[Talk-us] [Talk-us-nps] North Carolina National Park
Nic, I'm CCing the general talk-us on this, since National Forests are outside of the separate from the National Park Service, and there may be someone there who can provide more guidance. In this particular case the Pocosin Wilderness Area is managed by the Forest Service (part of the US Dept of Agriculture), although "wilderness areas" can be managed by a number of groups within the federal government. If you're using data from state governments, you will need to look at the licensing restrictions, because many states do not release their data into public domain. US Federal government datasets are mandated to be in the public domain, so there are no issues using them for OpenStreetMap. Since this National Forest and Wildlife area are not units of the National Park System, you will not find them in the irma.nps.gov dataset. It looks like your best source of data for this will be the PDF that you linked: https://www.fs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/stelprdb5403940.pdf -- Although it doesn't appear that the PDF is geo-enabled. I was able to find the boundary in the dataset named "Administrative Forest Boundaries": https://data.fs.usda.gov/geodata/edw/datasets. php?dsetCategory=boundaries That may be another good source. I would also suggest overlaying the boundaries and making tweaks to the existing OSM boundary instead of importing the new boundary and deleting the old. That would allow existing points in the database to maintain their history. I'm hoping someone from the general talk-us group can provide more input on this. Best of luck! -- Jim McAndrew On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 9:39 AM Nicolas Duclos wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I’m new in OSM Community and after a short trip on East Coast of North > Carolina, I decided to help making NC more accurate than it is right now. > > I’m currently trying to edit or remake the Croatan National Forest, but > I’m not too sure how to achieve it by importing data. Currently for some > reasons there is two Croatan National Forest at the same place and the > shape is not really accurate compared to other maps out there. > > Here is what I found : > > http://data.nconemap.gov/geoportal/dataexplorer/index.jsp > > https://www.fs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/stelprdb5403940.pdf > > Not too sure about the proclamation area on the map and what’s the > difference between national forest and wilderness. > > I could also create trails and outdoor activities spot in OSM. > > Data : > > http://data.nconemap.gov/geoportal/catalog/main/home.page (type *marea* > in search box) > or > https://irma.nps.gov/DataStore/Reference/Profile/2224545?lnv=True > > Not too sure which data to take or how they works. > > Thank you very much for your help. > > Nic from Canada > > > ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
[Talk-us] NJ Mapping Party Sunday 4/16 for National Park Week
OSM-US, I'm going to be running a three hour Mapping Party in Gateway National Recreation Area in conjunction with National Park Week. If you know of anyone who wants to attend, or have any good tips for getting information out about it, let me know! https://www.eventbrite.com/e/openstreetmap-party-sandy-hook-nj-tickets-24439452059 -- Jim McAndrew ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] Extra wide shoulders / travel lanes in NJ
Sorry for the google maps links on this, but I've found NJ's use of shoulders (or "curb lanes") as bike lanes kind of strange. I would tag this as cycleway=lane but nothing for shoulder. For example: (note the trash can in the "lane") https://www.google.com/maps/@40.5149298,-74.5297972,3a,40.9y,53.58h,83.98t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s0QLvGdBx82YW5Xs75YzWzQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656 Although I felt perfectly safe biking on this road this morning (without the sharrows / bikes only sign): https://www.google.com/maps/@40.5407346,-74.5356208,3a,75y,207.71h,66.1t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sJwFCiQoh4c09hukm1CsuNw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656 This would be a good candidate for the shoulder tag, but some shoulders are not bikable at all because of debris, grates, illegally? parked cars, etc. The second one looks more similar to CR 546, and I would definitely want to be able to see this information in OpenStreetMap, because these road tend to be far more bikable than something without a shoulder. Which is extremely common in NJ. (example: https://www.google.com/maps/@40.299179,-74.8338145,3a,75y,69.82h,65.03t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sedhRN9KpSkOu9mpGC1w-SQ!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo0.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3DedhRN9KpSkOu9mpGC1w-SQ%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D130.6606%26pitch%3D0!7i13312!8i6656 ) On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 7:42 AM, Mike Dupontwrote: > Take a look at this map of the area > http://www.dvrpc.org/asp/bikemercer/ > > It would not be used as a source, but it gives you an idea of what > people call bike-able around here. > > On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 7:29 AM, Richard Fairhurst > wrote: > > Elliott Plack wrote: > >> I am now leaning towards the shoulder tag, and perhaps > >> recommending that the routing tools consider that. > > > > I'd be genuinely delighted to add shoulder support to cycle.travel when > > there's more than a trace number of shoulder tags present in the OSM > > database - missing shoulder information is the second biggest bike > routing > > issue in the US IMO (after bogus TIGER highway=residential, of course). > But > > as Paul says, please don't misuse cycleway tags for this. > > > > cheers > > Richard > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > View this message in context: > http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Extra-wide-shoulders-travel-lanes-in-NJ-tp5856823p5856885.html > > Sent from the USA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > ___ > > Talk-us mailing list > > Talk-us@openstreetmap.org > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us > > > > -- > James Michael DuPont > Kansas Linux Fest http://kansaslinuxfest.us > Free/Libre Open Source and Open Knowledge Association of Kansas > http://openkansas.us > Member of Free Libre Open Source Software Kosova http://www.flossk.org > Saving Wikipedia(tm) articles from deletion > http://SpeedyDeletion.wikia.com > > ___ > Talk-us mailing list > Talk-us@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us > ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] hgv=designated in US National Park
Trail Ridge Road is a bit of an exception to normal NPS rules because it does connect two population centers that are otherwise very far from each other. I don't have any more specific knowledge on the exceptions other than the stories from Russell. In any case, you do need to check in at the gate and explain why you can legally use the road. On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 9:51 PM, Russell Deffner russdeff...@gmail.com wrote: No problem, had to do some searching and further remembering. The ‘agreement’ we were using was called the ‘tri-county waiver’ which allowed Boulder, Grand and Larimer county residents to pass through for work (it has changed a bit according to a search). However, there is also: http://www.nps.gov/romo/planyourvisit/commercial_trucking_permits.htm so I think access=destination may be best choice through RMNP (according to the wiki, first thought was =permissive)? =Russ *From:* Mike Thompson [mailto:miketh...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Monday, June 29, 2015 9:28 PM *To:* Russell Deffner *Cc:* Open Street Map Talk-US *Subject:* Re: [Talk-us] hgv=designated in US National Park Russ, Thanks for the additional information. Perhaps hgv=destination? I am pretty sure that if one showed up at one of the Estes Park entrances with a semi and told them that you had to make a delivery in Granby they wouldn't let you through. The next time I am up there I will ask. Mike On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 8:02 PM, Russell Deffner russell.deff...@hotosm.org wrote: Dang, sorry; just caught my typo, hgv=private may NOT be the proper tag. *From:* Russell Deffner [mailto:russell.deff...@hotosm.org] *Sent:* Monday, June 29, 2015 8:02 PM *To:* 'Mike Thompson' *Cc:* 'Open Street Map Talk-US' *Subject:* RE: [Talk-us] hgv=designated in US National Park Hi again Mike, I should have specified – the entirety of Trail Ridge Road J I think we did actually come in (from the east, i.e. FC to Granby) via 36. I would say hgv=private is the ‘correct’ tag; in this case the ‘highway’ is actually ‘State controlled w/ agreements of the Park Service’, maybe Jim or one of them have a better answer, but it seems more like “this is a State Highway” if you ‘know the rules’ and have a valid ID you can use it accordingly. (in our case we just had to have a Fort Collins address and say “we’re on our way to work in Granby” – this was in either our work trucks or my personal vehicle). Anyway, hope this helps find proper tagging for 34/36/Trail Ridge Road; cheers! =Russ ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
[Talk-us] Proper tagging for crosswalks
I am looking into tagging some crosswalks, and I've just been putting a node at the intersection. Some crosswalks are really long though, and I think that information is important to the person crossing the road. Is there an acceptable way that we can tag a way as a crosswalk without interfering with its other tags (ex: highway=crossing on a way could interfere with a tag like highway=path). I'd love to hear everyone's opinion on what we can do or why we shouldn't try this. -- Jim ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] Proper tagging for crosswalks
Paul, Bryan, Thanks for your help with this! My issue was with bicycle trails that cross roads, as they usually put a crosswalk in for these cases, but the route itself can support other non-motorized vehicles. I think this gives me some good options that would be acceptable. 1) I could use highway=footway, footway=crossing, bicycle=yes -- which is a little misleading, but could make sense 2) I could also use highway=path, crossing=yes, bicycle=yes -- this seems better to me, but I don't know if it's acceptable to use crossing without connecting it to a value -- Jim On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 2:16 PM, Bryan Housel br...@7thposition.com wrote: It’s ok to map them as either a single intersection node or a way. Here is my understanding from the various wiki pages the document these things, and it matches what I see people map in places with sidewalks and crosswalks. Keep in mind, the wiki does seem to change kind of frequently, and in my opinion there are too many extra detail crosswalk tags that just aren’t used in practice. If mapping only the intersection node, `highway=crossing` on that node is enough. If you want to add detail, `crossing=zebra` for a typical striped crosswalk, or `crossing=*` for whatever other kind of crosswalk people can dream up (there are plenty, see wiki). If mapping the crosswalk as a way, I map the node as above, and also map the way that crosses the street as `highway=footway + footway=crossing`. Again you can add `crossing=zebra` or `crossing=*` for more detail. These don’t conflict with anything, as the ends of the crosswalk typically join up with a `highway=footway + footway=sidewalk`. iD currently only has a zebra crossing preset, and I think I’m going to add an unmarked crossing preset also, following discussion on HOT list. Thanks, Bryan On Jun 23, 2015, at 3:46 PM, Jim McAndrew j...@loc8.us wrote: I am looking into tagging some crosswalks, and I've just been putting a node at the intersection. Some crosswalks are really long though, and I think that information is important to the person crossing the road. Is there an acceptable way that we can tag a way as a crosswalk without interfering with its other tags (ex: highway=crossing on a way could interfere with a tag like highway=path). I'd love to hear everyone's opinion on what we can do or why we shouldn't try this. -- Jim ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] Data sources for National Monument boundaries?
We (NPMap at the National Park Service) use the IRMA boundaries for most of our maps, but we have updated a few of the park boundaries in our own database. You can find our data here: https://nationalparkservice.cartodb.com/u/nps/tables/parks On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Clifford Snow cliff...@snowandsnow.us wrote: Steve, That Ten Steps plan sounds interesting. I would appreciate a copy as well. Clifford On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 8:41 AM, stevea stevea...@softworkers.com wrote: Ian McEwen writes: Does anyone know where this data is available/usable for OSM purposes? You might try http://data.fs.usda.gov/geodata/edw/datasets.php?dsetCategory=boundaries where you can scroll down to National Forest Lands with Nationally Designated Management or Use Limitations and download the shapefile. (Shapefiles can be opened in JOSM if you also install a plugin). These data only contain National Monuments WITHIN National Forests, but the data are not even a week old, and are at least something. I don't know what is included in Arizona, but it's probably worth a look. If this is daunting, too large a dataset, or you need additional technical help, email me and I'll send you my Ten steps for getting USFS data into OSM tutorial, which I've sent out several times to grateful recipients. SteveA California ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us -- @osm_seattle osm_seattle.snowandsnow.us OpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] request to revert changeset
If it's your own changeset, it's pretty easy to do in JOSM: https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/731/how-can-i-revert-a-changeset You can also go back and manually make the edits, but I find that sometimes its a lot easier just to revert an entire changeset than to go in and try to make it correct. If you'd like, I can revert it as well, just let me know. On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 9:13 AM, Ed Hillsman hills...@pobox.com wrote: How do I request to revert a changeset? This morning I went into Potlatch 2 to do some editing, and I noticed a park lot of streets were missing in long narrow east-west area. The features still showed as missing after making a number of changes in zoom and panning along the window. So, without looking at the rendered map (I’ll do this if it ever happens again), I added the missing features back. Upon closing the changeset, I noticed what looked like original data (a tag value I couldn’t add back without making a site visit to the area). When I then re-opened the editor, I found the missing data along with what I had just added. The changeset number is 31177943, titled retrace/add a number of streets mysteriously deleated, Matthew Avenue NW and viciinity, an east-west window. Ed Hillsman ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] New York, Ellis Island Boundary
This is correct, the island is part of NY, but the water is part of NJ, when they made the island bigger, the new land was in NJ. Similar to how Delaware has the entire Delaware Bay in its boundaries. They added some fill to the NJ side, and now there's a piece of Delaware connected to New Jersey: http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=14/39.6142/-75.5635 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finns_Point On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Luis Villa l...@lu.is wrote: Possibly useful context: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Jersey_v._New_York On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 9:30 AM Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net wrote: On 5/10/15 11:57 AM, Richard Welty wrote: On 5/10/15 11:31 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote: Hi, puzzled about http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37573502#map=18/40.69986/-74.03910 is this really part of today's political boundary, then (historical) should perhaps be removed from the name. And is there any significance to the funny shape (an owl sitting on a branch?) or should it rather be aligned with the coastline? this looks like a carve out, a tiny enclave of NYS/NYC surrounded by New Jersey. i'll look at the newer TIGER data in a little bit and see what i can see there. now that i have thought about it, Ellis Island is mostly fill. the political boundary likely matches the original waterline of the island and it was simply never changed. as it was operated by the Federal government, there was probably little motivation to do so. richard -- rwe...@averillpark.net Averill Park Networking - GIS IT Consulting OpenStreetMap - PostgreSQL - Linux Java - Web Applications - Search ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] Great Lakes Boundaries
Mike, Thanks for doing this! It sounds like a much bigger ordeal than I had originally thought. -- Jim On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Mike Thompson miketh...@gmail.com wrote: All, Since no objection to removing natural=water from the Lake Superior relation has been expressed, I have removed it. I also amended the note on the relation asking that it not be added back in. Mike On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 9:08 PM, David Fawcett david.fawc...@gmail.com wrote: Inland sea... On Apr 25, 2015, at 8:19 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote: Am 24.04.2015 um 17:23 schrieb AJ Ashton aj.ash...@gmail.com: Yes, if Lake Superior is mapped as natural=coastline (which I think is the easier-to-maintain approach for such a large complex water body) then we should remove natural=water from the multipolygon relation (r4039486). Does anyone have any objection to this? It's causing some noticeable rendering issues both in the standard style and for data consumers. yes, if the coastline tag remains it seems logical to remove the natural=water tag. Semantically the coastline tag on a freshwater lake is clearly wrong, but it seems to be an accepted compromise in this case: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dcoastline#What_about_lakes.3F cheers Martin ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] No Parallel/Resize or Copy/Paste in iD editor?
This is great, we're using a recent build of iD and we love the cmd/ctrl-C/V commands, it has really made our editing a lot quicker! On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 4:19 PM, Bryan Housel br...@7thposition.com wrote: iD will use the modifier key Cmd on Mac and Ctrl on Windows/Linux. It adjusts the popup tooltips to say the correct thing too. I didn't put anything in the builtin help yet about Ctrl-C and Ctrl-V but I do intend to. I only added the copy buffer code in the latest release a month ago. Also I'll probably be implanting a popup help page to list all the keyboard shortcuts sometime in the next few months. Thanks, Bryan Sent from my iPhone On Apr 20, 2015, at 6:03 PM, Charlotte Wolter techl...@techlady.com wrote: Bryan, Do you mean Control-C and Control-V, which are the usual Windows way to copy and paste? --C At 07:19 AM 4/19/2015, you wrote: On Apr 18, 2015, at 8:39 PM, David Wisbey yourvillagem...@yahoo.com wrote: don't see any way to create parallel features (or Copy and Paste as in JOSM). We don't have a way to create parallel features yet, but there is an open issue for it in github. It's something that a lot of people request and I agree would be a useful tool. Copy and paste does now work with cmd-C / cmd-V, this is a recent addition. Thanks, Bryan Sent from my iPhone ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us Charlotte Wolter 927 18th Street Suite A Santa Monica, California 90403 +1-310-597-4040 techl...@techlady.com Skype: thetechlady ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] Great Lakes Boundaries
Mike, That's the issue! I know there's some weird stuff going on with the great lakes either being coastlines or giant lakes. I don't have any experience working on something that large in OSM. We are using OSM data for an NPS map, and Isle Royale is a NPS unit, so I'd like to try to get it to look as correct as possible. -- Jim On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Mike Thompson miketh...@gmail.com wrote: Jim, Are you referring to how Isle Royale spills into Lake Superior? Might it be a broken relation rather than a tagging issue? Mike On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 12:57 PM, Jim McAndrew j...@loc8.us wrote: I've been noticing some weird tile issues around the Great Lakes. What is the best way to tag these islands so they render properly? http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=13/47.9399/-88.8770 I suppose the lake might be frozen right now, so maybe it is correct :). Thanks! -- Jim ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] CloudMade's ambassadors
I'd like to thank Russ as well! I was a long time lurker in OSM, but never did any edits myself. I saw a PR piece for the Boston mapping party, and thought.. Maps and Parties? Why am I not attending that? Then I saw that there would be a meetup in New York the next week. I borrowed my brother-in-law's GPS and I mapped Central Park. 6 years later, I'm still doing something with OSM (almost) every day. Thanks Russ, Dirk, Sarah, Thea, and Hurricane! On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 5:11 AM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net wrote: On 4/6/15 12:06 AM, Kate Chapman wrote: Thanks for posting this. The first OSM person I ever met was Russ Nelson when he was a CloudMade ambassador. It was at a mapping party in Baltimore, that really is what sparked further involvement in OSM for me. Prior to that I did a bit of mapping in my neighborhood. Thanks Russ! i'll thank Russ too. we go back in an entirely different internet community (anti-spam) and when he dropped out to go to Cloudmade it piqued my interest due to my long term love of maps (going back to boy scouts). so here i am. richard -- rwe...@averillpark.net Averill Park Networking - GIS IT Consulting OpenStreetMap - PostgreSQL - Linux Java - Web Applications - Search ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] Meetup sponsorship
Steve, Our meetup group OSM-Colorado is up for renewal in September, what can I do to have Telenav help us sponsor the group? -- Jim On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 6:56 PM, Steve Coast st...@asklater.com wrote: Hi I had a number of threads with people on Telenav sponsoring meetup groups. The process has now been worked out (much more smooth) and I wanted to make sure I closed the loop with everyone. So if I've missed you please drop me a line. Thanks Steve ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] Beach routing
I think this would be a great addition for routing. I would make sure that you add tags like bicycle=no, even though bicycles are probably not forbidden, bicycles and sand generally do not mix. ( http://www.njbikemap.com/ omits dirt roads in southern jersey for this reason) Another consideration is that outside of Atlantic City and Wildwood, most beaches require a beach tags/badges to use the beach. I'm not sure what the best way to tag these areas would be, but it would be important for routing people who are not familiar with the area. -- Jim On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 7:15 AM, Steven Johnson sejohns...@gmail.com wrote: A few years ago, I mapped beach access paths, too: http://ow.ly/yZT3G But I did not map along the beach as there was no clearly defined path or boardwalk, nor could I see a compelling case for doing so. I can see a reason if driving, horses, bikes compete for access, or there are areas that permit/restrict access to the beach. -- SEJ -- twitter: @geomantic -- skype: sejohnson8 There are two types of people in the world. Those that can extrapolate from incomplete data. On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 8:51 AM, Bryan Housel br...@7thposition.com wrote: I say go ahead and add it, though `highway=track` (with appropriate access tag) might make more sense if vehicles drive along the beach. Here in NJ, people have also been mapping the paths that lead down to the beach from the boardwalks, but they generally aren’t connected. I’m a runner, so I would find it useful to know which stretches of beach are passable and what the surface is like. Thanks, Bryan On Jul 9, 2014, at 12:50 PM, Elliott Plack elliott.pl...@gmail.com wrote: OSM US: I've been using some routing engines to map fitness routes (e.g. Strava) that use OSM data. Along our US coasts, there are beaches. The beaches I'm familiar with are popular with walkers and joggers to go up and down the shore, since access is generally open to anyone along the water's edge. I'm considering adding a `highway=path` along the beach to facilitate this. I'd add the connections to the walking paths between parking lots and the beach as well. For uninterrupted strips of sandy beach, would a path be appropriate to indicate walkability? How the map looks now in iD: http://i.imgur.com/2EQ06BR.jpg What I'd propose to do (note the connections): http://i.imgur.com/i8dj6lQ.jpg Area of the examples: http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/38.45143/-75.04957 Thanks, -- Elliott Plack http://about.me/elliottp ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] NJ Orthoimagery
Ian, I can put you in contact with the people in charge of the map servers at the USGS. There has been some turnover in the position recently, so things have been a bit mixed up. In the meantime, The National Map uses the following link: http://basemap.nationalmap.gov/arcgis/rest/services/USGSImageryOnly/MapServer Bryan, Thanks for this NJ data, it may come in handy! -- Jim On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 2:26 PM, Bryan Housel br...@7thposition.com wrote: Hey Ian that’s cool, I didn’t know this service was available. Would you consider proxying the New Jersey high res orthos too from 2012-2013? More info: https://njgin.state.nj.us/NJ_NJGINExplorer/jviewer.jsp?pg=2012_OrthoImagery Metadata for this layer is here: https://njgin.state.nj.us/NJ_NJGINExplorer/ShowMetadata.jsp?docId={DF49386A-73AC-4A1A-B6DC-13B769E176A4} (their page indicates that there are no constraints on access or use, though a source acknowledgment is appreciated) Their WMS server is here: http://njwebmap.state.nj.us/njimagery?REQUEST=GetCapabilitiesSERVICE=WMSVERSION=1.1.1 On Jul 7, 2014, at 2:54 PM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote: Note that the OSM US server tiles and caches the USGS NAIP and High Res Orthos and more information can be found here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Foundation/Local_Chapters/United_States/Servers/Imagery ...but the upstream USGS server that used to host this imagery seems to be broken (it's throwing 500's). I'm working on finding someone to talk to about that, but until then we'll have to find something else. On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Bryan Housel br...@7thposition.com wrote: The project for the common imagery sources is here: https://github.com/osmlab/editor-imagery-index You could enter an issue there to include this source so that it will be available in the various OSM editors. Before including it in the index, they will want to ensure that the source is properly licensed and has a bounding polygon around where the imagery is valid. On Jul 6, 2014, at 9:28 AM, Saikrishna Arcot saiarcot...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I noticed that there is a wiki page on the USGS High Resolution Orthoimagery https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/USGS_High_Resolution_Orthoimagery, but that the link is outdated. The new resource to use is likely one of these http://isse.cr.usgs.gov/ArcGIS/rest/services/Orthoimagery folders. I've looked at the 1-foot imagery, and this seems to be sharper or equal quality than the Bing imagery in at least two areas. In addition, according to this http://cumulus.cr.usgs.gov/listofortho.php page, only Canada and the border data is marked as View only; all other counties are public domain. Is there any reason this imagery can't be used in OSM, and perhaps even be added as one of the pre-existing imagery sources in JOSM? -- Saikrishna Arcot ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] Locations for State of the Map US 2014
It would be nice to have the SOTM-US within driving distance from Denver, but I enjoy the travel too. I'd suggest Philly if I wanted to get a bid together, but I don't think I'll be doing that this year. I would love to see some good bids this year, and hopefully if those bids aren't selected, the information can be updated for next year's bidding. On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 10:28 AM, richiekenned...@gmail.com wrote: Seeing as how the “official” location of the lower 48’s centroid is in north-central Kansas, I’d have to dispute your claim that Tulsa is the closest major metro area. Looks to me that Lincoln, Nebraska would be the closest. There’s also Wichita, Omaha, Topeka, and Kansas City. -- Richie Kennedy www.route56.com * richiekenned...@gmail.com facebook.com/route56 * twitter.com/route56 I'm not crazy. I'm just ahead of my time. *From:* Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org *Sent:* Friday, November 15, 2013 10:19 AM *To:* OpenStreetMap talk-us list talk-us@openstreetmap.org How about Tulsa, Oklahoma? Closest major metro area to the lower 48's centroid. Can't get much more heartland than that. ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] OSM US election status
I agree that it's great that so many great people are motivated to participate on the board! In the past, we have had enough interest in the project that we created working groups, and it looks like we may be getting enough interested again. The interest in the working groups has certainly waned since OSM US first started, but I think the groups can be recreated and can be very helpful to the advancement of open source mapping within the United States. I think that we should have an Editathon working group that plans the Editathons and themes. I would like to participate in a group devoted to mapping national parks such as this project: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_US_National_Parks I think last time we had too many groups and no real organization between them. I'm hoping we can learn from that and have successful working groups this time around. Good luck to all the candidates! -- Jim McAndrew (Soon to be former Vice President of OSM US) On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 9:23 PM, Mike N nice...@att.net wrote: On 10/5/2013 1:51 PM, Michal Migurski wrote: Can I just point out that the breadth of candidates this year is a very pleasant surprise? Agreed! It turned the voting into a challenging process. __**_ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.**org/listinfo/talk-ushttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] Hamlets!
It sounds like we want CDPs and not hamlets, although there is some overlap. What would be ideal would be to remove all the hamlets and import the CDPs, but we could also just remove all hamlets that aren't also a CDP. On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 8:20 AM, Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net wrote: i think this varies state-to-state. the following applies to NY. hamlets are not incorporated areas and have no government functions. in urban areas, hamlets are generally once distinct communities that have been absorbed into larger entities. they have no legal standing, but frequently the postal service will still deliver based on the name. in rural areas in NY, hamlets generally have white on green road signs erected by the state highway department and may have a CDP boundary. local post offices and/or school districts may use the same name as the hamlet. the CDP boundaries are at best vaguely related to the post office delivery routes sharing the name. I'm disinclined to touch a CDP based on my experience of living in one. In some places, they have the same function as a town. In NYC and DC, the hamlets were not places I'd ever heard of (even if they were close by). If they're just apartments, then it seems silly to keep them around, even if the post office delivers to them. So if I read you correctly, it seems like in urban areas that we know it's generally safe to reclassify them (either as a building, or building complex (as a multipolygon), or perhaps a neighborhood. Is that a fair statement? - Serge ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] Hamlets!
In Pennsylvania, Villages are often labeled as Hamlets. These villages always appear within another municipality (as the entire state is incorporated). They don't have any legal entity associated with them, and they are probably becoming less important as suburbs take over the old farming areas. They are still fairly important to people in Pennsylvania as far as giving directions or discussing a location. There are also populated places (such as this one, Chickentown: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/157635699) that the locals have no idea that it exists. The people who do know about, know it because online services tell them that they are in that town. Down the road a little bit, there is another Hamlet (Hecktown: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/1993248917) which definitely exists. They have their own fire station, and people in the area generally know where it is. Hecktown is also a village, where Chickentown is not. To confuse this further, there are Census Designated Places in PA, which are very well known. Hershey ( http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/25930002) is a very good example of this, which is oddly labeled as a town, which isn't a form of government recognized in Pennsylvania (There is one exception, Bloomsburg, which is essentially a Borough, but uses the name 'town'). It should be noted that this isn't an import, although there is a boundary (Admin level 8) which is imported from TIGER. Nobody really gets this stuff right. But I think the census data is a little bit better than the GNIS data, where a lot of these hamlets came from initially. In fact, the GNIS does list when a record is connected to a Census record on their website, it just isn't published in their downloadable files. See on the GNIS website: Hershey, PA: http://geonames.usgs.gov/pls/gnispublic/f?p=gnispq:3:2307265203645995::NO::P3_FID:1176895 Chickentown, PA: http://geonames.usgs.gov/pls/gnispublic/f?p=gnispq:3:1767520712437467::NO::P3_FID:1210868 Hecktown: http://geonames.usgs.gov/pls/gnispublic/f?p=gnispq:3:1179118570263105::NO::P3_FID:1176752 So, while I like the GNIS dataset, and I actually am working on a crowdsourcing project to improve the GNIS dataset ( http://navigator.er.usgs.gov), I think the Census data is much more useful for our purposes. -- Jim McAndrew On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.netwrote: On 6/21/13 11:07 AM, Sean Bartell wrote: I realized only after last week's discussion about neighborhoods that the hamlets (which are distinct from nehighborhoods) are the things messing up the geocoder. A neighborhood is understood to be a place that's not often in an address, but a hamlet is a village, and so a hamlet in the middle of an urban place doesn't make sense. So a hamlet within municipal boundaries is almost certainly wrong. Could we try to detect which imported hamlets are within cities, and delete them or change them to place=neighbourhood? i think we need to pull things like CDPs and hamlets out of the admin_boundary framework and confine it strictly to real government administration (and i think things like fire districts should be excluded from the admin_boundary framework as well). i have heard the argument that all of these things can be considered administrative, but this become so broad and general that you end up with a useless mess. i also think the US is a little peculiar in that our official addressing derives solely from postal routes, which can differ significantly from the admin boundary framework. this is one of the issues with virtually all of the data consumers that try to handle this; european assumptions are the norm and the US isn't europe. i see this in the address handling for things like OsmAnd and mkgmap as well. i suspect we need some algorithmic changes in these entities to reflect US reality; fiddling the data is only a bandaid. richard __**_ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.**org/listinfo/talk-ushttp://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
[Talk-us] OpenStreetMap Virtual Mapping Party Hangout
The OSM US Virtual Mapping party is going on now: https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/065ef2b3439320b01dca2d62de6a0e81a1fb7fdd?gpsrc=selm0utm_medium=embdenfplmutm_campaign=lrnmreutm_source=lmnavbrrtsl=1 ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] Dual Carriageway?
It looks like there were a few points where there were garden dividers, but that changed after a repaving. From looking around on OSM, it doesn't seem like people are marking roads with a garden in the middle of the road as a dual carriageway, maybe they should be? Bing Maps: http://binged.it/RlDDUD Google Streetview: https://maps.google.com/maps?q=Albany,+NYhl=enll=42.643872,-73.778837spn=0.006235,0.007263sll=38.997934,-105.550567sspn=6.743459,7.437744oq=albt=hhnear=Albany,+New+Yorkz=17layer=ccbll=42.643811,-73.778784panoid=uk2V_olPu0SkG1ZsvlA-oAcbp=12,298.26,,0,11.3 On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.netwrote: On 11/29/12 1:48 PM, Steven Johnson wrote: Yes, in that the carriageways are effectively separated. But in a very tortured sort of way. from looking at bing imagery, it looks like they tore out a badly deteriorated section between the two carriageways. richard __**_ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.**org/listinfo/talk-ushttp://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] US Addressing
The city/county of Denver, CO does have a parcels database (in a bunch of formats) (http://data.denvergov.org/dataset/city-and-county-of-denver-parcels) But it is licensed under a CC BY 3.0 License (http://data.denvergov.org/dataset/city-and-county-of-denver-parcels) Is this something that should even be added to the spreadsheet? It looks like all their data is from Sanborn, so the older data should be out of copyright by now, if it can be found elsewhere. On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Steven Johnson sejohns...@gmail.comwrote: That was exactly my reaction as well. My understanding is that these data are essentially in the public domain. I'll note it in the spreadsheet. -- SEJ -- twitter: @geomantic -- skype: sejohnson8 Common sense is the collection of prejudices acquired by age eighteen. -- Einstein On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Brian May b...@mapwise.com wrote: On 11/29/2012 1:11 PM, Richard Welty wrote: On 11/29/12 1:03 PM, Steven Johnson wrote: The data are copyrighted and Arlington County owns all rights to the data and allows use ...as an acknowledged source to produce maps or analysis but you may not redistribute, resell, or copy the data (except for back-up purposes). the redistribute clause is a real problem, as we don't attempt to control people taking copies of OSM as long as they honor the ODbL. i'd say this license is ODbL incompatible (not a lawyer, though.) richard Local governments may claim copyright, but whether they can legally is another matter. A very quick review of Virginia state law appears to show they have liberal open records laws. http://www.opengovva.org/**virginias-foia-the-lawhttp://www.opengovva.org/virginias-foia-the-law We should probably track these public records problems, e.g. counties and cities that claim copyright, etc but the state law says otherwise. Brian __**_ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.**org/listinfo/talk-ushttp://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] US Addressing
Brian, That's probably true. There is no reference to Sanborn in the metadata, but there is an attribute PARCEL_SOURCE which seems to be set to Sanborn in most cases. -- Jim On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Brian May b...@mapwise.com wrote: If Sanborn was just a contractor hired by the govmt agency to help with digitizing, data conversion, etc. there should be no copyright issues with them. I didn't see a reference to Sanborn in the parcel metadata. Brian On 11/29/2012 2:36 PM, Jim McAndrew wrote: The city/county of Denver, CO does have a parcels database (in a bunch of formats) (http://data.denvergov.org/dataset/city-and-county-of-denver-parcels) But it is licensed under a CC BY 3.0 License (http://data.denvergov.org/dataset/city-and-county-of-denver-parcels) Is this something that should even be added to the spreadsheet? It looks like all their data is from Sanborn, so the older data should be out of copyright by now, if it can be found elsewhere. On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Steven Johnson sejohns...@gmail.comwrote: That was exactly my reaction as well. My understanding is that these data are essentially in the public domain. I'll note it in the spreadsheet. -- SEJ -- twitter: @geomantic -- skype: sejohnson8 Common sense is the collection of prejudices acquired by age eighteen. -- Einstein On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Brian May b...@mapwise.com wrote: On 11/29/2012 1:11 PM, Richard Welty wrote: On 11/29/12 1:03 PM, Steven Johnson wrote: The data are copyrighted and Arlington County owns all rights to the data and allows use ...as an acknowledged source to produce maps or analysis but you may not redistribute, resell, or copy the data (except for back-up purposes). the redistribute clause is a real problem, as we don't attempt to control people taking copies of OSM as long as they honor the ODbL. i'd say this license is ODbL incompatible (not a lawyer, though.) richard Local governments may claim copyright, but whether they can legally is another matter. A very quick review of Virginia state law appears to show they have liberal open records laws. http://www.opengovva.org/virginias-foia-the-law We should probably track these public records problems, e.g. counties and cities that claim copyright, etc but the state law says otherwise. Brian ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us ___ Talk-us mailing listTalk-us@openstreetmap.orghttp://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] US Addressing
There are a few exceptions, but the local post offices know how to handle them. They are also extremely minor and the people who live or do business in these areas are probably used to the confusion. If you're curious though: Part of Kentucky has a Tennessee zip code and addresses: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kentucky_Bend There's also a town in Illinois with a Missouri zip code, although the current ZCTA map shows it as being in an Illinois zip code: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaskaskia,_Illinois Fishers Island, NY has a Connecticut zip code, but its own post office, so this is really only a special case from a routing point of view: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fishers_Island,_New_York#Culture -- Jim McAndrew On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Jeffrey Ollie j...@ocjtech.us wrote: On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote: Jeffrey Ollie wrote: It looks pretty good from what I saw, with the obvious exception that newer homes aren't tagged. I'm going to clean up my code a bit and stick it up on github somewhere. If you chaps are all dead set on doing another massive TIGER import - hey, it's your funeral - could I at least urge a little caution on the practicalities of it all? Just having a look at the .osm file posted here, for example, the street names are all unexpanded: Washington St, Park Ave, Deer Run Ln, etc. There have been about 937 threads about expanding TIGER street names since the initial import and it would be a shame to fall into the same hole again. None of the Iowa data that I am processing originates with the US Census or TIGER. The underlying sources of the data are described ad nauseum here: ftp://ftp.igsb.uiowa.edu/gis_library/counties/Story/Address_85.html Basically the data comes from county auditor parcel data, processed through the US Postal Service addressing database, and compared against aerial photography to move the point to the intersection of the driveway with the road. As for name expansion, I'll take a look into that. The data source that I'm using doesn't separate prefixes and suffixes out like TIGER does though... I'm also very very doubtful about the value of importing city, state and (!) country: if we don't have polygons for all of those already, then we really should. Importing n billion nodes into the States which all say hey, this is in the States will bloat the database and hammer download speeds for absolutely no gain whatsoever. As Richard Welty said, the addr:city tag is pretty much required, as US addresses aren't defined by the boundaries of the city you live in (or don't live in for rural addresses), but the post office that delivers your mail. I can see not including the country or the state, do the various routing/geocoding engines take advantage of state/country polygons? Are there any exceptions out there where the address is physically in one state, but their postal address is from a neighboring state because that's where the post office is? -- Jeff Ollie ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] Operation Cowboy - Progress/Todo
Paul, Martijn had suggested contacting the local library and seeing if you can reserve a study room or something like that. If you can't pull something together this weekend (it's not really a good weekend for get togethers in the US), I would love to attend a mapping party in OK in the future. So planning a mapping party in the future could also be a good idea. -- Jim On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 8:35 AM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote: I don't think the Tulsa one is going to happen, lack of venue. On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 5:05 AM, Matthias Meißer dig...@arcor.de wrote: Hi Folks, the organisation of Operation Cowboy seems to be nearly finished. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/**wiki/Operation_Cowboyhttp://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Operation_Cowboy I guess we have enough target areas and thanks to Martjins Map Roulett enough ideas on how to find new tasks :) Thanks fly out to everybody who starts a mapping cake! Thanks to Charlotte (Techlady) we had some *press releases* and it seemed to worked: http://www.spatialsource.com.**au/2012/11/20/article/** OpenStreetMap-second-annual-**map-a-thon-on-this-weekend/** RNXTDSVBSV.htmlhttp://www.spatialsource.com.au/2012/11/20/article/OpenStreetMap-second-annual-map-a-thon-on-this-weekend/RNXTDSVBSV.html http://www.h-online.com/open/**news/item/OpenStreetMap-** launches-Operation-Cowboy-**1751382.htmlhttp://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/OpenStreetMap-launches-Operation-Cowboy-1751382.html But if you like, you can try to still push the event, as it might be a good idea to bring attention of US IT media to the quality assurance topic and that we still looking for more mappers becausethere is still a lot of work to do in America. Sadly slashdot and raddit didn't work for me here :/ Another good thing would be *social media* so spreading to word to attract our global community (and others of course): - https://twitter.com/opcowboy and #OPC2012 - Starting a facebook or google+ account anyone? - Maintaining the IRC channel? Setup a bot? Might be interesting, that this party, we __might__ get a nice animation by Derick Rethans. But hey, let's first do the job and enjoy the results afterwards ;) bye, Matthias __**_ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.**org/listinfo/talk-ushttp://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] Utah voronoi mapcraft
Brian, Quantum GIS does Voronoi polygons pretty well. (under Vector - Geometry Tools - Voronoi Polygons) I would suggest trying that first. Otherwise, there is always ArcMap, but I think it's a spatial analyst tool, so if you don't have those tools already, it's not worth investing in for something you can do freely in qgis. -- Jim On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Clay Smalley claysmal...@gmail.comwrote: I'm not Martijn, but I'm going to guess he may have pulled GIS data of a few selected cities in Utah and used a GIS application to create the Thiessen polygons. I did just that for the Operation Cowboy - Texas map (with a few liberties taken). On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 10:00 PM, Brian DeRocher br...@derocher.orgwrote: Martijn, How did you create the voronoi partitions for this mapcraft map? http://mapcraft.nanodesu.ru/**pie/168http://mapcraft.nanodesu.ru/pie/168 Brian -- Brian DeRocher http://brian.derocher.org http://mappingdc.org http://about.me/brian.derocher __**_ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.**org/listinfo/talk-ushttp://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us -- Clay ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] Geography Awareness Week
Brian, Back in the day of the ambassadors, there was a pretty good presentation going around about the basics of OpenStreetMap. I know Kate Chapman and Tim Water have created a few presentations and put them up on slideshare: http://www.slideshare.net/wonderchook/introduction-to-openstreetmap-7974442 http://www.slideshare.net/chippy/volunteered-geographic-information-and-openstreetmap There's also a decent intro from Steven Johnson floating around the internet somewhere: http://149.168.87.13/NCGISConference2011/presentations/Johnson_Steven_Fri_130.pdf We have been using the google hangout format for our meetings and semi-scrums, and it seems to be working well for us. Good luck! --- Jim McAndrew On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Alex Barth a...@mapbox.com wrote: I think this is an awesome idea. Are you just going to use Google Hangout and stream to youtube? If you need help on getting set up with this, let me know. It's easy. What's great with it hangout is that you get the youtube video for free http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DU51Tfne9pEfeature=plcp - I am not sure whether the res is good enough for screencasts. On Nov 1, 2012, at 11:08 PM, Brian DeRocher br...@derocher.org wrote: Geography Awareness Week is November 11-17, 2012 http://education.nationalgeographic.com/education/collections/geographyawarenessweek My goal is to create a 20 minute OSM introduction / presentation to fellows geeks at my company about OpenStreetmap. I'd like to make this presentation in a way that it's re-usable to other people in other companies. Would anyone like to help? Has this been done before? Brian -- Brian DeRocher http://brian.derocher.org http://mappingdc.org http://about.me/brian.derocher ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us Alex Barth http://twitter.com/lxbarth tel (+1) 202 250 3633 ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] REST Services
Awesome work on this Ian! Randy, looks like you're going to have to find something else to complain about. Bats? On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Randal Hale rjh...@northrivergeographic.com wrote: Wiki page updated... Imagery displayed in JOSM ...and I can no longer complain If I only had the newest imagery. Randal Hale, GISP North River Geographic Systems, Inc. ESRI Business Partner and Certified Trainerhttp://www.northrivergeographic.com 423.653.3611 rjh...@northrivergeographic.com On 10/23/2011 3:58 PM, Ian Dees wrote: On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Josh Doe j...@joshdoe.com wrote: On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 6:32 AM, Randal Hale rjh...@northrivergeographic.com wrote: I know there's probably a better list to send this to... The county (Hamilton County, TN) I reside in is pumping out their 2010 Imagery over a REST Service or whatever I'm supposed to call it. I can completely use this in Arcmap. Can I use this in Merkaartor or JOSM? So far I have found a few other messages from people with the same problem digging around on the intertubes - but no answer. It may be right in front of me and I'm just You're probably talking about ArcGIS's REST interface. It's basically a simplified or RESTful WMS service. There is no way to access the ArcGIS REST interface directly from JOSM at this point. There might be a way to hack it with the undocumented Imagery keywords, but what I've been doing is adding it to the tile.osm.osuosl.org tile server [0] as a tile proxy source and using it from there. If you give me the REST API's URL I can add that relatively quickly and spit back a tile URL you can add to JOSM or Potlatch. Sounds like the same interface that Virginia uses for their VBMP orthoimagery. Just so others know, if the projection offered by the ArcGIS server isn't OSM-style (EPSG:3857, EPSG:900913, etc), and the Export Map functionality isn't backed by raw imagery (i.e. it's just tiled at the given projection, such as one of the state plane systems), then it's likely Ian's method won't work. Unfortunately this is the case with Virginia's server. The tiles are working for the imagery in question here. I don't think we ever figured out what was going on with the Virginia imagery that the export functionality wasn't working. ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] US local chapter board election results
I agree about the idea of the handoff agenda, but with or without, I will also be in the meeting tomorrow. We should at least go in with some goals on what we plan to accomplish this year, and discuss if those goals are practical and how we can work together to help each other with our goals, and how our goals fit with the goals of the greater OSM US. I'm going to try to be on the IRC channel more often as well. On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote: On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Michal Migurski m...@stamen.com wrote: Hey, cool! Thanks everyone. I'm excited to get started with Martijn, Randy, Jim, and Richard. According to the wiki page there is a monthly chapter meeting tomorrow, but the most recent one was six months ago. I'll dial the number tomorrow and see what happens. =) Perhaps the outgoing board can help you to put together an agenda, here on the list? I'm sure they'll have some thoughts on a smooth transition as well. Also #osm-us is a low traffic irc channel that might work for you. #osm-us is on irc.oftc.net, and available from the browser at http://irc.openstreetmap.org/ ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] US local chapter board election results
The Drop-U? call in that we used to use still appears to work. We have used it recently for GeoBus calls: Call-In: 218-486-3891 x663610833 You can't call in from google voice though. On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.netwrote: the number works, i'm enjoying hold music. no need for an emergency search for another free conference call service. On 10/12/11 6:13 PM, Richard Welty wrote: i'll be there, although i think i'll call the number at 6:30pm ET tonight to verify that it works. anyone should feel free to join me at that time. cheers, richard On 10/12/11 5:50 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote: Hah, hooray for all newly and re-elected members, including myself. I'm eager to get started as well. Thanks to Ian, Richard, and Jonathan for overseeing and managing the elections! A meeting tomorrow sounds like a great way to kick start. It would be great if a few outgoing board members could join to ensure a smooth transition. Agenda, let's see: a round of introductions (I for one don't know most of you), goals and ambitions, see which of those we share and how we can work together to achieve them. Practical stuff like finances/bookkeeping. Who's going to be president, secretary, treasurer (do we need to have these roles?). Set best time and frequency for future meetings. I like collaborative editors to jot down minutes on the fly, we could use PiratePad which does not require an account unlike Google Docs. Example -- http://piratepad.net/d4mimIgxOx As for IRC, I will try to be on there more but it doesn't come naturally to me. Looking forward to this! Martijn On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Michal Migurskim...@stamen.comm...@stamen.com wrote: Hey, cool! Thanks everyone. I'm excited to get started with Martijn, Randy, Jim, and Richard. According to the wiki page there is a monthly chapter meeting tomorrow, but the most recent one was six months ago. I'll dial the number tomorrow and see what happens. =) -mike. On Oct 12, 2011, at 9:49 AM, Richard Weait wrote: Dear All, The results of the US local chapter board election have been received and found to be valid. Fourteen valid ballots were received from 50% of the eligible members. I would like to thank the outgoing members of the board for their service to the community. I would also like to thank all of the candidates for offering to serve for the next year. Richard Welty, was re-elected. Martijn, Randy, Jim and Mike were each elected. You can find the detailed results on the wiki, http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Foundation/Local_Chapters/United_States/Elections Best regards, Richard Weait, independent scrutineer, on behalf of, Jonathan Bennett, independent scrutineer, Ian Dees, member of outgoing board. ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us michal migurski- m...@stamen.com 415.558.1610 ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us ___ Talk-us mailing listTalk-us@openstreetmap.orghttp://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] Mapping party best practices
Hi, We're been trying to come up with ways to help people run mapping parties, and have come up with a very basic outline. You may find the best resource to be here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mapping_Weekend_Howto As far as focusing on people, we've have good response from GIS groups, and universities. If you can find a local Geography department, you can send them a flyer about the party. Community colleges tend to be a good source too, and a lot of places have GIS classes. The real hard part is to get the word out, and to the right people, but there are a few places you can start. -- Jim McAndrew On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 7:01 PM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 7:51 PM, Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org wrote: Hi, As I am preparing my first mapping party here in Salt Lake, I am wondering what works and what doesn't. I'm used to organizing events in The Netherlands, but geographical and cultural differences may require a different approach in the US so I'd like to poke your brains: are there formats that work particularly well or not at all? Particular types of venues to gather, interest groups to target, types of mapping to do... Any input welcome. I had a decent response when I sought out GIS user groups and university folks. They seemed to be most interested in what OSM is and how to change it. They were also the quickest to disappear once they heard what OSM is (back then it was you can't use ESRI? oh...), but a few stuck and helped find other groups to work with. As far as location, I looked for places with fast wifi and decent places to sit down. Zoos, libraries, outdoor mall/commercial districts, etc. are all good places to start. ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] OSM US Chapter elections and
There has been some informal talk about when the elections are coming up. I think with SOTM this year, things have been more focused on that than the elections. I'm not a member of the board, although I am running this time around, but this is my understanding of the questions: - Where are the financial reports? - The secretary most likely has these, if they are published, I'm not sure how current they are - What assets does the Chapter have? e.g cash, investments, servers and other hardware - The cash number would probably be in the financial report, there are servers and some schwag - Who administers the server resources? (Ian and ?) - I believe that Ian is doing at least 90% of this - Will administration of the servers change after the election? - I think Ian is pretty set on doing this, but if he isn't on the new board, we may want to have him bring someone else up to speed - What are Chapter servers being utilized for now? - This is a very good question, I think it's mostly imports and bots, but I really don't know - What are the ongoing operations and maintenance costs for the servers? - These are pretty minimal right now, this should also be answered in the financial report - What projects are going on now or will be started after the election, - There are a number of subgroups that are all linked from the OSM US Chapter page on the wiki - http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Foundation/Local_Chapters/United_States - and what are the financial commitments? - I'm not sure on this, it would be on the financial reports as well - How many members are there? - I believe it to be 25ish - Has the Technical, Education Student Outreach or US Tagging working groups ever met? - The groups as a whole haven't, but each board member is responsible for one or more groups, and the board members voice the group concerns I hope my view of these situations at least gets some people talking on this subject. I don't know if my answers are 100% right, but it should be enough to get the ball rolling on these issues. -- Jim McAndrew @JimmyRocks On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote: On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Josh Doe j...@joshdoe.com wrote: I'm having trouble finding any information about the elections for the OSM US chapter, The 2010 election was held in August, by email. So it's probably a bit late this year. Minutes from meetings since March, if any, are missing from http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Call_Minutes ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] What should a US map of OSM data look like
If we're going to be picking apart the style.. I have a few things to add: * Trails (hiking/biking) are often darker than roadways * Limited Access highways (blue) should be darker, wider, etc.. made to stand out more * I really like the tolls idea, the data is there.. if you look at the PA/NJ bridges in open.mapquest.com versus normal mapquest.com, you'll see that the toll bridges actually show up as such in open, but not the main version. * Powerlines are cool to map, but they clutter the map a lot of the time too, they should be lighter in color * Municipalities boundaries are really interesting too, but usually they're just clutter -- Jim McAndrew On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Metcalf, Calvin (DOT) calvin.metc...@state.ma.us wrote: Shields def, also using the interstate, (urbal/rural) arterial, collectorand local nomenclature instead of trunk, primary, secondary. Fix the labling issues related to mulitiple cities near each other (ie Cambridge and all of the cities bordering Boston). Sent with Verizon Mobile Email ---Original Message--- From: Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com Sent: 9/12/2011 6:43 pm To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-us] What should a US map of OSM data look like On 9/12/2011 5:57 PM, Richard Weait wrote: A few of us were just asking on irc what a US-style tile theme would look like? Many printed US maps emphasize divided highways (often including undivided multilane highways). Perhaps a thicker line style at low zooms where lanes=4 or oneway=yes -lanes=1. A separate color for toll=yes (like MapQuest does, but also for toll non-motorways). Fix bloody Georgia and the way the trunks (and other highways) blend into the trees. Render shields at lower resolutions, since the US is not as dense as the UK. De-emphasize railways at lower zooms. Label motorways with both name and number where both are tagged (this would be useful even in Europe). Ian Dees liked the idea of fewer different colors for roads, blue / motorway, green / trunk, red / primary ... I'm not sure what the point of this would be - there's definitely enough variation in importance for all these classifications to be useful. For extra credit, can it also look good in Canada and Mexico? Canada and the US have rather similar road systems, so what works in one should be good for the other. I believe Mexico has a fair number of rural non-motorway toll roads. ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] Road Trip to SotM
Kate, Richard, Although Denver isn't much of a roadtrip for me anymore, I'd still love to do at least some of this trip, either as part of the GeoBus project or something separate. I like the idea of multiple carpools coming from different parts of the country as well. Maybe find out some people who are interested and design a few bus stops along the route. -- Jim On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote: On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 8:39 PM, Kate Chapman k...@maploser.com wrote: Hi All, I know there was some talk about the GeoBus for State of the Map. Well, on a much smaller scale myself and Iván Sánchez are going to drive from Washington D.C. to Denver. This is a one way trip and I plan to sell my car at the end. Anyway if anyone is interested in meeting up along the way here is now currently tentative schedule including dates. DC Sept 1 KnoxvilleSept 2 Memphis Sept 3 Dallas Sept 4 Dallas Sept 5 Amarillo Sept 6 Pueblo COSept 7 Denver Sept 8 Sounds like fun. If you can get Albuquerque / Santa Fe into the mix, the landscape is wonderful. Of course, I've not been to Amarillo and that might be equally great. ;-) ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] Who is mapping on the ground in US?
I've been to a successful mapping party in NYC, which was run by CloudMade. The meetup.com group still exists, and someone is funding it. I don't know anyone specific who is still working with it though. I believe Lancaster, PA is still trying to have monthly meetups as well. -- Jim McAndrew On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.netwrote: On 6/2/11 1:19 PM, Steve Coast wrote: Well.. it's chicken and egg. There wasn't anyone interested in the UK when I ran the first mapping parties there either. If you set up a group on meetup.com you'd be surprised how many people join and start to get interested once you have a group meeting monthly. We should really be aiming for one meetup per state. I think we have MA, WA, CA, CO now all have monthly meetups. How does NY, TX and the captiol look? i'm trying to get a group going in the Capitol District of NY; i think that NYC needs its own group, but i don't know of anything going on down there. richard ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] Ideas for OSMF US Swag
I'm in the same boat as Ian with limited space in my apartment, but I'd love to help out with the mailing. -- Jim McAndrew On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 11:59 AM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote: I'd be happy to do some mailing. I don't have a whole lot of room to store boxes of pamphlets in my apartment, but I could do a few batches. On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Kate Chapman k...@maploser.com wrote: Richard is right, there is an English language flyer. I believe Frederik Ramm has it. If someone can volunteer to mail it that would be great. I'm home less than 50% of the year so I don't think I'm the right person. -Kate On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote: On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Kai Krueger kakrue...@gmail.com wrote: Thea Aldrich wrote: Our question to the community is: If you like this idea, what types of branded materials would you like? I think it is a great idea and is the sort of thing a local chapter can be useful for to support the community and help spread the word. One thing that would imho be useful is to create flyers [1] to hand out to people who haven't heard about OSM to explain what OSM is about and why people should care to contribute. From what I have gathered, the German flyer [2] has been quite a success with apparently 40.000 flyers printed and distributed to date. There is now also an English flyer which the UK chapter distributes for free [3], but it only extends its offer to UK. So perhaps OSMF-US could print and distribute a similar flyer in the US, although it might be good to adapt it to fit the needs of the US better first. There is at least one English language flyer around. If I recall the biggest hold up is that nobody volunteered to do the actual mailings from a US address. Is somebody willing to do that? ideally, the volunteer would send out flyers each week in response to the requests. ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
[Talk-us] GeoBus call tonight
There will be a GeoBus call tonight at 8pm Eastern Time. Part of the agenda for this evening will be discussing the new Community Events and Mapping Party work group: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Foundation/Local_Chapters/United_States/Working_Groups/Community_Events The idea is to merge these two projects together because they will both mutually benefit from the other. The other topics for this evening include: - Fayetteville, GA Mapping Party - Repository for Mapping Party documentation - Party Marketing - Failures / Successes - Objectives - Common tasks to make it easy for anyone to run a mapping party - How this new group will affect the GeoBus project - Magnets / Stickers / Marketing ideas If you're interested in joining: Tonight's Call is at 8:00pm Eastern Time The Call In Number is: 218-486-3891 x663610833 -- Jim McAndrew ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] [Tagging] how to tag US townships?
Pennsylvania township administrative lines were added with the Tiger 2000 import, they do not have point data associated with them, and I have found them to be mostly correct in location. I don't believe there is any reason to add these municipalities as places on the map as point data, for they do not have a traditional center. As far as Pennsylvania and New Jersey are concerned, a township isn't really a point place. These townships were set up to govern a portion of a county. Many townships offer minimal services. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Township_%28Pennsylvania%29) (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Township_%28New_Jersey%29) There are a few exceptions to this because some townships have grown extremely large in the past 50 years, and these two states are not very active in creating new boroughs, towns (NJ), or cities. An example of this would be Upper Darby township in Delaware County, PA. Even in that case, people in Upper Darby are more likely to claim they are from a CDP inside of the township such as Drexel Hill. People generally go by whatever their post office is. Locals will generally have an idea of some of the township boundaries but will rarely use them for reference. Townships are not suburbs. Townships were created before most cities and boroughs in Pennsylvania. An excellent example of this process is the creation of Philadelphia as it is today. Philadelphia started as a small cities along the Delaware River, as it grew, it started adding surrounding areas. The farm land around the city, but still in Philadelphia county became townships, as population grew in certain spots in these townships, new villages would form, these villages would then become boroughs. Philadelphia also had another form of municipality called Districts at the time, which is no longer relevant. In 1854 Philadelphia City decided to join with the county, and incorporate every township, borough, and district within the county borders. Townships in adjacent counties had become the locations for the newer suburbs, as well as older boroughs in the area that were created distinctly from Philadelphia. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Act_of_Consolidation,_1854) What is now Lancaster city was originally not an incorporated place, but instead a village within a township. Lancaster became a borough from the surrounding Lancaster Township within Lancaster County in 1749, 20 years after the creation of Lancaster County from Chester County. In 1818 Lancaster borough was transformed into Lancaster City, and in 1924 it became a modern class-3 city. While the growth of Lancaster as a place contributed to the popularity of surrounding areas, and the surrounding boroughs (such as Lititz, Ephrata, East Petersburg) now act as almost suburbs to the city of Lancaster, they are not truly suburbs, and people from these boroughs would probably be offended by being labeled as such. (http://www.co.lancaster.pa.us/lancastercity/cwp/browse.asp?a=3bc=0c=42722 ) Suburbs can form in townships and boroughs, but they are not suburbs themselves. New Jersey has an interesting history with the creation of boroughs that makes them seem a little bit more suburban: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boroughitis There are townships in other states that are managed differently, but in PA and NJ, they are just county subdivisions, and are not points to put on a map. -- Jim McAndrew ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
[Talk-us] GeoBus call Sept 30, 2010
*GeoBus Meeting*: There will be a meeting tomorrow (September 30, 2010) about the GeoBus project at 8:00pm Eastern Time. This meeting will focus on some of the GeoBus initiatives. I don’t want to get caught up talking about funding, what to do with the funding, and the possibility of buy a bus. The focus of this meeting will be to come up with what will define the GeoBus. *GeoBus Call-In*: September 30, 2010 8:00pm Eastern Time 218-486-3891 x663610833 *My ideas for the GeoBus*: The idea of the GeoBus is a group of people who get people together and map. It will help build communities and promote mapping to special interests groups. It will be clearly defined and simple enough that other people can easily pick it up. It will focus on rural areas, parkland, and special interests (such as hiking, biking, fishing, and skiing). There may be a physical geobus in the future, and this will help get the media attention the geobus wants. There is no need to have a bus in order for GeoBus to be successful, instead, the physical bus should be a sign of the the GeoBus’ success. While the GeoBus can be a single bus going across the country, the GeoBus can be a lot chain of events to promote mapping to the masses. *Triangle Mapping Party*: The Triangle mapping party is this weekend. We are going to use this party as a study of what the GeoBus can do. This mapping party will include some special interest mapping (such as biking) and we will use the people who are mapping in this as a case study for what the GeoBus needs to do to promote mapping to these groups. Please reply to this with your ideas for the discussion, and if you are available Thursday night, please sit in the meeting and discuss where you believe the GeoBus should be going. -- Jim McAndrew j...@loc8.us ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
[Talk-us] GeoBus call tonight
Hello, We are planning another GeoBus call tonight. It looks like we have a logo! We only have a few things to discuss, so we can try to keep it short! There will be another call next week to prepare what we can for the Triangle Mapping Party. Tonight's Call is at 8:00pm Eastern Time The Call In Number is: 218-486-3891 x663610833 -- Jim McAndrew ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
[Talk-us] Geobus call tonight
Hey, There will be a brief GeoBus call tonight. I want to go over the action items quickly and discuss where we are going from there. The call will take place at 8PM Eastern Time The Call In Number is: 218-486-3891 x663610833 Thanks, Jim McAndrew ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] Reminder: Geobus call tomorrow
Did anybody make the call last night? On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Lars Ahlzen l...@ahlzen.com wrote: On 9/2/2010 10:50 AM, Jim McAndrew wrote: Hey, I am out of the country today and will not be able to attend the call this week either. Sorry, I can't make it either. Being Friday night before Labor day weekend, I have a feeling the attendance may be thinner than usual... :) - Lars -- Lars Ahlzen l...@ahlzen.com ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] Reminder: Geobus call tomorrow
Hey, I am out of the country today and will not be able to attend the call this week either. I have been leading the calls with a lot of help from Serge. The action items from last weeks' meeting were: 1. ZipCar / Rentals 2. Next OSM meeting -- keep discussing GeoBus keep it with OSM US 1. Will OSM US handle the money 2. Continue working on the website - Serge 3. Create a logo - Lisa Carl Some major talking points were: 1. We are anxious to get the GeoBus idea on the road, and while having an actual bus is a great idea, we want to focus on mapping and community building, and not bus maintenance. So we want to come up with some estimates on rental prices just so we can compare the ideas. 2. Lisa has been doing good work on the logo, and is working with Carl to come up with something that is fun, yet professional. 3. This project is not board-approved, and we are waiting for the new board to come on before the idea will be formally suggested to the board. *This may be a talking point for the week of Sept 2, 2010.* 4. Serge will continue to work on the website. 5. We want to focus on getting people to map and to continue mapping, and we used information from Nama Budhathoki's presentation to come up with some ideas on how we would find groups of people who will continue to map. I am really sorry to have to miss this meeting, I will be able to attend next week's meeting. If you have any questions for me before the meeting, please email me back and I will make sure to find a way to check my email before the meeting tonight. Tonight's Call-In information is: Call in number: 218-486-3891 x663610833 -- Jim McAndrew On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 10:57 PM, Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.com wrote: Hey all, Just a quick reminder that there's a Geobus call tomorrow night at 8pm. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GeoBus Unfortunately a personal issue that has come up and I won't be available tomorrow, but the Geobus is a really cool project and I think we can really make this happen. - Serge ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] GeoBus Discussion
I am planning on another phone meeting tonight at 8:00pm: Thursday August 26, 2010 8:00PM EDT Call in number: 218-486-3891 x663610833 I will try to get the minutes into this email as soon as the conversation is over, so we can keep the discussion going here. Katie had some good questions, so I'm going to try to answer them here: When do you think this would happen? Duration? Would anyone really be available for the entire duration? or just portions? I think the Bus will be a symbol of the project, and will be flexible enough that it can do a month long trip, but also be used for smaller trips. Agree with the concerns over costs and burden of maintenance. Do we really want to maintain something in the long-term? What about renting a vehicle? Considering the costs of ownership, perhaps this might be a better option? Having a Bus as a marking symbol is the way we want to go. Eric Wolf has some good information on VW buses. A lot of it is kind of scary. We did discuss renting a van for a short time. I'm not sure of how that would work, but it's not a bad idea. Also, what about taking Amtrak across the country? (always been interested in doing this) Amtrak offers unlimited passes for 15 days, 30 days, or 45 days of travel. They also have good group specials and perhaps we could lower the costs. I had a roommate in college that did this one summer, he had some great stories. I would also be happy doing car trips at a smaller scale, doing outreach at universities and engaging people, (e.g. ambassadors, trainers) and scheduling things during weekends. In reality, not sure how much vacation time I would have for this anyway, versus other ways of spending vacation time. That is a major problem with it, and people would probably each only do a short stint on the bus. I'll keep these in mind for the discussion tonight, and I hope to talk to some of you there! I'll be back with the meeting minutes before tomorrow. -- Jim McAndrew On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Eric Wolf ebw...@gmail.com wrote: Just to jump in here... As a former owner of a '74 VW Bus, I can tell you that there are serious positives and negatives to going that route. First, the positives: 1. If you can find someone not wanting to rape you, they can be purchased fairly cheap ~ $2500 for a decent camper. However, decent doesn't mean the same thing here as it would for any newer vehicle. That means: a. Engine runs well enough to get it home. b. Minimal rust through (straight frame, no undercarriage rust) c. Interior isn't hideously gross (and I'm not just talking 70s plaid gross) 2. They get pretty good gas mileage (~ 20mpg) and are fun to drive once you get used to it. They are amazingly easy to parallel park! Very short wheel-base. 3. Style + Substance - better than a schoolbus 4. There is a great network of people to help you WHEN you break down: http://www.type2.com/rescue/ 5. You will be a decent mechanic after owning one Second, the negatives: 1. 90% of the buses for sale now are in the rape category. I'm talking $11,000 for a vehicle with 150K miles?!? If you want a classic 21-window, you'll spend at least $5K for a rolling body and no engine. 2. Be sure to clean it thoroughly. If you have a friend in the police department, ask them if you can have a drug dog check it for you. There are about a billion places to hide (or lose) drugs in a VW bus. You don't want to get pulled over by an over-zealous redneck cop and then find out there's a kilo of cocaine in some hidden corner. 3. You get good gas mileage because you won't be going fast. The semis will be blowing past you. It will be life in the slow lane. 4. You will be a decent mechanic after owning one because you will do repairs on the side of the road. I always had the necessary tools with me in the bus to remove the engine on the side of the road. Fortunately, I only ever had to do this in my driveway. http://www.flickr.com/photos/ebwolf/269029370/ -Eric -=--=---===---=--=-=--=---==---=--=-=- Eric B. Wolf 720-334-7734 On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Jim McAndrew j...@loc8.us wrote: Blars, I do realize that the telephone format is inconvenient to a lot of people, especially considering time zones and availability. It is a good suggestion to move it to an email list. As far as the amount of work involved, we know that getting an old school bus is expensive and won't be easy. The mileage, insurance, and fuel cost are all concerns to us. Thea Clay is currently in the process of pricing the total cost of ownership for different vehicles, and we think that a VW bus will probably be the best solution for this idea. If you would like, I can send you the meeting minutes from last week's meeting. -- Jim McAndrew On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Blars Blarson openstreetmap-talk...@scd.debian.net wrote: In article
Re: [Talk-us] GeoBus Discussion
Blars, I do realize that the telephone format is inconvenient to a lot of people, especially considering time zones and availability. It is a good suggestion to move it to an email list. As far as the amount of work involved, we know that getting an old school bus is expensive and won't be easy. The mileage, insurance, and fuel cost are all concerns to us. Thea Clay is currently in the process of pricing the total cost of ownership for different vehicles, and we think that a VW bus will probably be the best solution for this idea. If you would like, I can send you the meeting minutes from last week's meeting. -- Jim McAndrew On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Blars Blarson openstreetmap-talk...@scd.debian.net wrote: In article aanlktinhg331nozjxjhkwceg2va+gnbcerhtzxm7p...@mail.gmail.comaanlktinhg331nozjxjhkwceg2va%2bgnbcerhtzxm7p...@mail.gmail.com j...@loc8.us writes: Tomorrow (Thursday) night at 8pm EST, we are going to have a meeting to discuss the GeoBus. You should realize by making it a phone discussion, you are excluding some people. I'm much more likely to participate in an email or IRC discussion. I think you are underestimating the amount of work involved in such a conversion. Used busses (school, local or long distance) tend to be very high mileage and need a lot of maintenance. I think a used RV should also be considered, they tend to have maintenance issues from lack of use. Also, the bus is more likely to need a commercial drivers licence. -- Blars Blarson blar...@scd.debian.net With Microsoft, failure is not an option. It is a standard feature. ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] Removing tiger:* tags
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 7:55 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote: On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 7:49 PM, Alan Millar amillar...@gmail.com wrote: Furthermore, don't store redundant data in the OSM database. There's absolutely no excuse for having 200 ways which all say name=Cain Rd, name_base=Cain, name_type=Rd. It's absolutely terrible design. Patches welcome. Please contribute a fix. I've been fixing it. The fact that Cain Rd has a base of Cain and a type Rd is already in the database over and over and over again. I've been taking out the redundant copies of that information (which should have been in a separate lookup table from the beginning anyway). I was never a fan of splitting a way, duplicating its tags, for something like a small bridge over a creek It would be great if attributes could be assigned to a number of ways, at least from a normalization standpoint. From a UI standpoint, I don't really know how it would be done, but it could be possible. Modifying all the existing OSM data would be a challenge though. ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] US meetups?
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Jim McAndrew j...@loc8.us wrote: What are the goals for the openstreetmap.us web page? That's a good question that we should probably all discuss. My opinion is that it should be a one-stop-shop for growing the US OSM community. Not entirely sure what that entails, but I imagine it starts with: - a calendar - pages for specific communities both new and established (the DC and Bay Area folks come to mind) - resources for getting involved (for someone that maybe doesn't want to commit to a mapping party yet but still wants to be involved?) - ...I ran out of ideas Any others? I like the ideas that Richard Weait has of integrating it with more social networking tools. I'm not entirely sure how that would be done without being too obtrusive. People coming to the openstreetmap.us website are going to be interested in: - Events - Mapping parties - Meetups - Talks - How people can help - Holding Mapping Parties - Doing Personal Mapping - Ideas - Funding OpenStreetMap.us - at least it should be easy for them to do so - Learning more about the organization - How to get a hold of people - Equipment needed to map - walking papers - GPSes There's really a lot that can go into it. The wiki format would make it easy for the community to add these things as people wish to see them, but isn't as attractive to people that aren't used to technical webpages. - Jim McAndrew ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] US meetups?
Who is paying for these meetup.com groups? I met with someone at Where 2.0 from meetup.com mentioned that OSM uses the site for some meetups, but it's hard because they charge $12/mo. There may be a way to get these groups sponsored by meetup.com, so that OSM mappers aren't footing the bill for the groups. There's also Yahoo!'s upcoming.comwhich is just free in general. -- Jim McAndrew On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Christopher Covington c...@vt.edu wrote: On Wed, 2010-04-28 at 13:59 -0400, Richard Weait wrote: Any US OSM meetups other than these three? Any other fixed addresses for local US OSM meetings? http://www.meetup.com/Atlanta-OpenStreetMap/ http://www.meetup.com/OpenStreetMap-Columbus/ http://www.meetup.com/Bay-Area-OpenStreetMappers/ Also, if the organizers of the Bay Area meetup would add OpenStreetMap as one of their groups, some others on the Bay Area OSM waiting list will be able to find them. While it's generally handy to have listings on multiple websites, what's the special importance of having OpenStreetMap groups listed on this particular paid service? -Chris C. ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Re: [Talk-us] OpenStreetMap U.S. Inc
Excellent news Kate! I know this has taken a lot of work from you and a few others. It's great to see it all coming together! On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Kate Chapman k...@maploser.com wrote: Hey All, Just wanted to let you know OpenStreetMap U.S. Inc exists now. This is so we can eventually become a chapter of OpenStreetMap. We'll be moving forward with getting an EIN (tax number) from the IRS, working out the Chapter agreement, etc shortly. Thanks for all your (and the temp board's) hard work on this, Kate! Woohoo! ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us