RE: DOJ to swappers Law's not on your side - Tech News - CNET.com

2002-08-22 Thread Raymond Camden
> most people like Brittney (puke) Spears and all the vomit sounding > mainstream crap... > > That audience, tasteless as they typically are, incidentally > are totally > obedient... so no worry about sales staying with them of course... Welcome to a democracy then. In other words - if people p

RE: DOJ to swappers Law's not on your side - Tech News - CNET.com

2002-08-22 Thread Paris Lundis
s just the same? -paris -Original Message- From: Nick McClure [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2002 10:56 AM To: CF-Community Subject: RE: DOJ to swappers Law's not on your side - Tech News - CNET.com That is because there are two different things you are buying. Th

RE: DOJ to swappers Law's not on your side - Tech News - CNET.com

2002-08-22 Thread Nick McClure
3 AM > To: CF-Community > Subject: RE: DOJ to swappers Law's not on your side - Tech News - CNET.com > > I love capitalism... The art of more for me Nick :) > > What product do you ever buy where you are so limited... Does your > lawnmower > dictate that you can't

RE: DOJ to swappers Law's not on your side - Tech News - CNET.com

2002-08-22 Thread Harkins,Patrick
, 2002 10:47 AM To: CF-Community Subject: RE: DOJ to swappers Law's not on your side - Tech News - CNET.com Amen... I have a proximate thought that is... Mall culture, the Walmart marketplace, is so cheap and corny that any wazoo can consume... so pilfering goods from this mall of Americ

RE: DOJ to swappers Law's not on your side - Tech News - CNET.com

2002-08-22 Thread Paris Lundis
to swappers Law's not on your side - Tech News - CNET.com You know when we moved from albums to tapes and then CD's, some of the mystique of the object got lost in the shuffle - I think. But that is still there and I think more than ever these days it is becoming important. So with th

RE: DOJ to swappers Law's not on your side - Tech News - CNET.com

2002-08-22 Thread Paris Lundis
hursday, August 22, 2002 10:33 AM To: CF-Community Subject: RE: DOJ to swappers Law's not on your side - Tech News - CNET.com > it's not a matter of proving money loss.. its a matter of being > anti-competitive... its about abusing privileges to conduct in commerce.. > its about ille

RE: DOJ to swappers Law's not on your side - Tech News - CNET.com

2002-08-22 Thread Harkins,Patrick
You know when we moved from albums to tapes and then CD's, some of the mystique of the object got lost in the shuffle - I think. But that is still there and I think more than ever these days it is becoming important. So with the album/CD you get Photos, artwork, lyrics and other little extras, eve

RE: DOJ to swappers Law's not on your side - Tech News - CNET.com

2002-08-22 Thread Smith, Matthew P -CONT(DYN)
2, 2002 9:22 AM >>To: CF-Community >>Subject: RE: DOJ to swappers Law's not on your side - Tech News - CNET.com >> >>most people like Brittney (puke) Spears and all the vomit sounding >>mainstream crap... >> >>That audience, tasteless as they typica

RE: DOJ to swappers Law's not on your side - Tech News - CNET.com

2002-08-22 Thread Paris Lundis
their own albums or doing the Indie circuit... Die Hollywood Die. -paris -Original Message- From: Raymond Camden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2002 9:57 AM To: CF-Community Subject: RE: DOJ to swappers Law's not on your side - Tech News - CNET.com >

RE: DOJ to swappers Law's not on your side - Tech News - CNET.com

2002-08-22 Thread Nick McClure
> it's not a matter of proving money loss.. its a matter of being > anti-competitive... its about abusing privileges to conduct in commerce.. > its about illegally controlling assets you bought > > Sure if someone sell a copy of something and makes money they should be > liable to buy/reimbur

Re: DOJ to swappers Law's not on your side - Tech News - CNET.com

2002-08-22 Thread Jon Hall
Just read my post...that didn't make sense. Should be because of things like 15% breakage fees. -- jon mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Thursday, August 22, 2002, 10:15:58 AM, you wrote: JH> First, concert proceeds are where artists make their money. Record JH> sales all go to the company, because of

RE: DOJ to swappers Law's not on your side - Tech News - CNET.com

2002-08-22 Thread Paris Lundis
: Thursday, August 22, 2002 10:03 AM To: CF-Community Subject: RE: DOJ to swappers Law's not on your side - Tech News - CNET.com I just want to ditto Nick's comment. The thing that a lot of people on the net seem to think is "I don't like this license so I ignore it." Tha

RE: DOJ to swappers Law's not on your side - Tech News - CNET.com

2002-08-22 Thread Kevin Graeme
It's all well and good for a company to be stupid, but legislating that stupidity at the expense of the will of the public is another matter. When the CSS encryption came out, Lawrence Lessig referred to it as "Code is Law". By preventing copying, the CSS encryption code violates the Fair Use prov

Re: DOJ to swappers Law's not on your side - Tech News - CNET.com

2002-08-22 Thread Bill Wheatley
Message - From: "Nick McClure" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2002 9:56 AM Subject: RE: DOJ to swappers Law's not on your side - Tech News - CNET.com > So you are saying that because they aren'

RE: DOJ to swappers Law's not on your side - Tech News - CNET.com

2002-08-22 Thread Paris Lundis
o: CF-Community Subject: RE: DOJ to swappers Law's not on your side - Tech News - CNET.com So you are saying that because they aren't loosing money it is legal? I would say the companies are loosing a little money on single sales more than anything. But they make up for it by rai

Re: DOJ to swappers Law's not on your side - Tech News - CNET.com

2002-08-22 Thread Jon Hall
First, concert proceeds are where artists make their money. Record sales all go to the company, because of the 15% "breakage" fees, which are a standard parts of roylaties. From the old days when records broke a lot...now all it does is reduce artists portion of the royalties by 15%. How often do

Re: DOJ to swappers Law's not on your side - Tech News - CNET.com

2002-08-22 Thread Jon Hall
The Senator from Disney, Fritz Holling's is a Democrat. He is one of the most senior Democrats and receives a ton of funding from the RIAA and the MPAA. He alone got $300,000 from them in his last election. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,47296,00.html The article also mentions that during 20

RE: DOJ to swappers Law's not on your side - Tech News - CNET.com

2002-08-22 Thread Raymond Camden
-Original Message- > From: Nick McClure [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2002 9:58 AM > To: CF-Community > Subject: RE: DOJ to swappers Law's not on your side - Tech > News - CNET.com > > > You are purchasing a license to a piece of

RE: DOJ to swappers Law's not on your side - Tech News - CNET.com

2002-08-22 Thread Nick McClure
You are purchasing a license to a piece of music, by making that purchase you agree to the terms of the contract. Just like software, you have a single license for a single computer. You may or may not be able to make a backup copy. Same thing with music, you don't like the license, wait for the

RE: DOJ to swappers Law's not on your side - Tech News - CNET.com

2002-08-22 Thread Raymond Camden
> > I am not arguing that piracy should create innovation... And > I don't believe > in a cup of free tea either... Actually, I _do_ think innovation should have been their response - not legislation. But again - there is no law requiring companies to be intelligent. Look at how the movie indus

RE: DOJ to swappers Law's not on your side - Tech News - CNET.com

2002-08-22 Thread Nick McClure
everybody else does. > -Original Message- > From: Paris Lundis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2002 9:20 AM > To: CF-Community > Subject: RE: DOJ to swappers Law's not on your side - Tech News - CNET.com > > This is exactly the reason w

RE: DOJ to swappers Law's not on your side - Tech News - CNET.com

2002-08-22 Thread Paris Lundis
ent: Thursday, August 22, 2002 9:32 AM To: CF-Community Subject: RE: DOJ to swappers Law's not on your side - Tech News - CNET.com > The Republiclans are at it again.. Defending an industry that has > essentially proven to be recession proof and that can't > really substantiate

RE: DOJ to swappers Law's not on your side - Tech News - CNET.com

2002-08-22 Thread Raymond Camden
> The Republiclans are at it again.. Defending an industry that has > essentially proven to be recession proof and that can't > really substantiate > any claims related to losses due to file sharing/swapping... Oh come on - don't tell me the Democrats don't sell out and are purely "Defenders of

RE: DOJ to swappers Law's not on your side - Tech News - CNET.com

2002-08-22 Thread Paris Lundis
ler.com (p) 1-212-655-4477 [finding the future in the past, passing the future in the present] [connecting people, places and things] -Original Message- From: Raymond Camden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2002 9:03 AM To: CF-Community Subject: RE: DOJ to swappers La

RE: DOJ to swappers Law's not on your side - Tech News - CNET.com

2002-08-22 Thread Kevin Graeme
nity > Subject: DOJ to swappers Law's not on your side - Tech News - CNET.com > > > Even giving your wife, husband or SO a copy can net you five years. Isn't > this getting a bit heavy handed. > > http://news.com.com/2100-1023-954591.html > > Don

RE: DOJ to swappers Law's not on your side - Tech News - CNET.com

2002-08-22 Thread Raymond Camden
> Even giving your wife, husband or SO a copy can net you five > years. Isn't > this getting a bit heavy handed. > > http://news.com.com/2100-1023-954591.html >Don't the DOJ have better things to do, such as catch criminals or >terrorists? Errr - aren't people who take songs w/o paying for t

DOJ to swappers Law's not on your side - Tech News - CNET.com

2002-08-22 Thread Larry Lyons
Even giving your wife, husband or SO a copy can net you five years. Isn't this getting a bit heavy handed. http://news.com.com/2100-1023-954591.html Don't the DOJ have better things to do, such as catch criminals or terrorists? A couple of other things, this person was speaking before a grou