The problem with fire them all is there are no viable candidates to
replace them.
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Jerry Milo Johnson jmi...@gmail.comwrote:
constitutional convention, to add a fire them all option?
~|
Maybe, over time we would have a cause and effect type of outcome. In other
words, enough of them get fired for being the way they are now, and over time
the message sinks in that you really need to do what you were elected to do
rather than what your lobbyists tell you to do.
On Oct 4,
No one gets elected without the money from the lobbyists so expecting
politicians to listen to the people they are supposed to work for instead
of the special interests that put them in office is a waste of time. And
after the Supreme Court handed the power to the corporations with the
Citizens
This doesn't surprise me that you idolize a politician who pulls off a
fillibuster that has no chance of affecting anything other than his self
promotion. The man should have to reimburse the public for his political
theater event.
Yeah...what a hero.
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Sam
Actually it did. His filibuster like performance got such a reaction from
the people that the Republicans finally realized they had to do something.
Maybe now we'll finally get some progress towards fixing the budget and the
economy. If not it would have been business as usual.
.
On Fri, Oct
Its going to get worse. The SCOTUS is hearing another couple of election
funding cases:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/supreme-court-case-could-give-wealthy-donors-more-latitude-in-elections/2013/10/03/26a66d82-2ad4-11e3-b139-029811dbb57f_story.html
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 8:04 AM,
You whined about Obama's birth certificate. You are being more than just
hypocritical with Cruz.
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Sam sammyc...@gmail.com wrote:
Didn't he already release it?
.
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Larry C. Lyons larrycly...@gmail.com
wrote:
So when are
I like what Lincoln had to say about similar circumstances:
(taken from
http://www.latimes.com/business/hiltzik/la-fi-mh-lincoln-20131001,0,1991443.story)
Your purpose, then, plainly stated, is that you will destroy the
Government, unless you be allowed to construe and enforce the Constitution
Why so? Cruz released his up front. Why didn't Obama? I'm still not
convinced Obama's is real, but I didn't whine
.
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Larry C. Lyons larrycly...@gmail.comwrote:
You whined about Obama's birth certificate. You are being more than just
hypocritical with Cruz.
He was talking about slavery. The dems want us back into slavery since half
now depend on food stamps. The GOP is trying to correct that.
.
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Larry C. Lyons larrycly...@gmail.comwrote:
I like what Lincoln had to say about similar circumstances:
(taken from
By making sure the half on food stamps die of starvation lol lol ^_^
On 4 October 2013 10:46, Sam sammyc...@gmail.com wrote:
He was talking about slavery. The dems want us back into slavery since half
now depend on food stamps. The GOP is trying to correct that.
Australia had a government shutdown once. In the end, the queen fired
everyone in Parliament.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2013/10/01/australia-had-a-government-shutdown-once-it-ended-with-the-queen-firing-everyone-in-parliament/
constitutional convention, to add a fire them all option?
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Larry C. Lyons larrycly...@gmail.comwrote:
Australia had a government shutdown once. In the end, the queen fired
everyone in Parliament.
Word
On Oct 3, 2013 2:17 PM, Jerry Milo Johnson jmi...@gmail.com wrote:
constitutional convention, to add a fire them all option?
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Larry C. Lyons larrycly...@gmail.com
wrote:
Australia had a government shutdown once. In the end, the queen fired
Larry, that's not a good thing.
Next you're going to brag about Caligula's horse.
.
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Larry C. Lyons larrycly...@gmail.comwrote:
Australia had a government shutdown once. In the end, the queen fired
everyone in Parliament.
The way that it works in Canada is that Parliament serves at the pleasure
of her Majesty as represented by the Governor General. If the government
money bill is defeated (think the CR's or budgets) then the GG can dissolve
Parliament and there has to be a general election in 6 weeks. There are
Six week vetting process, what could go wrong. Saying that, Reid and Pelosi
were vetted and they're still in.
.
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Larry C. Lyons larrycly...@gmail.comwrote:
The way that it works in Canada is that Parliament serves at the pleasure
of her Majesty as represented
So are Boehner, Bachmann and Cruz.
It cuts both ways.
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Sam sammyc...@gmail.com wrote:
Six week vetting process, what could go wrong. Saying that, Reid and Pelosi
were vetted and they're still in.
.
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Larry C. Lyons
Cruz is awesome, my new hero.
Boehner and Bachmann meh.
But there are definitely nutters on the R side of the isle.
.
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Scott Stroz boyz...@gmail.com wrote:
So are Boehner, Bachmann and Cruz.
It cuts both ways.
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Sam
Having participated in the process, it works very well. Most of the time
you don't get too many wing nuts. With the exceptions like Stockton Day and
Harper.
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Scott Stroz boyz...@gmail.com wrote:
So are Boehner, Bachmann and Cruz.
It cuts both ways.
On
So when are you going to demand to see his birth certificate?
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Sam sammyc...@gmail.com wrote:
Cruz is awesome, my new hero.
Boehner and Bachmann meh.
But there are definitely nutters on the R side of the isle.
.
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Scott
Didn't he already release it?
.
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Larry C. Lyons larrycly...@gmail.comwrote:
So when are you going to demand to see his birth certificate?
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
Using Railo would solve the cost problem
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 6:35 AM, Cameron Childress camer...@gmail.com wrote:
First - cost. Justin already mentioned this, and it's a very valid point.
Scaling means lots of servers, no matter how bad-ass your platform is. If
the world of PHP, there are
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Maureen mamamaur...@gmail.com wrote:
Using Railo would solve the cost problem
It solves both problems, as I mentioned further down in the email.
Admittedly, it was long...
-Cameron
...
~|
TL:DR
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Cameron Childress camer...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Maureen mamamaur...@gmail.com wrote:
Using Railo would solve the cost problem
It solves both problems, as I mentioned further down in the email.
Admittedly, it was long...
Whewthat looks like it came out of a text book. Well said Justin.
I'd add that i think CF sometimes suffers, undeservedly, from it's
ease-of-use. I use myself as an example. CF was my first coding language,
and I spit out a lot of code. As things became more complex, my apps
weren't running
BankofAmerica.com uses it for their public facing online banking system
amongst a bunch of other technology..
So it must be scalable to some degree.
I understand the infrastructure running the transactions is an entirely
different kettle of fish, but I think that shows some fairly heavy use in
and its probably a cheaper price point if its all done in *nix
environments, right?
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 9:28 AM, Erika L. Rich elr...@ruwebby.com wrote:
BankofAmerica.com uses it for their public facing online banking system
amongst a bunch of other technology..
So it must be scalable to
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 9:53 PM, PT cft...@gmail.com wrote:
I was wondering how much use CF can really handle either as a server
product or middleware. I am not talking about situations where throwing
hardware at performance issues can get one by, but to the point where
choosing the right
Cam is and always will be my hero. When I grow up I want to be just like
Cam. 3
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Cameron Childress camer...@gmail.comwrote:
Technically speaking, CF can scale very well. Virtually (or maybe
literally) no-one has the scale problems of Fabebook, so I would call
I dunno - I do live in the big bad city... :)
-Cameron
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Erika L. Rich elr...@ruwebby.com wrote:
Cam is and always will be my hero. When I grow up I want to be just like
Cam. 3
~|
Order the
I have so many heroes on here it's sick, from Cam to Judah to Dino (of
course), and tons of others..ya'all are better and smarter at
everything than I am. It's humbling.
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Cameron Childress camer...@gmail.comwrote:
I dunno - I do live in the big bad city...
Whewthat looks like it came out of a text book.
Well said Justin.
Thanks, my usual responsibilities toe the line between ColdFusion
development and server/network design and administration so these are
the kinds of problems I eat for breakfast every day. :)
-Justin
set of test cases and simultaneous visitors each.
That should give you a good idea of what it can handle.
One suggestion though I'd optimize the heck out of the web, database
and the CF application servers first
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 9:53 PM, PT cft...@gmail.com wrote:
I was wondering how much
at 9:35 AM, Cameron Childress camer...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 9:53 PM, PT cft...@gmail.com wrote:
I was wondering how much use CF can really handle either as a server
product or middleware. I am not talking about situations where throwing
hardware at performance issues can get
ripped apart over the bad code. When
they moved over to BlueDragon.Net the code problems increased. So in
the end CF just became a convenient scapegoat to hide some bad coding
practices etc.
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 9:53 PM, PT cft...@gmail.com wrote:
I was wondering how much use CF can really handle
:
I was wondering how much use CF can really handle either as a server
product or middleware. I am not talking about situations where throwing
hardware at performance issues can get one by, but to the point where
choosing the right middleware/application backend software can make or
break
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Larry C. Lyons larrycly...@gmail.comwrote:
BTW what happened with MySpace was not due to CF. It was due to the
fact that their code sucked. Their solution was to throw hardware at
it. I was at one CFUnited several years ago where the MySpace
development team
Sections of it during their preso. If I remember correct Mike Dinowitz
may have been there and saw the same preso. But the code sucked.
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 12:36 PM, GMoney gm0n3...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Larry C. Lyons larrycly...@gmail.comwrote:
BTW what
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Larry C. Lyons larrycly...@gmail.comwrote:
I have to disagree with you about the licensing issue. Both Railo
I mentioned Railo as a solution against cost.
-Cameron
...
~|
Order the Adobe
I'd also say that you need to look at using the appropriate technology
in the right spots. CF is great for all sorts of things. But it was
built for an html/db-centric world. Those parts are often still
important in applications. However, a lot of functionality in modern
applications has moved to
This is probably the reality of the situation. My questions about what
CF can handle were more academic.
Thanks for all of the responses peoples.
On 5/1/2012 10:31 PM, Justin Scott wrote:
(e.g. is it okay to start
with ColdFusion and limited resources and get something online more
quickly
I was wondering how much use CF can really handle either as a server
product or middleware. I am not talking about situations where throwing
hardware at performance issues can get one by, but to the point where
choosing the right middleware/application backend software can make or
break
Facebook, for example. Throwing hardware at something
like Facebook is not going to help performance issues in the
software. Facebook is built using PHP, but they do some
fancy compiling on the PHP to make it faster.
...
Can ColdFusion run something like Facebook/Twitter, ...
There's no
is the best thing to have come up for that page?
Should I cflocate to my root, www.domain.com/ ?
When you cflocate to another page, how does the se handle that as far as
ranking? My understanding is that cf sends a 301 status, moved permanently.
I could just serve the home page under that url
My understanding is that cf sends a 301 status,
moved permanently.
By default CF will use a 302 redirect unless you specify otherwise. Newer
versions of CF have a statuscode attribute on CFLOCATION which will let you
specify the 301 directly. On older versions you have to use CFHEADER to set
Okay folks, I've got an interesting Friday thought challenge for you all -
We have a manual process that I need to work on automating. It
involves the following:
1. Identify clients that have invoices posted in a week. If a client
has a contact email, proceed.
2. Run between 2 and 4 different
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 10:18 AM, C. Hatton Humphrey chumph...@gmail.comwrote:
Okay folks, I've got an interesting Friday thought challenge for you all -
We have a manual process that I need to work on automating. It
involves the following:
1. Identify clients that have invoices posted in
I've implemented a single authentication source for my web apps, but
each app still has it's own login form, password change form, etc.
Those of you who have a sso setup, do you redirect users to a
completely different web site to login in?
--
I'm searching
I'm yearning
I'm wondering
Waiting
[mailto:zaph0d.b33bl3b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2010 11:04 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: how do you handle single sign on?
I've implemented a single authentication source for my web apps, but
each app still has it's own login form, password change form, etc.
Those of you who have a sso
I've implemented a single authentication source for my web apps,
but each app still has it's own login form, password change form,
etc. Those of you who have a sso setup, do you redirect users to
a completely different web site to login in?
What I've done in the past is pick one place where
I guess one of my main concerns is keeping users from feeling
disconnected...most of my sites have a different look and feel about
them. The sso login page looks different from all the other
sites.how have you guys approached this?
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Justin Scott
I'm just finishing up an intranet rebuild, I pulled all of the apps in under
one look and feel umbrella.
-Original Message-
From: Zaphod Beeblebrox [mailto:zaph0d.b33bl3b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2010 1:51 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: how do you handle single sign
CSS?
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox
zaph0d.b33bl3b...@gmail.com wrote:
I guess one of my main concerns is keeping users from feeling
disconnected...most of my sites have a different look and feel about
them. The sso login page looks different from all the other
I guess one of my main concerns is keeping users from
feeling disconnected...most of my sites have a different
look and feel about them. The sso login page looks
different from all the other sites.how have you guys
approached this?
You could look at the HTTP headers and display a
to
take them into receivership in case they fail. An economist friend of mine
in LA has been saying that from the get go- let the banks fail and see where
the chips fall. But that only works if the government can handle the
potential chaos that will ensue.
When I think of regulation, then, I see
RoMunn wrote:
When I think of regulation, then, I see an organization in the government
that has the ability to take management control of even very large
institutions if it becomes necessary.
Well that's the whole lost half of anti-trust.
The half we still have is monopoly protection, the
I don't know what he's up to but we definitely needed a stall for anything.
My fear back in the Fall was that if the top banks failed, all hell would
break loose almost overnight. We seem to be past that probability, so now we
can get down to figuring out what the hell to do.
On Sat, Mar 14,
RoMunn wrote:
break loose almost overnight. We seem to be past that probability, so now we
can get down to figuring out what the hell to do.
Well we're not though; The danger last fall was *systemic* failure.
The banks are still in deep shit and here's why:
On the left half of the bank
sounds about right to me. i don't necessarily call it nationalization,
though. to me, nationalization implies that decisions are made for political
reasons as much for economic reasons. for instance, i would call it
nationalization if the government took over a bankrupt gm with the express
This dude predicted the crisis 5 years ago and here's what he had to
say a few days ago:
--
I believe that stocks are undervalued, but not extremely so. Passive,
long-term investors in the SP 500 can reasonably expect average total
returns moderately higher than 10% annually over the
Just stumbled over this one and thought it appropriate:
http://fwob.blogspot.com/2005/07/how-to-handle-web-deisgner.html
How to handle a web deisgner
Earlier we talked about not needing a web designer but you might be
two busy to bother with your website so you may have to have one after
all
hehe :-)
Just stumbled over this one and thought it appropriate:
--
will
If my life weren't funny, it would just be true;
and that would just be unacceptable.
- Carrie Fisher
~|
This list and all House of Fusion resources
I seriously wonder if we all have the same set of clients. I've had
one client who was exactly liike this.
larry
On 7/12/05, William Bowen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hehe :-)
Just stumbled over this one and thought it appropriate:
--
will
If my life weren't funny, it would just be
ensure that they don't return
:)
On 7/12/05, Larry C. Lyons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just stumbled over this one and thought it appropriate:
http://fwob.blogspot.com/2005/07/how-to-handle-web-deisgner.html
How to handle a web deisgner
Earlier we talked about not needing a web designer
awww *snugs* my little erika is not inept and used up and certainly
not old! *kiss* *hug* hows phil doin?
- Original Message -
From: Erika L. Walker-Arnold [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 23:01:31 -0400
Subject: I can't handle it ...
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED
Gah. Tell me about it.
-Kevin
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 23:01:31 -0400, Erika L. Walker-Arnold
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... There are too many websites.
Not enough time.
So MANY beautiful ones.
I feel old.
And used up.
And inept.
sigh
Time to sleep on it.
[Todays Threads]
[This
Phil's doing fab. Hasn't had time to come read community lately because
I've been keeping him busy, but he's good.
He shaved his head recently. Phil and a friend dared themselves to go
bald. So they did. And I shaved his head baby smooth. It looked pretty
funny. It's all stubbly now - he said
post pics, and omg please don't say fab again replace fab with
fetch (like from mean girls) lol
- Original Message -
From: Erika L. Walker-Arnold [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 08:56:01 -0400
Subject: RE: I can't handle it ...
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phil's doing fab
Nah. He simply won't do it again, ever. Was way too much work. We are
talking about a guy that had his face laser treated so that he only has
to shave intermittant stubble once every 10 days. He abhors shaving.
Here's some pics here:
Yea i am thinking of doing the laser thing as well to keep from having
to shave i hate it!!
- Original Message -
From: Erika L. Walker-Arnold [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 09:27:16 -0400
Subject: RE: I can't handle it ...
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nah. He simply won't
-
From: Erika L. Walker-Arnold [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 09:27:16 -0400
Subject: RE: I can't handle it ...
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nah. He simply won't do it again, ever. Was way too much work. We are
talking about a guy that had his face laser treated so that he
Erika L. Walker-Arnold wrote:
Nah. He simply won't do it again, ever. Was way too much work. We are
talking about a guy that had his face laser treated so that he only has
to shave intermittant stubble once every 10 days. He abhors shaving.
I did something similar, although I admit I went the
Although why it would be associated with things that are good, I dunno
well hey its a Mac. Enough said.
larry
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 09:56:47 -0400, Ben Doom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Erika L. Walker-Arnold wrote:
Nah. He simply won't do it again, ever. Was way too much work. We are
Fetch(ing[ly]).
-Kevin
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 09:27:16 -0400, Erika L. Walker-Arnold
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And fetch WTH is that?
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
]
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 10:02:58 -0400
Subject: Re: I can't handle it ...
To: CF-Community [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Although why it would be associated with things that are good, I dunno
well hey its a Mac. Enough said.
larry
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 09:56:47 -0400, Ben Doom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
... There are too many websites.
Not enough time.
So MANY beautiful ones.
I feel old.
And used up.
And inept.
sigh
Time to sleep on it.
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
Ok, so studio did it's daily crash on me, but today the error was different
than usual. There was a little alert looking box that said Access is
Denied so I clicked ok. Then comes up the next popup which says the
handle is. No matter how many times I clicked ok, the handle is, would not
go away
all your handles are belong to us.
chris olive, cio
cresco technologies
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.crescotech.com
-Original Message-
From: Jon Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 2:40 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: the handle is...
Ok, so studio did it's daily
Probably talking about a file handle i.e. the pointer to a file that it
can't access.
You can use HandleEx at
http://www.sysinternals.com/ntw2k/freeware/handleex.shtml to tell you what
files an application has open.
Really handy tool for troubleshooting NTFS file access/permission problems
80 matches
Mail list logo
