What is the actual maximum TX power you can set these to US models?
I will post this on the epmp forums a bit later but aside from improving the
upload signal or changing the downlink ratio on a timed EPMP system is there
any way to improve the upload? We have a few customers I know with signals in
the mid 70s on 2.4 that are getting 10-15 meg down but less th
Looks like 2.4 is out. Trying RC24 couple nights ago. The new PTP mode cut my
throughput about in half. Only saw maybe a 5ms latency improvement over running
TDD with flexible.
Is the new PTP mode more susceptible to noise perhaps?
John Woodfield, President
Delmarva WiFi Inc.
410-870-WiF
With my 90* sectors I can do 21dBm on 15dBi @ 10 MHz.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 8:39 PM, John Woodfield
wrote:
> What is the actual maximum TX power you can set these to US models?
>
>
>
Will they turn up above 21dbm? If I am using a 10dbi omni in a development for
example I would want them to run at 27 to equal 36 EIRP with 1db loss on the
jumpers.
John Woodfield
From: "Josh Luthman"
Sent: Friday, May 8, 2015 9:19pm
To: "af@afmug.com"
Subje
t them to run at 27 to equal 36 EIRP with 1db loss
> on the jumpers.
>
>
>
>
>
> John Woodfield
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: "Josh Luthman"
> Sent: Friday, May 8, 2015 9:19pm
> To: "af@afmug.com"
> Subject: Re:
Perfect, Thanks
How has it performed in noisy environments?
-Original Message-
From: "Josh Luthman"
Sent: Friday, May 8, 2015 10:48pm
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP 2.4
Says 27 is max on my US radio.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
onments?
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: "Josh Luthman"
> Sent: Friday, May 8, 2015 10:48pm
> To: af@afmug.com
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP 2.4
>
> Says 27 is max on my US radio.
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2
No better than Ubiquiti in 2.4?
John
-Original Message-
From: "Josh Luthman"
Sent: Friday, May 8, 2015 11:01pm
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP 2.4
802.11 quality :P
I can't really give you a good answer.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direc
ssage-
> From: "Josh Luthman"
> Sent: Friday, May 8, 2015 11:01pm
> To: af@afmug.com
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP 2.4
>
> 802.11 quality :P
>
> I can't really give you a good answer.
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2
0:36 AM, "John Woodfield" wrote:
>
>> No better than Ubiquiti in 2.4?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> John
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-
>> From: "Josh Luthman"
>> Sent: Friday, May 8, 2
Should be April
Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE Smartphone
The current beta rc says it has throughput improvements, may look into that
On Aug 27, 2017 6:00 PM, "CBB - Jay Fuller"
wrote:
>
> I will post this on the epmp forums a bit later but aside from improving
> the upload signal or changing the downlink ratio on a timed EPMP system is
> there any way
They released 3.5 last week. I'm running it on a couple sites. Seems
fine so far. The throughput improvements involve basic bridge config. No
extra QoS, no L2/L3 firewall rules. Basically like MikroTik's fast-path.
Jay, I think Force200's are going to be your best bet. If your uplink
speeds su
Agreed. Will give it a shot. Firmware too
Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE Smartphone
- Reply message -
From: "George Skorup"
To:
Subject: [AFMUG] epmp 2.4
Date: Sun, Aug 27, 2017 7:11 PM
They released 3.5 last week. I'm running it on a couple sites. Seems
fine so far.
gt;
> - Reply message -
> From: "George Skorup"
> To:
> Subject: [AFMUG] epmp 2.4
> Date: Sun, Aug 27, 2017 7:11 PM
>
> They released 3.5 last week. I'm running it on a couple sites. Seems fine
> so far. The throughput improvements involve basic bridge
gt;
> - Reply message -
> From: "George Skorup"
> To:
> Subject: [AFMUG] epmp 2.4
> Date: Sun, Aug 27, 2017 7:11 PM
>
> They released 3.5 last week. I'm running it on a couple sites. Seems fine
> so far. The throughput improvements involve basic bridge
I think with 2.4 they were supposed to drop latency on PTP mode. I'm not
sure why you would have lost throughput, though.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 7:22 PM, John Woodfield
wrote:
> Looks like 2.4 is ou
I'm looking at the Cambium 2.4 antenna C024900D004A, and it lists it as
being DualSlant +/-45 degrees. Does this mean that the Force 200 2.4
radios are also Dual Slant to talk to this antenna? I didn't find
anything on the Force200 spec sheet talking about slant. If you use a
V/H Antenna as
It is June
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 10:06 AM, CBB - Jay Fuller <
par...@cyberbroadband.net> wrote:
>
> Should be April
>
> Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE Smartphone
>
>
It is June... and 2.4 elevate has also been released... and it has been out
in beta form for well over a month.
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Josh Luthman
wrote:
> It is June
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
> 1100 Wayne S
Sorry should have been more clear. epmp 3.4 just came out and enabled 2.4
ghz elevate.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 12:53 PM, Mathew Howard
wrote:
> It is June... and 2.4 elevate has also been released..
;Animal Farm"
Sent: 11/22/2016 5:14:04 PM
Subject: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 antenna options
I'm looking at the Cambium 2.4 antenna C024900D004A, and it lists it as
being DualSlant +/-45 degrees. Does this mean that the Force 200 2.4
radios are also Dual Slant to talk to this antenna? I di
feature of their 802.11n chipset, so the computation is done in
hardware.
-- Original Message --
From: "Nate Burke"
To: "Animal Farm"
Sent: 11/22/2016 5:14:04 PM
Subject: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 antenna options
I'm looking at the Cambium 2.4 antenna C024900D004A, and it li
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 antenna options
So you have a Dual slant AP and a V/H SM? Isn't that just losing signal
for no reason?
On 11/22/2016 4:21 PM, Adam Moffett wrote:
They've apparently got some electronic magic that can take the received
signal on V/H and calc
t;
>> -- Original Message --
>> From: "Nate Burke"
>> To: "Animal Farm"
>> Sent: 11/22/2016 5:14:04 PM
>> Subject: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 antenna options
>>
>> I'm looking at the Cambium 2.4 antenna C024900D004A, and it lists it as
from both antennas.
I remember reading the original white paper, and I remember thinking I
understood it for about 5 minutes or so.
-Original Message- From: Nate Burke
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 3:24 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 antenna options
So you have a
I think so...
-Original Message-
From: Nate Burke
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 3:29 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 antenna options
So if you were to use like a v/h UBNT antenna instead of the Dual Slant
antenna, They both should work? Wondering what the 3x
Phase. Yes, it's built into the chipset. 450 does it too. At least the 3.65.
On 11/22/2016 4:34 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:
I think so...
-Original Message- From: Nate Burke Sent: Tuesday, November
22, 2016 3:29 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4
antenna options
does it too. At least the 3.65.
On 11/22/2016 4:34 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:
> I think so...
>
> -Original Message- From: Nate Burke Sent: Tuesday, November 22,
> 2016 3:29 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 antenna
> options
> So if you were to use like a
uot;Animal Farm"
Sent: 11/22/2016 5:45:38 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 antenna options
So how does the connector distinguish between these antennas and relay
information to chip set to "phase differently"? I am assuming these
antennas are passive with no smarts.
On Nov 22
e. Yes, it's built into the chipset. 450 does it too. At least the
3.65.
On 11/22/2016 4:34 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:
I think so...
-Original Message- From: Nate Burke Sent: Tuesday, November
22, 2016 3:29 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4
antenna options
So if
t saying I have no
reason to disbelieve it. If in doubt, turn your SM 45 degrees and see
if your signal changes.
-- Original Message --
From: "Jaime Solorza" <mailto:losguyswirel...@gmail.com>>
To: "Animal Farm" mailto:af@afmug.com>>
Sent: 11/22/201
SM's, so
>> they are/were confident enough in this to make it the "default" setup.
>>
>> It's a feature of their 802.11n chipset, so the computation is done
>> in hardware.
>>
>>
>> -- Original Message --
>> From: "Nate
as are passive with no smarts.
>
> On Nov 22, 2016 3:42 PM, "George Skorup" wrote:
>
> Phase. Yes, it's built into the chipset. 450 does it too. At least the
> 3.65.
>
>
> On 11/22/2016 4:34 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote:
>
>> I think so...
>>
>>
olorza"
> To: "Animal Farm"
> Sent: 11/22/2016 5:45:38 PM
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 antenna options
>
>
> So how does the connector distinguish between these antennas and relay
> information to chip set to "phase differently"? I am assuming these
&
el...@gmail.com>>
To: "Animal Farm" mailto:af@afmug.com>>
Sent: 11/22/2016 5:45:38 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 antenna options
So how does the connector distinguish between these antennas and
relay information to chip set to "phase differently"?
onnector distinguish between these antennas and relay
>> information to chip set to "phase differently"? I am assuming these
>> antennas are passive with no smarts.
>>
>> On Nov 22, 2016 3:42 PM, "George Skorup" <
>> geo...@cbcast.com> wrote:
>>
com
Sent: 11/22/2016 6:09:37 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 antenna options
I read through the whitepaper, and still don't understand it. My basic
takeaway was 'We can do this cool thing, but it really doesn't gain you
anything' It specifically says there is no net S
No, the only benefit is rejection of reflected signals.
From: Nate Burke
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 4:09 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 antenna options
I read through the whitepaper, and still don't understand it. My basic
takeaway was 'We can do this
>>
>>
>>
>> -- Original Message --
>> From: "Jaime Solorza"
>> To: "Animal Farm"
>> Sent: 11/22/2016 5:45:38 PM
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 antenna options
>>
>>
>> So how does the connector disti
rom:* Nate Burke
> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 22, 2016 4:09 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] EPMP 2.4 antenna options
>
> I read through the whitepaper, and still don't understand it. My basic
> takeaway was 'We can do this cool thing, but it really doesn&#
Are you f$%king serious?
Do you guys even make sure the thing compiled before you release it???
What a dumbass bug!!!
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
Running latest release firmware (2.4.2) ; still can't see the bridge table
right?
i see where it SHOULD be but it's showing blank...
LOL
Somebody's not angry! :P
--
Josh Reynolds
CIO, SPITwSPOTS
www.spitwspots.com
On 03/20/2015 03:19 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
Are you f$%king serious?
Do you guys even make sure the thing compiled before you release
it??? What a dumbass bug!!!
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937
Not really angry, but seriously disappointed. I mean how could you
possibly not check this before a final release? And it hasn't been
recalled or anyone notified. I have to assume I wasn't the first to notice
this bug.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite
ect: [AFMUG] Epmp 2.4 bug - no ap list
Are you f$%king serious?
Do you guys even make sure the thing compiled before you release it??? What a
dumbass bug!!!
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
apologize for the trouble caused.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Sriram
>
>
> --
> *From:* Af on behalf of Josh Luthman <
> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
> *Sent:* Friday, March 20, 2015 6:19 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* [AFMUG] Epmp
I was going to post to the list to ask a question, but when you say "no
ap list" Are you saying no MAC addresses in the ARP table, because
that is what I am seeing. The only ARP entry I see is the radio gateway.
My customer devices are not showing in the arp table of the subscriber
epmp sin
There's apparently a bunch of things broken.
My complaint was not seeing the APs found after a scan on the monitor >
wireless page.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mar 26, 2015 1:19 PM, "Gilbert Gutierrez" <
mailing-li...@phoenixin
I had the same initial complaint I have not yet installed any of them somewhat
waiting for that to be fixed I can't imagine it would be that big of a bug fix
to show the available APs
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 26, 2015, at 12:22, Josh Luthman wrote:
>
> There's apparently a bunch of things
Hi,
A 2.4.1 Beta release will most likely be posted in the next couple of days with
these issues repaired.
Dan Sullivan
ePMP Software Manager
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Craig House
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 12:26 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Epmp 2.4
oh, just looked up another customer and its working fine there.
oops.
nevermind ;)
- Original Message -
From: CBB - Jay Fuller
To: memb...@wispa.org ; af@afmug.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2015 6:48 PM
Subject: epmp 2.4 - still no bridge table right?
Running latest rele
I could swear last night I was looking at an EPMP 2.4 unit running 2.4 and i
saw it say scanningright there while i was looking at it. yup. just did
it again. and you KNOW it's registeredor you wouldn't be looking at it.
when is the ETA for this to be fixed? :)
- Original Messa
So we have a site where all of the customers are south of the tower and we
have a 2.4 120 degree KP Performance antenna and ePMP AP pointing at those
customers. We have put a lot of SMs onto the AP and before it gets to
congested we wanted to add an additional AP. It turns out most of the
customers
: memb...@wispa.org
Cc: af@afmug.com
Subject: [AFMUG] epmp 2.4 stats.not so good (was alignment help)
I could swear last night I was looking at an EPMP 2.4 unit running 2.4 and i
saw it say scanningright there while i was looking at it. yup. just did
it again. and you KNOW it's regis
2.4.1. I think it's RC1 right now.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mar 29, 2015 3:37 PM, "CBB - Jay Fuller"
wrote:
>
> I could swear last night I was looking at an EPMP 2.4 unit running 2.4 and
> i saw it say scanningright th
I have done this with Ubiquiti on 10Mhz channels without issue. We also
have a site with them back to back on 20MHz channels at both ends without
issue. They have 4-5' of horizontal separation shooting the same direction
and 2-3' back to back.
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 6:37 PM, Brandon Yuchasz
wro
It isn't too hard to overload the front-end in the ePMP 1k. Just like
the RocketM. I really doubt they're going to do a 2.4 ePMP 2000.
Can you try a 40MHz channel on one of the 2.4 APs and shut the other one
off? I don't know your setup and terrain, but I would try an ePMP 2k and
off-load the
I assume these APs are already synced?
If it's possible to get some of them onto 5ghz, that would be the way to
go... otherwise, I'd say a 40mhz channel on one AP is worth a try.
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 7:58 PM, George Skorup
wrote:
> It isn't too hard to overload the front-end in the ePMP 1k. J
Yes both GPS synced.
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Mathew Howard
Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2017 8:46 PM
To: af
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP 2.4 two aps pointing at the same location.
I assume these APs are already synced?
If it's possible to get some of them
: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP 2.4 two aps pointing at the same location.
It isn't too hard to overload the front-end in the ePMP 1k. Just like the
RocketM. I really doubt they're going to do a 2.4 ePMP 2000.
Can you try a 40MHz channel on one of the 2.4 APs and shut the other one
off? I don&#
[mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Mathew Howard
*Sent:* Wednesday, March 01, 2017 8:46 PM
*To:* af
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] ePMP 2.4 two aps pointing at the same location.
I assume these APs are already synced?
If it's possible to get some of them onto 5ghz, that would be the way
to
When I talked to KP today they seem to think that because they were side by
side the side lobe of the antenna was being infringed on.
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of George Skorup
Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2017 9:14 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP 2.4 two
Jeremy, how much of a guard band was used on this? 20 MHz? 40 MHz?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 8:47 PM, Jeremy wrote:
> I have done this with Ubiquiti on 10Mhz channels without issue. We also
> have a s
I have them at 10MHz channel width. One is at 2412 and one is at 2462. I
usually always do them like that unless there is localized interference on
one of those channels.
On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 8:09 AM, Josh Luthman
wrote:
> Jeremy, how much of a guard band was used on this? 20 MHz? 40 MHz?
>
50 MHz guard band, that's what I was after :)
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Jeremy wrote:
> I have them at 10MHz channel width. One is at 2412 and one is at 2462. I
> usually always do them like
67 matches
Mail list logo
