I will give him the benefit of the doubt and assume he is talking about
negotiating with individual tribal communities rather than elements of the
Taliban leadership. If he negotiates with the Taliban, his presidency will
be over in my eyes.
http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5hJgw
Yeah, cause foster parents are paid so much less than natural parents,
and never do drugs. And have some swampland in Arizona for sale.
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> oh that's ok, they can always go into foster care. Remember, it will save
> money.
>
>
~~
Everyone agrees that health care is a gigantic mess, but it is dishonest and
opportunistic of Obama to link health care reform with bankruptcy and
people's general fear for their finances at this juncture. For a guy who was
supposed to be champion of a new style of politics in Washington, his
tact
interesting...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rainbow_table
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f
Archive:
ht
Nothing I have said indicates that, but then, you are just making shit
up at this point.
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 10:35 PM, Dana wrote:
> wow. You really are obsessed with the idea that somebody out there might be
> getting a buzz on, aren't you
>
> On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 8:07 PM, Cameron Chil
oh that's ok, they can always go into foster care. Remember, it will save
money.
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 8:45 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> Before they pass a law mandating drug testing, they should beef up
> their treatment programs to handle those who will need it. Currently,
> there is an average
Before they pass a law mandating drug testing, they should beef up
their treatment programs to handle those who will need it. Currently,
there is an average wait of 94 days to even be considered for drug
treatment. 90 days with no benefits while waiting for admission to a
program is a long time
you are assuming that this will save money. I submit that it probably won't
if the accounting is honest. I suppose this is an unresolvable point at
least for now, though at least you are thinking about it.
But it might be interesting to go look at welfare reform as implemented
under Clinton and s
Just what do you find an acceptable use for YOUR tax dollars?
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 7:43 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> If they are using my tax dollars to pay for that buzz, then yes I am.
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is th
;) I was talking to Cam. But since the shoe fits, let me try it out on you:
I suspect that it's nowhere near that simple.
laters.
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> If they are using my tax dollars to pay for that buzz, then yes I am.
>
> On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 10:35 PM, D
If they are using my tax dollars to pay for that buzz, then yes I am.
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 10:35 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> wow. You really are obsessed with the idea that somebody out there might be
> getting a buzz on, aren't you
>
> On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 8:07 PM, Cameron Childress >wrote:
>
wow. You really are obsessed with the idea that somebody out there might be
getting a buzz on, aren't you
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 8:07 PM, Cameron Childress wrote:
>
> Yes, it sounds like it might even free up some money for those who
> really need it and may use it to better themselves inste
Cognitive dissonance is such a sad thing. I am putting words in *your* mouth
huh. OK :)
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Cameron Childress wrote:
>
> Whatever. You are upset because I won't let you put words in my
> mouth. Take your ball and go home, that's fine.
>
> On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 9:31
And if we can recoup 10% of the money going towards public assistance, that
could help pay for even more books. From what the local papers are
reporting, the delegate who proposed the bill has gotten quite a bit of
positive feedback from the public.
I admit its not prefect. But, I am OK with the
it might seem that way, but if the state of West Virginia can spend
3.70*(number of welfare recipients) to test everyone on welfare for drugs,
then it ought to have textbooks in its schools, is pretty much my
thought.
I mean! I don't know how apparent this is from Harper's Ferry, but West
Virg
Whatever. You are upset because I won't let you put words in my
mouth. Take your ball and go home, that's fine.
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 9:31 PM, Dana wrote:
> oh, my bad. Here I thought we were going to actually have a discussion, not
> a toddler tantrum. Carry on -- as you were.
~
Yes, it sounds like it might even free up some money for those who
really need it and may use it to better themselves instead of giving
it to those who are just going to blow it or have no interest in
improving their own situation.
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
> The bill in
sigh
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 7:37 PM, Erika L. Walker wrote:
>
> yesh ...
>
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 9:06 PM, Vivec wrote:
>
> >
> > *skips around the list*
> >
> > RRAAIIINBOW TABLES!!!
> >
> >
>
>
>
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion®
oh, my bad. Here I thought we were going to actually have a discussion, not
a toddler tantrum. Carry on -- as you were.
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 6:29 PM, Cameron Childress wrote:
>
> No, that is what you are saying.
>
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 7:50 PM, Dana wrote:
> > ok.. So "mommy and daddy" = t
Wouldn't that be a quadrillion?
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 6:12 PM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> > gg wrote:
> > agreed to guarantee them against
> > losses from credit default swaps
>
> And you see all, this is Robert does you such a disservice by
> repeating the misinformation about sub-prime.
>
> There
The bill in question was submitted ot the WV state legislature for
consideration. IN some articels over the last few days, one of the drg
testing programs they are looking at costs $3.70 per test. That seems like
a bargain for me. It also allows peopel to get cleaned up. If you fail a
drug tes
I guess that is not part of the 'change we can believe in'?
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 6:46 PM, Mary Jo Sminkey wrote:
>
> He's hardly the first politician (or president) to give misinformation or
> get his facts a bit skewed.
>
>
--
Scott Stroz
---
The democracy will cease to exist w
So, in other words, now that there is something to blame Obama for (based on
your previous comments) its not really his fault? Somehow I knew that was
gonna happen.
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> > Scott wrote:
> > No way..sorry dude. In the prvious thread you specifical
More likely he scared the hell out of the crooks on Wall Street, in
banking, insurance and government by letting them know he would no
longer tolerance their fraud and avarice.
I've heard no anti-capitalist rhetoric and claiming he has a socialist
agenda nothing more than propaganda from those wh
Using your assumption or 10%) I would say that 10% of all the
money currently distributed would be more than enough to conduct drug
testing. Probably actually would take way less than 10% of the total
welfare budget though - resulting in a potentially significant tax
savings.
On Fri, Mar 6,
No, that is what you are saying.
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 7:50 PM, Dana wrote:
> ok.. So "mommy and daddy" = the welfare system and "irresponsible teens" =
> the population. Is this not what you are saying/
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion®
Super-human? He blew-off Brown to meet with the Boyscouts.
If he was actually doing something rather than having parties and
telling people to panic the problem would solve itself.
As this admin keeps saying, "Never waste a crisis."
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> Soun
Sounds reasonable to me. The effort to unravel the economic mess we
are in is certainly super-human and I'm ok with Obama being strained
and sleepless and overly focused on domestic affairs at the moment. In
fact, I'd be quite worried if it were otherwise. I may not think much
of the previous occu
>Does it matter a great
>deal if it is 1 every 30 seconds, 45 seconds, 60 seconds? It is still
>a horrible thing that needs to be fixed.
AbsolutelyI could care less if he was off, this is still a major issue that
needs to be addressed. He's hardly the first politician (or president) to give
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/barackobama/4953523/Barack-Obama-too-tired-to-give-proper-welcome-to-Gordon-Brown.html
http://tinyurl.com/adh8jv
Barack Obama's offhand approach to Gordon Brown's Washington visit
last week came about because the president was facing exh
> gg wrote:
> agreed to guarantee them against
> losses from credit default swaps
And you see all, this is Robert does you such a disservice by
repeating the misinformation about sub-prime.
There is $1000 Trillion in nominal value of derivatives out there.
That is NOT a typo. I mean it's not e
The federal bailout of insurance giant American International Group
Inc. has benefited at least two dozen U.S. and foreign financial
institutions who collected some $50 billion, according to media
reports Saturday.
AIG - once the world's largest insurer - is paying money to its
counterparties bec
> Jim wrote:
> If I had no other debt I'd agree... but at this point I'd rather see this
> money paying off increasingly high-interest credit cards than sitting there.
> Once that debt's paid off I'll up the contribution again
Which is EXACTLY why tax cuts won't fix this problem.
When you give o
> -Original Message-
> From: William Bowen [mailto:william.bo...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2009 3:12 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Well... that was depressing (Retirement Funds)
>
>
> > Well... my company matches 4% as long as you contribute 3% so I've
> left it
> > a
> RoMunn wrote:
> I think we all get that you have become a believer in socialism.
I think I might be coming to terms with things.
See as much as The Scout and I could sit in a honky tonk beer bar and
agree 100% on how we'd LIKE things to be - just before a bar clearing
brawl - the fact is ... t
SAN DIEGO Stephen and Linda Drake cast aside concerns about owning
property in Mexico because they believed in Donald Trump.
The Southern California couple paid $250,000 down payment on a
19th-floor oceanfront condo in Trump Ocean Resort Baja in 2006 before
the first construction crew arrived.
> you see i just dont have that blind trust that "its going to go back up"
You've subscribed to the Fox News view then?
It doesn't cost me anything to continue buying on the way down.
The money I am investing bi-weekly in my 401(k) would translate to
about 50% of its current value if I went ahe
I do believe in the fundamentals of the stimulus. However, and this is
a big fucking however, it only works long term if we reign in
government spending and pay down some debt after the economy starts to
rebound. Borrow now, invest, get the engines going, then gradually
pull back, putting surpluse
you see i just dont have that blind trust that "its going to go back up"
tw
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 3:05 PM, William Bowen wrote:
>
>> Well just remember: depending on what you own, you still own the same
>> percentage and you haven't lost a penny until you sell.
>
> +1.
>
> My dollar/paycheck c
> Well... my company matches 4% as long as you contribute 3% so I've left it
> at 3% (was doing 12% - and felt so damn responsible about it).
mine grants 2% so that no one is without a 401(k) in the company.
Pretty decent of them.
they'll match an additional 5%
so I have 7% of my check going to
> RoMunn wrote:
> So far he has scared the hell out of investors and sent the markets
> plummeting with his anti-capitalist rhetoric and socialist agenda.
>
Nope. That's your Narrative Man super-powers talking.
(Seriously, what is it you read that gets you this hooey?)
"The markets" are scared
> Well just remember: depending on what you own, you still own the same
> percentage and you haven't lost a penny until you sell.
+1.
My dollar/paycheck contribution and company match are staying the
same. not futzing with my asset mix and I'm watching my money buy
double what it did 6 months ag
i think they were scared already and out came the lady from the goonies
in the tractor trailer... WOAH she was scary.
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Robert Munn wrote:
>
> On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Gruss wrote:
>
>>
>> 5.) Now we'll see if Obama can fix it. So far he's doing better th
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Ihrig [mailto:pih...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2009 8:34 AM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Well... that was depressing (Retirement Funds)
>
>
> i am not contributing at all.
> no sense. buying ammo instead.
Well... my company matches 4%
Guns are a pretty safe bet now, and always have been.
Should the assault weapons ban go through they will go up like crazy again,
like double, and if not they can still be dumped at near value if you need
to.
You should look into reloading equipment, will save you money on ammo and
allow you to
> Rasta wrote:
>
> ive pers. lost 40%
>
> and tempted to yank it all out and stop making deposits.
>
Well just remember: depending on what you own, you still own the same
percentage and you haven't lost a penny until you sell.
If you don't need the cash you might as well hang on to your
percenta
My wealthy route would have been to not give mortgages to people who were
unable to repay them and then bundle them together and sell them as
investment grade securities when they were just a bunch of crap underneath.
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 11:58 PM, Gruss wrote:
>
> > RoMunn wrote:
> > I think
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Gruss wrote:
>
> 5.) Now we'll see if Obama can fix it. So far he's doing better than
> Bush if only because he acknowledges the problem and taking action to
> fix it
>
So far he has scared the hell out of investors and sent the markets
plummeting with his anti
If we are just going by who is associated with whom, the critics of
the study are right wing neocons with no small bone to pick with
anything that might seem "liberal". There is a reason that their Op-Ed
was in the Washington Times.
But I don't get your insurance industry criticism. That study wa
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> That's kind of like saying, if small percentage of the population commits
> crime, should we really spend money to enforce the laws.
In a very real way this all comes down to security. Security is about
preventing abuse of systems whether it
> Scott wrote:
> No way..sorry dude. In the prvious thread you specifically used the word
> 'blame', not 'responsibility', not 'accountability', 'blame'
>
Lemme tell ya how it is Scotty ... it's like this:
1.) Bush didn't create this problem.
2.) Bush volunteered for ownership of the solution.
sucks man. heat and dust are killers, make sure you have dust controlled
under there...
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 7:45 AM, Vivec wrote:
> Soone card fried, due to heat. So I pulled it from the system and
> now just have one. It was a great SLI setup too...two 8800GTX cards.
> served me well.
>
Neat
Yves Arsenault
"Love is the only force capable of transforming an enemy into a friend".
--Martin Luther King, Jr.
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 11:57 PM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> http://ronwinter.tv/drums.html
>
>
~|
Adobe® Cold
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 11:57 PM, Rastafari wrote:
>
> man... i love it!
>
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 10:57 PM, Gruss Gott wrote:
> >
> > http://ronwinter.tv/drums.html
> >
>
that's cool. needs a little 4 or 8 bar loop repeat or something.
~~~
So...
Set up a new home office...with al ovely desk. BUt one that was enclosed.
So I put my CPU under the desk...and found that it was blowing a LOT
of hot air...that was being trapped beneath the desk. Made an
appointment for the moving guy to come back to sort it ou, but he
didn't show up.
Th
Caught by a motion capture camera
--
Scott Stewart
ColdFusion Developer
4405 Oakshyre Way
Raleigh, NC 27616
(h) 919.874.6229 (c) 703.220.2835
-Original Message-
From: Rastafari [mailto:rastaf...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 10:15 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: any thing you
2000 is my first known recollection of it. Muffins were introduced in the
fall of that year after Gel had a dry crumbly one for breakfast and got
crumbs all over his desk.
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 12:09 AM, Rastafari wrote:
>
> 7 years ive been here??? sheesh. thats a long damn ass time.
> when d
Sorry, I was mistaken. You did not say he was to 'blame' you said it was his
'fault'.
"Basically what Obama has decided to do nothing for the time being and
thus let investment banks contango even if that means you have to pay
higher prices even though the market doesn't demand it.
So without a do
No way..sorry dude. In the prvious thread you specifically used the word
'blame', not 'responsibility', not 'accountability', 'blame'
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 12:15 AM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> > Scott wrote:
> > Based on comments you have made in other threads, the blame for the drop
> in
> > the
i am not contributing at all.
no sense. buying ammo instead.
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f
Archive:
ive pers. lost 40%
and tempted to yank it all out and stop making deposits.
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 3:05 AM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
>> Jim wrote:
>> But still - I've lost nearly 30% of my retirement savings in the past three
>> months. After working 15 years I've lost nearly a third in three month
> Jim wrote:
> But still - I've lost nearly 30% of my retirement savings in the past three
> months. After working 15 years I've lost nearly a third in three months
> (numerologists can have some fun with that).
>
And people are asking why I've been pissed off lately. I've lost 50%.
Luckily we
Sounds like it can't be done in the US but can still be done in locations
without anti-spoofing measures on the SMS networks. US numbers could still
potentially be targeted from other countries.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/03/06/twitter_sms_spoofing_risk/
~
ouch
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 11:18 PM, Jim D wrote:
>
> But still - I've lost nearly 30% of my retirement savings in the past three
> months. After working 15 years I've lost nearly a third in three months
> (numerologists can have some fun with that).
>
> I know I'm hardly alone and am thankful
> RoMunn wrote:
> I think we all get that you have become a believer in socialism. It all
> sounds nice and fuzzy and warm in theory, but in practice it makes everyone
> poorer, not wealthier.
>
Here's what happened to Iceland when they went with your "wealthy" route:
Inside [Iceland's Central B
65 matches
Mail list logo
