A 2600 with a FE interface will do trunking and be the router on a stick. I
haven't tried a 3600 but it should work as well.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Michael L. Williams
Sent: Saturday, May 18, 2002 7:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Su
Michal Witte
Try using area 11 range 137.20.1.0 255.255.255.192 instead.
Hope that works.
Schwantz
""Michael Witte"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I am trying to do a lab that needs a inter-area ospf summary address
> configured
> I have two loopbacks 137.20
>I am trying to do a lab that needs a inter-area ospf summary address
>configured
>I have two loopbacks 137.20.1.17/28 and 137.20.1.33/28. These are then of
>course on networks 137.20.1.16 and 137.20.1.32. Taking the last octet of the
>subnets into binary we have:
>
>16= 0001
>32= 0010
Look Priscilla, I am not trying to get in a pissing contest here, and I am
not trying to "waste bandwidth" (though I don't know if I would worry about
that, considering all of the things that flow through the Internet). All I
was attempting to do was clarify what I was thinking, and I ADMITTED tha
But if he's trying to practice doing FastEthernet VLAN trunking. =)
But I agree, if you're looking to simply route, get a router with 2 ethernet
interfaces and connect one to each VLAN. if you need to route between
more than 2 VLANs, then you'll need a router that supports trunking on the
When does the new written exam go live( is live the proper term?)
;)
>From: "Michael L. Williams" >Reply-To: "Michael L. Williams" >To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Passed the written... Now on to the lab!!
[7:2] >Date: Sat, 18 May 2002 11:31:45 -0400 > >Just a quick note to
everyone saying t
If you want to do it really simply, just use a router that has 2 ethernet
interfaces.
""Phil Lorenz"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I'm looking to mock up RSM/ MSFC type routing between VLANs.
>
>
>
> If my memory serves me correctly, can't I do this with a 45
At 07:29 PM 5/18/02, Brian Hill wrote:
>First, the slot time (64 byte time) isn't much of an issue unless running at
>100Mbps or faster, and isn't an issue at all running full duplex.
Slot time is an issue for all CSMA/CD networks, regardless of transmission
speed. It is certainly discussed as
Ive recently finished all eight semesters of the Cisco Academy, and im
looking for a book or books to help me to continue my knowledge base. Im not
nessisarly interested in books just to pass certs, But that will help me in
the real world, and go into extream detail, I love to break down
configura
I am trying to do a lab that needs a inter-area ospf summary address
configured
I have two loopbacks 137.20.1.17/28 and 137.20.1.33/28. These are then of
course on networks 137.20.1.16 and 137.20.1.32. Taking the last octet of the
subnets into binary we have:
16= 0001
32= 0010
Acording t
r_r/irdshoin.htm#xtocid1
- Original Message -
From: "McHugh Randy"
To:
Sent: Saturday, May 18, 2002 4:14 PM
Subject: interpeting show int command [7:44459]
> Does someone know of a link where I can learn how to interpet all the
> details of a show interface command? I know its kinda
Here's a pretty good explanation of the STP timers, diameter, etc.
Understanding and Tuning Spanning-Tree Protocol Timers
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/122.html
Much easier to follow than the IEEE standard.
Marty Adkins Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chesapeake NetCraft
I'm looking to mock up RSM/ MSFC type routing between VLANs.
If my memory serves me correctly, can't I do this with a 4500 (or
better) router outfitted with an FE module ???
Can anyone elaborate and/ or offer a few clues to get me researching in
the right area ???
Thanks !!!
Phil
There is useful Internetwork Troubleshooting Guide at:
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/itg_v1/index.htm
[watch for warp]
Depending on interface type, check out appropriate chapter. Most of
the things are well explained.
In your case, you should check out:
http
HmmmFor the 7 hop from edge thing, I stand corrected. Now that you
mention "radius vs. diameter", I see what you mean. My thinking was that the
diameter was calculated with the root at the center (3 switches to either
side for 7 switches total). The problem with that is that it doesn't
necessa
Does someone know of a link where I can learn how to interpet all the
details of a show interface command? I know its kinda simple , but need to
know what it all means. Like here's an example. The top part is self
explanatory but the lower part is where I do not uderstand.
sh int fastEthernet 0/1
> BTW, how many is too many? :-)
Don't know about that, but I heard that one's enough, two's too
little ;-)
Marko.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=44458&t=44417
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription i
I'n not sure, but the beta was over May 6th, and results are due 6-8 weeks
after that, so I would expect for it to change over sometime in July...
perhaps August at the latest but that's just a guess.
Mike W.
wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> When will the curr
"Priscilla Oppenheimer" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> >The 7 hop limit is from the root bridge
>
> No. It's from edge to edge.
That's why it's called 'diameter'. not 'radius'.. hehe =)
Mike W.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.p
I wanted to post a followup I didn't mean to sound like I have an
attitude, etc with my previous post...
I've just always been a big believer in learning and understanding binary
(and Hex) from the get go, especially for subnetting, bitswapping, etc..
I learned binary to decimal conversi
This was not a comparison of network design methodologies, it was mean
to be humorous (I totally agree with the top down process). The idea of
"build a network and they will come" simply does not work!
The context of the other book was that no network will function properly
if Layer 1 is not desi
At 2:03 PM -0400 5/18/02, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
>At 08:49 PM 5/17/02, Steve Watson wrote:
>>I am reading Priscilla's book "Top Down Network Design" for the second
>>time for a refresher and decided to hit the pool after I got home.
>
>Thanks for reading Top-Down Network Design. I hope you h
Network design is an iterative process. I agree with you that it's not
entirely linear.
Top-Down Network Design doesn't deal so much with stacks or layers as it
does with the need to do a logical design before a physical design. Also,
it makes the important point that the first steps must invo
At 08:49 PM 5/17/02, Steve Watson wrote:
>I am reading Priscilla's book "Top Down Network Design" for the second
>time for a refresher and decided to hit the pool after I got home.
Thanks for reading Top-Down Network Design. I hope you had a nice swim and
didn't drink too many beers at the pool.
At 06:21 AM 5/18/02, Brian Hill wrote:
>Steven,
>
>The 7 hop limit is from the root bridge
No. It's from edge to edge. The root is at the top of a hierarchy of
switches. Think of the president's spot in an org chart, for example. The 7
hops is from one worker at the bottom of one branch talking
I need them , tell me how I can get it?
--- tran cender wrote:
> hi
>
>
> i have the following
>
>
transcender,troytech,ucertify,cheetsheet,boson,learnkey
>
>
> if you need it mail me [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> company exam no: product name
> Cisco 640-507 AssociateCert 2.0
> Cisco 640-5
Is it worthwhile to re-examine the assumption that an individual should
start at one end of the all-important "stack" and work their way to the
other end?
As far as the process itself goes (although, all too often there's not a lot
of process or method associated with design, but I'm sure we're a
I did the new CCDP (CID 3.0) exam a week ago. As I was going through it, I
was disappointed with the level of knowledge required to pass. I thought to
myself that most of the material covered focused on CCNA/CCDA concepts -
which
again, is quite disappointing because by the time you do that exam
Actually, the 5-4-3 rule has everything to do with detecting collisions.
It's
a limiting factor of distance so that a collision will be detected within the
first 64 bytes of a frame's transmission (also known as Ethernet's minimum
frame size). It's preferable to detect a collision before the fra
If I still remember correctly, CCIE #350-001 exam will be replaced by CCIE
#351-001 exam around October 2002. There will be an updated and more
interesting new technology presented in the new exam
wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> When will the current written-exam
When will the current written-exam expire?
Hamid
""Michael L. Williams"" wrote in message
news:...
> Just a quick note to everyone saying thanks for all of the good info
> and discussions. I've been in Groupstudy since I started studying
> CCNA and it has been invaluable to me.
>
> I guess
The following excerpt comes from a post by #1026 from a little less than a
month ago:
The first CCIE, #1025, is/was Stewart Biggs. My understanding is that his
certification has lapsed and he's off doing something else. I took the test
from him in August, 1993 and became the second CCIE, #1026.
Actually John, you're wrong, I am a CCNP. Anyway, I'm really sorry about
this post, and I recognize it was definitely a mistake.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=44437&t=44319
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription
Looks like the devices aren't configured with same properties.
""Alfredo Pulido"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying make a Fully Meshed VPN connections between 3 (Ra,Rb,Rc)
routers
> 827-4V,
>
> The used IOS is: c820-k8osv6y6-mz.122-2.T4.bin -
Congrats, Mike!
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
Get in my head:
http://sar.dynu.com
""Michael L. Williams"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Just a quick note to everyone saying thanks for all of the good info and
> discussions. I've been in Groupstudy since I started s
I thought it's "kill-OR-bite".
Or maybe you are expected to complete all requirements
from ten-to-four. Any more time needed means you didn't make it.
Ouch1!
Elmer
- Original Message -
From: "Chuck"
To:
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 11:58 PM
Subject: Re: CCIE Number [7:44294]
> 1024 is d
Just a quick note to everyone saying thanks for all of the good info and
discussions. I've been in Groupstudy since I started studying CCNA and it
has been invaluable to me.
I guess now it's time to gear up for the lab... WOOHOO
(just to echo what others have said) If you're anywhere close
I passed CCIE written. In my opinion, it's an old, useless test, and
defintily needs updating. CVoice or CCDP is a tougher test.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
Get in my head:
http://sar.dynu.com
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=1&t=1
---
The real question is why would you need such a tool. may as well take a
subnet calculator, a Binary-decimal-Hex converter, etc.
IMHO, there should be a basic binary/hex-decimal conversion and bitswapping
quiz that one must pass just to take any Cisco exam..
Bitswapping can be done in
Hi group
anyone knows the FXO's disconnect tone parameters ( cptone and
detect-parameters )
in IRAN
Thanks
Reza
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=44439&t=44439
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: htt
The 2 WIC slots are non-functional in a VG200. If you want to add voice
modules you can only add 2 using the NM-2V.
Tim
CCIE 9015
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, May 18, 2002 2:19 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: VG200 [7:44425]
H
> root. Historically, I am not sure why it's 7, but Ethernet
> has a base hop
> "limit" of 4 switches (5-4-3 rule), so it doesn't really
As far as I remember, this is not true. 5-4-3 applies only to
repeaters/hubs - not bridges/switches. R/H amplify received signal, while
B/S regerate i
Hi,
Not really a question but more of an observation.
I put a lab together do demonstrate IGRP unequal cost
load balancing recently, and configured 2 loopback
addresses at either end of the network and advertised
them via the network command.
I calculated the BWigrp + DLYigrp i.e the metric
ass
Plus, there is no more token ring on lab.
""Darren S Crawford"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> You won't have time. Besides nothing like would be allowed.
>
> D.
>
> At 01:49 PM 5/17/2002 -0400, Jason Greenberg wrote:
> >Does anyone know if the CCIE lab gives y
I believe the 5-4-3 rule is for repeaters, not switches.
""Brian Hill"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Steven,
>
> The 7 hop limit is from the root bridge, as STP calculates the tree from
the
> root. Historically, I am not sure why it's 7, but Ethernet has a bas
2.
""Ismail Al-Shelh"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hello All
>
> Anybody know what is the maximum VICs can be installed in VG200 ?
>
> I guess only two VICs can be installed in slot 1 which contains the voice
> network module, but still there is another two
Honestly speaking, it depends on what the chapter's topic is about.
If it's about subnetting, then you work from the core down.
If it's about summarization, then you work from the egde up.
I guess it boils down to Murhpy's Law:
Where you stand on an issue depends on where you sit.
;-)
Elmer
Steven,
The 7 hop limit is from the root bridge, as STP calculates the tree from the
root. Historically, I am not sure why it's 7, but Ethernet has a base hop
"limit" of 4 switches (5-4-3 rule), so it doesn't really matter so much. The
reason for the 4 hop limit in Ethernet is simple: For 10 Mb o
Priscilla
Thanks for your input - tried all your suggestions but the issue still
remains that I get connection in all but netmeeting to a remote phone
(in that specific direction). There is something I am missing with the
way netmeeting gets relayed and it may be a gateway problem but I cannot
se
49 matches
Mail list logo
