On Fri, 08 Aug 2003 16:26:11 -0500, Sam Ewalt wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Aug 2003 09:43:20 +0930, Greg Mayman wrote:
>> On Wed, 06 Aug 2003 17:45:07 -0500, Samuel W. Heywood wrote:
>>> Hello List:
>>> Can anyone please refer me to an authoritative URL that explains
>
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 10:02:11 -0930, Kevin JCJD Symons wrote:
> One facility that I would like incorporated into Arachne is something
> like http://www.mail2web.com/ where one can "see" the waiting mail
> [whether it be one your current ISP or at another address] and then
> choose to delete it BE
On Wed, 13 Aug 2003 17:06:11 +0930, Greg Mayman wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Aug 2003 13:22:57 -0500, Samuel W. Heywood wrote:
>> No, it does not let you out. You can run a Unixish version of PINE
>> in a remote shell, even if your operating system is DOS. The Unixish
>> vers
On Tue, 12 Aug 2003 15:20:51 +0930, Greg Mayman wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 14:23:59 -0500, Samuel W. Heywood wrote:
>> A good way to "see" the waiting mail before downloading it to reply
>> or even to read it is to access your inbox first by running PINE
>> from
Hello List:
Can anyone please refer me to an authoritative URL that explains
how the spamhauses conduct their operations?
I want to learn such things as how the spamhauses recruit new spammers,
how they pay them and how much money they make, how pharmaceutical
companies arrange to have their drug
On Fri, 08 Aug 2003 08:56:44 +0900, Kali Mclaughlin wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Aug 2003 15:39:50 -0500, Sam Ewalt wrote:
>> On Sun, 3 Aug 2003 14:04:21 -0400, Roger Turk wrote:
>>> We NEED secure shell capabilities AND javascript capabilities in
>>> Arachne as soon as possible.
> Yes, it would be nice
On Sun, 10 Aug 2003 14:47:43 -0600, Glenn Gilbreath Jr. wrote:
> Hello Fellow Arachnephobes!
> OK, I didn't quote the thread about HotMail, god only knows what else
> MS will do to STOP any and all alternatives. The thing is, MS is very
> much involved with US "national security" interests at the
On Wed, 13 Aug 2003 14:28:26 -0930, Kevin JCJD Symons wrote:
> I did a search for PINE the other day, and only came up with a Linux and
> an OS/2 version. Do you have a site to snatch it from?
You can download some versions for windoze and other operating systems
from a University of Washington w
Hello List:
Recently I sent a message to a webmaster to complain about some
browser incompatibility problems on his website.
Not too long ago the web site used to work perfectly OK with
Arachne. In the very recent past it started working just almost
OK with Arachne. Currently it hardly works at
On Fri, 01 Aug 2003 23:29:02 -0400, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Aug 2003 22:47:33 -0500, Samuel W. Heywood wrote:
>> Can anybody recommend a very nice DOS-based text string search
>> program that can search for a phrase throughout an entire
>> directory full of te
Can anybody recommend a very nice DOS-based text string search
program that can search for a phrase throughout an entire
directory full of text files? Also would like very much to get
a search utility that can search for phrases within an archive
of pkzipped text files.
I need such a program main
On Fri, 01 Aug 2003 15:43:09 -0500, Dean Coffey wrote:
> ftp://ftp.f-prot.com/pub
> HTH
> Dean Coffey
>> Does anybody know of an ftp site or an alternative web site
>> where I might be able to download the latest version of
>> F-PROT and also the latest updates for the virus signature
>> files?
http://fprot.org/fr_anleitung.htm
F-PROT in Deutschland und antivirus-shop.com
Works with Arachne!
You don't need to understand German in order to almost instantly
figure out where to click for downloading the latest F-PROT updates.
Most likely the folks who run this web site will never even th
I went to F-PROT's web site, "http://www.f-prot.com"; today
and I found that the site no longer works with Arachne.
Does anybody know of an ftp site or an alternative web site
where I might be able to download the latest version of
F-PROT and also the latest updates for the virus signature
files?
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 16:10:01 +0930, Greg Mayman wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Jul 2003 23:30:52 -0500, Samuel W. Heywood wrote:
>> Will running this command also work just as well if one runs it from
>> within a "DOS-box"? Has anyone here ever tried doing that? Did you
>>
In my experience I have always found that this command always works
flawlessly for curing one's Windows computer of all operating system
problems if one runs the command after starting up his computer and
selecting the most preferred option, i.e., to boot to DOS.
I have never ywt tried running
Hello Fellow Arachnians:
I found today the message inserted below in the newsgroup
"alt.military.retired". I am forwarding it along to you
all for your enjoyment.
Glenn, I hope you are still keeping your refrigerator
stocked with lots of cases of your favorite brand of
beer!
begin
On Fri, 18 Jul 2003 02:27:08 +00, Bastiaan Edelman, PA3FFZ wrote:
> AFAIN M$ stopped all support to Win95.
> Bastiaan
They should be required by court order or by legislation to
to continue to support Window$ 95, at least insofar as providing
security patches is concerned. They need to do this a
On Thu, 17 Jul 2003 03:41:58 +00, Bastiaan Edelman, PA3FFZ wrote:
> I have no idea why this was bouncing back...?
> See the message in the attachment.
Things like that happen to me every now and then when I try
to send an email to an email address at what I believe to be
a valid destinatio
On Thu, 17 Jul 2003 12:31:18 -0400, Roger Turk wrote:
> BTW, I saw in the paper this morning that M$ announced a major security
> hole in their Windows 2003 OS.
Fox news this afternoon said that there is a "crack in the windows",
their words. Then they went on to say that M$ had announced th
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 19:02:09 -0400, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Jul 2003 08:31:15 +1000, Ron Clarke wrote:
>> Hi Sam,
>> On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 16:59:30 -0500, Samuel W. Heywood wrote:
>> Does this sound familiar ?
> That sounds very familiar. :(
> Each time
During the wee small hours of this morning I was unable to access
my inbox. I was also unable to access my remote shell account. I
couldn't access any web sites either. I could not get to anywhere on
the internet. I tried with both Arachne and with Lynx386, an
alternative DOS browser. Neither
This is an easy do-it-yourself project:
Go to google.
Enter as your search term "weapons of mass destruction"
It is very important to enter the phrase in quotations,
as shown above.
Then click on "I'm feeling lucky"
Read your error message very carefully before continuing your
search any furth
ctions, I would suggest you conduct a google
search on Cotton Mather.
--- begin forwarded correspondence ----
From: "Samuel W. Heywood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Arachne Fan Club
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 06:36:21 -0500
X-Mailer: Arachne V1.70;rev.3
To: Roger Turk <[EMA
http://www.degraeve.com
COOL!
Sam Heywood
--
This mail was written by user of The Arachne Browser:
http://browser.arachne.cz/
On Tue, 08 Jul 2003 18:43:29 +0200, Michal H. Tyc wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Jul 2003 10:00:48 -0500, Samuel W. Heywood wrote:
> There is a file on the server that keeps all contents of your mailbox
> (all messages in a chain, like in mail folders on your local hard disk
> with Netscape
On Wed, 09 Jul 2003 09:54:29 +1000, Ron Clarke wrote:
> Hi Folks,
> On Tue, 08 Jul 2003 12:31:41 +0930, Greg Mayman wrote:
>> On Mon, 07 Jul 2003 20:29:38 -0400, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
>>> Most likely...
>>> The world-as-we-know-it would come to a screaching halt. ;-)
>> I doubt it. Voting in F
Questions:
When you delete some messages from your ISP's POP3 server, are the
messages usually automagically moved to some other storage media
maintained by your ISP before they are actually deleted from the
POP3 server?
I have always wondered if the messages you delete from the POP3
server get s
On Tue, 08 Jul 2003 08:24:49 +0930, Greg Mayman wrote:
> Hi List buddies!
Thanks for the story. Maybe it is from this story that we have
the popular expression about the "other side of the coin".
Speaking of coins, I want to tell you guys about a story I heard
about "The Enchanted Money". Th
On Mon, 7 Jul 2003 00:17:49 -0700 (PDT), Binky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday, July 6, 2003 at 05:58:31 -0500,
> "Samuel W. Heywood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Whenever a country devotes its wealth and resources to building
>> up its mili
On Mon, 07 Jul 2003 19:28:01 +0930, Greg Mayman wrote:
> On Sun, 06 Jul 2003 05:58:31 -0500, Samuel W. Heywood wrote:
>> Note that I had used the word within quotations so as to indicate
>> that the "facts" might not have really been proven as such.
> But to many p
On Sat, 05 Jul 2003 20:17:23 +00, Bastiaan Edelman, PA3FFZ wrote:
> To launch a war on a nation is a very serious matter and the evidence
> should be solid, very solid.
> The evidence for weapons of mass destruction has been very soft and it
> still is. To present it to the American people (and t
On Sat, 05 Jul 2003 18:06:37 -0400, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Jul 2003 11:00:10 -0500, Samuel W. Heywood wrote:
>> On Sat, 05 Jul 2003 13:30:28 +0200, Richard Menedetter wrote:
>>> Hi
>>> Go to http://www.google.com
>>> enter weapons of mass dest
On Sat, 05 Jul 2003 13:30:28 +0200, Richard Menedetter wrote:
> Hi
> Go to http://www.google.com
> enter weapons of mass destruction into the searchfield
> and press the I'm feeling lucky button.
> read and start to think.
> Naturally this 404 - not found page is meant only as a joke.
> But it
On Thu, 26 Jun 2003 04:06:08 -0930, Kevin JCJD Symons wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jun 2003 21:47:33 -0400, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
>> #1) Never, ever, ever click those 'unsub links'.
>> It's a 100% guarantee that the opposite effect will happen.
>> By taking that link, you confirm that yours' is an accessi
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 11:04:19, LIMA S.A. wrote:
> While reading a message, how can I delete them, without
> going to the index, using the keyboard only ?
> Thanks
> __
> Ing. Alejandro LieberLima S.A.
> San Martin 3808 Rosario Argentina
> [EMAIL PR
On Wed, 18 Jun 2003 19:56:49 -0400, L.D. Best wrote:
> To point out how old I am, GEICO ustawuz Gov't Employee's Insurance Co
> and you had to be in said group to use their services; they were one
> of the few companies who would insure just about anyone active military
> duty ... it might
Hello List:
A recent series of posts on the SDF bboard under a thread being the
same as subject of this message pointed out a useful URL for checking
user agent strings for browsers:
http://madvani.freeshell.org/browsercss.php
I went there with Arachne, Lynx386, and with Net-Tamer.
The results
Dear List:
"DELTREE C:\WINDOWS" is the most useful command for blocking a new
kind of spam.
There is a new kind of spam going around which suddenly raises its
ugly head in the form of pop-up windows which seem to appear out
of nowhwere even if you are running only a DOS program in a dos box
under
On Wed, 11 Jun 2003 23:05:26 +0100, "Arek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Sam
> That way, I am waiting fot the copy of exted150.apm and further
> instructions.
I just now sent moments ago to your private email EXTED150.APM along
with my instructions and suggestions for installing it for use w
On Wed, 11 Jun 2003 17:11:28 +0100, "Arek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi List,
> I've got some problem. I'm trying to use an external editor to write an
> email. When I write emails, save them, and exit from "editv" the
> textarea of Arachne editor is still empty untill I put there my massage
>
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003 21:53:05 -0400, Henry Carmichael wrote:
>
>> Opera is not an open source browser. It is like functional shareware.
>> You can download a free version that works fine, but you have to pay
>> and register it if you want their ad banners to go away. You are not
>> obligated
On Sun, 08 Jun 2003 08:50:41 +, Thomas Tabler wrote:
> Dear Sam:
> It's unfortunate, but whether or not Yahoo Egroups uses the
> information submitted online for selling to spammers, the Yahoo website
> seems to have two main features that are objectionable from a
> philisophical viewpoint: 1
Per my request I received sixteen fake spams at my alternate email
address "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" from various folks on the Arachne
List. All of the fake spams were messages having the same subject
heading as many well known real spams. The message content
contained words and phrases and sometimes e
On Tue, 27 May 2003 22:57:32 -0700, G J Feig wrote:
> On Thu, 22 May 2003, "Samuel W. Heywood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hello fellow Arachnids:
>> Does anyone know of any good free mailing list services?
> --snip
>> Th
On Fri, 06 Jun 2003 09:06:25 +0930, Greg Mayman wrote:
> DISCUSSION AND WISHLIST RE SEND MAIL AND GET MAIL.
> I have set up my own personal control page to include the buttons Send
> Mail and Get Mail.
> I click on one of these buttons and the respective operation SMPT: or
> POP3: takes place.
On Thu, 05 Jun 2003 21:50:54 -0930, Kevin JCJD Symons wrote:
> Could it be possible to send SMM [or whatever the mobile things are] via
> e_mail???
> Cooee and Love,
> Kevin... XXX
Do you mean SMS messages? SMS is an acronym meaning
"Short Message Service".
According to many pages tha
On Thu, 05 Jun 2003 19:19:44 -0930, Kevin JCJD Symons wrote:
> On Thu, 05 Jun 2003 00:00:22 -0500, Samuel W. Heywood wrote:
>> On Wed, 4 Jun 2003 22:59:07 -0300, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is this service available for non-USA area users and recipients?
According to my un
On Fri, 06 Jun 2003 09:09:13 +0930, Greg Mayman wrote:
> Here is an interesting problem I've noticed with the Compose Mail or
> Reply, or the Modify outgoing mail functions:
> If I edit the To: CC: Subject: and Attachments: fields, then I use the
> external editor to write the message or reply, w
On Wed, 4 Jun 2003 22:59:07 -0300, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Sam,
> Thanks for your link !
> I thought that it had a typo but it worked fine from here (non US)
> just putting
> www.tpc.int
> Three letter for a TLD is weird eh ?
> My problem:
> I downloaded the client software for Wind
forwarded spam begins
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from marlin.shentel.net (marlin.shentel.net [204.111.11.42])
by norm.shentel.net (8.11.7/8.11.7) with ESMTP id h54FAkR04137
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 11:10:47 -0400
Received: from 61.1
On Tue, 03 Jun 2003 18:03:01 +0900, Kali Mclaughlin wrote:
> Dear List:
> Sorry to use more bandwidth, particularly for those who cant unsuscribe,
> but I have a question about long filename support.
> I have lately had major disasters with this matter.
> I use Telix as a wonderful program for est
http://www-usa.tpc.int/sendfax.html
TPC.INT: Send a fax
The service is free. Nothing to sign up for and no software to
download and install and configure. You don't even need to have
a so-called "faxmodem".
The TPC sendfax system is compatible with all classes of fax machines.
Works with Arach
On Mon, 02 Jun 2003 16:21:22 +0930, Greg Mayman wrote:
> On Thu, 29 May 2003 03:11:58 -0500, Samuel W. Heywood wrote:
>> Yes. Versions 3.91 and 3.96 for DOS are available. The best place to
>> start looking for the download packages is at
>> "http://www.washin
On Fri, 30 May 2003 10:38:14 +0930, Greg Mayman wrote:
> On Wed, 28 May 2003 16:35:51 -0500, Sam Ewalt wrote:
>> My benchmark for email performance is Pine from a Unix shell, which
>> even on low end equipment will run circles around Arachne eight
>> days a week. By comparison Arachne is slow and
On Fri, 30 May 2003 10:55:55 +0930, Greg Mayman wrote:
> On Thu, 29 May 2003 11:30:07 +1000, Ron Clarke wrote:
>>> It may be the system your ISP is using. I had no trouble getting the
>>> newsgroups, so I suspect the problem is not at MicroSnot's end.
>> Possibly.
>> So I tried with my secondar
On Fri, 30 May 2003 09:57:04 +0930, Greg Mayman wrote:
> On Tue, 27 May 2003 03:58:20 -0500, Samuel W. Heywood wrote:
>> I don't send any infected messages to anyone.
> Of course you don't. But if someone was sending infected messages with
> your name in the FROM: fie
On Wed, 28 May 2003 18:00:05 -0400, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
> On Tue, 27 May 2003 04:26:35 -0500, Samuel W. Heywood wrote:
>> On Wed, 28 May 2003 12:10:59 +0930, Greg Mayman wrote:
>>> On Tue, 27 May 2003 15:13:30 -0400, L.D. Best wrote:
>>
> FYI,
> I know how t
On Tue, 27 May 2003 17:24:09 -0500, Sam Ewalt wrote:
> And if you should even once respond to a spam (sometimes just going
> to a suggested website is all it takes) then you will get on a list
> of "email responders". Lists of "email responders" are a hot item
> in the spam trade.
How can they fi
On Wed, 28 May 2003 08:36:13 -0400, Roger Turk wrote:
> Greg Mayman wrote:
> .. > On Tue, 27 May 2003 10:06:48 -0400, Roger Turk wrote:
>> My main modem on my office computer is a Practical Peripherals 28.8 external
>> modem. I also have a "real" 56K, V.92/V.44 external modem that apparently
>
On Wed, 28 May 2003 12:10:59 +0930, Greg Mayman wrote:
> On Tue, 27 May 2003 15:13:30 -0400, L.D. Best wrote:
> Someone (now who was it? d***ed if I can remember) told me that he
> downloads the headers only, selects which messages he wants then
> downloads just those, while deleting everything
On Tue, 27 May 2003 18:29:39 -0400, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
> I can tell you one thing about the spam filters here at CisNet.
> I HATE THEM.
> No messages will get through to me and none can be sent by me
> if they contain a dollar sign ($) in the subject.
> Those several messages with suject
On Wed, 28 May 2003 11:47:13 +0930, Greg Mayman wrote:
> On Mon, 26 May 2003 03:38:15 -0500, Samuel W. Heywood wrote:
>> No, it is not thoughtful at all. How would you like it if you were
>> to find your inbox flooded with hundreds of "bounced" messages that
>&g
On Tue, 27 May 2003 19:55:53 -0400, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
> Sam,
> Over 2 years ago, as a test.sent 600 messages to my own address.
> I found then that the limit in Arachne is 512.
I know that you had addressed the report of your experiment to The
Other Sam. I would like to report that I
On Wed, 28 May 2003 11:32:43 +0930, Greg Mayman wrote:
> On Mon, 26 May 2003 03:13:14 -0500, Samuel W. Heywood wrote:
>> If he didn't do it, then by the sending to him a copy of the misdeed
>> that was done they are unjustly accusing him of committing the crime.
> That&#x
On Wed, 02 Apr 2003 09:56:06 +0930, Greg Mayman wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Mar 2003 12:00:18 -0500, Samuel W. Heywood wrote:
> The world seems to have adopted English, so I don't think you'll
> convince many people...
I don't understand why the world should have adopted
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003 08:35:58 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi everybody,
> I'm trying to put together some material on landmines and UXOs
> (unexploded ordnances), to be used in *information kiosks* (on, you
> guessed it, some old 486s).
> I've been browsing the web for good photos and descr
On Wed, 2 Apr 2003 07:33:15 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, 02 Apr 2003 "Samuel W. Heywood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Learning to master the speaking and writing of English will be of
>> little economic benefit for those who lack skills and kno
On Tue, 01 Apr 2003 15:19:41 -0500, Sam Ewalt wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Mar 2003 12:00:18 -0500, Samuel W. Heywood wrote:
>> I remember back in the late 1950's and early 1960's there was
>> an international movement to adopt Esperanto as an international
>> language.
On Tue, 1 Apr 2003 11:18:15, Carl P. Nelson wrote regarding the English
language:
> It's a complex, irregular and confusing language,
> sometimes even to native speakers, but its power and range are virtually
> unchallenged. Oriental languages are to some extent inferential, German
> is more pr
I remember back in the late 1950's and early 1960's there was
an international movement to adopt Esperanto as an international
language. The proponents of the movement said that Esperanto
would be very easy for almost anyone to learn because the words
and the grammatical structure are made up of a
On Tue, 01 Apr 2003 09:36:03 -0500, Sam Ewalt wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Mar 2003 16:21:08 -0500, Samuel W. Heywood wrote:
>> Strictly speaking, "virus" is a very scientific term. It is the
>> Linnaean taxonomical term derived from Latin and used for referring
>>
On Mon, 31 Mar 2003 18:34:59 -0500, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Mar 2003 15:33:01 -0500, Samuel W. Heywood wrote:
>> On Sun, 30 Mar 2003 19:13:10 +00, Bastiaan Edelman, PA3FFZ wrote:
>>> Hi Samuel,
>>> Are you sure Arachne did not decode the attachment?
>&
On Mon, 31 Mar 2003 18:49:47 -0500, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Mar 2003 10:38:51, Alejandro Lieber wrote:
>> Today I received an email with an attached file: EDITDATA.MSO
>> The first characters of this binary file are: ActiveMime
>> What type of file is this ?
> The ".MSO" is the key.
On Mon, 31 Mar 2003 15:24:21 -0500, Sam Ewalt wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Mar 2003 08:50:05 +1000, Ron Clarke wrote:
>> I have also noted that F-Prot, which I use daily, will identify some
>> attached virii immediately, and a very few not until the message has
>> been opened and the attachments written t
On Mon, 31 Mar 2003 9:25:26 +, J J Young wrote:
> Hello again Sam,
> === On 2003-03-30 at 12:36:00 you wrote: ===
>> Perhaps F-prot is capable of indentifying email viruses only when it is
>> examining individual message files one at a time. It appears to not
>> work at all in fin
rograms sent as MIME-encoded email
attachments and received by Arachne's email client do not get
automagically decoded and written to cache unless one clicks on
the attachment ikon.
> On Sat, 29 Mar 2003 23:55:55 -0500, Samuel W. Heywood wrote:
>> I have noticed that F-prot AV will
On Sun, 30 Mar 2003 14:0:15 +, J J Young wrote:
> Hello Sam,
> === On 2003-03-29 at 23:55:00 you wrote: ===
>> I have noticed that F-prot AV will discover, flag, identify, and report
>> any MIME-encoded email attachments containing viruses in messages
>> received by Arachne's email c
I have noticed that F-prot AV will discover, flag, identify, and report
any MIME-encoded email attachments containing viruses in messages
received by Arachne's email client, even if the the attachment has not
yet been decoded and saved to a file.
In the case of messages received by Nettamer's emai
On Mon, 24 Mar 2003 02:23:01 -0500 (EST), Thomas Mueller wrote:
>> And I think your assumptions about pornography are also mistaken.
>> I hardly ever get spam promoting porn sites. Mostly it's just
>> Nigerian generals and drug offers. I used to get the free cable
>> tv device offer all the time,
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003 03:01:09 -0500 (EST), Thomas Mueller wrote:
> from [EMAIL PROTECTED], quoting without '>'
> Wizard57MdaGlenn Gilbreath
> Jr.dahttp://members.surfbest.net/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/index.htmda--DOS
> Interent, Close Windows, Keep the Internet Open!--dadaHi List!daJust wanted
> to share
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003 22:14:20 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Mar 2003 "Samuel W. Heywood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Spammers just harvest email addresses at random.
> I disagree and our Nigerian friends are an example of why. Every Nigerian
> spa
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003 09:11:02 -0500, Sam Ewalt wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Mar 2003 17:04:52 -0500, Samuel W. Heywood wrote:
> And I think your assumptions about pornography are also mistaken.
> I hardly ever get spam promoting porn sites. Mostly it's just
> Nigerian generals and drug
On Sun, 16 Mar 2003 14:02:41 -0500 (EST), Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Mar 2003, Samuel W. Heywood wrote:
>> Yes, it is consistent with the anti-spam viewpoint I have advocated in
>> the past. My point is that I think they should start taking down the
>
On Sun, 16 Mar 2003 13:04:38 -0500, Sam Ewalt wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Mar 2003 09:25:09 -0500, Samuel W. Heywood wrote:
>> The subdimension web site explains that their email services were
>> shut down by the spam fighters. I do know of other free email
>> services that have an
On Sun, 16 Mar 2003 11:29:46 -0500 (EST), Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> linuxfreemail.com is still free, and it works with
> arachne.
For me Linuxfreemail works for doing POP3 with any DOS-based email
client. The web-based interface part doesn't work at all with
anything, not even with Wind
On Sat, 15 Mar 2003 19:47:04 -0500, Sam Ewalt wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Mar 2003 15:39:36 -0500, Samuel W. Heywood wrote:
>> On March 3rd the spam fighters shot down the free email service
>> formerly offered by "http://www.subdimension.com"; where I used to
>> have a fr
On March 3rd the spam fighters shot down the free email service
formerly offered by "http://www.subdimension.com"; where I used to
have a free email account. They used to offer very fast and
reliable POP3 service and they offered free web-based email too.
Now they are not even offering any email s
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003 17:47:00 +0100, Michal H. Tyc wrote:
> Hi Sam, Hi all,
> On Thu, 13 Mar 2003 11:01:57 -0500, Samuel W. Heywood wrote:
>> Presumably you had a mailing list being a text file named "klasa".
> Right.
>> My interpretation of the error messag
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003 11:24:59 +0100, Michal H. Tyc wrote:
> Hi all,
> Recently I tried the "address-list" feature of Arachne (i.e.,
> "@list" as the e-mail address, where LIST is a text file in
> the main Arachne directory and contains one address per line).
> Arachne inserts "@list" into the "To
On Mon, 10 Mar 2003 04:04:41 -0500 (EST), Thomas Mueller wrote:
>> I once bought a PCI modem that was advertised to be capable of working
>> under DOS. I could not get it to work under DOS, but it worked fine
>> for me under Caldera OpenLinux and also under Window$ 98.
>> Sam Heywood
> I finall
deadly cloud if there is even the slightest
> spark Boom !
> For someone who was just guessing how to re-activate
> batteries, you are very clever. You are almost
> intelligent, taking all the safety precautions.
> Keep on truckin with those batteries.
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Sam Ewalt wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Mar 2003 01:44:23 +00, Bastiaan Edelman, PA3FFZ wrote:
>
> > Is there a way to use Arachne for hotmail?
>
> No. I don't think so. Hotmail stopped working with Arachne at
> least four years ago. Can't remember why exactly.
I know why. It is becaus
On Thu, 06 Mar 2003 22:17:38 -0500, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Mar 2003 01:44:23 +00, Bastiaan Edelman, PA3FFZ wrote:
>
>> Tonight I brought the machine back installed passwords, telephone
>> numbers, etc. All went fine, but...
>> They were not using the provider with POP3 and SMTP for
On Wed, 5 Mar 2003 08:04:32 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi all,
> I was given 2 very old laptops (Toshiba Satellite 1800s) that still
> function, but the batteries won't recharge. Everything else still works
> fine.
> I wanted to use the laptops for a demo of an old DOS database, but it's
On Tue, 04 Mar 2003 10:53:34 -0500, Sam Ewalt wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Feb 2003 20:40:03 -0500, Samuel W. Heywood wrote:
> Almost no money is being made by the people who send out the spam,
> just as almost no money was made by those who sent out chain letters.
> The money is made by t
On Sat, 01 Mar 2003 17:48:29 -0400, L.D. Best wrote:
> Note: You can check out the article at the URL below; however if you
> are not registered with NY Times yet, you'll have to be registered to
> access the archives. Note, that if you don't want to give out private
> information you are given
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003 20:52:50 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Feb 2003 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> .btw(war and rumors of warsounded King James)
>> Elliot
> Yes, Elliot,
> I knew it was from the biblical expression, but wasn't sure which
> translation.
It comes
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003 22:18:56 -0500 (EST), Steve
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Samuel W. Heywood wrote:
> Sam,
> This was all discussed and tested at length several weeks
> or even several months ago. You would not need to wonder
> or speculate if
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003 18:36:31 -0500, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Feb 2003 10:51:48 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Food for thought - if we have 2 lists, we'll get double the letters from
>> the general's son in Nigeria.
>> Bob
> You never should have said that.
> See what you went
1 - 100 of 1761 matches
Mail list logo
