Yeah but if you need to know the serial number for some reason and you
don't have access to records, Mike's comments really do the trick.
Brian
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
06/04/2002 02:37 PM
Please respond to Brian
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:
Not that I really care, but... it's Mark, not Mike, just for
clarification sake :)
(Big Grin and Smirk)
It's late (1:45am)... and I need to get to bed, rather than trying to
catch up on the last 3 days-worth of posts. (I participate on the list
the same way Priscilla does... via SMTP ;-) )
Hello Everyone,
I am having problems with my Cisco router the router fails to recognise the
card and the en light intially shows red when the router boots then it
turns
off and remains off and the FXO and FXS card red lights remain lit. my IOS
version is as follows
Cisco Internetwork Operating
You need @ least 12.0(5)T software and preferably you'd want something
in the 12.1 line-up... and if you have onboard memory, regular
Enterprise encompasses the voice stuff starting in 12.1.
All the best !!!
Phil
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
What is the bandwidth of you DSL?
Elijah Savage
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
06/04/2002 11:47 AM
Please respond to Elijah Savage
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: VPN Overhead [7:45719]
We have 2 3030 concentrators setup in a load balancing
I have a problem with isdn dialback in that when you dial in it cuts you off
but you wait until the call cuts off.Analog dialback works fine on the same
router.
Here is a config ,maybe some one can see some thing I cannot:
IOS (tm) 3600 Software (C3640-IS-M), Version 12.1(5)T6, RELEASE
Sure Hitesh,
That would be my simulator, found on my RouterChief site under Free
Software.
Good luck,
Ole
~
Ole Drews Jensen
Systems Network Manager
CCNP, MCSE, MCP+I
RWR Enterprises, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
~
or the guy that was hired two years after 24 2610's went out to their
sites. these guys wrote down the serial numbers, they just don't know which
ones go with which ones!!!
Thanks for the replies everyone!
bk
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=45752t=45730
Do I understand you correctly that your 6808s have both internal (secure)
and external (unsecure) traffic on them, separated only by VLAN?
At 09:30 PM 6/3/2002 -0400, you wrote:
All,
We have two 3640's and two Extreme Black Diamond 6808's (aka 6509's).
The two 3640's are doing IBGP between
Some while ago someone posted the idea of using a named access-list and
remark to record the serial number. Obviously it is not applied to any
interface.
ip access-list standard Serial_Number
remark This router's S/N JAB035x
-Original Message-
From: Mark Odette II [mailto:[EMAIL
Hello all
I am trying to send commands to a cisco router using
remote shell from a unix machine. My problem is that i
con not send configuration commands, but only show
commands. When i send configuration commands i.e
config t, ip finger i get a reply with permition
denied.
Can anybody has an
If I understand what you're describing, it sounds like you've pretty well
by-passed the firewall. As a general comment, it seems pointless to have a
firewall if you're not going to utilize it with sound network security
design.
I think I understand what you're trying to do, but you may want to
The error says the source and destination are the same. Since the source
and destination ip addresses are obviously different, I would guess the
complaint is that the last-hop and next-hop gateways are the same. The IDS
is complaining because some packets are trying to hairpin in your router.
Yes, I do remember seeing that thread when I first joined the group. Just
can't find it now.
Daniel Cotts wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Time to restart the blueberry thread.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=45759t=45682
Assuming the untrusted VLAN offers no IP connectivity to it's control
engine (ie the routed aspects are not reachable therein) what
vulnerabilities exist here? With no routing on the VLAN, I'm not exactly
sure how one gets from untrusted to trusted without traversing the
Firewall. The only
Every character that is processed by an AUX port creates an interrupt,
so the AUX port hits the CPU harder than any other port running at the
same speed. CPU utilization at 35% shouldn't be enough to cause the
problem you're seeing.
One thing you'd want to make sure of is that you are not
if you do not have Ip routing on the VLANs you can still hope from one VLAN
to another. See this artical for more info:
http://www.sans.org/newlook/resources/IDFAQ/vlan.htm
-Original Message-
From: Peter van Oene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 8:41 AM
To: [EMAIL
service timestamps log datetime msec localtime
show-timezone (watch the wrap).
keywords to note: localtime show-timezone
dayo
--- R. Benjamin Kessler
wrote:
I know on RedHat you have to ensure that syslogd is
started with the -r
flag so that it accepts syslog messages from
remote systems.
Interesting indeed. I hadn't seen that before. This is obviously an
architecturally flawed implementation. Ideally, the CAM (MAC) table should
be fully isolated to prevent unwanted forwarding and ports not considered
trunks shouldn't accept tagged packets. I assume folks are working on
Hello all
I am trying to send commands to a cisco router using
remote shell from a unix machine. My problem is that i
con not send configuration commands, but only show
commands. When i send configuration commands i.e
config t, ip finger i get a reply with permition
denied.
Can anybody has an
My quick analysis of the VLAN testing published by SANs Institute:
In a default configuration it is possible to inject 802.1q frames into
non-trunk ports on a switch and have these frames delivered to the
destination.
As Peter says, a non-trunk port shouldn't accept a tagged frame. Also, it
Did you try the enable command to get into privileged mode? Do you have the
enable password? Being able to enter only show commands is a symptom that
you are still in user mode.
Priscilla
At 01:31 PM 6/4/02, Michalis Palis wrote:
Hello all
I am trying to send commands to a cisco router using
Pete, bear in mind that this document is 2 years old. The IOS version on
the switch was 11.2. Anybody care to speculate on how much has changed
since 11.2? How about the changes in Dot1Q since then?
Nonetheless, I don't get a warm and fuzzy feeling with separating external
and internal
At 02:04 PM 6/4/02, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
My quick analysis of the VLAN testing published by SANs Institute:
In a default configuration it is possible to inject 802.1q frames into
non-trunk ports on a switch and have these frames delivered to the
destination.
As Peter says, a non-trunk
The bandwidth of the dsl that the telco generously loaned us for 60 days
was 608 down 128 up, that is another thing if you have a good working
relation with your local telco ask them to get you a circuit for testing
and they will probably do it.
What is the bandwidth of you DSL?
Elijah
VLANs. Here is a good link to read about them:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/90.shtml . According to Cisco Private
VLANs can only communicate with the router. As we know, VLANs work like a
logical bridge. Hosts on any VLAN can communicate with other hosts on the
same VLAN (a broadcast
Also, doesn't the SANS Institute publish the papers that their
certification candidates write? In other words, this may not have been
written by a security guru. It may have been written by someone trying to
pass the certification hurdles, one of which is the requirement to write a
white
All,
I just received my copy of Howard's latest book and I'm excited to get
started
reading this title. However, I'm in the midst of finishing reading his
previous book, WAN Survival Guide. Interesting enough this book's
Introduction states,
This book focuses on the service provider network,
It's very possible after a few beers that I'm not thinking straight, so I
won't linger on the point, but what is that wild card mask doing?
0.0.6.255
0110
Won't this work for all the odd subnets within the specified range
(192.168.1.0, 192.168.3.0.192.168.7.0)
If it's
Hi guys,
Can anybody tell me that which version of Cisco Secure
VPN client (version 1.0/1.1 OR 3.0/3.51) comes in MCNS
exam. I have read the MCNS Cisco press book but i
could not find enough material. Later, I was just
seeing the Course Outline and found the objectives:
Confguring the Cisco
After posting to this thread, I realized that no one responded to my post,
so I decided to figure out why? As it
would seem I was lost in my understanding of RIPE-181, now RPSL and boy do I
feel stupid. After spending
some time reading over RIPE-181, RFC2622, and RFC2650, I do now have a much
I've seen some of Cisco's private VLAN setup. The way I've seen it
implemented is on a DMZ switch. Say you have 3 servers on your DMZ, web,
mail, and ftp. If each of those servers is plugged into a different port on
the same switch and on the same network, you can configure each of them to
be
I'd like to thank EVERYONE in this group. Very difficult exam! but I somehow
feel prouder having passed this monster instead of the current 640-505.The
scenarios and ideas presented here are better than anything seen in a lab
and more diverse than anything seen in my workplace.
I was wondering
I have an Olicom switch configured with two rings under separate TrBRFs with
Win2k clients running NetBEUI attached to each ring. I have tried a couple
of different methods of bridging starting with a simple SRB and then a
multi-port SRB. I have source 6 1 4094 and source spanning on one To
I was wondering if anyone could tell me if this will count
toward the
existing CCNP track if my other exams are the current standard
(640-50x) in
which case I'M DONE!!!
Betas do indeed count, and if so, then you should be able to log into the
tracking syustem and see that you are indeed
Hi all,
Probably a frequently asked question but I'm asking it again:
I'm looking for CCIE lab scenario's. I already have some books covering all
the topics and issues but now I'm looking for Lab scenarios.
Can somebody also perhaps tell me if the document from CCBOOTCAMP a good
document is
I think following any training/certification track, if done with the intent
of increasing ones knowledge, is a beneficial thing if you truly increase
your knowledge level. Don't do it for the paper, do it for the knowledge
you'll have and the abilities you'll obtain from learning.
Just wanted to
I recieved the results for the BCRAN beta exam, but haven't recieved a score
report or seen results on the web for the Support beta I had taken. Has
anyone else recieved their results for the Support beta? Any Ideas?
Cisco tells me to call Prometric and Prometric tells me to call Cisco.
Any help
All,
I just received my copy of Howard's latest book and I'm excited to get
started
reading this title. However, I'm in the midst of finishing reading his
previous book, WAN Survival Guide. Interesting enough this book's
Introduction states,
This book focuses on the service provider network,
I read most of ISP Survival Guide by Geoff Huston. It's good, but I would
imagine at a higher level than Howard's book. Higher-level as in the
1000-ft view rather than the down-in-the trenches view. Huston's book is
highly technical, don't get me wrong, but I think it's more for the
technical
Im trying to get ISDN backup to work, but as i am debugging dialer packets,
I am seeing this.
BRI0: Dialing cause ip (s=10.3.101.13, d=224.0.0.10)
BRI0: Already 255 call(s) in progress on BRI0, dialing not
allowed
I have never seen this msg before. Anyone know what this means? Is there a
loop
Nigel Taylor wrote,
After posting to this thread, I realized that no one responded to my post,
so I decided to figure out why? As it
would seem I was lost in my understanding of RIPE-181, now RPSL and boy do I
feel stupid. After spending
some time reading over RIPE-181, RFC2622, and RFC2650,
At 07:06 PM 6/4/02, Nelson Herron wrote:
I have an Olicom switch configured with two rings
OK, got that.
under separate TrBRFs with
Win2k clients running NetBEUI attached to each ring. I have tried a couple
of different methods of bridging starting with a simple SRB and then a
multi-port SRB.
Hi
It should be 1.0/1.1
fahim
Shoaib Waqar wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi guys,
Can anybody tell me that which version of Cisco Secure
VPN client (version 1.0/1.1 OR 3.0/3.51) comes in MCNS
exam. I have read the MCNS Cisco press book but i
could not find
BRI0: Dialing cause ip (s=10.3.101.13, d=224.0.0.10)
BRI0: Already 255 call(s) in progress on BRI0, dialing not
allowed
I have never seen this msg before. Anyone know what this means?
Is there a loop somewhere?
I would guess that you have EIGRP running seeing as that is the multicast
Should have said:
int to0
source-bridge 6 1 8
int to1
source-bridge 8 1 6
(In the previous version I forgot to change one of them to to1! ;-)
Priscilla
At 08:43 PM 6/4/02, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
At 07:06 PM 6/4/02, Nelson Herron wrote:
I have an Olicom switch configured with two rings
Does anyone know of a converter or transceiver that would allow me to
connect a SH GBIC to a 100mb FX port?
Will
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=45792t=45792
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
Yes, we are running EIGRP, and someone put in an permit any any statement
in. I removed that but ISDN is still not dialing. if i look at the history,
it shows it has dialed successfully a few weeks ago. The IOS is 11.2(5)P so
i cannot force a call to test connectivity with the carrier switch.
It is platform dependent...newer boxes now habe the Electronic Serial
Numbers that are retrievable.
You best bet is to use the snmp-server chassid-id command. That is what
it was intended for and what CW2K queries for the serial number if it is in
the config.
Of course, you need to do the
Dear Group,
A large organization wants to begin a user pay cost recovery accounting
method in an attempt to get proper funding for services the central IT
service support provider has delivered free for a long time.
They would like to charge a per port fee which includes everything they
provide
what about a passive interface for eigrp for your bri0, maybe use a floating
static if its an option to dial your remote end
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=45796t=45786
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
You could match traffic on a particular port, set its next hop to a ip addr
or a interface, that way you can avoid the issue..
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=45798t=45682
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription
how about a route map to send traffic out a particular interface?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=45797t=45682
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report
You asking if its directly connected would it be switched and not effected
by policy routing? i think not. To my understanding any packet destined for
a remote desination that is directly connected or via a next hop would be
routed and subject to your policy. This is strange.
Ip local policy
In the master/slave synchronize procedure, the master will send its DDP
(database description packet) while slave only accept and reply with
LDR(linkstate database request).
OK, if there is some LSA in slave's databse while not in master's database,
how do they come to full state while in fact
WE have serveral branches that have passive int on the bri0 and we do use
floating static routes. What i ended up doing was removing the config from
the bri, reloading the router, entered the switch type and spids and it
dialed fine. Thanks all for the suggestions.
James
Message Posted at:
Multicasts in TR, hell yes.
Switch in 607? unsure, i got 1 question in the old 507 exam.
cop r st, definately not. I did Cisco's online sim tool and it marked me
wrong (wanted to see how they tested it!) so I'd say definately recommend
the full command.
Message Posted at:
Which is very very cheap. Looks like a card you get from a cornflakes
packets, shows you how much Cisco value us. Far out, I was really
disappointed to find my CCNP card exactly like the CCNA.
what a joke, my CNE card kicks the CCNP card
Message Posted at:
my results seem to disagree with your thought.
172.31.1.1 loop0---router--WAN--172.31.5.0 network
|
--WAN--
172.31.3.0 network
the route-map I used
A Url would probably help :-)
http://www.cisco.com/cic
http://www.micromuse.com
If you need to be contacted by an Account Manager, I can help locate one in
your region.
Clayton Dukes
CCNA, CCDA, CCDP, CCNP, NCC
- Original Message -
From: Clayton Dukes
To: Kevin Wigle ;
Sent:
yeah - I was just surfing CCO in that area but the light descriptions aren't
saying much...
Kevin
- Original Message -
From: Clayton Dukes
To: Kevin Wigle ;
Sent: Tuesday, 04 June, 2002 23:51
Subject: Re: Identifying Hosts [7:45795]
Hi Kevin,
Take a look at Cisco Info
Hi Kevin,
Take a look at Cisco Info Center, it can do exactly what you are trying to
accomplish using CIC/USMs (Usage Service Monitors)
Clayton Dukes
CCNA, CCDA, CCDP, CCNP, NCC
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Wigle
To:
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 10:55 PM
Subject: Identifying
Unknown referrer
you should notify the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
or similar responsible person for the content or search feature of that
site,
of the incorrect link to http://www.cisco.com/cic
??
Kevin
- Original Message -
From: Clayton Dukes
To: Clayton Dukes ; Kevin Wigle
;
Sent:
Hi Bill,
I am curious how the new test differs from the old exam. I take the remote
exam almost a year ago.
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Creighton Bill-BCREIGH1
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 4:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have the basic topology you conjecture, and I have configured the basic
SRB as you describe. On my system it works in the same way as the ring
group model that I described - I get some bridging but no browsing. The
clients are Win2k machines running MS NetBEUI - no IP. As fas as I know
65 matches
Mail list logo
