I am pretty happy. I'll be happier in one year, 11 months and 26 days when I
retire from the army and begin my new life.
Sent from my iPhone 4S.
> On Oct 24, 2013, at 11:08 AM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
>
> I'm damn happy. My friends are pretty happy, by an large as well. That is
> something
I'm damn happy. My friends are pretty happy, by an large as well. That is
something I look for in friends, so that isn't surprising. Not all of them
are happy with their jobs, but they are happy they have one.
You definitely make your own happiness. Just saying that "having a job"
doesn't automat
It helps tremendously :)
Plus the first winning season for the Royals in 10 years. Now we just need
to avoid the 3rd Cardinals championship in the last 7 years, and we'll call
it a successful year!
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 8:41 AM, Zaphod Beeblebrox <
zaph0d.b33bl3b...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> How
How much of that's due to KC Chiefs being 7-0 ;)
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 7:27 AM, GMoney wrote:
>
> *shrug* OK
>
> In KC, we're generally pretty happy. All my friends are employed, and they
> are all happy. Guess you make your own happiness.
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Judah McAuley
Actually, you did:
"I do know that the ones I have personally observed
are lazy, or at least vastly under-motivated."
You really shouldn't engage with people that question your statements
because you would have to defend your words. That too often proves
difficult.
.
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 1
*shrug* OK
In KC, we're generally pretty happy. All my friends are employed, and they
are all happy. Guess you make your own happiness.
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> Except that having a job does not mean that you are happy. Some people
> really love their job and
No, and I didn't claim they did. The only person in this conversation
using the word lazy is you. And I'm done. I broke my own rule about not
engaging in conversation with you. It won't happen again.
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 5:27 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> Somehow I doubt the labor depart told you a
Somehow I doubt the labor depart told you all of the 5% (it's 4.5%
actually) that will never work do so because they are lazy. Then again,
knowing the labor Department the way I do it's possible.
.
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 7:39 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> Actually those numbers were given to me by
Actually those numbers were given to me by the labor department when I ran
a business in Atlanta, Georgia at the height of the Internet boom. So
blaming it on California is just your usual twisty spin.
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> California is known to be different. Of the
California is known to be different. Of the 5%, I would guess half can't
work because of disabilities or some cause while the other half might be
lazy or just too used to the being on the gov teat. The other 26% didn't
used to be lazy four years ago.
.
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 6:48 PM, Maureen
The government considered 5% unemployment to be full employment because at
least 5% just aren't going to work..period. As for the rest, I don't know
if 47 million are lazy. I do know that the ones I have personally observed
are lazy, or at least vastly under-motivated. If they spent as much tim
So you think 47 million people are just lazy? They weren't lazy four years
ago. Just saying
.
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Maureen wrote:
>
> I'd like to see a study of the happiness levels of those who watch Cable
> news versus those who don't, with a breakout by channel. I suspect tho
I'd like to see a study of the happiness levels of those who watch Cable
news versus those who don't, with a breakout by channel. I suspect those
who listen to the fear-mongers are most unhappy.
As for unemployment, every single unemployed person I know personally sits
around and whines all day
Except that having a job does not mean that you are happy. Some people
really love their job and it is very much a part of who they are. I'd
hazard a guess that most people are not in that situation and that they are
in a job because they need the money. "Better than the alternative, I
guess" is r
47.9 million out of a workforce of 154 million
http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/100413-673964-ibdtipp-data-show-479-million-americans-looking-for-work.htm
I wonder if that counts the part time workers wishing they had full time
work.
I just had lunch with six co-workers from my last job
Since the vast majority of Americans are employed...that's a lot of happy
people.
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> The people in the US with jobs are happy, the rest are miserable. But if
> you want to use Larry's logic, flip that around.
>
> .
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 2:57
The people in the US with jobs are happy, the rest are miserable. But if
you want to use Larry's logic, flip that around.
.
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 2:57 PM, GMoney wrote:
>
> Americans are a strange bunch. We've got it good...real
> good...comparatively speaking...and deep down, most of us kn
If they just asked that, then yes, but they used the OECD measures, so you
are bound to get somewhat different answers.
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 2:57 PM, GMoney wrote:
>
> Americans are a strange bunch. We've got it good...real
> good...comparatively speaking...and deep down, most of us know th
Americans are a strange bunch. We've got it good...real
good...comparatively speaking...and deep down, most of us know that. So we
have sort of weird attitudes likewe need to downplay how well we've got
it, or we need to constantly be thinking that we really don't have it as
good as we think,
Here's the original report:
http://unsdsn.org/files/2013/09/WorldHappinessReport2013_online.pdf
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/22/denmark-happiest-country_n_4070761.html?icid=maing-grid7%7Chtmlws-sb-bb%7Cdl4%7Csec1_lnk2%26pLid%3D
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/22/denmark-happiest-country_n_4070761.html?icid=maing-grid7%7Chtmlws-sb-bb%7Cdl4%7Csec1_lnk2%26pLid%3D395069
Sorry to say guys but the US is pretty depressed.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion
http://globalnews.ca/news/544455/religion-marks-a-divergent-path-in-canadian-us-history/
--
Larry C. Lyons
web: http://www.lyonsmorris.com/lyons
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/larryclyons
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion An
The Year Without Summer
http://socialreader.com/me/channels/2995/content/2MtS0?_p=trending
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive:
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 7:04 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
> He only talks the talk. He has been responsible for some of the more
> intrusive pieces of legislation, such as the Sanctity of Life Act.
> He is also opposed to federal government influenza inoculation programs and
> the Civil Rights act o
All interesting points.
-Cameron
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 7:04 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> He only talks the talk. He has been responsible for some of the more
> intrusive pieces of legislation, such as the Sanctity of Life Act.
> He is also opposed to federal government influenza inoculation p
I like those ideals in libertarianism, but Ron Paul is a fraud and a
hypocrite. He mouths libertarian slogans, but his true position on
some issues, especially those having to do with personal liberties,
are about as far from being libertarian as you can get. He's further
to the right on social
eviat...@darktech.org]
Sent: Friday, December 23, 2011 9:49 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Interesting article on Ron Pauls newsletters
> Feel free to come back to reality at any time Robert...
I don't agree entirely with the libertarian viewpoint, or Ron Paul, for that
matter. I am cur
> Feel free to come back to reality at any time Robert...
I don't agree entirely with the libertarian viewpoint, or Ron Paul,
for that matter. I am curious, however, specifically which part of
Robert's comments were out of touch with reality?
-Justin
~~
Feel free to come back to reality at any time Robert...
-Original Message-
From: Robert Munn [mailto:cfmuns...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, December 23, 2011 3:14 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Interesting article on Ron Pauls newsletters
What I like about Ron Paul, and libertarian
3, 2011 11:50 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Interesting article on Ron Pauls newsletters
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
> I call BS on this one. You have a paid political newsletter going out
> under your name, you have 6 to 8 people writing for it, it grosses 6
editor at a magazine or a newspaper what would happen if an article that was
bad got out under their watch and they are just editors...
-Original Message-
From: Cameron Childress [mailto:camer...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, December 23, 2011 11:34 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Interesting
He only talks the talk. He has been responsible for some of the more
intrusive pieces of legislation, such as the Sanctity of Life Act.
He is also opposed to federal government influenza inoculation programs and
the Civil Rights act of 1964. He harps about the evils of government
spending, but has
n Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Cameron Childress wrote:
>
> Is there some reason you would assign behavior of GWB to Ron Paul? Is
> there some similar pattern of behavior?
>
> Used broadly, that statement really means that we should have equal
> mistrust of all politicians, which I already hav
What I like about Ron Paul, and libertarian ideas generally, is the
emphasis on liberty, individual rights, and freedom. Human dignity demands
that we recognize that we each have these rights. Rights are not the only
element of citizenship, though, freedom is not absolute. With rights come
respons
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> And George W. Bush consistently said, "I'm a uniter, not a divider".
> Just because someone says something doesn't mean you should believe
> them.
Is there some reason you would assign behavior of GWB to Ron Paul? Is
there some similar
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Cameron Childress wrote:
>
> Perhaps he knew. That's not cool. My point isn't wether he knew or not,
> it's that in his own words he's very consistently denied that as his own
> point of view.
And George W. Bush consistently said, "I'm a uniter, not a divider".
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
> I call BS on this one. You have a paid political newsletter going out
> under your name, you have 6 to 8 people writing for it, it grosses 6
> to 7 figures in a year and you claim you don't know anything about the
> contents of it?
Perhap
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
> so not being in office makes it OK to pass on racist material?
I actually explicitly said it does not excuse it. Are you really asking if
I meant the opposite of something I explicitly said?
-Cameron
...
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 9:34 AM, Cameron Childress wrote:
> He was not in political office when this crap came out and was focused on
> his medical practice. Doesn't totally excuse it, but it's an important
> distinction to make.
I call BS on this one. You have a paid political newsletter going
so not being in office makes it OK to pass on racist material?
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Cameron Childress wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
>> Big picture time. Ron Paul is not a racist, but racist material came
>> out under his watch, under his name.
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
> Big picture time. Ron Paul is not a racist, but racist material came
> out under his watch, under his name. He says he didn't write it and I
> believe him, but he hadn't the managerial oversight to make sure
> others weren't publishing hei
Big picture time. Ron Paul is not a racist, but racist material came
out under his watch, under his name. He says he didn't write it and I
believe him, but he hadn't the managerial oversight to make sure
others weren't publishing heinous material under his aegis. Ron Paul
supporters would say tha
That's my point. It's old news but someone is taking the time to dig it up
again. I really find election years both entertaining and stupid. If you
can't stand on your own issues, then start a smear campaign. No one is
perfect, I do not expect my President to be perfect, just do your effing
job an
None of this newsletter business is new information.
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Bruce Sorge wrote:
>
> I think that if you are going to take the time to research all this shit,
> then you as a candidate are perceived as a threat. I am no Paul fan but
> still he must have someone worried.
>
I think that if you are going to take the time to research all this shit,
then you as a candidate are perceived as a threat. I am no Paul fan but
still he must have someone worried.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
h
He's repeatedly said that they don't (and never did) represent his views.
But I guess building all this fear mongering means that more people are
taking him seriously.
-Cameron
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
>
> http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2011/12/the
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2011/12/the-story-behind-ron-pauls-racist-newsletters/250338/
>From the article:
Some choice quotes:
"Given the inefficiencies of what DC laughingly calls the criminal
justice system, I think we can safely assume that 95 percent of the
black males in
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> http://www.talk2action.org/story/2006/6/4/145852/2596
i don't understand what this has to do with polarization. it seems
more like the intolerance of a bunch of ignorant fools who believe in
fairy tales.
~
http://www.talk2action.org/story/2006/6/4/145852/2596
--
Larry C. Lyons
web: http://www.lyonsmorris.com/lyons
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/larryclyons
--
The real problem is not whether machines think but whether men do.
- B. F. Skinner -
~~~
http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/en/channels/avnery/1275739480/
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive:
htt
yeah, Tommy Douglas is a real Canadian hero.
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 7:28 PM, Medic wrote:
>
> Insightful, if not lengthy. Thanks for posting it Larry.
>
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
>>
>> http://www.slate.com/id/2245037/
>>
>> Tea Party, Canada-Style!
>> America's
Insightful, if not lengthy. Thanks for posting it Larry.
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> http://www.slate.com/id/2245037/
>
> Tea Party, Canada-Style!
> America's battle over health care reform started in Saskatchewan.
> By Christopher Flavelle
> Posted Thursday, Feb.
http://www.slate.com/id/2245037/
Tea Party, Canada-Style!
America's battle over health care reform started in Saskatchewan.
By Christopher Flavelle
Posted Thursday, Feb. 18, 2010, at 6:51 AM ET
Nearly 50 years before Sarah Palin gave us "death panels," the
American Medical Association was testin
Apparently the so called grass roots protesters are not as grass roots as it
would seem - there's a lot of astroturfing going on, to quote from the
Washington Post article:
--
Several of the biggest efforts are led by established veterans in the
conservative movement, whose organizations receiv
> TheScout wrote:
> be right when the administration is wrong. Well, I guess as I libertarian I
> get to bitch no matter who is in charge :)
>
I bet you loved Jindal's speech then!
As for Pres Obama, if you've got this many material complaints after
his 30 days in office then - love 'im or hate
. That's American diplomacy?
They screwed the morning news shows up bad. You have to admit that.
-Original Message-
From: Larry Lyons [mailto:larrycly...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 01, 2009 12:59 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: interesting article on suicide attacks and religion
>But this list is all about posturing. :)
>I'll flag this email as important and will try to contact them.
>
It should take all of 20 minutes, 15 of those would be going through the
university's cheerleadering section. The affiliations of the authors are listed
in the pdf.
larry
>
> Tool alert:
Pt. What a frickin tool.
;-)
jk
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f
Archive:
http
But this list is all about posturing. :)
I'll flag this email as important and will try to contact them.
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Larry Lyons wrote:
>
> So write the authors and tell them such. You claim to raise flaws in the
> study. Psych Science does print letters critiquing publish
So write the authors and tell them such. You claim to raise flaws in the study.
Psych Science does print letters critiquing published studies. It seems
there's a win-win situation here. Write a researched and thought out rebuttal
and submit it for publication. To some extent anything else woul
I find the study flawed in a number of ways. I'll start with the Israeli
part and then go to the Palestinian one.
Tool alert:
I find the whole Israeli part about of the study to be flawed. The
population that they asked was skewed towards what they expected and was
akin to asking someone at a Ham
http://idisk.mac.com/jeremyginges1-Public/suicideattacks.pdf
Support for suicide boming appears more related to attending religious services
and not to religious devotion itself. It would seem that in this case at least
organized religion is dangerous to your health.
--
Religion and Support fo
AKA the pastor of Westboro Baptist Church
http://www.ubyssey.ca/?p=5624
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f
She's a former beauty pageant contestant. She dreams of Jimmy Choos.
They'll probably have a Sarah Palin signature model hunting boot for
the next fashion season.
On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 12:17 PM, Beth In Alaska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> And from what I hear, she could NEVER move that fast i
woo-hoo!
On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 5:59 PM, Gruss wrote:
>> RoMunn wrote:
>> my mistake, i thought you were volunteering on the campaign.
>>
>
> np - but in the interest of keeping the wise-ass levels at enjoyable
> heights, my preference is that you keep up the accusations.
~~
> RoMunn wrote:
> my mistake, i thought you were volunteering on the campaign.
>
np - but in the interest of keeping the wise-ass levels at enjoyable
heights, my preference is that you keep up the accusations.
~|
Adobe® ColdFusio
my mistake, i thought you were volunteering on the campaign.
On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 1:33 PM, Gruss wrote:
>
> For the record, I don't work for the Obama Campaign, not even on a
> volunteer basis; I'm just a contributor & supporter.
>
~~
> GrussGott wrote:
> yes
>
> On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 12:14 PM, Beth wrote:
>>
>>
>> Does gruss work for the obama campaign?
>>
For the record, I don't work for the Obama Campaign, not even on a
volunteer basis; I'm just a contributor & supporter.
~~
apparently there is a lot going on in the emails I am filtering. Maybe
I should take a look (pause).
Naw. I kinda get the flavor :)
On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 1:27 PM, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> lol, touche!
>
> On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 12:12 PM, Judahwrote:
>>
>>> So now the Obama camp
lol, touche!
On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 12:12 PM, Judahwrote:
>
>> So now the Obama campaign is reduced to name-calling and cheap shots.
>> My work here is done.
>>
>
> This from the man who just said "the weenie liberal establishment Obama
> clan". Nice "work". Stay classy and here's hoping you end
this is just friendly ribbing between gruss and i
On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 12:16 PM, Beth wrote:
>> Oh, and Palin has actually hunted and killed animals. Unlike the
>> weenie liberal establishment Obama clan.
>
>
> Is this something we look for in leadership? the ability to kill animals?
>
>
> I
yes
On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 12:14 PM, Beth wrote:
>
>
> Does gruss work for the obama campaign?
>
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net
>> And from what I hear, she could NEVER move that fast in Jimmy Choos.
I doubt Palin has ever heard of Jimmy Choos.
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get the Free Trial
http:
> Oh, and Palin has actually hunted and killed animals. Unlike the
> weenie liberal establishment Obama clan.
Is this something we look for in leadership? the ability to kill animals?
I find it weird that people who get pleasure from hunting and killing
humans are psychopaths but that people
> So now the Obama campaign is reduced to name-calling and cheap shots.
> My work here is done.
Does gruss work for the obama campaign?
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get
On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 11:49 AM, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So now the Obama campaign is reduced to name-calling and cheap shots.
> My work here is done.
>
This from the man who just said "the weenie liberal establishment Obama
clan". Nice "work". Stay classy and here's hoping you
So now the Obama campaign is reduced to name-calling and cheap shots.
My work here is done.
On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 11:40 AM, Gruss wrote:
> PS - "chipping a nail" isn't sexist. Michele Obama (and my wife)
> could give a fuck about that. It intelligentist - only stupid people
> care about shall
> RoMunn wrote:
> No one is afraid of her-
Well you're right in that I am afraid of morons in office - and Palin
definitely ain't the brightest bulb on the shelf.
That's why it was a wholly irresponsible pick for McCain. It was a
political one.
But plenty of Americans like her as a leader.
And
did you though :) because I don't think we read the same aticle. She
is worried that Palin will co-opt the title, not saying that she is a
feminist :)
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 11:08 PM, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> just making sure ;-)
>
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 9:22 PM, Dana wrote:
>
just making sure ;-)
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 9:22 PM, Dana wrote:
> Dude, I read the article.
>
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/
Dude, I read the article.
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 9:33 PM, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Camille Paglia disagrees with you.
>
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 6:27 PM, Dana wrote:
>> I don't think you can be a feminist and anti-choice. Slightly
>> different sentence.
>
>
~~~
Camille Paglia disagrees with you.
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 6:27 PM, Dana wrote:
> I don't think you can be a feminist and anti-choice. Slightly
> different sentence.
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and d
No one is afraid of her- except for the entire Democratic leadership
and the Obama campaign.
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 4:08 PM, Gruss wrote:
>> GG wrote:
>> Nobody is afraid of Palin. The only way she'd win against, say, Putin
>> is if she struck before he stopped laughing.
>>
>
> And from what I
Wow, now the REAL sexist comments come out from the Obama campaign.
She doesn't want to chip a nail? You guys are getting seriously
desperate.
BTW, in case you forgot, Michelle Obama isn't running for office. Her
husband is.
Oh, and Palin has actually hunted and killed animals. Unlike the
weenie
I don't think you can be a feminist and anti-choice. Slightly
different sentence.
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 3:43 PM, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gruss said Michelle Obama was a role model and implied by extension
> that Sarah Palin was not. The latter point is essentially what the
> att
They're all afraid of Palin. That's why they sent the troops to Alaska
to dig dirt. Next moves is bump Biden for Hillary. Otherwise it's over
and she has to go back to her senators wife job macking big money as a
community organizer.
She did introduce Barry to Ayers and gang didn't she. That scar
> GG wrote:
> Nobody is afraid of Palin. The only way she'd win against, say, Putin
> is if she struck before he stopped laughing.
>
And from what I hear, she could NEVER move that fast in Jimmy Choos.
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 so
> RoMunn wrote:
> 1. Killing a dangerous animal.
> 2. Confronting aggressive, anti-freedom, anti-American thugs around
> the world. See number 1.
See, that's where you know people are making bad choices.
Palin just plays the huntress, but she's really more interested in not
chipping a nail.
Mich
Sounds like an excellent candidate for dog catcher. That is what she's
running for right?
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 4:01 PM, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1. Killing a dangerous animal.
> 2. Confronting aggressive, anti-freedom, anti-American thugs around
> the world. See number 1.
>
>
>
1. Killing a dangerous animal.
2. Confronting aggressive, anti-freedom, anti-American thugs around
the world. See number 1.
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 3:55 PM, Gruss wrote:
> So how about you? Which situation(s) would you prefer Palin in over Michele?
> RoMunn wrote:
> So a woman can be a role model if she gives up her career for her
> husband's ambitions, but she can't be a role model if she decides to
> be the ambitious one?
>
I was doing a comparative analysis not an either/or
Which basically concluded that I couldn't think of a single situ
Sam wrote:
> Right after you show me the center executive are correct.
Huh?
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;203748912;273904
Gruss said Michelle Obama was a role model and implied by extension
that Sarah Palin was not. The latter point is essentially what the
attempted character assassination in the press has been all about-
convincing women in particular who like Sarah Palin and identify with
her that she is not a role
Right after you show me the center executive are correct.
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 2:18 PM, Ian Skinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So now show me something that says these critics are correct?
>
>
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 softwa
They haven't taken the program to the point where it helps the
community. It takes it just far enough to save them a bundle and give
the hospital and upscale aura.
There's nothing to indicate that they ever will.
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Judah McAuley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Si, co
Si, comprende. Could they put more money into the program? Yes they could.
But you don't start a program by throwing all your money at it. Its a pilot
program, they've made some changes based on feedback and it will continue to
grow and, I hope, "save a whole bunch of
community health centers". To
Sam wrote:
> Comprende the next two paragraphs?
>
> Center executives said the initiative, on which they spent $2 million
> last year, could be a national model. Critics, however, describe the
> program as an attempt to ensure that the hospital retains only
> affluent patients with insurance.
>
> "
Sam wrote:
> If they really cared they'de set up a clinic in the hospital to
> help with the non emergencies, or donate doctor hours to clinics that
> are overloaded. Like all the other hospitals do.
I could have sworn your article said that they did provide doctors to
the clinics...
~~~
Robert Munn wrote:
> And being Governor of Alaska isn't ambitious?
And this is mutually exclusive? If one is ambitious then by definition
the other can not be?
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramat
Comprende the next two paragraphs?
Center executives said the initiative, on which they spent $2 million
last year, could be a national model. Critics, however, describe the
program as an attempt to ensure that the hospital retains only
affluent patients with insurance.
"If you put enough money i
1 - 100 of 221 matches
Mail list logo
