On Thu, 01 Nov 2001, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> "Matt Armstrong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
>> though perhaps other characters should be allowed as well (*=!%,
>> etc. etc.). In fact, perhaps all non-whitespace should be allowed
>> there -- or at least every character that doesn't require
"Matt Armstrong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Ronan Waide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> On October 30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
It seems as if BBDB doesn't like addresses with + in them:
(bbdb-extract-address-components "[EMAIL
Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ronan Waide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> On October 30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>>> It seems as if BBDB doesn't like addresses with + in them:
>>>
>>> (bbdb-extract-address-components "[EMAIL PROTECTED]")
>>>
>>> Is this somehow intentional? Ho
Ronan Waide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On October 30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>> It seems as if BBDB doesn't like addresses with + in them:
>>
>> (bbdb-extract-address-components "[EMAIL PROTECTED]")
>>
>> Is this somehow intentional? How can I fix it?
>
> What version of BBDB? What version
On October 30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> It seems as if BBDB doesn't like addresses with + in them:
>
> (bbdb-extract-address-components "[EMAIL PROTECTED]")
>
> Is this somehow intentional? How can I fix it?
What version of BBDB? What version of Emacs?
Cheers,
Waider.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /
It seems as if BBDB doesn't like addresses with + in them:
(bbdb-extract-address-components "[EMAIL PROTECTED]")
Is this somehow intentional? How can I fix it?
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bbdb-info
BBDB Home Pa
On April 12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> I must apologise again for my recent low profile; I'll try and get
> some good code updates in this weekend with, perhaps, a view towards a
> new release at the end of the month.
damn. i'm denying i ever said this.
waider.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / Yes, it /i
On April 6, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> - You have more control over the update type, i.e. you may
> add all or none of the new addresses with just one key
> press ...
The various functions to display all records need to distinguish
between the Sender address(es) and the Recipient address(es) f
On , March 30 2001 17:38:33, Colin Rafferty wrote:
[...]
> > Well, a feature got added for Gnus, I think. BBDB tries to notice all
> > the recipients.
>
> Isn't that just a variation on `bbdb-show-all-recipients'?
Basically yes, but bbdb/gnus-summary-show-all-recipients is
better in the followi
Alex Schroeder writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Colin Rafferty) writes:
>> Norbert Koch writes:
>> > Another header version which bbdb dislikes is
>> > 'To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mr Foo)'.
>> It works for me (BBDB version 2.00.06).
>> See my `From'.
>> Did this get broken?
> Well, a feature got adde
Robert Fenk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> And now I see it. It happens only if the last displayed
> header is one of those where we want to extract addresses,
> but unfortunately I have sorted them differently ...
>
> A fix is in CVS and the diff attached!
Thanks for the fix. I'm playing arou
On Thursday, March 29 2001 10:21:34, Norbert Koch wrote:
[...]
> Yes, I see now what happens. The combination
>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mr Foo)
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mr Foo)
And now I see it. It happens only if the last displayed
header is one of those where we want to extract addres
Robert Fenk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi!
> Well it is accepting those, but not " And it is liberal, since those bad one will generate no
> error, but you will get a message complaining about them ...
Yes, I see now what happens. The combination
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mr Foo)
Reply-To: [EMA
On , March 27 2001 22:30:54, Kai Grossjohann wrote:
> Technically, `To: ' is not a valid mail header, it must be either
> `To: foo' or `To: bla '.
>
> Nevertheless, BBDB should not barf when reading this. Be liberal in
> what you accept, and so on...
Well it is accepting those, but not " Anothe
Robert Fenk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My guess: One of the headers (From,To,Reply-To), probably
> the Reply-To header is not extracted correctly, as the
> closing ">" seems to be missing.
>
> Do a "M-: (mail-fetch-field "Reply-To") RET"
> Does it return the complete header content?
>
> Rem
,
> which is not the default.
I did this.
Signaling: (error "Cannot extract an address component at \"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]\"")
signal(error ("Cannot extract an address component at \"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]\""))
erro
Norbert Koch writes:
> Another header version which bbdb dislikes is
> 'To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mr Foo)'.
It works for me (BBDB version 2.00.06).
See my `From'.
Did this get broken?
--
Colin
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/
On March 27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Technically, `To: ' is not a valid mail header, it must be either
> `To: foo' or `To: bla '.
>
> Nevertheless, BBDB should not barf when reading this. Be liberal in
> what you accept, and so on...
>
> kai
Oddly enough, if I do (bbdb-extract-address-compon
On March 28, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > Technically, `To: ' is not a valid mail header, it must be either
> > `To: foo' or `To: bla '.
> >
> > Nevertheless, BBDB should not barf when reading this. Be liberal in
> > what you accept, and so on...
>
> Another header version which bbdb dislikes is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kai Großjohann) writes:
Hi!
> Technically, `To: ' is not a valid mail header, it must be either
> `To: foo' or `To: bla '.
>
> Nevertheless, BBDB should not barf when reading this. Be liberal in
> what you accept, and so on...
Another header version which bbdb dislikes is
'
oolkit) of Sat Jun 24 2000 on snail.
> >
> > Any ideas?
> >
> > Cannot extract an address component at "<[EMAIL PROTECTED]".
>
> Can you generate a stacktrace for this?
One usually would not get a stack trace for this unless
bbdb-extract-address-comp
;
> Cannot extract an address component at "<[EMAIL PROTECTED]".
Not really, I am not able to reproduce this with Xemacs. ;/
My guess: One of the headers (From,To,Reply-To), probably
the Reply-To header is not extracted correctly, as the
closing ">" seems to be missing
Technically, `To: ' is not a valid mail header, it must be either
`To: foo' or `To: bla '.
Nevertheless, BBDB should not barf when reading this. Be liberal in
what you accept, and so on...
kai
--
Be indiscrete. Do it continuously.
___
[EMAIL PROTEC
On March 27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> I am getting the following error on Oort Gnus v0.01, updated a few
> days ago, BBDB version 2.33 ($Date: 2001/03/26 14:35:42 $), GNU Emacs
> 20.7.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, X toolkit) of Sat Jun 24 2000 on snail.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Cann
I am getting the following error on Oort Gnus v0.01, updated a few
days ago, BBDB version 2.33 ($Date: 2001/03/26 14:35:42 $), GNU Emacs
20.7.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, X toolkit) of Sat Jun 24 2000 on snail.
Any ideas?
Cannot extract an address component at "<[EMAIL PROTECTED]".
This
On Thursday, February 1 2001 23:34:07, Sridhar Boovaraghavan wrote:
[...]
> I have had to set bbdb-extract-address-components-handler to nil for
> normal VM behavior to come back.
O.k. stay with this until I understand what is going wrong
...
Bye Robert
_
Robert Fenk writes:
> On Thursday, February 1 2001 00:17:41, Sridhar Boovaraghavan wrote:
> [...]
> > This might be some weird interaction with Emacs 21. I downloaded
> > 21.0.97 (the latest pretest) today and the behavior was even
> > worse. Now in addition to the error, VM doesn't display t
Robert Fenk writes:
> On Thursday, February 1 2001 00:17:41, Sridhar Boovaraghavan wrote:
> [...]
> > This might be some weird interaction with Emacs 21. I downloaded
> > 21.0.97 (the latest pretest) today and the behavior was even
> > worse. Now in addition to the error, VM doesn't display t
")
funcall(error " ")
(let ((result ...)) (if (and ... ... ... ... ...) (progn ... ...)))
(cond ((equal bbdb-extract-address-component-handler nil)) ((equal
bbdb-extract-address-component-handler ...) (bbdb-warn "Cannot extract an address
component at \"%
On Thursday, February 1 2001 00:17:41, Sridhar Boovaraghavan wrote:
[...]
> This might be some weird interaction with Emacs 21. I downloaded
> 21.0.97 (the latest pretest) today and the behavior was even
> worse. Now in addition to the error, VM doesn't display the messages
> properly (I see the e
On Monday, January 29 2001 23:00:21, Ronan Waide wrote:
[...]
> > many times. Now when I try to display/edit a user's notes by pressing
> > ';', it doesn't come up. It displays the above message and exits. I
> > couldn't get a meaningful stack trace also.
> >
> > Does this mean that some field(s)
On January 29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Hi,
>
> I am using the latest BBDB out of CVS, VM 6.90, Emacs 21.0.96.
>
> I am getting this error
>
> --
> Cannot extract an address component at " ".
> --
>
> many times. Now when I try to display/edit a
Hi,
I am using the latest BBDB out of CVS, VM 6.90, Emacs 21.0.96.
I am getting this error
--
Cannot extract an address component at " ".
--
many times. Now when I try to display/edit a user's notes by pressing
';', it doesn't come up. It displays the above mes
33 matches
Mail list logo
