Eric Carroll;180085 Wrote:
Why the use of solid wire rather than stranded? While I doubt audio
frequencies matter, there is definately a surface effect of AC signals
on solid copper cable, so stranded is more typical. Just curious.
Because it's an Anti-Cable!
FWIW I've probably read every
I agree with Mr.Anderson on the value of room correction, but it will
not make up the sonic short comings of the SB.
If you're interested in the best performance, I'd get a Transporter and
2150 with MauiMods.com's upgrades.
If you're going to roll your own speakers, then I look into the
DEQX.
crooner;180104 Wrote:
Which is only useful when using the digital volume control.
In my case, I prefer to have my preamp do the signal attenuation.
Sorry, I was joking actually. I have no idea if that's even true or
not...
--
Skunk
My German is lousy but Babelfish managed this with the article's
summary:
Measurements: 10/10
Practice[?]: 8/10
Priority[?]: 10/10
With the transporter it created SlimDevices as a pioneer in things
network Player, speaks this still recent equipment kind around the
first High end representative
LOL!!!
In any case, the TP's many features are more likely to attract people
who want to have a single digital component handle pretty much
everything including preamplification.
--
crooner
SB3 with Custom Linear Power Supply
Lite Audio DAC-60 Tube DAC
VPI Scout with Benz Micro Glider M2
The jitter measurement wasn't spectacular exactly. Comparing to the
SB3's measurements it even looks a bit more messy. Perhaps their
equipment is outdated. (Still doesn't explain the relative diff
though..)
The conclusion that Despite it receiving data via a WiFi link, and
despite its relatively
slimkid;180069 Wrote:
Which one? 'All XLRs are the same' or 'Various interconnects differ'? :)
That single ended interconnetcs audibly differs, but balanced do not.
I've only heard two versions of this before: Interconnects differ
(balanced or single ended), and interconnects are all the
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
truckfighters
Transporter - REDGUM RGASIL - REDGUM RGi120ENR AMP - REDGUM LS Cable
- Infinity Kappa 8.1i - Live!
truckfighters's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7852
View
Ok so bottom line is that I can go and buy a xlr - rca cable , where
the xlr will be the out from the lavry and the rca will feed the input
on the amp, and I am not missing some extra quality of the lavry by not
having balanced xlr inputs on the amp ?
would this cable be what I am looking for ?
Thanks, for pointing to the article. I also noticed The Shins' Wincing
the Night Away was the recording of the month, which was a no-brainer.
I actually just saw them in concert last night, and they were awesome!
--
ezkcdude
DIY projects page:
http://www.ezdiyaudio.com
System:
SB3-EZDAC-MIT
When I connect the digital output of the SB3 to the digital input of an
Arcam Blackbox 50 DAC, theres no signal (no sound). I use the coax
cable with RCA connectors that came with the Blackbox. The strange
thing is, when I connect the optical output of the SB3 to the optical
input of the BB 50
You might also want to consider doing digital room correction in the
software domain, using something like the Inguz plugin. Kind of like
having your cake and eating it too
--
jeffmeh
jeffmeh's Profile:
thingfish;180145 Wrote:
Ok so bottom line is that I can go and buy a xlr - rca cable , where
the xlr will be the out from the lavry and the rca will feed the input
on the amp, and I am not missing some extra quality of the lavry by not
having balanced xlr inputs on the amp ?
would this
I'm using your option A with an SB2 + TacT S2150XDM. I am perfectly
happy with the setup, though I have often wondered if replacing the SB2
with a Transporter would make a clearly noticeable difference. I have
noticed slightly better sound when playing the same material through a
Cyrus CD8 with
P Floding;180155 Wrote:
Yes, but if you are getting a Lavry you might want to invest a little
bit more on the cable. Those RCAs look very cheap indeed. (Loss of grip
with the grounding ring giving substandard contact would be my main
concern.)
Yea ... but the Lavry is already mine and
P Floding;180124 Wrote:
Do you twist them together with just the lacquer for insulation?
Sure would make me feel nervous!
I read somewhere that 90% of the world's electricity goes through
magnet wire.
The varnish is designed not to short in tightly wound coils etc.,
otherwise it wouldn't
try bluejeans cables, well built and inexpensive.
--
tomjtx
tomjtx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7449
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=32699
...to add the Transporter to the setup. It's only a matter of time until
someone claims that we need audiophile ripping tools, possibly even
network drives that specialize on audio content or something.
Especially the audiophile ripping tool may be something our way, I'd
expect - a mechanically
I don't understand your point guys. I totally understand what many feel
that most of hyper-expensive cables do not have enough of real
advantage in physical parameters to justify the price. I don't,
however, understand that desire to keep things oversimplified - lamp
cord, magnet wire, etc. Yes,
Eric Carroll;180082 Wrote:
Is perhaps one of the confusing things in this discussion the difference
between a single person, single trial negative result (i.e. null) vs a
single person multiple trial negative result/positive results vs
multiple person multiple trials?
Multiple trials add
snarlydwarf;180098 Wrote:
Can't we all agree on some basic realities:
1) Human perception is easily fooled by a variety of influences
(loouder, hints, expectations, etc... some obvious, some subtle)
2) Removing as many external influences as possible is necessary to
do any scientific test
P Floding;180121 Wrote:
The jitter measurement wasn't spectacular exactly. Comparing to the
SB3's measurements it even looks a bit more messy. Perhaps their
equipment is outdated. (Still doesn't explain the relative diff
though..)
JA measures jitter on analog outs - can anyone comment how
Unfortunately I'm using MAC.
jeffmeh;180154 Wrote:
You might also want to consider doing digital room correction in the
software domain, using something like the Inguz plugin. Kind of like
having your cake and eating it too
--
jmsun
jmsun;180189 Wrote:
Unfortunately I'm using MAC.
I believe I saw a post that the Inguz author was thinking of porting it
to the Mac. Perhaps it's worth going with the Transporter and Amp, and
implementing the room correction when it is available. Alternatively,
you could set up an
325xi;180181 Wrote:
I don't understand your point guys. I totally understand what many feel
that most of hyper-expensive cables do not have enough of real
advantage in physical parameters to justify the price. I don't,
however, understand that desire to keep things oversimplified - lamp
I use 12/4 industrial cable purchased from Lowes.
http://www.audioholics.com/techtips/setup/interconnects/DIYSpeakerCablesp2.html
--
Ben Diss
'SB3' (http://www.slimdevices.com/pi_squeezebox.html) - 'Lavry DA10'
(http://www.lavryengineering.com/productspage_da_10.html) - 'BAT
VK-31SE'
There's plenty of DVD burners available these days, and they are cheap.
Which of them are better for highest quality CD ripping - DAE?
By better I mean more accurate DAE, not necessarily faster.
--
325xi
simaudio nova cdp simaudio moon i-5 revel performa m20 via
acoustic zen matrix
Anyone has any suggestion on which valves to buy to substitute the
originals?
I am reasonably happy with the DAC-60, but it simply cannot compare to
the internal analogue-digital converter of my beautifl Jolida jd100s
(CD Player) with two Sovtek 12AX7LPS mounted in.
My last test was to connect
Hiya,
Had a linear psu since Christmas and I've noticed today that the bass
is heaver now, than when initially pluged in
Other changes (since Christmas) have been slight but this is quite
noticable :)
Do you know how burning/running in a linear psu affects output?
Cheers
:)
--
Deaf Cat
325xi;180206 Wrote:
I agree, but would like to emphasise that I compared simple vs.
technically advanced, and not cheap vs. expensive. Let's pretend price
has nothing to do with that just to get a picture.
I always prefer the most simple method, and the cheapest method- given
equal results.
How do you know the Squeezebox didn't finally reach the 1K hr mark?
That's when the sound becomes more analog, which is what you may be
hearing as increased bass ;-)
--
Skunk
Skunk's Profile:
snarlydwarf;180098 Wrote:
Can't we all agree on some basic realities:
1) Human perception is easily fooled by a variety of influences
(loouder, hints, expectations, etc... some obvious, some subtle)
Good post, I agree with your points.
Most people accept the truth of optical illusions.
Hirsch,
I should have read your posting first.
Totally agree, excellent post. Thanks.
--
Eric Carroll
Transporter-Bryston 3B SST-Paradigm Reference Studio 60 v.4
SB3-Rotel RB890-BW Matrix 805
SB3-Pioneer VSX-49TXi-Mirage OM7+C2+R2
That rule saying you need balanced connection only for long runs
originates from way back to last century, where level of EMI/RF at
homes was so much lower.
Remembering ongoing discussion on PSU for SB, cables are guilty for
pickup all EMI/RF junk around. People reported using especially well
Ben,
As per the lavry manual it says Note: Most XLR cable adaptors (such as
a cable with XLR Female and a ¼ inch MONO plug)
work correctly as Balanced to Unbalanced converters.
Does that mean that I can leave the lavry on default , that is
balanced, and have the cable convert the signal ? Do I
325xi;180201 Wrote:
Is dBpowerAMP as good as EAC on good (not damaged) CDs?
Should be.
What happens if CD has problems - will dBpowerAMP let me know so I can
process that CD manually with EAC afterwards, or it'll skip the error
and just continue?
That's the problem. I haven't tried the
Anything by Plextor at 1x speed.
--
Codmate
Codmate's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7154
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=32725
Supose it could have done...
Did not know about the 1k hr thing, how on earth did that marker point
come about?
--
Deaf Cat
Deaf Cat's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=515
View this thread:
I've been wondering about balanced RCA connectors for a while...
How can they possibly be balanced without 3 pins?!
Also - I'm currently using mono 1/4 TRS - XLR leads to get from my
PC's B/O box to my active monitors. Is this set-up balanced (the
outputs on the B/O box (M-Audio OmniStudio)
I am very skeptical about the whole burn in idea when it comes to
electronics. Speakers sure , they have mechanical parts and stuff but I
dont see the logic behind a piece of electronic becoming better with
time ? I am an electrical engineer btw, not that it matters but never
seen anything to
Deaf Cat;180238 Wrote:
Supose it could have done...
Did not know about the 1k hr thing, how on earth did that marker point
come about?
My point was one of illustration, i.e. there is no proof the power
supply made the difference. To the engineer, however, I might ask: do
capacitors possess
Skunk wrote:
My point was one of illustration, i.e. there is no proof the power
supply made the difference. To the engineer, however, I might ask: do
capacitors possess the ability to change, and how might that change
affect the reaction to transients in the device in question?
I'm not a EE,
This has been a particularly thought provoking thread - thanks!
Skunk;180213 Wrote:
FWIW I've probably read every page on the roger russell site :-) The
Science Fiction movie/book page is a good one..
Skunk - thanks for this pointer, there were several I had not read.
--
Bob Bressler
Bob
thingfish;180235 Wrote:
Ben,
As per the lavry manual it says Note: Most XLR cable adaptors (such as
a cable with XLR Female and a ¼ inch MONO plug)
work correctly as Balanced to Unbalanced converters.
Does that mean that I can leave the lavry on default , that is
balanced, and have the
Codmate;180239 Wrote:
I've been wondering about balanced RCA connectors for a while...
How can they possibly be balanced without 3 pins?!
Also - I'm currently using mono 1/4 TRS - XLR leads to get from my
PC's B/O box to my active monitors. Is this set-up balanced (the
outputs on the
Everything in the universe is subject to change in one way or another (
well almost everything ) but when it comes to hifi equipment I just
dont see how a change would improve anything, if there is one, it
should be a negative change if anything , as in a degredation of the
curcuits. Burning in
Pat Farrell;180248 Wrote:
I'm not a EE, but I hire them. Short term, a capacitor is fully
formed
in a few thousand cycles, which if you feed 50 or 60 hZ AC, is just a
few seconds. If you feed it high frequency audio, it will be fully
formed in a second or so.
Thanks Pat.
DeafCat, I
Skunk;180109 Wrote:
Because it's an Anti-Cable!
* http://anticables.com/technical.html
** http://www.venhaus1.com/diycatfivecables.html
Thanks for the references. Colour me better educated.
--
Eric Carroll
Transporter-Bryston 3B SST-Paradigm Reference Studio 60 v.4
SB3-Rotel RB890-BW
I've just got to chime in here.. Many years ago I was lucky enough to
tour the Mark Levinson factory ( Madrigal Labs) I was talking with one
of the designers/ engineers about why they burn in everything He said
that a component would measure differently after being up and running
for 24-48
Very nice post Hirsch!
I have been speculating about the possibility that critical or
concentrated listening modifies the way we hear things, and make many
qualitative judgements harder to make than if we listen more relaxed
over longer time periods.
The brain is amazingly good at filling in
P Floding;180255 Wrote:
The aren't.
You use half of a balanced connection (the XLR output) going into a
single-ended RCA. Balanced just means that we have to signals that are
exact mirror images of each other in two different wires, and a third
wire for earth.
Thanks :)
...but what about
I started using my Krell KSA-50S again recently, after years being
unused. Initially it sounded very good, but bass light. After a week or
so the bass was much better. Now I have no complaints at all. I then
read that large electrolytic capacitors that are unused lose a lot of
their capacity, and
P Floding;180258 Wrote:
Yes, I know about their usual usage in transformers, etc. But they don't
move about much in those applications. Rubbing against each other in
speaker cables sounds more risky to me.
You are of course right. The durability of the varnish is questionable
if twisted very
I know I will need one for each channel. Might as well get the cheap
ones just to play with I guess. Should be getting sound from it either
way I hope. If not ... anyone want to buy a lavry ? :P
P Floding;180253 Wrote:
There is no conversion going on.
A balanced cable has two single ended
Codmate;180266 Wrote:
Thanks :)
...but what about my mono 1/4 TRS - XLR?
No problem either. The XLR will have one signal pin connected to earth,
and the other connected to the sigle ended signal coming in from the
1/4.
Since balanced inputs compare both incoming signals it doesn't matter
if
Hirsch makes some great points. So, what do we need then? I would
suggest that having some sort of blind test should be part of the
solution. But, as Hirsch points out, the DBT, itself, may have some
problems. If one of the problems with DBT is the short duration, and
hence, listening pressure,
I thought a translation into Jive would be relevant to this thread. :)
Wid de transpo'ta' it created SlimDevices as some pionea' in
wahtahmelluns netwo'k Player, speaks dis still recent equipment kind
around da damn fust 'Sup, dudegh end representative too 'estend fo' it
da damn processin' and
Skunk;180268 Wrote:
You are of course right. The durability of the varnish is questionable
if twisted very tightly. I think Speltz recommends 3-4 twists per foot
which shouldn't be enough to short IMO. I didn't plan on putting it in
the vise+drill or anything.
I believe they've moved to
I was comparing the Stereophile Transporter review to the SB3 review.
And guess what? Stereophile shows in its testing the tone observed in
this thread and others.
See
www.stereophile.com/budgetcomponents/906slim/index3.html
The right channel, however, produced ... a cluster of spectral
Fifer;180115 Wrote:
I think we get the drift.
Really? wow. Your Babelfish interpolator is far better than mine.
--
Eric Carroll
Transporter-Bryston 3B SST-Paradigm Reference Studio 60 v.4
SB3-Rotel RB890-BW Matrix 805
SB3-Pioneer VSX-49TXi-Mirage OM7+C2+R2
P Floding wrote:
I started using my Krell KSA-50S again recently, after years being
unused. Initially it sounded very good, but bass light. After a week or
so the bass was much better. Now I have no complaints at all.
Are you sure? Did you ABX that? ;)
R.
These days, almost any drive will work fine. The hardware is all about
the same and there's no need to slow down to 1X. Use software that
extracts the data from the disk accurately. Exact Audio Copy seems to
be the accepted standard, though I have used Feurio for much faster
extraction.
TD
jmsun;180058 Wrote:
Either option costs about $4000, option A obviously offers pure digital
amp plus room correction; B may have a edge on DAC and overall sound
quality.
I went option B. Don't forget *good speakers*, which are, IMHO more
important than good amp for the set of amps that are
The most hyped drive atm seems to be the Plextor PX-230a cause of its
accurate way to report C2 errors.
--
Wombat
Wombat's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4113
View this thread:
Robin Bowes;180288 Wrote:
P Floding wrote:
I started using my Krell KSA-50S again recently, after years being
unused. Initially it sounded very good, but bass light. After a week
or
so the bass was much better. Now I have no complaints at all.
Are you sure? Did you ABX that? ;)
R.
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,2090976,00.asp
No comment on sound - they said the menu system was hard to navigate.
--
krochat
--
SB3 (+linear) - Big Ben - TacT RCS 2.2X - 2xS2150 - Vandersteen 3a
Signature + TacT W210
tyler_durden;180292 Wrote:
These days, almost any drive will work fine. The hardware is all about
the same and there's no need to slow down to 1X. Use software that
extracts the data from the disk accurately. Exact Audio Copy seems to
be the accepted standard, though I have used Feurio
Eric Carroll;180284 Wrote:
Really? wow. Your Babelfish interpolator is far better than mine.
I got the drift. It's the usual techno-babble.. ;-)
--
P Floding
No, I didn't ABX it. And I won't even if you ask me. (Especially not if
you ask me.)
Turns out there are some pretty glaring errors in that review:
http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=32512
...for example, it apparently doesn't support MP3!
--
Mark Lanctot
It's like, you know, a New Age religion, but with better treble
response. - Jon Heal
hirsch;180186 Wrote:
Placebo's do work...both ways. Expectancy can eliminate a real
difference as easily as it can produce a false positive.
We talked about this before on this forum - the hypthesis that the
stress of blind tests reduced people's hearing abilities was termed
blinditis.
Skunk;180326 Wrote:
You hit on an important point, though have failed to make the connection
I'm afraid.
EAC is free, and capable of making any drive perform perfect
extraction- when set up properly.
Your enthusiasm for perfect rips renders the question moot, IMO :-)
Yah,
Hey people, you wanna say there's no tool that can do perfect rip while
having fancy of doing tag work for me??? I refuse to believe in that!
Anyways, what are my options if EAC is a given? What's the best way to
flac the files, and to apply tags and album art as easy/fast as
possible? Foobar,
opaqueice;180328 Wrote:
We talked about this before on this forum - the hypthesis that the
stress of blind tests reduced people's hearing abilities was termed
blinditis. It's quite a lot to buy - that people think they can hear
a difference sighted or blind, but when blind they are stressed
P Floding;180332 Wrote:
It's all very interesting, and I hope more research is done in this
area.
However, I don't think the hobbyists called audiophiles should have
to keep this in mind every time the would like to endulge in their
chosen hobby.
I dunno, I think everyone should at least
325xi;180329 Wrote:
Yah, indeeed.
Nope, wrong :)
Drive naturally capable of good DAE will simply work few times faster
without losing quality - hardware error processing takes part of normal
EAC load. It also gives you better chance of a good rip if you don't use
EAC,
P Floding;180332 Wrote:
However, I don't think the hobbyists called audiophiles should have
to keep this in mind every time the would like to endulge in their
chosen hobby.
Actually, anyone who has performed DBT is automatically disqualified
from audiophile status. At least, that's what it
snarlydwarf;180335 Wrote:
I dunno, I think everyone should at least keep it in mind or it is
(depending on whether you are a half-empty or half-full person I guess)
easy to be suckered into buying the latest-area-51-gadget or risk
missing out on something affordable that makes a real
Its interesting stuff :)
I power down everything at night now. My Arcam has developed a couple
of faults over the few years I've had it, maybe from being on all the
time?? and the new linear psu gets rather warm, so I think its
probably good to give it a rest.?
Maybe the psu has never
ezkcdude;180340 Wrote:
Actually, anyone who has performed DBT is automatically disqualified
from audiophile status. At least, that's what it says in the small
print on the back of my membership card.
No, that would be petty!
We audiophiles can forgive and forget! ;-D
I have occasionally
P Floding;180332 Wrote:
However, I don't think the hobbyists called audiophiles should have to
keep this in mind every time the would like to endulge in their chosen
hobby.
Well, while I try to be respectful of people who can hear a difference,
I have to somewhat disagree with this
Dont trust pc magazines whatsoever. Saw a test of dvd recorders, my
grandmother could have done a better job.
--
Anne
Anne's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10071
View this thread:
Eric Carroll;180342 Wrote:
Well, while I try to be respectful of people who can hear a difference,
I have to somewhat disagree with this statement.
I have been personally subjected to salespeople who promolgate unproven
claims of better audio quality in order to extract money. The audio
Skunk;180337 Wrote:
If you have to change the question to make your point then this will be
no fun. You said speed wasn't a concern.
You can't know anything is accurate without a checksum, which I'm
thinking isn't incorporated into any drive's firmware. EAC is the best
at disabling a
Admittedly, there are a bunch of tools in play, but here is what I do:
-Rip with EAC, set up to use FLAC as an external compressor to get FLAC
files. Try to be diligent about the tags in EAC so I do not have to
retag later.
-Foobar to add replaygain (album and track) values.
-MP3Tag if I need
Deaf Cat;180343 Wrote:
Its interesting stuff :)
I power down everything at night now. My Arcam has developed a couple
of faults over the few years I've had it, maybe from being on all the
time?? and the new linear psu gets rather warm, so I give it a
rest.?
Maybe the psu has
Ok, how about a sci.audiophile and alt.audiophile then?
Or take the mods to the DIY forum.
Personally I want to understand what is superstition and what is
reproducible.
I think the response on anti-aging creams is self-evident. If it claims
efficacy I want to know it really works, not just
From what I've read none of the newer DVD-RW drives are very good at
DAE. EAC (or dbpoweramp) with Accuraterip is your answer because
Accuraterip will tell you if you got it right or not. If not, simply
redo that track. In my experience I don't think I've ever had to rip a
track three times to
325xi;180349 Wrote:
OK, you're right. Vague question. I meant priority of quality over
speed, but not that I like it slow (ripping).
I don't know anyone who cares about ripping like we do, so I doubt
we've met- but by 'people like us' I only meant audiophiles who
consider putting all their
Oh, that doesn't look good. I thought may be I can rip with EAC and ask
dBpoweramp to do the rest, dunno if it's possible.
I just noticed dBpoweramp Reference claim: Rip Securely digitally
record audio CDs, with C2 error pointer support. Anyone knows what
they mean saying Securely and C2 error
Try the Amperex 7308s PQ, JAN or USN. Mid 60s vintage if possible.
Even the cheaper 6DJ8 Bugle Boy made in Holland, gives you much better
sound than the stock Electroharmonix.
Also, upgrade the coupling caps to something better. I'm using Sonicaps
from Sonic Craft but I've heard success
It is generally recognized Delta Sigma DACs have improved considerably
in the past few years. However, there's still consensus that
traditional parallel or ladder DACs sound better than Delta Sigmas.
The Delta Sigma DACs are much cheaper to produce and that's pretty much
why the traditional
Eric Carroll;180342 Wrote:
You can always mod something, or sell something on non-performance
features. Claims of performance and efficacy demand a higher standard,
if you want my money.
And it may be a case of getting More For The Buck.
If using some special disc from a hardwood reduces
Eric Carroll;180295 Wrote:
I went option B. Don't forget *good speakers*, which are, IMHO more
important than good amp for the set of amps that are good enough
(flat frequency response, THD = .5%, good power cube behaviour). And
don't forget to check out
snarlydwarf;180363 Wrote:
And it may be a case of getting More For The Buck.
If using some special disc from a hardwood reduces vibration (which is
counterintuitive... a hard substance wouldn't absorb as much as a soft
wood), then would any hardwood do? Does it have to be ebony? Or would
P Floding;180365 Wrote:
Look, it is not as if there is, or will be A TRUTH, that we can all just
look up in a nice book and go by. You won't find it, and I won't and it
is pointless demanding it.
...
But see, that is incredibly anti-scientific. If something makes a
discernable difference,
snarlydwarf;180366 Wrote:
...
But see, that is incredibly anti-scientific. If something makes a
discernable difference, then it should be possible to show that. Even
if it is wow, P Floding has incredible hearing, he can hear the
difference, and we can -show- he can, though no one else
P Floding;180368 Wrote:
I don't believe I have fantastic hearing.
It may be better than average, but that doesn't mean much. Anyway, that
idea was foremost hypothetical to forward a line of reasoning.
And that has nothing to do with anything? You said you heard a
difference with those wood
Cheers !
Ah ha so when its said that some power amps have trouble on some big
bass tracks its because the little caps have not charged with power
quick enough to keep the big bass parts going, or something like that.
I'm on the way to understanding [ if above is right :) ]
Cool
So we need
Deaf Cat;180372 Wrote:
Cheers !
Ah ha so when its said that some power amps have trouble on some big
bass tracks its because the little caps have not charged with power
quick enough to keep the big bass parts going, or something like that.
I'm on the way to understanding [ if above is
P Floding;180373 Wrote:
There is a lot, lot more to it than that. But, yes, that can be one
restricting factor.
Yeer, I thought there may be a lot lot lot more to it :D
So much to learn a :)
--
Deaf Cat
Deaf Cat's
1 - 100 of 131 matches
Mail list logo
