Re: [Aus-soaring] Hypoxia Oxygen use

2004-08-28 Thread Ian McPhee
flying or is it above 5000ft at night. Ian McPhee - Original Message - From: Christopher H Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2004 3:40 PM Subject: RE: [Aus-soaring] Hypoxia Oxygen use Sec

RE: [Aus-soaring] Hypoxia Oxygen use

2004-08-27 Thread Mike Borgelt
At 09:46 AM 27/08/04 +1000, you wrote: That's a big call to say the NZ Gliding people misinterpreted the law. The Law sets the benchmark and as long as that is not breached, NZ Gliding is well within their rights to set their own guidelines. They are also free to turn naked handstands out the

RE: [Aus-soaring] Hypoxia Oxygen use

2004-08-27 Thread Mike Borgelt
At 11:44 AM 27/08/04 +1000, you wrote: On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 08:27:30 +1000, Mike Borgelt wrote In a dying, shrinking sport the last thing we need is mindless regulation and enthusiastic jack booted amateurs eagerly enforcing the law or doing so for the sake of safety or an illusory insurance

RE: [Aus-soaring] Hypoxia Oxygen use

2004-08-27 Thread Mike Borgelt
At 09:46 AM 27/08/04 +1000, you wrote: That's a big call to say the NZ Gliding people misinterpreted the law. The Law sets the benchmark and as long as that is not breached, NZ Gliding is well within their rights to set their own guidelines. Sorry left out a word first time. They are also free

Re: [Aus-soaring] Hypoxia Oxygen use

2004-08-27 Thread Quinn
I really want to know how many accidents or incidents involving at least one glider attributable in whole or part to lack of supplementary oxygen (at any altitude) have occurred during the last 50 years (anywhere in the world) That's the kind of data you need to determine whether the rule

Re: [Aus-soaring] Hypoxia Oxygen use

2004-08-27 Thread Terry Neumann
I've been wondering about one other aspect of this fascinating discussion. We may have talked about this before. Does anyone know to what altitude the cabin of commercial jets are pressurized when at normal cruising levels ? I did hear once (in the B-727 era) that it was somewhere

Re: [Aus-soaring] Hypoxia Oxygen use

2004-08-27 Thread Mark Newton
Terry Neumann wrote: Does anyone know to what altitude the cabin of commercial jets are pressurized when at normal cruising levels ?I did hear once (in the B-727 era) that it was somewhere around 6,000 to 8,000 feet. Usually 8,000'. (I have an altimeter built into my watch -- it's actually

Re: [Aus-soaring] Hypoxia Oxygen use

2004-08-27 Thread Mike Borgelt
At 11:12 PM 27/08/04 +0930, you wrote: We may have talked about this before. Is there a manufacturer's recommendation? Is there a company policy? Are there regulations on the subject? Unfortunately that would probably be viewed with considerable suspicion, even

Re: [Aus-soaring] Hypoxia Oxygen use

2004-08-26 Thread Terry Neumann
Brian Wade (and others) wrote: Sorry but I read that as you can go up to 13000 with no oxygen in the glider as long as you don't spend more than 30 minutes above 1. Well I read it as meaning you can go up to 13,000 without using oxygen, but you must have it available

Re: [Aus-soaring] Hypoxia Oxygen use

2004-08-26 Thread Mike Borgelt
At 06:45 PM 26/08/04 +0930, you wrote: Brian Wade (and others) wrote: Sorry but I read that as you can go up to 13000 with no oxygen in the glider as long as you don't spend more than 30 minutes above 1. Well I read it as meaning you can go up to 13,000 without

Re: [Aus-soaring] Hypoxia Oxygen use

2004-08-26 Thread Boyd Munro
. Cheers, Boyd - Original Message - From: Mike Borgelt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring inAustralia. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2004 10:20 AM Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] Hypoxia Oxygen use At 06:45 PM 26/08/04 +0930, you wrote: Brian

RE: [Aus-soaring] Hypoxia Oxygen use

2004-08-26 Thread Nigel Andrews
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Boyd Munro Sent: Thursday, 26 August 2004 8:32 PM To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia. Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] Hypoxia Oxygen use Hello Mike, There is another reason why Brigadier Brian Wade AM (Ret'd) and others are wrong

RE: [Aus-soaring] Hypoxia Oxygen use

2004-08-26 Thread Allan Armistead
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Nigel Andrews Sent: Thursday, 26 August 2004 20:47 To: 'Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia.' Subject: RE: [Aus-soaring] Hypoxia Oxygen use Hooray, some sense at last. Nigel Nigel Andrews Managing Director RF Developments Pty

Re: [Aus-soaring] Hypoxia Oxygen use

2004-08-26 Thread Rob Colleen Moore
. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2004 10:20 AM Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] Hypoxia Oxygen use At 06:45 PM 26/08/04 +0930, you wrote: Brian Wade (and others) wrote: Sorry but I read that as you can go up to 13000 with no oxygen in the glider as long as you don't spend

RE: [Aus-soaring] Hypoxia Oxygen use

2004-08-26 Thread Christopher H Thorpe
Mike, while the New Zealand Civil Aviation Rule 91.209 Use of Oxygen Equipment doesnt require the carriage or use of supplemental oxygen up to 13,000 AMSL unless above 10,000 for more than 30 minutes, the Gliding New Zealand Advisory circular

RE: [Aus-soaring] Hypoxia Oxygen use

2004-08-26 Thread Mike Borgelt
At 11:55 PM 26/08/04 +1000, you wrote: Mike, while the New Zealand Civil Aviation Rule 91.209 Use of Oxygen Equipment doesnt require the carriage or use of supplemental oxygen up to 13,000 AMSL unless above 10,000 for more than 30 minutes, the Gliding New Zealand Advisory circular

Re: [Aus-soaring] Hypoxia Oxygen use

2004-08-26 Thread Pete Siddall
A moment's thought should convince anyone that the AC interpretation is nonsense. Why would anyone have oxygen available and not use it? Because they didn't have enough for the whole time they would be above 10,000? -- ___ Aus-soaring mailing list

Re: [Aus-soaring] Hypoxia Oxygen use

2004-08-26 Thread Mike Borgelt
At 08:02 AM 27/08/04 +0930, you wrote: A moment's thought should convince anyone that the AC interpretation is nonsense. Why would anyone have oxygen available and not use it? Because they didn't have enough for the whole time they would be above 10,000? No, the law was clearly written to

RE: [Aus-soaring] Hypoxia Oxygen use

2004-08-26 Thread Robert Hart
On Thu, 2004-08-26 at 21:14, Allan Armistead wrote: So debate away to your hearts content about the regs in US vs Aus, parachuting vs gliding, variation between indiduals, the legal situation, and a whole host of other things. I'll take the oxygen every time thank you. So will I - that's why

RE: [Aus-soaring] Hypoxia Oxygen use

2004-08-26 Thread Jason Armistead
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 08:27:30 +1000, Mike Borgelt wrote In a dying, shrinking sport the last thing we need is mindless regulation and enthusiastic jack booted amateurs eagerly enforcing the law or doing so for the sake of safety or an illusory insurance policy. While I generally don't want

Re: [Aus-soaring] Hypoxia Oxygen use

2004-08-26 Thread Mark Newton
Robert Hart wrote: But I worry about being close to these people who seem to think that oxygen is an optional extra... Robert, I don't think there *are* any people like that. We're not talking here about whether oxygen is necessary for high altitude flight; We've been talking about whether the

Re: [Aus-soaring] Hypoxia Oxygen use

2004-08-26 Thread Boyd Munro
1:27 PM Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] Hypoxia Oxygen use Boyd, If you had been following this thread since I started it you would know that:mymotivation wasthe beliefthat we should all seek to bewell informed about the nature of hypoxia and use common sense in the application of that knowledge.

RE: [Aus-soaring] Hypoxia Oxygen use

2004-08-25 Thread Christopher H Thorpe
The USAF School of Aerospace Medicine has this to say about the stages of hypoxia:- The symptomatology of hypoxia may be divided into stages related to the approximate pressure, the altitudes, and the oxygen saturations of the blood. STAGES OF HYPOXIA Altitude in

Re: [Aus-soaring] Hypoxia Oxygen use

2004-08-25 Thread Brian Wade
: Thursday, August 26, 2004 2:56 PM Subject: RE: [Aus-soaring] Hypoxia Oxygen use At 02:17 PM 26/08/04 +1000, you wrote:2.1 Operation of a glider to a height greater than 10,000 ft QNH ispermitted only when oxygen is available for continuous use by each person onboard for any

Re: [Aus-soaring] Hypoxia Oxygen use

2004-08-25 Thread Mike Borgelt
At 03:04 PM 26/08/04 +1000, you wrote: Well I read it as meaning you can go up to 13,000 without using oxygen, but you must have it available in the glider for use if needed. -- So how do you interpret the US part 91.211 between 12500 and 14000? Mike Borgelt Instruments -

RE: [Aus-soaring] Hypoxia Oxygen use

2004-08-25 Thread Christopher H Thorpe
/home/medical/articles/Oxygen%20For%20The%20Pilot.asp -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Borgelt Sent: Thursday, 26 August 2004 3:24 PM To: Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia. Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] Hypoxia Oxygen