I have read a part of this book. It seems to line up with the CIT. Will this
be enough reading material to pass the CIT?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=66017t=66017
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
See below:
The Long and Winding Road wrote:
I'm working on a practice lab problem.
there are two domains - OSPF and EIGRP
The two domains can only communicate via ISDN
OSPF---R1---ISDN--R2EIGRP
R1 is where redistribution takes place. The ISDN link is in the
EIGRP
Yes I know it's not a bright idea ;-
I'm working on a practice lab which appears to me to be poorly written. Some
of the solutions are out of left field, but I suppose that's to be expected
of CCIE practice labs.
Question - redistribution of BGP into OSPF? Problematic? Impossible on a
Cisco
Hi Chuck
From the look of the problem the best solution to the problem would be to
move the redistribution from R1 to R2 and run OSPF over the link. Which then
allows you to use an OSPF Demand Circuit reducing the time the link is up.
But if the problem specifically mentions that EIGRP must be
There are many more than the four you mention.
See http://www.iana.org/assignments/protocol-numbers for details.
Best regards,
Dom Stocqueler
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Julian Firrincieli
Sent: 23 March 2003 03:00
To: [EMAIL
Hello,
Does tcp port 1790 have to be permitted both ways (similiar to bgp and
dlsw)?
Ex. #permit tcp any any eq 1790
#permit tcp any eq 1790 any
Could someone clarify this for me?
Thank you.
Sincerely,
CN
_
The new MSN 8:
Hi Chuck,
I don't know what scenario you are working on, so its hard to give a
specific answer.
It might be that you ran into the issue that by default I-BGP learned
routes are NOT redistributed unless you use the command below. (E-BGP
routes are redistributed without it !!)
bgp
Folks,
I'm sure this a pretty straight forward but as this ISDN
connection relates to the lab requirements as a complete scenario should
dictate how the requirements are interpreted.
It seems strange that the ISDN link should stay up indefinitely.
Another question here would be what
Are you talking about -
nmsp1790/tcpNarrative Media Streaming Protocol
nmsp1790/udpNarrative Media Streaming Protocol
I do not know the answer, but would suggest you permit it both ways then
do a show ip access-list to see what gets matched and then remove any
Hello,
Is there one solid book for preparing for the MPLS exam for the CCIP?
I checked a couple and not sure which one might be sufficient JUST for the
exam, yes I need one JUST for the exam as I will not be using it in my job
:-( - everything from BGP to QOS BUT MPLS and thus..
The books
You may see some duplicate messages from the Cisco list. This is
because a mailer at xinhuanet.com is looping messages back on the list.
This happens quite frequently and we have had for years loop prevention
software to prevent these loops. The offending mailer (along with about
100 others) are
I agree. I may not be the most technical person but i am good at selling so
i have no problems getting gigs to go to. what i find is not all tech guys
are good at sales and thats a shame. If you wanted to really be great you
need to do sales. Telemarketing is where you learn the tricks of the
www.google.ca
--
Regards,
Steve
Ivan Yip wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear All,
Can anyone share some useful links for me to explain the above items?
I am quite confused about them.
Thanks in advance.
rgds,
Ivan
Message Posted at:
Hey Folks...
Nigeria is slowly grapping with the IT world and people are ready to learn
here. i am looking for volunteers with whom i can work together to set up a
a Cisco academy in Uyo , south South Nigeria.This may be starting any time
within the next 3 months. I will give details to whoever
The lab in question is one of the current crop of Cisco ASET labs.
My answer:
access-list 120 deny ip any host 255.255.255.255
access-list 120 permit ip any host 224.0.0.9
access-list 120 permit ip any any
The book answer:
access-list 120 deny ip any host 255.255.255.255
access-list 120
The Long and Winding Road wrote in
message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am unable to successfully redistribute BGP into OSPF, although it works
just fine if I redistribute BGP into EIGRP, for example. The command
takes.
All the proper switches are there. But no route in OSPF or in the OSPF
Dosnt sound like they want the ISDN up all the time, if they did why mention
not allowing broadcasts to bring the link up?
Definitly sounds like an ACL is what they are looking for.
Chuck when are you sitting the lab again?
Don K.
Message Posted at:
Willy Schoots wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Chuck,
I don't know what scenario you are working on, so its hard to give a
specific answer.
It might be that you ran into the issue that by default I-BGP learned
routes are NOT redistributed unless you use the command below. (E-BGP
Usually when I get a letter from Nigeria someone's either asking for my bank
account information so they can transfer millions of ill-gotten $$$ into it
and then they'll transfer most of it later on to another account but I get
to keep some of it for my own trouble or, in a variation of the above
Hi everyone,
I have a very unique problem with this particular 7206 which I can't solve it
for the last 2 weeks!!!
I can only ping the local interfaces of this router but it won't communicate
with any other routers connected to it!!!
The show ip interface atm2/0 output show that the broadcast
Hi Chuck,
The command does work on 2500's, I used IOS 12.2(13)T. I did a clear ip
bgp when using the command.
bb#sh ver
Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software
IOS (tm) 2500 Software (C2500-IS-L), Version 12.2(13)T, RELEASE
SOFTWARE (fc1)
TAC Support: http://www.cisco.com/tac
Copyright
Newell Ryan D SrA 18 CS/SCBT wrote:
I have read a part of this book. It seems to line up with the
CIT. Will this
be enough reading material to pass the CIT?
Did you retransmit the message or did Group Study send it again by mistake?
Unfortunately, due to no marketing by the publisher, not
the rules of this particular lab exercise is that synchronization MUST be
enabled. Thus the route has to be in the IGP in order for iBGP to use it.
What equipment are you using? What IOS?
I'm using 12.1.5T10 and 12.2.12a - IP Plus versions on 25xx routers.
Yes, subnets is in the command line.
Does anyone out there in the wild vast yonder of Cisco Cert Land know if
Atalk and IPX are still on the CID 3.0 (640-025) test ?
It doesn't show up on the exam desciription...
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/testing/current_exam
s/640-025.html
Mahalo!
Joe
-Original
That,s not enough, download and read the cisco security executive summary at
the link below for good tips on hardening your router.
http://www.nsa.gov/snac/cisco/download.htm
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Doug S
Sent: Saturday, March 22,
Does anyone out there in the wild vast yonder of Cisco Cert Land know if
Atalk and IPX are still on the CID 3.0 (640-025) test ?
It doesn't show up on the exam desciription...
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/testing/current_exam
s/640-025.html
Mahalo!
Joe
-Original
I remember that I have made a telnet sesion froma Cisco Aironet 340 (not
sure about the model). You CAN do it if you have the mac. My scenario
was that someone had changed the IP address and I made the telnet with
the mac address.
HTH,
Hamid
hanan wrote in message
news:...
Hello
Could you
Remember that MRU is the maximum receive unit. The device sending it is
saying how big packets that it receives can be. The other side could have a
different MRU.
There's no need for them to negotiate it. They don't have to agree.
RFC 1661 also implies that even if a device advertises a value
Yes, it is a retransmit. I have already taken the test and passed by the
way! I have also used the book
to pass a couple of Sniffer Test. I think it is great.
___
Priscilla Oppenheimer
www.troubleshootingnetworks.com
www.priscilla.com
Message Posted at:
Hey folks, I had a question on Cisco's IDS offering.
Currently im getting ready to order:
3 IDS 4210's
2 IDS 4235's
VMS 2.1
and a 10 Agent bundle of Cisco's new Security Agent (OEM Okena).
I have a question on the management and rollout of the project.
Now if I buy VMS 2.1 which touts as being
The Long and Winding Road wrote:
The lab in question is one of the current crop of Cisco ASET
labs.
My answer:
access-list 120 deny ip any host 255.255.255.255
access-list 120 permit ip any host 224.0.0.9
access-list 120 permit ip any any
The book answer:
access-list 120 deny ip
It doesn't look like the market liked the idea. Cisco stock went down.
I think it sounds like a great idea! But don't take market advice from me. I
bought pets.com. :-) The only thing I have to show for it is a cool
sweatshirt and sock puppet.
Priscilla
CCIE #6746 wrote:
I used to work in a
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Long and Winding Road wrote:
The lab in question is one of the current crop of Cisco ASET
labs.
My answer:
access-list 120 deny ip any host 255.255.255.255
access-list 120 permit ip any host 224.0.0.9
access-list
Poor sales bah humbug I can't believe that, I got the book and think it
is a great tool. Unfortunately I could not give an answer because I took
the exam before I had this book in my hands. I think if I would have had
the book before I went and took the exam that it definitely would have
made it a
Howard,
I don't know if you would call this consistent but here are the links
to the presentations from 1999 - 2002:
http://www.cisco.com/networkers/nw99_pres/index.htm
http://www.cisco.com/networkers/nw00/pres/
http://www.cisco.com/networkers/nw01/pres/
Hi,All
Configure WRR queuing strategy on Cat3550 as the following:
mls qos
interface fa0/1
switch mode access
mls qos band 2 3 2 3
Then show queueing interface fa 0/1,the system always show me queueing
strategy: none instead of weighted-round-robin as expected.But I'm sure
the WRR queuing
Howard,
I don't know if you would call this consistent but here are the links
to the presentations from 1999 - 2002:
http://www.cisco.com/networkers/nw99_pres/index.htm
http://www.cisco.com/networkers/nw00/pres/
http://www.cisco.com/networkers/nw01/pres/
37 matches
Mail list logo
