Re: Yahoo REfuses to allow the new version of their Yahoo mail on SeaMonkey
NoOp a écrit : On 06/30/2011 01:30 PM, sean nathan bean wrote: cyberzen sent me the following:: PhillipJones a écrit : Received a message from Yahoo this morning to update my Yahoo Mail. I go to do it. First thing doesn't accept SeaMonkey at all. So I have the UA set to show FireFox 4. still doesn't accept What's with that? use seamonkey's Mail client ? pop.mail.yahoo.fr (SSL, port 995) smtp.mail.yahoo.fr (SSL, port 465 avec authentification) imap.mail.yahoo.com (SSL, port 993) 'cisely... why torture oneself with webmail interfaces... sean Because you still need to check the webmail interface occasionally to see if a valid email may have been caught up in the Yahoo! spam filters. not at all, I can check the bulk mail folder (as yahoo says) in IMAP yahoo account (SM 2.0.14) -- cyberzen ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Edit message as new - The sent is rejected
Ray_Net a écrit : cyberzen wrote: Ray_Net a écrit : What do you think about a bug i fill in just now ? Any hope for a correction ? . soon :-) https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=668504 Perhaps you can vote for it ... I think this is due to some automatic spam detection at your email provider's side (message with only BCC are supposed to be spam) This is a false assumption, because i test it without being connected(ADSL box power off). This is Seamokey who refuse to send the mail. may be yes, but... having no problem as you have I checked my settings.. 1 I BCC to myself 2 I do not copy the messages in the sent folder 3 I have set up a filter to move occurring messges BCC to me in the sent folder so when I edit a sent message as new I don't find malformed headers as you seem to have have typed Ctrl U to view the whole source ? for example I have seen something curious : To: Undisclosed-Recipient:;@spooler8-g27.priv.proxad.net it's some of my friends who sent a joke to a bunch of BCC other ones.. I do not know the real reason of it -- cyberzen ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Bookmarks Don't scroll with Synaptics Trackpad
Jim Taylor wrote: After upgrading to SeaMonkey 2.1 I can no longer scroll bookmarks and history on my HP dv7 laptop using the Synaptics Track Pad scrolling. Track Pad scrolling works everywhere else that I can find except in Bookmarks and History. I was at the latest Synaptics driver on the HP site (15.1.6.64) but I found a later one (v15_2_20_C) on the Synaptics site so upgraded to it. No help. If I connect a real mouse with a middle scroll wheel the bookmarks and history will scroll using the wheel, but they won't scroll using the Track Pad Scroll. The top and bottom autoascroll arrows work on Bookmarks, and I can click and drag the scroll bar in history, but the emulated middle mouse scroll does not work in Bookmarks and History. My OS is 64 bit Windows Home Premium SP1 with all the OS and driver updates. This worked in the previous versions of SeaMonkey and just stopped working after the 2.1 upgrade. Jim I have discovered that changing the Synaptics Pointing Device scrolling option from scroll item under pointer (which is the default) to scroll selected item corrects the problem. Not sure why this makes it work, seems like it should work with the default but I haven't found any down side to using scroll selected item so will leave it that way to get Bookmark scrolling to work because it was a real pain without it. Below is Synaptics definition of the options: Scroll item under pointer Select this option if you want to scroll the window or item that is under the pointer. With this option you do not need to click on a window first in order to scroll it. Scroll selected item Select this option if you want to scroll the currently active window or item. This is usually the last window, part of a window, or item that you clicked on. Jim ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: signature
Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: Rick Merrill wrote: Ok, stupid question du jour: why doesn't the SeaMonkey 2.1 installer have a valid digital signature? Sadly we do not yet possess the ability to digitally sign our installer. It needs a few things to accomplish. 1) a machine much more secure than our current machines, and dedicated to just signing. 2) a digital certificate to use for signing, from a valid certificate authority. We have neither of those at this time, we do hope to be in a position to get those. But until then all our release builds are unsigned. Sounds like a finance problem, so what is your business model? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Edit message as new - The sent is rejected
cyberzen wrote: so when I edit a sent message as new I don't find malformed headers as you seem to have have typed Ctrl U to view the whole source ? for example I have seen something curious : To: Undisclosed-Recipient:;@spooler8-g27.priv.proxad.net it's some of my friends who sent a joke to a bunch of BCC other ones.. I do not know the real reason of it This may be it. I've found that if I send a message with all the recipients bcc'ed, it goes out fine, but the copy in my Sent folder lists undisclosed-recipients:; in the To field (SeaMonkey apparently inserts this automatically). If I then edit that sent message as new, modifying the body without modifying the recipient list, SeaMonkey refuses to resend it, saying undisclosed-recipients:; is an invalid address. I have to delete that line before sending. If you're forwarding such a message, this shouldn't happen (the recipient fields will be blank until you fill them), but if you reply to it, or reply to all, the first listed recipient will be the invalid undisclosed-recipients:; and you'll have to delete it before sending. -- War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left. -- Paul B. Gallagher ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Googlebar Update?
Looking forward to re-installing the Google Toolbar (Googlebar) with V 2.1 SeaMonkey. Anyone have any thoughts? Thanks! Googlebar original link (several years old): http://googlebar.mozdev.org/ ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: tagzilla phillip chee
El 01/07/11 06:38, Philip Chee escribió: I just realized that I might actually have write access to http://tagzilla.mozdev.org/ At least according to: http://tagzilla.mozdev.org/members.html I probably need someone to help me update the html on that site as I have very little time to do that these days. Same topic on different newsgroups... :-) I can help you with it if you want. How would you like to get the updated files? Maybe a ZIP archive with the files to update in this directory? http://www.mozdev.org/source/browse/tagzilla/www/ Ricardo. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: WHY ?
Rick Merrill wrote: Ray_Net wrote: Rick Merrill wrote: .. SM can take a dozen seconds to close, even after the GUI disappears from your screen as it cleans cookies and cache. Sorry to dissapoint you, but the first program i stop is SM ... so he have plenty of time to clean all during the stop of other programs and before my pc-shutdown. Well, upgrade to 2.1 if you haven't already ;-) I juste switched to 2.1 :-) I don't believe that this action will cure the problem, because only the newsgroup mozilla.support.seamonkey is affected, the other groups that i have subscribed did not exhibit the problem. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: WHY ?
NoOp wrote: On 06/21/2011 02:00 PM, Ray_Net wrote: Why this groups is asking me to download 500 headers out of 61911 Probably because you can't put valid/helpful information in the Subject? Why? I reckon that whatever you are trying to resolve we definately help others later when they search the newsgroup on the 'Why' subject. I agree with you - sorry. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Edit message as new - The sent is rejected
Paul B. Gallagher wrote: cyberzen wrote: so when I edit a sent message as new I don't find malformed headers as you seem to have have typed Ctrl U to view the whole source ? for example I have seen something curious : To: Undisclosed-Recipient:;@spooler8-g27.priv.proxad.net it's some of my friends who sent a joke to a bunch of BCC other ones.. I do not know the real reason of it This may be it. I've found that if I send a message with all the recipients bcc'ed, it goes out fine, but the copy in my Sent folder lists undisclosed-recipients:; in the To field (SeaMonkey apparently inserts this automatically). If I then edit that sent message as new, modifying the body without modifying the recipient list, SeaMonkey refuses to resend it, saying undisclosed-recipients:; is an invalid address. I have to delete that line before sending. If you're forwarding such a message, this shouldn't happen (the recipient fields will be blank until you fill them), but if you reply to it, or reply to all, the first listed recipient will be the invalid undisclosed-recipients:; and you'll have to delete it before sending. You have better than me explained the SM problem. I hope to have a maximum votes for this bug :-) Feel free to vote for it ! https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=668504 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM 2.1 not a real enhancement
Ray_Net wrote:
I don't need
-Bookmak This Grouo of Tabs(greyed)
Hmm, I won't help you shoot yourself in the foot there. This is a normal
functionality to me. You could just as well start removing entries from
the menus... If you really want to go ahead you'd have to either use the
DOM Inspector to identify properties of the entry that allow creating a
CSS rule like below, or find someone who does it for you (not me!).
-Subscribe to This Page(greyed)
-Personal Toolbar
Try this rule with the Stylish add-on to remove Subscribe to This Page,
Personal Toolbar and the separator:
#BMB_feedsMenu,
#BMB_feedsMenu + menuseparator,
#BMB_bookmarksToolbarFolderMenu
{display:none}
-Recently Bookmarked
-Recent Tags
These are special search folders, but AFAIK you can just remove them if
you don't like them.
-Mozilla Project
-Search the Web
AFAIK these are normal folders/bookmarks. You should be able to just
remove these if you don't want them.
HTH
Jens
--
Jens Hatlak http://jens.hatlak.de/
SeaMonkey Trunk Tracker http://smtt.blogspot.com/
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
History as Places item
Whomever came up w/ the idea of the History item, and the various denominations thereof: Thank you very much! That's rock n roll, man/ chica. That's the sort of thing i dig. Keep the groove-on that direction, I hope. It's difficult to notice everything, but-- at risk of nonsensical, more so than usual-- it's why Seamonkey kicks so much ass-sshhut-your-mouth (i'm just talkin' bout Seamonkey!) nice. now, if i can only remember what URL i want, of all this awesome aggregate, super-intelligent hyper-data ... what's that stuff-- hotter than gas... plasma! yeah, it's plasma-rific! not places. plasma-ces yep. that's it. your new word, right there. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Multiple Seamonkey and Firefox Profiles: Everything but the Kitchen Sync
On Sunday, March 6, 2011 2:32:41 AM UTC-5, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Chris Ilias wrote: I was advocating best practices in communication, not criticizing. One of these best practices is to give a clear, complete answer on the first pass With all the replies, herein, I am certainly confused for a proper citation, but the text above gave /me/ a chuckle for, after skimming the topic of my apparent disinterest, I find the concern I address in opening the /topic/ has been thwarted. Allow me to clarify, I would not concern myself with derailing, whether gratuitous, or otherwise, but here we have a conversation stemmed to suggest-- i dare say, ironically-- what are the proper ways of communication on this channel. I beg your pardon, if I may reiterate my primary concern. I do not require the reader sift the sludge of mine, to glean what signal travels along that noisy text. With experience, of course, I've become aware that I fail to squelch the noise from my signal, so I abstain from communique for the returns only continue diminishing, notwithstanding my considerable effort toward the opposite. A lonely man bares his burden, so to spare them his torment he refuses his callers. I am likewise cognitive, and I wish to spare you. As stated in the original text, allusion to /multiple profiles/ is not to open discussion of profiles, but in preface to the primary concern. Furthermore, I presume a productive contribution, or the discussion which might ensue, is best appreciated within the context of the now (i.e. i enjoy the X on the Y release; the gizmo introduced in ver Z.1 works well, and I hope to see more development there; etc.), unless otherwise stated and understood as such (i.e. the conversation which /did/ ensue, here, as would rely upon speculation; the future of multiple profile management; public reaction and opinion; etc.). In handling discourse with kid-gloves, communication breakdown is a likely result, albeit undesirable for effective communication. It stands to reason, then, we're “damned if we do; damned if we don't”, and /Hank Hill/ I suspect would agree, or Confucius. Guffaw. Original signal, reprocessed, sans gloves; sans preface: 1.) Firefox and Seamonkey Sync suffer from an apparent lack of foresight. 2.) Sync, it seems, operates on a quantitative assessment, while qualitative attributes: A.) are evaluated erroneously B.) while the attributes (quality) of places are of primary importance ... it seems the Sync evaluation somehow effectively disregards attributes in favor of quantity of items. I'd wished to abstain from hacking-up the sort of presentation I've provided, directly above, but perhaps it's best for clarity. Another way of saying it: If I never see another Getting Started, BBC Headlines RSS, and link to Firefox something or other-- it will be too soon. (yet, i suspect i'll see it all again, real soon.) best wishes. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: it doesn't really matter but ...
km wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: km wrote: ... is there a way to get rid of that annoying black bar ( ) in .sigs??? b If you mean the signature delimiter it is two hyphens and a space on a line by itself. -- It has the purpose of allowing a replying email client to snip off the sig during a reply. You should leave it intact. See next line: ... yes but, i am using... like this: dear sir; bye; km ... but each it start with the annoying '' any hlp??? b Sorry, I don't understand your brand of English. How about a screenshot? Post it to a free photo site and give a link. -- -bts -Four wheels carry the body; two wheels move the soul ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: it doesn't really matter but ...
km wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: km wrote: ... is there a way to get rid of that annoying black bar ( ) in .sigs??? b If you mean the signature delimiter it is two hyphens and a space on a line by itself. -- It has the purpose of allowing a replying email client to snip off the sig during a reply. You should leave it intact. See next line: ... yes but, i am using... like this: dear sir; bye; km ... but each it start with the annoying '' any hlp??? b You wrote: each it start with the annoying '' each ? what is that each ... each what ? I did not see any ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: SM Yahoo Mail???
cmcadams wrote: No wrote: Hello all, for the last two (2) days, my SM 2.014 2.1 (two (2) different machines) are not retrieving any yahoo mail. I have checked my SM Yahoo settings and they appear to be fine. Has anyone else encountered this situation, if so, what settings or tweaking needs to be done to get this back in sync? TIA - Bo1953 No (OK...few) problems with Yahoo email on SM 2.1 here. You didn't specify an ISP but on the off chance they'll apply, here are my server settings: Incoming (POP) pop.att.yahoo.com Outgoing (SMTP) smtp.att.yahoo.com (requires authentication) Incoming mail server: POP3 Incoming/Outgoing User Name: Full ATT email address, including domain (e.g., t...@att.net, t...@bellsouth.net) Incoming mail port #: 995, secure connection (SSL) checked Outgoing mail port # 465, secure connection (SSL) checked cmc - Thank you. I Am on verizon. I also configured as the yahoo faq recommended and it was not until a few days ago everything just stopped. Now, I have tried using pop.verizon.yahoo.com and the system just continues to look up pop.verizon.yahoo.com, so I went back to pop.yahoo.com all without success, at the moment. Thank you again - bo1953 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: can't access Lotus Notes web mail
Well-- I still can't access it. I found out there is a lite view on the menu bar, and I clicked that, and it works, but doesn't have full features. At leadt I can check my mail that way. Jim wrote: Hi-- When I try to access my Lotus Notes web mail with SM 2.1, I get an error: A Domino Web Access script error has occurred that might result in missing data within the current page. If your current operation did not complete, click OK, and then refresh your browser display. Show details If I click OK and refresh the browser, I get the same error again. The details say: Message: uncaught exception: [Exception... Component returned failure code: 0x80040111 (NS_ERROR_NOT_AVAILABLE) [nsIDOMHTMLDocument.createElementNS] nsresult: 0x80040111 (NS_ERROR_NOT_AVAILABLE) location: JS frame :: https://gscodenm01.cr.usgs.gov/iNotes/Forms8.nsf/iNotes/Proxy/?OpenDocumentForm=s_JSViewListl=enCRMXTS=20100927T120310,52Zcharset=ISO-8859-1 :: CyB :: line 6 data: no] URL: https://gscodenm01.cr.usgs.gov/mail/(userID deleted for newsgroup post).nsf/iNotes/Welcome/?OpenDocumentKICUNH=f2tncaf3aossnk0puc49s1slvh0F8 Call Stack: Sorry, not yet implemented Date: Tue Jun 28 2011 11:19:17 GMT-0600 (Mountain Daylight Time) UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20110608 Firefox/4.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.1 Canonical UserName: CN=(my name deleted for newsgroup post)/OU=WRD/OU=USGS/O=DOI This worked OK in the previous release of SM, and Lotus Notes displays OK in IE 9.0. BTW, I allow pop-ups and cookies for this site. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: can't access Lotus Notes web mail
On 07/01/2011 06:54 PM, Jim wrote: Well-- I still can't access it. I found out there is a lite view on the menu bar, and I clicked that, and it works, but doesn't have full features. At leadt I can check my mail that way. ... Can you access it from Firefox? And if so what version (try FF 3.x and 5.0)? ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Workaround: How To Get Back the cZ Icon
In recent SeaMonkey builds, the ChatZilla window has lost its nice cZ
icon which was replaced by a SeaMonkey Icon. Here's how to get it back
(alas, it's not a once-and-for-all solution, only once-per-version):
Just reinstall ChatZilla as follows:
1. Open the add-ons manager
2. In the drop-down near the top, click Install Add-on From File…
3. In the file picker, go first to the install directory (this is
platform-dependent, maybe /usr/local/seamonkey, maybe C:\Program
Files\SeaMonkey, maybe something else)
4. Still in the file picker, go down into distribution/extensions
5. Select {59c81df5-4b7a-477b-912d-4e0fdf64e5f2}.xpi (by
double-clicking, or by one click followed by [ OK ] or [ Open ] or similar)
6. The popup should tell you that you're about to install ChatZilla.
When the countdown elapses, click Install Now.
7. Once the doorhanger (near the URL bar icon) tells you that ChatZilla
is installed, restart SeaMonkey.
Notice the nice cZ icon which is back on the taskbar when you start
ChatZilla? It will normally stay that way at least as long as you stay
on the same SeaMonkey version in the same profile. When you'll update to
some later SeaMonkey version (still in the same profile) there'll be a
check of your extensions' version compatibility at startup. At that
time, ChatZilla may go back to using the SeaMonkey icon, or even become
disabled: then repeat steps 1 to 7 above.
Note: At step 5, there may be three or four built-in extensions in
that directory:
debu...@mozilla.org.xpi (optional) Debug QA UI
inspec...@mozilla.org.xpi DOM Inspector
{59c81df5-4b7a-477b-912d-4e0fdf64e5f2}.xpi ChatZilla
{f13b157f-b174-47e7-a34d-4815ddfdfeb8}.xpi JavaScript Debugger
ChatZilla is the one with a name hard to remember, whose first hex
letter (i.e. digit 9) is c.
Best regards,
Tony.
--
You are the only person to ever get this message.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Workaround: How To Get Back the cZ Icon
On 07/01/2011 08:14 PM, Tony Mechelynck wrote: In recent SeaMonkey builds, the ChatZilla window has lost its nice cZ icon which was replaced by a SeaMonkey Icon. Here's how to get it back (alas, it's not a once-and-for-all solution, only once-per-version): ... Which builds would those be? All of my 2.1 and 2.2 builds (windows and linux) show the cZ icon. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Workaround: How To Get Back the cZ Icon
NoOp wrote: On 07/01/2011 08:14 PM, Tony Mechelynck wrote: In recent SeaMonkey builds, the ChatZilla window has lost its nice cZ icon which was replaced by a SeaMonkey Icon. Here's how to get it back (alas, it's not a once-and-for-all solution, only once-per-version): ... Which builds would those be? All of my 2.1 and 2.2 builds (windows and linux) show the cZ icon. Must be only for the active users of ChatZilla. I don't use Chatzilla and the bottom Component-Bar's Cz icon shows fine in the same build as Tony's, in both Default Classic and Modern Theme:- Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:7.0a1) Gecko/20110701 Firefox/7.0a1 SeaMonkey/2.4a1 ID:20110701003111 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Workaround: How To Get Back the cZ Icon
On 07/01/2011 09:37 PM, Barry Edwin Gilmour wrote: NoOp wrote: On 07/01/2011 08:14 PM, Tony Mechelynck wrote: In recent SeaMonkey builds, the ChatZilla window has lost its nice cZ icon which was replaced by a SeaMonkey Icon. Here's how to get it back (alas, it's not a once-and-for-all solution, only once-per-version): ... Which builds would those be? All of my 2.1 and 2.2 builds (windows and linux) show the cZ icon. Must be only for the active users of ChatZilla. I don't use Chatzilla and the bottom Component-Bar's Cz icon shows fine in the same build as Tony's, in both Default Classic and Modern Theme:- Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:7.0a1) Gecko/20110701 Firefox/7.0a1 SeaMonkey/2.4a1 ID:20110701003111 Barry I use cZ so being an active user probably isn't an issue. So I'm still confused reckon only Tony can clarify. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: tagzilla phillip chee
On 02/07/2011 04:04, Ricardo Palomares Martínez wrote: El 01/07/11 06:38, Philip Chee escribió: I just realized that I might actually have write access to http://tagzilla.mozdev.org/ At least according to: http://tagzilla.mozdev.org/members.html I probably need someone to help me update the html on that site as I have very little time to do that these days. Same topic on different newsgroups... :-) I can help you with it if you want. How would you like to get the updated files? Maybe a ZIP archive with the files to update in this directory? http://www.mozdev.org/source/browse/tagzilla/www/ Ricardo. You probably need to use CVS to checkout the source. http://tagzilla.mozdev.org/source.html Email me @gmail.com so that I don't forget to followup. p.s. xsidebar is also hosted on mozdev so the same concept holds. Phil -- Philip Chee phi...@aleytys.pc.my, philip.c...@gmail.com http://flashblock.mozdev.org/ http://xsidebar.mozdev.org Guard us from the she-wolf and the wolf, and guard us from the thief, oh Night, and so be good for us to pass. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Workaround: How To Get Back the cZ Icon
On 7/1/2011 11:33 PM, NoOp wrote: On 07/01/2011 08:14 PM, Tony Mechelynck wrote: In recent SeaMonkey builds, the ChatZilla window has lost its nice cZ icon which was replaced by a SeaMonkey Icon. Here's how to get it back (alas, it's not a once-and-for-all solution, only once-per-version): ... Which builds would those be? All of my 2.1 and 2.2 builds (windows and linux) show the cZ icon. Tony means the Window icon for chatzilla, on windows you'll see that on the top left corner of the window, or in win7 for example when you hover over the SeaMonkey icon in the taskbar and have cZ open you *should* see the cZ icon in the top left corner of the screenshot (or the list of windows if you have too many windows open for win7 to show the screenshots). That said, I hope to find the time to describe to Tony how to fix this in our build over the next weeks, which I expect to do (he gave up on the bug, due to some complexity that he forsaw). -- ~Justin Wood (Callek) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Re: Workaround: How To Get Back the cZ Icon
On 07/01/2011 10:46 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: On 7/1/2011 11:33 PM, NoOp wrote: ... Which builds would those be? All of my 2.1 and 2.2 builds (windows and linux) show the cZ icon. Tony means the Window icon for chatzilla, on windows you'll see that on the top left corner of the window, or in win7 for example when you hover over the SeaMonkey icon in the taskbar and have cZ open you *should* see the cZ icon in the top left corner of the screenshot (or the list of windows if you have too many windows open for win7 to show the screenshots). That said, I hope to find the time to describe to Tony how to fix this in our build over the next weeks, which I expect to do (he gave up on the bug, due to some complexity that he forsaw). Ah. Got it. Thanks. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
