Just a reminder that ColdFusion MX "Updater 3" is now available for free download from
the MM website.
In my opinion, this is very close to a full "dot-release" of CFMX, and includes all
cumulative major fixes in all product areas, and adds over 100 fixes, mostly focused
around server reliabili
Damon,
Someone here, I don't remember whom, acknowledged here a while back, CFMX couldn't
timeout unavailable datasource, a bug. I've looked at Updater 3's release note, I
didn't find anything referencing this topic, is this bug fixed in the Updater 3?
It's absolutely critical to our applica
Updater 3 Available
From: "Lee Fuller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 12:24:09 -0800
Damon,
What's the Plan-B procedure should our installations decide to die on us and
our customers after installing 3? Just need to know before we move forward.
Thanks...
Lee F
FYI, we're working with Dave to figure out what's up with this failure.
Thanks
Subject: CFMX Updater 3 Available
From: "Dave Carabetta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 16:01:36 -0500
Make that 99 fixes. The WDDX bug that is claimed to have been fi
portant
stuff fixed that would have affected you and other CF customers, so I'd strongly urge
you to give Updater 3 a try in general.
Of course, we'll try to re-verify #48769 against Updater 3 here as well and post back
here shortly...
---
Subject: CFMX Updater 3 Available
From: Chuns
Don,
To respond to your question, Macromedia is currently working on an issue where a
thread can hang while trying to get a connection to an unresponsive database. The
issue will be the underlying driver's use of the Socket API's. The ColdFusion Admin
general Timeout may be exceeded in that ca
Bug 49064 was fixed, in that you will no longer receive an "Invalid cast exception".
By extension of the same test case, we discovered that if a user receives a WDDX
packet with a reference to a relative DTD not on the user's server, a SAX Parser
exception is thrown. Bug 50535 has been entered s
Steven,
Thanks for the update. Glad to know MM is working on the problem.
Don
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscri
Hi Damon,
I've applied Updater 3 for my CFMX for Windows installation. The whole process was
very smooth. The updater's recompilation batch process also worked well except a few
warnings but that was my own neglect of not removing pre-CFMX scripts in the same
directory. However, the timeout
Are you looking into the outstanding issues I described? Thanks.
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ:
Damon Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 12:08 PM
| To: CF-Talk
| Subject: CFMX Updater 3 Available
|
|
| Just a reminder that ColdFusion MX "Updater 3" is now
| available for free download from the MM website.
|
| In my opinion, this is very close to a full &
th CFMX, but it is far outweighed by the
improved performance and the feature set.
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Lee Fuller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 3:24 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFMX Updater 3 Available
Damon,
What's the Plan-B procedure sho
>Just a reminder that ColdFusion MX "Updater 3" is now available for free
>download from the MM website.
>
>In my opinion, this is very close to a full "dot-release" of CFMX, and
>includes all cumulative major fixes in all product areas, and adds over 100
>fixes, mostly focused around server rel
Great.. Thanks Damon!
Lee
| -Original Message-
| From: Damon Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 5:04 PM
| To: CF-Talk
| Subject: CFMX Updater 3 Available
|
|
| You should be able to easily back out Updater 3 and restore
| whatever you had
--Original Message-
From: Damon Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 3:08 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: CFMX Updater 3 Available
Just a reminder that ColdFusion MX "Updater 3" is now available for free
download from the MM website.
In my opinion, this is ve
On Friday 28 Mar 2003 15:16 pm, Ruggiero, Kevin D wrote:
> to production level with CF MX know that it may be a good idea to give it a
> month or so at least and see what kind of feedback comes in. I'm not yet
> convinced that CF MX with updater 3 is necessarily up to snuff just yet.
We've not h
-Original Message-
From: Ruggiero, Kevin D [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 7:17 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFMX Updater 3 Available
I put Updater 3 in almost right away, since I was already on 2 and close to
rolling back to CF 5 due to the serious problems with the server
g http://www.webapper.net
Webapper
-Original Message-
From: Ruggiero, Kevin D [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 7:17 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFMX Updater 3 Available
I put Updater 3 in almost right away, since I was already on 2 and close to
rolling back to CF 5 due to
On Friday, Mar 28, 2003, at 07:16 US/Pacific, Ruggiero, Kevin D wrote:
> But, I want to let those who may be thinking of going to production
> level with CF MX know that it may be a good idea to give it a month or
> so at
> least and see what kind of feedback comes in. I'm not yet convinced
> th
I'm eager to help, since
this really is such an important issue for the future of CF.
Thanks,
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: Sean A Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 12:10 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFMX Updater 3 Available
On Friday, Mar 28, 2003, at 0
This guy has had some pretty good, measurable success with U3:
http://webforums.macromedia.com/coldfusion/
messageview.cfm?catid=10&threadid=582836
He might be a good resource for those who have questions.
Christian
On Friday, March 28, 2003, at 11:36 AM, Ruggiero, Kevin D wrote:
> Yes, I che
On Friday, Mar 28, 2003, at 11:24 US/Pacific, Ruggiero, Kevin D wrote:
> We have a brand new machine, and this is our server configuration:
Looks reasonable.
> Databases we connect to are:
> Oracle 8i (8.1.7) on two separate Windows NT servers (connected to
> using
> Oracle's JDBC/OCI 8.1.7.4 dr
> -Original Message-
> From: Sean A Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2003 3:35 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: CFMX Updater 3 Available
>
> > Databases we connect to are:
> > Oracle 8i (8.1.7) on two separate Windows NT se
On Monday, Mar 31, 2003, at 10:05 US/Pacific, Ruggiero, Kevin D wrote:
> If problems persist I could give the thin drivers a try and see
> if that makes a difference.
OK, let us know how you get on.
> The Access databases are small and simple- not worth taking up
> resources on
> an expensive Or
> The Access databases are small and simple- not worth taking
> up resources on an expensive Oracle server.
I would recommend that you reconsider. If you've already got the expensive
Oracle server, you might as well use it; I expect you'd find an overall
savings on resources.
> We've always conn
25 matches
Mail list logo
