Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-30 Thread Alberto Monteiro
Under what circumstances is prostitution, as outliked below, different from any other profession, like being a tax collector, an engineer, a pediatrician or a policeman? Erik Reuter wrote: Contention #1: Under certain circumstances (legality, reasonable regulation, etc.) prostitution can be a

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-30 Thread Martin Lewis
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 10:15:44 -0600, Dan Minette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I realise I have been terse to the point of rudeness in my recent posts to you. This was because it seemed to me that you were dragging child abuse into a conversation about adult rights. I accept that this is not what you

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-30 Thread Martin Lewis
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 12:42:48 -0500, Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Contention #1: Under certain circumstances (legality, reasonable regulation, etc.) prostitution can be a healthy and worthwhile job for a non-neglible fraction of people who choose to do it Contention #2: There are a

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-30 Thread Erik Reuter
Here are some questions: 1) Do you have a Bachelor's or post-graduate degree in a scientific field? 2) In recorded history, have any physical phenomena ever occurred that are completely impossible to ever explain scientifically? 3) Can a man and a woman have a healthy and fulfilling sexual

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-30 Thread Julia Thompson
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004, Alberto Monteiro wrote: Under what circumstances is prostitution, as outliked below, different from any other profession, like being a tax collector, an engineer, a pediatrician or a policeman? Erik Reuter wrote: Contention #1: Under certain circumstances

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-30 Thread Warren Ockrassa
On Nov 28, 2004, at 10:08 PM, Ritu wrote: Warren Ockrassa wrote: But when you work at any job at all you are doing exactly the same thing. You're selling your body for money. Even if your work is strictly intellectual, since there is no way to separate mind from body, you are *always* trading

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-29 Thread Martin Lewis
On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 22:31:33 -0600, Dan Minette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But, children are clearly capable of being sex workers. The trade in child prostitution shows that. Children are also clearly capable of being soldiers or coal miners too. This doesn't mean it's a good idea, but

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-29 Thread Dan Minette
- Original Message - From: Martin Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 4:49 AM Subject: Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 22:31:33 -0600, Dan Minette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But, children

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-29 Thread Dan Minette
- Original Message - From: Andrew Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 12:16 AM Subject: RE: More hypocrisy on display than skin From: Ritu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Well, after reading one of the mails in this thread

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-29 Thread Martin Lewis
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 08:35:37 -0600, Dan Minette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The point that was made was not, since children are not allowed to participate in prostitution, there is something wrong with it. The point is that it isn't just one more job. Being a soldier isn't just one more

RE: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-29 Thread Ritu
Andrew Paul wrote: LOL, yes, you are well known for your callousness, you are clearly blessed with a heart of stone! *g* You do say the nicest things to a girl. :) I get the feeling we are all being armchair experts here. It would be best if we listened to one who had some experience

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-29 Thread Dan Minette
- Original Message - From: Martin Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 9:39 AM Subject: Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 08:35:37 -0600, Dan Minette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The point

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-29 Thread Warren Ockrassa
On Nov 29, 2004, at 7:56 AM, Dan Minette wrote: From: Ritu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I get the feeling we are all being armchair experts here. It would be best if we listened to one who had some experience in such matters. I have no doubt there are women (and perhaps men) who are pushed into

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-29 Thread Erik Reuter
On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 09:52:03AM -0700, Warren Ockrassa wrote: On Nov 29, 2004, at 7:56 AM, Dan Minette wrote: My wife worked with strippers as part of her work with incest survivors. That convinced me to not go to strip joints. Not because it was immoral because seeing semi-naked women

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-29 Thread Dan Minette
- Original Message - From: Warren Ockrassa [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 10:52 AM Subject: Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin On Nov 29, 2004, at 7:56 AM, Dan Minette wrote: So far you haven't supplied contrary

RE: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-29 Thread Julia Thompson
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004, Andrew Paul wrote: I get the feeling we are all being armchair experts here. It would be best if we listened to one who had some experience in such matters. I have no doubt there are women (and perhaps men) who are pushed into prostitution, either by force, or by

RE: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-29 Thread Andrew Paul
From: Dan Minette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Andrew Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] I get the feeling we are all being armchair experts here. It would be best if we listened to one who had some experience in such matters. I have no doubt there are women (and perhaps men) who are pushed into

RE: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-29 Thread Andrew Paul
From: Ritu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andrew Paul wrote: LOL, yes, you are well known for your callousness, you are clearly blessed with a heart of stone! *g* You do say the nicest things to a girl. :) Always glad to oblige :) I get the feeling we are all being armchair

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-29 Thread Warren Ockrassa
On Nov 29, 2004, at 10:45 AM, Dan Minette wrote: From: Warren Ockrassa [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Nov 29, 2004, at 7:56 AM, Dan Minette wrote: So far you haven't supplied contrary evidence. In fact you've supplied nothing at all except, at best, hearsay. Ah, if I haven't talked to the women myself, by

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-29 Thread Robert Seeberger
- Original Message - From: Dan Minette [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 10:15 AM Subject: Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin So, lets add a year and say she was 16, and able to work in a coal mine. Would it be reasonable

RE: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-29 Thread Andrew Paul
From: Julia Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Mon, 29 Nov 2004, Andrew Paul wrote: I get the feeling we are all being armchair experts here. It would be best if we listened to one who had some experience in such matters. I have no doubt there are women (and perhaps men) who are

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-28 Thread Dan Minette
- Original Message - From: Richard Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 10:22 AM Subject: Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin Dan said: But, children are clearly capable of being sex workers. The trade in child

RE: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-28 Thread Ritu
William T Goodall forwarded: http://skepdic.com/devadasi.html Thanks for the link. Jogan Shankar's book looks interesting. Some of the other links on that page didn't work for me, and so I did a quick google on the subject. I didn't come across a site which had comprehensive information but if

RE: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-28 Thread Ritu
Warren Ockrassa wrote: I'm unsure, furthermore, how you make the jump from paying for sex to treating the sex partner as an object. I guess it might be a matter of the amount of choice enjoyed by the women. Do they get to set their own price? Do they get to choose between

RE: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-28 Thread Andrew Paul
From: Ritu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Well, after reading one of the mails in this thread yesterday, I wouldn't say 'necessarily', but I would still say 'highly likely'. And the reason would be that that is what most of us tend to do with most of the people who provide us with services. [I,

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-25 Thread Robert Seeberger
Doug Pensinger wrote: On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 21:46:36 -0600, Steve Sloan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dan Minette wrote: Sex is tied to one's emotions, to one's sense of self in a way that cleaning toilets, flipping burgers, raking yards, going down coal mines, etc. are not. No, but all

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-25 Thread Warren Ockrassa
On Nov 23, 2004, at 2:30 PM, Dan Minette wrote: From: Damon Agretto [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yupa disproportionate number of prostitutes, and strippers for that matter, have been the victim of childhood sexual abuse. How much of this evidence is skewed in favor of areas where prostitution os

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-24 Thread Erik Reuter
On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 10:27:28PM -0600, Dan Minette wrote: From: Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 03:30:09PM -0600, Dan Minette wrote: One might argue that the problems are caused by cultural views, that as long as prostitution is perceived as dirty or immoral,

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-24 Thread Martin Lewis
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 08:30:47 -0500, Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My problem with sex work is a lot more from a feminist perspective than from a religious perspective. The foundation of my viewpoints on what makes things right and wrong in sex is that one should treat other people

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-24 Thread JDG
A very simple question - how many parents want their daughters to grow up to be prostitutes? Most every woman that turns to prostitution represents a failure by society. JDG ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-24 Thread JDG
At 01:22 PM 11/23/2004 -0600 Dan Minette wrote: Having an affair with a young women that is much closer to one's daughter's age than to one's own is not healthy. Based upon what factual, immutable, inarguable criteria? Good for the kids, that sort of thing. For those who don't care for

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-24 Thread Martin Lewis
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 09:33:32 -0500, JDG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A very simple question - how many parents want their daughters to grow up to be prostitutes? How many parents want their daughters to grow up to be toilet cleaners? What is the relevance of your simple question to the topic

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-24 Thread Martin Lewis
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 22:00:34 -0600, Dan Minette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Prostitution is unhealthy? Yupa disproportionate number of prostitutes, and strippers for that matter, have been the victim of childhood sexual abuse. Or, do you think its OK for a parent to have sex

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-24 Thread Dan Minette
- Original Message - From: Martin Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 8:55 AM Subject: Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 22:00:34 -0600, Dan Minette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Prostitution

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-24 Thread Erik Reuter
On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 09:26:57AM -0600, Dan Minette wrote: In the social sciences, causality is extremely hard to prove. And since one should be cautious about making decisions without knowing causes, one should be careful about concluding that prostitution is unhealthy. -- Erik Reuter

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-24 Thread Dan Minette
- Original Message - From: Andrew Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 1:25 AM Subject: RE: More hypocrisy on display than skin What is the inherent difference between paying some guy to play an hour of tennis with you

Prostitution [was: More hypocrisy on display than skin]

2004-11-24 Thread Alberto Monteiro
William T Goodall wrote: So if making it illegal doesn't actually make it go away and regulating it makes at least some improvement in the lives of those involved... False logic. Murder exists everywhere, and only insane people think of making it legal. And don't tell me that murder harms

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-24 Thread Martin Lewis
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 09:26:57 -0600, Dan Minette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No you weren't. You were asked whether prostitution was unhealthy and you responded with the non sequitar that lots of people who practice prostitution were sexually abused as children. This has nothing to do with

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-24 Thread Martin Lewis
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 09:45:53 -0600, Dan Minette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What is the inherent difference between paying some guy to play an hour of tennis with you a week, and some girl to you for an hour a week. In both cases, they would probably rather be doing it with someone else (if

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-24 Thread Erik Reuter
On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 09:45:53AM -0600, Dan Minette wrote: In the first household, the 15 year old girl is required to do chores around the house (vacuum, clean toilets, mop the kitchen floor) for about two hours a week. In the second, she is required to have sex with her step-father 2

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-24 Thread Dan Minette
- Original Message - From: Martin Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 10:01 AM Subject: Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 09:45:53 -0600, Dan Minette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-24 Thread Dan Minette
- Original Message - From: Martin Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 9:48 AM Subject: Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 09:26:57 -0600, Dan Minette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No you

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-24 Thread Richard Baker
Dan said: But, children are clearly capable of being sex workers. The trade in child prostitution shows that. Children are also clearly capable of being soldiers or coal miners too. This doesn't mean it's a good idea, but nor does it mean that adults being any of those things is necessarily a

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-24 Thread Alberto Monteiro
JDG wrote: A very simple question - how many parents want their daughters to grow up to be prostitutes? How many parents want their kids to grow up to be tax collectors? :-P Alberto Monteiro ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-24 Thread Martin Lewis
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 10:15:31 -0600, Dan Minette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Good question. Let me give an example that illustrates it. Lets consider two newly blended family. In both cases, there is a 15 year old daughter of the women in the new family. They all move into the man's

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-24 Thread Doug Pensinger
Dan wrote: It is a different, related question. There is a hypothesis that clearly fits the data, including comments by sex workers. Women who feel that they already are in a degraded state with regards to sex are much more likely to take a job that is inherently degrading. So if that's the

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-24 Thread Warren Ockrassa
On Nov 24, 2004, at 8:26 AM, Dan Minette wrote: I don't. I'm sorry if my words indicated that. I'm just trying to not make assumptions...and after I've been challenged to find support for things for which the evidence is well known No you weren't. You were asked whether prostitution was

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-24 Thread Dan Minette
- Original Message - From: Doug Pensinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 10:54 AM Subject: Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin Dan wrote: It is a different, related question. There is a hypothesis that clearly

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-24 Thread Dan Minette
- Original Message - From: Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 10:05 AM Subject: Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 09:45:53AM -0600, Dan Minette wrote: In the first household

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-24 Thread Doug Pensinger
Dan wrote: In short, I'd consider prostitutes women who are in a bad place in their lives, not women who should be considered criminal. This is a more reasonable argument, but still does not deal with all aspects of the problem. As long as there is a demand for prostitutes and women willing to

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-24 Thread Doug Pensinger
Dan wrote: BTW, I'm not arguing either against/for legalization here. I'm arguing that one should now be seeing marked differences between prostitutes in the US and Germany/Netherlands as a result of legalization if the source of the difficulties experienced by prostitutes is fundamentally the

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-24 Thread Erik Reuter
On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 11:35:59AM -0600, Dan Minette wrote: It's interesting that you comments on my mental block. I have tried to support my arguments with data. To the extent that you have expressed a meaningful point, which isn't that great an extent, it is an irrelevant argument to what

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-24 Thread Dan Minette
- Original Message - From: Doug Pensinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 12:02 PM Subject: Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin Dan wrote: In short, I'd consider prostitutes women who are in a bad place

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-24 Thread Doug Pensinger
Dan wrote: I've been rather busy, though, fighting for the proposition that there is an intrinsic problem with prostitution that won't go away simply by changing societies attitudes towards the activity. Everything has intrinsic problems, methinks, though some are less important than others.

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-24 Thread Dan Minette
- Original Message - From: Doug Pensinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 12:19 PM Subject: Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin Dan wrote: BTW, I'm not arguing either against/for legalization here. I'm arguing

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-24 Thread Erik Reuter
On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 01:06:20PM -0600, Dan Minette wrote: The personal history of people involved in something is totally irrelevant to what they are involved in? Is that what you are saying? No. I wrote clearly, and so did several others. I'm not going to repeat it for a 4th or 5th time.

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-24 Thread Dan Minette
- Original Message - From: Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 1:14 PM Subject: Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 01:06:20PM -0600, Dan Minette wrote: The personal history

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-24 Thread Erik Reuter
On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 02:24:19PM -0600, Dan Minette wrote: So, more documentation should be forthcoming. And it will probably be dismissed out of hand again, for the same reason! This is so pathetic it is truly funny. For your next trick, you can prove that swimming is unhealthy. We already

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-24 Thread Doug Pensinger
Dan wrote: So, the idea that prostitution is not problematic is immune to falsification for 100 years or so? The question isn't whether or not prostitution is problematic; it's whether or not the decriminalization of prostitution makes it less problematic. Furthermore, the fact that there are

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-24 Thread Erik Reuter
On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 02:28:21PM -0800, Doug Pensinger wrote: One area I would expect improvement in almost immediately would be the spread of STDs. I would also think that by legitimizing the industry and levying taxes upon it that (among other things) improvements in health care,

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-24 Thread Warren Ockrassa
On Nov 23, 2004, at 11:22 PM, Dan Minette wrote: I'm picking one point to quickly refer to. Again, cite the literature. Are these studies done only in nations that assume monogamous couples? How much social bias it at play when we talk about how hard/easy it is for a blended family to maintain

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-24 Thread Warren Ockrassa
On Nov 24, 2004, at 10:35 AM, Dan Minette wrote: From: Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 09:45:53AM -0600, Dan Minette wrote: In the first household, the 15 year old girl is required to do chores around the house (vacuum, clean toilets, mop the kitchen floor) for about two

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-24 Thread Warren Ockrassa
On Nov 24, 2004, at 12:14 PM, Dan Minette wrote: Strippers at a local high class strip club, had put together a charity fund, and then voted to have it go to groups of sexually abused children. Teri talked to them, and they all had been sexually abused as children. Do you find this surprising?

RE: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-24 Thread Horn, John
Behalf Of Warren Ockrassa Do you find this surprising? I mean, the group self-selected. Of course they were all abuse victims. They set up a charity to *help* abuse victims. But it doesn't follow that all strippers are abuse victims, or even more likely to be abuse victims. Your

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-24 Thread Dan Minette
- Original Message - From: Warren Ockrassa [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 7:28 PM Subject: Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin On Nov 24, 2004, at 12:14 PM, Dan Minette wrote: Strippers at a local high class

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-24 Thread Warren Ockrassa
On Nov 24, 2004, at 7:06 PM, Dan Minette wrote: Strippers at a local high class strip club, had put together a charity fund, and then voted to have it go to groups of sexually abused children. Teri talked to them, and they all had been sexually abused as children. Do you find this surprising? I

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-24 Thread Steve Sloan
Dan Minette wrote: Sex is tied to one's emotions, to one's sense of self in a way that cleaning toilets, flipping burgers, raking yards, going down coal mines, etc. are not. No, but all those actions could be turned into euphemisms for sex... ;-)

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-24 Thread William T Goodall
On 24 Nov 2004, at 6:29 am, Ritu wrote: If one takes a look at the accounts of the dev-dasis, even from the region around the Khajurao temple, it is rare to come across women who didn't aim to get out of the business, and who wanted their own daughters to follow into the trade. And this is when

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-24 Thread Doug Pensinger
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 21:46:36 -0600, Steve Sloan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dan Minette wrote: Sex is tied to one's emotions, to one's sense of self in a way that cleaning toilets, flipping burgers, raking yards, going down coal mines, etc. are not. No, but all those actions could be turned

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-23 Thread Dan Minette
- Original Message - From: Warren Ockrassa [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2004 1:01 PM Subject: Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin So those who engage in group encounters are unhealthy? Extended intimacy partnership

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-23 Thread Damon Agretto
Yupa disproportionate number of prostitutes, and strippers for that matter, have been the victim of childhood sexual abuse. Or, do you think its OK for a parent to have sex with their 5 year old girl? Also, if you look at the lives of prostitutes, the working conditions of

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-23 Thread Alberto Monteiro
Damon Agretto wrote: How much of this evidence is skewed in favor of areas where prostitution os illegal? What sort of evidence do you have in areas were prostitution IS legal (such as Nevada, The Netherlands, etc)? Talking about hypocrisy... Prostitution[*] is legal in Brazil, but the

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-23 Thread Dan Minette
- Original Message - From: Damon Agretto [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 1:39 PM Subject: Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin Yupa disproportionate number of prostitutes, and strippers for that matter, have

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-23 Thread Dave Land
On Nov 23, 2004, at 11:22 AM, Dan Minette wrote: Prostitution is unhealthy? Yupa disproportionate number of prostitutes, and strippers for that matter, have been the victim of childhood sexual abuse. Or, do you think its OK for a parent to have sex with their 5 year old girl? While I usually

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-23 Thread William T Goodall
On 23 Nov 2004, at 9:30 pm, Dan Minette wrote: http://allserv.rug.ac.be/~rmak/europap/rapned.html which is a governmental report on legalized prostitution in the Netherlands. It quotes studies, but does not quote evidence that the decriminalization has resulted in a decrease in the negative

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-23 Thread Warren Ockrassa
On Nov 23, 2004, at 12:22 PM, Dan Minette wrote: So those who engage in group encounters are unhealthy? Extended intimacy partnership groups are unhealthy? People who have sex in order to enjoy sex -- not to express love, but just for the fun of it -- are also engaging in unhealthy sexual

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-23 Thread Erik Reuter
On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 03:30:09PM -0600, Dan Minette wrote: So, I'd conclude that a preliminary review of the evidence indicates that legalization does not remove problems with prostitution. Surely you meant does not remove ALL problems with prostitution? When you say prostitution is

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-23 Thread Erik Reuter
On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 05:41:30PM -0700, Warren Ockrassa wrote: No, but when you go ad hominem like this (third time in one argument), it's very hard to assume you have actual facts on your side. This is little more than hand-waving in an attempt to discredit my character -- that is, you're

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-23 Thread Warren Ockrassa
On Nov 23, 2004, at 6:12 PM, Erik Reuter wrote: On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 03:30:09PM -0600, Dan Minette wrote: So, I'd conclude that a preliminary review of the evidence indicates that legalization does not remove problems with prostitution. Surely you meant does not remove ALL problems with

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-23 Thread Warren Ockrassa
On Nov 23, 2004, at 7:33 PM, I drivelled: There is some research (I'll have to dig up the citation) that seems to show that sexual promiscuity in women is linked to homosexuality in their male children (!), and that those same male children are much more likely to engage in sexual

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-23 Thread Dan Minette
- Original Message - From: Dave Land [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 3:41 PM Subject: Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin On Nov 23, 2004, at 11:22 AM, Dan Minette wrote: Prostitution is unhealthy? Yup

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-23 Thread Dan Minette
- Original Message - From: Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 7:12 PM Subject: Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 03:30:09PM -0600, Dan Minette wrote: One might argue

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-23 Thread Dan Minette
- Original Message - From: William T Goodall [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 6:34 PM Subject: Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin which is a governmental report on legalized prostitution in the Netherlands

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-23 Thread Warren Ockrassa
On Nov 23, 2004, at 9:37 PM, Dan Minette wrote: From: William T Goodall [EMAIL PROTECTED] But making it illegal doesn't make it go away. Even strict Muslim countries have prostitution. No, it doesn't. But, my point was that prostitution wasn't healthy for society, not how/whether it should be

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-23 Thread Dan Minette
I'm unsure, furthermore, how you make the jump from paying for sex to treating the sex partner as an object. A guy goes to a prostitute because he loves her and cares about what happens to her as a person? Is that what you are arguing? Its about relationships? Dan M.

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-23 Thread Warren Ockrassa
On Nov 23, 2004, at 10:52 PM, Dan Minette wrote: I'm unsure, furthermore, how you make the jump from paying for sex to treating the sex partner as an object. A guy goes to a prostitute because he loves her and cares about what happens to her as a person? Is that what you are arguing? Its about

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-23 Thread Dan Minette
I'm picking one point to quickly refer to. - Original Message - From: Warren Ockrassa [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 6:41 PM Subject: Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin Or, to look at more common occurrences, lets

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-23 Thread Dan Minette
- Original Message - From: Warren Ockrassa [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 12:20 AM Subject: Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin On Nov 23, 2004, at 10:52 PM, Dan Minette wrote: I'm unsure, furthermore, how you

RE: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-23 Thread Ritu
Warren Ockrassa wrote: But making it illegal doesn't make it go away. Even strict Muslim countries have prostitution. No, it doesn't. But, my point was that prostitution wasn't healthy for society, not how/whether it should be regulated. It's healthy in *any* society that treats

RE: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-23 Thread Ritu
I wrote: The sex might be mind-blowingly good [I don't see myself caring about his pleasure], Edit: [for me at least - I don't see...] Ritu ___ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

RE: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-23 Thread Andrew Paul
From: Dan Minette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm unsure, furthermore, how you make the jump from paying for sex to treating the sex partner as an object. A guy goes to a prostitute because he loves her and cares about what happens to her as a person? Is that what you are arguing? Its

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-20 Thread Dan Minette
- Original Message - From: Warren Ockrassa [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 11:48 AM Subject: Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin Impotence spots seem to adress long term relationships (marriages) that have been

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-20 Thread Warren Ockrassa
On Nov 20, 2004, at 11:46 AM, Dan Minette wrote: Impotence spots seem to adress long term relationships (marriages) that have been adversely affected by a physical dysfunction. Yes it deals with sex, but it seems to deal with it in a healthy manner. Please describe how you obtained the

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-20 Thread Julia Thompson
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004, JDG wrote: At 07:52 AM 11/19/2004 -0800 Doug Pensinger wrote: I wasn't outraged but I thought the whole thing was in poor taste. I think that it is important, however, to also note that everyone who watched ABC's promo was receiving a message from ABC (and a very

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-20 Thread Julia Thompson
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004, Doug Pensinger wrote: Julia wrote: I wonder if we would even be having this discussion if it had been Payton Manning instead of T.O.? I think Payton Manning would have had better taste than to agree to participate in the promo T.O. was in. :) Now you see,

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-20 Thread Robert Seeberger
Julia Thompson wrote: On Fri, 19 Nov 2004, JDG wrote: At 07:52 AM 11/19/2004 -0800 Doug Pensinger wrote: I don't think that's quite accurate outside of San Francisco. TO is the #1 selling jersey in the NFL, IIRC. Not in Texas, it isn't, believe me! A lot of people in Texas hate him,

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-19 Thread JDG
At 10:03 PM 11/18/2004 -0800 Doug Pensinger wrote: JDG wrote: Anyhow, just about every paragraph in this piece was off-target, but the above are probably the best examples. So it's just OK for the _sponsors_ of football to plug sex and intoxicating drugs to this oh-so-easily offended crowd

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-19 Thread Doug Pensinger
JDG wrote: Let me be clear that I was outraged by the Super Bowl Halftime Show long before Janet Jackson ever appeared - everything from Kid Rock blatantly violating the US Flag Code to a dance performance that was extremely raunchy.In fact, I was so disgusted that I was in the restroom when

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-19 Thread William T Goodall
On 19 Nov 2004, at 12:31 pm, JDG wrote: Let me be clear that I was outraged by the Super Bowl Halftime Show long before Janet Jackson ever appeared - everything from Kid Rock blatantly violating the US Flag Code to a dance performance that was extremely raunchy.In fact, I was so disgusted

Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin

2004-11-19 Thread Dan Minette
- Original Message - From: Doug Pensinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 9:52 AM Subject: Re: More hypocrisy on display than skin A player people love to hate - big difference. that was directly glorifying casual

  1   2   >