[videoblogging] Re: New blip.tv show player

2007-04-26 Thread andydragt
Thanks Mike, I appreciate the advice from the source!

andy


--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Mike Hudack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Andy,
 
 I would definitely suggest having separate blip accounts for each of
 your vlogs.  The way blip is designed, it's best to have one account per
 show.
 
 Yours,
 
 Mike
 Blip.tv
 
 -Original Message-
 From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of andydragt
 Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 9:30 AM
 To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [videoblogging] Re: New blip.tv show player
 
 Can I just ask a clarifying question...
 
 It's seems like conventional wisdom has recommended against using a
 seperate blip account for each vlog. However, with the new show
 player, it makes sense to have your content in seperate accounts. 
 Otherwise it's pretty much useless.  
 
 Heres the question: Is this two weeks comment about a solution to
 this problem or should I begin to seperate my content into different
 accounts so I have the option of using the player on one of my sites?
 
 Am I right in understanding the best practice has been to have only
 one account and cross-post to different blogs?
 
 thanks all,
 
 Andy Dragt
 
 www.developinggr.com - a vlog about development in GR, MI
 www.developinggr.com/house - a vlog about my home renovation...
 
 
 
 
 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Mike Hudack mike@ wrote:
 
  Two weeks.  :)
  
  Yours,
  
  Mike
  
  -Original Message-
  From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of mattfeldman78
  Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 3:36 PM
  To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
  Subject: [videoblogging] Re: New blip.tv show player
  
  Hi,
  
  Has anyone found a way to control the order of the episodes within the
  player?  Is this something that Blip is planning on offering?
  
  
  -Matt
  http://neovids.tv
  
  
  
  --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Verdi michael@
  wrote:
  
   Yes - point taken about it not being a replacement. It's also good
 for
   things like user profiles on various social networks.
   - Verdi
   
   On 4/16/07, Bill Cammack BillCammack@ wrote:
   
  --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
  videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com,
Steve Watkins steve@ wrote:

 Offering both makes a lot of sense to me. I dream of this stuff
  being
 pushed to the extreme and for it to be possible for a blog like
 experience to be completely available from within a flash
 player.
 Complexities quickly arise when the people providing the player
  are
 hosting your videos, but are not responsible for the rest of
 your
 blog, it leads to an understandable focus on the video hosting
  page
 rather than your blog page. This may not be considered a probem
 because the expectation may be that you embed their player in
 your
 site, and your site provides all the other bloggy stuff you
  want. But
 this doesnt cover scenarios where our show player may be
 embedded
  on
 another site or used as a widget.

 I see the guide button is optional, and its easy to rebrand the
  player
 so that its got your own site in the bottom right hand corner,
  which
 is a clickable link pointing to the URL of your choice.
   
Thanks for mentioning that. I had those pointing to the blip
 shows,
basically by default, but I've switched them now so that they
 point
  to
the blogs for the shows instead of the blip pages.
   
This helps out the permalink situation A LITTLE BIT, but it still
takes the viewer to the most recent post in the blog. The only
 thing
that seems to update with the individual video is if you click
  guide
and then read more about this on blip.tv, which takes you to the
individual video's page on blip.
   
--
Bill C.
BillCammack.com
   
   
 Id love to see the creative commons stuff thats been requested
  in the
 past, be rolled out into this show player in the future, whether
  it be
 through a little cc icon on the bottom bar of the player, or the
 inclusion of this info in the popup 'about this episode' tab.

 I agree about the font size, hmm this stuff starts to get a bit
 tricky, a big decision to break away from the player being
  320x240. I
 see that Veoh's player is rather large now, but this makes it
 look
 quite good and leaves more room for additional info overlays to
 be
 displayed in a larger font. Some other services have really wide
 players with separate episode bars to one side of the video.

 Personally Im fascinated by the idea of a flash player for
  wordpress
 that can display the entire blog, text video etc, in the flash
  player.
 I was looking at WPF/E but I think I'll ignore that technology
 for
 now, and go buymyself a copy of flash and join the fun.

 Cheers

 Steve Elbows
 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
  videoblogging

[videoblogging] Re: New blip.tv show player

2007-04-26 Thread andydragt
Again, THANKS for the heads up!  You folks rock!  Keep up the great
work :)

Cheers,

Andy
developinggr.com
developinggr.com/house

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Mike Hudack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Jen,
 
 We're definitely moving in this direction, it's just going to take us a
 little while.  Because of the way the blip software was originally
 developed it's a big difficult for us.  But we do want things to work
 this way in the future, no doubt.
 
 In the meantime, it's in our roadmap to relax the e-mail requirements
 really soon.  The one email/show/user requirement was designed to
 prevent spam.  We're going to move to requiring a CAPTCHA for signup in
 an upcoming release (hopefully this one coming up in two weeks, maybe
 the one after that) and remove the unique e-mail requirement.
 
 From there we'll definitely be looking at ways to become more
 Blogger-like in the way we handle accounts and shows.  It'll probably
 take us a little while, though :(
 
 Yours,
 
 Mike 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jen Simmons
 Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2007 11:05 AM
 To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: New blip.tv show player
 
 In blogger, it's easy to have multiple blogs in one account. Sign in  
 under one name, pick the blog to work on, and go there. In blip, blip  
 assumes one person = one account = one 'show'. I've got multiple blip  
 accounts going, and have to sign in and sign out to get to each one.  
 Plus, in order to get those multiple accounts, I had to use unique  
 email addresses for each one, and have run out of real email address.  
 So now to create new accounts, I have to go make an email account,  
 and then use that for blip.
 
 Hm.
 
 Can blip be retooled at some point to make it more like blogger? One  
 sign-in. AND -- have the ability to add other people to the people  
 allowed to work on that account. So I can setup accounts for clients  
 using my log -in, and then invite them to join in... yet still be  
 able to get in myself, and have those log-ins be separate. (Allowing  
 me the ability to uninvite, and for each of us to have different  
 passwords / not get into multiple people knowing passwords) -- just  
 like how blogger works.
 
 Jen
 
 
 On Apr 21, 2007, at 8:53 am, Mike Hudack wrote:
 
  Andy,
 
  I would definitely suggest having separate blip accounts for each of
  your vlogs. The way blip is designed, it's best to have one account  
  per
  show.
 
  Yours,
 
  Mike
  Blip.tv
 
 
 
 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
 
 
 
  
 Yahoo! Groups Links





Re: [videoblogging] Re: New blip.tv show player

2007-04-25 Thread Jan McLaughlin
Here. Here.

Just beginning to work with the new Show Player now.

Grinding through the wee 3gp files.

Wonder what it'll do with the audio only?

Feels like Geek Christmas morning.

Jan

On 4/23/07, bestdamntechshow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I've had similar experiences with blip.  They're awesome and always
 available to help in any way they can.

 We're lucky folks to have them around.

 _drew

 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, eric gunnar rochow [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 wrote:
 
  i think, by and large, that blip.tv has done well in the first
  rollout of their ShowPlayer.
 
  gardenfork has become less and less a blog and more of what i call an
  internet video show. gardenfork's audience is mainly people who watch
  DIY-gardening-cooking shows on cable, and for some reason have run
  across gardenfork.tv . they don't get the blog format ( meaning they
  have to scroll down to watch older episodes) , nor do they know what
  an RSS feed is.
 
  blip.tv's ShowPlayer works well for gardenfork. previously we ran the
  brightcove player, but the company behind it was not nearly as pro-
  active as blip is in our world here. i emailed blip 3 times today,
  and heard back within an hour each time. this from a company
  comprised of about 8 people.
 
  the initial rollout of any software has some bumps in the road.
 
  thx, eric.
 
  http://gardenfork.tv
 





 Yahoo! Groups Links






-- 
The Faux Press - better than real
http://fauxpress.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/fauxpress


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Re: [videoblogging] Re: New blip.tv show player

2007-04-23 Thread Jen Simmons
Yeah, someone really needs to invent THE killer ap -- imagine it, and  
it exists. Funny how there's always a gap between those two...

spam :(
blip perfect as it is now :)
blip perfect as it will be :)

j


On Apr 22, 2007, at 4:32 pm, Mike Hudack wrote:

 Jen,

 We're definitely moving in this direction, it's just going to take  
 us a
 little while. Because of the way the blip software was originally
 developed it's a big difficult for us. But we do want things to work
 this way in the future, no doubt.

 In the meantime, it's in our roadmap to relax the e-mail requirements
 really soon. The one email/show/user requirement was designed to
 prevent spam. We're going to move to requiring a CAPTCHA for signup in
 an upcoming release (hopefully this one coming up in two weeks, maybe
 the one after that) and remove the unique e-mail requirement.

 From there we'll definitely be looking at ways to become more
 Blogger-like in the way we handle accounts and shows. It'll probably
 take us a little while, though :(

 Yours,

 Mike



 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



[videoblogging] Re: New blip.tv show player

2007-04-23 Thread bestdamntechshow
I've had similar experiences with blip.  They're awesome and always
available to help in any way they can.

We're lucky folks to have them around.

_drew

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, eric gunnar rochow [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 i think, by and large, that blip.tv has done well in the first  
 rollout of their ShowPlayer.
 
 gardenfork has become less and less a blog and more of what i call an  
 internet video show. gardenfork's audience is mainly people who watch  
 DIY-gardening-cooking shows on cable, and for some reason have run  
 across gardenfork.tv . they don't get the blog format ( meaning they  
 have to scroll down to watch older episodes) , nor do they know what  
 an RSS feed is.
 
 blip.tv's ShowPlayer works well for gardenfork. previously we ran the  
 brightcove player, but the company behind it was not nearly as pro- 
 active as blip is in our world here. i emailed blip 3 times today,  
 and heard back within an hour each time. this from a company  
 comprised of about 8 people.
 
 the initial rollout of any software has some bumps in the road.
 
 thx, eric.
 
 http://gardenfork.tv





Re: [videoblogging] Re: New blip.tv show player

2007-04-22 Thread Jen Simmons
In blogger, it's easy to have multiple blogs in one account. Sign in  
under one name, pick the blog to work on, and go there. In blip, blip  
assumes one person = one account = one 'show'. I've got multiple blip  
accounts going, and have to sign in and sign out to get to each one.  
Plus, in order to get those multiple accounts, I had to use unique  
email addresses for each one, and have run out of real email address.  
So now to create new accounts, I have to go make an email account,  
and then use that for blip.

Hm.

Can blip be retooled at some point to make it more like blogger? One  
sign-in. AND -- have the ability to add other people to the people  
allowed to work on that account. So I can setup accounts for clients  
using my log -in, and then invite them to join in... yet still be  
able to get in myself, and have those log-ins be separate. (Allowing  
me the ability to uninvite, and for each of us to have different  
passwords / not get into multiple people knowing passwords) -- just  
like how blogger works.

Jen


On Apr 21, 2007, at 8:53 am, Mike Hudack wrote:

 Andy,

 I would definitely suggest having separate blip accounts for each of
 your vlogs. The way blip is designed, it's best to have one account  
 per
 show.

 Yours,

 Mike
 Blip.tv



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



RE: [videoblogging] Re: New blip.tv show player

2007-04-21 Thread Mike Hudack
Andy,

I would definitely suggest having separate blip accounts for each of
your vlogs.  The way blip is designed, it's best to have one account per
show.

Yours,

Mike
Blip.tv

-Original Message-
From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of andydragt
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 9:30 AM
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [videoblogging] Re: New blip.tv show player

Can I just ask a clarifying question...

It's seems like conventional wisdom has recommended against using a
seperate blip account for each vlog. However, with the new show
player, it makes sense to have your content in seperate accounts. 
Otherwise it's pretty much useless.  

Heres the question: Is this two weeks comment about a solution to
this problem or should I begin to seperate my content into different
accounts so I have the option of using the player on one of my sites?

Am I right in understanding the best practice has been to have only
one account and cross-post to different blogs?

thanks all,

Andy Dragt

www.developinggr.com - a vlog about development in GR, MI
www.developinggr.com/house - a vlog about my home renovation...




--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Mike Hudack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Two weeks.  :)
 
 Yours,
 
 Mike
 
 -Original Message-
 From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of mattfeldman78
 Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 3:36 PM
 To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [videoblogging] Re: New blip.tv show player
 
 Hi,
 
 Has anyone found a way to control the order of the episodes within the
 player?  Is this something that Blip is planning on offering?
 
 
 -Matt
 http://neovids.tv
 
 
 
 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Verdi michael@
 wrote:
 
  Yes - point taken about it not being a replacement. It's also good
for
  things like user profiles on various social networks.
  - Verdi
  
  On 4/16/07, Bill Cammack BillCammack@ wrote:
  
 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
 videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com,
   Steve Watkins steve@ wrote:
   
Offering both makes a lot of sense to me. I dream of this stuff
 being
pushed to the extreme and for it to be possible for a blog like
experience to be completely available from within a flash
player.
Complexities quickly arise when the people providing the player
 are
hosting your videos, but are not responsible for the rest of
your
blog, it leads to an understandable focus on the video hosting
 page
rather than your blog page. This may not be considered a probem
because the expectation may be that you embed their player in
your
site, and your site provides all the other bloggy stuff you
 want. But
this doesnt cover scenarios where our show player may be
embedded
 on
another site or used as a widget.
   
I see the guide button is optional, and its easy to rebrand the
 player
so that its got your own site in the bottom right hand corner,
 which
is a clickable link pointing to the URL of your choice.
  
   Thanks for mentioning that. I had those pointing to the blip
shows,
   basically by default, but I've switched them now so that they
point
 to
   the blogs for the shows instead of the blip pages.
  
   This helps out the permalink situation A LITTLE BIT, but it still
   takes the viewer to the most recent post in the blog. The only
thing
   that seems to update with the individual video is if you click
 guide
   and then read more about this on blip.tv, which takes you to the
   individual video's page on blip.
  
   --
   Bill C.
   BillCammack.com
  
  
Id love to see the creative commons stuff thats been requested
 in the
past, be rolled out into this show player in the future, whether
 it be
through a little cc icon on the bottom bar of the player, or the
inclusion of this info in the popup 'about this episode' tab.
   
I agree about the font size, hmm this stuff starts to get a bit
tricky, a big decision to break away from the player being
 320x240. I
see that Veoh's player is rather large now, but this makes it
look
quite good and leaves more room for additional info overlays to
be
displayed in a larger font. Some other services have really wide
players with separate episode bars to one side of the video.
   
Personally Im fascinated by the idea of a flash player for
 wordpress
that can display the entire blog, text video etc, in the flash
 player.
I was looking at WPF/E but I think I'll ignore that technology
for
now, and go buymyself a copy of flash and join the fun.
   
Cheers
   
Steve Elbows
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
 videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com,
   Mike Hudack mike@ wrote:

 Michael,

 For some people the blog format is really important.
 Cross-posting,
 copy  paste and everything else we've built to support the
blog
   format
 aren't going away. We're going to keep those features, and
we're

[videoblogging] Re: New blip.tv show player

2007-04-20 Thread andydragt
Can I just ask a clarifying question...

It's seems like conventional wisdom has recommended against using a
seperate blip account for each vlog. However, with the new show
player, it makes sense to have your content in seperate accounts. 
Otherwise it's pretty much useless.  

Heres the question: Is this two weeks comment about a solution to
this problem or should I begin to seperate my content into different
accounts so I have the option of using the player on one of my sites?

Am I right in understanding the best practice has been to have only
one account and cross-post to different blogs?

thanks all,

Andy Dragt

www.developinggr.com - a vlog about development in GR, MI
www.developinggr.com/house - a vlog about my home renovation...




--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Mike Hudack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Two weeks.  :)
 
 Yours,
 
 Mike
 
 -Original Message-
 From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of mattfeldman78
 Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 3:36 PM
 To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [videoblogging] Re: New blip.tv show player
 
 Hi,
 
 Has anyone found a way to control the order of the episodes within the
 player?  Is this something that Blip is planning on offering?
 
 
 -Matt
 http://neovids.tv
 
 
 
 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Verdi michael@
 wrote:
 
  Yes - point taken about it not being a replacement. It's also good for
  things like user profiles on various social networks.
  - Verdi
  
  On 4/16/07, Bill Cammack BillCammack@ wrote:
  
 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
 videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com,
   Steve Watkins steve@ wrote:
   
Offering both makes a lot of sense to me. I dream of this stuff
 being
pushed to the extreme and for it to be possible for a blog like
experience to be completely available from within a flash player.
Complexities quickly arise when the people providing the player
 are
hosting your videos, but are not responsible for the rest of your
blog, it leads to an understandable focus on the video hosting
 page
rather than your blog page. This may not be considered a probem
because the expectation may be that you embed their player in your
site, and your site provides all the other bloggy stuff you
 want. But
this doesnt cover scenarios where our show player may be embedded
 on
another site or used as a widget.
   
I see the guide button is optional, and its easy to rebrand the
 player
so that its got your own site in the bottom right hand corner,
 which
is a clickable link pointing to the URL of your choice.
  
   Thanks for mentioning that. I had those pointing to the blip shows,
   basically by default, but I've switched them now so that they point
 to
   the blogs for the shows instead of the blip pages.
  
   This helps out the permalink situation A LITTLE BIT, but it still
   takes the viewer to the most recent post in the blog. The only thing
   that seems to update with the individual video is if you click
 guide
   and then read more about this on blip.tv, which takes you to the
   individual video's page on blip.
  
   --
   Bill C.
   BillCammack.com
  
  
Id love to see the creative commons stuff thats been requested
 in the
past, be rolled out into this show player in the future, whether
 it be
through a little cc icon on the bottom bar of the player, or the
inclusion of this info in the popup 'about this episode' tab.
   
I agree about the font size, hmm this stuff starts to get a bit
tricky, a big decision to break away from the player being
 320x240. I
see that Veoh's player is rather large now, but this makes it look
quite good and leaves more room for additional info overlays to be
displayed in a larger font. Some other services have really wide
players with separate episode bars to one side of the video.
   
Personally Im fascinated by the idea of a flash player for
 wordpress
that can display the entire blog, text video etc, in the flash
 player.
I was looking at WPF/E but I think I'll ignore that technology for
now, and go buymyself a copy of flash and join the fun.
   
Cheers
   
Steve Elbows
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
 videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com,
   Mike Hudack mike@ wrote:

 Michael,

 For some people the blog format is really important.
 Cross-posting,
 copy  paste and everything else we've built to support the blog
   format
 aren't going away. We're going to keep those features, and we're
   going
 to keep improving them. It's just that the blog format isn't
   right for
 everyone.

 -Original Message-
 From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
 videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com

 [mailto:videoblogging@yahoogroups.comvideoblogging%40yahoogroups.com]
   On Behalf Of Michael Verdi
 Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2007 12:09 PM
 To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com

RE: [videoblogging] Re: New blip.tv show player

2007-04-20 Thread Mike Hudack
Ah, yes, multiple playlists.  They're on the list.  The Show Player is
already capable of accommodating up to half a dozen playlists, we just
have to build the interface to allow people to configure them.  They're
coming :)

-Original Message-
From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jackson West
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 10:12 PM
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: New blip.tv show player

Rad.  I agree with Sull -- been waitin' for multiple playlists. :)

JW

On 4/19/07, Mike Hudack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   Two weeks. :)

 Yours,

 Mike

 -Original Message-
 From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com
 [mailto:videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com]
 On Behalf Of mattfeldman78
 Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 3:36 PM
 To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [videoblogging] Re: New blip.tv show player

 Hi,

 Has anyone found a way to control the order of the episodes within the
 player? Is this something that Blip is planning on offering?

 -Matt
 http://neovids.tv

 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com,
 Michael Verdi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
 
  Yes - point taken about it not being a replacement. It's also good
for
  things like user profiles on various social networks.
  - Verdi
 
  On 4/16/07, Bill Cammack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com
 videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com,
   Steve Watkins steve@ wrote:
   
Offering both makes a lot of sense to me. I dream of this stuff
 being
pushed to the extreme and for it to be possible for a blog like
experience to be completely available from within a flash
player.
Complexities quickly arise when the people providing the player
 are
hosting your videos, but are not responsible for the rest of
your
blog, it leads to an understandable focus on the video hosting
 page
rather than your blog page. This may not be considered a probem
because the expectation may be that you embed their player in
your
site, and your site provides all the other bloggy stuff you
 want. But
this doesnt cover scenarios where our show player may be
embedded
 on
another site or used as a widget.
   
I see the guide button is optional, and its easy to rebrand the
 player
so that its got your own site in the bottom right hand corner,
 which
is a clickable link pointing to the URL of your choice.
  
   Thanks for mentioning that. I had those pointing to the blip
shows,
   basically by default, but I've switched them now so that they
point
 to
   the blogs for the shows instead of the blip pages.
  
   This helps out the permalink situation A LITTLE BIT, but it still
   takes the viewer to the most recent post in the blog. The only
thing
   that seems to update with the individual video is if you click
 guide
   and then read more about this on blip.tv, which takes you to the
   individual video's page on blip.
  
   --
   Bill C.
   BillCammack.com
  
  
Id love to see the creative commons stuff thats been requested
 in the
past, be rolled out into this show player in the future, whether
 it be
through a little cc icon on the bottom bar of the player, or the
inclusion of this info in the popup 'about this episode' tab.
   
I agree about the font size, hmm this stuff starts to get a bit
tricky, a big decision to break away from the player being
 320x240. I
see that Veoh's player is rather large now, but this makes it
look
quite good and leaves more room for additional info overlays to
be
displayed in a larger font. Some other services have really wide
players with separate episode bars to one side of the video.
   
Personally Im fascinated by the idea of a flash player for
 wordpress
that can display the entire blog, text video etc, in the flash
 player.
I was looking at WPF/E but I think I'll ignore that technology
for
now, and go buymyself a copy of flash and join the fun.
   
Cheers
   
Steve Elbows
--- In
videoblogging@yahoogroups.comvideoblogging%40yahoogroups.com
 videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com,
   Mike Hudack mike@ wrote:

 Michael,

 For some people the blog format is really important.
 Cross-posting,
 copy  paste and everything else we've built to support the
blog
   format
 aren't going away. We're going to keep those features, and
we're
   going
 to keep improving them. It's just that the blog format isn't
   right for
 everyone.

 -Original Message-
 From:
videoblogging@yahoogroups.comvideoblogging%40yahoogroups.com
 videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com

 [mailto:videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com
 videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com]
   On Behalf Of Michael Verdi
 Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2007 12:09 PM

[videoblogging] Re: New blip.tv show player

2007-04-20 Thread Bill Cammack
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, andydragt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Can I just ask a clarifying question...
 
 It's seems like conventional wisdom has recommended against using a
 seperate blip account for each vlog. However, with the new show
 player, it makes sense to have your content in seperate accounts. 
 Otherwise it's pretty much useless.

Do you have a link to this conventional wisdom?

I have four blip shows because they have nothing to do with each
other.  To post everything to one show would be completely disruptive.

With the new blip player, I have all four shows on one page... each
show having its own episode guide.  If someone wants to see something
larger, they click fullscreen in any of the players.

 Heres the question: Is this two weeks comment about a solution to
 this problem or should I begin to seperate my content into different
 accounts so I have the option of using the player on one of my sites?
 
 Am I right in understanding the best practice has been to have only
 one account and cross-post to different blogs?
 
 thanks all,
 
 Andy Dragt
 
 www.developinggr.com - a vlog about development in GR, MI
 www.developinggr.com/house - a vlog about my home renovation...

Unless all of your videoblogs are about the same topic, the way blip
has been in the past, I think it's better to have one show for each of
your topics.  If people tune in to your show about development, they
won't necessarily be interested in videos now and then about home
renovation.

OTOH, it depends how you're using blip as a host.  If you never direct
people to your blip pages, then it makes sense to only have one blip
account and let your blog handle separating them into categories and
feeds.

I'd be interested to hear why someone thinks it's better to have one
blip account with four unrelated topics in it than to have four
focused blip accounts.

--
Bill C.
http://BillCammack.com (all four players)
http://reelsolid.blip.tv
http://ems.blip.tv
http://thelab.blip.tv
http://masamibillshow.blip.tv



 
 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Mike Hudack mike@ wrote:
 
  Two weeks.  :)
  
  Yours,
  
  Mike
  
  -Original Message-
  From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of mattfeldman78
  Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 3:36 PM
  To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
  Subject: [videoblogging] Re: New blip.tv show player
  
  Hi,
  
  Has anyone found a way to control the order of the episodes within the
  player?  Is this something that Blip is planning on offering?
  
  
  -Matt
  http://neovids.tv
  
  
  
  --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Verdi michael@
  wrote:
  
   Yes - point taken about it not being a replacement. It's also
good for
   things like user profiles on various social networks.
   - Verdi
   
   On 4/16/07, Bill Cammack BillCammack@ wrote:
   
  --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
  videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com,
Steve Watkins steve@ wrote:

 Offering both makes a lot of sense to me. I dream of this stuff
  being
 pushed to the extreme and for it to be possible for a blog like
 experience to be completely available from within a flash
player.
 Complexities quickly arise when the people providing the player
  are
 hosting your videos, but are not responsible for the rest of
your
 blog, it leads to an understandable focus on the video hosting
  page
 rather than your blog page. This may not be considered a probem
 because the expectation may be that you embed their player
in your
 site, and your site provides all the other bloggy stuff you
  want. But
 this doesnt cover scenarios where our show player may be
embedded
  on
 another site or used as a widget.

 I see the guide button is optional, and its easy to rebrand the
  player
 so that its got your own site in the bottom right hand corner,
  which
 is a clickable link pointing to the URL of your choice.
   
Thanks for mentioning that. I had those pointing to the blip
shows,
basically by default, but I've switched them now so that they
point
  to
the blogs for the shows instead of the blip pages.
   
This helps out the permalink situation A LITTLE BIT, but it still
takes the viewer to the most recent post in the blog. The only
thing
that seems to update with the individual video is if you click
  guide
and then read more about this on blip.tv, which takes you to the
individual video's page on blip.
   
--
Bill C.
BillCammack.com
   
   
 Id love to see the creative commons stuff thats been requested
  in the
 past, be rolled out into this show player in the future, whether
  it be
 through a little cc icon on the bottom bar of the player, or the
 inclusion of this info in the popup 'about this episode' tab.

 I agree about the font size, hmm this stuff starts to get a bit
 tricky, a big decision to break away from the player being
  320x240. I

RE: [videoblogging] Re: New blip.tv show player

2007-04-19 Thread Mike Hudack
Two weeks.  :)

Yours,

Mike

-Original Message-
From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of mattfeldman78
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 3:36 PM
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [videoblogging] Re: New blip.tv show player

Hi,

Has anyone found a way to control the order of the episodes within the
player?  Is this something that Blip is planning on offering?


-Matt
http://neovids.tv



--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Verdi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 Yes - point taken about it not being a replacement. It's also good for
 things like user profiles on various social networks.
 - Verdi
 
 On 4/16/07, Bill Cammack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com,
  Steve Watkins steve@ wrote:
  
   Offering both makes a lot of sense to me. I dream of this stuff
being
   pushed to the extreme and for it to be possible for a blog like
   experience to be completely available from within a flash player.
   Complexities quickly arise when the people providing the player
are
   hosting your videos, but are not responsible for the rest of your
   blog, it leads to an understandable focus on the video hosting
page
   rather than your blog page. This may not be considered a probem
   because the expectation may be that you embed their player in your
   site, and your site provides all the other bloggy stuff you
want. But
   this doesnt cover scenarios where our show player may be embedded
on
   another site or used as a widget.
  
   I see the guide button is optional, and its easy to rebrand the
player
   so that its got your own site in the bottom right hand corner,
which
   is a clickable link pointing to the URL of your choice.
 
  Thanks for mentioning that. I had those pointing to the blip shows,
  basically by default, but I've switched them now so that they point
to
  the blogs for the shows instead of the blip pages.
 
  This helps out the permalink situation A LITTLE BIT, but it still
  takes the viewer to the most recent post in the blog. The only thing
  that seems to update with the individual video is if you click
guide
  and then read more about this on blip.tv, which takes you to the
  individual video's page on blip.
 
  --
  Bill C.
  BillCammack.com
 
 
   Id love to see the creative commons stuff thats been requested
in the
   past, be rolled out into this show player in the future, whether
it be
   through a little cc icon on the bottom bar of the player, or the
   inclusion of this info in the popup 'about this episode' tab.
  
   I agree about the font size, hmm this stuff starts to get a bit
   tricky, a big decision to break away from the player being
320x240. I
   see that Veoh's player is rather large now, but this makes it look
   quite good and leaves more room for additional info overlays to be
   displayed in a larger font. Some other services have really wide
   players with separate episode bars to one side of the video.
  
   Personally Im fascinated by the idea of a flash player for
wordpress
   that can display the entire blog, text video etc, in the flash
player.
   I was looking at WPF/E but I think I'll ignore that technology for
   now, and go buymyself a copy of flash and join the fun.
  
   Cheers
  
   Steve Elbows
   --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com,
  Mike Hudack mike@ wrote:
   
Michael,
   
For some people the blog format is really important.
Cross-posting,
copy  paste and everything else we've built to support the blog
  format
aren't going away. We're going to keep those features, and we're
  going
to keep improving them. It's just that the blog format isn't
  right for
everyone.
   
-Original Message-
From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com
   
[mailto:videoblogging@yahoogroups.comvideoblogging%40yahoogroups.com]
  On Behalf Of Michael Verdi
Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2007 12:09 PM
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] New blip.tv show player
   
Aaron  Steve - you bring up some good points. I do think
options for
people
are important and I do like the ability to look through an
archive but
the
price is that you loose all the other benefits of a blog -
permalinks,
comments, context, choice of video size and formats. That
player is
really
built on the idea that your blip.tv blog is your blog. So it
only
  shows
and
links back to your blog posts on blip. Comments? They have to go
  on the
blip
blog (as long as the viewer know to click through to the blip
blog to
leave
a comment). Plus you have to have the blip hot shows menu.
That thing
pulls
in stuff completely out of context that you have no control
over. Of
course
you do have control in that you certainly don't have to use
the show
player
at all. I just think

Re: [videoblogging] Re: New blip.tv show player

2007-04-19 Thread Jackson West
Rad.  I agree with Sull -- been waitin' for multiple playlists. :)

JW

On 4/19/07, Mike Hudack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   Two weeks. :)

 Yours,

 Mike

 -Original Message-
 From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com
 [mailto:videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com]
 On Behalf Of mattfeldman78
 Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 3:36 PM
 To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [videoblogging] Re: New blip.tv show player

 Hi,

 Has anyone found a way to control the order of the episodes within the
 player? Is this something that Blip is planning on offering?

 -Matt
 http://neovids.tv

 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com,
 Michael Verdi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
 
  Yes - point taken about it not being a replacement. It's also good for
  things like user profiles on various social networks.
  - Verdi
 
  On 4/16/07, Bill Cammack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com
 videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com,
   Steve Watkins steve@ wrote:
   
Offering both makes a lot of sense to me. I dream of this stuff
 being
pushed to the extreme and for it to be possible for a blog like
experience to be completely available from within a flash player.
Complexities quickly arise when the people providing the player
 are
hosting your videos, but are not responsible for the rest of your
blog, it leads to an understandable focus on the video hosting
 page
rather than your blog page. This may not be considered a probem
because the expectation may be that you embed their player in your
site, and your site provides all the other bloggy stuff you
 want. But
this doesnt cover scenarios where our show player may be embedded
 on
another site or used as a widget.
   
I see the guide button is optional, and its easy to rebrand the
 player
so that its got your own site in the bottom right hand corner,
 which
is a clickable link pointing to the URL of your choice.
  
   Thanks for mentioning that. I had those pointing to the blip shows,
   basically by default, but I've switched them now so that they point
 to
   the blogs for the shows instead of the blip pages.
  
   This helps out the permalink situation A LITTLE BIT, but it still
   takes the viewer to the most recent post in the blog. The only thing
   that seems to update with the individual video is if you click
 guide
   and then read more about this on blip.tv, which takes you to the
   individual video's page on blip.
  
   --
   Bill C.
   BillCammack.com
  
  
Id love to see the creative commons stuff thats been requested
 in the
past, be rolled out into this show player in the future, whether
 it be
through a little cc icon on the bottom bar of the player, or the
inclusion of this info in the popup 'about this episode' tab.
   
I agree about the font size, hmm this stuff starts to get a bit
tricky, a big decision to break away from the player being
 320x240. I
see that Veoh's player is rather large now, but this makes it look
quite good and leaves more room for additional info overlays to be
displayed in a larger font. Some other services have really wide
players with separate episode bars to one side of the video.
   
Personally Im fascinated by the idea of a flash player for
 wordpress
that can display the entire blog, text video etc, in the flash
 player.
I was looking at WPF/E but I think I'll ignore that technology for
now, and go buymyself a copy of flash and join the fun.
   
Cheers
   
Steve Elbows
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.comvideoblogging%40yahoogroups.com
 videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com,
   Mike Hudack mike@ wrote:

 Michael,

 For some people the blog format is really important.
 Cross-posting,
 copy  paste and everything else we've built to support the blog
   format
 aren't going away. We're going to keep those features, and we're
   going
 to keep improving them. It's just that the blog format isn't
   right for
 everyone.

 -Original Message-
 From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.comvideoblogging%40yahoogroups.com
 videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com

 [mailto:videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com
 videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com]
   On Behalf Of Michael Verdi
 Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2007 12:09 PM
 To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.comvideoblogging%40yahoogroups.com
 videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com
 Subject: Re: [videoblogging] New blip.tv show player

 Aaron  Steve - you bring up some good points. I do think
 options for
 people
 are important and I do like the ability to look through an
 archive but
 the
 price is that you loose all the other benefits of a blog -
 permalinks,
 comments, context, choice of video size and formats. That
 player

[videoblogging] Re: New blip.tv show player

2007-04-19 Thread mattfeldman78
sounds great--thinking about changing up my homepage once that feature
comes out.  thanks;)

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Mike Hudack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Two weeks.  :)
 
 Yours,
 
 Mike
 
 -Original Message-
 From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of mattfeldman78
 Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 3:36 PM
 To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [videoblogging] Re: New blip.tv show player
 
 Hi,
 
 Has anyone found a way to control the order of the episodes within the
 player?  Is this something that Blip is planning on offering?
 
 
 -Matt
 http://neovids.tv
 
 
 
 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Verdi michael@
 wrote:
 
  Yes - point taken about it not being a replacement. It's also good for
  things like user profiles on various social networks.
  - Verdi
  
  On 4/16/07, Bill Cammack BillCammack@ wrote:
  
 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
 videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com,
   Steve Watkins steve@ wrote:
   
Offering both makes a lot of sense to me. I dream of this stuff
 being
pushed to the extreme and for it to be possible for a blog like
experience to be completely available from within a flash player.
Complexities quickly arise when the people providing the player
 are
hosting your videos, but are not responsible for the rest of your
blog, it leads to an understandable focus on the video hosting
 page
rather than your blog page. This may not be considered a probem
because the expectation may be that you embed their player in your
site, and your site provides all the other bloggy stuff you
 want. But
this doesnt cover scenarios where our show player may be embedded
 on
another site or used as a widget.
   
I see the guide button is optional, and its easy to rebrand the
 player
so that its got your own site in the bottom right hand corner,
 which
is a clickable link pointing to the URL of your choice.
  
   Thanks for mentioning that. I had those pointing to the blip shows,
   basically by default, but I've switched them now so that they point
 to
   the blogs for the shows instead of the blip pages.
  
   This helps out the permalink situation A LITTLE BIT, but it still
   takes the viewer to the most recent post in the blog. The only thing
   that seems to update with the individual video is if you click
 guide
   and then read more about this on blip.tv, which takes you to the
   individual video's page on blip.
  
   --
   Bill C.
   BillCammack.com
  
  
Id love to see the creative commons stuff thats been requested
 in the
past, be rolled out into this show player in the future, whether
 it be
through a little cc icon on the bottom bar of the player, or the
inclusion of this info in the popup 'about this episode' tab.
   
I agree about the font size, hmm this stuff starts to get a bit
tricky, a big decision to break away from the player being
 320x240. I
see that Veoh's player is rather large now, but this makes it look
quite good and leaves more room for additional info overlays to be
displayed in a larger font. Some other services have really wide
players with separate episode bars to one side of the video.
   
Personally Im fascinated by the idea of a flash player for
 wordpress
that can display the entire blog, text video etc, in the flash
 player.
I was looking at WPF/E but I think I'll ignore that technology for
now, and go buymyself a copy of flash and join the fun.
   
Cheers
   
Steve Elbows
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
 videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com,
   Mike Hudack mike@ wrote:

 Michael,

 For some people the blog format is really important.
 Cross-posting,
 copy  paste and everything else we've built to support the blog
   format
 aren't going away. We're going to keep those features, and we're
   going
 to keep improving them. It's just that the blog format isn't
   right for
 everyone.

 -Original Message-
 From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
 videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com

 [mailto:videoblogging@yahoogroups.comvideoblogging%40yahoogroups.com]
   On Behalf Of Michael Verdi
 Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2007 12:09 PM
 To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
 videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com
 Subject: Re: [videoblogging] New blip.tv show player

 Aaron  Steve - you bring up some good points. I do think
 options for
 people
 are important and I do like the ability to look through an
 archive but
 the
 price is that you loose all the other benefits of a blog -
 permalinks,
 comments, context, choice of video size and formats. That
 player is
 really
 built on the idea that your blip.tv blog is your blog. So it
 only
   shows
 and
 links back to your blog posts on blip. Comments? They have to go
   on the
 blip
 blog (as long as the viewer know to click through

[videoblogging] Re: New blip.tv show player

2007-04-16 Thread Chuck Olsen

I'm really digging the new player.

However, right now my latest posted video is breaking
the player. It completed the Flash conversion, but
perhaps there is a secondary conversion happening
in the background just for the new player?

I'm going to try using the new player for my most
recent video (i.e. the MN Stories home page).
When that video becomes yesterday's video, I'll 
switch to the old embed method so the correct video
plays in the permalink.

Yes, it would be nice to specify which video plays
first for permalink purposes.

Also, there are some videos I don't want popping up
in the player - like the Justin.tv sex video.
So I just labeled that video as explicit content
and it smartly is not included in the player videos.

All in all, GREAT job Blip.tv!

-chuck
http://mnstories.com



[videoblogging] Re: New blip.tv show player

2007-04-16 Thread Bill Cammack
The blip player is an addition, not a replacement, for the reasons
stated below.  It's good to have permalinks and commenting for people
that are going to utilize permalinks and comments.  You don't want to
twitter someone to a page with your blip player if you're trying to
point them to a single video because the player auto-updates.  As soon
as you add another video to that show, the link is useless.

OTOH, for people that DON'T use permalinks, the blip player's great. 
I just changed my front page to house four blip players, representing
each one of my current shows.  Each show has its own episode guide and
navigation controls, AND any one of them can be played full-screen. :)
 This means I can send people that don't know anything about
permalinks to one page, and they can browse all of my episodes right
from there.

The other thing that's useful about it is the auto-play, because
people don't tend to surf my site.  They look at the page they landed
on, then they exit.  With episode guides and descriptions available,
as well as the video continuing to the next one when the current one
finishes, I think that will increase the likelihood that more people
will see multiple videos of mine instead of just one.  Simply by
having four players on the same screen, there's the possibility that
they'll explore a show that they've never heard of or didn't come to
the site to check out.

The player's also good if you want to embed a dynamic version of your
show in general instead of your page in particular.  Instead of having
to announce updates, the player gets the update as soon as it posts to
blip and gets encoded to flash.

--
Bill C.
http://BillCammack.com


--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Mike Hudack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Michael,
 
 For some people the blog format is really important.  Cross-posting,
 copy  paste and everything else we've built to support the blog format
 aren't going away.  We're going to keep those features, and we're going
 to keep improving them.  It's just that the blog format isn't right for
 everyone. 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Verdi
 Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2007 12:09 PM
 To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: Re: [videoblogging] New blip.tv show player
 
 Aaron  Steve - you bring up some good points. I do think options for
 people
 are important and I do like the ability to look through an archive but
 the
 price is that you loose all the other benefits of a blog - permalinks,
 comments, context, choice of video size and formats. That player is
 really
 built on the idea that your blip.tv blog is your blog. So it only shows
 and
 links back to your blog posts on blip. Comments? They have to go on the
 blip
 blog (as long as the viewer know to click through to the blip blog to
 leave
 a comment). Plus you have to have the blip hot shows menu. That thing
 pulls
 in stuff completely out of context that you have no control over. Of
 course
 you do have control in that you certainly don't have to use the show
 player
 at all. I just think the blog part of videoblogging is important and
 desirable and I feel a little sad when people are so excited about
 dropping
 it.
 
 - Verdi
 
 On 4/15/07, Steve Garfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
I put the new blip.tv player on my 'homepage' this morning.
 
  http://www.stevegarfield.com/
 
  I blogged about it here:
 
  http://offonatangent.blogspot.com/2007/04/blip-video-player.html
 
  In the blog post I say, vlogs are dead. ;-)
 
  It's a joke, but also ironic since the reason for initially using
  blogs to post video in the first place was a technical one.
 
  There wasn't any easy way to post video to the web.
 
  Once I figured out that I could put video in a blog post, I got a
  very easy way to publish videos, along with the added benefits of
  that video being included in a blog post.
 
  But that method, over time, introduced the problems of old videos
  getting lost in archives, and not having an easy way to browse
  through videos.
 
  There are a lot of companies now bringing to the market ways to make
  it easy to surf videos and I'm glad that blip.tv has given me a way
  to allow people to browse my archives that are hosted with blip.tv.
 
  --Steve
 
  On Apr 15, 2007, at 9:45 AM, Steve Watkins wrote:
 
   Sounds quite interesting, anybody tried it yet?
  
   Some details here:
  
   http://blog.blip.tv/blog/
  
   Cheers
  
   Steve Elbows
  
  
  
  
   Yahoo! Groups Links
  
  
  
 
  --
  Steve Garfield
  http://SteveGarfield.com
 
   
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 http://michaelverdi.com
 http://spinxpress.com
 http://freevlog.org
 Author of Secrets Of Videoblogging - http://tinyurl.com/me4vs
 
 
 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
 
 
 
  
 Yahoo! Groups Links





[videoblogging] Re: New blip.tv show player

2007-04-16 Thread Bill Cammack
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Steve Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Offering both makes a lot of sense to me. I dream of this stuff being
 pushed to the extreme and for it to be possible for a blog like
 experience to be completely available from within a flash player.
 Complexities quickly arise when the people providing the player are
 hosting your videos, but are not responsible for the rest of your
 blog, it leads to an understandable focus on the video hosting page
 rather than your blog page. This may not be considered a probem
 because the expectation may be that you embed their player in your
 site, and your site provides all the other bloggy stuff you want. But
  this doesnt cover scenarios where our show player may be embedded on
 another site or used as a widget. 
 
 I see the guide button is optional, and its easy to rebrand the player
 so that its got your own site in the bottom right hand corner, which
 is a clickable link pointing to the URL of your choice.

Thanks for mentioning that.  I had those pointing to the blip shows,
basically by default, but I've switched them now so that they point to
the blogs for the shows instead of the blip pages.

This helps out the permalink situation A LITTLE BIT, but it still
takes the viewer to the most recent post in the blog.  The only thing
that seems to update with the individual video is if you click guide
and then read more about this on blip.tv, which takes you to the
individual video's page on blip.

--
Bill C.
BillCammack.com


 Id love to see the creative commons stuff thats been requested in the
 past, be rolled out into this show player in the future, whether it be
 through a little cc icon on the bottom bar of the player, or the
 inclusion of this info in the popup 'about this episode' tab.
 
 I agree about the font size, hmm this stuff starts to get a bit
 tricky, a big decision to break away from the player being 320x240. I
 see that Veoh's player is rather large now, but this makes it look
 quite good and leaves more room for additional info overlays to be
 displayed in a larger font. Some other services have really wide
 players with separate episode bars to one side of the video.
 
 Personally Im fascinated by the idea of a flash player for wordpress
 that can display the entire blog, text video etc, in the flash player.
 I was looking at WPF/E but I think I'll ignore that technology for
 now, and go buymyself a copy of flash and join the fun.
 
 Cheers
 
 Steve Elbows 
 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Mike Hudack mike@ wrote:
 
  Michael,
  
  For some people the blog format is really important.  Cross-posting,
  copy  paste and everything else we've built to support the blog
format
  aren't going away.  We're going to keep those features, and we're
going
  to keep improving them.  It's just that the blog format isn't
right for
  everyone. 
  
  -Original Message-
  From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Verdi
  Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2007 12:09 PM
  To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
  Subject: Re: [videoblogging] New blip.tv show player
  
  Aaron  Steve - you bring up some good points. I do think options for
  people
  are important and I do like the ability to look through an archive but
  the
  price is that you loose all the other benefits of a blog - permalinks,
  comments, context, choice of video size and formats. That player is
  really
  built on the idea that your blip.tv blog is your blog. So it only
shows
  and
  links back to your blog posts on blip. Comments? They have to go
on the
  blip
  blog (as long as the viewer know to click through to the blip blog to
  leave
  a comment). Plus you have to have the blip hot shows menu. That thing
  pulls
  in stuff completely out of context that you have no control over. Of
  course
  you do have control in that you certainly don't have to use the show
  player
  at all. I just think the blog part of videoblogging is important and
  desirable and I feel a little sad when people are so excited about
  dropping
  it.
  
  - Verdi
  
  On 4/15/07, Steve Garfield steve@ wrote:
  
 I put the new blip.tv player on my 'homepage' this morning.
  
   http://www.stevegarfield.com/
  
   I blogged about it here:
  
   http://offonatangent.blogspot.com/2007/04/blip-video-player.html
  
   In the blog post I say, vlogs are dead. ;-)
  
   It's a joke, but also ironic since the reason for initially using
   blogs to post video in the first place was a technical one.
  
   There wasn't any easy way to post video to the web.
  
   Once I figured out that I could put video in a blog post, I got a
   very easy way to publish videos, along with the added benefits of
   that video being included in a blog post.
  
   But that method, over time, introduced the problems of old videos
   getting lost in archives, and not having an easy way to browse
   through videos.
  
   There are a lot of companies now bringing to the 

Re: [videoblogging] Re: New blip.tv show player

2007-04-16 Thread Michael Verdi
Yes - point taken about it not being a replacement. It's also good for
things like user profiles on various social networks.
- Verdi

On 4/16/07, Bill Cammack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com,
 Steve Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Offering both makes a lot of sense to me. I dream of this stuff being
  pushed to the extreme and for it to be possible for a blog like
  experience to be completely available from within a flash player.
  Complexities quickly arise when the people providing the player are
  hosting your videos, but are not responsible for the rest of your
  blog, it leads to an understandable focus on the video hosting page
  rather than your blog page. This may not be considered a probem
  because the expectation may be that you embed their player in your
  site, and your site provides all the other bloggy stuff you want. But
  this doesnt cover scenarios where our show player may be embedded on
  another site or used as a widget.
 
  I see the guide button is optional, and its easy to rebrand the player
  so that its got your own site in the bottom right hand corner, which
  is a clickable link pointing to the URL of your choice.

 Thanks for mentioning that. I had those pointing to the blip shows,
 basically by default, but I've switched them now so that they point to
 the blogs for the shows instead of the blip pages.

 This helps out the permalink situation A LITTLE BIT, but it still
 takes the viewer to the most recent post in the blog. The only thing
 that seems to update with the individual video is if you click guide
 and then read more about this on blip.tv, which takes you to the
 individual video's page on blip.

 --
 Bill C.
 BillCammack.com


  Id love to see the creative commons stuff thats been requested in the
  past, be rolled out into this show player in the future, whether it be
  through a little cc icon on the bottom bar of the player, or the
  inclusion of this info in the popup 'about this episode' tab.
 
  I agree about the font size, hmm this stuff starts to get a bit
  tricky, a big decision to break away from the player being 320x240. I
  see that Veoh's player is rather large now, but this makes it look
  quite good and leaves more room for additional info overlays to be
  displayed in a larger font. Some other services have really wide
  players with separate episode bars to one side of the video.
 
  Personally Im fascinated by the idea of a flash player for wordpress
  that can display the entire blog, text video etc, in the flash player.
  I was looking at WPF/E but I think I'll ignore that technology for
  now, and go buymyself a copy of flash and join the fun.
 
  Cheers
 
  Steve Elbows
  --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com,
 Mike Hudack mike@ wrote:
  
   Michael,
  
   For some people the blog format is really important. Cross-posting,
   copy  paste and everything else we've built to support the blog
 format
   aren't going away. We're going to keep those features, and we're
 going
   to keep improving them. It's just that the blog format isn't
 right for
   everyone.
  
   -Original Message-
   From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com
   [mailto:videoblogging@yahoogroups.comvideoblogging%40yahoogroups.com]
 On Behalf Of Michael Verdi
   Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2007 12:09 PM
   To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com
   Subject: Re: [videoblogging] New blip.tv show player
  
   Aaron  Steve - you bring up some good points. I do think options for
   people
   are important and I do like the ability to look through an archive but
   the
   price is that you loose all the other benefits of a blog - permalinks,
   comments, context, choice of video size and formats. That player is
   really
   built on the idea that your blip.tv blog is your blog. So it only
 shows
   and
   links back to your blog posts on blip. Comments? They have to go
 on the
   blip
   blog (as long as the viewer know to click through to the blip blog to
   leave
   a comment). Plus you have to have the blip hot shows menu. That thing
   pulls
   in stuff completely out of context that you have no control over. Of
   course
   you do have control in that you certainly don't have to use the show
   player
   at all. I just think the blog part of videoblogging is important and
   desirable and I feel a little sad when people are so excited about
   dropping
   it.
  
   - Verdi
  
   On 4/15/07, Steve Garfield steve@ wrote:
   
I put the new blip.tv player on my 'homepage' this morning.
   
http://www.stevegarfield.com/
   
I blogged about it here:
   
http://offonatangent.blogspot.com/2007/04/blip-video-player.html
   
In the blog post I say, vlogs are dead. ;-)
   
It's a joke, but also ironic since the reason for initially using
blogs to post video in the first place was a technical one.
   

[videoblogging] Re: New blip.tv show player

2007-04-16 Thread mattfeldman78
Hi,

Has anyone found a way to control the order of the episodes within the
player?  Is this something that Blip is planning on offering?


-Matt
http://neovids.tv



--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Verdi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Yes - point taken about it not being a replacement. It's also good for
 things like user profiles on various social networks.
 - Verdi
 
 On 4/16/07, Bill Cammack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com,
  Steve Watkins steve@ wrote:
  
   Offering both makes a lot of sense to me. I dream of this stuff
being
   pushed to the extreme and for it to be possible for a blog like
   experience to be completely available from within a flash player.
   Complexities quickly arise when the people providing the player are
   hosting your videos, but are not responsible for the rest of your
   blog, it leads to an understandable focus on the video hosting page
   rather than your blog page. This may not be considered a probem
   because the expectation may be that you embed their player in your
   site, and your site provides all the other bloggy stuff you
want. But
   this doesnt cover scenarios where our show player may be embedded on
   another site or used as a widget.
  
   I see the guide button is optional, and its easy to rebrand the
player
   so that its got your own site in the bottom right hand corner, which
   is a clickable link pointing to the URL of your choice.
 
  Thanks for mentioning that. I had those pointing to the blip shows,
  basically by default, but I've switched them now so that they point to
  the blogs for the shows instead of the blip pages.
 
  This helps out the permalink situation A LITTLE BIT, but it still
  takes the viewer to the most recent post in the blog. The only thing
  that seems to update with the individual video is if you click guide
  and then read more about this on blip.tv, which takes you to the
  individual video's page on blip.
 
  --
  Bill C.
  BillCammack.com
 
 
   Id love to see the creative commons stuff thats been requested
in the
   past, be rolled out into this show player in the future, whether
it be
   through a little cc icon on the bottom bar of the player, or the
   inclusion of this info in the popup 'about this episode' tab.
  
   I agree about the font size, hmm this stuff starts to get a bit
   tricky, a big decision to break away from the player being
320x240. I
   see that Veoh's player is rather large now, but this makes it look
   quite good and leaves more room for additional info overlays to be
   displayed in a larger font. Some other services have really wide
   players with separate episode bars to one side of the video.
  
   Personally Im fascinated by the idea of a flash player for wordpress
   that can display the entire blog, text video etc, in the flash
player.
   I was looking at WPF/E but I think I'll ignore that technology for
   now, and go buymyself a copy of flash and join the fun.
  
   Cheers
  
   Steve Elbows
   --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com,
  Mike Hudack mike@ wrote:
   
Michael,
   
For some people the blog format is really important.
Cross-posting,
copy  paste and everything else we've built to support the blog
  format
aren't going away. We're going to keep those features, and we're
  going
to keep improving them. It's just that the blog format isn't
  right for
everyone.
   
-Original Message-
From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com
   
[mailto:videoblogging@yahoogroups.comvideoblogging%40yahoogroups.com]
  On Behalf Of Michael Verdi
Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2007 12:09 PM
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] New blip.tv show player
   
Aaron  Steve - you bring up some good points. I do think
options for
people
are important and I do like the ability to look through an
archive but
the
price is that you loose all the other benefits of a blog -
permalinks,
comments, context, choice of video size and formats. That
player is
really
built on the idea that your blip.tv blog is your blog. So it only
  shows
and
links back to your blog posts on blip. Comments? They have to go
  on the
blip
blog (as long as the viewer know to click through to the blip
blog to
leave
a comment). Plus you have to have the blip hot shows menu.
That thing
pulls
in stuff completely out of context that you have no control
over. Of
course
you do have control in that you certainly don't have to use
the show
player
at all. I just think the blog part of videoblogging is
important and
desirable and I feel a little sad when people are so excited about
dropping
it.
   
- Verdi
   
On 4/15/07, Steve Garfield steve@ wrote:

 I put the new blip.tv player on my 'homepage' this 

[videoblogging] Re: New blip.tv show player

2007-04-16 Thread Bill Cammack
As far as I can tell, there are no parameters for order of videos,
and there's no parameter for which video to start with.  It seems like
the function is an up-to-date player of your latest video, with the
opportunity to use the FF and Rewind buttons to scroll through the
videos one by one OR the option to use the guide and select an
episode from the rest of the list.

You can ask them in the blip user group:
http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/blip-users/

--
Bill C.
BillCammack.com

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, mattfeldman78
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi,
 
 Has anyone found a way to control the order of the episodes within the
 player?  Is this something that Blip is planning on offering?
 
 
 -Matt
 http://neovids.tv
 
 
 
 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Verdi michael@ wrote:
 
  Yes - point taken about it not being a replacement. It's also good for
  things like user profiles on various social networks.
  - Verdi
  
  On 4/16/07, Bill Cammack BillCammack@ wrote:
  
 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
 videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com,
   Steve Watkins steve@ wrote:
   
Offering both makes a lot of sense to me. I dream of this stuff
 being
pushed to the extreme and for it to be possible for a blog like
experience to be completely available from within a flash player.
Complexities quickly arise when the people providing the
player are
hosting your videos, but are not responsible for the rest of your
blog, it leads to an understandable focus on the video hosting
page
rather than your blog page. This may not be considered a probem
because the expectation may be that you embed their player in your
site, and your site provides all the other bloggy stuff you
 want. But
this doesnt cover scenarios where our show player may be
embedded on
another site or used as a widget.
   
I see the guide button is optional, and its easy to rebrand the
 player
so that its got your own site in the bottom right hand corner,
which
is a clickable link pointing to the URL of your choice.
  
   Thanks for mentioning that. I had those pointing to the blip shows,
   basically by default, but I've switched them now so that they
point to
   the blogs for the shows instead of the blip pages.
  
   This helps out the permalink situation A LITTLE BIT, but it still
   takes the viewer to the most recent post in the blog. The only thing
   that seems to update with the individual video is if you click
guide
   and then read more about this on blip.tv, which takes you to the
   individual video's page on blip.
  
   --
   Bill C.
   BillCammack.com
  
  
Id love to see the creative commons stuff thats been requested
 in the
past, be rolled out into this show player in the future, whether
 it be
through a little cc icon on the bottom bar of the player, or the
inclusion of this info in the popup 'about this episode' tab.
   
I agree about the font size, hmm this stuff starts to get a bit
tricky, a big decision to break away from the player being
 320x240. I
see that Veoh's player is rather large now, but this makes it look
quite good and leaves more room for additional info overlays to be
displayed in a larger font. Some other services have really wide
players with separate episode bars to one side of the video.
   
Personally Im fascinated by the idea of a flash player for
wordpress
that can display the entire blog, text video etc, in the flash
 player.
I was looking at WPF/E but I think I'll ignore that technology for
now, and go buymyself a copy of flash and join the fun.
   
Cheers
   
Steve Elbows
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
 videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com,
   Mike Hudack mike@ wrote:

 Michael,

 For some people the blog format is really important.
 Cross-posting,
 copy  paste and everything else we've built to support the blog
   format
 aren't going away. We're going to keep those features, and we're
   going
 to keep improving them. It's just that the blog format isn't
   right for
 everyone.

 -Original Message-
 From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
 videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com

 [mailto:videoblogging@yahoogroups.comvideoblogging%40yahoogroups.com]
   On Behalf Of Michael Verdi
 Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2007 12:09 PM
 To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
 videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com
 Subject: Re: [videoblogging] New blip.tv show player

 Aaron  Steve - you bring up some good points. I do think
 options for
 people
 are important and I do like the ability to look through an
 archive but
 the
 price is that you loose all the other benefits of a blog -
 permalinks,
 comments, context, choice of video size and formats. That
 player is
 really
 built on the idea that your blip.tv blog is your blog. So it
only
   shows
 and
 links back to your blog posts on 

Re: [videoblogging] Re: New blip.tv show player

2007-04-16 Thread pepa
for video festivals is also great, for new submissions show up
automatically. thanks!

On 4/16/07, Michael Verdi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   Yes - point taken about it not being a replacement. It's also good for
 things like user profiles on various social networks.
 - Verdi

 On 4/16/07, Bill Cammack [EMAIL PROTECTED]BillCammack%40alum.mit.edu
 wrote:
 
  --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com 
  videoblogging%40yahoogroups.comvideoblogging%40yahoogroups.com,

  Steve Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   Offering both makes a lot of sense to me. I dream of this stuff being
   pushed to the extreme and for it to be possible for a blog like
   experience to be completely available from within a flash player.
   Complexities quickly arise when the people providing the player are
   hosting your videos, but are not responsible for the rest of your
   blog, it leads to an understandable focus on the video hosting page
   rather than your blog page. This may not be considered a probem
   because the expectation may be that you embed their player in your
   site, and your site provides all the other bloggy stuff you want. But
   this doesnt cover scenarios where our show player may be embedded on
   another site or used as a widget.
  
   I see the guide button is optional, and its easy to rebrand the player
   so that its got your own site in the bottom right hand corner, which
   is a clickable link pointing to the URL of your choice.
 
  Thanks for mentioning that. I had those pointing to the blip shows,
  basically by default, but I've switched them now so that they point to
  the blogs for the shows instead of the blip pages.
 
  This helps out the permalink situation A LITTLE BIT, but it still
  takes the viewer to the most recent post in the blog. The only thing
  that seems to update with the individual video is if you click guide
  and then read more about this on blip.tv, which takes you to the
  individual video's page on blip.
 
  --
  Bill C.
  BillCammack.com
 
 
   Id love to see the creative commons stuff thats been requested in the
   past, be rolled out into this show player in the future, whether it be
   through a little cc icon on the bottom bar of the player, or the
   inclusion of this info in the popup 'about this episode' tab.
  
   I agree about the font size, hmm this stuff starts to get a bit
   tricky, a big decision to break away from the player being 320x240. I
   see that Veoh's player is rather large now, but this makes it look
   quite good and leaves more room for additional info overlays to be
   displayed in a larger font. Some other services have really wide
   players with separate episode bars to one side of the video.
  
   Personally Im fascinated by the idea of a flash player for wordpress
   that can display the entire blog, text video etc, in the flash player.
   I was looking at WPF/E but I think I'll ignore that technology for
   now, and go buymyself a copy of flash and join the fun.
  
   Cheers
  
   Steve Elbows
   --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com 
   videoblogging%40yahoogroups.comvideoblogging%40yahoogroups.com,
  Mike Hudack mike@ wrote:
   
Michael,
   
For some people the blog format is really important. Cross-posting,
copy  paste and everything else we've built to support the blog
  format
aren't going away. We're going to keep those features, and we're
  going
to keep improving them. It's just that the blog format isn't
  right for
everyone.
   
-Original Message-
From: 
videoblogging@yahoogroups.comvideoblogging%40yahoogroups.comvideoblogging%40yahoogroups.com
[mailto:videoblogging@yahoogroups.comvideoblogging%40yahoogroups.com
 videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com]
  On Behalf Of Michael Verdi
Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2007 12:09 PM
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com 
videoblogging%40yahoogroups.comvideoblogging%40yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] New blip.tv show player
   
Aaron  Steve - you bring up some good points. I do think options
 for
people
are important and I do like the ability to look through an archive
 but
the
price is that you loose all the other benefits of a blog -
 permalinks,
comments, context, choice of video size and formats. That player is
really
built on the idea that your blip.tv blog is your blog. So it only
  shows
and
links back to your blog posts on blip. Comments? They have to go
  on the
blip
blog (as long as the viewer know to click through to the blip blog
 to
leave
a comment). Plus you have to have the blip hot shows menu. That
 thing
pulls
in stuff completely out of context that you have no control over. Of
course
you do have control in that you certainly don't have to use the show
player
at all. I just think the blog part of videoblogging is important and
desirable and I feel a little sad when people are so excited about
dropping
it.
   
- Verdi
   
   

[videoblogging] Re: New blip.tv show player

2007-04-15 Thread valdezatron
Grace at http://www.fearlesscooking.tv used it in her new post. 

I like the built in episode guide. The text for the episode
description is a bit small (in terms of my parents being able to read
it!).  

It'd be nice if there was a clearer Commenting Link. I may have missed
it but I think now you have to click on Read More About This Post on Blip.

Maybe we'll see a shift from blog structured websites to more emphasis
on custom site design around a single embedded player. Variety would
be nice, the blog structure isn't really ideal for all.

Neato.

AV



http://www.aaronvaldez.com

--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Steve Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Sounds quite interesting, anybody tried it yet?
 
 Some details here:
 
 http://blog.blip.tv/blog/
 
 Cheers
 
 Steve Elbows





[videoblogging] Re: New blip.tv show player

2007-04-15 Thread valdezatron
Verdilicious - 

Points well taken. I think the blog format isn't for everyone. I've
switched one of my three videoblogs back over to standard site because
I found I didn't need things like commenting, permalinks, or
categories. I use my blip acct to update RSS subscribers on this site.
My other two sites that include a big chunk of text and photos along
with video in their posts are meant for a blog format.

Like anything I think people should evaluate what they are doing, what
they want to do and find the best suitable format.  

(It would be nice to have a customizable player sort of like wordpress
widgets where you can pick and choose what elements are included on
your player.)


AV



--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Michael Verdi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Aaron  Steve - you bring up some good points. I do think options
for people
 are important and I do like the ability to look through an archive
but the
 price is that you loose all the other benefits of a blog - permalinks,
 comments, context, choice of video size and formats. That player is
really
 built on the idea that your blip.tv blog is your blog. So it only
shows and
 links back to your blog posts on blip. Comments? They have to go on
the blip
 blog (as long as the viewer know to click through to the blip blog
to leave
 a comment). Plus you have to have the blip hot shows menu. That
thing pulls
 in stuff completely out of context that you have no control over. Of
course
 you do have control in that you certainly don't have to use the show
player
 at all. I just think the blog part of videoblogging is important and
 desirable and I feel a little sad when people are so excited about
dropping
 it.
 
 - Verdi
 
 On 4/15/07, Steve Garfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
I put the new blip.tv player on my 'homepage' this morning.
 
  http://www.stevegarfield.com/
 
  I blogged about it here:
 
  http://offonatangent.blogspot.com/2007/04/blip-video-player.html
 
  In the blog post I say, vlogs are dead. ;-)
 
  It's a joke, but also ironic since the reason for initially using
  blogs to post video in the first place was a technical one.
 
  There wasn't any easy way to post video to the web.
 
  Once I figured out that I could put video in a blog post, I got a
  very easy way to publish videos, along with the added benefits of
  that video being included in a blog post.
 
  But that method, over time, introduced the problems of old videos
  getting lost in archives, and not having an easy way to browse
  through videos.
 
  There are a lot of companies now bringing to the market ways to make
  it easy to surf videos and I'm glad that blip.tv has given me a way
  to allow people to browse my archives that are hosted with blip.tv.
 
  --Steve
 
  On Apr 15, 2007, at 9:45 AM, Steve Watkins wrote:
 
   Sounds quite interesting, anybody tried it yet?
  
   Some details here:
  
   http://blog.blip.tv/blog/
  
   Cheers
  
   Steve Elbows
  
  
  
  
   Yahoo! Groups Links
  
  
  
 
  --
  Steve Garfield
  http://SteveGarfield.com
 
   
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 http://michaelverdi.com
 http://spinxpress.com
 http://freevlog.org
 Author of Secrets Of Videoblogging - http://tinyurl.com/me4vs
 
 
 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[videoblogging] Re: New blip.tv show player

2007-04-15 Thread Steve Watkins
Offering both makes a lot of sense to me. I dream of this stuff being
pushed to the extreme and for it to be possible for a blog like
experience to be completely available from within a flash player.
Complexities quickly arise when the people providing the player are
hosting your videos, but are not responsible for the rest of your
blog, it leads to an understandable focus on the video hosting page
rather than your blog page. This may not be considered a probem
because the expectation may be that you embed their player in your
site, and your site provides all the other bloggy stuff you want. But
 this doesnt cover scenarios where our show player may be embedded on
another site or used as a widget. 

I see the guide button is optional, and its easy to rebrand the player
so that its got your own site in the bottom right hand corner, which
is a clickable link pointing to the URL of your choice.

Id love to see the creative commons stuff thats been requested in the
past, be rolled out into this show player in the future, whether it be
through a little cc icon on the bottom bar of the player, or the
inclusion of this info in the popup 'about this episode' tab.

I agree about the font size, hmm this stuff starts to get a bit
tricky, a big decision to break away from the player being 320x240. I
see that Veoh's player is rather large now, but this makes it look
quite good and leaves more room for additional info overlays to be
displayed in a larger font. Some other services have really wide
players with separate episode bars to one side of the video.

Personally Im fascinated by the idea of a flash player for wordpress
that can display the entire blog, text video etc, in the flash player.
I was looking at WPF/E but I think I'll ignore that technology for
now, and go buymyself a copy of flash and join the fun.

Cheers

Steve Elbows 
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mike Hudack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Michael,
 
 For some people the blog format is really important.  Cross-posting,
 copy  paste and everything else we've built to support the blog format
 aren't going away.  We're going to keep those features, and we're going
 to keep improving them.  It's just that the blog format isn't right for
 everyone. 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Verdi
 Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2007 12:09 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [videoblogging] New blip.tv show player
 
 Aaron  Steve - you bring up some good points. I do think options for
 people
 are important and I do like the ability to look through an archive but
 the
 price is that you loose all the other benefits of a blog - permalinks,
 comments, context, choice of video size and formats. That player is
 really
 built on the idea that your blip.tv blog is your blog. So it only shows
 and
 links back to your blog posts on blip. Comments? They have to go on the
 blip
 blog (as long as the viewer know to click through to the blip blog to
 leave
 a comment). Plus you have to have the blip hot shows menu. That thing
 pulls
 in stuff completely out of context that you have no control over. Of
 course
 you do have control in that you certainly don't have to use the show
 player
 at all. I just think the blog part of videoblogging is important and
 desirable and I feel a little sad when people are so excited about
 dropping
 it.
 
 - Verdi
 
 On 4/15/07, Steve Garfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
I put the new blip.tv player on my 'homepage' this morning.
 
  http://www.stevegarfield.com/
 
  I blogged about it here:
 
  http://offonatangent.blogspot.com/2007/04/blip-video-player.html
 
  In the blog post I say, vlogs are dead. ;-)
 
  It's a joke, but also ironic since the reason for initially using
  blogs to post video in the first place was a technical one.
 
  There wasn't any easy way to post video to the web.
 
  Once I figured out that I could put video in a blog post, I got a
  very easy way to publish videos, along with the added benefits of
  that video being included in a blog post.
 
  But that method, over time, introduced the problems of old videos
  getting lost in archives, and not having an easy way to browse
  through videos.
 
  There are a lot of companies now bringing to the market ways to make
  it easy to surf videos and I'm glad that blip.tv has given me a way
  to allow people to browse my archives that are hosted with blip.tv.
 
  --Steve
 
  On Apr 15, 2007, at 9:45 AM, Steve Watkins wrote:
 
   Sounds quite interesting, anybody tried it yet?
  
   Some details here:
  
   http://blog.blip.tv/blog/
  
   Cheers
  
   Steve Elbows
  
  
  
  
   Yahoo! Groups Links
  
  
  
 
  --
  Steve Garfield
  http://SteveGarfield.com
 
   
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 http://michaelverdi.com
 http://spinxpress.com
 http://freevlog.org
 Author of Secrets Of Videoblogging - http://tinyurl.com/me4vs
 
 
 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
 
 
 
  
 Yahoo! Groups Links





[videoblogging] Re: New blip.tv show player

2007-04-15 Thread Enric
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Steve Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Sounds quite interesting, anybody tried it yet?
 
 Some details here:
 
 http://blog.blip.tv/blog/
 
 Cheers
 
 Steve Elbows


I think this is probably one of the most important examples of where
video is headed:  the containment of all information in the video
container.  Containing descriptive text, links, comments, etc.  Video
travels outside the website to mobile devices, internet TVs, etc.  It
needs to contain all it's information along the way and this feature
shows this capability.

  -- Enric
  -==-
  http://cirne.com




[videoblogging] Re: New blip.tv show player

2007-04-15 Thread johnleeke
The customizable branding is terrific!

John



Re: [videoblogging] Re: New blip.tv show player

2007-04-15 Thread joshpaul
Yes, metadata is key. There are already hooks available, it just seems that
the vast majority of people aren't using them. In other words, the major
video containers provide methods to embed metadata, so that it travels with
the file itself.

Maybe this is something the video vertigo team would be willing to tackle? (
i.e. key/value pairs)

On 4/15/07, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com,
 Steve Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Sounds quite interesting, anybody tried it yet?
 
  Some details here:
 
  http://blog.blip.tv/blog/
 
  Cheers
 
  Steve Elbows
 

 I think this is probably one of the most important examples of where
 video is headed: the containment of all information in the video
 container. Containing descriptive text, links, comments, etc. Video
 travels outside the website to mobile devices, internet TVs, etc. It
 needs to contain all it's information along the way and this feature
 shows this capability.

 -- Enric
 -==-
 http://cirne.com

  




-- 
joshpaul

o: 818-237-5200
c: 818-667-0900
w: joshpaul.com


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Re: [videoblogging] Re: New blip.tv show player

2007-04-15 Thread Rupert
There are a lot of these players coming out now.

If it were possible to create permalinks so that a link would take  
you to the site AND make the player play a certain episode, that'd be  
perfect.

Crowdabout.us have recently released a similar large Show player - 2  
weeks ago - and allowed anonymous commenting without logging into  
their site (which you had to do before).  So you and your viewers can  
use their commenting and posting system, putting information and  
conversations at specific points along the timeline of your videos  
(with great RSS).  I strongly advise you to check it out.  It runs  
straight off your Blip RSS - they just pull in your flv files from  
Blip and then allow their commenting.

At the moment, though, I want people to be able to link to specific  
episodes, not just watch the latest by default.

I wrote to Crowdabout.us and asked them if they could produce another  
player, which allowed specific episodes to be played within  
individual permalinked blog posts.  I hope they're going to do it.   
If they do, I will switch straightaway to using their players.  The  
show player on the Home page and the individual players within the  
individual post pages.

This kind of functionality is moving towards what Steve Elbows has  
talked about here for a long time and which I am always very excited  
about the possibility of - everything contained within one player - a  
multipurpose blog tool.

The idea of making the videos themselves richer with easy custom  
hyperlinks and hotspots is also something I salivate over.

I think people will start to build all this stuff in as the more  
advanced players get more popular.  Wish it would all happen right  
now, though.  Technologically, I can't see any reason why it  
shouldn't.  Surely just a question of incentive, energy and  
inspiration.  Maybe Elbows will come up with some blueprints - now  
he's overcome his Flashphobia ;)  If I can help at all, even just as  
a sounding board, let me know.

Rupert
http://twittervlog.blogspot.com/
http://www.twitter.com/ruperthowe/
http://feeds.feedburner.com/twittervlog/


On 15 Apr 2007, at 19:45, joshpaul wrote:

Yes, metadata is key. There are already hooks available, it just  
seems that
the vast majority of people aren't using them. In other words, the major
video containers provide methods to embed metadata, so that it  
travels with
the file itself.

Maybe this is something the video vertigo team would be willing to  
tackle? (
i.e. key/value pairs)

On 4/15/07, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging% 
40yahoogroups.com,
  Steve Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   Sounds quite interesting, anybody tried it yet?
  
   Some details here:
  
   http://blog.blip.tv/blog/
  
   Cheers
  
   Steve Elbows
  
 
  I think this is probably one of the most important examples of where
  video is headed: the containment of all information in the video
  container. Containing descriptive text, links, comments, etc. Video
  travels outside the website to mobile devices, internet TVs, etc. It
  needs to contain all it's information along the way and this feature
  shows this capability.
 
  -- Enric
  -==-
  http://cirne.com
 
 
 

-- 
joshpaul

o: 818-237-5200
c: 818-667-0900
w: joshpaul.com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



[videoblogging] Re: New blip.tv show player

2007-04-15 Thread Enric
May be worth bringing up at the Microformats for Media Web 2.0 Expo
Open session lead by Mary Hodder (Tue 2 pm.)  I'll mention it.

  -- Enric

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, joshpaul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Yes, metadata is key. There are already hooks available, it just
seems that
 the vast majority of people aren't using them. In other words, the major
 video containers provide methods to embed metadata, so that it
travels with
 the file itself.
 
 Maybe this is something the video vertigo team would be willing to
tackle? (
 i.e. key/value pairs)
 
 On 4/15/07, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com,
  Steve Watkins steve@ wrote:
  
   Sounds quite interesting, anybody tried it yet?
  
   Some details here:
  
   http://blog.blip.tv/blog/
  
   Cheers
  
   Steve Elbows
  
 
  I think this is probably one of the most important examples of where
  video is headed: the containment of all information in the video
  container. Containing descriptive text, links, comments, etc. Video
  travels outside the website to mobile devices, internet TVs, etc. It
  needs to contain all it's information along the way and this feature
  shows this capability.
 
  -- Enric
  -==-
  http://cirne.com
 
   
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 joshpaul
 
 o: 818-237-5200
 c: 818-667-0900
 w: joshpaul.com
 
 
 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[videoblogging] Re: New blip.tv show player

2007-04-15 Thread Steve Watkins
I reckon part of the cause of that is that many implementations of
embedded metadata were done many years before video took off on the
net. So there are cobwebs all over the place, no buzz, no hoards of
would-be web 2 billionaries creating new versions of the tools, and
largely no recognition by the original implementers (eg Apple with
quicktime) that they could dig up these slumbering efforts and merge
them with the new generation of net video  syndication  smil and
whatever.

It wouldnt be easy, theres a bit too much overlap, and things arent
joined up enough. Its a pain for the user to enter the metadata into
the media with the poor GUI things like quicktime give to do it. Then
no site/software bothers reading this embedded information, or your
video gets transcoded into another format and its lost. SMIL could be
used and could be embedded in a mov, but then pure mp4 is mor
compatible with a range of devices. And quicktime supports SMIL 1 and
real player on my phone supports SMIL 2. Mess, mess, mess.

So I gave up on that sort of thing, and look to flash to provide a
glossy wrapper that delivers the results that would ideally be
possible using 1 technology  embedded metadata, but in reality are
coming from all sorts of different sources and are mashed together nicely.

Cheers

Steve Elbows 
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, joshpaul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Yes, metadata is key. There are already hooks available, it just
seems that
 the vast majority of people aren't using them. In other words, the major
 video containers provide methods to embed metadata, so that it
travels with
 the file itself.
 
 Maybe this is something the video vertigo team would be willing to
tackle? (
 i.e. key/value pairs)
 
 On 4/15/07, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com,
  Steve Watkins steve@ wrote:
  
   Sounds quite interesting, anybody tried it yet?
  
   Some details here:
  
   http://blog.blip.tv/blog/
  
   Cheers
  
   Steve Elbows
  
 
  I think this is probably one of the most important examples of where
  video is headed: the containment of all information in the video
  container. Containing descriptive text, links, comments, etc. Video
  travels outside the website to mobile devices, internet TVs, etc. It
  needs to contain all it's information along the way and this feature
  shows this capability.
 
  -- Enric
  -==-
  http://cirne.com
 
   
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 joshpaul
 
 o: 818-237-5200
 c: 818-667-0900
 w: joshpaul.com
 
 
 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[videoblogging] Re: New blip.tv show player

2007-04-15 Thread Steve Watkins
Im glad crowdabout have implemented a fully embeddable version of
their exciting features. I considered using them for my videoblogweek
stuff, but I rushed the hosting/formats side of things, and personally
I feel like crowdabouts sucess might be hampered by their choice of
layout of their features visually. Id like a smaller version of thee
player where the stuff that currently opens in windows at the side, is
overlayed on top of the video. And a smaller timeline thats still just
as functional because it can be zoomed in or out when theres a lot of
conversation markers on a clip. But thats would take quite a bit of
work to achieve all that Im sure. I am a huge fan of the concept,
thats for sure, just not the GUI.

Dont give me too much credit for talking about 'whole blog in a
player' stuff for ages, its only been a month or so I guess. Anyway it
does seem to be happening, but its unclear how much of the blog will
make it into mainstream implementations of this sort of thing, so it
would be nice if some vloggers who care about the blog part could help
add momentum for this stuff. Im up for it, I enjoyed vlogging the
other week and Im tired of listening to myself waffle and never do
anything, . But right now when I go to get Flash I seem to be stuck
ina bad moment before the new version of flash is released. Doh, can I
get a trial of the previous version?

Meanwhile on the radar of whats out there in terms of code people can
download and install themselves, some fine efforts such as vPiP seem
rather more closed when it comes to the flash player, which is fair
enough, thats up to them. So Ive een seeign what else is out ther,
this looks promising:

http://www.jeroenwijering.com/?item=Flash_Video_Player

This wordpress plugin version of that is currently floating my boat,
off to have a look at it in more detail:

http://alexrabe.boelinger.com/?page_id=20

Cheers

Steve Elbows
 
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Rupert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 There are a lot of these players coming out now.
 
 If it were possible to create permalinks so that a link would take  
 you to the site AND make the player play a certain episode, that'd be  
 perfect.
 
 Crowdabout.us have recently released a similar large Show player - 2  
 weeks ago - and allowed anonymous commenting without logging into  
 their site (which you had to do before).  So you and your viewers can  
 use their commenting and posting system, putting information and  
 conversations at specific points along the timeline of your videos  
 (with great RSS).  I strongly advise you to check it out.  It runs  
 straight off your Blip RSS - they just pull in your flv files from  
 Blip and then allow their commenting.
 
 At the moment, though, I want people to be able to link to specific  
 episodes, not just watch the latest by default.
 
 I wrote to Crowdabout.us and asked them if they could produce another  
 player, which allowed specific episodes to be played within  
 individual permalinked blog posts.  I hope they're going to do it.   
 If they do, I will switch straightaway to using their players.  The  
 show player on the Home page and the individual players within the  
 individual post pages.
 
 This kind of functionality is moving towards what Steve Elbows has  
 talked about here for a long time and which I am always very excited  
 about the possibility of - everything contained within one player - a  
 multipurpose blog tool.
 
 The idea of making the videos themselves richer with easy custom  
 hyperlinks and hotspots is also something I salivate over.
 
 I think people will start to build all this stuff in as the more  
 advanced players get more popular.  Wish it would all happen right  
 now, though.  Technologically, I can't see any reason why it  
 shouldn't.  Surely just a question of incentive, energy and  
 inspiration.  Maybe Elbows will come up with some blueprints - now  
 he's overcome his Flashphobia ;)  If I can help at all, even just as  
 a sounding board, let me know.
 
 Rupert
 http://twittervlog.blogspot.com/
 http://www.twitter.com/ruperthowe/
 http://feeds.feedburner.com/twittervlog/
 
 
 On 15 Apr 2007, at 19:45, joshpaul wrote:
 
 Yes, metadata is key. There are already hooks available, it just  
 seems that
 the vast majority of people aren't using them. In other words, the major
 video containers provide methods to embed metadata, so that it  
 travels with
 the file itself.
 
 Maybe this is something the video vertigo team would be willing to  
 tackle? (
 i.e. key/value pairs)
 
 On 4/15/07, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging% 
 40yahoogroups.com,
   Steve Watkins steve@ wrote:
   
Sounds quite interesting, anybody tried it yet?
   
Some details here:
   
http://blog.blip.tv/blog/
   
Cheers
   
Steve Elbows
   
  
   I think this is probably one of the most important examples of where
   video is headed: the containment of all information 

[videoblogging] Re: New blip.tv show player

2007-04-15 Thread Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Steve Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Im glad crowdabout have implemented a fully embeddable version of
 their exciting features. I considered using them for my videoblogweek
 stuff, but I rushed the hosting/formats side of things, and personally
 I feel like crowdabouts sucess might be hampered by their choice of
 layout of their features visually. Id like a smaller version of thee
 player where the stuff that currently opens in windows at the side, is
 overlayed on top of the video. And a smaller timeline thats still just
 as functional because it can be zoomed in or out when theres a lot of
 conversation markers on a clip. But thats would take quite a bit of
 work to achieve all that Im sure. I am a huge fan of the concept,
 thats for sure, just not the GUI.
 
 Dont give me too much credit for talking about 'whole blog in a
 player' stuff for ages, its only been a month or so I guess. Anyway it
 does seem to be happening, but its unclear how much of the blog will
 make it into mainstream implementations of this sort of thing, so it
 would be nice if some vloggers who care about the blog part could help
 add momentum for this stuff. Im up for it, I enjoyed vlogging the
 other week and Im tired of listening to myself waffle and never do
 anything, . But right now when I go to get Flash I seem to be stuck
 ina bad moment before the new version of flash is released. Doh, can I
 get a trial of the previous version?
 
 Meanwhile on the radar of whats out there in terms of code people can
 download and install themselves, some fine efforts such as vPiP seem
 rather more closed when it comes to the flash player, which is fair
 enough, thats up to them.

I plan to release an open version of the included flash flv player in
vPIP.  Right now it's under development for features I'm writing for
the cinegage site (not ready yet.)  Once I can package the flash flv
player so it has some commenting, cleaned up code and useable, I'll
release that version under an open license.  

BTW, You can use any flash flv player in vPIP including the one by
jeroenwijering.  See

http://vpip.org/home/playing-flash/

  -- Enric
  -==-
  http://cirne.com


 So Ive een seeign what else is out ther,
 this looks promising:
 
 http://www.jeroenwijering.com/?item=Flash_Video_Player
 
 This wordpress plugin version of that is currently floating my boat,
 off to have a look at it in more detail:
 
 http://alexrabe.boelinger.com/?page_id=20
 
 Cheers
 
 Steve Elbows
  
 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Rupert rupert@ wrote:
 
  There are a lot of these players coming out now.
  
  If it were possible to create permalinks so that a link would take  
  you to the site AND make the player play a certain episode, that'd
be  
  perfect.
  
  Crowdabout.us have recently released a similar large Show player - 2  
  weeks ago - and allowed anonymous commenting without logging into  
  their site (which you had to do before).  So you and your viewers
can  
  use their commenting and posting system, putting information and  
  conversations at specific points along the timeline of your videos  
  (with great RSS).  I strongly advise you to check it out.  It runs  
  straight off your Blip RSS - they just pull in your flv files from  
  Blip and then allow their commenting.
  
  At the moment, though, I want people to be able to link to specific  
  episodes, not just watch the latest by default.
  
  I wrote to Crowdabout.us and asked them if they could produce
another  
  player, which allowed specific episodes to be played within  
  individual permalinked blog posts.  I hope they're going to do it.   
  If they do, I will switch straightaway to using their players.  The  
  show player on the Home page and the individual players within the  
  individual post pages.
  
  This kind of functionality is moving towards what Steve Elbows has  
  talked about here for a long time and which I am always very excited  
  about the possibility of - everything contained within one player
- a  
  multipurpose blog tool.
  
  The idea of making the videos themselves richer with easy custom  
  hyperlinks and hotspots is also something I salivate over.
  
  I think people will start to build all this stuff in as the more  
  advanced players get more popular.  Wish it would all happen right  
  now, though.  Technologically, I can't see any reason why it  
  shouldn't.  Surely just a question of incentive, energy and  
  inspiration.  Maybe Elbows will come up with some blueprints - now  
  he's overcome his Flashphobia ;)  If I can help at all, even just as  
  a sounding board, let me know.
  
  Rupert
  http://twittervlog.blogspot.com/
  http://www.twitter.com/ruperthowe/
  http://feeds.feedburner.com/twittervlog/
  
  
  On 15 Apr 2007, at 19:45, joshpaul wrote:
  
  Yes, metadata is key. There are already hooks available, it just  
  seems that
  the vast majority of people aren't using them. In other words, 

[videoblogging] Re: New blip.tv show player

2007-04-15 Thread Steve Watkins
Thats brilliant news, cheers. vPIP is wonderful stuff, the flash
player being closed isnt exactly a big issue, I just got curious about
how everyone makes these things, and what efforts are out there that
are happy for others to build on top of them. I wouldnt want to do
anything that went against the spirit of what the creator intended
when releasing their stuff.

Could you explain if/what sort of use of SMIL your vPIP can do? Is it
passing SMIL along to play in quicktime or something else?

Cheers

Steve Elbows

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I plan to release an open version of the included flash flv player in
 vPIP.  Right now it's under development for features I'm writing for
 the cinegage site (not ready yet.)  Once I can package the flash flv
 player so it has some commenting, cleaned up code and useable, I'll
 release that version under an open license.  
 
 BTW, You can use any flash flv player in vPIP including the one by
 jeroenwijering.  See
 
 http://vpip.org/home/playing-flash/
 
   -- Enric
   -==-
   http://cirne.com



[videoblogging] Re: New blip.tv show player

2007-04-15 Thread Enric
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Steve Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Thats brilliant news, cheers. vPIP is wonderful stuff, the flash
 player being closed isnt exactly a big issue, I just got curious about
 how everyone makes these things, and what efforts are out there that
 are happy for others to build on top of them. I wouldnt want to do
 anything that went against the spirit of what the creator intended
 when releasing their stuff.
 
 Could you explain if/what sort of use of SMIL your vPIP can do? Is it
 passing SMIL along to play in quicktime or something else?

Yes, there's basic support for SMIL in quicktime (passing SMIL along
should be the accurate description.)  I haven't done work in SMIL
myself, but setup support for SMIL in vPIP during debugging with
Michael Sullivan having vPIP with SMIL on vlogdir.com.  

In the vPIP package the file, InitSMIL.mov, gives SMIL activation support.

  -- Enric

 
 Cheers
 
 Steve Elbows
 
 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric enric@ wrote:
 
  I plan to release an open version of the included flash flv player in
  vPIP.  Right now it's under development for features I'm writing for
  the cinegage site (not ready yet.)  Once I can package the flash flv
  player so it has some commenting, cleaned up code and useable, I'll
  release that version under an open license.  
  
  BTW, You can use any flash flv player in vPIP including the one by
  jeroenwijering.  See
  
  http://vpip.org/home/playing-flash/
  
-- Enric
-==-
http://cirne.com





[videoblogging] Re: New blip.tv show player

2007-04-15 Thread caroosky
Hey Steve,
Thanks so much for giving us your perspective on what we're trying to
do.  I know we are on the same page in terms of where we are headed,
but it's always helpful to get more input from users.  And those
considering using.

 Im glad crowdabout have implemented a fully embeddable version of
 their exciting features. I considered using them for my videoblogweek
 stuff, but I rushed the hosting/formats side of things, and personally
 I feel like crowdabouts sucess might be hampered by their choice of
 layout of their features visually. Id like a smaller version of thee
 player where the stuff that currently opens in windows at the side, is
 overlayed on top of the video. And a smaller timeline thats still just
 as functional because it can be zoomed in or out when theres a lot of
 conversation markers on a clip. But thats would take quite a bit of
 work to achieve all that Im sure. I am a huge fan of the concept,
 thats for sure, just not the GUI.

This is an area where it's hard to get it right for everyone's use. 
I've been thinking about doing a contest, and letting everyone tell us
what they want the player to look like/operate from an interface
perspective.  What do you think?

Carter Harkins
http://crowdabout.us






Re: [videoblogging] Re: New blip.tv show player

2007-04-15 Thread sull
Josh-

Maybe this is something the video vertigo team would be willing to tackle? (
 i.e. key/value pairs)


Can you ellaborate here?  Because it sounds similar to some of my efforts.

Thnx,

sull


On 4/15/07, joshpaul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   Yes, metadata is key. There are already hooks available, it just seems
 that
 the vast majority of people aren't using them. In other words, the major
 video containers provide methods to embed metadata, so that it travels
 with
 the file itself.

 Maybe this is something the video vertigo team would be willing to tackle?
 (
 i.e. key/value pairs)




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Re: [videoblogging] Re: New blip.tv show player

2007-04-15 Thread sull
Right, and it was actually experimented with on vlogwall.com.  In another
recent thread I made mention of that too.
The idea of the vPiP approach and SMIL/RSS usage seemed perfect, at least
conceptually.  This was last Summer mind you.
So I made a gridwall of vPiP embeds of Video RSS Feeds (I just call them
vodcasts).  RSS feeds were transformed to SMIL.
I had added pre and post clips to demonstrate what could be ads, cc
licenses, branding bumps etc.
So an entire video feed could technically be played back right within the
embedded player and you could easily switch around to different
feeds by clicking the other vPiP images/embeds.

But, as mentioned before, Quicktime SMIL does tend to get overwhelmed and
can suffer buffering delays or hangups.  It worls better when every video is
optimized small clips and the user doesnt jump around the playlist to much.
So all in all, not ideal for the mass audience of net video, unfortunately.


It's all about Flash when it comes to web based playback and playlisting of
video.  It just works more smoothly than anything else and now that Flash
Video quality has improved so much in the past 12-18 months there is no
reason to take full advantage of the platform right now.

I also mentioned Jeroen's
Playerhttp://www.jeroenwijering.com/?item=Flash_Media_Player
His is probably the basis several video services.
YouTube started off using it and I have been using it since he released the
first version long ago.
It's good stuff and he has been actively developing and fixing it over the
years.
I recently talked to Jeroen again about supporting SMIL extensively.
It's not a simple undertaking, but I think a SMIL smart Flash Wrapper is a
big deal and I am pushing for him to consider expending the time on
development of that (as well as myself and others).

Of course, you can do alot by way of custom namespaces in RSS or XSPF to
achieve all kinds of cool functionality.  But the idea of utilising a
standards compliant format and what I think is just an extremely cool XML
spec... SMIL could make a comeback in the web.  Its been around a long long
time and nobody really ever talks about it.  It is commonly used for mobile
phone networks however.  I just think it can be brought into the limelight
and be used creatively again and now with Flash as the wrapper instead of
Quicktime or Real.

Sull



On 4/15/07, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com,
 Steve Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Thats brilliant news, cheers. vPIP is wonderful stuff, the flash
  player being closed isnt exactly a big issue, I just got curious about
  how everyone makes these things, and what efforts are out there that
  are happy for others to build on top of them. I wouldnt want to do
  anything that went against the spirit of what the creator intended
  when releasing their stuff.
 
  Could you explain if/what sort of use of SMIL your vPIP can do? Is it
  passing SMIL along to play in quicktime or something else?

 Yes, there's basic support for SMIL in quicktime (passing SMIL along
 should be the accurate description.) I haven't done work in SMIL
 myself, but setup support for SMIL in vPIP during debugging with
 Michael Sullivan having vPIP with SMIL on vlogdir.com.

 In the vPIP package the file, InitSMIL.mov, gives SMIL activation support.

 -- Enric


 
  Cheers
 
  Steve Elbows
 
  --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com,
 Enric enric@ wrote:
 
   I plan to release an open version of the included flash flv player in
   vPIP. Right now it's under development for features I'm writing for
   the cinegage site (not ready yet.) Once I can package the flash flv
   player so it has some commenting, cleaned up code and useable, I'll
   release that version under an open license.
  
   BTW, You can use any flash flv player in vPIP including the one by
   jeroenwijering. See
  
   http://vpip.org/home/playing-flash/
  
   -- Enric
   -==-
   http://cirne.com
 

  



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Re: [videoblogging] Re: New blip.tv show player

2007-04-15 Thread joshpaul
I'm not that familiar with your efforts. Is there somewhere online I can
view them?

I'm essentially thinking using key/value pairs within metadata hooks
provided by QT, Flash, et al. Basically, come up with some type of schema we
can expect to extract, such as licensing restrictions, copyright owner,
originating host (i.e. blip.tv, youtube.com, ...) etc.

I think part of the problem is that the hooks are there, but nobody is
embedding the information. So, nobody's looking for it.

On 4/15/07, sull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   Josh-

 Maybe this is something the video vertigo team would be willing to tackle?
 (
  i.e. key/value pairs)

 Can you ellaborate here? Because it sounds similar to some of my efforts.

 Thnx,

 sull

 On 4/15/07, joshpaul [EMAIL PROTECTED]lists%2Byahoo%40joshpaul.com
 wrote:
 
  Yes, metadata is key. There are already hooks available, it just seems
  that
  the vast majority of people aren't using them. In other words, the major
  video containers provide methods to embed metadata, so that it travels
  with
  the file itself.
 
  Maybe this is something the video vertigo team would be willing to
 tackle?
  (
  i.e. key/value pairs)
 
 

 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

  




-- 
joshpaul

o: 818-237-5200
c: 818-667-0900
w: joshpaul.com


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]