n Nov 13, 2014 3:54 PM, "Rick Faircloth" wrote:
>
>> Apparently it does.
>>
>> When she sobered up (if she was drunk and not just being a b**ch)
>> and had a look at the video, she'll be grateful that the guy didn't lose
>> his temper and hit her with
o flee, which I think is nuts. Even in your
> house if there's a window or a door you're expected to go out it.
> On Nov 13, 2014 3:54 PM, "Rick Faircloth" wrote:
>
>> Apparently it does.
>>
>> When she sobered up (if she was drunk and not just bein
Men do not have to take crap like that from women, just because
they're female!
On 11/13/2014 3:49 PM, LRS Scout wrote:
> It's new York, the right to self defense doesn't really exist.
> On Nov 13, 2014 3:47 PM, "Rick Faircloth" wrote:
>
>> She asked for
She asked for and received everything she got.
On 11/13/2014 3:31 PM, Vivec wrote:
> Interested in the views on this situation...
>
> http://nypost.com/2014/11/12/man-whose-epic-slap-went-viral-has-charges-dropped/
>
> I think he deserved to have the charges dropped.
>
>
>
uot;.
> Your opinions are right there for the entire world, including
> potential clients and employers, to see.
>
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Rick Faircloth
> wrote:
>> Stop twisting mine, Maureen, and I'll return the favor...
>>
>>
>> On 9/10/2
tercation), will it change your position that she was 'looking for
> trouble'?
>
> http://espn.go.com/espn/otl/story/_/id/11503496/ray-rice-spat-face-fiancee-twice-punch-lines-reports
>
> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 11:13 PM, Rick Faircloth
> wrote:
>
>> They *both* were v
Maureen...
I know this discussion has gotten quite contentious. These are serious
matters.
No one wants to give ground easily and it's difficult to discuss such
matters
with any clarity and understanding in just a few days.
All that aside, I do wish you well. I harbor no ill feelings towards y
t; But you go right ahead with your distortions and insults. I'm not the
> only one reading it and you are digging a deep hole for yourself.
>
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 4:40 PM, Rick Faircloth
> wrote:
>> I would never strike a woman first, Maureen. (Unless in a war)
>>
>
Finally! A sane person!
On 9/10/2014 4:43 PM, Jerry Milo Johnson wrote:
> As a plea of sanity here, just as there is no justification for Rice to
> punch his fiance, I think we need to as a group dial down the rhetoric and
> personal attacks.
>
> Even IF someone is defending Rice, or thinks what
You, asshole! :D
On 9/10/2014 4:40 PM, Rick Faircloth wrote:
> If you're referring to my typo, you're right Scott!
>
>
> On 9/10/2014 4:22 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>>>
>>> I try to teach the women (and men) in my life to be careful about what
>>>
If you're referring to my typo, you're right Scott!
On 9/10/2014 4:22 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>>
>>
>> I try to teach the women (and men) in my life to be careful about what
>> you say and
>> do.
>>
>>
> Maybe you should take your own advice. Do you recall saying this:
>
> 'PERSONAL RESPONSIBILIT
;
>>> Rick,
>>>
>>> It is impossible for anyone to perform a character assassination on you.
>>> You cannot assassinate something does does not exist.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Rick Faircloth
>>> wrote:
>>>
>&g
When you've realized you've lost the argument, insult...
On 9/10/2014 4:32 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
> Reading this: "It is impossible for anyone to perform a character
> assassination on you.
> You cannot assassinate something does does not exist." from Scott reminded
> me of a quote from the CT
>
> You would intervene based on what you think even where you're not wanted
> or welcome. You know everyone's situation just because you've worked with
> "some" cases of abuse. What hubris..."
>
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Rick Faircloth
>
n reading distance.
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Rick Faircloth
> wrote:
>> Tending towards violence now, are we, Maureen?
>>
>> I'm waiting for your " consistent, very level headed, thought provoking
>> commentary"
>> to quote Sco
She just made an interesting choice of words...
On 9/10/2014 4:16 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
> That is not what she was saying...man you are either really dense, or
> incredibly obtuse.
>
> Not sure which one I would prefer.
>
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Rick Faircloth
>
Ooh, another "low blower" in the house.
Before we begin, are you a boy or girl, Dana?
(Just so I'll know where and how hard I can hit back)
On 9/10/2014 4:16 PM, Dana wrote:
> sock puppet? maybe you're right at that
>
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
>> No one expected
Sep 10, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Rick Faircloth
> wrote:
>
>> I'm not inclined to accept character assassination from anyone, male or
>> female.
>>
>> If she doesn't like conflict, she shouldn't start one.
>>
>>
>> On 9/10/2014 4:05 PM, Scott St
Tending towards violence now, are we, Maureen?
I'm waiting for your " consistent, very level headed, thought provoking
commentary"
to quote Scott, but you seem to have lost your cool a little Maureen.
Want to punch someone in the face with your fist?
On 9/10/2014 4:08 PM, Maureen wrote:
> No
quot;. But you don't understand the concept of adequate response, how
> could you understand this..
> On Sep 10, 2014 3:58 PM, "Rick Faircloth" wrote:
>
>> And Maureen is just being a liar, stating that I "insist that the fault
>> is always
>> with
is parrot what you saw on FoxNews
> earlier in the day.
>
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Rick Faircloth
> wrote:
>
>> And Maureen is just being a liar, stating that I "insist that the fault
>> is always
>> with the victim." I don't like my wor
have said something that he deserved to get slapped
> for, but in no way did she deserve the level and viciousness of retaliation
> that she got. He could have easily killed her.
>
> A real man would have walked away.
>
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Rick Faircloth
> wrote:
I responded. Who was the first victim?
Oh, but Maureen gets a pass for her abusive tone because she's a woman.
Did Maureen provoke my response in any way, Scott, you asshole. ;o)
On 9/10/2014 3:51 PM, Scott Stewart wrote:
> Now you're just being a dick..
> On Sep 10, 2014 3:49 PM,
"But people like Rick continue to insist that the fault is always with
the victim."
Slow down, take a deep breath, and try to think clearly, Maureen.
On 9/10/2014 1:39 PM, Maureen wrote:
> There are millions of people living in abusive relationships. Mostly
> they consist of women who are too
"Your attitude is that the victim deserved it..."
You are so wrong, Maureen. I just pointed out what any reasonable
person would.
But whatever gets you through every day, Maureen. You'll obviously
believe whatever you choose; truth or not.
On 9/10/2014 12:36 PM, Maureen wrote:
> Your attitude
e elevator cam.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:r...@whitestonemedia.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 8:31 AM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Ray Rice
>
>
> Wrong, Eric!
>
> Ray is responsible for his actions. HOWEVER, the
Now that's going to cause you to have a balanced perspective...
On 9/10/2014 6:04 AM, Maureen wrote:
> My familiarity with spousal abuse includes 19 trips to the hospital
> and having almost every bone in my face broken. I have absolutely no
> tolerance for it and no respect for anyone who does
d of Ray's and they got into a fight."
>
> Proof? You can claim that all you like, but unless you have proof of that
> it is just you rambling on. You are also on the outside looking in and
> claiming special knowledge oh mighty kettle...
>
> -----Origina
/10/2014 9:37 AM, Scott Stroz wrote:
> Why do have such hostility and apparent hatred towards women, Rick?
>
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Rick Faircloth
> wrote:
>
>> Wrong, Eric!
>>
>> Ray is responsible for his actions. HOWEVER, the woman is responsible
&g
Just setting the record straight...
On 9/10/2014 9:36 AM, Scott Stroz wrote:
> Nice backpedaling, Rick.
>
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Rick Faircloth
> wrote:
>
>> No, I was trying to type:
>>
>> She shouldn't have started it and Ray SHOULDN'T h
ing her with your fist?
> If not, why not?
>
> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 11:22 PM, Rick Faircloth
> wrote:
>> Oh, bull, Maureen.
>>
>> You would intervene based on what you think even where you're not wanted
>> or welcome. You know everyone's situation just beca
No, I was trying to type:
She shouldn't have started it and Ray SHOULDN'T have ended it the way he
did.
Scott, you scum. You absolute scum.
On 9/10/2014 9:27 AM, Scott Stroz wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Rick Faircloth
> wrote:
>
>>
>> PERSONAL RES
> subsequently, she was knocked unconscious and you are trying to justify his
> actions because you think she deserved it.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 9:16 AM, Rick Faircloth
> wrote:
>
>> Scott, if you attacked Ray, and Ray knocked you out. Is Ray solely to
>
x27;s going
> through anything at all).
>
> Ridiculous.
>
> On 10 September 2014 08:11, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
>> You don't see that by saying '...if his soon-to-be wife hadn't
>> assaulted him, he never would have struck back.' You are essentially
n't assaulted
> him, he never would have struck back.' You are essentially saying, 'she
> deserved it' or 'she was asking for it'? Maybe if she stayed in the kitchen
> making him sandwiches, non of this would have happened, right Rick?
>
> Typical, misogynisti
You're absolute right, Scott. Actions have consequences. EVERYONE'S
action have consequences.
Even a woman's actions can have consequences. Typical "women are never
at fault for
anything and men are the cause of all trouble in the world" feminism.
I'll bet that if his soon-to-be wife hadn't ass
until you can product a few more brain cells.
On 9/10/2014 12:05 AM, Scott Stroz wrote:
> No..they were not. He was not a victimof anything. And to try and paint
> him as such shows how misogynistic you really are.
>
> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 11:13 PM, Rick Faircloth
> wrote:
>
e "woman is never at fault" side of domestic problems.
On 9/10/2014 12:08 AM, Scott Stroz wrote:
> Ah, yes, Rick, please enlighten us with your tales of working with abuse
> victims. I am sure they were all looking for trouble, just like Ray Rice's
> fiance, right?
>
>
itude towards women is not dead yet. Shows we still have some work to
>>> do.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Rick Faircloth >>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Well, I've just reached a point with the implosion of our society
>>>>
are of the nation when it enriches
> those whose propaganda you believe and you are unwilling to consider
> compassion or help to anyone those propagandists have denigrated.
>
> Keep your soul, if you have one, in a bank vault. As long as people
> like those you support are in char
. Shows we still have some work to
>> do.
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Rick Faircloth
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Well, I've just reached a point with the implosion of our society
>>> that it's time to speak up and take a stand.
>>>
>>
Oh, bull, Maureen.
You would intervene based on what you think even where you're not wanted
or welcome. You know everyone's situation just because you've worked with
"some" cases of abuse. What hubris...
On 9/9/2014 10:58 PM, Maureen wrote:
> He hit her in the face with his fist. If there is n
They *both* were victims of assault.
If the woman had assaulted a smaller, weaker woman like she did Ray
Rice, and did the
same amount of physical damage to the smaller, weaker woman, should she
be charged with assault?
Of course she should.
The both did things that were wrong.
On 9/9/2014 9
gt; Days...
>> On Sep 9, 2014 7:33 PM, "Eric Roberts"
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/09/09/nfl-commissioner-goodell-does-no
>>> t-rule -out-ray-rice-return-to-football-he-has-paid-the-price/
>>>
>>>
Scout, you must be off your meds, bud.
On 9/9/2014 8:33 PM, LRS Scout wrote:
> That can come here and do us harm?
>
> Not one.
>
> A true border defense force and nationwide conscription in militia in time
> of need, shared sacrifice and no foreign entanglements.
> On Sep 9, 201
looking for
> trouble'. Though, I am not sure what that has to do with the discussion at
> hand.
>
> How would you feel if it was your daughter that Ray Rice dragged out of the
> elevator? Would you still think she was 'looking for trouble'?
> On Sep 9, 2014 6:54 P
What!? I agree with Eric! So it ain't so!
On 9/9/2014 8:09 PM, Eric Roberts wrote:
> That wouldn't be very practical. I am all for force reductions...but I
> don't think getting rid of the standing army would be very good for our
> defense. That would leave us pretty defenseless. It's not lik
Any type of fraud is unacceptable...
On 9/9/2014 8:08 PM, Eric Roberts wrote:
> Exactly...or all of the corporate welfare that goes to multi-billion dollar
> corporations...
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Maureen [mailto:mamamaur...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 6:20 PM
Why in the world would you want to "shut down the standing army", Scout?
Do you not think this nation has enemy against which we must be ready
to defend ourselves?
On 9/9/2014 7:21 PM, LRS Scout wrote:
> You know I want to shut down the standing army for the most part.
>
> That has nothing to
.rawstory.com/rs/2014/09/09/nfl-commissioner-goodell-does-no
>> t-rule -out-ray-rice-return-to-football-he-has-paid-the-price/
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:r...@whitestonemedia.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 5:55 PM
>> To:
You don't understand "general vs individual welfare", Maureen. The
Federal governments
job is to protect the nation as a whole, not every individual that makes
up the nation.
Scout was right. It is not the job of the Federal government to provide
people with food
to eat, clothes to wear, and a
m the Heritage Foundation nonsense. Confirmation
> bias could be your middle name.
>
> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 6:45 PM, Rick Faircloth
> wrote:
>> My concern was mostly over long-term dependency abuse:
>>
>> http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2010/06/confronting-the-u
essed..she was asking for trouble' after a woman gets raped.
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 3:31 PM, Rick Faircloth
> wrote:
>
>> No, because a woman's right to dress provocatively does not allow a man the
>> right to rape her.
>>
>> However, a woma
ut the bulk of the people are not
> abusing it and are people that really need it.
>
> Eric
> -Original Message-
> From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:r...@whitestonemedia.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 1:09 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Democrats set to lose the senate
/9/2014 3:34 PM, LRS Scout wrote:
> You have no concept of proportional response.
>
> I'd say she paid for whatever minor infractions led to this.
> On Sep 9, 2014 3:32 PM, "Rick Faircloth" wrote:
>
>> No, because a woman's right to dress provocatively do
was being approached by someone saying give me All your money,
> insinuating a robbery.
>
> Would you shoot that unarmed attacker.
> On Sep 9, 2014 1:54 PM, "Rick Faircloth" wrote:
>
>> Can you quote me, Scott, stating that Rice's response was appropriate?
>
3:10 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Rick Faircloth
> wrote:
>
>> No, asshole, it reeks of "she was asking for trouble."
>>
>
> When a woman is raped would you say the same if she was dressed
> provocatively?
>
~~
Well, I've just reached a point with the implosion of our society
that it's time to speak up and take a stand.
On 9/9/2014 2:31 PM, LRS Scout wrote:
> Angel, a long term member of the list.
> On Sep 9, 2014 2:27 PM, "Rick Faircloth" wrote:
>
>> Scout, what go
Scout, what goes "gellie" mean? I couldn't find a definition I was sure
you're using.
On 9/9/2014 11:36 AM, LRS Scout wrote:
> I'm more surprised by gellie personally.
> On Sep 9, 2014 11:25 AM, "Cameron Childress" wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Ray Champagne wrote:
>>
>>> My opi
No, Cameron, you look like an asshole, and thick-headed, for not being
able to understanding the nuances of my arguments. They are refined, not
gross statements. And you have finally stated what would have avoided
this situation completely:
"Perhaps she should not have slapped him..."
That in
the reasons we have a country today.
> On Sep 9, 2014 2:06 PM, "Rick Faircloth" wrote:
>
>> Well, if you trust the likes of Al Sharpton more than you trust the police,
>> you are on the same side as the terrorists in Ferguson.
>>
>>
>> On 9/9/2014 1:50
/2014 2:11 PM, LRS Scout wrote:
> I do not concede life threatening.
> On Sep 9, 2014 2:11 PM, "Rick Faircloth" wrote:
>
>> That's fine. I have no problem with that.
>>
>> But that's not the choice every individual faced with a life-threatening
>>
u said it reeks of 'she was asking for trouble' you did not
> mean to imply that his response was justified? Because that is what you
> have done - numerous times.
>
> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Rick Faircloth
> wrote:
>
>> Quote where I stated this was a
; knowledge if the martial arts would be considered ';strength' regardless of
> your size.
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Rick Faircloth
> wrote:
>
>> Can you quote me, Scott, stating that Rice's response was appropriate?
>>
>> And, you&
every time.
> On Sep 9, 2014 1:57 PM, "Rick Faircloth" wrote:
>
>> Yeah, right. And he very well might have taken it from you and shot you
>> with it.
>> He had already attempted to take it from the officer. Are you willing to
>> take that chance?
>>
>
Then, let's see the evidence, Herr Eric.
Provide the quote.
(And by the way, your "some...yes...many...no" response doesn't line
up with my questions and makes little sense.)
On 9/9/2014 2:02 PM, Eric Roberts wrote:
> Some...yes...many...no.
>
> -Origi
n by the pd themselves.
> On Sep 9, 2014 1:48 PM, "Rick Faircloth" wrote:
>
>> And you know for a fact that this officer did?
>>
>> And if several rounds shot into Michael Brown, who was on drugs at the
>> time,
>> didn't stop him, do you think the offic
On 9/9/2014 1:54 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Rick Faircloth
> wrote:
>
>> I'm glad you enjoy me throwing your language back in your face, Scott.
>> Glad it made you
>> think about resorting to such childish behavior.
>>
> Actu
ot
> him with it.
> On Sep 9, 2014 1:45 PM, "Rick Faircloth" wrote:
>
>> I'm glad you enjoy me throwing your language back in your face, Scott.
>> Glad it made you
>> think about resorting to such childish behavior.
>>
>> Now, more to the poi
ou're probably going to prison. Why? Because he was
> unarmed and you didn't have to kill him to get out of the situation.
>
> Regardless of what she did, Ray Rice' response wasn't appropriate to the
> situation. He could have blocked her slaps, restrained her
;
> They've turned into punks
> On Sep 9, 2014 1:39 PM, "Rick Faircloth" wrote:
>
>> Doesn't matter. He would easily have killed the cop without a gun.
>> Therefore, by law,
>> the cop had the right to use whatever force was necessary to stop the
>&g
y OK for a 200+lb professional athlete to punch a much smaller
> woman in the face. You are part of the problem that women in this country
> have to face every day of their lives.
>
> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 1:27 PM, Rick Faircloth
> wrote:
>
>> I see you're expanding your
e in Leavenworth.
>>>
>>> Cops are supposed to be tough guys, brawling is supposed to be part of
>> the
>>> job. All go straight to the gun now.
>>> On Sep 9, 2014 1:14 PM, "Rick Faircloth"
>> wrote:
>>>> Some kids, who are
e bulk of the people on welfare programs are
>> conservatives? Red states consume more way more welfare dollars than
>> blue states do.
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:r...@whitestonemedia.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 09
alled escalation of force principals.
>
> You were in the military man, it would be a violation of ROE that would
> have ended with me in Leavenworth.
>
> Cops are supposed to be tough guys, brawling is supposed to be part of the
> job. All go straight to the gun now.
> On Sep
liberals.
On 9/9/2014 11:48 AM, Eric Roberts wrote:
> Then why is it that the bulk of the people on welfare programs are
> conservatives? Red states consume more way more welfare dollars than blue
> states do.
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:r...@w
sogynistic douche bags like you, I am
> thankful that I do not have any daughters who would have to deal with
> bullshit like yours their entire lives.
>
> Nothing she did to him warranted being punched in the face.
>
> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Rick Faircloth
> wrote:
sailant who doesn't possess a firearm and was only beating them with their
bare hands?
Would you, Scout?
On 9/9/2014 1:05 PM, LRS Scout wrote:
> This is why we shoot unarmed kids.
> On Sep 9, 2014 1:04 PM, "Rick Faircloth" wrote:
>
>> The women in your life, if yo
t the charges against her were dropped and that he was charged
> with more serious charges kind of deflates your argument.
>
> If you honestly view this as a qui pro quo, you are a worse human being
> than I could possibly imagine.
>
> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 1:01 PM, Rick Faircloth
Quote the line I wrote stating that the assaults were comparable, you
asshole.
On 9/9/2014 1:02 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
> She got knocked unconscious and you think the assaults are comparable?
>
> You are truly a disgusting human being.
>
> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 12:58 PM,
like
something
he said or did? If not, why not, you asshole.
On 9/9/2014 12:59 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
> No, she was not.
>
> Nothing she did warranted being punched in the face.
>
> If you disagree, I feel sorry for any women in your life.
>
> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Rick F
> She was knocked out when her head hit the railing.
>>
>> It wasn't "appropriate" force, but the fact that they were BOTH charged
>> says something about the overall incident.
>>
>> On 9 September 2014 11:02, Rick Faircloth
>> wrote:
>>
&
>
> The assaults are in no way comparative and your attempt to blame the victim
> is disgusting.
>
> On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 11:53 PM, Rick Faircloth
> wrote:
>
>> No, Judah and Jerry, you're both wrong.
>>
>> I make no equivalency argument, but both were vic
"Most victims of domestic abuse blame themselves."
Is it POSSIBLE that this woman realized she had crossed
a line, instead of suffering some kind of "trauma?"
On 9/9/2014 12:52 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Vivec wrote:
>
>> Today the wife apologised for her role in
No, asshole, it reeks of "she was asking for trouble."
Was she not asking for trouble, asshole? (Your word, Scott)
On 9/9/2014 12:53 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
> More proof you are an asshole.
>
> This reeks of 'she had it coming to her'.
>
> On Tue, Sep
Let's start with 'personal responsibility'.
Liberals have abused the generosity of the American Public
to the point that welfare is now a way of life for half our population.
On 9/9/2014 11:11 AM, William Bowen wrote:
> mmm... excellent bogeymen all...
>
> Rick, it was your initial statement, c
r sent :)
>
> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Ray Champagne wrote:
>
>> My opinion of some people on this list has changed...not for the better.
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 10:02 AM, Rick Faircloth
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I wouldn't slap my wife, but
And I'm not sure who cares, Ray. Having your approval
is of no significance to me, or any other thinking person.
On 9/9/2014 11:04 AM, Ray Champagne wrote:
> My opinion of some people on this list has changed...not for the better.
>
> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 10:02 AM, Rick Fair
misogynist.
> On Sep 9, 2014 10:39 AM, "Rick Faircloth" wrote:
>
>> Women want equality. They don't want to be treated as "weaker."
>>
>> These are the consequences of feminism.
>>
>> You can't have it both ways.
>>
>>
&
iend
> /significant other out she slapped you...? If your answer is yes then
> you've got bigger issues.
> On Sep 9, 2014 10:38 AM, "Rick Faircloth" wrote:
>
>> Women want equality. They don't want to be treated as "weaker."
>>
>> These
Yes, I watch Fox News AND CNN's talk/dicussion shows to stay aware of other
viewpoints. However, Fox is willing to call a spade a spade. Other news
media
is simply a liberal mouthpiece, for the most part.
Obamacare a success?!? That viewpoint is just unbelievable. It's STILL a
failure,
being u
Women want equality. They don't want to be treated as "weaker."
These are the consequences of feminism.
You can't have it both ways.
On 9/9/2014 10:33 AM, GMoney wrote:
> What is with all these false equivalencies
>
> All these arguments of "Well, IF she was a man..." are completely
> irre
to these debates.
>
> After Bundy and Ferguson can't you see how close we are to tall violence.
> The government is responding wrong, so far the civilian side hasn't screwed
> up, but his long can that last and then we're in a shooting war.
> On Sep 9, 2014 10:20 AM, &q
do to this country would likely be permanent and result in a
> balkanization effect. Treating under the union for all time.
>
> Maybe that's what the next cycle of history requires but I'm not yet ready
> to surrender to it.
> On Sep 8, 2014 11:57 PM, "Rick Fairc
Compared to Obama he is...
On 9/9/2014 12:22 AM, LRS Scout wrote:
> Romney isn't a conservative. He was governor of Massachusetts.
>
> That's like pointing to Bloomberg as a republican idealist
> On Sep 8, 2014 11:41 PM, "Rick Faircloth" wrote:
>
>>
learn something.
>
> Cheers,
> Judah
>
> On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 8:40 PM, Rick Faircloth
> wrote:
>
>> Judah stated:
>>
>> "You know, Rick, my wife said to me on election night, "I've never seen
>> someone so depressed and pissed off when the
No, Judah and Jerry, you're both wrong.
I make no equivalency argument, but both were victims of assault.
However, both assaults should be treated on their own merits, or lack
thereof.
Yes, Ray is guilty of his assault and should be punished accordingly,
whether
he hit a man or a woman. The f
bama believes that America should be considered
only an equal to any other country in the world, be it Russia or Somalia.
American is distinctive and unique and will be a force for good in this
world, or, by our lack of leadership, will allow the world to fall into
even more chaos that it alrea
That's nonsense, Judah... at least the House votes and passes bills.
Wouldn't it be smarter for Reid to bring up bills for a vote, pass them
(if he could),
and then force the House to have to wrestle with a bill?
Reid is only trying to protect his senators by making sure they don't
have to tak
I'm just going to jump into the middle of this, only knowing what has
been said in this thread:
What should happen to the woman concerning her battery?
On 9/8/2014 5:24 PM, Maureen wrote:
> If he didn't want to get fired for violating a contract with an
> anti-domestic abuse clause, he shouldn'
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
