[xmail] error code -60 and -152
Since I switched to ssl/tls started to get some error sending mails: [PeekTime] 1574942083 : Thu, 28 Nov 2019 12:54:43 +0100 << ErrCode = -60 ErrString = Bad SMTP response SMAIL SMTP-Send MX = "mailshield.exent.it." SMTP = "smtp.convergenze.it" From = "c...@socome.com" To = "i...@edil2000altamura.it" Failed ! SMTP-Error = "417 Temporary delivery error" SMTP-Server = "mailshield.exent.it." >> << ErrCode = -152 ErrString = End of socket stream data SMAIL SMTP-Send MX = "mx2.exent.it." SMTP = "smtp.convergenze.it" >From = "c...@socome.com" To = "i...@edil2000altamura.it" Failed ! SMTP-Error = "417 Temporary delivery error" SMTP-Server = "mx2.exent.it." >> [PeekTime] 1574942564 : Thu, 28 Nov 2019 13:02:44 +0100 It is common to some domains. So I would like some help about what they means. All of them respond to: openssl s_client -connect (mx dmain):25 -starttls smtp with TLSv1.2 that it is the same of my centos7 with xmail. any help is appreciated. regards Ros ___ xmail mailing list xmail@xmailserver.org http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail
[xmail] smail with ssl/tls
Hi, I was able to configure our xmail 1.27 server to use ssl/tls, now I would like to check if the email it get through smtp frm sender client is sent to the final destination using ssl/tls. so I would like to know if smail uses ssl/tls like smtp and pop3. regards Ros ___ xmail mailing list xmail@xmailserver.org http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail
Re: [xmail] SMTP external authentication is not worjing
Dear, I have version 1.26 of XMail. I have found that the configuration file smtpextauth.tab is not interpreted correctly. The parameters have a shift. It is necessary to add a "Dummy" field, like this: "LOGIN" "*Dummy*" "/etc/dovecot/user_auth.sh" "@@USER""@@PASS" "@@RFILE" Regards! Cesar Meloni El mar., 5 mar. 2019 a las 4:43, Spon Spon via xmail () escribió: > Hello, > > I have a mixed setup with DOVECAT for IMAP access, and XMAIl 1.27 for the > rest. The relay is cosed until authentication is made In order to have a > centralized place for authentication I used in XMAIL external > authentication. However seems it is not working as I receive 550 Relay > Denied when I try to send an email using this XMAIL server. > > The setup is as following: > > In smtpextauth.tab I put following line: > > "LOGIN" "/config/scripts/checkSmtpAuth.sh" "@@AUTH" "@@USER" "@@PASS" > "@@RFILE" > In server tab I have: > "DefaultSmtpPerms" "MRVZ" > > In checkSmtpAuth.sh I always exit with 0 for testing. However I received > 550 Relay denied each time I tried to send an email. If the script exits > with 1 then the error is different, (Authentication error). > > I tried also populating RFILE with Perms=MR but without success. I tried > also with Perms=MRVZ . No change. > > Also another issue is the fact that those RFILE files were never get > deleted. For each email, that file is created and stays there forever > (need external action to delete it) > > Is there any other settings that need to be made or is this a bug ? > > Using internal authentication (smtpauth.tab or mailuser.tab) emptying > smtpextauth.tab there is no such error, and everything works as expected.. > > Unfortunately there is no debug log in application, so only way to figure > out is DEBUG, and currently it is installed on an embedded router so no way > to debug. > > Thanks, > Spon > > ___ > xmail mailing list > xmail@xmailserver.org > http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail > ___ xmail mailing list xmail@xmailserver.org http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail
Re: [xmail] SMTP external authentication is not worjing
Hi,checkSmtpAuth.sh is for sure created as I print input parameters and they seems fine. The created RFILE gave 644 permission being owned by root.root. Indeed, if exit code is different than 0 I received authentication error, so the script works. See below the content of checkSmtpAuth.sh :#!/bin/sh set -x AUTH=$1 USER=$2 PASS=$3 RFILE=$4 c=`doveadm auth $USER $PASS` echo "Perms=MRVZ" > $RFILE exit 0 No matter if I write something in RFILE or not the result is the same. 550 Relay Denied. I looked in the code, and it seems that if nothing is written in RFILE default should be used (MRVZ), which seems not the case. Having the same configuration, nothing else changed, if I use internal authentication(by emptying smtpextauth.tab), everything works fine. Thank You From: Bart Mortelmans via xmail To: Spon Spon via xmail Sent: Tuesday, March 5, 2019 5:33 PM Subject: Re: [xmail] SMTP external authentication is not worjing I understand that you can be sure that your checkSmtpAuth.sh is indeed being called, because you see that the RFILE is created, with the contents you expect your script to put in there? In that case my guess is that XMail is having trouble accessing your RFILE. If the exit code wasn't seen as "0", then you should either get "451 Requested action aborted" or "503 Authentication failed". The error "550 Relay denied" most probably is based on the fact that it isn't finding "R" (for relaying) in the RFILE. In theory, it should also delete the RFILE. So the fact that they're still there, also seems to indicate a problem with the RFILE. - What would happen if you don't write this RFILE and don't specify the @@RFILE parameter in smtpextauth.tab? In theory the default from server.tab would be used. - Anything strange about permissions of the RFILE's that have not been removed? - Could it be that your script has somehow not finished writing the file yet by the time XMail tries to read it? Bart Op 5/03/19 om 07:41 schreef Spon Spon via xmail: Hello, I have a mixed setup with DOVECAT for IMAP access, and XMAIl 1.27 for the rest. The relay is cosed until authentication is made In order to have a centralized place for authentication I used in XMAIL external authentication. However seems it is not working as I receive 550 Relay Denied when I try to send an email using this XMAIL server. The setup is as following: In smtpextauth.tab I put following line: "LOGIN" "/config/scripts/checkSmtpAuth.sh" "@@AUTH" "@@USER" "@@PASS" "@@RFILE" In server tab I have: "DefaultSmtpPerms" "MRVZ" In checkSmtpAuth.sh I always exit with 0 for testing. However I received 550 Relay denied each time I tried to send an email. If the script exits with 1 then the error is different, (Authentication error). I tried also populating RFILE with Perms=MR but without success. I tried also with Perms=MRVZ . No change. Also another issue is the fact that those RFILE files were never get deleted. For each email, that file is created and stays there forever (need external action to delete it) Is there any other settings that need to be made or is this a bug ? Using internal authentication (smtpauth.tab or mailuser.tab) emptying smtpextauth.tab there is no such error, and everything works as expected.. Unfortunately there is no debug log in application, so only way to figure out is DEBUG, and currently it is installed on an embedded router so no way to debug. Thanks, Spon _______ xmail mailing list xmail@xmailserver.org http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail _______ xmail mailing list xmail@xmailserver.org http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail ___ xmail mailing list xmail@xmailserver.org http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail
Re: [xmail] SMTP external authentication is not worjing
Hi, smtp.ipmap.tab contains "0.0.0.0" "0.0.0.0" "ALLOW" 1smtprelay.tab contains only local addresses, therefore not the IP from where I try (internet). But htis hsould be fine, because this is why I use authentication. To summarize: I want to connect to the xmail server from internet, and send an email to a different domain (internet). I have following scenarios (all other settings remaining unchanged)1. Leaving smtpextauth empty, if I send a mail using a user/pass defined in mailusers.tab mail is properly send 2. Leaving smtpextauth empty, if I send a mail using a user/pass defined in smtpauth.tab mail is properly send 3. If I put an entry in smtpextauth with a script that always return 1, no matter what user/pass I'll use I received AUTH=EFAIL:TYPE=LOGIN in the log, the user not being authenticated, which is as expected, mail not being sent.4. If I put an entry in smtpextauth with a script that always return 0 , no matter what user/pass I'll use I received RCPT=ERELAY in the log, the user BEING authenticated, which is fine, but error not being sent because of RELAY DENIED. In this step 4 no matter if I put something in RFILE (Perms=MRZV) or nothing, the result is the same. The problem seems to be related to external authentication, because the internal one works fine. Thank You From: Edinilson - ATINET To: Spon Spon Cc: "xmail@xmailserver.org" Sent: Tuesday, March 5, 2019 4:51 PM Subject: Re: [xmail] SMTP external authentication is not worjing Is your ip range allowed in smtprelay.tab? And about smtp.ipmap.tab ? Do you have installed a new Xmail Server OR it stops after some time of use? Edinilson ---- Original Message From: Spon Spon via xmail To: "xmail@xmailserver.org" Sent: Ter, Mar 5, 2019, 4:44 AM Subject: [xmail] SMTP external authentication is not worjing Hello, I have a mixed setup with DOVECAT for IMAP access, and XMAIl 1.27 for the rest. The relay is cosed until authentication is made In order to have a centralized place for authentication I used in XMAIL external authentication. However seems it is not working as I receive 550 Relay Denied when I try to send an email using this XMAIL server. The setup is as following: In smtpextauth.tab I put following line: "LOGIN" "/config/scripts/checkSmtpAuth.sh" "@@AUTH" "@@USER" "@@PASS" "@@RFILE" In server tab I have:"DefaultSmtpPerms" "MRVZ" In checkSmtpAuth.sh I always exit with 0 for testing. However I received 550 Relay denied each time I tried to send an email. If the script exits with 1 then the error is different, (Authentication error). I tried also populating RFILE with Perms=MR but without success. I tried also with Perms=MRVZ . No change. Also another issue is the fact that those RFILE files were never get deleted. For each email, that file is created and stays there forever (need external action to delete it) Is there any other settings that need to be made or is this a bug ? Using internal authentication (smtpauth.tab or mailuser.tab) emptying smtpextauth.tab there is no such error, and everything works as expected. Unfortunately there is no debug log in application, so only way to figure out is DEBUG, and currently it is installed on an embedded router so no way to debug. Thanks,Spon ___ xmail mailing list xmail@xmailserver.org http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail
Re: [xmail] SMTP external authentication is not worjing
I understand that you can be sure that your checkSmtpAuth.sh is indeed being called, because you see that the RFILE is created, with the contents you expect your script to put in there? In that case my guess is that XMail is having trouble accessing your RFILE. If the exit code wasn't seen as "0", then you should either get "451 Requested action aborted" or "503 Authentication failed". The error "550 Relay denied" most probably is based on the fact that it isn't finding "R" (for relaying) in the RFILE. In theory, it should also delete the RFILE. So the fact that they're still there, also seems to indicate a problem with the RFILE. - What would happen if you don't write this RFILE and don't specify the @@RFILE parameter in smtpextauth.tab? In theory the default from server.tab would be used. - Anything strange about permissions of the RFILE's that have not been removed? - Could it be that your script has somehow not finished writing the file yet by the time XMail tries to read it? Bart Op 5/03/19 om 07:41 schreef Spon Spon via xmail: Hello, I have a mixed setup with DOVECAT for IMAP access, and XMAIl 1.27 for the rest. The relay is cosed until authentication is made In order to have a centralized place for authentication I used in XMAIL external authentication. However seems it is not working as I receive 550 Relay Denied when I try to send an email using this XMAIL server. The setup is as following: In smtpextauth.tab I put following line: "LOGIN""/config/scripts/checkSmtpAuth.sh""@@AUTH""@@USER""@@PASS""@@RFILE" In server tab I have: "DefaultSmtpPerms""MRVZ" In checkSmtpAuth.sh I always exit with 0 for testing. However I received 550 Relay denied each time I tried to send an email. If the script exits with 1 then the error is different, (Authentication error). I tried also populating RFILE with Perms=MR but without success. I tried also with Perms=MRVZ . No change. Also another issue is the fact that those RFILE files were never get deleted. For each email, that file is created and stays there forever (need external action to delete it) Is there any other settings that need to be made or is this a bug ? Using internal authentication (smtpauth.tab or mailuser.tab) emptying smtpextauth.tab there is no such error, and everything works as expected. Unfortunately there is no debug log in application, so only way to figure out is DEBUG, and currently it is installed on an embedded router so no way to debug. Thanks, Spon ___ xmail mailing list xmail@xmailserver.org http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail smime.p7s Description: S/MIME-cryptografische ondertekening ___ xmail mailing list xmail@xmailserver.org http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail
Re: [xmail] SMTP external authentication is not worjing
Is your ip range allowed in smtprelay.tab? And about smtp.ipmap.tab ? Do you have installed a new Xmail Server OR it stops after some time of use? Edinilson Original Message From: Spon Spon via xmail To: "xmail@xmailserver.org" Sent: Ter, Mar 5, 2019, 4:44 AM Subject: [xmail] SMTP external authentication is not worjing Hello, I have a mixed setup with DOVECAT for IMAP access, and XMAIl 1.27 for the rest. The relay is cosed until authentication is made In order to have a centralized place for authentication I used in XMAIL external authentication. However seems it is not working as I receive 550 Relay Denied when I try to send an email using this XMAIL server. The setup is as following: In smtpextauth.tab I put following line: "LOGIN" "/config/scripts/checkSmtpAuth.sh" "@@AUTH" "@@USER" "@@PASS" "@@RFILE" In server tab I have:"DefaultSmtpPerms" "MRVZ" In checkSmtpAuth.sh I always exit with 0 for testing. However I received 550 Relay denied each time I tried to send an email. If the script exits with 1 then the error is different, (Authentication error). I tried also populating RFILE with Perms=MR but without success. I tried also with Perms=MRVZ . No change. Also another issue is the fact that those RFILE files were never get deleted. For each email, that file is created and stays there forever (need external action to delete it) Is there any other settings that need to be made or is this a bug ? Using internal authentication (smtpauth.tab or mailuser.tab) emptying smtpextauth.tab there is no such error, and everything works as expected. Unfortunately there is no debug log in application, so only way to figure out is DEBUG, and currently it is installed on an embedded router so no way to debug. Thanks,Spon _______ xmail mailing list xmail@xmailserver.org http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail
[xmail] SMTP external authentication is not worjing
Hello, I have a mixed setup with DOVECAT for IMAP access, and XMAIl 1.27 for the rest. The relay is cosed until authentication is made In order to have a centralized place for authentication I used in XMAIL external authentication. However seems it is not working as I receive 550 Relay Denied when I try to send an email using this XMAIL server. The setup is as following: In smtpextauth.tab I put following line: "LOGIN" "/config/scripts/checkSmtpAuth.sh" "@@AUTH" "@@USER" "@@PASS" "@@RFILE" In server tab I have:"DefaultSmtpPerms" "MRVZ" In checkSmtpAuth.sh I always exit with 0 for testing. However I received 550 Relay denied each time I tried to send an email. If the script exits with 1 then the error is different, (Authentication error). I tried also populating RFILE with Perms=MR but without success. I tried also with Perms=MRVZ . No change. Also another issue is the fact that those RFILE files were never get deleted. For each email, that file is created and stays there forever (need external action to delete it) Is there any other settings that need to be made or is this a bug ? Using internal authentication (smtpauth.tab or mailuser.tab) emptying smtpextauth.tab there is no such error, and everything works as expected. Unfortunately there is no debug log in application, so only way to figure out is DEBUG, and currently it is installed on an embedded router so no way to debug. Thanks,Spon ___ xmail mailing list xmail@xmailserver.org http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail
Re: [xmail] Current development status?
Hello Eadthem, Davide and List, I agree that a "thumbs up" from Davide Libenzi would be a very good starting point... so: Davide, what do you think? Undefined behaviour testing is a good idea and fuzzing would be made easier if we had a suite for another mailserver to base it on, do you have experience in this area? As for bugs: * There may be some here http://xmailforum.marketmix.com/ it is rather quiet now but was an active forum at one time. * If we were to place this code in github we could track issues. There is a wish list, a TODO file in the distribution IIRC. I am aware of a minor issue regarding line endings when writing mail to file, I have looked at this locally but since development has stalled and it is not a big concern I did nothing more. Kind regards, Benjamin. On Sunday, 31 December 2017, 7:32, ead wrote: At the moment ive started toying with the source some. I am still torn between working on xmail vs switching to a different mail server. My thoughts so far. * My first concern with no active development is, Are there any security issues hiding. * I haven't found any in the wild exploits against the current release of xmail. ** Doesn't mean it Doesn't exist. * I have no experience with any other mail server. * I don't have time to do a ton of matinance support on my own for a mail server * I have no windows machines to test with (YAY !?) Things i would want to do if taking this on would be.. * Get some sort of thumbs up or feedback from Davide Libenzi. * Recompile for testing with asan + ubsan + tsan. As they can spot a lot of potential security issues. (Not aware of any myself) * Conduct fuzzing testing. * Change the server setup to run as an unprivileged user by default / with ease. * Look for current bug reports, as at the moment, I know of none. So my first question is, is there even a wish list? or any known security or bug issues to be dealt with? I am interested in feedback on this stuff. I would keep any security issues confidential until a patching method was available and merely state if i knew of one. I do not at this time know of any. eadthem On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 8:23 AM, Ben Green via xmail wrote: Hello Ead, > >I have been using xmailserver for quite a long time I have only one server >running but I am familiar with the code and would like to see a stronger >community behind the project. There is a copy of v1.26 and some changes that >someone cloned to Github: https://github.com/GerHobbelt/ xmail > >I would like to help and would suggest that we start by taking the 1.27 source >and seeing if there were any changes that GerHobbelt made that should be >included and put the resulting code into a new repo on github. > >I am happy to undertake this first small bit of work this weekend... what do >you think? is anyone else interested in helping maintain the code? > >Kind regards, > >Benjamin. >__ _ >xmail mailing list >xmail@xmailserver.org >http://xmailserver.org/ mailman/listinfo/xmail > ___ xmail mailing list xmail@xmailserver.org http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail
Re: [xmail] Current development status?
At the moment ive started toying with the source some. I am still torn between working on xmail vs switching to a different mail server. My thoughts so far. * My first concern with no active development is, Are there any security issues hiding. * I haven't found any in the wild exploits against the current release of xmail. ** Doesn't mean it Doesn't exist. * I have no experience with any other mail server. * I don't have time to do a ton of matinance support on my own for a mail server * I have no windows machines to test with (YAY !?) Things i would want to do if taking this on would be.. * Get some sort of thumbs up or feedback from Davide Libenzi. * Recompile for testing with asan + ubsan + tsan. As they can spot a lot of potential security issues. (Not aware of any myself) * Conduct fuzzing testing. * Change the server setup to run as an unprivileged user by default / with ease. * Look for current bug reports, as at the moment, I know of none. So my first question is, is there even a wish list? or any known security or bug issues to be dealt with? I am interested in feedback on this stuff. I would keep any security issues confidential until a patching method was available and merely state if i knew of one. I do not at this time know of any. eadthem On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 8:23 AM, Ben Green via xmail wrote: > Hello Ead, > > I have been using xmailserver for quite a long time I have only one server > running but I am familiar with the code and would like to see a stronger > community behind the project. There is a copy of v1.26 and some changes > that someone cloned to Github: https://github.com/GerHobbelt/xmail > > I would like to help and would suggest that we start by taking the 1.27 > source and seeing if there were any changes that GerHobbelt made that > should be included and put the resulting code into a new repo on github. > > I am happy to undertake this first small bit of work this weekend... what > do you think? is anyone else interested in helping maintain the code? > > Kind regards, > > Benjamin. > ___ > xmail mailing list > xmail@xmailserver.org > http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail > ___ xmail mailing list xmail@xmailserver.org http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail
Re: [xmail] Current development status?
Hello Ead, I have been using xmailserver for quite a long time I have only one server running but I am familiar with the code and would like to see a stronger community behind the project. There is a copy of v1.26 and some changes that someone cloned to Github: https://github.com/GerHobbelt/xmail I would like to help and would suggest that we start by taking the 1.27 source and seeing if there were any changes that GerHobbelt made that should be included and put the resulting code into a new repo on github. I am happy to undertake this first small bit of work this weekend... what do you think? is anyone else interested in helping maintain the code? Kind regards, Benjamin. ___ xmail mailing list xmail@xmailserver.org http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail
Re: [xmail] Current development status?
I think no one develops the xmail. I have not seen updates for a long time. Thanks & regards, Dmitriy From: xmail [mailto:xmail-boun...@xmailserver.org] On Behalf Of ead via xmail Sent: Saturday, December 23, 2017 1:13 AM To: xmail@xmailserver.org Subject: [xmail] Current development status? I was wondering if Xmail was still being maintained? Where the official Repo was? If your looking for volunteers to keep the project alive? I have been using xmail and phpxmail for 11 years now sense apache2triad. I have used it on windows, and migrated it to linux and have been using it on linux for 8 of those years. I would like to continue to use xmail over postfix or other mail systems. I have 13 years experience with PHP, C++ and C as well as servers and database operation and programming. I would be willing to do some maintenance work on xmail as needed, as long as there are others also willing to continue to use it, and help some. what are your thoughts. thanks Eadthem akip pat a ___ xmail mailing list xmail@xmailserver.org http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail
[xmail] Current development status?
I was wondering if Xmail was still being maintained? Where the official Repo was? If your looking for volunteers to keep the project alive? I have been using xmail and phpxmail for 11 years now sense apache2triad. I have used it on windows, and migrated it to linux and have been using it on linux for 8 of those years. I would like to continue to use xmail over postfix or other mail systems. I have 13 years experience with PHP, C++ and C as well as servers and database operation and programming. I would be willing to do some maintenance work on xmail as needed, as long as there are others also willing to continue to use it, and help some. what are your thoughts. thanks Eadthem akip pat a ___ xmail mailing list xmail@xmailserver.org http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail
Re: [xmail] Catch All
Bart: I did as you said. But it generates 550 Mailbox unavailable errors. So I went ahead and made a dummy internal account named forw...@rpzdesign.com Inside the domain for rpzdesign.com, I put a mailproc.tab with a "redirect"[tab]"externalem...@gmail.com"[newline] Then I alias to the internal user in aliases.tab And it works without 550 errors. FYI md On 3/20/2016 5:33 AM, Bart Mortelmans wrote: Hi, The easiest solution probably is putting this in aliases.tab: “rpzdesign.com”[tab]”*”[tab]”rpzrpzrpzj...@gmail.com” Obviously replacing [tab] with real tabs. And take into account that this is a file you can’t edit while XMailserver is running (so turn it off first or use CtrlClnt to edit it). Sincerely, Bart On 20 mrt. 2016, at 11:05, md--- via xmail wrote: How does one create a catch all for a given domain while still allowing specific users to receive their messages? For example: My domain is rpzdesign.com I want all messages sent specifically to m...@rpzdesign.com to come to my inbox. But I want ALL other email address like anyth...@rpzdesign.com to be sent to an external email address at rpzrpzrpzj...@gmail.com Mailproc.tab in domain? I tried using aliases but it does not work like I want, to many 550 user unkown errors. Any help? Marco ___ xmail mailing list xmail@xmailserver.org http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail ___ xmail mailing list xmail@xmailserver.org http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail
Re: [xmail] Catch All
Hi, The easiest solution probably is putting this in aliases.tab: “rpzdesign.com”[tab]”*”[tab]”rpzrpzrpzj...@gmail.com” Obviously replacing [tab] with real tabs. And take into account that this is a file you can’t edit while XMailserver is running (so turn it off first or use CtrlClnt to edit it). Sincerely, Bart > On 20 mrt. 2016, at 11:05, md--- via xmail wrote: > > How does one create a catch all for a given domain while still allowing > specific users to receive > their messages? > > For example: > > My domain is rpzdesign.com > > I want all messages sent specifically to m...@rpzdesign.com to come to my > inbox. > > But I want ALL other email address like anyth...@rpzdesign.com to be sent to > an external email address > at rpzrpzrpzj...@gmail.com > > Mailproc.tab in domain? > > I tried using aliases but it does not work like I want, to many 550 user > unkown errors. > > Any help? > > Marco > > > ___ > xmail mailing list > xmail@xmailserver.org > http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail ___ xmail mailing list xmail@xmailserver.org http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail
[xmail] Catch All
How does one create a catch all for a given domain while still allowing specific users to receive their messages? For example: My domain is rpzdesign.com I want all messages sent specifically to m...@rpzdesign.com to come to my inbox. But I want ALL other email address like anyth...@rpzdesign.com to be sent to an external email address at rpzrpzrpzj...@gmail.com Mailproc.tab in domain? I tried using aliases but it does not work like I want, to many 550 user unkown errors. Any help? Marco ___ xmail mailing list xmail@xmailserver.org http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail
Re: [xmail] Problem!! Xmail Checks Maildir Size On Every RCPT command
I use XMail in some customers servers and they have big mailboxes, but don't have such problem. What XMail version are you using? What OS and filesystem type? I use XMail 1.27 on Slackware 13.37 64bits with reiserfs. How maildir works with a file per message, reiserfs is very nice to handle large number of files. 2015-10-18 15:33 GMT-02:00 Akash via xmail : > Hi, > > There seems to be a problem in the way XMail checks for quotas on every > RCPT command. I have a large Maildir with around 50 emails and I > noticed that every time XMail receives a email, the CPU spikes to 100% for > few seconds before responding to the RCPT. On debugging I found that it > actually calculates directory size for every RCPT command. > > And there is just no way to bypass this. I tried removing MaxMBSize from > user.tab, setting it to 0, setting it to empty "" but nada. I checked the > source and it seems UPopGetMailboxSize() is called before "MaxMBSize" value > is evaluated. > > In order to tackle this I am at present using a dummy front account which > has "redirect" in its mailproc.tab to redirect mails to the actual large > email account. This way the directory size of only dummy account is > calculated by XMail which is almost instant and doesn't cause any CPU spike. > > Shouldn't this behavior be rectified? > > -Akash > ___ > xmail mailing list > xmail@xmailserver.org > http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail > ___ xmail mailing list xmail@xmailserver.org http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail
Re: [xmail] Problem!! Xmail Checks Maildir Size On Every RCPT command
Hi, Are you using mboxes or Maildirs? I am using XMail v1.27 with Debian 7 on ext4 filesystem. May be its filesystem's bottleneck but XMail does calculate directory size on every RCPT (I looked into the codes) and causes CPU spike, which isn't a right thing I feel. -Akash On 2015-10-22 19:04, Helio C Jr wrote: > I use XMail in some customers servers and they have big mailboxes, but don't > have such problem. What XMail version are you using? What OS and filesystem > type? I use XMail 1.27 on Slackware 13.37 64bits with reiserfs. How maildir > works with a file per message, reiserfs is very nice to handle large number > of files. _______ xmail mailing list xmail@xmailserver.org http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail
[xmail] Problem!! Xmail Checks Maildir Size On Every RCPT command
Hi, There seems to be a problem in the way XMail checks for quotas on every RCPT command. I have a large Maildir with around 50 emails and I noticed that every time XMail receives a email, the CPU spikes to 100% for few seconds before responding to the RCPT. On debugging I found that it actually calculates directory size for every RCPT command. And there is just no way to bypass this. I tried removing MaxMBSize from user.tab, setting it to 0, setting it to empty "" but nada. I checked the source and it seems UPopGetMailboxSize() is called before "MaxMBSize" value is evaluated. In order to tackle this I am at present using a dummy front account which has "redirect" in its mailproc.tab to redirect mails to the actual large email account. This way the directory size of only dummy account is calculated by XMail which is almost instant and doesn't cause any CPU spike. Shouldn't this behavior be rectified? -Akash _______ xmail mailing list xmail@xmailserver.org http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail
[xmail] howt send bounced email trough a different smtp server
My idea to avoid blacklisted on my smtps is to use a dedicated smtp to send out the bouced emals. Any idea to do it using xmail? regards Ros ___ xmail mailing list xmail@xmailserver.org http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail
Re: [xmail] ask about smtp authentication with openldap database via XMail service.
On 4 Aug 2015 at 4:26, Watthanachai Kekhua via xmail wrote: > Dear XMail members, > > Right now we use about XMail as MTA and we would like to use SMTP > authentication with ldap DB (openldap) . > And in the manual said about add username (email address ) + password in to > file "MAILUSERS.TAB". > > So we would like to ignore this kind of case due to security issue show > password field and then > We would like to point authentication method to our ldap server instead such > as integrate with cyrussasl something like this, > could you kindly guide us about setting configure on XMail to support ldap DB > ? > > Please do not hesitate to contact us , If you have any questions . > Best Regards. > > # Watthanachai KEKHUA (Golf) > # Operation And Maintenance Department (OAM) > # Tel: 02-2367227 Ext. 1624 > # NTT Communications (Thailand) Co., Ltd. > # > > DISCLAIMER : > This email is for the use of the intended recipient(s) only. > If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender > immediately and then delete it. > If you are not the intended recipient, you must not keep, use, disclose, copy > or distribute this email without the author's prior permission. > We have taken precautions to minimise the risk of transmitting software > viruses, but we advise you to carry out your own virus checks on any > attachment to this message. > We cannot accept liability for any loss or damage caused by software viruses. > The information contained in this communication may be confidential and may > be subject to the attorney-client privilege. > If you are the intended recipient and you do not wish to receive similar > electronic messages from us in future then please respond to the sender to > this effect. > > Hi logged in as my general admin user: bash-4.3$ ls -l /var/MailRoot/ ls: acv: Permission denied ls: aliasdomain.tab: Permission denied ... ls: userauth: Permission denied ls: userdef.tab: Permission denied bash-4.3$ ls -l /var/MailRoot/mailusers.tab ls: /var/MailRoot/mailusers.tab: Permission denied mailusers.tab: "domain"[TAB]"account"[TAB]"enc-passwd"[TAB]"account- id"[TAB]"accountt-dir"[TAB]"account-type" also maybe your security risk "enc-passwd" is encrypted, eg: "0123456789abcdef" It's possible to add hooks to external utilities, eg: openssl, spam-assassin. See xmail.txt. I've not changed my config since around 2004 but xmail and supporting programs are rebuilt fairly regularly, some along with base OS, some with pkgsrc and a few, including xmail in /usr/local/sources. David ___ xmail mailing list xmail@xmailserver.org http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail
Re: [xmail] ask about smtp authentication with openldap database via XMail service.
On Tue, 4 Aug 2015 04:26:33 + Watthanachai Kekhua via xmail wrote: > Right now we use about XMail as MTA and we would like to use SMTP > authentication with ldap DB (openldap) . And in the manual said about > add username (email address ) + password in to file "MAILUSERS.TAB". > > So we would like to ignore this kind of case due to security issue > show password field and then We would like to point authentication > method to our ldap server instead such as integrate with cyrussasl > something like this, could you kindly guide us about setting > configure on XMail to support ldap DB ? > AFAIK, ldap is not supported in xmail. _______ xmail mailing list xmail@xmailserver.org http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail
[xmail] ask about smtp authentication with openldap database via XMail service.
Dear XMail members, Right now we use about XMail as MTA and we would like to use SMTP authentication with ldap DB (openldap) . And in the manual said about add username (email address ) + password in to file "MAILUSERS.TAB". So we would like to ignore this kind of case due to security issue show password field and then We would like to point authentication method to our ldap server instead such as integrate with cyrussasl something like this, could you kindly guide us about setting configure on XMail to support ldap DB ? Please do not hesitate to contact us , If you have any questions . Best Regards. # Watthanachai KEKHUA (Golf) # Operation And Maintenance Department (OAM) # Tel: 02-2367227 Ext. 1624 # NTT Communications (Thailand) Co., Ltd. # DISCLAIMER : This email is for the use of the intended recipient(s) only. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and then delete it. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not keep, use, disclose, copy or distribute this email without the author's prior permission. We have taken precautions to minimise the risk of transmitting software viruses, but we advise you to carry out your own virus checks on any attachment to this message. We cannot accept liability for any loss or damage caused by software viruses. The information contained in this communication may be confidential and may be subject to the attorney-client privilege. If you are the intended recipient and you do not wish to receive similar electronic messages from us in future then please respond to the sender to this effect. ___ xmail mailing list xmail@xmailserver.org http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail
Re: [xmail] POP3 UIDL PROBLEM
Oversea Site via xmail wrote on 06/04/2015 04:25 PM: I have over 1 EMAILS but when I test UIDL, Sometimes, it's not sorting by ID. it's a file system -rw-rw-r-- 1 root root30558 Jun 1 04:46 1433105179992.70d12960.34c.3f8be2.bravo -rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 989 Jun 1 05:04 1433106257177.5ace6960.34c.3fafbd..bravo -rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 162486 Jun 1 13:04 1433135071576.71513960.34c.43c7a9.bravo -rw-rw-r-- 1 root root21401 Jun 1 13:47 1433137677235.6fd10960.34c.4428cc.bravo -rw-rw-r-- 1 root root54084 Jun 1 22:24 1433168674933.6ed0e960.34c.48d596.bravo -rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 9112 Jun 2 02:35 1433183738295.6ed0e960.34c.4acc30..bravo -rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 9142 Jun 2 02:35 1433183738434.5f4ef960.34c.4acc39.bravo -rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 5342 Jun 2 03:26 1433186769695.70511960.34c.4b30b7.bravo -rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 1238 Jun 2 04:02 1433188925598.6dd0c960.34c.4b7832.bravo -rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 1020 Jun 2 04:02 1433188949218..69d04960.34c.4b78f7.bravo -rw-rw-r-- 1 root root22474 Jun 2 06:32 1433197934458.6f50f960.34c.4ca2e8.bravo -rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 2615 Jun 2 07:40 1433202046360.59ce4960.34c.4d2b2f.bravo -rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 2678 Jun 2 07:43 1433202184456.4fcd0960.34c.4d2fbe.bravo -rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 3272 Jun 2 08:04 1433203475828.55cdc960.34c.4d5ab8.bravo -rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 2863 Jun 2 08:26 1433204809317.57ce0960.34c.4d8766.bravo -rw-rw-r-- 1 root root41748 Jun 2 11:30 1433215840379.72d16960.34c.4f3bf6.bravo -rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 1857 Jun 2 11:39 1433216376230.73d18960.34c..4f5305.bravo -rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 6157 Jun 2 11:44 1433216684073.71d14960.34c.4f5e9a.bravo -rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 5402 Jun 2 12:55 1433220946062.6f50f960.34c.500170.bravo -rw-rw-r-- 1 root root29790 Jun 2 14:03 1433224988810.70511960.34c.5092ca.bravo -rw-rw-r-- 1 root root10473 Jun 2 22:11 1433254291563.4a4c5960.34c.553526.bravo -rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 1238 Jun 3 04:02 1433275327112.6f50f960.34c.580f59.bravo -rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 1020 Jun 3 04:02 1433275353273.654fb960.34c.581041.bravo -rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 988 Jun 3 05:14 1433279643381.5ecee960.34c.589f69.bravo -rw-rw-r-- 1 root root15235 Jun 3 07:50 1433289052265.614f3960.34c.59db64.bravo -rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 3985615 Jun 3 08:36 1433291762335.49cc4960.34c.5a40b9.bravo -rw-rw-r-- 1 root root30149 Jun 3 14:52 1433314331266.71513960.34c.5dab73.bravo -rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 5382 Jun 3 14:54 1433314498740.6dd0c960.34c.5db2ce.bravo -rw-rw-r-- 1 root root44713 Jun 3 16:55 1433321724856.74d1a960.34c.5ed68c.bravo -rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 110709 Jun 3 17:54 1433325240897.6dd0c960.34c.5f65fa.bravo -rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 322169 Jun 3 18:56 143332954.6e50d960.34c.5fff22.bravo -rw-rw-r-- 1 root root14174 Jun 3 20:57 146272368.6e50d960.34c.610ed5.bravo -rw-rw-r-- 1 root root27877 Jun 4 00:03 1433347390242.7fc51afdd700.bca.152b.bravo -rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 8116 Jun 4 03:06 1433358408984.5c450960.24ad.336b.bravo -rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 9831 Jun 4 14:05 1433397936295.7347e960.24ad.635a7.bravo -rw-rw-r-- 1 root root90604 Jun 4 19:59 1433399979747.5ec55960.24ad.6860d.bravo -rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 2193650 Jun 4 20:00 1433412426056.43c1f960.24ad.8919a.bravo -rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 2783 Jun 4 20:07 1433419665957.6ead6960.649d.6e32.bravo -rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 4651 Jun 4 20:23 1433420596561.73ae0960.649d.90c8.bravo 13873 1433105179992.70d12960.34c.3f8be2.bravo 13874 1433106257177.5ace6960.34c.3fafbd.bravo 13875 1433135071576.71513960.34c.43c7a9.bravo 13876 1433137677235.6fd10960.34c.4428cc.bravo 13877 1433168674933.6ed0e960.34c..48d596.bravo 13878 1433183738295.6ed0e960.34c.4acc30.bravo 13879 1433183738434.5f4ef960.34c.4acc39.bravo 13880 1433186769695.70511960.34c.4b30b7.bravo 13881 1433188925598.6dd0c960.34c.4b7832.bravo 13882 1433188949218.69d04960.34c.4b78f7.bravo 13883 1433197934458.6f50f960.34c.4ca2e8.bravo 13884 1433202046360.59ce4960.34c.4d2b2f.bravo 13885 1433202184456.4fcd0960.34c.4d2fbe.bravo 13886 1433203475828.55cdc960.34c.4d5ab8.bravo 13887 1433204809317.57ce0960.34c.4d8766.bravo 13888 1433215840379.72d16960.34c.4f3bf6.bravo 13889 1433216376230.73d18960.34c.4f5305.bravo 13890 1433216684073.71d14960.34c.4f5e9a.bravo 13891 1433220946062.6f50f960.34c.500170.bravo 13892 1433224988810.70511960.34c.5092ca.bravo 13893 1433254291563.4a4c5960.34c.553526.bravo 13894 1433275327112.6f50f960.34c.580f59.bravo 13895 1433275353273.654fb960.34c.581041.bravo 13896 1433279643381.5ecee960.34c.589f69.bravo 13897 1433289052265.614f3960.34c.59db64.bravo 13898 1433291762335.49cc4960.34c.5a40b9.bravo 13899 1433314331266.71513960.34c.5dab73.bravo 13900 1433314498740.6dd0c960.34c.5db2ce.bravo 13901 1433321724856.74d1a960.34c.5ed68c.bravo 13902 1433325240897.6dd0c960.34c.5f65fa.bravo 13903 143332954.6e50d960.34c.5fff22.bravo 13904 146272368.6e50d960.34c.610ed5.b
[xmail] POP3 UIDL PROBLEM
24ad.635a7.bravo13908 1433402316803.6fc77960.24ad.6e7cc.bravo It will let some android email app not display correctly by first 25 messages or somethings like that. So I need to download all emails on android. ___ xmail mailing list xmail@xmailserver.org http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail
Re: [xmail] new maintainer for the 1.27 branch
bugs--- via xmail wrote on 06/02/2015 01:31 AM: Hi List, I already made some fixes. See http://www.econtrario.ch/tools/. Maybe you can use them. Yes, it's already on the todo list. Thx. -- cu Uenal ___ xmail mailing list xmail@xmailserver.org http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail
[xmail] New fork or maintainer for xmail?
Greetings; Have I missed something here? I've been monitoring this list as a xmail server user since version 1.2 - simply the best email server we have ever encountered. Has something happened to Davide? I know there has been no updates from him in some long time - I hope that he is well. He has given us all a wonderful program and we wish him well. Can anyone clue us - has something changed with Davide and xmail server? Tony Shiffer ___ xmail mailing list xmail@xmailserver.org http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail
Re: [xmail] new maintainer for the 1.27 branch
Am 24.05.2015 um 18:07 schrieb U.Mutlu via xmail: > > if time permits. I'll also setup an svn repository. > Considered using github? So long Stefan ___ xmail mailing list xmail@xmailserver.org http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail
Re: [xmail] new maintainer for the 1.27 branch
Hi List, I already made some fixes. See http://www.econtrario.ch/tools/. Maybe you can use them. So long Stefan ___ xmail mailing list xmail@xmailserver.org http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail
Re: [xmail] BUG : XMAIL 1.27 with SSL
U.Mutlu via xmail wrote on 05/26/2015 04:38 PM: Bart Mortelmans via xmail wrote on 05/26/2015 03:55 PM: It might be difficult to determine if the problem is with XMail or with the client. And even if for example Tencent actually closes the connection incorrectly, it should be better if XMail would be able to handle such an improperly closed connection. But I'm not sure if you'll find somebody in this forum that will be able to fix this problem. Maybe you could try to get K9 developers involved in this? That seems to be managed much more actively than XMail. With a bit of luck, they can at least find out what they are doing differently compared to for example Outlook and that could cause this problem. Regarding FIN_WAIT2: I suspect it is caused by a firewall issue where some FIN's or ACK's are blocked or wrongly filtered out, or the client side doesn't properly close the socket, or some of the sockets it allocates. One really cannot trust any interpreted scripting language many mobiles do use. Using iptables one can diagnose this by logging the FIN's, ACK's. cu Uenal Oversea Site via xmail schreef op 26/05/15 om 15:09: Now I am using original XMAIL-1.27.tar.gz source without simultaneous POP3 logins, no STUNNEL, use NATIVE XMAIL SSL. The problem still exists, K9-MAIL will report IllegalFormatConversonException when I receive more then 100-200 emails. So It should be XMAIL SSL problem. Because When I reuse STUNNEL to do a POP3 tunnel again, the problem will fix. One more thought: If an application throws an exception without catching and handling it, like is the case above, then this means that the application is badly programmed. A good application would catch the exception and do what is necessary in that state of of the program. In this case one can simply say the app or part of it just badly crashed; no app should behave so. Exceptions can and must be handled by the app. cu Uenal _______ xmail mailing list xmail@xmailserver.org http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail
Re: [xmail] BUG : XMAIL 1.27 with SSL
Bart Mortelmans via xmail wrote on 05/26/2015 03:55 PM: It might be difficult to determine if the problem is with XMail or with the client. And even if for example Tencent actually closes the connection incorrectly, it should be better if XMail would be able to handle such an improperly closed connection. But I'm not sure if you'll find somebody in this forum that will be able to fix this problem. Maybe you could try to get K9 developers involved in this? That seems to be managed much more actively than XMail. With a bit of luck, they can at least find out what they are doing differently compared to for example Outlook and that could cause this problem. Regarding FIN_WAIT2: I suspect it is caused by a firewall issue where some FIN's or ACK's are blocked or wrongly filtered out, or the client side doesn't properly close the socket, or some of the sockets it allocates. One really cannot trust any interpreted scripting language many mobiles do use. Using iptables one can diagnose this by logging the FIN's, ACK's. cu Uenal Oversea Site via xmail schreef op 26/05/15 om 15:09: Now I am using original XMAIL-1.27.tar.gz source without simultaneous POP3 logins, no STUNNEL, use NATIVE XMAIL SSL. The problem still exists, K9-MAIL will report IllegalFormatConversonException when I receive more then 100-200 emails. So It should be XMAIL SSL problem. Because When I reuse STUNNEL to do a POP3 tunnel again, the problem will fix. _______ xmail mailing list xmail@xmailserver.org http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail
Re: [xmail] BUG : XMAIL 1.27 with SSL
It might be difficult to determine if the problem is with XMail or with
the client. And even if for example Tencent actually closes the
connection incorrectly, it should be better if XMail would be able to
handle such an improperly closed connection.
But I'm not sure if you'll find somebody in this forum that will be able
to fix this problem. Maybe you could try to get K9 developers involved
in this? That seems to be managed much more actively than XMail. With a
bit of luck, they can at least find out what they are doing differently
compared to for example Outlook and that could cause this problem.
Oversea Site via xmail schreef op 26/05/15 om 15:09:
Now I am using original XMAIL-1.27.tar.gz source without simultaneous POP3
logins, no STUNNEL, use NATIVE XMAIL SSL. The problem still exists, K9-MAIL
will report IllegalFormatConversonException when I receive more then 100-200
emails. So It should be XMAIL SSL problem. Because When I reuse STUNNEL to do a
POP3 tunnel again, the problem will fix.
Original Message
From: Bart Mortelmans
To: t...@os.st, "XMail Users Mailing List"
Sent: Tue, May 26, 2015, 3:13 PM
Subject: Re: [xmail] BUG : XMAIL 1.27 with SSL
Is there any way for you to test if the problem exists if you don't
allow simultaneous POP3 logins?
Oversea Site via xmail schreef op 26/05/15 om 08:14:
POP3Utils.cpp - ADD POP3 Concurrent Login. I used this function over 5 years..
I don't know C++ programming. Sorry :)
}
if (pPOPMD->ulFlags & POPF_MSG_DELETED) {
UPopSendErrorResponse(hBSock, ERR_MSG_DELETED,
pPOPSD->iTimeout);
ErrSetErrorCode(ERR_MSG_DELETED);
return ERR_MSG_DELETED;
}
UsrGetMailboxPath(pPOPSD->pUI, szMsgFilePath, sizeof(szMsgFilePath),
1);
StrNCat(szMsgFilePath, pPOPMD->szMsgName, sizeof(szMsgFilePath));
/*
* ADDED CODE START
*/
FILE *pMsgFile = fopen(szMsgFilePath, "rb");
if (pMsgFile == NULL) {
UPopSendErrorResponse(hBSock, ERR_FILE_OPEN, pPOPSD->iTimeout);
ErrSetErrorCode(ERR_FILE_OPEN);
return ERR_FILE_OPEN;
}
fclose(pMsgFile);
/*
* ADDED CODE END
*/
SysSNPrintf(szResponse, sizeof(szResponse) - 1,
"+OK " SYS_OFFT_FMT " bytes", pPOPMD->llMsgSize);
if (BSckSendString(hBSock, szResponse, pPOPSD->iTimeout) < 0)
return ErrGetErrorCode();
if (pPOPMD->llMsgSize > 0 &&
Original Message
From: Oversea Site via xmail
To: "XMail Users Mailing List"
Sent: Tue, May 26, 2015, 1:56 PM
Subject: Re: [xmail] BUG : XMAIL 1.27 with SSL
FEDORA 4 X86_64 GLIBC 2.3.6-3 (I can't upgrade it to the lastest version..
Because I have a chiliasp 3.6.2 32-bit run ASP VBSCRIPT on APACHE 1.3 32-bit
software, it need GLIBC 2.3.x and Kernel 2.6)
KERNEL 3.3 MOD FROM FC15 (It will display KERNEL 2.6.43 Number). Kernel is not
a main problem. Because I have been test 2.6.32 or other. same problem was
found.
REAL HARDWARE -> INTEL B85M i3-4150 16G RAM SATA3 RAID 1 LINUX SOFTRAID1 MDADM
Corp. Email System is not heavily use when I test it in HK TIME midnight..
Anyway I will test this issue in other linux distribution in VM, such as
CentOS. (You can give me any linux distribution, let's build the same platform
in VM. I use virtualbox.
[root@bravo logs]# uname -a
Linux bravo 2.6.43-gcc402 #3 SMP Sun May 17 23:10:29 HKT 2015 x86_64 x86_64
x86_64 GNU/Linux
[root@bravo logs]#
[root@bravo logs]# ldd /var/MailRoot/bin/XMail127v3
linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x77f0e000)
libssl.so.0.9.8 => /usr/local/ssl/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8
(0x7f43b00bc000)
libcrypto.so.0.9.8 => /usr/local/ssl/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.8
(0x7f43afd35000)
libdl.so.2 => /lib64/libdl.so.2 (0x003e1820)
libpthread.so.0 => /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x003e1860)
libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6 (0x7f43afa37000)
libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x003e1800)
libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x003e1940)
libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x003e17d0)
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x003e17b0)
***
/var/MailRoot/bin/XMail127v3 -Md -Ms /var/MailRoot -Sl -Pl -Cl \
-SI 0.0.0.0:8025 -SI 0.0.0.0:25 \
-PI 0.0.0.0:8110 -PI 0.0.0.0:110 \
-BI 0.0.0.0:995 \
-XI 0.0.0.0:465 \
-Ql -Ln 256 -Pt 60 -St 150 -F- -SX 2048 -Mx 64 \
-Qn 64 -PX 2048 -Qr 1 -Qt 1 -QT 150 -Qg -CX 256
***
---- Original Message
From: "U.Mutlu"
To: t...@os.st, "XMail Users Mailing List"
Sent: Tue, May
Re: [xmail] BUG : XMAIL 1.27 with SSL
Oversea Site via xmail wrote on 05/26/2015 03:09 PM:
Now I am using original XMAIL-1.27.tar.gz source without simultaneous POP3
logins, no STUNNEL, use NATIVE XMAIL SSL. The problem still exists, K9-MAIL
will report IllegalFormatConversonException when I receive more then
100-200 emails. So It should be XMAIL SSL problem. Because When I reuse
STUNNEL to do a POP3 tunnel again, the problem will fix.
But since you said that no error happens with normal mail-clients
(Outlook etc.), then the error must lie in the mobile clients you listed.
They seem to not handle properly the closing of the sockets they create.
cu
Uenal
Original Message From: Bart Mortelmans To:
t...@os.st, "XMail Users Mailing List" Sent: Tue,
May 26, 2015, 3:13 PM Subject: Re: [xmail] BUG : XMAIL 1.27 with SSL
Is there any way for you to test if the problem exists if you don't allow
simultaneous POP3 logins?
Oversea Site via xmail schreef op 26/05/15 om 08:14:
POP3Utils.cpp - ADD POP3 Concurrent Login. I used this function over 5
years.. I don't know C++ programming. Sorry :)
}
if (pPOPMD->ulFlags & POPF_MSG_DELETED) { UPopSendErrorResponse(hBSock,
ERR_MSG_DELETED, pPOPSD->iTimeout);
ErrSetErrorCode(ERR_MSG_DELETED); return ERR_MSG_DELETED; }
UsrGetMailboxPath(pPOPSD->pUI, szMsgFilePath, sizeof(szMsgFilePath),
1); StrNCat(szMsgFilePath, pPOPMD->szMsgName, sizeof(szMsgFilePath));
/* * ADDED CODE START */
FILE *pMsgFile = fopen(szMsgFilePath, "rb"); if (pMsgFile == NULL) {
UPopSendErrorResponse(hBSock, ERR_FILE_OPEN, pPOPSD->iTimeout);
ErrSetErrorCode(ERR_FILE_OPEN); return ERR_FILE_OPEN; }
fclose(pMsgFile);
/* * ADDED CODE END */
SysSNPrintf(szResponse, sizeof(szResponse) - 1, "+OK " SYS_OFFT_FMT "
bytes", pPOPMD->llMsgSize); if (BSckSendString(hBSock, szResponse,
pPOPSD->iTimeout) < 0) return ErrGetErrorCode();
if (pPOPMD->llMsgSize > 0 &&
Original Message From: Oversea Site via xmail
To: "XMail Users Mailing List"
Sent: Tue, May 26, 2015, 1:56 PM Subject: Re:
[xmail] BUG : XMAIL 1.27 with SSL
FEDORA 4 X86_64 GLIBC 2.3.6-3 (I can't upgrade it to the lastest
version.. Because I have a chiliasp 3.6.2 32-bit run ASP VBSCRIPT on
APACHE 1.3 32-bit software, it need GLIBC 2.3.x and Kernel 2.6)
KERNEL 3.3 MOD FROM FC15 (It will display KERNEL 2.6.43 Number).
Kernel is not a main problem. Because I have been test 2.6.32 or
other. same problem was found.
REAL HARDWARE -> INTEL B85M i3-4150 16G RAM SATA3 RAID 1 LINUX
SOFTRAID1 MDADM
Corp. Email System is not heavily use when I test it in HK TIME
midnight..
Anyway I will test this issue in other linux distribution in VM, such
as CentOS. (You can give me any linux distribution, let's build the
same platform in VM. I use virtualbox.
[root@bravo logs]# uname -a Linux bravo 2.6.43-gcc402 #3 SMP Sun May
17 23:10:29 HKT 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux [root@bravo
logs]# [root@bravo logs]# ldd /var/MailRoot/bin/XMail127v3
linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x77f0e000) libssl.so.0.9.8 =>
/usr/local/ssl/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8 (0x7f43b00bc000)
libcrypto.so.0.9.8 => /usr/local/ssl/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.8
(0x7f43afd35000) libdl.so.2 => /lib64/libdl.so.2
(0x003e1820) libpthread.so.0 => /lib64/libpthread.so.0
(0x003e1860) libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6
(0x7f43afa37000) libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6
(0x003e1800) libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1
(0x003e1940) libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6
(0x003e17d0) /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
(0x003e17b0)
***
/var/MailRoot/bin/XMail127v3 -Md -Ms /var/MailRoot -Sl -Pl -Cl \ -SI
0.0.0.0:8025 -SI 0.0.0.0:25 \ -PI 0.0.0.0:8110 -PI 0.0.0.0:110 \ -BI
0.0.0.0:995 \ -XI 0.0.0.0:465 \ -Ql -Ln 256 -Pt 60 -St 150 -F- -SX
2048 -Mx 64 \ -Qn 64 -PX 2048 -Qr 1 -Qt 1 -QT 150 -Qg -CX 256
***
Original Message From: "U.Mutlu" To:
t...@os.st, "XMail Users Mailing List" Sent:
Tue, May 26, 2015, 1:06 PM Subject: Re: [xmail] BUG : XMAIL 1.27
with SSL
Oversea Site via xmail wrote on 05/26/2015 05:14 AM:
No Log Error. No Fatal Error log. No Core Dump
It's not RAM or HW problem. It's XMAIL internal issue, because
when I switch to stunnel, all problems solved. And then when I
test K9-MAIL with XMAIL+STUNNEL, K9 Client will not have any JAVA
somethings Exception Error
Two tests
1. Very Important Thing in Xmail 1.27 Native SSL
If the emailbox has many emails such as 1, Microsoft Outlook
with SSL or NON-SSL download them, it WILL NOT have this issue.
Some Tencent Foxmail for Windows, after finish ssl session, it
will take the server be FIN_WAIT2 (
Re: [xmail] BUG : XMAIL 1.27 with SSL
Now I am using original XMAIL-1.27.tar.gz source without simultaneous POP3
logins, no STUNNEL, use NATIVE XMAIL SSL. The problem still exists, K9-MAIL
will report IllegalFormatConversonException when I receive more then 100-200
emails. So It should be XMAIL SSL problem. Because When I reuse STUNNEL to do a
POP3 tunnel again, the problem will fix.
> Original Message
>From: Bart Mortelmans
>To: t...@os.st, "XMail Users Mailing List"
>Sent: Tue, May 26, 2015, 3:13 PM
>Subject: Re: [xmail] BUG : XMAIL 1.27 with SSL
>
>Is there any way for you to test if the problem exists if you don't
>allow simultaneous POP3 logins?
>
>
>Oversea Site via xmail schreef op 26/05/15 om 08:14:
>> POP3Utils.cpp - ADD POP3 Concurrent Login. I used this function over 5
>> years.. I don't know C++ programming. Sorry :)
>>
>>
>> }
>> if (pPOPMD->ulFlags & POPF_MSG_DELETED) {
>> UPopSendErrorResponse(hBSock, ERR_MSG_DELETED,
>> pPOPSD->iTimeout);
>>
>> ErrSetErrorCode(ERR_MSG_DELETED);
>> return ERR_MSG_DELETED;
>> }
>>
>> UsrGetMailboxPath(pPOPSD->pUI, szMsgFilePath,
>> sizeof(szMsgFilePath), 1);
>> StrNCat(szMsgFilePath, pPOPMD->szMsgName, sizeof(szMsgFilePath));
>> /*
>> * ADDED CODE START
>> */
>>
>> FILE *pMsgFile = fopen(szMsgFilePath, "rb");
>> if (pMsgFile == NULL) {
>> UPopSendErrorResponse(hBSock, ERR_FILE_OPEN, pPOPSD->iTimeout);
>>
>> ErrSetErrorCode(ERR_FILE_OPEN);
>> return ERR_FILE_OPEN;
>> }
>> fclose(pMsgFile);
>>
>> /*
>> * ADDED CODE END
>> */
>>
>> SysSNPrintf(szResponse, sizeof(szResponse) - 1,
>> "+OK " SYS_OFFT_FMT " bytes", pPOPMD->llMsgSize);
>> if (BSckSendString(hBSock, szResponse, pPOPSD->iTimeout) < 0)
>> return ErrGetErrorCode();
>>
>> if (pPOPMD->llMsgSize > 0 &&
>>
>>
>>> Original Message
>>> From: Oversea Site via xmail
>>> To: "XMail Users Mailing List"
>>> Sent: Tue, May 26, 2015, 1:56 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [xmail] BUG : XMAIL 1.27 with SSL
>>>
>>> FEDORA 4 X86_64 GLIBC 2.3.6-3 (I can't upgrade it to the lastest version..
>>> Because I have a chiliasp 3.6.2 32-bit run ASP VBSCRIPT on APACHE 1.3
>>> 32-bit software, it need GLIBC 2.3.x and Kernel 2.6)
>>>
>>> KERNEL 3.3 MOD FROM FC15 (It will display KERNEL 2.6.43 Number). Kernel is
>>> not a main problem. Because I have been test 2.6.32 or other. same problem
>>> was found.
>>>
>>> REAL HARDWARE -> INTEL B85M i3-4150 16G RAM SATA3 RAID 1 LINUX SOFTRAID1
>>> MDADM
>>>
>>> Corp. Email System is not heavily use when I test it in HK TIME midnight..
>>>
>>> Anyway I will test this issue in other linux distribution in VM, such as
>>> CentOS. (You can give me any linux distribution, let's build the same
>>> platform in VM. I use virtualbox.
>>>
>>> [root@bravo logs]# uname -a
>>> Linux bravo 2.6.43-gcc402 #3 SMP Sun May 17 23:10:29 HKT 2015 x86_64 x86_64
>>> x86_64 GNU/Linux
>>> [root@bravo logs]#
>>> [root@bravo logs]# ldd /var/MailRoot/bin/XMail127v3
>>> linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x77f0e000)
>>> libssl.so.0.9.8 => /usr/local/ssl/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8
>>> (0x7f43b00bc000)
>>> libcrypto.so.0.9.8 => /usr/local/ssl/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.8
>>> (0x7f43afd35000)
>>> libdl.so.2 => /lib64/libdl.so.2 (0x003e1820)
>>> libpthread.so.0 => /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x003e1860)
>>> libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6 (0x7f43afa37000)
>>> libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x003e1800)
>>> libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x003e1940)
>>> libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x003e17d0)
>>> /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x003e17b0)
>>>
>>> ***
>>> /var/MailRoot/bin/XMail127v3 -Md -Ms /var/MailRoot -Sl -Pl -Cl \
>>> -SI 0.0.0.0:8025 -SI 0.0.0.0:25 \
>>> -PI 0.0.0.0:8110 -PI 0.0.0.0:110 \
>>> -BI 0.0.0.0:995 \
>>> -XI 0.0.0.
Re: [xmail] BUG : XMAIL 1.27 with SSL
Oversea Site via xmail wrote on 05/26/2015 07:56 AM: Anyway I will test this issue in other linux distribution in VM, such as CentOS. (You can give me any linux distribution, let's build the same platform in VM. I use virtualbox. If you could test it with Debian 7 (wheezy) i386, that would make it easier for me to track the bug. -- Thx Uenal ___ xmail mailing list xmail@xmailserver.org http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail
Re: [xmail] BUG : XMAIL 1.27 with SSL
Is there any way for you to test if the problem exists if you don't
allow simultaneous POP3 logins?
Oversea Site via xmail schreef op 26/05/15 om 08:14:
POP3Utils.cpp - ADD POP3 Concurrent Login. I used this function over 5 years..
I don't know C++ programming. Sorry :)
}
if (pPOPMD->ulFlags & POPF_MSG_DELETED) {
UPopSendErrorResponse(hBSock, ERR_MSG_DELETED,
pPOPSD->iTimeout);
ErrSetErrorCode(ERR_MSG_DELETED);
return ERR_MSG_DELETED;
}
UsrGetMailboxPath(pPOPSD->pUI, szMsgFilePath, sizeof(szMsgFilePath),
1);
StrNCat(szMsgFilePath, pPOPMD->szMsgName, sizeof(szMsgFilePath));
/*
* ADDED CODE START
*/
FILE *pMsgFile = fopen(szMsgFilePath, "rb");
if (pMsgFile == NULL) {
UPopSendErrorResponse(hBSock, ERR_FILE_OPEN, pPOPSD->iTimeout);
ErrSetErrorCode(ERR_FILE_OPEN);
return ERR_FILE_OPEN;
}
fclose(pMsgFile);
/*
* ADDED CODE END
*/
SysSNPrintf(szResponse, sizeof(szResponse) - 1,
"+OK " SYS_OFFT_FMT " bytes", pPOPMD->llMsgSize);
if (BSckSendString(hBSock, szResponse, pPOPSD->iTimeout) < 0)
return ErrGetErrorCode();
if (pPOPMD->llMsgSize > 0 &&
Original Message
From: Oversea Site via xmail
To: "XMail Users Mailing List"
Sent: Tue, May 26, 2015, 1:56 PM
Subject: Re: [xmail] BUG : XMAIL 1.27 with SSL
FEDORA 4 X86_64 GLIBC 2.3.6-3 (I can't upgrade it to the lastest version.
Because I have a chiliasp 3.6.2 32-bit run ASP VBSCRIPT on APACHE 1.3 32-bit
software, it need GLIBC 2.3.x and Kernel 2.6)
KERNEL 3.3 MOD FROM FC15 (It will display KERNEL 2.6.43 Number). Kernel is not
a main problem. Because I have been test 2.6.32 or other. same problem was
found.
REAL HARDWARE -> INTEL B85M i3-4150 16G RAM SATA3 RAID 1 LINUX SOFTRAID1 MDADM
Corp. Email System is not heavily use when I test it in HK TIME midnight.
Anyway I will test this issue in other linux distribution in VM, such as
CentOS. (You can give me any linux distribution, let's build the same platform
in VM. I use virtualbox.
[root@bravo logs]# uname -a
Linux bravo 2.6.43-gcc402 #3 SMP Sun May 17 23:10:29 HKT 2015 x86_64 x86_64
x86_64 GNU/Linux
[root@bravo logs]#
[root@bravo logs]# ldd /var/MailRoot/bin/XMail127v3
linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x77f0e000)
libssl.so.0.9.8 => /usr/local/ssl/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8
(0x7f43b00bc000)
libcrypto.so.0.9.8 => /usr/local/ssl/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.8
(0x7f43afd35000)
libdl.so.2 => /lib64/libdl.so.2 (0x003e1820)
libpthread.so.0 => /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x003e1860)
libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6 (0x7f43afa37000)
libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x003e1800)
libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x003e1940)
libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x003e17d0)
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x003e17b0)
***
/var/MailRoot/bin/XMail127v3 -Md -Ms /var/MailRoot -Sl -Pl -Cl \
-SI 0.0.0.0:8025 -SI 0.0.0.0:25 \
-PI 0.0.0.0:8110 -PI 0.0.0.0:110 \
-BI 0.0.0.0:995 \
-XI 0.0.0.0:465 \
-Ql -Ln 256 -Pt 60 -St 150 -F- -SX 2048 -Mx 64 \
-Qn 64 -PX 2048 -Qr 1 -Qt 1 -QT 150 -Qg -CX 256
***
---- Original Message
From: "U.Mutlu"
To: t...@os.st, "XMail Users Mailing List"
Sent: Tue, May 26, 2015, 1:06 PM
Subject: Re: [xmail] BUG : XMAIL 1.27 with SSL
Oversea Site via xmail wrote on 05/26/2015 05:14 AM:
No Log Error. No Fatal Error log. No Core Dump
It's not RAM or HW problem. It's XMAIL internal issue, because when I switch to
stunnel, all problems solved. And then when I test K9-MAIL with XMAIL+STUNNEL,
K9 Client will not have any JAVA somethings Exception Error
Two tests
1. Very Important Thing in Xmail 1.27 Native SSL
If the emailbox has many emails such as 1, Microsoft Outlook with SSL or
NON-SSL download them, it WILL NOT have this issue.
Some Tencent Foxmail for Windows, after finish ssl session, it will take the
server be FIN_WAIT2 (some version, not all)
But K9-MAIL for Android, Download first 1000, it will appear the error in
K9-MAIL randomly.
2. Xmail 1.27 + Stunnel Proxy
If the emailbox has many emails such as 1, Microsoft Outlook with SSL or
NON-SSL download them, it WILL NOT have this issue.
Some Tencent Foxmail for Windows, after finish ssl session, it WILL NOT have
any problem. Server WILL NOT TAKE FIN_WAIT_2
K9-MAIL for Android, Download first 1000, it will NOT DISPLAY any error when it
finished download emails.
I would need full description about the ser
Re: [xmail] BUG : XMAIL 1.27 with SSL
POP3Utils.cpp - ADD POP3 Concurrent Login. I used this function over 5 years..
I don't know C++ programming. Sorry :)
}
if (pPOPMD->ulFlags & POPF_MSG_DELETED) {
UPopSendErrorResponse(hBSock, ERR_MSG_DELETED,
pPOPSD->iTimeout);
ErrSetErrorCode(ERR_MSG_DELETED);
return ERR_MSG_DELETED;
}
UsrGetMailboxPath(pPOPSD->pUI, szMsgFilePath, sizeof(szMsgFilePath), 1);
StrNCat(szMsgFilePath, pPOPMD->szMsgName, sizeof(szMsgFilePath));
/*
* ADDED CODE START
*/
FILE *pMsgFile = fopen(szMsgFilePath, "rb");
if (pMsgFile == NULL) {
UPopSendErrorResponse(hBSock, ERR_FILE_OPEN, pPOPSD->iTimeout);
ErrSetErrorCode(ERR_FILE_OPEN);
return ERR_FILE_OPEN;
}
fclose(pMsgFile);
/*
* ADDED CODE END
*/
SysSNPrintf(szResponse, sizeof(szResponse) - 1,
"+OK " SYS_OFFT_FMT " bytes", pPOPMD->llMsgSize);
if (BSckSendString(hBSock, szResponse, pPOPSD->iTimeout) < 0)
return ErrGetErrorCode();
if (pPOPMD->llMsgSize > 0 &&
> Original Message
>From: Oversea Site via xmail
>To: "XMail Users Mailing List"
>Sent: Tue, May 26, 2015, 1:56 PM
>Subject: Re: [xmail] BUG : XMAIL 1.27 with SSL
>
>FEDORA 4 X86_64 GLIBC 2.3.6-3 (I can't upgrade it to the lastest version.
>Because I have a chiliasp 3.6.2 32-bit run ASP VBSCRIPT on APACHE 1.3 32-bit
>software, it need GLIBC 2.3.x and Kernel 2.6)
>
>KERNEL 3.3 MOD FROM FC15 (It will display KERNEL 2.6.43 Number). Kernel is not
>a main problem. Because I have been test 2.6.32 or other. same problem was
>found.
>
>REAL HARDWARE -> INTEL B85M i3-4150 16G RAM SATA3 RAID 1 LINUX SOFTRAID1 MDADM
>
>Corp. Email System is not heavily use when I test it in HK TIME midnight.
>
>Anyway I will test this issue in other linux distribution in VM, such as
>CentOS. (You can give me any linux distribution, let's build the same platform
>in VM. I use virtualbox.
>
>[root@bravo logs]# uname -a
>Linux bravo 2.6.43-gcc402 #3 SMP Sun May 17 23:10:29 HKT 2015 x86_64 x86_64
>x86_64 GNU/Linux
>[root@bravo logs]#
>[root@bravo logs]# ldd /var/MailRoot/bin/XMail127v3
>linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x77f0e000)
>libssl.so.0.9.8 => /usr/local/ssl/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8
> (0x7f43b00bc000)
>libcrypto.so.0.9.8 => /usr/local/ssl/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.8
> (0x7f43afd35000)
>libdl.so.2 => /lib64/libdl.so.2 (0x003e1820)
>libpthread.so.0 => /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x003e1860)
>libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6 (0x7f43afa37000)
>libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x003e1800)
>libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x003e1940)
>libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x003e17d0)
>/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x003e17b0)
>
>***
>/var/MailRoot/bin/XMail127v3 -Md -Ms /var/MailRoot -Sl -Pl -Cl \
>-SI 0.0.0.0:8025 -SI 0.0.0.0:25 \
>-PI 0.0.0.0:8110 -PI 0.0.0.0:110 \
>-BI 0.0.0.0:995 \
>-XI 0.0.0.0:465 \
>-Ql -Ln 256 -Pt 60 -St 150 -F- -SX 2048 -Mx 64 \
>-Qn 64 -PX 2048 -Qr 1 -Qt 1 -QT 150 -Qg -CX 256
>***
>
>> Original Message
>>From: "U.Mutlu"
>>To: t...@os.st, "XMail Users Mailing List"
>>Sent: Tue, May 26, 2015, 1:06 PM
>>Subject: Re: [xmail] BUG : XMAIL 1.27 with SSL
>>
>>Oversea Site via xmail wrote on 05/26/2015 05:14 AM:
>>> No Log Error. No Fatal Error log. No Core Dump
>>>
>>> It's not RAM or HW problem. It's XMAIL internal issue, because when I
>>> switch to stunnel, all problems solved. And then when I test K9-MAIL with
>>> XMAIL+STUNNEL, K9 Client will not have any JAVA somethings Exception Error
>>>
>>> Two tests
>>>
>>> 1. Very Important Thing in Xmail 1.27 Native SSL
>>>
>>> If the emailbox has many emails such as 1, Microsoft Outlook with SSL
>>> or NON-SSL download them, it WILL NOT have this issue.
>>> Some Tencent Foxmail for Windows, after finish ssl session, it will take
>>> the server be FIN_WAIT2 (some version, not all)
>>> But K9-MAIL for Android, Download first 1000, it will appear the error in
>>> K9-MAIL randomly.
>>>
>>>
>>> 2. Xmail 1.27 + Stunnel Proxy
>>>
>>> If the emailbox has many emails such as 1, Microsoft Outlook wi
Re: [xmail] BUG : XMAIL 1.27 with SSL
FEDORA 4 X86_64 GLIBC 2.3.6-3 (I can't upgrade it to the lastest version. Because I have a chiliasp 3.6.2 32-bit run ASP VBSCRIPT on APACHE 1.3 32-bit software, it need GLIBC 2.3.x and Kernel 2.6) KERNEL 3.3 MOD FROM FC15 (It will display KERNEL 2.6.43 Number). Kernel is not a main problem. Because I have been test 2.6.32 or other. same problem was found. REAL HARDWARE -> INTEL B85M i3-4150 16G RAM SATA3 RAID 1 LINUX SOFTRAID1 MDADM Corp. Email System is not heavily use when I test it in HK TIME midnight. Anyway I will test this issue in other linux distribution in VM, such as CentOS. (You can give me any linux distribution, let's build the same platform in VM. I use virtualbox. [root@bravo logs]# uname -a Linux bravo 2.6.43-gcc402 #3 SMP Sun May 17 23:10:29 HKT 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux [root@bravo logs]# [root@bravo logs]# ldd /var/MailRoot/bin/XMail127v3 linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x77f0e000) libssl.so.0.9.8 => /usr/local/ssl/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8 (0x7f43b00bc000) libcrypto.so.0.9.8 => /usr/local/ssl/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.8 (0x7f43afd35000) libdl.so.2 => /lib64/libdl.so.2 (0x003e1820) libpthread.so.0 => /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x003e1860) libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6 (0x7f43afa37000) libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x003e1800) libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x003e1940) libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x003e17d0) /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x003e17b0) *** /var/MailRoot/bin/XMail127v3 -Md -Ms /var/MailRoot -Sl -Pl -Cl \ -SI 0.0.0.0:8025 -SI 0.0.0.0:25 \ -PI 0.0.0.0:8110 -PI 0.0.0.0:110 \ -BI 0.0.0.0:995 \ -XI 0.0.0.0:465 \ -Ql -Ln 256 -Pt 60 -St 150 -F- -SX 2048 -Mx 64 \ -Qn 64 -PX 2048 -Qr 1 -Qt 1 -QT 150 -Qg -CX 256 *** > Original Message ---- >From: "U.Mutlu" >To: t...@os.st, "XMail Users Mailing List" >Sent: Tue, May 26, 2015, 1:06 PM >Subject: Re: [xmail] BUG : XMAIL 1.27 with SSL > >Oversea Site via xmail wrote on 05/26/2015 05:14 AM: >> No Log Error. No Fatal Error log. No Core Dump >> >> It's not RAM or HW problem. It's XMAIL internal issue, because when I switch >> to stunnel, all problems solved. And then when I test K9-MAIL with >> XMAIL+STUNNEL, K9 Client will not have any JAVA somethings Exception Error >> >> Two tests >> >> 1. Very Important Thing in Xmail 1.27 Native SSL >> >> If the emailbox has many emails such as 1, Microsoft Outlook with SSL or >> NON-SSL download them, it WILL NOT have this issue. >> Some Tencent Foxmail for Windows, after finish ssl session, it will take the >> server be FIN_WAIT2 (some version, not all) >> But K9-MAIL for Android, Download first 1000, it will appear the error in >> K9-MAIL randomly. >> >> >> 2. Xmail 1.27 + Stunnel Proxy >> >> If the emailbox has many emails such as 1, Microsoft Outlook with SSL or >> NON-SSL download them, it WILL NOT have this issue. >> Some Tencent Foxmail for Windows, after finish ssl session, it WILL NOT have >> any problem. Server WILL NOT TAKE FIN_WAIT_2 >> K9-MAIL for Android, Download first 1000, it will NOT DISPLAY any error when >> it finished download emails. > >I would need full description about the server HW and SW (OS version, >xmail start params etc., any xmail patches applied etc.). > >There is of course also the possibility that the bug lies in the >said mobile client program, especially if it goes online via >unstable mobile links as it seems to be a link latency problem, >or the client does not close the socket cleanly. Take a look at these: >https://github.com/Automattic/socket.io/issues/1380 >http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5328155/preventing-fin-wait2-when-closing-socket > >cu >Uenal > > >>> Original Message >>> From: "U.Mutlu" >>> To: t...@os.st, "XMail Users Mailing List" >>> Sent: Tue, May 26, 2015, 10:11 AM >>> Subject: Re: [xmail] BUG : XMAIL 1.27 with SSL >>> >>> Oversea Site via xmail wrote on 05/25/2015 09:23 PM: >>>> I found the bug on XMAIL 1.27 with SSL (POP3S is main), SSMTP service maybe >>>> has a same bug too >>>> >>>> 1. it will have too many FIN_WAIT_2 on POP3S with two many requests, It is >>>> because of some non-popular WINDOWS CLIENT e.g. tencent foxmail , outlook >>>> will >>>> not have this issue. >>>> >>>> 2. If you're using XMAIL'S internal SSL POP
Re: [xmail] BUG : XMAIL 1.27 with SSL
[root@bravo logs]# cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_fin_timeout 10 [root@bravo logs]# > Original Message >From: "U.Mutlu via xmail" >To: "U.Mutlu" , "XMail Users Mailing List" > >Sent: Tue, May 26, 2015, 1:28 PM >Subject: Re: [xmail] BUG : XMAIL 1.27 with SSL > >U.Mutlu via xmail wrote on 05/26/2015 07:06 AM: >> Oversea Site via xmail wrote on 05/26/2015 05:14 AM: >>> No Log Error. No Fatal Error log. No Core Dump >>> >>> It's not RAM or HW problem. It's XMAIL internal issue, because when I switch >>> to stunnel, all problems solved. And then when I test K9-MAIL with >>> XMAIL+STUNNEL, K9 Client will not have any JAVA somethings Exception Error >>> >>> Two tests >>> >>> 1. Very Important Thing in Xmail 1.27 Native SSL >>> >>> If the emailbox has many emails such as 1, Microsoft Outlook with SSL or >>> NON-SSL download them, it WILL NOT have this issue. >>> Some Tencent Foxmail for Windows, after finish ssl session, it will take the >>> server be FIN_WAIT2 (some version, not all) >>> But K9-MAIL for Android, Download first 1000, it will appear the error in >>> K9-MAIL randomly. >>> >>> >>> 2. Xmail 1.27 + Stunnel Proxy >>> >>> If the emailbox has many emails such as 1, Microsoft Outlook with SSL or >>> NON-SSL download them, it WILL NOT have this issue. >>> Some Tencent Foxmail for Windows, after finish ssl session, it WILL NOT have >>> any problem. Server WILL NOT TAKE FIN_WAIT_2 >>> K9-MAIL for Android, Download first 1000, it will NOT DISPLAY any error when >>> it finished download emails. >> >> I would need full description about the server HW and SW (OS version, >> xmail start params etc., any xmail patches applied etc.). >> >> There is of course also the possibility that the bug lies in the >> said mobile client program, especially if it goes online via >> unstable mobile links as it seems to be a link latency problem, >> or the client does not close the socket cleanly. Take a look at these: >> https://github.com/Automattic/socket.io/issues/1380 >> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5328155/preventing-fin-wait2-when-closing-socket > >Check this too: > ># cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_fin_timeout >60 > >The following page is informative too: >http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/misc/fin_wait_2.html > >-- >cu >Uenal > >___ >xmail mailing list >xmail@xmailserver.org >http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail ___ xmail mailing list xmail@xmailserver.org http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail
Re: [xmail] BUG : XMAIL 1.27 with SSL
U.Mutlu via xmail wrote on 05/26/2015 07:06 AM: Oversea Site via xmail wrote on 05/26/2015 05:14 AM: No Log Error. No Fatal Error log. No Core Dump It's not RAM or HW problem. It's XMAIL internal issue, because when I switch to stunnel, all problems solved. And then when I test K9-MAIL with XMAIL+STUNNEL, K9 Client will not have any JAVA somethings Exception Error Two tests 1. Very Important Thing in Xmail 1.27 Native SSL If the emailbox has many emails such as 1, Microsoft Outlook with SSL or NON-SSL download them, it WILL NOT have this issue. Some Tencent Foxmail for Windows, after finish ssl session, it will take the server be FIN_WAIT2 (some version, not all) But K9-MAIL for Android, Download first 1000, it will appear the error in K9-MAIL randomly. 2. Xmail 1.27 + Stunnel Proxy If the emailbox has many emails such as 1, Microsoft Outlook with SSL or NON-SSL download them, it WILL NOT have this issue. Some Tencent Foxmail for Windows, after finish ssl session, it WILL NOT have any problem. Server WILL NOT TAKE FIN_WAIT_2 K9-MAIL for Android, Download first 1000, it will NOT DISPLAY any error when it finished download emails. I would need full description about the server HW and SW (OS version, xmail start params etc., any xmail patches applied etc.). There is of course also the possibility that the bug lies in the said mobile client program, especially if it goes online via unstable mobile links as it seems to be a link latency problem, or the client does not close the socket cleanly. Take a look at these: https://github.com/Automattic/socket.io/issues/1380 http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5328155/preventing-fin-wait2-when-closing-socket Check this too: # cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_fin_timeout 60 The following page is informative too: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/misc/fin_wait_2.html -- cu Uenal ___ xmail mailing list xmail@xmailserver.org http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail
Re: [xmail] BUG : XMAIL 1.27 with SSL
Oversea Site via xmail wrote on 05/26/2015 05:14 AM: No Log Error. No Fatal Error log. No Core Dump It's not RAM or HW problem. It's XMAIL internal issue, because when I switch to stunnel, all problems solved. And then when I test K9-MAIL with XMAIL+STUNNEL, K9 Client will not have any JAVA somethings Exception Error Two tests 1. Very Important Thing in Xmail 1.27 Native SSL If the emailbox has many emails such as 1, Microsoft Outlook with SSL or NON-SSL download them, it WILL NOT have this issue. Some Tencent Foxmail for Windows, after finish ssl session, it will take the server be FIN_WAIT2 (some version, not all) But K9-MAIL for Android, Download first 1000, it will appear the error in K9-MAIL randomly. 2. Xmail 1.27 + Stunnel Proxy If the emailbox has many emails such as 1, Microsoft Outlook with SSL or NON-SSL download them, it WILL NOT have this issue. Some Tencent Foxmail for Windows, after finish ssl session, it WILL NOT have any problem. Server WILL NOT TAKE FIN_WAIT_2 K9-MAIL for Android, Download first 1000, it will NOT DISPLAY any error when it finished download emails. I would need full description about the server HW and SW (OS version, xmail start params etc., any xmail patches applied etc.). There is of course also the possibility that the bug lies in the said mobile client program, especially if it goes online via unstable mobile links as it seems to be a link latency problem, or the client does not close the socket cleanly. Take a look at these: https://github.com/Automattic/socket.io/issues/1380 http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5328155/preventing-fin-wait2-when-closing-socket cu Uenal Original Message From: "U.Mutlu" To: t...@os.st, "XMail Users Mailing List" Sent: Tue, May 26, 2015, 10:11 AM Subject: Re: [xmail] BUG : XMAIL 1.27 with SSL Oversea Site via xmail wrote on 05/25/2015 09:23 PM: I found the bug on XMAIL 1.27 with SSL (POP3S is main), SSMTP service maybe has a same bug too 1. it will have too many FIN_WAIT_2 on POP3S with two many requests, It is because of some non-popular WINDOWS CLIENT e.g. tencent foxmail , outlook will not have this issue. 2. If you're using XMAIL'S internal SSL POP3S with any openssl lib. (tested 0.9.8za 1.0.0, tested gcc 4.0.2/4.0.4/4.3.6) and the email account contain too many emails (1000-2000 emails), the mobile client POP3 such as Samsung internal Email Client is using SSL, K9-MAIL on any android devices using SSL, some iPhone devices (connect with XMAIL SSL port 995), will not download them successfully (Android Error - Java Exception Error) and some iPhone device will stuck with it, it will not download all emails successfully. But if you disable XMAIL'S internal POP3S with -B- startup option, and switch stunnel 5.17 port 995 tunnel to port 110, it will solve this problem and kick out FIN_WAIT_2 * stunnel 5.17 config * [pop3s] accept = 995 connect = 110 cert = /etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem *** What do the logs (server, client) say about the errors? I think you need a faster server HW and/or need to optimize the resources, for example the number of threads, and possibly also RAM. An excerpt from the doc: " If you have an heavily loaded server remember to setup the best number of XMAIL threads by specifying the '-Qn nthreads' option (you must do some tentatives to find the best value for your needs). Also you can limit the number of SMTP, POP3 and CTRL service threads by specifying the options '-SX maxthreads', '-PX maxthreads' and '-CX maxthreads'. " If there are mail filters, you can put them into a ramdisk and set PATH accordingly, or use an absolute path to them. See also XMAIL_TEMP in the doc. In task manager / system monitor you can see how the resource usage is, especially CPU, memory, and network. -- cu Uenal ___ xmail mailing list xmail@xmailserver.org http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail ___ xmail mailing list xmail@xmailserver.org http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail
Re: [xmail] BUG : XMAIL 1.27 with SSL
No Log Error. No Fatal Error log. No Core Dump It's not RAM or HW problem. It's XMAIL internal issue, because when I switch to stunnel, all problems solved. And then when I test K9-MAIL with XMAIL+STUNNEL, K9 Client will not have any JAVA somethings Exception Error Two tests 1. Very Important Thing in Xmail 1.27 Native SSL If the emailbox has many emails such as 1, Microsoft Outlook with SSL or NON-SSL download them, it WILL NOT have this issue. Some Tencent Foxmail for Windows, after finish ssl session, it will take the server be FIN_WAIT2 (some version, not all) But K9-MAIL for Android, Download first 1000, it will appear the error in K9-MAIL randomly. 2. Xmail 1.27 + Stunnel Proxy If the emailbox has many emails such as 1, Microsoft Outlook with SSL or NON-SSL download them, it WILL NOT have this issue. Some Tencent Foxmail for Windows, after finish ssl session, it WILL NOT have any problem. Server WILL NOT TAKE FIN_WAIT_2 K9-MAIL for Android, Download first 1000, it will NOT DISPLAY any error when it finished download emails. > Original Message >From: "U.Mutlu" >To: t...@os.st, "XMail Users Mailing List" >Sent: Tue, May 26, 2015, 10:11 AM >Subject: Re: [xmail] BUG : XMAIL 1.27 with SSL > >Oversea Site via xmail wrote on 05/25/2015 09:23 PM: >> I found the bug on XMAIL 1.27 with SSL (POP3S is main), SSMTP service maybe >> has a same bug too >> >> 1. it will have too many FIN_WAIT_2 on POP3S with two many requests, It is >> because of some non-popular WINDOWS CLIENT e.g. tencent foxmail , outlook >> will >> not have this issue. >> >> 2. If you're using XMAIL'S internal SSL POP3S with any openssl lib. (tested >> 0.9.8za 1.0.0, tested gcc 4.0.2/4.0.4/4.3.6) and the email account contain >> too >> many emails (1000-2000 emails), the mobile client POP3 such as Samsung >> internal Email Client is using SSL, K9-MAIL on any android devices using SSL, >> some iPhone devices (connect with XMAIL SSL port 995), will not download them >> successfully (Android Error - Java Exception Error) and some >> iPhone device will stuck with it, it will not download all emails >> successfully. But if you disable XMAIL'S internal POP3S with -B- startup >> option, and switch stunnel 5.17 port 995 tunnel to port 110, it will solve >> this problem and kick out FIN_WAIT_2 >> >> * stunnel 5.17 config * >> [pop3s] >> accept = 995 >> connect = 110 >> cert = /etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem >> *** > > >What do the logs (server, client) say about the errors? > >I think you need a faster server HW and/or need to optimize the resources, >for example the number of threads, and possibly also RAM. >An excerpt from the doc: >" >If you have an heavily loaded server remember to setup the best number of >XMAIL threads by specifying the '-Qn nthreads' option (you must do some >tentatives to find the best value for your needs). Also you can limit the >number of SMTP, POP3 and CTRL service threads by specifying the options '-SX >maxthreads', '-PX maxthreads' and '-CX maxthreads'. >" > >If there are mail filters, you can put them into a ramdisk and set PATH >accordingly, or use an absolute path to them. See also XMAIL_TEMP in the doc. > >In task manager / system monitor you can see how the resource usage is, >especially CPU, memory, and network. > >-- >cu >Uenal ___ xmail mailing list xmail@xmailserver.org http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail
Re: [xmail] BUG : XMAIL 1.27 with SSL
Oversea Site via xmail wrote on 05/25/2015 09:23 PM: I found the bug on XMAIL 1.27 with SSL (POP3S is main), SSMTP service maybe has a same bug too 1. it will have too many FIN_WAIT_2 on POP3S with two many requests, It is because of some non-popular WINDOWS CLIENT e.g. tencent foxmail , outlook will not have this issue. 2. If you're using XMAIL'S internal SSL POP3S with any openssl lib. (tested 0.9.8za 1.0.0, tested gcc 4.0.2/4.0.4/4.3.6) and the email account contain too many emails (1000-2000 emails), the mobile client POP3 such as Samsung internal Email Client is using SSL, K9-MAIL on any android devices using SSL, some iPhone devices (connect with XMAIL SSL port 995), will not download them successfully (Android Error - Java Exception Error) and some iPhone device will stuck with it, it will not download all emails successfully. But if you disable XMAIL'S internal POP3S with -B- startup option, and switch stunnel 5.17 port 995 tunnel to port 110, it will solve this problem and kick out FIN_WAIT_2 * stunnel 5.17 config * [pop3s] accept = 995 connect = 110 cert = /etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem *** What do the logs (server, client) say about the errors? I think you need a faster server HW and/or need to optimize the resources, for example the number of threads, and possibly also RAM. An excerpt from the doc: " If you have an heavily loaded server remember to setup the best number of XMAIL threads by specifying the '-Qn nthreads' option (you must do some tentatives to find the best value for your needs). Also you can limit the number of SMTP, POP3 and CTRL service threads by specifying the options '-SX maxthreads', '-PX maxthreads' and '-CX maxthreads'. " If there are mail filters, you can put them into a ramdisk and set PATH accordingly, or use an absolute path to them. See also XMAIL_TEMP in the doc. In task manager / system monitor you can see how the resource usage is, especially CPU, memory, and network. -- cu Uenal ___ xmail mailing list xmail@xmailserver.org http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail
[xmail] BUG : XMAIL 1.27 with SSL
I found the bug on XMAIL 1.27 with SSL (POP3S is main), SSMTP service maybe has a same bug too 1. it will have too many FIN_WAIT_2 on POP3S with two many requests, It is because of some non-popular WINDOWS CLIENT e.g. tencent foxmail , outlook will not have this issue. 2. If you're using XMAIL'S internal SSL POP3S with any openssl lib. (tested 0.9.8za 1.0.0, tested gcc 4.0.2/4.0.4/4.3.6) and the email account contain too many emails (1000-2000 emails), the mobile client POP3 such as Samsung internal Email Client is using SSL, K9-MAIL on any android devices using SSL, some iPhone devices (connect with XMAIL SSL port 995), will not download them successfully (Android Error - Java Exception Error) and some iPhone device will stuck with it, it will not download all emails successfully. But if you disable XMAIL'S internal POP3S with -B- startup option, and switch stunnel 5.17 port 995 tunnel to port 110, it will solve this problem and kick out FIN_WAIT_2 * stunnel 5.17 config * [pop3s]accept = 995connect = 110cert = /etc/stunnel/stunnel.pem *** ___ xmail mailing list xmail@xmailserver.org http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail
Re: [xmail] Tip: Speeding up xmail by pointing envvar XMAIL_TEMP to a ramdisk
Bart Mortelmans via xmail wrote on 05/25/2015 02:24 PM: Are you sure this will actually speed up XMail? Have you been able to compare, specifically for XMail? It will help for files xmail creates in /tmp and doesn't move to an other drive (for example when the realtime filters get fired during mail acceptance, the passed file always lies in /tmp). Since a /tmp on a ramdisk is ultra-fast I concluded that this will speed things up. But I'm not sure yet if xmail moves that file to main disk. As far as I understand how XMail processes e-mails, it actually only creates a file one time and then moves that file around between temp-folder, spool folder and local POP3 folders. Moving a file on the same filesystem means the file isn't re-rewritten. If you move a file between different filesystems, it does need to be re-written. That could actually mean that having the temp folder on a RAM-disk might slow things down if there would be an event in which XMail moves a file from spool to temp to local POP3 folder. When they are all on the same filesystem, this would mean the file would need to be written only once (and then moved around). If the temp folder is on a different file-system, this would cause the file to be writting to the hard drive twice and to the RAM-drive once. Hmm. yes, true. But there are use cases where ramdisk will be w/o question useful, for example starting the filter-programs from ramdisk. All mails will not only pass through the temp-folder, but will also end up in the spool-folder. If most mails only pass through the server (and don't need to be stored locally) then you might be able to see a speed improvement by also placing the spool folder on a ramdisk. But this would mean that all mails pending delivery are lost at server restart (so this isn't really recommended). Yes, true, putting spool on ramdisk is not that a good idea :-) cu Uenal Sincerely, Bart Mortelmans U.Mutlu via xmail schreef op 25/05/15 om 01:09: Tip: Speeding up xmail by pointing envvar XMAIL_TEMP to a ramdisk (here on Linux using a 64 MB ramdisk mounted to /mnt/ramdisk ) mkdir -p /mnt/ramdisk in /etc/fstab: tmpfs /mnt/ramdisk tmpfs nodev,size=64M 0 0 then either reboot or use this cmd: mount /mnt/ramdisk in xmail start script: export XMAIL_ROOT=/var/MailRoot export XMAIL_TEMP=/mnt/ramdisk export PATH=$XMAIL_ROOT/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin ... and restart xmail. The ramdisk size should be bigger than "MaxMessageSize" (unit KB) in server.tab. This will speed up mail processing (at least incoming mails) significantly. Here's more info about speed gains: http://www.jamescoyle.net/knowledge/951-the-difference-between-a-tmpfs-and-ramfs-ram-disk "The major benefit to memory based file systems is that they are very fast – 10s of times faster than modern SSDs. Read and write performance is massively increased for all workload types." One can even copy the mostly called programs (for example filters) onto the ramdisk, but then one must use such a PATH line (instead of the above one): export PATH=/mnt/ramdisk:$XMAIL_ROOT/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin _______ xmail mailing list xmail@xmailserver.org http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail
Re: [xmail] Tip: Speeding up xmail by pointing envvar XMAIL_TEMP to a ramdisk
Are you sure this will actually speed up XMail? Have you been able to compare, specifically for XMail? As far as I understand how XMail processes e-mails, it actually only creates a file one time and then moves that file around between temp-folder, spool folder and local POP3 folders. Moving a file on the same filesystem means the file isn't re-rewritten. If you move a file between different filesystems, it does need to be re-written. That could actually mean that having the temp folder on a RAM-disk might slow things down if there would be an event in which XMail moves a file from spool to temp to local POP3 folder. When they are all on the same filesystem, this would mean the file would need to be written only once (and then moved around). If the temp folder is on a different file-system, this would cause the file to be writting to the hard drive twice and to the RAM-drive once. All mails will not only pass through the temp-folder, but will also end up in the spool-folder. If most mails only pass through the server (and don't need to be stored locally) then you might be able to see a speed improvement by also placing the spool folder on a ramdisk. But this would mean that all mails pending delivery are lost at server restart (so this isn't really recommended). Sincerely, Bart Mortelmans U.Mutlu via xmail schreef op 25/05/15 om 01:09: Tip: Speeding up xmail by pointing envvar XMAIL_TEMP to a ramdisk (here on Linux using a 64 MB ramdisk mounted to /mnt/ramdisk ) mkdir -p /mnt/ramdisk in /etc/fstab: tmpfs /mnt/ramdisk tmpfs nodev,size=64M 0 0 then either reboot or use this cmd: mount /mnt/ramdisk in xmail start script: export XMAIL_ROOT=/var/MailRoot export XMAIL_TEMP=/mnt/ramdisk export PATH=$XMAIL_ROOT/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin ... and restart xmail. The ramdisk size should be bigger than "MaxMessageSize" (unit KB) in server.tab. This will speed up mail processing (at least incoming mails) significantly. Here's more info about speed gains: http://www.jamescoyle.net/knowledge/951-the-difference-between-a-tmpfs-and-ramfs-ram-disk "The major benefit to memory based file systems is that they are very fast – 10s of times faster than modern SSDs. Read and write performance is massively increased for all workload types." One can even copy the mostly called programs (for example filters) onto the ramdisk, but then one must use such a PATH line (instead of the above one): export PATH=/mnt/ramdisk:$XMAIL_ROOT/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin _______ xmail mailing list xmail@xmailserver.org http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail
Re: [xmail] new maintainer for the 1.27 branch
I think that a github repo is better and easier to fork just in case someone else will contribute. Stefano > Il giorno 24/mag/2015, alle ore 18:09, U.Mutlu via xmail > ha scritto: > > Hi Bart & All, > > Bart Mortelmans via xmail wrote on 05/16/2015 10:27 PM: >> I have been using XMail for what must have been almost 15 years. I still >> prefer XMail for anything that does not need IMAP. > > I have no experience yet with Dovecot, but what does it mean when > they say "If you already have XMail Setup and just want to add in IMAP > support See : dovecot-setup.html" on this webpage: > http://xmail.nomadcf.com/xmail-dovecot > >> I made some small changes to the code. If anybody would be willing to pick >> up XMail and start development again, I hope that these changes can also >> get into the new version. If you need more details, let me know! > > Thx, since Davide is not reachable for a very long time now (3+ yrs?), > I hereby accounce my general interest in bugfixing and adding new > features (patches and wishes of users) into the current 1.27 branch, > if time permits. I'll also setup an svn repository. > > The only problem is: at this time I can't support any other OS beyond Linux. > > I will brand the new version something like "v1.27.n.linux" > where "n" is a counter. > >> - Change the default error message for a failed pre-date or post-data >> filter to code 451 (by default this would otherwise be 554 which means >> there won’t be an other attempt). For me 451 makes much more sense. > > Can you explain how this is meant? > Is it the return code of the filter program like discussed here? : > http://xmailforum.marketmix.com/index.php?showtopic=3362 > >> - Added basic support for LMTP. That way I can have XMail deliver mails to >> dovecot directly. For this, I just had to add the LHLO message next to the >> HELO and EHLO. This works for me, as with my configuration there shouldn’t >> be any event in which XMail tries to deliver one e-mail to multiple >> recipients via LTMP. I’m not sure if there might be other configurations >> for which more work would be needed for LMTP to work. > > This sounds not trivial :-) I must admit I have no experience yet with LMTP, > but I saw wikipedia has a page about it: > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Local_Mail_Transfer_Protocol > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2033 > >> - Made XMail log a line to SMAIL log in case of delivery failure (posted >> details on this in an e-mail to this mailing list very recently). > > Yeah, I would need that feature too. > > I recently added this feature into xmail: > > spamassassin (spamd via spamc) reports, with default config, > to every mail received by xmail the following bad score of 1.3: > "1.3 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS" > After much research and experimenting I figured out what the reason is: > it is the "Received:" line xmail prepends to the mail depending on > "ReceivedHdrType" in server.tab. There are choices from 0 to 4, and > I added one more (5), and now spamassassin no more gives the above spam-score. > >> If anybody is taking feature requests: I would be interested in a way of >> XMail talking to a “filter” via a socket. Now, for every e-mail to be >> filtered, a process has to be started. It would be much more efficient if >> XMail could talk a filter-server via a socket. That filter server could be >> anything, but maybe we could even get it to talk directly to spamd and >> clamd… > > Yes, that's a good idea. I'll study the xmail sources. > > -- > Thx > Uenal > > ___ > xmail mailing list > xmail@xmailserver.org > http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail ___ xmail mailing list xmail@xmailserver.org http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail
[xmail] Tip: Speeding up xmail by pointing envvar XMAIL_TEMP to a ramdisk
Tip: Speeding up xmail by pointing envvar XMAIL_TEMP to a ramdisk (here on Linux using a 64 MB ramdisk mounted to /mnt/ramdisk ) mkdir -p /mnt/ramdisk in /etc/fstab: tmpfs /mnt/ramdisk tmpfs nodev,size=64M 0 0 then either reboot or use this cmd: mount /mnt/ramdisk in xmail start script: export XMAIL_ROOT=/var/MailRoot export XMAIL_TEMP=/mnt/ramdisk export PATH=$XMAIL_ROOT/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin ... and restart xmail. The ramdisk size should be bigger than "MaxMessageSize" (unit KB) in server.tab. This will speed up mail processing (at least incoming mails) significantly. Here's more info about speed gains: http://www.jamescoyle.net/knowledge/951-the-difference-between-a-tmpfs-and-ramfs-ram-disk "The major benefit to memory based file systems is that they are very fast – 10s of times faster than modern SSDs. Read and write performance is massively increased for all workload types." One can even copy the mostly called programs (for example filters) onto the ramdisk, but then one must use such a PATH line (instead of the above one): export PATH=/mnt/ramdisk:$XMAIL_ROOT/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin -- cu Uenal _______ xmail mailing list xmail@xmailserver.org http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail
[xmail] HOWTO quick-testing spamassassin (spamd + spamc) at home
Hi Spros & All,
this maybe might interest some of you:
HOWTO quick-testing spamassassin (spamd + spamc) at home
spamd is the daemon program (runs in background)
spamc is the client pgm to interact with spamd
1.) install spamassassin pkg (Debian-Linux: apt-get install spamassassin)
2.) enable the spamd daemon (in file /etc/default/spamassassin set ENABLED=1)
3.) start spamd ("/etc/init.d/spamassassin start" or "service spamassassin
start"
depending on your init-system (syvinit/upstart/systemd))
4.) in your mailclient save a single mail to disk for testing
5.) spamc -R < mailfile.eml
This gives the result of spam testing
Example:
"
$ spamc -R < test3.eml
-0.5/5.0
Spam detection software, running on the system "xx",
has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.
...
Content analysis details: (-0.5 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
-- --
0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was
blocked.
See
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
for more information.
[URIs: srpsecure.de]
0.0 TVD_RCVD_SPACE_BRACKET No description available.
-0.6 RP_MATCHES_RCVDEnvelope sender domain matches handover relay domain
0.0 T_FRT_CONTACT BODY: ReplaceTags: Contact
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
0.0 DC_PNG_UNO_LARGO Message contains a single large inline gif
"
After testing you can stop spamd, deaktive it or uninstall if desired.
In real life one would install spamassassin on the mailserver and
create a filter to pass the to be checked mail to it, and analyse
its return value etc...
More info @ http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/
cu
Uenal
Spyros Tsiolis via xmail wrote on 05/24/2015 06:34 PM:
I was introduced to XMail by a colleague of mine.
At first it seemed cryptic and it still is for some stuff I am interested in.
I've been using it since 2003 and never looked back.
-------
On Sun, 24/5/15, U.Mutlu via xmail wrote:
Subject: Re: [xmail] new maintainer for the 1.27 branch
To: "Bart Mortelmans" , "XMail Users Mailing List"
Date: Sunday, 24 May, 2015, 19:07
Hi Bart & All,
Bart Mortelmans via xmail wrote on 05/16/2015 10:27 PM:
> I have been using XMail for what must have been almost
15 years. I still
> prefer XMail for anything that does not need IMAP.
I have no experience yet with Dovecot, but what does it mean
when
they say "If you already have XMail Setup and just want to
add in IMAP
support See : dovecot-setup.html" on this webpage:
http://xmail.nomadcf.com/xmail-dovecot
I think what it's trying to say is : "if you have already XMail setup for
pop3/smtp, all you need is dovecot for lmtp/imap.
I have working installations with XMail / dovecot / Horde and it works
like a dream. No problems there. That has been for about seven years;
Since 2008 I think.
> I made some small changes to the code. If anybody would
be willing to pick
> up XMail and start development again, I hope that these
changes can also
> get into the new version. If you need more details, let
me know!
Thx, since Davide is not reachable for a very long time now
(3+ yrs?),
WOW ! 3 Years ? I know he has a life (no pun intended) apart from
his XMail project. I also know he has developed other stuff
(see here : http://xmailserver.org/davide.html) but I never expected for
him to just abandon XMail. It's a good project. Why would he do this ?
I hereby accounce my general interest in bugfixing and
adding new
features (patches and wishes of users) into the current 1.27
branch,
if time permits. I'll also setup an svn repository.
There are many nice things one could add to XMail. However I am
not a developer and I can only propose stuff.
One feature I longed for is the ability to view e-mail traffic in real-time
and also XMail be able to log incoming and outgoing messages.
The only problem is: at this time I can't support any other
OS beyond Linux.
will brand the new version something like "v1.27.n.linux"
where "n" is a counter.
> - Change the default error message for a failed
pre-date or post-data
> filter to code 451 (by default this would otherwise be
554 which means
> there won’t be an other attempt). For me 451 makes
much more sense.
Can you explain how this is meant?
Is it the return code of the filter program like discussed
here? :
http://xmailforum.marketmix.com/index.php?showtopic=3362
> - Added basic support for LMTP. That way I can have
XMail deliver mails to
> dovecot directly. For this, I just had to add the LHLO
m
Re: [xmail] new maintainer for the 1.27 branch
I was introduced to XMail by a colleague of mine. At first it seemed cryptic and it still is for some stuff I am interested in. I've been using it since 2003 and never looked back. --- > On Sun, 24/5/15, U.Mutlu via xmail wrote: > > Subject: Re: [xmail] new maintainer for the 1.27 branch > To: "Bart Mortelmans" , "XMail Users Mailing List" > > Date: Sunday, 24 May, 2015, 19:07 > > Hi Bart & All, > > Bart Mortelmans via xmail wrote on 05/16/2015 10:27 PM: > > I have been using XMail for what must have been almost > 15 years. I still > > prefer XMail for anything that does not need IMAP. > > I have no experience yet with Dovecot, but what does it mean > when > they say "If you already have XMail Setup and just want to > add in IMAP > support See : dovecot-setup.html" on this webpage: > http://xmail.nomadcf.com/xmail-dovecot I think what it's trying to say is : "if you have already XMail setup for pop3/smtp, all you need is dovecot for lmtp/imap. I have working installations with XMail / dovecot / Horde and it works like a dream. No problems there. That has been for about seven years; Since 2008 I think. > > I made some small changes to the code. If anybody would > be willing to pick > > up XMail and start development again, I hope that these > changes can also > get into the new version. If you need more details, let > me know! > > Thx, since Davide is not reachable for a very long time now > (3+ yrs?), WOW ! 3 Years ? I know he has a life (no pun intended) apart from his XMail project. I also know he has developed other stuff (see here : http://xmailserver.org/davide.html) but I never expected for him to just abandon XMail. It's a good project. Why would he do this ? > I hereby accounce my general interest in bugfixing and > adding new > features (patches and wishes of users) into the current 1.27 > branch, > if time permits. I'll also setup an svn repository. There are many nice things one could add to XMail. However I am not a developer and I can only propose stuff. One feature I longed for is the ability to view e-mail traffic in real-time and also XMail be able to log incoming and outgoing messages. > The only problem is: at this time I can't support any other > OS beyond Linux. > > will brand the new version something like "v1.27.n.linux" > where "n" is a counter. > > > - Change the default error message for a failed > pre-date or post-data > > > filter to code 451 (by default this would otherwise be > 554 which means > > there won’t be an other attempt). For me 451 makes > much more sense. > > Can you explain how this is meant? > Is it the return code of the filter program like discussed > here? : > http://xmailforum.marketmix.com/index.php?showtopic=3362 > > > - Added basic support for LMTP. That way I can have > XMail deliver mails to > > dovecot directly. For this, I just had to add the LHLO > message next to the > > HELO and EHLO. This works for me, as with my > configuration there shouldn’t > > be any event in which XMail tries to deliver one e-mail > to multiple > > recipients via LTMP. I’m not sure if there might be > other configurations > > for which more work would be needed for LMTP to work. > > This sounds not trivial :-) I must admit I have no > experience yet with LMTP, > but I saw wikipedia has a page about it: > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Local_Mail_Transfer_Protocol > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2033 That would be nice. To send e-mails directly (internally ?) to dovecot . . . . Am I getting this right ? > > - Made XMail log a line to SMAIL log in case of > delivery failure (posted > > details on this in an e-mail to this mailing list very > recently). > > Yeah, I would need that feature too. > > I recently added this feature into xmail: > > spamassassin (spamd via spamc) reports, with default > config, > to every mail received by xmail the following bad score of > 1.3: > "1.3 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal > network by a host with no rDNS" > After much research and experimenting I figured out what the > reason is: > it is the "Received:" line xmail prepends to the mail > depending on > "ReceivedHdrType" in server.tab. There are choices from 0 to > 4, and > I added one more (5), and now spamassassin no more gives the > above spam-score. Also nice to have sa work in some way with XMail. Never managed to get my head round it (spamassassin, that is). > > If anybody is taki
Re: [xmail] new maintainer for the 1.27 branch
Hi Bart & All, Bart Mortelmans via xmail wrote on 05/16/2015 10:27 PM: I have been using XMail for what must have been almost 15 years. I still prefer XMail for anything that does not need IMAP. I have no experience yet with Dovecot, but what does it mean when they say "If you already have XMail Setup and just want to add in IMAP support See : dovecot-setup.html" on this webpage: http://xmail.nomadcf.com/xmail-dovecot I made some small changes to the code. If anybody would be willing to pick up XMail and start development again, I hope that these changes can also get into the new version. If you need more details, let me know! Thx, since Davide is not reachable for a very long time now (3+ yrs?), I hereby accounce my general interest in bugfixing and adding new features (patches and wishes of users) into the current 1.27 branch, if time permits. I'll also setup an svn repository. The only problem is: at this time I can't support any other OS beyond Linux. I will brand the new version something like "v1.27.n.linux" where "n" is a counter. - Change the default error message for a failed pre-date or post-data filter to code 451 (by default this would otherwise be 554 which means there won’t be an other attempt). For me 451 makes much more sense. Can you explain how this is meant? Is it the return code of the filter program like discussed here? : http://xmailforum.marketmix.com/index.php?showtopic=3362 - Added basic support for LMTP. That way I can have XMail deliver mails to dovecot directly. For this, I just had to add the LHLO message next to the HELO and EHLO. This works for me, as with my configuration there shouldn’t be any event in which XMail tries to deliver one e-mail to multiple recipients via LTMP. I’m not sure if there might be other configurations for which more work would be needed for LMTP to work. This sounds not trivial :-) I must admit I have no experience yet with LMTP, but I saw wikipedia has a page about it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Local_Mail_Transfer_Protocol https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2033 - Made XMail log a line to SMAIL log in case of delivery failure (posted details on this in an e-mail to this mailing list very recently). Yeah, I would need that feature too. I recently added this feature into xmail: spamassassin (spamd via spamc) reports, with default config, to every mail received by xmail the following bad score of 1.3: "1.3 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS" After much research and experimenting I figured out what the reason is: it is the "Received:" line xmail prepends to the mail depending on "ReceivedHdrType" in server.tab. There are choices from 0 to 4, and I added one more (5), and now spamassassin no more gives the above spam-score. If anybody is taking feature requests: I would be interested in a way of XMail talking to a “filter” via a socket. Now, for every e-mail to be filtered, a process has to be started. It would be much more efficient if XMail could talk a filter-server via a socket. That filter server could be anything, but maybe we could even get it to talk directly to spamd and clamd… Yes, that's a good idea. I'll study the xmail sources. -- Thx Uenal ___ xmail mailing list xmail@xmailserver.org http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail
[xmail] server redundancy
Hi, i'm using xmail but i need to create a cluster with 2 active server. In particular i need to share the mail folder. Is there some solution for this task? I thought to nfs is this a good idea? I can use drbd with on top iscsi, but i don't know if iscsi supports multiple "mount" from multiple server. Thanks ___ xmail mailing list xmail@xmailserver.org http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail
Re: [xmail] thx to xmail and its author
Hi, I have been using XMail for what must have been almost 15 years. I still prefer XMail for anything that does not need IMAP. I made some small changes to the code. If anybody would be willing to pick up XMail and start development again, I hope that these changes can also get into the new version. If you need more details, let me know! - Change the default error message for a failed pre-date or post-data filter to code 451 (by default this would otherwise be 554 which means there won’t be an other attempt). For me 451 makes much more sense. - Added basic support for LMTP. That way I can have XMail deliver mails to dovecot directly. For this, I just had to add the LHLO message next to the HELO and EHLO. This works for me, as with my configuration there shouldn’t be any event in which XMail tries to deliver one e-mail to multiple recipients via LTMP. I’m not sure if there might be other configurations for which more work would be needed for LMTP to work. - Made XMail log a line to SMAIL log in case of delivery failure (posted details on this in an e-mail to this mailing list very recently). If anybody is taking feature requests: I would be interested in a way of XMail talking to a “filter” via a socket. Now, for every e-mail to be filtered, a process has to be started. It would be much more efficient if XMail could talk a filter-server via a socket. That filter server could be anything, but maybe we could even get it to talk directly to spamd and clamd… Sincerely, Bart Mortelmans ___ xmail mailing list xmail@xmailserver.org http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail
Re: [xmail] thx to xmail and its author
On 16 May 2015 at 16:00, U.Mutlu via xmail wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm using xmail for a long time now (maybe 7 yrs), and I'm still
> very satisfied with it. OTOH I must admit I'm using it only for
> a small number of users, and I've used (before xmail)
> only one other mail-system (it was qmail iirc).
>
> I'm using a self-compiled version of xmail (the crippled version
> in the debian repository I tried about 2 yrs ago was unusable
> due to cfg-files spread around to many OS-system dirs;
> I like it compact under a single app-dir and its subdirs).
>
> The only thing I don't like much is the usage of TAB as delimiter in the
> cfg-files.
>
> What I would like to ask is:
>
> - What are the shortcomings or missing features other
users experience with xmail?
> - What about the new developments regarding ssl and
crypto since Snowden,
>and their relevance to xmail?
> - What new features should xmail have implemented?
Hi
I started using xmail around 2005 and at that time
also had about four remote users.
Main system here changed over time and is currently
NetBSD. When a security vulnerability relevant to my
setup is announced I rebuild the main base system,
ntpd, xmail and other affected packages. XMail uses
a few third party programs that are from either base
system, NetBSD pkgsrc or local imports.
I've always been setup so that a delay is introduced
so that email from point and shoot mailers or
mailers that don't retry isn't received but
unfortunately "hotmail" is currently one of those.
David
_______
xmail mailing list
xmail@xmailserver.org
http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail
[xmail] thx to xmail and its author
Hi folks, I'm using xmail for a long time now (maybe 7 yrs), and I'm still very satisfied with it. OTOH I must admit I'm using it only for a small number of users, and I've used (before xmail) only one other mail-system (it was qmail iirc). I'm using a self-compiled version of xmail (the crippled version in the debian repository I tried about 2 yrs ago was unusable due to cfg-files spread around to many OS-system dirs; I like it compact under a single app-dir and its subdirs). The only thing I don't like much is the usage of TAB as delimiter in the cfg-files. What I would like to ask is: - What are the shortcomings or missing features other users experience with xmail? - What about the new developments regarding ssl and crypto since Snowden, and their relevance to xmail? - What new features should xmail have implemented? -- Thx Uenal _______ xmail mailing list xmail@xmailserver.org http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail
Re: [xmail] non-delivered mails not listed in the logs - update to log permanent delivery failures
I'm also still here :) I actually also found it annoying that the SMAIL logs show success, but don't show failure. I don't want to receive an e-mail about every message that can't be delivered, but if someone contacts me about an email he (assumes) to not have received, I want to be able to quickly find it in the logs. You can solve this by editing QueueUtils.cpp and adding this around line 803 (just below "int iResult = QueUtTXErrorExNotifySender ..."): > USmlLogMessage(hFSpool, "FAIL", pszReason, pszServer); Recompile and copy the files to the bin-folder and from then on you'll see "FAIL" lines appear on the smail-log every time there was a permanent delivery failure, with details about what went wrong. I actually only just figured this out. I have only tested it on a test-server, but not in production yet. Let me know if you see any problems. Sincerely, Bart Mortelmans U.Mutlu via xmail schreef op 30/04/15 om 13:56: Hi, anybody left here? :-) Can anybody confirm this? : It seems xmail does not make a log entry for a non-deliverable mail. Though it sends an error mail to the sender (Subject "Error sending message ..."). This is not optimal, since the mail admin should have the possibility to inform himself about such problems from the logs. Thx ___ xmail mailing list xmail@xmailserver.org http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail ___ xmail mailing list xmail@xmailserver.org http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail
Re: [xmail] non-delivered mails not listed in the logs
I'm still here :) You can set ErrorsAdmin in server.tab to an email address that will receive delivery failure notification On 04/30/2015 04:56 AM, U.Mutlu via xmail wrote: Hi, anybody left here? :-) Can anybody confirm this? : It seems xmail does not make a log entry for a non-deliverable mail. Though it sends an error mail to the sender (Subject "Error sending message ..."). This is not optimal, since the mail admin should have the possibility to inform himself about such problems from the logs. Thx ___ xmail mailing list xmail@xmailserver.org http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail ___ xmail mailing list xmail@xmailserver.org http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail
Re: [xmail] non-delivered mails not listed in the logs
Hi, still here, waiting for new XMail version, after such long time it must be any day now. ;) What you want are ErrorsAdmin and TempErrorsAdmin variables in server.tab: [ErrorsAdmin] The email address that receives notification messages for every message that has had delivery errors. If it is empty (allowed), the notification message is sent to the sender only. [TempErrorsAdmin] The email address that receives notification for temporary delivery failures. In case it's empty the notification message is sent to the sender only. -- ___ xmail mailing list xmail@xmailserver.org http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail
[xmail] non-delivered mails not listed in the logs
Hi, anybody left here? :-) Can anybody confirm this? : It seems xmail does not make a log entry for a non-deliverable mail. Though it sends an error mail to the sender (Subject "Error sending message ..."). This is not optimal, since the mail admin should have the possibility to inform himself about such problems from the logs. Thx ___ xmail mailing list xmail@xmailserver.org http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail
Re: [xmail] Getting hammered bad
use spamhaus add this to your servers.tab file "CustMapsList" "zen.spamhaus.org:0" On 07/06/2011 10:36 AM, Fred wrote: Hello all, I need help to fight against spammers, here is a sample of an smtp log entry: "mail" "mail" "72.16.236.115" "2011-07-06 12:46:21" "ALEXSERVER01.ANDREWALEX.local" "hotmail.co.uk" "vreaus...@vreausutelog.com""obbard_d...@hotmail.co.uk" "SE86331" "RECV=OK" "legitusern...@legitdomain.com" "2507" "" I am receiving sometimes hundreds of this kind of email in a short time. I have tried black listing the IP and sender domain in spam-adress.tab and spammers.tab but they just change both and they spam again. The email legitusern...@legitdomain.com is a legit user on my server. I am using spamassassin, spf filter and RBL checks. Anyone has any ideas how to block these ers. Thanks ___ xmail mailing list xmail@xmailserver.org http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail ___ xmail mailing list xmail@xmailserver.org http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail
Re: [xmail] Problem with PSYNC aborts
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 17:56:08 +0200 From: xmail-l...@renergeteq.org To: xmail@xmailserver.org Subject: [xmail] Problem with PSYNC aborts There is the possibility to delete the mentioned message, sure. But what if there's a new one? How to get the XMail server to a reliable operation? I'm out of ideas now... Thank you in advance for your help. Best Regards, Norman Hi Norman, You say the message is about 32Mb ? Silly question ; Have you checked that XMail is happy to relay a 32Mb message ? Two places to look at : . server.tab and . /var/MailRoot/domains/domain.com/user/user.tab "MaxMBSize""number" Hope this helps, The "user.tab" was right from the beginning, but it seems there could be the problem in "server.tab": "MaxMessageSize"[TAB]"20" and I tip so... I will try a nightly sync with a more appropriate message limit while the users doesn't use their provider accounts. Could take one or two days. I will post the result. Thanks for your idea, Spyros! Norman ___ xmail mailing list xmail@xmailserver.org http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail
[xmail] Problem with PSYNC aborts
On Mon, 9 Aug 2010, xmail-l...@renergeteq.org wrote: There is the possibility to delete the mentioned message, sure. But what if there's a new one? How to get the XMail server to a reliable operation? I'm out of ideas now... Thank you in advance for your help. Can you show the 32MB message headers, and the PSYNC line you use to fetch such account from? - Davide Okay, here is it: pop3links.tab "mydomain.local"[TAB]"localusername"[TAB]"external.provider-server.net"[TAB]"external.usern...@provider.net"[TAB]"crypted_password"[TAB]"APOP,Leave"[RET] It's almost impossible that there is a mistake in pop3links.tab, because it's working for other users (without this amount of messages) until it comes to this "magic" mail. The user message quota on the system is at 100 GB. There was a mistake by me: The message number is 699 at the provider's server and has a size of 36356049 Bytes, resp. 36,35 MB. Windows Live Mail is fully able to fetch all Email of this account. XMail breaks always reproducable. This is the header by telnet session (without confidential data an names): LIST 699 +OK 699 36356049 TOP 699 0 +OK Message follows Return-Path: Received: from mailin07.aul.t-online.de (mailin07.aul.t-online.de [172.20.27.45]) by mhead403 (Cyrus v2.3.15-fun-3.2.2.1-1) with LMTPA; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 17:02:39 +0200 X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.3 Received: from mailx.domain.net ([123.45.678.90]) by mailin07.aul.t-online.de with esmtp id 1O1hdI-0SIf4q0; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 17:02:32 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailx.domain.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E1DB5E07A for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 17:02:26 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=x tagged_above=-5 required=5 tests=[] Received: from dmkas03-backup.domain.intern (unknown [123.456.78.901]) by mailx.domain.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF3EE5E077 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 17:01:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from DMKAS03-BACKUP.domain.intern ([10.0.0.189]) by dmkas03-backup ([10.0.0.189]) with mapi; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 17:01:39 +0200 From: "Name, Some" To: "Name, Asecond" , "Name, Another" , 'Addressed Person' , "Name, Athird" CC: "Name, Afourth" , "Name, Afifth" Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 17:01:29 +0200 Subject: 12345678_DOCNAM_Est.doc Thread-Topic: 12345678_DOCNAM_Est.doc Thread-Index: AcrbGjFpzOaPx8oUSM2ooomilJsNHg== Message-ID: <2da44f945718824e8bd50a2c35ac9beb14738f2...@dmkas03-backup> Accept-Language: de-DE Content-Language: de-DE X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: de-DE Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_004_2DA44F945718824E8BD50A2C35AC9BEB14738F2398dmkas03backup_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TOI-SPAM: u;0;2010-04-13T15:02:39Z X-TOI-VIRUSSCAN: unchecked X-TOI-MSGID: e9bf14db-e54d-4eec-80d7-36a4966c99c2 X-Seen: false X-ENVELOPE-TO: .. Any idea what's wrong with it?? This is the header of the last mail (on provider's server) that XMail can fetch from the provider and that i can find in the mailfolder: TOP 698 0 +OK Message follows Return-Path: Received: from fwd05.aul.t-online.de (fwd05.aul.t-online.de [172.20.27.149]) by mhead403 (Cyrus v2.3.15-fun-3.2.2.1-1) with LMTPA; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 13:44:03 +0200 X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.3 Received: from some.local (vut9k4zggtpda9uh5msx2zj9eyigkn7juhrzr35-9tivrpog8mils-c9t0k5-mm16hfkcse...@[12.34.567.89]) by fwd05.webpage.t-com.de with esmtp id 1O1eX7-1Fg2Yy0; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 13:43:57 +0200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="_=_NextPart_001_01CADAFE.998A5EA2"; type="multipart/alternative" Subject: WG: some topic; some name Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 13:43:56 +0200 Message-ID: <8549547f93135c4089335e79628096ed1c5...@some-w2k3-ex.some.local> X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: some topic; some name Thread-Index: Acra3L2D8GmS1+EyRYCipVrHHA3/MgABeZlQAAY3QpAAALiT4A== From: "Any Body [Any-Companyname]" To: "Addressed Person" X-ID: VUt9k4ZGgtpda9uh5Msx2Zj9EyIgkN7JUHRZR35-9tIVRPoG8mILS-C9T0k5-mM16HFKcSepeR X-TOI-SPAM: u;0;2010-04-13T11:44:03Z X-TOI-VIRUSSCAN: unchecked X-TOI-MSGID: a1725d8b-836c-4c5e-8aad-e381c8a45f5b X-Seen: false X-ENVELOPE-TO: .. I hope you can help me with this problem. Regards, Norman ___ xmail mailing list xmail@xmailserver.org http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail
[xmail] Problem with PSYNC aborts
Hi all,
I have this problem with XMail server:
My setup is a local XMail server (v 1.27) with Dovecot for internal
email storage on an embedded NAS system "QNAP TS-459 Pro" on Intel Atom
platform. XMail polls mails of four user accounts from an external
provider server by PSYNC and leaves it at the provider's server
("APOP,Leave" in "pop3links.tab"). Three of these accounts are working
fine, but for one account the PSYNC aborts always at the same message on
the provider's server and at the next PSYNC cycle it doesn't start
again, respectively breaks at the same message.
The concerning message on the provider's server is about 32 MBytes (with
attachment) and has the number of 870 (by manually looking with telnet
on the provider's POP3-server). The user has a total number of over 2200
messages on the provider's server.
How can i get the user account to work? Maybe the message size is the
problem?
I even tried to increase the PSYNC interval (-Yi command line option) to
some hours for excluding timing problems, but this doesn't work, too.
There is the possibility to delete the mentioned message, sure. But what
if there's a new one? How to get the XMail server to a reliable
operation? I'm out of ideas now...
Thank you in advance for your help.
Best Regards,
Norman
___
xmail mailing list
xmail@xmailserver.org
http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail
[xmail] Problem with PSYNC aborts
Hi all,
I have this problem with XMail server:
My setup is a local XMail server (v 1.27) with Dovecot for internal
email storage on an embedded NAS system "QNAP TS-459 Pro" on Intel Atom
platform. XMail polls mails of four user accounts from an external
provider server by PSYNC and leaves it at the provider's server
("APOP,Leave" in "pop3links.tab"). Three of these accounts are working
fine, but for one account the PSYNC aborts always at the same message on
the provider's server and at the next PSYNC cycle it doesn't start
again, respectively breaks at the same message.
The concerning message on the provider's server is about 32 MBytes (with
attachment) and has the number of 870 (by manually looking with telnet
on the provider's POP3-server). The user has a total number of over 2200
messages on the provider's server.
How can i get the user account to work? Maybe the message size is the
problem?
I even tried to increase the PSYNC interval (-Yi command line option) to
some hours for excluding timing problems, but this doesn't work, too.
There is the possibility to delete the mentioned message, sure. But what
if there's a new one? How to get the XMail server to a reliable
operation? I'm out of ideas now...
Thank you in advance for your help.
Best Regards,
Norman
___
xmail mailing list
xmail@xmailserver.org
http://xmailserver.org/mailman/listinfo/xmail
[xmail] Re: XMail + SSL patch
Am 9.9.2005 schrieb "Adrian Hicks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >You might consider using stunnel. I think it's available for Windows >(definitely for GNU/Linux). Yes it is! Can be found here: http://www.stunnel.org/download/binaries.html But using stunnel is preferred using SSL secured IRC connections - I'm not sure it works in this case. -- Regards, Alexander 'xaitax' Hagenah http://xmail.topconcepts.net - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Backup Server Revisited
Thanks for all the feedback guys, much appreciated! I believe I have the problem solved. I have configured my backup server as advised Bill, but have also added a rule to forward all mail to a third party email address. The reason I've done this is because if my client goes offline for a long period of time (perhaps a couple of days) the the mail will be lost, correct? I have been unable to find a setting to make the backup server try indefinately until it is answered, without doing the same to normal undeliverable messages on other domains. Can I set a domain-specific rule? Other than this, the setup seems to be working perfectly fine! Thanks! P.S. I am using XMail Manager 1.0a to manage most of my servers. I find this to be excellent software and well worth the $49US! There's a free version to, but it doesn't have the fancy bits. http://www.encenia.com/products/default.asp - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Backup server
Hi all! I have recently set up a bit of an ad-hoc backup system for a client's server. The best way to explain what I've done is to do it in sections. DNS Records for my client's domain: youdontneedtoknow.com.au. MX IN 3600 mail.youdontneedtoknow.com.au. [Preference = 10] youdontneedtoknow.com.au. MX IN 3600 mail.blits.com.au. [Preference = 5000] His server: is set up just as any Joe Blog would have their server set up My server: has youdontneedtoknow.com.au entered as a domain name and a single user under it. This user has an alias of *, is set to store messages and then forward them on to a third party email address. The idea? If his server goes down, mine catches the mail until it comes back online. We can sort the mess out later :-) The problem? I like my client, and I want to send him emails. But every time I do, they end up in the third party email account. Obviously this is because I'm using my server as an SMTP server and it's seeing the address internally and not feeling the need to look any further. How can I solve this without changing my outgoing server every time I want to send him mail? Thankyou in advance!!! Liam - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: xmail quota in user.tab not working
Setting the quota to 0 will make it unlimited. How are you modifying this? through the console or just the text file? If the text file, have you tried reloading xmail? - Original Message - From: "jonn ah" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2005 6:57 PM Subject: [xmail] xmail quota in user.tab not working > > > Hi, > > > > I have set quotas in my user's users.tab file but it doesnt seem to work. > I verified it by making MaxMBSize= "4096". but my mailbox size now is at a > whopping 10456.1. I've also tried setting it to "0" but i can still > receive mail. > > > > Any help is appreciated > > > > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: AW: emails to list sent several times
I only sent this message once. I did send a similar message to the same thread. I was specifically writing about for example the messages from ck today or the recent messages from Shawn Anderson which have both appeared twice. -Original Message- From: Sönke Ruempler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 11:36 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [xmail] Re: AW: emails to list sent several times > I am receiving multiple copies of some of the messages sent to the > xmail mailing list. Is anyone else experiencing this problem? You sent this mail twice, the message ids aren't the same: 82339E0D2BA5F144A6887F682C4FB71F9C61 82339E0D2BA5F144A6887F682C4FB71F9C62 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: AW: emails to list sent several times
I am receiving multiple copies of some of the messages sent to the xmail mailing list. Is anyone else experiencing this problem? -Original Message- From: Harald Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 11:26 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [xmail] AW: emails to list sent several times Maybe those list members sit on an Exchange server. There is a known problem with Exchange's POP3 connector, causing this multiple posts. For more info see http://xmailforum.homelinux.net/index.php?showtopic=3D1658 --Harald > -Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht- > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Roman Dusek > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 19. Mai 2004 17:13 > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Betreff: [xmail] emails to list sent several times =20 =20 Hi, =20 >from time to time it happens that mail sent to a mailing list=20 is >delivered=20 several times to some of the mailing list members. Here >are=20 the smtp-log=20 file records for such a mailing: >=20 > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"=09 > "SA272" "RCPT=3DOK"=20 > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "0" "" > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"=09 > "SA272" "RECV=3DOK"=20 > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "527406""" >=20 > and smail-log records for one user ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) of the=20 mailing >list=20 > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): >=20 > "backhost.iclub.cz" "1084968706189.1000.backhost" "SA272"=20 > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "SMTP"=09 > "smtp.userisp.cz."=20 > "2004-05-19 14:10:46" > "backhost.iclub.cz" "1084969185473.2280.backhost" "SA272"=20 > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "SMTP"=09 > "smtp.userisp.cz."=20 > "2004-05-19 14:18:27" > "backhost.iclub.cz" "1084969696825.2264.backhost" "SA272"=20 > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "SMTP"=09 > "smtp.userisp.cz."=20 > "2004-05-19 14:27:03" > "backhost.iclub.cz" "1084970241958.2148.backhost" "SA272"=20 > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "SMTP"=09 > "smtp.userisp.cz."=20 > "2004-05-19 14:36:03" > "backhost.iclub.cz" "1084970817971.1700.backhost" "SA272"=20 > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "SMTP"=09 > "smtp.userisp.cz."=20 > "2004-05-19 14:45:47" > "backhost.iclub.cz" "1084971443127.2276.backhost" "SA272"=20 > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "SMTP"=09 > "smtp.userisp.cz."=20 > "2004-05-19 14:56:08" > "backhost.iclub.cz" "1084972100379.2280.backhost" "SA272"=20 > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "SMTP"=09 > "smtp.userisp.cz."=20 > "2004-05-19 15:07:01" > "backhost.iclub.cz" "1084972788812.1000.backhost" "SA272"=20 > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "SMTP"=09 > "smtp.userisp.cz."=20 > "2004-05-19 15:18:34" > "backhost.iclub.cz" "1084973525534.1700.backhost" "SA272"=20 > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "SMTP"=09 > "smtp.userisp.cz."=20 > "2004-05-19 15:30:47" > "backhost.iclub.cz" "1084974310746.2272.backhost" "SA272"=20 > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "SMTP"=09 > "smtp.userisp.cz."=20 > "2004-05-19 15:43:53" > "backhost.iclub.cz" "1084975144026.1700.backhost" "SA272"=20 > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "SMTP"=09 > "smtp.userisp.cz."=20 > "2004-05-19 15:57:48" > "backhost.iclub.cz" "1084976024829.2272.backhost" "SA272"=20 > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "SMTP"=09 > "smtp.userisp.cz."=20 > "2004-05-19 16:20:41" >=20 > This happens on XMail 1.18, no filters. >=20 > What could be the problem? >=20 > I'm not sure if there is some relevance, but I have seen via=20 XMail >Queue=20 Manager similar multiplicated messages in "resend" state >due=20 to a temporary=20 delivery error. Can this situation cause the >problem? >=20 > Thanks, > Roman >=20 > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in >the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: >send the line "help" in the body of a message to >[EMAIL PROTECTED] =20 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: AW: emails to list sent several times
I am also receiving multiple emails for the list -Original Message- From: Harald Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 11:26 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [xmail] AW: emails to list sent several times Maybe those list members sit on an Exchange server. There is a known problem with Exchange's POP3 connector, causing this multiple posts. For more info see http://xmailforum.homelinux.net/index.php?showtopic=3D1658 --Harald > -Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht- > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Roman Dusek > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 19. Mai 2004 17:13 > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Betreff: [xmail] emails to list sent several times =20 =20 Hi, =20 >from time to time it happens that mail sent to a mailing list=20 is >delivered=20 several times to some of the mailing list members. Here >are=20 the smtp-log=20 file records for such a mailing: >=20 > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"=09 > "SA272" "RCPT=3DOK"=20 > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "0" "" > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"=09 > "SA272" "RECV=3DOK"=20 > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "527406""" >=20 > and smail-log records for one user ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) of the=20 mailing >list=20 > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): >=20 > "backhost.iclub.cz" "1084968706189.1000.backhost" "SA272"=20 > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "SMTP"=09 > "smtp.userisp.cz."=20 > "2004-05-19 14:10:46" > "backhost.iclub.cz" "1084969185473.2280.backhost" "SA272"=20 > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "SMTP"=09 > "smtp.userisp.cz."=20 > "2004-05-19 14:18:27" > "backhost.iclub.cz" "1084969696825.2264.backhost" "SA272"=20 > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "SMTP"=09 > "smtp.userisp.cz."=20 > "2004-05-19 14:27:03" > "backhost.iclub.cz" "1084970241958.2148.backhost" "SA272"=20 > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "SMTP"=09 > "smtp.userisp.cz."=20 > "2004-05-19 14:36:03" > "backhost.iclub.cz" "1084970817971.1700.backhost" "SA272"=20 > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "SMTP"=09 > "smtp.userisp.cz."=20 > "2004-05-19 14:45:47" > "backhost.iclub.cz" "1084971443127.2276.backhost" "SA272"=20 > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "SMTP"=09 > "smtp.userisp.cz."=20 > "2004-05-19 14:56:08" > "backhost.iclub.cz" "1084972100379.2280.backhost" "SA272"=20 > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "SMTP"=09 > "smtp.userisp.cz."=20 > "2004-05-19 15:07:01" > "backhost.iclub.cz" "1084972788812.1000.backhost" "SA272"=20 > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "SMTP"=09 > "smtp.userisp.cz."=20 > "2004-05-19 15:18:34" > "backhost.iclub.cz" "1084973525534.1700.backhost" "SA272"=20 > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "SMTP"=09 > "smtp.userisp.cz."=20 > "2004-05-19 15:30:47" > "backhost.iclub.cz" "1084974310746.2272.backhost" "SA272"=20 > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "SMTP"=09 > "smtp.userisp.cz."=20 > "2004-05-19 15:43:53" > "backhost.iclub.cz" "1084975144026.1700.backhost" "SA272"=20 > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "SMTP"=09 > "smtp.userisp.cz."=20 > "2004-05-19 15:57:48" > "backhost.iclub.cz" "1084976024829.2272.backhost" "SA272"=20 > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "SMTP"=09 > "smtp.userisp.cz."=20 > "2004-05-19 16:20:41" >=20 > This happens on XMail 1.18, no filters. >=20 > What could be the problem? >=20 > I'm not sure if there is some relevance, but I have seen via=20 XMail >Queue=20 Manager similar multiplicated messages in "resend" state >due=20 to a temporary=20 delivery error. Can this situation cause the >problem? >=20 > Thanks, > Roman >=20 > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in >the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: >send the line "help" in the body of a message to >[EMAIL PROTECTED] =20 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Xmail reports -- anyone have a wish list?
Shawn, Would it be possible to abstract the db layer? Many of us already run many different DB's and would prefer not to have to add another. -Original Message- From: Shawn Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, May 16, 2004 11:38 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [xmail] Re: Xmail reports -- anyone have a wish list? Wow! I hat not idea I would start such a debate :) Here is the thing of it all: I have spent somewhere between 18 and 20 years writing code. I have written in C/C++, Perl, Pascal, Cobol, PowerBuilder and a ton of other that are barely worth mentioning :) Each and every one has its plus and minus :) Will I use Perl to do this? Nope, to be honest I really cannot stand Perl's syntax. It is an awesome language and I have written tons of code in it -- but I still don't like the syntax, especially when dealing with objects. That's just my opinion. Will I use C/C++ for this? Not unless there is a HUGE cry for me to switch to it. Why? Because as great as the language is, I have to write all the parsing code by hand, all the config code by hand, all the rendering code by hand, etc etc etc. It's a pain :) and time consuming -- and time is something most of us probably have little to spare. So why did I pick .NET and C#? Because the CLR is an awesome run time library with built in support for everything a developer could possible want in a base library. No need to deal with installing extra libraries, no need to download extra code (Anyone ever try to get a CPAN component to work in Windows, not an easy thing without a compiler also installed). With all that said -- now for a progress up date :) All of the core code is written. I have a log importer that takes all the log files and imports them into an embedded database. I picked SQLite (http://www.sqlite.org/) because it is free, open source, and ported to windows and many unix systems. Once the logs are in the internal database, it is possible to run SQL command against it. So I wrote a reporting engine that will query that database and generate the reports that we have all been looking for. I took this approach for a bunch of reasons, so I hope you will like the idea. All that I have left is to finish the actual queries on the data and then the rendering of the output. Once I have a few basic reports done I will start posting some output and looking for some people to help me test it. Also something that is worth noting, this report system will allow anyone to add any reports that they can come up with -- all you will need to do is be able to write your own SQL queries and edit/create your own config file. All of with is done with a command line application, a few parameters, and a config file. If there is enough interest, I may be willing to create a webservice that can be called to execute and return the reports -- but I will leave that for a little later. Shawn -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Davide Libenzi Sent: Sunday, May 16, 2004 9:47 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [xmail] Re: Xmail reports -- anyone have a wish list? On Mon, 17 May 2004, Michal Altair Valasek wrote: [...] Guys, when you go at those MS workshops, you DO NOT have to drink that coffee! Now more than ever it is clear to me that it contains some sort of poison, that you might even like if you're going for a rave, but it definitely has a very long hang-over :-) - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Embeded perl filters for XMail
I run the scopee 2.02 release and have been running this for almost a year now. Iit really takes the load off sa in particular and some of the additional procedure have been pretty straight forward to implement and extend, even for someone who HATES perl. This was my original thoughs when forwarding Thomas Loo's info to the list earlier. If Beau has done something similar and or better it might be good for them to get together and merge the concepts. Scopee is a perl program run as a service and doesn't have the c wrapper on the service side of things but uses a c sockets program to call to the perl server application. -Original Message- From: Davide Libenzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 6:40 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [xmail] Re: Embeded perl filters for XMail On Thu, 6 May 2004, Beau E. Cox wrote: > On Thursday 06 May 2004 11:57 am, Davide Libenzi wrote: > > On Thu, 6 May 2004, Beau E. Cox wrote: > > > I'm really not trying to BS anyone. OK, I'll make a new filter: > > > 'mod_xmail', that tcp's to a server 'mod_xmaild' which will > > > implement my perl embedding. To use mod_xmail, simply change the > > > filter's .tab from: > > > > > > "/where/ever/my_filter.pl"[TAB]"@@WHATEVER"[TAB]... > > > > > > to: > > > > > > > > >"/where/ever/mod_email"[TAB]"/where/ever/my_filter.pl"[TAB]"@@WHATE > > >VER"[T > > >AB]... > > > > > > I will get back to everyone soon with timings. > > > > Ouch, since it seemed to me that someone already implemented my old > > idea ... > > > > http://www.saltstorm.net/depo/scopee/ > > > > > > > > - Davide > > > > Yep. Bye (I had fun anyway ;) ). Did anyone actually tried to compare performances? - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Embeded perl filters for XMail
This seems similar to another project I saw called SCOPEE that Thomas Loo was working on. Maybe you guys can collaborate and make each one better. -Original Message- From: Davide Libenzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2004 3:22 PM To: XMail mailing list Subject: [xmail] Re: Embeded perl filters for XMail On Wed, 5 May 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi - > > Last year I developed a library of c functions to embed the perl > interpreter into c/c++ applications. After several successful > deployments, I decided to try to 'embed' perl in the XMail server. > > It works! I have been running it on my personal XMail server for > several days and have yet to encounter problems. There's a better solution that does not involve tweaking the XMail source code. You have one (or more) pre-loaded Perl interpreters running as servers bound on certain TCP ports, and you have a very small binary (cperl, written in C using sockets) that talks a trivial protocol with the Perl interpreters. You "external" command call will change from: "perl /home/davide/myscript.pl" to: "cperl -s localhost -p 17171 /home/davide/myscript.pl" If the script is not already loaded in the interpreter, it will be at client connection time. Do I have to proceed? :-) - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: announce : XAV has been updated.
[XMail AntiVirus Filter] ; ## Debug mode to write out parameters while trouble occurs. XAVDebug=2 XAVMessage=Your message was rejected by DOLIST.NET XAV Antivirus Filter. Check your computer. [Multipart Decoder] ; -- Product Mimeqp ; -- Homepage http://www.simtel.net/product.php?url_fb_product_page=43209 ;DecoderPath=h:\xav\mpack\mimeqp.exe ; -- Product Munpack ; -- Homepage ftp://ftp.andrew.cmu.edu:pub/mpack/ ;DecoderPath=c:\xav\mpack\munpack.exe ;DecoderCommand= ;DecoderRemoveUNC=0 ;DecoderReturn=1 ; -- Product UUDeview DecoderPath=d:\xav\uudeview\uudeview.exe ; -- Homepage http://www.fpx.de/fp/Software/UUDeview/ DecoderCommand=-i -a -d -o -q DecoderRemoveUNC=1 [AVG AntiVirus] ; -- AVG 6.0 Free Edition ; -- Product home page: http://www.grisoft.com ; ## AntivirusReturn is the code returned by the AV Software when a virus is detected. ;AntivirusPath="c:\program files\grisoft\avg6\avgscan.exe" ;AntivirusCommand=. /comp /nomem /nohimem /noself /arc /rt ;AntivirusReturn=6 ; -- F-Prot Antivirus for DOS ; -- Product home page: http://www.f-prot.com/ AntivirusPath=d:\f-prot\f-prot.exe AntivirusCommand=/COLLECT /DUMB /AI /ARCHIVE /NOBOOT /NOMEM /PACKED /NOFLOPPY /SILENT AntivirusReturn=3 ; -- F-Prot Antivirus for Windows ; -- Product home page: http://www.f-prot.com/ ;AntivirusPath="C:\Program Files\FSI\F-Prot\fpcmd.exe" ;AntivirusCommand=-COLLECT -DUMB -AI -ARCHIVE -PACKED ;AntivirusReturn=3 ; -- Product mcafee virus scanner -- commercial product -- ; -- Homepage http://www.nai.com ;AntivirusPath=c:\progra~1\common~1\networ~1\viruss~1\4.0.xx\scan.exe ;AntivirusCommand=/analyze /append /nobreak /nomem /program /report c:\virus.rpt /silent /all ;AntivirusReturn=13 ; -- Sophos AV ; -- Product home page: http://www.sophos.com ; -- Please note: XMail service must be started as a local user or sav32cli will not work (Bhozar) ;AntivirusPath="C:\Program Files\Sophos SWEEP for NT\SAV32CLI.EXE" ;AntivirusCommand= -ss -archive ;AntivirusReturn=3 This is my xav.ini can you tell me where I have missed something? -Original Message- From: DOLIST Technical Center [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 5:22 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [xmail] Re: announce : XAV has been updated. Bonjour, Friday, April 2, 2004, 4:59:25 PM, Xmail wrote: > I updated the xav to the newest from the website and I still have the > process hanging and eventually the messages continue to the > destination with virus intact. If it hangs, most of time, it's because parameters to the virus scanner are not set to "quiet" or is waiting for something, so XAV wait the child process to be completed to continue, and the script finaly times out (I don't remember this value). > I currently have over a 100 processes on our test server (one for > every test message we fed it) I understand that, but you should have missed something somewhere. Regards, -- DOLIST Technical Center __ DOLIST.NET, Internet E-mail List Server Technology DOLIST information at : http://www.dolist.net - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: announce : XAV has been updated.
I updated the xav to the newest from the website and I still have the process hanging and eventually the messages continue to the destination with virus intact. I currently have over a 100 processes on our test server (one for every test message we fed it) -Original Message- From: DOLIST Technical Center [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 9:06 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [xmail] Re: announce : XAV has been updated. Bonjour, Friday, April 2, 2004, 3:34:01 PM, DOLIST Technical Center wrote: > I will ask the "doc" to be modified to explain the entry in .ini It has been done, the temp folder process rewritten and some code cleanup. Enjoy! Have all a great week-end. Regards, -- DOLIST Technical Center __ DOLIST.NET, Internet E-mail List Server Technology DOLIST information at : http://www.dolist.net - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: announce : XAV has been updated.
Rob, We tried the same things (modify the included ini file, modify the return code in the xav.tab that is called by filters.out.tab and filters.in.tab) On our server, when we try to use XAV. 1) the temp directories under the xav tree never disappear. 2) the xav.exe processes never end 3) the emails end up at the destination with the virus still intact I would be interested in any resolution that gets worked out. Thanks David -Original Message- From: Rob Arends [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 7:34 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [xmail] Re: announce : XAV has been updated. I agree, the "you missed something" is not a good start. How hard can it be to take an existing working xav setup (as noted 22/08/2003 version of exe) and replace the exe with a newer one. Also verify and update if needed, the ini file for any new options. In the latest xav.zip I also tried the new de-mime package included in the zip. I even tried the supplied ini, with mods to paths only. I checked the debug output of both xav and xmail. I can see xmail launch xav, I can see the xav launch uudeview & AVG, and then return to xmail with RC=0. What would be useful is the debug of xav to output the actual RC that it got from AVG, at the moment it only shows what it expects to get if there is a virus. I have done this for each new version DOLIST has put out and each and every version after 22/08/2003 fails to return anything other than RC=0. I have then returned to the original xav.exe and re-tested, and the virus is found. Most times I have not returned to the original ini, just left the updated one in place, because there is nothing significant changed. As it seems that there are a few of us out here with problems with xav, could you put out a version with more verbose logging. This will help to identify where the problem is. You are welcome to mail me off list and we can report back to the list when there is a solution. Rob :-) PS. It would be nice to have a version number in your distro. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of DOLIST Technical Center Sent: Wednesday, 31 March 2004 7:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [xmail] Re: announce : XAV has been updated. Bonjour Rob, You should have missed something somewhere. We have more than 8000 message in keep directory at this time since yesterday with this version, and last recent worms with AVG are filtered out, and under XMAIL 1.18. Good luck :) Tuesday, March 30, 2004, 5:46:19 PM, Rob Arends wrote: > Have installed, tested with eicar (it failed to stop the email), and > reverted back to 22/08/2003 version. This is the last version that > works on my system. > Whatever DOLIST did after the 22/08/2003 version, it has it broken here. > The xmail debug shows Retcode=0 on the filter. So xav is either not > finding a virus or not setting the retcode properly. I have tested > AVG on the uudeviewed folder and it finds the eicar virus as expected. > So it must be failing to set the retcode. > I thought the new version might have a fix, but alas no. > My system is w2k sp4 / xmail 1.17 running flawlessly for a many months > now (so long since I had to fiddle, I can't remember). And of course XAV. > Btw, this new version leaves tmp* folders behind. > Rob :-) > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of DOLIST Technical > Center > Sent: Tuesday, 30 March 2004 11:24 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [xmail] announce : XAV has been updated. > http://software.dolist.net/xav.asp > We use now UUDeview that works much better than munpack on MIME > decoding and support UUDeview supports the uuencoding, xxencoding, > Base64 and BinHex encoding methods, and is able to handle split-files > (which have been sent in multiple parts) as well as multiple files at > once, thus greatly simplifying the decoding process > XAV has been tested with these softwares. If you have parameters for > AV and decoder softwares not listed in xav.ini, please send it to us > to update and make it available for others. > Antivirus softwares > --- > AVG 6.0 Server Edition. > F-Prot Antivirus for DOS. > F-Prot Antivirus for Windows. > mcafee virus scanner. > Sophos AV. > MIME decoder softwares > -- > mpack/munpack for DOS. > UUDeview for DOS (in the package). > MimeQP. > CORRECTIONS > --- > 09.mar.2004 - D.Olivier - Added log function. > 10.mar.2004 - D.Olivier - Use UUDEview instead of munpack. > 10.mar.2004 - D.Olivier - Add DecoderRemoveUNC= to xav.ini to delete > \\?\ from message path. > 16.oct.2003 - D.Olivier - Fixed problem with some temp directories. > Also added in .ini file entries to use MimeQP decoder and F-
[xmail] Re: PHP admin
The code is commented in the in the archive under docs is a readme that should give you some basics. Everything that you need to change is in the config.php file (the docs call it config.inc but this will change if it hasn't already in the version you are running) The 1.13 version filters configuration doesn't work well I don't think (I am running a beta version so I don't know which versions are on the website at the moment). I have modified my version a bit. Review the config file and let me know and I will see if I cant answer questions for you. -Original Message- From: Dustin Krysak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 3:41 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [xmail] Re: PHP admin ok, I had found no documentation, so i was not aware of this file - I changed the IP in there, and I can now log-on. Is there any kind of documentation on this product? and what the settings do? d On 30-Mar-04, at 4:16 PM, Xmail wrote: > Can you ping the address 127.0.0.1? Do you have the xmail ctrl > protocol > bound to this address at 6017? Have you verified the settings in your > xpai > config.php file? Is the server address and port in the servers array? > Is > the xpai control user in your ctrlaccounts.tab file? > -Original Message- > From: Dustin Krysak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 1:47 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [xmail] Re: PHP admin > > Well when i try to log-on with the control account, it just says " > Network is unreachable" It is running on the same box as xmail. > > Dustin > > > On 29-Mar-04, at 6:38 PM, Xmail wrote: > >> Dustin, >> What types of problems are you having? I have been using the xpai >> interface for a while now. >> The author of xpai I believe reads this forum and can be reached via >> email directly. I have found him to be very helpful. >> David >> -Original Message----- >> From: Dustin Krysak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 7:31 PM >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: [xmail] PHP admin >> >> Hi there - >> >> I was looking at some of the PHP admin interfaces on hte xmail >> homepage, does anyone know where the documentation is for either >> phpxmail or xpai? I am having issues with both - so I was hoping it >> read some documentation >> >> d >> >> - >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in >> the body >> of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the >> line >> "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in >> the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: announce : XAV has been updated.
Of what benefit is a "it works here!" response? I have also been unable to get the xav filter working but have just opted to using other filter method since I got no feedback on making it work. -Original Message- From: DOLIST Technical Center [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 4:48 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [xmail] Re: announce : XAV has been updated. Bonjour Rob, You should have missed something somewhere. We have more than 8000 message in keep directory at this time since yesterday with this version, and last recent worms with AVG are filtered out, and under XMAIL 1.18. Good luck :) Tuesday, March 30, 2004, 5:46:19 PM, Rob Arends wrote: > Have installed, tested with eicar (it failed to stop the email), and > reverted back to 22/08/2003 version. This is the last version that > works on my system. > Whatever DOLIST did after the 22/08/2003 version, it has it broken here. > The xmail debug shows Retcode=0 on the filter. So xav is either not > finding a virus or not setting the retcode properly. I have tested > AVG on the uudeviewed folder and it finds the eicar virus as expected. > So it must be failing to set the retcode. > I thought the new version might have a fix, but alas no. > My system is w2k sp4 / xmail 1.17 running flawlessly for a many months > now (so long since I had to fiddle, I can't remember). And of course XAV. > Btw, this new version leaves tmp* folders behind. > Rob :-) > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of DOLIST Technical > Center > Sent: Tuesday, 30 March 2004 11:24 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [xmail] announce : XAV has been updated. > http://software.dolist.net/xav.asp > We use now UUDeview that works much better than munpack on MIME > decoding and support UUDeview supports the uuencoding, xxencoding, > Base64 and BinHex encoding methods, and is able to handle split-files > (which have been sent in multiple parts) as well as multiple files at > once, thus greatly simplifying the decoding process > XAV has been tested with these softwares. If you have parameters for > AV and decoder softwares not listed in xav.ini, please send it to us > to update and make it available for others. > Antivirus softwares > --- > AVG 6.0 Server Edition. > F-Prot Antivirus for DOS. > F-Prot Antivirus for Windows. > mcafee virus scanner. > Sophos AV. > MIME decoder softwares > -- > mpack/munpack for DOS. > UUDeview for DOS (in the package). > MimeQP. > CORRECTIONS > --- > 09.mar.2004 - D.Olivier - Added log function. > 10.mar.2004 - D.Olivier - Use UUDEview instead of munpack. > 10.mar.2004 - D.Olivier - Add DecoderRemoveUNC= to xav.ini to delete > \\?\ from message path. > 16.oct.2003 - D.Olivier - Fixed problem with some temp directories. > Also added in .ini file entries to use MimeQP decoder and F-Prot. > 11.sep.2003 - D.Olivier - Added custom reject message (XAVMessage entry). > 22.aug.2003 - J.Laffitte - now, seems to run on major unix systems. > 19.aug.2003 - J.Laffitte - Timestamp in log added. Debug mode enhanced > to log every message analyzed. > 08.aug.2003 - J.Laffitte - temporary files and its directories are > deleted in depth. Files in keep directory are named incrementaly if > the filename is already used. > 05.aug.2003 - J.Laffitte - replace the mkdir, chdir and rmdir > functions by their equivalents in win32 api : CreateDirectory, > SetCurrentDirectory and RemoveDirectory. > 01.aug.2003 - Denis Olivier - update for public release. > 31.jul.2003 - Julien Laffitte (DOLIST.NET) - main and primary coding. > Sincerely, > -- > DOLIST Technical Center > __ > DOLIST.NET, Internet E-mail List Server Technology DOLIST information at : > http://www.dolist.net > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: > send the line "help" in the body of a message to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: > send the line "help" in the body of a message to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Best regards, -- DOLIST Technical Center __ DOLIST.NET, Internet E-mail List Server Technology DOLIST information at : http://www.dolist.net - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: PHP admin
Can you ping the address 127.0.0.1? Do you have the xmail ctrl protocol bound to this address at 6017? Have you verified the settings in your xpai config.php file? Is the server address and port in the servers array? Is the xpai control user in your ctrlaccounts.tab file? -Original Message- From: Dustin Krysak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 1:47 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [xmail] Re: PHP admin Well when i try to log-on with the control account, it just says " Network is unreachable" It is running on the same box as xmail. Dustin On 29-Mar-04, at 6:38 PM, Xmail wrote: > Dustin, > What types of problems are you having? I have been using the xpai > interface for a while now. > The author of xpai I believe reads this forum and can be reached via > email directly. I have found him to be very helpful. > David > -Original Message- > From: Dustin Krysak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 7:31 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [xmail] PHP admin > > Hi there - > > I was looking at some of the PHP admin interfaces on hte xmail > homepage, does anyone know where the documentation is for either > phpxmail or xpai? I am having issues with both - so I was hoping it > read some documentation > > d > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in > the body > of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line > "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: PHP admin
Dustin, What types of problems are you having? I have been using the xpai interface for a while now. The author of xpai I believe reads this forum and can be reached via email directly. I have found him to be very helpful. David -Original Message- From: Dustin Krysak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 7:31 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [xmail] PHP admin Hi there - I was looking at some of the PHP admin interfaces on hte xmail homepage, does anyone know where the documentation is for either phpxmail or xpai? I am having issues with both - so I was hoping it read some documentation d - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[no subject]
xmailserver.org S10BF1B MAIL FROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <> Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 10:44:24 -0800 (PST) From: Davide Libenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Davide Libenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [xmail] Re: smtp - local error in processing (-31) In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Errors-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-original-sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Precedence: bulk Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-list: xmail On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I dont thing,after EHLO and smtp auth is everything ok. But if I am > trying through HELO and than MAIL TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] where > [EMAIL PROTECTED] is existing email account on my mail server. :-( 1st) 'MAIL TO:' does not exist inside the SMTP RFC 2nd) The format is 'MAIL FROM:<...>' and 'RCPT TO:<...>' - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Xmail SMTP Authentciation and ETRN
Not likely as these are all windows servers but I can try and get a libpcap capture from them if you think that would be helpful. I would like to know that the exchange server is sending the ID and password correctly myself... -Original Message- From: Davide Libenzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 6:22 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: [xmail] Re: Xmail SMTP Authentciation and ETRN On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Xmail wrote: > I am configuring the exchange 2000 SMTP connector to authenticate > against the server as it is what is forwarding mail. Can you get the output of "tcpdump -X -x" during the login transaction? - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Xmail SMTP Authentciation and ETRN
I am configuring the exchange 2000 SMTP connector to authenticate against the server as it is what is forwarding mail. -Original Message- From: Davide Libenzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 12:49 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: [xmail] Re: Xmail SMTP Authentciation and ETRN On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Xmail wrote: > "" "" "" "" "AUTH=EFAIL:TYPE=LOGIN" "" "0" > "" "" "" "" "AUTH=EFAIL:TYPE=LOGIN" "" "0" > > I get these types of entries when I try to use the pop user I created > for this test on the server to server connection Which client are you using to authenticate? - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Xmail SMTP Authentciation and ETRN
"" "" "" "" "AUTH=EFAIL:TYPE=LOGIN" "" "0" "" "" "" "" "AUTH=EFAIL:TYPE=LOGIN" "" "0" I get these types of entries when I try to use the pop user I created for this test on the server to server connection -Original Message- From: Davide Libenzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 11:28 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: [xmail] Re: Xmail SMTP Authentciation and ETRN On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, Xmail wrote: > Davide, > This is not for a locally hosted email domain, it is for a domain that > is to be delivered to via ETRN. Are you saying that I should create a > dummy user for them on a local domain that they use for > authentication? This is the server to server setting. Yes, just for a test ... - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Xmail SMTP Authentciation and ETRN
Davide, This is not for a locally hosted email domain, it is for a domain that is to be delivered to via ETRN. Are you saying that I should create a dummy user for them on a local domain that they use for authentication? This is the server to server setting. Thanks David -Original Message- From: Davide Libenzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 10:20 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: [xmail] Re: Xmail SMTP Authentciation and ETRN On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, Xmail wrote: > Hi Davide, > What am I doing wrong here? Seems like everything should work. > I am trying to setup a domain on my server so that one of my users who > hosts his server on a dynamic IP and send and receive mail for his > domain. The clients server is running Exchange 2000. > > My setup.... > > DNS points to my xmail server as the MX record Xmail server has a > custom domain tab file domain.tld.tab Inside the tab file is > "SMTPRELAY"[TAB]"system.dnsalias.com" pointing to the dynamic service > he is using > > In my smtpauth.tab file > "name"[TAB]"unencrypted password"[TAB]"MRTZ" Try to remove this entry and use a full email address plus POP3 passwd for authentication. - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Xmail SMTP Authentciation and ETRN
Hi Davide, What am I doing wrong here? Seems like everything should work. I am trying to setup a domain on my server so that one of my users who hosts his server on a dynamic IP and send and receive mail for his domain. The clients server is running Exchange 2000. My setup DNS points to my xmail server as the MX record Xmail server has a custom domain tab file domain.tld.tab Inside the tab file is "SMTPRELAY"[TAB]"system.dnsalias.com" pointing to the dynamic service he is using In my smtpauth.tab file "name"[TAB]"unencrypted password"[TAB]"MRTZ" Mail appears to be routing out to him but he cannot send mail. I have the outbound security on his server setup to use EHLO, and authenticate using the user ID and password from the name and password I added to the SMTPAUTH.TAB file. But I get the following entry in the smtp log when he connects. "fqdn.domain.tld" "domain header" "IP address""date time" "machine name connecting" "" "" "" "" "AUTH=EFAIL:TYPE=LOGIN" "" "0" HELP! Thanks David - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Xmail SMTP Authentciation and ETRN
Hi Davide, What am I doing wrong here? Seems like everything should work. I am trying to setup a domain on my server so that one of my users who hosts his server on a dynamic IP and send and receive mail for his domain. The clients server is running Exchange 2000. My setup DNS points to my xmail server as the MX record Xmail server has a custom domain tab file domain.tld.tab Inside the tab file is "SMTPRELAY"[TAB]"system.dnsalias.com" pointing to the dynamic service he is using In my smtpauth.tab file "name"[TAB]"unencrypted password"[TAB]"MRTZ" Mail appears to be routing out to him but he cannot send mail. I have the outbound security on his server setup to use EHLO, and authenticate using the user ID and password from the name and password I added to the SMTPAUTH.TAB file. But I get the following entry in the smtp log when he connects. "fqdn.domain.tld" "domain header" "IP address""date time" "machine name connecting" "" "" "" "" "AUTH=EFAIL:TYPE=LOGIN" "" "0" HELP! Thanks David - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Xmail SMTP Authentciation and ETRN
Hi, I am trying to setup a domain on my server so that one of my users who hosts his server on a dynamic IP and send and receive mail for his domain. My setup DNS points to my xmail server as the MX record Xmail server has a custom domain tab file domain.tld.tab Inside the tab file is "SMTPRELAY"[TAB]"system.dnsalias.com" pointing to the dynamic service he is using In my smtpauth.tab file "name"[TAB]"unencrypted password"[TAB]"MRTZ" Mail appears to be routing out to him but he cannot send mail. I have the outbound security on his server setup to use EHLO, and authenticate using the user ID and password from the name and password I added to the SMTPAUTH.TAB file. But I get the following entry in the smtp log when he connects. "fqdn.domain.tld" "domain header" "IP address""date time" "machine name connecting" "" "" "" "" "AUTH=EFAIL:TYPE=LOGIN" "" "0" Any ideas what I am doing wrong here? Thanks David - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: 1.12 -> 1.17
;-) I was going to give it a try, just wondering if you had tried. I do have encrypt/decrypt routines for maintaining xMail passwords Written in DBL if you are interested. Rich... www.autotraker.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bowen Moursund Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 10:39 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [xmail] Re: 1.12 -> 1.17 > Hi Bowen, > Did you write any filters in dBL? No, I'm using JavaScript/Windows Script. dBASE doesn't seem to me to be the appropriate tool for mail server scripts . Bowen Moursund - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: 1.12 -> 1.17
Hi Bowen, Did you write any filters in dBL? Rich... www.autotraker.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bowen Moursund Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2004 9:50 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [xmail] 1.12 -> 1.17 To upgrade from 1.12 to 1.17 on Windows, it appears to me that one must: 1. Add the filters.in.tab and filters.out.tab files. 2. Update filters for new return codes. 3. Replace XMail.exe. Am I missing anything? Bowen Moursund - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Problem with spool directory
I'm facing troubles running xmail in linux's. I don't know what exatally happens, but anyway xmail stops its function and does not send e-mails (but Ithink it goes recieving on). So is necessary to stop the program and delete the directory spool. Following is create new directory spool and reiniciate de service. Xmail is running under conective linux 6.0, and I intend to change it for slackware 9.1. Had anyone a problem like this? My version is 1.17 Thanks any aid - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: Outgoing mail with attachements times out.
Are you connecting to your xmail server through a DSL or cablemodem? Is this the case for all of your users? How are you connecting to your mail server? I had a problem similar and found that some ISP's (like Earthlink) filter port 25 outbound from their network. I had to setup my SMTP outbound server to be the nearest outbound smtp server to them rather than through my own server on some clients computers. -Original Message- From: Nick Marino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 7:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [xmail] Outgoing mail with attachements times out. Anyone have any idea's where to start looking when trying to send a message with an attachment I get errors that say my mail server did not respond and asks if I want to wait or stop. Server is Xmail 1.17 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: can not send mail from asp ?
Are you trying to use CDONTS to do mail? This is dependent on the MS SMTP service. You can either keep the MS-SMTP service on the box but running on an alternate port or you can take a look at some alternate ASP email script solutions like ASPEmail (www.aspemail.com) -Original Message- From: Jhon Wong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 9:34 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [xmail] Re: can not send mail from asp ? Hi,I can't believe what you said. Please tell us what ASP you are using. > Hi! > > I have xmail server on windows machine. Every thing seems fine except > I can not send email through ASP to local domains!! > > Please help > > Thanks > Junaid > > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: > send the line "help" in the body of a message to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: 1.15 to 1.16 update
> That message means that either your IP is mapped inside a CustMapsList or > your RDNS failed. Thanks Davide, It turns out that it was due to Osirusoft being down. Strange that it was only affecting some emails and not all. I took out the references to Osirusoft and everything went back to normal. It is interesting to note that 1.16/1.17 seemed to rejecting all mail while 1.15 was only rejecting some. This must have been due to changes you made in releases. When I went back to 1.15, I thought all was back to normal because I was no longer being rejected from my home IP, but we were still rejecting other emails that we should not have been rejecting. Thanks again Davide. Rich... www.autotraker.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] 1.16 to 1.16 update
I'm currently using version 1.15 with Windows 2k. (Thanks Davide) When I upgraded to 1.16, all I did was copy and replace the files in the bin directory. I've been doing an update this was though quite a few releases, adding any parameters or files that were new (such as the filters tab files) with no ill effects. Everything did seem to go fine this time also. The server came right up after a reboot. I didn't notice much difference since I'm currently not using filters and I don't believe there was much else that would effect my installation. I did however start seeing a slowdown when sending mail from my house and I have been getting a few complaints of bounces from my domain with "551 Server access forbidden by your IP". Yesterday after a week of being on 1.16, I started getting the same message from my home when sending messages. After playing around with the new smtp.ipprop.tab file and having everything bounce, I gave up and went back to 1.15. Everything is back the way it should be with 1.15. Is there something I should have done with the 1.16 update that I missed? Rich. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: relay settings; help
Thanks Bill. And more power to xmail. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Healy Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2003 6:36 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: [xmail] Re: relay settings; help All you need to do from the default files is empty the smtprelay.tab file. You don't want to add anything to the smtp.ipmap.tab or you will prevent other servers from sending you mail. Change the line in smtp.ipmap.tab to ALLOW. Is zeus.datacollege.edu.ph the xmail server? If it is then all you have to do is setup the domain and users and you will be able to accept mail for it. If it is not a domain on xmail but you want other servers to be able to relay through it then you should setup a custom domain for it and use the smtprelay command with the IP address of the actual zeus.datacollege.edu.ph e-mail server. Bill >-- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2003 12:01 AM >To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: [xmail] relay settings; help > > >Gentlemen, > I'm a newbie in xmail and I want to want my server to be >secured. > Please suggest to or correct my settings. > > smtprelay.tab - blank inside. > smtp.ipmap.tab > "0.0.0.0" "0.0.0.0" "DENY" 1 > > And also try if you can still make relaying to this server >"zeus.datacollege.edu.ph" > > Looking forward ... > >Alveda > > >--- >Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. >Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). >Version: 6.0.500 / Virus Database: 298 - Release Date: 7/10/2003 > > >- >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in >the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.500 / Virus Database: 298 - Release Date: 7/10/2003 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.500 / Virus Database: 298 - Release Date: 7/10/2003 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] relay settings; help
Gentlemen, I'm a newbie in xmail and I want to want my server to be secured. Please suggest to or correct my settings. smtprelay.tab - blank inside. smtp.ipmap.tab "0.0.0.0" "0.0.0.0" "DENY" 1 And also try if you can still make relaying to this server "zeus.datacollege.edu.ph" Looking forward ... Alveda --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.500 / Virus Database: 298 - Release Date: 7/10/2003 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] spammer.tab & spam-address.tab
Can I bring down to user level the SPAMMER.TAB & SPAM-ADDESS.TAB? Perhaps copy these two tab files to the folder of a user and serves as to block incoming ip's or addresses. Is it possible? Looking forward... Alvin - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[xmail] Re: SPAM and Porn Filters
I gave it a look, and two others too. Prior to going and hacking up my running server with a perl add-on and some extra lines of code in the config files, I was checking in for a preferred path. Are you running this setup and does it fare well? Larry W. Gerads -Original Message- From: Davide Libenzi [mailto:davidel@;xmailserver.org] Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 10:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [xmail] Re: SPAM and Porn Filters On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Network Larry (Xmail) wrote: > I have tried a couple filter add-on's without success and before I delve > in to deep on this I was wondering what was the consensus of the best > filtering set. I am running the latest Xmail server, on 2000 server, and > simply need to filter a set of spam words and a set of email addresses > (from). The server is not setup with any deliverable domains and/or pop > accounts, all domains are just forwarding domains. The entire project is to > setup a SPAM, porn email filter server for 20 or so domains. > > As always, any help is greatly appreciated and thank you! Did you try this : http://www.drakeconsult.com/xmail/ - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
