Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Question from an old newbie
agentsmith wrote: > I see. Previously I had my friend helping me to install Squeezecenter > to my QNAP. I recall the performance was much better with about 30,000 > tracks. Problem is I don't think I will be capable of reinstalling LMS > to the QNAP. > I find installing LMS on my QNAP became much easier with the package described here: http://forum.qnap.com/viewtopic.php?f=123&t=35740 My earlier installations were really quite fiddly, needing to install SSOTS before installing LMS. The package includes both. Robert Grumpy Bob's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=41857 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=97459 ___ Touch mailing list Touch@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Question from an old newbie
Mnyb wrote: > No that's the other mystery, why is you server slow it should not be ? > > Is not PureMusic one of those apps that tweaks the whole OS basically , > can that have any influence on running a normal aplication . Sorry to have confused you. My MacMini is the player directly connected to my DAC and playback from MAcOS using Pure Music. My LMS is installed onto a Macbook Pro which is not used as a player. But anyway, Pure Music is just a so called audiophile grade software player, and is not known to hog the CPU. In ay case I could load up a Firewire or USB drive with gobs of files and connect to my Macbook Pro and see if that is much faster. Someone mentioned 1 hour scan time for 10's of thousands of tracks on the Vortex server, that seems pertty amazing speed. agentsmith's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1838 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=97459 ___ Touch mailing list Touch@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Question from an old newbie
agentsmith wrote: > I see. Previously I had my friend helping me to install Squeezecenter > to my QNAP. I recall the performance was much better with about 30,000 > tracks. Problem is I don't think I will be capable of reinstalling LMS > to the QNAP. > > Of course I can always buy one more FireWire drive for my MacMini and > have LMS installed there, that should really fly. But my MacMini also > houses PureMusic for DSD playing so I don't really that machine to do > too much. > > One thing I don't understand is after finished scanning, access to the > database which is local should not be slow. Especially considering that > the system is quite capable of playing even 24/192 files over the LAN > very smoothly. Or is the database stored on the NAS drive? If so, is > there anyway to set the DB to local? No that's the other mystery, why is you server slow it should not be ? Is not PureMusic one of those apps that tweaks the whole OS basically , can that have any influence on running a normal aplication . Mnyb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4143 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=97459 ___ Touch mailing list Touch@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Touch considered lower SQ than CD player on a high-end system?
Thank-you all for your comments. I appreciate the time you took to respond to my question. gln2's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=58384 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=97483 ___ Touch mailing list Touch@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Touch considered lower SQ than CD player on a high-end system?
Many of us say that something "sounds better" than something else, whether it be a comparison of DACs, CD players, digital audio via FLAC files or via shiny discs, the Touch, etc., however I would speculate most of us have not precisely level matched the components in question and performed a double-blind test of the components, DACs or equipment in order to determine whether we really can discern a difference. I have played the chase the DAC issue ever since the first outboard DACs became available. I am no longer playing that game as it is an endless drain on one's wallet without any real objective evidence that it significantly improves one's system. I spent a lot of time and money building a dedicated audio room with acoustical treatment and really enjoy the sound of the Touch vs. my various CD/SACD/Universal disc players. It sounds pretty good to me. I guess I got over my audio nervosa many years ago. The Touch coupled with a competently designed system in a decent listening environment is a very capable piece of equipment. Enjoy the music. Jeff52's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=103 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=97483 ___ Touch mailing list Touch@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Question from an old newbie
Mnyb wrote: > Exactly , scanning files over the network is slow even if the server is > fast . > > Almost no NAS comes close to 1g tranfer speed more often less than 100mb > in practice, and even if they did it still much slover than SATA or > actually even USB can be faster . I see. Previously I had my friend helping me to install Squeezecenter to my QNAP. I recall the performance was much better with about 30,000 tracks. Problem is I don't think I will be capable of reinstalling LMS to the QNAP. Of course I can always buy one more FireWire drive for my MacMini and I that that should really fly. One thing I don't understand is after finished scanning, access to the database which is local should not be slow. Espccially considering that the system is quite capable of playing even 24/192 files over the LAN vey smoothly. agentsmith's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1838 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=97459 ___ Touch mailing list Touch@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Touch considered lower SQ than CD player on a high-end system?
I will say that my CDP (Marantz SA11-s1; $3,500.00 or $4,500.00 player) was sold shortly after getting a Touch. My rig, though not high end, does sound good with the unmodified Touch. Preamp - deHavilland Ultraverve 3 Amps - QuickSilver MidMonos Speakers - Von Schweikert VR4jr's Brian Astroimage's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=38571 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=97483 ___ Touch mailing list Touch@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Touch Web Server non accessible
Unfortunately it's not quite this simple, a number of the important files get regenrated at boot time (I don't remember exactly which ones) so just changing the file doesn't work. server.prefs should not be re-generated - and that's where most changes would go. Just make sure the server is not running when you edit the file, as in that case it _will_ be overwritten sooner or later. There's a json file in the prefs folder with information about the media connected etc. That's the one which gets generated whenever you start the device or plug something in. So the simple answer is "it CAN be done, but it aint easy!" Agreed :-). -- Michael ___ Touch mailing list Touch@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Touch Web Server non accessible
mherger wrote:
> > Ok, I'm not totally new to this kind of solutions.
> > Please, could you give some hints, some starting point?
>
> In Settings/Advanced you can enable SSH ("Remote access"). Then you'll
>
> find the configuration file in /etc/squeezecenter. I'd suggest you play
>
> with the prefs on a desktop installation before you start tinkering on
> the
> device. And always keep a copy of the working file..
>
> --
>
> Michael
Unfortunately it's not quite this simple, a number of the important
files get regenrated at boot time (I don't remember exactly which
ones) so just changing the file doesn't work. I experimented with this
a while back and wound up having to write some "patches" and apply them
from linix at the correct place in the boot process, after the files get
rewritten but before the server gets started. Unfortunately it's been
awhile and the machine I did all this on is no longer with us so I
don't have the details.
Another option is to find where in the boot code the files are being
re-written and stop it, but it turned out to be multiple places, it was
easier to just aply a patch after the re-writes.
So the simple answer is "it CAN be done, but it aint easy!"
John S.
JohnSwenson's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=5974
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=97466
___
Touch mailing list
Touch@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] RCA Output while in standby
For the digital out . http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=16069 http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?77360-Disable-audio-outputs-when-off/page4 But it may not always help ,some dac's are to simplistic . See this SB3 bug ,it has" digital out off" but... http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=10077 Mnyb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4143 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=97477 ___ Touch mailing list Touch@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] RCA Output while in standby
giantpopples wrote: > Hello ! > I have recently bought a Emotiva A-100 amp which has a very nice > function : it detects when a signal comes from the stereo RCA input to > automatically power. > Problem is, I have hooked up my squeezebox touch and it seems that there > is always current on the RCA output (like the digital one), even when > the SBT is in standby, therefore the amp is always on :-( (the fault is > on the SBT, if I remove the RCA from the SBT after a few seconds the amp > goes off) > Is that normal behavior, and is there any options/plugins/lua file I > could use to have this behavior disabled ? > > The amp also have a trigger input, but the SBT does not support this > whith the 3.5" audio out.. > > Thank you very much ! Are you talking about the single RCA digital out, or the two analog RCA outs? The noise level on the analog outs is VERY low when not playing anything, if that is triggering the amp then either its sensitivity is set wrong or you have a ground loop. If you are talking about the DIGITAL out from the Touch, then this is a known issue, the digital out is always sending out a signal, even if it is "silent". John S. JohnSwenson's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=5974 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=97477 ___ Touch mailing list Touch@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Touch considered lower SQ than CD player on a high-end system?
This is one of those very difficult to answer in the general sense. I have a $1200 CD player that does not sound as good as the Touch, but a $4000 one which is a lot better. Non of my less than $1000 players are better than the Touch, but that does not mean it is universally true. I certainly have not compared it to every player out there. Then there is what you are looking for. I have been in a listening session with several people where different people ranked equipment differently and we were all in the same room listening to the exact same setup. So YOU may like the Touch better and someone else may like the CD player better etc. The same thing goes for external DACs, there are a LOT of inexpensive DACs out there right now, some people think some of them sound better than the Touch analog outs and others think the Touch sounds better. I have a system in my listening room (It's all DIY, so don't ask what equipment it is) that is very resolving. I also have built many DACs, some of which are about as good as it gets today. These DACs DO sound significantly better than the Touch, but the Touch on it's own still sounds quite good in this system. Last night I was doing a little comparison with the Touch, a $300 DAC and a $1200 DAC. The Touch easily beat the $300 DAC and was neck and neck with the $1200 DAC. Of course someone else might have heard it differently. But then there is a $150 DAC (HRT music streamerII) which when used with EDO and parts of TT3.0 is better than that $1200 DAC! (again that is for ME, someone else may think differently) John S. JohnSwenson's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=5974 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=97483 ___ Touch mailing list Touch@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Touch considered lower SQ than CD player on a high-end system?
Maybe bring out the preamp anyway , unless you use analog attenuators (or the power amp has adjustable gain ) . I may be wrong is this an integrated classe or a power amp ? Touch volume is digital that is normally not a problem but if you are very low on the volume scale it could be ? I once had a classe amp it had high sensitivity ? for comparison note that if you use replay gain you drop -10dB in volume. If you are to compare try to calibrate the volume as it is not likely that your CD player or Touch sounds equally loud (radio schah spl meter would do ) and turn of replay gain/smart gain And as you say you have many unknown at the same time , you cant asses what is what really . Speakers you never heard before ? and you havent heard good stuff in your home for years ? the human sound memory is not really that good soo the events are a bit to far separated in time too ? Suggest getting used to new speakers ,just listen to music a week or two ,do some placement experiments with them to get them to perform their best they might need some "burn in" but actually it is often the listener that gets accustomed to the sound, but speakers could in same cases need it for real (most other components don't contrary to popular opinion ). I have just briefly used the analog outs into my old speakers so I have no solid opinion that could help (and that to was a long time ago ) and I did not eminently had any analog CD player of any kind to compare with. Touch could possible be bettered by a very good dac , Touch is not state of the art in all aspects the price point makes for some compromises . Mnyb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4143 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=97483 ___ Touch mailing list Touch@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Touch considered lower SQ than CD player on a high-end system?
garym wrote: > Short answer is there should be no difference unless your cd player has > a much better built in Dac. That's unlikely unless you have a cd player > costing more than 750, and even then who knows. > > More likely, the touch is not as loud as the cd player so you probably > just perceive the slightly louder cd player as sounding better. Which is why I was wondering if the DAC in the Touch is inferior to the DAC's in a mid-level CD player, which is what I had used previously. I had read many that said the Touch has a decent DAC, but then again many people seem to feed the output into an outside DAC unit. So, I wasn't sure how it compared to a decent CD player. Volume definitely needs to be turned way up, you are correct. gln2's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=58384 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=97483 ___ Touch mailing list Touch@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Touch considered lower SQ than CD player on a high-end system?
Short answer is there should be no difference unless your cd player has a much better built in Dac. That's unlikely unless you have a cd player costing more than 750, and even then who knows. More likely, the touch is not as loud as the cd player so you probably just perceive the slightly louder cd player as sounding better. garym's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=17325 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=97483 ___ Touch mailing list Touch@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
[SlimDevices: Touch] Touch considered lower SQ than CD player on a high-end system?
I'm wondering if the Touch's analogue output is generally considered inferior to a mid-level CD player WHEN USING a high-end receiver/amp and speakers. (I realize a DAC can be a big improvement, but I'm not up to that step yet.) For those who have listening experience using high-end equipment did you feel that your CD player outperformed the Touch? (I'd prefer no comments from experiences using ~$300 receivers with ~$400 speakers, please.) I had my Touched hooked up to ceiling speakers for the past year, but just purchased a pair of high-end stereo speakers (Ascend Tower RAAL). Just hooked up an unmodified Touch to them playing CD ripped FLAC files stored on a vortexbox and using the analogue out into a 200 wpc Classe amp. I expected to be blown away, but just find the sound "good". Sound quality does not seem as good as my previous speakers and CD player, which I got rid of a few years ago. This is the first time I've feed the Touch into a high-end stereo, and also the first time I've listened to these speakers, so I'm not sure why I'm disappointed. It has also been a few years since I've had my prior high-end stereo, so I can't make any direct comparisons. The speakers are very highly regarded, so could it be the Touch analogue out? My CD player doesn't have variable out, so I would need to pull my old preamp out of storage in order to do a direct comparison with CD's. So, I thought it would be good to get some opinions. Thanks. gln2's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=58384 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=97483 ___ Touch mailing list Touch@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] SqueezePad or iPeng app?
Letten wrote: > Sorry for picking up on the original question of choosing an App for > controlling Squeezebox'es. > > But our household has many squeezeboxes old and new, and we control them > from many different devices: PC's through webinterface, Android phones > and tablets, iPads, and the Squeezeboxes them seleves. > > In my experience, switching between all these "remotes" is much easier > using interfaces which are more or less identical. > > So, I actually went back to using Logitech's own App more often, even > though I have some of the others. I know it's not as smooth in the > interface, but at least it's familiar across all our devices. > > Just my 2 cents :-) No apology necessary. I was the one who took this thread off it's original course. :o I appreciate your feedback using Logitech's app to control multiple devices. :) toby10 wrote: > Might be because iPeng is still trying to connect to the (now absent) > LMS. You need to switch iPeng over to MySB.com where your Touch is. Yes, that's what I've learned from the responses here. I'm slowly but surely learning how all this works with the great help I am getting here. :) Saturn94's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=56831 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=97366 ___ Touch mailing list Touch@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
[SlimDevices: Touch] RCA Output while in standby
Hello ! I have recently bought a Emotiva A-100 amp which has a very nice function : it detects when a signal comes from the stereo RCA input to automatically power. Problem is, I have hooked up my squeezebox touch and it seems that there is always current on the RCA output (like the digital one), even when the SBT is in standby, therefore the amp is always on :-( (the fault is on the SBT, if I remove the RCA from the SBT after a few seconds the amp goes off) Is that normal behavior, and is there any options/plugins/lua file I could use to have this behavior disabled ? The amp also have a trigger input, but the SBT does not support this whith the 3.5" audio out.. Thank you very much ! giantpopples's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=42798 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=97477 ___ Touch mailing list Touch@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] LMS on Ubuntu 12.04 cannot downsample 24/192
Fukinagashi wrote: > But my machine is 32 bit indeed... :/ then it should work ? no funny settings in "file types" like disabling flac=native Mnyb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4143 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=97454 ___ Touch mailing list Touch@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] SqueezePad or iPeng app?
Saturn94 wrote: > The issue I'm running into is when I launch iPeng on my iPad Mini > sometimes it doesn't "see" the Touch at all; there's simply no option to > connect to the Touch via iPeng when this happens. Might be because iPeng is still trying to connect to the (now absent) LMS. You need to switch iPeng over to MySB.com where your Touch is. toby10's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=12553 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=97366 ___ Touch mailing list Touch@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Question from an old newbie
agentsmith wrote: > - Is Vortexbox a software only solution? I see a lot of Vortexox based > hardware boxes. It can be either. An old computer can be converter to Vortexbox or you can purchase a Vortexbox Appliance (a small computer running Votexbox). I have an old PC (2004) running Vortexbox, other forum members have the Vortexbox Appliance. agentsmith wrote: > - If I just want to use a dedicated PC with gobs of storage just to > serve as a LMS or may be as a file server for my MacMini/Pure Music > player, could I just download VortexBox and be in business within > minutes? Maybe not minutes but not hours. The software has to be downloaded and burned to a CD (using ISO burning software). The target computer is then booted up using the ISO CD which wipes the hard drive and loads up the Vortexbox operating systen. This sounds more complicated than it actually was for me. I hung out on the Vortexbox Fourm, reading, before attemping this. agentsmith wrote: > - Is Vortexbox free? Do I have to buy anything else? No. I bought and installed a larger hard drive on my old PC because the original was tiny. I also bought an external hard drive to backup to. BTW backing up using Vortexbox works really slick. agentsmith wrote: > - After the Vortexbox software is installed, can the PC be left running > headless and be accessed 100% from a web client? Yes. I access mine from a Windows 7 PC on my network (I think this is what you're asking). agentsmith wrote: > - Can a Unix/Linux dummy like me live happily with Vortexbox? Will I > get stuck at some point if I am not a Linux person? > > Sorry about all the questions. Yes. I can't even spell LInex :-) CharlieG's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=32439 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=97459 ___ Touch mailing list Touch@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] LMS on Ubuntu 12.04 cannot downsample 24/192
But my machine is 32 bit indeed... Fukinagashi's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=42922 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=97454 ___ Touch mailing list Touch@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] SqueezePad or iPeng app?
Saturn94 wrote: > > For myself, I'm not looking for an Android app, just an app for my iPad > Mini (when I get it). My other half recently got an Android based > smartphone. Sorry for picking up on the original question of choosing an App for controlling Squeezebox'es. But our household has many squeezeboxes old and new, and we control them from many different devices: PC's through webinterface, Android phones and tablets, iPads, and the Squeezeboxes them seleves. In my experience, switching between all these "remotes" is much easier using interfaces which are more or less identical. So, I actually went back to using Logitech's own App more often, even though I have some of the others. I know it's not as smooth in the interface, but at least it's familiar across all our devices. Just my 2 cents :-) Letten's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=16718 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=97366 ___ Touch mailing list Touch@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Question from an old newbie
agentsmith wrote: > One more question on Vortexbox if I may. > > Someone mentioned that my slowness is due to slow NAS. If I my > Vortexbox has no internal storage and access the same NAS through the > LAN, would I still experience the dramatic speed improvement? I think Mnyb was saying LMS works smoother if the music files are locally attached rather than network attached. For example having the music files stored on your Mac’s hard drive, or on an external hard drive attached to the Mac, might be faster than running LMS on the Mac and accessing the files over your network. I think garym was referring to running LMS on a slow NAS as compared to running LMS on a Vortexbox Appliance (the hardware solution of Votexbox). Guys, please correct me if I have misread your replies. CharlieG's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=32439 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=97459 ___ Touch mailing list Touch@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Touch Web Server non accessible
Ok, I'm not totally new to this kind of solutions.
Please, could you give some hints, some starting point?
In Settings/Advanced you can enable SSH ("Remote access"). Then you'll
find the configuration file in /etc/squeezecenter. I'd suggest you play
with the prefs on a desktop installation before you start tinkering on the
device. And always keep a copy of the working file..
--
Michael
___
Touch mailing list
Touch@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Touch Web Server non accessible
mherger wrote: > > > Any case... is there some way to customize the SBT server? > > Not much, no. Unless you want to venture and edit configuration files on > > the command line using ssh and vi :-). > > -- > > Michael Ok, I'm not totally new to this kind of solutions. Please, could you give some hints, some starting point? EJ erwjack's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=53954 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=97466 ___ Touch mailing list Touch@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Touch Web Server non accessible
Uhm... what about this link? http://logitech-en-amr.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/16663/~/can%E2%80%99t-open-my-squeezebox-touch-software-in-my-web-browser Ouch... wrong. At least very confusing. Obviously written by someone who doesn't have a clue. Any case... is there some way to customize the SBT server? Not much, no. Unless you want to venture and edit configuration files on the command line using ssh and vi :-). -- Michael ___ Touch mailing list Touch@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Touch Web Server non accessible
mherger wrote: > > The problem is that I can't connect with the SBT server via web. > > The server built in to the Touch does not have a web UI. > > -- > > Michael Uhm... what about this link? http://logitech-en-amr.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/16663/~/can%E2%80%99t-open-my-squeezebox-touch-software-in-my-web-browser Any case... is there some way to customize the SBT server? I would uncheck the automatic file scanning (and activate it only if needed) and a lot of useless plugin. Thanks in advance. EJ erwjack's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=53954 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=97466 ___ Touch mailing list Touch@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
