Re: [arch] "Industrial" GTK theme broken + KDE control center shows gtk settings twice

2006-08-20 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
On 17/08/06, RedShift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Jan de Groot wrote: > > On Thu, 2006-08-17 at 08:07 +0530, Vinay S Shastry wrote: > >> On Thursday 17 August 2006 02:17, RedShift wrote: > >>> The industrial GTK theme doesn't work, it shows the "simple" theme. And > >>> "GTK Styles and Fonts"

Re: [arch] resuming a failed --sync

2006-08-16 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
On 16/08/06, Roman Kyrylych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here is the bug report: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/4182 (Total Download > Size > ) > > -- > Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич) > ___ > arch mailing list > arch@archlinux.org > http://www.archlinux.

Re: [arch] Death to all top-repliers!

2006-08-14 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
Surely people have better things to spend their time pissing about!? I have to use Lotus Notes at work and assist people that cannot open a pdf file but do you hear me moaning about it?! NO! I feel like top-posting in HTML just to spite all of you. __

Re: [arch] Death to all top-repliers!

2006-08-13 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
On 13/08/06, Jan de Groot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 2006-08-13 at 22:14 +0100, Philip Dillon-Thiselton wrote: > > Quite! Gmail defaults to top posting too AFAIK...so...that seems odd, > > although I do agree that top posting is the devils work. Try the >

Re: [arch] Death to all top-repliers!

2006-08-13 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
On 11/08/06, Stavros Giannouris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Στις Fri, 11 Aug 2006 16:34:04 +0200Ο/Η Johannes Held <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> έγραψε:> Jan de Groot schrieb:> > Another thing is quoting: some people include the archlinux > > mailinglist footer in their quotes, which is silly: at the time the>

Re: [arch] Gensplash withou beyond kernel

2006-08-04 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
On 01/08/06, Philip Dillon-Thiselton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Fantastic!  It's going to need some testing and I'm sure it's not quite right just yet but you have done the hard part, which was figuring out the difference between doing it with and without patches.   I t

Re: [arch] Gensplash withou beyond kernel

2006-08-01 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
On 01/08/06, Rodrigo Coacci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Well, here they are. I guess they should work correctly both with patched and unpatched kernels.At least it surely worked with my unpatched kernel. Again, it only does boot splash and progress, not console background image (as fbsplash is need

Re: [arch] Gensplash withou beyond kernel

2006-07-31 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
On 31/07/06, Rodrigo Coacci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I never knew that and I have never seen any explanation of how it is done!  The scripts that were developed in gensplashutils by me do require the patches as they check for /dev/fbsplash - however it appears it is doable.  All you would need to

Re: [arch] Gensplash withou beyond kernel

2006-07-31 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
On 31/07/06, Rodrigo Coacci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Has anyone here got gensplash/splashutils to work out-of-the-box without patched kernels? I only got them to work with -beyond kernels, but I just found out from gensplash site[1] that the booting image & progress bar works without patched kern

Re: [arch] blog software with aggregator plugin?

2006-07-23 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
On 24/07/06, Greg Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sunday 23 July 2006 6:25 pm, Philip Dillon-Thiselton wrote:> Does anyone know a popular blog software that allows you to aggregate> another blog as links or sidebars or whatever?I think serendipity does this too.   http:/

[arch] blog software with aggregator plugin?

2006-07-23 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
Does anyone know a popular blog software that allows you to aggregate another blog as links or sidebars or whatever? ___ arch mailing list arch@archlinux.org http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch

Re: [arch] Bug squashing?

2006-07-19 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
On 19/07/06, Roman Kyrylych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 2006/7/19, Philip Dillon-Thiselton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:>> Has there been a bug squashing recently?  I've never been involved but I> think I could be now and I think given the numbers of top quality people now

[arch] Bug squashing?

2006-07-19 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
Has there been a bug squashing recently?  I've never been involved but I think I could be now and I think given the numbers of top quality people now filling the TU roles and appearing from the community we could do some serious damage to that bug list!   Any thoughts?

Re: [arch] About Network Profiles

2006-06-22 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
On 22/06/06, James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 6/22/06, Philip Dillon-Thiselton <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:> Well, no, it's not because we still have to be able to stop and restart ppp> interfaces properly.  Also it appears counter-intuitive to me that something> shoul

Re: [arch] About Network Profiles

2006-06-21 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
On 21/06/06, James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 6/21/06, Philip Dillon-Thiselton <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:> OK, so that's sorted, what about checking what type of interface it is,> though?just modify the netcfg so that it wont run ifconfig, if IFOPTS is undefined.Cu

Re: [arch] About Network Profiles

2006-06-21 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
On 20/06/06, Thomas Bächler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Philip Dillon-Thiselton schrieb:> I can see from looking at poff that the only good way of killing a> specific pppd is by pid.  I can only assume we want support for multiple> pppd so we need to append the pid "arch-daemon-

Re: [arch] About Network Profiles

2006-06-20 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
On 20/06/06, Philip Dillon-Thiselton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: In addition...I can see from looking at poff that the only good way of killing a specific pppd is by pid.  I can only assume we want support for multiple pppd so we need to append the pid "arch-daemon-style" to the en

Re: [arch] About Network Profiles

2006-06-20 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
On 20/06/06, Philip Dillon-Thiselton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: OK - it's _way_ more complicated than that.  We don't want to run ifconfig on this interface at all do we, or we'll get errors coming out our ears.  So that means that we need to check that the device is not a pp

Re: [arch] About Network Profiles

2006-06-20 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
On 18/06/06, Thomas Bächler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: James schrieb:> if [ "$PPP_PEER" ]; then>   /usr/sbin/pppd call $PPP_PEER> fi>> this assumes ppp forks itself, which is what the scripts lying around> seems to suggest. /usr/sbin/pppd call $PPP_PEER detachThis does not guarantee that the co

Re: [arch] About Network Profiles

2006-06-18 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
On 17/06/06, James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 6/17/06, Philip Dillon-Thiselton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:>  Well, the wiki has information on how to set ppp up - surely reading that> is a start ;)  Obviously you can't test it though.  I was going to take a > look at th

Re: [arch] About Network Profiles

2006-06-17 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
On 17/06/06, James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 6/17/06, Alper KANAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> But in the mean time, I agree that etcnet is a little bit complicated..> Debian way of network profiles was really simple like Arch's.. But I > really don't know what to do about it, so any implementat

Re: [arch] Can these conflicts be fixed a unified pkg built?

2006-06-15 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
On 15/06/06, Jan de Groot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 20:39 +0100, Philip Dillon-Thiselton wrote:> "we knew there would be problems... :>> nvidia-utils conflicts with ati-fglrx-utils which conflicts with> libgl-dri... >> so its nvidia VS ati VS me

[arch] Can these conflicts be fixed a unified pkg built?

2006-06-15 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
"we knew there would be problems... :nvidia-utils conflicts with ati-fglrx-utils which conflicts with libgl-dri...so its nvidia VS ati VS mesa..."I did pacman -Ql for all three pkgs and as far as I can see the conflicting files are: /usr/lib/libGL.so/usr/lib/libGL.so.1/usr/lib/libGL.so.1.2/usr/lib/

Re: [arch] About Network Profiles

2006-06-13 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
I might take a look at this because I think it would be great too :)   Phil  On 12/06/06, Alper KANAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thanks for your reply.. Debian has also something like network profilesand you can easily set it to start ppp0 connection automatically... So they've done it :) I don't k

Re: [arch] Inadvertant demonstration that the Arch anti-doc ethos isn't without reason

2006-05-31 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
Heh, guess that shows my levels of pro-activity :) ___ arch mailing list arch@archlinux.org http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch

Re: [arch] Inadvertant demonstration that the Arch anti-doc ethos isn't without reason

2006-05-31 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
On 31/05/06, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 5/27/06, Philip Dillon-Thiselton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> http://methylblue.com//filelight/index.php >> Fantastic app this - thanks, Damir :)Nice... makes me laugh___

Re: [arch] amsn-svn and tls

2006-05-28 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
On 28/05/06, Richard Lupton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 5/28/06, Philip Dillon-Thiselton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> On 28/05/06, Richard Lupton <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:>> >>  Hi,>> I've just installed tcl-devel, tk-devel and amsn-svn from

Re: [arch] amsn-svn and tls

2006-05-28 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
On 28/05/06, Richard Lupton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi,I've just installed tcl-devel, tk-devel and amsn-svn from the AUR (sogot nice antialiased fonts now! :) ). However, when I try to log inaMSN complains that TLS is not installed, even though it is. I've tried specifying the path to tls in aMS

Re: [arch] "xfce4-svn: not found in sync db"??

2006-05-27 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
Your additions to pacman.conf and pacman.d are a bit fluffy as well.Either add:[shadowhand]Server = http://arch.os-zen.net/pkg/shadowhandor (using the shadowhand file)Include = /etc/pacman.d/shadowhandto /etc/pacman.conf - you don't need both as one makes the other redundant __

[arch] Inadvertant demonstration that the Arch anti-doc ethos isn't without reason

2006-05-27 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
http://methylblue.com//filelight/index.phpFantastic app this - thanks, Damir :) ___ arch mailing list arch@archlinux.org http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch

Re: [arch] Just a fanart

2006-05-26 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
The idea of branding is clearly lost on some then :) ___ arch mailing list arch@archlinux.org http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch

Re: [arch] Codenames for Arch 0.8

2006-05-19 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
On 18/05/06, Jason Chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 07:40:21PM +0100, Philip Dillon-Thiselton wrote:>>Arch Linux 0.8 PointlessDebate(I'm not picking on you alone Philip, I just chose this one to reply to)I always wonder why people get worked up a

Re: [arch] Codenames for Arch 0.8

2006-05-19 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
Archlinux 0.8 Budgie Smuggler ___ arch mailing list arch@archlinux.org http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch

Re: [arch] Codenames for Arch 0.8

2006-05-18 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
Arch Linux 0.8 PointlessDebate ___ arch mailing list arch@archlinux.org http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch

Re: [arch] General Discusson about Arch Linux

2006-05-17 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
On 17/05/06, Matthew Gyurgyik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 5/17/06, Joeri Vlekken <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: some suggestions of my side:> Arch Linux 0.8 "Zion"> Arch Linux 0.8 "Luca"> Arch Linux 0.8 "Cyan"> Arch Linux 0.8 "Adelpha"> Arch Linux 0.8 "Delta"> Arch Linux 0.8 "Delphi"> Arch Linux

Re: [arch] We're behind ubuntu in some packages

2006-04-30 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
On 29/04/06, Hussam Al-Tayeb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Saturday 29 April 2006 10:48 pm, Jan de Groot wrote:> On Sat, 2006-04-29 at 22:22 +0300, Hussam Al-Tayeb wrote:> > The reason I'm asking as some part of kdeadmin ( kpackage ,> > knerworkconf and > > ksysv ) are useless in archlinux.> > Also

Re: [arch] Kernel26 Beyond

2006-04-25 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
On 25/04/06, James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 4/25/06, Nathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> I was wondering if somebody could explain to me why there is a > kernel26beyond in both testing and extra, yet the one in testing is actually> an older version than that which is in testing.>> Just curious

Re: [arch] 'cardctl' is gone? (after upgrade) so what do i use in place of 'cardctl eject'?

2006-04-24 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
On 23/04/06, Tom K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Jeffrey Lim wrote:> hi guys, as per subject. I noticed after the latest upgrade that my> cardctl is gone. (Think that was because pcmcia-cs was removed - > deprecated by udev, apparently). Problem now is, what should i use in> place of 'cardctl eject'?

Re: [arch] Freedom of choice ?

2006-04-13 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
Sorry "not always" not "always" On 13/04/06, Philip Dillon-Thiselton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Often, yeah it will, but always. On 13/04/06, Low Kian Seong <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: No. What I meant to ask is, if I answer 'n' to the replacement w

Re: [arch] Freedom of choice ?

2006-04-13 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
Often, yeah it will, but always. On 13/04/06, Low Kian Seong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: No. What I meant to ask is, if I answer 'n' to the replacement will the upgrade process stop ? On 4/13/06, Mike McQueen < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wednesday 12 April 2006 21:24, Low Kian Seong wrote: > D

Re: [arch] Bootsplash

2006-04-05 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
On 02/04/06, Tom K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Rohan Dhruva wrote:> No, Tom, this is not what ubuntu uses. Ubuntu uses usplash -- which> requires special 'hooks' in initrd, unlike splashy. >> But, imo, someone who uses arch is experienced enough to set up> bootsplash .. I hope arch is not having pl

Re: [arch] Hedilinux - flattery or rip-off?

2006-03-24 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
Jason, >From what I can see from the forum links the first sentence at least is pretty much verbatim. Which is odd to say the least... Phil - Original Message - On Fri, 24 Mar 2006 10:07:46 + > Tom K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Sander has just raised this on the forum - > > >

Re: [arch] Suggestion regarding improving website usability

2006-03-21 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
- Original Message - > Could someone also put in an effort to make a new AUR logo, I was > looking at it and it's just godawful. I was just thinking that yesterday :( > > ___ > arch mailing list > arch@archlinux.org > http://www.archlinux.org/ma

Re: [arch] Server Donation Drive!]

2006-02-25 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
I'd be more in favour of saving it than some of us pissing it up a wall :D I have a hunch that Sun will shortly be purchased by google, investment may not be a bad option :P Phil Judd Vinet wrote: > On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 10:29:03AM -0600, Philip Dillon-Thiselton wrote: > >&

Re: [arch] Server Donation Drive!

2006-02-24 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
Er, yeah, 191% now. So what WILL happen to the extra money? I'm sure no decision has yet been made but I hope we will get an update about where our cash went! Great work though, guys. Just goes to show how deep this community goes - it's like an iceberg, 80% of it seems to be hidden below the w

Re: [arch] request PKGBUILD list

2005-12-09 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
There is a board on the forums for pkg requests but generally people do it themselves, the idea being that you generally have to learn sometime so you as as well get started! Phil Fabian Braennstroem wrote: >Hi, > >I just saw a forum to request packages for pclinuxos. Does >there exist someth

Re: [arch] Recompile and bugs?

2005-12-06 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
If you strongly suspect that an update has caused a program to fail and that this can be fixed by rebuilding the fault programme against the updated files then, yes, that is a great bug to file :) Magnus Therning wrote: >I've just been bitten by an updated wvstreams. The latest version breaks >

Re: [arch] Annoying initscripts updates!

2005-12-01 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
- Original Message - > On 12/1/05, Philip Dillon-Thiselton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I see the devs still remaining tight-lipped on my follow-up questions, > > I'm sure a lot of us would really like to know why the decision has been > > made to do th

Re: [arch] Annoying initscripts updates!

2005-12-01 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
Attila wrote: >On Mittwoch, 30. November 2005 23:41 Philip Dillon-Thiselton wrote: > > > >>Hmmm but yet a file in /etc/conf.d is fine for everything else? :) >> >> > >Okay, this is a nice place too. Thanks for the hint to have a look >at /etc/conf.d be

Re: [arch] lftp crash

2005-11-30 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
Yup, upstream bug I think, just don't tab complete twice! :( Jaroslaw Swierczynski wrote: >I'm getting a crash with lftp, easily and always reproducatble. Here >is what to do: > >1. Connect to any server. >2. Type "cd public_html/" (do not press Enter). >3. Press Tab. > >And that's it. Any name

Re: [arch] Annoying initscripts updates!

2005-11-30 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
Attila wrote: >On Mittwoch, 30. November 2005 21:17 Philip Dillon-Thiselton wrote: > > > >>I can't see why it is better to include it IN rc.sysinit vs add it to >>DAEMONS array - what makes the former better? I actually think it is >>messier if anything!

Re: [arch] Annoying initscripts updates!

2005-11-30 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
Attila wrote: >On Mittwoch, 30. November 2005 15:20 Philip Dillon-Thiselton wrote: > > > >>By hardcoded I mean that support for hwdetect has been include in the >>initscripts rather than separately. >> >> > >Okay, than i misunderstood you ..

Re: [arch] Annoying initscripts updates!

2005-11-30 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
Attila wrote: >Am Sonntag, 27. November 2005 23:56 hackte Philip Dillon-Thiselton in die >Tastatur: > > > >>Please can someone explain why hwdetect has been hardcoded into the Arch >>initscripts rather than provided separately as most similar tools are. >>

Re: [arch] Annoying initscripts updates!

2005-11-29 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
Khashayar Naderehvandi wrote: >--- Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>On 11/28/05, Khashayar Naderehvandi >><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >>>I guess if your gensplash-bits would have been >>> >>> >>merged >> >> >>>into the official initscripts, you wouldn't have

Re: [arch] Annoying initscripts updates!

2005-11-28 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
Thread hijack anyone?! Newton B. Costa Junior wrote: > 005/11/28, Joe Giles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >>On Monday 28 November 2005 11:03, Jaroslaw Swierczynski wrote: >> >>>http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?t=16754 >>> >>>Maybe not exactly what you meant but is helpful with annoying .pacnew >>>

Re: [arch] Annoying initscripts updates!

2005-11-28 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
Georg Grabler wrote: > On Monday 28 November 2005 10:20, Philip Dillon-Thiselton wrote: > >>Well, fair enough but as I already said, he could update it as often as >>he likes if it was pkg'ed separately. I think most people have to do >>the .pacnew tango when they

Re: [arch] Annoying initscripts updates!

2005-11-28 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
Judd Vinet wrote: > On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 10:56:10PM +0000, Philip Dillon-Thiselton wrote: > >>Touche. You know, you could have just said, "Shut up, Phil." and saved >>yourself some typing. > > > Hehe, I didn't want to insult, Phil. Ah but i

Re: [arch] Annoying initscripts updates!

2005-11-27 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
gt;possible. > > >Sincerely, > >The Management. > > >On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 09:45:13PM +, Philip Dillon-Thiselton wrote: > > >>Why the hell does hwdetect have to be in the initscripts pkg if it is >>going to need so many updates? Generally I am pret

[arch] Annoying initscripts updates!

2005-11-27 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
Why the hell does hwdetect have to be in the initscripts pkg if it is going to need so many updates? Generally I am pretty understanding of the devs and their odd whims but this one takes the biscuit. I could not give two shits about hwdetect and certainly don't want it on my system if I don'

Re: [arch] arch and info

2005-11-16 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
Better cover some cases rather than none where possible, eh? James Rayner wrote: >On 11/16/05, Ken Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 03:25:44PM +0200, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote: >> >> >>>I think the cleanest solution would be creating seperate packages with >>

Re: [arch] arch and info

2005-11-15 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
Eugene Philippov wrote: >В сообщении от 15 ноября 2005 00:57 Philip Dillon-Thiselton написал(a): > > >>Dimitrios Apostolou wrote: >> >> >>>Perhaps now that Arch is really widespread, including info docs should >>>be reconsidered. >>>

Re: [arch] arch and info

2005-11-15 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
Dimitrios Apostolou wrote: >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >>Hey Ken and the gang; >> >> > >we are no gang, we don't even know each other. It's the common need that >unites us. > > > >>Life seems to be difficult for you Ken when you are told something is the >>way the designers wished, and

Re: [arch] arch and info

2005-11-15 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
Jaroslaw Swierczynski wrote: >2005/11/14, Philip Dillon-Thiselton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > >>Therefore argueably, Arch is widespread because we DON'T have info files >> >> > >IMHO it's too far-going conclusion. I think most people use

Re: [arch] arch and info

2005-11-14 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
Dimitrios Apostolou wrote: >Perhaps now that Arch is really widespread, including info docs should >be reconsidered. > > This is flawed logic - the info docs were not excluded because we weren't popular, they are excluded as part of a design choice. Therefore argueably, Arch is widespread be

Re: [arch] 2.6.14-archck4

2005-11-11 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
z4ziggy wrote: > On Thursday 10 November 2005 23:41, James Rayner wrote: > >>On 11/11/05, James Rayner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>>On 11/11/05, Philip Dillon-Thiselton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>>>Thanks for the tip but ala

Re: [arch] 2.6.14-archck4

2005-11-10 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
eh gentoo forums... Philip Dillon-Thiselton wrote: >Should be here: > >http://gd.tuwien.ac.at/opsys/linux/gentoo/distfiles/genkernel-3.3.6.tar.bz2 > >Hard to track down... > >James Rayner wrote: > > > >>On 11/11/05, James Rayner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Re: [arch] 2.6.14-archck4

2005-11-10 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
Should be here: http://gd.tuwien.ac.at/opsys/linux/gentoo/distfiles/genkernel-3.3.6.tar.bz2 Hard to track down... James Rayner wrote: >On 11/11/05, James Rayner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>Just a question... what stops us from putting drivers in the initramfs? >> >> >> > >And it lo

Re: [arch] 2.6.14-archck4

2005-11-10 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
James Rayner wrote: >On 11/11/05, James Rayner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>On 11/11/05, Philip Dillon-Thiselton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >>>Thanks for the tip but alas the whole point of fbsplash is that it is >>>managed

Re: [arch] 2.6.14-archck4

2005-11-10 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
Thanks for the tip but alas the whole point of fbsplash is that it is managed from userspace - the problems with fbsplash stem directly from it's "working parts" being removed from the kernel :( Attila wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 10. November 2005 08:01 hackte James Rayner in die Tastatur: > > >>J

Re: [arch] 2.6.14-archck4

2005-11-10 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
As James already said, probably not. However, we are currently discussing the possibility of adding more SCSI modules into the current archck config so i would appreciate input on that from anyone with experience in these realms. While I can build and pkg a kernel I'm a bit clueless about how

Re: [arch] aur username

2005-11-02 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
Fabian Braennstroem wrote: > Hi, > > I created a while ago an aur account. Now, I can't remember > my settings (username and password). Is there a way to get > those to the corresponding email address? > > Greetings! > Fabian Your user name is fabb and I can reset your password if you want. Phi

Re: [arch] Wireless on my dell D800

2005-10-31 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
wd wrote: > 1 Install wireless_tools. > > pacman -S wireless_tools > > > 2 Install ipw2100(the wireless modules). > > pacman -S ipw2100 > > Then modify /etc/rc.conf ,add ipw2100 to the MODULES line,and eth1 to the > INTERFACES line,add eth1="dhcp"(to use dhcp) blow eth0="". > >

Re: [arch] Creating an ABS like CVS repository for AEGIS

2005-10-30 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
OK - now I think my original thought which is that there are four separate CVSROOTs - is that correct? Does cvsup only work if you have separate ROOT rather than modules? Philip Dillon-Thiselton wrote: >Hello all, > >I would still like some one to help explain how ABS works with

Re: [arch] Creating an ABS like CVS repository for AEGIS

2005-10-30 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
many modules/repos as I want to, handy for a testing repo for my huge dev team...of just me... Any explaination would be great, Phil Philip Dillon-Thiselton wrote: > We have finally got set up with our hosting solution for AEGIS and I > am now looking at setting up an ABS-like CVS repo

Re: [arch] Wireless-Profiles - Encryption Key

2005-10-30 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
wiki. I was never able to get the profiles to work, nor >could I enable wpa, etc. > >Thanks, >Paul > >On Sun, 2005-10-30 at 13:21 +, Philip Dillon-Thiselton wrote: > > >>Is this regarding the official wireless support or phraks ancient efforts? >> >>Geo

Re: [arch] Judd, we need roadmap!!!

2005-10-30 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
Simo Leone wrote: >On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 10:06:51AM -0400, Andrew Conkling wrote: > > >>On 10/28/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >>>With the exception of one package improperly installed the last time I >>>tried it; the ftp install will get you the very latest packag

Re: [arch] Wireless-Profiles - Encryption Key

2005-10-30 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
Is this regarding the official wireless support or phraks ancient efforts? Georg Grabler wrote: >I've lately looked up the wireless scripts again. > >Though, there are still a couple of errors in the scripts, but anyway, as i >got my version working a lot of others did i guess. > >I've found ano

Re: [arch] pacman segfault

2005-10-21 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
Yeah, it's definitely to do with the remove and install part (i.e. the replace) - When I switched from acl to xfsacl it segfaulted, as it did in the original report, and it just segfaulted again when I switched back :) Remove: xfsacl xfsattr Targets: acl-2.2.32-4 attr-2.4.24-5 xfsprogs-2.7.3-1

Re: [arch] pacman segfault

2005-10-19 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
Mine segfault too when I removed the apr pkgs and installed the new ones - I would guess it's the remove doing it. Eric Belanger wrote: On Wed, 19 Oct 2005, Mark Rosenstand wrote: Can someone verify this bug before I submit it to Flyspray? # pacman -S apache Remove: apr

Re: [arch] Problem with the forums

2005-10-19 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
Of course :) Damir Perisa wrote: Le Tuesday 18 October 2005 23:46, Philip Dillon-Thiselton a écrit : | DUDE! I already emailed you about it personally but I hope you are | diff'ing the bbs software when you update it or all of my hard work to | make the mod patching reversible has just

Re: [arch] Re: Better formatting of install messages

2005-10-19 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
James Rayner wrote: On 9/20/05, kozaki.dev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, 14 Oct 2005 21:53:30 +0200, Kurt B Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Philip Dillon-Thiselton wrote: Has anyone ever devised or suggested a better way of standardizing and formating inst

Re: [arch] Problem with the forums

2005-10-18 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
Judd Vinet wrote: On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 10:02:29PM +0200, Richard Golier wrote: Here are the problems I noticed: * wiki diffs aren't working * flyspray is not working Flyspray should be fixed now. - J ___ arch mailing list arch@archlinux.org

[arch] Problem with the forums

2005-10-18 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
Hello all, There seems to be a problem with posting in the forums. I am getting an error generated by posting.php: *Fatal error*: Only variables can be passed by reference in */home/forum/bbs/posting.php* on line *579 *I have taken a quick look at that ftp files and it doesn't look to me

Re: [arch] Problem with kdelibs 3.4.92

2005-10-17 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
Douglas Soares de Andrade wrote: Hi ! When i do a pacman -Syu i cant upgrade the kdelibs because of the acl dependency. I cant find acl anywhere... How to proceed ? Here is the dependency list for kdelibs: acl arts>=1.4.92 aspell bzip2 fam heimdal jasper libart-lgpl libidn libxslt mdnsresp

Re: [arch] AUR Package Installation

2005-10-17 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
Simo Leone wrote: On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 04:33:32PM +1000, James Rayner wrote: I hope I'm not stepping on Judd's toes by answering, but the chances are roughly zero. You are aware, of course, that all packages in the directory you parse over are never deleted, so you could be scraping up somet

Re: [arch] Openoffice2 went to testing

2005-10-17 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am Montag, 17. Oktober 2005 01:04 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Is it possible to have both version 1 and version 2 co-exist ? Very best regards; Bob Finch Hi theoretical it would be possible, but why? OO 2.0 will be developed 1.x not. so please try the OO 2.0 i didn'

Re: [arch] Openoffice2 went to testing

2005-10-16 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
Why not enable testing in pacman.conf - then do pacman -Sy testing/openoffice2 and disable testing in pacman.conf again? That is the way to do it! Just don't do a pacman -Syu! Simple. matthew g wrote: No not fair :( I don't want testing but I want Ooo2 :( unstable is the only place were I

[arch] Better formatting of install messages

2005-10-10 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
Has anyone ever devised or suggested a better way of standardizing and formating install messages? Or even trying to pin down some guidelines? ___ arch mailing list arch@archlinux.org http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch

Re: [arch] An upgrade problem

2005-10-10 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
Maybe you should take a look at the forums where the same problem has been warned against, occured and been solved repeatedly since time immemorial - apology accepted tho :) tom wrote: Howdy guys, apologies in advance if this has been covered, or if I am being dense. I finally got around t

Re: [arch] listing packages which are not in the repos

2005-10-08 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
I wrote a similar script, which you can find on the forums, which tells you which pkgs you have installed from which repo. It needs some tidying tho :) Aaron Griffin wrote: Hmm I'd vote for it in pacman... sounds worthwhile... until then: #! /bin/bash installed=`pacman -Q | tr ' ' -` repos

Re: [arch] ati-drivers and latest kernel26archck

2005-10-07 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
intend to continue the pkg against archck in [community]. If ati is added to [extra] against stock we'll have to see what happens... On 10/7/05, Philip Dillon-Thiselton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm not sure why you are apologising - I *really* am grateful for the remi

Re: [arch] ati-drivers and latest kernel26archck

2005-10-07 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
yone could look into that, that would be awesome. As always, thanks a lot. I haven't touched windows for a while b/c of arch (3 months and counting) Vivek On 10/7/05, Philip Dillon-Thiselton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: That's what happens when people step in and make updates an

Re: [arch] Libtoolslay leftovers

2005-10-07 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
You know, it would be much better if you did pacman -Qo on said files and told us the pkg they belong to rather then the filename... Anton Paulic wrote: Hi there, I just reinstalled from scratch after the big update, and there are still some .la files hanging around. Are they supposed to be

Re: [arch] ati-drivers and latest kernel26archck

2005-10-07 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
That's what happens when people step in and make updates and only do half a job without even telling you... So much for common courtesy even. Thanks for the reminder Vivek dibble Vivek Ayer wrote: Hi all, After upgrading to the latest kernel26archck to use the ati-drivers package, I realize

Re: [arch] initscripts: which version where and since when?

2005-10-06 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
RAYNER! You goddamn thread hijacker! :D Judd Vinet wrote: Hi James, On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 07:47:35PM +1000, James Rayner wrote: And just quickly asking whether my patch will be merged? http://iphitus.loudas.com/arch/network/network-improved.patch Sorry, I must have missed this o

[arch] initscripts: which version where and since when?

2005-10-06 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
The pkgrel on the initscripts in CVS has not be updated for ages yet I see a lot of changes, which version exactly IS in [current] at the moment? Phil ___ arch mailing list arch@archlinux.org http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch

Re: [arch] xfsprogs & xfsdump

2005-10-02 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
Khashayar Naderehvandi wrote: Ah, alright :) Thanks alot! I know this case is closed but in these situations, when a pkg in [current] or [extra] needs a feature included to support other apps, uploading a new pkg to the AUR doesn't really help anyone - it's just a work around. The most ef

Re: [arch] Problems compiling lineak_kdeplugins

2005-10-02 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
depends=('lineakd>=0.8' Where is that installed from? That will need to have been "slain" too. Pierre Schmitz wrote: Hello, I have tried to compile lineak_kdeplugins and klineakconfig. Both fail because there is no libfam.la. I am sure this has something to do with the "Libtool has been sl

Re: [arch] Upgraders please read this:

2005-10-02 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
Tobias Powalowski wrote: Hi due to the monster upgrade in the last hours be prepared for some things: Remember this points: devfs is removed from kernel26, get ready for udev. the /dev/discs entries will not work anymore on boot prompt. Please change it according to kernel26 install message.

Re: [arch] Libtool has been slain

2005-10-01 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
Er...does that also include combing the bugtracker and confirming bugs, etc? I think I could lend a hand but my system ain't the most exciting and hence hardly rigourous... Phil Judd Vinet wrote: On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 11:35:19PM +0100, Philip Dillon-Thiselton wrote: But none o

  1   2   3   >