RE: Partitioning?

2003-01-02 Thread Spanke, Alexander
Hi,

You want delete all your partitions to reinstall Win and RedHat ? Boot with
the RedHat Install CD and choose repair at the first Boot-Screen, you get a
Recovery System, so you can use all Linux partitioning tools.

Regards
Alex

-Original Message-
From: Cannon, Andrew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 11:18 AM
To: Redhat (E-mail)
Subject: Partitioning?


Hi All,

Happy New Year! Hope everyone had a good Christmas.

My problem is with Window$ and Mandrake. I'm reinstalling Window$ and I want
to use the partition containing Mandrake as my Red Hat partition. The only
problem is that my Window$ installation is trashed (along with Partition
Magic) and I can't resize (or delete) the extended partition on my hard
drive because fdisk can't see the Linux partition. Mandrake doesn't work
anymore (I think the kernel got corrupted) so I'm replacing with Red Hat.
Any ideas on how to delete this partition before reinstalling Window$ and
then installing Red Hat?

Many thanks.

Andrew

Andrew Cannon, Nuclear Technology (J2), NNC Ltd, Booths Hall, Knutsford,
Cheshire, WA16 8QZ.

Telephone; +44 (0) 1565 843768
email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
NNC website: http://www.nnc.co.uk




***
 NNC Limited
 Booths Hall
 Chelford Road
 Knutsford
 Cheshire
 WA16 8QZ
 
 Country of Registration: United Kingdom
 Registered Number: 1120437
 
 This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
 intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they   
 are addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify 
 the NNC system manager by e-mail at [EMAIL PROTECTED]

***



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



new linux server, re-partitioning

2002-06-21 Thread Joshua James

We just received a new RedHat v7.2 server from Dell. This is an
experiment to see how linux works compared to our current installation
of NT servers. This will be an intranet server behind our firewall.

Our 40gb drive came partitioned as follows:

/dev/hda1   ext3990mb   /home
/dev/hda6   ext3494mb   /
/dev/hda2   ext322.8mb  /boot
/dev/hda8   ext360.7mb  /tmp
/dev/hda3   ext321.8gb  /usr
/dev/hda5   ext313.1gb  /var

I installed apache (2.x.39) to the default location and I'm trying to
install ColdFusion MX. It wants to install to /opt which is in / and
there isn't near enough room, its already 60% full.

I heard you shouldn't move /etc because there is something in there
necessary for finding other mount points.

I assume my website is going to /etc/httpd and since my other software
is going to /opt I need more room, what is the usual place for databases
to go?

How can I make my / partition bigger? Do I really need 21.8gb for /usr?

Any suggestions?

Thanks in advance.



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: new linux server, re-partitioning

2002-06-21 Thread Willem van der Walt[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hi,
Under 7.2, the web home dir is normally under
/var/www.
I would try to tell the installation program to change prefix to some 
thing
else.
If that does not work, I would make a link to a directory under /usr where 
there is a lot of space.
If it wants to create a directory called newprog under /opt, i will do,
before i install, 
cd /usr
mkdir lot_of_space
cd /opt
ln -s /usr/lot_of_space newprog
hth Willem

On 21 Jun 2002, Joshua James wrote:

 We just received a new RedHat v7.2 server from Dell. This is an
 experiment to see how linux works compared to our current installation
 of NT servers. This will be an intranet server behind our firewall.
 
 Our 40gb drive came partitioned as follows:
 
 /dev/hda1 ext3990mb   /home
 /dev/hda6 ext3494mb   /
 /dev/hda2 ext322.8mb  /boot
 /dev/hda8 ext360.7mb  /tmp
 /dev/hda3 ext321.8gb  /usr
 /dev/hda5 ext313.1gb  /var
 
 I installed apache (2.x.39) to the default location and I'm trying to
 install ColdFusion MX. It wants to install to /opt which is in / and
 there isn't near enough room, its already 60% full.
 
 I heard you shouldn't move /etc because there is something in there
 necessary for finding other mount points.
 
 I assume my website is going to /etc/httpd and since my other software
 is going to /opt I need more room, what is the usual place for databases
 to go?
 
 How can I make my / partition bigger? Do I really need 21.8gb for /usr?
 
 Any suggestions?
 
 Thanks in advance.
 
 
 
 ___
 Redhat-list mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
 

-- 
Willem van der Walt
Information Services Directorate
Department of Health
South Africa
tel: 27 12 3120700




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: new linux server, re-partitioning

2002-06-21 Thread Joshua James

I really think Apache uses /etc/httpd, is it safe to change that? Will
it affect other programs?

ColdFusion wants to install to /opt, is that safe to change? Should I
make a /usr/ColdFusion or /var/ColdFusion?

On Fri, 2002-06-21 at 09:43, Willem van der Walt wrote:
 Hi,
 Under 7.2, the web home dir is normally under
 /var/www.
 I would try to tell the installation program to change prefix to some 
 thing
 else.
 If that does not work, I would make a link to a directory under /usr where 
 there is a lot of space.
 If it wants to create a directory called newprog under /opt, i will do,
 before i install, 
 cd /usr
 mkdir lot_of_space
 cd /opt
 ln -s /usr/lot_of_space newprog
 hth Willem
 
 On 21 Jun 2002, Joshua James wrote:
 
  We just received a new RedHat v7.2 server from Dell. This is an
  experiment to see how linux works compared to our current installation
  of NT servers. This will be an intranet server behind our firewall.
  
  Our 40gb drive came partitioned as follows:
  
  /dev/hda1   ext3990mb   /home
  /dev/hda6   ext3494mb   /
  /dev/hda2   ext322.8mb  /boot
  /dev/hda8   ext360.7mb  /tmp
  /dev/hda3   ext321.8gb  /usr
  /dev/hda5   ext313.1gb  /var
  
  I installed apache (2.x.39) to the default location and I'm trying to
  install ColdFusion MX. It wants to install to /opt which is in / and
  there isn't near enough room, its already 60% full.
  
  I heard you shouldn't move /etc because there is something in there
  necessary for finding other mount points.
  
  I assume my website is going to /etc/httpd and since my other software
  is going to /opt I need more room, what is the usual place for databases
  to go?
  
  How can I make my / partition bigger? Do I really need 21.8gb for /usr?
  
  Any suggestions?
  
  Thanks in advance.
  
  
  
  ___
  Redhat-list mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
  
 
 -- 
 Willem van der Walt
 Information Services Directorate
 Department of Health
 South Africa
 tel: 27 12 3120700
 
 




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: new linux server, re-partitioning

2002-06-21 Thread achana

Joshua James wrote:

 We just received a new RedHat v7.2 server from Dell. This is an
 experiment to see how linux works compared to our current installation
 of NT servers. This will be an intranet server behind our firewall.

 Our 40gb drive came partitioned as follows:

 /dev/hda1   ext3990mb   /home
 /dev/hda6   ext3494mb   /
 /dev/hda2   ext322.8mb  /boot
 /dev/hda8   ext360.7mb  /tmp
 /dev/hda3   ext321.8gb  /usr
 /dev/hda5   ext313.1gb  /var

 I installed apache (2.x.39) to the default location and I'm trying to
 install ColdFusion MX. It wants to install to /opt which is in / and
 there isn't near enough room, its already 60% full.

 I heard you shouldn't move /etc because there is something in there
 necessary for finding other mount points.

 I assume my website is going to /etc/httpd and since my other software
 is going to /opt I need more room, what is the usual place for databases
 to go?

 How can I make my / partition bigger? Do I really need 21.8gb for /usr?

 Any suggestions?

 Thanks in advance.

 ___
 Redhat-list mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Do u really need to re-partition ?
Why not use a softlink : ln -s /fromhere/filename /tohere/filename



begin:vcard 
n:Chan;Arthur
tel;work:1.718.633.5892
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
url:www.saysit.com
org:SAYS I.T.
adr:;;234 E 2nd Street;Brooklyn;New York;11218-2314;USA
version:2.1
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Senior Partner
note;quoted-printable:This message and all attachments are confidential.=0D=0AThey are meant solely for the addressee.=0D=0AAny authorised use or dessemination is prohibited.=0D=0AEmails are liable to unauthorised alterations.=0D=0ANeither SAYS I.T. nor any of its partners or subsidiaries or affiliates=0D=0Ashall be responsible for the message if altered, changed or falsified.
x-mozilla-cpt:;25408
fn:Arthur Chan
end:vcard



Re: new linux server, re-partitioning

2002-06-21 Thread achana

Willem van der Walt wrote:

 Hi,
 Under 7.2, the web home dir is normally under
 /var/www.
 I would try to tell the installation program to change prefix to some
 thing
 else.
 If that does not work, I would make a link to a directory under /usr where
 there is a lot of space.
 If it wants to create a directory called newprog under /opt, i will do,
 before i install,
 cd /usr
 mkdir lot_of_space
 cd /opt
 ln -s /usr/lot_of_space newprog
 hth Willem

 On 21 Jun 2002, Joshua James wrote:

  We just received a new RedHat v7.2 server from Dell. This is an
  experiment to see how linux works compared to our current installation
  of NT servers. This will be an intranet server behind our firewall.
 
  Our 40gb drive came partitioned as follows:
 
  /dev/hda1 ext3990mb   /home
  /dev/hda6 ext3494mb   /
  /dev/hda2 ext322.8mb  /boot
  /dev/hda8 ext360.7mb  /tmp
  /dev/hda3 ext321.8gb  /usr
  /dev/hda5 ext313.1gb  /var
 
  I installed apache (2.x.39) to the default location and I'm trying to
  install ColdFusion MX. It wants to install to /opt which is in / and
  there isn't near enough room, its already 60% full.
 
  I heard you shouldn't move /etc because there is something in there
  necessary for finding other mount points.
 
  I assume my website is going to /etc/httpd and since my other software
  is going to /opt I need more room, what is the usual place for databases
  to go?
 
  How can I make my / partition bigger? Do I really need 21.8gb for /usr?
 
  Any suggestions?
 
  Thanks in advance.
 
 
 
  ___
  Redhat-list mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
 

 --
 Willem van der Walt
 Information Services Directorate
 Department of Health
 South Africa
 tel: 27 12 3120700

 ___
 Redhat-list mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Come to think of it, does it matter where u install it as long as there is a
path to it ?
/usr and /usr/local needs to be fairly big if u intent to use it as an
app-server.


begin:vcard 
n:Chan;Arthur
tel;work:1.718.633.5892
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
url:www.saysit.com
org:SAYS I.T.
adr:;;234 E 2nd Street;Brooklyn;New York;11218-2314;USA
version:2.1
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Senior Partner
note;quoted-printable:This message and all attachments are confidential.=0D=0AThey are meant solely for the addressee.=0D=0AAny authorised use or dessemination is prohibited.=0D=0AEmails are liable to unauthorised alterations.=0D=0ANeither SAYS I.T. nor any of its partners or subsidiaries or affiliates=0D=0Ashall be responsible for the message if altered, changed or falsified.
x-mozilla-cpt:;25408
fn:Arthur Chan
end:vcard



Re: new linux server, re-partitioning

2002-06-21 Thread achana

Joshua James wrote:

 I really think Apache uses /etc/httpd, is it safe to change that? Will
 it affect other programs?

 ColdFusion wants to install to /opt, is that safe to change? Should I
 make a /usr/ColdFusion or /var/ColdFusion?

 On Fri, 2002-06-21 at 09:43, Willem van der Walt wrote:
  Hi,
  Under 7.2, the web home dir is normally under
  /var/www.
  I would try to tell the installation program to change prefix to some
  thing
  else.
  If that does not work, I would make a link to a directory under /usr where
  there is a lot of space.
  If it wants to create a directory called newprog under /opt, i will do,
  before i install,
  cd /usr
  mkdir lot_of_space
  cd /opt
  ln -s /usr/lot_of_space newprog
  hth Willem
 
  On 21 Jun 2002, Joshua James wrote:
 
   We just received a new RedHat v7.2 server from Dell. This is an
   experiment to see how linux works compared to our current installation
   of NT servers. This will be an intranet server behind our firewall.
  
   Our 40gb drive came partitioned as follows:
  
   /dev/hda1   ext3990mb   /home
   /dev/hda6   ext3494mb   /
   /dev/hda2   ext322.8mb  /boot
   /dev/hda8   ext360.7mb  /tmp
   /dev/hda3   ext321.8gb  /usr
   /dev/hda5   ext313.1gb  /var
  
   I installed apache (2.x.39) to the default location and I'm trying to
   install ColdFusion MX. It wants to install to /opt which is in / and
   there isn't near enough room, its already 60% full.
  
   I heard you shouldn't move /etc because there is something in there
   necessary for finding other mount points.
  
   I assume my website is going to /etc/httpd and since my other software
   is going to /opt I need more room, what is the usual place for databases
   to go?
  
   How can I make my / partition bigger? Do I really need 21.8gb for /usr?
  
   Any suggestions?
  
   Thanks in advance.
  
  
  
   ___
   Redhat-list mailing list
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
  
 
  --
  Willem van der Walt
  Information Services Directorate
  Department of Health
  South Africa
  tel: 27 12 3120700
 
 

 ___
 Redhat-list mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Go into /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf and overwrite the default directory , you
can put it anywhere you want.
You ar correct in pointing out that this is the default and normal path
though...
While u r at it, might as well check whether u want the default log location.


begin:vcard 
n:Chan;Arthur
tel;work:1.718.633.5892
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
url:www.saysit.com
org:SAYS I.T.
adr:;;234 E 2nd Street;Brooklyn;New York;11218-2314;USA
version:2.1
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Senior Partner
note;quoted-printable:This message and all attachments are confidential.=0D=0AThey are meant solely for the addressee.=0D=0AAny authorised use or dessemination is prohibited.=0D=0AEmails are liable to unauthorised alterations.=0D=0ANeither SAYS I.T. nor any of its partners or subsidiaries or affiliates=0D=0Ashall be responsible for the message if altered, changed or falsified.
x-mozilla-cpt:;25408
fn:Arthur Chan
end:vcard



Re: new linux server, re-partitioning

2002-06-21 Thread Anthony E. Greene

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 21-Jun-2002/09:05 -0400, Joshua James [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We just received a new RedHat v7.2 server from Dell. This is an
experiment to see how linux works compared to our current installation
of NT servers. This will be an intranet server behind our firewall.

Our 40gb drive came partitioned as follows:

/dev/hda1  ext3990mb   /home
/dev/hda6  ext3494mb   /
/dev/hda2  ext322.8mb  /boot
/dev/hda8  ext360.7mb  /tmp
/dev/hda3  ext321.8gb  /usr
/dev/hda5  ext313.1gb  /var

I installed apache (2.x.39) to the default location and I'm trying to
install ColdFusion MX. It wants to install to /opt which is in / and
there isn't near enough room, its already 60% full.

I heard you shouldn't move /etc because there is something in there
necessary for finding other mount points.

I assume my website is going to /etc/httpd and since my other software
is going to /opt I need more room, what is the usual place for databases
to go?

How can I make my / partition bigger? Do I really need 21.8gb for /usr?

You can make /opt a symlink to /usr/local/opt. That will solve the
immediate problem, and prevent something similar from happening later.

  mkdir /usr/local/opt
  ln -s /usr/local/opt /opt

As you get familiar with Linux, you will get your own ideas about how your
partitions should be laid out. I would have wiped that machine and setup
my own partitions, but then I've been doing this for years.

Here are some things you might consider for your next Linux box:

 - Put /usr/local on it's own partition. Software that you compile locally
   (install from tarballs) often puts everything it needs under
   /usr/local. I also tend to put the scripts and such that I create to
   help run the machine in /usr/local/[bin|sbin]. With all of this on a
   separate partition, I can install the latest version of my distro, tell
   the installer to leave /home and /usr/local alone, and most of my
   customizations remain in place. I just have to worry about the config
   stuff in /etc.

 - Put Apache's DocumentRoot in /home/httpd. This stuff will not change if
   Apache is upgraded, and needs to be preserved between OS upgrades. Red
   Hat used to do this, but apparently it's not LSB compliant. Fine, but I
   like to simplify my sysadmin tasks, so I put DocumentRoot on a
   partition that I kow will be preserved between upgrades and/or
   reinstalls.

 - Make /opt a symlink to /usr/local/opt.

 - Adjust partition sizes for /home and /usr to reflect use as either a
   file server (big /home) or a database or email server (big /var).

I tend to restrict /usr to 4GB because I don't generally install that
much software on a server. I allow more space for data files (/home,
/var).

In any case, welcome to Linux.


Tony
- -- 
Anthony E. Greene mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OpenPGP Key: 0x6C94239D/7B3D BD7D 7D91 1B44 BA26  C484 A42A 60DD 6C94 239D
AOL/Yahoo Chat: TonyG05  HomePage: http://www.pobox.com/~agreene/
Linux: the choice of a GNU Generation. http://www.linux.org/

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Anthony E. Greene 0x6C94239D [EMAIL PROTECTED]

iD8DBQE9EzMbpCpg3WyUI50RAorJAJ9/IB0p8zpRvpKx5XzSdU8k3M/Q6ACfSbQd
skVLdUzxCGhKv2NO08a9ToA=
=Ufyz
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: new linux server, re-partitioning

2002-06-21 Thread achana

Joshua James wrote:

 I really think Apache uses /etc/httpd, is it safe to change that? Will
 it affect other programs?

 ColdFusion wants to install to /opt, is that safe to change? Should I
 make a /usr/ColdFusion or /var/ColdFusion?

 On Fri, 2002-06-21 at 09:43, Willem van der Walt wrote:
  Hi,
  Under 7.2, the web home dir is normally under
  /var/www.
  I would try to tell the installation program to change prefix to some
  thing
  else.
  If that does not work, I would make a link to a directory under /usr where
  there is a lot of space.
  If it wants to create a directory called newprog under /opt, i will do,
  before i install,
  cd /usr
  mkdir lot_of_space
  cd /opt
  ln -s /usr/lot_of_space newprog
  hth Willem
 
  On 21 Jun 2002, Joshua James wrote:
 
   We just received a new RedHat v7.2 server from Dell. This is an
   experiment to see how linux works compared to our current installation
   of NT servers. This will be an intranet server behind our firewall.
  
   Our 40gb drive came partitioned as follows:
  
   /dev/hda1   ext3990mb   /home
   /dev/hda6   ext3494mb   /
   /dev/hda2   ext322.8mb  /boot
   /dev/hda8   ext360.7mb  /tmp
   /dev/hda3   ext321.8gb  /usr
   /dev/hda5   ext313.1gb  /var
  
   I installed apache (2.x.39) to the default location and I'm trying to
   install ColdFusion MX. It wants to install to /opt which is in / and
   there isn't near enough room, its already 60% full.
  
   I heard you shouldn't move /etc because there is something in there
   necessary for finding other mount points.
  
   I assume my website is going to /etc/httpd and since my other software
   is going to /opt I need more room, what is the usual place for databases
   to go?
  
   How can I make my / partition bigger? Do I really need 21.8gb for /usr?
  
   Any suggestions?
  
   Thanks in advance.
  
  
  
   ___
   Redhat-list mailing list
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
  
 
  --
  Willem van der Walt
  Information Services Directorate
  Department of Health
  South Africa
  tel: 27 12 3120700
 
 

 ___
 Redhat-list mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re. Database location : Oracle uses OFA and has mount points /u01, /u02, /u03
etc I think 3 mount points may be the minimum that u can get away with. It is
prudent to put each mount point on a different physical disk.



begin:vcard 
n:Chan;Arthur
tel;work:1.718.633.5892
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
url:www.saysit.com
org:SAYS I.T.
adr:;;234 E 2nd Street;Brooklyn;New York;11218-2314;USA
version:2.1
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Senior Partner
note;quoted-printable:This message and all attachments are confidential.=0D=0AThey are meant solely for the addressee.=0D=0AAny authorised use or dessemination is prohibited.=0D=0AEmails are liable to unauthorised alterations.=0D=0ANeither SAYS I.T. nor any of its partners or subsidiaries or affiliates=0D=0Ashall be responsible for the message if altered, changed or falsified.
x-mozilla-cpt:;25408
fn:Arthur Chan
end:vcard



Re: new linux server, re-partitioning

2002-06-21 Thread Paul Branston

I would use /usr/local/www for the DocumentRoot and
/usr/local/coldfusion for the coldfusion base.

Apache is easy to change, edit the httpd.conf to show the
new location of the document root. Look for the line
DocumentRoot /var/www/htdocs
or some such directory.

Coldfusion will probably prompt you for these things when you
run the install. Its a while since I installed it and can't
remember how it actually went.

Paul

On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 09:51:32AM -0400, Joshua James wrote:
 I really think Apache uses /etc/httpd, is it safe to change that? Will
 it affect other programs?
 
 ColdFusion wants to install to /opt, is that safe to change? Should I
 make a /usr/ColdFusion or /var/ColdFusion?
 
 On Fri, 2002-06-21 at 09:43, Willem van der Walt wrote:
  Hi,
  Under 7.2, the web home dir is normally under
  /var/www.
  I would try to tell the installation program to change prefix to some 
  thing
  else.
  If that does not work, I would make a link to a directory under /usr where 
  there is a lot of space.
  If it wants to create a directory called newprog under /opt, i will do,
  before i install, 
  cd /usr
  mkdir lot_of_space
  cd /opt
  ln -s /usr/lot_of_space newprog
  hth Willem
  
  On 21 Jun 2002, Joshua James wrote:
  
   We just received a new RedHat v7.2 server from Dell. This is an
   experiment to see how linux works compared to our current installation
   of NT servers. This will be an intranet server behind our firewall.
   
   Our 40gb drive came partitioned as follows:
   
   /dev/hda1 ext3990mb   /home
   /dev/hda6 ext3494mb   /
   /dev/hda2 ext322.8mb  /boot
   /dev/hda8 ext360.7mb  /tmp
   /dev/hda3 ext321.8gb  /usr
   /dev/hda5 ext313.1gb  /var
   
   I installed apache (2.x.39) to the default location and I'm trying to
   install ColdFusion MX. It wants to install to /opt which is in / and
   there isn't near enough room, its already 60% full.
   
   I heard you shouldn't move /etc because there is something in there
   necessary for finding other mount points.
   
   I assume my website is going to /etc/httpd and since my other software
   is going to /opt I need more room, what is the usual place for databases
   to go?
   
   How can I make my / partition bigger? Do I really need 21.8gb for /usr?
   
   Any suggestions?
   
   Thanks in advance.
   
   
   
   ___
   Redhat-list mailing list
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
   
  
  -- 
  Willem van der Walt
  Information Services Directorate
  Department of Health
  South Africa
  tel: 27 12 3120700
  
  
 
 
 
 
 ___
 Redhat-list mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: new linux server, re-partitioning

2002-06-21 Thread achana

Anthony E. Greene wrote:

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

 On 21-Jun-2002/09:05 -0400, Joshua James [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 We just received a new RedHat v7.2 server from Dell. This is an
 experiment to see how linux works compared to our current installation
 of NT servers. This will be an intranet server behind our firewall.
 
 Our 40gb drive came partitioned as follows:
 
 /dev/hda1  ext3990mb   /home
 /dev/hda6  ext3494mb   /
 /dev/hda2  ext322.8mb  /boot
 /dev/hda8  ext360.7mb  /tmp
 /dev/hda3  ext321.8gb  /usr
 /dev/hda5  ext313.1gb  /var
 
 I installed apache (2.x.39) to the default location and I'm trying to
 install ColdFusion MX. It wants to install to /opt which is in / and
 there isn't near enough room, its already 60% full.
 
 I heard you shouldn't move /etc because there is something in there
 necessary for finding other mount points.
 
 I assume my website is going to /etc/httpd and since my other software
 is going to /opt I need more room, what is the usual place for databases
 to go?
 
 How can I make my / partition bigger? Do I really need 21.8gb for /usr?

 You can make /opt a symlink to /usr/local/opt. That will solve the
 immediate problem, and prevent something similar from happening later.

   mkdir /usr/local/opt
   ln -s /usr/local/opt /opt

 As you get familiar with Linux, you will get your own ideas about how your
 partitions should be laid out. I would have wiped that machine and setup
 my own partitions, but then I've been doing this for years.

 Here are some things you might consider for your next Linux box:

  - Put /usr/local on it's own partition. Software that you compile locally
(install from tarballs) often puts everything it needs under
/usr/local. I also tend to put the scripts and such that I create to
help run the machine in /usr/local/[bin|sbin]. With all of this on a
separate partition, I can install the latest version of my distro, tell
the installer to leave /home and /usr/local alone, and most of my
customizations remain in place. I just have to worry about the config
stuff in /etc.

  - Put Apache's DocumentRoot in /home/httpd. This stuff will not change if
Apache is upgraded, and needs to be preserved between OS upgrades. Red
Hat used to do this, but apparently it's not LSB compliant. Fine, but I
like to simplify my sysadmin tasks, so I put DocumentRoot on a
partition that I kow will be preserved between upgrades and/or
reinstalls.

  - Make /opt a symlink to /usr/local/opt.

  - Adjust partition sizes for /home and /usr to reflect use as either a
file server (big /home) or a database or email server (big /var).

 I tend to restrict /usr to 4GB because I don't generally install that
 much software on a server. I allow more space for data files (/home,
 /var).

 In any case, welcome to Linux.

 Tony
 - --
 Anthony E. Greene mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 OpenPGP Key: 0x6C94239D/7B3D BD7D 7D91 1B44 BA26  C484 A42A 60DD 6C94 239D
 AOL/Yahoo Chat: TonyG05  HomePage: http://www.pobox.com/~agreene/
 Linux: the choice of a GNU Generation. http://www.linux.org/

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
 Comment: Anthony E. Greene 0x6C94239D [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 iD8DBQE9EzMbpCpg3WyUI50RAorJAJ9/IB0p8zpRvpKx5XzSdU8k3M/Q6ACfSbQd
 skVLdUzxCGhKv2NO08a9ToA=
 =Ufyz
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-

 ___
 Redhat-list mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Anthony has a good point : wipe it and start from scratch.
It's probably bloat-ware, most of which you don't need !
Just pop the CD in and it will walk you thru it.


begin:vcard 
n:Chan;Arthur
tel;work:1.718.633.5892
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
url:www.saysit.com
org:SAYS I.T.
adr:;;234 E 2nd Street;Brooklyn;New York;11218-2314;USA
version:2.1
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Senior Partner
note;quoted-printable:This message and all attachments are confidential.=0D=0AThey are meant solely for the addressee.=0D=0AAny authorised use or dessemination is prohibited.=0D=0AEmails are liable to unauthorised alterations.=0D=0ANeither SAYS I.T. nor any of its partners or subsidiaries or affiliates=0D=0Ashall be responsible for the message if altered, changed or falsified.
x-mozilla-cpt:;25408
fn:Arthur Chan
end:vcard



Re: new linux server, re-partitioning

2002-06-21 Thread Joshua James

I'm concerned about installation. This came pre-installed. Normally with
Windows I would easily reinstall but I'm not sure about drivers or even
tech support.

It is a Dell PowerEdge 350, it is however just a development server.
Everything will be reinstalled from scratch on a new server for full
production.

I thank you all for your help!

On Thu, 2002-06-20 at 20:28, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Anthony E. Greene wrote:
 
  -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
  Hash: SHA1
 
  On 21-Jun-2002/09:05 -0400, Joshua James [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  We just received a new RedHat v7.2 server from Dell. This is an
  experiment to see how linux works compared to our current installation
  of NT servers. This will be an intranet server behind our firewall.
  
  Our 40gb drive came partitioned as follows:
  
  /dev/hda1  ext3990mb   /home
  /dev/hda6  ext3494mb   /
  /dev/hda2  ext322.8mb  /boot
  /dev/hda8  ext360.7mb  /tmp
  /dev/hda3  ext321.8gb  /usr
  /dev/hda5  ext313.1gb  /var
  
  I installed apache (2.x.39) to the default location and I'm trying to
  install ColdFusion MX. It wants to install to /opt which is in / and
  there isn't near enough room, its already 60% full.
  
  I heard you shouldn't move /etc because there is something in there
  necessary for finding other mount points.
  
  I assume my website is going to /etc/httpd and since my other software
  is going to /opt I need more room, what is the usual place for databases
  to go?
  
  How can I make my / partition bigger? Do I really need 21.8gb for /usr?
 
  You can make /opt a symlink to /usr/local/opt. That will solve the
  immediate problem, and prevent something similar from happening later.
 
mkdir /usr/local/opt
ln -s /usr/local/opt /opt
 
  As you get familiar with Linux, you will get your own ideas about how your
  partitions should be laid out. I would have wiped that machine and setup
  my own partitions, but then I've been doing this for years.
 
  Here are some things you might consider for your next Linux box:
 
   - Put /usr/local on it's own partition. Software that you compile locally
 (install from tarballs) often puts everything it needs under
 /usr/local. I also tend to put the scripts and such that I create to
 help run the machine in /usr/local/[bin|sbin]. With all of this on a
 separate partition, I can install the latest version of my distro, tell
 the installer to leave /home and /usr/local alone, and most of my
 customizations remain in place. I just have to worry about the config
 stuff in /etc.
 
   - Put Apache's DocumentRoot in /home/httpd. This stuff will not change if
 Apache is upgraded, and needs to be preserved between OS upgrades. Red
 Hat used to do this, but apparently it's not LSB compliant. Fine, but I
 like to simplify my sysadmin tasks, so I put DocumentRoot on a
 partition that I kow will be preserved between upgrades and/or
 reinstalls.
 
   - Make /opt a symlink to /usr/local/opt.
 
   - Adjust partition sizes for /home and /usr to reflect use as either a
 file server (big /home) or a database or email server (big /var).
 
  I tend to restrict /usr to 4GB because I don't generally install that
  much software on a server. I allow more space for data files (/home,
  /var).
 
  In any case, welcome to Linux.
 
  Tony
  - --
  Anthony E. Greene mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  OpenPGP Key: 0x6C94239D/7B3D BD7D 7D91 1B44 BA26  C484 A42A 60DD 6C94 239D
  AOL/Yahoo Chat: TonyG05  HomePage: http://www.pobox.com/~agreene/
  Linux: the choice of a GNU Generation. http://www.linux.org/
 
  -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
  Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
  Comment: Anthony E. Greene 0x6C94239D [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  iD8DBQE9EzMbpCpg3WyUI50RAorJAJ9/IB0p8zpRvpKx5XzSdU8k3M/Q6ACfSbQd
  skVLdUzxCGhKv2NO08a9ToA=
  =Ufyz
  -END PGP SIGNATURE-
 
  ___
  Redhat-list mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
 
 Anthony has a good point : wipe it and start from scratch.
 It's probably bloat-ware, most of which you don't need !
 Just pop the CD in and it will walk you thru it.




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: new linux server, re-partitioning

2002-06-21 Thread Javier Gostling

On Fri, 2002-06-21 at 10:40, Joshua James wrote:
 I'm concerned about installation. This came pre-installed. Normally with
 Windows I would easily reinstall but I'm not sure about drivers or even
 tech support.

Hmm... Last year I installed a few Dell PowerApp linux based boxes.
There was a java app in the Dell CD that allows you to create a
kickstart disk to reinstall the system with factory defaults. Check if
you have this. If so, the worst grief you will experience if you
reinstall and run into trouble, is that you will have to use the Dell
supplied CDs to make a Dell standard install.

As for support, don't care about it unless you bought the server with OS
support. And the support you buy is from Redhat, not Dell. Dell only
gives you hardware support.

 It is a Dell PowerEdge 350, it is however just a development server.
 Everything will be reinstalled from scratch on a new server for full
 production.

All the more reason to go ahead and try it. If it doesn't work for you,
you will know for sure that it doesn't work.

 
 I thank you all for your help!

Anytime  ;-)

Cheers,
-- 
Javier Gostling
Ingeniero de Sistemas
Virtualia S.A.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fono: +56 (2) 202-6264 x 130
Fax: +56 (2) 342-8763

Av. Kennedy 5757, of 1502
Las Condes
Santiago
Chile



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: new linux server, re-partitioning

2002-06-21 Thread Anthony E. Greene

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 21-Jun-2002/10:28 +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anthony E. Greene wrote:
[snip]
 As you get familiar with Linux, you will get your own ideas about how your
 partitions should be laid out. I would have wiped that machine and setup
 my own partitions, but then I've been doing this for years.

[snip]

Anthony has a good point : wipe it and start from scratch.
It's probably bloat-ware, most of which you don't need !
Just pop the CD in and it will walk you thru it.

I would not recommend that for a new user with a pre-installed box.  There
may be driver issues, and there may be vendor customizations that help the
user get started.

Tony
- -- 
Anthony E. Greene mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OpenPGP Key: 0x6C94239D/7B3D BD7D 7D91 1B44 BA26  C484 A42A 60DD 6C94 239D
AOL/Yahoo Chat: TonyG05  HomePage: http://www.pobox.com/~agreene/
Linux: the choice of a GNU Generation. http://www.linux.org/

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Anthony E. Greene 0x6C94239D [EMAIL PROTECTED]

iD8DBQE9E0ecpCpg3WyUI50RAgg1AJ4yiLX6ejIKVgRBvMUhMVITuZB0SwCgrl7N
XAtN72yCGV7XR+qu3Ps1npc=
=i929
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: new linux server, re-partitioning

2002-06-21 Thread Paul Greene




Apache is quite flexible and can be installed almost anywhere you want to 
put it.

PG

 Joshua James wrote:
 
  I really think Apache uses /etc/httpd, is it safe to change that? Will
  it affect other programs?
 
  ColdFusion wants to install to /opt, is that safe to change? Should I
  make a /usr/ColdFusion or /var/ColdFusion?
 



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: Partitioning HD

2001-02-20 Thread John Aldrich

On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, you wrote:
 I have two partitions, both Fat32.  Would like to install RH 7 and am
 trying to find out if I need to repartion the entire drive and reload
 everything or is there a way to just add the linux partitions.
 
 My two partitions are 16G and 2G both on the same HDD
 
 The box is a Compaq pentium II 533.
 
Are you using both partitions? If not, you can theoretically just reformat one
of the partitions and install linux on that. If you are using some of both
partitions,  you can use a util like FIPS to non-destructively repartition your
hard drive and "steal" some drive space from one or both partitions.

IIRC, you can also use Partition Magic to create a partition for linux, but I'd
let the installer reformat the partition before using, just to be safe.
John



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: Partitioning HD

2001-02-20 Thread Mike Burger

If you don't need the 2nd partition for DOS/Windows, at all, you can use
the Linux fdisk to change the partition type to type 83 (Linux
native)...or you can delete that partition and repartition the 2GB space
(assuming that it's currently your D: drive) for use with LInux...eithr
way, you can generally leave the first partition (C: drive) alone.

On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Charles wrote:

 I have two partitions, both Fat32.  Would like to install RH 7 and am
 trying to find out if I need to repartion the entire drive and reload
 everything or is there a way to just add the linux partitions.

 My two partitions are 16G and 2G both on the same HDD

 The box is a Compaq pentium II 533.

 Thanks

 Charles



 ___
 Redhat-list mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: Partitioning HD

2001-02-20 Thread Mike Burger

Scratch what I said, earlier.

Grab parted, or Partition Magic.

Shrink your C: drive by about 15MB at th efront of the drive.  You can
even shrink the C: at the back of the drive, too.

When you go to partition, designate that 15MB slice as /boot (keeping your
boot area above the 1024 cylinder mark), and do whatever you like with the
remaining space.

On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Charles wrote:

 I have two partitions, both Fat32.  Would like to install RH 7 and am
 trying to find out if I need to repartion the entire drive and reload
 everything or is there a way to just add the linux partitions.

 My two partitions are 16G and 2G both on the same HDD

 The box is a Compaq pentium II 533.

 Thanks

 Charles



 ___
 Redhat-list mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: re-partitioning

2000-09-02 Thread M. Neidorff

At 10:14 AM 08/31/2000 -0700, you wrote:
But in any case, if you can burn CDs and have a computer that can boot 
from the CDROM
(almost any computer built in the last few years), then in a situation
like this you might want to consider downloading the "Linuxcare Bootable
Business Card".

http://www.linuxcare.com/bootable_cd/

An invaluable tool to have around for things like this and any
unexpected emergencies that might come up.


Wow.  Great tool.  Thanks,



Mark
   ___
 __HHH__
  (@ @)
.oOO--\_/--OOo.-
| Mark Neidorff|Never assume a conspiracy exists   |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]|when mere stupidity can explain|
| Just Answers!|an event.  |
| Computer Systems Solutions   |   R. K. Bernstein |
---.ooo0---0ooo.
(   )   (   )
 \ ( ) /
  \_)   (_/



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



re-partitioning

2000-08-31 Thread M. Neidorff

Hi folks,

I know that we have beat this topic up for a while.  I just want to clarify 
an issue.  I've just gotten a new HDD and want to take my RH 6.2 
installation and

  tar the partitions onto the new drive (easy)
  delete existing partitions from old drive, (also easy)
  * re-partition old drive
  * replace the files onto the new partitions.

While I am thinking this through, it occurred to me that once I delete the 
existing partitions I won't have tar or fdisk available anymore to work 
with.  I've created a boot disk (mkbootdisk) and verified that it will boot 
the system.  Will cp'ing the files "tar" and "fdisk" to the bootdisk be 
enough to do the work, or do I need some libraries as well?  Any other 
files that I might be missing?

Thanks,


Mark
   ___
 __HHH__
  (@ @)
.oOO--\_/--OOo.-
| Mark Neidorff|Never assume a conspiracy exists   |
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]|when mere stupidity can explain|
| Just Answers!|an event.  |
| Computer Systems Solutions   |   R. K. Bernstein |
---.ooo0---0ooo.
(   )   (   )
 \ ( ) /
  \_)   (_/



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



re-partitioning (more info)

2000-08-31 Thread M. Neidorff

Hi folks,
While I am thinking this through, it occurred to me that once I delete the 
existing partitions I won't have tar or fdisk available anymore to work 
with.  I've created a boot disk (mkbootdisk) and verified that it will boot 
the system.  Will cp'ing the files "tar" and "fdisk" to the bootdisk be 
enough to do the work, or do I need some libraries as well?  Any other 
files that I might be missing?

I just thought of the files to make the ext2 file system also.  Anything else?

Thanks again,

Mark




___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: re-partitioning

2000-08-31 Thread Duane Clark

Mark wrote:
 Hi folks,
 
 I know that we have beat this topic up for a while.  I just want to clarify 
 an issue.  I've just gotten a new HDD and want to take my RH 6.2 
 installation and
 
   tar the partitions onto the new drive (easy)
   delete existing partitions from old drive, (also easy)
   * re-partition old drive
   * replace the files onto the new partitions.
 
 While I am thinking this through, it occurred to me that once I delete the 
 existing partitions I won't have tar or fdisk available anymore to work 
 with.  I've created a boot disk (mkbootdisk) and verified that it will boot 
 the system.  Will cp'ing the files "tar" and "fdisk" to the bootdisk be 
 enough to do the work, or do I need some libraries as well?  Any other 
 files that I might be missing?

Well, it is not clear to me why if you have copied the files onto your
new drive, that you would not be booting from that. But in any case, if
you can burn CDs and have a computer that can boot from the CDROM
(almost any computer built in the last few years), then in a situation
like this you might want to consider downloading the "Linuxcare Bootable
Business Card". 

http://www.linuxcare.com/bootable_cd/

An invaluable tool to have around for things like this and any
unexpected emergencies that might come up. They can fit a lot more tools
onto a CDROM, including tar and fdisk and lots of READMEs with helpful
info.



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: re-partitioning (more info)

2000-08-31 Thread Statux

You'd need static versions of those utilities. Libraries are too big for
bootdisks. You can prolly manage to get the source and compile your own
static copies :)

On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, M. Neidorff wrote:

 Hi folks,
 While I am thinking this through, it occurred to me that once I delete the 
 existing partitions I won't have tar or fdisk available anymore to work 
 with.  I've created a boot disk (mkbootdisk) and verified that it will boot 
 the system.  Will cp'ing the files "tar" and "fdisk" to the bootdisk be 
 enough to do the work, or do I need some libraries as well?  Any other 
 files that I might be missing?
 
 I just thought of the files to make the ext2 file system also.  Anything else?
 
 Thanks again,
 
 Mark
 
 
 
 
 ___
 Redhat-list mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
 

-- 
**
* Statux *
*
*   |   *
* E-Mail:   |   [EMAIL PROTECTED]  *
* ICQ:  |   1732414 *
* Homepage: |   http://www.geocities.com/reverendstatux/*
*   |   *
*



___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list



Re: partitioning

2000-07-22 Thread Matt Whitfield

Warren Piece wrote:
 
 total newbie question...
 i'm trying to install redhat, currently running win 98, and am using fips to
 partition my hd.  i've defragged a couple of times, but there is still a
 small amount of information that is pushed to the very end of the hd (which
 is not even half full).  because the last cylinder is not empty, fips boots
 me out and won't let me do anything.  any help would be great.


Sorry I took so long to reply to this (forgot to change my spam
blocking e-mail address before sending to this list). I had the same
problem so maybe the solution will be the same. If you're using the
Winblows defragmenter uncheck the 'optimise so my programs start faster'
option as this always seems to leave some junk at the end of the disk.
Hope this helps,

Matt.


-- 
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.




Re: partitioning

2000-07-01 Thread Leonard den Ottolander

Hi Warren,

 i've defragged a couple of times, but there is still a 
 small amount of information that is pushed to the very end of the hd

 Did you check (with a disk editor or defrag utility) which files are at the 
end of the disk? If you are using Norton Utilities, it might be that its 
image.idx and image.dat file are located there. Just delete them. Otherwise I 
wouldn't know.

Good luck,

Leonard.


-- 
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.




Re: partitioning

2000-06-30 Thread Gordon Messmer

Warren Piece wrote:
 is not even half full).  because the last cylinder is not empty, fips boots
 me out and won't let me do anything.  any help would be great.

Perhaps you could try parted?  Search for it on freshmeat.  You can
download a bootable floppy image (use rawrite from the Red Hat CDROM to
write the image to a floppy) which you can use to resize your
partitions.   I've used it to increase the size of a FAT32 partition,
but not shrink.  Let me know how it works  :)

MSG


-- 
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.




Re: partitioning

2000-06-30 Thread Mikkel L. Ellertson

On Fri, 30 Jun 2000, Warren Piece wrote:

 
 total newbie question...
 i'm trying to install redhat, currently running win 98, and am using fips to 
 partition my hd.  i've defragged a couple of times, but there is still a 
 small amount of information that is pushed to the very end of the hd (which 
 is not even half full).  because the last cylinder is not empty, fips boots 
 me out and won't let me do anything.  any help would be great.
 
 
Are you running something like Norton Utilities Image that puts am
"image" file at the end of the disk?  If so, turn it off, look for, and
delete a hidden/system file called something like Image in C:\, and try
it again.

Mikkel
-- 

Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons,
 for you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup.


-- 
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.




Re: partitioning

2000-06-30 Thread Stephen Liu

Hi Warren,

Take my advice don't use fips.  It is not safe as indicated in the warning
of this resizing software.  I got a bitter lesson twice in using this
software.  The partition will be destroyed automatically for unknown reason
on starting PC, everything then gone.

Partition Magic is reliable but it is not free.  I have no idea about
another resizing software recommended by another guy MSG

Good luck

Stephen


- Original Message -
From: "Warren Piece" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 01, 2000 2:39 AM
Subject: partitioning



 total newbie question...
 i'm trying to install redhat, currently running win 98, and am using fips
to
 partition my hd.  i've defragged a couple of times, but there is still a
 small amount of information that is pushed to the very end of the hd
(which
 is not even half full).  because the last cylinder is not empty, fips
boots
 me out and won't let me do anything.  any help would be great.
 
 Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com



-- 
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.




Re: partitioning

2000-06-30 Thread Charles Galpin

Your current situation doesn't sound good, but just wanted to offer that I
have used fips several times and it has been very reliable each
time. Follow the directions carefully of course.

charles
On Sat, 1 Jul 2000, Stephen Liu wrote:

 Hi Warren,
 
 Take my advice don't use fips.  It is not safe as indicated in the warning
 of this resizing software.  I got a bitter lesson twice in using this
 software.  The partition will be destroyed automatically for unknown reason
 on starting PC, everything then gone.
 
 Partition Magic is reliable but it is not free.  I have no idea about
 another resizing software recommended by another guy MSG
 
 Good luck
 
 Stephen
 
 
 - Original Message -
 From: "Warren Piece" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  total newbie question...
  i'm trying to install redhat, currently running win 98, and am using fips
 to
  partition my hd.  i've defragged a couple of times, but there is still a
  small amount of information that is pushed to the very end of the hd
 (which
  is not even half full).  because the last cylinder is not empty, fips
 boots
  me out and won't let me do anything.  any help would be great.


-- 
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.




Re: partitioning with diskdruid: not enough space

2000-01-14 Thread Alan Mead

At 09:48 PM 1/14/00 +0100, David Krings wrote:

   What am i doing wrong ? I know that i had the same problem back then when

Have you read the large disk HOWTO?  Go to www.redhat.com, click on
suporrt, find their own HOWTO on large disks and then matbe visit
www.linuxdocs.org and read the LDP HOWTO.

Good luck!

-Alan
---
Alan D. Mead  /  Research Scientist  /  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Institute for Personality and Ability Testing
1801 Woodfield Dr  /  Savoy IL 61874 USA
217-352-4739 (v)  /  217-352-9674 (f)


-- 
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.



Re: Partitioning Advice

1999-12-16 Thread Tim Fairchild


 On Wed, 15 Dec 1999, Jason Grovert wrote:
 
  What is the best way to partition a drive as far as sizing goes.  
  Let's say I have a 8 gig hard drive.  How would everyone do it and for
  what reasons?

As said, it depends, but I think you are looking for what other people
have done and why...

My first installation of RH4.2 was a while ago and the system grew an
was upgraded to 5.2 and in the process I added a drive and moved
partitions and was continually juggling the partitions to get a best
fit... I'd add a partition and put /usr/local there etc, but then I'd
install something and run low on space, etc...

When I decided to do a new installation (with a new 8 gig drive) with
6.1 I got lazy and put in a big 3 gig drive and used that for / and
another gig for /home, and that was it so far. The rest of the drive is
for shared files (samba), DOS files/games, and a cd writer image
partition... Linux and ext2 have been so reliable I guess I got brave,
but kept /home on it's own. I'll be using half of my original 1 gig
drive for file backup and well as putting stuff onto cdrom. 

I did this because I really wasn't sure where I was going to need the
space, KDE went from opt, SO5 went to opt, and it wasn't clear what I'd
really need. So I guess I took the easy way out. Hopefully it won't
caome back and bite me, but then the install was so easy that I'm not
too worried. 

Oh, and I used 256 meg of swap. I only have and old P120 with 32meg, and
the extra swap has made this into a new machine... It just wasn't
working with 64meg swap. If I had NS and gimp open in KDE the system was
under stress :-)

I made the mistake of making a single 256 meg swap partition rather than
two 128 meg partitions as planned - but then found that apparently the
new kernal handles larger swap files. Handy that :-)

Anyway, that's what I did :-)

tim

-- 
-
  Tim  Therese Fairchild
  Atchafalaya Border Collies.
  Kuttabul, Queensland, Australia.
-
 Email   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Homepagehttp://www.home.aone.net.au/tims 
 BCs4me List http://www.onelist.com/subscribe.cgi/BCs4me
 BCs4me Page http://members.xoom.com/amosf
-


-- 
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.



Re: Partitioning Advice

1999-12-16 Thread Alan Mead

At 12:45 AM 12/17/99 +1000, Tim Fairchild wrote:

I made the mistake of making a single 256 meg swap partition rather than
two 128 meg partitions as planned - but then found that apparently the
new kernal handles larger swap files. Handy that :-)

= 2.2 apparently.  I would say it's safer to make multiple 128MB swap
partitions
---
Alan D. Mead  /  Research Scientist  /  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Institute for Personality and Ability Testing
1801 Woodfield Dr  /  Savoy IL 61874 USA
217-352-4739 (v)  /  217-352-9674 (f)


-- 
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.



Re: Partitioning Advice

1999-12-15 Thread Brian Anderson

On Wed, 15 Dec 1999, Jason Grovert wrote:

 What is the best way to partition a drive as far as sizing goes.  Let's say
 I have a 8 gig hard drive.  How would everyone do it and for what reasons?


Depends on what you are doing with it. I usually do

10 for /boot
100-150 for /
100-200 for /var
250 for /opt

then the rest divided between /var/spool/mail, /usr and /export/home (i do
the solaris style of using /export/home, with autofs mounting under /home
as needed... force of habit, i work mostly with sun)

figure out what your functions are going to be. if you'll be the only user
of the system, make /var/spool/mail only as big as you want to allow for
your inbox (or just make /var that much bigger, and leave out
/var/spool/mail)

/usr is where the vast majority of your software will go. occasionally
things will default to /opt, but i don't see it often in linux. i like
/usr to be at least 1500M, usually 2-3 gig.

/home should be determined by # of users multiplied by the amount of space
you'll allow for each. On my linux system, I only have 10 users, but i
have some REALLY large disk quotas (one user has 5 gig!), so /home is on a
13 gig drive. 

for an 8 gig drive, single user system, i'd probably go:


/boot   10M
/   240M
/opt500M
/var250M
/usr3.5G
/home   3.5G


That leaves enough room in /, and /var with tons of room in /usr and
/home, and a good amount of space in /opt, just in case any packages want
to go there (so you don't fill up /)


This is just my opinion, not the 'right' way to do it.





Brian


-- 
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.



Re: Partitioning Advice

1999-12-15 Thread J. Scott Kasten

In addition, I'd split out /tmp, and of course don't forget your swap which
the old rule of thumb is 2*physical ram, but I usually use 128M+ (2.2.x) or so with
disk capacities being so outrageously huge.

On Wed, Dec 15, 1999 at 02:16:18PM -0500, Brian Anderson wrote:
 On Wed, 15 Dec 1999, Jason Grovert wrote:
 
  What is the best way to partition a drive as far as sizing goes.  Let's say
  I have a 8 gig hard drive.  How would everyone do it and for what reasons?
 
 
 Depends on what you are doing with it. I usually do
 
 10 for /boot
 100-150 for /
 100-200 for /var
 250 for /opt
 
 then the rest divided between /var/spool/mail, /usr and /export/home (i do
 the solaris style of using /export/home, with autofs mounting under /home
 as needed... force of habit, i work mostly with sun)
 

-- 
J. Scott Kasten

jsk AT tetracon-eng DOT net

"That wasn't an attack.  It was preemptive retaliation!"


-- 
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.



Re: Partitioning Advice

1999-12-15 Thread Brian Anderson



Forgot about swap... oops :) 

I usually use either 2xRAM, or 128, depending on the system (my home
machine has 128 physical, and i don't feel that i need 256 swap)



Brian


On Wed, 15 Dec 1999, J. Scott Kasten wrote:

 In addition, I'd split out /tmp, and of course don't forget your swap which
 the old rule of thumb is 2*physical ram, but I usually use 128M+ (2.2.x) or so with
 disk capacities being so outrageously huge.


-- 
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.



Re: Partitioning Advice

1999-12-15 Thread Alan Mead

On Wed, Dec 15, 1999 at 02:16:18PM -0500, Brian Anderson wrote:
 On Wed, 15 Dec 1999, Jason Grovert wrote:
 
  What is the best way to partition a drive as far as sizing goes.
Let's say
  I have a 8 gig hard drive.  How would everyone do it and for what
reasons?
 
 
 Depends on what you are doing with it. I usually do
 
 10 for /boot
 100-150 for /
 100-200 for /var
 250 for /opt
 
 then the rest divided between /var/spool/mail, /usr and /export/home (i do
 the solaris style of using /export/home, with autofs mounting under /home
 as needed... force of habit, i work mostly with sun)

Jason, you should check out the discussion of this in older (5x) RH guides
or in many Linux books and I would also check out the fs standard (I think
there's a link on the RH page) about what you're separating of globbing
with these sorts of choices.  Because these choices have implications and
it's hard to pick for you.  For example, you might get really unhappy with
100MB /var if you do something that generates a lot of logging.  

As I see it, the main rationale for making a partition is (1) because you
must (not usually an issue with Linux), (2) to follow a standard, (3) to
localize something like growing log files, mail spools, etc. so that they
don't take up the whole disk, (4) to mount something separately as in a
/usr mounted read-only.  Only you can balance these needs against problems
like running out of room.

In general, I advocate fewer partitions because they can be really
limiting.  I've never used /opt or /export but I understand some programs
expect /opt.  I usually make a /usr partition because, at least in theory,
you can make easier backups, restores, etc. and also allows mounting it
read-only.  You should probably make a smallish /root and I usually
separate /home from the rest of / (including /tmp) but that's a tricky
choice dependent on how many users you will support and who they are.  For
just yourself, I might not separate them.

-Alan
---
Alan D. Mead  /  Research Scientist  /  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Institute for Personality and Ability Testing
1801 Woodfield Dr  /  Savoy IL 61874 USA
217-352-4739 (v)  /  217-352-9674 (f)


-- 
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.



Re: Partitioning Advice

1999-12-15 Thread Brian Anderson

On Wed, 15 Dec 1999, Alan Mead wrote:

 As I see it, the main rationale for making a partition is (1) because you
 must (not usually an issue with Linux), (2) to follow a standard, (3) to
 localize something like growing log files, mail spools, etc. so that they
 don't take up the whole disk, (4) to mount something separately as in a
 /usr mounted read-only.  Only you can balance these needs against problems
 like running out of room.

Another reason that I partition things out is in case of a crash (ie
incorrect shutdown)

I have no factual basis, but the concept seems sound: if you have 1 really
big partition, and you halt unexpectedly, and the fs is corrupted, then
you're in trouble.

If you have 5 partitions, and one of them is corrupted, then you can
either fix it, as long as / us ok, or at least it's easier to recover the
rest of the data, since it's still on a valid FS.



brian

-- 

---'---,---'--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---,---'---,---
  E! Evil... Bright... Yellow... Thing...!!
 That must be the Daystar. I've heard talk about it.
  User Friendly, 12/8/1999
  --'--,--'--,-- http://diabolis.net --'--,--'--,--


-- 
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.



Re: Partitioning Advice

1999-12-15 Thread Todd A. Jacobs

On Wed, 15 Dec 1999, Jason Grovert wrote:

 What is the best way to partition a drive as far as sizing goes.  
 Let's say I have a 8 gig hard drive.  How would everyone do it and for
 what reasons?

Cut it up into bite-sized pieces, and serve with Ranch dressing.

Seriously, this is a FAQ with no simple answers. The answer is always "it
depends." Until you know how you're going to use space on your system, it
doesn't make a lot of sense to lose sleep over this subject. If you don't
have special security concerns or unusual enterprise needs, you don't need
to deviate too much from the defaults.

-- 
Todd A. Jacobs
Network Systems Engineer


-- 
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.



Re: Partitioning large hard drives

1998-06-02 Thread Ian Burrell

 
 
 Sorry, forgot to mention that.  Basically two jobs, POP3 mail and FTP
 server (very small).
 

Then it is very good idea to separate the system software, the mail
spool, and FTP area.  Also, you probably want to have a separate
partition for user home directories even if the only user will be for
the ftp server (/home/ftp).  

A good plan to make a root partition of 300-500MB (small enough to fit
under 1024 cylinders for booting); a user partition (/home) of however
space you think you will need (500MB-1GB); and the mail spool
(/var/spool/mail) for the rest of the drive.


 - Ian

-- 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://www-leland.stanford.edu/~iburrell/
If at first you don't succeed, you're doing about average.


-- 
  PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists
 To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 
   "unsubscribe" as the Subject.




Re: Partitioning large hard drives

1998-06-01 Thread John J. Donohue

 I'm installing RH5.0 for a client.  The hard drive they wish to use is a
 6GB Maxtor IDE drive.
 
 I'd like to hear from others their thoughts on partitioning this drive
 as well as any pitfalls I may encounter.
 
Depends. What's the machine going to be doing? Web server? Usenet news
server? Graphics workstation? Mailserver for an ISP? Samba replacement for
an NT box? ;-)


-- 
  PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists
 To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 
   "unsubscribe" as the Subject.




RE: Partitioning large hard drives

1998-06-01 Thread Mike A. Lewis, CNE


Sorry, forgot to mention that.  Basically two jobs, POP3 mail and FTP
server (very small).


-Original Message-
From:   John J. Donohue [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:   Monday, June 01, 1998 4:12 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject:Re: Partitioning large hard drives

 I'm installing RH5.0 for a client.  The hard drive they wish to use is
a
 6GB Maxtor IDE drive.
 
 I'd like to hear from others their thoughts on partitioning this drive
 as well as any pitfalls I may encounter.
 
Depends. What's the machine going to be doing? Web server? Usenet news
server? Graphics workstation? Mailserver for an ISP? Samba replacement
for
an NT box? ;-)


-- 
  PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST
ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips
/mailing-lists
 To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 
   "unsubscribe" as the Subject.


-- 
  PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists
 To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 
   "unsubscribe" as the Subject.




Re: partitioning strategy

1998-05-25 Thread Patrick T. Berry

Deryk: I have an ASUS TX97-E Revision 1.12, using the clock chip ICS9147-09
and Bios Rev 4010a-0107e.  the web page
http://www.asus.com/support/mb/answers/chipset/75or83.asp
contains all the info straight from the horses' mouth about running at 83 mhz.
I have an Intel Pentium, SL27S series 233.  with the jumpers set at 4.5
multiplier,
I install RedHat with about 702 Mb of applications in less than 20 minutes from
the NEC 6x CDROM (number one of the quad set).  The onboard thermometers
report a CPU temp of between 131 and 134, depending on the room temperature, with
the circuit board being about 128 to 132 degrees fahrenheit.   Regular temps were
about
4 degrees lower when set up as a 233 (66x3.5)  I am using a large stock heatsink,
ball bearing fan, and thermal compound (white silicon).  A list of ;motherboards
which support 83 mhz is at http://www.sysopt.com/mb83mhz.html.  Setup of the
ASUS TX 97 board(s) is at http://www.sysopt.com/mreview/asustx97.html
which is 8 printed pages long.  The ASUS booklet warns that the Intel chip set
does
NOT support 75 or 83 mhz.  Have not had any lockups due to overclock in three
months, but dual boot Win95, and that has locked up about 8 times the past month.
This system is exercised with different operating systems fairly vigoriously,
(changed, loaded, and unloaded) various Linux and windows revisions about three
times a week.

Deryk Barker wrote:

  I looked at the specs for the ASUS board (on thier web site) and all I could
  see was up to 83 Mhz.  How are you getting 373?  I would love to see how you
  did this (since I would love to try!!!).

 I think you are confusing bus clock speed with cpu clock speed. The
 PCI spec only goes up to 66MHz AFAIK, but 83 and above is already
 fairly common in the marketplace.

 I believe the original message was concerned with overclocking the cpu
 chip.




-- 
  PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists
 To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 
   "unsubscribe" as the Subject.




Re: partitioning strategy -Reply

1998-05-22 Thread Dennis Clark

Does this give you true 373Mhz performance?  Just curios.

 "Patrick T. Berry" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/21/98 05:10pm 


Ray Curtis wrote:

  "ptb" == Patrick T Berry [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 ptb I am overclocking a 233mx at 373.5 mhz!

 Boy, I hope you have this on a block of ice, this is a 66% overclock
 speed !
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.clark.net/pub/ray

I am using an ASUS TX97-E Rev 1.12 board, which has monitor
thermometer on
the board beneath the CPU, and one on the board.  They report CPU at
134 degrees, board at
128 degrees.  I am using ONLY a stock fan with  green aluminum
heatsink,
the fan is a ball bearing model.  I have had no problems in the past two
months, as far as
lock-ups in Win95 and Linux.  Before the over clock, temps were:
CPU=131; board
was 124 degrees.  I do have thermal silicon paste on the cpu/heatsink. I
am experimenting,
as always, with new and used equipment I picked up at stores, sales,
shows, etc.  Sure is
fun! Only smoked one power supply and one 486 board so far!  Those
casualties were due to
start-up stress on capacitors, and old battery on board.
 Red Hat has no apparent problem running on the overclocked board!


-- 
  PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST
ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips
/mailing-lists
 To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 
   "unsubscribe" as the Subject.


-- 
  PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists
 To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 
   "unsubscribe" as the Subject.




Re: partitioning strategy

1998-05-22 Thread Deryk Barker

Once upon a time Smith, Nathan A., Capt. wrote:
 
 Ok, 
 
 I looked at the specs for the ASUS board (on thier web site) and all I could
 see was up to 83 Mhz.  How are you getting 373?  I would love to see how you
 did this (since I would love to try!!!).

I think you are confusing bus clock speed with cpu clock speed. The
PCI spec only goes up to 66MHz AFAIK, but 83 and above is already
fairly common in the marketplace.

I believe the original message was concerned with overclocking the cpu
chip. 

-- 
|Deryk Barker, Computer Science Dept. | Music does not have to be understood|
|Camosun College, Victoria, BC, Canada| It has to be listened to.   |
|email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |
|phone: +1 250 370 4452   | Hermann Scherchen.  |


-- 
  PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists
 To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 
   "unsubscribe" as the Subject.




RE: partitioning strategy

1998-05-22 Thread Ray Curtis

 "sna,c" == Smith, Nathan A , Capt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

sna,c Ok, 
sna,c I looked at the specs for the ASUS board (on thier web site) and all I could
sna,c see was up to 83 Mhz.  How are you getting 373?  I would love to see how you
sna,c did this (since I would love to try!!!).

You can't when I first answered this message telling him it must be
cooled  by a block of ice I was only joking.

With this board (Asus TX97) an the max bus speed of 83 Mhz and the 
max multiplier of 4 this would only get you 332 Mhz if the processor 
could handle it.

I suspect something is not normal here, either the board has been
modified somehow or the speed and bogomips are being confused
here.


-- 
Curtis Consulting
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.clark.net/pub/ray

If I am elected no one will ever have to do their laundry again!


-- 
  PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists
 To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 
   "unsubscribe" as the Subject.




Re: partitioning strategy

1998-05-21 Thread Patrick T. Berry



Ray Curtis wrote:

  "ptb" == Patrick T Berry [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 ptb I am overclocking a 233mx at 373.5 mhz!

 Boy, I hope you have this on a block of ice, this is a 66% overclock
 speed !
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.clark.net/pub/ray

I am using an ASUS TX97-E Rev 1.12 board, which has monitor thermometer on
the board beneath the CPU, and one on the board.  They report CPU at 134 degrees, 
board at
128 degrees.  I am using ONLY a stock fan with  green aluminum heatsink,
the fan is a ball bearing model.  I have had no problems in the past two months, as 
far as
lock-ups in Win95 and Linux.  Before the over clock, temps were: CPU=131; board
was 124 degrees.  I do have thermal silicon paste on the cpu/heatsink. I am 
experimenting,
as always, with new and used equipment I picked up at stores, sales, shows, etc.  Sure 
is
fun! Only smoked one power supply and one 486 board so far!  Those casualties were due 
to
start-up stress on capacitors, and old battery on board.
 Red Hat has no apparent problem running on the overclocked board!


-- 
  PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists
 To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 
   "unsubscribe" as the Subject.




Re: partitioning strategy

1998-05-18 Thread Patrick T. Berry

I usually put about 350 to 600 MB of drivespace towards DOS/Win.  Windows 95 takes

about 114Mb.  DOS 7.xx is in the X:/Windows/Command directory.  the rest of the
partition is usually enough for lots of apps.  Linux is cool anywhere, because you
will
probably use LILO to choose which system boots up.  You have no need for the third
partition (Win95), as you could make the first partition(Win95) as large as you
want.
I do wonder at FAT32, as I don't ever use it, formatting FAT16 on all my drives.
I run
OSR2, Works, lotts of graphics and games, and don't experience any problems,
course
I am overclocking a 233mx at 373.5 mhz!
Stacy Brodzik wrote: ..(snipped).

 I assume I need to put the boot partitions for both Win95 and LINUX at the
 front of the disk.

 Stacy Brodzik   INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 University of Washington
 Dept of Atmospheric Sciences
 Box 351640
 Seattle, WA  98195-1640




-- 
  PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists
 To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 
   "unsubscribe" as the Subject.




Re: Partitioning

1998-05-04 Thread Chris Frost

What will the machine be used for? A user? A server? Everything

Chris
- Visit Me At http://home.hiwaay.net/~jfrost -

-- For My Public PGP Key Visit http://home.hiwaay.net/~jfrost/pgp_key.txt --


-- 
  PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists
 To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 
   "unsubscribe" as the Subject.




Re: Partitioning

1998-05-04 Thread Rick Forrester


[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
 I have a question.

 I have a 486/66 with 16MB of RAM and a 1.6GB HD.  How many partitions 
 should I have and what sizes should the be? I plan on installing all 
 the RedHat packages.  

 Thanks, Larry 

This is a bit like asking "What religion should I join", or "What's the worst 
Microsoft product." or some such.  Given 300 responses, you'll probably get 
300 slightly different answers.

That said, especially if you're fairly new to Linux, I'd suggest the following:

/dev/hda1   everything else   /
/dev/hda2   200Mb   /home
/dev/hda364Mb   swap

You'll eventually end up reinstalling  repartitioning to suit yourself.  In 
the meantime, having a separate /home means a place to save copies of critical 
files, and that when you re-install you won't lose those critical files or 
your personal accounts.

Best!

-- 
Rick Forrister [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Opera: Greek word meaning "death by music".
--Anonymous



-- 
  PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists
 To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 
   "unsubscribe" as the Subject.




Re: Partitioning

1998-05-04 Thread Rick


 I have a 486/66 with 16MB of RAM and a 1.6GB HD.  How many partitions
 should I have and what sizes should the be? I plan on installing all
 the RedHat packages.

 Thanks, Larry

This is a bit like asking "What religion should I join", or "What's the
worst
Microsoft product." or some such.  Given 300 responses, you'll probably get
300 slightly different answers.


true!, but bearin mind if you are going to have any dos FAT partitions that
about 500mb is the best size, personally i would go for to 500mb, one for
RH, one /usr, and the rest for crap.

and as for the worst M$ product, i have a feeling i know what will be voted
worst!

Rick



-- 
  PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists
 To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 
   "unsubscribe" as the Subject.