Interesting idea. One of the comments on the story asked someone to write
song lyrics containing all the words. Thing is, there are a lot of them. It
would be Alice's Restaurant.
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Cameron Childress wrote:
>
> That text would make someone a nice signature line.
>
>
That text would make someone a nice signature line.
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Dana wrote:
>
> with a pork chop from mexico on a cloudy day, it seems.
>
>
> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2150281/REVEALED-Hundreds-words-avoid-using-online-dont-want-government-spying-you.html?ICO=m
Fuck Hoover!
-Original Message-
From: Dana [mailto:dana.tier...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 28, 2012 2:24 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: the list: how to ensure government scrutiny
with a pork chop from mexico on a cloudy day, it seems.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2150281/R
It needed some political stories to kick start it back up.
-Original Message-
From: Erika L. Rich [mailto:elr...@ruwebby.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 9:54 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: The List!
If it looks like the list is taking a vacation ... will someone email me off
lis
This is a test of the emergency HOF IV Drip ... those that need an infusion
should be getting it soon ... I hope ...
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/
Go on girl give it a kick.
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 10:03 PM, Erika L. Rich wrote:
>
> good good. I only need to hear when it isn't.
> So I can kick it into submission. :)
>
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http
good good. I only need to hear when it isn't.
So I can kick it into submission. :)
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 9:57 PM, Eric Roberts <
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote:
>
> It was chugging along just fine a little earlier...
>
> Eric
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Erika L. Rich [mailto
It was chugging along just fine a little earlier...
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Erika L. Rich [mailto:elr...@ruwebby.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 9:54 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: The List!
If it looks like the list is taking a vacation ... will someone email me off
list
Little late on this but ...wow...that was awesome.
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 11:40 AM, Scott Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> I don't necessarily agree with Olberman on alot but this is a heartfelt
> sentiment and probably sums up
> mine and alot of straight folks feelings on gay marriage
>
> ht
The biggest Yes votes came from religious groups, including Mormons,
African-Americans, and Catholics. Those last two groups are strongly
Democrat, not Republican, but conservative on social issues- essentially the
polar opposite of people like me.
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 9:34 AM, Jim wrote:
>
>
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Jim Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Why does it matter to the right? Why should it? How does it affect them?
>
Because it's "icky", and makes them uncomfortable, and their religious
beliefs give them a good cover for trying to punish or isolate these people
w
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, November 21, 2008 11:41 AM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Keith Olbermen on Prop 8 was Re: the list
>
> I don't necessarily agree with Olberman on alot but this is a heartfelt
>
+1
Saw this earlier this week. Olberman can bloviate with the best of
them, but every once in a while he's got a particularly salient point.
> I don't necessarily agree with Olberman on alot but this is a heartfelt
> sentiment and probably sums up
> mine and alot of straight folks feelings on ga
I don't necessarily agree with Olberman on alot but this is a heartfelt
sentiment and probably sums up
mine and alot of straight folks feelings on gay marriage
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1HpTBF6EfxY
Michael Grant [Modus IS] wrote:
> Fair enough Judas.
>
>
>
~~~
> Michael wrote:
> Having the opinion of not wanting gay marriage != tyranny.
But it does. Here's why:
Your point is essentially that people should be able to vote on
whether we suppress another's rights. That's tyranny of the majority
by definition. Look it up in any Oxford dictionary.
But i
uhmmm. no that honor belongs to Canada, in terms of pure square
mileage...
where are you getting your information from, it seems a bit...slanted
Michael Grant [Modus IS] wrote:
> Haha, best response I've read today.
> Riddle me this: I've heard that your world maps show the USA as visually
It's not, but I think you over-estimate the importance of this issue
outside of the US
Michael Grant [Modus IS] wrote:
> It's a "hot button issue" in every western civilization. I didn't realize
> the forum was for Americans only. Believe it or not life does exist outside
> the borders of the usa
generally, no, not at the federal level. We do to an extent at the state
level, but it's mostly on large credit expenditures (bond referendums)
and this can vary wildly from state to state. The US isn't a true
democracy we're a bicameral republic, more in the old Roman model. We
elect people wh
One final thought.
I really can't afford any more time to try to defend my opinion on this, nor
do I really feel I should have to.
However in closing let me just say this. Throughout the last few days a very
few people, namely David, have tried to have me rethink my opinion. He's
been thought pro
Talk about rhetoric...
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f
Archive:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf
2008 8:56 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: the list
> Mike wrote:
> Scott, how is it bigotry when it's defined as "between a man and a woman."
> Always has been. Check the oxford dictionary.
(1.) Your definition of "marriage" is completely arbitrary.
(2.) By
> Mike wrote:
> Scott, how is it bigotry when it's defined as "between a man and a woman."
> Always has been. Check the oxford dictionary.
(1.) Your definition of "marriage" is completely arbitrary.
(2.) By that logic slavery should be reinstated because there were
slaves for millennia.
(3.) Per
You, and almost every other person who holds opinions similar to
yours, use the same rhetoric, the same misdirection, and the same lame
denials when you are called on your actions. You may not be a part of
"some massive conservative conspiracy designed to spread
disinformation and prevent discussi
"Just typical disinformation spread by the opponents to prevent discussion of
the substance of the issues."
I think you watch too much tv. Me having an opinion, however illogical,
misinformed, off-base or just downright stupid, doesn't make me part of some
massive conservative conspiracy design
Yeah..but only if you're looking for male virgins. Geek girls party.
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 2:22 PM, Charlie Griefer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 2:18 PM, Michael Grant [Modus IS]
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>> Good luck finding virgins anymore
>>
>
> well you're on a m
The reason your "logic" falls apart is that you're using the wrong comparisons.
Just like your donkey comment, these are all red-herrings and have
nothing to do with the actual debate. Just typical disinformation
spread by the opponents to prevent discussion of the substance of the
issues.
Read
Not all democracies work the same. I'm not exactly familiar with how the
U.S. works, but I believe you get to vote on bills? Where I live laws aren't
voted on by the general population.
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the m
Michael Grant [Modus IS] wrote:
> My opinion will zero impact on what laws are passed or made.
>
Unless you also live outside of a democracy - that is an incorrect
statement.
And for those of us who definitely live inside a democracy , many are
becoming concerned about so many laws that seem
I never cited the bible. I never said it would harm society. I'm not a law
maker, just an opinion poster, therefore I truly don't have to justify it
anymore than to say it's how I feel. My opinion will zero impact on what
laws are passed or made.
~~
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Grant [Modus IS] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 4:37 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: RE: the list
>
> Scott, how is it bigotry when it's defined as "between a man and a
> woman.&qu
Michael Grant [Modus IS] wrote:
> David, I respect your opinion, however I still don't agree. I've tried to
> rationalise and explain it and am man enough to admit that under scrutiny my
> attempt at logic has flaws. However it doesn't change my feelings, logical
> or not.
>
The trouble here, f
BW-H-HAA
And the winner is Charlie
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f
Archive:
http://www.ho
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 2:18 PM, Michael Grant [Modus IS]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Good luck finding virgins anymore
>
well you're on a mailing list dedicated to programmers. it's as good a
place to start as any.
--
I have failed as much as I have succeeded. But I love my life. I love my
wi
Good luck finding virgins anymore
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f
Archive:
http://www.houseoffusion.c
should be changed.
>>
>> Oh, and David in regards to "age old." You're splitting hairs here
>> a bit.
>> The term "age" generally refers to a period of advancement.
>> 1600-1800: The
>> age of enlightenment, 1750-1900: The industrial age,
My mistake. I've never been to North America so it's no doubt more tree
hugger propaganda.
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;2
Fair enough Judas.
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f
Archive:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-co
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 2:02 PM, Michael Grant [Modus IS]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Haha, best response I've read today.
> Riddle me this: I've heard that your world maps show the USA as visually
> the
> largest country in North America. Is that true?
>
There you go again with those absurd ins
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Michael Grant [Modus IS]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Scott, how is it bigotry when it's defined as "between a man and a woman."
> Always has been. Check the oxford dictionary. This isn't a matter of me
> interpreting it differently than its original intent. If we r
Haha, best response I've read today.
Riddle me this: I've heard that your world maps show the USA as visually the
largest country in North America. Is that true?
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and drama
I apologize for the bit about the donkey, though I truly wasn't directly
comparing homosexuality to bestiality. Perhaps I should've chosen "breakfast
cereal" instead of donkey and could have still made the same point. Speaking
of advancement, I would say that we've advanced as far as we can in this
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 1:56 PM, Michael Grant [Modus IS]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> It's a "hot button issue" in every western civilization. I didn't realize
> the forum was for Americans only. Believe it or not life does exist outside
> the borders of the usa.
>
i have heard rumors of this, bu
It's a "hot button issue" in every western civilization. I didn't realize
the forum was for Americans only. Believe it or not life does exist outside
the borders of the usa.
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most importan
Because it's an interesting topic?
2008/11/20 Scott Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> ok, then why discuss something that's been a hot button issue in
> American politics?
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and
ok, then why discuss something that's been a hot button issue in
American politics?
Michael Grant [Modus IS] wrote:
> Well, perhaps I've discovered part of the problem. I'm not American't.
>
>
>
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software
Well, perhaps I've discovered part of the problem. I'm not American't.
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f
-
From: Michael Grant [Modus IS] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 4:37 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: RE: the list
David, I respect your opinion, however I still don't agree. I've tried to
rationalise and explain it and am man enough to admit that under scrutiny my
att
vancement. 1600-1800: The
> age of enlightenment, 1750-1900: The industrial age, etc. So to say marriage
> is age old is appropriate.
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 4:13 PM
> To: cf-
to say marriage
is age old is appropriate.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 4:13 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: the list
But your social institution holds no legal standing
I'm straight, I'm married (twic
riginal Message-
> From: David Churvis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 3:18 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: RE: the list
>
> G doesn't seem to be that type, but you have certainly shown yourself to be
> the type to compare someone's
ty.
I'm glad you don't feel I should be persecuted (except when it comes to
marriage), but that doesn't change the fact that we are.
David Churvis
-Original Message-
From: Michael Grant [Modus IS] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 3:55 PM
To: cf-communit
and woman
establish their decision to live as husband and wife.
The end bit about donkeys and xbox's was obviously (or so I thought)
tongue-in-cheek.
-Original Message-
From: David Churvis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 3:18 PM
To: cf-community
ovember 20, 2008 1:27 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: RE: the list
Try to follow along G, read the whole thread between Maureen and I. I wonder
if you might be the type to enter in the middle of a conversation and spout
the first thing that comes to mind. :(
-Original Message-
From: G Money [mai
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 12:27 PM, Michael Grant [Modus IS]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Try to follow along G, read the whole thread between Maureen and I. I
> wonder
> if you might be the type to enter in the middle of a conversation and spout
> the first thing that comes to mind. :(
>
Uh huh. I
Ladies and Gentlemen, Charlie has ventured into that magical realm known
as "TMI"...
Charlie Griefer wrote:
> i think it does void the warranty tho...
> not that i've... i mean nevermind.
>
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Judah McAuley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>
>> The xbox really d
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 10:55 AM, Charlie Griefer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i think it does void the warranty tho...
> not that i've... i mean nevermind.
Curious, you'd think that opposite given the way that MS seems to fuck
their products all the time...
Maybe they just don't like competi
Oh, let's please end this tread on that note. That's some funny shit.
-Original Message-
From: Charlie Griefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 1:56 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: the list
i think it does void the warranty tho...
not that i&#x
i think it does void the warranty tho...
not that i've... i mean nevermind.
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Judah McAuley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> The xbox really doesn't care if you fuck it. The donkey may have more
> to say in the matter.
>
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 10:44 AM, Michael G
The xbox really doesn't care if you fuck it. The donkey may have more
to say in the matter.
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 10:44 AM, Michael Grant [Modus IS]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well it has about the same appeal in my eyes. I'm surprised you didn't say
> anything about my mention of game-consoli
Well it has about the same appeal in my eyes. I'm surprised you didn't say
anything about my mention of game-consoliality.
-Original Message-
From: Judah McAuley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 1:43 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: the list
I find it fascinating that I've yet to see a discussion of gay
marriage that did not end up with a supporter of "traditional"
marriage bringing up beastiality.
Make of it what you will.
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Michael Grant [Modus IS]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think you'll find his
idea of
marriage is getting distorted anyway. Then you can go ahead and marry
whatever your sexual taste is. Man, woman, donkey or xbox.
-Original Message-
From: David Churvis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 9:28 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: RE: the list
:27 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: the list
Who said anything about ironcald or unwavering?
You said there is no benefit to be gained, I said there islearning.
I'm starting to think maybe you are only a troll :/
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 8:03 AM, Michael Grant [Modus IS]
<[EMAIL P
I don't have a horse in this race. But why does sacredness preclude
David's participation in it? If he feels that way abouthis partner and
vice versa, then he just does. Isn't it about how they feel about one
another not about how various members of the public might?
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 9:16 P
That sure must be an embarrasing situation when all you have is a row of
urinals...
-Original Message-
Subj: Re: the list
Date: Thu Nov 20, 2008 8:58 am
Size: 603 bytes
To: cf-community
> Chuck wrote:
> Gay men don't have to put the toilet seat down when they'r
> Chuck wrote:
> Gay men don't have to put the toilet seat down when they're done peeing at
> home.
>
Real men pee sitting down.
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get the Free
-community
Subject: RE: the list
> -Original Message-
> From: David Churvis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 2:59 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: RE: the list
>
> What about gay couples who adopt children?
>
> David Churvis
They get
one does not need an
> ironclad, unwavering opinion for it to have inherent value.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: G Money [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 8:30 AM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: the list
>
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at
that one does not need an
ironclad, unwavering opinion for it to have inherent value.
-Original Message-
From: G Money [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 8:30 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: the list
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 4:11 PM, Michael Grant [Modus IS]
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 4:11 PM, Michael Grant [Modus IS]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> What benefit does anyone gain from posting on an opinion based forum, other
> than a mild reprieve from the work-a-day world.
> So by posting what benefit did you gain Maureen? The former or the latter?
>
What b
> -Original Message-
> From: David Churvis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 2:59 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: RE: the list
>
> What about gay couples who adopt children?
>
> David Churvis
They get the exact same "tax br
> -Original Message-
> From: Ian Skinner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 2:56 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: the list
>
> Michael Grant wrote:
> > ...
>
> Pinhead.
>
> I'll let others with more time to p
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 2:47 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: the list
>
> Keeping that in mind, let's look at the root of marriage. Marriages (in
> the traditional sens
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 3:32 PM, Charlie Griefer wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 2:27 PM, Vivec wrote:
>
>> That's a lot of what-ifs.
>> What does the research say about the benefits that gays have over
>> heterosexuals?
>> As far as I know, there aren't any.
>>
>
> Gay men don't have to put the t
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 1:05 PM, David Churvis wrote:
> When there is overpopulation in a given area, reducing the amount of
> breeding going on is extremely beneficial.
Happens all the time in "nature" (don't get me started on "natural"
and whatnot!).
Life is all about teaming up (and staying in
4:43 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: the list
There are no known genetic markers for homosexuality. Homosexuality seems
likely to have some genetic components and some social components. The
genetic portion that been being investigated so far centers around the
endocrine system and fetal exposure t
There are no known genetic markers for homosexuality. Homosexuality
seems likely to have some genetic components and some social
components. The genetic portion that been being investigated so far
centers around the endocrine system and fetal exposure to androgen.
The endocrine system is enormously
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 2:27 PM, Vivec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's a lot of what-ifs.
> What does the research say about the benefits that gays have over
> heterosexuals?
> As far as I know, there aren't any.
>
Gay men don't have to put the toilet seat down when they're done peeing at
hom
That's a lot of what-ifs.
What does the research say about the benefits that gays have over heterosexuals?
As far as I know, there aren't any.
2008/11/19 Judah McAuley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> But let us say that the homosexual allele is linked to another trait,
> say efficient metabolism.
What benefit does anyone gain from posting on an opinion based forum, other
than a mild reprieve from the work-a-day world.
So by posting what benefit did you gain Maureen? The former or the latter?
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 softwa
> Shall I make a cf-science podcast of that? :)
+1!
--
will
"If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
and that would just be unacceptable."
- Carrie Fisher
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and
oh jeez :)
Judah McAuley wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Scott Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> and if you want to sit at your desk and giggle, read this again, but
>> imagine Cartman from South park reciting it.
>>
>
> Shall I make a cf-science podcast of that? :)
>
>
And lots more fun ;->
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 1:00 PM, Judah McAuley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In short, biology and evolution don't work the way you think they
> do...and bisexual people still have the best of all worlds :)
>
~~~
I fail to see the point of espousing an opinion if you don't gain
benefit from it, even if the only benefit is the social attention you
receive from stating said opinion, or the warm fuzzies you get from
feeling superior to those who hold divergent opinions.
Unless, of course, you're playing devil
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Scott Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> and if you want to sit at your desk and giggle, read this again, but
> imagine Cartman from South park reciting it.
Shall I make a cf-science podcast of that? :)
~~~
and if you want to sit at your desk and giggle, read this again, but
imagine Cartman from South park reciting it.
Judah McAuley wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Michael Grant [Modus I.S.]
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> It's certainly not genetically defective. In fact homosexualit
chael Grant [Modus I.S.] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 3:22 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: RE: the list
So if I get this right you're suggesting we send all gay couples to
overpopulated areas?
-Original message-
From: "David Churvis" [EMAIL PROT
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Michael Grant [Modus I.S.]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's certainly not genetically defective. In fact homosexuality appears in
> many species, not just humans. However mother nature (for lack of a better
> term) has just made it so that it can't be (naturally
So to have an opinion you have to gain some benefit from it?
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f
Archive:
Then what good is it?
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Michael Grant [Modus I.S.]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's an opinion. It's not meant to gain me any benefit.
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and
The truth is that the Gay marriage issue is more about economics than
morality. Ranting about morality is just the smoke screen., although
the government propaganda machine has no qualms about exploiting those
who would enforce their mortality on the rest of us.
Figure what the cost would be to e
It's an opinion. It's not meant to gain me any benefit.
-Original message-
From: Maureen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:27:38 -0500
To: cf-community cf-community@houseoffusion.com
Subject: Re: the list
> What benefit do you derive from holding onto an opinion t
> Maureen wrote:
> You're assuming intelligence not in evidence.
>
The real question is should be constrain personal liberty based on
arbitrary ideas of morality?
Bible says that you shouldn't have pictures on your walls. Should we
legally constrain people's liberty to hang pictures of themselve
+1
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 12:27 PM, Maureen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What benefit do you derive from holding onto an opinion that you admit
> is full of holes.
>
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 12:20 PM, Michael Grant [Modus I.S.]
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > No, it's true, I'm a pinhead. You
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 2:20 PM, Michael Grant [Modus I.S.] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> No, it's true, I'm a pinhead. You should go hat shopping with me... it's
> impossible.
>
> I certainly agree that my opinion has many many holes in it. Luckily I'm
> just a guy posting his opinion and not a l
sage-
From: "Gruss Gott" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:22:13 -0500
To: cf-community cf-community@houseoffusion.com
Subject: Re: the list
> > Scott wrote:
> > I could certainly see the evolutionary benefit in ending procreation in
> > defective gene lines
What benefit do you derive from holding onto an opinion that you admit
is full of holes.
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 12:20 PM, Michael Grant [Modus I.S.]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, it's true, I'm a pinhead. You should go hat shopping with me... it's
> impossible.
>
> I certainly agree that my o
ssage-
From: Scott Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:17:13 -0500
To: cf-community cf-community@houseoffusion.com
Subject: Re: the list
> I could certainly see the evolutionary benefit in ending procreation in
> defective gene lines, as part of natural selection
> (an
> Scott wrote:
> I could certainly see the evolutionary benefit in ending procreation in
> defective gene lines,
What about organisms who can be either gender or who bud? (not weegs,
spontaneously grow another creature. I said not weegs)
To claim that anything is biologically proper is to essen
So if I get this right you're suggesting we send all gay couples to
overpopulated areas?
-Original message-
From: "David Churvis" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:16:30 -0500
To: cf-community cf-community@houseoffusion.com
Subject: RE: the list
> Dude. It&
1 - 100 of 188 matches
Mail list logo
