building apps. I work
incrementally and it drives me nuts.
- Original Message
From: Dave Watts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Sunday, April 8, 2007 9:57:18 AM
Subject: RE: A Question for Development: Ajax Now or Ajax Later?
> I guess we'll disagree on this. Th
and I know you're
one of the best out there so give me some details.
> I think you misunderstand what I'm saying. I'm not saying you shouldn't use
> AJAX, or HTML, or anything else. I'm not saying that you should immediately
> rewrite everything in Flex. What I am
ere when people initially did remote
> scripting before it was called Ajax but there's just too much
> good technology out there now to call it a band-aid.
The fact that it's easy to do AJAX development is irrelevant. The fact is
that HTML and HTTP weren't designed to deliver a
Or Apollo. That's the whole point of it; freeing internet technologies
from the restrictions of the browser.
On 4/8/07, Rey Bango <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>If you need to build a desktop application, then use
> desktop development tools such as MS' suite of .Net tools.
>
> I'm still not convince
try that out with ScrapBlog and see how it performs. I'm really
interested in seeing how it does as that would help me form a better
opinion.
> I've worked extensively with those same technologies before anyone came up
> with names like "AJAX" and "Web 2.0",
or a variety of connection
> types and bandwidth requirements, Ajax is better suited and
> provides excellent features for providing desktop-like
> functionality.
Flex applications can work pretty well without any more bandwidth than a
typical web application. The big limitation is the requi
al Message-
From: James Holmes
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Sun Apr 08 03:14:07 2007
Subject: Re: A Question for Development: Ajax Now or Ajax Later?
Of course Flex is one of the primary development platforms for Apollo...
On 4/8/07, Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For sure, Fle
> And finally, Flex is a much better solution for applications than AJAX,
> which is a collection of band-aids applied to the sucking wound that is HTML
> interface development.
I think Flex is a better solution for developing desktop-like
applications that have a requirement of
Of course Flex is one of the primary development platforms for Apollo...
On 4/8/07, Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For sure, Flex has some kick ass neat stuff and I can see where it does make
> sense (if I look hard enough), but I think that Apollo as an RIA makes more
> se
Thanks for the perspective, Jim...
-Original Message-
From: Jim Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 07, 2007 2:56 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: A Question for Development: Ajax Now or Ajax Later?
> -Original Message-
> From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:
ation are not necessarily those expressed by Reed Exhibitions."
Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com
-Original Message-
From: Paul Hastings
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Sat Apr 07 21:47:24 2007
Subject: Re: A Question for Development: Ajax Now or Ajax Later?
Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) wro
Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) wrote:
> "And finally, Flex is a much better solution for applications than AJAX,
> which is a collection of band-aids applied to the sucking wound that is HTML
> interface development."
>
> In your opinion :-)
ditto for yours that flex isn'
"And finally, Flex is a much better solution for applications than AJAX,
which is a collection of band-aids applied to the sucking wound that is HTML
interface development."
In your opinion :-)
"This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Gateway House, 28 The Quadrant,
Richmond,
time it takes
you to learn something new), you should be able to find out fairly quickly
with the trial.
And finally, Flex is a much better solution for applications than AJAX,
which is a collection of band-aids applied to the sucking wound that is HTML
interface development.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf
Development: Ajax Now or Ajax Later?
Rick,
Neil said it perfectly. Its good to know the ins and outs of Ajax but more
specifically, DOM manipulation. Ajax functionality is a very small aspect of
what everyone regards as Web 2.0-style development and whether you're using
jQuery, Prototy
> -Original Message-
> From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, April 07, 2007 9:32 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: A Question for Development: Ajax Now or Ajax Later?
>
> Hi, all..
>
> Just wanted to throw this out for some perspective.
>
rom: Casey Dougall
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Sat Apr 07 18:33:04 2007
Subject: Re: A Question for Development: Ajax Now or Ajax Later?
Dreamweaver CS3 will have SPRY built in...
~|
Deploy Web Applications Quickly across the enterprise with
arily those expressed by Reed Exhibitions."
Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com
-Original Message-
From: Casey Dougall
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Sat Apr 07 18:33:04 2007
Subject: Re: A Question for Development: Ajax Now or Ajax Later?
Dreamweaver CS3 will have SPR
Dreamweaver CS3 will have SPRY built in...
~|
Macromedia ColdFusion MX7
Upgrade to MX7 & experience time-saving features, more productivity.
http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion?sdid=RVJW
Archive:
http://www.houseoffusion.c
And Rey said it perfectly. The vanilla toucher of Ajax wants it like CFML -
all fluffy like, it's not and you need to learn/know JS to a degree (well
any web developer should know at least the most basic DOM manipulation and
JS).
"This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Gateway Hou
sarily those expressed by Reed Exhibitions."
Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com
-Original Message-
From: James Holmes
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Sat Apr 07 16:08:47 2007
Subject: Re: A Question for Development: Ajax Now or Ajax Later?
If by "rubbish" you mean the most productive
Rick Faircloth wrote:
> I guess Flex is an option, but I've tried working with Flash with every
> version that has come out, and I've hated working with the Flash timeline.
the timeline has gone bye-bye as far as flex is concerned.
> why I would even consider it. And there also the face that I h
> Flex and AJAX both have their place and they can both be very uselful
> - they can even work with one another using the Flex-AJAX bridge.
Yep, very true. The only thing that Adobe has not effectively done is
clarify when either technology should be used. I really think that needs
Rick,
Neil said it perfectly. Its good to know the ins and outs of Ajax but
more specifically, DOM manipulation. Ajax functionality is a very small
aspect of what everyone regards as Web 2.0-style development and whether
you're using jQuery, Prototype or whatever CF8 provides, you ne
#x27;m already
purchasing CF 8...
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Paul Hastings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 07, 2007 10:22 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: A Question for Development: Ajax Now or Ajax Later?
Rick Faircloth wrote:
> For a few years I've been wanting t
If by "rubbish" you mean the most productive way to produce a rich
internet app, then sure, I'm in agreement :-)
Flex and AJAX both have their place and they can both be very uselful
- they can even work with one another using the Flex-AJAX bridge.
On 4/7/07, Robertson-Ravo,
at Apr 07 15:22:14 2007
Subject: Re: A Question for Development: Ajax Now or Ajax Later?
Rick Faircloth wrote:
> For a few years I've been wanting to get in on the Ajax-style development.
why not flex?
~|
ColdFusion MX7
Rick Faircloth wrote:
> For a few years I've been wanting to get in on the Ajax-style development.
why not flex?
~|
Deploy Web Applications Quickly across the enterprise with ColdFusion MX7 &
Flex 2
Free
No harm in learning the ins and outs now, as undoubtedly the Adobe
integration will hand feed the developer and when you need to something more
advanced you will be pinging lists asking how (which of course is what lists
are for)
An hour or so would familiarise you with Ajax development to a
Hi, all..
Just wanted to throw this out for some perspective.
For a few years I've been wanting to get in on the Ajax-style development.
However, dealing with javascript was just going to take more time than I
could
spare and keep up with project demands, since I have no experience wi
No, you can only call web-accessible templates via the web (whether
they're CFM or CFC). If you have a remote service, why isn't it in
your webroot? If it's not a remote service, then you WANT to have a
middleman (though it's typically a facade CFC, not a CFM). And if
you're using ColdSpring, it
Right now my JS looks like this:
$.get("psychic.cfm", {method:idArr[0],key:idArr[1]}, function(data){
//do some stuff
});
psychic.cfm contains the following code:
#func(URL.key)#
It's the only way that I can think of to call a CFC outside of my webroot. I
don't like having to do this as it r
jQuery is very cool. I am new to it. However, jQuery only does the
client side of things. The Server side is pretty much up to you. There
are several CF solutions out there. I have not looked into them (as I am
very new to AJAX also). Here is what I have been working on:
http://www.bennadel.com
jquery reminds of DynApi JS library.
thanks all...
-Original Message-
From: Michael E. Carluen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 12:55
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF + Ajax
On the jquery list, you can feel very comfortable posting your
cfml+cfc+jquery+javascript code
ct: RE: CF + Ajax
That would be awesome but when I try and subscribe.
Bug in Mailman version 2.1.9.cp1
We're sorry, we hit a bug!
Please inform the webmaster for this site of this problem. Printing of
traceback and other system information has been explicitly inhibited, but the
webmaste
this information in the Mailman error logs.
-Original Message-
From: Michael E. Carluen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 12:55
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF + Ajax
On the jquery list, you can feel very comfortable posting your
cfml+cfc+jquery+javascript code knowing that y
-
> From: Andy Matthews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 10:20 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: CF + Ajax
>
> Look into jQuery.com.
>
> Many CF programmers on this list are using it.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Bader, Terrence C
t. Back into doing more CF
>>> programming with some pretty decent applications in the works.
>>>
>>> What I am interested in at the moment is seeing what people are doing for
>>> their Ajax applications. i.e. libraries, functions, cfcs, etc.
>>>
>>>
http://jQuery.com.
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>
> Bader, Terrence C CTR MARMC, 231 wrote:
>
>>Hey all, been years since I have been on this list. Back into doing more CF
>>programming with some pretty decent applications in the works.
>>
>>What I am interested in at
in at the moment is seeing what people are doing for
> their Ajax applications. i.e. libraries, functions, cfcs, etc.
>
> Thanks...
>
> ~Terry
>
>
>
~|
Create Web Applications With ColdFusion MX7 &
Look into jQuery.com.
Many CF programmers on this list are using it.
-Original Message-
From: Bader, Terrence C CTR MARMC, 231 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 12:08 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: CF + Ajax
Hey all, been years since I have been on this list. Back into
Hey all, been years since I have been on this list. Back into doing more CF
programming with some pretty decent applications in the works.
What I am interested in at the moment is seeing what people are doing for
their Ajax applications. i.e. libraries, functions, cfcs, etc.
Thanks
Megan,
If you want the page to be refreshed without a reload, then the easiest
way is to use some form of Ajax call. With that said, I would recommend
looking into any of the number of top-notch libraries out their that
will make this task easier. These include:
jQuery - my personal choice
or the simplest implementation for the lowest common
denominator (within reason). I was thinking of dabbling in AJAX (which I know
next to nothing about)? Or is there a simpler way (aside from using frames,
which I refuse to do...).
muchas gracias,
Megan Cytron
Alpha 60 Design Sho
very well supported on both
platforms from a community perspective.
Rey...
Ian Skinner wrote:
> Our ASP.NET programmers just discovered AJAX this past weekend and now want
> it installed on all our servers.
>
> Of course I was talking about AJAX over a year ago, but I'm ju
Since you prolly won't end up using the same Ajax Framework, I'd suggest
Rob Gonda's AjaxCFC for the ColdFusion side of stuff. I'd further
recommend the jQuery branch of that framework.
Chris
Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) wrote:
> Ajax is just JS, it doesn't real
Give jQuery a look.
Www.jquery.com
People are using it with CF, Asp, PHP and more.
-Original Message-
From: Ian Skinner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2007 11:17 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: SOT: Ajax for both CF and ASP.NET
Our ASP.NET programmers just discovered AJAX
Ajax is just JS, it doesn't really require an install so any language which
can call / use an XMLhttp object will server you just fine.
Microsoft obviously has it's own implementation of it - it used to be called
Atlas now I think it is just Microsoft Ajax.
Any one of the Frameworks
Our ASP.NET programmers just discovered AJAX this past weekend and now want it
installed on all our servers.
Of course I was talking about AJAX over a year ago, but I'm just the lone
remaining CF programmer, so what do I know, but that is a separate gripe.
Anyway, my question is there an
+1 to JSMX
Have used both AjaxCFC and JSMX in production webapplications, and I
think JSMX is a bit easier to grasp and a more lightweight.
I have recommended AjaxCFC in the past and will continue to do so, but I
have to say JSMX is currently on top of my list.
I haven't checked any other
I agree with Chris, and Josh with jQuery on AjaxCFC.
But for the record, you can go implement Ajax on CF with jQuery only.
AjaxCFC just includes several built-in features like better error handling
etc- to make life just a little bit better ;)...
> -Original Message-
> From
> Once you've read up on how Ajax works, and you think you understand the
> concepts, I'd suggest using Rob Gonda's AjaxCFC.
I was just writing essentially the same email when the above posted.
+1 jQuery, +1 AjaxCFC
Super duper easy to get up a
TED]> wrote:
> Ok, I am a newbie to AJAX. Can anyone point me in the right direction for
> tutorials/information on this?
>
> Thanks!
>
> -Jim H
>
>
~|
Deploy Web Applications Quickly across the enterpri
Jim,
Once you've read up on how Ajax works, and you think you understand the
concepts, I'd suggest using Rob Gonda's AjaxCFC. He has two branches of
the code one works with a library called DWR (Direct Web Remoting) and
jQuery. I *highly* recommend using the jQuery branch.
ook into something like jQuery (which is high on my
list of "things to check out when I have time (tm)")
On 3/5/07, Jim H <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, I am a newbie to AJAX. Can anyone point me in the right direction for
> t
Jim,
Start with understanding the basics. I started with HeadStart Ajax and
moved on from there to reading up on the various frameworks available.
Also, be sure to pick up Ajax In Action which is another great book.
Rey...
Jim H wrote:
> Ok, I am a newbie to AJAX. Can anyone point me in
Ok, I am a newbie to AJAX. Can anyone point me in the right direction for
tutorials/information on this?
Thanks!
-Jim H
~|
ColdFusion MX7 and Flex 2
Build sales & marketing dashboard RIAâs for your business. Upgrade
Thank you Rey, for your answers!
More inline:
On 2/27/07, Rey Bango <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Howz the jQuery sources?
>
> Not sure what you mean. If you're asking how tight the code is, I'd have
> to say VERY and constantly being optimized. We use subversion for
> maintenance and Trac
ets.
Andrew Scott
Senior Coldfusion Developer
Aegeon Pty. Ltd.
www.aegeon.com.au
Phone: +613 8676 4223
Mobile: 0404 998 273
-Original Message-
From: Rey Bango [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 28 February 2007 11:42 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Ajax and CF question?
Hi Andre
hi Dinner,
Dinner wrote:
> LOL. 90% of the time it's fastest to just peek at the dojo sources--
> it's pretty straight forward from there-- which makes me wonder--
>
> Howz the jQuery sources?
Not sure what you mean. If you're asking how tight the code is, I'd have
to say VERY and constantly b
Hi Andrew,
Andrew Scott wrote:
> Yes I can see that, well the only thing that I couldnt find was how to
> write a plugin. With Dojo this is very simple to do, and it might be for
> jQuery but I just didnt see it in the docs.
http://docs.jquery.com/Plugins/Authoring
> Now one thing I have notic
Phone: +613 8676 4223
Mobile: 0404 998 273
-Original Message-
From: Josh Nathanson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 28 February 2007 11:18 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Ajax and CF question?
> Now one thing I have noticed so correct me if I am wrong, everything seems
> to be
On 2/27/07, Andrew Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There are a few things that I could not find on the website on how to do
> something, but hey I will admit the docs are far easier to search through
> than Dojo's..
Dojo has docs!?!?! Aww. Gonna have to lose the "powered by
Real Men"
> Now one thing I have noticed so correct me if I am wrong, everything seems
> to be based on Ids? Is that correct.
It's not based on ids, you can select your DOM elements any old way you
want.
$("input") selects all inputs
$("[EMAIL PROTECTED]") selects a select element named "myselect"
$("div.
4223
Mobile: 0404 998 273
-Original Message-
From: Rey Bango [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 28 February 2007 10:48 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Ajax and CF question?
What didn't you find Andrew? Let me know and maybe I can help.
Also, dedicate a couple of hours to jQuery,
What didn't you find Andrew? Let me know and maybe I can help.
Also, dedicate a couple of hours to jQuery, just as a proof of concept.
Dojo is VERY powerful but so is jQuery. I think you'll be pleasantly
surprised.
Rey...
Andrew Scott wrote:
> Well, what can I say...
>
> I decided to check jQ
Well, what can I say...
I decided to check jQuery out again as I haven't seen its progression and
let me say that I am very impressed with the amount of work that has gone
into this project in such a short time.
There are a few things that I could not find on the website on how to do
something, b
Nope. That was more like a "Ha! Good one." ;)
Real men (manly men) don't "tee-he-he", or "giggle". ;)
Rey
Dinner wrote:
> Don't you mean "tee-he-he", or "giggle"? :)))
>
> On 2/27/07, Rey Bango <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Ha!
>>
>> Rey
>>
>> Dinner wrote:
I frankly couldn't care les
Don't you mean "tee-he-he", or "giggle"? :)))
On 2/27/07, Rey Bango <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ha!
>
> Rey
>
> Dinner wrote:
> >> I frankly couldn't care less what framework people use, after all it is
> >> their choice.
> >
> > But real men (manly men) use Dojo.
~~
troduction to Adobe's AJAX
frame work including examples of Spry/ColdFusion integration. Afraid
of Ajax complexities but need to add it to your site? Then check
out this talk.
Raymond is a long time ColdFusion user, Raymond is a Adobe
Community Expert and one of the managers of the Acadiana M
Ha!
Rey
Dinner wrote:
>> I frankly couldn't care less what framework people use, after all it is
>> their choice.
>
> But real men (manly men) use Dojo.
>
>
~|
Create robust enterprise, web RIAs.
Upgrade & integrate Adobe
> I frankly couldn't care less what framework people use, after all it is
> their choice.
But real men (manly men) use Dojo.
~|
Deploy Web Applications Quickly across the enterprise with ColdFusion MX7 &
Flex 2.
Free Trial
htt
13 8676 4223
> Mobile: 0404 998 273
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Rey Bango [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, 28 February 2007 9:08 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Ajax and CF question?
>
> I don't think it makes it better but it most certainly helps t
: Wednesday, 28 February 2007 9:08 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Ajax and CF question?
I don't think it makes it better but it most certainly helps to have
plenty of support when you're starting off. Being part of the jQuery
team, I can tell you that ensuring the success of CF developers using
b 27 22:35:30 2007
Subject: Re: Ajax and CF question?
Dude, please take a look at jQuery. With your Prototype background
you'll take to it like nothing. And now that Jack Slocum is working with
us to port YUI-Ext (now called Ext) to jQuery, the UI library will be
insane. Check out the ar
is
> communication are not necessarily those expressed by Reed Exhibitions."
> Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Rey Bango
> To: CF-Talk
> Sent: Tue Feb 27 22:16:00 2007
> Subject: Re: Ajax and CF question?
>
> Absolutely
those expressed by Reed Exhibitions."
Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com
-Original Message-
From: Rey Bango
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Tue Feb 27 22:16:00 2007
Subject: Re: Ajax and CF question?
Absolutely. Which one are you using Neil? Have you taken a look at
jQuery yet?
Rey...
Robe
Absolutely. Which one are you using Neil? Have you taken a look at
jQuery yet?
Rey...
Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) wrote:
> Indeed, as there are loads of libs to choose from!
~|
Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7
Experience Flex 2 &
ngo
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Tue Feb 27 22:08:00 2007
Subject: Re: Ajax and CF question?
I don't think it makes it better but it most certainly helps to have
plenty of support when you're starting off. Being part of the jQuery
team, I can tell you that ensuring the success of CF developers using
inal Message-
> From: Andy Matthews
> To: CF-Talk
> Sent: Tue Feb 27 21:33:11 2007
> Subject: RE: Ajax and CF question?
>
> But they're not as vocal.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, Feb
ent: Tue Feb 27 21:33:11 2007
Subject: RE: Ajax and CF question?
But they're not as vocal.
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 3:31 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Ajax and CF question?
And just as many CF'ers are taking
But they're not as vocal.
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 3:31 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Ajax and CF question?
And just as many CF'ers are taking up www.dojotoolkit.org as well
On 2/28/07, Michael E. Carlu
a number excellent CF coders to answer any of your
> CF+jQuery implementation questions (newbies-friendly of course).
>
> See you there Che!
>
> Michael
>
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Che Vilnonis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 9:09 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Ajax and CF question?
>
> Take a look at the following page. It pulls information from the
> Amazon.com
> web service.
> http://typedhype.com/bpp/displayresults.cfm?f=2&s=Books&a
database by checking individual
checkboxes. Has anyone done something similar to this with CF and Ajax? I
could do this using the tried and true FORM based approach, but I was
looking for a more elegant solution.
Thanks, Ché
~|
Co
Hi John,
Do you suggest that as a complimentary method? Also, this should take
the form of a progressive enhancement correct?
Rey...
John Dowdell wrote:
> Richard Cooper wrote:
>> My question is what is the best way to cope with using back button and
>> bookmarks.
>
> Putting an "undo" button
Richard Cooper wrote:
> My question is what is the best way to cope with using back button and
> bookmarks.
Putting an "undo" button in your interface helps people avoid wondering
"If I hit the browser's back button will I still go back to the previous
HTML page?"
jd
--
John Dowdell . Ad
Thats very cool! Since I already use jQuery, I'm covered but I'll have
keep this for future reference.
Rey...
Qasim Rasheed wrote:
> This is a library without using JQuery
>
> http://codinginparadise.org/weblog/2005/08/ajax-tutorial-saving-session-across.html
>
> Th
This is a library without using JQuery
http://codinginparadise.org/weblog/2005/08/ajax-tutorial-saving-session-across.html
Thanks
Qasim
On 2/23/07, Rey Bango <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Tackling the back button in Ajax isn't a trivial task and has really
> frustrated
Tackling the back button in Ajax isn't a trivial task and has really
frustrated a lot of developers. Several of the frameworks out there
offer back button support so you may want to consider switching.
As Andy mentioned, jQuery (www.jquery.com) offers a plugin that supports
this function
Cheers Andy, I'll check that out now.
~|
Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7
Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powerful cross-platform RIAs
http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/
Archive:
http://www.houseoffusion
The jQuery library has a "back button" plugin that automatically manages
back button clicks. It works a treat.
-Original Message-
From: Richard Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 2:31 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: AJAX & back button
Hi all,
I'
Hi all,
I've a site that has a lot of onclick content changes using ajax. I'm a
creature of habit and have been using the same framework I started with, Simple
AJAX Code-Kit.
My question is what is the best way to cope with using back button and
bookmarks. Should I change framewo
On 2/21/07, Dave Watts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > All AJAX is is JavaScript. It's not really something different.
> > XHTMLHTTPRequest stuff could have been done with frames/whatnot.
> > Or was done, I guess I'd stipulate.
>
> You're missing m
On 2/21/07, Andy Tyrone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Well, actually, once you go AJAX, you kinda want it
> > everywhere. It truly
> > is a different way of doing stuff than the old "static" way.
> > What's that
> > quote... we'
]> wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I'm thinking about creating a open source Ajax poll system and
> wondered if anyone else has anything already? If not then i'll crack
> on. What would people look for in it and would anyone want to get
> involved?
>
> Nick
>
&g
Hi list,
I'm thinking about creating a open source Ajax poll system and
wondered if anyone else has anything already? If not then i'll crack
on. What would people look for in it and would anyone want to get
involved?
Nick
--
Nick Tong
web: http://talkwebsolutions.
CFC (let's say AjaxCaptcha.cfc) and make use of LylaCaptcha and
AjaxCFC or some other AJAX cfc type component...
(all below is pseudocode at best)
Methods:
[- AjaxCaptcha.CFC -]
CreateCaptchaPrompt(){
returns JSON object with Hash text, and ImageURL (the path to th
open question:
>
>
>
> We are going back through our application and trying to introduce more
> Ajax where we can to dynamically add content when we can instead of
> reloading the entire page. Example: we often use a tabbed interface,
> and for performance reasons, we only load
Ok, here's a wide open question:
We are going back through our application and trying to introduce more
Ajax where we can to dynamically add content when we can instead of
reloading the entire page. Example: we often use a tabbed interface,
and for performance reasons, we only loa
1101 - 1200 of 1855 matches
Mail list logo
