Thanks
Albert
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3424&t=3424
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Since this is my first time of seating an examination on Network i will like
to suggest if any one can give some guidelines
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3423&t=3423
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
I've used the Cisco ATM Solutions book, from cisco press. In there you'll
find anything you need about the exam. My exam had a lot of theoritical
questions about ATM's functions and of course questions about the LS1010.
Good luck
==
Chuck,
It'll take the command but it doesn't disable summarization if you're only
using RIPv1.
>From CCO:
RIP Version 1 always uses automatic summarization. If you are using RIP
Version 2, you can turn off automatic summarization by specifying no
auto-summary. Disable automatic summarization if y
I'm trying to install an eval copy of CiscoSecure ACS 2.3(5) onto Solaris 8
on Intel. I successfully get the package from Cisco, use their eval key,
unzip/untar it, transfer the package (using pkgtrans) to /tmp, and then try
to install it using pkgadd.
I successfully get into the opening install
Obviously I can't comment as to what I personally saw in my Lab, but I can
say that it would be fair game within the scope of testing set forth by
Cisco.
RIPv2 does understand RIPv1 packets, but the opposite is not true. The RIPv2
header is different, containing fields for subnet mask and authent
If that's the answer, what was the question? And what relevance does it
have to MCSEs, let alone a Cisco mailing list?
JMcL
-- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 07/05/2001
03:37 pm ---
"RANMA" @groupstudy.com on 05/05/2001 12:23:45 am
Please res
Hhhm..
RIPv1 offers the command [no] auto-summary as well. Haven't tried this one
out, but I will hazard a guess that it would be useful in situations where
one is subnetting a classful address, and did want the advertisements to go
out at the classful boundary. For example, if connected
Hello,
I'm trying to configure a 3640 router (E1/PRI) that
supports PC with ISDN modem dials in. I couldn't find
a sample config on CCO, anyone knows where it is?
Thanks in advance.
Jim
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want
Hello,
I know there are people from all over the world on this email list, but I
am looking for a suggestion on an instructor led course for CCNA
canadiates based in the Chicago Area. I know there are a lot of
locations that say that they will help you earn Cisco Cert. but I don't
have any revie
RIPv2 also supports discontinuous networks (no auto-summary) and the ability
to do summarization (ip summary-address rip).
Brian
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Chuck Larrieu
> Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2001 9:05 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECT
Hello,
I know there are people from all over the world on this email list, but I
am looking for a suggestion on an instructor led course for CCNA
canadiates based in the Chicago Area. I know there are a lot of
locations that say that they will help you earn Cisco Cert. but I don't
have any revie
Well, it has always been my opinion that if you are good, then there is
nothing that a piece of paper can say about you. Of course, most of the
people that throw their CCIE number around, are the ones you could smoke in
your sleep. It's not what you have, it's what you say that separates the
men
WOW- good question !!! RIP Version 1 picks the configured interface Subnet
Mask to define it's Classful Network. RIP version 2 is Classless & carries
the Subnet Mask in it's updates. I have redistributed RIP Version 1 into
OSPF, but I'm not sure that knowledge totally applies. I wonder if ver
hi friends
small doubt i have.
what is max speed of sync port in 2 port sync / async card used in 2600
series
routers?
and
what is max speed of sync port in 2 port sync card used in 2600 series
routers?
bye
ravee
Get fre
also another tip. The WIC 2-T modules do not work in plain ethernet based
modules (such as 1e2w).
You need to get a 1FE2W at least to put the WIC 2t-s in.
However the wic 2-t's will work in the fixed serial slots in the 2600's.
Regards,
Jason Baker
---
Network Engine
VLSM is the major one. RIPv2 also supports authentication. It's been a
while, and I forget the other ones. Well, a quick browse of RFC 2453
indicates in general - that's it. RIPv2 uses the multicast address of
224.0.0.9, rather than the broadcast address of 255.255.255.255
A RIPv2 router will res
If you check the cisco site you will find that the 1E2W does nto work in a
2600 series.
The only ethernet modules you can put in a 2600 series is a NM-1E or a
NM-4E.
The 1e2w will work in 3600 series though.
Regards,
Jason Baker
- Original Message -
From:
To:
Sent: Monday, May 07, 20
Kinda reminds me of a place I used to work. In an all Cisco shop, the
strategic direction, as stated in the IT strategy document, was to plan a
migration from RIPv1 to RIPv2. Go figure.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2001 8
Why are you trying to migrate if you don't know the differences ?
""Thomas"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi All - What's the main feature of RIPv2 over RIPv1, beside the VLSM? I
am
> trying to migrate to RIPv2, but some devices only support RIPv1. Is there
>
I believe you need 16MB DRAM. Also note that Catalyst 5000's require
incremental update paths to move up versions. This is outlined in the
relase notes for each Cat IOS version.
Brian
On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, Circusnuts wrote:
> I'm upgrading my 5000 (Supervisor I WS-X5009) from 2.4(4) to 4.5.(8
Hi All - What's the main feature of RIPv2 over RIPv1, beside the VLSM? I am
trying to migrate to RIPv2, but some devices only support RIPv1. Is there
any workaround to have RIPv2 and RIP compatable? Thanks all in advance!
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3404
Hi all !!
I have just finished installinga new 1 e 2 w module in my 2610 router &
It's not being recognized, unit allready had an existing Wic 2t plus the
built in ethernet
port. I added the 2t 1e which is actually 2 wic 1 t cards with an
ethernet port on the main module
and it's not being recogn
On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 08:38:33PM -0400, Carroll Kong wrote:
> I do not believe linux does fast switching
>From the configuration utility for the Linux 2.4.4 kernel source:
CONFIG_NET_FASTROUTE
Saying Y here enables direct NIC-to-NIC (NIC = Network Interface
Card) data transfers on th
What solution are you using to implement the DDR (backup interface, floating
static routes...)? If you are using the backup interface solution, are you
having problems with the primary interface (flapping, etc) as this can be
compensated by modifying the time before the backup DDR is implemented
Campbell, CA
Where are you?
jp
""Jason"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> No. You only need to know RIP . But don't take my word for it !! Check it
> out at http://www.microsoft.com/warp/public/625/ccie/
>
> ;-)
>
>
>
>
> ""Jeongwoo Park"" wrote in message
> [EMAIL
On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 01:28:25PM -0400, Chuck Larrieu wrote:
> Without getting into the relative merits of router running open versus
> closed code, or the obvious cost issue, what would be the advantage of a
> Linux OS versus IOS?
Why not consider open versus closed source code? The public a
Hi folks-
I have an abundance of male db-60 to v.35 DTE cables & not enough of the
DCE
female cables..I'd like to know if it's possible to convert the DTE
cables to DCE
cables without too much hassle if it's too much hassle then I'll just
purchase a few more DCE's.
Pinout's ???
Thanks in advance
granted!
This thread got started because I thought I was reporting something "new" to
the group about certification.
At one time Priscilla and the oldest NP/DP had me doubting my own memory
about what was required to get CCDA a while back. And now CCO and "newer"
books had me wondering also.
I
No, here is not the problem on auto-summary, remember the ip summary-route
command has a supernet address, 192.168.0.0/16, so disabled auto-summary or
not doesn't matter, it will always be suppressed.
The point I want to clear is whether ip summary-address will suppress only
external eigrp route
Are access-lists wildcard block sizes always a factor of 2?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3394&t=3394
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and
Try again. The list server ate my homework, as well as the link I provided
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121mindx/cgd
index.htm#53274
watch the wrap
scroll down to the service module commands
hope you have DSL.
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: Chuck L
I tried pinging a remote host from a set-based switch. The ping did not go
throutgh the first time because the switch was configured with wrong default
gateway and I received a redirect response from a host that I do not any
thing
about. Could some one explain what is happening from the output of
Hi,
I need to perform extended ping form the console of a set-based switch
(6509) catalyst switch. How can I do that.
Thanks
LW
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3391&t=3391
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription
I think that most people just take the exams in that order: CCNA first then
the CCDA. I know thats what I did when I took them, it didn't cross my mind
to do it in an other way.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Kevin Wigle
Sent: Sunday, Ma
index.htm#53274
scroll down to the service module configuration examples.
HTH
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Scott Vicari
Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2001 5:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Sample config for 3620 po
Hey!
So I'm not loosing it - I was sure that was the case!!
I can remember answering questions on this list about what you needed to get
CCDA.
And since Jenny has given me faith again - I have found another book:
Global Knowledge Certification Press
Syngress/Osborne - CCNP, Cisco Internetwork
Does anyone have a sample configuration I can use for a Cisco 3620 w/ T1
WIC? I am trying to connect a point-to-point T1 connection between a office
in the US and one over seas. There will be another 3620 on the other side
of this connection.
Thanks
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.
At 01:28 PM 5/6/01 -0400, Chuck Larrieu wrote:
>In raw terms of what is happening on a router, does a Linux based OS versus
>whatever the Cisco IOS is really matter? in terms of code size? In terms of
>router speed?
I do not believe linux does fast switching (route caching like
cisco). Cisco IO
oops, forget the 192.168.4.0 subnets - I just realized that autosummary was
enabled on eigrp 2.
if Snider gets the individual network advertisement at all, it will be
192.168.4.0/24 because it was summarized by Robinson's eigrp 2.
-e-
- Original Message -
From: "EA Louie"
To:
Sent: Su
It takes me by surprise, as I have a brochure from Geotrain (dating from
about 1998 I think - yeah, I'm a bit of a packrat - I think I can throw it
out now :-) that states that CCNA certification is a prerequisite for CCDA.
At the time, test requirements for the CCDA were CCNA certification and CD
make sure you redistributed ospf 1 into eigrp 1, and eigrp 1 into eigrp 2 on
Robinson.
Also, do a clear ip route * and clear arp on Robinson and Snider and see if
the route to 192.168.4.0 reappears on Snider.
If not, Doyle could be wrong on this one. His paragraph on 726 regarding
suppression (
>Question #2 - That's a good troubleshooting exercise for you. do a "debug
>ip eigrp transactions" on Snider and Robinson to find out why the subnet
>isn't being advertised in the routing table (hint: make sure your summary
>address didn't include that subnet)
That's my point, see the config a
Question #1 - you can use the summary address command in the case study if
you wish.
Question #2 - That's a good troubleshooting exercise for you. do a "debug
ip eigrp transactions" on Snider and Robinson to find out why the subnet
isn't being advertised in the routing table (hint: make sure yo
yeah, in the past when Ive worked in nocs, things like extended ping and
show conf have been made exec level 1.
Brian "Sonic" Whalen
Success = Preparation + Opportunity
On Sun, 6 May 2001, EA Louie wrote:
> Big operations shops use privelege levels to allow NOC personnel to perform
> certain l
Big operations shops use privelege levels to allow NOC personnel to perform
certain limited configuration commands - for example to give the NOC the
ability to clear lines or configure an interface but not to reconfigure
routing, or to disable debug commands from a particular priveleged EXEC
secre
First, thanks for your answer Drew ... but I'm still
confused ...
> It determines what information
> is stored in the mls entry and enforces all packets
> coming through the mls
> switch to be compared with the entry according to
> the flow mask specified
> with set mls flow.
How about the note i
yes you are right!
nat 1 0 0 means all host start connection.
""Brandon"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Jason,
>
> Doesn't the statement "nat 1 0 0" take care of all internal networks? Do
I
> actually need to specify the subnet on the fast ethernet segment?
>
Jason,
Doesn't the statement "nat 1 0 0" take care of all internal networks? Do I
actually need to specify the subnet on the fast ethernet segment?
- Original Message -
From: "Jason Roysdon"
To:
Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2001 12:04 PM
Subject: Re: PIX config question [7:3352]
> Do a 'sh
see these pages:
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/ito_doc/routing.htm
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/103/5.html (this one is very technical, but
addresses metric calculation in IGRP)
http://www.cisco.com/cpress/cc/td/cpress/fund/iprf/ip2907.htm (general
presentation of route met
__
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential, may be
privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure, and are intended solely
for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. Any
unau
searched CCO for "cables"
first hit is: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/pcat/
Chapter 10 is "Connector Cables"
Then there is a section on "Smart Serial"
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/pcat/sec2.htm
Probably all you'll ever need... except prices.
Kevin Wigle
- O
Without getting into the relative merits of router running open versus
closed code, or the obvious cost issue, what would be the advantage of a
Linux OS versus IOS? Doesn't the "OS" have to be an inherent part of the
"IOS" in any case? I presume that Cisco boxes operate as do any Von Neuman
based
There is no serial interface built in Cisco 2600 series. You need to
purchase separate module.
Smart serial is for WIC-2T. Cisco 2600 also support WIC-IT, DB60.
Expensive than DB60.
More information, go to www.cisco.com.
""Hunt Lee"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Can anyone please shed some light on this - what is the 2
Serial(sync/async) network interface(s) built-in on the Cisco 2610?
They look much smaller than the normal Cisco 2500 Serials. What kind of
cables do they need? Is it expensive?
Thanks.
Regards,
Hunt Lee
IP Solution Analyst
Cable and Wi
Do a 'show xlate local x.x.x.x' and search for a private IP on the
fastethernet segment.
It sounds like your PIX 'nat (inside) #' is missing the network of the
fastethernet segment.
nat (inside) 1 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 0 0
nat (inside) 1 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0 0 0
--
Jason Roysdon, CCNP
You were attempting to have a warranty honored under the original purchaser
agreement, which is 120 days by default. Since you were not the original
person to receive the product (unopened box), Cisco's response makes sense.
SmartNet does not cover delivery damage, just failed internals. To init
Is it possible you have too many inside machines requesting outside ip's
(NAT) at the same time?
On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, Alex Lee wrote:
> Group,
>
> We have a PIX 515 for a year now. There is one recurring problem which we
> still cannot resolve. We opened case and talked to TAC at least two time
I was configuring extended ACL on PIX firewall Ver 5.2.1 and started
observing that the access-list is not working properly. Later on I realized
that it is different from extended access list of the routers.
I couldn't get the philosophy behind that. Any comments!
___
I believe 2926T is SupII, since it supports FEC (unlike the Sup1/2901)
Brian
On Tue, 6 Mar 2001, Mark Holloway wrote:
> I researched the archives and saw a conflict. Anyone mind advising?
>
>
> Catalyst 2901 = Sup I
>
> Catalyst 2926T = Sup ? (I or II)
>
>
> Regards,
> Mark
-
My Token-ring and the ethernet segments communicate just fine. As, far as
the NT questionI don't know. (It may be my problem)
- Original Message -
From: "Vincent Chong"
To:
Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2001 4:37 AM
Subject: Re: PIX config question [7:3352]
> Hi;
>
> 1)What is token
On Sun, 6 May 2001, Jacques Atlas wrote:
||It has already BEEN done !! :-)
|
|got a url for us ?
http://www.mcvax.org/~koen/uClinux-cisco2500/
--
jacques
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3364&t=3362
--
FAQ, lis
On Sun, 6 May 2001, Jason wrote:
|It has already BEEN done !! :-)
got a url for us ?
--
jacques
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3363&t=3362
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.c
It has already BEEN done !! :-)
""Brian"" wrote in message
011d01c0bd97$a7d15880$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:011d01c0bd97$a7d15880$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> netbsd is the most portable of the free nixes, thatd be the one to expect,
> if one could do it.
>
> Brian Whalen
>
> - Original Messa
Version 1 @ that...
- Original Message -
From: Jason
To:
Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2001 3:48 AM
Subject: Re: CCIE LAB TEST [7:]
> No. You only need to know RIP . But don't take my word for it !! Check it
> out at http://www.microsoft.com/warp/public/625/ccie/
>
> ;-)
>
>
>
>
> ""Jeong
Hi All,
In BCMSN course book (Cisco Press) p233, it is stated that:
"Most Cisco documentation explains flow masks as a way to determine how
packets are compared to entries in the MLS cache. This is inaccurate. Flow
masks are actually used to determine how much information about the packet is
plac
Also eigrp are auto-summary is enable by default.
Vincent Chong
""Jerry Seven"" Hi group,
>
> I'm get confused to this command, according to explaination in Routing
TC/IP
> p724, the eigrp xx is where the summary address sent to, so in p380, the
> example on redistribute eigrp route to igrp do
I am Plannaing to start virtual Lab
kindly mail me some lab design for best virtual lab and equipments detail
+ I would be glad if some one help me in sending Lab Manuals
Tariq
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3358&t=3358
1) The network 172.20.0.0 is under the routing protocol of eigrp and igrp.
2) The process no. for each routing protocol is the same, so
automatical redistribution
with 2 routing Protocol, so the routing information are exchanged
within in the router Earhart.
3) The summary route
IF you guyz are intrested to buy Cisco Training+ Testing stuff contact me
Cisco Testing have been tested with 100% success its better than any boson
or ccprep or transcnder thing
it gives 100% success and created after very hardworking with all summaires
u can sale them or use in ur training area
I am also working on Lab
I have many Cisco Training stuff + question which give 100% success and have
been tested
i wanan sale this..intrested
mail me..i can send the demo copy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3355&t=2705
---
Hi;
1)What is token Ring ethernet segment? For I know, token ring can not
direct communicate etherent segment.
2)I wonder Windows NT can perform SR/TLB function?
For I know window NT just can perfrom IP forwarding.
3) The token ring domain can communicate ethernet domain pro
No. You only need to know RIP . But don't take my word for it !! Check it
out at http://www.microsoft.com/warp/public/625/ccie/
;-)
""Jeongwoo Park"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi all
> Are ATM and VOIP a part of CCIE routing and switching lab test?
>
> J
Strange problem...
Here is the setup
I have a PIX firewall directly connect to a token-ring ethernet segment. All
users on this segment can reach the internet.(I am using NAT..(nat 1 0 0)
I also have a fast ethernet segment connected to the token ring segment by a
router.(NT server) I can
74 matches
Mail list logo
