Traffic monitoring [7:61252]

2003-01-16 Thread Semih Üstün
Greetins all, We are currently using nat in our network. I want to monitor the bandwidth usage per ip. And also the traffic type they generate. Using Cisco 7206 router that runs IOS 12.2(13) release. I will appreciate any comment. Best Regards Semih \st|n Message Posted at: http://www.groups

Re: RX port buffers on cat4000's [7:61248]

2003-01-16 Thread Erick B.
* In-Lost - Packets which could not be received since the input buffers are full. Reason: Excessive input rate of traffic. * Delay Exceed - This is an indication of the number of frames discarded because of excessive delay in the switching process. Reason/Cause: Severe problem with the switch. Op

RE: Serial Interface Down [7:61220]

2003-01-16 Thread Andrew Larkins
Report the link to your Telco. -Original Message- From: Curious [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2003 21:43 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Serial Interface Down [7:61220] We just noticed the Serial Interface of our CIsco 2600 router is down, here is its current status Seri

Netbios on Wan [7:61249]

2003-01-16 Thread Han Chuan Alex Ang
hi, wondering if it is possible to configure more than 1 ip for IP helper address Author: Amazing () Date: 01-17-03 01:18 ip helper address on the ethernet interface of the remote router. this will change the nbns broadcast to a unicast directed at the remote lan ""Frederico Madeira"" w

RX port buffers on cat4000's [7:61248]

2003-01-16 Thread Vicuna, Mark
Hi All, Just wondering if anyone has figures for the size of rx buffers for cat 4000 ports? Had a issue today where a port was connected to a pix 535 manually set at half/100 (yep you read right), the switch port was at auto/auto. The rate of In-Lost (rx buffer filling up) errors was on average

RE: Traceroute troubles [7:61247]

2003-01-16 Thread William Pearch
Solved my own problem - see CSCdu43762 on the CCO. Shows up with the 7200 and an NSE-1 and (evidently though they are not listed) the 1760, 2621, 2621XM, 2611 and 1720. Solution is to turn off PXF (rate limiting of ICMP unreachables) using: no ip icmp rate unreach Lesson learned? Read everyth

RE: NETBIOS on WAN [7:61237]

2003-01-16 Thread Newell Ryan D SrA 18 CS/SCBT
IP helper will send NETBIOS broadcast and change the packet to a unicast to the address given. But I not really sure it will solve your problem. I have a few questions before I try to answer your question. 1. Is there a DHCP server involved? 2. Do have Domain Controllers? 3. Do you want the browse

Backup interface [7:61245]

2003-01-16 Thread Waqar Ahmed
Hi, I have to configure backup link for my primary Frame relay link with 2 subinterfaces. Please confirm I have to configure backup interface command on physical interface or subinterfaces. Regards __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Af

More odd router occurances [7:61244]

2003-01-16 Thread The Long and Winding Road
It's getting to where I actually wish troubleshooting would come back to the lab ;-> had two routers go into endless reload tonight when I turned a few on to get some more practice. after going through the password recovery procedure for both, it appears that the two routers in question did not l

Re: EIGRP network 0.0.0.0 to redistribute static route [7:61243]

2003-01-16 Thread Wei Zhu
I read some document suggesting to use ip route 0.0.0.0 and network 0.0.0.0 to redistribute static route in eigrp, in this case, it seems not a good solution, instead using redistribute static can do the same job. Thanks Wei - Original Message - From: "The Long and Winding Road" To: Se

Re: CSS11152 VIP question [7:61229]

2003-01-16 Thread Clayton Price
That is correct, your vip does not have to be a part of one of the VLAN's. Make sure you have ip opportunistic enabled, and that you are routing that VIP towards the CSS. Clayton ""Sam Sneed"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > quick typo correction : ip on service

Re: EIGRP network 0.0.0.0 to redistribute static route [7:61241]

2003-01-16 Thread The Long and Winding Road
""Wei Zhu"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Thank you everyone for your response, > > The reason I am confused is not becasuse the NULL0 in routing table, that's > the way eigrp does. only if you have automatic summarization enabled. if you enter the command "no au

Re: response time between PIX with VPN [7:60981]

2003-01-16 Thread Mike Sweeney
Darrell- I like the tidbit about reverse lookup with traceroute.. I always wondered why the Sun boxes were so slow at times during pings . Now I need to fire up the sniffer and the x86 Solaris and see what I can see :) It would be my luck that the x86 Solaris is different .. Anyways.. this config

RE: User Privilege Level [7:60469]

2003-01-16 Thread Newell Ryan D SrA 18 CS/SCBT
I know the thread is about dead but until you get TACACS+ server there are some commands you could implement to help the situation. The port is being disabled for a reason. You can configure the port to renable after 30 secs. using the command set errdisable-timeout enable all set errdisable-timeo

Re: NETBIOS on WAN [7:61237]

2003-01-16 Thread Amazing
ip helper address on the ethernet interface of the remote router. this will change the nbns broadcast to a unicast directed at the remote lan ""Frederico Madeira"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hellow, > > how i configure an 2600 router to permit acess for netw

NETBIOS on WAN [7:61237]

2003-01-16 Thread Frederico Madeira
Hellow, how i configure an 2600 router to permit acess for network neighborhood to computers on the lan, in other words, how i make to see all computers of my WAN in network neighborhood of windows explore ? Fred Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=61237&t=61237 -

Re: EIGRP network 0.0.0.0 to redistribute static route [7:61236]

2003-01-16 Thread Wei Zhu
Thank you everyone for your response, The reason I am confused is not becasuse the NULL0 in routing table, that's the way eigrp does. The reason is when I set the "network 0.0.0.0" in eigrp, it distribute the 172.22.0.0 network to S0 side(I have another router running eigrp at S0 side, its routing

Re: DES license on PIX free? [7:61201]

2003-01-16 Thread J.D. Chaiken
Actually, you dont need the contract number. I bought a PIX 1 from Ebay, called cisco and they were happy to give me the code. You do need a valid serial number though. The automated webpage that hands out the DES keys works for most models so you dont even need to call them. The only time

Re: response time between PIX with VPN [7:60981]

2003-01-16 Thread Darrell Newcomb
What eric is refering to is a couple different items. One is the forward lookup of the name given on the command prompt, which I don't recall any traceroute implementations which cause high latency for that. Secondly is the reverse lookup many traceroute's will do if you give an IP address as the

RE: Cisco VPN Question [7:61148]

2003-01-16 Thread Kim Graham
Disabling split tunneling is being visited. As TJ has pointed out there are several different reasons why it is/can be implemented in different scenarios. This configuration was in place before I started. It is my job to upgrade the concentrator at which time the security policies associated wit

Re: Diff. b/w ^701$ 701$ _701$ _701_ [7:61219]

2003-01-16 Thread Xueyan Liu
You're right. Didn't think that you would have number(s) right before 7. Xueyan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=61233&t=61219 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html R

Re: Diff. b/w ^701$ 701$ _701$ _701_ [7:61219]

2003-01-16 Thread Andrew Cook
""Xueyan Liu"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > 701$ matches routes end with 701, such as 1234 701, 234 345 701, etc > _701$ matches routes end with 701, I would say it's same as 701$ There is a difference between 701$ and _701$. 701$ would match any AS path that

Re: Diff. b/w ^701$ 701$ _701$ _701_ [7:61219]

2003-01-16 Thread J.D. Chaiken
My understanding was that 701$ differs from _701$ in that 701$ will also match 5701 10701, etc whereas _701$ will *only* match AS 701. Please correct me if I'm mistaken. Thanks Jarett ""Xueyan Liu"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi, > > The following cisco w

Re: CSS11152 VIP question [7:61229]

2003-01-16 Thread Sam Sneed
quick typo correction : ip on service svc-w2.web2 should be > ip address 10.20.20.11 > port 80 > keepalive type http > keepalive uri "/test.html" > active > ""Sam Sneed"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Lets say I have the following scenario. CSS11152 wit

CSS11152 VIP question [7:61229]

2003-01-16 Thread Sam Sneed
Lets say I have the following scenario. CSS11152 with ethernet e0 IP address 192.168.1.1 VLAN outside. I have 2 sets of servers addresses 10.10.10.0/24 on eth5 VLAN server1 and 10.20.20.20/24 on eth6 VLAN server2. I configure services as per below. On my content rules can a make a VIP on the 192.16

Re: Switching EXAM (Hex Conversion Chart) [7:61108]

2003-01-16 Thread Dain Deutschman
You should just learn how to convert decimal to hex...then you won't need a chart. -- Dain Deutschman CCNA, CSS-1, MCP, CNA Data Communications Manager New Star Sales and Service, Inc. 800.261.0475 ""Bond, Jeffrey T"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > On the Switchin

Re: Diff. b/w ^701$ 701$ _701$ _701_ [7:61219]

2003-01-16 Thread YASSER ALY
^701$ = Routes originated from AS 701 and received directly to your AS _701$ = Routes originated from AS 701 and passed by another AS before reaching yours _701_ = Routes that passed by AS 701 before reaching yours. They are neither originated by AS 701 nor your AS is the next AS

RE: Diff. b/w ^701$ 701$ _701$ _701_ [7:61219]

2003-01-16 Thread Xueyan Liu
Hi, The following cisco webpage explains different regular expressions. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1831/products_command_reference_chapter09186a00800ca655.html >From what I worked in the isp world, ^701$ matches routes with AS number 701 only in the AS-PATH 701$ matches rou

RE: RSP7000/AIP gives SNMP-3-BADOID: [7:61175]

2003-01-16 Thread Nelson Herron
Went back and checked. The board is 73-1188-03 B0. Board version shouldn't be a problem. I forgot to say that I get the error in loopback mode, too. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=61225&t=61175 -- FAQ, list archi

Re: Serial Interface Down [7:61220]

2003-01-16 Thread Jeff Smith
You are not getting any Data Carrier Detect (DCD=Down) to the interface. If it uses an external csu/dsu try a loopback from the csu back toward your router- if everything goes up then it is a most likley problem with the carrier or cable from demarc to your equipment. I assume this was up and

Re: DES license on PIX free? [7:61201]

2003-01-16 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is there a VPN client that is free? "Greg Owens" @groupstudy.com em 16/01/2003 13:04:55 Favor responder a "Greg Owens" Enviado Por: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Assunto:Re: DES license on PIX free? [7:61201] it is true > > From: "Sam Sneed" > Date: 2003/01/16

Re: Serial Interface Down [7:61220]

2003-01-16 Thread Scott
My first thought would be your T1 is down. =) ""Curious"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > We just noticed the Serial Interface of our CIsco 2600 router is down, > here is its current status > > > Serial0/0 is down, line protocol is down > Hardware is PQUICC with

Re: Passed nr. TWO [7:61217]

2003-01-16 Thread Larry Letterman
Consider doing volunteer work for the experience... There are plenty of place that need the help... Edgar A. Howard wrote: > I passed the Switching Exam of CCNP yesterday. Scored > better than I thought 877 of 1000. But that was 4 months of > study. It's hard to be motiviated when the

Serial Interface Down [7:61220]

2003-01-16 Thread Curious
We just noticed the Serial Interface of our CIsco 2600 router is down, here is its current status Serial0/0 is down, line protocol is down Hardware is PQUICC with Fractional T1 CSU/DSU Internet address is A.B.C.D MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1544 Kbit, DLY 2 usec, reliability 253/255, txload

Diff. b/w ^701$ 701$ _701$ _701_ [7:61219]

2003-01-16 Thread Cisco Nuts
Hello,I am trying to find the exact differences between ^701$ 701$ _701$ and _701_ to implement in a route-map deny statement.Here is what I understand:^701$ - Deny all routes originating from AS701701$ - Does this mean the same as above?? _701$ - Deny only AS 701 routes_701_ - Deny routes via

Re: Passed nr. TWO [7:61217]

2003-01-16 Thread Scott
CCIE won't help. I've been out of work for over a year with a CCIE. ""Edgar A. Howard"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I passed the Switching Exam of CCNP yesterday. Scored > better than I thought 877 of 1000. But that was 4 months of > study. It's hard

Passed nr. TWO [7:61217]

2003-01-16 Thread Edgar A. Howard
I passed the Switching Exam of CCNP yesterday. Scored better than I thought 877 of 1000. But that was 4 months of study. It's hard to be motiviated when there is no job at the end of the tunnel. Many say the CCNP ain't enough to get a job. I wonder if the CCIE would do it?

RE: The effect of NAT on an interface [7:61178]

2003-01-16 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
The Long and Winding Road wrote: > > it's happened twice now, and the policy routing was removed > from the > interface, so I'm thinking the problem has to be the NAT > configuration It doesn't seem like NAT could do this to you, though. NAT just affects inside hosts and you were Telnetting to th

Re: callmanager gateway problem [7:61183]

2003-01-16 Thread Matthew Tighe
Make sure there are no route plans that could be causing/blocking access. Ran into that in the lab last week. ""supernet"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I tried to configure an MGCP gateway (Cisco 2611 router, VIC-2FXO) using > TAC sample configuration. Under 26

interesting article..... [7:61213]

2003-01-16 Thread Madl, Michael (CAP, AFS Contractor)
> http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,813833,00.asp Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=61213&t=61213 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondi

RE: Cisco VPN Question [7:61148]

2003-01-16 Thread Evans, TJ (BearingPoint)
IMHO - it is all a question of usability/functionality vs. security ... Ideally (from a security perspective) - you would not split tunnel; as the hosts are then, in effect, multi-homed. In fact, ideally, you wouldn't VPN at all ;> However, in the real world, there are issues with not usi

RE: RSP7000/AIP gives SNMP-3-BADOID: [7:61175]

2003-01-16 Thread Nelson Herron
Sorry all. That is 11.2(15) from ROM (an SR7A upgrade)> All those Christmas cookies made my fingers a little wide. I'll have to diet. Thx. Daniel. Nelson Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=61211&t=61175 -- FAQ, li

Re: DES license on PIX free? [7:61201]

2003-01-16 Thread Greg Owens
it is true > > From: "Sam Sneed" > Date: 2003/01/16 Thu AM 09:41:25 EST > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: DES license on PIX free? [7:61201] > > I read in PIX book all PIX's come with the 56 bit DES license free. Can > anyone verfiy this before I spend money? I'm looking at a 501 or 506E. > Tha

RE: EIGRP network 0.0.0.0 to redistribute static route [7:61208]

2003-01-16 Thread Daniel Cotts
I'll put in a plug for the Cisco Press book "EIGRP Network Design Solutions" by Ivan Pepelnjak ISBN 1578701651 It would seem that for network 172.22.0.0 to participate in the eigrp process it would have to listed under eigrp 100 as network 172.22.0.0. Users choice to make the S1 int passive for ei

RE: Need CCIE [7:61155]

2003-01-16 Thread Xueyan Liu
Hi Mr. A P Where is this position located? Direct or contract? How much do you want to pay? Benefits? Vacation? etc. We need more information than just say "hey, we need a CCIE" Xueyan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=61209&t=61155 -

RE: DES license on PIX free? [7:61201]

2003-01-16 Thread Joshua Vince
This is correct. 56-bit DES out of the box. (free) -Original Message- From: Sam Sneed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 9:41 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: DES license on PIX free? [7:61201] I read in PIX book all PIX's come with the 56 bit DES license free

RE: The effect of NAT on an interface [7:61178]

2003-01-16 Thread Mark W. Odette II
Chuck- What about TFTPing your changes in a "new" startup-config file, then reloading the router. If you are pretty certain your changes won't be bad afterwards, I don't see where you could go wrong. If you do have a programming issue with a route-map or acl, then you definitely are getting to vi

Re: DES license on PIX free? [7:61201]

2003-01-16 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can request one for free as long as you have Contract # and Key, I just got one last week for a Cisco Classic Firewall ""Mark W. Odette II"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Yes, it's free. If you order your PIX with 56Des installed, you're good > to go, IIRC.

RE: RSP7000/AIP gives SNMP-3-BADOID: [7:61175]

2003-01-16 Thread Daniel Cotts
To run on an RSP card your AIP must be part number 73-1188-02 Rev D0 or later. How did you get 12.2(15) on an RP card? I thought they maxed out around 11.2. > -Original Message- > From: Nelson Herron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 10:45 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTE

RE: Cisco VPN Question [7:61148]

2003-01-16 Thread Mark W. Odette II
> Split tunneling has been enabled up until now. Does this mean you have recently DISabled split tunneling?? If not, does the newest client 3.6? have a function for keeping traffic sourced from the internet from using the Split-tunneling host from acting as a mirror to breach the corporate network

RE: DES license on PIX free? [7:61201]

2003-01-16 Thread Mark W. Odette II
Yes, it's free. If you order your PIX with 56Des installed, you're good to go, IIRC. -Mark -Original Message- From: Sam Sneed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 8:41 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: DES license on PIX free? [7:61201] I read in PIX book all PIX

DES license on PIX free? [7:61201]

2003-01-16 Thread Sam Sneed
I read in PIX book all PIX's come with the 56 bit DES license free. Can anyone verfiy this before I spend money? I'm looking at a 501 or 506E. Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=61201&t=61201 -- FAQ, list archi

7606 with VPN and FlexWAN [7:61199]

2003-01-16 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Greetings all, Any on you guys running 7606 routers with VPN blade and Flexwan blade with both IP and IPX routing? I need to know which ios release is being used. Any suggestions would be great. Thanks...Nabil "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." Message

Re: BGP origin attribute type "e" - EGP? [7:61075]

2003-01-16 Thread Amar
sorry i confused you guys i meant to type EGP: i=internal (network command) e=External Gateway Protocol ?=incomplete, (redistributed via static) the origin will be I even if it cames from a EBGP peer unless he has learned through redistribution rgds ""Peter van der Voort"" a icrit dans le mes

RE: Automated Script for backing up Cisco configs and Image [7:61197]

2003-01-16 Thread Marko Milivojevic
I have recently played with configuration backups. If you are using UNIX/Linux, you might following an useful tool. http://www.pangalactic.net/rbackup/ I'm open for comments, if you do find it useful :-) Marko. > -Original Message- > From: Evans, TJ (BearingPoin

Re: ISDN issue [7:61159]

2003-01-16 Thread Jens Neelsen
If you do not configure one number on rrouter 1 and another number on router 2 then both router will try to answer the call. Of course only one will succeed. What do you want to achieve? Jens --- Bruno Fernandes wrote: > OK, > > Assuming that I don't force the configuration with > > # isdn an

RE: EIGRP network 0.0.0.0 to redistribute static route [7:61169]

2003-01-16 Thread tu do
Wei, When redistributing routes from one protocol to other, you donot want these routes get feeded back and that may cause routing loops. These issues also come with route summarization. To prevent these, manually direct them (the routes) to interface Null 0 (a black hole) in case of OSPF. Eigrp d

RE: Cisco VPN Question [7:61148]

2003-01-16 Thread Kim Graham
Basically it performs as per stated. We have VPN users that come into our concentrator from all over North American and abroad. They have used a variety of cable, dsl, dial-up providers and for the most part do not have any issues. Split tunnelling has been enabled up until now. As for private

RE: CCIE Written Study Material [7:61026]

2003-01-16 Thread Kaminski, Shawn G
I believe that Brad was talking about two separate books, the one that you read by Halabi (Internet Routing Arch) and the one by Caslow (Cisco Certification: Bridges, Routers, and Switches for CCIE's 2nd Edition). The best resource would probably be the blueprint and CCO. I haven't heard of any bo

Automated Script for backing up Cisco configs and Image [7:61193]

2003-01-16 Thread Evans, TJ (BearingPoint)
In the past I have just scripted telnet in a batch file; that has my pw passed as a command line parameter and a device list / device type setting to account for differences between IOS and CatOS ... oh yeah, and to 'script' telnet I used "pushkeys" ... Thanks! -Original Message- From:

Re: OSPF LSR's [7:61176]

2003-01-16 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
At 4:47 AM + 1/16/03, Matthew Webster wrote: >Hi all, > >just a minor (I think) question. In the OSPF LSR message, why does the LS >type have 4 bytes to describe it, when there are only 5 different values? Am >I missing something? > >TIA. > >cheers, >Matthew. One of the design goals of OSPF, a

Re: Please confirm (conf#6497e3283ce91d54ff654914f7a4f43b) [7:61191]

2003-01-16 Thread Simon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thursday, January 16, 2003 11:01 AM: > Hi, > > You have tried to post to GroupStudy.com's Professional mailing list. > Because the server does not recognize you as a confirmed poster, you > will be required to authenticate that you are using a valid e-mail > address and

output brake [7:61190]

2003-01-16 Thread Simon
Hi all, I have problem with terminal scrolling. I want to login and execute autocommand and I need output without any brake for key press. I tried to set length 0 on vty line configuration but it doesn't work. Maybe someone have any idea why this not work like Cisco say or maybe how to attach more

RE: Automated Script for backing up Cisco configs and Image [7:61189]

2003-01-16 Thread Jens von Bülow
Have a look at http://www.shrubbery.net/rancid/ I also believe that JFFNMS (http://jffnms.sourceforge.net/)does this (plus a whole lot more) -Original Message- From: Kerry Ogedegbe [ MTN - Portharcourt ] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 16 January 2003 11:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Su

Automated Script for backing up Cisco configs and Image [7:61188]

2003-01-16 Thread Kerry Ogedegbe [ MTN - Portharcourt ]
Hello People, Can anyone help me with were I can get an automated script / shareware application that I could use in backing up my cisco router & switches config Cheers ___ Kerry [GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of Clear Day Bkgrd.JPG]

RE: BGP origin attribute type "e" - EGP? [7:61075]

2003-01-16 Thread Peter van der Voort
A route with origin egp is not learned from an external BGP peer, but from a peer running the protocol EGP (External Gateway Protocol, the predecessor of BGP). It's also possible to change this origin code via a route-map. Peter > -Original Message- > From: cebuano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE