Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS WAN

ses AF31. You will need to set your generated singling to CS3 for mgcp (mgcp ip qos dscp cs3 sig), dial-peers (under dial-peer voip: ip qos dscp cs3 sig), and sccp (sccp ip precedence 3). Router generated media usually defaults to EF. > > Regards, > Vir > > > > > From: Just

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS WAN

you think that this could cause an issue on the WAN? Regards, Vir From: Justin Carney <justin.s.car...@gmail.com> Sent: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 04:04:57 To: virajith <vir...@rediffmail.com> Cc: "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" <ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com> Subject: Re

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS WAN

1, last time pvc status changed 07:03:41 > > DLCI = 301, DLCI USAGE = LOCAL, PVC STATUS = ACTIVE, INTERFACE = > Serial0/3/0.3 > > input pkts 33687 output pkts 35031in bytes 21243954 > out bytes 2728102dropped pkts 0 in pkts dropped 0 > out pkts d

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS WAN

om> Sent: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 19:39:31 To: virajith <vir...@rediffmail.com> Cc: "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" <ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS WAN At first glance those steps look ok.  What do you see from "show traffic" and "show

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS WAN

At first glance those steps look ok. What do you see from "show traffic" and "show frame-r pvc #" on all three site routers? For odd audio issues I would look at LAN QoS (make sure you're not policing too low) and ensure you don't have one-way LFI or cRTP (which looks like you moved crtp to polic

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS WAN

Hello All, Any update? I am still waiting for a reply. Please assist guys. From: "virajith " Sent: Sat, 21 Sep 2013 07:18:00 To: "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" Subject: QOS WAN hi All, I am trying to connect HQ and SB with a 384 k

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS WAN

hi All, I am trying to connect HQ and SB with a 384 k frame relay PVC.Enable FRF.12 link fragmentation and interleave on the Frame Relay connections to fragment large data packets and interleave voice packets to minimize delays. Max delay between fragments should be set at 10 ms . Also provisio

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS WAN

hi All, I am trying to connect HQ and SB with a 384 k frame relay PVC.Enable FRF.12 link fragmentation and interleave on the Frame Relay connections to fragment large data packets and interleave voice packets to minimize delays. Max delay between fragments should be set at 10 ms . Also provision

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] qos for cue that coming to switch 1/4 port

inbound service > policy on the same interface ! > > Any one has idea about this doubt.. > Thx > > Manly > > -- > * From: * Amit Sharma 'aryan231...@gmail.com');>>; > * To: * CCIE Study 'cvml', 'ccie_voice@on

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] qos for cue that coming to switch 1/4 port

I am not sure if it is correct to apply trust option and inbound service policy on the same interface ! Any one has idea about this doubt.. Thx Manly ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.co

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] qos for cue that coming to switch 1/4 port

guys..i have this config... mla qos mls qos mal policed-dscp 24 to 8 mls qos map cos-dscp 0 8 16 24 32 46 48 56 ip access-list extended signal permit tcp host 10.10.210.10 eq 2748 host 10.10.115.2 permit tcp host 10.10.210.11 eq 2748 host 10.10.115.2 class-map match any signal match access-gr

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [QOS Question - To get proper understanding]

Dear Bill, Sorry about the first part of the question. It has to correct I want to match a traffic which is in/out from specific ip which is sip traffic. Thanks, Ravi On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Bill wrote: > If you are trying to match traffic from a single server wouldn't you want > to

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [QOS Question - To get proper understanding]

If you are trying to match traffic from a single server wouldn't you want to match on ip? You might try a class map that does match all and have it match sip and the IP address of the server in question. Sent from my iPad On May 27, 2013, at 3:59 AM, Ken Wyan wrote: > Question 1 is not cle

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [QOS Question - To get proper understanding]

Question 1 is not clear. Question 2 : any any eq 5060 > This is destination port any eq 5060 any -> This is source port On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 4:06 AM, ie ravindra wrote: > Dear Experts, > > What is the mostly recommended way to mark all in/out traffic to specific > ip including proto

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] [QOS Question - To get proper understanding]

Dear Experts, What is the mostly recommended way to mark all in/out traffic to specific ip including protocol. Assuming, we required to match all sip traffic which goes and in and out from specific port and at the same time it requires to match the source and destination as to be identified. Que

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS

Hi guys, I want to know what is the idle solution for LAN and WAN QoS. I have read too many responses which has confused me.  1. For LAN QoS, what will be the access-list?  Do we have to give source ip address of CUPS in the access-list.? What abt the other server connected to the same port? 

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS big question

limit 64 packets >> (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer drops) 0/0/0 >> (pkts output/bytes output) 0/0 >> bandwidth 5% (38 kbps) >> >> Class-map: class-default (match-any) >> 430 packets, 47701 bytes >> 5 minute offered rate 0 bps

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS big question

) > > Class-map: class-default (match-any) > 430 packets, 47701 bytes > 5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps > Match: any > Queueing > queue limit 64 packets > (queue depth/total drops/no-buffer drops/flowdrops) 0/0/0/0 > (

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS big question

udylist.com From: singh8...@in.com Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 22:18:27 +0530 Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS big question hi Guys, I need to configure 384 K link between by HQ and site B site . FRF.12 needs to used and configuration of QOS for 4 G729 calls & 16K signaling CRTP should be als

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS big question

; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com >> From: singh8...@in.com >> Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 22:18:27 +0530 >> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS big question >> >> >> >> >> hi Guys, >> >> I need to configure 384 K link between by HQ and site B site .

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS big question

> To: ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com > From: singh8...@in.com > Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 22:18:27 +0530 > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS big question > > > > > hi Guys, > > I need to configure 384 K link between by HQ and sit

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS big question

how you got the 49? Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 23:17:28 +0545 From: bring...@gmail.com To: singh8...@in.com CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS big question A very basic QoS question, I must say. Go to the intended interface

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS big question

I must say, rather an easy one. Go to the intended interface, issue "bandwidth 384" command and go into frame-relay dlci. run the "auto qos voip trust" It will prepare you the required MQC. In the same sub-interface the auto qos adds "frame-relay ip rtp header-compression", you should remove th

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS big question

: singh8...@in.com Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 22:18:27 +0530 Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS big question hi Guys, I need to configure 384 K link between by HQ and site B site . FRF.12 needs to used and configuration of QOS for 4 G729 calls & 16K signaling CRTP should be also enabled. How do I do

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS big question

A very basic QoS question, I must say. Go to the intended interface, issue "bandwidth 384" command and go into frame-relay dlci. run the "auto qos voip trust" It will prepare you the required MQC. In the same sub-interface the auto qos adds "frame-relay ip rtp header-compression", you should re

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS big question

hi Guys,I need to configure 384 K link between by HQ and site B site .FRF.12 needs to used and configuration of QOS for 4 G729 calls & 16K signalingCRTP should be also enabled.How do I do this?Please help.singhGet Yourself a cool, short @in.com Email ID now! _

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] qos

Could someone recommend a in person course of materials that focuses just on QOS. I am looking for something more advanced than an ascolta or globalknowledge type of curriculum. Thanks! - This message and its attachments may contain confidential and/

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Qos big info

hi Guys ,On the switch how do I achieve this and where should I make these changes ?COS 5 should be in priority queueCOS 4, 6, 7 should be in Queue 2COS 3, 2, 3 should be in Queue 3COS 4, 0 should be in Queue 4Guarantee Queue 1 has the 25% of the bandwidth the other queues should share thebandwi

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS Questions

hi folks, I have two questions in QOS. 1. When classifying a qos traffic for CTI Cube I used access lists. ip access-list extended CTIQBE match tcp any any eq 2748 match tcp any eq 2748 any Question is there any other method to clasify traffic in QOS CTI CUBE ? 2. When bandwi

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS Access List

All, There have been some questions about the fact the when you do an access-list on a 3750 and attach it to a class-map for QoS purposes, the "show access-list" command does not show hits on the ACL. I did some research and that is how the switch works. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/swi

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS Best Pract

I think it is possible do not change name auto qos map-class and the service-policy! It is enough to delete a configuration rmon event and rmon alarm. Main, config autoqos should not be impact on functionality of the lab. 2013/1/5, Pixar Perfect : > > What is the best practice for the real lab QOS

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS Best Pract

nk the grading could be affected if we > remove the names built by the QOS script and use our custom names? > > Thanks > > -- > Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 08:55:57 +0100 > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS Best Pract > From: stbruen...@gmail.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS Best Pract

Ignore the RTP header compressions part. My question is not technical but from strategy point. Do you think the grading could be affected if we remove the names built by the QOS script and use our custom names? Thanks Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 08:55:57 +0100 Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS Best Pract

The problem with your example is that the frame-relay ip rtp header-compression is out-dated and the header compression should be in the policy-map in the rtp class. Also I don't see any less flexibilty in using auto qos, you can adjust all the values as with the manual way. Regards Steffen Am

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS Best Pract

What is the best practice for the real lab QOS after running the AutoQos - use the AutoQoS nomenclature and make changes to the classmaps, policymaps and map-class OR copy the AutoQOS output on a notepad and rename policymaps, classmaps and mapclass? I typically follow the second route as it gi

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS solution problem

hi Bill, Also what is the navigation path to this doc . It does seem to be easy to locate once you are moving from the product/ support page. -MJ On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Bill wrote: > Ps you do not show your policy-map WAN-EDGE so you config is incomplete > > You need to config a cla

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS solution problem

hi Bill and All, Thanks for your reply, 1) I checked the srnd the part you have pasted does not seem to be present can u tell it on which page you got this from? 2) Also is the configuration I earlier pasted in my email correct? 3)I checked the enterprise QOS document . I there an easlier way t

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS solution problem

Using the SRND it is fairly easy to cut and paste but here is a full sample of class based shaping class-map match-any RTP match ip dscp ef class-map match any Signal match ip dscp cs3 policy-map queueing class RTP priority percent 25 class Signal bandwidth percent 5 class class-default fair-que

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS solution problem

Hi Bill, Thanks for your reply. I shall be therefore using the following config without using auto qos... policy-map MQC-FRTS-768 class class-default shape average 729600 7296 0 ! Enables MQC-Based FRTS service-policy WAN-EDGE ! Queues packets headed to the shaper ! … ! interface Serial2/0 no ip

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS solution problem

Auto qos is acceptable in some situations but be sure you can configure it manually because things like class based shaping require manual config. As for which auto qos to use, you are best off trying each of them several times so you can see what they do. You may have requirements and by tryin

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS solution problem

hi Bill, Thanks for for the link. That is what I was looking for. Also do we use auto qos voip trust or auto qos voip frtm for the base config . Thanks once again -MJ On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 8:25 AM, Bill Lake wrote: > Have you tried using the Cisco QOS SRND? > > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS confusion..

Your mls qos map cos-dscp 0 8 16 24 32 46 48 56 maps cos 5 to dscp 46 aka dscp ef. I am confused by your question/solution because you are configuring cos 5 and dscp ef but the question is asking about cos 3 Sent from my iPhone On Nov 22, 2012, at 6:08 AM, "virajith " wrote: > mls qos map co

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS confusion..

hi Guys, Have a short query .. How do we ensure that the cos vaule "5" is mapped to DSCP EF . On the interface all incoming traffic from the CUPC should be marked CS3 and a bandwidth of 32 k. If there be anything in excess should be first marked down to dscp value of 8 before transmitting.

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS Question

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Craig Hill (crahill) Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2012 11:21 AM To: 'Online Study' Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS Question Hey, I was hoping to get some input

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS Question

Hey, I was hoping to get some input on my QoS calculations for header compression. I have been using the Cisco 360 program, and in their exercise workbooks it takes into account the 4 byte checksum for UDP, but I ran Wireshark in my lab to confirm the values. From what I see, the UDP Checksum i

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS : Shape Adaptive and Shape Average

Yes they are for traffic shaping. "Average" is the rate you want to shape to. "Adaptive" tells IOS to throttle back the shape rate if receiving BECN's from the far end and to step the rate back up when the BECN's stop. DQ Dan Quinlan, CCIE #36129 daqui...@cisco.com O

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS : Shape Adaptive and Shape Average

Hi All, What is the use of  Shape adaptive / shape Average  in QOS. is it a part of traffic shaping ? and how it works ? cheers, Dulip. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Qos lan egress queue & no phones registering via cucm dhcp

ot;ip dhcp snooping trust" - Original Message - From: Krishna Sent: 08/06/12 10:24 AM To: Online Study Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Qos lan egress queue & no phones registering via cucm dhcp hi folks, this query is about lan qos and dhcp config on cucm, yesterday i had an

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Qos lan egress queue & no phones registering via cucm dhcp

--- Original Message - From: Krishna Sent: 08/06/12 10:24 AM To: Online Study Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Qos lan egress queue & no phones registering via cucm dhcp hi folks, this query is about lan qos and dhcp config on cucm, yesterday i had an issue where i couldn't able to register

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Qos lan egress queue & no phones registering via cucm dhcp

hi folks, this query is about lan qos and dhcp config on cucm, yesterday i had an issue where i couldn't able to register the Site A and Site B phones to cucm. Cucm is the dhcp server, and initially i put the default route ip address in the primary dns field in the dchp subnet, later corrected

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Qos class class-default will route the voice rtp traffic???

Hi folks, I configured the below LLQ-CBWFQ on the HQ and BR1, and when i made the test calls i.e. two calls made from br1 -hq, the calls went through. But in the configuration the rtp allowed for only one g729 call, so will the class class-default taking this traffic??? Any help in giving clari

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS on 3750

Is there a way to remark excess traffic in an egress queue to COS 0 ? -Chase -- If winners never quit and quitters never win, then who coined the phrase, "Quit while you’re still ahead."?

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS config

Hi folks when asked to configure WAN QoS between two sites, with just the following specifics- - allow 2 calls - RTP compression on the link do you do the whole SRND-recommended, 2-level qos policy, including 95% bw calculation ? or do you just do auto qos (trust, if we can assume packets ar

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS 3750

I would 100% recommend running auto qos on an UNUSED port for the base config it adds in global config (e.g. cos-dscp maps) - but MANUALLY add port specific commands if required (e.g srr, pr out, service-policy). Vik Malhi – CCIE #13890 Managing Partner - IPexpert, Inc. Telephone: +1.810.326.1

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS 3750

I found this to be very interesting... I remember some people asking about the "priority-queue out" command in earlier posts. As I am fine tuning my QoS skills, I found this here on the Command Reference Guide for Catalyst 3750: *Usage Guidelines When you configure the priority-queue out command,

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS 3750

Hello Expert, I am curious... When we issue "auto qos" command on a port, does it "mess" around with queue-set 1 or queue-set 2? I was told by a friend that when we do auto qos it messes around with queue-set 1, but I also see equal configs on queue-set 2. Can anybody share some thoughts? Thanks

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS Question

; of X from the common pool, in this case Q4T3 traffic will be dropped when it > reaches X. > > I hope this is correct!! > > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS Question > From: vma...@ipexpert.com > Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 11:39:40 -0800 > CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.c

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS Question

from: vmalhi@ipexpert.comDate: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 14:56:33 -0800 To: k...@rogers-mail.com CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS Question We are using the T1 and T2 values on the egress side in a very different way to the way we use T1/T2 on the ingress side. We are

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS Question

uring congestion. Is this correct Thanks a lot, from: vmalhi@ipexpert.comDate: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 14:56:33 -0800 To: k...@rogers-mail.com CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS Question We are using the T1 and T2 values on the egress side in a very diff

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS Question

We are using the T1 and T2 values on the egress side in a very different way to the way we use T1/T2 on the ingress side. We are trying to expand our buffers dynamically to prevent the frame from being dropped. How we do this is by not reserving all of our memory per port (in our case we reserv

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS Question

Vik, Thanks for the explanation, that answered most of my questions and helped quite a bit. My only other question is why someone would carve out 10% of the buffers for a queue, but reserve an amount other than 100%. For example, if I set the Reserved Bandwidth to 80, why wouldn't I just set the

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS Question

Answers inline. For more info please read my 3 part blog on the Catalyst 3750: http://blog.ipexpert.com/tags/3750-qos/ Vik Malhi – CCIE #13890 Managing Partner - IPexpert, Inc. Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 ext 420 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com On Mar 5, 2012, at 11:26 AM,

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS Question

QoS is probably the area that I have the most difficulty with - especially LAN QoS. I have some general questions. let's use the following sample config: mls qos queue-set output 1 buffers 10 10 26 54 mls qos queue-set output 1 threshold 2 138 138 92 400 Let's say this is applied to a 100 Mbps

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS 3750

When mls qos is enabed srr is enabled and cannot be disabled- since you cannot set srr share to zero. Vik Malhi – CCIE #13890 Managing Partner - IPexpert, Inc. Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 ext 420 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com On Dec 6, 2011, at 6:19 AM, datucha123 datucha

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS and Payload Size

For (1) it doesn't make sense to me- I would expect them to state that you should use the default payload size (20ms). So I'm not sure on this For (2) with RSVP the call setup ALWAYS asks for worst case scenario which is 40kbps for g729 and after the call is answered the actual bandwidth is

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS and Payload Size

Hello All, I have to QOS related quesitons. Scenario 1: Assuming that the lab does not instruct you to change the default payload size:however QOS requirement prompts you to calculate the priority queue bandwidth with any values other than default codec’s payload size. Then should we change the pre

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS LFI and BACD files

>> From: "Robert Schuknecht" >>> To: "'AJ BG'" , >>> >>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS LFI and BACD files >>> Message-ID: <00ed01cce5af$fad8a000$f089e000$@gmx.de> >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS LFI and BACD files

As long as your provider does not monitor and charge for overages ;) Sent from my iPad On Feb 7, 2012, at 1:42 PM, George Goglidze wrote: > Frame-Relay is known for it's oversubscription capabilities... > > So feel free to oversubscribe... It will be fine to configure one PVC 1536 > and ano

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS LFI and BACD files

Frame-Relay is known for it's oversubscription capabilities... So feel free to oversubscribe... It will be fine to configure one PVC 1536 and another 128 or whatever is required... Sent from my iPad On 7 Feb 2012, at 19:32, datucha123 datucha123 wrote: > But that won't go for HQ router, as i

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS LFI and BACD files

t;> Today's Topics: >> >> 1. Re: QOS LFI and BACD files (Robert Schuknecht) >> 2. QOS LFI and BACD (Larry Stern) >> 3. Re: QOS LFI and BACD files (CCIEVoiceKP) >> >> >> ---------- >>

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS LFI and BACD files

But that won't go for HQ router, as it is a Hub Router -- multiple PVCs per physical interfaces via subinterfaces. For instance, if you have a T1 frame relay link, and already shaped one PVC to 500kbps, you cannot shape another PVC to 1536. You have to shape another PVC to 1536 - 500 = 1036 kbps,

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS LFI and BACD files

--- > > Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 16:48:42 +0100 > From: "Robert Schuknecht" > To: "'AJ BG'" , > > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS LFI and BACD files > Message-ID: <00

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS LFI and BACD files

I agree with the last post. When you have used FRTS use the command "show traff" to verify Interval time and target rate- default to 1536 if PVC speed is not given to you. The snippet below shows what happens when FRTS is enabled- both these PVC's will need fixing. SiteA-RTR(config)#interfac

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS LFI and BACD files

I personally would set it to a full T1 ... Bandwidth 1536 When in doubt, explain what and why to the proctor to make sure it's ok. KP Sent from my iPhone and I have big thumbs ... So please excuse the typos. On Feb 6, 2012, at 9:02 PM, AJ BG wrote: > Hello, >1. QOS que

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS LFI and BACD

- Message: 1 Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 22:02:37 -0800 From: AJ BG To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS LFI and BACD files Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Hello, 1. QOS question According to Vic, if y

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS LFI and BACD files

| CCIE_Voice] QOS LFI and BACD files Hello, 1. QOS question According to Vic, if you configure LFI for a subinterface in a hub and spoke environment, Your second sub interface will dopes its CIR to 56k. To solve this issue you should configure map-class for the second

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS LFI and BACD files

Hello, 1. QOS question According to Vic, if you configure LFI for a subinterface in a hub and spoke environment, Your second sub interface will dopes its CIR to 56k. To solve this issue you should configure map-class for the second interface as well. I have tested this and confi

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS question from new 5 labs, lab 2, question 10.1

I meant my opinion the same as your. - Original Message - From: "John McGaughey (jomcgaug)" Date: Friday, January 27, 2012 3:05 pm Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS question from new 5 labs, lab 2,question 10.1 To: wormh...@sch.hu Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com >

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS question from new 5 labs, lab 2, question 10.1

You are correct John. Also note that the interface would need to be set to use queue-set 2 because default is queue-set 1. Chris On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 7:31 AM, John McGaughey (jomcgaug) < jomcg...@cisco.com> wrote: > Hello, > > ** ** > > From the new 5 labs, Lab 2 question 10.1 it asks th

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS question from new 5 labs, lab 2, question 10.1

bject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS question from new 5 labs, lab 2,question 10.1 Think the same, since 3rd threshold performs tail drop. Peter - Original Message - From: "John McGaughey (jomcgaug)" Date: Friday, January 27, 2012 2:56 pm Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS questi

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS question from new 5 labs, lab 2, question 10.1

Think the same, since 3rd threshold performs tail drop. Peter - Original Message - From: "John McGaughey (jomcgaug)" Date: Friday, January 27, 2012 2:56 pm Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS question from new 5 labs, lab 2, question 10.1 To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS question from new 5 labs, lab 2, question 10.1

Hello, >From the new 5 labs, Lab 2 question 10.1 it asks the following. "For traffic being sent to the Site A gateway ensure that traffic marked with COS 5 is dropped if queue 1 is 75% full." The solution guide says to add queue-set 2 to the fastethernet port and change the following 2

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS question on Workbook2 Lab 10

The ASICs on the HWIC-4ESW do not support QoS mechanisms as other ethernet ports do so that is why you have to do QoS on a layer three device On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 2:12 AM, Mohd Baqari wrote: > Hi, > > HWIC module doesn't support trust/untrust even if command applied, it > won't be functional.

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS question on Workbook2 Lab 10

Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS question on Workbook2 Lab 10 If the question says to trust packets, should you use the trust keyword or is that there to throw you off. Sent from my iPhone On Jan 16, 2012, at 6:54 PM, Ashraf Ayyash wrote: > Hello John , > > You thinking is correct h

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS question on Workbook2 Lab 10

Hi, HWIC module doesn't support trust/untrust even if command applied, it won't be functional. I have explained this in details in my blog. If interested for more details refer here http://x-ccie.blogspot.com/ Regards, Mohammed Al Baqari Sent from my iPhone On Jan 18, 2012, at 11:14 AM, Rrcr

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS question on Workbook2 Lab 10

If the question says to trust packets, should you use the trust keyword or is that there to throw you off. Sent from my iPhone On Jan 16, 2012, at 6:54 PM, Ashraf Ayyash wrote: > Hello John , > > You thinking is correct however as the Packet will traverse over the > wan , it will be always s

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS question on Workbook2 Lab 10

...I just did a check: in Workbook 2 Lab 6, Tasks 7.1, 7.2 we are trusting the phones+HWIC-4ESW on both BR1 & BR2 , the class-map used is class-map match-all wan-rtp match dscp ef etc. etc ...so as I thought, the DSG is not consistent here... On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Anthony Alba wrote

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS question on Workbook2 Lab 10

Hello, This is what I thought the DSG was pointing too: the HWIC-4ESW is a cheapo low-end device and we're not sure what it does with the markings from the phone so let's re-classify and re-mark at BR1's WAN egress interface to be safe (i.e., don't depend on what phone + HWIC-4ESW passes to us)

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS question on Workbook2 Lab 10

Hello John , You thinking is correct however as the Packet will traverse over the wan , it will be always subject to get modified by a lot of SW to change specially the DSCP Value and so the QOS SRND recommend to Not trust the packets coming from the wan and so we dont trust in the Branches route

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS question on Workbook2 Lab 10

Hello, In Workbook 2, Lab 10, question 5.2 it asks you to setup MLP LFI between HQ and BR1. In the solution guide it has you use auto qos trust on the HQ side but does not use trust on the BR1 side. The DSG guide says the reason for not using the trust key word is because of the following:

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS for HWIC module

ommand for > SRR configuration. > > ** ** > > Hope its clarified now. > > ** ** > > Regards, > > Mohd Baqari > > ** ** > > > > *From:* datucha123 datucha123 [mailto:datucha...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Tuesday, December 06, 20

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS for HWIC module

nd for SRR configuration. Hope its clarified now. Regards, Mohd Baqari From: datucha123 datucha123 [mailto:datucha...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2011 12:28 PM To: Mohd Baqari Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS for HWIC module Does it trust C

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS 3750

Hello, What is the default Queuing method on 3750, when the mls qos is enabled globally, but no srr is configured. Is it FIFO? ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE a

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS for HWIC module

Does it trust CoS or DSCP? Well, basically, I guess what does it trust, it trust just like the Router is trusting anything and relaying any QoS markings, am I right? But as for SRR, HWIC module interfaces does not undertand the command srr-queue or anything that begins with srr key word. On Tue,

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS for HWIC module

In HWIC trust is the default state. Also. srr can be configured. Regards, Mohammed Al Baqari Sent from my iPhone On Dec 5, 2011, at 5:12 PM, datucha123 datucha123 wrote: > Hello, > > We can configur the L2 QoS on 3750 switch using SRR, Port based Trusts and > etc. > > But what about the 4

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS for HWIC module

Hello, We can configur the L2 QoS on 3750 switch using SRR, Port based Trusts and etc. But what about the 4 port HWIC module? What kind of QoS must be done for that? I have tryed but the HWIC ports does not undertand the mls qos command. ___ For more i

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS for Frame Relay

- >> *From:* datucha123 datucha123 >> *To:* Randall Crumm >> *Cc:* "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" >> *Sent:* Sunday, November 20, 2011 10:00 AM >> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS for Frame Relay >> >> Yes, Sure, &g

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS for Frame Relay

uot;ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" > Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2011 10:00 AM > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS for Frame Relay > > Yes, Sure, > > Mandatory (Video Desired) > > But still no success :( > > On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 9:58 PM, Randall Crumm

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS for Frame Relay

ool > assigned to the GW? > > RC > > -- > *From:* datucha123 datucha123 > *To:* Randall Crumm > *Cc:* "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" > *Sent:* Sunday, November 20, 2011 10:00 AM > *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS fo

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS for Frame Relay

Do you have the locations in your Device pool and the proper device pool assigned to the GW? RC From: datucha123 datucha123 To: Randall Crumm Cc: "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2011 10:00 AM Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_

  1   2   3   4   5   >