Planning on hanging a DC box on the tower
30-40w total power
Cat5 using multiple pairs or 2 conductor cable?
We are inclined on cat 5 for standardization purposes...
Sent from Marconi's and Graham Bell's fused thoughts!!!
Maybe just some LMR400? Would give you shielding, and probably handle
up to 150-200 watts.
bp
On 9/27/2014 11:16 AM, Gino Villarini via Af wrote:
Planning on hanging a DC box on the tower
30-40w total power
Cat5 using multiple pairs or 2 conductor cable?
We are inclined on cat 5 for standa
o: af@afmug.com
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Power up the tower?
>
> Maybe just some LMR400? Would give you shielding, and probably handle up
to 150-
> 200 watts.
>
> bp
>
> On 9/27/2014 11:16 AM, Gino Villarini via Af wrote:
> > Planning on hanging a DC box on the towe
This is what we have used for all our CMM units for years.
http://www.outdoorspeakerdepot.com/14ga2inspca5.html
Outdoor, UV resistant, etc.
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Gino Villarini via Af wrote:
> Planning on hanging a DC box on the tower
>
> 30-40w total power
>
> Cat5 using multiple
We do power and fiber up the tower as our standard...ever since that
standard has been used, I don't think we've lost a site yet.
Regards,
Chuck
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 4:32 PM, Matt via Af wrote:
> This is what we have used for all our CMM units for years.
>
> http://www.outdoorspeakerdepot.co
Chuck,
Are you doing any 8-10 gauge runs exceeding 500' ?
I can't seem to find what I need
Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 28, 2014, at 9:50 AM, Chuck Hogg via Af wrote:
>
> We do power and fiber up the tower as our standard...ever since that standard
> has been used, I don't think we've lost
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CC0QFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.commscope.com%2FDocs%2FHELIAX_FFDirect_Brochure_BR-107083.pdf&ei=uhQoVLffMIWayQSu5YCoBA&usg=AFQjCNFvqSzEDLibQ4WCTebhIbt3KgEQYQ&sig2=gR3vElbGdefgDpcYEtvB2Q&bvm=bv.76247554,d.aWw
I'm get
If the radios did have SFPs, wouldn't you still need to provide sync (which
would mean additional cables)?
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Mark Radabaugh via Af
wrote:
>
> http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CC0QFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.commscope
The built-in GPS in the 450 works reasonably well. Now that they have
the option of internal GPS and freerun it's reasonably safe to let them
run that way. We still have most of our units powered by CTM's but have
increasingly gone to turning off sync-over-power. There is some risk
of the
Chuck
What gear are you using up in the tower to break out to copper ethernet?
Sent from Marconi's and Graham Bell's fused thoughts!!!
On Sep 28, 2014, at 9:52 AM, Chuck Hogg via Af
mailto:af@afmug.com>> wrote:
We do power and fiber up the tower as our standard...ever since that standard
has
Keep us posted on pricing!
Any ideas of what sw to use on top?
Sent from Marconi's and Graham Bell's fused thoughts!!!
On Sep 28, 2014, at 10:13 AM, Mark Radabaugh via Af
mailto:af@afmug.com>> wrote:
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CC0QFjAA&u
We use this, and solder two legs together. We send 48v DC up to the top
and downconvert. I think we've gone about 450' with this configuration
(including up the tower and along the cable raceway to the inside of a
building) However, that's primarily why we send 48v up and downconvert,
because of
Planet makes a few models that look attractive.
http://www.advice.co.il/data/files/C-IGS-802T_s.pdf
If you need L3 or routing, a 2011 is a cheap solution.
Josh
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Gino Villarini via Af
wrote:
> Keep us posted on pricing!
>
> Any ideas of what sw to use on top?
I have requested pricing on this as well. I think that in the end, it was
overly expensive (something like 4x the cost of doing 2 split runs,
$4.10/ft or something like that). If we could get that even within 15% of
what I'm paying now, I'd be happy.
Regards,
Chuck
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 10:12
At $4.10 it's not great, but I would probably go for it. Biggest
driver for me would be the single cable up the tower and the ease of
securing that cable. I used to do 'box at the top' and moved to
individual runs to the base. The cabling is a nuisance with everything
at the bottom which is
Any of these SW work?
http://www.planet.com.tw/en/product/product_list.php?id=22154
Gino A. Villarini
President
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
www.aeronetpr.com
@aeronetpr
On 9/28/14, 11:28 AM, "Mark Radabaugh via Af" wrote:
>At $4.10 it's not great, but I would probably go for it.
from Planet.
PC
Blaze Broadband
> -Original Message-
> From: Af [mailto:af-bounces+pconlin=blazebroadband@afmug.com] On Behalf
> Of Mark Radabaugh via Af
> Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2014 11:29 AM
> To: af@afmug.com
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Power up the tower?
>
The 8port GigE switch that I referenced above has both SFP and copper
interfaces, mounts on a DIN rail and is hardened. It's also only $199.
Sure - it's twice as many ports as you need, but that may come in handy
down the road. Anything keeping you from trying this model?
Josh
On Sun, Sep 28,
+ 1 billion on hybrid cable
My first site used RG58 for Power and fiber for the data but when the
Hybrid cable came on the scene
I fell in love with it LOL
Bestronics does a turn-key cable with custom length pigtail on each end
and what ever type terminations.
On 9/28/2014 8:50 AM, Chuck Hog
Hybrid cable is nice, but it is a 1+1=8 type situation. Simply not worth
the additional cost.
On Sunday, September 28, 2014, David Milholen via Af wrote:
> + 1 billion on hybrid cable
> My first site used RG58 for Power and fiber for the data but when the
> Hybrid cable came on the scene
> I f
Ahem Tesla's fused thoughts before Marconi stole them.
Jaime Solorza
On Sep 27, 2014 12:16 PM, "Gino Villarini via Af" wrote:
> Planning on hanging a DC box on the tower
>
> 30-40w total power
>
> Cat5 using multiple pairs or 2 conductor cable?
>
> We are inclined on cat 5 for standardization pu
We have been installing sensors down 600 ft well pipes that are 24vdc on
current project. Cable looks like heavy jacketed Cat 5 with three leads
and a strong pull guide inside. That connects to box outside the control
room and about 15 more feet via conduit to RTU panel
Jaime Solorza
On Sep 27
We have been installing sensors down 600 ft well pipes that are 24vdc on
current project. Cable looks like heavy jacketed Cat 5 with three leads
and a strong pull guide inside. That connects to box outside the control
room
Jaime Solorza
On Sep 27, 2014 12:16 PM, "Gino Villarini via Af" wrote:
Our Top boxes usually contain the following.
1x Sitemonitor
2x GigabitSyncInjectors
1x Citel DS210-48DC
2x Traco TCL 060-124 DC Down Convertors -
http://www.tracopower.com/products/tcl-dc.pdf
1x RB2011
2x APC PRM4 Surge Chasis
8x GigEAPC-HV
Gerard
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Chuck Hogg v
Do you guys find that the packetflux gear has a high survival rate up
there? We have a site that needs converted to DC and recabled, and are
considering this route. Our thinking is, why put the dc box at the bottom
when we can just put the thing up at the top and run nothing down to the
bottom ex
That's where having sync built-in is nice.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: "Josh Baird via Af"
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2014 9:27:11 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Power up the t
Kade,
I can't speak on the fiber, because we have used a few different kinds over
the builds we have done. My favorite has been bend insensitive fiber. It is
small and can make the same turns the Ethernet and power can without
risking a break. It is also really thin and makes for easier movement w
Cisco IE-3000 4TC sounds like exactly what you are looking for. It runs on
18-60VDC and can operate up to 167 degrees Fahrenheit.
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Mark Radabaugh via Af wrote:
> At $4.10 it's not great, but I would probably go for it. Biggest driver
> for me would be the singl
I've tried a few of these and seem to like them:
http://www.planet.com.tw/en/product/product.php?id=48479
-40 to 70C
8x1G copper and 2xSFP
No routing, but for the need, it'd work and is DIN rail mounted.
-c
--
Cassidy B. Larson
CTO - InfoWest, Inc.
Voice: 435-773-6073
c...@infowest.com
To be clear, we don't use something like an APC UPS. We do a battery array
with a charge controller.
Regards,
Chuck
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Vince West via Af wrote:
> Kade,
>
> I can't speak on the fiber, because we have used a few different kinds
> over the builds we have done. My fav
What are u using?
Sent from Marconi's and Graham Bell's fused thoughts!!!
On Oct 4, 2014, at 11:02 AM, Chuck Hogg via Af
mailto:af@afmug.com>> wrote:
To be clear, we don't use something like an APC UPS. We do a battery array
with a charge controller.
Regards,
Chuck
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 3
Traco Charge Controller & Power supply.
TSP-BCM48
TSP 360–148
Regards,
Chuck
On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Gino Villarini via Af wrote:
> What are u using?
>
> Sent from Marconi's and Graham Bell's fused thoughts!!!
>
>
> On Oct 4, 2014, at 11:02 AM, Chuck Hogg via Af wrote:
>
> To be
32 matches
Mail list logo
