Make keyholes for handles? If you happen to need them slide them on.
Removeable. Keep 1 set in the go bag.
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 10:09 PM Forrest Christian (List Account) <
li...@packetflux.com> wrote:
> I'm wondering if anyone has strong opinions about handles on
> rackmount devices.
>
> I'm
I’d be fine without the handles.
2 cents
-Sean
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 11:09 PM Forrest Christian (List Account) <
li...@packetflux.com> wrote:
> I'm wondering if anyone has strong opinions about handles on
> rackmount devices.
>
> I'm in the process of switching the enclosure manufacturer on
I'm wondering if anyone has strong opinions about handles on
rackmount devices.
I'm in the process of switching the enclosure manufacturer on the
RackInjector and in the process making some design changes that should make
things better for both us and our customers. I don't want to share too
Sounds like he is looking for lead generation?
I assume he has ruled out (or is already doing) advertising like online, direct
mail, billboards, etc. Not sure how a salesperson would approach this, given
that small businesses generally hate cold calls. And knocking on doors won’t
be
I guess I don't understand why you would want to pay a salesperson with a
100% close rate. Why not spend the money on either front line phone
answering people or installers? If you have more than a 2 day wait list it
seems pointless to guess sales staff.
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020, 8:31 PM Matt Hoppes
Our pricing is location dependent so we don't want someone in the rural
areas to get pissy when they can't get city speeds. It's just easier to
hide it and provide it once we know their address.
I would say your base $50 plan is too cheap. I'd recommend making your
minimum $60 to $65. It'll have
I can't get to that website and I'm out of the country may be a DNS server
or WAN IP you purchased from someone else and it resolves to outside the
U.S?
I have a public WAN with google DNS
On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 2:10 AM Steve Jones
wrote:
> I never really thought about that, I figured it was
I know you don’t believe it but it’s true.
I see you don’t include pricing on your website. We do. I suspect that
contributes to some of the difference.
When people call us they’ve already looked at the webpage and aren’t so much
calling for pricing as much as calling to get service.
> On
Matt,
Plenty of people call who are price shopping. They're paying $30 to $55 per
month with a competitor for worse service. But they call and ask if we can
offer faster service for the same or less money. We give them our pricing
and if it's $1 more than what they have now, they go radio silent.
With the underlying license.
There is something weird there though - a few WinnForum presentations have the
GPWZ’s expiring by 2023. I’m guessing that is when the last of the licenses
that have GWPZ’s expire even though there are NN licenses that last longer.
I’m guessing none of those
Not exaggerated.
Folks who call us are ready to dump Comcast. It’s barely a sell and more a
schedule of when we can get there.
Same with businesses who call. They already made their mind up they want us
when they call.
I’m trying to drum up sales for folks who haven’t called or don’t know
Mark,
Do the GPWZ areas expire on April 17th 2020 also? Or they expire whenever
the grandfathered NN license expires?
-sean
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 5:01 PM Mark Radabaugh wrote:
>
>
> > On Jan 27, 2020, at 2:20 PM, Adam Moffett wrote:
> >
> > <>
> >
> > In theory you could argue that a
I have to assume you're exaggerating with a 100% close rate. That's
literally not possible.
Looking at our stats of current and canceled subs, then comparing it to
serviceable subs who didn't go with us, we're at a 65% close rate for
residential. Very fair in my opinion. We are definitely not
Wow... Sounds like you are to cheap. Just kidding. I assume you have little
to no completion.
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020, 6:29 PM Matt Hoppes
wrote:
> Our close ratio of leads we get is 100%. So not likely. This person would
> be drumming up new leads that are not organically coming in.
>
> On Jan
Our close ratio of leads we get is 100%. So not likely. This person would be
drumming up new leads that are not organically coming in.
> On Jan 27, 2020, at 7:16 PM, Lewis Bergman wrote:
>
> I would hope an effective sales person in the position you describe could
> triple the close ratio of
I would hope an effective sales person in the position you describe could
triple the close ratio of the leads you get currently and generate a few
every month you are not currently seeing.
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020, 6:06 PM Matt Hoppes
wrote:
> We are looking at hiring a commercial sales rep.
>
>
We are looking at hiring a commercial sales rep.
Their job would be to sell direct to larger businesses dedicated fiber internet
service.
Assuming a sales area the size of Pennsylvania - is it reasonable to assume a
closed sale count for business fiber customers of 4-6 accounts per month?
--
> On Jan 27, 2020, at 2:20 PM, Adam Moffett wrote:
>
> <>
>
> In theory you could argue that a grandfathered NN license protects you from
> interference from a CBRS operator, but a person better make sure they don't
> have any of those "bodies in the trunk" if they try to call the FCC for
Yeah, Mike did live in Naperville. I forget at times that there's a cluster of
people on the list that know where Naperville is.
I've worked with Liz as well. I've attached her information here.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers
I don't think anyone WANTS to stick with Part 90, it's just that 2 months isn't
enough time to transition a bunch of sites and customers. The starting line
moved like 5 years and the finish line didn't move.
-Original Message-
From: AF On Behalf Of Adam Moffett
Sent: Monday, January
I remember talking to a Mike Carpinelli at a WISPAmerica, I’d have to dig out
his card, but I think you’re right he lived in Naperville or something. But I
also remember various “team” members named Liz, Brian, Scott. I don’t remember
who did what. I think Liz, maybe last name Christie, was
Hmmm, seems like there used to be a trade show about this time of year that did
exactly that.
From: Steve Jones
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2020 12:24 PM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] FCC 3.5 GHz Spectrum Auction 105
Cambium matt...
This is why we need more
About to start this with the wife...last season is about to start.
She and I just finished Messiahthat was a trip
Sent from my smartphone
- Reply message -
From: "Chuck McCown"
To: "AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group"
Subject: [AFMUG] OT porn vs streaming
Date: Sat, Jan 25, 2020
its manageable, and can always be added as a recovery fee if it comes down
to it
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 3:39 PM Adam Moffett wrote:
> Sounds like a couple bucks per month per CPE. The number started higher
> and trended downwards.I'm not sure if it's at the bottom yet.
> I was
Sounds like a couple bucks per month per CPE. The number started higher
and trended downwards.I'm not sure if it's at the bottom yet.
I was disappointed about the per CPE thing, but it's not an insane cost.
On 1/27/2020 4:00 PM, Jason McKemie wrote:
Has there been any indication of what
Cambium listed their price already, I dont recall exactly their cost, you
pick the SAS administrator but pay cambium. I think its a pretty slick
deal, pay cambium, you still have direct SAS access if you want but you do
all your magicianhood through cnmaestro. Its a combined pseudoEPC/SAS cost,
Has there been any indication of what costs are going to be associated with
the SAS?
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 1:20 PM Adam Moffett wrote:
> In CBRS you'll get higher EIRP, you'll no longer have the +2dbm Tx limit
> on mobile devices, and you'll have access to 3x the spectrum. Overall
> you'd
I do enjoy sandwiches
On 1/27/2020 3:30 PM, Steve Jones wrote:
Not wrong, just not complete(ish)
a "grandfathered" NN is not grandfathered simply by being there. there
was a process we had to go through, most of us missed the window
because the deadline had passed before we knew we had
Not wrong, just not complete(ish)
a "grandfathered" NN is not grandfathered simply by being there. there was
a process we had to go through, most of us missed the window because the
deadline had passed before we knew we had to. "grandfathered" NN has
already clearly been marked for removal, in the
The FCC just certified the first round of SAS providers - CommScope,
Federated, Google and Sony.
https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-20-110A1.pdf
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
Matt, it's not easy to make Steve happy. If Steve is happy with your
course then I'll sign up for the next one right now.
Either this session was amazing or you were handing out free bottles of
Hurricane and Old English. .
Either way I'm in.
On 1/27/2020 2:24 PM, Steve Jones wrote:
Here lies NN
Beloved father of small and medium sized WISPs
Grandfather to early adopters and trailblazers
Survived by CBRS and 5 GHz unlicensed children
David Coudron
david.coud...@advantenon.com | Mobile: 612-991-7474
Advantenon, Inc.
i...@advantenon.com | 3500 Vicksburg
What did I get wrong?
On 1/27/2020 2:24 PM, Steve Jones wrote:
Cambium matt...
This is why we need more classes from you guys
just this thread alone, look how much unintentional disinformation is here
this is all over the industry
The real time classroom session with people who actually know,
Cambium matt...
This is why we need more classes from you guys
just this thread alone, look how much unintentional disinformation is here
this is all over the industry
The real time classroom session with people who actually know, because
theyre on a first name basis with people at FCC and
In CBRS you'll get higher EIRP, you'll no longer have the +2dbm Tx limit
on mobile devices, and you'll have access to 3x the spectrum. Overall
you'd much rather operate under the CBRS rules
The main reason a person might prefer NN is they don't have to pay for
the SAS.
In theory you could
As it stands now, the FCC hasn't made a decision regarding the waiver for
extending NN licenses past April 17, 2020. Some think that since they
haven't made the decision yet, that could mean they won't grant the waiver.
Historically speaking, most blanket waivers have a low grant percentage. I
Good analogy, but more like the other direction. They wouldn't have
noticed the broken tail light except they knew there was a dead body and
they were searching all the car trunks in the area.
On 1/27/2020 12:42 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
And not registering locations. I guess like having
I believe you are still able to update existing locations. We have updated
some locations last week and it looks like this changes were accepted on
Friday. We haven’t tried to register new locations though. These are
non-grandfathered locations since they were initially registered after
I never really thought about that, I figured it was more along the lines of
the thing with disney when it went live, but that does make me think i
should see about getting whitelisted
does anybody know a state of illinois contact?
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 11:54 AM Dan Spitler wrote:
> My
Hrm, he must have moved. He used to live not far from me.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
From: "Josh Luthman"
To: "AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group"
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2020
My biggest issues with double NAT wasn't so much the double NAT (though
gamers hate it) but with a rogue customer doing something naughty and
getting their shared IP on some blacklist that is used by any number of
random services. CA DMV being a prime example.
Be sure to check the IP against e.g.
And not registering locations. I guess like having drugs or a dead body in
your trunk, they wouldn’t have searched the car if your didn’t have a broken
tail light.
From: AF On Behalf Of Steve Jones
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2020 11:37 AM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
Subject: Re:
that was for interfering with an earth station outside our band it turns out
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 11:13 AM Ken Hohhof wrote:
> Well that would be bad since they are apparently still issuing fines for
> not
> having registered locations, based on info posted last week.
>
> -Original
That's my guy for Ohio. He lives in Kentucky.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Sat, Jan 25, 2020 at 9:13 AM Mike Hammett wrote:
> Mike's my regional guy. He's probably yours too.
>
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent
Well that would be bad since they are apparently still issuing fines for not
having registered locations, based on info posted last week.
-Original Message-
From: AF On Behalf Of Seth Mattinen
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2020 11:00 AM
To: af@af.afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [ External ]
+1 on more onsite CBRS classes. Or do one at Cambium HQ. Or a webinar.
From: AF On Behalf Of Steve Jones
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2020 10:46 AM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [ External ] Re: FCC 3.5 GHz Spectrum Auction 105
Theres Cambium Matts input.
Matt
On 1/27/20 8:43 AM, Matt Mangriotis via AF wrote:
The license expiration date is tied to your specific license. Most of them
(~85% of the total) do expire on April 17, 2020.
Yeah I know my NN license doesn't expire this year, but it's been
unclear to me if the FCC expects everyone with NN
Our NN license expired in January 2020. So we applied for a renewal. They
renewed to April 2020. When talking to FCC about it, they said that all NN's
would expire on April 2020 no matter what. They were a little fuzzy about
that answer, but eventually worked around to setting on that
Apparently there was a window of time where new or renewed licenses got
expiration dates out to like 2025. See for example WQVI696. I'm a little
unclear on whether all Part 96 equipment becomes illegal this April regardless
of whether your NN license expires. Ours was renewed in October 2018
Theres Cambium Matts input.
Matt
A. DO MORE ONSITE CBRS!!! That was the most informative CBRS class ever,
learned more there than from CPI
B. Do you have any supporting documentation on the NN expiration thing?
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 10:44 AM Matt Mangriotis via AF
wrote:
> The license
Ive been told, and IIRC even from Cambium, the NN is done in April, unless
your NN isnt expired, then you can operate until it expires. I have
Commsearch verifying this right now
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 10:35 AM David Coudron
wrote:
> Yes, that is our understanding.
>
> David Coudron
>
The license expiration date is tied to your specific license. Most of them
(~85% of the total) do expire on April 17, 2020.
You can check the expiration date of your license in the FCC ULS database, by
searching here:
Yes, that is our understanding.
David Coudron
david.coud...@advantenon.com | Mobile: 612-991-7474
Advantenon, Inc.
i...@advantenon.com | 3500 Vicksburg Lane N, Suite 315, Plymouth, MN 55447 |
www.advantenon.com | Phone: 800-704-4720 | Local: 612-454-1545
-Original
On 1/27/20 7:20 AM, Mark Radabaugh wrote:
yep, and a self fulfilling failure on the part of the FCC. The FCC
looked at the registered CPE and decided that WISP’s were not using the
band without ever considering how badly they fubared the entire
registration process.
You WISP’s don’t need
A long time ago we had an issue where a banking website wouldn't function
for a specific customer on dual-NAT, but it functioned when they were put
on a public IP. I believe that it was a combination of a too-strict /
over-bureaucratic firewall at the bank's end and the NAT affecting path MTU
Title: Re: [AFMUG] mytax illinois inaccessible to NAT customers
Steve,
FWIW - My home system is double nat. I was able to pull up that web site with no issue.
--
Best regards,
Mark mailto:m...@mailmt.com
Myakka Technologies, Inc.
www.Myakka.com
--
Monday,
We have been having issues where customers that are NAT (double NAT) are
unable to connect to the Illinois mytax website. I assume its got to do
with security of the site and the double NAT. Changing to a public IP
resolves it, so its not a huge issue. We see that it appends a _/ to the
end of it
It is going to be similar with SAS, as in there will be times that its a
day or 2 until your CPE can broadcast. Im not a fan of the inter SAS
communications only happening overnight, I hope that becomes real time. Its
going to be a tough sell telling a customer you need to wait for a grant
before
yep, and a self fulfilling failure on the part of the FCC.The FCC looked at
the registered CPE and decided that WISP’s were not using the band without ever
considering how badly they fubared the entire registration process.
You WISP’s don’t need an extension, you didn’t use the band. Uh,
That whole process was such a joke. You were supposed to register the AP
locations and then each subscriber location BEFORE you installed them and wait
several weeks for the FCC to mail you the notice of registration. As if any
customer would order service and then wait for the FCC to let you
I guess it would make sense for those who are wanting to have something
inside the metro areas or places with dense population otherwise yes
this is a great opportunity for those who are in the rural areas.
I have both so I am wanting at least 1 pal to secure our future here.
I dont have too
61 matches
Mail list logo
