to fix the problem. Clearly corruption and vote-rigging is what is behind it. -Original Message- From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Nicholas Geti Sent: Tuesday, 13 November 2012 8:56 AM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win We all agree Florida voting needs help. Let's not belabor that point. So how are you going to convince your Leader and crew to accept fixing Florida? Nick Geti - Original Message - From: lelandj lela...@mail.smvfp.com To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 3:39 PM Subject: Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win . [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/C729D81D7C0E4855BBC6313B87F170F2@dual ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win
Maybe it starts with people like you just refusing to accept the pathetic standard. As it stands at the moment it appears Americans just accept long lines and voter fraud. Perhaps you get want you deserve. the old saying you deserve what you tolerate is fitting here. -Original Message- From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Nicholas Geti Sent: Tuesday, 13 November 2012 4:38 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win Yes. It is easy to say just do it when the very parties who are blocking things are also in control of deciding whether to do it. Geoff doesn't see that as a problem. Just do it. I would like to but I would need some powerful weapons to go to Florida and tell them what I want to do. LOL. - Original Message - From: Michael Madigan mmadi10...@yahoo.com To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 8:31 PM Subject: Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win It's tough having an argument with Geoff since he is so misinformed on general knowledge. - Original Message - From: Nicholas Geti ng...@optonline.net To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Cc: Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 5:40 PM Subject: Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win You should do a better job of keeping up with the news. It is Obama and Holder who are pressing claims in court to block all voter ID requirements in the states: Arizona, Florida, and others. Look it up in Google. Nick Geti - Original Message - From: geoff data...@adam.com.au To: 'ProFox Email List' profox@leafe.com Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 5:29 PM Subject: RE: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win Federal intervention. Clearly they are unwilling to fix the problem. Clearly corruption and vote-rigging is what is behind it. -Original Message- From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Nicholas Geti Sent: Tuesday, 13 November 2012 8:56 AM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win We all agree Florida voting needs help. Let's not belabor that point. So how are you going to convince your Leader and crew to accept fixing Florida? Nick Geti - Original Message - From: lelandj lela...@mail.smvfp.com To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 3:39 PM Subject: Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win . [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/027001cdc168$af701450$0e503cf0$@com.au ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win
We try Voter ID laws and your friends, the Blacks, complain about voter suppression. - Original Message - From: geoff data...@adam.com.au To: 'ProFox Email List' profox@leafe.com Cc: Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 1:32 AM Subject: RE: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win Maybe it starts with people like you just refusing to accept the pathetic standard. As it stands at the moment it appears Americans just accept long lines and voter fraud. Perhaps you get want you deserve. the old saying you deserve what you tolerate is fitting here. -Original Message- From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Nicholas Geti Sent: Tuesday, 13 November 2012 4:38 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win Yes. It is easy to say just do it when the very parties who are blocking things are also in control of deciding whether to do it. Geoff doesn't see that as a problem. Just do it. I would like to but I would need some powerful weapons to go to Florida and tell them what I want to do. LOL. - Original Message - From: Michael Madigan mmadi10...@yahoo.com To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 8:31 PM Subject: Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win It's tough having an argument with Geoff since he is so misinformed on general knowledge. - Original Message - From: Nicholas Geti ng...@optonline.net To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Cc: Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 5:40 PM Subject: Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win You should do a better job of keeping up with the news. It is Obama and Holder who are pressing claims in court to block all voter ID requirements in the states: Arizona, Florida, and others. Look it up in Google. Nick Geti - Original Message - From: geoff data...@adam.com.au To: 'ProFox Email List' profox@leafe.com Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 5:29 PM Subject: RE: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win Federal intervention. Clearly they are unwilling to fix the problem. Clearly corruption and vote-rigging is what is behind it. -Original Message- From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Nicholas Geti Sent: Tuesday, 13 November 2012 8:56 AM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win We all agree Florida voting needs help. Let's not belabor that point. So how are you going to convince your Leader and crew to accept fixing Florida? Nick Geti - Original Message - From: lelandj lela...@mail.smvfp.com To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 3:39 PM Subject: Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win . [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1352789715.1617.yahoomail...@web122303.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
RE: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win
Maybe because the last time you redneck whites tried 'ID registration' you tattooed it on them. And let's face it, given the chance you would again. Maybe thats why they dont trust you? -Original Message- From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan Sent: Tuesday, 13 November 2012 5:25 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win We try Voter ID laws and your friends, the Blacks, complain about voter suppression. - Original Message - From: geoff data...@adam.com.au To: 'ProFox Email List' profox@leafe.com Cc: Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 1:32 AM Subject: RE: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win Maybe it starts with people like you just refusing to accept the pathetic standard. As it stands at the moment it appears Americans just accept long lines and voter fraud. Perhaps you get want you deserve. the old saying you deserve what you tolerate is fitting here. -Original Message- From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Nicholas Geti Sent: Tuesday, 13 November 2012 4:38 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win Yes. It is easy to say just do it when the very parties who are blocking things are also in control of deciding whether to do it. Geoff doesn't see that as a problem. Just do it. I would like to but I would need some powerful weapons to go to Florida and tell them what I want to do. LOL. - Original Message - From: Michael Madigan mmadi10...@yahoo.com To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 8:31 PM Subject: Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win It's tough having an argument with Geoff since he is so misinformed on general knowledge. - Original Message - From: Nicholas Geti ng...@optonline.net To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Cc: Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 5:40 PM Subject: Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win You should do a better job of keeping up with the news. It is Obama and Holder who are pressing claims in court to block all voter ID requirements in the states: Arizona, Florida, and others. Look it up in Google. Nick Geti - Original Message - From: geoff data...@adam.com.au To: 'ProFox Email List' profox@leafe.com Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 5:29 PM Subject: RE: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win Federal intervention. Clearly they are unwilling to fix the problem. Clearly corruption and vote-rigging is what is behind it. -Original Message- From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Nicholas Geti Sent: Tuesday, 13 November 2012 8:56 AM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win We all agree Florida voting needs help. Let's not belabor that point. So how are you going to convince your Leader and crew to accept fixing Florida? Nick Geti - Original Message - From: lelandj lela...@mail.smvfp.com To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 3:39 PM Subject: Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win . [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/027101cdc16c$c06c8aa0$41459fe0$@com.au ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win
What a tool you are. - Original Message - From: geoff data...@adam.com.au To: 'ProFox Email List' profox@leafe.com Cc: Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 2:01 AM Subject: RE: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win Maybe because the last time you redneck whites tried 'ID registration' you tattooed it on them. And let's face it, given the chance you would again. Maybe thats why they dont trust you? -Original Message- From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan Sent: Tuesday, 13 November 2012 5:25 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win We try Voter ID laws and your friends, the Blacks, complain about voter suppression. - Original Message - From: geoff data...@adam.com.au To: 'ProFox Email List' profox@leafe.com Cc: Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 1:32 AM Subject: RE: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win Maybe it starts with people like you just refusing to accept the pathetic standard. As it stands at the moment it appears Americans just accept long lines and voter fraud. Perhaps you get want you deserve. the old saying you deserve what you tolerate is fitting here. -Original Message- From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Nicholas Geti Sent: Tuesday, 13 November 2012 4:38 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win Yes. It is easy to say just do it when the very parties who are blocking things are also in control of deciding whether to do it. Geoff doesn't see that as a problem. Just do it. I would like to but I would need some powerful weapons to go to Florida and tell them what I want to do. LOL. - Original Message - From: Michael Madigan mmadi10...@yahoo.com To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 8:31 PM Subject: Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win It's tough having an argument with Geoff since he is so misinformed on general knowledge. - Original Message - From: Nicholas Geti ng...@optonline.net To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Cc: Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 5:40 PM Subject: Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win You should do a better job of keeping up with the news. It is Obama and Holder who are pressing claims in court to block all voter ID requirements in the states: Arizona, Florida, and others. Look it up in Google. Nick Geti - Original Message - From: geoff data...@adam.com.au To: 'ProFox Email List' profox@leafe.com Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 5:29 PM Subject: RE: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win Federal intervention. Clearly they are unwilling to fix the problem. Clearly corruption and vote-rigging is what is behind it. -Original Message- From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Nicholas Geti Sent: Tuesday, 13 November 2012 8:56 AM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win We all agree Florida voting needs help. Let's not belabor that point. So how are you going to convince your Leader and crew to accept fixing Florida? Nick Geti - Original Message - From: lelandj lela...@mail.smvfp.com To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 3:39 PM Subject: Re: [OT] Can't let conservative blacks win [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1352790242.39321.yahoomail...@web122304.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
