sday, March 08, 2006 4:07 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: military recruiting on college campuses
>> I have to admit, I am not the nicest guy in the world. I
>> did a short
>> term thing at Hopkins a while ago for teratech. Went to
>> the cafeteria
>> and
I know, just made me think of that kid.
--
Tim Heald
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
703-300-3911
-Original Message-
From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 4:09 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: military recruiting on college campuses
Actually I was referring
Umm, OK.
Yeah, sense of humor.
--
Tim Heald
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
703-300-3911
-Original Message-
From: S. Isaac Dealey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 4:07 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: military recruiting on college campuses
> I have to admit, I am not
the client at the time.
>
>
> --
> Tim Heald
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 703-300-3911
> -Original Message-
> From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 3:42 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: military recruiting on college c
> I have to admit, I am not the nicest guy in the world. I
> did a short term
> thing at Hopkins a while ago for teratech. Went to the
> cafeteria and saw
> this ROTC nazi hat was all fucked up. His cover was on
> inside, his uniform
> wasn't' pressed and I could actually see brown leather on
>
mmunity
Subject: Re: military recruiting on college campuses
I'm not sure whether the placement of those booths was appropriate.
There should have been some distance.
You have to admire those soldiers though for putting up with that sort of
thing.
larry
On 3/8/06, Kevin Graeme <[EMAIL PROTE
I'm not sure whether the placement of those booths was appropriate.
There should have been some distance.
You have to admire those soldiers though for putting up with that sort of thing.
larry
On 3/8/06, Kevin Graeme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Heh. We have a moderately active ROTC on the campu
Heh. We have a moderately active ROTC on the campus here. I often see
a person in uniform walking down the sidewalk or a group of them
jogging. And this is a pretty liberal campus.
The other day in the student union there were two booths. One was
students upset about the turture and treatment by
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 10:20 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: military recruiting on college campuses
150 years ago Congress pass laws allowing private citizens to hunt runaway
slaves.
Besides the people who want to go into the military will go into it
regardless.
larry
On 3
. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 9:52 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: military recruiting on college campuses
Here's what I disagree with. Universities state openly that they want
corporate recruiters and their companies to sign a non-discriminatory
stat
> Schmidt wrote:
> Like I said Larry, they don't have to take the money if they want to stand
> on their principles.
>
That's a disingenuous argument because that's public money.
The correct answer to Larry's question is that the military is
different because they are a public-good publicly funde
Yep, we disagree.
I don't agree with the "Don't ask Don't tell" policy, but I am not
personally affected in any way.
But Congress DOES have the ability to create laws. And even
universities have to follow them.
The high court has ruled that the law is constitutional, so it stands.
If you don't li
Wednesday, March 08, 2006 9:20 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: military recruiting on college campuses
150 years ago Congress pass laws allowing private citizens to hunt
runaway slaves.
Besides the people who want to go into the military will go into it
regardless.
larry
On 3/8/06, Jerry Johns
150 years ago Congress pass laws allowing private citizens to hunt
runaway slaves.
Besides the people who want to go into the military will go into it regardless.
larry
On 3/8/06, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For two reasons.
>
> Because Congress passed a laaw that said they could.
For two reasons.
Because Congress passed a laaw that said they could.
Because they ARE the US military, and we, as a country, need them to
find the best people they can get (that fit within THEIR rules).
On 3/8/06, Larry C. Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's what I disagree with. Universi
Here's what I disagree with. Universities state openly that they want
corporate recruiters and their companies to sign a non-discriminatory
statement, specifying that they do not discriminate on the basis of
race, religion, gender or sexual orientation etc. Evey recruiter on
campus is required to f
> Hat wrote:
> It's the power of the purse... if the schools don't want recruiters on
> their camuses then don't take the money.. right.
>
Weee, but let's think about this for a second. Where does the
federal government get *its* money from? Taxes. And where do most of
the taxes com
> At the same time, corporate recruiters are required to sign a
> statement saying that they, and their corporations comply with the
> equal rights policies of the university. If the objection is equal
> access, then why not let the military sign the same statement.
>
> In other words why should th
So you think in Germany in the 30's they were listening to the
equivalent of today's neo-cons?
I think it was the socialist "the government will get you a job and
provide for you" message.
On 3/7/06, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
> No, capitalism has little to do with left/right orientation. You can
> hav
> Hseems like some of them don't want to go home.
that can't be helped...
> "Kevvy-baby"
> I kind of like that it's got a nice ring to it.
And neither, apparently, can this...
:-D
--
will
"If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
and that would just be unacceptable."
- Carrie
CF-Community
Subject: Re: SPAM-LOW: RE: military recruiting on college campuses
but his efforts will squelch academic freedom. That is important.
On 3/7/06, Kevin Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You're missing my point Larry, he's not a professor, my argument lies with
>
Hseems like some of them don't want to go home.
"ermm... what? I assume the recruiters _would_ get to go home at the
end of the day."
"Kevvy-baby"
I kind of like that it's got a nice ring to it.
Kevi
~|
Message: ht
e liberal and 13 percent are
> conservative.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 2:49 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: SPAM-LOW: RE: military recruiting on college campuses
>
> I do not think
> -Original Message-
>> > From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 2:23 PM
>> > To: CF-Community
>> > Subject: Re: SPAM-LOW: RE: military recruiting on
>> > college
>> > campuses
>>
>>
No, capitalism has little to do with left/right orientation. You can
have equal arguments regarding slave labour from both the extreme
communistic left (think gulags) or the extreme communist right (think
of the Bergen-Belsen slave labour camps).
Similarly what we see now has little to do with cl
C'mon Larry, they aleady do, right. Ever here of the College
Republicans
-Original Message-
From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 12:59 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: military recruiting on college campuses
At the same time, corp
nced at the most elite schools, where,
according to the study, 87 percent of faculty are liberal and 13 percent are
conservative.
-Original Message-
From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 2:49 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: SPAM-LOW: RE: military recrui
of it.
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Stewart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community"
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 3:01 PM
Subject: SPAM-LOW: RE: SPAM-LOW: RE: military recruiting on college campuses
> To play devils advocate and bounce back to th
t; Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 2:23 PM
> > To: CF-Community
> > Subject: Re: SPAM-LOW: RE: military recruiting on college
> > campuses
>
> > Here's another example of Horowitz's purported accuracy:
> > http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2005/03/15/horowitz3_
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 4:01 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: SPAM-LOW: RE: military recruiting on college campuses
>
> To play devils advocate and bounce back to the original sta
rom: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 3:48 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: SPAM-LOW: RE: military recruiting on college campuses
Here's another good commentary from the same page:
Academic Freedom Is a Cornerstone of Democracy
Academic freedom is
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 2:23 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: SPAM-LOW: RE: military recruiting on college
> campuses
> Here's another example of Horowitz's purported accuracy:
> http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2005/03/15/horowitz3_15
> On 3/7/06, Larry C
So you think conservatism and capitalism is all about slave labor and
removing workers rights? That's GG's clue to start arguing about
minimum wage again and social programs that lock people into poverty.
Cause I ain't got the time.
On 3/7/06, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
> No, they were closely in bed w
itary recruiting on college campuses
Here's another example of Horowitz's purported accuracy:
http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2005/03/15/horowitz3_15
On 3/7/06, Larry C. Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You mean like David Horowitz's little crusade and retraction of
nce here, and you know that.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 2:10 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: SPAM-LOW: RE: military recruiting on college campuses
>
> You mean like David Horowitz's lit
news/2006/03/07/acfree
>
> On 3/7/06, Kevin Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yep, if it ain't science, it don't belong in the science class!
> >
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > S
e here, and you know that.
-Original Message-
From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 2:10 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: SPAM-LOW: RE: military recruiting on college campuses
You mean like David Horowitz's little crusade and retraction of
2006/03/07/acfree
On 3/7/06, Kevin Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yep, if it ain't science, it don't belong in the science class!
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 2:02 PM
> To: CF-Com
Coming from you, it's hard to tell if it's sarcasm or not.
-Original Message-
From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 1:03 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: military recruiting on college campuses
geez what I was referring to was a jo
Here's another example of Horowitz's purported accuracy:
http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2005/03/15/horowitz3_15
On 3/7/06, Larry C. Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You mean like David Horowitz's little crusade and retraction of some
> of his claims.
> http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2006
Yep, if it ain't science, it don't belong in the science class!
-Original Message-
From: G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 2:02 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: SPAM-LOW: RE: military recruiting on college campuses
> I'd say the same for a
No, they were closely in bed with the corporations - the large
corporations such as Zeiss and Krupp were very strong supporters of
the Nazis. The laws protecting workers rights were repealed in 1934
(Hitler had been in power for a year at that point), while special
laws favouring those corporations
You mean like David Horowitz's little crusade and retraction of some
of his claims.
http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2006/01/11/retract
Its also interesting some of the stuff in wikipedia about him
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Horowitz
Quotations
* If blacks are oppressed in America,
That institution is already laden with special and different treatment.
Suspension of the basic constitutional rights for members is one that
leaps to mind (substituted for the CMJ).
I don't think that it should necessarily be given carte blanche, but I
don't think this particular rule is too bur
And that's what you should do. But when McCarthyite tactics are used
to silence others, as what David Horowitz is trying to do at various
universities across the country (i.e.,
http://chronicle.com/free/v50/i23/23a01801.htm and
http://chronicle.com/free/v50/i23/23b01201.htm).
larry
On 3/7/06, Mat
> I'd say the same for a right-winger doing the same type of stuff.
>
Good to hear!!! Remember this statement when your state board of education
gets around to discussing whether ideologues should be allowed to
indoctrinate your children with their religious beliefs during biology
classes. You
The Nationalsozialist were left wingers, kind of like today's
professors, so an occasional conservative view is a good idea.
On 3/7/06, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
> You mean they should only listen to right wing opinions then.
>
> Wasn't that a part of what occurred in Germany during the 1930's?
>
~~~
1:35 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: SPAM-LOW: RE: military recruiting on college campuses
>
> History classes are unbiased?
>
> Look at some textbooks from as recent as the 1980's and then tell me that.
>
> As for godwin's law. I was citing a fact, not ca
> I know the type of Professor who doesn't want the
> recruiters on campus.
> It's same type who was teaching one of my brothers college
> history classes
> who says they aren't going to cover any type of history
> that involves war or
> the military because he thought it was wrong and he
> despise
The universities are not giving special treatment they are renting it. If
they don't want to rent the special treatment they can certainly end the
relationship. I'm willing to bet if Microsoft throws a few million dollars
at the university, they too can rent said special treatment.
On 3/7/06,
--Original Message-
From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 1:35 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: SPAM-LOW: RE: military recruiting on college campuses
History classes are unbiased?
Look at some textbooks from as recent as the 1980's and then tell m
I don't have a problem with other people's opinion, but I wouldn't want to
pay for an education where the professors use it as an opportunity to preach
their views, right or left, that's why I said, "pull out the soap box".
Unbiased teaching is what I pay for, not someone oppressing their views
I disagree, if we give any institution special treatment beyond what
should be considered normal, its fast considered an entitlement, then
a right. Then a special right to impose its rule on the rest of
society.
larry
On 3/7/06, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, simple because they
win's law?
>
> In a political science class, yes, in a history class it should be unbiased,
> no, period.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 1:08 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: SPAM-LOW:
I wasn't on the list when you were deployed, to know you were deployed. If I
was I would've sent you mail.
-Original Message-
From: Loathe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 10:53 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: military recruiting on college campuses
H
itary recruiting on college campuses
You mean they should only listen to right wing opinions then.
Wasn't that a part of what occurred in Germany during the 1930's?
On 3/7/06, Matthew Blatchley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Exactly right...pull the soap box out from under their feet...
> Bill, Will, Willie, whatever I understand where you're coming from.
Kev, Kevbo, Kevvy-baby... really? do you?
> I understand people will have disagreements with how the military is used,
> that's fine, having an opinion against that, and speaking out against it is
> what our country is all abou
You mean they should only listen to right wing opinions then.
Wasn't that a part of what occurred in Germany during the 1930's?
On 3/7/06, Matthew Blatchley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Exactly right...pull the soap box out from under their feet... so tired of
> that crap.
> No one should have t
ng the uniform, and that's
> exactly what Larry was doing by suggesting they put them where he did.
>
> But like I said, he supports the troops!
>
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: William Bowen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006
Well, simple because they ARE the military.
That is reason enough for me.
On 3/7/06, Larry C. Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In other words why should the military get special treatment?
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.
e men cry, and sometimes bleed.
>
> What's your point?
>
> --
> Tim Heald
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 703-300-3911
> -Original Message-
> From: Jerry Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 1:33 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: military
At the same time, corporate recruiters are required to sign a
statement saying that they, and their corporations comply with the
equal rights policies of the university. If the objection is equal
access, then why not let the military sign the same statement.
Or given this ruling the opposite may h
I'm not a nice man.
I make nice men cry, and sometimes bleed.
What's your point?
--
Tim Heald
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
703-300-3911
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 1:33 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: military rec
I rifled a filing cabinet once
--Ben
Loathe wrote:
> Shotguns are not rifled, so no. You now have a completely valid reason to
> tell your wife you MUST buy a new gun :)
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/
What? Between the two bad knees, diabetes, and a history of mental
health issues? Yeah, they don't really want me. :-)
So, instead, I stay at home and send science fiction to my buddies overseas.
--Ben
Loathe wrote:
> Pretty sure you would be medically disallowed anyway.
>
> -Original
It wasn't his purpose I question, it was his tactics.
He was NOT a nice man.
On 3/7/06, Loathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wait, wait, wait.
>
> As a serious anti-communist, I need to say, a lot of the McCarthy stuff has
> been over blown for years. He was trying to do the right thing, and they
Subject: Re: military recruiting on college campuses
Does a shotgun count? If not, I've been eyeing a few rifles that I might
like to own. Plus, I could tell my wife that I'm only doing my
consitutional duty :)
On 3/7/06, Loathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, from the
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 11:15 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: military recruiting on college campuses
If you feel that strongly about it Kevin, why not enlist? Put your money
where your mouth is.
On 3/7/06, Kevin Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> They should g
Big friggin' dealif you want a giant circle jerk for yourself, go right
ahead.
Jerry, Ostrich. Ostrich, Jerry.
On 3/7/06, Jerry Johnson wrote:
> Well, it seems I am getting less and less tolerant of belligerent angry
people.
> I just don't have the time or energy.
>
> Kevin, you have official
ssage-
From: William Bowen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 11:22 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: military recruiting on college campuses
> Sorry Bill,
It's Will.
> I don't think he does.
So what, exactly would "support" be, then? Abject gr
> Sorry Bill, I don't think he does.
> I didn't join the military, no, but my father was in the
> Army and my brother
> is currently serving in the Navy. I was about two seconds
> away from joining
> the Navy out of high school, but opted to go straight to
> college.
Go straight to College!
Do no
gt; --
> Tim Heald
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 703-300-3911
> -Original Message-
> From: Jerry Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 11:52 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: military recruiting on college campuses
>
> Did you happen to
I didn't say anything.
Do you really think people care if you don't read his or her post?
Why do people do that on this list? It's like a child sitting in the
corner holding his breath or covering his ears...tooo funny. I'm not
listening lalalalalalal
On 3/7/06, Jerry Johnson wrote:
> Well, it s
ald
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 703-300-3911
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 10:56 AM
> > To: CF-Community
> > Subject: Re: military recruiting on college campuses
>
Pretty sure you would be medically disallowed anyway.
--
Tim Heald
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
703-300-3911
-Original Message-
From: Ben Doom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 12:07 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: military recruiting on college campuses
Speaking as a man
Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 11:52 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: military recruiting on college campuses
Did you happen to recently watch the movie "Good night and good luck", and
feel more for McCarthy than Murrow?
On 3/7/06, Kevin Schmidt <[EM
I didn't see whether anyone answered this question. Congress passed a law a few
years ago that said colleges had to allow military recruiters on their campuses
and afford them all the same support and access as other recruiters, OR they
could give up all federal funding for their institution.
> Sorry Bill,
It's Will.
> I don't think he does.
So what, exactly would "support" be, then? Abject grovelling at the
feet of the administration? Being a "yes-man" for failed diplomacy?
Handing out flyers showing all the kiddies where the recruiter's
office is, or maybe carrying signs and helpin
t;CF-Community"
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 11:44 AM
Subject: SPAM-LOW: RE: military recruiting on college campuses
> Yes Jerry, I do tend to get a little worked up when it comes to issues
> like
> this. I may not be in the military, but I have brother who is actively
> servi
Well, it seems I am getting less and less tolerant of belligerent angry people.
I just don't have the time or energy.
Kevin, you have officially made my killfile for now.
Sam, Kevin. Kevin, Sam.
(Good thing I can't put myself on the list for some of my recent tirades)
On 3/7/06, Kevin Schmidt <
>I look around a bit more and I was wrong. the solomon amendment
> requires that military recruiters get the same support as other
> corporate recruiters.
Ok, that is what I had been reading too. Seems completely fair to me.
>
> that said I still disagree with the coercive nature to this. It stil
age-
From: Jerry Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 11:24 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: military recruiting on college campuses
Just a little bit angry, Kevin?
I'll stop poking you then, you obviously aren't in the mood.
On 3/7/06, Kevin Schmidt <
riginal Message-
From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 10:15 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: military recruiting on college campuses
If you feel that strongly about it Kevin, why not enlist? Put your
money where your mouth is.
On 3/7/06, Kevin Schmidt &l
2006 11:29 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: military recruiting on college campuses
I look around a bit more and I was wrong. the solomon amendment
requires that military recruiters get the same support as other
corporate recruiters.
my bad.
that said I still disagree with the coercive natu
Just a little bit angry, Kevin?
I'll stop poking you then, you obviously aren't in the mood.
On 3/7/06, Kevin Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nope, haven't seen it.
>
> But I understand where you're going.
>
> Larry's statement about where to put the recruiters is what I'm talking
> about. I
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 703-300-3911
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 10:56 AM
> > To: CF-Community
> > Subject: Re: military recruiting on college campuses
> >
> >
My understanding was that the constitution only protected people's
_right_ to own a firearm _if_ they were a member of a state militia.
The ammendment that the NRA harps on claiming that it's supposed to
protect people's rights to load themselves up with as much of whatever
kind of arsenal they ple
iform,
then you have bigger issues.
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 10:52 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: military recruiting on college campuses
Did you happen to recently watch the movie "Good night and good
Speaking as a man in his early 20's, I pay attention because I want to
avoid mandatory participation!
Don't get me wrong -- I have the utmost respect for those in uniform.
It's just not on my list of things I want to learn about firsthand.
--Ben
Loathe wrote:
> I bet that people would pay a he
56 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: military recruiting on college campuses
>
> utilities, copy paper, a secretary and other admin support staff,
> permanent
> office space, all at the university's expense.
>
> The thing is that the universities are required to supp
Did you happen to recently watch the movie "Good night and good luck",
and feel more for McCarthy than Murrow?
On 3/7/06, Kevin Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> But you support the troops, right Larry?
~|
Message: http://ww
esday, March 07, 2006 10:52 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: military recruiting on college campuses
To clarify my position, I have no objection to military recruiting on
campus. I object to the universities being required to pay for the
"privilege." According to what I've read universi
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: military recruiting on college campuses
> No shit!!! Kids these days are, in general, horrible.
These damn kids today... no respect, why in _my day_. Blah-de-friggin-blah.
no offense... but doesn't that make your kids and mine part of the problem?
And to
recruiting on college campuses
utilities, copy paper, a secretary and other admin support staff, permanent
office space, all at the university's expense.
The thing is that the universities are required to support them to a degree
that most corporate recruiters do not get.
On 3/7/06, G &l
still only talk shit that is true.
--
Tim Heald
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
703-300-3911
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Schmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 11:44 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: military recruiting on college campuses
One need not read into anything
I doubt the requirement is for a rifle, as at the time of the framing
of the constitution rifles were pretty scarce. Smoothbore muskets were
the rule.
But I don't see where in the constitution that requirement exists.
Help me out?
On 3/7/06, Loathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, from the con
m: William Bowen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 10:05 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: military recruiting on college campuses
> Your contempt for the military is showing Larry, it's not very flattering.
erm...hey loud-talkin' guy. Did you put on the uniform?
definition of contempt.
But you support the troops, right Larry?
-Original Message-
From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 10:11 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: military recruiting on college campuses
Do I? you can read into it whatever your little
I suspect that if service was mandatory, they would cut the
promotional recruiting benefits like tuition pretty damn quick.
On 3/7/06, Harry Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i think they shouldn't need to recruit on campuses.. i think /all/
> kids should have to do a 2 year stint after high sch
ces.
>
> --
> Tim Heald
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 703-300-3911
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 11:00 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: military recruiting on college campuses
>
> Just out
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
