[Puppet Users] Re: node-specific resources outside of a general-purpose module
On Monday, April 9, 2012 5:35:09 PM UTC+3, jcbollinger wrote: I'm not following why defined types present a special problem here. They aren't a special problem: they simply haven't *solved* the problem. If as generalized as I can get is defining some types, where do I put the declaration of these types so that they get applied to my nodes? It's entirely possible that this is just a namespacing question: I've seen references to a `site` module where such site-specific classes should go, and, as I've said, we're already using modules with a `s_` prefix for this purpose; but I'm looking for what the normal thing is. If modules are not supposed to be site-specific, where do I put my site-specific config? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet Users group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/puppet-users/-/qwi6W4v1D9MJ. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
Re: [Puppet Users] node-specific resources outside of a general-purpose module
On Monday, April 9, 2012 6:12:48 PM UTC+3, Nan Liu wrote: You can use create_resources to make this a bit more flexible and dynamic with the ability to specify resources in your ENC: Either that doesn't actually apply to my question, or using it as a solution horrifies me. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet Users group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/puppet-users/-/Rmet2oQnac4J. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
[Puppet Users] collecting resources for iteration in a template
I have a `sysctl::variable` defined type that creates files in
`/etc/sysctl.d`. Some operating systems (*cough*SLES10*cough*) don't read
sysctl settings from `/etc/sysctl.d`, though, and expect all settings to be
in a single file, `/etc/sysctl.conf`. For such operating systems, I'd like
to define the content of that file with a template that references the
values of the `sysctl::variable`s.
In the Puppet DSL I can collect all fragments with language like
`Sysctl::Variable| |`. How can I do something similar in a template such
that I can access the variable names and values? For example:
%
variables = magic('Sysctl::Variable||')
variables.each do |variable| -%
%= variable.name % = %= variable.value %
% end -%
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Puppet Users group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/puppet-users/-/BDDUjVBiAI4J.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
[Puppet Users] pluginsync - custom fact with 0 size
Dear List,
i'm running Puppet version 2.7.1 (Natty backport) on both sides. I
have a custom fact in [module]/lib/facter/customfact.rb and i have
enabled pluginsync on both the server and client side. When i'm
running the agent it shows the following output:
puppetd --test --noop
info: Retrieving plugin
notice: /File[/var/lib/puppet/lib/facter/customfact.rb]/content:
content changed '{md5}d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e' to '{md5}
e57687d165dc489c3738d481583c1062'
info: Loading downloaded plugin /var/lib/puppet/lib/facter/
latestkernel.rb
info: Loading facts in latestkernel
info: Loading facts in latestkernel
info: Caching catalog for some.domain.tld
info: Applying configuration version '1334569173'
notice: /Stage...module stuff
notice: Finished catalog run in 1.67 seconds
But the plugin on the client is an empty file:
ls -l /var/lib/puppet/lib/facter/
total 0
-rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 0 Apr 16 11:43 customfact.rb
I've tried to find a solution for this but as you see i'm lost. Do you
have any idea what might causing this?
Best regards,
Mate
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Puppet Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
[Puppet Users] Re: Need puppet module for condition copy
It's definitely a class loading problem and I don't think Jeeva is using
modules at all.
Jeeva:
Could you pls try the things I said in my previous post and see if that
works? Cheers!!
On Monday, April 16, 2012 1:34:31 AM UTC+1, Wil Cooley wrote:
On Apr 13, 10:49 am, Munna S 19.mu...@gmail.com wrote:
I followed your steps. now i am getting below error
Apr 13 17:42:44 pil-vm-pup-01 puppet-master[7899]: Could not find class
dev_jboss_jeeva for vm-jeeva2.aircell.prod at
...
i have jeeva_base.pp file under /etc/puppet/manifests/nodes and below is
its content
node jeeva_base {
include dev_jboss_jeeva}
--
also i have a another .pp file by name vm-jeeva2 under
/etc/puppet/manifests/nodes and below is its content. we have seperate
.pp
file for each server name. one server is vm-jeeva2.
--
node vm-jeeva2 inherits jeeva_base {}
what could be the problem ?
Where is the class dev_jboss_jeeva defined? You mentioned above an
'init.pp', which would be usual if you were using modules, but it does
not seem like you are using modules.
It sounds like the problem you are having is wholly outside of the
complicated machinations of what you're trying to do. It looks more
like you have a much simpler class-loading problem.
Here are a few things to try:
* Comment out all of the stuff from dev_jboss_jeeva and replace it
with a warning function call, to log that everything is working
right:
class dev_jboss_jeeva {
warning(dev_jboss_jeeva has successfully loaded)
}
* Copy your class dev_jboss_jeeva { ... } right before the node
jeeva_base and see if you see your warning message (I suggest warning
instead of info because info sometimes requires using --verbose on the
command line; warning will always show):
class dev_jboss_jeeva {
warning(dev_jboss_jeeva was here)
}
node jeeva_base {
include dev_jboss_jeeva
}
If you see the message with the class defined right before the node,
but not wherever else you have it, then you know the problem is that
it is unable to actually find the class and you should give specifics
about that instead.
Wil
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Puppet Users group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/puppet-users/-/_Puid9FxhfAJ.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Need puppet module for condition copy
Hi Sans
i am trying it now. will let you know the output soon. Also in my site.pp i
have the below content
import 'nodes/*'
$puppetserver = 'puppet-server.domain.com'
I do have many modules , which works as expected.
Thanks,
Jeeva
cat /etc/puppet/manifests/site.pp
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 5:36 AM, Sans r.santanu@gmail.com wrote:
It's definitely a class loading problem and I don't think Jeeva is using
modules at all.
Jeeva:
Could you pls try the things I said in my previous post and see if that
works? Cheers!!
On Monday, April 16, 2012 1:34:31 AM UTC+1, Wil Cooley wrote:
On Apr 13, 10:49 am, Munna S 19.mu...@gmail.com wrote:
I followed your steps. now i am getting below error
Apr 13 17:42:44 pil-vm-pup-01 puppet-master[7899]: Could not find class
dev_jboss_jeeva for vm-jeeva2.aircell.prod at
...
i have jeeva_base.pp file under /etc/puppet/manifests/nodes and below
is
its content
--**--
node jeeva_base {
include dev_jboss_jeeva}
--**
also i have a another .pp file by name vm-jeeva2 under
/etc/puppet/manifests/nodes and below is its content. we have seperate
.pp
file for each server name. one server is vm-jeeva2.
--
node vm-jeeva2 inherits jeeva_base {}
what could be the problem ?
Where is the class dev_jboss_jeeva defined? You mentioned above an
'init.pp', which would be usual if you were using modules, but it does
not seem like you are using modules.
It sounds like the problem you are having is wholly outside of the
complicated machinations of what you're trying to do. It looks more
like you have a much simpler class-loading problem.
Here are a few things to try:
* Comment out all of the stuff from dev_jboss_jeeva and replace it
with a warning function call, to log that everything is working
right:
class dev_jboss_jeeva {
warning(dev_jboss_jeeva has successfully loaded)
}
* Copy your class dev_jboss_jeeva { ... } right before the node
jeeva_base and see if you see your warning message (I suggest warning
instead of info because info sometimes requires using --verbose on the
command line; warning will always show):
class dev_jboss_jeeva {
warning(dev_jboss_jeeva was here)
}
node jeeva_base {
include dev_jboss_jeeva
}
If you see the message with the class defined right before the node,
but not wherever else you have it, then you know the problem is that
it is unable to actually find the class and you should give specifics
about that instead.
Wil
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Puppet Users group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/puppet-users/-/_Puid9FxhfAJ.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Puppet Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
[Puppet Users] puppet dashboard and mysql server is not localhost
Hi, I'm installing puppet dashboard on a server1. I have an already existing mysql service, hosted on server2. Is it possible to configure database.yml in the puppet dashboard to use the host server2 instead of localhost ? Regards, -- *Fabien COMBERNOUS* /unix system engineer/ www.kezia.com http://www.kezia.com/ *Tel: +33(0)4 6787 0704 / +33(0)6 2584 0337* -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet Users group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
[Puppet Users] Question regarding multi-OS NTP manifest
Hi all,
I'm jumping into learning puppet with the modules on Puppetlabs
websites, but I'm running into a few issues and I could use some help.
I'm currently working on the second exercise here:
http://docs.puppetlabs.com/learning/variables.html
I can write a manifest that installs NTP for CentOS:
package { 'ntp':
ensure = installed,
}
file { '/etc/ntp.conf':
owner = 'root',
group = 'root',
mode= '640',
content = server 0.rhel.pool.ntp.org,
notify = Service['ntpd'],
require = Package['ntp'],
}
service { 'ntpd':
ensure = running,
enable = true,
hasstatus = true,
hasrestart = true,
}
But when I try to use the $case variable to select the correct OS, I
get an error. Here's my manifest:
package { 'ntp':
ensure = installed,
}
file { '/etc/ntp.conf':
content = server 0.rhel.pool.ntp.org,
owner = 'root',
mode= '640',
require = Package['ntp'],
}
case $operatingsystem {
centos, redhat: { $ntp = ntp }
debain, ubuntu: { $ntp = ntpd }
default: { fail(Unrecognized operating system for webserver) }
}
if $ntp == 'ntp' {
service { 'ntp':
name = $ntp,
ensure = running,
enable = true,
hasrestart = true,
hasstatus = true,
}
}
else {
service { 'ntpd':
name = $ntp,
ensure = running,
enable = true,
hasstatus = true,
hasrestart = true,
}
}
I've tried to reorder things a few different ways but I have a feeling
this is related to how I'm using the case variable and the if/else
statement. My error is this:
err: /Stage[main]//Service[ntp]/ensure: change from stopped to running
failed: Could not start Service[ntp]: Execution of '/sbin/service ntp
start' returned 1: at /root/learning-manifests/ntp.pp:24
Which confuses me, because the after the manifest is finished the /etc/
ntp.conf file is written and configured correctly, NTP is installed,
but it's calling '/sbin/service ntp start' as opposed to '/etc/init.d/
ntp start.'
When I run the vanilla script, everything configures correctly and
ntp(d) is started. Why is my second script using /sbin when it seems
that it should be using /etc/init.d/?
Thanks!
Jesse
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Puppet Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
[Puppet Users] Is paramater ordering non-deterministic?
I've run into the following issue with parameters that are dependent on
each other. Suppose I have the following class:
class foo(
$owner,
$prefix = /opt/${owner},
$etc_dir = ${prefix}/etc
) {
file{${etc_dir}:
ensure = directory,
owner = $owner,
group = $owner,
mode = 0660,
...
}
The order that the parameters are defined appears to be non-deterministic,
so that sometimes $etc_dir is defined before $prefix. Which means that $etc
is set to '/etc', and of course, this restricts the permissions on /etc,
which breaks the server (including preventing any user, including root,
from sudoing!). Fortunately, this was found while testing manifests on
disposable virtual machines. I shudder to think what would have happened if
we didn't figure out the cause and deployed this on actual servers.
So, am I correct in assuming that the order of parameter setting is
non-deterministic (and so should avoid setting them like above), or is
there something else going on?
If parameter order is not deterministic, I do think it should be explicitly
documented, with a warning about what can go wrong. (Apologies if I've been
daft and missed an existing mention of this somewhere.)
FWIW, I added a note to http://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/4408 about
this issue.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Puppet Users group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/puppet-users/-/AjNp3Hlh8woJ.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
[Puppet Users]
Hi, I updated the Puppet Enterprise 2.0 to 2.5.1 and tried to restart the httpd and getting following error in /var/log/pe-httpd/puppetdashboard.error.log [warn] RSA server certificate CommonName (CN) `pe-internal-dashboard' does NOT match server name!? -- Thanks, Aphroj Hussain -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet Users group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
[Puppet Users] Could not send report: Error 400 on SERVER: execution expired
Hi all! One of my Puppet masters has to compile some 3800 stored configurations which takes a very long time to proceed. Example log: Apr 16 13:17:13 mymaster puppet-agent[15249]: Finished catalog run in 954.58 seconds Apr 16 13:18:35 mymaster puppet-master[11422]: execution expired Apr 16 13:18:35 mymaster puppet-agent[15249]: Could not send report: Error 400 on SERVER: execution expired Seems, this long run leads to the 'execution expired' error. Is there a way to change the timeout for reports? Thanks Bernd -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet Users group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
Re: [Puppet Users] puppet dashboard and mysql server is not localhost
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 That is possible you just need to edit the hosts parameter. The Dashboard is a rails application don't forget to migrate your database afterwards, Regards, Mike Am 16.04.2012 12:19, schrieb Fabien COMBERNOUS: Hi, I'm installing puppet dashboard on a server1. I have an already existing mysql service, hosted on server2. Is it possible to configure database.yml in the puppet dashboard to use the host server2 instead of localhost ? Regards, -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPjARVAAoJEJbRlombcANxKhYH/ijuL/TU6fVuO6Fy4WB29jPJ wsXMe7KCV0FsAGtNE13L3j+6qHBKNZpbZ72FF/V5hAa5dk5tukLV5il3ZRyEEGxY 3KFyWMtIBA5w9ozmOEpE6XYZQwhVYUDY/q+e7EIYjvJBzdlwuPvQe2xgrulgTjhU kM1WY8P7SivYcGN1HAZxqjtGJJzpVdJqdCmHoObyIorEyo+fxz7/7nO2108lWrIA ImomaTI1L/vW+Mmba7y8jc1mYrefy/4GIVVxOHK1S86WtW3TCxVDZa4XzLQqQUjK ZPGEfHAcNir2YcVn8FiAbVzROKhKxyIYvMy19D29JYkPCoOtKnWOe/1ZYs/Kztk= =9ZLV -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet Users group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
Re: [Puppet Users] puppet dashboard and mysql server is not localhost
Thank you for your answer. I added the hosts parameter in the file : # config/database.yml production: database: dashboard hosts: server2 username: dashboard password: dashboard encoding: utf8 adapter: mysql Then i used the migrate and got the following output : server1:puppet-dashboard root# rake RAILS_ENV=production db:migrate (in /usr/share/puppet-dashboard) rake aborted! uninitialized constant MysqlCompat::MysqlRes I missed something ? On 16/04/2012 13:36, Mike Becker wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 That is possible you just need to edit the hosts parameter. The Dashboard is a rails application don't forget to migrate your database afterwards, Regards, Mike Am 16.04.2012 12:19, schrieb Fabien COMBERNOUS: Hi, I'm installing puppet dashboard on a server1. I have an already existing mysql service, hosted on server2. Is it possible to configure database.yml in the puppet dashboard to use the host server2 instead of localhost ? Regards, -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPjARVAAoJEJbRlombcANxKhYH/ijuL/TU6fVuO6Fy4WB29jPJ wsXMe7KCV0FsAGtNE13L3j+6qHBKNZpbZ72FF/V5hAa5dk5tukLV5il3ZRyEEGxY 3KFyWMtIBA5w9ozmOEpE6XYZQwhVYUDY/q+e7EIYjvJBzdlwuPvQe2xgrulgTjhU kM1WY8P7SivYcGN1HAZxqjtGJJzpVdJqdCmHoObyIorEyo+fxz7/7nO2108lWrIA ImomaTI1L/vW+Mmba7y8jc1mYrefy/4GIVVxOHK1S86WtW3TCxVDZa4XzLQqQUjK ZPGEfHAcNir2YcVn8FiAbVzROKhKxyIYvMy19D29JYkPCoOtKnWOe/1ZYs/Kztk= =9ZLV -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- *Fabien COMBERNOUS* /unix system engineer/ www.kezia.com http://www.kezia.com/ *Tel: +33(0)4 6787 0704 / +33(0)6 2584 0337* Kezia -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet Users group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Need puppet module for condition copy
Hi Sans,
I followed your steps, but i am getting the same error again
Apr 16 11:29:39 pil-vm-pup-01 puppet-master[8092]: Could not find class
cp_jboss_conf for vm-jeeva2.aircell.prod at
/etc/puppet/manifests/nodes/vm-jeeva2.aircell.prod.pp:2 on node
vm-jeeva2.aircell.prod
Apr 16 11:29:39 pil-vm-pup-01 puppet-master[8092]: Could not find class
cp_jboss_conf for vm-jeeva2.aircell.prod at
/etc/puppet/manifests/nodes/vm-jeeva2.aircell.prod.pp:2 on node
vm-jeeva2.aircell.prod
Apr 16 11:29:39 pil-vm-pup-01 puppet-master[8092]:
(//vm-jeeva2.aircell.prod/Puppet) Could not retrieve catalog from remote
server: Error 400 on SERVER: Could not find class cp_jboss_conf for
vm-jeeva2.aircell.prod at
/etc/puppet/manifests/nodes/vm-jeeva2.aircell.prod.pp:2 on node
vm-jeeva2.aircell.prod
Apr 16 11:29:39 pil-vm-pup-01 puppet-master[8092]:
(//vm-jeeva2.aircell.prod/Puppet) Using cached catalog
Apr 16 11:29:39 pil-vm-pup-01 puppet-master[8092]:
(//vm-jeeva2.aircell.prod/Puppet) Could not retrieve catalog; skipping run
@All, Just not to confuse anyone, currently my puppet server is working as
expected. i have lot of modules created and it works. This is how my
configuration is
1 ) my site.pp file is under /etc/puppet/manifest/site.pp and below is my
content
import 'nodes/*'
$puppetserver = 'puppet-server.domain.com'
2) All my modules is under below path
/etc/puppet/modules/
3) under below path i have all my .pp files . eg
/etc/puppet/manifests/nodes/server1.pp
/etc/puppet/manifests/nodes/server2.pp
/etc/puppet/manifests/nodes/server3.pp
/etc/puppet/manifests/nodes/server4.pp
addition to this i have a jeeva_base.pp file where i include all my
modules. below is the portion of its content
---
node jeeva_base {
include all_scripts
include dev_jboss_jeeva
}
---
below is the content of my server1.pp file . i have created individual .pp
file for each server which inherits jeeva_base node.
--
node server1 inherits jeeva_base {
}
---
As i said above, this is my requirement.
we have 3 version of jboss running in our environment in different servers.
eg. jboss4 in server1, jboss5 in server2 , jboss6 in server3 , and no jboss
in server 4 , etc
on each server, jboss config file sits under different path.
eg: in server 1 it sits under /opt/jboss4/
in server 2 it sits under /opt/jboss5/
in server 3 it sits under /opt/jboss6/
in server 4 no jboss is running
now i have 3 different configuration file for each version of jboss which i
need to replace. eg.
file1, i need to replace it to jboss4
file2 , i need to replace it to jboss5
file3 , i need to replace it to jboss6
also we need to keep in mind that it should not create a files/folder on
server4 which doesnt have jboss.
Now i need a module which checks the jboss path on each server and should
replace the sepcific file if it finds the specific path. eg
if it finds /opt/jboss4, then it should replace file1, if it finds
/opt/jboss5, then replace file2 and so on. But if no jboss path is found
then dont perform any thing on that server.
As suggested by Gary ( initial conversation) , gary helped me to create the
custom facts. but it didnt work. Not sure what went wrong.
in general, my requirement is very simple. just do a check on each server
for specific path. if found, then copy/replace respective file , if not
found then dont perform any action on that server.
I hope i didnt confuse anyone.
Thanks,
Jeeva
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 5:54 AM, Munna S 19.mu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Sans
i am trying it now. will let you know the output soon. Also in my site.pp
i have the below content
import 'nodes/*'
$puppetserver = 'puppet-server.domain.com'
I do have many modules , which works as expected.
Thanks,
Jeeva
cat /etc/puppet/manifests/site.pp
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 5:36 AM, Sans r.santanu@gmail.com wrote:
It's definitely a class loading problem and I don't think Jeeva is using
modules at all.
Jeeva:
Could you pls try the things I said in my previous post and see if that
works? Cheers!!
On Monday, April 16, 2012 1:34:31 AM UTC+1, Wil Cooley wrote:
On Apr 13, 10:49 am, Munna S 19.mu...@gmail.com wrote:
I followed your steps. now i am getting below error
Apr 13 17:42:44 pil-vm-pup-01 puppet-master[7899]: Could not find
class
dev_jboss_jeeva for vm-jeeva2.aircell.prod at
...
i have jeeva_base.pp file under /etc/puppet/manifests/nodes and below
is
its content
--**--
node jeeva_base {
include dev_jboss_jeeva}
--**
also i have a another .pp file by name vm-jeeva2 under
/etc/puppet/manifests/nodes and below is its content. we have seperate
.pp
file for each server name. one server is vm-jeeva2.
--
node vm-jeeva2 inherits jeeva_base {}
Re: [Puppet Users] Could not send report: Error 400 on SERVER: execution expired
Hi I had met the problem,so I want to know the answer. 在 2012年4月16日 下午7:31，Bernd Adamowicz bernd.adamow...@esailors.de写道： Hi all! One of my Puppet masters has to compile some 3800 stored configurations which takes a very long time to proceed. Example log: Apr 16 13:17:13 mymaster puppet-agent[15249]: Finished catalog run in 954.58 seconds Apr 16 13:18:35 mymaster puppet-master[11422]: execution expired Apr 16 13:18:35 mymaster puppet-agent[15249]: Could not send report: Error 400 on SERVER: execution expired Seems, this long run leads to the 'execution expired' error. Is there a way to change the timeout for reports? Thanks Bernd -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet Users group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet Users group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Need puppet module for condition copy
humm.. not sure but looks like couple of steps from my previous post
are missing.
Can you pls confirm that you have all of these:
1. The line: *import 'modules'* in */etc/puppet/manifests/site.pp*
2. The line: *import 'jb_test'* in* /etc/puppet/manifests/modules.pp*
3. The file:* /etc/puppet/modules/jb_test/manifests/jb_config.pp*
4. The file:* /etc/puppet/modules/jb_test/manifests/init_config.pp*
5. The file:* /etc/puppet/modules/jb_test/files/group_test*
6. and finally, in the */etc/puppet/manifests/nodes.pp*
node 'vm-jeeva2' {
include cp_jboss_conf
}
(don't add inherits jeeva_base for the time being)
Cheers!!
On Monday, April 16, 2012 1:06:59 PM UTC+1, Jeeva wrote:
Hi Sans,
I followed your steps, but i am getting the same error again
Apr 16 11:29:39 pil-vm-pup-01 puppet-master[8092]: Could not find class
cp_jboss_conf for vm-jeeva2.aircell.prod at
/etc/puppet/manifests/nodes/vm-jeeva2.aircell.prod.pp:2 on node
vm-jeeva2.aircell.prod
Apr 16 11:29:39 pil-vm-pup-01 puppet-master[8092]: Could not find class
cp_jboss_conf for vm-jeeva2.aircell.prod at
/etc/puppet/manifests/nodes/vm-jeeva2.aircell.prod.pp:2 on node
vm-jeeva2.aircell.prod
Apr 16 11:29:39 pil-vm-pup-01 puppet-master[8092]:
(//vm-jeeva2.aircell.prod/Puppet) Could not retrieve catalog from remote
server: Error 400 on SERVER: Could not find class cp_jboss_conf for
vm-jeeva2.aircell.prod at
/etc/puppet/manifests/nodes/vm-jeeva2.aircell.prod.pp:2 on node
vm-jeeva2.aircell.prod
Apr 16 11:29:39 pil-vm-pup-01 puppet-master[8092]:
(//vm-jeeva2.aircell.prod/Puppet) Using cached catalog
Apr 16 11:29:39 pil-vm-pup-01 puppet-master[8092]:
(//vm-jeeva2.aircell.prod/Puppet) Could not retrieve catalog; skipping run
@All, Just not to confuse anyone, currently my puppet server is working as
expected. i have lot of modules created and it works. This is how my
configuration is
1 ) my site.pp file is under /etc/puppet/manifest/site.pp and below is my
content
import 'nodes/*'
$puppetserver = 'puppet-server.domain.com'
2) All my modules is under below path
/etc/puppet/modules/
3) under below path i have all my .pp files . eg
/etc/puppet/manifests/nodes/server1.pp
/etc/puppet/manifests/nodes/server2.pp
/etc/puppet/manifests/nodes/server3.pp
/etc/puppet/manifests/nodes/server4.pp
addition to this i have a jeeva_base.pp file where i include all my
modules. below is the portion of its content
---
node jeeva_base {
include all_scripts
include dev_jboss_jeeva
}
---
below is the content of my server1.pp file . i have created individual .pp
file for each server which inherits jeeva_base node.
--
node server1 inherits jeeva_base {
}
---
As i said above, this is my requirement.
we have 3 version of jboss running in our environment in different
servers. eg. jboss4 in server1, jboss5 in server2 , jboss6 in server3 , and
no jboss in server 4 , etc
on each server, jboss config file sits under different path.
eg: in server 1 it sits under /opt/jboss4/
in server 2 it sits under /opt/jboss5/
in server 3 it sits under /opt/jboss6/
in server 4 no jboss is running
now i have 3 different configuration file for each version of jboss which
i need to replace. eg.
file1, i need to replace it to jboss4
file2 , i need to replace it to jboss5
file3 , i need to replace it to jboss6
also we need to keep in mind that it should not create a files/folder on
server4 which doesnt have jboss.
Now i need a module which checks the jboss path on each server and should
replace the sepcific file if it finds the specific path. eg
if it finds /opt/jboss4, then it should replace file1, if it finds
/opt/jboss5, then replace file2 and so on. But if no jboss path is found
then dont perform any thing on that server.
As suggested by Gary ( initial conversation) , gary helped me to create
the custom facts. but it didnt work. Not sure what went wrong.
in general, my requirement is very simple. just do a check on each server
for specific path. if found, then copy/replace respective file , if not
found then dont perform any action on that server.
I hope i didnt confuse anyone.
Thanks,
Jeeva
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 5:54 AM, Munna S 19.mu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Sans
i am trying it now. will let you know the output soon. Also in my site.pp
i have the below content
import 'nodes/*'
$puppetserver = 'puppet-server.domain.com'
I do have many modules , which works as expected.
Thanks,
Jeeva
cat /etc/puppet/manifests/site.pp
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 5:36 AM, Sans r.santanu@gmail.com wrote:
It's definitely a class loading problem and I don't think Jeeva is using
modules at all.
Jeeva:
Could you pls try the things I
Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Need puppet module for condition copy
1. The line: *import 'modules'* in */etc/puppet/manifests/site.pp
- i do have site.pp file but dont have the entry for modules. i added
the entry but later i saw lot of errors related to modules in log
*
2. The line: *import 'jb_test'* in* /etc/puppet/manifests/modules.pp
- i dont have modules.pp file. But as i said in my previous email, i
have customised servername.pp siles
*
3. The file:* /etc/puppet/modules/jb_test/manifests/jb_config.pp
- i created this file
*
4. The file:* /etc/puppet/modules/jb_test/manifests/init_config.pp
- i created this file
*
5. The file:* /etc/puppet/modules/jb_test/files/group_test
- i have this file*
6. and finally, in the */etc/puppet/manifests/nodes.pp
- I dont have this file in my configuration*
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 7:38 AM, Sans r.santanu@gmail.com wrote:
humm.. not sure but looks like couple of steps from my previous post
are missing.
Can you pls confirm that you have all of these:
1. The line: *import 'modules'* in */etc/puppet/manifests/site.pp*
2. The line: *import 'jb_test'* in* /etc/puppet/manifests/modules.pp*
3. The file:* /etc/puppet/modules/jb_test/manifests/jb_config.pp*
4. The file:* /etc/puppet/modules/jb_test/manifests/init_config.pp*
5. The file:* /etc/puppet/modules/jb_test/files/group_test*
6. and finally, in the */etc/puppet/manifests/nodes.pp*
node 'vm-jeeva2' {
include cp_jboss_conf
}
(don't add inherits jeeva_base for the time being)
Cheers!!
On Monday, April 16, 2012 1:06:59 PM UTC+1, Jeeva wrote:
Hi Sans,
I followed your steps, but i am getting the same error again
Apr 16 11:29:39 pil-vm-pup-01 puppet-master[8092]: Could not find class
cp_jboss_conf for vm-jeeva2.aircell.prod at /etc/puppet/manifests/nodes/*
*vm-jeeva2.aircell.prod.pp:2 on node vm-jeeva2.aircell.prod
Apr 16 11:29:39 pil-vm-pup-01 puppet-master[8092]: Could not find class
cp_jboss_conf for vm-jeeva2.aircell.prod at /etc/puppet/manifests/nodes/*
*vm-jeeva2.aircell.prod.pp:2 on node vm-jeeva2.aircell.prod
Apr 16 11:29:39 pil-vm-pup-01 puppet-master[8092]:
(//vm-jeeva2.aircell.prod/**Puppet) Could not retrieve catalog from
remote server: Error 400 on SERVER: Could not find class cp_jboss_conf for
vm-jeeva2.aircell.prod at
/etc/puppet/manifests/nodes/**vm-jeeva2.aircell.prod.pp:2
on node vm-jeeva2.aircell.prod
Apr 16 11:29:39 pil-vm-pup-01 puppet-master[8092]:
(//vm-jeeva2.aircell.prod/**Puppet) Using cached catalog
Apr 16 11:29:39 pil-vm-pup-01 puppet-master[8092]:
(//vm-jeeva2.aircell.prod/**Puppet) Could not retrieve catalog; skipping
run
@All, Just not to confuse anyone, currently my puppet server is working
as expected. i have lot of modules created and it works. This is how my
configuration is
1 ) my site.pp file is under /etc/puppet/manifest/site.pp and below is my
content
import 'nodes/*'
$puppetserver = 'puppet-server.domain.com'
2) All my modules is under below path
/etc/puppet/modules/
3) under below path i have all my .pp files . eg
/etc/puppet/manifests/nodes/**server1.pp
/etc/puppet/manifests/nodes/**server2.pp
/etc/puppet/manifests/nodes/**server3.pp
/etc/puppet/manifests/nodes/**server4.pp
addition to this i have a jeeva_base.pp file where i include all my
modules. below is the portion of its content
--**-
node jeeva_base {
include all_scripts
include dev_jboss_jeeva
}
--**-
below is the content of my server1.pp file . i have created individual
.pp file for each server which inherits jeeva_base node.
--**
node server1 inherits jeeva_base {
}
--**-
As i said above, this is my requirement.
we have 3 version of jboss running in our environment in different
servers. eg. jboss4 in server1, jboss5 in server2 , jboss6 in server3 , and
no jboss in server 4 , etc
on each server, jboss config file sits under different path.
eg: in server 1 it sits under /opt/jboss4/
in server 2 it sits under /opt/jboss5/
in server 3 it sits under /opt/jboss6/
in server 4 no jboss is running
now i have 3 different configuration file for each version of jboss which
i need to replace. eg.
file1, i need to replace it to jboss4
file2 , i need to replace it to jboss5
file3 , i need to replace it to jboss6
also we need to keep in mind that it should not create a files/folder on
server4 which doesnt have jboss.
Now i need a module which checks the jboss path on each server and should
replace the sepcific file if it finds the specific path. eg
if it finds /opt/jboss4, then it should replace file1, if it finds
/opt/jboss5, then replace file2 and so on. But if no jboss path is found
then dont perform any thing on that server.
As suggested by Gary ( initial conversation) , gary helped me to create
the custom facts. but
[Puppet Users] Re: override/replace native types
On Apr 13, 4:08 am, Guillaume Rousse guillomovi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello list.
I'd like to implement a basic 'onlyif' property, as existing in 'exec'
type, to 'service' type. Rather than patching the original puppet code,
I think I could use the custom type mechanism, and implement my own
'conditional_service' type. However, in order to keep the benefit of
existing providers, I think renaming the type isn't the best solution.
So, would it possible to either inherit the original type definition,
and just add the new property, or distributing a modified type copy as
part of a module would also replace original type definition for this
module ?
No.
That is, you *can* subclass the built-in type and add a parameter, but
you cannot expect the existing type's providers to work with your
subclass. In fact, it is likely that the new behavior you want needs
to be in the provider(s) anyway.
BTW, the exact intent is to allow to test the configuration file syntax
before reloading a service, and avoid reloading it with an invalid
state. Something as:
file { /etc/openldap/slapd.conf:
content = template(slapd.conf.erb),
notify = Service[slapd]
}
service { slapd:
ensure = running,
onlyif = /usr/sbin/slaptest}
I'm with Craig that it would be best to rely on the initscript to
perform the test.
Moreover, I don't find the current behavior that bad. Is it better to
continue running the service with an out-of-date configuration? Is it
better to delay discovering the problem until the machine is
restarted, or until you or some other admin tries to restart the
service manually? If it were my server, the answers to both questions
would be no.
John
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Puppet Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
Re: [Puppet Users] puppet dashboard and mysql server is not localhost
On 16/04/2012 14:03, Fabien COMBERNOUS wrote: [...] Then i used the migrate and got the following output : server1:puppet-dashboard root# rake RAILS_ENV=production db:migrate (in /usr/share/puppet-dashboard) rake aborted! uninitialized constant MysqlCompat::MysqlRes I missed something ? The answer is with MacOSX Lion : install_name_tool -change libmysqlclient.18.dylib /usr/local/mysql/lib/libmysqlclient.18.dylib /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/mysql-2.8.1/lib/mysql_api.bundle -- *Fabien COMBERNOUS* /unix system engineer/ www.kezia.com http://www.kezia.com/ *Tel: +33(0)4 6787 0704 / +33(0)6 2584 0337* Kezia -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet Users group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
Re: [Puppet Users] Is paramater ordering non-deterministic?
The evaluation order of the parameters is not deterministic as I learned
when implementing validation of references in Geppetto. (BTW, Geppetto
issues warnings/errors when trying to reference potentially
uninitialized variables as in your example).
You need to move the logic computing the resulting defaults inside the
class to be able to use the $owner and $prefix values.
Regards
- henrik
On 2012-16-04 12:39, Robert Rothenberg wrote:
I've run into the following issue with parameters that are dependent on
each other. Suppose I have the following class:
| class foo(
$owner,
$prefix = /opt/${owner},
$etc_dir = ${prefix}/etc
) {
file{${etc_dir}:
ensure = directory,
owner = $owner,
group = $owner,
mode = 0660,
...
}|
The order that the parameters are defined appears to be
non-deterministic, so that sometimes $etc_dir is defined before $prefix.
Which means that $etc is set to '/etc', and of course, this restricts
the permissions on /etc, which breaks the server (including preventing
any user, including root, from sudoing!). Fortunately, this was found
while testing manifests on disposable virtual machines. I shudder to
think what would have happened if we didn't figure out the cause and
deployed this on actual servers.
So, am I correct in assuming that the order of parameter setting is
non-deterministic (and so should avoid setting them like above), or is
there something else going on?
If parameter order is not deterministic, I do think it should be
explicitly documented, with a warning about what can go wrong.
(Apologies if I've been daft and missed an existing mention of this
somewhere.)
FWIW, I added a note to http://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/4408 about
this issue.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Puppet Users group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/puppet-users/-/AjNp3Hlh8woJ.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet
Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
[Puppet Users] Re: Does one puppet master support multiply users to manage their resources?
On Apr 12, 10:06 pm, runner pengyongb...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I am a new user of puppet. We want every user of our group to manage software in his/her machines. How can puppet support this? Thank you. Puppet does not prevent users from employing the ordinary tools (yum, apt, etc.) for managing software. You could consider just giving users the ability to run yum via sudo, instead of complicating things by involving Puppet. Do note, by the way, that allowing users to install or update software of their choice on their computers makes it easy for them to completely subvert their systems, whether they are using their systems' tools directly or via Puppet. If you have some idea that Puppet can prevent that then give it up now. If you still want to delegate some degree of responsibility for software management to users, and to do it via Puppet, then you could look at putting per-machine config files in a source repository, such as Subversion. Rely on the repository's access controls to protect those files from unauthorized changes. On the master, pull down the latest config files at least as often as the client run interval, and build a module around using Hiera to load the data into Package resources. John -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet Users group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
Re: [Puppet Users] Is paramater ordering non-deterministic?
So will the setting of the values for $owner and $prefix be deterministic,
when set inside a class or resource definition?
Also, what if I want to be able to override these with user settings?
(That's one of the reasons that they are parameters in the first place.)
On Monday, April 16, 2012 2:14:36 PM UTC+1, Henrik Lindberg wrote:
The evaluation order of the parameters is not deterministic as I learned
when implementing validation of references in Geppetto. (BTW, Geppetto
issues warnings/errors when trying to reference potentially
uninitialized variables as in your example).
You need to move the logic computing the resulting defaults inside the
class to be able to use the $owner and $prefix values.
Regards
- henrik
On 2012-16-04 12:39, Robert Rothenberg wrote:
I've run into the following issue with parameters that are dependent on
each other. Suppose I have the following class:
| class foo(
$owner,
$prefix = /opt/${owner},
$etc_dir = ${prefix}/etc
) {
file{${etc_dir}:
ensure = directory,
owner = $owner,
group = $owner,
mode = 0660,
...
}|
The order that the parameters are defined appears to be
non-deterministic, so that sometimes $etc_dir is defined before $prefix.
Which means that $etc is set to '/etc', and of course, this restricts
the permissions on /etc, which breaks the server (including preventing
any user, including root, from sudoing!). Fortunately, this was found
while testing manifests on disposable virtual machines. I shudder to
think what would have happened if we didn't figure out the cause and
deployed this on actual servers.
So, am I correct in assuming that the order of parameter setting is
non-deterministic (and so should avoid setting them like above), or is
there something else going on?
If parameter order is not deterministic, I do think it should be
explicitly documented, with a warning about what can go wrong.
(Apologies if I've been daft and missed an existing mention of this
somewhere.)
FWIW, I added a note to http://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/4408 about
this issue.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Puppet Users group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/puppet-users/-/r2OAYubbE-oJ.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
[Puppet Users] regsubst and regex
Hi everyone, A quick question for you, here is the code: $tt=regsubst(test,^(.*)-(.*),'\2') Doesn't return: undef or nil, it does return: test Niether does $tt=regsubst(test,^(.?)-(.*),'\2') or $tt=regsubst(test,^(.+?)-(.*),'\2'). Is there a way to return undef if the string doesn't include '-something' ? Regards, JM -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet Users group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
[Puppet Users] Re: Define node environment on puppet master nodes.pp?
On Apr 12, 5:26 pm, Will S. G. w...@arw.in wrote: Hello, Is there a way to define an environment for the prospective nodes in nodes.pp (maybe a default node?) I'd like to be able to define it there and then have my puppet module configure the node puppet.conf (erb template) based on the parameters that’s passed on from the master. Possible? If present, the special node name default will match any node that is not matched by another node definition (including one actually named default, if there is any). I'm having trouble seeing how that will actually help you, though, because you have to have Puppet already running on the client. Also, it is tricky (but I think possible) to make Puppet reconfigure itself in such a way that future runs would select a different node definition. You would need to deal with installing the corresponding cryptographic certificate. John -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet Users group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
Re: [Puppet Users] Re: override/replace native types
Le 16/04/2012 15:02, jcbollinger a écrit : Moreover, I don't find the current behavior that bad. Is it better to continue running the service with an out-of-date configuration? Is it better to delay discovering the problem until the machine is restarted, or until you or some other admin tries to restart the service manually? If it were my server, the answers to both questions would be no. I wholefully agree. My final objective is to test, reload is everything is OK, and notifies otherwise so as to have the problem be corrected ASAP. I described only initial step to make the point easier. I don't want to interfere with native distribution initscripts, mainly for maintenance reasons. However, using a custom wrapper could be the solution here. -- BOFH excuse #297: Too many interrupts -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet Users group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
Re: [Puppet Users] regsubst and regex
On 2012-04-16 15:26, Antidot SAS wrote:
A quick question for you, here is the code:
$tt=regsubst(test,^(.*)-(.*),'\2')
Doesn't return: undef or nil, it does return: test
As expected and intended.
Niether does $tt=regsubst(test,^(.?)-(.*),'\2')
or $tt=regsubst(test,^(.+?)-(.*),'\2').
Is there a way to return undef if the string doesn't include '-something' ?
Perhaps something like this:
$x = 'test'
$temp = regsubst($x, '^(.*)-(.*)', '\2')
if $temp == $x {
# No substitution done, must mean there is no - in $x
$tt = undef
} else {
$tt = $temp
}
Or perhaps this:
$tt = regsubst($x, '^(.*)-(.*)|.*', '\2')
It will however give you the empty string (), not undef, if there is
no - in the string.
/Bellman
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Puppet Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
[Puppet Users] Re: New CA, why do clients with old certs still work?
On Apr 13, 1:40 pm, Chip Schweiss chip.schwe...@gmail.com wrote: I'm in the process of scalling my puppet master to two server with a separate CA. My plan was to establish a new CA and reissue certificates. Part way through the process I noticed a behavior that seems a bit alarming. With one of my clients pointing to the new CA and new Puppetmaster but with the old certificate I ran a 'puppetd --test --server puppet01.mydomain' I was expecting it to fail validation and then regenerate the client certificate. However it ran without error. Thinking maybe it's still hitting the orginal CA, I backed-up and wiped the ssl dir on the puppetmaster and restarted the pupetmaster to generate a new CA. The client still works. There are no signed certificates for this client on either puppetmaster or CA now and it still runs. Am I missing something about how the puppetmaster decides it's okay to talk to a client, or is all the security simply on the client side, and the puppetmaster trusts any puppet client? I'm about confused about what you mean by the client pointing to the new CA and Puppet hitting the original CA. The CA is only involved in signing certificates. It is not actively involved in verifying certificates (though verifiers do use the CA's certificate). Admitedly, that distinction can be somewhat muddy when the Puppetmaster serves as its own CA, but it more-or-less still holds. If your client already has a valid certificate, regardless of which CA signed it, then that is the certificate it will present. If the master can verify that certificate then it will accept the client. If you want the master to reject certificates signed by the old CA, then you must configure it so that it does not trust that CA. Even better, also revoke all the certificates signed by the old CA and install the corresponding CRL in the master. John -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet Users group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
[Puppet Users] Re: Puppet definitions and hashes/arrays syntax problem.
On Apr 13, 10:17 am, Rocky rosco...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I have this definiton for keepalived. And i need to feed the template
this array that i will loop trough.
site.pp definition snippet:
keepalived::vrrp_virtual_server {
real_servers = { realserver1 = { ip = '192.168.33.10',
Variables in Puppet manifests are designated by an initial '$' sigil:
$real_servers = ...
(The sigil is left off when you refer to local Puppet variables in
templates, however.)
John
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Puppet Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
Re: [Puppet Users] regsubst and regex
Thx for the reply it helps.
But how come the \2 returns something that I never asked?
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Thomas Bellman bell...@nsc.liu.se wrote:
On 2012-04-16 15:26, Antidot SAS wrote:
A quick question for you, here is the code:
$tt=regsubst(test,^(.*)-(.*),'\2')
Doesn't return: undef or nil, it does return: test
As expected and intended.
Niether does $tt=regsubst(test,^(.?)-(.*),'\2')
or $tt=regsubst(test,^(.+?)-(.*),'\2').
Is there a way to return undef if the string doesn't include
'-something' ?
Perhaps something like this:
$x = 'test'
$temp = regsubst($x, '^(.*)-(.*)', '\2')
if $temp == $x {
# No substitution done, must mean there is no - in $x
$tt = undef
} else {
$tt = $temp
}
Or perhaps this:
$tt = regsubst($x, '^(.*)-(.*)|.*', '\2')
It will however give you the empty string (), not undef, if there is
no - in the string.
/Bellman
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Puppet Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Puppet Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
[Puppet Users] content source
Hi everyone, Maybe a dump question but what happens if for a file ressource I specify a source and a content? Is there a priority? The resul won't be determinist? Regards, JM -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet Users group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
[Puppet Users] Re: Is paramater ordering non-deterministic?
On Apr 16, 8:22 am, Robert Rothenberg rob...@gmail.com wrote:
So will the setting of the values for $owner and $prefix be deterministic,
when set inside a class or resource definition?
Manifest code inside a class or definition is processed in lexical
order.
Note also that some programming languages behave similarly to Puppet,
in that their specifications do not require function arguments to be
evaluated in order. C, for example.
Also, what if I want to be able to override these with user settings?
(That's one of the reasons that they are parameters in the first place.)
This is the usual idiom:
class foo(
$owner,
$user_prefix = '',
$user_etc_dir = ''
) {
$prefix = $user_prefix ? { '' = /opt/${owner}, default =
$user_prefix }
$etc_dir = $user_etc_dir ? { '' = ${prefix}/etc, default =
$user_etc_dir }
...
}
John
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Puppet Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
[Puppet Users] How to modify a file content?
Hi guys, I trying to modify a file on Windows using puppet, I got a template file like this: [default] host = SOmeNAme [WinEventLog:Security] disabled = 1 is copied using puppet to the windows machine as C:\Program Files\Soft1\inputs.conf And I need to replace the host line with the real name of the windows machine: i.e.: host = machine1 Is this possible using puppet for windows? Regards. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet Users group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
Re: [Puppet Users] Is paramater ordering non-deterministic?
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 6:22 AM, Robert Rothenberg rob...@gmail.com wrote: So will the setting of the values for $owner and $prefix be deterministic, when set inside a class or resource definition? Yes. The issue with parameters in class declaration is described in further details here: http://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/9848 Also, what if I want to be able to override these with user settings? (That's one of the reasons that they are parameters in the first place.) John's example works with the edge case where you actually want to set a variable to '', you'll see our documentation list 'UNSET' as the default for this reason: http://docs.puppetlabs.com/guides/parameterized_classes.html Thanks, Nan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet Users group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
[Puppet Users] Re: node-specific resources outside of a general-purpose module
On Apr 16, 3:13 am, Jonathon Anderson anderbub...@gmail.com wrote: On Monday, April 9, 2012 5:35:09 PM UTC+3, jcbollinger wrote: I'm not following why defined types present a special problem here. They aren't a special problem: they simply haven't *solved* the problem. If as generalized as I can get is defining some types, where do I put the declaration of these types so that they get applied to my nodes? You put them into classes that are declared on your nodes -- but that can't be the answer you're looking for. If Jeff's response does not adequately address your question then perhaps an example would help. What kind of defined type instances are you struggling to find a home for? It's entirely possible that this is just a namespacing question: I've seen references to a `site` module where such site-specific classes should go, and, as I've said, we're already using modules with a `s_` prefix for this purpose; but I'm looking for what the normal thing is. If modules are not supposed to be site-specific, where do I put my site-specific config? As a matter of best practices, modules should not contain site- specific *data*. Instead, they should obtain such data from an external source, one or more of node facts, external data via a service such as hiera, or class parameters. Also as a matter of best practices, all classes should be in modules. These principles do not conflict. If you have classes that are site-specific in the sense that nobody else would want to do the things they do (as opposed to containing site-specific data), then I don't see any problem with putting them in one or more modules. If you want, you can add a directory to your module path for such modules, but I don't see any special need to do so. John -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet Users group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Need puppet module for condition copy
According to your configuration, I don't think my code will work at all.
Your setup is quite different then mine and I've no other suggestions for
you at the moment. Hopefully, someone else will pick it up from here.
Cheers!!
On Monday, April 16, 2012 1:59:25 PM UTC+1, Jeeva wrote:
1. The line: *import 'modules'* in */etc/puppet/manifests/site.pp
- i do have site.pp file but dont have the entry for modules. i added
the entry but later i saw lot of errors related to modules in log
*
2. The line: *import 'jb_test'* in* /etc/puppet/manifests/modules.pp
- i dont have modules.pp file. But as i said in my previous email, i
have customised servername.pp siles
*
3. The file:* /etc/puppet/modules/jb_test/manifests/jb_config.pp
- i created this file
*
4. The file:* /etc/puppet/modules/jb_test/manifests/init_config.pp
- i created this file
*
5. The file:* /etc/puppet/modules/jb_test/files/group_test
- i have this file*
6. and finally, in the */etc/puppet/manifests/nodes.pp
- I dont have this file in my configuration*
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 7:38 AM, Sans r.santanu@gmail.com wrote:
humm.. not sure but looks like couple of steps from my previous post
are missing.
Can you pls confirm that you have all of these:
1. The line: *import 'modules'* in */etc/puppet/manifests/site.pp*
2. The line: *import 'jb_test'* in* /etc/puppet/manifests/modules.pp*
3. The file:* /etc/puppet/modules/jb_test/manifests/jb_config.pp*
4. The file:* /etc/puppet/modules/jb_test/manifests/init_config.pp*
5. The file:* /etc/puppet/modules/jb_test/files/group_test*
6. and finally, in the */etc/puppet/manifests/nodes.pp*
node 'vm-jeeva2' {
include cp_jboss_conf
}
(don't add inherits jeeva_base for the time being)
Cheers!!
On Monday, April 16, 2012 1:06:59 PM UTC+1, Jeeva wrote:
Hi Sans,
I followed your steps, but i am getting the same error again
Apr 16 11:29:39 pil-vm-pup-01 puppet-master[8092]: Could not find class
cp_jboss_conf for vm-jeeva2.aircell.prod at /etc/puppet/manifests/nodes/
**vm-jeeva2.aircell.prod.pp:2 on node vm-jeeva2.aircell.prod
Apr 16 11:29:39 pil-vm-pup-01 puppet-master[8092]: Could not find class
cp_jboss_conf for vm-jeeva2.aircell.prod at /etc/puppet/manifests/nodes/
**vm-jeeva2.aircell.prod.pp:2 on node vm-jeeva2.aircell.prod
Apr 16 11:29:39 pil-vm-pup-01 puppet-master[8092]:
(//vm-jeeva2.aircell.prod/**Puppet) Could not retrieve catalog from
remote server: Error 400 on SERVER: Could not find class cp_jboss_conf for
vm-jeeva2.aircell.prod at
/etc/puppet/manifests/nodes/**vm-jeeva2.aircell.prod.pp:2
on node vm-jeeva2.aircell.prod
Apr 16 11:29:39 pil-vm-pup-01 puppet-master[8092]:
(//vm-jeeva2.aircell.prod/**Puppet) Using cached catalog
Apr 16 11:29:39 pil-vm-pup-01 puppet-master[8092]:
(//vm-jeeva2.aircell.prod/**Puppet) Could not retrieve catalog;
skipping run
@All, Just not to confuse anyone, currently my puppet server is working
as expected. i have lot of modules created and it works. This is how my
configuration is
1 ) my site.pp file is under /etc/puppet/manifest/site.pp and below is
my content
import 'nodes/*'
$puppetserver = 'puppet-server.domain.com'
2) All my modules is under below path
/etc/puppet/modules/
3) under below path i have all my .pp files . eg
/etc/puppet/manifests/nodes/**server1.pp
/etc/puppet/manifests/nodes/**server2.pp
/etc/puppet/manifests/nodes/**server3.pp
/etc/puppet/manifests/nodes/**server4.pp
addition to this i have a jeeva_base.pp file where i include all my
modules. below is the portion of its content
--**-
node jeeva_base {
include all_scripts
include dev_jboss_jeeva
}
--**-
below is the content of my server1.pp file . i have created individual
.pp file for each server which inherits jeeva_base node.
--**
node server1 inherits jeeva_base {
}
--**-
As i said above, this is my requirement.
we have 3 version of jboss running in our environment in different
servers. eg. jboss4 in server1, jboss5 in server2 , jboss6 in server3 , and
no jboss in server 4 , etc
on each server, jboss config file sits under different path.
eg: in server 1 it sits under /opt/jboss4/
in server 2 it sits under /opt/jboss5/
in server 3 it sits under /opt/jboss6/
in server 4 no jboss is running
now i have 3 different configuration file for each version of jboss
which i need to replace. eg.
file1, i need to replace it to jboss4
file2 , i need to replace it to jboss5
file3 , i need to replace it to jboss6
also we need to keep in mind that it should not create a files/folder on
server4 which doesnt have jboss.
Now i need a module which checks the jboss path on each server and
[Puppet Users] Re: Puppet definitions and hashes/arrays syntax problem.
On Apr 13, 10:17 am, Rocky rosco...@gmail.com wrote: weight = '100' Also, you're missing a comma after each appearance of that entry. John -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet Users group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
Re: [Puppet Users] regsubst and regex
On 2012-04-16 15:57, Antidot SAS top-posted:
Thx for the reply it helps.
But how come the \2 returns something that I never asked?
It doesn't. But since there are no occurrances of '^(.*)-(.*)',
then there are none that get replaced. Similarly, if you do:
regsubst('foobar', 'x', 'y')
you will get 'foobar', since there *is* no 'x' in 'foobar' that
can be replaced by a 'y'.
/Bellman
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Puppet Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
[Puppet Users] Re: Puppet Certificate's
Gary, thanks very much for that. I got that to work as I wanted after a bit of fighting with other issues of my own creation. So I am very grateful to you for your help. If you ever in Dublin, Ireland. Look me up, I owe you a favor so I'm willing to pay back, within reason of course. Best Sean On Apr 12, 5:21 pm, Gary Larizza g...@puppetlabs.com wrote: Hey Guys, Let me try to step through this one step at a time. I recommend downloading one of our VMs that we host for testing puppet (I'm using the VM we use for training located here --http://downloads.puppetlabs.com/training/puppet-vmware.zipbut there's also one for VirtualBox too --http://downloads.puppetlabs.com/training/puppet-vbox.zip) to test this setup. If you do that, make sure DNS and networking are working (So, setup host entries on your laptop for each VM, setup the hostname and FQDN ON EACH VM, and make sure each VM can ping the VM Master). I'm using three VMs (a master and two agents): nodemaster.puppetlabs.vm, node1.puppetlabs.vm, and node2.puppetlabs.vm. Once DNS resolves and is working, setup Puppet on the master FIRST, and then setup the remaining nodes as agents. Again, I recommend using the VMs and using Puppet Enterprise because it makes it MUCH EASIER to setup Puppet - just use the puppet-enterprise-installer script (once you get the process of using a single cert and multiple node_names DOWN, THEN you can start on some actual machines). Now we can start customizing Puppet. There are a couple of key steps that need to be taken since we're shipping around a single cert for all machines: 1. When you stand up a PE Agent, it's going to contact the master and setup a Certificate Signing Request. Because of this, go to the master node's $ssldir (which, on Puppet Enterprise, is /etc/puppetlabs/puppet/ssl. If you want to find the $ssldir on YOUR master, just run `puppet config print ssldir` and it will print it out for you) and remove the CSRs that are in the ca/requests/ directory (they should be named after your nodes). 2. Next, lets generate the single certificate that will be shopped around. You will need to use the same 'certname' on every node. This is the name of the node as SSL is aware (in my case I'm using 'macs.puppetlabs.vm'). Do this by doing `puppet cert generate macs.puppetlabs.vm` on your MASTER machine. The master will generate the certs and your $ssldir will look something like this: ssl |-- ca | |-- ca_crl.pem | |-- ca_crt.pem | |-- ca_key.pem | |-- ca_pub.pem | |-- inventory.txt | |-- private | | `-- ca.pass | |-- requests | |-- serial | `-- signed | |-- macs.puppetlabs.vm.pem | |-- nodemaster.puppetlabs.vm.pem | |-- pe-internal-broker.pem | |-- pe-internal-dashboard.pem | |-- pe-internal-mcollective-servers.pem | |-- pe-internal-peadmin-mcollective-client.pem | `-- pe-internal-puppet-console-mcollective-client.pem |-- certificate_requests |-- certs | |-- ca.pem | |-- macs.puppetlabs.vm.pem | |-- nodemaster.puppetlabs.vm.pem | |-- pe-internal-broker.pem | |-- pe-internal-mcollective-servers.pem | |-- pe-internal-peadmin-mcollective-client.pem | `-- pe-internal-puppet-console-mcollective-client.pem |-- crl.pem |-- private |-- private_keys | |-- macs.puppetlabs.vm.pem | |-- nodemaster.puppetlabs.vm.pem | |-- pe-internal-broker.pem | |-- pe-internal-mcollective-servers.pem | |-- pe-internal-peadmin-mcollective-client.pem | `-- pe-internal-puppet-console-mcollective-client.pem `-- public_keys |-- foo.puppetlabs.vm.pem |-- macs.puppetlabs.vm.pem |-- nodemaster.puppetlabs.vm.pem |-- pe-internal-broker.pem |-- pe-internal-mcollective-servers.pem |-- pe-internal-peadmin-mcollective-client.pem `-- pe-internal-puppet-console-mcollective-client.pem 3. There are three files you need to collect on your master and ship around to all of your nodes. They are ALL in the $ssldir, so these paths are relative to THAT directory. The three files are: - $ssldir/private_keys/macs.puppetlabs.vm.pem on the master - gets copied to the agent's $ssldir/private_keys directory - $ssldir/public_keys/macs.puppetlabs.vm.pem on the master - gets copied to the agent's $ssldir/public_keys directory - $ssldir/ca/signed/macs.puppetlabs.vm.pem on the master - gets copied to the agent's $ssldir/certs directory 4. You need to modify /etc/puppetlabs/puppet/auth.conf on the master so every node can access the find action on the catalog REST endpoint for the master (i.e. The Mac nodes can get their catalog). Look for this stanza in auth.conf: # allow nodes to retrieve their own catalog (ie their configuration) path ~ ^/catalog/([^/]+)$ method find allow $1 Add the following line under 'allow $1': (Remember that I'm using the certname of
[Puppet Users] Re: Creating classes for individual nodes
Thanks everyone! This is a good start. I'll have to research most of
this but at least I know what to research now. Thanks.
Josh
On Apr 12, 10:19 am, Brian Gallew g...@gallew.org wrote:
I'm absolutely with John on this. As an example, for our JBoss application
we need the configuration file to be different based on the the hostname
(we only host one app per host/VM) and environment
(dev/integration/qa/staging/production). Further, some dev boxes need to
allow the developers to hand-update their configs. So what I have is a
templated configuration file that has all the configuration information in
it for all the environments, and only the pertinent information gets
shipped to the Puppet client. Further, I wrap this in a define{} so that
the file Puppet actually manages is server.properties-default. There is
an exec{} in the define which checks for a server.properties-noupdate
file. If that file exists, the exec{} bails. If it doesn't, then it
rsync's the -default file onto the server.properties file that JBoss
references. Finally, the define{} also creates a
server.properties-README which tells the developer about how the file is
managed and what they can do if they want to override Puppet.
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 1:52 PM, jcbollinger john.bollin...@stjude.orgwrote:
On Apr 11, 12:04 pm, Josh joshua.l.greenb...@gmail.com wrote:
This is more of a style question than implementation. I have a bunch of
nodes running the same software but in many cases they need config files
that are customized for that specific node. I was thinking I could push
all
the main files from the app through a central class and have separate
classes for each individual node that has the config files. Is this the
best way to do this or does it go against the purpose of using puppet?
There is no inherent problem with that approach, but for a little
extra effort you can get something that will be easier to maintain.
I'm not a big fan of parameterized classes myself, but I heartily
endorse an external data store, accessed via Hiera. Instead of using
per-node classes, record per-node data where needed. You can use that
data to fill templates, choose among alternatives in your manifests,
set resource properties, etc..
Also, for implementation, is it best practice to create a separate module
and class for each node where the class includes only that module?
Thanks.
I would say not. It might or might not make sense to put the per-node
classes in the module with the main classes for the application in
question, but I certainly see no reason to separate them from each
other. But the question is moot if you choose a cleaner strategy.
John
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Puppet Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Puppet Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Need puppet module for condition copy
Thank you so much San for your time and help.
Can anyone help me with this
-Jeeva
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Sans r.santanu@gmail.com wrote:
According to your configuration, I don't think my code will work at all.
Your setup is quite different then mine and I've no other suggestions for
you at the moment. Hopefully, someone else will pick it up from here.
Cheers!!
On Monday, April 16, 2012 1:59:25 PM UTC+1, Jeeva wrote:
1. The line: *import 'modules'* in */etc/puppet/manifests/site.pp
- i do have site.pp file but dont have the entry for modules. i added
the entry but later i saw lot of errors related to modules in log
*
2. The line: *import 'jb_test'* in* /etc/puppet/manifests/modules.pp
- i dont have modules.pp file. But as i said in my previous email, i
have customised servername.pp siles
*
3. The file:* /etc/puppet/modules/jb_test/manifests/jb_config.pp
- i created this file
*
4. The file:* /etc/puppet/modules/jb_test/manifests/init_config.pp
- i created this file
*
5. The file:* /etc/puppet/modules/jb_test/files/group_test
- i have this file*
6. and finally, in the */etc/puppet/manifests/nodes.pp
- I dont have this file in my configuration*
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 7:38 AM, Sans r.santanu@gmail.com wrote:
humm.. not sure but looks like couple of steps from my previous post
are missing.
Can you pls confirm that you have all of these:
1. The line: *import 'modules'* in */etc/puppet/manifests/site.pp*
2. The line: *import 'jb_test'* in* /etc/puppet/manifests/modules.pp*
3. The file:* /etc/puppet/modules/jb_test/manifests/jb_config.pp*
4. The file:* /etc/puppet/modules/jb_test/manifests/init_config.pp*
5. The file:* /etc/puppet/modules/jb_test/files/group_test*
6. and finally, in the */etc/puppet/manifests/nodes.pp*
node 'vm-jeeva2' {
include cp_jboss_conf
}
(don't add inherits jeeva_base for the time being)
Cheers!!
On Monday, April 16, 2012 1:06:59 PM UTC+1, Jeeva wrote:
Hi Sans,
I followed your steps, but i am getting the same error again
Apr 16 11:29:39 pil-vm-pup-01 puppet-master[8092]: Could not find class
cp_jboss_conf for vm-jeeva2.aircell.prod at /etc/puppet/manifests/nodes/
**vm**-jeeva2.aircell.prod.pp:2 on node vm-jeeva2.aircell.prod
Apr 16 11:29:39 pil-vm-pup-01 puppet-master[8092]: Could not find class
cp_jboss_conf for vm-jeeva2.aircell.prod at /etc/puppet/manifests/nodes/
**vm**-jeeva2.aircell.prod.pp:2 on node vm-jeeva2.aircell.prod
Apr 16 11:29:39 pil-vm-pup-01 puppet-master[8092]:
(//vm-jeeva2.aircell.prod/**Pupp**et) Could not retrieve catalog from
remote server: Error 400 on SERVER: Could not find class cp_jboss_conf for
vm-jeeva2.aircell.prod at
/etc/puppet/manifests/nodes/**vm**-jeeva2.aircell.prod.pp:2
on node vm-jeeva2.aircell.prod
Apr 16 11:29:39 pil-vm-pup-01 puppet-master[8092]:
(//vm-jeeva2.aircell.prod/**Pupp**et) Using cached catalog
Apr 16 11:29:39 pil-vm-pup-01 puppet-master[8092]:
(//vm-jeeva2.aircell.prod/**Pupp**et) Could not retrieve catalog;
skipping run
@All, Just not to confuse anyone, currently my puppet server is working
as expected. i have lot of modules created and it works. This is how my
configuration is
1 ) my site.pp file is under /etc/puppet/manifest/site.pp and below is
my content
import 'nodes/*'
$puppetserver = 'puppet-server.domain.com'
2) All my modules is under below path
/etc/puppet/modules/
3) under below path i have all my .pp files . eg
/etc/puppet/manifests/nodes/**se**rver1.pp
/etc/puppet/manifests/nodes/**se**rver2.pp
/etc/puppet/manifests/nodes/**se**rver3.pp
/etc/puppet/manifests/nodes/**se**rver4.pp
addition to this i have a jeeva_base.pp file where i include all my
modules. below is the portion of its content
---
node jeeva_base {
include all_scripts
include dev_jboss_jeeva
}
---
below is the content of my server1.pp file . i have created individual
.pp file for each server which inherits jeeva_base node.
--
node server1 inherits jeeva_base {
}
---
As i said above, this is my requirement.
we have 3 version of jboss running in our environment in different
servers. eg. jboss4 in server1, jboss5 in server2 , jboss6 in server3 , and
no jboss in server 4 , etc
on each server, jboss config file sits under different path.
eg: in server 1 it sits under /opt/jboss4/
in server 2 it sits under /opt/jboss5/
in server 3 it sits under /opt/jboss6/
in server 4 no jboss is running
now i have 3 different configuration file for each version of jboss
which i need to replace. eg.
file1, i need to replace it to jboss4
file2 , i need to replace it to jboss5
file3 , i need to replace it to jboss6
also we need to keep in mind that
Re: [Puppet Users] How to modify a file content?
Hi Marco,
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 7:22 AM, Marco Parra D. marco.parr...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi guys, I trying to modify a file on Windows using puppet, I got a
template file like this:
[default]
host = SOmeNAme
[WinEventLog:Security]
disabled = 1
is copied using puppet to the windows machine as C:\Program
Files\Soft1\inputs.conf
And I need to replace the host line with the real name of the windows
machine:
i.e.: host = machine1
Is this possible using puppet for windows?
Regards.
Yes, definitely. You should be able to specify the file content parameter
as a template:
file { 'C:\Program Files\Soft1\inputs.conf':
ensure = present,
content = template('module/template.erb')
}
and then in your template template.erb, you can have it resolve the value
of the host property using the agent's hostname fact:
host = %= @hostname %
This page provides more information about puppet templates:
http://docs.puppetlabs.com/guides/templating.html
Josh
--
Josh Cooper
Developer, Puppet Labs
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Puppet Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
Re: [Puppet Users] content source
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 6:59 AM, Antidot SAS antidot...@gmail.com wrote: Hi everyone, Maybe a dump question but what happens if for a file ressource I specify a source and a content? Is there a priority? The resul won't be determinist? Regards, JM The file resource should generate a validation error as source and content are mutually exclusive. Josh -- Josh Cooper Developer, Puppet Labs -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet Users group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
Re: [Puppet Users] content source
thx On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Josh Cooper j...@puppetlabs.com wrote: On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 6:59 AM, Antidot SAS antidot...@gmail.com wrote: Hi everyone, Maybe a dump question but what happens if for a file ressource I specify a source and a content? Is there a priority? The resul won't be determinist? Regards, JM The file resource should generate a validation error as source and content are mutually exclusive. Josh -- Josh Cooper Developer, Puppet Labs -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet Users group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet Users group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
Re: [Puppet Users] regsubst and regex
Ok, I totally forget that replacement part is not a search :D
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Thomas Bellman bell...@nsc.liu.se wrote:
On 2012-04-16 15:57, Antidot SAS top-posted:
Thx for the reply it helps.
But how come the \2 returns something that I never asked?
It doesn't. But since there are no occurrances of '^(.*)-(.*)',
then there are none that get replaced. Similarly, if you do:
regsubst('foobar', 'x', 'y')
you will get 'foobar', since there *is* no 'x' in 'foobar' that
can be replaced by a 'y'.
/Bellman
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Puppet Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Puppet Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
[Puppet Users] configured puppet server as client now no updates are working
Hi, My puppet server was working up until I configured it to be a puppet client. I applied the configuration on the server which seemed to work fine. However, now when ever a client or itself asks for an updated configuration it always comes back with a successful poll, no updates, and the configuration version changed. So configuration changes are not being applied anymore. Is there some cache that's not being cleared? Is there a way of reversing this? test-puppet ~ # puppetd -t info: Caching catalog for test-puppet.lab.lcl info: Applying configuration version '1334594015' notice: Finished catalog run in 0.02 seconds Thanks, -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet Users group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/puppet-users/-/J7ehDlU1CUcJ. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
Re: [Puppet Users] How to modify a file content?
On 16-04-2012 12:55, Josh Cooper wrote:
Hi Marco,
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 7:22 AM, Marco Parra D.
marco.parr...@gmail.com mailto:marco.parr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys, I trying to modify a file on Windows using puppet, I got
a template file like this:
[default]
host = SOmeNAme
[WinEventLog:Security]
disabled = 1
is copied using puppet to the windows machine as C:\Program
Files\Soft1\inputs.conf
And I need to replace the host line with the real name of the
windows machine:
i.e.: host = machine1
Is this possible using puppet for windows?
Regards.
Yes, definitely. You should be able to specify the file content
parameter as a template:
file { 'C:\Program Files\Soft1\inputs.conf':
ensure = present,
content = template('module/template.erb')
}
and then in your template template.erb, you can have it resolve the
value of the host property using the agent's hostname fact:
host = %= @hostname %
This page provides more information about puppet templates:
http://docs.puppetlabs.com/guides/templating.html
Josh
--
Josh Cooper
Developer, Puppet Labs
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Puppet Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
Hi Josh, I'll try this, thanks a lot...
Regards..
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet
Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
[Puppet Users] Re: configured puppet server as client now no updates are working
Hi Psychobyte, Can you please post you site.pp and nodes.pp file which u have in server. On Monday, April 16, 2012 10:15:25 PM UTC+5:30, psychobyte wrote: Hi, My puppet server was working up until I configured it to be a puppet client. I applied the configuration on the server which seemed to work fine. However, now when ever a client or itself asks for an updated configuration it always comes back with a successful poll, no updates, and the configuration version changed. So configuration changes are not being applied anymore. Is there some cache that's not being cleared? Is there a way of reversing this? test-puppet ~ # puppetd -t info: Caching catalog for test-puppet.lab.lcl info: Applying configuration version '1334594015' notice: Finished catalog run in 0.02 seconds Thanks, -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet Users group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/puppet-users/-/ZmBl6eP898cJ. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
Re: [Puppet Users] How to modify a file content?
Hi Josh
On 16-04-2012 12:55, Josh Cooper wrote:
Hi Marco,
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 7:22 AM, Marco Parra D.
marco.parr...@gmail.com mailto:marco.parr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys, I trying to modify a file on Windows using puppet, I got
a template file like this:
[default]
host = SOmeNAme
[WinEventLog:Security]
disabled = 1
is copied using puppet to the windows machine as C:\Program
Files\Soft1\inputs.conf
And I need to replace the host line with the real name of the
windows machine:
i.e.: host = machine1
Is this possible using puppet for windows?
Regards.
Yes, definitely. You should be able to specify the file content
parameter as a template:
file { 'C:\Program Files\Soft1\inputs.conf':
ensure = present,
content = template('module/template.erb')
}
and then in your template template.erb, you can have it resolve the
value of the host property using the agent's hostname fact:
host = %= @hostname %
This page provides more information about puppet templates:
http://docs.puppetlabs.com/guides/templating.html
Josh
--
Josh Cooper
Developer, Puppet Labs
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Puppet Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
It works perfect, thank you again!
:)
Regards.!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet
Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
Re: [Puppet Users] How to modify a file content?
Hi Josh,
Where can I find the complete fact's list to use on windows?...
thank you in advance!
Regards..
On 16-04-2012 12:55, Josh Cooper wrote:
Hi Marco,
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 7:22 AM, Marco Parra D.
marco.parr...@gmail.com mailto:marco.parr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys, I trying to modify a file on Windows using puppet, I got
a template file like this:
[default]
host = SOmeNAme
[WinEventLog:Security]
disabled = 1
is copied using puppet to the windows machine as C:\Program
Files\Soft1\inputs.conf
And I need to replace the host line with the real name of the
windows machine:
i.e.: host = machine1
Is this possible using puppet for windows?
Regards.
Yes, definitely. You should be able to specify the file content
parameter as a template:
file { 'C:\Program Files\Soft1\inputs.conf':
ensure = present,
content = template('module/template.erb')
}
and then in your template template.erb, you can have it resolve the
value of the host property using the agent's hostname fact:
host = %= @hostname %
This page provides more information about puppet templates:
http://docs.puppetlabs.com/guides/templating.html
Josh
--
Josh Cooper
Developer, Puppet Labs
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Puppet Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet
Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
Re: [Puppet Users] How to modify a file content?
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Marco Parra D. marco.parr...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Josh,
Where can I find the complete fact's list to use on windows?...
thank you in advance!
Regards..
You should be able to run Facter directly on the system in question.
On 16-04-2012 12:55, Josh Cooper wrote:
Hi Marco,
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 7:22 AM, Marco Parra D.
marco.parr...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi guys, I trying to modify a file on Windows using puppet, I got a
template file like this:
[default]
host = SOmeNAme
[WinEventLog:Security]
disabled = 1
is copied using puppet to the windows machine as C:\Program
Files\Soft1\inputs.conf
And I need to replace the host line with the real name of the windows
machine:
i.e.: host = machine1
Is this possible using puppet for windows?
Regards.
Yes, definitely. You should be able to specify the file content
parameter as a template:
file { 'C:\Program Files\Soft1\inputs.conf':
ensure = present,
content = template('module/template.erb')
}
and then in your template template.erb, you can have it resolve the
value of the host property using the agent's hostname fact:
host = %= @hostname %
This page provides more information about puppet templates:
http://docs.puppetlabs.com/guides/templating.html
Josh
--
Josh Cooper
Developer, Puppet Labs
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Puppet Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Puppet Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
--
Kelsey Hightower
Solutions Engineer
Puppet Labs
1-678-471-9501
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Puppet Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
Re: [Puppet Users] How to modify a file content?
Hi Kelsey,
thank you, Are these the only list of facts?, What makes this list?,
It's possible add more facts to windows?
Thank you
Regards.!
On 16-04-2012 14:33, Kelsey Hightower wrote:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Marco Parra D.
marco.parr...@gmail.com mailto:marco.parr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Josh,
Where can I find the complete fact's list to use on windows?...
thank you in advance!
Regards..
You should be able to run Facter directly on the system in question.
On 16-04-2012 12:55, Josh Cooper wrote:
Hi Marco,
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 7:22 AM, Marco Parra D.
marco.parr...@gmail.com mailto:marco.parr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys, I trying to modify a file on Windows using puppet,
I got a template file like this:
[default]
host = SOmeNAme
[WinEventLog:Security]
disabled = 1
is copied using puppet to the windows machine as C:\Program
Files\Soft1\inputs.conf
And I need to replace the host line with the real name of the
windows machine:
i.e.: host = machine1
Is this possible using puppet for windows?
Regards.
Yes, definitely. You should be able to specify the file content
parameter as a template:
file { 'C:\Program Files\Soft1\inputs.conf':
ensure = present,
content = template('module/template.erb')
}
and then in your template template.erb, you can have it resolve
the value of the host property using the agent's hostname fact:
host = %= @hostname %
This page provides more information about puppet templates:
http://docs.puppetlabs.com/guides/templating.html
Josh
--
Josh Cooper
Developer, Puppet Labs
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Google Groups Puppet Users group.
To post to this group, send email to
puppet-users@googlegroups.com mailto:puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
mailto:puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Puppet Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com
mailto:puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
mailto:puppet-users%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
--
Kelsey Hightower
Solutions Engineer
Puppet Labs
1-678-471-9501
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups Puppet Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet
Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
Re: [Puppet Users] Supported Ruby Versions for Telly
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 8:53 PM, Dan White y...@comcast.net wrote: Great to hear this, but I am now looking for a reliable way to get Ruby 1.8.7 or 1.9.3 onto a RHEL-5 system. The environment I am working still has RHEL 3 and 4 machines running, and I would not hold my breath waiting for transition to RHEL 6 (which does have ruby 1.8.7 in it) One more thing: When I say reliable, it has to be able to convince a non-technical PHB type. Suggestions ? Other than the suggestions already listed in this thread, you might just want to not move to Telly. Obviously you're running things that MUCH older than what telly is setup to do. Another option would be to run Puppet Enterprise (which includes Ruby 1.8.7), but doesn't support RHEL 3 or 4. I'd probably talk to my boss about what end-of-life really means ;) On Apr 13, 2012, at 2:59 PM, Michael Stahnke wrote: Puppet Labs is happy to announce full support for Ruby 1.9.3 will be part of the next major release of Puppet, codenamed Telly. Ruby 1.8.7 and 1.9.3 are considered the primary supported Ruby versions, on all platforms including Unix, Linux, Windows, and MacOS-X. Ruby 1.8.5 is also supported, on the agent only. The Puppet 2.7 series featured initial support for the Ruby 1.9 series, and we are happy to see that work completed and brought forward to full production support in the forthcoming release. Other Ruby versions including 1.8.6, 1.9.1, and 1.9.2 are not officially supported. Ruby implementations other than the MRI series are not officially supported. We will accept patches that fix issues on other (non MRI) Ruby systems. 1.9.3 was selected due to its inclusion in Fedora 17 (Beefy Miracle) and Ubuntu Precise Pangolin. Previews of Telly should be available in May. If you'd like to see some of the changes happening today, you are also welcome to run Puppet's master branch. If you have questions or concerns, feel free to respond here. Mike Stahnke Community Manager -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet Users group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet Users group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
Re: [Puppet Users] How to modify a file content?
Hi Marco, On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Marco Parra D. marco.parr...@gmail.comwrote: Hi Kelsey, thank you, Are these the only list of facts?, What makes this list?, I don't think we have a facts supported by platform sort of document. Windows does support basic facts, e.g. hostname, domain, etc. This is the ticket describing the initial set of facts we added support for in 2.7.x: http://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/8439 It's possible add more facts to windows? You can always write custom facts. http://docs.puppetlabs.com/guides/custom_facts.html Josh -- Josh Cooper Developer, Puppet Labs -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet Users group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
Re: [Puppet Users] Supported Ruby Versions for Telly
Gary Larizza wrote: Have you checked out the packages that Karanbir Singh has created? They work fairly well -- http://centos.karan.org/el5/ruby187/ They're also not updated for recent security vulnerabilities, which should be a concern for anyone deploying them in production. Basically, this means that Telly won't support el5 as a master, right? -- ToddOpenPGP - KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~ The most overlooked advantage to owning a computer is that if they foul up, there's no law against whacking them around a little. -- Eric Porterfield pgpxRuPkSIdmG.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [Puppet Users] Telly: Nagios types moving into Module
Michael Stahnke wrote: For the next major Puppet version, code-named Telly, we have some changes coming. This is the first in a series of emails around these changes and may require some input from the community. For Telly, the nagios types will be moved into a module. This allows them to be iterated on in isolation from the rest of Puppet's core release cycle and process. In the future we have plans to move several other types into modules that can be individually maintained, improved, tested and used. The module for Nagios will be available on the Forge. The upgrade path is the thing we need some feedback about. The basic steps to upgrade would be to setup a Telly master, and then install the Nagios module via the Puppet Module Tool, which ships integrated with 2.7.13+ and Telly. Is it possible to package these modules for distros? In the past, we've had a few requests to do this for third-party modules but we didn't do this because there wasn't really any standard for it. With puppet module tool being integrated now, perhaps that's something that can be reconsidered. I'm thinking that for folks using rpm, they'd rather see an update that pulls in the same fucntionality as they had before. And even for new installs, I'd personally prefer to install these things via rpm. If I wanted to use a secondary package management system, I could use gems or eggs or CPAN, but I don't. ;) I think it's good to split out these things, as it would allow us to properly add a nagios dep to the hypothetical puppet-module-nagios package. -- ToddOpenPGP - KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~ I am free of all prejudice. I hate everyone equally. -- W. C. Fields pgpimlSvSIWQQ.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [Puppet Users] Telly: Nagios types moving into Module
In regard to: Re: [Puppet Users] Telly: Nagios types moving into Module,...: If I wanted to use a secondary package management system, I could use gems or eggs or CPAN, but I don't. ;) +1. Tim -- Tim Mooney tim.moo...@ndsu.edu Enterprise Computing Infrastructure 701-231-1076 (Voice) Room 242-J6, IACC Building 701-231-8541 (Fax) North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105-5164 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet Users group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
Re: [Puppet Users] How to modify a file content?
Hi Josh On 16-04-2012 15:24, Josh Cooper wrote: Hi Marco, On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Marco Parra D. marco.parr...@gmail.com mailto:marco.parr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Kelsey, thank you, Are these the only list of facts?, What makes this list?, I don't think we have a facts supported by platform sort of document. Windows does support basic facts, e.g. hostname, domain, etc. This is the ticket describing the initial set of facts we added support for in 2.7.x: http://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/8439 It's possible add more facts to windows? You can always write custom facts. http://docs.puppetlabs.com/guides/custom_facts.html Josh -- Josh Cooper Developer, Puppet Labs -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet Users group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en. I'll check the page that you gave me... Thank you... Regards -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet Users group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
Re: [Puppet-dev] Re: [Puppet Users] Telly: Nagios types moving into Module
A pm2rpm tool perhaps Todd? :-). On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 7:36 PM, Todd Zullinger t...@pobox.com wrote: Michael Stahnke wrote: For the next major Puppet version, code-named Telly, we have some changes coming. This is the first in a series of emails around these changes and may require some input from the community. For Telly, the nagios types will be moved into a module. This allows them to be iterated on in isolation from the rest of Puppet's core release cycle and process. In the future we have plans to move several other types into modules that can be individually maintained, improved, tested and used. The module for Nagios will be available on the Forge. The upgrade path is the thing we need some feedback about. The basic steps to upgrade would be to setup a Telly master, and then install the Nagios module via the Puppet Module Tool, which ships integrated with 2.7.13+ and Telly. Is it possible to package these modules for distros? In the past, we've had a few requests to do this for third-party modules but we didn't do this because there wasn't really any standard for it. With puppet module tool being integrated now, perhaps that's something that can be reconsidered. I'm thinking that for folks using rpm, they'd rather see an update that pulls in the same fucntionality as they had before. And even for new installs, I'd personally prefer to install these things via rpm. If I wanted to use a secondary package management system, I could use gems or eggs or CPAN, but I don't. ;) I think it's good to split out these things, as it would allow us to properly add a nagios dep to the hypothetical puppet-module-nagios package. -- Todd OpenPGP - KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~ I am free of all prejudice. I hate everyone equally. -- W. C. Fields -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet Users group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
[Puppet Users] hiera puppet augeas and hash keys ?
Hi,
if possible can someone post a working example please ?
I am using hiera = puppet = augeas.
cat myserver.yaml
---
myserver:
Birthday: '1'
Debug: '5'
The no. of settings will change, so i would like to use a hash here.
The hiera lookup works already:
hiera -c /etc/puppet/hiera.yaml -h myserver
{Debug=5, Birthday=1}
I can save a single value via hiera = puppet = augeas sucessfully
when i know its variable name.
What i am searching for is the proper syntax to use 'hiera_hash'
and save all settings into augeas with 'set $name $value' coming from
the yaml-file.
In perl it would be have been like this:
foreach $key (keys %hash){
print $key $hash{$key}\n;
}
Thank you
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Puppet Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
Re: [Puppet Users] Supported Ruby Versions for Telly
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Todd Zullinger t...@pobox.com wrote: Gary Larizza wrote: Have you checked out the packages that Karanbir Singh has created? They work fairly well -- http://centos.karan.org/el5/ruby187/ They're also not updated for recent security vulnerabilities, which should be a concern for anyone deploying them in production. Basically, this means that Telly won't support el5 as a master, right? This is my understanding, yes. We'll support EL5 as a master with Puppet Enterprise, and as an agent with the vendor provided Ruby, but the cost of supporting Ruby 1.8.5 running a Puppet Master is quite high. I know this isn't ideal, but Ruby 1.8.5 is extremely long in the tooth. -Jeff -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet Users group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
Re: [Puppet Users]
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 4:14 AM, Afroz Hussain hussainaph...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I updated the Puppet Enterprise 2.0 to 2.5.1 and tried to restart the httpd and getting following error in /var/log/pe-httpd/puppetdashboard.error.log [warn] RSA server certificate CommonName (CN) `pe-internal-dashboard' does NOT match server name!? This question might be better suited for the pe-users list. [1] This is just a warning and not an actual error. It means the certificate's Common Name field doesn't match the server name Apache is using for the virtual host. Unfortunately this is by design for the time being. We're having difficult coming up with a reliable way to issue the certificate used by the Console's HTTPS vhost. Ideally, the certificate name will match the hostname, but this is very difficult to make work reliably given the state of name resolution in most networks PE is installed into. To make installation and upgrades reliable, we simply issue a certificate named pe-internal-dashboard rather than try to figure out the hostname. [1] https://groups.google.com/a/puppetlabs.com/group/pe-users/topics Hope this helps, -Jeff -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet Users group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
Re: [Puppet Users] Facter not initialized in rspec in puppetlabs-stdlib?
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 8:34 PM, Wil Cooley wilcoo...@gmail.com wrote: On Thursday, April 12, 2012 10:06:25 AM UTC-7, Jeff McCune wrote: The problem is that modules like stdlib need Puppet to be initialized in a manner suitable for testing. Setting things like confdir and what not. This means different actions for different versions of Puppet, and stdlib works all the way back through 2.6. I took the expedient way out and commented out the requires from spec_helper. :-\ My tests pass now, at least. I have now added tests for the has_ip_address and has_ip_network, which are more porcelain than has_interface_with. https://github.com/wcooley/puppetlabs-stdlib/compare/puppetlabs:master...wcooley:has_interface_with_function If you like it, I will open a ticket and submit a pull request. Yes, please file a ticket at: http://projects.puppetlabs.com/projects/stdlib You'll need to register an account if you don't already have one. If it's a somewhat substantial patch could you also please sign the CLA at: https://projects.puppetlabs.com/contributor_licenses/sign Thanks, -Jeff McCune -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet Users group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
Re: [Puppet Users] Supported Ruby Versions for Telly
I'd like to recommend the frameos version instead. If you're going to do it from source, the frameos ruby spec file is much simpler, with much smaller diff files against the distro, and doesn't compile in a bunch of japanese and Tk stuff. I've been updating the spec file to track the latest ruby patchlevel with no other changes, and that works fine for me. https://github.com/frameos/ruby-rpm On Apr 14, 2012, at 9:55 PM, Gary Larizza wrote: Have you checked out the packages that Karanbir Singh has created? They work fairly well -- http://centos.karan.org/el5/ruby187/ On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 8:53 PM, Dan White y...@comcast.net wrote: Great to hear this, but I am now looking for a reliable way to get Ruby 1.8.7 or 1.9.3 onto a RHEL-5 system. The environment I am working still has RHEL 3 and 4 machines running, and I would not hold my breath waiting for transition to RHEL 6 (which does have ruby 1.8.7 in it) One more thing: When I say reliable, it has to be able to convince a non-technical PHB type. Suggestions ? On Apr 13, 2012, at 2:59 PM, Michael Stahnke wrote: Puppet Labs is happy to announce full support for Ruby 1.9.3 will be part of the next major release of Puppet, codenamed Telly. Ruby 1.8.7 and 1.9.3 are considered the primary supported Ruby versions, on all platforms including Unix, Linux, Windows, and MacOS-X. Ruby 1.8.5 is also supported, on the agent only. The Puppet 2.7 series featured initial support for the Ruby 1.9 series, and we are happy to see that work completed and brought forward to full production support in the forthcoming release. Other Ruby versions including 1.8.6, 1.9.1, and 1.9.2 are not officially supported. Ruby implementations other than the MRI series are not officially supported. We will accept patches that fix issues on other (non MRI) Ruby systems. 1.9.3 was selected due to its inclusion in Fedora 17 (Beefy Miracle) and Ubuntu Precise Pangolin. Previews of Telly should be available in May. If you'd like to see some of the changes happening today, you are also welcome to run Puppet's master branch. If you have questions or concerns, feel free to respond here. Mike Stahnke Community Manager -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet Users group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en. -- Gary Larizza Professional Services Engineer Puppet Labs -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet Users group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en. -- Jo Rhett Net Consonance : consonant endings by net philanthropy, open source and other randomness -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet Users group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
[Puppet Users] file resource
Hi All,
i'd like to define a file resource that transfers a tar ball that doesn't
have fixed name
actually tarball name will be tarball_name-version.tar.gz
i tried to define file resouce as following using regex :
file { /opt/tarball_name*.tar.gz :
...
}
but it seems that regex doesn't work with with file resource
so what do you suggest regarding this issue
Thanks in advance
--
Best Regards,
Eslam Mamdouh El Husseiny
*Systems Administrator**
Cloud Niners Ltd.
*
*Cellular: (+2) 011 198 40 40
Mansoura: (+2) 050 234 70 81
Cairo:(+2) 022 *268 34 60
Fax: (+2) 022 268 34 63
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Puppet Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
[Puppet Users] Re: configured puppet server as client now no updates are working
Actually, this was a stupid mistake on my part. I manage the puppet.conf file, when I applied the config. the puppet master config file got set to a puppet client config. I'm surprised it didn't output any error messages. On Monday, April 16, 2012 9:45:25 AM UTC-7, psychobyte wrote: Hi, My puppet server was working up until I configured it to be a puppet client. I applied the configuration on the server which seemed to work fine. However, now when ever a client or itself asks for an updated configuration it always comes back with a successful poll, no updates, and the configuration version changed. So configuration changes are not being applied anymore. Is there some cache that's not being cleared? Is there a way of reversing this? test-puppet ~ # puppetd -t info: Caching catalog for test-puppet.lab.lcl info: Applying configuration version '1334594015' notice: Finished catalog run in 0.02 seconds Thanks, -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet Users group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/puppet-users/-/fW_u7t_SXIIJ. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
[Puppet Users] Puppet Learner
Hi Guys, Let me Introduce myself as self learner and very new to puppet and I am sure that now on I am staying here in this group for long and keep asking questions, I am sorry if my message annoys you or if its a bit childish please forgive me but i believes that if you want to learn you should ask, My Question is : I have a server running puppet Master and 8 clients are connected with Master and every half an hour clients pulls up there configuration if requires from master and update themselves, but if need to restart Apache on 4 of them and have to restart varnish in the remaining 4 all in a sudden then how i will do that? do I need to wait for the next half an hour that clients connects with master and restart the service or is there any other way for doing so? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet Users group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
[Puppet Users] Requiring defines from other classes in a fact
Hi Guys,
Currently I'm coding a recipe for installing some UNIX daemon (openca,
but that's not very relevant).
This works fine, except some dependency stuff regarding classes from
an external module.
My current setup is like this:
/etc/puppet/modules/openca/manifests/init.pp:
class openca {
define openca-server($db_name, et cetera) {
mysql::database{$db_name:
ensure = present
}
package{openca:
.
}
service{openca:
...
requires = Package[openca],
}
}
}
(yeah this example has been simplified a lot, I know puppet resolves
the depency all by it self in this case)
Very very simple, except for the fact that I want to add the
dependency for the mysql::database too. I'm using this excellent
module for managing mysql: https://github.com/camptocamp/puppet-mysql
Is there a neat way to do something like this
service{openca:
...
requires = [Package[openca],mysql::database[openca]],
}
I already tried doing this, and also tried dependency chaining, but
just can't get it to work at all.
Another option might be:
class openca
{
define openca-database($db_name){
mysql::database{$db_name:
ensure = present
}
}
define openca-server($db_name , etc ) {
openca::openca-database($db_name)
}
But that will not fix the dependency issue either.
Can someone please point either where to look for a clue (yeah in the
manual, but where?) or give me some advice regarding this?
Cheers,
Boudewijn Ector
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Puppet Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
Re: [Puppet-dev] Re: [Puppet Users] Telly: Nagios types moving into Module
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Ken Barber k...@puppetlabs.com wrote: A pm2rpm tool perhaps Todd? :-). Something like pm2rpm would work, but we need to have a least one standard path for Puppet modules. I guess we can count on /etc/puppet/modules or /usr/share/puppet/modules being part of the default module path. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet Users group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
[Puppet Users] how to get ruby-shadow installed before trying to make users,groups
I know I need to have ruby-shadow installed to get puppet to be able
to manage shadow file based passwords.
so tried to code that up in a puppet manifest like this:
===
class strobenet {
package { 'ruby-shadow':
ensure = 'present',
}
user { 'tuser':
ensure = 'present',
comment = 'Test User',
gid = '302',
home = '/home/tuser',
password = '***',
password_max_age = '99000',
password_min_age = '5',
shell= '/bin/tcsh',
uid = '302',
}
group { 'tuser':
ensure = 'present',
gid= '302',
}
Package['ruby-shadow'] - User | |
}
===
the problem is that when it runs the first time the puppet User
provider says it can't handle manages_passwords and
manages_password_age during init and so clips those attributes.
Then it goes to apply the actual resources and does the package first,
then the user.
But since the provider has already clipped the attributes they don't
get set in the first run.
when run a second time the attributes do get set correctly, but that
seems a bit kludgy to have to run puppet twice to get the desired
affect.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Puppet Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
Re: [Puppet-dev] Re: [Puppet Users] Telly: Nagios types moving into Module
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Todd Zullinger t...@pobox.com wrote: Michael Stahnke wrote: For the next major Puppet version, code-named Telly, we have some changes coming. This is the first in a series of emails around these changes and may require some input from the community. For Telly, the nagios types will be moved into a module. This allows them to be iterated on in isolation from the rest of Puppet's core release cycle and process. In the future we have plans to move several other types into modules that can be individually maintained, improved, tested and used. The module for Nagios will be available on the Forge. The upgrade path is the thing we need some feedback about. The basic steps to upgrade would be to setup a Telly master, and then install the Nagios module via the Puppet Module Tool, which ships integrated with 2.7.13+ and Telly. Is it possible to package these modules for distros? In the past, we've had a few requests to do this for third-party modules but we didn't do this because there wasn't really any standard for it. With puppet module tool being integrated now, perhaps that's something that can be reconsidered. I'm thinking that for folks using rpm, they'd rather see an update that pulls in the same fucntionality as they had before. And even for new installs, I'd personally prefer to install these things via rpm. If I wanted to use a secondary package management system, I could use gems or eggs or CPAN, but I don't. ;) Note that as soon as you adopt environments, you end up having multiple locations on disk that you want modules to be installed into, which doesn't fit very well with traditional package management systems. I think it's good to split out these things, as it would allow us to properly add a nagios dep to the hypothetical puppet-module-nagios package. -- Nigel Kersten Product Manager, Puppet Labs -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet Users group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
[Puppet Users] Case statements in a file directive
I want to distribute a binary directory based upon whether the
architecture is 32- or 64-bit. It appears I cannot nest a case
statement under file, however this is what I was attempting to do:
file { /usr/local/nagios/libexec:
require = File['/usr/local/nagios'],
ensure = directory,
owner = 'root',
group = 'root',
mode= 655,
recurse = true,
## APPEARS I can't do this
case $architecture {
/(i386|i586|i686/): {
source = puppet:///files/32/usr/local/nagios/
libexec
}
x86_64: {
source = puppet:///files/64/usr/local/nagios/
libexec
}
}
}
I know I could reverse it and do a case first, then have redundant
file {} declarations, but that seems just that, redundant.
Can anyone point out what I'm doing wrong here. The output in the
puppet logs isn't generally helpful with debugging.
Thanks.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Puppet Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
Re: [Puppet Users] Case statements in a file directive
You're pretty close. You don't want the case statement per se, but you do want
a conditional:
file { /usr/local/nagios/libexec:
require = File['/usr/local/nagios'],
ensure = directory,
owner = 'root',
group = 'root',
mode= 655,
recurse = true,
source = $::architecture {
/(i386|i586|i686/) = puppet:///files/32/usr/local/nagios/libexec,
x86_64 = puppet:///files/64/usr/local/nagios/libexec,
}
}
On Apr 16, 2012, at 3:43 PM, Forrie wrote:
I want to distribute a binary directory based upon whether the
architecture is 32- or 64-bit. It appears I cannot nest a case
statement under file, however this is what I was attempting to do:
file { /usr/local/nagios/libexec:
require = File['/usr/local/nagios'],
ensure = directory,
owner = 'root',
group = 'root',
mode= 655,
recurse = true,
## APPEARS I can't do this
case $architecture {
/(i386|i586|i686/): {
source = puppet:///files/32/usr/local/nagios/
libexec
}
x86_64: {
source = puppet:///files/64/usr/local/nagios/
libexec
}
}
}
I know I could reverse it and do a case first, then have redundant
file {} declarations, but that seems just that, redundant.
Can anyone point out what I'm doing wrong here. The output in the
puppet logs isn't generally helpful with debugging.
Thanks.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Puppet Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Puppet Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
Re: [Puppet Users] Puppet Learner
If you are not running your agents in daemon mode, you can have a look at mcollective. It allows you to define a set of servers that you want to do a puppet run on. cheers, Walter On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 05:31, OverDue Ocean overdueoc...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Guys, Let me Introduce myself as self learner and very new to puppet and I am sure that now on I am staying here in this group for long and keep asking questions, I am sorry if my message annoys you or if its a bit childish please forgive me but i believes that if you want to learn you should ask, My Question is : I have a server running puppet Master and 8 clients are connected with Master and every half an hour clients pulls up there configuration if requires from master and update themselves, but if need to restart Apache on 4 of them and have to restart varnish in the remaining 4 all in a sudden then how i will do that? do I need to wait for the next half an hour that clients connects with master and restart the service or is there any other way for doing so? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet Users group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en. -- Walter Heck -- follow @walterheck on twitter to see what I'm up to! -- Check out my new startup: Server Monitoring as a Service @ http://tribily.com Follow @tribily on Twitter and/or 'Like' our Facebook page at http://www.facebook.com/tribily -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet Users group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
Re: [Puppet-dev] Re: [Puppet Users] Telly: Nagios types moving into Module
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Todd Zullinger t...@pobox.com wrote: Michael Stahnke wrote: For the next major Puppet version, code-named Telly, we have some changes coming. This is the first in a series of emails around these changes and may require some input from the community. For Telly, the nagios types will be moved into a module. This allows them to be iterated on in isolation from the rest of Puppet's core release cycle and process. In the future we have plans to move several other types into modules that can be individually maintained, improved, tested and used. The module for Nagios will be available on the Forge. The upgrade path is the thing we need some feedback about. The basic steps to upgrade would be to setup a Telly master, and then install the Nagios module via the Puppet Module Tool, which ships integrated with 2.7.13+ and Telly. Is it possible to package these modules for distros? In the past, we've had a few requests to do this for third-party modules but we didn't do this because there wasn't really any standard for it. With puppet module tool being integrated now, perhaps that's something that can be reconsidered. I'm thinking that for folks using rpm, they'd rather see an update that pulls in the same fucntionality as they had before. And even for new installs, I'd personally prefer to install these things via rpm. If I wanted to use a secondary package management system, I could use gems or eggs or CPAN, but I don't. ;) Todd, welcome and I feel your pain. Trust me, I pushed every way I could to use native packages as our module deliver mechanism. However we have some odd requirements that make things not work as well with RPM (or deb, or gems). Basically we need a mechanism to allow multiple versions installed into separate environments (paths on disk). That sort of ruled out traditional packaging systems, without doing some installation and symlink-selection magic. Even then, there were some issues. Something like pm2rpm and pm2deb is very likely something we'll need to make the lives of Puppet Users happy. It should be fairly simple and we'll want to be sure that the default module path is something that is FHS compliant. We'll also want to work with Jordan and see if we can get packaging Puppet Modules (in this format) as an option with FPM. I think FPM already does some Puppet Module stuff, so it may not need any real updates. Mike I think it's good to split out these things, as it would allow us to properly add a nagios dep to the hypothetical puppet-module-nagios package. -- Todd OpenPGP - KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~ I am free of all prejudice. I hate everyone equally. -- W. C. Fields -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet Users group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
Re: [Puppet-dev] Re: [Puppet Users] Telly: Nagios types moving into Module
This is kind of an argument against moving these things out of the core in the first place in my opinion. The fact that you can now have multiple versions of the nagios provider is just worse than having a single copy. Before at least I could update to 2.7.x and be assured all my providers were at the same version, now I have to deal with all the module updates (which only grows as time goes on) and constantly deal with checking them into git, managing them, testing them with various versions of the client. I get why you're doing this but as an end user this is just causing me more work and making me do more testing and a lot more management. At least before I could rely on having a broad set of core resources. Now we're going in the opposite direction. Maybe I'm just a grouchy old sysadmin but now I can't just rely on yum.puppetlabs.com to provide my resources and that means time out of my day to update them and push them into git. In the workflow we've instigated at work I cannot just throw in an update and push it - I have to create branches, run tests, open tickets. With things provided by puppet's core I just have to get approval to update the client in one easy push. Maybe I'll just make /etc/puppet/modules/ for modules imported directly from the forge (and unedited in any way) and instigate easier rules around updating these. Sorry if this turned into a bit of a GET OFF MY LAWN post. On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 8:45 PM, Michael Stahnke stah...@puppetlabs.comwrote: On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Todd Zullinger t...@pobox.com wrote: Michael Stahnke wrote: For the next major Puppet version, code-named Telly, we have some changes coming. This is the first in a series of emails around these changes and may require some input from the community. For Telly, the nagios types will be moved into a module. This allows them to be iterated on in isolation from the rest of Puppet's core release cycle and process. In the future we have plans to move several other types into modules that can be individually maintained, improved, tested and used. The module for Nagios will be available on the Forge. The upgrade path is the thing we need some feedback about. The basic steps to upgrade would be to setup a Telly master, and then install the Nagios module via the Puppet Module Tool, which ships integrated with 2.7.13+ and Telly. Is it possible to package these modules for distros? In the past, we've had a few requests to do this for third-party modules but we didn't do this because there wasn't really any standard for it. With puppet module tool being integrated now, perhaps that's something that can be reconsidered. I'm thinking that for folks using rpm, they'd rather see an update that pulls in the same fucntionality as they had before. And even for new installs, I'd personally prefer to install these things via rpm. If I wanted to use a secondary package management system, I could use gems or eggs or CPAN, but I don't. ;) Todd, welcome and I feel your pain. Trust me, I pushed every way I could to use native packages as our module deliver mechanism. However we have some odd requirements that make things not work as well with RPM (or deb, or gems). Basically we need a mechanism to allow multiple versions installed into separate environments (paths on disk). That sort of ruled out traditional packaging systems, without doing some installation and symlink-selection magic. Even then, there were some issues. Something like pm2rpm and pm2deb is very likely something we'll need to make the lives of Puppet Users happy. It should be fairly simple and we'll want to be sure that the default module path is something that is FHS compliant. We'll also want to work with Jordan and see if we can get packaging Puppet Modules (in this format) as an option with FPM. I think FPM already does some Puppet Module stuff, so it may not need any real updates. Mike I think it's good to split out these things, as it would allow us to properly add a nagios dep to the hypothetical puppet-module-nagios package. -- ToddOpenPGP - KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~ I am free of all prejudice. I hate everyone equally. -- W. C. Fields -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet Users group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet Users group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[Puppet Users] Trying to build Ruby 1.8.7 on a RHEL5 systems
Old thread reference: http://www.mail-archive.com/puppet-users@googlegroups.com/msg27199.html I am trying to build Ruby 1.8.7 on a RHEL 5 system following the instructions in that thread and I have a few questions as I am a n00b to RPM building: On Jan 4, 2012, at 8:04 PM, Jo Rhett wrote: wget http://rbel.frameos.org/stable/el5/SRPMS/ruby-1.8.7.352-5.el5.src.rpm rpm -i ruby-1.8.7.352-5.el5.src.rpm rpmbuild -ba ~/rpmbuild/SPECS/ruby.spec For any of the nodes, you need only put this RPM in your repository and have Puppet upgrade them. It just works ;-) When I ran the rpmbuild command, I got no RPM's. I got a bunch of error complaining about rpaths, and in the output was a suggestion to prepend an environment setting to the command -- like this: QA_RPATHS=$[ 0x0001|0x0010 ] rpmbuild -ba ~/rpmbuild/SPECS/ruby.spec When I ran this, the previous errors were now warnings, and I got a set of RPM's. Is this The Way It Works ? Is it possible to eliminate the errors/warnings ? Would a link to a PatchBin of the build output help ? Thanks in advance. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet Users group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
[Puppet Users] Having trouble getting puppet to set users/groups to a defined state
I'm hoping I'm just missing something simple.
I ran across this in my deployment setup and have replicated in a
simple set of manifests. command output and the manifests below.
basically start with a user/group name but it had the name was
misspelled 'txuser'
so correct it to 'tuser' but puppet errors out saying the gid is a
dupe.
I thought one of the key ideas for puppet was the ability to define a
manifest and puppet would make the machine look like that manifest.
I checked the group resource documentation and didn't see an option to
say 'force' or something.
I'm thinking would also be a problem if someone locally edited /etc/
passwd and /etc/group the manifest would also fail.
[test00] ROOT 7:46pm Mon /tmppuppet apply txuser.pp
notice: /Stage[main]//Group[txuser]/ensure: created
notice: /Stage[main]//User[txuser]/ensure: created
notice: Finished catalog run in 0.47 seconds
[test00] ROOT 7:47pm Mon /tmppuppet apply tuser.pp
err: /Stage[main]//Group[tuser]/ensure: change from absent to present
failed: Could not create group tuser: Execution of '/usr/sbin/groupadd
-g 302 tuser' returned 4: groupadd: GID 302 is not unique
notice: /Stage[main]//User[tuser]: Dependency Group[tuser] has
failures: true
warning: /Stage[main]//User[tuser]: Skipping because of failed
dependencies
notice: Finished catalog run in 0.22 seconds
[test00] ROOT 7:47pm Mon /tmptail -n 100 txuser.pp tuser.pp
== txuser.pp ==
user { 'txuser':
ensure = 'present',
comment = 'Test User',
gid = '302',
home = '/home/tuser',
password = '***',
password_max_age = '99000',
password_min_age = '5',
shell= '/bin/tcsh',
uid = '302',
}
group { 'txuser':
ensure = 'present',
gid= '302',
}
== tuser.pp ==
user { 'tuser':
ensure = 'present',
comment = 'Test User',
gid = '302',
home = '/home/tuser',
password = '***',
password_max_age = '99000',
password_min_age = '5',
shell= '/bin/tcsh',
uid = '302',
}
group { 'tuser':
ensure = 'present',
gid= '302',
}
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Puppet Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
Re: [Puppet Users] file resource
Hi,
Use
file { /opt/tarball_name-${version}.tar.gz :
You then declare that with
$version = 1.2.3
See http://docs.puppetlabs.com/learning/variables.html for fuller explanation.
Den
On 17/04/2012, at 7:32, Eslam Mamdouh emamd...@cloud9ers.com wrote:
Hi All,
i'd like to define a file resource that transfers a tar ball that doesn't
have fixed name
actually tarball name will be tarball_name-version.tar.gz
i tried to define file resouce as following using regex :
file { /opt/tarball_name*.tar.gz :
...
}
but it seems that regex doesn't work with with file resource
so what do you suggest regarding this issue
Thanks in advance
--
Best Regards,
Eslam Mamdouh El Husseiny
Systems Administrator
Cloud Niners Ltd.
Cellular: (+2) 011 198 40 40
Mansoura: (+2) 050 234 70 81
Cairo:(+2) 022 268 34 60
Fax: (+2) 022 268 34 63
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Puppet Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Puppet Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
[Puppet Users] Failed to parse template ... private method 'split' called for :undef:Symbol - github - puppetlabs/puppet-dhcp
Hi Puppet Users,
Puppet Version - v2.7.13
Ruby Version - ruby 1.8.7 (2010-08-16 patchlevel 302) [i486-linux]
I am trying to use the Puppetlabs DHCP module
(https://github.com/puppetlabs/puppet-dhcp) to setup a DHCP server on one of my
nodes.
I have followed the example in the readme.md file in my node declaration for
the server (extracted part below)
class { 'dhcp':
dnsdomain= ['dev.ifoley.local', '200.168.192.in-addr.arpa'],
nameservers = ['192.168.200.1', '192.168.10.211'],
ntpservers = ['titanium.ifoley.local', 'core.dev.ifoley.local'],
interfaces = ['eth0'],
}
### dhcp::pool Define the pool attributes
dhcp::pool{ 'dev.ifoley.local':
network = '192.168.200.0',
mask= '255.255.255.0',
range = '192.168.200.11 192.168.200.20',
gateway = '192.168.200.1',
}
To confirm everything is working I then try to manually initiate a puppet run
puppet apply -v /etc/puppet/manifests/nodes/core.dev.ifoley.local.pp
Which spits out an error message:
Failed to parse template dhcp/dhcpd.conf.erb: private method `split' called for
:undef:Symbol at /etc/puppet/modules/dhcp/manifests/init.pp:46 on node
core.dev.ifoley.local
In the template
(https://github.com/puppetlabs/puppet-dhcp/blob/master/templates/dhcpd.conf.erb)
there is only one location that uses a split method which is on the
dnsupdatekey. As you can see from the above class definition for dhcp I have
not passed a dnsupdatekey.
I currently do not have DNS setup for Dynamic Updates so do not want to
configure the DHCP server to update DNS.
The code that uses the split function should not be executed because it is
protected by test to confirm that it is not undefined. My question is am I
doing something wrong?
Thanks,
Peter.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Puppet Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
[Puppet Users] Re: Requiring defines from other classes in a fact
On Apr 16, 2:39 pm, Boudewijn Ector boudew...@boudewijnector.nl
wrote:
Very very simple, except for the fact that I want to add the
dependency for the mysql::database too. I'm using this excellent
module for managing mysql:https://github.com/camptocamp/puppet-mysql
Is there a neat way to do something like this
service{openca:
...
requires = [Package[openca],mysql::database[openca]],
}
I already tried doing this, and also tried dependency chaining, but
just can't get it to work at all.
You've almost got it here; you need to use reference syntax for the
mysql::database resource just like you do for the package:
requires = [Package[openca],Mysql::Database[openca]],
Wil
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Puppet Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
[Puppet Users] Re: Question regarding multi-OS NTP manifest
On Apr 15, 4:44 pm, Jesse anonym...@gmail.com wrote:
case $operatingsystem {
centos, redhat: { $ntp = ntp }
debain, ubuntu: { $ntp = ntpd }
This is backwards; centos/redhat should be 'ntpd' and debian/ubuntu
should be 'ntp'.
if $ntp == 'ntp' {
service { 'ntp':
name = $ntp,
ensure = running,
enable = true,
hasrestart = true,
hasstatus = true,
}}
else {
service { 'ntpd':
name = $ntp,
ensure = running,
enable = true,
hasstatus = true,
hasrestart = true,
}
}
This conditional is redundant. I think it's better to use one resource
name and change the name attribute with the variable as you have
done (although I would a more explicit variable name like
'$ntp_service'):
service { 'ntp':
name = $ntp_service,
...
}
err: /Stage[main]//Service[ntp]/ensure: change from stopped to running
failed: Could not start Service[ntp]: Execution of '/sbin/service ntp
start' returned 1: at /root/learning-manifests/ntp.pp:24
This is because of the reversal I mentioned above; it should be 'ntpd'
on CentOS, not 'ntp'.
When I run the vanilla script, everything configures correctly and
ntp(d) is started. Why is my second script using /sbin when it seems
that it should be using /etc/init.d/?
Have you tried 'man service'? '/sbin/service' is a way of running init
scripts with a sanitized environment and is the preferred way of
running init scripts rather than doing so directly.
http://linux.die.net/man/8/service
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Puppet Users group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
[Puppet Users] This worked for me
Thankyou - this was a great help, and fixed my issue straight off. Good to know about the version problem. Steve -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet Users group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
[Puppet Users] Re: collecting resources for iteration in a template
On Apr 16, 1:45 am, Jonathon Anderson anderbub...@gmail.com wrote: I have a `sysctl::variable` defined type that creates files in `/etc/sysctl.d`. Some operating systems (*cough*SLES10*cough*) don't read sysctl settings from `/etc/sysctl.d`, though, and expect all settings to be in a single file, `/etc/sysctl.conf`. For such operating systems, I'd like to define the content of that file with a template that references the values of the `sysctl::variable`s. In the Puppet DSL I can collect all fragments with language like `Sysctl::Variable| |`. How can I do something similar in a template such that I can access the variable names and values? For example: Have you considered instead using something like the file fragment pattern? Basically, you add 'notifiy' to sysctl::variable resources to notify an exec that rebuilds sysctl.conf from sysctl.d (basically cat /etc/sysctl.d/*.conf /etc/sysctl.conf). http://projects.puppetlabs.com/projects/puppet/wiki/Generating_a_config_file_from_fragments (I'm not sure the special concatenation script is really necessary; you can have the exec notify the service to reload if necessary and the 'for' loop is unnecessary with shell wildcards. At least, that's how we do it at work.) Wil -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Puppet Users group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
