[OSL | CCIE_Voice] christa niemeier

http://southbeachcottage.com/Silvana.html ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] EM Service LAB 9A

Could be a stupid question but are you subscribing the EM service at the Phone and doing a reset? Ash> On 21/03/2010 10:57, Moataz Mamdouh wrote: Dear All i am trying to configure EM on CUCM 7.1.2 , it works fine with me when i add the service as service url in the phone button template , but

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] NTP and DBReplication

I'm not sure if it has been discussed before… I’m doing several labs these past days and I noticed a weird behavior in CM. I did the auto-registration of the phone and start to apply the correct DN, DP, etc. At some point theses changes stop to take effect in the phone. Even a reset/restart

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need Clarification: mls qos map cos-dscp

I'd be curious when "auto qos voip" changed to CS3 or if it has, but you should change it. The feeling is that QoS SRND needs to be updated for MediaNet/RFC4594 and that Auto QoS should only be used in most basic scenarios. The QoS Baseline recommends marking Call-Signaling to CS3. However, cur

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] EM Service LAB 9A

As people continue to ask for help without any thorough explanations or troubleshooting done, you are free to ask as many "stupid" questions as you like. On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 12:01 AM, Ashar wrote: > Could be a stupid question but are you subscribing the EM service at the > Phone and doing a

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE Voice Vol 2 Lab 5 Task 4.2

Why don't you provide your translation rules? And then , what ephone-dn or register dn are you expecting to hit? You could also send a "show dial-peer voice sum" to check the status of the dial-peers. On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 1:53 PM, CCIETalk.com wrote: > Another interesting task > > My BR2

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] EM Service LAB 9A

Hi Ashar, Ensure that the extension mobility service is enabled, if not you can enable it by checking the "Enable" Checkbox in the extension mobility service configuration window. Regards, Radhesh From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudyli

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need Clarification: mls qos map cos-dscp

In 12.2(44), the cos-dscp marking is correct CS3 or 24. In "Ask the expert" Ben has provided that to be IOS version for lab. Another important thing that has changed and not updated in SRND is the ability to put both a priority queue and service policy on the interface. -- Mustafa Jason Aarons

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] EM Service LAB 9A

Dear Ashar   thanks for your fast reply on my stupid question , it's very clear that i didn't forget to subscribe the service on the phone and reset it  , by the way it's working on 7960 but not 7961 or 65. also you do not have to reply on any question if you found it a STUPID.   --- On Sun, 3

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] EM Service LAB 9A

Guys, calm down I think only Randall understood what I meant... Radhesh...I am not the one who asked this question...it's Mr.Mamdouh. And for my dear friend Moataz Mamdouh...I never said your question was stupid, I said my question might sound stupid as I was asking a basic question but y

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE reset

Hi, I am having this strange problem that my Cisco Unity Express ... is just suddenly not working anymore... Is this a common problem? My phones went into SRST more and from there CUE was just working fine ... but when coming out of SRST mode the phones registered to the CUCM... CUE suddenly w

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Standard Local Route List/Group ?

Just want to know how most would handle this type of scenario. It appears there are multiple ways to configure this. 9.[2-9]XX -> Standard Local RL (must strip predot because HQ is mgcp gw) *HQ Device Pool:* Standard Local Route Group: HQ-MGCP-RG *BR1 Device Pool:* Standard Local Route Gr

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] SRST display problem

Hello, I am having some issues in displaying the number on PSTN phone while in SRST mode. I only want the _calling number_ to get displayed on PSTN phone but I am getting a number with + and then number again in brackets for e.g. it display this on PSTN phone > From *+16178631001 (*6178631001

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SRST display problem

Use clid strip on Dial peer Sent from my iPhone On Mar 21, 2010, at 10:53 AM, Ashar wrote: Hello, I am having some issues in displaying the number on PSTN phone while in SRST mode. I only want the calling number to get displayed on PSTN phone but I am getting a number with + and then num

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Standard Local Route List/Group ?

Mike (sorry, missed to copy the list on first try), You are missing one option, which is the one I like most. For almost all situations, I would go about using Calling Party Transformations and Called Party Transformations. Since these are device specific, you would make a Called Party Transform

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SRST display problem

Ashar is correct, that should help. Funny, I have a similar setup right now, so I checked on how the voice ports look like as I noticed the SRST phones would pickup the mask from the call manager, and use it as the calling name. I have this on a similar setup (my mask and caller id are backwards

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SRST display problem

Thanks a lot for your help guys. I know this command just forgot to use it :) I will try it on my next session. Thanks, Ash> On 22/03/2010 02:41, Randall Saborio wrote: Ashar is correct, that should help. Funny, I have a similar setup right now, so I checked on how the voice ports look like

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE reset

Hi Iwan, I experienced this before, and applied the same troubleshooting you mentioned, but it was to long to restore the cue functioning. A way I found to get the module back up quickly, was to going to srst mode by shutting down the serial interface between br2 and hq, so, restoring the connecti

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Standard Local Route List/Group ?

ahh..yes very good point... I have been moving away from the "new school" routing methods lately because of some of the flexibility issues I have ran into while using it. For instance ANI manipulation based on the type of call. I do prefer sticking to the "old school" routing method if possible,

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SIP Integration of UCM and UC

Hi, Did you take a look at this document? http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/connection/7x/integration/cucm_sip/guide/cucintcucmsip050.html Also, make sure the Redirecting Div

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE reset

Guys, I havent run into such specific problems, but the other day I ran into this document which is related. From it, it seems doing the reload is needed on most occasions, but should try Ottos suggestion first as it would be faster. It mentions a bug but I am still confused on the cause of the fa

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Standard Local Route List/Group ?

Hi Mike, If using old school method, I think you wouldn't be using local route group concept as well, right?. In that case you will need two separate RP, two different RL/RG, in which case you can perform manipulations in RG within RL and send the leading 9 only to the h.323 gw, If still want to

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Standard Local Route List/Group ?

Thanks Otto. Yes I would not use standard local route groups if I had the option not to, but am exploring methods if forced to use standard local route groups based on requirements of the lab. For call routing what was your approach... old school ..or new school ? and why ? Thanks, Mike Bro

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] EZVPN with ASA, Any progress IPExpert????

Hi, I've read a couple of weeks ago that Tyson Scott is working on the issue of EZVPN with ASA and trying to fix it. Any update on this? I have a Cisco ASA and would like to use it to do EZvpn with my hardware phones, any one had luck with configuration?? Thx

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Called & Calling Party Transformations

I just discovered something on accident that seems more like a bug. On the phones you can only configure the "calling party transformation css", which makes sense because you have already reached the destination (called #/phone). BUT the "calling party transformation css" can contain "call*ed* pa

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME- cBarge on Overlay DNs???

t; For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > > -- Regards, Otto Sanchez CCIE #25592 (Voice) Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc. URL: http://www.IPexpert.com -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http:/

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SIP Integration of UCM and UC

I meant for the *Out*bound direction, i.e., from ucm to uc, On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Otto Sanchez wrote: > Hi, > > Did you take a look at this document? > > > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/connection/7x/integration/cucm_sip/guide/cucintcucmsip050.html > > >

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Standard Local Route List/Group ?

Hi Mike, I would get used to the new features and the new way to tackle the dial plan, as they, in many cases will optimize the call routing configurations, lets think about your example, if you would have used cd xform patterns, only one route pattern and rl/ rg would have been used, also think i

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Standard Local Route List/Group ?

Yes, I understand in the real world the new method has tons of advantages in regards to simplifying the dialplan if designed properly. But for the LAB the new method in my opinion has far less flexibility. *2 examples:* 1. If I need backup gateways for a route pattern then "standard rl/rg" would

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Called & Calling Party Transformations

Yes, I agree. It is just sort of misleading. You would think called party transformations can only affect the called number, and calling party transformations can only affect the calling number, but that is not the case. Basically, as you mentioned, they are just transformation patterns assigned

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Called & Calling Party Transformations

Whenever I'm building those CSS, I always name my xform patterns and partitions accordingly. Can take a few extra minutes, but I am all but guaranteed to lose more than that troubleshooting in a lab scenario From: Mike Brooks [mailto:2xcci...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2010 11:56 P

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] EM Service LAB 9A

Dear Ashar No problem my friend it was just miss-understanding from me , but the problem still exist :) i can't figure exactly what is the cause of this issue . why i got "no service configured" on the ip phone which is already subscribed to the service do any one know how to restore the servic