Hi all,
Just wondering, are there plans for an always on top control in BB?
Anyway, BB is a primo wm - you guys are doing an awesome job, and it's much
appreciated by non-coders such as myself :)
Cheers,
Matt.
ÄãºÃ£¡
×öΪÄã×îºÃµÄÅóÓÑ£¬ÇëÄãÒ»¶¨¿´Íê¡£Good luck to you.
×îÐÂÃâ·Ñ׬Ǯ¹«Ë¾--NitroClicks(»ð±¬Óʼþ, ¼ò³ÆNC)!
NCÊÇÒ»¼Ò×îеÄÊÕÓʼþ׬Ǯ¹«Ë¾, Ãâ·Ñ×¢²á, ¶øÇÒ×¢²á¾Í°×ËÍ$10ÃÀÔª (80ÔªÈËÃñ±Ò)!Õâ
ƪÎÄÕ¿ÉÄÜÊÇÄãÃüÔ˵Äת»ú£¬ÇëÂýÂýµØ¶Á¡£
µ«ÇëǧÍò²»Òª°ÑËüºÍÒÔÇ°ÆäËûµÄ´ËÀ๫˾ÏàÌá²¢ÂÛ!
On 02-Apr-2002 Matt Wilson wrote:
Hi all,
Just wondering, are there plans for an always on top control in BB?
Anyway, BB is a primo wm - you guys are doing an awesome job, and it's much
appreciated by non-coders such as myself :)
Cheers,
Matt.
yep, always on top/bottom is in the works.
How about adding shadows for the text on toolbar, windows bars and menus?
Nothing fancy, just the same text with different color under the normal
one, and displaced by 1px VH. Maybe some resources describing the color
of the shadow and maybe the displacement distance in the menu files? If
someone
The forecast: a long thread arguing for and against freeping creaturism.
Anyway... I just wanted to voice my opinion in favour of said addition... it
would definately add some character additional to BB!
DC
On Tue, Apr02,02 18:29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about adding shadows for the text
On 02-Apr-2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about adding shadows for the text on toolbar, windows bars and menus?
Nothing fancy, just the same text with different color under the normal
one, and displaced by 1px VH. Maybe some resources describing the color
of the shadow and maybe the
On 02-Apr-2002 Marius Nita wrote:
This should at least be used for disabled menu items. Right now, disabled
items look anything but disabled. Also, you may consider having one disabled
item that says (empty) or something similar in empty menus.
WHY?? An empty menu is well, empty. If I put
On Tue, Apr02,02 09:24, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
This is not KDE or Windows. We do not have to do everything just like
they do.
And we're also not catering to morons! :)
DC
--
Derek Cunningham
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Human beings act intelligently only after they have
exhausted the
On 02-Apr-2002 Derek Cunningham wrote:
On Tue, Apr02,02 09:24, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
This is not KDE or Windows. We do not have to do everything just like
they do.
And we're also not catering to morons! :)
I was attempting to not be insulting (-;
Seriously, from the user
On Tue, Apr02,02 09:54, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
And we're also not catering to morons! :)
I was attempting to not be insulting (-;
*shrug* life's too short to walk on shells.
Seriously, from the user perspective, is having an empty menu actually be empty
that shocking? Must we
IMHO, the only thing that would make sense, would be to drop the menu item
entirely, unless it get something in it. Besides, the default menu doesn't
have any empty menus... and most people have generated their own menus
manually, so why would one leave a menu empty?
think icons/window
On Tue, Apr02,02 10:24, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
IMHO, the only thing that would make sense, would be to drop the menu item
entirely, unless it get something in it. Besides, the default menu doesn't
have any empty menus... and most people have generated their own menus
manually, so
I've only been using blackbox for a few months, but it is certainly my
favorite WM in the more than two years I've been using Linux. My only beef
with it so far is the slit... and not so much how it looks or works, but how
programs are loaded into it.
I've searched through the archives, and
On Tue, Apr02,02 14:38, Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote:
I've only been using blackbox for a few months, but it is certainly my
favorite WM in the more than two years I've been using Linux. My only beef
with it so far is the slit... and not so much how it looks or works, but how
programs are
I've tried hacks like:
bbrun
sleep 1 bbpager
sleep 1 wmusic
etc., but these are not consistent.
Any _other_ ideas anyone?
There is no good way. The slit is given windows as they are opened and it
basically adds them to the bottom of the stack. The only sure fire way is
On Tue, Apr02,02 11:52, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
I've tried hacks like:
bbrun
sleep 1 bbpager
sleep 1 wmusic
etc., but these are not consistent.
Any _other_ ideas anyone?
There is no good way. The slit is given windows as they are opened and it
basically
Maybe bblaunch could be modified (with some source code modification in BB
as well) to specify which position a dockable app should be in?
Just an idea... expand on it as you see fit. :)
we would have to come up with some way to tell blackbox where to put it. Seems
icky:
put bbpal at
On Tue, Apr02,02 12:02, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
Maybe bblaunch could be modified (with some source code modification in BB
as well) to specify which position a dockable app should be in?
Just an idea... expand on it as you see fit. :)
we would have to come up with some way to
Hi,
because i want to have all the blackbox related dot_files in one
directory (the .blackbox/),
(who want x dot_files in his home for more or less 1 applikation)
i've changed my 0.61 code.
I see the problem, that most (all?) bb-tools have their own dot_file
or search the .blackboxrc in the
On Tuesday 02 April 2002 15:08, Derek Cunningham wrote:
Agreed... _I_ don't really care anymore, since I've found gkrellm, it
solves all of my problems (well, except for bbpager, and bbkeys is
iconified).
...
DC
Last I'd tried GKrellM, I hated it -- but I just checked it out again, and I
In blackbox, only, use the code I contributed to gkrellm. =:)
*injuring arm patting self on back*. First, make sure that you have
remember screen location at exit amd move to it at next startup
UN-checked in gkrellm's configuration. Then, restart gkrellm with
gkrellm -w and gkrellm will fit
On Tue, 2 Apr 2002 16:37:34 -0500
Matthew Weier O'Phinney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, I _would_ like to put this in the slit as I use multiple
workspaces. I just tried wmswallow as follows:
wmswallow gkrellm gkrellm
...and got a truncated gkrellm inside the slit. How do I get the
On 02-Apr-2002 Jens Giessmann wrote:
Hi,
because i want to have all the blackbox related dot_files in one
directory (the .blackbox/),
(who want x dot_files in his home for more or less 1 applikation)
i've changed my 0.61 code.
I see the problem, that most (all?) bb-tools have their own
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 01:48:14PM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
as we move things into shared code I hope to fix this. blackbox
needs a way to advertise where its .rc file is. Perhaps I want to
run tests with a user's config -- blackbox --rc users.blackboxrc.
Everything should still
Ah, why do I even bother?
I talked to nyz about the empty thing a while back and he liked the idea; he
asked me to file a feature request for it, so he could put it in
moving_target. Then again, nyz is not your ordinary idiot.
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 09:24:18AM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
For those of you not hitting the site every day.
http://sf.net/projects/blackboxwm
On 02-Apr-2002 Marius Nita wrote:
Ah, why do I even bother?
All I was asking for is a rationale for why you felt they should be added. I
am not opposed to the idea, I just want to know why adding them is better
than what we have. It appears silly to me right now. Show me the other
I use licq and have its icon in the slit. I can close its window and then
click the icon to make it reapear. In blackbox 0.62.1, the licq window
reappears in the current workspace (good). But in the CVS release, it
appears in the workspace I closed it from(bad). I use the licq CVS from
about a
On 03-Apr-2002 Eric Binet wrote:
I use licq and have its icon in the slit. I can close its window and then
click the icon to make it reapear. In blackbox 0.62.1, the licq window
reappears in the current workspace (good). But in the CVS release, it
appears in the workspace I closed it
On Tue, 2 Apr 2002, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
If anyone with some hacking skill uses them (these seem to be opposite
attributes) please help me out.
Ok, got the message, it might take a while though, I never wrote window
managing code.
The problem is each item owns its menu. So to click
30 matches
Mail list logo
