from:"Tony"


On 23/12/11 11:39, Dustbin wrote:

Edmund wrote:

Dustbin wrote:

It should not be necessary to spoof firefox.

If people wrote their code to work to TCP/IP standard protocols SM would
work.


Do you mean putting FireFox in the UA string? If so, that has (AFAIU)
nothing to do with the TCP/IP standard protocols, but the way the
website detects browsers and adapts the website to the user
depending on the UA.

Since (AFAIK) most sites cater to IE, Chrome and Firefox, they care
only about those browsers. Even though SeaMonkey also uses the same
engine as FireFox, our users don't get the same treatment as
FireFox users. If the websites detect the engine instead of the
browser string, it would make it simple and we can just use
SeaMonkey in the UA.

If I've erred.. any corrections appreciated.


It is not that you have erred it is that they should not be abusing the
system's facilities to engineer code for a limited number of browsers.
The code should work equally on all browsers. That is the point of
standards. Writing code with a preference for one or two browsers is wrong.

It is notable that Netscape/Mozilla/SeaMonkey has been around since the
dawn of HTTP and, therefore, is one of the earliest browsers; yet coders
are favouring far more recent browsers such as FireFox and Chrome.

[...]

You are right, of course: sites, and the people who write them, should 
be sniffing for specific features rather than for specific versions of 
specific browsers. We at SeaMonkey tried for years to educate them to do 
just that — there is still an open meta bug about these very attempts, 
at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=334967 — but it's a 
losing battle. When Fennec and Camino added a Firefox version to their 
UA strings, SeaMonkey followed suit, and between one day and the next 
90% of all broken sites started working again with our (new) default UA 
setting.



The advantage over overriding the UA string by means of the UA Switcher 
(or by setting general.useragent.override) is that as we update from one 
browser version to the next, the default UA string reflects the new 
version: for instance, before this "Advertise compatibility" existed, I 
had set a User Agent Switcher setting for the sites which required it; 
it is still there in my UA Switcher choices, but of course it hasn't 
been updated, and this is what it says:


Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.6pre) Gecko/20091125 
SeaMonkey/2.0.1pre, a sibling of Firefox/3.5


as compared with the default setting of my current SeaMonkey build, viz.

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0a1) Gecko/20111226 Firefox/12.0a1 
SeaMonkey/2.9a1


As you can see, the latter faithfully reflects the characteristics of my 
present build (and the "Firefox/12.0a1" part ought to be unnecessary, it 
can be reconstructed from the presence of "Gecko/" and of "rv:12.0a1", 
but it says to moronic sites which don't know any Gecko browser other 
than Firefox that anything that Firefox 12.0a1 can browse, so can I), 
while the former is hopelessly out of date, reflecting a build which is 
not supported anymore, and a hardware platform which isn't anymore what 
I'm using.



BTW, AFAIK there are no real "standards" about the UA string, any 
standards about it are de-facto: compare with Konqueror:


Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/533.3 (KHTML, like Gecko) 
konqueror/4.7.2 Safari/533.3


which BTW manages to "spoof" both Gecko and Safari, and maybe (I'm less 
sure) Google Chrome; or with Lynx:


Lynx/2.8.7rel.2 libwww-FM/2.14 SSL-MM/1.4.1 OpenSSL/1.0.0e

which didn't even add the "Mozilla/?.? (" string at the start, which IE 
added long ago in order to spoof Netscape, which was still, at that 
time, the market leader.



Best regards,
Tony.
--
Join the march to save individuality!
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Spoofing firefox!


On 24/12/11 13:34, Desiree wrote:

"Dustbin"  wrote in message
news:l5qdnwyww4jcagntnz2dnuvz_vwdn...@mozilla.org...

Robert Kaiser wrote:

Dustbin schrieb:

It should not be necessary to spoof firefox.


You're right that it should not, but in many cases it unfortunately is.
You can turn it off in preferences, though - but be prepared to
encounter broken websites then.

I have left it on - and some sites that usually give warnings do not do so
now.



I use the extension User Agent Switcher and spoof all the time. I like the
extension so much (also use it on Fx and have it spoof as IE or Chrome -
there are long lists of browser versions you can download and then choose
from) that I have postponed upgrading SM to 2.6. When I went to upgrade I
was informed that User Agent Switcher was incompatible with 2.6. So, I did
not upgrade (although MR Tech Toolkit works fine even though SM says it
doesn't).  I could use MR Tech to override any incompatibilities with User
Agent Switcher but I intensely dislike all the rush-rush, update, update
anyway so I will just wait for a new version of User Agent Switcher before
updating SM.




User Agent Switcher works fine, even with SeaMonkey 2.9a1, I used it a 
few minutes ago. It officially supports up to SeaMonkey 2.5.*, but with 
the new "Default to Compatible" feature (turned on by default in the 
latest nightlies) it is not even listed as incompatible.


To use it with Sm 2.6, either install the Add-on Compatibility Reporter 
extension, or set extensions.checkCompatibility.2.6 to false in 
about:config, but beware that by doing that you take up the 
responsability of disabling misbehaving extensions manually.


However, with the "Advertise Firefox compatibility" feature, there are 
much fewer sites which require user-agent spoofing.



Best regards,
Tony.
--
"California is proud to be the home of the freeway."
-- Ronald Reagan
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: [Mint 12 / SM 2.6.1] Download Manager - "Open Containing Folder" starts PDF viewer


On 28/12/11 00:12, Rob Lindauer wrote:

When I download a file and then attempt to "open containing folder"
(either by right clicking the downloaded file name, or from the File
menu option), SM attempts to start the pdf document viewer (evince).

I get this same behavior no matter what the file type of the downloaded
file is (pdf, zip, whatever).

I've looked at the list of helper applications, which look OK (e.g.,
"always ask" for pdf documents)

Any idea what I've done / how to fix / what setting to check?

Thanks, RL


- Is this the built-in download manager or the Jökulsárlón Download 
Manager extension? https://addons.mozilla.org/addon/download-manager/
- If you use the other one (by installing the extension if not 
installed, enabling it if disabled, or disabling if enabled), is the 
result better?



Best regards,
Tony.
--
Men's skin is different from women's skin.  It is usually bigger, and
it has more snakes tattooed on it.  Also, if you examine a woman's skin
very closely, inch by inch, starting at her shapely ankles, then gently
tracing the slender curve of her calves, then moving up to her ...
[EDITOR'S NOTE: To make room for news articles about important
 world events such as agriculture, we're going to delete the
 next few square feet of the woman's skin.  Thank you.]
... until finally the two of you are lying there, spent, smoking your
cigarettes, and suddenly it hits you: Human skin is actually made up of
billions of tiny units of protoplasm, called "cells"!  And what is even
more interesting, the ones on the outside are all dying!  This is a
fact.  Your skin is like an aggressive modern corporation, where the
older veteran cells, who have finally worked their way to the top and
obtained offices with nice views, are constantly being shoved out the
window head first, without so much as a pension plan, by younger
hotshot cells moving up from below.
-- Dave Barry, "Saving Face"
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Which of these security flaws are present in SM 2.6.1


On 27/12/11 04:09, Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:

In their 12/22/2011 security bulletin,
@RISK: The Consensus Security Vulnerability Alert Week 52 2011
SANS reports the following vulnerabilities in Mozilla FF & TB releases.
Since SM code is so closely related to the Moz. FF & TB codes,
which, if any, of these vulnerabilities are present in SM 2.6.1
and when are they due to be removed?

*

(3) HIGH: Mozilla Firefox Multiple Security Vulnerabilities
Affected: Firefox 8.x

[...]

SeaMonkey 2.6.1 is based on the same backend code as Firefox 9.0.1. They 
both are emergency security releases for late-noticed (or late-fixed) 
flaws common to Sm 2.6(.0) and Fx 9.0(.0). Firefox 8 is the previous 
release, six weeks older, and the corresponding SeaMonkey release is 2.5.


You might be interested by the page 
http://www.mozilla.org/security/known-vulnerabilities/seamonkey.html — I 
found it quite easily by following links (starting with the "Release 
Notes" link) from the SeaMonkey front page, 
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/



Best regards,
Tony.
--
"Nice boy, but about as sharp as a sack of wet mice."
-- Foghorn Leghorn
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Tricking sites into thinking SeaMonkey is Firefox

2011-12-03 Thread Tony Mechelynck


On 03/12/11 12:08, Desiree wrote:
[...]

You need either User Agent Switcher extension but it only works on Fx [...]


User Agent Switcher 0.7.3, available at AMO, advertises compatibility 
with not only Firefox 1.0 to 10.* but also SeaMonkey 1.0 to 2.5.*. It 
ought to work also on later versions if you override compatibility 
checking, either by means of the Add-on Compatibility Reporter 
extension, or by setting the appropriate version-dependent preference in 
about:config.


See http://kb.mozillazine.org/Extensions.checkCompatibility


Best regards,
Tony.
--
hundred-and-one symptoms of being an internet addict:
230. You spend your Friday nights typing away at your keyboard

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: can i have both sm and firefox?

2011-11-12 Thread Tony Mechelynck


On 11/11/11 18:31, Jim wrote:

WLS (CompTIA A+ Certified - Retired) wrote:

Jim wrote:

Houston -- I have a problem --

I am a U.S. government employee. To view our pay statements and make
changes, we
have to use the site www.employeeexpress.gov. I have SM and IE 9.0 on
my PC.
Employee Express will work with neither of these (sigh). It requires
Firefox or
IE 7.0 or 8.0.

Can I install FF, just for the purpose of accessing this site, and
still keep
SM? If so, how do I do that? I can't go back to IE 8.0. I wish I never
put IE
9.0 on my PC -- I hate it.

TIA --


Do you have Advertise Firefox compatibility checked in your Advanced >
HTTP Networking preferences? If not check it, and see if that helps.

You can install Firefox, but shouldn't need to. Does the site load, or
tell you your browser is not supported?

I can load the site with SeaMonkey 2.5. Not a government employee so
can't try logging in.

I tried it, and it works now. They must have changed the site recently

(or maybe SM added that compatibility check box on a recent update.)
When I used to go to the site, it had a big red X on the browser, saying
I needed FF or IE & or 8. Guess I don't have a problem. Thanks for a
quick response.


That "Advertise Firefox compatibility" setting was added just because 
there are too many sites which check for Firefox "the wrong way", by 
looking for the string "Firefox/" in the user-agent string, rather than 
for "Gecko/" or, better, by checking whether the needed JavaScript 
methods are defined.


Now that you checked that box (which is the factory default), your 
browser advertises itself to the site as "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; 
WOW64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110928 Firefox/7.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.4.1" which is 
the factory default value for a SeaMonkey 2.4.1 32-bit executable 
running on 64-bit Windows; but most of those badly written sites will 
accept it as Firefox 7.0.1, and indeed Firefox 7.0.1 and SeaMonkey 2.4.1 
share the same version of the Gecko rendering engine, so anything that 
the one can do, the other can do the same way.


Best regards,
Tony.
--
If God had not given us sticky tape, it would have been necessary to
invent it.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: What can I expect with upgrade to Version 2.3.3

2011-11-10 Thread Tony Higgins


MCBastos wrote:

Interviewed by CNN on 04/10/2011 22:58, Tony Higgins told the world:
   

I'm currently using SeaMonkey 2.0.14.  What can I expect with upgrading
to Version 2.3.3?  I get constant reminders to upgrade.
 

Well, THE major feature change (which happened in 2.1) is the new
"Places" bookmarks system (the same one that Firefox uses since version
3). This allows, among other things, full syncing of your bookmarks with
other computers (and even phones) through Firefox Sync.

There were also a few changes to the user interface -- new Add-Ons
Manager and new Data Manager, for instance -- but those shouldn't
directly impact your browsing.

You get new Gecko versions, the same ones current Firefox versions are
using, so page rendering is the same (and as fast as) new Firefox. For
instance, Seamonkey (and Firefox) now pass the ACID 3 rendering test,
Javascript is getting faster every version, and SM 2.4/FF 7 had some
work done to use less memory.

Oh, and also there's a built-in feature to send websites an user-agent
string advertising Firefox compatibility. This means that most sites now
treat Seamonkey as Firefox, instead of "generic unknown brand X
browser". Although I found that sometimes it's better to turn off that
feature.

   

When I upgraded to the current version my profiles were copied to
another location which I had difficulty locating and then couldn't get
to work and had to re-establish all of my 5 email accounts using the old
location.  It seems to me I also had trouble with my bookmarks.

Will this happen again?  Is there an upgrade guide with step-by-step
instructions?
 

No, if you are already using SM 2.0.x, the upgrade can be done by simply
installing the new version on top of the old (that is, by letting the
installer use the defaults). There are only minor changes to the
profile, not needing a full conversion like what happened in the 1.1 ->
2.0 migration. So, no special procedures needed, at least in theory.

Still, as has been pointed out, sometimes shit DOES happen, so it's a
good idea to back up your profile beforehand. Also, if by some reason
you decide to go back to the old version, it's best to have a
non-upgraded profile to go back too.

Known issues with the upgrade:

- If you go directly from 2.0.x to 2.2 or higher, your downloads history
is not migrated. Most users don't care about it, though (I don't, in
fact I clear my downloads history regularly). If you are one of the few
that DO care, you should download Seamonkey 2.1 and upgrade to it before
doing the final upgrade to the current version. Otherwise, just go ahead
with the latest version (manual or auto-update).

- SOMETIMES the bookmarks are not converted correctly. But in most
cases, the problems can be fixed manually with no special tools. The two
most reported problems I have seen are:

1- Bookmarks are not converted at all (when you open the Bookmarks
manager, you find it empty). Solution: from Bookmarks Manager, open
Tools, Import HTML and import your bookmarks.html file.

2- Bookmarks are imported (you see plenty of your old bookmarks inside
the Bookmarks Manager) but your Bookmarks toolbar is empty. Solution:
look around in the Manager -- you will probably find a folder with all
your old Toolbar bookmarks (I forget what it's called). Just move the
bookmarks to the "Bookmarks Toolbar" folder.

- Another frequent source of complaints regards add-ons (extensions)
that no longer work. In most cases, the cause of this is that the add-on
author did not update the compatibility version list of the add-on --
that is, the add-on CLAIMS it is not compatible with the new version,
although in fact it works fine. The easy workaround for this problem is
to install the Add-On Compatibility Reporter add-on, which disables
add-on compatibility checking. Be aware that the Compatibility Reporter
is not a panacea, though: some add-ons WON'T work correctly with the new
versions. So exercise caution in the beginning.

The most current version is 2.4.1. You will see some people telling you
to stay clear of it, recommending some previous version. Let me dispel
some of the fears. Yes, some people DID run into problems. I'm not
dismissing their problems. But the plain truth is that the new versions
-- EVERY new version -- have worked fine for the vast majority of users.
I had only a couple minor hiccups myself (that "Bookmarks toolbar" thing
I mentioned above, and the need for the Add-on Compatibility Reporter in
order to use some of my extensions).

   
My thanks to you MCBastos for addressing my concerns and conveying an 
understanding of what happened when I upgraded from 1.1.  Thanks for 
some good advice on what to expect.  And thanks to Paul Bergsagel for 
suggesting backing things up before proceeding.  I was already thinking 
along those lines.  Though it may be overkill I will do a Windows backup 
of my Mozilla

Re: What can I expect with upgrade to Version 2.3.3

2011-11-10 Thread Tony Higgins


JD wrote:

Walter wrote:

Tony Higgins wrote:

I'm currently using SeaMonkey 2.0.14. What can I expect with upgrading
to Version 2.3.3? I get constant reminders to upgrade.

When I upgraded to the current version my profiles were copied to
another location which I had difficulty locating and then couldn't get
to work and had to re-establish all of my 5 email accounts using the 
old

location. It seems to me I also had trouble with my bookmarks.

Will this happen again? Is there an upgrade guide with step-by-step
instructions?

Thanks,

Tony Higgins


Me, too, Tony. I need instructions by the number with somebody holding
my hand all the way. Here's hoping.

Walter.



Feel free to read along. Did somebody supply you with instructions by 
the number and hold your hand when you started using SM?


If all you have to offer is ridicule and sarcasm then don't bother 
replying.  I don't know what version I'm being prompted to upgrade to.  
All I know is that it is annoying and I still remember the fiasco when I 
upgraded from the previous version of Sea Monkey.  I still don't know 
why it copied my profiles and email files to another location and then 
wouldn't let me designate that location.  I'm using Windows XP Media 
Center SP3.  I also have Windows 7 Pro on another drive that I would 
like to install Sea Monkey on and have it work with my email files when 
I boot to it.  But for now, I just want to know what's in store doing 
this upgrade if it is going to be anything like last time.  If it is 
then I'm not so eager to upgrade.  I've upgraded through several 
versions of Netscape and never had that experience before the last upgrade.


Tony
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

What can I expect with upgrade to Version 2.3.3

2011-11-10 Thread Tony Higgins

I'm currently using SeaMonkey 2.0.14.  What can I expect with upgrading 
to Version 2.3.3?  I get constant reminders to upgrade.


When I upgraded to the current version my profiles were copied to 
another location which I had difficulty locating and then couldn't get 
to work and had to re-establish all of my 5 email accounts using the old 
location.  It seems to me I also had trouble with my bookmarks.


Will this happen again?  Is there an upgrade guide with step-by-step 
instructions?


Thanks,

Tony Higgins
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

ANN: SeaMonkey Hallowe'en Bug Event

2011-10-19 Thread Tony Mechelynck

(This announcement is intentionally cross-posted; followups are set to 
mozilla.dev.apps.seamonkey. Please do not change the Followup-To: line.)



The SeaMonkey Community will hold a Bug event in the days and nights 
preceding Hallowe'en. Witches and wizards, hold your wands and get ready 
to fight the sly and evil Bugs and their offspring Maggots!


* WHEN?

From Thursday 27 October 2011 08:00 to Sunday 30 October 2011 23:00 UTC 
without interruption.


Europe will go off summer time during the night from Saturday to Sunday; 
most countries which use DST / summer time on other continents will be 
using it during the whole test (North hemisphere countries such as the 
USA will still be on DST, South hemisphere countries such as the 
DST-using states of Brazil and provinces of Australia will already be on 
summer time). A table with local start and stop times of the Event in 
various time zones around the world appears on the wiki page for the 
event (linked below).


* WHERE?

Channel #bugday on the Mozilla IRC server (for ChatZilla, 
irc://moznet/bugday , for other clients, either irc://irc.mozilla.org/ 
or ircs://irc.mozilla.org:6697/ then /join #bugday )




For more information: https://wiki.mozilla.org/SeaMonkey/Bug_events/20111027



Best regards,
Tony.
--
hundred-and-one symptoms of being an internet addict:
201. When somebody asks you where you are, you tell them in which chat room.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: 32 and 64 bits

2011-10-14 Thread Tony Mechelynck


On 13/10/11 16:20, Gertjan wrote:

Can I use a 64bit .profile on a 32bit Machine


The profile, probably, unless there is an extension in it (or several) 
which includes a 64-bit binary component (Lightning comes to mind): you 
will have to install the 32-bit version of that extension. The 
application, no: a 64-bit machine can run 32-bit programs but a 32-bit 
machine can of course not run 64-bit programs.



Best regards,
Tony.
--
There was a young whore from kaloo
Who filled her vagina with glue.
She said with a grin,
"If they pay to get in,
They can pay to get out again too!"
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Are "security(sic/sick) updates" _EVER_ needed? ?? ???

2011-09-14 Thread Tony Mechelynck


On 15/09/11 03:27, Richard Owlett wrote:

Provocative enough subject line?
Actually I'm *serious* !

I personally suspect that all these "security" features are trying to
protect users from there own culpable acts.

I take responsibility for my own well being by:
1. *DISABLING* {user.js *IS* your friend}
JavaScript
Cookies
2. *NOT* using an "always live" connection
3. a local *always LIVE* firewall set to _paranoid_
4. my ISP provides some firewall and anti-virus email protection

and "other" measures


Well, even with those measures, security updates are useful. The latest 
case in point is the DigiNotar certificate authority, which was recently 
broken into and used without its managers' knowledge to issue several 
hundreds of bogus certificates for various domains such as google.com, 
cia.gov, mossad.il, etc. etc. etc.


The security update (culminating in SeaMonkey 2.3.3, Firefox 6.0.2, 
Thunderbird 6.0.2, etc.) consisted of removing all DigiNotar root and 
intermediary certificates from Mozilla's store of "trusted" 
certificates. None of the measures you mention above would have 
protected you against a MITM attack using one of those counterfeit 
certificates, especially if you happened to connect to a hijacked DNS 
server. Since you are still using the obsolete SeaMonkey 2.0.8, you 
could still fall victim to such an attack (though after Mozilla, Google, 
Mocrosoft and others, including my Linux distro, took measures in 
concert, the attacks have declined). If you used this browser in Iran 
(where most, but not all, of the attacks were targeted), you may very 
well have been one of the victims: in that case you should change your 
Google etc. passwords and log out of any current session. Maybe also 
restart SeaMonkey to clear the DNS cache.



Best regards,
Tony.
--
All [zoos] actually offer to the public in return for the taxes spent
upon them is a form of idle and witless amusement, compared to which a
visit to a penitentiary, or even to a State legislature in session, is
informing, stimulating and ennobling.
-- H. L. Mencken
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Why does SeaMonkey delete browsing history?

2011-08-28 Thread Tony Bonano

> Hmmm, my first thought was related to a "Private Browsing" feature that
> seems to have become /de rigueur/ among browsers lately. But I couldn't
> find it on Seamonkey, so it doesn't seem to have been ported yet.
>
> However, I did find a relevant option (besides the ones in the "Privacy
> & Security" section) in the Preferences...
> Preferences/Browser/History: are your "Remember Visited Pages" box checked?
>
> --
> MCBastos

Yes, the "Remember visited pages" box is checked.

SeaMonkey history worked perfectly up until about a week ago.
But since then it keeps emptying the history by itself -- nothing
survives in the history list for more than an hour.

Currently it has removed everything I visited more than seven minutes
ago... and now it has deleted everything from history.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Why does SeaMonkey delete browsing history?

2011-08-27 Thread Tony Bonano

On Aug 27, 11:27 pm, nr  wrote:
> Interesting.  The only history option my SM has is to clear it when I exit.
>
> How have you told SM to keep your history for 10 days?  (I'd like to keep 
> mine for 3 days.)

Sorry, the 10 days setting is for "Form and Search History".

I assume your setting is for your Download History (When they have
completed / When quitting SeaMonkey / Never).

Back to my original problem:
Why does SeaMonkey 2.3.1 chose to empty my browsing history every hour
or so?
Earlier versions of SeaMonkey 2 didn't do this.

What is the point of SeaMonkey having a browser history if it doesn't
store anything in there?

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Why does SeaMonkey delete browsing history?

2011-08-27 Thread Tony Bonano

In the past week SeaMonkey 2.3.1 has started fully deleting my browser
history every few hours -- it is uncear why. Is this a new bug?

My SeaMonkey settings are set to keep browser history for ten days.

How can this be fixed?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: A plea for a return to sanity in new version release scheduling

2011-08-19 Thread Tony Mechelynck


On 19/08/11 11:54, David Wilkinson wrote:

Philip Chee wrote:

It is not true that none of those working with Mozilla cannot see the
problems.


Triple negative here.

As written this says that it is not true that everybody working at
Mozilla can see the problems.



As evidenced by his second paragraph, Philip meant "it is false that 
nobody working at Mozilla can see the problems". Neither he nor I are 
paid employees of Mozilla AFAIK, but we are both "putting some work 
into" Mozilla-family products (SeaMonkey and sometimes Gecko or 
Toolkit), and I can tell you that we are deeply concerned.


I think that on several key points (version numbering one of them) 
SeaMonkey made wiser decisions than Firefox in the past, and I hope that 
it is going to go on that way, but I don't have an infallible crystal 
ball: I'll know what my future is when it becomes my present, and by the 
time I realize what it means, it'll already be my past.


About the discoverability of version numbers, bug 678775 
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=678775 has been mentioned 
(perhaps without the bug number) in this thread. I'm added the link so 
that anybody can go and see (but this is somewhat off-topic in the 
_SeaMonkey_ newsgroup since it is a Firefox bug and AFAIK Seamonkey 
isn't going that way). The bug has been RESOLVED INVALID a few hours 
ago, and I believe that that resolution (or maybe WONTFIX) is the right 
one, but I'm taking no bets on how long it will be before Asa 
Dotzler-Schmotzler (the guy with a big mouth and his foot in it: this 
phrase wasn't coined by me but I like it) or someone on his "side" in 
this controversy, REOPENs it.



Best regards,
Tony.
--
hundred-and-one symptoms of being an internet addict:
159. You get excited whenever discussing your hard drive.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: YouTube won't maximize?

2011-08-06 Thread Tony Mechelynck


On 06/08/11 11:19, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:

Lately I've noticed that if I maximize a YouTube video, the content part
of the screen goes black. I still have controls at the bottom, and they
work, but that's it. At the end, the "Replay" and other navigation
controls appear in front of the black screen. I can maximize vids from
other sources. Is it just me?

SM 2.0.14, WinXP SP3.

Have tried clearing cache and cookies, restarting SM, no joy.

Examples from two different YouTube posters:
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hEcjgJSqSRU>
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l6DNQX_lxkg>

Flash plugins:

Shockwave Flash
File name: NPSWF32.dll
Shockwave Flash 10.3 r181

Shockwave for Director
File name: np32dsw.dll
Adobe Shockwave for Director Netscape plug-in, version 11.5.9.615

Any ideas?



I don't have that problem, but I'm using SeaMonkey 2.5a1 on 64-bit Linux 
with a 32-bit Flash plugin distributed by openSUSE Linux via their 
"Non-OSS" repository (Adobe Flash PlugIn and standalone Player, version 
10.3.181.34, SuSE patchlevel 1.2.1, architecture i586).


about:plugins mentions:

Shockwave Flash
/root/.mozilla/plugins/npwrapper.libflashplayer.so
Shockwave Flash 10.3 r181

(also Adobe Reader and Tcl, not relevant here).


So there could be a lot of reasons why our results differ.


I hope someone better informed than me can help you out of your predicament.


Ah, "Shockwave for Director" is something different, see 
http://kb.mozillazine.org/Flash


In this KB page I see a lot of info which seems relevant for Windows but 
is Greek to me, maybe you should go and read it.



Best regards,
Tony.
--
Although written many years ago, Lady Chatterley's Lover has just been
reissued by the Grove Press, and this pictorial account of the
day-to-day life of an English gamekeeper is full of considerable
interest to outdoor minded readers, as it contains many passages on
pheasant-raising, the apprehending of poachers, ways to control vermin,
and other chores and duties of the professional gamekeeper.
Unfortunately, one is obliged to wade through many pages of extraneous
material in order to discover and savour those sidelights on the
management of a midland shooting estate, and in this reviewer's opinion
the book cannot take the place of J. R. Miller's "Practical
Gamekeeping."
-- Ed Zern, "Field and Stream" (Nov. 1959)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: IE users are dumber .

2011-08-01 Thread Tony Mechelynck


On 02/08/11 03:11, MCBastos wrote:

Interviewed by CNN on 01/08/2011 17:41, Tony Mechelynck told the world:

On 31/07/11 05:06, Rufus wrote:

question wrote:


Ie users are suppose to be Dumb

http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2011/07/30/internet-explorer-users-are-dumber-study-shows/





...Opera?..really?..



I notice they didn't even include SeaMonkey in their test data (except
maybe as part of the Firefox sample, which in this case I have a sort of
gut feeling is doing us a disservice — but I have no proof). Who knows?
Maybe _we_ would have scored higher than Opera if only we'd been tested
separately. :-P


I think that, generally speaking, *ignoring completely the actual merits
of each browser,* you will find higher concentration of smart users in
the products with the least market share.

The reason are simple: user inertia and network effect. The less-smart
users tend to stay with what they know, or what has a well-known brand
name. *Any* change demands a bit on the user, be it on installing, or
learning the interface of the new product, or migrating settings, or
figuring out how to deal with the odd case this new product does not
work as well as the old one did.

So, the dumbest users (or at least the least computer-savvy ones -- my
father is astoundingly smart, he's a very respected mechanical engineer
with a number of patents to his name -- but he's just not at home with
computers) stay with whatever came with the machine (IE on Windows,
Safari on Mac). The slightly savvier ones will know that Firefox and
Chrome (two well-known product "brands") offer features IE lacks, and
will try them -- safe in the knowledge that if they get stuck, their
computer-savvy workmate/nephew/friend will help them. Only the savviest
users will attempt to use "obscure" products like Camino, iCab,
Seamonkey, Maxthon or Opera.



Hm, indeed Camino and Opera were their "top of the list"; the other 
three I don't think they mentioned. But if I read you well, Lynx and w3m 
users should be even smarter than all the rest? ;-)



Best regards,
Tony.
--
hundred-and-one symptoms of being an internet addict:
148. You find it easier to dial-up the National Weather Service
 Weather/your_town/now.html than to simply look out the window.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: IE users are dumber .

2011-08-01 Thread Tony Mechelynck


On 31/07/11 05:06, Rufus wrote:

question wrote:


Ie users are suppose to be Dumb

http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2011/07/30/internet-explorer-users-are-dumber-study-shows/





...Opera?..really?..



I notice they didn't even include SeaMonkey in their test data (except 
maybe as part of the Firefox sample, which in this case I have a sort of 
gut feeling is doing us a disservice — but I have no proof). Who knows? 
Maybe _we_ would have scored higher than Opera if only we'd been tested 
separately. :-P



Best regards,
Tony.
--
Hell hath no fury like a bureaucrat scorned.
-- Milton Friedman
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Bug 669207 - right click in the empty part of the tabbar doesn't produce menu

2011-07-17 Thread Tony Mechelynck


On 16/07/11 17:59, Philip Chee wrote:

Several people have noticed this including in the Mozillazine forums.

This was a deliberate change I introduced when I implemented scrollable
tabs. I think this should go into the FAQ so that I can point people at it.

Secondly, should we revert this particular change for the time being
since long time SeaMonkey users have been expecting the old behaviour.
It isn't likely that the tabbar will be turned into a customizable
toolbar for some time yet.

Phil



Well, it did "feel wrong" to me at first, that in order to "Undo Close 
Tab" you had to right-click a tab which had _not_ been closed, not the 
empty space where the (rightmost) tab would be if it were still open.


But that's just one more of those quirks to which you get accustomed 
with time, so, yes, I'd like to see a right-click menu on the empty part 
of the tab bar with any menuitems which aren't specific to one tab; but 
I'd regard that as a low-priority enhancement.


FWIW, I almost always have "some" empty tabbar space because of a 
userChrome.css enhancement of mine which makes all tabs visible on 
several rows, though reduced to just a favicon (ATM a little more than 
2½ rows of 16x16px icons).



Best regards,
Tony.
--
If men could get pregnant, abortion would be a sacrament.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Uncalled-for messages on Inbox screen


On 06/07/11 17:21, Ken wrote:

Thanks, Tony. Not sure how much of that I've fully understood. But next
time the box opens, maybe I'll just click on 'Yes' and that will take me
to the group in question, from which I can then quietly check out, and
the thing won't happen again?


The thing will happen again if you hit the N key or click the "Next" 
button (the toolbar button which says "Move forward to the next unread 
message" if you hover your mouse over it) and either there are no unread 
messages in the folder or newsgroup currently being displayed, or the 
only unread message in it (especially if you've closed the preview pane 
at the bottom of the 3-pane window) is the one currently selected in the 
thread pane. In that case SeaMonkey will look if there is any message 
marked as unread anywhere in another mail folder, another newsgroup, an 
RSS feed for which you've chosen to get new posts in a News & Blogs 
account accessible via your mail window, etc. — and if it finds such an 
unread message (other than in the "Junk" and "Trash" folders), it will 
pop the question again.


Best regards,
Tony.
--
HOW YOU CAN TELL THAT IT'S GOING TO BE A ROTTEN DAY:

#32: You call your answering service and they've never heard of
 you.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Uncalled-for messages on Inbox screen


On 03/07/11 10:19, Ken wrote:

I have SM 2.0. 14 and Windows 7.

When my Inbox is open in its regular function (i.e., for receiving
standard emails, not one of my listed user groups such as this one), do
boxes sometimes appear in the middle of the screen saying, for example,
'Confirm. Advance to next unread message in alt.video.dvd?' (I don't
think I have used that particular group for months, btw.)

All help appreciated.

Thanks - Ken (in Oz)


This is what you see when clicking "go to next unread" or hitting N or 
selecting "Go → Next Unread" (and possibly similar buttons, hotkeys and 
menus), and there isn't any unread message (other than, possibly, the 
one currently selected) in the folder you're viewing. SeaMonkey then 
asks permission to go to the first unread message in a *different* 
folder (or newsgroup or RSS feed).


The example you mentioned is of a Usenet (NNTP) group, maybe the first 
one (as shown in the left pane) of those to which you're subscribed. Of 
course, newsgroup messages posted by other people accumulate, SeaMonkey 
knows approximately how many there are (it will know more precisely when 
that group becomes current), and it offers to go to the first of them.


You then have the choice of clicking Yes (or hitting Y) or clicking No 
(or hitting N) to tell SeaMonkey whether or not you want to switch to 
that newsgroup (or it could be to another mail folder, e.g. if you have 
filters which move your mail out of your Inbox and to specific folders 
depending on where they come from).



Best regards,
Tony.
--
Molecule, n.:
The ultimate, indivisible unit of matter.  It is distinguished
from the corpuscle, also the ultimate, indivisible unit of matter, by a
closer resemblance to the atom, also the ultimate, indivisible unit of
matter ... The ion differs from the molecule, the corpuscle and the
atom in that it is an ion ...
-- Ambrose Bierce, "The Devil's Dictionary"
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Workaround: How To Get Back the cZ Icon


On 02/07/11 07:46, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:

On 7/1/2011 11:33 PM, NoOp wrote:

On 07/01/2011 08:14 PM, Tony Mechelynck wrote:

In recent SeaMonkey builds, the ChatZilla window has lost its nice cZ
icon which was replaced by a SeaMonkey Icon. Here's how to get it back
(alas, it's not a once-and-for-all solution, only once-per-version):

...
Which builds would those be?

All of my 2.1 and 2.2 builds (windows and linux) show the cZ icon.




Tony means the "Window" icon for chatzilla, on windows you'll see that
on the top left corner of the window, or in win7 for example when you
hover over the SeaMonkey icon in the taskbar and have cZ open you
*should* see the cZ icon in the top left corner of the screenshot (or
the "list" of windows if you have too many windows open for win7 to show
the screenshots).

That said, I hope to find the time to describe to Tony how to fix this
in our build over the next weeks, which I expect to do (he gave up on
the bug, due to some complexity that he forsaw).



...or rather, due to some complexity that I hadn't foreseen, which made 
me lose my path in the maze of the source (and SeaMonkey is built from 
repositories with a lot of source, since it pulls all the following 
Mercurial repositories:

1) the repository with the specific Suite, MailNews and Calendar sources
2) the repository with the Firefox, Toolkit, Gecko, etc. sources
3) the ChatZilla repository
4) the DOM Inspector repository
5) the LDAP SDK repository
6) the Venkman repository
). You could also build any of Thunderbird, Firefox, or the ChatZilla, 
Lightning, Provider for Google Calendar, Dom Inspector and Javascript 
Debugger extensions from that same pile of code. Also Sunbird if it were 
still supported.


The first problem is to find where and how in the "comm" repository (#1 
above) the ChatZilla taskbar image from the "irc" repository (#3 above) 
is moved into the temporary directory structure which will then be 
archived into the .tar.bz2, the .dmg, or the .zip and .installer.exe 
which are what users will then download. The second problem (but I think 
I can get inspiration from Venkman on how to solve that) is where to put 
that icon so the OS can use it.



Best regards,
Tony.
--
There is no time like the present for postponing what you ought to be
doing.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Workaround: How To Get Back the cZ Icon


On 02/07/11 07:01, NoOp wrote:

On 07/01/2011 09:37 PM, Barry Edwin Gilmour wrote:

NoOp wrote:

On 07/01/2011 08:14 PM, Tony Mechelynck wrote:

In recent SeaMonkey builds, the ChatZilla window has lost its nice cZ
icon which was replaced by a SeaMonkey Icon. Here's how to get it back
(alas, it's not a once-and-for-all solution, only once-per-version):

...
Which builds would those be?

All of my 2.1 and 2.2 builds (windows and linux) show the cZ icon.



Must be only for the active users of ChatZilla. I don't use Chatzilla
and the bottom Component-Bar's Cz icon shows fine in the same build as
Tony's, in both Default Classic and Modern Theme:-
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:7.0a1) Gecko/20110701 Firefox/7.0a1
SeaMonkey/2.4a1 ID:20110701003111



Barry I use cZ so being an active user probably isn't an issue. So I'm
still confused&  reckon only Tony can clarify.



Recent builds of SeaMonkey, but I don't know how recent, maybe only 
2.4a1, will install the built-in ChatZilla (and the built-in DOM 
Inspector and the built-in Javascript Debugger) in your profile, but:


- only if there was a change in the SeaMonkey version, AND
- only if there isn't already an equal or newer version of the same 
extension in the profile.


This implies that if you're using nightlies, and some bug is fixed in 
ChatZilla between one nightly and the next, you won't get the fix until 
the next SeaMonkey version unless you forcibly reinstall the fixed 
version. OTOH if you have installed ChatZilla from AMO, that profile 
copy will be overridden by the copy built into the _next_ version of 
SeaMonkey if it's newer: you won't be stranded forever with an obsolete 
version in your profile.


There is no usable ChatZilla anymore under the application installation 
directory: you get the following:


/extensions/
only the default and Modern themes
/distribution/extensions/
the built-in extensions. They cannot be used directly from here.
/extensions/
your extensions and themes, including any built-in extensions

This install into the profile is made while checking for extensions' 
compatibility, and it will install ChatZilla in "packed" mode, leaving 
the unpacked XPI in your profile, even though ChatZilla requests 
unpack-at-install.


The "packed" ChatZilla works, maybe even faster since there aren't many 
files to be fetched at different places on your HD, but its icon on the 
OS taskbar (NOT the icon on the SeaMonkey statusbar) is the "default" 
SeaMonkey icon (same blue icon as for the browser), not the grey cZ icon 
specific of ChatZilla.


If you install ChatZilla yourself from AMO, or from "somewhere on your 
HD", it will install in "unpacked" mode (a directory and a number of 
files and directory inside), and the image passed to the OS for display 
on the taskbar is a separate "image" file, not something inside an XPI, 
so the OS can display it.



Best regards,
Tony.
--
hundred-and-one symptoms of being an internet addict:
123. You ask the car dealer to install an extra cigarette lighter
 on your new car to power your notebook.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Workaround: How To Get Back the cZ Icon

2011-07-01 Thread Tony Mechelynck

In recent SeaMonkey builds, the ChatZilla window has lost its nice cZ 
icon which was replaced by a SeaMonkey Icon. Here's how to get it back 
(alas, it's not a once-and-for-all solution, only once-per-version):


Just reinstall ChatZilla as follows:
1. Open the add-ons manager
2. In the drop-down near the top, click "Install Add-on From File…"
3. In the file picker, go first to the install directory (this is 
platform-dependent, maybe /usr/local/seamonkey, maybe "C:\Program 
Files\SeaMonkey", maybe something else)

4. Still in the file picker, go down into distribution/extensions
5. Select {59c81df5-4b7a-477b-912d-4e0fdf64e5f2}.xpi (by 
double-clicking, or by one click followed by [ OK ] or [ Open ] or similar)
6. The popup should tell you that you're about to install ChatZilla. 
When the countdown elapses, click "Install Now".
7. Once the doorhanger (near the URL bar icon) tells you that ChatZilla 
is installed, restart SeaMonkey.


Notice the nice cZ icon which is back on the taskbar when you start 
ChatZilla? It will normally stay that way at least as long as you stay 
on the same SeaMonkey version in the same profile. When you'll update to 
some later SeaMonkey version (still in the same profile) there'll be a 
check of your extensions' version compatibility at startup. At that 
time, ChatZilla may go back to using the SeaMonkey icon, or even become 
disabled: then repeat steps 1 to 7 above.


Note: At step 5, there may be three or four "built-in extensions" in 
that directory:

debu...@mozilla.org.xpi (optional) Debug & QA UI
inspec...@mozilla.org.xpi   DOM Inspector
{59c81df5-4b7a-477b-912d-4e0fdf64e5f2}.xpi  ChatZilla
{f13b157f-b174-47e7-a34d-4815ddfdfeb8}.xpi  JavaScript Debugger

ChatZilla is the one with a name hard to remember, whose first hex 
"letter" (i.e. digit > 9) is c.



Best regards,
Tony.
--
You are the only person to ever get this message.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Anyway to use Sync bookmarks addon with Seamonkey?

2011-06-04 Thread Tony Mechelynck


On 04/06/11 19:33, goldtech wrote:

Hi,

Is there anyway to use sync bookmarks addon with SM 2.0.14 ? Right now
I have FF installed then I import the syn'd bookmarks from FF to SM...

thanks


AFAIK there is no "clean" way to use Sync with SeaMonkey 2.0.x, but 
SeaMonkey 2.1 will have Sync built-in, just like Firefox 4 and later. 
The first release-candidate is already out (there is a link to its 
download page on the SeaMonkey homepage 
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/ ) and the second release-candidate is 
due any day now.


These are "release candidates" which means better and stabler than your 
average beta; indeed, the RC2 which is about to be released could quite 
well become the official release 2.1 if no serious bug is found in it.



HTH,
Tony.
--
Romeo wasn't bilked in a day.
-- Walt Kelly, "Ten Ever-Lovin' Blue-Eyed Years With
   Pogo"
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: New version

2011-06-03 Thread Tony Mechelynck


On 03/06/11 10:48, Ray_Net wrote:

Neil Winchurst wrote:

Although not new to computers I am fairly new to SeaMonkey. I am using
version 2.0.14. There has been a lot of chat about the new version 2.1.
Since my version works just fine for me is there any real reason or
advantage to moving up?

I feel that I would be quite happy to stay where I am. If it ain't broke
.


If you have decide to use SM instead of IE, you should know that with SM
you always must change,upgrade, etc  there is no "stable release"


Yeah, with IE it's always broke whatever you do, so fixin' it don' make 
it any better. :-P


Best regards,
Tony.
--
FIGHTING WORDS

Say my love is easy had,
Say I'm bitten raw with pride,
Say I am too often sad --
Still behold me at your side.

Say I'm neither brave nor young,
Say I woo and coddle care,
Say the devil touched my tongue --
Still you have my heart to wear.

But say my verses do not scan,
And I get me another man!
-- Dorothy Parker
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: New version

2011-06-02 Thread Tony Mechelynck


On 31/05/11 04:32, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:

On 5/30/2011 9:17 AM, Tony Mechelynck wrote:

and between current builds of SeaMonkey 2.2a1pre and Firefox 7.0a1.


Fwiw, SeaMonkey 2.2 will soon be only comprable to Firefox 5... we're
just getting ready to bump version numbers there to reflect reality.



"Will soon"... maybe: I hear a lot of that kind of talk, and I'm eagerly 
waiting for it to happen, like a teen-ager at a movie house just before 
the posters come up for next week's movie. In the meantime, the "latest 
and greatest" that I'm using is still calling itself


Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:7.0a1) Gecko/20110602 Firefox/7.0a1 
SeaMonkey/2.2a1pre


i.e., "SeaMonkey 2.2a1pre built on the same source as Firefox 7.0a1". 
(And don't get me started on the utility of declaring a new "major 
version" number every six weeks, or you'll get the same speech you could 
get from KaiRo except that he's a lot more aware of the ins and outs of 
the project than I am).



Best regards,
Tony.
--
To be rich is not the end, but only a change of worries.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: New version

2011-05-30 Thread Tony Mechelynck


On 30/05/11 12:53, Neil Winchurst wrote:

Although not new to computers I am fairly new to SeaMonkey. I am using
version 2.0.14. There has been a lot of chat about the new version 2.1.
Since my version works just fine for me is there any real reason or
advantage to moving up?

I feel that I would be quite happy to stay where I am. If it ain't broke
.

Just wondering

Neil


You can still safely wait until the SeaMonkey 2.1 release is announced 
and maybe a little more, but not too long: once SeaMonkey 2.1 final gets 
released, support for SeaMonkey 2.0 won't last very long -- the 
(volunteer) SeaMonkey team just hasn't got enough resources to keep 
maintaining as many parallel versions of the software as does the 
Firefox team (many of whose members are paid employees of the Mozilla 
corporation). It is a testimony to the SeaMonkey community's enthusiasm 
that they are succeeding to maintain such a good-quality software 
product in spite of their relative lack of human and hardware resources.


Once the users of SeaMonkey 2.0 start going over to SeaMonkey 2.1, there 
will be fewer and fewer people finding any possible remaining bugs in 
SeaMonkey 2.0 -- and fewer bugs found means fewer bugs fixed too. You 
can't prove that the software ain't broke, and any bug left in it is 
gonna bite you some day, maybe sooner -- maybe later.


Currently, in addition to SeaMonkey 2.0 where AFAIK only severe security 
and stability bugs are still being fixed, the SeaMonkey team is 
maintaining two later "code branches", namely SeaMonkey 2.1, which may 
be released any day now (the first release-candidate is already out and 
a second one is in the works), and SeaMonkey 2.2, which is still at the 
preliminary "pre-alpha" stage. IIUC, the underlying "backend" code is 
common between SeaMonkey 2.1 and Firefox 4.0.x, and between current 
builds of SeaMonkey 2.2a1pre and Firefox 7.0a1.



Best regards,
Tony.
--
hundred-and-one symptoms of being an internet addict:
101. U can read htis w/o ny porblm and cant figur eout Y its evn listd.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Need testers for Lightning 1.0b4 for SeaMonkey 2.1

2011-05-28 Thread Tony Mechelynck


On 26/05/11 11:30, Philip Chee wrote:

Hi!

SeaMonkey 2.1 is almost out of the gate. We need to make sure that the
Lightning version targetting SM 2.1 works well with it. So I need
volunteers to smoke test Lightning 1.04b on SeaMonkey 2.1

Lightning 1.0b4pre builds are here:
https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/calendar/lightning/nightly/latest-comm-miramar/
SeaMonkey 2.1pre builds are here:
http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-2.0/

Lightning will integrate into the MailNews window and you can open new
Calendar and Task tabs via the mini buttons in the tabbar.


...or via the "Events and Tasks" menu which it adds on the menubar.



Phil

(also posted to Mozillazine
http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=2210021)



Best regards,
Tony.
--
hundred-and-one symptoms of being an internet addict:
99. The hum of a cooling fan and the click of keys is comforting to you.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

ANN: Results of SeaMonkey "Nugzilla" bug event

2011-05-22 Thread Tony Mechelynck

@ashughes: could you please rewrite the following for QMO? Thanks, and 
thanks again for setting the channel topic during the event.



The results of the SeaMonkey "Nugzilla" bug event which took place on 
IRC channel #bugday from Wednesday 18 to Friday 20 of this month are now 
available at 
https://wiki.mozilla.org/SeaMonkey/Bug_events/20110518#Results where you 
will find:


* A link to the list of bugs which were handled, as a Bugzilla search, 
repeated here: 
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=dorem&remaction=run&namedcmd=Nugzilla&sharer_id=104443 
(to see this list, you may perhaps need to be logged-in to 
bugzilla.mozilla.org but no special permissions are required on your 
Bugzilla account).
* A breakdown by Product and Component of where the 19 bugs which were 
moved or reported to Products other than "SeaMonkey" ended up (Core: 10, 
Toolkit: 5, MailNews Core: 3, Mozilla Localizations: 1), and a summary 
by Component and Status/Resolution of the 98 bugs handled which remained 
in the SeaMonkey Product.
* An honour list by number of bugs of the seven people who did the 
actual "dirty work", with links to all those bugs at BMO. I'm listing 
those people there in alphabetical order of IRC nicknames, go there to 
see "who did what": Aleksej, Aqualon, IanN, RattyAway, Rickie, therube, 
tonymec


Additional remarks:
* ashughes and KaiRo were noticed as lurkers during part of the time but 
they didn't move any actual bugs. Their presence may have encouraged 
those who did: thanks for being there.
* All platforms for which SeaMonkey is built at Mozilla were represented 
among the testers: Linux-i686 and Mac had a token presence, Windows and 
Linux-x86_64 were outstandingly represented, even though SeaMonkey 
builds for the latter platform are not yet regarded as "official".



Best regards,
Tony.
--
The University of California Bears announced the signing of Reggie
Philbin to a letter of intent to attend Cal next Fall.  Philbin is said
to make up for no talent by cheating well.  Says Philbin of his
decision to attend Cal, "I'm in it for the free ride."
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey Bug Event 18 to 20 May 2011 (OOPS)

2011-05-12 Thread Tony Mechelynck


On 09/05/11 05:11, Tony Mechelynck wrote:

A three-day "SeaMonkey Bug Event" (unofficially nicknamed "Operation
Nugzilla") will be held on IRC on 18, 19 and 20 may 2011, 14h to 24h
GMT. Full details, including equivalent times for various timezones
around the world, what to test and with which tools, are available at
https://wiki.mozilla.org/SeaMonkey/Bug_events/20110518


Oops! 12h to 24h GMT, 14h to 24h CEST. (The times published at wikimo 
are correct.)


Best regards,
Tony.
--
Ambition is a poor excuse for not having sense enough to be lazy.
-- Charlie McCarthy

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

SeaMonkey Bug Event 18 to 20 May 2011

2011-05-08 Thread Tony Mechelynck

A three-day "SeaMonkey Bug Event" (unofficially nicknamed "Operation 
Nugzilla") will be held on IRC on 18, 19 and 20 may 2011, 14h to 24h 
GMT. Full details, including equivalent times for various timezones 
around the world, what to test and with which tools, are available at 
https://wiki.mozilla.org/SeaMonkey/Bug_events/20110518


The main goal is to give a thorough test to SeaMonkey 2.1, which is 
expected to be released any time soon, most probably before Nugzilla starts.


If you have questions (after reading the page linked above), feel free 
to ask them, either by replying to the copy of this post published in 
the mozilla.dev.apps.seamonkey newsgroup, or on IRC in the #seamonkey 
channel (on, of course, the irc.mozilla.org server known to ChatZilla as 
"moznet").


If you are using SeaMonkey (or Firefox with Chatzilla installed), 
clicking the following links will open the corresponding channel in 
ChatZilla:

irc://moznet/seamonkey
irc://moznet/bugday


Best regards,
Tony "tonymec" Mechelynck.
--
Hire the morally handicapped.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Updated to 2.0.14

2011-05-01 Thread Tony Mechelynck


On 01/05/11 19:31, wingspan2 wrote:

Hello everyone,
   Well I logged onto my Sea Monkey browser as usual and when my
browser appeared, it had automatically updated to Sea Monkey 2.0.14.
It looked a bit different but everything appeared to be there.
But.. when I went to use my e-mail that Sea Monkey provides, I was
unable to to send any messages. I was able to receive them just not
able to send them. I called my internet provider "Comcast" to aid me
with this problem, but they no longer help with browsers other than
their own. I went through all the setting and every thing was still
the same, but it will not send. I get this email message stating when
I attempt to send it:

"Cannot send message using the server
Smtp.comcast.net:wingspan2..Use the pop-up menu below to try a
different outgoing mail server.  All messages will use this server
until you quit Mail or change your network settings"

  So my wife and I tried different options that appeared in the drop
down box, but none were able to make the out going mail work. Has
anyone had this problem or know how to repair so our email can be sent
again?

Thanks in advance,
Rob


Maybe the knowledge base article 
http://kb.mozillazine.org/Cannot_send_mail could be relevant.



Best regards,
Tony.
--
"... one of the main causes of the fall of the Roman Empire was that,
lacking zero, they had no way to indicate successful termination of
their C programs."
-- Robert Firth
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Upgrade to new version

2011-05-01 Thread Tony Mechelynck


On 01/05/11 17:18, Neil Winchurst wrote:

Daniel wrote:

Neil Winchurst wrote:

I have installed version 2.0.13 in /usr/local/bin which works fine.
There is now version 2.0.14 ready as an upgrade. I have downloaded it
but it will not install. I get a message about having other versions
installed. I do not have any version in /usr/bin. It will not upgrade my
version.

Am I missing something somewhere please?

Neil


Neil, when you say you downloaded it, do you mean you downloaded the
upgrade or did you download the entire program (15MB or there abouts)??

When I upgrade from one version to the next, SeaMonkey downloads the
upgrade and installs it next time I start up, job done!


I had better give more information. I have installed Mint 10 KDE. When I
wanted to install Seamonkey the available version was 2.0.11 while the
latest version was 2.0.13. So I downloaded the full version 2.0.13 of
the program, the .deb version, and ran the installer.

Now I have downloaded the upgrade to version 2.0.14 but when I go to
Help > Apply Downloaded Upgrade I am told to restart Seamonkey. When I
do I get an error message asking if there is another version installed.
There isn't. Here is the message

*

The update could not be installed. Please make sure there are no other
copies of SeaMonkey running on your computer, and then restart SeaMonkey
to try again.

*

So now every time I start Seamonkey I get this error message and have to
click on OK to go to the program.

I should mention that I have installed Seamonkey in /usr/local/bin,
there is no copy in /usr/bin.

If necessary I am happy to stay with version 2.0.13 but I would like to
avoid the error message every time I log in. If I could find the upgrade
file I could rename it or delete it.

Thanks for any help,

Neil





You say there is no SeaMonkey running:

- How did you close SeaMonkey the last time? The "proper" way to do it 
consists of using File→Quit or Ctrl+Q then _waiting_ until it has 
finished running, which means _longer_ than just waiting for all windows 
to be closed: see next paragraph. Don't turn the computer off while 
SeaMonkey is busy closing down.


- Does
ps -lC seamonkey-bin
list something other than column headings? If it does, then even if 
SeaMonkey has already closed all its windows in response to your Ctrl+Q 
(or File → Quit), there is still some cleanup in progress. If you run 
ksysguard or gnome-system-monitor you should be able to follow how 
SeaMonkey takes its time releasing its memory.


- See also
http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_in_use
http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_folder_-_SeaMonkey
about how to recover from a locked profile.


Best regards,
Tony.
--
"He did decide, though, that with more time and a great deal of mental
effort, he could probably turn the activity into an acceptable
perversion."
-- Mick Farren, "When Gravity Fails"
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Strange results when viewing mail folder in my profile folder

2011-04-28 Thread Tony Mechelynck


On 28/04/11 19:00, Colin Ager wrote:

Hi all.
In prearation for a forthcoming update from Fedora 12 to Fedora 14 I
have saved my Seamonkey profile. While doing this I looked at a mail
folder and was shown an e-mail from Sept 2009. To my surprise it does
not show when I look for it in the usual way with Seamonkey. As far as I
can see only the first item in the mail folder is shown although there
are lots more some of which show in Seamonkey as being before the date
on this item. Cn anyone explain why this happens?
Colin


Most "files" in the Mail folder of your profile are mailbox files, each 
of them corresponds to one the "folders" which you see in the mail client.


Each of these mailbox files contains emails one after another: if you 
look at one such mailbox with a plain text editor such as Vim, Notepad, 
etc., you'll see for each message the following:


- one line starting with "From -" with no colon after From
- the email headers, with no intervening empty line. Lines beginning 
with whitespace (i.e. with spaces or tabs) are continuation lines.

- one empty line
- the body text, which is what you normally see when reading the email. 
This body text may either be one message in plaintext, or it may be made 
of several parts (HTML text, plaintext, attachment 1, attachment 2, 
etc.) in MIME format. In the latter case there are delimiter lines 
between each part, and the same delimiter with two dashes appended marks 
the end of the last part, see 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIME#Multipart_messages


When you delete a message, it is not immediately removed from the 
mailbox; rather, for efficiency's sake, it is "marked as deleted" and 
nothing else is done to it. Anything marked as deleted in this way won't 
be shown by the mailer. It's only when you "compact" that folder (or 
when SeaMonkey does it on its own, depending on your Preferences) that 
all such messages "marked as deleted" will be actually removed.


If you point your browser to a copy of a mailbox file, it may perhaps 
see only the first message, thinking that this file is one message which 
you've "saved" as a file in EML format (MIME type message/rfc822) as 
when you use the "File → Save As → File..." menu. This would explain 
what you're seeing. But unlike what goes before, what I'm saying in this 
paragraph is only a guess.



Best regards,
Tony.
--
"Now the Lord God planted a garden East of Whittier in a place called
Yorba Linda, and out of the ground he made to grow orange trees that
were good for food and the fruits thereof he labeled SUNKIST ..."
-- "The Begatting of a President"
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: New control of mouse-click-menus - additional click necessary now - drives my hand crazy

2011-04-18 Thread Tony Mechelynck


On 18/04/11 23:30, S. Beaulieu wrote:

Ray_Net a écrit :

Context menu is opened by using only the right-click ... all well-done
windows programs will permit that without the need of pressing the ctrl
key in the same time. The middle-button (not present on every mouse)
will do other things but not opening the context menu.



But that's not what he said. He said he was only clicking the left
button and holding it down to select the proper option. That's not
right-clicking.

S.


If you press and hold the right mouse button, the context (popup) menu 
will open. You can then move the mouse pointer without releasing the 
button, and if you pass over a submenu it will open while the mouse 
pointer is over it. You can navigate the menus in this way, still 
holding the right button, until the mouse pointer reaches the menuitem 
which you want to trigger. Then you release the mouse button. This has 
always worked as far back as I can remember, maybe even on Netscape 4.72.


Similarly with the left button if you start on the menubar.

Of course, if you have configured your mouse for left-handed use, the 
left button becomes the right button and vice-versa.


An alternative way of navigating the menus consists of doing a 
click-and-release at each level going down, until you reach a menuitem 
which is not a submenu: then that one gets triggered.


On modern mice of the "wheel" type, pressing the wheel without rolling 
it actuates the middle button.



Best regards,
Tony.
--
"People think love is an emotion.  Love is good sense."
-- Ken Kesey
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: "Unsent messages"

2011-04-18 Thread Tony Mechelynck


On 18/04/11 10:29, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:

Ken Rudolph wrote:


SM 2.0.13, W-7. When I click to go to Mail & Newsgroups I get a window
which says "Would you like to send your unsent messages now? Send. Don't
send." The problem is that there are no unsent messages that I know of.
Nothing shows up in the Drafts folder. And if I click "Send" it just
spins and does nothing. What can I do to purge these non-existent unsent
messages?


"Drafts" and "Unsent Messages" are two different folders for two
different purposes. Look below "Trash" and you'll see.

If "Unsent Messages" is empty, I suggest you compact folders and restart
SM.



It could also be named "Outbox", but "Drafts" is something else.


Best regards,
Tony.
--
hundred-and-one symptoms of being an internet addict:
63. You start using smileys in your snail mail.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SM 2.1b3

2011-04-17 Thread Tony Mechelynck


On 17/04/11 07:27, Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:

Robert Kaiser wrote:

ejdelet...@edmullen.net schrieb:

Have you guys tried your solutions? Have you tried to replicate my
problem?


I don't need to replicate anything, as know what the code does, because
I wrote that code that forces a certain set of zoom levels. And I didn't
offer a solution, as I don't think there is one.
I'm still a bit unsure what your actual problem is - do you need a
different set of zoom levels? Did you manage to do that in any previous
SeaMonkey version?

Robert Kaiser



Well Mr. Kaiser, since you wrote the code and so know that the
solutions offered here by the other posters won't work
"as I don't think there is one."
you could have written as much here earlier
and so saved Mr. Mullen from his frustrating experiences and
needing to make his exasperated posting.


Well, actually Mr. Rostyslaw "Smartass" Lewyckyj, Robert was the first 
to answer, and he said that SeaMonkey needs to force-set a certain set 
of zoom levels (different than the Firefox defaults IIUC) for 
localization reasons.


Of course, no one could guess that Mr. Mullen was "being driven crazy" 
(his words) until he told us so.



Best regards,
Tony.
--
Hartley's First Law:
You can lead a horse to water, but if you can get him to float
on his back, you've got something.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: HTML display inside feeds not working

2011-04-17 Thread Tony Mechelynck


On 17/04/11 05:04, MCBastos wrote:

I have been away for a while, now I'm back with a weird problem...

Suddenly, my Seamonkey (2.0.13) stopped displaying the images linked
from the entry summaries in Atom feeds. Even from old messages. I think
it's affecting RSS feeds too, but other than the Blogger ones (which are
all Atom), I don't recall which feeds are RSS and which ones are Atom.

I tried a lot of things.

I tried turning off, then back on, "View/Display Attachments Inline." No
dice.

I tried fiddling with "View/Feed Message Body As".
The upper part seems to be locked in "Original HTML" -- I attempted
changing it to "Simple HTML" or "Plain Text", and not only the message
stays the same, but the menu option stays selected as "Original HTML."
The lower part is selected as "Summary", which is where it was before. I
tried changing it to "Web Page," and it works -- after a fashion: it
loads the full web page instead of the summary. But what I want, what
worked before, is the summary -- the full page is much slower to load,
and sometimes is filled with troublesome scripts.

I tried fiddling with the character encoding. That's the only thing that
gave me some slim results: when I change the "View/Character
Encoding/Auto-detect" setting -- no matter from which value to which --
the message is reloaded and the linked images displayed. But not
perfectly: when I do this, the header is displayed in the body of the
message, in a badly formatted way. Worse, this trick only affects the
message currently being displayed: go to another message, and the
problem is back. Go back to the "fixed" message, and it's back there, too.

I tried reinstalling Seamonkey over itself to check if it was some
corrupted program file. No dice.

I really don't know that to attempt next, other than starting from
scratch with a new profile. And, while I know how to do that and have
done so in the past (I have been using Seamonkey's predecessors all the
way back to Netscape 2, at least), I really would like to avoid the
considerable work that would be involved in setting all my stuff back.

Any ideas?



I'm using SeaMonkey 2.2a1pre, and there might be differences, but I've 
noticed recently that some HTML message came up garbled (especially in 
email here though). I noticed after some fiddling that hitting F5 almost 
always restored the correct view. Maybe you should try that?


Another possibility would be a firewall or proxy blocking the images but 
I don't think that is it.


A corrupt program file is less often a problem than an obsolete file, 
which was present in older builds but has disappeared in recent ones, 
and has not been removed by a reinstall of the program over itself. That 
has caused me no end of trouble in the past, and reinstalling the 
program again wouldn't cure it, because unpacking the archive is a 
strictly additive process, it never removes anything (at least on Linux 
where I am). The solution was to remove the "old" installation folder 
and all its contents just before unpacking the "new" archive (for 
instance here on Linux, and for the version I'm using:


rm -Rvf /usr/local/seamonkey
tar -jxvC /usr/local -f seamonkey-2.2a1pre.en-US.linux-x86_64.tar.bz2

). Doing this doesn't touch my Preferences or my Extensions because they 
are elsewhere, in my profile folder (somewhere under my home directory), 
not under the installation directory.



Best regards,
Tony.
--
Kansas state law requires pedestrians crossing the highways at night to
wear tail lights.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: The line break that isn't?

2011-04-14 Thread Tony Mechelynck


On 15/04/11 01:00, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:

I've noticed a strange behavior from SM in my outgoing mail: if I send a
line that exceeds 72 characters and contains Asian text at the end, the
program inserts an extraneous space at every 72nd character, but it
doesn't actually force a line break (more below). For Western text, it
doesn't break words this way, but for Asian text it does.

For example, when I posted the following sentence to a mailing list
(without these line breaks):

I get 27,500 hits for +"핸디폰" (haendiphon), vs. 37.2
million for 핸드폰 (haendeuphon) and 3.4 million for
+"이동 전화" (idong cheonhwa, the native term).

SeaMonkey inserted a space between 핸드 and 폰 (breaking the word), so
the middle of the sentence looked like this:

vs. 37.2 million for 핸드 폰 (haendeuphon)

instead of this:

vs. 37.2 million for 핸드폰 (haendeuphon)

As nearly as I can tell by viewing the source code of this message, SM
did break the line at this point, inserting a space, but unbroke it for
display purposes, and failed to delete the extraneous space when
displaying the message.

So I guess my question is, do we have an option to tell SM not to break
Korean words at line ends? I'd like it to treat them with just as much
respect as English words -- either carry over the entire word, or not.



I don't know if there is an option, but IIUC the reason for this 
behaviour is that sometimes in CJK languages whole sentences are written 
without word breaks, and linebreaks may happen between any two wide 
glyphs if required by the width of the text column.


With the email "format=flowed" convention, the text is transmitted over 
the Net in "reasonably" short lines, then reassembled on arrival and 
displayed in the whole width of the receiving mailer's window. This 
convention was thought up by people using "alphabetic" scripts where all 
words are separated by spaces, so whenever a linebreak is suppressed a 
space is added in its stead.


I don't see anything relevant in Edit → Preferences, but in about:config 
I see two Boolean preferences by filtering on "flowed" (without the 
quotes): you might try toggling one of them, the other, or both, and see 
what happens.



Best regards,
Tony.
--
Be different: conform.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Support for large mail boxes

2011-04-12 Thread Tony Mechelynck


On 12/04/11 17:39, Mike wrote:

Tony Mechelynck wrote:


Mike, I have about a dozen additional folders on my Mail account into
which I drag-and-drop my mail, e.g. 2011_Family, 2011_Jokes, 2011_Linux,
etc.

Then, on New Years Day (or there-abouts), I move all these folders onto
my Local Folders account, and give myself a new set of folders on the
mail account.

Using Local Folders means all my mail is with-in easy reach.


At the risk of being a little transparent:

http://www.phivegills.com/seamonkey.png

I do use the global inbox feature, and then mainly filter email based on
account into sub folders of the Inbox. I do this to avoid vertical
scrolling in the left folder view pane. Am I "doing it wrong"?



Probably not; but I see two "Inbox" folders in your screenshot. Surely 
they are not both the Global Inbox? Also, I don't see any "Local 
Folders" account?



Best regards,
Tony.
--
You will lose your present job and have to become a door to door
mayonnaise salesman.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Support for large mail boxes

2011-04-12 Thread Tony Mechelynck


On 12/04/11 14:44, Daniel wrote:

Mike wrote:

I use Seamonkey (2.0.13) to check several mail boxes. I've used this
software since before Moz Suite supported tabbed browsing. My point is,
I have a lot of email. And I like SM but it's crawling. I've compacted
all the folders, but changing from one account or folder or email to
another takes 5 to 10 seconds sometimes, rarely even more. Frequent
pauses in composing emails happens as well.

A couple POP accounts have about 2000 messages, another has 7K, and my
main POP account has about 14k. I delete junk and unimportant messages
such as list email, so what is left is mail I wish to have for search or
archive.

Am I seeing expected behavior for the size of mailboxes I have? If not
what can I tune? If not, how can I archive mail older than a certain
date in a manner that I can quickly/easily get to it for search? TIA!



Mike, I have about a dozen additional folders on my Mail account into
which I drag-and-drop my mail, e.g. 2011_Family, 2011_Jokes, 2011_Linux,
etc.

Then, on New Years Day (or there-abouts), I move all these folders onto
my Local Folders account, and give myself a new set of folders on the
mail account.

Using Local Folders means all my mail is with-in easy reach.

HTH

Daniel


...and I use the Global Inbox (Inbox on Local Folders) but I don't keep 
mail there: I have filters to sort "repeat mail" to separate folders 
(e.g. anything from bugzilla-dae...@mozilla.org goes to a "Mozilla 
bugmail" folder); when it's harder to automate I move them about 
manually, and of course there's the Junk folder for spam. The result is 
that at the end of the day my Inbox folder is empty.


Best regards,
Tony.
--
Proposed Additions to the PDP-11 Instruction Set:

PI  Punch Invalid
POPIPunch Operator Immediately
PVLCPunch Variable Length Card
RASCRead And Shred Card
RPM Read Programmers Mind
RSSCreduce speed, step carefully  (for improved accuracy)
RTABRewind tape and break
RWDSK   rewind disk
RWOCRead Writing On Card
SCRBL   scribble to disk  - faster than a write
SLC Search for Lost Chord
SPSWScramble Program Status Word
SRSDSeek Record and Scar Disk
STROM   Store in Read Only Memory
TDB Transfer and Drop Bit
WBT Water Binary Tree
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: It seems going to HTML source more than once just trashes my heading etc.

2011-04-12 Thread Tony Mechelynck


On 12/04/11 13:05, Rick Merrill wrote:

KRUB wrote:

Well, thanks Tony but the lines are blank, not continuations of
anything. It doesn't seem to happen in the body. But this is a minor
hindrance compared to the editor going wacko on me. I don't use it
for e-mails, I am continually editing a WEB site and it is not an
option.


The blank lines only affect our personal sense of coding aesthetics. I
have seen the same thing so I keep my own lines trimmed and use
SeaMonkey Composer and that keeps
the problem minimal.


As I said, a truly *empty* line (with not even a space in it) marks the 
end of the headers, so it affects more than just aesthetics. OTOH, a 
blank *nonempty* line in the headers (i.e. a line consisting of *at 
least one* space or tab) *is* technically a continuation line -- it adds 
one space to the previous line, which normally makes no difference.




My guess is that there is a residual 'formatted' embedded somewhere in
the code.



And to make sure there is no misunderstanding, by "headers" I mean email 
or newsgroup headers: here are those of the message to which I'm 
replying here, and the next line is empty:


(I'm using "Paste as Quotation" to avoid additional line breaks) (Notice 
the continuation line starting with one space after the "Subject:" line, 
and also notice the absence of embedded empty lines.)



Path: 
Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.mozilla.org!news.mozilla.org.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 06:05:44 -0500
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 07:05:42 -0400
From: Rick Merrill 
Organization: batco
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.18) 
Gecko/20110320 SeaMonkey/2.0.13 Firefox/3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: mozilla.support.seamonkey
Subject: Re: It seems going to HTML source more than once just trashes my
 heading etc.
References: <2610de4e-b3ba-448e-8eb0-6af15684c...@f30g2000yqa.googlegroups.com> 
 
<58ed1e6b-fd0b-4b59-86a2-810056974...@u12g2000vbf.googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <58ed1e6b-fd0b-4b59-86a2-810056974...@u12g2000vbf.googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: 
Lines: 13
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.63.58.8
X-AuthenticatedUsername: NoAuthUser
X-Trace: 
sv3-Rr8ul4sZrbio1RKFIIXPvxhLvR5qClhHisd4pfZMycxTs0JVJRb7ueGSSRen6ofRvxSWhu3jbu8ugLL!uM/9Pnp0g4EhFUxmw3uxmpgkV6zpJ0yHDtNFVX6Fk7MI6TMOQV0VWUHtaBInLXXAvTBzjEKou/X3!SsvV3Yut
X-Complaints-To: ab...@mozilla.org
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: ab...@mozilla.org
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint 
properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 2160
X-Original-Bytes: 2099
Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com mozilla.support.seamonkey:59767



Best regards,
Tony.
--
Space is big.  You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind-
bogglingly big it is.  I mean, you may think it's a long way down the
road to the drug store, but that's just peanuts to space.
-- "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy"
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: It seems going to HTML source more than once just trashes my heading etc.

2011-04-11 Thread Tony Mechelynck


On 10/04/11 19:03, KRUB wrote:

First of all, what is with all the line spaces (in source) that are
getting put in?  I often see 5 blank lines added between lines in my
header.


Blank lines or empty lines?

Empty lines should not happen between header lines, since the fist blank 
line is what separates "headers" from "body".


Lines beginning with whitespace (i.e. with spaces or tabs) are 
continuation lines, they should be regarded as "continuing" the previous 
line: the leading whitespace and the preceding linebreak together are 
treated as just one space.


Now a line consisting only of *one* or more spaces (a blank line which 
is not an empty line)... I'm not 100% sure, but I think that the 
receiving mailer would treat such a line as if it didn't exist.



It seems if I go back and forth between source and regular more than
once or twice sea monkey decides to change all my "<" type characters
to their html equivalent.  the ones in the header that are not
supposed to be "equivalent."  Something is going to have to change
else I'm going to be forced to find another editor, something really
strange about Seamonkey.  This just started recently too.  The line
spaces I've had before and the problem went away and now it is back.


Hm. Apparently the HTML composer is not 100% perfect. Personally I 
prefer sending my messages in plaintext; YMMV.



Best regards,
Tony.
--
The scum also rises.
-- Dr. Hunter S. Thompson
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: What do these SeaMonkey errors mean?

2011-04-11 Thread Tony Mechelynck


On 10/04/11 23:32, Robert Gault wrote:

Tony Mechelynck wrote:

On 09/04/11 16:20, Robert Gault wrote:

I clear the SeaMonkey 2.0.13 error console, set the home page to Blank
Page, and leave SeaMonkey. The next time SeaMonkey is started, the error
console shows five warnings:
Unrecognized at-rule or error parsing at-rule '@import'.
chrome://navigator/skin/navigator.css Line: 615
Unrecognized at-rule or error parsing at-rule '@import'.
chrome://navigator/skin/navigator.css Line: 616
Unrecognized at-rule or error parsing at-rule '@import'.
chrome://navigator/skin/navigator.css Line: 617
Unrecognized at-rule or error parsing at-rule '@import'.
chrome://navigator/skin/navigator.css Line: 619
Unrecognized at-rule or error parsing at-rule '@import'.
chrome://navigator/skin/navigator.css Line: 914

Lines 615-619
@import url("chrome://navigator/content/navigator.css");
@import url("chrome://communicator/skin/");
@import
url("chrome://communicator/skin/bookmarks/bookmarksToolbar.css");

@namespace
url("http://www.mozilla.org/keymaster/gatekeeper/there.is.only.xul";);

Line 914
white-space: -moz-pre-wrap;

Are these known bugs or is my installation at fault?
WinXP SP3 Home system


There ought to be nothing before an @import rule, except maybe comments,
blank lines, and other @import rules (this is a W3C requirement on the
CSS @import rule syntax). More than six hundred lines with only comments
and other @import rules in them sounds a little bizarre to me.

What theme are you using? These errors seem (IIUC) to point to a
navigator.css file in your theme, but (AFAICT) the one in my SeaMonkey
default skin (but it's a trunk build, 2.2a1pre not 2.0.13) has a
"License block" as a comment at lines 1-37, line 38 is empty, and the
three @import lines, empty line, and @namespace line which you quote are
at lines 39-43. The whole file (seen in Vim on Linux as
zipfile:/usr/local/seamonkey/omni.jar::chrome/classic/skin/classic/navigator/navigator.css)

is 716 lines long. But then the Linux default theme might be different
from the Windows default theme.

In the Modern theme's navigator.css
(zipfile:/usr/local/seamonkey/extensions/mod...@themes.mozilla.org.xpi::chrome/modern/skin/modern/navigator/navigator.css),

I see those same lines one line further down (i.e. at lines 38-44) and
the style sheet is 902 lines long. I wouldn't expect the *Modern* theme
to be very different across platforms. Yet this is the "trunk" version.


Best regards,
Tony.


Thank you Tony. You spotted the source of the problem if not the exact
cause.

I'm not sure how/why this occurred but I was using Classic Default as a
theme. Switching to SeaMonkey Default removed the errors and reverting
to Classic Default returned them.

I guess I'll stay with SeaMonkey Default. If this classifies as a bug,
maybe you can report it.

Robert


I can't report it because I can't reproduce it: in my version of 
SeaMonkey, the only built-in themes are "SeaMonkey default" and 
"Modern", and neither of them gives me that bug.


If you think it worthwhile, you should report it yourself, since only 
you can give all details of what you did and what happened.


If that "Classic default" theme you mention was not distributed built-in 
with SeaMonkey (if it was something you installed separately), then you 
should complain to the theme author, i.e. not to Mozilla unless the 
author *was* Mozilla.


(And you may or may not know that bugs for Mozilla products including 
SeaMonkey are reported at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/ , that you need 
to register -- or, if you already did, to make sure you are logged-in -- 
before you can open a new bug, and that the cost of registering is $0.00.)



Best regards,
Tony.
--
Men's skin is different from women's skin.  It is usually bigger, and
it has more snakes tattooed on it.  Also, if you examine a woman's skin
very closely, inch by inch, starting at her shapely ankles, then gently
tracing the slender curve of her calves, then moving up to her ...
[EDITOR'S NOTE: To make room for news articles about important
 world events such as agriculture, we're going to delete the
 next few square feet of the woman's skin.  Thank you.]
... until finally the two of you are lying there, spent, smoking your
cigarettes, and suddenly it hits you: Human skin is actually made up of
billions of tiny units of protoplasm, called "cells"!  And what is even
more interesting, the ones on the outside are all dying!  This is a
fact.  Your skin is like an aggressive modern corporation, where the
older veteran cells, who have finally worked their way to the top and
obtained offices with nice views, are constantly being shoved out the
window head first, without so much as a pension plan, by younger
hotshot cells moving up from below.
-- Dave Barry, "Saving Face"
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: What do these SeaMonkey errors mean?

2011-04-10 Thread Tony Mechelynck


On 09/04/11 16:20, Robert Gault wrote:

I clear the SeaMonkey 2.0.13 error console, set the home page to Blank
Page, and leave SeaMonkey. The next time SeaMonkey is started, the error
console shows five warnings:
Unrecognized at-rule or error parsing at-rule '@import'.
chrome://navigator/skin/navigator.css Line: 615
Unrecognized at-rule or error parsing at-rule '@import'.
chrome://navigator/skin/navigator.css Line: 616
Unrecognized at-rule or error parsing at-rule '@import'.
chrome://navigator/skin/navigator.css Line: 617
Unrecognized at-rule or error parsing at-rule '@import'.
chrome://navigator/skin/navigator.css Line: 619
Unrecognized at-rule or error parsing at-rule '@import'.
chrome://navigator/skin/navigator.css Line: 914

Lines 615-619
@import url("chrome://navigator/content/navigator.css");
@import url("chrome://communicator/skin/");
@import url("chrome://communicator/skin/bookmarks/bookmarksToolbar.css");

@namespace
url("http://www.mozilla.org/keymaster/gatekeeper/there.is.only.xul";);

Line 914
white-space: -moz-pre-wrap;

Are these known bugs or is my installation at fault?
WinXP SP3 Home system


There ought to be nothing before an @import rule, except maybe comments, 
blank lines, and other @import rules (this is a W3C requirement on the 
CSS @import rule syntax). More than six hundred lines with only comments 
and other @import rules in them sounds a little bizarre to me.


What theme are you using? These errors seem (IIUC) to point to a 
navigator.css file in your theme, but (AFAICT) the one in my SeaMonkey 
default skin (but it's a trunk build, 2.2a1pre not 2.0.13) has a 
"License block" as a comment at lines 1-37, line 38 is empty, and the 
three @import lines, empty line, and @namespace line which you quote are 
at lines 39-43. The whole file (seen in Vim on Linux as 
zipfile:/usr/local/seamonkey/omni.jar::chrome/classic/skin/classic/navigator/navigator.css) 
is 716 lines long. But then the Linux default theme might be different 
from the Windows default theme.


In the Modern theme's navigator.css 
(zipfile:/usr/local/seamonkey/extensions/mod...@themes.mozilla.org.xpi::chrome/modern/skin/modern/navigator/navigator.css), 
I see those same lines one line further down (i.e. at lines 38-44) and 
the style sheet is 902 lines long. I wouldn't expect the *Modern* theme 
to be very different across platforms. Yet this is the "trunk" version.



Best regards,
Tony.
--
Why do we have two eyes?  To watch 3-D movies with.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SM 2.1b3 User Interface Changes

2011-04-10 Thread Tony Mechelynck


On 09/04/11 14:30, WLS wrote:
[...]

I like Tony's multirow tab bar.

WLS


I just uploaded my current SeaMonkey userChrome.css as 
http://users.skynet.be/antoine.mechelynck/other/userChrome-seamonkey.css


That file lives in the chrome subfolder of the profile, and doesn't 
exist by default. Rename it to userChrome.css and (re)start SeaMonkey in 
order to use it. You may want to eyeball it and make some changes, 
perhaps with the help of the DOM Inspector.



Best regards,
Tony.
--
Q:  Why do ducks have flat feet?
A:  To stamp out forest fires.

Q:  Why do elephants have flat feet?
A:  To stamp out flaming ducks.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SM 2.1b3 User Interface Changes

2011-04-09 Thread Tony Mechelynck


On 09/04/11 04:31, NoOp wrote:

On 04/08/2011 06:43 PM, WLS wrote:

[...]

Did you know SeaMonkey had tabs on top before all the browsers? Just
collapse all the tool bars and you will see what I mean. Yes, I am going
out on a limb with that statement.


You are as I've never seen tabs on top. Got a screenshot of tabs on top
with SeaMonkey?


:-) http://users.skynet.be/antoine.mechelynck/other/tabs-on-top.png

The multirow tab bar is an enhancement from my userChrome.css -- you may 
disregard it if what interests you is only the "tabs on top in 
SeaMonkey" concept.


Best regards,
Tony.
--
"No, `Eureka' is Greek for `This bath is too hot.'"
-- Dr. Who
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey with Thunderbird and Firefox?

2011-04-06 Thread Tony Mechelynck

On 07/04/11 05:18, Jay O'Brien wrote:

I would like to install Thunderbird and Firefox in addition to SeaMonkey so that I can verify ISP and server
problems with "supported" applications and avoid the support personnel finger pointing to the
"unsupported" and unknown to them "SeaMonkey".

My ISP has an intermittent SMTP problem I've tried to get them to fix, they say
it is my unsupported mail client. My bank had an access problem they blamed on
SeaMonkey, but the Bank ultimately fixed their problem. I would like to be able
to avoid these issues, but I want to continue to use SeaMonkey.

Is it possible to install Thunderbird in addition to SeaMonkey so that it will
use the SeaMonkey profile and mail files? Is it possible to install Firefox in
addition to SeaMonkey and have it use the SeaMonkey profile, password, and
bookmark files?

It is my desire to be able to use Thunderbird or Firefox when troubleshooting a
problem, thus avoiding the support folks blaming SeaMonkey for the problem
being reviewed.

Help Please?

Jay O'Brien
Folsom, California

First, the bad news:
- You can NEVER use one profile in more than one program instance at a time.
- Normally you shouldn't use a single profile in different applications,
there may be incompatibilities between them. For instance in the past,
Firefox moved its bookmarks from bookmark.htm (or something) to
places.sqlite much earlier than SeaMonkey did. Some preferences may have
different meanings or different defaults. And so on. (Whenever a Mozilla
app sees that a preference has been set to what has now become the
current default, it omits the preference when saving at closedown. The
next time the default changes, you'll get the new default. Now if a
Boolean pref defaults to true in Firefox and to false in SeaMonkey...
YSWIM.)
- It *is* possible to run Firefox and/or SeaMonkey and/or Thunderbird
all at the same time, but each with its own profile. You might even set
up the same mail accounts in SeaMonkey and Thunderbird, but in that
case, if it's a POP3 server, you'll probably want one of them to "Leave
mail on server". (For IMAP4 leaving mail on server is the normal
behaviour.) Similarly you may define the same bookmarks and passwords in
the *different* profiles used by SeaMonkey and Firefox.

And now the good news:
- With Firefox 4 (or later), SeaMonkey 2.1 beta (or later), you may use
Sync to synchronise passwords, bookmarks, etc. between different
profiles, even between Firefox (for desktop/laptop), Firefox-mobile (for
smartphone) and SeaMonkey. On recent builds, you don't even need an
extension for that.

Best regards,
Tony.
--
If I could drop dead right now, I'd be the happiest man alive!
-- Samuel Goldwyn
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Tab Browsing

2011-04-06 Thread Tony Mechelynck


On 03/04/11 23:29, Danny Kile wrote:

Tab Browsing, my browser use to open a new tab to the right of the
active tab. It now open all the way to the right. I can not seem to find
the setting where I controlled this. Any help would be appreciated.

Thank you, Danny


IIUC it's the preference browser.tabs.insertRelatedAfterCurrent (in 
about:config ). Depending on your browser version, there may or may not 
be a checkbox or radiobutton for it somewhere under Edit → Preferences.


_Possible values_
true = right of parent
false = at far right

The doc ( http://kb.mozillazine.org/About:config_entries then search for 
"browser. tabs. insertRelatedAfterCurrent" without the quotes but with a 
space after each full stop) says the default is true in Fx4.0 and later, 
false in Fx3.6, not governed by a pref (and always behaves like "false") 
in Fx3.5 and earlier, doesn't say whether it applies also to SeaMonkey 
(but the pref exists and defaults to true in my Sm2.2a1pre).


_Version equivalence_ (disregarding sub-versions, alpha/beta, etc., and 
also obsolete versions)

Gecko Firefox  SeaMonkey
1.9.1 3.5  2.0
1.9.2 3.6  n/a
2.0   4.0  2.1
2.2   4.2  2.2

Note that prefs which happen to be set at their default value are 
forgotten, with the result that if you switch back and forth between two 
versions which have different defaults for a boolean pref, that pref's 
setting will be forgotten: the pref will be "forced to default" and will 
thereafter behave according to whatever is the current default. See 
http://kb.mozillazine.org/User.js for a possible workaround.



Best regards,
Tony.
--
Genius may have its limitations, but stupidity is not thus
handicapped.
-- Elbert Hubbard
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Mail Outbox

2011-03-30 Thread Tony Mechelynck


On 29/03/11 17:44, JohnW-Mpls wrote:


On my SM Mail page, the Local Folder has an Outbox.  Is the operation
of that Outbox described anywhere?  I did not find it in Help.

A few weeks ago I started to send 4 messages with similar content to 4
different addresses every day and the Outbox is handy for mailing all
four about the same time each day.  To separate things, I copied the
Outbox icon from under the Local Folder to under the "4 massage"
account so releasing affects only that 4.   Well, the Outbox looks
pretty there but it's totally worthless - can't get anything into it,
or out of it, nor even delete the dumb icon.

So help: any way to use an Outbox per account?  Or, how can I delete
that excess Icon?



Take what I say below with a grain of salt: I'm certain of nothing.

I *think* that the Outbox is used to store temporarily messages on which 
you have clicked "Send" but whose sending has not yet either succeeded 
or failed. Maybe it is needed, but only for internal use by the mailer.


I *think* that a folder (which may be called Outbox if your locale is 
English, but also something else if you're in a different locale) is "an 
outbox" is marked by flags set on that folder. Perhaps there is some 
extension to help you see those flags, or even manipulate them.



Best regards,
Tony.
--
Really heard in court in the U.S.A.:
Q.: Doctor, is it really true that when someone dies while sleeping, he 
or she

doesn't realize it until the next morning?
A.: Is it really true that you passed your exams before being admitted 
to the

Bar?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: How do I send saved messages as an attachment?

2011-03-28 Thread Tony Mechelynck


On 28/03/11 22:40, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
[...]

Weird -- I just tried it myself and the two files had slightly different
sizes. Wonder what's going on...



If the difference in size is equal to the number of lines, it could be 
because text sent by mail MUST be in Dos/Windows format (with both CR 
and LF, or 0x0D 0x0A, at the end of every line) and the mailer will 
convert it if necessary; while text stored on a Unix computer is usually 
in Unix format (LF only, or 0x0A without 0x0D). IIUC (but I might be 
wrong) the Mac convention used to be CR alone but on Mac OS X the Unix 
conventions are used.



Best regards,
Tony.
--
Rule of Feline Frustration:
When your cat has fallen asleep on your lap and looks utterly
content and adorable, you will suddenly have to go to the bathroom.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Does Seamonkey use latest Firefox "engine"?


On 28/03/11 03:34, NoOp wrote:

On 03/27/2011 01:18 AM, Stereotactic wrote:



On 03/27/2011 01:45 PM, Stéphane Grégoire wrote:

Hi,

Stereotactic a tapoté, le 27/03/2011 06:43:

Does Sea Monkey use the
firefox "rendering engine"?


I can say :

Seamonkey 2.0 ~ Thunderbird 3.0 + Firefox 3.5

Seamonkey 2.1 ~ Thunderbird 3.3 + Firefox 4.0

Where can I download the latest build? Does this have a ppa for Ubuntu
10.10? I'd be more than happy to report bugs and assist around here on
the lists.



PPA - Joe is quite reliable:
https://launchpad.net/~seamonkey2/+archive/seamonkey-2-test

However, its just as easy to down load from
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/2.1b2
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.1b2/

extract to a home folder&  run from there. Be aware that many/most of
your extensions etc will *not* work (including lightning) unless you
know how to modify the extension files.


...or which pref to create in about:config to forbid auto-disabling of 
incompatible addons.


Lightning 1.0b4pre is compatible with SeaMonkey 2.2a1pre (and, I think, 
also with 2.1b3pre): it works quite well, even without a compatibility 
override.




Were I you, I wouldn't count on the Ubuntu maintainers for valid
updates/maintenance:

https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/seamonkey
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/seamonkey
You can see that even Natty (yet to be released) is still at
2.0.11+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu2
and IMO the Ubuntu "maintainers" are not only non-existent, but are also
negligent as they've added no security patches/updates in 14 weeks.

You're better off relying on Joe Leskow, or using the builds directly
from Mozilla. Anything "mozilla" on Unbuntu outside of Firefox or
Thunderbird is both suspect and unmaintained.




Best regards,
Tony.
--
This life is a test.  It is only a test.  Had this been an actual life,
you would have received further instructions as to what to do and where
to go.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Some thoughts


On 28/03/11 01:22, Ray_Net wrote:

Stereotactic wrote:

.




AAs I understand it, the volunteers working on SeaMonkey a in the
process of making thie mail & Newsgroup screen become a tab in the
browser but not quite there yet.



I have zero coding skills :( But I am very keen to work for the browser.
Please tell me where to start from; I'd be glad to assist (just have
some prior academic commitments though- but should be over by end of
this month:)

And yes, that would be great.


No ! I prefer to have mails&News separated ...


Oh, even if it becomes a tab, you can always open that tab in a new window.

I guess though, that having a browser URL bar on top of the 3-pane 
MailNews window would take some getting used to.


Best regards,
Tony.
--
"My country, right or wrong," is a thing that no patriot would think of
saying except in a desperate case.  It is like saying, "My mother,
drunk or sober."
-- G. K. Chesterton
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Back and Forward buttons don't work


On 27/03/11 14:45, Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:

Daniel wrote:


Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:

Alex wrote:
[snip]

The clicked email link opens in a new window but I don't want to go
back to email but start navigating within the browser and it
doesn't work.


So then, I've already answered your question. You open the clicked
link in a new window. There are no links in this window to go back
to. If you want to "navigate" from there, you'll have to click on a
link in the page's content somewhere .. a menu or whatever .. or
type something in the location bar .. but there are *no* back links
in the history of that window (or forward links until you've gone
somewhere else and then back).


Alex, if I read between the lines a bit, maybe you mean that you have a
browser page open, then clicking on the link replaces the web site you
were at and you are wanting to get back to the page that you had open.


I thought that might be possible, so is why I asked the pointed
question. To which he answered: "The clicked email link opens in a new
window". Since new windows have no history yet, it is what fits.  :-)



There are two possible solutions that jump to my mind:
* If you change your preferences to open the link in the same tab, the 
Back and Forward buttons will work as expected.
* If you install the "Duplicate This Tab" extension, you'll be able to 
click right on a link, then "Open Link in Duplicated Tab" which will 
duplicate the history, allowing you to use Back and Forward in the new 
tab. The same extension offers, by right-clicking on a tab in the tab 
bar, "Duplicate to New Window", which copies that tab, with its history, 
to a new window, and "Detach Tab", which moves the tab (with its 
history) out of its current window and into a new one.



Best regards,
Tony.
--
New York is real.  The rest is done with mirrors.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Thank you, SeaMonkey developers.


On 27/03/11 18:25, Dano wrote:

On Mar 23, 8:25 am, Stan  wrote:

I'd like to express my appreciation to all the developers and others who
have devoted themselves to keeping SeaMonkey alive and still the most
logical way for integrating browser, mail, newsgroups, and other things.

I started in 1997 with Netscape and thanks to so many of you I am still
going strong on that path with SeaMonkey.  Thank you again for making
this possible.

Stan Pierce


Hey Stan...
Thanks for stating this publicly. I whole-heartedly agree with your
comments.
I have been using Netscape, and then SeaMonkey for many years.
I have encouraged a number of my friends to use it as well.
One of my "selling points" is that hackers and virus writers go for
the "more popular" or "better known" browsers.
SeaMonkey is not one of those, so I'm convinced that it (we) are not
in their line of fire.

Thnx...Dano


Maybe, maybe not. The Gecko rendering engine is common to Firefox, 
Thunderbird and SeaMonkey, remember, so exploits targeting Firefox could 
conceivably hit (Thunderbird HTML and) SeaMonkey as well. It is true 
though, that MSIE and Windows still have the bigger share of the 
worldwide market, so on SeaMonkey on Linux I don't feel like being near 
the center of the enemy's fire.



Best regards,
Tony.
--
"But what we need to know is, do people want nasally-insertable
computers?"
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Does Seamonkey use latest Firefox "engine"?


On 27/03/11 06:43, Stereotactic wrote:

Hi!

I am new here so please excuse my naivette. Does Sea Monkey use the
firefox "rendering engine"? If yes, what does it take to use the latest
Firefox 4 and combine it with thunderbird code base to give best of both
the worlds in Sea Monkey?

I had earlier used it but found it to be slower than FF 3.6 so dropped
the idea. With release of FF 4, I am excited to use "ALL IN ONE" app.

What is the way forward?

Thanks!



With SeaMonkey 2.1x and later, it's easy to know which Firefox version 
is built on the same version of the Gecko rendering engine as your 
current SeaMonkey version: if you have "Advertise Firefox compatibility" 
ticked in your "Advanced / HTTP Networking" preferences (which is the 
default), you'll see the equivalent Firefox version mentioned on the 
last line of Help => About SeaMonkey, for instance like this:


* Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:2.2a1pre) 
Gecko/20110327 Firefox/4.2a1pre SeaMonkey/2.2a1pre


This is the latest "bleeding-edge" nightly I'm using, and I'm happy with 
it; but as Robert Kaiser said, there are unfixed bugs in it -- 
apparently in parts I'm not using, but YMMV. For slightly "more 
conservative" testing, SeaMonkey 2.1, equivalent to Firefox 4.0, also 
includes this "Firefox version" feature. Its "beta 2" version (SeaMonkey 
2.1b2) has been released around Valentine's day, or you can get the 
latest SeaMonkey 2.1 nightlies from 
http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-2.0/ (or 
latest-comm-2.0-l10n if you want menus & messages in some language other 
than United States English).



Best regards,
Tony.
--
Quick!!  Act as if nothing has happened!
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: For those who upgraded their AdBlock Plus to v1.3.5 in SM v2.0.x... (P.S.)


On 27/03/11 22:57, Tony Mechelynck wrote:

On 27/03/11 16:43, Ant wrote:

Hello!

I just upgraded my AdBlock Plus extension v1.3.3 to v1.3.5 in Mozilla's
SeaMonkey v1.3.5 and restarted it. Then, I noticed its new toolbar icon
in Mail & Newsgroups window:
http://img823.imageshack.us/img823/1139/mailandnewssm2013abp135.jpg ...
Did anyone else get this too?

I saw this in my old, updated Windows XP Pro. SP3 machine. I did not see
this problem in my Debian/Linux computer though. I posted my issue in
ABP's forum: https://adblockplus.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=7217 just
in case. I wanted to see if other SM2 users have this problem too or if
it was just me.

Thank you in advance. :)


Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:2.2a1pre) Gecko/20110327
Firefox/4.2a1pre SeaMonkey/2.2a1pre
ID:20110327003001

Now that you mention it, I see the Adblock Plus icon in the MailNews
window. I don't see it as a problem; in fact, to me it would be normal
for Adblock Plus to "do its stuff" in HTML mail, or in RSS articles, or
in the "Mail Start Page", all of which are in HTML and may appear in the
preview pane of the 3-pane window.

And since I don't regard it as a problem, I couldn't say when that icon
first appeared.


Best regards,
Tony.


P.S.: Ah, sorry, you meant in the toolbar, not in the statusbar. I have 
"Show in Toolbar" unchecked in my ABP preferences, so I don't see the 
icon in any toolbar, and also not on the buttons customization palette. 
But of course if I checked it it would appear either in a toolbar or in 
the palette on every window where I now have the ABP icon in the bottom 
right corner.


Best regards,
Tony.
--
hundred-and-one symptoms of being an internet addict:
38. You wake up at 3 a.m. to go to the bathroom and stop and check your 
e-mail

on the way back to bed.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: For those who upgraded their AdBlock Plus to v1.3.5 in SM v2.0.x...


On 27/03/11 16:43, Ant wrote:

Hello!

I just upgraded my AdBlock Plus extension v1.3.3 to v1.3.5 in Mozilla's
SeaMonkey v1.3.5 and restarted it. Then, I noticed its new toolbar icon
in Mail & Newsgroups window:
http://img823.imageshack.us/img823/1139/mailandnewssm2013abp135.jpg ...
Did anyone else get this too?

I saw this in my old, updated Windows XP Pro. SP3 machine. I did not see
this problem in my Debian/Linux computer though. I posted my issue in
ABP's forum: https://adblockplus.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=7217 just
in case. I wanted to see if other SM2 users have this problem too or if
it was just me.

Thank you in advance. :)


Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:2.2a1pre) Gecko/20110327 
Firefox/4.2a1pre SeaMonkey/2.2a1pre

ID:20110327003001

Now that you mention it, I see the Adblock Plus icon in the MailNews 
window. I don't see it as a problem; in fact, to me it would be normal 
for Adblock Plus to "do its stuff" in HTML mail, or in RSS articles, or 
in the "Mail Start Page", all of which are in HTML and may appear in the 
preview pane of the 3-pane window.


And since I don't regard it as a problem, I couldn't say when that icon 
first appeared.



Best regards,
Tony.
--
U:  There's a U -- a Unicorn!
Run right up and rub its horn.
Look at all those points you're losing!
UMBER HULKS are so confusing.
-- The Roguelet's ABC
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Future of PPC support in Seamonkey


On 27/03/11 00:34, PhillipJones wrote:

Ray_Net wrote:

Jens Hatlak wrote:

Adam Jimerson wrote:

Unless something has changed Seamonkey 2.1 is still no long
compatible with PPC correct?


Correct. The platform SM 2.1 will be based on, Mozilla 2.0, dropped PPC
support.



1. Is this so important ... dropping PPC support ?
2. BTW What is PPC ?


PowerPC that used a RISC Processor from Motorola

Yes it important I just updated to Intel Machine only 3 weeks ago. And
it cost me a good 6 thousand to do so. Counting the Computer and the
Software. Just updating Software has cost me about 2-2.5 K. Not everyone
can afford to upgrade. I really can't I had to dig into my retirement
fund to do. When your 62 (Monday the 28th) and already.


Thousands? Dollars, presumably? Good gracious! Sounds totally out of 
proportion to me -- but what do I know? I don't use my computer to write 
synthetic music or to produce complex computer-assisted 3D drawings, not 
to mention animation movies. A week or two ago I upgraded my Linux tower 
to a twin-core 2.8 GHz x86_64 (Pentium 4) with 2GiB RAM in a somewhat 
smaller case than the older one and it cost me (including a laser 
printer) a mere couple of hundred euros. Yes, hundreds, not thousands; 
but I already had a working keyboard, screen and ADSL interface which 
could be fitted to the new machine. I even brought back into service a 
couple of speakers which had been collecting dust on top of a shelf for 
at least five years. Software cost me exactly 0.00€; even the download 
volume for the x86_64 version of the OS, and then for the next release, 
did not (and by far) exceed my monthly allowance (above which my 
pay-by-month Internet contract becomes 1€ per additional gigabyte). As 
for horsepower, this machine handles over 150 browser tabs, plus 
mailnews, chat, and CD audio playback, all at the same time with no 
apparent problem -- my CPUs seem to be typically some 60% idle.




10.7 Lion will be even more of a shock. there will be absolutely no
scintilla of PowerPC code. In fact Universal Binary will be a thing of
the pass as even Rosetta will be removed. So I ill have even more apps
That I will have to replace. Eventually this update will likely cost me
10K over time. But computer makers and software designers don't care
about financial hardships , what they do impose upon Users.

The days of using a Pencil and paper are gone. And its costly own a
Computer. Sure you can get a 2-400 dollar computer at WalMart. But if
you want to do more than get on the internet. You better have something
with some horsepower. And, horsepower takes Dough. Apple use to to the
most expensive Computers. But I've been in a computer store here that
sells Dell and other PCs and there are some Dells that cost as much Macs.



Best regards,
Tony.
--
Really heard in court in the U.S.A.:
Q.: Are you sexually active?
A.: No, I let my partner take the initiative.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Seamonkey No Longer Working


On 26/03/11 14:52, The Devil wrote:

I have downloaded the latest version 2.0.13 and since then Seamonkey
has stopped working. I cannot access any websites seamonkey just hangs
at the loading screen. I therefore reloaded 2.0.12 and am encountering
the same problem. I have been using Seamonkey for many years and am
frustrated and disappointed that such a good browser is no longer
funtional.


Something must have happened, probably something that you did, but the 
way you tell it it's hard to say what, or to reproduce the problem. More 
details would be welcome; or if you have the time you might also want to 
read "How to Ask Questions the Smart Way" at 
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html



Best regards,
Tony.
--
My mother loved children -- she would have given anything if I had been
one.
-- Groucho Marx
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Using Lightning with shared calendars (Linux)


On 24/03/11 23:49, Bill Davidsen wrote:

Is there any documentation which doesn't assume you are using Windows or
that you knew the answer before you asked the question? I would like to
set up a site calendar and use a google calender, which would be a total
of three, the UID on the local machine, the shared calendar for the site
on all my machines, and my google calendar.

I do not have windows, exchange, Microsoft software, or any desire to
change that. I find (really) about 100 links telling me to select
new->calendar->network and the location of the calendar, but no way to
guess what location or format it wants, or where google stores their
calendar. I can skip that and run my own on site if I can find out what
the calendar server program is.

Is this (a) very hard, or (b) documented by Windows people and gurus?



In the development cycle, Lightning skipped Gecko 1.9.1 while SeaMonkey 
skipped 1.9.2. This means that there is no Lightning version which 
officially supports SeaMonkey 2.0.x. OTOH, the latest Lightning 
nightlies are compatible with the latest SeaMonkey nightlies (SeaMonkey 
2.1b3pre and maybe even 2.2a1pre), since both are based on Gecko 2.x.


If you want read-write access to a Google calendar, you need to install 
the "Provider for Google Calendar" (gdata-provider.xpi) extension 
compiled from the same sources as your Lightning version. Both can be 
found together in the appropriate subfolder of 
ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/calendar/lightning/nightly/ (for 
nightly builds) or of 
ftp://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/calendar/lightning/releases/ 
(for release builds).


OTOH, if read-only access is enough, and especially if the Google 
calendar owner shares it with "anyone", you can define your Google 
calendar to Lightning as an ICS calendar *instead* of as a Google 
calendar. In this case the Provider for Google Calendar is not necessary.


In both cases I recommend to use the "ICAL" URL found as follows: in the 
drop-down found next to the calendar name on the Google "Calendar" page, 
select "Share this Calendar", then near top left of the next page, 
"Calendar details", and after that click right and "Copy Link Location" 
on one of the two green ICAL buttons near the bottom. The "Private 
Address" is for use only by the owner of the calendar while the 
"Calendar Address" above it is for use by anyone who has been given 
access to it. The difference between read-write access (with 
gdata-provider.xpi installed) and read-only access (with or without it) 
is that you select either "Google calendar" or "ICS/ICAL calendar" in 
the first popup when "creating" a new calendar in Lightning.


See also https://wiki.mozilla.org/Calendar:GDATA_Provider


Best regards,
Tony.
--
hundred-and-one symptoms of being an internet addict:
37. You start looking for hot HTML addresses in public restrooms.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Spoofing with SM 2.1


On 24/03/11 22:15, NoOp wrote:

On 03/24/2011 10:05 AM, David E. Ross wrote:

I am using SM 2.0.12.  My bank's Web site is sniffing for "Firefox" in a
strange way.

If I use the UA string
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.17)
Gecko/20110123 SeaMonkey/2.0.12, NOT Firefox/3.6.15
or the UA string
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.17)
Gecko/20110123 SeaMonkey/2.0.12 Firefox/3.6.15
(without the ", NOT"), I still have a problem.

If I use the UA string
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15)
   Gecko/20110303 Firefox/3.6.1
or the UA string
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.17)
Gecko/20110123 NOT Firefox/3.6.15 BUT INSTEAD
SeaMonkey/2.0.12,
the problem goes away.

Apparently "Firefox" has to be found before "SeaMonkey".

What is the sequence for SM 2.1?  If it has "SeaMonkey" before
"Firefox", how can I switch them?



2.1b2 has:

Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:2.0b11)
Gecko/20110209 Firefox/4.0b11 SeaMonkey/2.1b2


Yes, and one of the latest nightlies has (on my machine):

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:2.2a1pre) Gecko/20110325 
Firefox/4.2a1pre SeaMonkey/2.2a1pre


This is the default. It is possible to remove the Firefox/something part 
via a preference (under Advanced => HTTP networking) but apparently you 
wouldn't even need that.




Also see:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Gecko_user_agent_string_reference


Best regards,
Tony.
--
Real computer scientists don't write code.  They occasionally tinker
with `programming systems', but those are so high level that they
hardly count (and rarely count accurately; precision is for
applications.)
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Future of PPC support in Seamonkey


On 26/03/11 02:12, Rufus wrote:

No, but I will - thanks for the pointer.

I think I'd prefer Safari to FireFox, and TB would be a fair companion
to it as a newsreader. Right now I use SM...and I may just hang in there
with it once PPC support vanishes. I imagine Apple will do the same with
Safari at some point.



Hm... Have you tinkered with your user-agent, or are you maybe on a 
different machine? Your newsreader identifies itself as


User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; 
rv:1.9.1.18) Gecko/20110320 SeaMonkey/2.0.13


i.e., as running on an Intel Mac.


Best regards,
Tony.
--
It is better for civilization to be going down the drain than to be
coming up it.
-- Henry Allen
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Thank you, SeaMonkey developers.


On 23/03/11 20:00, PhillipJones wrote:
[...]

I will use SM as my preferred Browser and Email/News Client and FF3.6.x
as my back up Browser. I'm not going to ff4 I've tried the beta just put
out. And it’s a bunch of junk.



Personally, I wouldn't say that Fx4 is just a bunch of junk, though time 
and again (starting at Fx1 and possibly earlier) I've seen the Firefox 
guys change some perfectly working parts of the UI, just for the sake of 
gadgetry. OTOH, SeaMonkey has profited by what's good in Firefox, while 
at the same time leaving aside the useless gadgetry: for instance, in 
Sm2.0 the Preferences backend underwent a complete overhaul to bring it 
in line with the Toolkit backend used on Fx&Tb (picking up a "real" 
extensions manager as an important side benefit), while at the same time 
conserving the functional, no-nonsense Preferences look&feel which dates 
back to Netscape 4.7 and, I suppose, earlier. Sync is now an integral 
part of SeaMonkey, even allowing synching between SeaMonkey and Firefox, 
though of course in SeaMonkey we don't call it "Firefox" Sync. The 
throbber link was kept when the Firefox guys gratuitously removed it. 
The DOM Inspector and ChatZilla components are still distributed with 
SeaMonkey, while in Firefox they are separate extensions. SeaMonkey 
nightlies have even got a built-in "Debug & QA UI" component which AFAIK 
is not even available to Firefox testers. The status bar is still there 
in SeaMonkey, even with a button for each of Browser, Mail, Composer, 
Address Book and Chat, while the Fx guys seemingly jumped through hoops 
in order to have a status bar which is both present and absent. The tabs 
are still where they belong, presenting an obvious material boundary 
between what comes from the website (the "content") and what comes from 
the browser (the "chrome")... And so on and so forth.



Best regards,
Tony.
--
'Twas the nocturnal segment of the diurnal period
   preceding the annual Yuletide celebration, And
   throughout our place of residence,
Kinetic activity was not in evidence among the
   possessors of this potential, including that
   species of domestic rodent known as Mus musculus.
Hosiery was meticulously suspended from the forward
   edge of the woodburning caloric apparatus,
Pursuant to our anticipatory pleasure regarding an
   imminent visitation from an eccentric
   philanthropist among whose folkloric appelations
   is the honorific title of St. Nicklaus ...
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: where is bookmarks.html?

2011-01-08 Thread Tony Mechelynck


On 09/01/11 00:29, Ray_Net wrote:

David E. Ross wrote:

On 1/8/11 9:08 AM, adse...@br0wn.co.uk wrote:

I just came back to seamonkey with 2.011. A while ago I used 1.1.18
and the bookmarks.html file was tucked away in
c:\documents and setting\application data\mozilla\sea monkey\profiles
I like to put it in my daily autobackup.

While with the new seamonkey I can use export to create a
bookmarks.html, I can't file the current file anywhere. Where have
they hidden it?


Are you sure you have SeaMonkey 2.0.11 and not some beta SeaMonkey 2.1x?

In SeaMonkey 2.0.x (including 2.0.11), bookmarks are in the file
bookmarks.html in your profile directory.

In SeaMonkey 2.1, bookmarks will be in a SQLite database in your profile
directory, not in a text .html file. Database files have the extension
.sqlite (of course). I'm not sure, but I think bookmarks will be in
places.sqlite.



Another good reason to stay in 2.0.x  Why they put this txt file
into a file that cannot be used by notepad.exe ?


They rewrote the way bookmarks are handled: it isn't text anymore, it's 
a database. You can sill export the bookmarks that are in that database 
to a bookmarks.html file, but you have to ask for it (by opening the 
Bookmarks Manager, then "Tools => Export HTML" in it).


Best regards,
Tony.
--
For those who like this sort of thing, this is the sort of thing they
like.
-- Abraham Lincoln
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0 Maintenence Mode?

2011-01-01 Thread Tony Mechelynck

On 30/12/10 04:26, NoOp wrote:

On 12/29/2010 06:33 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:

On 12/29/2010 5:07 PM, Ricardo Palomares Martínez wrote:

- will provisions be made for importing/exporting lightning calendars?

That's my biggest concern, too.:-)

Lightning is an extension, one which does not directly provide support
for SeaMonkey, and is also [last I knew] currently targeting Gecko 1.9.2
which there was and is no SeaMonkey release on.

We as the Council hopes there is a suitable solution for lightning
users, and will support the efforts where possible, but I do not foresee
anyone from the SeaMonkey team devoting direct time to get export/import
improved in the near future.

Then you'd be seriously mistaken. Users have spent considerable time&
effort integrating lightning calendars& data into their systems. If you
think that there was backlash with SM 1.1.x and forms, wait until they
try 2.1 and try backing down to 2.0 and realize that their calendars no
longer are compatible.
http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=46&t=1248265
<http://mozilla-xp.com/mozilla.dev.apps.seamonkey/Please-help-testing-For-SeaMonkey-2.1-Alpha-1-candidates>

The solution is mentioned there too: don't use in-profile calendars (in
the proprietary Mozilla format), export them (or create them) as *.ics
calendars somewhere else on your HD. In that format they should even be
compatible with the no-longer-supported Sunbird program.

I *highly* recommend that the "Council" sort out the issues (personal
and technical) with the SeaMonkey& Lightning folks *before* any SM 2.1
release. If you don't then I suspect that you'll continue to lose space
with MS Office& other browser/calendar integration offerings. IMO
seamless Lightning integration with SeaMonkey is critical to SeaMonkey's
future.

The main problem with Lightning is that *Lightning* is practically a
one-man operation, and a busy man at that. Alas for us, he cannot afford
to dedicate all his time to Lightning, so fixes to Lightning bugs
(sometimes including bugs very annoying to the users) take their own
(long) time coming. The SeaMonkey guys can do nothing about that, they
have enough on their hands keeping SeaMonkey working.

Best regards,
Tony.
--
Christian, n.:
One who believes that the New Testament is a divinely inspired
book admirably suited to the spiritual needs of his neighbor. One who
follows the teachings of Christ in so far as they are not inconsistent
with a life of sin.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey 2.0 Maintenence Mode?

2011-01-01 Thread Tony Mechelynck


On 31/12/10 04:16, NoOp wrote:
[...]

OK, it was marked as RESOLVED as in:
This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 613199 ***
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=613199
Status:  RESOLVED FIXED
Product:SeaMonkey

Hence, it was technically marked as FIXED.

<https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_activity.cgi?id=531210>


At bugzilla.mozilla.org, FIXED means fixed-on-trunk. There are also some 
flags and keywords to indicate that, in addition, a bug has been fixed 
on some other branch.


In your OP you asked, what good is there in staying with SeaMonkey? 
That's for every user to judge for him- or herself. The fact that this 
product is maintained by a small group of unpaid volunteers, as an 
all-in-one Suite uniting a Firefox-like browser, a Thunderbird-like 
mail/news/RSS client, a chat client, and more, all in a single 
executable program and the libraries that go with it, will be seen by 
some as an advantage, by others as a blemish.


Myself, I have in the past felt as "just a number" in the mass of 
not-listened-to users of Firefox, where features on which I depended 
have repeatedly been sacked by the developers, for no good reason or for 
some obviously false reason (like "no one uses it" and "it is not 
discoverable" for something -the throbber link- that I had discovered 
without help, and used). With SeaMonkey, in my experience, the 
developers listen better to what the users have to say — or maybe I'm 
lulling myself with illusions and have just found a group of developers 
with the same values as mine; anyway I feel more at home with SeaMonkey 
than I ever did with Firefox (or, worse, with Konqueror or of course 
with Internet Explorer). But the SeaMonkey developers are fewer than 
Firefox's, none of them is paid by Mozilla (unlike Firefox's), and they 
don't have as many machines at their disposal as are used to maintain 
three or four parallel branches of the Firefox code: with SeaMonkey, it 
seems that two's the limit: one trunk undergoing active development, and 
in a kind of "state of flux", continually changing especially when 
labeled "alpha" or even "beta", and one "stable" branch whose behaviour 
will not fundamentally change between one day and the next or even one 
month and the next: this gives extension developers some confidence that 
it is worth their while to develop extensions for it, but it also means 
no new features. Bugs, however, especially important bugs, still get 
fixed, even on the "stable" branch, if a fix can be found for them. Of 
course, it can happen that, for some bug, no fix is found (yet): then of 
course that bug doesn't (yet) get fixed.


So, make your own choice: it may be other than mine (I've been using 
SeaMonkey trunk nightlies for some time even if, unlike WLS, I have 
problems getting Lightning to work with them) because you are not me; 
that's why it's important to *have* a choice, one thing to which the 
not-for-profit Mozilla Foundation is dedicated.



Best regards,
Tony.
--
hundred-and-one symptoms of being an internet addict:
5. You find yourself brainstorming for new subjects to search.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: [OT] Happy New Year

2011-01-01 Thread Tony Mechelynck


On 01/01/11 06:52, Ed Mullen wrote:

NoOp wrote:

To all SeaMonkey devs, contributors, users, complainers, curmudgeons,
testers& even Thunderbird& Firefox folks, et al: Happy New Year& Best
Wishes for 2011. May the red haired Mozilla stepchild live a long&
eventual prosperous life :-)

Special thanks to 'stressed out Kairo', Neil, Jens, Phillip, Rich,
Manuel, Chris& other devs/contributors that I've failed to mention&
have somehow managed to keep SeaMonkey together. Your efforts are indeed
appreciated.


Indeed. A Happy New Year to all.


and a happy year 2011 to all the people mentioned above, including the 
ones who were forgotten.




2011? Cripes. I remember when 1990 seemed like a big deal.




1990? A few months before I first laid hands on a computer (a big and 
fast mainframe: as big as my whole today's apartment, with 128K of 
memory and a 667 kHz processor), it was Flower Power, Woodstock in the 
USA, Mai 68 in Paris, Make Love Not War, "Il est interdit d'interdire", 
etc. *That* looked like a big deal. Oh well, I must look like a 
doddering grandpa by now — where I live, the neighbours' children call 
me "Papa Noël" (which translates as 'Santa Claus' or 'Father Christmas' 
etc.).


Best wishes,
Tony.
--
Nasrudin walked into a shop one day, and the owner came forward to
serve him.  Nasrudin said, "First things first.  Did you see me walk
into your shop?"  "Of course."  "Have you ever seen me before?"
"Never."  "Then how do you know it was me?"
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: OT: FF to Offer "Do Not Track" in browser...

2010-12-24 Thread Tony Mechelynck


On 24/12/10 20:34, David E. Ross wrote:

On 12/24/10 11:06 AM, Tony Mechelynck wrote:

On 22/12/10 23:04, David E. Ross wrote:
[...]

By the way, because my cable modem is always on, it has the effect of
giving me a static IP address.  Every so often, I force a new IP address.



Hm. My ISP (Belgacom Skynet of Belgium; what is yours if you don't mind
sharing the info?) disconnects me forcibly whenever my modem has been
connected continuously for 36 hours (± 1 second). At other times (in
practice rarely) I may of course get a new IP address by turning the DSL
interface off then on from a root console prompt.


Best regards,
Tony.


My cable modem is connected to Road Runner, a unit of Time Warner Cable.
  It has no on/off switch.  Even when my PC is powered off, the modem is
still connected to the Internet.  To disconnect it, I have to pull the
plug on the power cord or physically disconnect the cable.

Road Runner said I should get a new IP address if I disconnect for at
least 15 minutes.  Alternatively, they suggested the use of ipconfig,
for which I created the following DOS script:

chdir C:\WINDOWS\system32
ipconfig.exe /all
Pause "Old IP"
ipconfig /release
ipconfig /renew
ipconfig.exe /all
Pause "New IP"

However, to run this script, I have to connect my PC directly to the
modem instead of connecting through my router.  The router creates a LAN
for my PC and my wife's PC.  I tested this, and the script was not
effective while my PC was connected through the router to the modem.

Doing anything with the router or modem is a bother.  They are in an
attic storage area that I can reach only if I move my printer stand.



Aha. My modem has no on/off switch either but it is at one end of an 
Ethernet cable (one meter long maybe) whose other end plugs into my 
"floortop" PC. No router (and no wife — for better or worse, I'm 
celibate). So (under Linux and in a root console)


ifdown dsl0
ifup dsl0

and optionally (before and/or after)

ifconfig

is enough for me to get a new IP address. Quite similar to what your 
script does, after one allows for differences between Windows and 
Unix/Linux. And I don't have any attic — each apartment here (or should 
I say each flat?) is one not very big floor, the attic is used by a 
cellphone relay station (which radiates mostly in a horizontal plane, 
I've had the radiation measured in my apart to make sure it doesn't leak).


Have a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year
Tony.
--
There was a young girl of Angina
Who stretched catgut across her vagina.
From the love-making frock
(With the proper sized cock)
Came Toccata and Fugue in D minor.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: [OT] Bye Bye UUCP!

2010-12-24 Thread Tony Mechelynck


On 21/12/10 13:55, Philip Chee wrote:

[cross posted to various places because I don't blog]

phi...@aleytys.pc.my was the first email address I ever had. For the
last fifteen years aleytys was a uucp node and I got my email and usenet
via uucp. Today my ISP closed down UUCP and switched me to some unholy
combination of cpanel/horde/IMAP. This marks a bitter sweet end to an
era. This Christmas I shall offer a small libation to this period of
time and probably wax maudlin into my beer.

Once upon a time we heard of this strange wondrous thing called the
Internet from far off America. A group of visionaries decided that it
was good and that we too should have it. A bunch of loud arrogant
American consultants came by and laughed at us saying that a third world
country like ours didn't have the smarts to build an internet. It became
a point of honour, of pride and so we set forth on a shoe string budget
with freeBSD, with Morningstar, NSCS Telnet, SLIPdial, UUCP, with blood,
sweat and tears. It wasn't easy, connections were frequently dodgy and
our usenet feed was a mag tape flow out of Berkeley once a week. The
return trip carried our messages for the previous week and the earliest
you could get an answer to your question was a fortnight. But built it
we did, node by node, cable by cable. And we proved those arsehole
Americans wrong.


A fortnight to get an answer by Usenet! Well, once upon a time 
Californians and New Englanders exchanged mail by way of threemasters 
sailing over Cape Horn… And nowadays we talk of "snail mail" when it 
takes only a couple of days and a trip to the mailbox at the front gate…




I was the 39th individual to sign up for an account when they became
available. As early adopters every thing was new and there were no
precedents. We helped each other and we helped less technically astute
users get on the internet in our self help forums and newgroups. We were
the new Prometheans bringing the Internet to the masses, we were the
Lokapalas. Those were heady days and we the first users jokingly called
ourselves "The Jaring Cabal" after our ISP (Jaring Internet). We were
the leaders, the defenders and the supporters of the local Internet. I
ran several successful RFCs for local usenet usegroups. Others
contributed in their own ways. To all the other uucp nodes that were
there, thank you all for the camaraderie. We had a real blast then
didn't we back when the world was all new and bright and shiny.

Back then we even had our own tongue-in-cheek slogan so one more time I
shall raise my fist in the air and cry "There is no Cabal! Long live the
Jaring Cabal"!

phi...@aleytys.pc.my



Ah, the time when "open relay" was not a dirty word! And no, I'm not a 
UUCP old-timer but I boned up on Net history before replying.


Have a merry Christmas, Philip, and a happy New Year :-) ! Midnight (my 
time) is in three and a quarter hours (about), yours in several more if 
you are back home and not visiting family in Britain — I shall have a 
thought for you and all the nice SeaMonkey guys tomorrow when we cut the 
cake at my nephew's. (Why so few girls BTW? Is monkeying around with a 
Suite so unladylike?)


Tony.
--
As far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality, they are not
certain, and as far as they are certain, they do not refer to reality.
-- Albert Einstein
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: OT: FF to Offer "Do Not Track" in browser...

2010-12-24 Thread Tony Mechelynck


On 22/12/10 23:04, David E. Ross wrote:
[...]

By the way, because my cable modem is always on, it has the effect of
giving me a static IP address.  Every so often, I force a new IP address.



Hm. My ISP (Belgacom Skynet of Belgium; what is yours if you don't mind 
sharing the info?) disconnects me forcibly whenever my modem has been 
connected continuously for 36 hours (± 1 second). At other times (in 
practice rarely) I may of course get a new IP address by turning the DSL 
interface off then on from a root console prompt.



Best regards,
Tony.
--
hundred-and-one symptoms of being an internet addict:
1. You actually wore a blue ribbon to protest the Communications Decency 
Act.

___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SM 2.1b1 Extensions

2010-11-19 Thread Tony Mechelynck


On 19/11/10 10:44, Stéphane Grégoire wrote:

Hi,

Ed Mullen a tapoté, le 18/11/2010 21:13:

Anyone have success installing extensions in SM 2.1b1?




No go with:

Web Developer
User Agent Switcher


It works for me, see my user agent!



LiveHTTPeaders


Don't work with Seamonkey 2.1b1

British English Dictionary 1.19 is also don't work for me!




With the ones that don't install I've tried bumping up the maxVersion
number to no avail.


You can use Nightly Tester Tools.


I'm using this extensions :
Signal Spam 0.5.2
Nostalgy 0.2.25.2
Adblock Plus 1.3.1
ChatZilla 0.9.86
AutoPager 0.6.1.16
Nightly Tester Tools 2.5.1
Forecastfox Weather 2.0.2.0.2
Dictionnaire français «Classique» 3.9.2
United States English Spellchecker 5.0.1
User Agent Switcher 0.7.2.2




There have been quite severe changes in the extensions subsystem for 
Gecko 2 (Firefox 4 - SeaMonkey 2.1 - etc.), so it's understandable that 
many extensions haven't yet followed suit.


In general, if an extension supports Firefox and SeaMonkey, and if it 
supports Firefox 4.0b8pre or higher, it will "probably" run correctly in 
the latest SeaMonkey trunk nightlies, though if it doesn't boast support 
for Sm 2.1b2pre you may have to either bump the maxVersion or set 
extensions.checkCompatibility.2.1b to true in about:config (this 
preference doesn't exist by default). Beware that if you set this pref 
it is *your* responsibility to disable misbehaving extensions: SeaMonkey 
will still check the version compatibility and mention any mismatches in 
the addons manager, but it won't anymore auto-disable extensions which 
say they are incompatible. Alternatively, you could install the "Add-on 
Compatibility Reporter" extension, which allows you to report which 
extensions worked in spite of a compatibility mismatch, and which ones 
didn't in spite of a match.


Best regards,
Tony.
--
HOW YOU CAN TELL THAT IT'S GOING TO BE A ROTTEN DAY:

#32: You call your answering service and they've never heard of
 you.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: What File Contains URL Browsing History List SM 2.10?

2010-11-14 Thread Tony Mechelynck


On 14/11/10 17:22, J. Weaver Jr. wrote:

Jens Hatlak wrote:

places.sqlite. Starting with SM 2.1 (there is no 2.10, you currently run
2.0.10), that file will also contain your bookmarks.


Is the "bookmarks.html" file being eliminated? -JW


It is not read anymore, except the first time. It can still be used as a 
medium to export your bookmarks, by toggling a pref in about:config


Best regards,
Tony.
--
Fortune's Real-Life Courtroom Quote #32:

Q:  Do you know how far pregnant you are right now?
A:  I will be three months November 8th.
Q:  Apparently then, the date of conception was August 8th?
A:  Yes.
Q:  What were you and your husband doing at that time?
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Image pasted into a mail


On 07/11/10 16:32, jim wrote:

On Sun, 07 Nov 2010 10:48:22 +0100, Tony Mechelynck
  in mozilla.support.seamonkey wrote:


On 07/11/10 09:36, Ray_Net wrote:

Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:

Sun, 07 Nov 2010 08:44:55 +0100, /Ray_Net/:

David E. Ross wrote:


The problem is that, no matter how you obtain the image, it traverses
the Internet as an attached file separate from the message. Only when
you compose the message and when the recipient's E-mail application
displays the message does the image file get combined with the
message. Thus, you need an image file when composing the message.


But 1. There is no file ...
2. When embedded in(per example, in the middle of the mail) the mail
there is no visible "file attachement" this is different when i click
on attach-browse-select a file; in this case the file is attached with
the mail(and not embedded in the mail text).
3. I know that the file or pseudo file is appended at the end of the
mail. Looking at the message source we see a multi-part message with
the message text/plain, the message text/html and the message image/png
... all those parts are composing the full message.


So just try this and observe there's no difference:

1. While you're composing (in HTML I guess), select Insert ->  Image...
and then Choose File... from the file system (rather than pasting an
image from the clipboard);
2. Do you see any difference?


Yes, this is working ... we can insert a jpg file...
but the aim is to "paste" not to insert a file... and this paste insert
a pseudo png file. That's the problem ..Lotus Notes cannot render a png
picture type if the version is before 8.5 and my recipeint cannot upgrade.
Howevedr as i said before ... i think that i found the solution ... just
...we have to wait until Wednesday evening.


If you don't have an image-processing program that can convert PNG to
something else, then, if you can display the full PNG image onscreen (if
it isn't too big, that is), try hitting PrtScr then to get a screenshot
of it, probably in JPEG or maybe BMP format. (You may have to "Paste as
New Image" in some image-manipulation software, but at least it ought to
be in some format it understands). Then maybe you can edit that to
remove unneeded stuff around the image, and insert _that_ (and not the
clipboard) as an image file.

Best regards,
Tony.


Tony, as a small piece of now useless knowledge to 99% of the public with
multi-megabit broadband, an MS prtscrn is a BMP image -- meaning it is
ponderously huge, especially when taken from a large display monitor.
(I did a full screen PRTSCRN, which was 1.1meg and converted it to a jpg
which was116kb.)


Apparently I was (for more reasons than I knew) wise to switch to Linux, 
where a Print-Sceen screenshot is immediately saved to disk as a… let me 
check… a PNG image.




Also, and off this topic, I was wondering if the JPG is an offshoot of or
utilizes the old RLE internal tech?  Your thought on that?

jim


My thought of that is, "I don't know".

Best regards,
Tony.
--
You are a very redundant person, that's what kind of person you are.
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Image pasted into a mail


On 07/11/10 09:36, Ray_Net wrote:

Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:

Sun, 07 Nov 2010 08:44:55 +0100, /Ray_Net/:

David E. Ross wrote:


The problem is that, no matter how you obtain the image, it traverses
the Internet as an attached file separate from the message. Only when
you compose the message and when the recipient's E-mail application
displays the message does the image file get combined with the
message. Thus, you need an image file when composing the message.


But 1. There is no file ...
2. When embedded in(per example, in the middle of the mail) the mail
there is no visible "file attachement" this is different when i click
on attach-browse-select a file; in this case the file is attached with
the mail(and not embedded in the mail text).
3. I know that the file or pseudo file is appended at the end of the
mail. Looking at the message source we see a multi-part message with
the message text/plain, the message text/html and the message image/png
... all those parts are composing the full message.


So just try this and observe there's no difference:

1. While you're composing (in HTML I guess), select Insert -> Image...
and then Choose File... from the file system (rather than pasting an
image from the clipboard);
2. Do you see any difference?


Yes, this is working ... we can insert a jpg file...
but the aim is to "paste" not to insert a file... and this paste insert
a pseudo png file. That's the problem ..Lotus Notes cannot render a png
picture type if the version is before 8.5 and my recipeint cannot upgrade.
Howevedr as i said before ... i think that i found the solution ... just
...we have to wait until Wednesday evening.


If you don't have an image-processing program that can convert PNG to 
something else, then, if you can display the full PNG image onscreen (if 
it isn't too big, that is), try hitting PrtScr then to get a screenshot 
of it, probably in JPEG or maybe BMP format. (You may have to "Paste as 
New Image" in some image-manipulation software, but at least it ought to 
be in some format it understands). Then maybe you can edit that to 
remove unneeded stuff around the image, and insert _that_ (and not the 
clipboard) as an image file.


Best regards,
Tony.
--
"Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved
it correct, not tried it." -- Donald Knuth
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Mail column layout: how to vary it per folder?


On 07/11/10 09:24, Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:

Sun, 07 Nov 2010 08:44:45 +0100, /Tony Mechelynck/:


Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:2.0b8pre) Gecko/20101106
Firefox/4.0b8pre SeaMonkey/2.1b2pre - Build ID: 20101106020228

When I customize the columns of the mailnews Threads Pane (by means of
the drop-down widget at the far right end of the titlebar, and/or by
drag-dropping column titles about), I see my new set of columns in
every folder. I'd like to be able to customize each folder's columns
separately. Is that possible? And if yes, how?


I don't know if Mnenhy works with latest nightlies but this is one of
its features I like very much:

http://mnenhy.mozdev.org/folderstore.html



well, if I don't try I won't know, right? I guess maybe now's the time 
to test that extension about which I've heard so much good...


Best regards,
Tony.
--
There once was a plumber from Leigh,
Who was plumbing his maid by the sea,
Said she, "Please stop plumbing,
I think someone's coming!"
Said he, "Yes I know love, it's me."
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Image pasted into a mail


On 07/11/10 08:44, Ray_Net wrote:

David E. Ross wrote:

On 11/6/10 1:54 PM, Ray_Net wrote:

Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:

Sat, 06 Nov 2010 22:37:04 +0100, /Ray_Net/:

Ed Mullen wrote:

Ray_Net wrote:


How can i change the format .png when doing "paste" into a mail ?


You can't. You have to convert the file first, then paste the new
file. If you need a converter program try:

http://irfanview.com/

It's free and very good.


This is *not* a file  it's just a copy/paste of an image, per
example, you press the "PrintScrn" button when what you want to
transfer is on screen.


You could probably first paste in IrfanView and then save in whatever
format you need. You could also paste in Paint and save in one of the
formats it supports.


I understand, but i did not want to put a file in attachement ... i
prefer just a copy/paste ... but as i have said soemwhere else:
I think that i have found the solurion ... i have to wait some days now,
because the recipient will be at work only at wednesday. I will tell you
the result.


The problem is that, no matter how you obtain the image, it traverses
the Internet as an attached file separate from the message. Only when
you compose the message and when the recipient's E-mail application
displays the message does the image file get combined with the message.
Thus, you need an image file when composing the message.


But 1. There is no file ...
2. When embedded in(per example, in the middle of the mail) the mail
there is no visible "file attachement" this is different when i click on
attach-browse-select a file; in this case the file is attached with the
mail(and not embedded in the mail text).
3. I know that the file or pseudo file is appended at the end of the
mail. Looking at the message source we see a multi-part message with the
message text/plain, the message text/html and the message image/png
... all those parts are composing the full message.


Well, in a plaintext mail there's no way you can have an image appear in 
the middle. You may see it at the end, just like you may see a text 
attachment at the end.


In an HTML email, you may see an image in the middle of the text if 
there is an  tag in your HTML source. The src= attribute in that 
tag may be a "relative URL" to an attachment, or the URL of a remote 
image. In the latter case the image is not sent with the email, but 
SeaMonkey will refuse to display it, unless *either* the mail is from 
someone already klnown in your address book, and with "Allow remote 
content" checked, *or* you click "Display remote content" after opening 
the mail. This click only applies for one email, but there is a link to 
create the address book entry if you want to always display remote 
content from this sender.


In every case, the MIME type of the image (as set in the attachment 
header fopr an image sent together with the mail, or as served by the 
remote server for a remote image) must agree with the actual format of 
the image. Renaming "foobar.png" to "foobar" without actually 
translating the image binary content is liable to get the sending mailer 
(for an attachment) or the remote HTTP server (for a remote image) 
mistake it for something other than image/png, with the result that the 
recipient's mailer probably won't be able to display it.



Best regards,
Tony.
--
The only way to get rid of a temptation is to yield to it.
-- Oscar Wilde
___
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Mail column layout: how to vary it per folder?