"I usually am not that engaged on this issue, but I did want to note
in passing that I applaud Obama for saying something about this when
the conventional wisdom was that it was not in his own best interests to do
so. Even if he was pushed :) He still did the right thing and I think a
little less
"Wait, Jerry, are you saying that announcing his personal support for gay
marriage is fascist?"
Nope. I asked her if she wants him to become more fascistic. I didn't say
anything about President Obama's new found support for gay marriage being
fascistic. Personally, I am glad he took a stand.
Wait, Jerry, are you saying that announcing his personal support for
gay marriage is fascist? Or are you talking about something else?
Because I'm pretty sure that Dana's comment that you quoted was about
announcing his personal support for gay marriage.
Judah
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Je
I have a somewhat favorable opinion of the guy based on moving to New
Mexico after he left office, but he's also a bit daffy, you know. Shrug,
read up on the guy and if nothing gives you pause then go for it, I say. I
personally don't want to see Romney elected, but if you can't stomach
voting for
Gary Johnson.
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> agreed, but nobody running even vaguely comes close to ideal in my eyes.
> Process problem, I think. So to answer aphorism with aphorism, why let the
> perfect become the enemy of the the good? Ish?
>
> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 8:49
"He is losing support due to his actions in regards to privacy, in
continuing Bush era policies,"
Continuing? He has doubled down on Bush's policies. Then there's that
issue of due process versus judicial process. No need for privacy concerns
when a citizen can be black bagged or droned by exe
"shrug, maybe they heard enough from people like me saying dude, quit
trying to find common ground with people determined to undermine you or who
are pushing their own agenda to the exclusion of yours. Do something that
needs to be done. Period."
So, are you saying he should become even more fasc
http://askville.amazon.com/pronounce-CTHULHU/AnswerViewer.do?requestId=1407662
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Tony wrote:
>
> how does one pronounce that word??
>
> On Friday, May 11, 2012, Eric Roberts wrote:
>
> >
> > Then vote Cthuthu for President...why vote for the lesser of two evils?
how does one pronounce that word??
On Friday, May 11, 2012, Eric Roberts wrote:
>
> Then vote Cthuthu for President...why vote for the lesser of two evils?
>
> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 10:49 AM, LRS Scout wrote:
>
> >
> > The lesser of two evils is still evil.
> >
> > On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 11:
Then vote Cthuthu for President...why vote for the lesser of two evils?
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 10:49 AM, LRS Scout wrote:
>
> The lesser of two evils is still evil.
>
> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Dana wrote:
>
> >
> > shrug. Maybe it's an orchestrated gesture. It's still an improvement
agreed, but nobody running even vaguely comes close to ideal in my eyes.
Process problem, I think. So to answer aphorism with aphorism, why let the
perfect become the enemy of the the good? Ish?
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 8:49 AM, LRS Scout wrote:
>
> The lesser of two evils is still evil.
>
> On
The lesser of two evils is still evil.
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Dana wrote:
>
> shrug. Maybe it's an orchestrated gesture. It's still an improvement over
> the gestures, orchestrated and not, that Romney is making
>
> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 5:34 AM, Ras Tafari wrote:
>
> >
> > FUCK T
shrug. Maybe it's an orchestrated gesture. It's still an improvement over
the gestures, orchestrated and not, that Romney is making
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 5:34 AM, Ras Tafari wrote:
>
> FUCK THE GESTURE.
>
> its lame. he's lame.
>
> the quote from cnn takes the fucking cake.
>
> "I had already
t; > -Original Message-
> > From: LRS Scout [mailto:lrssc...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 10:24 PM
> > To: cf-community
> > Subject: Re: same sex marriage
> >
> >
> > And who will stand for the polygamists?
> >
> >
FUCK THE GESTURE.
its lame. he's lame.
the quote from cnn takes the fucking cake.
"I had already made a decision that we were going to probably take
this position before the election and before the convention,"
douche. bag.
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> heh. I agree with
24 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: same sex marriage
>
>
> And who will stand for the polygamists?
>
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 11:22 PM, LRS Scout wrote:
>
> > Hey, Hitler did wonders for the German economy.
> >
> > Haha *Godwin's Law* of Nazi Anal
..@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 10:13 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: same sex marriage
>
>
>
> https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/531699_331943153542824_
> 103005129769962_804362_1485757734_n.jpg
>
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 10:50 P
PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: same sex marriage
he did???
I guess slave labor will do that?
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 8:22 PM, LRS Scout wrote:
>
> Hey, Hitler did wonders for the German economy.
>
>
~
Maybe Romney will...
-Original Message-
From: LRS Scout [mailto:lrssc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 10:24 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: same sex marriage
And who will stand for the polygamists?
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 11:22 PM, LRS Scout wrote:
> Hey, Hitler
Even better:
http://worldwideinterweb.com/photos/item/3-obama-rides-neil-patrick-unicorn.
html
-Original Message-
From: LRS Scout [mailto:lrssc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 10:13 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: same sex marriage
https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net
he did???
I guess slave labor will do that?
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 8:22 PM, LRS Scout wrote:
>
> Hey, Hitler did wonders for the German economy.
>
>
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-C
And who will stand for the polygamists?
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 11:22 PM, LRS Scout wrote:
> Hey, Hitler did wonders for the German economy.
>
> Haha *Godwin's Law* of Nazi Analogies, I win.
>
>
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Dana wrote:
>
>>
>> heh. I agree with about half of that. But.
Hey, Hitler did wonders for the German economy.
Haha *Godwin's Law* of Nazi Analogies, I win.
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> heh. I agree with about half of that. But.
>
> AT LEAST HE MADE THE GESTURE.
>
> some sort of sanity in a year that hasn't had very much.
>
> On Thu,
heh. I agree with about half of that. But.
AT LEAST HE MADE THE GESTURE.
some sort of sanity in a year that hasn't had very much.
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 8:12 PM, LRS Scout wrote:
>
>
> https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/531699_331943153542824_103005129769962_804362_14857577
https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/531699_331943153542824_103005129769962_804362_1485757734_n.jpg
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 10:50 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> I think that's kinda true except I started from supporting him and I gather
> you didn't
>
> support due to his actions in regar
I think that's kinda true except I started from supporting him and I gather
you didn't
support due to his actions in regards to privacy,
definitely a disappointment in this area
> in continuing Bush era policies,
and this one
> in the ever growing national debt and the horrible economy.
Here is my take on it, and one I have seen in many places. He is losing
support due to his actions in regards to privacy, in continuing Bush era
policies, in the ever growing national debt and the horrible economy. He
has shown time and again that he doesn't feel the need to meet his campaign
pr
once Biden opened his mouth Obama would have looked weak if he tried to
spin it. And the Defense of Marriage crew weren't going to be on his side
for the most part anyway, with the exception of the fundamentalist black
community. They are the question mark. Don't think they'll vote against
Obama b
shrug, maybe they heard enough from people like me saying dude, quit trying
to find common ground with people determined to undermine you or who are
pushing their own agenda to the exclusion of yours. Do something that needs
to be done. Period.
Or maybe as you say, they see something I don't.
On
I think that he was simply being honest about what he thought about
it. I guess he would have preferred to wait but after Biden decided to
speak out, he thought he had no real reason not to.
Essentially it may be an empty issue, and best to get it out of the
way now rather than at a more critical
I agreethis does not seem to help him politically...at least in the
short term. I thought that was refreshing.
BUTpoliticians rarely do things that don't seem to help them
politicallyso maybe the Obama folks see a different angle on this that
I don't.
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:38 PM,
yeah that's the way I was hearing it. Which is why I am going to the
trouble of saying bravo. The politics of accomodation have not really
worked out for the country. If you're going to get crapped on anyway, may
as well get crapped on for what you actually think. About freaking time, I
say.
On T
He really gains nothing from it. If anything it hurts him.
The teahadis who are mostly against same sex marriage are not going to
vote for him anyhow. Those on the left will probably vote for him
regardless, what other choice do they have. It will cost him with a
lot of conservative black voters
Political move to secure his left wing in an upcoming election year cycle.
No more no less.
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Eric Roberts <
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote:
>
> yeah...that was awesome. it is never too late to do the right thing.
> Biden did sorta give him a kick in the b
yeah...that was awesome. it is never too late to do the right thing.
Biden did sorta give him a kick in the backside on this. Go Joe!
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> I usually am not that engaged on this issue, but I did want to note in
> passing that I applaud Obama for say
35 matches
Mail list logo
