RIF FIELDS [7:35268]

2002-02-13 Thread muhammad haroon
Hi , is there any web link which can help me to memorize and understand RIF calculation ?Thanks in advance . A Beginner . Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com. Message Posted at: http://www

Cisco mc3810 [7:35269]

2002-02-13 Thread Ouellette, Tim
hey all. I just bought an mc 3810. What's the going rate for one of these without any modules except the 2 serials and 1 ethernet that it comes with. I'd like to be able to use this in a home lab to do VOIP testing. Can I buy the FXS personality modules or do I need some sort of NM to put those

VPN 3000 Auth. with W2k ActiveDirectory? [7:35270]

2002-02-13 Thread Johan Hjalmarsson
Is it possible to get the VPN 3000 Concentrator to authenticate dial-in users using an internal Windows 2000 Active Directory, or is it only the "old" Windows NT 4 Domain model that's supported? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=35270&t=35270 -

RE: Cisco mc3810 [7:35269]

2002-02-13 Thread Bykov Andrey
No, Tim, you don't need to buy any NM. You can buy: MC3810-AVM6 (6 port Analog Voice Interface) - "Motherboard" for FXS, FXO, E&M MC3810-APM-FXS (FXS Analog Personality Module) - one per endpoint - analog telephone MC3810-HCM6 (6 DSP High Density Voice Compression Module) - Compression module (if

Voice Error [7:35272]

2002-02-13 Thread Sujal G. Ajmera
Hi, I get this error message on my console when I think a voice call is terminated. FAILURE in act_release_timeout Any pointers on this plz? Thanks, Sujal Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=35272&t=35272 -- FAQ,

Re: VPN 3000 Auth. with W2k ActiveDirectory? [7:35270]

2002-02-13 Thread Pieter Jan Bakhuijzen
Yes, it can be done. I've set up AD with RADIUS for authentication of dial-in users. I found a doc on cisco.com for the VPN5000 concentrator, it will probably tell you enough to figure it out. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/471/vpn5k-msias.shtml Good luck. Pieter Jan Bakhuijzen iXio Networks

Re: Flash upgrade disaster [7:35184]

2002-02-13 Thread Ziyad
what switch did you use for xmodem ??? - Original Message - From: "Wilson, Christian" To: Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 7:26 PM Subject: Flash upgrade disaster [7:35184] > Begging for help once again . . . > > I have upgraded the flash in a 3640 from the 8 Mb chip to a 16 Mb chip.

Re: [Re: VOIP & Vic-2fx cards [7:34768]

2002-02-13 Thread Patrick Donlon
Sujal thought it could be case, just couldn't remember as it was some time back, Thanks ""Sujal G. Ajmera"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Pat and Rich: > > I had a similar problem and got it solved just today. > > What we did was change the IOS and that made

Re: Adding more VTYs [7:35188]

2002-02-13 Thread Ziyad
I think you eitehr have ip only or ip plus image. You will be needing an Enterprise feature set IOS for adding vty lines..Check out for a "j"in the new IOS Ziyad - Original Message - From: "A Mehr" To: Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 7:50 PM Subject: Adding more VTYs [7:35188] > Hi a

RE: Ethernet or FastEthernet [7:35245]

2002-02-13 Thread Schneider, Matt
In the book that I read it says that you can only use fast ethernet or gig ethernet -Original Message- From: Colin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 8:20 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Ethernet or FastEthernet [7:35245] Hello I have been doing some reading

RE: RIF FIELDS [7:35268]

2002-02-13 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ccprep.com/resources/cc-news/archives/Token_Ring.pdf enjoy :-) -Original Message- From: muhammad haroon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 09:07 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RIF FIELDS [7:35268] Hi , is there any web link which can help me to me

Re: 6000 Hybrid vs Native [7:35216]

2002-02-13 Thread Patrick Donlon
Sorry to spoil the party but I've had a problem with IOS on 6Ks. With version 12.1(3a)E4, using the console port would put the switch into rommon mode, the switch would keep running but you couldn't config it, it's a recognised bug I think. Apart from that though I think it simplifies things by ha

great ftp [7:35280]

2002-02-13 Thread WW
examaway.myftp.org login: ex pw : ex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=35280&t=35280 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure vio

Re: Whew! CCIE 8776! [7:35261]

2002-02-13 Thread talbotpat
Way to go Chuck! Perserverance pays off! Pat - Original Message - From: "Chuck Church" To: ; Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 11:43 PM Subject: Whew! CCIE 8776! > All, > > I think the title says it all. Took the lab today at RTP. 4th time > was the charm. I don't know where to beg

Re: Whew! CCIE 8776! [7:35281]

2002-02-13 Thread Joe Morabito
Congrats! What did you do the last couple of months? Practice speed? Or maybe practice the many "little" things in IOS? Thanks! I too long for a good night sleep - Original Message - From: "Chuck Church" To: ; Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 12:43 AM Subject: Whew! CCIE 877

Re: Whew! CCIE 8776! [7:35267]

2002-02-13 Thread Bob Grafals
Congrats!!! 3:30am and I'm still studying. Reading about your success helps make it seem worthwhile. I hope to join you on the other side soon. Bob - Original Message - From: "Chuck Church" To: ; Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 12:43 AM Subject: Whew! CCIE 8776! > All, > > I thi

Re: Whew! CCIE 8776! [7:35258]

2002-02-13 Thread Lab Candidate
Thousands of Congrats, Chuck! --- Chuck Church wrote: > All, > > I think the title says it all. Took the lab today at RTP. 4th time > was the charm. I don't know where to begin. Might as well start with the > thank you's. Thanks to Bruce, Val, and Fred at NetMasterClass. Thanks also

Whew! CCIE 8776! [7:35257]

2002-02-13 Thread Chuck Church
All, I think the title says it all. Took the lab today at RTP. 4th time was the charm. I don't know where to begin. Might as well start with the thank you's. Thanks to Bruce, Val, and Fred at NetMasterClass. Thanks also to those on the list that I've either studied with or have help

Re: Whew! CCIE 8776! [7:35263]

2002-02-13 Thread Ahmed Mamoor Amimi
Congrats.. - Original Message - From: Lab Candidate To: Chuck Church ; ; Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:03 AM Subject: Re: Whew! CCIE 8776! > Thousands of Congrats, Chuck! > > --- Chuck Church wrote: > > All, > > > > I think the title says it all. Took the lab today at RTP

Re: Whew! CCIE 8776! (strange) [7:35265]

2002-02-13 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Millions of Congrats mate, You know.. it is the stragest thing.. I did the one day lab, one week after it was released.. and I came out of the lab thinking a 94 is the least I will get... only to find out that I have failed by a considerably low mark! To this date, I am devastated! I

RE: RIF FIELDS [7:35268]

2002-02-13 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
also http://www.groupstudy.com/notes/notepages/rif2.html -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 11:55 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: RIF FIELDS [7:35268] http://www.ccprep.com/resources/cc-news/archives/Token_Ring.pdf

Re: Cisco mc3810 [7:35285]

2002-02-13 Thread Duy Nguyen
You need fxs modules. This router doesn't uses nm's I believe. >From: "Ouellette, Tim" >Reply-To: "Ouellette, Tim" >To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" >CC: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" >Subject: Cisco mc3810 >Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 04:17:14 -0500 > >hey all. I just bought an mc 3810. What's the going rate

RE: Ethernet or FastEthernet [7:35245]

2002-02-13 Thread Georg Pauwen
Hi Colin, I have configured a port on a 2900 for 10Mbit and half duplex, and it lets me issue the command 'switchport trunk encapsulation isl' without any problems. On CatOS switches, you can issue the command 'show port capabilities', which will tell you the capabilities of each port. Regards,

Ethernet versus Token Ring [7:35291]

2002-02-13 Thread Naeiym Omar
Hi Group Off the topic really , but can anyone please point me to a Web site where I can get topics on Ethernet versus Token Ring . Some sales and technical infomation is needed on why the customer will want to migate from Token Ring To Ethernet. Thanks Naeiym Message Posted at: http://www.

Re: Ethernet versus Token Ring [7:35291]

2002-02-13 Thread Steven A. Ridder
www.cisco.com/univercd ""Naeiym Omar"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi Group > > Off the topic really , but can anyone please point me to a Web site where I > can get topics on Ethernet versus Token Ring . Some sales and technical > infomation is needed on why

PIX information [7:35294]

2002-02-13 Thread BASSOLE Rock
Hello group, What command can I use to copy a configuraton form a tftp server to a PIX Firewall? I have look on the cisco web site for the command but couldn't find. Can somebody help. Thank you. Rock Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=35294&t=35294 --

RE: Whew! CCIE 8776! [7:35286]

2002-02-13 Thread Jeff Kesemeyer
Congratulations !!! You have been a valuable assets to this group as well. You passing is well deserved !! Jeff Kesemeyer CCNP, CCDP, MCSE, CNE www.bradshawlabs.com "Your CCIE Rack Rental Source" -Original Message--

Re: Whew! CCIE 8776! [7:35257]

2002-02-13 Thread Steven A. Ridder
Congrats! It looks like about 20 people a week get the CCIE looking at the last person who announced his passing. ""Chuck Church"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > All, > > I think the title says it all. Took the lab today at RTP. 4th time > was the charm. I d

RE: Whew! CCIE 8776! (strange) [7:35284]

2002-02-13 Thread Church, Chuck
I think you hit that one on the head. Even today, I don't think I could have passed that test I had in November. In fact, when our proctor arrived back in November, we were all waiting for him. His exact words were: "Wow, you guys are in a hurry to fail." True story. Chuck -Original Mes

Re: Whew! CCIE 8776! [7:35257]

2002-02-13 Thread Ziyad
Chuck Congratz, Congratz, Contratz... Ziyad - Original Message - From: "Chuck Church" To: Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 5:46 PM Subject: Whew! CCIE 8776! [7:35257] > All, > > I think the title says it all. Took the lab today at RTP. 4th time > was the charm. I don't know w

RE: Whew! CCIE 8776! [7:35288]

2002-02-13 Thread Church, Chuck
Joe, I practiced mostly on speed. Plus some crack and methanphetamines as well. Just kidding. I've got 8 routers at home. The last couple of weeks, I've practiced just blasting in the various frame maps as fast as possible, and then configuring the most bizarre IGP configurations. Mul

RE: Whew! CCIE 8776! [7:35286]

2002-02-13 Thread Jeff Kesemeyer
Congratulations !!! You have been a valuable assets to this group as well. You passing is well deserved !! Jeff Kesemeyer CCNP, CCDP, MCSE, CNE www.bradshawlabs.com "Your CCIE Rack Rental Source" -Original Message--

OT: RE: Whew! CCIE 8776! (strange) [7:35290]

2002-02-13 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We were all like little lab rats that's what we were... The gave us a new drug and tried it on us until they got it right (if they have) "Church,

OT: RE: Whew! CCIE 8776! (strange) [7:35290]

2002-02-13 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We were all like little lab rats that's what we were... The gave us a new drug and tried it on us until they got it right (if they have) "Church,

RE: Whew! CCIE 8776! [7:35257]

2002-02-13 Thread Ole Drews Jensen
Congratulations Chuck, Thanks for all the info. Ole ~~~ Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNP, MCSE, MCP+I RWR Enterprises, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~~ http://www.RouterChief.com ~~~ N

Re: Whew! CCIE 8776! [7:35257]

2002-02-13 Thread Ziyad
Chuck Congratz, Congratz, Contratz... Ziyad - Original Message - From: "Chuck Church" To: Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 5:46 PM Subject: Whew! CCIE 8776! [7:35257] > All, > > I think the title says it all. Took the lab today at RTP. 4th time > was the charm. I don't know w

RE: Whew! CCIE 8776! [7:35288]

2002-02-13 Thread Church, Chuck
Joe, I practiced mostly on speed. Plus some crack and methanphetamines as well. Just kidding. I've got 8 routers at home. The last couple of weeks, I've practiced just blasting in the various frame maps as fast as possible, and then configuring the most bizarre IGP configurations. Mul

RE: PIX information [7:35294]

2002-02-13 Thread Evans, TJ
Config net TFTP_IP:FILENAME ? Thanks! TJ -Original Message- From: BASSOLE Rock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 9:07 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:PIX information [7:35294] Hello group, What command can I use to copy a configuraton fo

Re: 6000 Hybrid vs Native [7:35216]

2002-02-13 Thread MADMAN
Yes you can order the SUP in either mode. When converting make sure you follow every step or you will be RMAing the sup!! Dave Michael Williams wrote: > > Jose Almodovar wrote: > > The onyl thing that I found cumbersome was the > > intial change from Hybrid to Native. > > Actually, I f

RE: CIT Test [7:34856]

2002-02-13 Thread Mears, Rob
This test was not the hardest, maybe the 2nd hardest. You better study though. Use the Transcenders, they come close to crossing the line as far as the NDA goes. -Original Message- From: Ole Drews Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 1:30 PM To: [EMA

RE: Cisco exams are too easy??? [7:34923]

2002-02-13 Thread Mears, Rob
I got some land in Florida I will sale you cheap too. Who are you trying to fool? Rob -Original Message- From: mike johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 6:10 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OT: Cisco exams are too easy??? [7:34923] Hi All, I took th

Re: Ethernet or FastEthernet [7:35245]

2002-02-13 Thread MADMAN
Some platfors support it on 10M ethernet with the right IOS: C2611A#conf t Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z. C2611A(config)#inter e0/1.1 C2611A(config-subif)#enc C2611A(config-subif)#encapsulation ? dot1Q IEEE 802.1Q Virtual LAN sdeIEEE 802.10 Virtual LAN - Se

rtp and frame relay [7:35301]

2002-02-13 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi, I want to configure for a FR PVC rtp which should have a guaranted bandwidth of 300 k. And 20 k per session. Can any on help with a solution on IOS 12.09 or 12.1 ? Thanks Udo Konstantin Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=35301&t=35301

Mac address [7:35302]

2002-02-13 Thread Kwame
Is it possible to add a dynamic mac address to a cisco catalyst switch? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=35302&t=35302 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report

Dynamic Mac Address Assignment [7:35303]

2002-02-13 Thread Kwame
Pls ignore my previous post b'cos it's wrongly frame. Here's what I want to ask: Is it possible to assign a mac address to a catalyst switch such that the switch would not use the burned-in-mac but rather use the assigned mac? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3

Re: PIX information [7:35294]

2002-02-13 Thread Jose Celestino
PIX-FW1# copy ? usage: copy tftp[:[[//location][/pathname]]] flash For instance: copy tftp://192.168.2.2/configs/pix.cfg flash Thus spake BASSOLE Rock, on Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 09:06:59AM -0500: > Hello group, > > > What command can I use to copy a configuraton form a tftp server to a PIX > F

Understanding BGP (was: Any advice for first attempt at JNCIE [7:35305]

2002-02-13 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
Let me share what made the light dawn for me about BGP: first understanding the problem it was meant to solve, not how the protocol proper works or how to configure it on Cisco or Juniper. It's a reasonable simplification to say that BGP is policy controlled. Therefore, it makes sense to und

Re: Whew! CCIE 8776! [7:35296]

2002-02-13 Thread Todd Carswell
Chuck, Congratulations! Thanks for the good word on NMC-1 because I'll be taking that class the week of February 25th. Todd Carswell - Original Message - From: "Chuck Church" To: ; Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 12:43 AM Subject: Whew! CCIE 8776! > All, > > I think the title s

ISDN line drops at the same time [7:35306]

2002-02-13 Thread Steve Smith
Hey guys and gals this one is very weird. I have a PRI than connects to a AS5200. All is fine except 1 client. This persons connection gets dropped everyday at 9:26. TAC has no idea so far. debug shows nothing on either side. Any ideas? Here is the config. I have been playing with the mppp and the

RE: Ethernet or FastEthernet [7:35245]

2002-02-13 Thread Michael Williams
I had read (and understood) that you needed FastEthernet for ISL trunking. I'm not for sure about Dot1Q though. It appears from the post from MADMAN, that you can indeed perform Dot1Q on Ethernet ports. But I still think FastEthernet I read a post in this thread that on a 2900 switch someone s

RE: Ethernet versus Token Ring [7:35291]

2002-02-13 Thread Daniel Cotts
Begin padding so URL won't be deleted. Here's a page with lots of links covering Token Ring: http://www.nwfusion.com/research/token.html > -Original Message- > From: Naeiym Omar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 7:55 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Ethe

Re: 6000 Hybrid vs Native [7:35216]

2002-02-13 Thread Michael Williams
MADMAN wrote: > When converting make sure you follow every step or you will > be RMAing > the sup!! LOL Funny you mention that. It is very true as before I came to this job, one of the other people here tried to "wing it" through a conversion and ended up having to RMA another Sup.. h

RE: Ethernet or FastEthernet [7:35245]

2002-02-13 Thread Oleg Oz
I also belive that it is possible to run isl/802.1Q over ethernet. I seem to remember reading that the limiting factor was the age of the ethernet hardware. The originally ethernet chips used in cisco network modules only supported a fixed frame size. When ISL/802.1Q came along, the hardware neede

Re: ISDN line drops at the same time [7:35306]

2002-02-13 Thread MADMAN
I take it this is the remote site that dials into the PRI. Have you tried a debug dialer? This will give you and indication of why the call was dropped and by whom. Dave Steve Smith wrote: > > Hey guys and gals this one is very weird. I have a PRI than connects to > a AS5200. All is fine ex

One Source [7:35313]

2002-02-13 Thread Jason
Be very careful if you are dealing with this company. They were formerly Grandstore , until the name was trashed like @!#$ and then they became IQSale , and then THAT name was trashed and now they changed name again.. So BE CAREFUL ! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.p

RE: PIX information [7:35294]

2002-02-13 Thread Hartnell, George
AND, am I to understand correctly, as the manual is quite vague, that an upgrade of the primary failover unit also updates the secondary? Or, must the hapless administrator do each individually? Best, G. > -Original Message- > From: Jose Celestino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wedn

RE: Flash upgrade disaster [7:35184]

2002-02-13 Thread Scott Nawalaniec
Hi Rik, Anybody, Regarding formatting the flash from rommon mode. I have looked on Cisco's website for a couple of hours trying to find the commands to format flash from rommon and haven't found any useful information. I have looked through all the commands in rommon and haven't found the command

=?iso-8859-1?Q?FYI_-_CERT=AE_Advisory_CA-2002-03_Multiple_=28SN [7:35316]

2002-02-13 Thread Eric
FYI - If your running SNMP on your networks you'll probably want to check this out. Just popped up on Cert.org and Cisco.com another DOS technique has reared its head again. - http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-2002-03.html#vendors - http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/cisco-malformed-snmp-msgs

Re: FYI - CERT® Advisory CA-2002-03 Multiple [7:35318]

2002-02-13 Thread Frederick R. Carlson
Is there anyting to this? I, for one, am not happy at all with CERT for this "press offensive" (its in the NY Times as well). Is there any there - there?? Eric wrote: > FYI - > > If your running SNMP on your networks you'll probably want to check this out. > Just popped up on Cert.org and Cisco

Re: FYI - CERT® Advisory CA-2002-03 Multiple [7:35320]

2002-02-13 Thread Frederick R. Carlson
Is there anyting to this? I, for one, am not happy at all with CERT for this "press offensive" (its in the NY Times as well). Is there any there - there?? Eric wrote: > FYI - > > If your running SNMP on your networks you'll probably want to check this out. > Just popped up on Cert.org and Cisco

Re: FYI - CERT® Advisory CA-2002-03 Multiple [7:35317]

2002-02-13 Thread Frederick R. Carlson
Is there anyting to this? I, for one, am not happy at all with CERT for this "press offensive" (its in the NY Times as well). Is there any there - there?? Eric wrote: > FYI - > > If your running SNMP on your networks you'll probably want to check this out. > Just popped up on Cert.org and Cisco

Re: FYI - CERT® Advisory CA-2002-03 Multiple [7:35321]

2002-02-13 Thread Frederick R. Carlson
Is there anyting to this? I, for one, am not happy at all with CERT for this "press offensive" (its in the NY Times as well). Is there any there - there?? Eric wrote: > FYI - > > If your running SNMP on your networks you'll probably want to check this out. > Just popped up on Cert.org and Cisco

Re: FYI - CERT® Advisory CA-2002-03 Multiple [7:35319]

2002-02-13 Thread Frederick R. Carlson
Is there anyting to this? I, for one, am not happy at all with CERT for this "press offensive" (its in the NY Times as well). Is there any there - there?? Eric wrote: > FYI - > > If your running SNMP on your networks you'll probably want to check this out. > Just popped up on Cert.org and Cisco

Re: Cisco mc3810 [7:35323]

2002-02-13 Thread Ahmed Mamoor Amimi
Please have a look in to the archieves. we have discussed it allot... -Mamoor - Original Message - From: Ouellette, Tim To: Cc: Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 2:17 PM Subject: Cisco mc3810 > hey all. I just bought an mc 3810. What's the going rate for one of these > without

RIPS default-network [7:35324]

2002-02-13 Thread Ryn
Hello folks, I am tring to figure out what RIPs "ip default-network" command actually does. If you have a router with: router rip network 172.16.0.0 network 192.168.17.0 ip default network 192.168.17.0 and the network 192.168.17.0 is on a serial link to a second router. What does the ip d

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Re: [7:35325]

2002-02-13 Thread Patrick Ramsey
Can you send your message one more time...I don't think I got it... heh >>> "Frederick R. Carlson" 02/13/02 01:25PM >>> Is there anyting to this? I, for one, am not happy at all with CERT for this "press offensive" (its in the NY Times as well). Is there any there - there?? Eric wrote: > FY

Re: Whew! CCIE 8776! [7:35296]

2002-02-13 Thread Todd Carswell
Chuck, Congratulations! Thanks for the good word on NMC-1 because I'll be taking that class the week of February 25th. Todd Carswell - Original Message - From: "Chuck Church" To: ; Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 12:43 AM Subject: Whew! CCIE 8776! > All, > > I think the title s

RE: Dynamic Mac Address Assignment [7:35303]

2002-02-13 Thread Joseph Brunner
IOS based switch - 3524XL_ATL(config-if)#mac-address ? H.H.H MAC address Joseph Brunner ASN 21572 MortgageIT MITLending New York, NY 10038 (212) 651 - 7695 Voice (212) 651 - 7795 Fax -Original Message- From: Kwame [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 10:1

RE: PIX information [7:35294]

2002-02-13 Thread Evans, TJ
I believe it sync's them auto-magically, or perhaps on a timed basis. Regardless ... I always do a wr standby ... just to be sure. Thanks! TJ -Original Message- From: Hartnell, George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 12:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

CERT Advisory on SNMP [7:35327]

2002-02-13 Thread Frederick R. Carlson
All, What is the real risk in the newly announced CERT bullitin on SNMP. Its at : http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-2002-03.html Thanks in advance, FRC Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=35327&t=35327 -- FAQ, list

Sorry in advance for the Duplicates [7:35328]

2002-02-13 Thread Frederick R. Carlson
EOM Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=35328&t=35328 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

SNMP- (S)ecurity is (N)ot (M)y (P)roblem [7:35329]

2002-02-13 Thread Steven A. Ridder
It's kind of high but not really. Most networks have SNMP pretty well hidden behind firewalls, or turned off if on the net, but if it's open, then I can ddos you and / or add code into the memory space of the crashed SNMP process (servers). There haven't been many attacks reported yet from the f

CCNP Recertification Test.. [7:35330]

2002-02-13 Thread Devinder Singh
Hello all- Has anyone taken recertification test for CCNP?? Any experiences on how it is ?? Thanks Devinder Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=35330&t=35330 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www

OT: Unknown protocol on network [7:35331]

2002-02-13 Thread John Neiberger
After watching a sniffer connected to one of our LANs we're seeing a lot of different clients attempting to reach UDP port 1034 on one of our primary servers. The source UDP port is in the range 1026-1033. I'm not able to find any good information regarding these ports. Some sites say that some

RE: SNMP- (S)ecurity is (N)ot (M)y (P)roblem [7:35329]

2002-02-13 Thread Sean Knox
As demonstrated by the security group, some vendor SNMP implementations crash when this new test suite is run against them -- even when SNMP is not actively listening! I do agree about protecting SNMP devices, but this is much more difficult from INSIDE an SNMP network. -Original Message-

RE: CCNP Recertification Test.. [7:35330]

2002-02-13 Thread Johns, John A.
Was not bad, did it at the last Networkers in Chicago... I think I had an 865, passing was 757... Although I was working on the CCIE Lab at the time, and the Written was somewhat fresh... John A. Johns, CCIE No. 7983, CCDP, CCNP, MCSE, MCP+I, CCA, A+ System Engineer The Hillman Company 1900 Gra

Re: Unknown protocol on network [7:35331]

2002-02-13 Thread Steven A. Ridder
I found three that it could be. Any of the other ports open listed below? I hope this comes through readable... 1. Pal Talk [support page] (Watch Out! Opens a wide port range!) IN UDP 2090 [voice] IN UDP 2091 [control stream] IN TCP 2090 [file transfer] IN TCP 2091 [vi

RE: One Source [7:35313]

2002-02-13 Thread Woods, Randall, SOBUS
It's funny that you mention that. I just recently bought a couple of routers from them off ebay and one of them was dead when I received it. I took almost a month to get a replacement. The one shipped did work but during the whole process, they never responded to email and never initiated a call t

Re: Unknown protocol on network [7:35331]

2002-02-13 Thread John Neiberger
We now think that this is related to the Corporate Edition of Norton AntiVirus. There is some sort of scanning involved there, but I'm not very clear on the details. Our LAN people just rolled this version out into our network a couple of weeks ago which explains why I wasn't seeing it in the pa

Re: cef vs fast switching [7:35183]

2002-02-13 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
CEF was designed to improve performance on core, backbone routers, that handle a lot of dynamic traffic to a variety of destinations. It also has major benefits for load sharing. It wasn't designed for an edge router with only one egress like you're talking about. Nonetheless, I think it would

Re: Ethernet versus Token Ring [7:35291]

2002-02-13 Thread Steven A. Ridder
Sometimes if you send something, especially with a url as first line (or only line), it get's deleted by server. SO he put in his creative padding. ""Michael Williams"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Daniel Cotts wrote: > > > > Begin padding so URL won't be delet

Re: FW: Number of people passing CCIE [7:35341]

2002-02-13 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
Vaguely fitting this thread, I was once giving a protocols seminar at NASA's Kennedy Space Center. During one of my breaks, I eavesdropped at one of the classrooms, where a frustrated lecturer on the Space Shuttle burst out, "this is rocket science, it isn't BGP!" >Hmm... That actually sounds

Ip subnet Zero & Ip classess [7:35340]

2002-02-13 Thread Arnaldo Gomez
Can someone give a gerneral explanation on these two commands? ip subnet-zero ip-classless What do they do and why would you use them? Thanks. Arnaldo Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=35340&t=35340 -- FAQ, list

RE: Ethernet versus Token Ring [7:35291]

2002-02-13 Thread Michael Williams
Daniel Cotts wrote: > > Begin padding so URL won't be deleted. Huh? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=35337&t=35291 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misc

Re: Ip subnet Zero & Ip classess [7:35340]

2002-02-13 Thread John Neiberger
This is definitely a topic where you should search the archives. There have been some excellent discussions in the past that have resulted in some great explanations of each of these commands. It would be better for you to read them than to have the original posters type them in all over again.

RE: Ip subnet Zero & Ip classess [7:35340]

2002-02-13 Thread Sean Knox
Well, From http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/12cgcr/np1_r /1rprt2/1ripadr.htm#xtocid12 : ip classless At times the router might receive packets destined for a subnet of a network that has no network default route. To have the Cisco IOS software forward such packets

Re: Ip subnet Zero & Ip classess [7:35340]

2002-02-13 Thread MADMAN
subnet zero lets you do this: ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.252 ip classless lets you do this ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.0.0 and probably more importantly it will allow a router to forward a packet via a default route even though router is connected to a subnet of the major netwo

Re: Secret Clearance? [7:4152]

2002-02-13 Thread Jeff Buehler
You were not "Lucky" that you had nothing in your background. You made the right choices. People who make the wrong choices pay for it their whole life. It is called Character. ""William Gragido"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Well, since this is obviously a

CCIE Written+Lab [7:35345]

2002-02-13 Thread PING
As a new member I want to say Hi to all. I am pretty sure, you have heard this question before: I am looking to buy material for CCIE R&S written and lab, so please take few seconds to type your best recommendation. . Thanks, -- Ishrat Nadeem Zahid CCNP Cisco Systems,Inc. Che

power session tapes [7:35346]

2002-02-13 Thread IPSec
does anyone know where I can find/order the power session voice tapes? TIA Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=35346&t=35346 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Repo

Injecting a default route to an IGRP stub router-HOW?? [7:35347]

2002-02-13 Thread Cisco Nuts
Hello, I can't seem to figure out how to inject a default route to an IGRP stub router from another router without actually typing in the default route cmd.(ip route 0.0) on the stub router itself? Basically, I have stub router RTA connected to RTB on netw 8. RTB is connected to RTC and RT

Re: Ip subnet Zero & Ip classess [7:35340]

2002-02-13 Thread PING
ip classless is used to tell the routing protocols which supports VLSM that subnet should be sdvertised as part of the route. ip classfull on the other hand is used to restrict to use major class subnet mask. Nadeem == Arnaldo Gomez wrote: > Can someone give a gerneral explanation on these

Re: Serial (X.21) X-over cables [7:35212]

2002-02-13 Thread Gaz
Joel, Have a look at www.kg2.com Kelly Griffin used to post to the group. Not heard of him for a while. I've noticed he's doing some DB60 to RJ45 converters from March 2002 for around 20 dollars, so one of each DCE/DTE for 40 dollars and you're away - whatever length you want, and I believe the f

RE: V35 - smartserial cross-over cable [7:35181]

2002-02-13 Thread Ken Corkins
Try this link as a starting point; http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/534/index.shtml -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Taco Hettema Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 6:48 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: V35 - smartserial cross-over cable [

RE: Serial (X.21) X-over cables [7:35212]

2002-02-13 Thread Ken Corkins
Try this Link as a start; http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/534/index.shtml -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Joel Satterley Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 11:30 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Serial (X.21) X-over cables [7:35212] An

Re: RIPS default-network [7:35324]

2002-02-13 Thread PING
a default route is used as the out of last resorte. In case router receives a packet and it cannot figure out where to send it, it forwards to the default route. Nadeem == Ryn wrote: > Hello folks, > > I am tring to figure out what RIPs "ip default-network" command actually > does. > If yo

Re: set community no-export V.S. set community local-as [7:35355]

2002-02-13 Thread Hunt Lee
John, So isn't that Local-AS means can only send routes within the local AS, while no-export means only advertised to IBGP peers (which means advertised to only local AS).. so aren't they the same thing - I'm still very confused. Best Regards, Hunt Lee WebCentral ""John Neiberger"" wrote in m

Re: rtp and frame relay [7:35301]

2002-02-13 Thread PING
You can use RSVP on FR. I think RSVP code was in 12.1 first time but you might wannat try. You can also use priority ququeing with CBWQ and allocating a b/w of 300K for voice class. Nadeem == "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote: > Hi, > > I want to configure for a FR PVC rtp which should have a gu

subnet mask question [7:35357]

2002-02-13 Thread Simon Yang (ITeX)
We know that 127.0.0.1 is for loopback. If we need to assing a subnet mask for it, what the number should be. for Class A, the noraml subnet mask is 255.0.0.0 for Class B, the normail subnet mask is 255.255.0.0. 127 is not belong to Class A and B. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com

Re: Route-map question [7:34431]

2002-02-13 Thread Hunt Lee
Tom, Can you please elaborate how the outbound filter with the community tag of no-export would help... as I'm still not too clear what it will achieve. And sorry for the stupid question... Thanks again. Best Regards, Hunt Lee ""Tom Martin"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL

  1   2   >