[freenet-support] Re: We need your help!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Matthew Toseland schrieb: As of today, we are down to ONE daily updated DBR index freesite - that being The Freedom Engine. Its author's dedication is greatly appreciated - but this is one hell of a single point of failure, and we need more than one index site and one flog by the same person on the Web Interface page. I haven't watched the lists for some weeks now (I was on a longer business related trip). So my question: Do you still plan on switching the whole network over to UDP based transfers? -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCp2Ul5Sa8EyIJhugRAohRAJ9eFI/bRfDG1fpaJO/+WBwL5ia/9wCeN/nK nwvfGEVi2xk9zawZByrmknE= =nvXK -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: Comparison of 5100 vs 5101
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 5101 works very fine here, my node was offline for 3 days as I needed my bandwith. And 30 minutes after starting it up again it was back to 40 Connections, after about 3 hours it had it's normal count of 70+ connections. Btw. I suggest you update your jvm to 1.5.0_01, or at least the newest version of 1.4.2 (which is _07). And an win9x based machine is shurely not something to be used for judging the quality of a new build... -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32) iD8DBQFB/3T15Sa8EyIJhugRAqnJAJ4nfk1/X7UKzDuBTxA7hgcPQPGmygCdEr0/ OmTGz4ff7zjKwg0VIFtdcys= =OwY+ -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: Comparison of 5100 vs 5101
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Todd Walton schrieb: | You were'nt starting from a blank routing table, were you? As a matter of fact it doesn't matter wheter it is blank or not because the number of outgoing connections is mostly less than 5. My node purely lives from incoming connections. | What the hell does it matter what the OS is, as long as it's the same | both times? (It doesn't.) The TCP/IP stack of Win9x is shit, you can easily overrun or bork it. Most of the time when mass connections fail on Win9x it isn't the app, it is the OS that fucked up. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32) iD8DBQFB/7Cn5Sa8EyIJhugRAgXVAJ48KVnUHgy0vh3picbzbqtIDFGyoACffxy4 a9TQo3XyIBovfIUiy5e3FV4= =gZ7s -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: Unable to Load
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Victor Denisov schrieb: | Yes, you have to forward ports if you're behind NAT, regardless of the | DMZ. All that DMZ really does is that router doesn't perform any traffic | filtering for it by default, not that it can magically understand that | connections on this certain port should be forwarded to that specific IP | address behind NAT. Actually it does for most home routers. On those setting a machine into the DMZ means that every incoming request, that doesn't fit a configured rule (like a firewall ruleset or an open/forwarded port), will automatically be send to the machine in the DMZ. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32) iD8DBQFB/7Gp5Sa8EyIJhugRAr9xAJ4x+BBwQGynXh3Usu0oLhzhDVhmMgCeO5Eu dhW0xXHwp0oYPlPLDP9Hz6E= =A2eM -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: Unable to Load
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Matthew Toseland schrieb: | That would rather mean that only 1 machine can be DMZed, right? Exactly, you can only enter one destination IP as DMZ. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32) iD8DBQFB/7zP5Sa8EyIJhugRAoQ2AJ9rDmlzF4oXd3s6dHvNdVECey1AVgCeN/Kv W1q57TJa9nKWUKOfMcTUnaQ= =5Dt9 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: Error When starting
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Col.Steve Austin Ret. schrieb: | have never seen an error like this one before. | | Freenet started and ran fine last night. this morning attempted restart | after rebooting(NO setting or file changes at all) and came up with this | for (so far) three consecutive startup attempts. here is log for the last | two tries: Seems like your routing table has been corrupted, this happens from time to time. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32) iD8DBQFB/qJw5Sa8EyIJhugRAmkYAJ98KnedgqVHq4Pwmf3WHtPvHEbeiQCfaRAT iI+nYOo+Lj4GJfwHproOB7c= =sfX5 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: Error When starting
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Todd Walton schrieb: | On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 22:26:08 +0100, Someone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | |Seems like your routing table has been corrupted, this happens from time to |time. | | | In which case he should... ...search the archive for older messages about this topic. There's no need to repeat something that has already been answered. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32) iD8DBQFB/rBE5Sa8EyIJhugRAgXDAJ4hbjOYBMoEKW0xgqeX9ttQr5j7RwCfWR32 LbOV1XSgaI3MZhf6KBzI6Dw= =q3nu -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: ANNOUNCE: DFI (Dolphin's Freenet Index) is now back online!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Toad schrieb: | Not adding hopeless index until somebody writes code to autoupdate | edition sites on the bookmarks page. ~From his last entry on edition 17 I guess that his spider will die soon, so why wasting time adding a site that won't live long? -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32) iD8DBQFB6CGX5Sa8EyIJhugRAiBFAJ40YnvwAly8wSziWb9cdk0qncKb2QCdHuf0 DhTEeHFwV22bxu881pBIlkQ= =M/9l -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: ANNOUNCE: DFI (Dolphin's Freenet Index) is now back online!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Conrad J. Sabatier schrieb: | [EMAIL PROTECTED]/DFI// | | I just completed my first successful insert of DFI today since returning to | freenet just yesterday. Please try using it so that it will begin to | propagate again as quickly as possible. | | Due to the fact that I'm just starting back with freenet, the index is still | rather smallish, but we should be seeing it grow with each passing day as my | node's routing improves and the spider successfully locates more and more | sites. | | Please try to bear with us during this early phasing back in of the site. | Thanks! | It's not coming through, what HTL did you use to insert? -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32) iD8DBQFB5t3R5Sa8EyIJhugRAmE6AJ9urEn8OwZ/zf27x+r4Jy8xLGL1tgCfa+cy ga6jEHgJ7ZbRk7dV5t2umlA= =qL0G -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: ANNOUNCE: DFI (Dolphin's Freenet Index) is now back online!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Conrad J. Sabatier schrieb: | Ack! I already had one failed (automated, scheduled) insert, due to my | falling asleep and the node going off the deep end for some reason. :-) | So the site wasn't ready at the time of the DBR rollover, unfortunately. | | It should be better now. Got it inserted on time today (at HTL 15). Ok, I'll try again. But if you really want others to get the site fast you should consider inserting at HTL 20, everything lower can be a pain in the ass to get, especially with daily changing DBR sites. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32) iD8DBQFB5zDe5Sa8EyIJhugRAsD2AJ97TlHZBy2PzaodyzMK8kr/j76UAwCeNgPd 6H3AGhM7Sd68lj/xAZ7dTPE= =qfaT -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: FNP question
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Toad schrieb: |Also I noticed that every time I export the node's reference the |signature information changes. I'd like find out more about how FNP |works and what all this identity information is. I haven't found |anything on freenethelp.org - can you suggest any resources? | | | Had anything else changed? I don't know exactly how the sigs work.. | there may be some randomness involved? Maybe it inlcudes the nodes IP address when creating the sig? So it changes whenever your IP changes. Which would be another reason to use dyndns names. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32) iD8DBQFByhna5Sa8EyIJhugRArw8AJ41PmmXqX0E5luEid5h7IU2Xg0m5wCggHeO SCZaSjG2ukyd0mkRHMLinXw= =TqFp -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Support mailing list Support@freenetproject.org http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: regarding freenethelp.org slowness
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Toad schrieb: | It shouldn't slow your browsing down much if correctly configured i.e. | if the output limit is appropriate for your connection and what else you | want to run on it. It may slow down your gaming and other CPU/memory heavy | tasks, but that's another matter. The limiter isn't working really accurate, at least not when using Windows. If I wan't to make shure the node never uses more than 10kB/s upstream I need to set the limit around 6 to 8 kB/s, but this also means that the node will quite often slow transfers down to the set limit. The output stream then looks like a sinus-curve (is it spelled this way?) here. This is why I do hard-limit it by my switch, this way it's almost a straight line. This together with the relative high number of transfering connections can cause quite a heavy slowdown when using cheap cable modems or routers. But this is the same with every other p2p/filesharing network I know of, so to my believe it's in the nature of such networks and not a freenet specific fault. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) iD8DBQFBteOF5Sa8EyIJhugRAlFzAKCE0MKumwNxXojsefqjsVBuc7g/kQCfS49y 2u7cjIkvDWCODqy9a+3mbF8= =nbBZ -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: What is this consequitive same winner thing?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Toad schrieb: | Could be a bug, could be severe CPU overload. I tend to say it's a bug. I get many of them since 5099, and this even on my 1,8 GHz machine. The average CPU load with freenet is around 10% on this machine with no spikes above 40%, so I doubt that it is CPU overload. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFBsdYy5Sa8EyIJhugRAitfAJ9XYIlmz66WPkn3dXUiFRbVKqbitQCfSf2r 03iPyZIVILZUdwrKJ7/fV6w= =7/c7 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: [Tech] Is it always this slow?/kicked out of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Phillip Hutchings schrieb: | On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 15:19:59 +0100, Newsbyte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | [cut for brevity] | | In my time watching this list, which is well over a year now, I don't | actually recall you making a valid contribution to the project. I do | tend to read your emails, though it can be a struggle at times, and | all I normally see is this: | * Freenet's too slow | * I don't like person (frequently Ian) | * Whine whine whine Yes, that the same impression I got from Newsbyte and it's the reason why I tend to ignore his posts, just like I do with other troll posts. | Now, personally I don't find Freenet slow. That may be because my node | is sitting on a basically unmetered 10Mbps half duplex connection, but | it may not. I take the goals of the project in to consideration, and | waiting 2-3 minutes for a text document to download isn't that bad. Even on ADSL it isn't so slow. Shure it is much slower than browsing a normal Website. But this I do expect when the data has to pass through multiple nodes, with maybe even some ISDN or 56K users in the chain. Newsbyte: Go back to i2p if you like it that much, or try to give some real critics instead of just posting polemic and sarcasmic whine messages. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFBrke/5Sa8EyIJhugRAs7jAJwKJYLjMX4Nk8lwVVHM6wjnQbGJHwCePrHu DGdByVBvHuP/xwNtk+BtxLQ= =tfcI -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: [Tech] Is it always this slow?/kicked out of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Newsbyte schrieb: | I've made the comparison between I2P and freenet, and they both have value, | as I said in the past. I agree that the level of whining has increased, but | that's mostly due to the fact that being diplomatic and giving alternatives | doesn't actually do one iota neither, while after 4 years (yes, I've been | follow the lists for so long) Freenet today isn't much better (in the | endusers sense) then it was in the 0.4 days. Now that's not true, I'm using freenet since 0.3 and there have been great improvements to usability, speed and resource usage. | The truth is, I *do* annoy people, and I'm well aware of that, but mostly | it's because they know it *is* true and I do have a point. Hah, freenet | working fast? Well, indeed, if you have T1 line or something like the other | poster said. But normal users often have a different impression, and even | when noobs come tell it on the maillist themselves, it is still being | refuted by some coders. I've been inserting my flog not long ago, it took me | one hour...do you think I invent this? I don't have a T1. My node has a hard bandwith limit of 30 kByte/sec down and 8 kByte/sec up, this limit is enforced by the switch the machine is connected to, so freenet can't break them. That's far away from a T1. ~From your posts I guess you haven't been running a stable node for some time, then installed a new one and tried to insert your flog the same day. Then it doesn't suprise me that it took quite some time. Let your node run a week with frost (to train it) and you will see a great improvement, shure a week is a long time, but if you take in mind that it has to learn a whole network and find some good routes/nodes it's not that much. Since build 5099 I see specialization on my node and insert speed is very good. I currently run 4 freesites, the smallest about 100kB, the biggest nearly 30MB. The smallest is usually inserted within 10 Minutes. The biggest takes between 4 to 6 hours, this isn't too long for the amount of bandwith my node is allowed to use. | And as for never bringing any alternatives...yeah, right. I remember clearly | I made a whole list of suggestions and alternatives for improving the | end-user experience. Seems that memory is very selective. Why, only a few | days ago, I pointed to an error in the uninstaller. But hey, feel free to | ignore all that, and say I whine (not without reason in any case) about the | fact that freenet still sucks for the most part, mostly because of bad | directions that have been taken. Didn't I suggest to go for UDP and small | chunks, and leave the NGR (that, after all this time, still hasn't actually | proved it worked) if the simulations don't clearly show a benefit? Yes, I | did. But that, I suppose, is rapidly forgotten, even it's exactly the | alternatives that you claim I never gave. It's easier to say I 'just whine', | so you can regard me as a troll, instead of contemplating if I don't have | valid points. Pointing out errors and making valid suggestions is a different thing. As for going for UDP, this actually would have made it worse. I know you suggested it to push holes through NAT routers, but this doesn't work on most routers here. And this for a very simple reason, almost all (yes even the low end cheap trash ones) routers you can get here have full SPI. So it isn't possible to push a hole into their NAT, what's even worse is that the cheaper ones have SPI, but only allow to open or redirect TCP ports, not UPD ports. So going to UDP would have ruled out users with one of these routers, even if they knew how to open/forward the listen port. The only thing that might help with this is to support UPNP. But it wouldn't change much, because ppl always get told that UPNP is a security risk, and they tend to believe it and disable it. As for small chunks, IIRC it was suggested by Toad not by you. You only agreed that it might be usefull, just like I did. And I also did run a node pre NGR, and I saw a great improvement when switching it over to NGR last year. | In neither case it validates deleting my account, so that I now would have | to change all references and links to it into new ones, if people want to | contact me via the site or the wiki I run. Oh, yes, but that's all not a | 'valid contribution', that's right. Oh, how bad. You have to edit some lines of HTML or change some entrys in a DB, this will be the end of the world. :-P -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFBrrw15Sa8EyIJhugRAkmrAJ4qUsKE/W+3kVP0GK89VNd+UR9nMwCghvdv 9mRM7JJEsURjoWj6mh4HS60= =chit -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: Is it always this slow?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Clueless schrieb: | Oh, that's interesting. | Connections open (Inbound/Outbound/Limit) 89 (43/46/200) | Transfers active (Transmitting/Receiving) 41 (19/22) | | Is that good or bad? Interestingly, even that many connections use very little | of my bandwidth. Looks good. How did you set your bandwitdh limit? Don't forget, the bandwith limit is set in byte not kByte. | BTW, how big should the cache, or 'store' be? I guess the 300 MB I've given it | are not nearly enough. 300 MB isn't really much, my small node has 3 GB my big node has 15 GB. | Thanks for your help. Well, Freenet seems to be working, or maybe limping... | but Frost still doesn't get any messages. Is this program even being used? What frost build did you get? The older ones are not compatible to the current node builds, get the latest build from http://jtcfrost.sourceforge.net and you should get quite some messages. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFBrSij5Sa8EyIJhugRAj7sAJ4tbdZNSoPxrLkf/eBRHm+WZMKV2wCfQL+x oQq9L0wB3Ikz8/3uP60cIiU= =UEOs -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Are TFE and FIND dead?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hmmm, I couldn't get TFE and FIND in the last 4 days. Most Frost groups are also much more silent than usual. Could someone else get TFE or FIND, or is there some kind of problem within the network? The interesting part is, my node does generate quite some traffic, and it is well connected. So it's not a problem in this area. Strangely I get DNFs almost instantly (mostly less than 2 minutes, sometimes less than 30 seconds till the DNF) and my failure table shows a high number of blocked requests (mostly some thounsands, while it got barely above 500 with the older builds). Running build 5099. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFBnqeL5Sa8EyIJhugRAr9gAKCD58LZx+KFZ4MM09NQkOWHT/83wwCfay9s geJcHEnAfP7/jwhiaj1Uqxg= =rPCm -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: ERROR(s) - FreeNet never can access the portals.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 bob schrieb: | I received that after I *waited* for all the retries. Ive tried every portal on | the list and nothing so far. They all give me an error that says it will retry | again. Anyone had this problem? Is there something I should change in the | Configuration What build are you running? -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFBk6AL5Sa8EyIJhugRAhCMAJ4qfC/VD1ui48rBkWdZnIJYLiGKpwCbBxO7 59l4H1rBNcCwz++28ynmK+4= =xY12 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: n o open connections
Robert Greenage schrieb: Apparently with Java 5.0 and a a complete uninstall...including a registry purge and a fresh install it's back on track. Is there really a ver. 5098? All I got was 5096 again. Freenet doesn't write anything into the registry. Actually there is already 5099 out, look into the dev mailing list. Especially the messages about the upcoming reset of the stable network. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: n o open connections
Robert Greenage schrieb: I had not used freenet for awhile . I d/l ver. 5096. I have had it up for at least 24 hrs. on three separtae days with not one connection. I saw a message about getting a real OS. I'm using win 98se. prior to this I have never had a problem. Will freenet no longer work on win 98se? It won't work very good with a win 9x/me. Actually it would be very wise to upgrade at least to 2k, not only because of freenet. Remember 9x isn't supported anymore, so there hasn't been enough security patches for a long time. Did you do a fresh node install or did you just upgrade the freenet.jar. If you did a fresh install be shure to check that the listen port can be accessed from the outside, so check any type of firewall or nat you are running. If you only upgraded the jar you may need to reseed your node. In that case stop your node, go to http://www.freenetproject.org/snapshots download the seednodes.ref file, copy it over the one in your freenet directory and restart the node. Make shure your are using one of the latest Sun JVMs, I personally would suggest the new 5.0 (or 1.5.0), get it from: http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/ Btw. don't write HTML mails, they are ugly and make you look stupid ;-) ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: Bind external Port to another IP
BlueStar88 schrieb: I have some virtual IP-adresses without reverse mapping i'd like to use freenet with. You know that you can do a whois on IPs too? So if you have static IPs eighter you or your hoster is registered as owner of those IPs. In both cases it's no big deal to find out who you are. See http://sunny.nic.com/cgi-bin/whois and enter your IP ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: Data store wiped - 11 Gb gone.
Niklas schrieb: Can you put them on a web server or so? I would like to see what kind of error that caused the index file corruption. /N I disabled the index some months ago, because it got corrupt whenever I killed the java process while it refreshed the index. Seems like windows doesn't give it enough time to finish the current jobs when you kill it by the taskmanager. This also kills my routing table from time to time, so I have to backup it on a regular basis. Maybe the node should have some type of button on the fproxy page to do a clean shutdown. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: Data store wiped - 11 Gb gone.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Can you not right click on the blue bunny in the system tray and select Shutdown? -todd See my message here: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.devel/15673 and AFAIK shutting it down via the bunny ist the same as killing the process via the taskmanager. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: Some infos on improving the memory footprint and routing
Toad schrieb: THAT is interesting. We have repeatedly been fed the dogma that the JVM can handle this perfectly well by itself... I'm quite prepared to reinstate it if this is commonly seen... Having said that, reports of OOMs are rather rare - what did you set the memory limit to? It's set to 192MB, I can't give it more because the system only has 256MB. But with the aggressiveGC it's enough for the node. What's the CPU usage? Currently somewhere between 20% and 40% with the regular 100% spikes of about 1 to 3 seconds while the GC runs. Without the aggressiveGC it doesn't have those spikes, unless it reaches the limit, then it goes mad. failureTableSize was at 2000 failureTableItems was at 1000 failureTableTime was at 18000 I very much doubt it. The failure table does not DO anything - or very much. Look at the stats... Hmmm, with the default settings the failure table fills quite fast here. It get's without problems above 1 keys within 2 or 3 hours. With the smaller settings it's full within 30 to 40 minutes. This may be due frost or that my node is in the seednodes from time to time. We will get rid of the failure table soon but this looks like a placebo to me... Quite possible, like I said I'm not shure about this and measuring the the real performance of freenet on a comparable base is quite hard. It depends upon to much constantly changing factors. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: Some infos on improving the memory footprint and routing
Toad schrieb: Of course it gets keys! It's supposed to! That's just it recording the DNFs. What matters is does it do any actual blocking? There's a couple of statistics on that... Oh, do you mean Number of Requests Blocked and Number of DNFs Ignored? If yes, they are at the following after the node is running 8 hours with an QPH of ~1414: Number of Requests Blocked: 621 Number of DNFs Ignored: 529 So, yes it isn't that much. Must be just another placebo effect then. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: Stable build 5093
Are you running freenet on Win98? Which JVM do you use? ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: Stable build 5093
Heine Laursen schrieb: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uname -s Linux [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ Ok. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ java -version java version 1.4.1_01 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.1_01-b01) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.1_01-b01, mixed mode) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ I have no luck running the current build with anything older than 1.4.2_05 or 1.5.0 Beta 2 either. So try to go for one of those and see if it helps. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: Stable build 5092
Build 5092 looks good so far, did some small inserts and some splitfile requests and didn't get a single RNF. CPU usage seems good (except this: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.devel/14981 but as said there, this may be a JVM problem). Nothing bad in the error log so far. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: reseed
Which build are you running, you need at least 5089 to connect to the network. If you aren't running 5091 you should really UPGRADE. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: NPE in 5090
Plonk schrieb: Log: Unexpected Exception in FproxyServlet.doGet -- java.lang.NullPointerException java.lang.NullPointerException Stable 5090, when trying to get a [EMAIL PROTECTED] AFAIK it's already fixed in current unstable. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [freenet-support] Question about the bunny app
The answer would be no, as far as I can tell. Supposedly there was going to be another line added into the flaunch.ini that would let you send parameters to java to startup Freenet with, however there does not seem to be any at this time. The current workaround is: 1. Start Freenet directly through the command line, without the bunny icon. you'd do something like: javaw -server -Xmx256m -jar freenet.jar 2. Change how your Java starts by default so that it will *always* try to start in server mode before it tries client mode. You can do this by editing your jvm.cfg file make sure -server KNOWN comes before -client KNOWN (you'll just need to rearrange them). The file is in your Java Runtime directly..mines is in the jre\lib\i386 folder. If you're using Sun Java, remember you need to have the SDK version to be able to run Java in server mode. Enjoy! - Original Message - From: Someone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 10:59 AM Subject: [freenet-support] Question about the bunny app Is it possible to add additional commandline parameters to the flaunch.ini that is used by the bunny app to start freenet. So I can for ex. add the server switch for java to it instead of starting freenet via a batch file? It's nothing important, just something that might be usefull. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Question about the bunny app
Is it possible to add additional commandline parameters to the flaunch.ini that is used by the bunny app to start freenet. So I can for ex. add the server switch for java to it instead of starting freenet via a batch file? It's nothing important, just something that might be usefull. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: Node not finishing start up under W2k
Hessi James schrieb: Hey there, I just updated to 5089. However, the node does not finish starting up. Go to: http://www.freenetproject.org/snapshots and get a new seednodes.ref If you still have trouble starting the node with it use an editor and cut the ref down in its size (this is because the big file takes an insane amount of memory to process). ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] What is the recommended MaxDirectMemorySize
What is the recommended MaxDirectMemorySize for fred with 150 connections? Don't tell me 256MB or something like this, I really don't think it must be that high. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: Seednodes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: I put a new permanent node online. (30GB storage for FN) But I can't really surf on freenet, not much opens. I'm getting very often this: Route Not Found messages mean that your node, or the rest of the network, didn't find the data or enough nodes to send the request to. You should retry, with the same Hops-To-Live; if it persists, there may be a problem (check that your internet connection is working). Try reseeding your node, and if that doesn't work, contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] My node is now up for more than 21h ! Sincerly, Art Jepp, the latest stable build seems to generate big amounts of RNFs :(. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: Seednodes
Toad schrieb: It's a bit perplexing. I get DNFs and RNFs; the RNFs don't seem particularly incredible... mostly. Yes, it's the same here in the first hours of runtime. But then the amount of backed off nodes reachs the number of connected nodes and stays there most of the time. Seems like the node is using all the quota it gets from other nodes by itself leaving nothing for user started requests. Bandwith throughput is high, so it's not like the node is loosing something, it just doesn't spare anything for the user. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: Stable build 5087
Klaus Brüssel schrieb: P.S. I deleted those *_a and *_b files and replaced seednodes.ref with a version that is much smaller (2 nodes) and my node starts up ! ciao --klaus Reading the big seednode files in takes a whole lot of memory. Using an 8MB seednode.ref I had an initial memory usage of more the 200MB when fred starts, which dropped to around 70MB after some minutes. As the current ref has 23MB I suspect the initial memory usage to be gigantic. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: Why Freenet doesn't try any nodes?
Nick Tarleton schrieb: I've started using Freenet for the Nth time (transient - 5084 - WinXP - Sun JVM 1.4.1), and am going through the 99% RNF phase. I know this is normal, but I noticed that many of them RNF instantly and say no nodes were tried. If it's not too hard to explain, I'd like to know the reason for this. Why is it not even trying - sometimes for 5 times in a row - to request what I tell it to? Maybe because the network is getting something like a mini reset due the fact that 5085 is out, and it contains quite a bit of changes to the routing alg. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] [Fwd: Stable build 5085 - please upgrade]
Seems like this didn't make it here. Check the devel or technical list if you don't trust me. Original-Nachricht Betreff: Stable build 5085 - please upgrade Datum: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 18:55:40 +0100 Von: Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] Antwort an: Discussion of development issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Newsgroups: gmane.network.freenet.devel,gmane.network.freenet.technical Freenet stable build 5085 is now available. Please upgrade ASAP, if you are running a stable branch node (if you are running unstable, you'll know that you're running unstable). You can do this using the update.sh script on POSIX-like systems such as Linux and MacOS/X (or Darwin): ./stop-freenet.sh ./update.sh ./start-freenet.sh On Windows, you can use the update option on the start menu. On any platform, you can stop the node, download http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-latest.jar over your existing freenet.jar, and then start the node up again. Note that this build makes 5084 mandatory, so if you are still running 5083, you should DEFINITELY upgrade. This is the result of more than 2 months work, and has many changes: Some major changes to a critical part of the routing algorithm, the KeyspaceEstimators. The new implementation is faster and much more accurate. There are also many other changes to the routing code. There may be a readjustment period on the network for a while as people upgrade and the network sorts itself out. Your routing table will be reset on upgrade: the nodes will still be there but because of the algorithm change, the node will need to discover what their specialities are all over again. Sorry, it was not possible to make this backwards compatible. Many other minor routing improvements, many of them as a result of simulation (by running several nodes simultaneously on one machine, and running tests). Firewalled nodes will now automatically pick up their IP address from the nodes they are connected to (once enough nodes have upgraded). Thus you no longer need to specify an address in the config file or use dyndns. This should make Freenet significantly easier to use for new users on firewalled/NATted setups. You will still need to forward the listenPort for maximum performance as we have not yet implemented automatic port forwarding (it would require us to borrow some code for Universal Plug and Play from other GPL'd Java apps; we may do this later). Several fairly significant rate limiting fixes and improvements. Nodes were comparing two averages over different time periods when calculating their current request capacity, and sending the wrong Minimum Request Interval to the requesting node. This caused significant problems in our simulations. Also we now send keepalive messages occasionally, including the MRI, so that nodes don't get out of date when the MRI changes quickly (for example on startup). Fixed a number of long running bugs affecting inserts, mostly at the client end. Especially inserts of large files. If you gave up trying to insert something because of timeouts, try it again on 5085. Use a limit of 80 connections by default on Windows 98/ME, not 40. This should make nodes on such operating systems work slightly better. If you have problems with running out of sockets you may need to reduce the limits. New diagnostics, new scripts, updates to scripts, improvements to announcements (but still not working properly), fixes for NullPointerExceptions (if you don't know what these are you don't want to), improvements to the routing table status pages, always overwrite the old logfile unless told otherwise in the config file (logOverwrite) to prevent the disk filling up, two new stats, node_number renamed to node, and loads of internal refactoring (moving code around, deleting dead code). -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: How much download?
Joachim Scharfetter schrieb: Hi, I have got a fair use DSL account with limited download volume. How much download traffic will a permanent freenet node approximately cause? Depends on the personal use. In an idle-state (when I'm not browsing freesites or downloading splitfiles) my stable node generates about 2GB traffic within 24 hours on my 768/128 DSL line (the nodes upstream is limited to 8kbyte/sec). As I can download freshly inserted splitfiles at a maximum rate of about 80kbyte/sec the traffic can increase quite a bit when I actually use my node. If you really wan't to limit the nodes traffic you will be better of to do it system side, as the nodes limiter isn't that accurate and may lead to some nasty surprises on the next provider bill. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: Secure NIMs?
Jano schrieb: Freemail is an idea I like a lot but at least my windows experience has been... lacking. The alpha 20 has been there for ages... is it still under development? Is someone using it on stable? I tried to use it on stable, but it doesn't work that good. Almost all of the times it tries to insert a message an gets a RNF it doesn't remember the slot it used to insert. So after some hours the same message got inserted in multiple slots. To make it worse, the message somehow got through and got confirmed by the receiver, but freemail didn't get it right and was still trying to insert the message. After an manual count I saw that the one message I did send was inserted into about 80 receiver slots and there was no way to tell freemail to stop inserting it again and again into new slots. Additionally the freemail process stalled totally after some hours using all available CPU which means I had to run it on a very low priority or it would starve my freenet node to death. All this is with the latest windows version of freemail, don't know if the linux version runs better. My conclusion about it: nice idea but far from beeing usable at the moment. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: RNFs
Toad schrieb: OUCH! Have you reseeded recently? In any case if you leave it running for a day or so it should accumulate more... a reasonable number is 100+ connections... I found that around 30 connections or normal and 60 connections is a really good number around 1 hour after restarting my stable node. If my node was down more then 2 days (this happens from time to time) I have to reseed or I would need more than 6 hours to get more than 20 connections to other nodes. I think this is related to two things: 1. There are many stable nodes behind NATs or (personal) Firewalls that aren't configured right, so they can't accept incoming connections. 2. In countries like here in germany you don't have fixed IPs and your internet connection will get forcefully disconnected after something between 6 and 24 hours. So most of the nodes here change their IPs really often. AFAIK freenet doesn't use ARKs anymore, and ppl concerned about their privacy aren't really into using dyndns services. So if the node was down for a longer time most IPs of the nodes in its routing table are no longer valid and it can't connect to many other nodes. Additionally it's own IP might have changed, so the node won't get many incoming connections eighter, because the other nodes don't know the new IP of it. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: RNFs
Toad schrieb: SIX HOURS? Woah... my address gets changed at most once a month... The longest time any of the major ISPs for DSL/Dialup allow you to have an IP is 24 hours, after that you'll get disconnected, no matter what comes, and get a new IP after reconnecting. There are some smaller ISPs that only allow between 6 and 12 hour without a forced disconnect. There are ISPs that give special offers for fixed IPs, but this costs quite some additional money and you won't get unlimited bandwith from them. Yeah, the network needs to work pretty well for ARKs to be useful, and anyway they operate over too long a timescale normally. Thus I never reimplemented them for unstable. Hmmm, but something like this would be needed. Dyndns is mainly needed for nodes behind NATs. A solution has been half-coded, will be completed eventually. But it also helps with changing IPs, if I don't use a dyndns on my node it takes ages after a forced disconnect for other nodes to reconnect to mine. With dyndns it's a matter of some minutes. Possibly. What's typical stats on stable? The machine my nodes runs on is currently down (the IBM hard disk died), so I can't give exact numbers :-(. But from previous observations I can say that with using dyndns I had around 130 to 140 connections after around 2 hours from which 30 to 50 outgoing connections and the others incoming connections were. So my node always depended on incoming conns. The IPs in the routing table changed quite fast and only very few of them stayed longer then 1 day. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: RNFs
Michael R. Stork schrieb: It depends on when they do system maintenance. As long as their system is up, and you stay connected, you should keep renewing the same IP. No, it is not system maintenance here in germany. In fact it's part of the contract with the ISPs that you will get forcefully disconnected at least every 24 hours, even on DSL (which uses PPPoE here, so it actually is just a faster dialup connection). There are no IP leases and you can't influence what IP you get. This doesn't have a technically reason, its more due political and economical reasons. And AFAIK there are more european countries in which it is handled the same way. To say it clear, a fixed IP (even when it is only fixed for a week) is something special you have to pay for in germany, and no ISP will give you something for free if he can actually charge a good ammount of extra money for it. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: RNFs
Troed Sångberg schrieb: I'm myself on 8/1 ADSL with a static IP, and I just got my VDSL modem in the mail so in 1-2 weeks I should be up on ~13-20Mbit both ways ... (depends on the distance to the station). Cost? ¤43/month. No traffic limits. Home servers allowed. Woa, I wish something like this would be available here. The best you can get is DSL with 3 Mbit/s down and 384 Kbit/s up without traffic limits. This will cost around 100 euro per month and home servers are not disallowed, but also not liked very much. Of course you will have the normal 24 hour disconnect also, and this speed is only available if your home is within a Range of ~2 kilometers of the DSLAM. In my home the fastest DSL connection I can get is 1 Mbit/s down and 128 KBit/s up, this still costs around 60 euro per month with unlimited traffic. VDSL isn't used here, you can have Modem/ISDN or ADSL for private users. The next bigger thing are leased lines with 2 MBit up and down, but these cost way more money and you won't get unlimited traffic. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: Permanent node default
Jonathan Towle schrieb: I thought the primary difference between permanent and transient was that a transient node did not store data. Is this not the case any more? AFAIK: Transient did always store data. It simply didn't announce nor accept incoming requests, which meant that all stored data was requested by the user. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: Why?
Nicholas Sturm schrieb: I don't think being told where to find the jar will help me. Why? This is all that is really updated. Unless you deleted the .exe files you won't need to download them again. And if you deleted them, they are in the same server location as the jar. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: Open Connection Disparity Between Stable And Unstable
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Why does my stable node have so few connections, but my unstable node has many? When I start my stable node it begins with maybe 2 or 3 connections, but when I start my unstable node I get 20 or more connection. I'm using similar config settings between the two node (not the same .conf file). I've reseeded my stable node, but that doesn't help. My guess is that many stable nodes are behind NATs and or firewalls, that are not set up right (i.e. the node port isn't forwarded or is blocked for incoming conns.). This may not be such an big issue on unstable as the ppl using unstable are more experienced when it comes to setting up their system the right way. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: Open Connection Disparity Between Stable And Unstable
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: I thought that it didn't matter now with bidi built into stable. Does this mean that bidi is not working on the stable node like it does on the unstable node? Bidi means that both outgoing and incoming connections will be used for routing. It doesn't help against nodes that don't accept incoming conns. To route to those nodes your node has to wait till they make a connection to you (provided that your node is able to accept incoming connections). ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: Unable to download freenet
Nicholas Sturm schrieb: Any advise? Get the freenet-latest.jar from http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/ and replace the current freenet.jar with it. That's all when it comes to upgrading a node. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: mailing list subscriber email should bypass spam blockers
Edward J. Huff schrieb: Nothing goes through my ISP's mail server, but since traffic on port 25 is unencrypted, they can read my mail anyway. As an alternative you could post to and read the lists via the gmane news group server, which also allows encrypted SSL connections. But as long as the freenet node can be found via a short port scan followed by an fnp connection attempt on open ports, it won't help much if your provider dislikes freenet. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: Transient or Permanent?
Perseid schrieb: I have a decent broadband connection and a decent amount of disk space to give to a node, but unfortunately I share my connection with other people so I can't leave Freenet on 24/7. I pretty much have to load it, use it, then shut it off. For this reason I've been running a transient node, figuring my 1-2 hours a day on the network wouldn't help anyone. Is this what I should be doing? Or would it be more 'healthy' to run a permanant node despite my flaws? AFAIK there is no more a difference between transient set and not set due the recent changes (bidi connections). ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: freenet and JRE on Win XP
Nicholas Sturm schrieb: If you do not have the java from Sun, you should try their latest stable build 1.3.1_02 near end of name, I believe. The latest stable Sun JRE is actually 1.4.2_04. I hardly believe that you can get freenet working with an 1.3 Sun JRE. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: Can't connect !?
Matt schrieb: I have tried disabling my norton 2002 firewall, but it seems to make no difference. Exactly, you have to disable and deinstall the norton fw to stop it from fucking with your network. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: 60016 - no upstream bandwidth usage??
Rudolf Krist schrieb: After 11 hours web interface still reported 19 bytes/second UPDATE YOUR NODE, the bug has been resolved some hours ago. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: slowdom in freeville
Michael Schierl schrieb: Someone [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: sites. Maybe because of the still very slow insert performance of fiw, which still takes 36 hours to successfully insert a 4 MB freesite (fuqid inserts much faster). Any ideas why? I'd like to make FIW fast too ;) I get many of these (using FIW 0.08): #11 02 ***RouteNF *removed* (Chunk 6) [42/42/42] they can't be right as I only have 50 nodes in my routing table and a max connections number of 100. I also get quite some of these: java.io.IOException: Premature end of stream at fiw.fcp.FCPMessage.readMessage(FCPMessage.java:34) at fiw.fcp.FCPConn.insertStream(FCPConn.java:263) at fiw.fcp.FCPConn.insertStream(FCPConn.java:218) at fiw.core.jobs.InsertJob.run(InsertJob.java:231) at fiw.core.jobs.Job.run0(Job.java:131) at fiw.core.jobs.PooledThreadProducer$PooledThread.run(PooledThreadProducer.java:97) It also complains very often that it can't fetch an inserted chunk, while I can fetch it without a problem through fproxy. This leads to continous insert retries whitout FIW inserting the mapfile. mihi Greets someone ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: slowdom in freeville
Michael Schierl schrieb: Hehe. That 42/42/42 (do you know Douglas Adam's Hitchhiker's guide to the galaxy?) is just a code for bad things happend as any other combination of at least twice 42. In that case it means that an insert returned a DNF message which is invalid according to the spec and thus treated as a RNF. (RFC1122 Robustness principle). Toad told me that he had fixed that but most likely he hasn't... Ok. I also get quite some of these: java.io.IOException: Premature end of stream at fiw.fcp.FCPMessage.readMessage(FCPMessage.java:34) at fiw.fcp.FCPConn.insertStream(FCPConn.java:263) Hmm. Why does fred close his connections prematurely? It's not because you are restarting fred? No, I'm not restarting fred. Frost and fuqid also don't show errors like this. set the default priority in advanced settings so that the mapfile is inserted first. This should speed your insert up somehow. Then you can disable to ignore local datastore. This will make your insert much faster, but much less reliable as well. I don't know what FUQID is doing, but if it does similar things, I understand that insert is faster. I'll give it try on the next insert. Greets mihi Greets someone ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: slowdom in freeville
Toad schrieb: On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 02:21:19PM +0100, Troed S?ngberg wrote: My experience is the opposite of his, but I guess you know that the last stable builds have been really good already .. They have? In what sense? All I hear are complaints... and I usually run unstable, because it's what gets hacked on mostly... Yes, they have. It is the first time my node was running for over 72 hours without fully claiming the allowed heap size (I had to stop it because I needed my full bandwith for some work, it would have run much longer). Also this is the first build where my node is able to serve around 1 QPH, with older builds the highest I have seen was around 8000 QPH. I can browse freshly inserted freesites very fast, and even very old ones are coming in a little bit faster. The only downside is that many freesite authors have stopped maintaining their sites. Maybe because of the still very slow insert performance of fiw, which still takes 36 hours to successfully insert a 4 MB freesite (fuqid inserts much faster). Greets someone ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: freenet commitment settings
vinyl1 schrieb:
{Fall2003.zip 1/ 13} Inserting 262144 bytes (try 1), HTL=25
[2004-03-08 22:15:17] {Fall2003.zip 1/ 13} Fatal error in insert
thread: EFCPError: connect failed: 10061
Looks like a error in the setup of your node or fuqid, as it can't even connect
to the FCP port of your node. Make shure you have entered the right port and
address within fuqid.
I am on dialup, and am running a transient node. It used to work OK,
although slowly, for viewing content and using FUQID and Frost.
Don't expect any good performance from a transient node on dialup.
I can see why FUQID might not be able to retrieve old content, but I cannot
see why FUQID won't insert, unless it has hard-coded node IP addresses
compiled into it. Release 1.2 is the latest FUQID I could find.
FUQID 1.3 is the latest and resolves some major bugs.
___
Support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: routing table
Victor Denisov schrieb: Wow!!! Man, how do you use computers at all with such prices for brand memory? I've just checked - retail Kingston 256 Mb PC133 module costs $38-$45 here in Russia, and we consider our computer parts market to be quite expensive compared to western one. Like I said this is one of the most expensive ones, you can get brand 256 MB PC133 memory for around 80 euro to 90 euro. The prices for PC133 are also higher than the prices for DDR modules because they did become really rare here. But DDR modules don't fit into the older machines most people use for server purposes. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: Compilation error
Yoann schrieb: I try to compile the lastest Freenet sources. I take the library freenet-ext.jar and junit.jar And when i do make, I have (I had -depecation) : javac -target 1.1 -classpath lib/freenet-ext.jar:lib/junit.jar -sourcepath src -d build -deprecation src/freenet/client/*.java src/freenet/client/cli/*.java src/freenet/support/servlet/http/HttpSessionImpl.java:7: warning: javax.servlet.http.HttpSessionContext in javax.servlet.http has been deprecated import javax.servlet.http.HttpSessionContext; ^ 1 warning I don't know what it mean This means that the named class/interface is from an older JVM version and shouldn't be used anymore because it is considered bad in some ways. But it isn't an error, it's just a warning and not really harmfull. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: Compilation error
Yoann schrieb: If I turn off -deprecation, I have this : javac -target 1.1 -classpath lib/freenet-ext.jar:lib/junit.jar -sourcepath src -d build src/freenet/client/*.java src/freenet/client/cli/*.java Note: src/freenet/support/servlet/http/HttpSessionImpl.java uses or overrides a deprecated API. Note: Recompile with -deprecation for details. .jar are not generated :( How do you build it and on what OS? If you build it on windows use ant ( http://ant.apache.org/ ) the included build.bat doesn't work right. On linux the make file should work. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: routing table
Toad schrieb: Upgrade it to 256MB. Your motherboard doesn't support 256MB? That sounds unlikely if it can take a celeron 400. If you are so poor that you can't afford the $50 upgrade, well frankly, can you afford the bandwidth? Well there are Countrys where bandwidth is very cheap or free for home users while memory is really expensive. For around 10$ per month I get unlimited bandwitdh on my adsl line. Take a look at the attached Image to see how cheap brand memory can be (noname memory isn't a subject cause it is a shure way to make your system unstable). This is one of the most expensive here, but it is still a quite good example for way higher prices in different countrys. inline: cheap-memory.jpg___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: Stable 5068 Bad Seednodes, Transient/Permanent Question, etc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Where do I get the JRE update to 1.4.2_03 ? I have 1.4.1_03, and it runs out of memory. At http://java.sun.com if it runs very fast out of memory look again into freenet.ini and search for threadFactory=, change this into threadFactory=Y also search for tfAbsoluteMaxThreads= and set this to something lower, for ex. to 300: tfAbsoluteMaxThreads=300 Remember, you have to remove the % in front of settings you change or they will be ignored. If you have enough memory in your system you can also open flaunch.ini and change the line JavaMem=default to something like JavaMem=256M (this allowes Freenet to use 256 MB of memory instead of the default of 128 MB) I run my permanent node with a maximum of 200 threads and 196 MB memory and it works for ~24 hours before I have to restart it to avoid that it runs out of memory (I'm using Win2k). Sadly it seems that Java needs more memory when used on windows. Thanks for the help Greets someone ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Does garbage collection really work on windows?
Hi, there is something that I always wondered about: Does the java garbage collection really work under windows? From looking at the fred environment page I get the impression that it doesn't work. For ex. the current memory infos of my node: Maximum memory the JVM will allocate195.136 KiB Memory currently allocated by the JVM 168.768 KiB Memory in use 100.007.152 Bytes Estimated memory used by loggerNone Unused allocated memory72.809.304 Bytes So, there are 72 Megs of unused but allocated memory, it seems like this memory won't be used by fred anymore. When ever it needs more ram it just allocates more till runs at the limit and into oom errors, while it still shows nearly half of the allocated memory as unused. Any thoughts about this? Are these infos from the node simply wrong or is there some serious bug within the windows version of java? Greets someone ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: route not found
dave schrieb: Hello, After upgrading to 5066, I can't get anything off Freenet. It connects to some nodes after a while, but still says it can't finde a route. I have upgraded to 5068, but still no luck. It worked before 5066 and I have not changed any settings after upgrading. Whats wrong? You need to reseed your node. Thanks in advance. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: Stable 5068 Bad Seednodes, Transient/Permanent Question, etc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: I configured my router/firewall when I first installed Freenet last summer, and I don't remember the details but it has always worked. Make shure the port freenet uses is still forwarded to the right machine and not filtered by some sort of (personal) firewall, for ex. the WinXP integrated fw. When I go into settings the radio button for switching to permanent rather than transient is blacked out and it says to change that on the geek page. How do I change it? It isn't obvious and I am afraid to play around with settings blind. Open freenet.ini with notepad or wordpad, search for transient and make shure the line looks like: %transient=false not like: transient=true Which JRE do you use and from which build did you upgrade, best JREs for windows the 1.4.2_03 and 1.5 beta from Sun as far as I can tell. If yours is older upgrade it (go for 1.4.2_03 at the moment, 1.5 is faster but a little bit wanky). Greets someone ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: Stable build 5066 - stable branch network reset, merged rate limiting
Troed Sångberg schrieb: No one in my routing table is usig 5066 .. are they incompatible versions? Yes, you have to reseed your node. Please read toads message again ;-). ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Sun JRE 1.5.0 beta is a no go for Freenet
Hi, just giving the new Sun JRE 1.5.0 beta a try. It promises about improved Performance made me hope that it could help me to run a stable node. But it doesn't work a bit at the moment. It just spams the error log (about 10 MB logdata per Minute) with the following: 05.02.2004 16:20:11 (freenet.transport.WriteSelectorLoop, write interface thread, ERROR): Caught throwable in AbstractSelectorLoop!: java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException at sun.nio.ch.Util+1.add(Unknown Source) at freenet.transport.WriteSelectorLoop.fixKeys(WriteSelectorLoop.java:331) at freenet.transport.AbstractSelectorLoop.loop(AbstractSelectorLoop.java:692) at freenet.transport.WriteSelectorLoop.run(WriteSelectorLoop.java:747) at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source) java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException at sun.nio.ch.Util+1.add(Unknown Source) at freenet.transport.WriteSelectorLoop.fixKeys(WriteSelectorLoop.java:331) at freenet.transport.AbstractSelectorLoop.loop(AbstractSelectorLoop.java:692) at freenet.transport.WriteSelectorLoop.run(WriteSelectorLoop.java:747) at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source) java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException at sun.nio.ch.Util+1.add(Unknown Source) at freenet.transport.WriteSelectorLoop.fixKeys(WriteSelectorLoop.java:331) at freenet.transport.AbstractSelectorLoop.loop(AbstractSelectorLoop.java:692) at freenet.transport.WriteSelectorLoop.run(WriteSelectorLoop.java:747) at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source) java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException at sun.nio.ch.Util+1.add(Unknown Source) at freenet.transport.WriteSelectorLoop.fixKeys(WriteSelectorLoop.java:331) at freenet.transport.AbstractSelectorLoop.loop(AbstractSelectorLoop.java:692) at freenet.transport.WriteSelectorLoop.run(WriteSelectorLoop.java:747) at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source) java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException at sun.nio.ch.Util+1.add(Unknown Source) at freenet.transport.WriteSelectorLoop.fixKeys(WriteSelectorLoop.java:331) at freenet.transport.AbstractSelectorLoop.loop(AbstractSelectorLoop.java:692) at freenet.transport.WriteSelectorLoop.run(WriteSelectorLoop.java:747) at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source) So it seems eighter fred is incompatible with the new JRE or it is due its beta state (although I never had such a Problem with the 1.4 betas before). Greets someone ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: Sun JRE 1.5.0 beta is a no go for Freenet
Niklas Bergh schrieb: And here is the relevant documentation from sun: Keys may be removed from, but not directly added to, the selected-key set. Any attempt to add an object to the key set will cause an UnsupportedOperationException to be thrown. Someone: you could try to remove the call to fixKeys at AbstractSelectorLoop.java:692 I could try it. But I don't think that simply removing a function call will be any good to fred (assuming that the call has a purpose to be there). But Thanks for having a closer look at it. Regards /N Greets someone ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: Sun JRE 1.5.0 beta is a no go for Freenet
So far it is running well. Memory and cpu usage is at an acceptable level, I can retrieve (not localy stored) YoYo pages and the error log looks normal (just the normal really late data reply and job part done errors I reported already in earlier versions). I now also used the 1.5 JDK to build it. FYI fred currently uses a identifier named enum, this is also a keyword in 1.5. Simply renaming it to enumm in every occurence did the trick. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[freenet-support] Re: What things of Freenet eats the most memory
Edward J. Huff schrieb: 5061 seems to have a memory leak. I gave it 512M and it still got up to 450M (I restarted it so it wouldn't run out). At least I'm not the only one having this problem. I could live with the node needing 128 MB memory if it will still work without stalling when reaching the limit. Would it be possible to implement a automatic node restart as soon as it has only 1 MB of free memory left. This would at least make shure the node doesn't stall totally. Routing remains an unsolved problem... Read freenet-dev on gmane for more info. Yes, but it was never this bad QPH wise with earlier builds. With 5050 and earlier the QPH stabilized somewhere at 4 QPH. This was still far more than my node could handle, but at least it didn't influence my internet connection to a point where it is having similiar effects to a DOS attack, that is even going on after the node has been down for more than 1 hour. Especially since 5061 it has really gone mad. QPH was at 15 when I took the node down. -- Ed Huff Greets someone ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
[freenet-support] What things of Freenet eats the most memory
Hi, after some switching of different JREs (now back to 1.4.2_03 from Sun) and resetting the whole freenet.ini to default values by installing a second fresh fred and comparing the settings manually (there were many differences, but I didn't tweak the settings in the past, maybe due the old ini beeing created many months ago from an now ancient node version). I finally got the node running well for about 12 hours (still having the errors mentioned earlier here in the Log). But now the node doesn't stall out of nowhere, instead it runs out of memory after 12 hours and stalls. So is there any setting that I can change to reduce memory usage of the node. It has a max memory of 128MB to use, this is the default so I think it has to work with it. I'm already running the Y-threads with an absolut maximum of 200 threads, but this doesn't help. Upping the max memory for the node is NOT an option, unless a nice guy gives me the money to buy more ram ;-). Besides: Is there really some form of routing going on? To me it seems like the nodes are simply hammering every other node they know with request till they get the data. This is the only way I can explain why my node is getting ~85000 QPH (they are still raising, I expect them to be beyond 10 QPH in the next 2 days) while it can only serve around 8000 QPH. Greets someone ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
[freenet-support] Which JRE is recommended for Win2k
Hi, at the moment I'm running my node with the Sun JRE 1.4.2_03 but it doesn't work quite good (many errors within the log, high CPU and memory usage, node totally stalls after ~6 hours). From reading other messages here I got the impression that the actual stable build should do way better than it does for me. So can this be a problem with the current Sun JRE? On the download page you recommend the 1.4.1 version of the Sun JRE for Unix, but what version do you recommend for Win2k. Which version is used by the developers? Maybe it is just a matter of using the right JRE to get Fred to run better. Greets someone ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
[freenet-support] Re: Which JRE is recommended for Win2k
Herve Lefebvre schrieb: What kind of errors ? I already reported them here and mailed some log files to toad. or maybe a configuration problem. It is mainly on default configuration, I just had to reduce the max connections to 80 because of my cheap SOHO router. And with the builds previous to 5054 (the non mux builds) it run for days without errors in the log, CPU and memory usage was quite high but it didn't stall. I'm running with the IBM JVM 1.4.1 wich has (at least under linux) dramatically better performances than the SUN JVM. Is there a stand alone JRE from IBM? I just found the big JDK for Windows, which isn't good according to the readme of fred. BTW, I had to make some adjustements : The JVM is launched with the option to allows up to 200 MB of RAM allocated. I can't give it more than 128 MB because the machine it runs on is low on memory (256 MB) and has to run some other things too. I had to increase (currently up to 4096) the number of allowed open file for the user running the node. This shouldn't be a problem here. I had also to increase (currently up to 350) the maximum number of threads. Use threads actually stay below 200 on my node, but memory usage is still very high, seems like a memory hole somewhere. My node is now running with th last stable version since 18 hours without problems (except BW overload), on a K7-800MHz with 512 MB of RAM. It use about 30% of CPU. Well, my machine is an poor K6-2 300 Mhz with 256 MB of RAM. Just can't afford to upgrade it, besides everything else that runs on it doesn't have a problem with the low specs. I'll try the 1.4.1 JRE from Sun now. Maybe it is performing better. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
[freenet-support] Re: Which JRE is recommended for Win2k
Niklas Bergh schrieb: Does it really include the 1.4.1 JVM or does it only include the 1.3.1 one? If it includes 1.4.1 I'd really much like to know where I can download it. Seems to be only 1.3.1 http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/webservices/wsdk/ /N Greets someone ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
[freenet-support] Re: Which JRE is recommended for Win2k
Herve Lefebvre schrieb: Yes, surprising. It seems that the IBM-1.4.x is not available une Windows. Well maybe there will be one in the future. But probably the SUN JVM has good performances under Windows. Last time I tried it under Linux it was _very_ slow (no JIT available). I tried some others JVM, and the IBM JVM for Linux appears to be fast and reliable. It is very slow, at least compared to non java apps. But the node seems to run much smoother with the 1.4.1_06 JRE. But I'm still getting some of theses: jobPartDone(473) on [EMAIL PROTECTED] MuxConnectionHandler[conn=[tcp/connection: *removed*local,[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], identity=[DSA(*removed*)], sock=[Socket[addr=/*removed*,port=*removed*,localport=*removed*]], chan=[java.nio.channels.SocketChannel[closed]], peer=[Peer [DSA(*removed*) @ *removed* (1/3)]], outbound=[false]] but sendingPacket == null! Seems to be a bug within the mux code, maybe some sort of a timing problem due to my slow machine. But I really can't say more because I'm not a Java programmer (well I had to learn it for 6 months due my studies but the school dropped it because it is not really a programming language worth to use for bigger apps). ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
[freenet-support] Specialisation with stable was Re: Marked specialisation with 6441
In stable I can't see any specialisation. My node is running since 04/2003 with a DS size of 4GB (no DS wipe) and this is the current Histogram of keys in the DS: Histogram of keys in in fred's data store These are the keys to the data in your node's local cache (DataStore) 16.01.2004 22:53:38 keys: 11993 scale factor: 0.07872078567743301 (This is used to keep lines 64 characters) 0 |= 1 |=== 2 |=== 3 |= 4 |== 5 | 6 |= 7 |= 8 |=== 9 | a |== b |=== c |== d |=== e |=== f |=== peaks (count/mean) 1 -- (1.0019178) 6 -- (0.9819061) a -- (1.0632869) d -- (1.0819645) f -- (1.0846328) Doesn't look like it did specialize somehow. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
[freenet-support] Re: Stable build 5060 - more routing improvements
Hi, I'm still getting many of these: jobPartDone(431) on [EMAIL PROTECTED] MuxConnectionHandler[conn=[tcp/connection: CLOSED,[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], identity=[DSA(*removed*)], sock=[Socket[addr=/*removed*,port=*removed*,localport=*removed*]], chan=[java.nio.channels.SocketChannel[connected local=/*removed* remote=/*removed*]], peer=[Peer [DSA(*removed*) @ *removed* (1/3)]], outbound=[false]] but sendingPacket == null! Got a trailer chunk ahead of our time!: message starts 73728, stream currently at 20480 from [EMAIL PROTECTED]: id=15563, keyOffset=73728, length=4096, cb=null on [EMAIL PROTECTED]: curPos=20480, 0 chunks pending, wantChunk=true with Build 5060 using Sun JRE 1.4.2_03 on a Win2k machine. CPU and memory usage is again higher than before. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
[freenet-support] Re: Stable build 5059
Toad schrieb: On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 02:53:31AM +0100, Someone wrote: I am getting some of these: Unhandled exception java.lang.NullPointerException in job [EMAIL PROTECTED] Does it provide a stack trace? How to get one on Win2k? Would it help if I send you the log file? Handling [EMAIL PROTECTED]@74ec80fb05ceb2cd,true@ 1074130489411:1074130487208:true:null:freenet.Message: DataRequest @null @ 74ec80fb05ceb2cd took more than 3000ms: 22365 at 1074130512628! Overloaded node. Well yes, my node is within the seednodes.ref and along with most of the others it gets totally overrun. Over 25000 queries per hour while it can do something near 6000 to 8000 queries. and many (about 1 every 2 minutes) of these: jobPartDone(116) on [EMAIL PROTECTED] MuxConnectionHandler[conn=[tcp/connection: CLOSED,[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], identity=[DSA(*removed*)], sock=[Socket[addr=/*removed*,port=*removed*,localport=*removed*]], chan=[java.nio.channels.SocketChannel[connected local=/192.168.0.3:*removed* remote=/*removed*]], peer=[Peer [DSA(*removed*) @ *removed* (1/3)]], outbound=[false]] but sendingPacket == null! Eek. What build are you running? 5059 running for 2.5 hours now. Got a really late DataReply. We really ought to cache it, on freenet.node.states.request.DataPending: key=*removed*, hopsToLive=11, id=e7420a33ba4e5243, routes@ s¥W¯à¹¥ÍÖ[z!SÚ¦®¯t¯Py, ft@ s¥W¯à¹Ú° [EMAIL PROTECTED]¨ ª Íb]Å, orig=Peer [DSA(*removed*) @ *removed* (1/3)], last=Peer [DSA(*removed*) @ *removed* (1/3)], routedTime=1074130107044, replyTime=-1, outwardSender@ s¥W¯à¹0ß3H[EMAIL PROTECTED],true@ -1:1074130107044:false:null:freenet.Message: DataRequest @null @ e7420a33ba4e5243 That means your node is slow, or their node is slow, or something... Most likely my node, the poor 300Mhz K6-2 isn't really a fast machine. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
[freenet-support] Re: Stable build 5059
Toad schrieb: On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 03:04:34AM +0100, Someone wrote: How to get one on Win2k? Would it help if I send you the log file? Definitely. Ok, the log is on it's way via private eMail. I also found some of them: (freenet.support.FileBucket, Finalizer, ERROR): Delete failed on bucket tcfcdc80 But not in the last hours. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
[freenet-support] Re: Stable build 5059
Someone schrieb: Oh well switching log level from error to normal floods the log with: (freenet.MuxTrailerReadManager, read interface thread, NORMAL): Unrecognized trailer ID: 14000 on [EMAIL PROTECTED] (DSA(*removed*),tcp/*removed*, sessions=1, presentations=3,1, ID=DSA(*removed*)): outbound attempts=0:0/0 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: read: 0, init read: 45280, authorized: 0, waiting: 0, max buffered: 65535, readers: 0, chunks waiting: 0 on [EMAIL PROTECTED] (DSA(*removed*),tcp/*removed*, sessions=1, presentations=3,1, ID=DSA(*removed*)): outbound attempts=0:0/0 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]: id=14000, keyOffset=16384, length=21, cb=null) Failed to send (2) [EMAIL PROTECTED]: id=60155, keyOffset=136007, length=491, cb=freenet.node.states.data.TrailerWriteCallbackMessage:false:false: freenet.SendFailedException: Against peer DSA(*removed*) @ null - Removing from OCM (terminal) I also get: (freenet.node.Node, YThread-1, ERROR): Error while receiving message freenet.node.states.request.RequestInitiator@ 1074134737797 in state freenet.node.states.request.DataPending: key=*removed*, hopsToLive=20, id=b2f715d1d0c0700b, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], orig=Peer [DSA(*removed*) @ *removed* (1/3)], last=Peer [DSA(*removed*) @ *removed* (1/3)], routedTime=1074134737815, replyTime=-1, [EMAIL PROTECTED]@b2f715d1d0c0700b,true@ 1074134737906:1074134737815:false:freenet.SendFailedException: Against peer DSA(*removed*) @ *removed* - Sent 0 bytes (124 of packet in notifyDone (nonterminal):freenet.Message: DataRequest @null @ b2f715d1d0c0700b: java.lang.NullPointerException java.lang.NullPointerException at freenet.MuxConnectionHandler.sendPacket(MuxConnectionHandler.java:212) at freenet.MuxConnectionHandler.forceSendPacket(MuxConnectionHandler.java:185) at freenet.PeerHandler.sendSinglePacket(PeerHandler.java:1188) at freenet.PeerHandler.innerSendMessageAsync(PeerHandler.java:1063) at freenet.PeerHandler.sendMessageAsync(PeerHandler.java:958) at freenet.OpenConnectionManager.sendMessageAsync(OpenConnectionManager.java:639) at freenet.node.Node.sendMessageAsync(Node.java:4510) at freenet.node.states.request.Pending.sendOn(Pending.java:850) at freenet.node.states.request.Pending.receivedRequestInitiator(Pending.java:471) at freenet.node.states.request.DataPending.receivedMessage(DataPending.java:97) at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor2.invoke(Unknown Source) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Unknown Source) at freenet.node.State.received(State.java:128) at freenet.node.StateChain.received(StateChain.java:183) at freenet.node.StateChain.received(StateChain.java:67) at freenet.node.StandardMessageHandler$Ticket.run(StandardMessageHandler.java:235) at freenet.node.StandardMessageHandler$Ticket.received(StandardMessageHandler.java:173) at freenet.node.StandardMessageHandler$Ticket.access$100(StandardMessageHandler.java:125) at freenet.node.StandardMessageHandler.handle(StandardMessageHandler.java:73) at freenet.Ticker$Event.run(Ticker.java:393) at freenet.thread.YThreadFactory$YThread.run(YThreadFactory.java:247) (freenet.node.rt.TreeRouting, Finalizer, NORMAL): Did not terminate [EMAIL PROTECTED] Did my mail reach you? ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
