Thanks to everyone! Now onward to the holy grail
Scott Chapin, CCNA, CCNP
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37720t=37720
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Hi everyone,
Can anyone give me some advice on getting my first networking job. I am
currently studying for my CCNA through the Cisco Networking Academy. Will my
CCNA get my foot in the door even if it is a junior network engineer. Is the
CCNA certificate really good to get if you want to get
Hmmm. Not even sure if that's a joke.
What is it that the router's sat on?
Some sort of large wooden box??? Looks like it's been used before.
Is that our own Chuck L at highest bidder? If it is, check the fuse isn't a
nail Chuck and do the back of the hand test :-)
colin newman wrote
hi there.
for the other ccnp exams i used cisco press however was confused about
CIT.
some people advice sybex..
what do you think i should go in for?
Also ive been told to get routersim's simulator for CIT, is it
essential? i didnt know simulations would come into cit.
thank you people.
Also any
Have anyone successfully installed minicom on Solaris
8? I tried and it failed me when I did: make ; make
install.
Kim.
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email!
http://mail.yahoo.com/
Message Posted at:
Hello all
I have two Cat 2950-24 switches , when I connect to the first switch
through hyper terminal , something strange happening to me , that strange
thing is when I try to type any letter on the keyboard it gives me another
letter or symbols I do not know why this is happening the
There were some bugs with 12.0(5) with regards to hyperterm, causing the
switch to reboot was one of them. Try upgrading.
- Original Message -
From: Ismail Al-Shelh
To:
Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2002 9:12 AM
Subject: 2950-24 giving me strange symbols [7:37724]
Hello all
I have
-Original Message-
From: Francis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2002 7:29 PM
To: 'Francis'
Subject: RE: Please confirm (conf#b49ab9db80dee4b731ac905d9a2cfa1d)
[7:37713]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Congrats
What book(s) did you use for the Routing exam?
Colinscott wrote:
Thanks to everyone! Now onward to the holy grail
Scott Chapin, CCNA, CCNP
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37727t=37720
--
use the BSCN and Routing TCP/IP, it's really good.
colin newman wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Congrats
What book(s) did you use for the Routing exam?
Colinscott wrote:
Thanks to everyone! Now onward to the holy grail
Scott Chapin, CCNA, CCNP
Hi
Are you referring to the BSCN book by Paquest and Teare? Is the Routing
book Vol 1 by Doyle?
Thanks
Colin
Kenneth wrote:
use the BSCN and Routing TCP/IP, it's really good.
colin newman wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Congrats
What book(s) did
In the following cisco configuration , Is the static route necessary, either
it is ebgp or ibgp?
ROUTER-A
interface Loopback0
ip address 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.255
!
interface Serial1
ip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0
!
router bgp 400
neighbor 1.1.1.1 remote-as 400
neighbor 1.1.1.1
Yes. BGP needs to know how to get to that neighbor and since they are not
directly connected or running a common IGP, you need a static route.
Stanzin Takpa wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
In the following cisco configuration , Is the static route necessary,
Hi Guys,
Just want to warn you all to be careful if you go to the Postal Plus, 1685
Branham Lane, San jose CA for shipping.I had very bad experience with them
when i sent a parcel through them and asked them to send via Air Mail. They
charged me for the Via Air Mail but sent it through Via
If you disable synchronization, will it work fine?
Scott H. wrote:
Yes. BGP needs to know how to get to that neighbor and since
they are not
directly connected or running a common IGP, you need a static
route.
Stanzin Takpa wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
No. Synch does not have any effect here. The issue is to create the
initial neighbor relationship. Synch only matters when you are trying to
get routes into the route table.
David j wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
If you disable synchronization, will it work
Thought bgp had a gotcha where you couldn't start a neighbor relationship
based on a static route.
I'm fairly confident that I remember this. It could be for ibgp only, or
maybe just for ebgp.
You may want to take a look
Tim
-Original Message-
From: Scott H. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I've never tried it with IBGP, but I've used it for EBGP multihop with no
problems.
-Original Message-
From: Ouellette, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2002 1:39 PM
To: 'Scott H.'
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: BGP issue ??? [7:37730]
Thought bgp had a
If money was not an issue, which 48 port Cisco switch would you implement
for general purpose (branch offices, access switch connecting to
distribution layer, etc.)
The main differences of course are that the 2948 is set based and the 3548
is IOS based, and the switch fabric for the 2948 (24
Anyone have any issues with WindowsXP and using tftp? Seems not to work with
my XP box.
Jeff
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37738t=37738
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
Wonder if anyone has ever tried this senario:
Router A run both OSPF and IGRP which redistribute
into each other. Router R run IGRP with router A.
The direct link between A (Ethernet 0) B (Ethernet 0)
is /24 (172.16.100.0/24 -IGRP).
On router A, there are a prefix with /22 mask which
run
I dont think you will get any bottlenecks at both.
48x100Mb=4,8 Gb
2x1000Gb=2 Gb
=6,8 Gb
The only thing that could be is that the 3548backplane is 5Gb FullDuplex
(The 6500 wit Sup1A has for example a 32 Gb backplane.(It is a 16 Gb
backplane operating at FullDuplex)
But do you really think
If money were not an issue, I would purchase the new WS-C3550-48-EMI @ $7790
list with a street price of about $5800. This switch has full HW based IP
multicast routing, supports all the major routing protocols, is only 1U high
and has two GBIC slots.
Jeffrey Reed
Classic Networking, Inc.
Jeff- As a matter of fact, YES!
Dunno why, as I didn't have time to try figuring it out, but this was my
scenario.
Klever Nothings PumpKIN TFTP Server installed on WinXP workstation, and
running with proper folder specified for images.
Cisco 1750 Router configured to boot loading image from
John,
I think you brought an interesting topic.
With all these pitches about Layer 3 VPN, the question has been bothering me
for a while, how many enterprises out there really need to have an
any-to-any solution? Less than 0.5% is my guess. Most of the enterprise
client/server applications fit
Create a static route on B which points all 172.16.200.0 traffic to A and
eliminate the summary route on A.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
HUNG NGUYEN wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Wonder if anyone has ever tried this senario:
Router A run both OSPF and IGRP which
To make things even more interesting...
While discussing this with a few different vendors I decided
that this particular solution is smoke-and-mirrors, at least in
our area. We'd have to buy new point-to-point circuits that
all point to a _single_ POP.
MPLS isn't even needed in this case
Did you try disabling the built-in winxp firewall?
Kind Regards,
Tim Booth
MCDBA, CCNP, CCDP, CCIE written
-
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
Benjamin Franklin, 1759
Tim Booth wrote:
Did you try disabling the built-in winxp firewall?
This is disabled by default, so unless they specifically turned it on, this
shouldn't be the problem. But a good thing to check never the less.
Mike W.
Message Posted at:
You may have heard that about a default, but not a normal static. There
should be no issues with using static routes.
At 02:37 PM 3/9/2002 -0500, Ouellette, Tim wrote:
Thought bgp had a gotcha where you couldn't start a neighbor relationship
based on a static route.
I'm fairly confident that
I've been studying BGP using several books and papers. One of which is the
Cisco Academy Semester 5 lab companion. So far it's been pretty good but Lab
8-3 drives me nuts.
3 routers.. 3 AS
R1R2R3
AS100AS300 AS65000
The idea is to have everyone share routes(did that)
Stanzin,
If you have no other IGP's running, then yes. You have to know how to reach
the loopback on the remote router since a recursive lookup will have to
occur since the remote loopback is not a directly attached network.
If you turned on an IGP (What a typical network would do, or at least
That's a default route as I recall, not static for a specific prefix...
-Julian
Ouellette, Tim wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Thought bgp had a gotcha where you couldn't start a neighbor relationship
based on a static route.
I'm fairly confident that I
Team,
I just got NLI's Study Guide...wow what book, well written, all need
information, this book is a must have for any serious person who is into
networking. It is a book that you would not like to put it down.Well
job, Networking Learning, Dennis Laganiere and Brad Ellis. This book
I will implement 3548 as a access layer switch. It also support web base
management for
easy management. Since in the access layer is port density critical, it must
have a easy way
management it. 3500 series also support cluster management.
2848 is a high performance switch. I will implement it
CCNA definitely is useful to have. It is the foundation on which you build
additional skills. Many folks in IT haven't taken the time to learn
networking. It shows in their troubleshooting. You can be an asset either as
a junior network engineer in a large shop or as THE network engineer in a
It's disabled.
Have you tried it yourself?
Jeff
Jeff D wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Anyone have any issues with WindowsXP and using tftp? Seems not to work
with
my XP box.
Jeff
Message Posted at:
Hello,
I used to use Linksys router connect to cable modem.
Linksys router outside interface gets IP addresses,
default gateway and DNS from ISP, then it will give
DNS information to inside PCs.
Will 1605 router do the same thing? My 1605 only gets
IP address, not DNS (I turned on debug and
Can anyone help me in configuring AS/400 Controller 5394
Here is my configuration
interface Serial1/0
no ip address
encapsulation sdlc
no keepalive
nrzi-encoding
clockrate 9600
sdlc role prim-xid-poll
sdlc vmac 4030..
sdlc T1 2
sdlc address 01
sdlc xid 01 05F1
sdlc
On Wed, 06 Mar 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote :
Hi,
You have tried to post to GroupStudy.com's Professional mailing
list. Because
the server does not recognize you as a confirmed poster, you will
be required
to authenticate that you are using a valid e-mail address and are
not a
spammer. By
hi there.
for the other ccnp exams i used cisco press however was confused about
CIT.
some people advice sybex..
what do you think i should go in for?
Also ive been told to get routersim's simulator for CIT, is it
essential? i didnt know simulations would come into cit.
thank you people.
Also any
I have found that asking, innocently, why is it important to get the
wrong answer quickly sometimes clarifies such situations.
Strange things do happen. I had an otherwise sane customer that had
10 Mbps to the desktop, which was routed to two FDDI rings on
dual-ported servers. There were
Anyone studying for CCIE Written and LAB that would be interested in a group
study? I am looking to meet 1 or 2 times a week to do labs. If anyone is
interested, please email me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] ,
CCNP,CCDP,CCNA,CCDA and others.
I live in Orange County, Let me know
P.S. New to the
I used CIT Ciscopress and Bosons's and they worked great...
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37764t=37722
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and
- Original Message -
From:
To:
Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2002 8:22 AM
Subject: Please confirm (conf#b34385a7390107303e856f457fafe599)
Hi,
You have tried to post to GroupStudy.com's Professional mailing list.
Because
the server does not recognize you as a confirmed poster, you will
Steven A. Ridder wrote:
I believe the delay is by default set on the interface by the
router based
on the type of link it is. I'm sure there's charts on CCO
somewhere. You
can change this info on the interface with the delay command,
which is the
recommended way of changing a metric if
I took the beta BCRAN last Thursday and plan to take the beta Support on
Monday the 18th. I do not think I would have any problem with the
regular BCRAN test because I am having no trouble with Transcender and
Boson tests. The 3 hour beta is a royal pain. I will probably take the
regular test
I did a search and came across this question posted about 2 weeks ago. But I
did not get the answer I need.
Could anyone have a link stating the default delay for different types of
Interfaces ? Thanks a lot.
By the way, Cisco is marketing that EIGRP can do route selection based on
current
well you got me curious.
I upgraded to XP Pro a while back on my desktop but haven't tried tftp on
it yet. I usually do that from my notebook and it's still Win98.
I have been using the TFTP server from Boson so I tried that first.
Nope, failed with the error Runtime error 13, type
49 matches
Mail list logo
