> -Original Message-
> From: C. Hatton Humphrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 6:06 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Another Bit about Carlin
>
> >> Good stuff. I love it. I am sure George would appreciate it.
> >
> > I think he actually might have appreciate
This is my new favorite blog:
http://failblog.org/
Collected codified humiliation? Freakin' brilliant.
Jim Davis
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get the Free Trial
http://
> gg wrote:
>> tBone wrote:
>> The say that bear means carry
Here's a good summary from everyone's fav source, the AP:
Dick Anthony Heller, 66, an armed security guard, sued the District
after it rejected his application to keep a handgun at his Capitol
Hill home a short distance from the Supreme
Yes dear, I know the history of the modern computer, my father was an
integral part of it.
However, you're weaving around a point, a gun is a weapon, a hunting knife
or K-Bar is a weapon, a bow and arrow is a weapon, a modern laptop or
desktop is not a weapon. You as a gun owner have certain respo
> tBone wrote:
> The say that bear means carry, that there must be a means to be able to
> carry unless you're a felon or on the short list (mental illness,
> history of spousal abuse) of "reasonable restrictions".
>
But for handguns as it relates to the DC case. Put another way, can
you use an R
> Billy wrote:
> "If the gov't steps in and sets flat rates, doctors flee, quality drops, and
> people die."
>
> By that logic, Japan would not have any doctors at all, and Japanese people
> would have the lowest life expectancy, not the highest.
>
Life expectancy is based on a zillion factors, o
Ahh. I had to read it about 6 times before I figured it out ... I kinda
looked like Gel for awhile ...
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 10:08 PM, Loathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oh I got it, just amazed.
>
>
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8
Oh I got it, just amazed.
Erika L. Walker wrote:
> A list member, is complaining about a good friend who abuses the chat access
> to them. They can't shut the chat off because they use it for work. That be
> all :)
>
> Oh, and it wasn't me ... I cant be bothered to make up aliases ...
>
> On Thu
Did you read the same decision I did?
The say that bear means carry, that there must be a means to be able to
carry unless you're a felon or on the short list (mental illness,
history of spousal abuse) of "reasonable restrictions".
They got into what keep meant, to include that it means store p
A list member, is complaining about a good friend who abuses the chat access
to them. They can't shut the chat off because they use it for work. That be
all :)
Oh, and it wasn't me ... I cant be bothered to make up aliases ...
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 8:51 PM, Loathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> tBone wrote:
> Additionally, even if you do say that the second allows "reasonable
> regulation", well then it should be federal, and the same everywhere.
>
So that's the type of legal theory debate I was getting at and we're
still going to have. But since everyone is in love with SCOTUS now:
> From: Scott Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Let me phrase this better, it's primary and original purpose is as a
> weapon
> anything else, target shooting, hunting, etc came after the primary
> purpose..
See that thing you're using right now? No, not your penis, your computer.
Right. Its p
Did anyone catch Spain - Russia today? The Spanish team looks awesome.
I will be in Marbella, Spain starting Saturday afternoon, I can't wait!
Everything is going to be crazy for the match on Sunday. Woohoo!
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion
nah, they are just following standard procedure to try and get elected.
step 1 - pander to the base in the primaries
step 2 - after th primary fight, kiss butt to all the people you beat up on
in the primaries
step 3 - move to the center for the general election
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 6:08 PM, L
Whats reasonable?
Who defines that? I think it's pretty reasonable to be able to carry
pretty much everywhere, without having to get the governments permission
for the execution of my rights.
Scott Stewart wrote:
> Let me phrase this better, it's primary and original purpose is as a weapon
> a
Let me phrase this better, it's primary and original purpose is as a weapon
anything else, target shooting, hunting, etc came after the primary
purpose..
Anyways the original point is that owning a gun comes with very specific
obligations, including the safe storage there of. If you don't take
rea
On a tangent, if you want a good detective novel, read "Wolves Eat Dogs" by
Martin Cruz Smith. It is an Arkady Renko novel. Part of it takes place in
the area around Chernobyl 14 years after the disaster. Lots of interesting
factoids about life in the area can be picked up.
~~~
Campaign finance reform for one, his flip flop on where his money coming
from, Obama did basically the same shit.
I said in a different thread, neither of these men have any integrity,
they have both decided to pander to their respective parties on
different issues.
Dana wrote:
> oh :) it's no
I disagree.
I think the second clause should allow extension over class 3 firearms,
of a military type. I also think the militia clause would prohibit
large scale licensing due to the records involved and a fear of
tyrannical government.
Additionally, even if you do say that the second allows
It will be interesting to see how this effects crime rates in DC. I have
heard some pundits say it will only get worse. Hard to imagine that.
Probably just following the party line.
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the mos
Took the words right out of my mouth.
Vivec wrote:
> 0_0
> what..what the hell...
>
>
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;20374
Other than private property, pretty much.
Gruss Gott wrote:
>> Adam wrote:
>> Now, how many licensed-to-carry taxpayers have committed handgun crimes
>
> If we interpret the Constitution to say that *an individual* has the
> right to bear arms (and it would be an interpretation since the
> Consti
President
>>> Productivity Enhancement
>>>
>>>> -Original Message-
>>>> From: Loathe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 12:09 PM
>>>> To: CF-Community
>>>> Subject: Suprem
Come on man, thats not even close to true.
So, you know that England is suffering under a rash of stabbings, and
have made most of your stuff illegal right?
Hell their Olympic shooting team has to leave the country to train.
Scott Stewart wrote:
> A gun only has one purpose, to end the life of
>"A friend's brother-in-law is a psychiatrist at 3 hospitals. And he drives
>a Ferrari. Do you think that doctor accepts Medicare? Do you think he'll
>give up his Ferrari because he submits a bill to the government instead of a
>private insurer?"
>
>Tom Cruise may be a nutcase on many things, bu
I usually give Bush around $15 a year.
I gave Rudy $50
>>
>> anyone else care to make a disclosure?
>>
>
>
>I gave Bbama $15 dollars so I could get a magnet. Hillary $20 bucks.
>Republicans can kiss my cheep ass!
~|
Adobe® ColdF
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 1:46 AM, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> anyone else care to make a disclosure?
>
I gave Bbama $15 dollars so I could get a magnet. Hillary $20 bucks.
Republicans can kiss my cheep ass!
~|
Ad
oh :) it's not. Possibly those sentences should be in separate paragraphs.
I am trying to remember the specifics of why I changed my mind and am
drawing a blank. I know I became convinced he was pandering to the
base -- I remember saying "that is what running for president as a
Republican will do
Nothing, I just don't see how it is connected with the notion that McCain is
somehow not an honorable man.
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 4:56 PM, Dana wrote:
> so what is wrong with either of those statements?
>
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion
so what is wrong with either of those statements?
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 5:53 PM, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> McCain wants town hall meetings. Obama does not. (Actually, he agreed to
> one, on the 4th of July in the evening after everyone is passed out or
> watching fireworks).
>
> O
McCain wants town hall meetings. Obama does not. (Actually, he agreed to
one, on the 4th of July in the evening after everyone is passed out or
watching fireworks).
Obama basically wants what plays to his strength - giving speeches, and
McCain wants what plays to his strengths - verbal sparring in
> Therefore if, via interpretation, we say permits are acceptable (i.e.,
> we can ban "bearing arms" at certain times and places) then we can't
> also claim that an outright ban is unconstitutional.
I *think* the Supreme Court justices know a *wee* bit more about this than
you do.
> Personally I'
there is no "We" there. The Supereme Court just ruled that an outright ban
is unconstitutional.
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 3:21 PM, Gruss wrote:
>
> Therefore if, via interpretation, we say permits are acceptable (i.e.,
> we can ban "bearing arms" at certain times and places) then we can't
> also c
actually no... they don't. They drop out of the Medicaid/Medicare programs,
is what they do...
> Actually they do it every day. It's called Medicare and Medicaid.
>
>
>
>
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important
> Adam wrote:
> amount of certified training. I believe it balances well between personal
> right/responsibility and the reasonable expectation of others to not be
> accidentally shot.
>
I totally agree - But a typical debate will have gun rights' advocates
claiming the Constitution is unambiguou
>> Good stuff. I love it. I am sure George would appreciate it.
>
> I think he actually might have appreciated this as well:
>
> http://www.godhatesfags.com/written/fliers/20080624_carlin-in-hell.pdf
>
> Those people better hope that I never end up with nothing to lose... because
> I know exactly w
Nobody said anything about handing out degree's to just anyone. Doctors need
to go to school and be trained just the same. There lie's another issue!
Shouldn't the government step in and kick up the assistance for Education to
those who choose to go into healthcare.
I want a doctor that knows what
"A friend's brother-in-law is a psychiatrist at 3 hospitals. And he drives
a Ferrari. Do you think that doctor accepts Medicare? Do you think he'll
give up his Ferrari because he submits a bill to the government instead of a
private insurer?"
Tom Cruise may be a nutcase on many things, but in h
+1 million ...
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 4:39 PM, kim torrance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm from RI originally...stay on 95 the whole way. Leave at 2 pm to beat
> the traffic.
>
>
>
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the
> -Original Message-
> From: Bruce Sorge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 11:30 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Another Bit about Carlin
>
> Good stuff. I love it. I am sure George would appreciate it.
I think he actually might have appreciated this as well:
BINGO!
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 3:22 PM, yo mama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Part of the problem I think is that people who do not work on the web
> consider that if you are online, you are playing. Even if your status
> message says otherwise.
>
>
>> Oh, you say he'll have no choice? Sure he does. He'll quit and
>> change careers or go into practice for rich people.
>
> Good! I want a doctor that wants to help people not just line his wallet.
> The same should apply to teachers too. If you become a doctor or a teacher
> for money then you
Doctors in Japan want to be doctors because they want to help people. You
can't tell me there isn't anyone left in the US that wants to help others.
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Billy Cox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 4:40 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Healt
"If the gov't steps in and sets flat rates, doctors flee, quality drops, and
people die."
By that logic, Japan would not have any doctors at all, and Japanese people
would have the lowest life expectancy, not the highest.
~|
> Oh, you say he'll have no choice? Sure he does. He'll quit and
> change careers or go into practice for rich people.
Good! I want a doctor that wants to help people not just line his wallet.
The same should apply to teachers too. If you become a doctor or a teacher
for money then you chose a c
> Rick wrote:
> That would never work in our country...
>
Exactly. It's not that it won't work, it's that it won't work in
country of 300+ million people used to private practice and doctors
used to making $500k/yr.
If the gov't steps in and sets flat rates, doctors flee, quality
drops, and peo
> Billy Cox wrote:
> I think the more fundamental problem is that 'insurance' is not compatible
Irrelevant to cost. Doctors, hospitals, clinics, and drug
manufacturers set cost. That is, it doesn't matter if a billed
medical service is preventative, prescriptive, treatment, et al.
Provider cost
I watch a great show a few months ago. Kind of an investigative report
style. They went to other countries and compared there health care from all
angles and we are really behind other nations when it comes to excisable
health care. Japan's general health care is amazing it's like going through
the
I suppose for somewhat the same reason that you need a permit (it's actually
a permit) to have a peaceful public demonstration, or perhaps post a
document in a public place.
I'm all for specific gun permits, and I'm all for requiring a reasonable
amount of certified training. I believe it balance
sure, and that is a separate issue from criminal culpability.
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 11:58 AM, Jacob wrote:
> It just take 7 jurors in a civil case to say yes... ;-)
>
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important
No. The Court specifically said the ruling was not meant to prevent
government from enacting reasonable regulations (my words) on gun ownership.
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Gruss wrote:
> > Adam wrote:
> > Now, how many licensed-to-carry taxpayers have committed handgun crimes
>
> If we int
I think the more fundamental problem is that 'insurance' is not compatible
with the way that healthcare functions.
What other type of insurance (besides health/dental) pays a claim for
preventative measures?
What other type of insurance do we sign up for with 99% certainty that we
are going to fi
0_0
what..what the hell...
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;203748912;27390454;j
Archive:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups
I'm from RI originally...stay on 95 the whole way. Leave at 2 pm to beat the
traffic.
>Once again.. to you NY'ers (or North Easterner's) .
>
>
>
>Next Wednesday, I need to drive from Newark to Providence, RI. I need to
>arrive in Providence for dinner, around 8pm ish.
>
>
>
>Google Maps tell
> Adam wrote:
> Now, how many licensed-to-carry taxpayers have committed handgun crimes
If we interpret the Constitution to say that *an individual* has the
right to bear arms (and it would be an interpretation since the
Constitution is vague on the topic), why do citizens need a license?
Shouldn
Um, yeah, link didn't paste
http://maps.google.com/maps/ms?hl=en&ie=UTF8&msa=0&msid=100483915724424959392.0004509765475ca77d3da&ll=41.356196,-72.778931&spn=1.58332,3.378296&z=8
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 4:15 PM, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I live at the other end of CT (near the RI
I live at the other end of CT (near the RI border), and make that drive a
couple times a year.
We _always_ take the GWP up to the Tappan Zee Bridge (87/287), then follow
it down to the Merritt Pkwy (15), to Rt 95 in Milford, then 95 north to
Providence.
The drive is a touch longer, but faster, an
Just admit it Adam, you've incapacitated wooden burglar targets and
maimed defenseless skeet!
And let's not even bring up all the Snipe you've obliterated.
On Jun 26, 2008, at 2:39 PM, Adam Churvis wrote:
>> From: Scott Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> A gun only has one purpose, to end t
> From: Scott Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> A gun only has one purpose, to end the life of or incapacitate another
> living being.
Where in pluperfect fucking hell do you get that piece of Rhodes
Scholar-worthy logic, Sparky?
I have neither incapacitated nor have I ended the life of any hum
Once again.. to you NY'ers (or North Easterner's) .
Next Wednesday, I need to drive from Newark to Providence, RI. I need to
arrive in Providence for dinner, around 8pm ish.
Google Maps tells me to basically take the 95, cut across on the GW bridge,
through the Bronx, up to coast to Provid
> gg wrote:
> know) so there's 2 concepts on how to protect them:
>
> (1.) Have government run everything and hope "government" doesn't act
> like people, or
>
> (2.) Let the market do it by allowing to freely operate within bounds.
That, by the way, is the exact reason why Universal Health Care w
> Nope, but then, a knife isn't a gun, is it?
Nope, but then, a gun isn't a knife, is it? Or a rutabaga? Or a submarine?
So what?
Respectfully,
Adam Phillip Churvis
President
Productivity Enhancement
> -Original Message-
> From: G Money [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, J
ds individual right to own guns
> > >
> > > My god I'm freaking ecstatic.
> > >
> > > This is the best news I've had in months, after that garbage they
> come
> > > up with prohibit
> Billy wrote:
> fund managers continued pushing sub-prime mortgage funds even after they
> knew that those funds were going to tank.
>
Zackly, but why are there even mortgage funds? The answer to that
question is the nexus between Dana's old blind lady and the melt-down.
By separating the lende
According to the blog, the blog is staged but the campaign is real.
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 3:06 PM, Cameron Childress <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 2:58 PM, C. Hatton Humphrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> http://imtalkathon.com/archive/2008/6/26.aspx
>>
>> http://im.live.c
Not upset with friend.
I just don't want to bark and the current situation is untenable. And fwiw I
have IMed through Gmail to someone who is busy (sometimes we are busy on the
same thing!) and it does say so so-and-so is busy, you may be bothering him or
her. Some people just have an expansiv
> Friend IM all the time. Friend not understand chat sometimes on for
> work. Friend disregard busy status. Friend disregard busy status with
> status message "really means busy." Friend good friend though. Not
> want hurt friend feelings. Not want leave chat turned off. Arghh.
>
>
Code Monk
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 2:58 PM, C. Hatton Humphrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://imtalkathon.com/archive/2008/6/26.aspx
>
> http://im.live.com/Messenger/IM/Join/Default.aspx
Nope - sounds kinda like a hoax chain email come true.
-Cameron
~~~
http://imtalkathon.com/archive/2008/6/26.aspx
http://im.live.com/Messenger/IM/Join/Default.aspx
--
Woody Allen - "I am not afraid of death, I just don't want to be
there when it happens."
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is
It just take 7 jurors in a civil case to say yes... ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Robert Munn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 10:55 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Supreme Court finds individual right to own guns
what if someone stole a knife from my kitchen and u
I actually have a second AIM name called "camisverybusy" that I use if
I'm really super busy. I can give that out to a few people, but
nowhere near as many as have my regular AIM name.
-Cameron
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 2:53 PM, C. Hatton Humphrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Don't use the web cli
thanks.
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 12:53 PM, C. Hatton Humphrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Don't use the web client in gmail, disable chat there, use Pidgin or
> something along those lines that will let you block, set auto-replies
> and the like.
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 2:45 PM, yo mama <[E
Don't use the web client in gmail, disable chat there, use Pidgin or
something along those lines that will let you block, set auto-replies
and the like.
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 2:45 PM, yo mama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hmm. I don't think that's a setting. That's about what I need but is there
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Cameron Childress <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Loathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Don't carry unless you think he actually means to do you physical harm
> > and not just talk big. I understand the whole judged by 12 rather than
hmm. I don't think that's a setting. That's about what I need but is there a
way to do it without getting into the API? Google mail by the way.
> Create automatic response to friend between hours of 8 and 5 "Can't
> Talk, Busy Working".
>
> Probably harder then it should be...
~~
;>
>>> My god I'm freaking ecstatic.
>>>
>>> This is the best news I've had in months, after that garbage they come
>>> up with prohibiting the execution of child rapists I was getting
>>> worried.
>>>
>>> Ladies and gentleme
yo mama wrote:
> Friend IM all the time. Friend not understand chat sometimes on for work.
> Friend disregard busy status. Friend disregard busy status with status
> message "really means busy." Friend good friend though. Not want hurt friend
> feelings. Not want leave chat turned off. Arghh.
>
Oh no not chat!
I finally found someone who makes my grammar look awesome :)
On 6/26/08, Cameron Childress <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Oogle boogle on my noogle. Flingah flam shimah sham on the hizzie.
>
> Word.
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Charlie Griefer
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
tatic.
>>>
>>> This is the best news I've had in months, after that garbage they come
>>> up with prohibiting the execution of child rapists I was getting
>>> worried.
>>>
>>> Ladies and gentlemen the Supreme Court of the United States today
>
Oogle boogle on my noogle. Flingah flam shimah sham on the hizzie.
Word.
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Charlie Griefer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Atouk zugzug Lana
>
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 11:25 AM, yo mama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Friend IM all the time. Friend not understand chat
Atouk zugzug Lana
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 11:25 AM, yo mama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Friend IM all the time. Friend not understand chat sometimes on for work.
> Friend disregard busy status. Friend disregard busy status with status
> message "really means busy." Friend good friend though. No
Friend IM all the time. Friend not understand chat sometimes on for work.
Friend disregard busy status. Friend disregard busy status with status message
"really means busy." Friend good friend though. Not want hurt friend feelings.
Not want leave chat turned off. Arghh.
~
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 1:56 PM, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyway, props to the Supreme Court for upholding gun rights.
>
>
Next up, the right to grow marijuana ;-)
yeah right...
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software
come
>> up with prohibiting the execution of child rapists I was getting
>> worried.
>>
>> Ladies and gentlemen the Supreme Court of the United States today
>> pulled
>> their collective heads out of the asses of 100 years of bad law.
>>
>> http:/
Part two was the point that I was more trying to get at...
--
Scott Stewart
ColdFusion Developer
4405 Oakshyre Way
Raleigh, NC 27616
(h) 919.874.6229 (c) 703.220.2835
-Original Message-
From: Charlie Griefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 2:14 PM
To: CF-Community
In that case they would medically chapter him out.
The things that would prevent deployment are generally physical fitness,
like not being able to pass the PT test, or something medically
preventing him from deploying or family problems.
That being said, if you're motivated they usually will fi
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Loathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Heller vs. DC
> decision specifically makes trigger lock and disassembly requirements
> unconstitutional, so theres no way around that.
I'm not a gun person myself so i don't know if this is something out
of james bond and/o
go in your study, close the door and do it.
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 12:14 PM, morchella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> 3-4?, 6-8 if you hunt?
> yeah. i just need to calm down. just feel like i cheated on my wife or
> some thing bad like that...
> i know i just need to stick to the plan and wrap up
hibiting the execution of child rapists I was getting
> >> worried.
> >>
> >> Ladies and gentlemen the Supreme Court of the United States today
> >> pulled
> >> their collective heads out of the asses of 100 years of bad law.
> >>
> >>
A gun could also be for target practice. I am quite fond of target practice
myself. :)
On 6/26/08, Scott Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> A gun only has one purpose, to end the life of or incapacitate another
> living being.
>
> A weaponized knife (K-Bars, Hunting Knives, Bowie knives) falls
3-4?, 6-8 if you hunt?
yeah. i just need to calm down. just feel like i cheated on my wife or
some thing bad like that...
i know i just need to stick to the plan and wrap up last minute design
changes. just dont feel like touching code until my mind is calm...
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Loat
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 11:10 AM, Scott Stewart
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A gun only has one purpose, to end the life of or incapacitate another
> living being.
I'd disagree with that statement. I know a few people who do nothing
with their guns but take them to the range. They don't hunt. T
Could his CO say "I think you're a homicidal nut, you're staying here while
we go over".
--
Scott Stewart
ColdFusion Developer
4405 Oakshyre Way
Raleigh, NC 27616
(h) 919.874.6229 (c) 703.220.2835
-Original Message-
From: Loathe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 2:0
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Loathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Don't carry unless you think he actually means to do you physical harm
> and not just talk big. I understand the whole judged by 12 rather than
> carried by 6 thing, but felony gun possession is a bitch.
Not to mention that gett
ting the execution of child rapists I was getting
>> worried.
>>
>> Ladies and gentlemen the Supreme Court of the United States today
>> pulled
>> their collective heads out of the asses of 100 years of bad law.
>>
>> http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080626/ts_nm/us
A gun only has one purpose, to end the life of or incapacitate another
living being.
A weaponized knife (K-Bars, Hunting Knives, Bowie knives) falls into the
same class, IMO.
I own several swords, their display and martial arts practice pieces, none
can hold an edge. However if I bought one that
It would actually be easier in the case of the car to prosecute, as you
do not have the right to own one, drive one, register one.
To be honest, I don't think you should be held accountable for the
others actions in any of the cases mentioned so far. You didn't make
them break into your home o
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 1:54 PM, G Money <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just think people who want to own guns should be HEAPED with
> responsibilities to ensure that their gun is used only for it's intended
> purpose of self defense.
That's really what jurys are for. Just like the child rape cas
Sounds like a real tool.
Don't carry unless you think he actually means to do you physical harm
and not just talk big. I understand the whole judged by 12 rather than
carried by 6 thing, but felony gun possession is a bitch.
The fact that his unit has deployed twice and he hasn't gone at all
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 11:01 AM, G Money <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nope, but then, a knife isn't a gun, is it?
A knife is an instrument that I purchased to use with no intention of
it ever doing anybody harm. somebody took it from me without my
knowledge or consent and used it to harm somebod
1 - 100 of 186 matches
Mail list logo
